Why the Koran must be true – even though it isn’t


By JON MC

[Source]

In this article I intend to look at “Why the Koran must be True” from the Islamic viewpoint and some of the consequences and conclusions that flow from this position from a more sceptical viewpoint.

Given that this is a lengthy article, I have included summaries to the longer parts (1,2 and 4) of the argument for those who don’t wish to follow the detail of the argument.

Part 1. The transmission of the Koran.

There are many excellent books and articles on the origins and compilation of the Koran. What I intend to do in this section is present a thumb-nail sketch of the process of “how the written Koran came to be” from an orthodox Islamic perspective.

According to Islam the Koran is the literal word of “the god” i.e. Allah. The version we have today is the “Uthmanic recension” compiled by Caliph Uthman about 20 years after Mohammed’s death. To Muslims, this compilation (and its fore-runners) are all perfectly accurate recordings of the ‘revelations’ received by Mohammed during the 23 years of his ‘prophet-hood’.

But let me take you back to the beginning …

‘A’ishah bint Abu Bakr (Mohammed’s favourite and youngest wife) is recorded in the Hadith{1} of Muslim as giving the following narration of that most significant event in the Muhammad’s life as follows:

Muslim Bk 1, Number 0301:

A’isha, the wife of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him), reported: The first (form) with which was started the revelation to the Messenger of Allah was the true vision in sleep. And he did not see any vision but it came like the bright gleam of dawn. Thenceforth solitude became dear to him and he used to seclude himself in the cave of Hira’, where he would engage in worship for a number of nights before returning to his family and getting provisions again for this purpose. He would then return to Khadija and take provisions for a like period, till Truth came upon him while he was in the cave of Hira’. There came to him the angel and said: “Recite [or: read]”{2}, to which he replied: “I am not lettered.” He [the Angel] took hold of me and pressed me, till I was hard pressed; then he let me go and said: “Recite.” I said: I am not lettered. He then again took hold of me and pressed me for the second time till I was hard pressed and then let me go and said: “Recite”, to which I replied: “I am not lettered.” He took hold of me and pressed mefor the third time, till I was hard pressed and then let me go and said: “Recite in the name of your Lord Who created, created man from a clot of blood. Recite. And your most bountiful Lord is He Who taught the use of pen, taught man what he knew not.” (Koran 96:1-4)

Thus the first verses of the Koran that were ‘revealed’ were Sura 96 verses 1-4.{3}

Throughout the ‘revelation’ of the Koran it is the Angel Jibreel (Gabriel) who is assumed to have transmitted Allah’s words to Mohammed{4}, who then recited them back to the Angel to prove he had got it correctly memorised before reciting it to his Sahaba (“companions”) who in turn learnt it and recorded at least some of it{5} in writing.

Thus, to put it in Islamic terms we have the following “chain of narration” (Isnad or Sanad){6}: Allah → Gabriel → Mohammed → The Sahaba → the written Koran.

Let me consider the reliability of each step in the Koran’s Sanad.

What we know about the god of the Koran is contained in the Koran. Islam defines the “ninety nine beautiful names” – the ‘names’ (more accurately attributes) of Allah{7}. Many of these are interesting in their own right, but the ones I wish to consider are: Al-Khaaliq,The Creator;  Al-Bari’, The Maker; Al-’Aleem, The All-Knowing; As-Samee’, The All-Hearing; Al-Baseer, The All-Seeing; Al-Khabeer, The Aware and Al-Haqq, The Truth.

Thus the Allah of the Koran is declared to be the aware, all-knowing (seeing, hearing, etc.) creator who is The Truth.

This latter-most is important: Allah isn’t merely “truthful” he is “The Truth”. Therefore the Koran declares that Allah is “100% pure truth” so to speak. Therefore, every word that Allah says MUST be true. Allah cannot tell a lie{8}.

However, merely “not lying” does not give the full picture: If someone tells me that “the earth is flat” and I know no better, then if I tell you the same, it can be argued that I amnot lying – as far as I know I am telling the truth and therefore my honesty is not imperilled.

But Allah is also claimed to be the creator (of the whole universe), aware, all knowing etc. then there can be no excuse of ignorance or misinformation (like the fact that the earth orbits the Sun, not vice-versa), what Allah says MUST be true in an absolute sense (i.e. he has no excuses for “getting it wrong”).

Therefore, Islamically speaking, the source of the Koran is the literal Truth, Allah, and the first step in the “Isnad” is quite unimpeachable.

According to the Islamic view Angels are are heavenly beings who  have no free will, (unlike humans or jinn) and can do only what God orders them to do. Thus if Allah gives the Angel Jibreel (Gabriel) a revelation to take to Mohammed, Gabriel will do so – flawlessly.

Thus there can be no question of any falsehood or error creeping in here.

Mohammed himself is the next step in our Sanad and so we must assess his character from the Islamic viewpoint.

There are many stories about Mohammed{9} that aim to show his good character, but we need not trouble ourselves, because the Koran itself, the ‘true word of Allah’ settles the matter: “Your companion (Muhammad) has neither gone astray nor has erred. Nor does he speak of (his own) desire. It is nothing but revelation sent down to him.”(53:2-4) neither can Mohammed forget it: “And truly, this (the Quran) is a revelation from the Lord of All, which the trustworthy Angel [Gabriel]  has brought down upon your heart (O Muhammad) that you may be (one) of the warners”.{10}

These verses state clearly that what Mohammed is preaching is “revelation” and that Mohammed has not erred in his transmission of said ‘revelation’.

Thus – Islamically speaking – we can rest assured that the Koran, as recited by Mohammed  is a   completely accurate transmission of the words of Allah as recited to him by Gabriel.

Passing on to the Sahaba.

No-one claims that the Sahaba are more than human. Therefore, at first blush, it seems possible that there could be mistakes made in the transmission or remembering of the ‘words of Allah’{11}. However, once again Allah assures that this did not and indeed could not happen: “Verily, we have sent down the Reminder [the Koran], and, verily, we will guard it.”(13:9). Again: “No falsehood could enter it, in the past or in the future; a revelation from the Most Wise, Praiseworthy [one].” (41:42) Again: “This is an honourable Quran, in a protected book{12}. None can grasp it except the sincere. A revelation from the Lord of the universe.” (K.56:77-80)

Thus we see that the Sahaba also fulfilled their role in the transmission of the Koran perfectly, if only because Allah was guarding this ‘revelation’ and protecting it from any error they might have made.

The final step is the compilation of the written Koran.

Despite many Muslims’ statements to the contrary, the Islamic sources give a confused and colourful picture of this period of the transmission of the Koran. What is generally clear is that since the Muslims were perpetually at war and therefore suffering large numbers of casualties (especially at Yemana) amongst those who knew the Koran best, the fear arose that parts of the Koran would be lost “from men’s minds” unless it was written down. (Islamically speaking, we may see Allah intervening to preserve the Koran by spurring the Muslims to compile it.){13}. This resulted in the  compilation under Abu Bakr, which amounted to but a single privately held manuscript that passed from hand-to-hand until the time of Uthman. (As well as this compilation at least one other and perhaps several others in fact existed.) During Uthman’s Caliphate disagreements arose over the recitation (or reading) of the Koran{14} (amongst other things) and so Uthman ordered a newcompilation from various existing sources (including the Abu Bakr MSS, other MSS and part MSS) and this became the “offical” version. Uthman ensured that his Koran became the official one by firstly distributing his version (thus it was more than a private copy) and secondly by ordering all other versions burned{15}.

As the final element in this story, I wish to quote the Koran again: K.5:3 states “This day I have perfected your religion for you…”, {16} K.2:2 “This is the Book (the Quran), whereof there is no doubt…”, K.32:2-3 “ The sending down of the Book (Koran), there is no doubting it, from the Lord of all Being. They say ‘He (Muhammad SAW) has fabricated it!’Not so! It is the truth from your Lord…”

Thus Allah states that the religion of Islam is perfect and that perfection must include the perfection of the Koran which is itself the truth and beyond doubt,  Islamically speaking, that is.

Summary of part 1.

From the Islamic perspective:

  1. the transmission of the Koran from Allah to the final (Uthmanic) written Koran is perfectly reliable and as such it can be stated that the Koran is the literal word of Allah, perfect in every detail, unchanged and indeed unchangeable for all time and eternity in it’s original  form.
  2. Every word of the Koran MUST be true.{17}

Part 2. The types of verse in the Koran.

The Koran goes to great lengths, with over fifty statements, to state that it is a clear guide with clear and simple commandments and that Mohammed made Allah’s message plain and simple to understand. Such “plain and simple to understand “ verses are called “muhkam” verses.

However, the Koran admits in one verse:

It is He Who has sent down to you (Muhammad ) the Book. In it are Verses that are entirely clear [or: firm, or:decisive], they are the foundations [or: heart] of the Book andothers not entirely clear. So as for those in whose hearts there is a deviation (from the truth) they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof, seeking Al-Fitnah{18}, and seeking for [the Koran’s] hidden meanings, but none knows its hidden meanings save Allah and those who are firmly grounded in knowledge. Say: “We believe in it; the whole of it(clear and unclear Verses) are from our Lord.”(K.3:7){19}

And in one other, the Koran goes further: “Allah has sent down the best statement, a Book(this Quran), its parts resembling each other, oft-repeated. The skins of those who fear their Lord shiver from itThen their skin and their heart soften to the remembrance of Allah. That is the guidance of Allah. He Guides therewith whom He pleases and whomever Allah sends astray, for him there is no guide.”(K.39:23){20}

The words underlined are in Arabic the single word “muttashabih” which is generally understood to mean both “ambiguous” (including in the senses of allegory, simile and parable) and “similar” (here in the sense of  parallel or equivalent verses – “verses … oft repeated”.).

Thus, for example, when Allah says (in the Koran) “Obey Allah and the Messenger” wemight regard the verse as “muttashabih”{21} since it does not tell us who the “Messenger” is, therefore the verse isn’t entirely clear. However, as any Muslim will tell you, “the Messenger” is none other  than Mohammed. With this bit of understanding  we can definitively ascribe a meaning to it. (This is a somewhat trivial example, but I hope it makes the point.) On the other hand K.33:40 “Muhammad  is not the father of any man among you, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the last of the Prophets…” is “muhkam” since the verse is completely unambiguous as to whom it refers and as to what (it claims) he is{22}.

The Koran says that the clear verses are the foundation, heart or core of the Koran, whereas  ambiguous verses are misleading to those who lack understanding and lead them astray from the ‘Truth of Islam’. Thus the Koran hints very strongly that a good but unlearned Muslim should follow the clear verses and not worry over much about the ambiguous ones (ones he does not understand). Implicit is that clear verses cannot be “overruled” by ambiguous ones{23}.

In turn this means that we must take what the Koran says in clear language to mean what it says. The clear verses hide no other meanings – they are clear – and it is these verses that form the core of Islamic belief.

The last point to be drawn out here is that the “muttashaabih” verses can be understood by “those who are firmly grounded in knowledge” (K.3:7) and it is for the exegesis of such verses that the ‘science’ of Tafseer (interpretation/commentary) was born.{24}

Summary of Part 2.

  1. Not all verses of the Koran are easy to understand, some are ambiguous, some have pertinent details missing.
  2. The good news is that the unambiguous verses are the “heart of the Koran” and (since the Koran is truth itself)such verses mean what they say.{25}

Part 3. The consequences for Muslims.

  1. The above means the Koran must be inerrant. That is, it must contain no errors whatsoever. If the Koran contains a single factual error, then the Koran falsifies itself and thus cannot be from a god who is “all-knowing” (al-Alim). (That said, it is important to make sure that Muhkam verses are used to demonstrate an error, a  muttashabih verse won’t do, since it is open to multiple interpretations anyway){26}.

Therefore Muslims must and will strive to show that all the verses of the Koran are compatible with fact. Muslims regard this doctrine – the Koran as being Allah’s literal word as a great strength in their religion, but it is a brittle strength as the above shows.

  1. An Islamist{27} must accept the doctrine of Abrogation since it is in the Koran. It is simply not according to the Koran to deny this doctrine – in principle at least{28}.
  2. Since the Koran itself tells Muslims to “obey the Messenger/Prophet” about fifty times then an Islamist can’t be a “Quranite” (Koran only) Muslim. Such Muslims deny the importance of Mohammed’s teaching{29}, disobey the Koran and effectively disobey Allah as well {30}. Therefore such Muslims are “hypocrites” according to the Koran – we might also refer to them as “pick-n-mix” Muslims since they just pick out the bits they want to follow/believe and ignore those they don’t.
  3. Only those who are “firmly grounded in faith” as the Koran puts it and have spent a lot of time (often a lifetime) should be entrusted to interpret the  muttashabih verses{31} which can lead people astray from ‘the Truth’ of the Koran{19}.

Part 4: On the horns of many dilemmas.

(1)     To Muhkam or not to Muhkam: that is the question{32}.

The absolute requirement that the Koran be “perfect” means that Islam utterly rejects any attempts at a critique of the text by any critical method that would be accepted in the wider world and indeed many Muslim writers disparage non-Muslim critics for a “lack of knowledge” (to be fair this is sometimes justified), but it is also an easy option and an ad hominem attack.

Often such “counter-criticism” revolves around the notion that the critic has a poor or non-existent understanding of Arabic (like yours truly) and thus “doesn’t understand what the Koran means”.

But all that means is that the “counter-critic” is saying “the Koran is untranslatable and can’t be understood by non-Arabic speakers.” Since there are a plethora of translations in almost all languages and most such translations are done by Muslims who speak both Arabic and the language of translation this is a hard argument to sustain, especially when the Koran says that the heart of its message is unambiguous, clear and simple to understand, if that is so the muhkam verses must be translatable. To be sure,  muttashaabih verses may be “untranslatable” in the sense that it may be hard to translate all the meanings, but  this cannot apply to muhkam verses because the Koran says they are clear, thus the Koran itself denies this argument.

Thus those who make this argument are falsifying the Koran by their argument.

(2)     Now  is the Koran of our discontent turned to glorious Tafseer.

A second counter-criticism is basically: “you have use the Tafseers (or Hadith/Sunnah) to understand the Koran verses.” But this just approaches the same dilemma from a different direction: why does a book who’s message is “clear and simple” need every verse (including, therefore Muhkam verses) “explained”? Further, many Koran translations use the most famous Tafseers{33} in the task of ensuring accurate translation.

Since the study of all these sources would be a lifetime’s work in itself, this is really a way of saying “no one except the experts [whoever they are] can understand the Koran.” Again this argument falsifies the Koran which tells us it’s “core message” is clear. This is also an odd statement from the point of view that Islam prides itself on being a religion in which there are no intermediaries between god and man – yet this approach generates exactly that: if you can’t really understand the Koran without a life-time of study, then only those who spend their lives in Theological study can understand and interpret it, thus we have a Priesthood in all but name and hence we place an intermediary between man and god – contrary to Islamic teaching. This would be tantamount to Shirk{34} in fact.

(3) Of God and Men.

If the Koran is the literal word of god, then it must contain within it nothing “man-made”. Much is made by some critical writers of the fact that the Koran contains stories that are derivative from other religious sources (most commonly the Bible) but this is a weak argument since Islam’s response is that the Koran “corrects” those earlier versions. Whilst many might look askance at this given the frequently debased nature of the Koran’s versions, it is a tenable position since the Koran regards itself as god’s final revelation and as such part of it’s “job” would be to correct earlier ‘errors’. Indeed the Koran claims that the earlier scriptures (the Bible) have become corrupted, hence the Koran’s “corrective” ‘mission’.

However, when the source is something that is demonstrably purely human in origin then this position is untenable. Consider the following:

Therefore the man was created singly, to teach that he who destroys one soul of a human being, the Scripture considers him as if he should destroy a whole world, and him who saves one soul of Israel, the Scripture considers him as if he should save a whole world. (Jewish Mishna Sanhedrin 4:5)

Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. (Koran 5:32)

Excepting the Koranic substitutions and glosses{35} the two are (virtually) identical.  What is of note here is that the Koran verse says that god ordained (or prescribed, or decreed) this for Israel. This language in the Koran defines revealed “orders” i.e. Allah’s commands. The Mishna is understood by Orthodox Jews to be inspired words; that is they are not G-d’s very words, but man’s albeit expressing a religious truth, often expanding on a subject within the Torah. So how can something written by men – a “Tafseer” on the Torah in fact – be the literal word of god?

(4)   Malice through the looking glass.

In the looking-glass world, left is right and right is wrong.

The Koran teaches that Muslims must “obey the prophet” and that to do so “is to obey Allah”{30}. Islam has always understood this to mean not just Mohammed’s words, but hisactions also. In modern Western societies a number of Mohammed’s actions are considered criminal as well as immoral{36}.

Thus either Muslims must defend these actions since “to obey Mohammed is to obey Allah” and therefore these actions must be of Allah, which means that Muslims are left in the unenviable position of arguing that some immoral/illegal acts are right and proper, disparaging “mere man made laws” -which criminalise these actions- whilst insisting that the Shari’ah Law which supports them is “god-given” and thus ‘superior’; or else they must accept that Mohammed is a man of his times – not the eternal exemplar for humanity, the “Ihsan Kamel” of Islam – which rejects what the Islamic literature, including the Koran, says about Mohammed {37}.

Both “defences” can be found within Muslim literature, sometimes in the same piece.

(5)  Logic, Logic, for where art thou, Logic?

I have already shown how Muslims are forced into some illogical positions (such as defending Mohammed’s immorality in various ways, or accepting as “from god” verses that are clearly human-authored), but I wish to pass on to a couple of specific examples of logical problems with the Koran text or illogical responses to such problems.

The “Satanic verses” in the Koran(53:19-22). Here Mohammed receives a ‘revelation’ that was acclaimed by the Quraish since it honoured their Goddesses (at the time Mo was seeking a rapprochement), but his own followers were made unhappy so these verses were declared “satanic” by Allah, who rebuked Mohammed: K.17-73: “Indeed they were near to seducing thee from that We revealed to thee, that thou might forge against Us another, and then they [the Quraish] would surely have taken thee as a friend.”

Naturally enough, some people queried this volte-face, but up pops Allah to “resolve” this problem too: K.22:52-53. “Never did We send a Messenger or a Prophet before you, but; when he did recite the revelation or narrated or spoke, Shaitan (Satan) threw (some falsehood) in it. But Allah abolishes that which Shaitan throws in. Then Allah establishes His Revelations. And Allah is All-Knower, All-Wise. That He (Allah) may make what is thrown in by Shaitan a trial for those in whose hearts is a disease and whose hearts are hardened. And certainly, the Zalimoon are in an opposition far-off.”{38}{39}

So we learn that this is something that “always” happens to Allah’s messengers{40} and that Allah will sort it out and use it as a trial for unbelievers{41}.

Thus it would seem that Muslims  were and are content to accept that satanic verses could be insinuated into Allah’s word – the Qur’an, that Allah could “abolish” said satanic verses, and that Allah could replace a verse of his own revelation with a similar or better verse{see note 10}. You may recall that I earlier pointed out K.41:42. “No falsehood could enter it[the Koran], in the past or in the future; a revelation from the Most Wise, Praiseworthy [one].” Quite how Muslims can truly square this with Satan getting his words into the Koran, even temporarily, I can’t say{42}.

But there is another problem: if Mohammed could not tell that it was Satan, not Gabriel, who was speaking to him, Mohammed cannot differentiate between true revelation and satanic verses, so how do we know that Satan did not manage the same “trick” on other occasions? Certainly, the Koran tells us that Allah “guards” it etc., but the Koran is already compromised as a source since Satan managed the “trick” on at least one occasion that we know about since he was “found out”.  As a second point here, it shows that Allah wasn’t that good at “guarding” the revelation if Satan could get by his guard – even temporarily{43}.

The shape of the earth. I’m not going to restate the “flat earth” arguments nor their (attempted) rebuttals. Both these are very well known and it is up to each individual to decide on which side of the argument they wish to come down{44}.

Rather I wish to consider the really illogical “the Koran says the earth is egg-shaped” argument. This is based on Sura 79:30 “Wal’arda ba’da dhalika dahaha”{45} which some modern apologists (e.g. Dr. Zakir Naik) have translated as “and He made the earth egg-shaped.” On the basis of this, these same apologists say this shows that the Koran says the earth is a sphere, not flat. Neither am I interested in the argument about the meaning of “dahaha” and it’s roots which Modern Muslims have curiously translated as “egg-shaped” or “shaped like an ostrich egg”. Instead I will simply assume that this is true{46}.

For the record let me state the fact that, yes, the earth is slightly oblate but it is spherical to within 0.4%. To give a context: the earth is more spherical (in gross terms) than a billiard ball.

Sadly for Dr. Naik et al, whilst the earth is a (marginally) oblate spheroid an egg is a markedly  prolate and asymmetric spheroid. Simply: an oblate spheroid is bigger “around the middle” (equator – which is always a circle by definition) whereas a prolate one is bigger “north to south”. Thus even if we were to accept the apologists’ argument theshape of the world in the Koran is still completely wrong. (In fact physics makes such an earth-sized world-shape as impossible as a disc-world in our universe.)

Thus to counter the “flat earth” charge, some Muslims have adopted an apologetic stance that merely replaces one error with another and this latter is worse in that it’s linguistic basis is weak to say the least and requires substantial meaning being read into the text itself.

(6)  Hubble, bubble, strife and trouble.

Samuel P. Huntingdon made his famous statement “Islam’s borders are bloody and so are its innards” in 1998. Whilst I am sure that there are some who would deride this as “Islamophobic”, “bigoted” and “racist”; the sad truth is that this is an accurate observation. In the ten and a half years since 9/11 (at the time of writing) -call that 4000 days-  there have nearly 19,000 Islamic terror attacks resulting in death and/or serious injury.

Simple maths tells us that means that on average there have been more than four such attacks each and every day in which devout Muslims kill and maim “for the sake of Allah”. Most of these attacks take place (ironically perhaps) within the Dar-ul-Islam. We in the Dar-ul-Harb{47} are far better protected against such attacks since we have effective and efficient security services that thwart such attacks in the planning stages most of the time{48}. Yet despite this we are constantly told that Islam is “the religion of peace”.

Thus the dilemma is that Muslims kill each other (as well as us) in terrorist attacks carried out in the name of Allah by people quite convinced they are doing the will of Allah, yet Islam is purported to be “the religion of peace”.

Let me state quite clearly that I do not, for one instant, believe or infer that all Muslims are violent. Far from it: a majority of Muslims clearly live quiet peaceful and peaceable lives. But this does not negate the fact that pious Islamic terrorists (and I use the phrase deliberately even though I know it offends some Muslims) carry out their terrorist attacks in the name of Allah and for the sake of Allah, quite convinced (by Islamic teaching) that they are engaged in legitimate sword-jihad against the enemies of Islam (even if they are their brother Muslims!). No other religion on Earth today behaves in this way to both it’s own and the “other”.

Apologists use various approaches to ‘resolve’ this dilemma:

(1)                      The “Islam has been hijacked!” approach (Irshad Manji is particularly scathing about this) which tries to cast the Islamic terrorist as a non-Muslim, which is ironic since this is “Takfir”{49} which is highly frowned upon within Shari’ah and these self-same Islamic terrorists to a man (or woman) believe they are doing Allah’s will in killing. A problem with this approach, apart from it’s ‘legal’ difficulties within Shari’ah, is that it is a cop-out as well as being dis-ingenuous (to be polite). It is a cop-out since it instantly absolves Islam of any responsibility and it is dis-ingenuous since it simply ignores the violent verses of the Koran.

(2)                      The “Islam has been misunderstood!” argument. This is the same argument that is applied to non-Muslim critics of course (which is a little ironic), but here the idea is that the violent Muslims haven’t understood the Koran. This argument is, in essence, a modification of the first and the same counter-arguments apply – except that here the apologist would have us believe that somehow early peaceful verses abrogate later violent ones in contravention to the principles of abrogation.

(3)                      The “Don’t look at what Muslims do, look at the scriptures.” approach. This is usually followed with an appeal to the “peaceful” verses of the Koran{50}. This approach has several problems: firstly many of these peaceful verses are abrogated by later verses which contradict them. Let me remind you that abrogation itself is controversial in Islam which simply adds another layer of controversy. Second: If Muslims are supposed to actually follow Islam (as the Koran commands over 50 times!) then shouldn’t the actions and acts of Muslims, particularly those carried out in the name of it’s god, reflect it’s teaching? Third: this argument implies that there aren’t many (or any) “true Muslims” in the world and from this it follows that Islam has failed as a religion since it’s ‘followers’ don’t follow it{51}.

(4)                      The “Don’t look at the Scriptures, lookit the peaceful Muslims!” approach. Often when Islam critics point out the violent verses of the Koran counter-critics will respond by pointing out (rightly) that most Muslims are not violent and therefore (here comes the leap-to-conclusion) so must Islam be. Again, it is really a variant on approach 1, with all the same problems{52}.

(5)                      The “Muslims only fight defensively!” line. This version of apologia sets out a series of premises, assertions or (occasionally) arguments by which it is alleged that “the West” is at war with, or has attacked “Islam” and/or is “oppressing Islam”. Therefore, terror attacks are a defensive response to this “aggression” and that if the West only stopped it’s aggression and/or oppression then all would be peace{53}.

The astute reader will have realised that all the arguments (except the last) I’ve outlined above are mutually contradictory, based on circular reasoning (one of the arguments above can easily lead to another), tendentious in that they simply ignore contrary evidence or eisegetic in nature.

The crux of the dilemma for Muslim apologists is this: why, if Islam is peaceful is it so violent? This violence is not only present today, it has been a feature of Islam throughout it’s history, even when Islam was the dominant power, which rather undermines #5 also.{54} Thus none of the above arguments really provide an answer, rather they evade the question.

(7)   The Trouble with Science.

One of the most curious aspects of the “Koran inerrancy” position is how Muslims have responded to modern science. This position is ‘augmented’  by verses such as 17: 12. “… And We have explained everything (in detail) with full explanation….” (see also 7:52, 11:1 and 17:89) which seems to lead some Muslims to believe that the Koran contains all possible knowledge (or at least all useful knowledge) in the Universe (this view was also held by the earliest Muslims).

In this arena there seem to be two strands of polemical approach, though as usual the same Muslim writer often employs both consecutively.

The “The Koran knew that!” argument. In this argument the  science is taken as trueand the Koran text (and the root-meanings of it’s words{55}) searched until something is found that can be taken (and often twisted) to match the science. (The example of the “egg-shaped” earth is a case in point.) Proponents of this approach usually attempt to show that the Koran exactly matches the current science (e.g. the embryology ‘debate’). This has the obvious weakness that if the science changes, this falsifies the ‘revelation’ the polemicist has ‘discovered’. Polemicists aware of this problem often switch to …

The “It’s only a Theory!” argument. In this argument the science (e.g. evolution) is dismissed as being just a (false) theory (which misunderstands the nature of scientific theory against that of hypothesis) and the Koran held up as the “ultimate truth” which “proper science” will validate in time.

Of the two, which are mutually contradictory of course, I think that the second has slightly more intellectual honesty attendant upon it in that it is at least consistent with a belief-set. The former approach simply begs the question “why, if this was in the Koran didn’t a Muslims spot this before Western science made the discovery?” To which no satisfactory answer is ever forthcoming as well as being inherently fluid and changeable – today’s ‘scientific revelation’ becomes tomorrow’s ‘interpretive mistake’.

Summary of part 4.

Muslims face a number of dilemmas consequent on their insistence that the Koran text be inerrant which are exacerbated by the doctrine that the Koran contains “all truth”.  Apologetic attempts to resolve these dilemmas are often mutually contradictory and logically flawed. Many also seem weak, or even perverse, to non-Muslims who are used to a more rationalistic basis for argument than “the Koran says xxxx so it must be true” which then compels attempts to justify a position on that basis rather than any logical/rational system. Some such attempts merely replace one error with another and others require meaning to be “read into” the text in a retro-active way to show that a modern explanation was already present “within” the Koran text.

An approach common in dealing with controversy between the Koran and modern science is to dismiss modern science on the basis that it’s “only a theory” and hold that the Koranic understanding will be validated in time by “proper science”.

Conclusions.

  1. Islam teaches that one of it’s strengths is that the Koran is (purportedly) the literal word of god. The main consequence of  this, given the formulation of the nature of god within Islam, is that the Koran must be inerrant. This makes this strength a brittle one in that if one single error is found in the Koran then the Koran falsifies itself.
  2. Muslims must (attempt to) preserve the ‘truth’ of the Koran against all criticism, even if this means that they are forced into moral or exegetical positions that are difficult or even impossible to logically or rationally sustain, which is why so often Muslims find themselves impaled on the horns of moral or rational versus belief dilemmas{56}.
  3. Examination of many of the apologetic methods used to “resolve” dilemmas and perceived “problems” with the text shows that they are either mutually contradictory, dismissive or eisegetic in nature.
  4. The dis-regard for history, logic and consistency in handling the Koran text often makes the arguments of apologists seem hagiographic at best and risible at worst to non-Muslims (how Muslims view them I couldn’t say), being based on a series of a priori assumptions that often do not comport with the real world.

Notes and References.

  1. The Hadith, or Ahadith are collections of “the sayings of Mohammed”. The pre-eminent collections are those of Bukhari and Muslim. As well as the sayings of Mohammed the Hadith also include records of many of his actions such as washing, bathing, praying etc. and in addition they further contain some sayings (not many as a proportion) ascribed to Mohammed’s “Sahaba” (that is “companions”). Thus the description of the Hadith as “Mohammed’s sayings” is somewhat inaccurate – or at least incomplete. [return]
  2. There is considerable debate within Muslim circles as to whether or not Mohammed was illiterate. That argument is well beyond the scope of this article, but my own preference on the balance of such argument is that Mohammed was told to “recite” (since he himself did not write the Koran down) and his response was, in effect,  “I’m not a man of letters”. This fits with the fact that pre-Islamic Arab society apotheosised Poets and thus a man who was not a poet would consider himself “unlettered” in the sense that he was not well-educated in poetic composition – indeed part of Mohammed’s fear may have been of the reception of what he had to “recite” by a highly critical Arab audience. Alternatively, he may have meant that he was not “good” at reading and writing – hence his use of scribes to record the ‘revelations’. Either way, on balance I think that the evidence points to Mohammed not being illiterate as such, but literate to a low standard. [return]
  3. Note that Sura (“chapter”) 96 has a total of 19 verses. Thus Mohammed’s first ‘revelation’ was but part of a single Sura. [return]
  4. Although the Islamic narrative is that is was Jibreel (Gabriel) who gave Mohammed the revelations see K.81:19, this is problematic due to the “satanic verses” that were revealed to Mohammed. In this case at least we have to assume that Mohammed did not realise that Satan was reciting verses to him, not Gabriel – which is suspicious to say the least.[return]
  5. Some Muslim sources insist that the whole Koran was written down in Mohammed’s time. However, this flies in the face of the fact (recorded in the Hadith) that the prime reason that Abu Bakr compiled the Koran was due to the fear that parts of it were (at risk of) being lost as members of the Sahaba died in battle. This worry would simply never have arisen if the Koran was already known to be compiled in written form. Further other Hadith refer to various “lost” verses (e.g.”the verse of stoning” with reference to stoning adulterers to death), this again shows that the Koran was not compiled in Mohammed’s lifetime. [return]
  6. The “chain of narration” is a vital part of Hadith classification. A Hadith can only begin to be considered as “sound” (Sunan) or “true” (Sahih) if it’s Sanad is unimpeachable. [return]
  7. Islamic mythology says that there are 100 names, the hundredth of which is known only to the Camel – hence it’s superior expression. This idea of other names is supported in that if you compare various compilers’ lists of the “beautiful names” you will find that they (sometimes) differ. Put another way, Muslims can’t fully agree on what “beautiful names” actually belong to Allah and which ones don’t – for whatever reason. [return]
  8. I’m deliberately overlooking those verses that refer to Allah being the best deceiver (or in other translations: schemer, plotter, deviser, planner). These words are derived from “mkr” which means deceit. On this point apologetics usually follows the line exemplified here: IslamQ&A says “Plotting against, betraying and mocking theenemy are attributes of perfection [and thus belong to Allah], because that is indicative of complete knowledge, power and might, and so on….plotting in the right circumstances may be something praiseworthy that points to the strength of the plotter, and that he is superior to his enemy.” Thus IslamQ&A admits that Allah is a deceiver, but “spins” this to try to make it a positive attribute. One is led to wonder how Islam Q&A would consider non-Muslims (or their Deities) deceiving Muslims. Would that be equally positive? [return]
  9. For example: how Mohammed’s heart was “cleansed” – not once but twice, or how he gained and maintained the reputation for honesty and integrity. So say the Islamic sources.  [return]
  10. Quite how this squares with the Doctrine of Abrogation I could not say: 2:106 “We do not abrogate any of Our verses (of the Qur’an) or cause it to be forgotten except that We substitute it with something better or similar; don’t you know that Allah has full power over everything?”, 13:39 “Allah doth blot out or confirm what He pleaseth: with Him is the Mother [or essence/basis] of the Book.” and 16:101 “And when We change a Verse in place of another (and Allah knows the best of what He sends down) they [the non-believers] say: ‘You [Mohammed] are but a Muftari! [forger, liar].’ Nay, but most of them know not.” A hadith records: “Abdullah bin Masud said “Muhammad taught me a verse and I got it by heart and wrote it in my book. When I returned to my place I could not remember anything of it. Next morning when I opened my book, I found the page, on which it was written, white. I reported the matter to Muhammad. He said to me. “O Ibn Masud that verse has been taken up (back to God) yesterday.”” [return]
  11. Ironically, the Hadith give us evidence that precisely this happened and on occasion with Mohammed’s approval. For instance: from the book Usûd Ulghâbah fi Ma’rifat Is-Sahâbah by Ibn al-Athîr, in the entry concerning Abdullâh Ibn Sâd Ibn Abî Sarh we find the following: “He converted to Islam before the conquest of Mecca and immigrated to the Prophet [i.e. in Medina]. He used to record the revelation for the Prophet before he apostatized and went back to Mecca. Then he told Quraysh: ‘I used to orient Muhammad wherever I willed, he dictated to me “All-Powerful All-Wise” and I suggest “All Knowing All-Wise” so he would say: “Yes, it is all the same.” Here we see Mohammed agreeing to changes in Allah’s words and it was that which caused Sarh to apostatise since he felt that if Mohammed’s ‘revelation’ truly was from God, then it should be unchangeable (curiously, the Muslim position on this issue!). This account is disputed on the grounds of the times of Sarh’s conversion to Islam being after the revelation of the verse. But this does not negate the point because, according to tradition, Mohammed used to repeatedly recite the Koran so Sahr may have written it down at a later (private) recitation. [return]
  12. This is a reference to the Koran being preserved in heaven (85:21-22) and/or a reference to the Koran’s preservation on Earth. [return]
  13. I suppose it would be churlish of me to point out that had the Muslims not embarked on serial and parallel wars of conquest, they could have accomplished this at their leisure. [return]
  14. It is important to remember that during this period written Arabic was a defective script, without vowel pointing or diacritical marks. This meant that words themselves were often ambiguous, requiring the use of context to sort them out. Muslims will tell you that the argument was about dialect, but this doesn’t make much sense because, around that time, there were seven “accepted” modes of recitation (i.e. seven “dialects” were accommodated), hence we may deduce that, as one author puts it, the dispute was about the reading (i.e. the words themselves) of the Koran. Given the defective nature of Arabic, this makes sense. Can you puzzle out this sentence, done 7th century Arabic style? “Nd th prpht sd “Sd ths fr a lk, ts scrpt is prblm, hw t tll dffrnc btwn ft nd ft!” Up to “ft nd ft” probably, but think how many words are circumscribed by “ft”.  But Uthman’s Koran didn’t solve this problem (the script was defective!), so in fact there must have been differences in the consonants as well. Thus “allah’s words” differed between the collections (this is not necessarily to say that the meanings were different – one may substitute different words with the same (or similar) meaning) though given the problems of the script it is pretty much inevitable that actual changes in meaning occurred. Of course, the Muslim response would be that Allah guided Zaid ibn Thabit (the actual compiler of Uthman’s Koran) and made sure he got it right… [return]
  15. Given that Uthman started the practice of Koran-burning, one is forced to wonder why Muslims find it so objectionable. That said, it should be remembered that Uthman (like Umar before him and Ali after him) was murdered by Muslims. Uthman did not even receive a Muslim burial, being buried, unwashed, in a Jewish cemetery. [return]
  16. This verse (K.5:3) which Muslims often quote to show that Islam is the “perfect religion” actually falsifies itself(and thus the Koran). It states that “…This day I have perfected your religion…”. Sura 5 is a late Medinan Sura, but it is not the last Sura revealed during Mohammed’s life (so one might ask “why does the now perfect need additions?”), nor does it take account of the differences that crept into the Koran text prior to Uthman’s recension which re-standardised the text. Thus Allah says something in this verse that simply cannot be true at the time of revelation.[return]
  17. As the observant reader will be aware the arguments I have presented depend on a priori “reasoning”. I remind the reader I am arguing from the Islamic perspective and ultimately a lot of such “Islamic arguments” boil down to “the Koran says xxxx, so it must be true”. [return]
  18. “Fitnah” is sometimes translated as “mischief”or “discord”. But in reality it’s breadth is greater in that it encompasses a range of actions that “disturb the peace” of the Umma from outright treason to criticising Islam. In particular “fitnah” is often associated with “Shirk” – the association of others with Allah (or the replacement of Allah by another). From shirk we get “Mushrik” – an “associator”, ultimately one of the labels bestowed on all non-Muslims by the Koran. [return]
  19. This is a curious statement in that Allah is implying that these “ambiguous” verses are in the Koran to lead people astray. Muslims will riposte that those are “people with diseased hearts”, true; but isn’t it the job of God and His Prophets to guide people to “The Truth”? Secondly, how do you square Allah as “The Truth” with this somewhat deceptive practice? And third, if people are “diseased” spiritually should they not be succoured rather than suckered? [return] [return pt4]
  20. Thus the Koran can’t decide if it is “clear verses”, a mix or all “ambiguous” verses. See also note 17. [return]
  21. To be fussy, it’s “Mutashabih-ijmal” – a general statement without mentioning the necessary specific details (in this case, who the messenger is). The second type is “al-Ishtirak al-Lafdhi” which is where a word (or verse) has two (or more) meanings, either/or in the literal sense or in the sense of a literal meaning and a simile/parable etc. meaning. Sometimes the ambiguity comes about as a result of where you put the punctuation. Ironically, this is neatly demonstrated in K.3:7 where, if we punctuate as I have (which is the logical way given the arabic “wa” = “and”) we get “… hidden meanings save Allah and those who are firmly grounded in knowledge. Say…”; but some translations punctuate is as: … hidden meanings save Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say…” which substantially changes the meaning. (This latter punctuation is inconsistent since the Koran contains many commands to Mohammed to “Say…”, so it’s use is theologically, not textually driven.) [return]
  22. As might be expected, the determination of Muhkam and  Mutashabih verses is a ‘science’ in itself that is hotly contested within Islam, with different and contradictory views being held. [return]
  23. In practice (most) Islamic scholars acknowledge three kinds of verses: (1)-“Muhkam Ayah”, Unambiguous ( “clear”) or “perfected” verses; (2)-“Mutashabih Ayah”, Verses that can have many meanings, or are similes or parables and (3)-abrogated verses (notwithstanding the purported “perfection” of the Koran). Some Islamic Authorities state that the Koran is completely “Muhkam”, claiming that “Mutashabih” verses are similar / parallel to other verses and that abrogation does not exist. This is not entirely untenable since there is much repetition within the Koran (parallel verses or similar) and abrogated verses can usually be re-interpreted according to other verses, but it is a weak position in that it ignores (or disagrees with) verses of the Koran that state that abrogation occurred and the fact that “the verse of stoning” isn’t in the Koran, though the law it brings in is upheld in Shari’ah, thus the effect of the verse remains. [return]
  24. One of the ironies of Islam is that the Koran which claims clarity of message for itself spawned such a massive industry in “Tafseers” and interpretation. A further irony is that no interpreter will claim to know the correct interpretation: they always conclude with “and Allah knows best”. Whilst this may be just a pietistic phrase, one can’t help but wonder if they really mean “well, this is what I/we think, but god alone knows what it really means”. So much for “clear guidance”! [return]
  25. I should add a caveat here. For instance K.3:26 speaks of Allah’s hand: “In Your Hand is the good.” There is nothing ambiguous in the language here. However, Islamic Theology would generally deny that Allah has “hands” in the human sense (Salafi scholars might disagree), therefore, although the sentence is “muhkam” linguistically, the meaning of “hands” is either allegorical or esoteric, thus it’s meaning could be termed “muttashabih” since Allah does not tell us what his “hands” are like.  This points up the sort of difficulties that arise in deciding what is “muhkam” and what is  “muttashabih”, never mind what the “muttashabih” verse/words mean. [return]
  26. I’m sure we can all think of many errors in the Koran, but listing them falls outside the purview of this article. However, the point here is that since Muhkam verses mean what they say, you can’t “explain them away” through apologetic gymnasticism. To do so means that you are tampering with the “heart of the book” in a most egregious way and so such gymnastics are most  un-Islamic. [return]
  27. I use this term to mean “a Muslim who believes (and seeks to impliment) what  his/her scriptures say and teach”. [return]
  28. One may – and Muslims do – argue about what verses are abrogated and which are abrogating etc., but the principle cannot be denied. Inevitably, abrogation is a moderately complex issue, however for our purposes it is sufficient to note that, in general, when two verses conflict the new(er) verse abrogates the old(er). Of course, this merely opens another can of worms, since the Koran isn’t arranged chronologically, but (roughly) according to length of Sura and (just to make matters worse) it has been shown that in some of the longer Suras, different verses (probably) date to different times. Thus “just” working out which are the newer and older verses relatively speaking is a somewhat speculative process. [return]
  29. I realise that this reads oddly given the near-deification accorded to Mohammed and the extreme violence with which so many Muslims react to an ‘insult’ to Mohammed. But perhaps it is those Muslims who don’t react this way who aren’t “real Muslims”- i.e. Islamists at all. [return]
  30. K.4:80. “He who obeys the Messenger (Muhammad SAW), has indeed obeyed Allah…” [return] [return pt.4]
  31. Fortunately this has been done by the eminent Tafseer and Shari’ah writers of antiquity, so there is no need to re-interpret the Koran today. Hence the closing of the door to (Sunni) Ijtihad. [return]
  32. With apologies to Shakespeare, Lewis Carroll, Robert Bolt and Johns Wyndham and Steinbeck for borrowing or bastardising quotes and/or titles. [return]
  33. At-Tabari, Al-Qutubi, Ibn Kathir; Bukhari, Muslim for example. [return]
  34. This is Islam’s unforgivable sin: the association of anyone/thing with Allah. I should note that  Atheism would be regarded as Shirk as well. [return]
  35. The substitution of the word “mankind” for “world” and “life” for “soul”. The Koranic “mischief” part seems to be agloss inserted to make it possible to excuse the killing of people for a variety of reasons covered by “mischief” [fitnah] which basically means anything that upsets the tranquillity of the Muslims. Also: Some Muslim writers attempt to argue that since the Koran “universalises” the Mishna – by omitting the two words “from Israel” that makes it an “original” statement. However, to do so ignores the start of the Koran verse: “ordained for the children of Israel” which shows this Koran verse is specific to the Jews. [return]
  36. Examples would include multiple wives, sex with minors and slave trading to name but three. [return]
  37. To be fair I should point out 35:45 (Hilali-Khan): “And if Allah were to punish men for that which they earned, He would not leave a moving (living) creature on the surface of the earth, but He gives them respite to an appointed term, and when their term comes, then verily, Allah is Ever All-Seer of His slaves.” (See also 16:16) This vaguely threatening verse states that all men – thus including Mohammed – deserve death. The “respite” mentioned means that Allah “holds off his hand” (so to speak) until either death or judgement day, what happens then, note, is not mentioned here! [return]
  38. These verses fall in Sura 53. The original text (53:19-22) reads: “Have ye thought upon al-Lat and al-Uzza And Manat, the third, the other? These are the gharanaq (intermediaries)
    Whose intercession is to be hoped for.” After Gabriel “corrected” the text it reads: “Have ye thought upon al-Lat and al-Uzza and Manat, the third, the other. Are yours the males and His the females? That indeed were an unfair division!” Thus making a “joke” out of the idea of goddesses. [return]
  39. The “Satanic verses” in Sura 53 were ‘revealed’ in Mohammed’s fifth year of ministry in Mecca, 618 A.D., Allah’s rebuke (Sura 17) in 621 A.D. in Mecca, but Allah’s “explanation” comes in Sura 22 ‘revealed’ in Medina (more precisely those verses after v.40 are generally considered “Medinan”) in 623 A.D. Thus these verses apparently spanfive years with two year gaps between the parts. This is highly unlikely and consequently what we most likely have here is evidence of verses all dating from ~618 appearing in Suras up to  five years later, thus demonstrating the chronological dis-arrangement of the Koran-text  not merely Sura-by-Sura, but also within Suras. This makes any dating of verses within Suras (except, perhaps, for short mono-themed Suras) a speculative enterprise. Somewhat simply: What is normally done is to try to associate verses within a Sura with known historical events (thus providing a date) and to assume that all the verses in a Sura were ‘revealed’ at (approximately) the same time. As the above shows, this is not necessarily justified and all that can really be done with any certainty is to date various passages within Suras. [return]
  40. This is an odd (though not perhaps unexpected) statement. Elsewhere in the Koran “Allah’s messengers” are primarily identified as the Biblical prophets. Needless to say, such an event (Satan inserting his words for God’s) isnot recorded in the Bible. [return]
  41. The irony here is that the “Satanic verses” were (initially) more of a trial for Mohammed’s followers who basically asked “what’s the point of this Islam if we still have to believe in the Meccan Goddesses?” Once the change occurs, then the shift from conciliation to insult (and a “yah-boo” one at that) does become a “trial” for the Quraish who were upset by Mohammed’s recidivism. [return]
  42. An alternative translation of this verse is “…from before it or behind it…” This version is understood to mean “before” = previous revelations and “behind” = later revelations. The problem with this interpretation is that Islam denies that there are any later revelations which makes something of a nonsense of the verse. To be fair I should add that some exegetes refer to the “period of revelation” as being neither “before” nor “after” the Koran – thus implicitly saying that the Koran text was fluid during the period of ‘revelation’ (and, presumably, up to the Uthmanic recension). [return]
  43. Perhaps he’d run out of meteors K.15:18, 37:10, 72:8-9. [return]
  44. If anyone cares: I think the Koran speaks of a flat earth a la “Discworld” of  T.Pratchett, but I know (unlike the odd – in more senses than one – Saudi Sheikh) that the earth is a very slightly oblated sphere.  [return]
  45. If you really want to know about the “dahaha” argument – go online. [return]
  46. Of course we have to simply ignore all the other verses that say/mean flat – unless we are expected to believe that Arabs sat on spherical carpets and slept on spherical beds that is and the fact that no earlier translators (pre-late 20th century) or authoritative Tafseer writers noticed this ‘meaning’. [return]
  47. The “dar-ul-Islam” literally means “the house of Islam” thus “Islamic world”. “Dar-ul-Harb” literally means “house of war”. Since the “house of war” is not the Islamic world, we may render this as “non-Islamic world”. [return]
  48. Most recently (as of May 2012) was the Toulouse massacre in which French soldiers and Jews were killed by a lone Islamist gunman. [return]
  49. In essence Takfir is the sin of calling a Muslim an “apostate” or a “Non-Muslim”. In Shari’ah you need a very good reason indeed to “excommunicate” a Muslim.  [return]
  50. Yes there really are some. They are early Meccan verses by and large.  Also for detail on this see here.      [return]
  51. If that sounds contradictory, don’t blame me, I’m not responsible for irrational positions taken by Muslims. [return]
  52. Amusingly I’ve seen Muslim apologists use both arguments (3) and (4) in the same “rebuttal” piece – which is kinda ironic really. [return]
  53. I’ve written about this argument here. [return]
  54. I should add that there is one argument that does resolve this dilemma, but it is one that you will hardly ever hear spoken of in the West. Islam is (supposed to be) at peace when it controls a region and it regards war – in all its manifestations – as a legitimate tool to achieving this goal. Thus, by this rationale, a suicide bomber jihadi can be a “seeker after peace” if his/her actions promote (at least in his/her own mind) the goal of Islamic control. Thus we find an Orwellian “war is peace” type of attitude. This is partially undermined by the violence within the Dar-ul-Islam; but here sectarianism is usually to blame in that the various groups believe that only their version of Islam is the “real Islam” and until everybody is under it’s sway the struggle must continue. This is usually combined with Takfir against their opponents (declaring or considering them as “non-Muslim” in some way). [return]
  55. Arabic starts out as  tri-consonantal groupings. To these are added prefixes, suffixes and a variety of vowelisations in order to change the meanings of the word. Thus “SLM” for instance gives us “SaLaaM” (peace),“iSLaM” (submission), “muSLiM” (one who has submitted), “SaLiM” (whole/complete), “muSaLlaM” (undisputed). But the polemicist who uses these techniques might say that since “musallam” and “salaam” come from the same root, that in Sura x, verse y, musallam really means peace to Muslims – if it furthered his argument. [return]

Let me say that most “value systems” have their illogical and/or inconsistent elements, butIslam has a particular problem here since it and thus it’s value system must be inerrant. I can hardly stress this enough: since Islam insists that the Koran is the literal word of a god who is all-knowing, then it can contain no errors of any sort. If an error is found this means that either the god of the koran is a liar since he knows this isn’t the truth, or it means he isn’t all-knowing which also means he is a liar since he says he is all knowing. Thus one error in the Koran causes it to falsify itself and the Muslim deity.

58 thoughts on “Why the Koran must be true – even though it isn’t

  1. Lucky, dude, that’s not Sunni Morality FYI. That’s actually Salafi Morality. Shia Pen speaks of Shia-Sunni unity and brotherhood.

    • Dear MM,

      Lucky bin Satan’s Truck (BRAIN) is deflated and stuck in deep mud (STAGNANT). After bursting his four tyres (OBLANGATA) he got frantic and damaged his rim (NEURON SYNAPSES) too.

      He is stuck, deep in the Mud (REPETITIONS OF COPY PASTINGS), down the Jungle (LONG, LONGER, LONGEST USELESS POSTINGS)… what ALL his ears CAN pick (CRITICISE) is the roar of the lion (ISLAM) which is the Adhan on this Friday noon prayers, the same all over the WORLD!

      Hurt, bruised this Catholic Nazarean failed in the kindergarten (NO CIVILITY AND HUMILITY IN APPROACH), what can such a sick, demented brain (KAPUT) offer save for insulting others? Have you EVER heard a word of PRAISE from him?

      That is a sign of an APE gone KAPUT!

    • YO MONKEY MUTT & GOATBOY,

      SHORT & TO THE POINT!

      ISLAM: HAJJ PILGRIMAGE INCOMPLETE WITHOUT HOT CAMEL SEX

      Sunni Imam Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H) records in his authority work ‘Badaye al-Sanae’ Volume 2 page 216:
      ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه

      ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه

      “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal that will not make his hajj void”

      HOT MOHAMMEDAN SEX

      Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five
      world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:
      Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
      Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
      Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
      Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
      Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
      Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
      Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
      Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
      Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
      Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
      Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
      Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
      Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

      BUGGING YOUR WIFE?

      A RIGHT PAIN IN THE ARSE!

      Distortion committed by Bukhari whilst copying down a tradition in his ‘Sahih’ pertaining to the legitimacy of sodomy

      We read in the Holy Quran:

      Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will (Yusufali, 2:223).
      In various Sunni works we read that testimony of Abdullah Ibn Umar regarding the reason for the revelation of the said verse qua legitimacy of performing buggery on one’s wife. Hafiz Jalaluddin Suyuuti for example recorded in Tafseer Durre Manthur, Volume 1 page 638:
      وأخرج الحسن بن سفيان في مسنده والطبراني في الأوسط والحاكم وأبو نعيم في المستخرج بسند حسن عن ابن عمر قال‏:‏ إنما نزلت على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏{‏نساؤكم حرث لكم‏.‏‏.‏‏.‏‏}‏ الآية‏.‏ رخصة في إتيان الدبر‏.‏
      Hasan bin Sufiyan in his Musnad, Tabarani in Al-Awsat, Hakim and Abu Naeem in Al-Mastakhraj with a ‘Hasan’ chain of narration narrated from Ibn Umar who said: ‘This verse was revealed upon the Holy Prophet (s) in respect of the permissibility of performing sex in the anus of a woman’
      Curiously, when it came to the great Imam Bukhari, he felt compelled to record the statement of Abdullah Ibn Umar in an incomplete manner. We read in Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 50:
      Narrated Nafi’: Whenever Ibn ‘Umar recited the Qur’an, he would not speak to anyone till he had finished his recitation. Once I held the Qur’an and he recited Surat-al-Baqara from his memory and then stopped at a certain Verse and said, “Do you know in what connection this Verse was revealed? ” I replied, “No.” He said, “It was revealed in such-and-such connection.” Ibn ‘Umar then resumed his recitation. Nafi added regarding the Verse:–”So go to your tilth when or how you will” Ibn ‘Umar said, “It means one should approach his wife in ..”

      ‘In’ what? Of course IN her anus and whilst Hafiz Jalaluddin Suyuti and other famed Sunni scholars recorded this fact, it was Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani who filled in the blanks whilst commenting on the cited tradition of Bukhari:

      في إتيان المرأة في دبرها
      “Approach the woman in her anus”

      Fatah ul Bari Sharah Sahih Bukhari, Volume 8 page 190
      Imam Bukhari has recorded this tradition in his ‘Sahih’ with the following chain of narration:
      Ishaq (bin Rehwiya) – Nadar – Ibn Aun – Nnaf’i
      Now the most interesting part is that Bukhari actually copied down the above statement of Abdullah Ibn Umar from his Shaykh, namely Ishaq bin Rehwiya as mentioned by Ibn Hajar Asqalani:
      فقد أخرجها إسحاق ابن راهويه في مسنده وفي تفسيره بالإسناد المذكور ، وقال بدل قوله حتى انتهى إلى مكان ” حتى انتهى إلى قوله نساؤكم حرث لكم فأتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم فقال : أتدرون فيما أنزلت هذه الآية ؟ قلت لا . قال : نزلت في إتيان النساء في أدبارهن
      Ishaq bin Raheweh recorded it in his Musnad and his Tafsir with the same chain, when it reached the part “your wives are tilth to you, so go to your tilth anyhow you will” he said: ‘Do you know what for this verse has been revealed about?’ They said: ‘No’. He replied: ‘It has been revealed in regards to approaching women in their anuses’
      Interestingly whilst citing the said tradition verbatim Bukhari committed deception and did not quote the words of his Shaykh opting to leave a blank, in the hope that the attention plan of his readers would be short enough to confuse them and direct them to the next narration.

      (2) Second example of Sunni morality:
      SUNNI ‘ULAMA LEGITIMISED THE USE OF DILDOS (FEMALE SEX TOYS)

      After this ingenious fatwa, Ibn Qayyim then goes on to make permissible the use of a dildoe by women. It is only logical; when the husbands leave to go masturbate and spread Islam by the sword, they need something to do with themselves. On the same page as quoted above, Ibn Qayyim writes:
      “If a woman does not have a husband, and her lust becomes strong, then some of our scholars say: It is permissible for the woman to take an akranbij, which is a piece of leather worked until it becomes shaped like a penis, and insert it in herself. She may also use a cucumber”.

      COMMENT:

      Now, according to Dr. Salamah’s logic, the Saudi government should therefore purchase a large number of such dildos, and distribute them to old widows or otherwise unattractive women who cannot marry. Since anything that is permissible, according to Dr. Salamah, requires stand sanction and support, than clearly a dildoe distribution office needs to be immediately established in the great Islamic state of Saudi Arabia.
      Maybe this is another reason why ‘Umar the Khalifa never went on jihad: somebody had to stay behind and organize the cucumber distribution.

      (3) Third example of Sunni morality –
      PEDOPHILIA, BESTIALITY & NECROPHILIA CAN BE PERFORMED WHILST ONE IS FASTING

      In Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603:
      “It was narrated by Ahmed that a man came to him that feared that he would ejaculate while he was fasting. Ahmed said: “What I see is that he can release semen without ruining the fast, he can masturbate using his hands or the hands of his wife, If he has an “Ammah” whether be it a girl or a little child, she can masturbate for him using her hands, and if she was a non-believer, he can sleep with her without releasing (his semen), if he released it in her, it becomes impermissible”.
      Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603
      Not to be hard done by, the Hanafi’s follow suit. In Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820, the learned Hanafi scholar Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan sets out those acts that do not invalidate one’s fast, and he includes:
      “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”
      Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820

      COMMENT:

      What can we say about such Fatwas of morality? Fasting in Islam, is viewed as a means via which a believer purifies himself, via self-discipline, he dedicates that time to the remembrance of Allah (swt) and keeps aloof from sinful thoughts and acts. That is the theory, but the Hanbali and Hanafi madhab allows a man (whilst fasting) to have sex with kaffir women, animals, and dead people, the only proviso being that no ejaculation takes place! Ibn Hanbal was however more considerate to his adherents allowing for a man to ejaculate whilst fasting, providing the deed is achieved via masturbation, and to this end he can do it himself, or seek the help of his wife or a small child! Is this is not evidence that Ibn Hanbal was endorsing paedophilia? Would any decent man (Muslim or Non Muslim) find it appropriate to use a child for sexual stimulation? If we put together these type of fatwas one shudders to think of the image of these great Salaf, entering the war whilst fasting, their buttocks exposed, having sex with melons at the ready. This image would have terrified the opposition!

      (4) Fourth example of Sunni morality –
      A SALAFI WOMAN CAN SUCKLE A SALAFI MAN WITH A BEARD

      We read in Sahih Muslim Hadith Number 3426:
      Ibn Abu Mulaika reported that al-Qasim b. Muhammad b. Abu Bakr had narrated to him that ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail b. ‘Amr came to Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Messenger of Allah, Salim (the freed slave of Abu Hudhaifa) is living with us in our house, and he has attained (puberty) as men attain it and has acquired knowledge (of the sex problems) as men acquire, whereupon he said: Suckle him so that he may become unlawful (in regard to marriage) for you He (Ibn Abu Mulaika) said: I refrained from (narrating this hadith) for a year or so on account of fear. I then met al-Qasim and said to him: You narrated to me a hadith which I did not narrate (to anyone) afterwards. He said: What is that? I informed him, whereupon he said: Narrate it on my authority that ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) had narrated that to me.

      COMMENT:

      This reference is especially for Dr Salamah who has accused the Shi’a of being filthy proponents of Mut’ah, what right do you have to attack us when have the above Fatwa of Ayesha allowing your women to suckle men with beards so as to make them mahram? How many pubescent Salafi men has your mother suckled so that they can enter your house? When your madhab allows your mothers / daughters to breast feed men with beards what gives you the right to attack the practice of Mut’ah? If today any Nasibi tries to suggest that this practice no longer exists in their school and it was only Ayesha who had issued the fatwa then we shall present the thoughts of their Imam Ibn Tamiyah as quoted by one of the revered scholars of Salafies Ibn Uthaimeen:
      واختار شيخ الإسلام ابن تيميه رحمه الله التفصيل وقال إذا دعت الحاجة إلى إرضاع الكبير وأرضع ثبت التحريم
      “Sheikh ul-Islam ibn Taymia (may Allah’s mercy be upon him) chosed to explain in details and said that if the breast suckling by an adult was necessary and he suckled, then the prohibition (of marriage) is established.”
      Fatawa Nur Ala Aldarb, Volume 10 page 204
      Imam Ibn Hazm records:
      ورضاع الكبير محرم ولو انه شيخ يحرم كما يحرم رضاع الصغير
      “The breast suckling by an adult prohibits (marriage) even if he is an old man just like it prohibits (marriage) in the case of suckling by a child”
      Al-Muhala, Volume 10 page 17

      Now compare this morality to the comments of a contemporary Salafi scholar from “Islamic Fatawa Regarding Women” compiled by Muhammed al-Musnad and translated by Jamal Zarabozo. In Chapter 19, Questions of a Miscellaneous Nature under the sub heading Ruling Concerning Women Driving Automobiles’, Imam of the Salafi Nasibi Shaykh bin Baz stated:

      There have been numerous questions concerning the ruling of women driving automobiles. The response is the following:

      There is no doubt that such is not allowed. Women driving leads to many evils and negative consequences. Included among these is her mixing with men without her being on her guard. It also leads to the evil sins due to which such an action is forbidden. The Pure Law forbids those acts that lead to forbidden acts and considers those means to be forbidden also. Allah has ordered the wives of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the women of the believers to remain in their houses, to wear hijab and not to display their adornments to non-mahram males as that leads to promiscuity that overruns a society.

      Now on the one side these moralistic Salafi have this kind of fatawa prohibiting their women from (Allah forbid) driving a car as this may cause promiscuity, and on the other hand they deem it permissible for their women to suckle men with beards! Women driving ‘leads to many evils and negative consequences’, but if the same women were to remain at home suckling men with beards, that’s fine!

      (5) Fifth example of Sunni morality –
      BESTIALITY CAN BE PERFORMED DURING HAJJ

      Sunni Imam Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H) records in his authority work ‘Badaye al-Sanae’ Volume 2 page 216:

      ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه
      “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal that will not make his hajj void”

      (6) Sixth example of Sunni morality –
      PEDOPHILIA, BESTIALITY & NECROPHILIA CAN BE PERFORMED WHILST ONE IS FASTING

      In Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603:
      “It was narrated by Ahmed that a man came to him that feared that he would ejaculate while he was fasting. Ahmed said: “What I see is that he can release semen without ruining the fast, he can masturbate using his hands or the hands of his wife, If he has an “Ammah” whether be it a girl or a little child, she can masturbate for him using her hands, and if she was a non-believer, he can sleep with her without releasing (his semen), if he released it in her, it becomes impermissible”.
      Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603

      Not to be hard done by, the Hanafi’s follow suit. In Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820, the learned Hanafi scholar Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan sets out those acts that do not invalidate one’s fast, and he includes:

      “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”
      Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820

      COMMENT:

      What can we say about such Fatwas of morality? Fasting in Islam, is viewed as a means via which a believer purifies himself, via self-discipline, he dedicates that time to the remembrance of Allah (swt) and keeps aloof from sinful thoughts and acts. That is the theory, but the Hanbali and Hanafi madhab allows a man (whilst fasting) to have sex with kaffir women, animals, and dead people, the only proviso being that no ejaculation takes place! Ibn Hanbal was however more considerate to his adherents allowing for a man to ejaculate whilst fasting, providing the deed is achieved via masturbation, and to this end he can do it himself, or seek the help of his wife or a small child! Is this is not evidence that Ibn Hanbal was endorsing paedophilia? Would any decent man (Muslim or Non Muslim) find it appropriate to use a child for sexual stimulation? If we put together these type of fatwas one shudders to think of the image of these great Salaf, entering the war whilst fasting, their buttocks exposed, having sex with melons at the ready. This image would have terrified the opposition!

      ANIMAL LOVING MUSLIMS: ISLAM & ZOOPHILIA

      Pakistan has banned content on more than a dozen websites because of “offensive” and “blasphemous” material, while they themselves rank No. 1 for certain sex-related search terms, including “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.[1]

      IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD

      AFGHANISTAN

      In a society where homosexuals and adulterers are stoned to death for “sexual immorality” you would expect a similar outcome for someone caught having sex with an animal. Surprisingly this is not the case.
      An Afghan soldier was detained by police after being caught having sex with a donkey in southeastern Afghanistan, a police officer told AFP.
      The soldier was discovered with the donkey in an abandoned house in a small village of Gardez, the capital of Paktia province, last week, a local police officer said.
      “He was caught in the act by a small boy who immediately told police about what he had seen and police arrested him in action,” the Gardez-based officer told AFP, requesting anonymity.
      The soldier claimed he committed the act because he did not have enough money to get married.
      After being caught with the donkey in a village about 100km south of the capital Kabul, he was jailed for four days and then released without charge.
      According to tradition in south and southeastern Afghanistan, a suitor must pay around $US5,000 ($A6,800) to the parents of the girl he wishes to marry.
      Soldier caught with his pants down
      The Age, March 16, 2004
      Could it be that the soldier was released without charge because there is nothing in the Qur’an that prohibits bestiality?

      PALESTINE

      In 1923, the Director of Health in the British Mandate government in Palestine sent out a questionnaire to his Principal Medical and Health Officers in the country, asking them to report on various sexual practices and attitudes among the Muslim Arab population.
      As a result, the British discovered that the Muslim Arabs engaged in bestiality.
      The Nablus officer finds sodomy and “similar vices” “not uncommon in some of the towns but less so in the villages where…bestiality is by no mean unknown” and “immorality…rather lightly regarded” in those villages that are closer to the larger towns. He comments, “in the villages there seems to be curiously little feeling against bestiality which I have heard admitted in a very airy way on more than one occasion. Sodomy is considered disgraceful but not I think more so than ordinary immorality” (III).

      “Unnatural Vices” or Unnatural Rule? The Case of a Sex Questionnaire and the British Mandate
      Ellen L. Fleischmann, Jerusalem Quarterly File, Issue 10, 2000

      PAKISTAN

      In Southern Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh and Balochistan, sex with animals is a common practice among rural youths and considered a rite of passage into adulthood.
      In southern Punjab, much of NWFP, Sindh and Balochistan sodomy and bestiality are common among rural youths. In fact, he caught two boys trying to rape a goat in the vicinity of the mazar of Hazrat Sultan Bahu. The punishment meted out to them was 10 blows with a chhittar (shoe) each on their butts. They protested however that in many rural areas having sex with an animal was considered a rite of passage on the way to becoming full members of the male society!

      Desegregation of the sexes and promiscuity
      Ishtiaq Ahmed (associate professor of political science at Stockholm University), Daily Times, June 27, 2006

      DONKEY KILLED AFTER BEING RAPED

      In June 2011, a male who was caught having sex with another man’s donkey was fined Rs 50,000. This fine was not imposed for having sex with an animal, but for committing adultery. The raped donkey was labelled a ‘kari’ (an adultress) and eventually honor killed by its owner.

      Incredible though it may sound, a donkey was declared ‘Kari’ and shot dead here in a remote area on Monday. The Jirga imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the alleged ‘Karo’.
      The reports said that in Village Ghahi Khan Jatoi, a villager Ghazi Khan alias Malang shot dead his donkey on being ‘Kari’ with Sikandar Ali alias Deedo. He attempted to kill Sikander too but the alleged Karo managed to escape and surrendered himself to an influential person of the area.
      Sources said the influential person summoned both the parties and imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the Karo. They said Sikander and his family were forced to pay Rs 50,000 on the spot and the remaining amount in two installments.
      The sources added that the alleged Karo pleaded innocence at the Jirga, but the Jirga members paid no attention to it. Sikander’s family said he paid Rs 50,000 to save his life otherwise he would have been killed.
      Donkey declared ‘Kari’ killed

      The News International, July 19, 2011
      Pakistan ranks number 1 for such varied search terms as “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.

      The Muslim country, which has banned content on at least 17 websites to block offensive and blasphemous material, is the world’s leader in online searches for pornographic material
      . . .
      Google ranks Pakistan No. 1 in the world in searches for pornographic terms, outranking every other country in the world in searches per person for certain sex-related content.
      Pakistan is top dog in searches per-person for “horse sex” since 2004, “donkey sex” since 2007, “rape pictures” between 2004 and 2009, “rape sex” since 2004, “child sex” between 2004 and 2007 and since 2009, “animal sex” since 2004 and “dog sex” since 2005, according to Google Trends and Google Insights, features of Google that generate data based on popular search terms.
      The country also is tops — or has been No. 1 — in searches for “sex,” “camel sex,” “rape video,” “child sex video” and some other searches that can’t be printed here.
      No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan
      Kelli Morgan, Fox News, July 13, 2010

      OTHER COUNTRIES & BESTIALITY — RELATED SEARCHES

      Pakistani Muslims are not alone in their search for porn.
      Google, the world’s most popular Internet search engine, has found in a survey that mostly Muslim states seek access to sex-related websites and Pakistan tops the list. Google found that of the top 10 countries – searching for sex-related sites – six were Muslim, with Pakistan on the top. The other Muslim countries are Egypt at number 2, Iran at 4, Morocco at 5, Saudi Arabia at 7 and Turkey at 8. Non-Muslim states are Vietnam at 3, India at 6, Philippines at 9 and Poland at 10.

      PAKISTAN MOST SEX STARVED

      Khalid Hasan, Daily Times, May 17, 2006
      Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
      Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
      Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
      Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
      Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
      Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
      Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
      Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
      Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
      Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
      Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
      Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
      Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
      Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

      MIDDLE EAST

      Bestiality is common among boys of tribal Arab cultures.
      Miner and DeVos (1960) comment that amongst Arab tribal cultures, “Bestiality with goats, sheep, or camels provides another outlet. These practices are not approved but they are recognized as common among boys.” Havelock-Ellis [note 52] states “The Arabs, according to Kocher, chiefly practice bestiality with goats, sheep and mares. The Annamites, according to Mondiere, commonly employ sows and (more especially the young women) dogs.”
      Historical And Cultural Perspectives On Zoophilia
      Serving History
      There is also a certain saying which remains popular among the Arabs:
      The Arabs have never taken quite so condemnatory an attitude towards the practice, and indeed a popular Arab saying had it that

      “The pilgrimage to Mecca is not complete without copulating with the camel.”[9]

      SUDAN

      In February 2006, a man caught having sex with a neighbor’s goat was not punished, but ordered by the council of elders to pay the neighbor a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) and marry the animal because he “used it as his wife”.
      A Sudanese man has been forced to take a goat as his “wife”, after he was caught having sex with the animal.
      The goat’s owner, Mr Alifi, said he surprised the man with his goat and took him to a council of elders.
      They ordered the man, Mr Tombe, to pay a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) to Mr Alifi.
      “We have given him the goat, and as far as we know they are still together,” Mr Alifi said.
      Sudan man forced to ‘marry’ goat
      BBC News, February 24,2006

      MOROCCO
      Morocco is an Islamic country, with 98.7% of the population Muslims.[10] The following is taken from a paper on sexuality in Morocco written by Nadia Kadiri, M.D., and Abderrazak Moussaïd, M.D., with Abdelkrim Tirraf, M.D., and Abdallah Jadid, M.D. Translated by Raymond J. Noonan, Ph.D., and Sandra Almeida.[11]
      In the rural world, zoophilia is still very widespread and not blameworthy. With masturbation, it constitutes an obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality.
      The operative phrase is ‘obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality’. Obligatory. It means in rural Morocco, Muslim males must have sexual intercourse with animals as part of their sexual apprenticeship.
      Also according to the scholars Allen Edwardes and Robert Masters, Ph.D, FAACS, the Muslims of Morocco believe that sexual intercourse with donkeys “make the penis grow big and strong” and masturbation is often scorned by them in favor of bestiality.[12]

      SLAMIC SCRIPTURE

      The above paper also says “it is prohibited without question by the Shariâ”. But is this alleged prohibition within the Shari’ah extracted (as it must be) from the Qur’an and Hadith, or has this fiqh been derived using external non-Islamic sources?

      QURAN

      In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur’an has to say on the subject:
      That’s right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur’an’s clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’
      If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.[13]

      HADITH

      There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. The following hadith is taken from the Sunnah Abu-Dawud collection, not Bukari or Muslim.
      Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.
      Abu Dawud 38:4449
      Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? And it is. Just look at the very next hadith.
      Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
      Abu Dawud 38:4450
      This is a very clear contradiction. How can one hadith say kill the person committing bestiality, and the very next one say there is no prescribed punishment for the same person? Both statements cannot be true.
      What’s worse; these two contradictory hadiths (transmitted through different isnad) have been attributed to the same person. Abu Dawud himself had said the former of the two hadith is “not strong” and the latter further “weakens” it.[14]
      From the above, we can gather that Robert Masters had correctly stated, “bestiality was not specifically prohibited by the Prophet,”[9] so there is little wonder that Islamists generally shy away from mentioning Abu Dawud 38:4449 in their pronouncements on bestiality.

      • Lucky bin Catholic Satan,

        John 13:16 -Jesus says : “he(Jesus) is NOT greater than GOD” : That is in agreement with the Quran.

        Isaiah 42:8 (KJV):” I am the Lord : that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images”.

        GOD says : He will NOT give HIS Glory to ANYBODY nor should there be any Idol worship in HIS name!

        The Quran says there is ONLY ONE GOD!

        Islam does NOT have hotch-potchs as the Catholics want the world to believe. Their anti Islam sites, like MEMRI.TV even go to the extent of uploading “PLANTED” videos, showing underage girls’ forced marriages. Those videos ARE fake!. Why are the Catholics so much against Islam?? I think EVERY Muslim should know that the actual enemy of Islam IS the bogus cult called Catholicism!

        Catholicism IS the most BOGUS religion on this planet! It venerates Saints and Jesus in IDOL form when Exodus 20:3 clearly says : “Do NOT make any graven IMAGES..” IT goes against the very foundation of Christianity in that it adopts the rule of TRINITY, which is NOWHERE mentioned in the Bible.

        Their Churches are the MOST corrupt and world leaders in child molestations! The Church even beheaded their founding dude, called Saul bin Paul bin Liar and NEVER gave him a resting place within the Church after his slaying. Why?

        Why are the Catholics so much against Islam when they themselves(Catholics) believe in the MOST BOGUS religion in the world???????

        • YO GOATBOY & MONKEY MUTT,

          BUGGING YOUR WIFE?

          A RIGHT PAIN IN THE ARSE!

          Distortion committed by Bukhari whilst copying down a tradition in his ‘Sahih’ pertaining to the legitimacy of sodomy

          We read in the Holy Quran:

          Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will (Yusufali, 2:223).
          In various Sunni works we read that testimony of Abdullah Ibn Umar regarding the reason for the revelation of the said verse qua legitimacy of performing buggery on one’s wife. Hafiz Jalaluddin Suyuuti for example recorded in Tafseer Durre Manthur, Volume 1 page 638:
          وأخرج الحسن بن سفيان في مسنده والطبراني في الأوسط والحاكم وأبو نعيم في المستخرج بسند حسن عن ابن عمر قال‏:‏ إنما نزلت على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏{‏نساؤكم حرث لكم‏.‏‏.‏‏.‏‏}‏ الآية‏.‏ رخصة في إتيان الدبر‏.‏
          Hasan bin Sufiyan in his Musnad, Tabarani in Al-Awsat, Hakim and Abu Naeem in Al-Mastakhraj with a ‘Hasan’ chain of narration narrated from Ibn Umar who said: ‘This verse was revealed upon the Holy Prophet (s) in respect of the permissibility of performing sex in the anus of a woman’
          Curiously, when it came to the great Imam Bukhari, he felt compelled to record the statement of Abdullah Ibn Umar in an incomplete manner. We read in Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 50:

          Narrated Nafi’: Whenever Ibn ‘Umar recited the Qur’an, he would not speak to anyone till he had finished his recitation. Once I held the Qur’an and he recited Surat-al-Baqara from his memory and then stopped at a certain Verse and said, “Do you know in what connection this Verse was revealed? ” I replied, “No.” He said, “It was revealed in such-and-such connection.” Ibn ‘Umar then resumed his recitation. Nafi added regarding the Verse:–”So go to your tilth when or how you will” Ibn ‘Umar said, “It means one should approach his wife in ..”

          ‘In’ what? Of course IN her anus and whilst Hafiz Jalaluddin Suyuti and other famed Sunni scholars recorded this fact, it was Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani who filled in the blanks whilst commenting on the cited tradition of Bukhari:
          في إتيان المرأة في دبرها
          “Approach the woman in her anus”

          Fatah ul Bari Sharah Sahih Bukhari, Volume 8 page 190
          Imam Bukhari has recorded this tradition in his ‘Sahih’ with the following chain of narration:
          Ishaq (bin Rehwiya) – Nadar – Ibn Aun – Nnaf’i
          Now the most interesting part is that Bukhari actually copied down the above statement of Abdullah Ibn Umar from his Shaykh, namely Ishaq bin Rehwiya as mentioned by Ibn Hajar Asqalani:
          فقد أخرجها إسحاق ابن راهويه في مسنده وفي تفسيره بالإسناد المذكور ، وقال بدل قوله حتى انتهى إلى مكان ” حتى انتهى إلى قوله نساؤكم حرث لكم فأتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم فقال : أتدرون فيما أنزلت هذه الآية ؟ قلت لا . قال : نزلت في إتيان النساء في أدبارهن
          Ishaq bin Raheweh recorded it in his Musnad and his Tafsir with the same chain, when it reached the part “your wives are tilth to you, so go to your tilth anyhow you will” he said: ‘Do you know what for this verse has been revealed about?’ They said: ‘No’. He replied: ‘It has been revealed in regards to approaching women in their anuses’

          Interestingly whilst citing the said tradition verbatim Bukhari committed deception and did not quote the words of his Shaykh opting to leave a blank, in the hope that the attention plan of his readers would be short enough to confuse them and direct them to the next narration.

          (2) Second example of Sunni morality:
          SUNNI ‘ULAMA LEGITIMISED THE USE OF DILDOS (FEMALE SEX TOYS)

          After this ingenious fatwa, Ibn Qayyim then goes on to make permissible the use of a dildoe by women. It is only logical; when the husbands leave to go masturbate and spread Islam by the sword, they need something to do with themselves. On the same page as quoted above, Ibn Qayyim writes:
          “If a woman does not have a husband, and her lust becomes strong, then some of our scholars say: It is permissible for the woman to take an akranbij, which is a piece of leather worked until it becomes shaped like a penis, and insert it in herself. She may also use a cucumber”.

          COMMENT:

          Now, according to Dr. Salamah’s logic, the Saudi government should therefore purchase a large number of such dildos, and distribute them to old widows or otherwise unattractive women who cannot marry. Since anything that is permissible, according to Dr. Salamah, requires stand sanction and support, than clearly a dildoe distribution office needs to be immediately established in the great Islamic state of Saudi Arabia.
          Maybe this is another reason why ‘Umar the Khalifa never went on jihad: somebody had to stay behind and organize the cucumber distribution.

          (3) Third example of Sunni morality –
          PEDOPHILIA, BESTIALITY & NECROPHILIA CAN BE PERFORMED WHILST ONE IS FASTING

          In Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603:
          “It was narrated by Ahmed that a man came to him that feared that he would ejaculate while he was fasting. Ahmed said: “What I see is that he can release semen without ruining the fast, he can masturbate using his hands or the hands of his wife, If he has an “Ammah” whether be it a girl or a little child, she can masturbate for him using her hands, and if she was a non-believer, he can sleep with her without releasing (his semen), if he released it in her, it becomes impermissible”.
          Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603
          Not to be hard done by, the Hanafi’s follow suit. In Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820, the learned Hanafi scholar Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan sets out those acts that do not invalidate one’s fast, and he includes:
          “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”
          Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820

          COMMENT:

          What can we say about such Fatwas of morality? Fasting in Islam, is viewed as a means via which a believer purifies himself, via self-discipline, he dedicates that time to the remembrance of Allah (swt) and keeps aloof from sinful thoughts and acts. That is the theory, but the Hanbali and Hanafi madhab allows a man (whilst fasting) to have sex with kaffir women, animals, and dead people, the only proviso being that no ejaculation takes place! Ibn Hanbal was however more considerate to his adherents allowing for a man to ejaculate whilst fasting, providing the deed is achieved via masturbation, and to this end he can do it himself, or seek the help of his wife or a small child! Is this is not evidence that Ibn Hanbal was endorsing paedophilia? Would any decent man (Muslim or Non Muslim) find it appropriate to use a child for sexual stimulation? If we put together these type of fatwas one shudders to think of the image of these great Salaf, entering the war whilst fasting, their buttocks exposed, having sex with melons at the ready. This image would have terrified the opposition!

          (4) Fourth example of Sunni morality –
          A SALAFI WOMAN CAN SUCKLE A SALAFI MAN WITH A BEARD

          We read in Sahih Muslim Hadith Number 3426:
          Ibn Abu Mulaika reported that al-Qasim b. Muhammad b. Abu Bakr had narrated to him that ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail b. ‘Amr came to Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Messenger of Allah, Salim (the freed slave of Abu Hudhaifa) is living with us in our house, and he has attained (puberty) as men attain it and has acquired knowledge (of the sex problems) as men acquire, whereupon he said: Suckle him so that he may become unlawful (in regard to marriage) for you He (Ibn Abu Mulaika) said: I refrained from (narrating this hadith) for a year or so on account of fear. I then met al-Qasim and said to him: You narrated to me a hadith which I did not narrate (to anyone) afterwards. He said: What is that? I informed him, whereupon he said: Narrate it on my authority that ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) had narrated that to me.

          COMMENT:

          This reference is especially for Dr Salamah who has accused the Shi’a of being filthy proponents of Mut’ah, what right do you have to attack us when have the above Fatwa of Ayesha allowing your women to suckle men with beards so as to make them mahram? How many pubescent Salafi men has your mother suckled so that they can enter your house? When your madhab allows your mothers / daughters to breast feed men with beards what gives you the right to attack the practice of Mut’ah? If today any Nasibi tries to suggest that this practice no longer exists in their school and it was only Ayesha who had issued the fatwa then we shall present the thoughts of their Imam Ibn Tamiyah as quoted by one of the revered scholars of Salafies Ibn Uthaimeen:
          واختار شيخ الإسلام ابن تيميه رحمه الله التفصيل وقال إذا دعت الحاجة إلى إرضاع الكبير وأرضع ثبت التحريم
          “Sheikh ul-Islam ibn Taymia (may Allah’s mercy be upon him) chosed to explain in details and said that if the breast suckling by an adult was necessary and he suckled, then the prohibition (of marriage) is established.”
          Fatawa Nur Ala Aldarb, Volume 10 page 204
          Imam Ibn Hazm records:
          ورضاع الكبير محرم ولو انه شيخ يحرم كما يحرم رضاع الصغير
          “The breast suckling by an adult prohibits (marriage) even if he is an old man just like it prohibits (marriage) in the case of suckling by a child”
          Al-Muhala, Volume 10 page 17

          Now compare this morality to the comments of a contemporary Salafi scholar from “Islamic Fatawa Regarding Women” compiled by Muhammed al-Musnad and translated by Jamal Zarabozo. In Chapter 19, Questions of a Miscellaneous Nature under the sub heading Ruling Concerning Women Driving Automobiles’, Imam of the Salafi Nasibi Shaykh bin Baz stated:

          There have been numerous questions concerning the ruling of women driving automobiles. The response is the following:

          There is no doubt that such is not allowed. Women driving leads to many evils and negative consequences. Included among these is her mixing with men without her being on her guard. It also leads to the evil sins due to which such an action is forbidden. The Pure Law forbids those acts that lead to forbidden acts and considers those means to be forbidden also. Allah has ordered the wives of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the women of the believers to remain in their houses, to wear hijab and not to display their adornments to non-mahram males as that leads to promiscuity that overruns a society.

          Now on the one side these moralistic Salafi have this kind of fatawa prohibiting their women from (Allah forbid) driving a car as this may cause promiscuity, and on the other hand they deem it permissible for their women to suckle men with beards! Women driving ‘leads to many evils and negative consequences’, but if the same women were to remain at home suckling men with beards, that’s fine!

          (5) Fifth example of Sunni morality –
          BESTIALITY CAN BE PERFORMED DURING HAJJ

          Sunni Imam Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H) records in his authority work ‘Badaye al-Sanae’ Volume 2 page 216:

          ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه
          “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal that will not make his hajj void”

          (6) Sixth example of Sunni morality –
          PEDOPHILIA, BESTIALITY & NECROPHILIA CAN BE PERFORMED WHILST ONE IS FASTING

          In Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603:
          “It was narrated by Ahmed that a man came to him that feared that he would ejaculate while he was fasting. Ahmed said: “What I see is that he can release semen without ruining the fast, he can masturbate using his hands or the hands of his wife, If he has an “Ammah” whether be it a girl or a little child, she can masturbate for him using her hands, and if she was a non-believer, he can sleep with her without releasing (his semen), if he released it in her, it becomes impermissible”.
          Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603

          Not to be hard done by, the Hanafi’s follow suit. In Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820, the learned Hanafi scholar Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan sets out those acts that do not invalidate one’s fast, and he includes:

          “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”
          Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820

          COMMENT:

          What can we say about such Fatwas of morality? Fasting in Islam, is viewed as a means via which a believer purifies himself, via self-discipline, he dedicates that time to the remembrance of Allah (swt) and keeps aloof from sinful thoughts and acts. That is the theory, but the Hanbali and Hanafi madhab allows a man (whilst fasting) to have sex with kaffir women, animals, and dead people, the only proviso being that no ejaculation takes place! Ibn Hanbal was however more considerate to his adherents allowing for a man to ejaculate whilst fasting, providing the deed is achieved via masturbation, and to this end he can do it himself, or seek the help of his wife or a small child! Is this is not evidence that Ibn Hanbal was endorsing paedophilia? Would any decent man (Muslim or Non Muslim) find it appropriate to use a child for sexual stimulation? If we put together these type of fatwas one shudders to think of the image of these great Salaf, entering the war whilst fasting, their buttocks exposed, having sex with melons at the ready. This image would have terrified the opposition!

          ANIMAL LOVING MUSLIMS:

          ISLAM & ZOOPHILIA

          Pakistan has banned content on more than a dozen websites because of “offensive” and “blasphemous” material, while they themselves rank No. 1 for certain sex-related search terms, including “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.[1]

          IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD

          AFGHANISTAN

          In a society where homosexuals and adulterers are stoned to death for “sexual immorality” you would expect a similar outcome for someone caught having sex with an animal. Surprisingly this is not the case.
          An Afghan soldier was detained by police after being caught having sex with a donkey in southeastern Afghanistan, a police officer told AFP.
          The soldier was discovered with the donkey in an abandoned house in a small village of Gardez, the capital of Paktia province, last week, a local police officer said.
          “He was caught in the act by a small boy who immediately told police about what he had seen and police arrested him in action,” the Gardez-based officer told AFP, requesting anonymity.
          The soldier claimed he committed the act because he did not have enough money to get married.
          After being caught with the donkey in a village about 100km south of the capital Kabul, he was jailed for four days and then released without charge.
          According to tradition in south and southeastern Afghanistan, a suitor must pay around $US5,000 ($A6,800) to the parents of the girl he wishes to marry.
          Soldier caught with his pants down
          The Age, March 16, 2004
          Could it be that the soldier was released without charge because there is nothing in the Qur’an that prohibits bestiality?
          PALESTINE

          In 1923, the Director of Health in the British Mandate government in Palestine sent out a questionnaire to his Principal Medical and Health Officers in the country, asking them to report on various sexual practices and attitudes among the Muslim Arab population.
          As a result, the British discovered that the Muslim Arabs engaged in bestiality.
          The Nablus officer finds sodomy and “similar vices” “not uncommon in some of the towns but less so in the villages where…bestiality is by no mean unknown” and “immorality…rather lightly regarded” in those villages that are closer to the larger towns. He comments, “in the villages there seems to be curiously little feeling against bestiality which I have heard admitted in a very airy way on more than one occasion. Sodomy is considered disgraceful but not I think more so than ordinary immorality” (III).

          “Unnatural Vices” or Unnatural Rule? The Case of a Sex Questionnaire and the British Mandate
          Ellen L. Fleischmann, Jerusalem Quarterly File, Issue 10, 2000

          PAKISTAN

          In Southern Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh and Balochistan, sex with animals is a common practice among rural youths and considered a rite of passage into adulthood.
          In southern Punjab, much of NWFP, Sindh and Balochistan sodomy and bestiality are common among rural youths. In fact, he caught two boys trying to rape a goat in the vicinity of the mazar of Hazrat Sultan Bahu. The punishment meted out to them was 10 blows with a chhittar (shoe) each on their butts. They protested however that in many rural areas having sex with an animal was considered a rite of passage on the way to becoming full members of the male society!

          Desegregation of the sexes and promiscuity
          Ishtiaq Ahmed (associate professor of political science at Stockholm University), Daily Times, June 27, 2006

          DONKEY KILLED AFTER BEING RAPED

          In June 2011, a male who was caught having sex with another man’s donkey was fined Rs 50,000. This fine was not imposed for having sex with an animal, but for committing adultery. The raped donkey was labelled a ‘kari’ (an adultress) and eventually honor killed by its owner.

          Incredible though it may sound, a donkey was declared ‘Kari’ and shot dead here in a remote area on Monday. The Jirga imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the alleged ‘Karo’.
          The reports said that in Village Ghahi Khan Jatoi, a villager Ghazi Khan alias Malang shot dead his donkey on being ‘Kari’ with Sikandar Ali alias Deedo. He attempted to kill Sikander too but the alleged Karo managed to escape and surrendered himself to an influential person of the area.
          Sources said the influential person summoned both the parties and imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the Karo. They said Sikander and his family were forced to pay Rs 50,000 on the spot and the remaining amount in two installments.
          The sources added that the alleged Karo pleaded innocence at the Jirga, but the Jirga members paid no attention to it. Sikander’s family said he paid Rs 50,000 to save his life otherwise he would have been killed.
          Donkey declared ‘Kari’ killed

          The News International, July 19, 2011
          Pakistan ranks number 1 for such varied search terms as “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.

          The Muslim country, which has banned content on at least 17 websites to block offensive and blasphemous material, is the world’s leader in online searches for pornographic material
          . . .
          Google ranks Pakistan No. 1 in the world in searches for pornographic terms, outranking every other country in the world in searches per person for certain sex-related content.
          Pakistan is top dog in searches per-person for “horse sex” since 2004, “donkey sex” since 2007, “rape pictures” between 2004 and 2009, “rape sex” since 2004, “child sex” between 2004 and 2007 and since 2009, “animal sex” since 2004 and “dog sex” since 2005, according to Google Trends and Google Insights, features of Google that generate data based on popular search terms.
          The country also is tops — or has been No. 1 — in searches for “sex,” “camel sex,” “rape video,” “child sex video” and some other searches that can’t be printed here.
          No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan
          Kelli Morgan, Fox News, July 13, 2010

          OTHER COUNTRIES & BESTIALITY — RELATED SEARCHES

          Pakistani Muslims are not alone in their search for porn.
          Google, the world’s most popular Internet search engine, has found in a survey that mostly Muslim states seek access to sex-related websites and Pakistan tops the list. Google found that of the top 10 countries – searching for sex-related sites – six were Muslim, with Pakistan on the top. The other Muslim countries are Egypt at number 2, Iran at 4, Morocco at 5, Saudi Arabia at 7 and Turkey at 8. Non-Muslim states are Vietnam at 3, India at 6, Philippines at 9 and Poland at 10.

          PAKISTAN MOST SEX STARVED

          Khalid Hasan, Daily Times, May 17, 2006
          Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
          Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
          Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
          Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
          Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
          Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
          Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
          Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
          Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
          Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
          Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
          Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
          Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
          Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

          MIDDLE EAST

          Bestiality is common among boys of tribal Arab cultures.
          Miner and DeVos (1960) comment that amongst Arab tribal cultures, “Bestiality with goats, sheep, or camels provides another outlet. These practices are not approved but they are recognized as common among boys.” Havelock-Ellis [note 52] states “The Arabs, according to Kocher, chiefly practice bestiality with goats, sheep and mares. The Annamites, according to Mondiere, commonly employ sows and (more especially the young women) dogs.”
          Historical And Cultural Perspectives On Zoophilia
          Serving History
          There is also a certain saying which remains popular among the Arabs:
          The Arabs have never taken quite so condemnatory an attitude towards the practice, and indeed a popular Arab saying had it that

          “The pilgrimage to Mecca is not complete without copulating with the camel.”[9]

          SUDAN

          In February 2006, a man caught having sex with a neighbor’s goat was not punished, but ordered by the council of elders to pay the neighbor a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) and marry the animal because he “used it as his wife”.
          A Sudanese man has been forced to take a goat as his “wife”, after he was caught having sex with the animal.
          The goat’s owner, Mr Alifi, said he surprised the man with his goat and took him to a council of elders.
          They ordered the man, Mr Tombe, to pay a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) to Mr Alifi.
          “We have given him the goat, and as far as we know they are still together,” Mr Alifi said.
          Sudan man forced to ‘marry’ goat
          BBC News, February 24,2006

          MOROCCO
          Morocco is an Islamic country, with 98.7% of the population Muslims.[10] The following is taken from a paper on sexuality in Morocco written by Nadia Kadiri, M.D., and Abderrazak Moussaïd, M.D., with Abdelkrim Tirraf, M.D., and Abdallah Jadid, M.D. Translated by Raymond J. Noonan, Ph.D., and Sandra Almeida.[11]
          In the rural world, zoophilia is still very widespread and not blameworthy. With masturbation, it constitutes an obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality.
          The operative phrase is ‘obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality’. Obligatory. It means in rural Morocco, Muslim males must have sexual intercourse with animals as part of their sexual apprenticeship.
          Also according to the scholars Allen Edwardes and Robert Masters, Ph.D, FAACS, the Muslims of Morocco believe that sexual intercourse with donkeys “make the penis grow big and strong” and masturbation is often scorned by them in favor of bestiality.[12]

          SLAMIC SCRIPTURE

          The above paper also says “it is prohibited without question by the Shariâ”. But is this alleged prohibition within the Shari’ah extracted (as it must be) from the Qur’an and Hadith, or has this fiqh been derived using external non-Islamic sources?

          QURAN

          In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur’an has to say on the subject:
          That’s right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur’an’s clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’
          If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.[13]

          HADITH

          There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. The following hadith is taken from the Sunnah Abu-Dawud collection, not Bukari or Muslim.
          Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.
          Abu Dawud 38:4449
          Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? And it is. Just look at the very next hadith.
          Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
          Abu Dawud 38:4450
          This is a very clear contradiction. How can one hadith say kill the person committing bestiality, and the very next one say there is no prescribed punishment for the same person? Both statements cannot be true.
          What’s worse; these two contradictory hadiths (transmitted through different isnad) have been attributed to the same person. Abu Dawud himself had said the former of the two hadith is “not strong” and the latter further “weakens” it.[14]
          From the above, we can gather that Robert Masters had correctly stated, “bestiality was not specifically prohibited by the Prophet,”[9] so there is little wonder that Islamists generally shy away from mentioning Abu Dawud 38:4449 in their pronouncements on bestiality.

          • Lucky bin Satan, you believe in Nazarene Church? But it was established recently, some 130 years ago!

            The Nazarenes believe that he Bible is the divinely inspired Word of God. The Old and New Testaments contain all the truth needed for faithful Christian living.

            But the Bible is a collection of Jewish traditions, poems and mythos. Does the Bible say anywhere that it is the WORD of God????

          • Lucky bin Satan, why do you constantly talk of dirty homoship, brute?

            It is the dirtiest topic and we have other better things to do than read your crap!

            You Satan, don’t you have any other things that contradicts Quran??

            Why do ONLY Catholics oppose Islam, when they themselves do NOT follow the teachings of the BIBLE?

            1. STONING Verse in the BIBLE…but NOWHERE in the QURAN
            Deuteronomy 22:23-24 “you shall bring them both out of the gate of the city and there stone them to death”. So why don’t the Christians stone their adulterer pastors to death?

            2. MUTAH in the Bible but NOWHERE in the Quran!
            Deuteronomy 21:10-14 : After she has mourned her father and mother for a full month, you may have relations with her, and you shall be her husband and she shall be your wife. However, if later on you lose your liking for her, you shall give her her freedom, if she wishes it; but you shall not sell her or enslave her, since she was married to you under compulsion.”

            3. RAPE in the Bible BUT NOWHERE in the Quran!
            Judges 5:30 They must be dividing the spoils they took: there must be a damsel or two for each man.
            Also refer : Judges 21:10-24; Deuteronomy 20:10-14

            4. SEX SLAVERY and DISCRIMINATION in the Bible but NOWHERE in the Quran:
            Exodus 21:7 : When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not PLEASE the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again.

            5. GOD PREDICTS THE THIRD WORLD WAR!
            Zechariah 14:1-2 And I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem for battle: the city shall be taken, houses plundered, women ravished.

            6. INCEST in the BIBLE but NOWHERE in the Quran!:
            Exodus 6 :19-20 : 20 And Amram took to wife Jochabed his AUNT by the father’s side: and she bore him Aaron and Moses!!!
            Genesis 19:31-36 : And the elder said to the younger Our father is old, and there is no man left on the earth, to come in unto us after the manner of the whole earth. Come, let us make him drunk with wine, and let us lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. And they made their father drink wine that night: and the elder went in and lay with her father: but he perceived not neither when his daughter lay down, nor when she rose up. And the next day the elder said to the younger: Behold I lay last night with my father, let us make him drink wine also to night, and thou shalt lie with him, that we may save seed of our father. They made their father drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went in, and lay with him: and neither then did he perceive when she lay down, nor when she rose up. So the two daughters of Lot were with child by their father.

            The Bible APPROVES OF THE : Murder, Killings, Incest, Slavery and Oppression of women!

            But the Catholics find faults with ISLAM and pretend to be HOLIER than thou!

            Lucky bin Satan…..stop your homo tendencies and come down to the Earth. We know you are a Nazarene follower that has hardly less than 2 million followers, the world over. See what Islam has : 1.8 Billion people and everyday the figure keeps rising. It is too late now….you failed to stop Islam when it was budding in its early stages…but NOW how can you succeed fighting 1.8….first defeat even one, the smallest person called Modest Muslim!!

          • GOATBOY & MONKEY,

            MECCA & ANIMAL SEX:

            HAJJ PILGRIMAGE INCOMPLETE WITHOUT HOT CAMEL SEX

            Sunni Imam Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H) records in his authority work ‘Badaye al-Sanae’ Volume 2 page 216:
            ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه

            ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه
            “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal that will not make his hajj void”
            Islamic Scripture

            Qur’an

            In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur’an has to say on the subject:

            ” __________________________________________________”

            That’s right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur’an’s clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’

            If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.

            HOT MOHAMMEDAN SEX

            Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five
            world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
            Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
            Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
            Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
            Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
            Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
            Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
            Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
            Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
            Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
            Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
            Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
            Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
            Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

            Hadith

            There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. The following hadith is taken from the Sunnah Abu-Dawud collection, not Bukari or Muslim.
            Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.
            Abu Dawud 38:4449

            Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? And it is. Just look at the very next hadith.
            Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
            Abu Dawud 38:4450

            This is a very clear contradiction. How can one hadith say kill the person committing bestiality, and the very next one say there is no prescribed punishment for the same person? Both statements cannot be true.

            What’s worse; these two contradictory hadiths (transmitted through different isnad) have been attributed to the same person. Abu Dawud himself had said the former of the two hadith is “not strong” and the latter further “weakens” it.[14]

            From the above, we can gather that Robert Masters had correctly stated, “bestiality was not specifically prohibited by the Prophet,”[9] so there is little wonder that Islamists generally shy away from mentioning 38:4449 in their pronouncements on bestiality.
            Sahih Hadith

            As we have previously mentioned, there is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. However there does exist a certain hadith and commentary by the renowned Islamic scholar al-Nawawi, which is of interest.

            The following narration does not exist in the English translations of Sahih Muslim, but a similar (but sanitized version) appears in: Sahih Muslim 3:684

            و حدثني ‏ ‏زهير بن حرب ‏ ‏وأبو غسان المسمعي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثناه ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏وابن بشار ‏ ‏قالوا حدثنا ‏ ‏معاذ بن هشام ‏ ‏قال حدثني ‏ ‏أبي ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏ومطر ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏الحسن ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي رافع ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي هريرة ‏ ‏أن نبي الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏إذا جلس بين ‏ ‏شعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ثم جهدها فقد وجب عليه الغسل ‏
            ‏وفي حديث ‏ ‏مطر ‏ ‏وإن لم ينزل ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏زهير ‏ ‏من بينهم بين ‏ ‏أشعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن عمرو بن عباد بن جبلة ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن أبي عدي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏حدثني ‏ ‏وهب بن جرير ‏ ‏كلاهما ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏بهذا الإسناد ‏ ‏مثله غير أن في حديث ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏ثم اجتهد ولم يقل وإن لم ينزل ‏

            Narrated by Zuhair Ibn Harb, narrated by Ghasan Al-Masma’i, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Ibn Bashar, who said that it was narrated by Muath Ibn Hisham, narrated by Abu Qatada, narrated by Mattar, narrated by Al-Hassan, narrated by Abu Rab’i, narrated by Abu Huraira who said:

            “The prophet – peace be upon him – said, ‘If one sits between a woman’s four parts (shu’biha Al-arba’) and then fatigues her, then it necessitates that he wash.’
            In the hadith of Mattar it is added ‘even if he does not ejaculate (yunzil).’ Zuhair narrated among them using the phrase ‘Ashba’iha Al-arba’. It was also narrated by Muhammad Ibn Umar Ibn Ibad Ibn Jablah, narrated Muhammad Ibn Abi Uday, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Wahb Ibn Jarir who both related from Shu’bah who narrated from Qatada who gave this same chain of transmission, except that in the hadith of Shu’bah it has the phrase ‘then he labored’ but did not have the phrase ‘even if he does not ejaculate.’
            Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525
            Imam al-Nawawi (1234 – 1278 AD)

            Below is a short bio of al-Nawawi, whose commentary of Sahih Muslim is second only to Ibn Hajar’s commentary of Sahih Bukhari.[15]
            Imam Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi was born in the village of Nawa in Southern Syria, Nawawi spent most of his life in Damascus where he lived in a simple manner, devoted to Allah, engaging single-mindedly in worship, study, writing and teaching various Islamic sciences. The life of this world seems scarcely to have impinged upon him. He was a versatile and extremely dedicated scholar whose breadth of learning was matched by its depth.

            Imam Nawawi died at the young age of 44 years, leaving behind him numerous works of great importance, the most famous of these being:

            al-Arba’un Nabawi (An-Nawawis Forty Hadith)
            Riyadhus saleheen
            al-Maqasid (Al-Nawawi’s Manual of Islam).
            Kitab al-Adhkar,
            Minhaj al-Talibin (a main reference for Shafi’i fiqh)
            Shar’ Sahih Muslim (he was the first to arrange the sahih of Muslim in the now familiar categories)

            Although best known for his works in hadith, Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi (d. 676/1277) was also the Imam of the later Shafi’i school of Jurisprudence, and widely acknowledged as the intellectual heir to Imam Shafi’i. He was a renowned scholar and jurist who dedicated his life to the pursuit of Islamic learning.
            About Imam al-Nawawi
            Commentary

            صحيح مسلم بشرح النووي ‏ ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو غَسَّان الْمِسْمَعِيّ ) ‏ ‏هُوَ بِفَتْحِ الْغَيْن الْمُعْجَمَة وَتَشْدِيد السِّين الْمُهْمَلَة , وَيَجُوز صَرْفه وَتَرْكُ صَرْفه . وَالْمِسْمَعِيّ بِكَسْرِ الْمِيم الْأُولَى وَفَتْح الثَّانِي , وَاسْمه مَالِك بْن عَبْد الْوَاحِد , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَانه مَرَّات , لَكِنِّي أُنَبِّه عَلَيْهِ وَعَلَى مِثْله لِطُولِ الْعَهْد بِهِ , كَمَا شَرَطْتهُ فِي الْخُطْبَة . ‏

            ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو رَافِع عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَة ) ‏ ‏اِسْم أَبِي رَافِع : ( نُفَيْع ) وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ أَيْضًا . ‏ ‏قَوْله صَلَّى اللَّه عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : ( إِذَا قَعَدَ بَيْن شُعَبهَا الْأَرْبَع ثُمَّ جَهَدهَا ) ‏ ‏وَفِي رِوَايَة ( أَشْعُبهَا ) اِخْتَلَفَ الْعُلَمَاء فِي الْمُرَاد بِالشُّعَبِ الْأَرْبَع , فَقِيلَ : هِيَ الْيَدَانِ وَالرِّجْلَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالْفَخِذَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالشَّفْرَانِ , وَاخْتَارَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض أَنَّ الْمُرَاد شُعَب الْفَرْج الْأَرْبَع , وَالشُّعَب النَّوَاحِي وَاحِدَتهَا شُعْبَة , وَأَمَّا مَنْ قَالَ : ( أَشْعُبِهَا ) , فَهُوَ جَمْع شُعَب . وَمَعْنَى ( جَهَدَهَا ) حَفَرَهَا كَذَا قَالَهُ الْخَطَّابِيُّ وَقَالَ غَيْره : بَلَغَ مَشَقَّتهَا , يُقَال : جَهِدْته وَأَجْهَدْته بَلَغْت مَشَقَّته , قَالَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض رَحِمَهُ اللَّه تَعَالَى : الْأَوْلَى أَنْ يَكُون جَهَدَهَا بِمَعْنَى بَلَغَ جَهْده فِي الْعَمَل فِيهَا , وَالْجَهْد الطَّاقَة , وَهُوَ إِشَارَة إِلَى الْحَرَكَة وَتَمَكُّن صُورَة الْعَمَل , وَهُوَ نَحْو قَوْله مِنْ حَفَرَهَا أَيْ كَدّهَا بِحَرَكَتِهِ . وَإِلَّا فَأَيّ مَشَقَّة بَلَغَ بِهَا فِي ذَلِكَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . وَمَعْنَى الْحَدِيث أَنَّ إِيجَاب الْغُسْل لَا يَتَوَقَّف عَلَى نُزُول الْمَنِيّ بَلْ مَتَى غَابَتْ الْحَشَفَة فِي الْفَرْج وَجَبَ الْغُسْل عَلَى الرَّجُل وَالْمَرْأَة , وَهَذَا لَا خِلَاف فِيهِ الْيَوْم , وَقَدْ كَانَ فِيهِ خِلَاف لِبَعْضِ الصَّحَابَة وَمَنْ بَعْدهمْ , ثُمَّ اِنْعَقَدَ الْإِجْمَاع عَلَى مَا ذَكَرْنَاهُ , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَان هَذَا . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ الْحَشَفَة فِي دُبُر اِمْرَأَة , أَوْ دُبُر رَجُل , أَوْ فَرْج بَهِيمَة , أَوْ دُبُرهَا , وَجَبَ الْغُسْل سَوَاء كَانَ الْمَوْلَج فِيهِ حَيًّا أَوْ مَيِّتًا , صَغِيرًا أَوْ كَبِيرًا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ ذَلِكَ عَنْ قَصْد أَمْ عَنْ نِسْيَان , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مُخْتَارًا أَوْ مُكْرَهًا , أَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَهُ وَهُوَ نَائِم , وَسَوَاء اِنْتَشَرَ الذَّكَر أَمْ لَا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مَخْتُونًا أَمْ أَغْلَف , فَيَجِب الْغُسْل فِي كُلّ هَذِهِ الصُّوَر عَلَى الْفَاعِل وَالْمَفْعُول بِهِ إِلَّا إِذَا كَانَ الْفَاعِل أَوْ الْمَفْعُول بِهِ صَبِيًّا أَوْ صَبِيَّة فَإِنَّهُ لَا يُقَال وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ لِأَنَّهُ لَيْسَ مُكَلَّفًا , وَلَكِنْ يُقَال صَارَ جُنُبًا فَإِنْ كَانَ مُمَيِّزًا وَجَبَ عَلَى الْوَلِيّ أَنْ يَأْمُرهُ بِالْغُسْلِ كَمَا يَأْمُرهُ بِالْوُضُوءِ , فَإِنْ صَلَّى مِنْ غَيْر غُسْلٍ لَمْ تَصِحّ صَلَاته , وَإِنْ لَمْ يَغْتَسِل حَتَّى بَلَغَ وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ الْغُسْل , وَإِنْ اِغْتَسَلَ فِي الصِّبَى ثُمَّ بَلَغَ لَمْ يَلْزَمهُ إِعَادَة الْغُسْل . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَالِاعْتِبَار فِي الْجِمَاع بِتَغْيِيبِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْ صَحِيح الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ , فَإِذَا غَيَّبَهَا بِكَمَالِهَا تَعَلَّقَتْ بِهِ جَمِيع الْأَحْكَام , وَلَا يُشْتَرَط تَغْيِيب جَمِيع الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ . وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ بَعْض الْحَشَفَة لَا يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام بِالِاتِّفَاقِ إِلَّا وَجْهًا شَاذًّا ذَكَرَهُ بَعْض أَصْحَابنَا أَنَّ حُكْمه حُكْم جَمِيعهَا , وَهَذَا الْوَجْه غَلَط مُنْكَر مَتْرُوك , وَأَمَّا إِذَا كَانَ الذَّكَر مَقْطُوعًا فَإِنْ بَقِيَ مِنْهُ دُون الْحَشَفَة لَمْ يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام , وَإِنْ كَانَ الْبَاقِي قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَحَسْب تَعَلَّقَتْ الْأَحْكَام بِتَغْيِيبِهِ بِكَمَالِهِ , وَإِنْ كَانَ زَائِدًا عَلَى قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَفِيهِ وَجْهَانِ مَشْهُورَانِ لِأَصْحَابِنَا أَصَحّهمَا أَنَّ الْأَحْكَام تَتَعَلَّق بِقَدْرِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْهُ , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَتَعَلَّق شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام إِلَّا بِتَغْيِيبِ جَمِيع الْبَاقِي . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ لَفَّ عَلَى ذَكَرِهِ خِرْقَة وَأَوْلَجَهُ فِي فَرْج اِمْرَأَة فَفِيهِ ثَلَاثَة أَوْجُه لِأَصْحَابِنَا مِنْهَا وَالْمَشْهُور أَنَّهُ يَجِب عَلَيْهِمَا الْغُسْل , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَجِب لِأَنَّهُ أَوْلَجَ فِي خِرْقَة , وَالثَّالِث إِنْ كَانَتْ الْخِرْقَة غَلِيظَة تَمْنَع وُصُول اللَّذَّة وَالرُّطُوبَة لَمْ يَجِب الْغُسْل . وَإِلَّا وَجَبَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَ بَهِيمَة وَجَبَ عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل , وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت ذَكَرًا مَقْطُوعًا فَوَجْهَانِ أَصَحّهمَا يَجِب عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل

            Commentary of Imam Al-Nawawi on the Hadith

            The saying of the prophet – peace be upon him- ‘When he sits between a her fours parts) mostly its home animal (shu’biha Al-arba) and has intercourse with her then fatigues her’

            In another narration the word ‘Ashu’biha’ is used. The scholars have disagreed about the intended meaning of ‘shu’biha Al-arba’ (the fours) for some said that it means the arms and the legs, while others have said that it refers to the legs and thighs, and other said it means the legs and the edge of the pubic area. Al-Qadi Ayad chose the meaning of the four areas surrounding the vagina. The word (Shu’b) means areas, its singular form being (Shu’bah). As for those who say (Ashba’iha) that is the plural of the word (Shu’b).

            The word Aj-hada-ha (fatigue her) means to plow her, which was also stated by Al-Khatabi. Others have said it means to make her reach exhaustion as in the phrase ‘she made him toil and labor till he was exhausted’. Al-Qadi Ayad – may Allah rest his soul- said ‘Primarily, the word (Jahada’ha) means that the man exerted his effort working in a woman, where the word (Juh’d) means energy and refers to motion by describing the type of work. This is similar to his (the prophet) saying ‘he who plowed her’ meaning he who penetrated her by his motion. Otherwise, what other fatigue could a man experience because of her, and Allah knows best.

            The meaning of the hadith is that the necessity to wash is not limited to when semen is ejaculated, rather it is when the penile head (Hash-fa, lit. “the head of the male member,” i.e. head of the penis) penetrates the vagina, then it is necessary for the man and the woman to wash. There is no disagreement on this today, even though there was disagreement on this by some of the early companions and others later. However, an agreement was later reached and this is what we have shown and presented previously.

            Our companions have said that if the penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus, or a man’s anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus then it is necessary to wash whether the one being penetrated is alive or dead, young or old, whether it was done intentionally or absentmindedly, whether it was done willfully or forcefully. This also applies if the woman places the male member inside her while the man is asleep, whether the penis is erect or not, whether the penis is circumcised or uncircumcised. All these situations require that the person committing the act and the one the act is committed on must wash themselves, unless the person committing the act or the person the act is committed on is a young male or female. In that case it cannot be said that the person must wash, for they do not have the responsibility, rather it is said that this person is in a state of impurity. If that person can discern (the sexual act) then his guardian can command him to wash just as he commands him to perform the ablution washing for prayers. For if he prays without washing, his prayer has not been performed correctly; likewise if he doesn’t wash after he reaches puberty he must be forced to wash. If he washed as a youth and then reaches puberty, then he does not have to repeat the washing.

            Our companions have said that intercourse occurs when a healthy male’s penile head completely penetrates (an orifice), as has been unanimously agreed. Thus, when the penile head has completely disappeared (inside the orifice), then all the regulations concerning washing apply. It is unanimously agreed that it is not necessary that the entire penile shaft penetrate to apply the regulations of washing. If part of the penile head penetrates, then the regulations of washing are not imposed as is agreed, except by an odd few of our companions who said that even in this case all the regulations of washing apply. However, this opinion is wrong, rejected and abandoned. If the male member was severed and what remained was less than the length of the penile head, then none of the washing regulations apply. If the part remaining was equal in length to the penile head length then that part must completely penetrate for the regulation of washing to apply. If the part remaining was greater in length to the penile head length then there are two famous opinions for our companions. The most correct is that if the portion that penetrates is equal to the length of the penile head, then the regulations for washing apply. The other opinion is that none of the regulations for washing apply until the entire remaining length of the penile shaft completely penetrates and Allah knows best.

            If a man wraps a sheath around his male member and then ejaculates inside a woman’s vagina, then there are three opinions from our companions. The most famous is that the man must wash. The second is that he does not have to wash because he ejaculated inside the sheath. The third is that if the sheath is thick and prevents climax and wetness (in the vagina) then washing is not necessary, otherwise it is necessary and Allah knows best.

            If a woman inserts (in her vagina) an animal’s penis she must wash, and if she inserts a detached penis (thakaran maktu-an, lit. “a severed male member”) there are two opinions; the most correct is that she must wash.
            Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525 – Commentary
            Islamic scholars

            Some Islamic scholars have ruled that bestiality does not invalidate the hajj or ones fast.
            Sunni Imam Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H) records in his authority work ‘Badaye al-Sanae’ Volume 2 page 216:

            ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه
            “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal, that will not make his hajj void”[16]

            In Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820, the learned Hanafi scholar Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan sets out those acts that do not invalidate one’s fast, and he includes:
            “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”[16]
            Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820

            Others have said it is halal.
            لقد كانت نكاح الحيوانات قبل البعثه منتشره وتروى كثير من الروايات انها حلال لكنها مكروه والاحوط وجوبا ترك هذه العاده التي تسبب الأذى النفسي ويجب عليك الاعتراف لصاحب الاغنام ودفع قيمتها لمالكها

            Sex with animals before the mission (Islam) was wide spread and many narrations are narrated that it is halal but makrooh (disliked). And on the compulsory precaution one should abandon this practice that may cause self harm. And you must admit this to the owner of the sheep and pay the owner.[17]
            Conclusion
            From all of the above, we can certainly see that, unlike the West,
            Islamic societies do not universally harbor negative attitudes towards
            bestiality. Many Muslims seek out gratification or are indifferent to
            this perversion, and in some cases it is even openly promoted and made
            obligatory.
            This is all in stark contrast with their attitudes towards
            homosexuality and their allowance of pedophilia. Therefore to claim that
            the West without the guidance of Islam has allowed bestiality is not
            only false, but hypocritical when you consider that this perversion,
            alongside pedophilia, is left largely unhindered by the Islamic clerisy
            in their societies and runs rampant among followers of Islam.
            Aside from their own embarrassment, we can also see that there is
            little basis for any Shari’ah prohibition of bestiality/zoophilia as
            the Qur’an and the Sahih Hadiths (Bukhari and Muslim) do not prohibit
            this unnatural practice, furthermore the references we have examined
            outside of the two Sahihs are considered weak.

            HOT MOHAMMEDAN SEX

            Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five
            world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
            Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
            Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
            Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
            Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
            Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
            Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
            Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
            Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
            Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
            Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
            Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
            Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
            Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

            MOROCCO
            Morocco is an Islamic country, with 98.7% of the population Muslims.[10] The following is taken from a paper on sexuality in Morocco written by Nadia Kadiri, M.D., and Abderrazak Moussaïd, M.D., with Abdelkrim Tirraf, M.D., and Abdallah Jadid, M.D. Translated by Raymond J. Noonan, Ph.D., and Sandra Almeida.[11]
            In the rural world, zoophilia is still very widespread and not blameworthy. With masturbation, it constitutes an obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality.
            The operative phrase is ‘obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality’. Obligatory. It means in rural Morocco, Muslim males must have sexual intercourse with animals as part of their sexual apprenticeship.
            Also according to the scholars Allen Edwardes and Robert Masters, Ph.D, FAACS, the Muslims of Morocco believe that sexual intercourse with donkeys “make the penis grow big and strong” and masturbation is often scorned by them in favor of bestiality.[12]
            Islamic Scripture
            The above paper does also say “it is prohibited without question by the Shariâ”. But is this alleged prohibition within the Shari’ah extracted (as it must be) from the Qur’an and Hadith, or has this fiqh been derived using external non-Islamic sources?

            Qur’an

            In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur’an has to say on the subject:

            That’s right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur’an’s clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’
            If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.[13]
            Hadith
            There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. The following hadith is taken from the Sunnah Abu-Dawud collection, not Bukari or Muslim.
            Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.
            Abu Dawud 38:4449
            The very next hadith states:
            Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
            Abu Dawud 38:4450
            This is a clear contradiction. How can one hadith say kill the person committing bestiality, and the very next one say there is no prescribed punishment for the same person? Both statements cannot be true.
            Furthermore, these two contradictory hadiths (transmitted through different isnad) have been attributed to the same person. Abu Dawud himself had said the former of the two hadith is “not strong” and the latter further “weakens” it.[14]
            From the above, we can gather that Robert Masters had correctly stated, “bestiality was not specifically prohibited by the Prophet,”[9] so there is little wonder that apologists generally shy away from mentioning 38:4449 in their pronouncements on bestiality.

            Sahih Hadith
            There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. However there does exist a certain hadith and commentary by the renowned Islamic scholar al-Nawawi, which is of interest.
            The following narration does not exist in the English translations of Sahih Muslim, but a similar (but sanitized version) appears in: Sahih Muslim 3:684
            و حدثني ‏ ‏زهير بن حرب ‏ ‏وأبو غسان المسمعي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثناه ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏وابن بشار ‏ ‏قالوا حدثنا ‏ ‏معاذ بن هشام ‏ ‏قال حدثني ‏ ‏أبي ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏ومطر ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏الحسن ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي رافع ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي هريرة ‏ ‏أن نبي الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏إذا جلس بين ‏ ‏شعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ثم جهدها فقد وجب عليه الغسل ‏
            ‏وفي حديث ‏ ‏مطر ‏ ‏وإن لم ينزل ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏زهير ‏ ‏من بينهم بين ‏ ‏أشعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن عمرو بن عباد بن جبلة ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن أبي عدي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏حدثني ‏ ‏وهب بن جرير ‏ ‏كلاهما ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏بهذا الإسناد ‏ ‏مثله غير أن في حديث ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏ثم اجتهد ولم يقل وإن لم ينزل ‏
            Narrated by Zuhair Ibn Harb, narrated by Ghasan Al-Masma’i, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Ibn Bashar, who said that it was narrated by Muath Ibn Hisham, narrated by Abu Qatada, narrated by Mattar, narrated by Al-Hassan, narrated by Abu Rab’i, narrated by Abu Huraira who said:
            “The prophet – peace be upon him – said, ‘If one sits between a woman’s four parts (shu’biha Al-arba’) and then fatigues her, then it necessitates that he wash.’
            In the hadith of Mattar it is added ‘even if he does not ejaculate (yunzil).’ Zuhair narrated among them using the phrase ‘Ashba’iha Al-arba’. It was also narrated by Muhammad Ibn Umar Ibn Ibad Ibn Jablah, narrated Muhammad Ibn Abi Uday, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Wahb Ibn Jarir who both related from Shu’bah who narrated from Qatada who gave this same chain of transmission, except that in the hadith of Shu’bah it has the phrase ‘then he labored’ but did not have the phrase ‘even if he does not ejaculate.’
            Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525
            Imam al-Nawawi (1234 – 1278 AD)

            Below is a short bio of al-Nawawi, whose commentary of Sahih Muslim is second only to Ibn Hajar’s commentary of Sahih Bukhari.[15]
            Imam Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi was born in the village of Nawa in Southern Syria, Nawawi spent most of his life in Damascus where he lived in a simple manner, devoted to Allah, engaging single-mindedly in worship, study, writing and teaching various Islamic sciences. The life of this world seems scarcely to have impinged upon him. He was a versatile and extremely dedicated scholar whose breadth of learning was matched by its depth.
            Imam Nawawi died at the young age of 44 years, leaving behind him numerous works of great importance, the most famous of these being:
            • al-Arba’un Nabawi (An-Nawawis Forty Hadith)
            • Riyadhus saleheen
            • al-Maqasid (Al-Nawawi’s Manual of Islam).
            • Kitab al-Adhkar,
            • Minhaj al-Talibin (a main reference for Shafi’i fiqh)

            • Shar’ Sahih Muslim (he was the first to arrange the sahih of Muslim in the now familiar categories)
            Although best known for his works in hadith, Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi (d. 676/1277) was also the Imam of the later Shafi’i school of Jurisprudence, and widely acknowledged as the intellectual heir to Imam Shafi’i. He was a renowned scholar and jurist who dedicated his life to the pursuit of Islamic learning.
            About Imam al-Nawawi
            Commentary
            صحيح مسلم بشرح النووي ‏ ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو غَسَّان الْمِسْمَعِيّ ) ‏ ‏هُوَ بِفَتْحِ الْغَيْن الْمُعْجَمَة وَتَشْدِيد السِّين الْمُهْمَلَة , وَيَجُوز صَرْفه وَتَرْكُ صَرْفه . وَالْمِسْمَعِيّ بِكَسْرِ الْمِيم الْأُولَى وَفَتْح الثَّانِي , وَاسْمه مَالِك بْن عَبْد الْوَاحِد , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَانه مَرَّات , لَكِنِّي أُنَبِّه عَلَيْهِ وَعَلَى مِثْله لِطُولِ الْعَهْد بِهِ , كَمَا شَرَطْتهُ فِي الْخُطْبَة . ‏
            ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو رَافِع عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَة ) ‏ ‏اِسْم أَبِي رَافِع : ( نُفَيْع ) وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ أَيْضًا . ‏ ‏قَوْله صَلَّى اللَّه عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : ( إِذَا قَعَدَ بَيْن شُعَبهَا الْأَرْبَع ثُمَّ جَهَدهَا ) ‏ ‏وَفِي رِوَايَة ( أَشْعُبهَا ) اِخْتَلَفَ الْعُلَمَاء فِي الْمُرَاد بِالشُّعَبِ الْأَرْبَع , فَقِيلَ : هِيَ الْيَدَانِ وَالرِّجْلَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالْفَخِذَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالشَّفْرَانِ , وَاخْتَارَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض أَنَّ الْمُرَاد شُعَب الْفَرْج الْأَرْبَع , وَالشُّعَب النَّوَاحِي وَاحِدَتهَا شُعْبَة , وَأَمَّا مَنْ قَالَ : ( أَشْعُبِهَا ) , فَهُوَ جَمْع شُعَب . وَمَعْنَى ( جَهَدَهَا ) حَفَرَهَا كَذَا قَالَهُ الْخَطَّابِيُّ وَقَالَ غَيْره : بَلَغَ مَشَقَّتهَا , يُقَال : جَهِدْته وَأَجْهَدْته بَلَغْت مَشَقَّته , قَالَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض رَحِمَهُ اللَّه تَعَالَى : الْأَوْلَى أَنْ يَكُون جَهَدَهَا بِمَعْنَى بَلَغَ جَهْده فِي الْعَمَل فِيهَا , وَالْجَهْد الطَّاقَة , وَهُوَ إِشَارَة إِلَى الْحَرَكَة وَتَمَكُّن صُورَة الْعَمَل , وَهُوَ نَحْو قَوْله مِنْ حَفَرَهَا أَيْ كَدّهَا بِحَرَكَتِهِ . وَإِلَّا فَأَيّ مَشَقَّة بَلَغَ بِهَا فِي ذَلِكَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . وَمَعْنَى الْحَدِيث أَنَّ إِيجَاب الْغُسْل لَا يَتَوَقَّف عَلَى نُزُول الْمَنِيّ بَلْ مَتَى غَابَتْ الْحَشَفَة فِي الْفَرْج وَجَبَ الْغُسْل عَلَى الرَّجُل وَالْمَرْأَة , وَهَذَا لَا خِلَاف فِيهِ الْيَوْم , وَقَدْ كَانَ فِيهِ خِلَاف لِبَعْضِ الصَّحَابَة وَمَنْ بَعْدهمْ , ثُمَّ اِنْعَقَدَ الْإِجْمَاع عَلَى مَا ذَكَرْنَاهُ , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَان هَذَا . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ الْحَشَفَة فِي دُبُر اِمْرَأَة , أَوْ دُبُر رَجُل , أَوْ فَرْج بَهِيمَة , أَوْ دُبُرهَا , وَجَبَ الْغُسْل سَوَاء كَانَ الْمَوْلَج فِيهِ حَيًّا أَوْ مَيِّتًا , صَغِيرًا أَوْ كَبِيرًا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ ذَلِكَ عَنْ قَصْد أَمْ عَنْ نِسْيَان , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مُخْتَارًا أَوْ مُكْرَهًا , أَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَهُ وَهُوَ نَائِم , وَسَوَاء اِنْتَشَرَ الذَّكَر أَمْ لَا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مَخْتُونًا أَمْ أَغْلَف , فَيَجِب الْغُسْل فِي كُلّ هَذِهِ الصُّوَر عَلَى الْفَاعِل وَالْمَفْعُول بِهِ إِلَّا إِذَا كَانَ الْفَاعِل أَوْ الْمَفْعُول بِهِ صَبِيًّا أَوْ صَبِيَّة فَإِنَّهُ لَا يُقَال وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ لِأَنَّهُ لَيْسَ مُكَلَّفًا , وَلَكِنْ يُقَال صَارَ جُنُبًا فَإِنْ كَانَ مُمَيِّزًا وَجَبَ عَلَى الْوَلِيّ أَنْ يَأْمُرهُ بِالْغُسْلِ كَمَا يَأْمُرهُ بِالْوُضُوءِ , فَإِنْ صَلَّى مِنْ غَيْر غُسْلٍ لَمْ تَصِحّ صَلَاته , وَإِنْ لَمْ يَغْتَسِل حَتَّى بَلَغَ وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ الْغُسْل , وَإِنْ اِغْتَسَلَ فِي الصِّبَى ثُمَّ بَلَغَ لَمْ يَلْزَمهُ إِعَادَة الْغُسْل . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَالِاعْتِبَار فِي الْجِمَاع بِتَغْيِيبِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْ صَحِيح الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ , فَإِذَا غَيَّبَهَا بِكَمَالِهَا تَعَلَّقَتْ بِهِ جَمِيع الْأَحْكَام , وَلَا يُشْتَرَط تَغْيِيب جَمِيع الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ . وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ بَعْض الْحَشَفَة لَا يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام بِالِاتِّفَاقِ إِلَّا وَجْهًا شَاذًّا ذَكَرَهُ بَعْض أَصْحَابنَا أَنَّ حُكْمه حُكْم جَمِيعهَا , وَهَذَا الْوَجْه غَلَط مُنْكَر مَتْرُوك , وَأَمَّا إِذَا كَانَ الذَّكَر مَقْطُوعًا فَإِنْ بَقِيَ مِنْهُ دُون الْحَشَفَة لَمْ يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام , وَإِنْ كَانَ الْبَاقِي قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَحَسْب تَعَلَّقَتْ الْأَحْكَام بِتَغْيِيبِهِ بِكَمَالِهِ , وَإِنْ كَانَ زَائِدًا عَلَى قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَفِيهِ وَجْهَانِ مَشْهُورَانِ لِأَصْحَابِنَا أَصَحّهمَا أَنَّ الْأَحْكَام تَتَعَلَّق بِقَدْرِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْهُ , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَتَعَلَّق شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام إِلَّا بِتَغْيِيبِ جَمِيع الْبَاقِي . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ لَفَّ عَلَى ذَكَرِهِ خِرْقَة وَأَوْلَجَهُ فِي فَرْج اِمْرَأَة فَفِيهِ ثَلَاثَة أَوْجُه لِأَصْحَابِنَا مِنْهَا وَالْمَشْهُور أَنَّهُ يَجِب عَلَيْهِمَا الْغُسْل , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَجِب لِأَنَّهُ أَوْلَجَ فِي خِرْقَة , وَالثَّالِث إِنْ كَانَتْ الْخِرْقَة غَلِيظَة تَمْنَع وُصُول اللَّذَّة وَالرُّطُوبَة لَمْ يَجِب الْغُسْل . وَإِلَّا وَجَبَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَ بَهِيمَة وَجَبَ عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل , وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت ذَكَرًا مَقْطُوعًا فَوَجْهَانِ أَصَحّهمَا يَجِب عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل
            Commentary of Imam Al-Nawawi on the Hadith

            The saying of the prophet – peace be upon him- ‘When he sits between a her fours parts) mostly its home animal (shu’biha Al-arba) and has intercourse with her then fatigues her’
            In another narration the word ‘Ashu’biha’ is used. The scholars have disagreed about the intended meaning of ‘shu’biha Al-arba’ (the fours) for some said that it means the arms and the legs, while others have said that it refers to the legs and thighs, and other said it means the legs and the edge of the pubic area. Al-Qadi Ayad chose the meaning of the four areas surrounding the vagina. The word (Shu’b) means areas, its singular form being (Shu’bah). As for those who say (Ashba’iha) that is the plural of the word (Shu’b).

            The word Aj-hada-ha (fatigue her) means to plow her, which was also stated by Al-Khatabi. Others have said it means to make her reach exhaustion as in the phrase ‘she made him toil and labor till he was exhausted’. Al-Qadi Ayad – may Allah rest his soul- said ‘Primarily, the word (Jahada’ha) means that the man exerted his effort working in a woman, where the word (Juh’d) means energy and refers to motion by describing the type of work. This is similar to his (the prophet) saying ‘he who plowed her’ meaning he who penetrated her by his motion. Otherwise, what other fatigue could a man experience because of her, and Allah knows best.

            The meaning of the hadith is that the necessity to wash is not limited to when semen is ejaculated, rather it is when the penile head (Hash-fa, lit. “the head of the male member,” i.e. head of the penis) penetrates the vagina, then it is necessary for the man and the woman to wash. There is no disagreement on this today, even though there was disagreement on this by some of the early companions and others later. However, an agreement was later reached and this is what we have shown and presented previously.

            Our companions have said that if the penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus, or a man’s anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus then it is necessary to wash whether the one being penetrated is alive or dead, young or old, whether it was done intentionally or absentmindedly, whether it was done willfully or forcefully. This also applies if the woman places the male member inside her while the man is asleep, whether the penis is erect or not, whether the penis is circumcised or uncircumcised. All these situations require that the person committing the act and the one the act is committed on must wash themselves, unless the person committing the act or the person the act is committed on is a young male or female. In that case it cannot be said that the person must wash, for they do not have the responsibility, rather it is said that this person is in a state of impurity. If that person can discern (the sexual act) then his guardian can command him to wash just as he commands him to perform the ablution washing for prayers. For if he prays without washing, his prayer has not been performed correctly; likewise if he doesn’t wash after he reaches puberty he must be forced to wash. If he washed as a youth and then reaches puberty, then he does not have to repeat the washing.

            Our companions have said that intercourse occurs when a healthy male’s penile head completely penetrates (an orifice), as has been unanimously agreed. Thus, when the penile head has completely disappeared (inside the orifice), then all the regulations concerning washing apply. It is unanimously agreed that it is not necessary that the entire penile shaft penetrate to apply the regulations of washing. If part of the penile head penetrates, then the regulations of washing are not imposed as is agreed, except by an odd few of our companions who said that even in this case all the regulations of washing apply. However, this opinion is wrong, rejected and abandoned. If the male member was severed and what remained was less than the length of the penile head, then none of the washing regulations apply. If the part remaining was equal in length to the penile head length then that part must completely penetrate for the regulation of washing to apply. If the part remaining was greater in length to the penile head length then there are two famous opinions for our companions. The most correct is that if the portion that penetrates is equal to the length of the penile head, then the regulations for washing apply. The other opinion is that none of the regulations for washing apply until the entire remaining length of the penile shaft completely penetrates and Allah knows best.

            If a man wraps a sheath around his male member and then ejaculates inside a woman’s vagina, then there are three opinions from our companions. The most famous is that the man must wash. The second is that he does not have to wash because he ejaculated inside the sheath. The third is that if the sheath is thick and prevents climax and wetness (in the vagina) then washing is not necessary, otherwise it is necessary and Allah knows best.

            If a woman inserts (in her vagina) an animal’s penis she must wash, and if she inserts a detached penis (thakaran maktu-an, lit. “a severed male member”) there are two opinions; the most correct is that she must wash.

            Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525 – Commentary

            Islamic scholars
            Some Sunni Islamic scholars have ruled that bestiality does not invalidate the hajj or ones fast.
            ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه

            “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal, that will not make his hajj void”
            Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H), Badaye al-Sanae, Vol. 2, p. 216
            “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”
            Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan, Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820
            Others have said it is halal.
            لقد كانت نكاح الحيوانات قبل البعثه منتشره وتروى كثير من الروايات انها حلال لكنها مكروه والاحوط وجوبا ترك هذه العاده التي تسبب الأذى النفسي ويجب عليك الاعتراف لصاحب الاغنام ودفع قيمتها لمالكها

            Sex with animals before the mission (Islam) was wide spread and many narrations are narrated that it is halal but makrooh (disliked). And on the compulsory precaution one should abandon this practice that may cause self harm. And you must admit this to the owner of the sheep and pay the owner.
            Sex with animals Fatwa
            al-Uzma Seyyid Ali al-Sistani

            Conclusion

            From all of the above, we can certainly see that, unlike the West, Islamic societies do not universally harbor negative attitudes towards bestiality. Many Muslims seek out gratification or are indifferent to this perversion, and in some cases it is even openly promoted and made obligatory.
            This is all in stark contrast with their attitudes towards homosexuality and their allowance of pedophilia. Therefore to claim that the West without the guidance of Islam has allowed bestiality is not only false, but hypocritical when you consider that this perversion, alongside pedophilia, is left largely unhindered by the Islamic clerisy in their societies and runs rampant among followers of Islam.
            Aside from their own embarrassment, we can also see that there is little basis for any Shari’ah prohibition of bestiality/zoophilia as the Qur’an and the Sahih Hadiths (Bukhari and Muslim) do not prohibit this unnatural practice, furthermore the references we have examined outside of the two Sahihs are considered weak.
            9• ↑ Robert E.L. Masters – Forbidden Sexual Behavior and Morality – The Julian Press, 1st edition 1966,
            10• Africa :: Morocco – The online Factbook
            11• Read the full text here.
            12• Allen Edwardes and R.E.L. Masters – Cradle of Erotica (pp. 223-224) – Bantam Paperback; New Ed edition (1977), ISBN 0553103016
            13• Judith Worell – Encyclopedia of women and gender: Volume 1 (p. 298) – Academic Press; 1 edition, September 27, 2001, ISBN 9780122272455
            14• Dr. Ahmad Shafaat, “Ahadith About Rajm”, Islamic Perspectives, March 6, 2005 (archived).
            15• ON TASAWWUF Imam Nawawi (d. 676) – Sunnah.org

      • Lucky the Catholic Satan, You are just stupid. Read this and answer my questions every time I pose them to you, monkey :

        1 Timothy 4 (KJV) :
        ” Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times, some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils”.

        a. Who is this SPIRIT… kept on talking without a break :”the SPIRIT speaketh expressly”?

        b.Again : “seducing spirits”. Who are they?

        c. And finally, “doctrines of devils” : What are the DOCTRINES OF THE DEVIL??

        If “SPIRITS” AND “SEDUCING SPIRITS” are humans then who is the HOLY GHOST??

        This shatters the theory of Trinity into fragments leaving the BOGUS Church of Catholics
        stark naked! Why do the Catholics and ONLY Catholics attack Islam? Is it a curse upon them for NOT saving at his crucial time when JESUS shouted at the top of voice :

        OH, DADDY, DADDY…why don’t you save your bearded naked baby??

        He said that just before his throat was cut (like those MEMRI.TV videos uploaded on Youtube) and hung on a mango tree!

        Acts 5:30 : The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree.

        • HOT CAMEL SEX & THE HAJJ “HOLY” PILGRIMAGE

          Sunni Imam Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H) records in his authority work ‘Badaye al-Sanae’ Volume 2 page 216:
          ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه

          ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه
          “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal that will not make his hajj void”
          Islamic Scripture

          Qur’an

          In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur’an has to say on the subject:

          ” __________________________________________________”

          That’s right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur’an’s clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’

          If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.

          HOT MOHAMMEDAN SEX

          Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five
          world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
          Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
          Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
          Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
          Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
          Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
          Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
          Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
          Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
          Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
          Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
          Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
          Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
          Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

          • Lucky bin Satan, why do you constantly talk of dirty homoship, brute?

            It is the dirtiest topic and we have other better things to do than read your crap!

            1. SEX SLAVERY and DISCRIMINATION in the Bible but NOWHERE in the Quran:
            Exodus 21:7 : When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not PLEASE the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again.

            2. GOD PREDICTS THE THIRD WORLD WAR!
            Zechariah 14:1-2 And I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem for battle: the city shall be taken, houses plundered, women ravished.

            But the Catholics find faults with ISLAM and pretend to be HOLIER than thou!

            Lucky bin Satan…a NAZARENE PIG…..stop your homo tendencies and come down to the Earth. ….first defeat even one MUSLIM for example, Modest Muslim!!

    • Lucky bin Satan,

      YOUR ISRAELITE GOD PREDICTS THE THIRD WORLD WAR!

      Zechariah 14:1-2 :

      And I will gather ALL the NATIONS against JERUSALEM for battle: the city shall be taken, houses plundered, women ravished.

      Latest Breaking NEWS from Biblelies.com Press : THE HOUR IS NIGH!!

      It is reported by Lucky bin Satan that when he visited the homes of Matthew on street number 26:45, of 1 Peter 4:7, and of Romans 13:11 they all ….all gave him the same NEWS : THE HOUR IS NIGH!!!!

      But when he visited the home of Mark at the address 13:32 he got the SHOCK of his life!

      After pouring water on him by Mr Plum and having recovered fully he was asked, why did you fall down? He replied that it was Mark 13:32, which said : “NO ONE KNOWS ABOUT THAT DAY”

      So, Mr Plum solved for him the equation : THE HOUR IS NIGH > NOT Equal<NO ONE KNOWS ABOUT THAT DAY = BOGUS BIBLE = CATHOLICISM= FAKE MYTHO CULT= FAKE BELIEFS OF LUCKY bin SATAN!

      • YO GOATBOY & MONKEY,

        HAVE YOU DONE HAJJ YET?

        THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND WEARING BURKA:

        ONCE YOU COVER WITH A BURKA, ALL THAT IS VISIBLE ARE THE EYES!

        WHERE THERE IS A SCARCITY OF WOMEN, A DONKEY WEARING BURKA, LOOKS ATTRACTIVE.
        THEY HAVE LOVELY EYES & SO HAVE GOATS!

        FROM THE REAR ITS HARD TO TELL ONE PIECE OF ASS FROM ANOTHER & THE SMELL IS ABOUT THE SAME.

        MECCA & ANIMAL SEX:

        HAJJ PILGRIMAGE INCOMPLETE WITHOUT HOT CAMEL SEX
        Sunni Imam Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H) records in his authority work ‘Badaye al-Sanae’ Volume 2 page 216:
        ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه

        ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه
        “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal that will not make his hajj void”
        Islamic Scripture

        Qur’an

        In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur’an has to say on the subject:” __________________________________________________”

        That’s right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur’an’s clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’

        If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.

        HOT MOHAMMEDAN SEX

        Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five
        world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
        Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
        Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
        Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
        Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
        Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
        Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
        Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
        Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
        Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
        Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
        Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
        Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
        Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)
        Hadith

        There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. The following hadith is taken from the Sunnah Abu-Dawud collection, not Bukari or Muslim.
        Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.
        Abu Dawud 38:4449

        Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? And it is. Just look at the very next hadith.
        Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
        Abu Dawud 38:4450

        This is a very clear contradiction. How can one hadith say kill the person committing bestiality, and the very next one say there is no prescribed punishment for the same person? Both statements cannot be true.

        What’s worse; these two contradictory hadiths (transmitted through different isnad) have been attributed to the same person. Abu Dawud himself had said the former of the two hadith is “not strong” and the latter further “weakens” it.[14]

        From the above, we can gather that Robert Masters had correctly stated, “bestiality was not specifically prohibited by the Prophet,”[9] so there is little wonder that Islamists generally shy away from mentioning 38:4449 in their pronouncements on bestiality.
        Sahih Hadith

        As we have previously mentioned, there is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. However there does exist a certain hadith and commentary by the renowned Islamic scholar al-Nawawi, which is of interest.

        The following narration does not exist in the English translations of Sahih Muslim, but a similar (but sanitized version) appears in: Sahih Muslim 3:684

        و حدثني ‏ ‏زهير بن حرب ‏ ‏وأبو غسان المسمعي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثناه ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏وابن بشار ‏ ‏قالوا حدثنا ‏ ‏معاذ بن هشام ‏ ‏قال حدثني ‏ ‏أبي ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏ومطر ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏الحسن ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي رافع ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي هريرة ‏ ‏أن نبي الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏إذا جلس بين ‏ ‏شعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ثم جهدها فقد وجب عليه الغسل ‏
        ‏وفي حديث ‏ ‏مطر ‏ ‏وإن لم ينزل ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏زهير ‏ ‏من بينهم بين ‏ ‏أشعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن عمرو بن عباد بن جبلة ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن أبي عدي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏حدثني ‏ ‏وهب بن جرير ‏ ‏كلاهما ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏بهذا الإسناد ‏ ‏مثله غير أن في حديث ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏ثم اجتهد ولم يقل وإن لم ينزل ‏

        Narrated by Zuhair Ibn Harb, narrated by Ghasan Al-Masma’i, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Ibn Bashar, who said that it was narrated by Muath Ibn Hisham, narrated by Abu Qatada, narrated by Mattar, narrated by Al-Hassan, narrated by Abu Rab’i, narrated by Abu Huraira who said:

        “The prophet – peace be upon him – said, ‘If one sits between a woman’s four parts (shu’biha Al-arba’) and then fatigues her, then it necessitates that he wash.’
        In the hadith of Mattar it is added ‘even if he does not ejaculate (yunzil).’ Zuhair narrated among them using the phrase ‘Ashba’iha Al-arba’. It was also narrated by Muhammad Ibn Umar Ibn Ibad Ibn Jablah, narrated Muhammad Ibn Abi Uday, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Wahb Ibn Jarir who both related from Shu’bah who narrated from Qatada who gave this same chain of transmission, except that in the hadith of Shu’bah it has the phrase ‘then he labored’ but did not have the phrase ‘even if he does not ejaculate.’
        Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525
        Imam al-Nawawi (1234 – 1278 AD)

        Below is a short bio of al-Nawawi, whose commentary of Sahih Muslim is second only to Ibn Hajar’s commentary of Sahih Bukhari.[15]
        Imam Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi was born in the village of Nawa in Southern Syria, Nawawi spent most of his life in Damascus where he lived in a simple manner, devoted to Allah, engaging single-mindedly in worship, study, writing and teaching various Islamic sciences. The life of this world seems scarcely to have impinged upon him. He was a versatile and extremely dedicated scholar whose breadth of learning was matched by its depth.

        Imam Nawawi died at the young age of 44 years, leaving behind him numerous works of great importance, the most famous of these being:

        al-Arba’un Nabawi (An-Nawawis Forty Hadith)
        Riyadhus saleheen
        al-Maqasid (Al-Nawawi’s Manual of Islam).
        Kitab al-Adhkar,
        Minhaj al-Talibin (a main reference for Shafi’i fiqh)
        Shar’ Sahih Muslim (he was the first to arrange the sahih of Muslim in the now familiar categories)

        Although best known for his works in hadith, Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi (d. 676/1277) was also the Imam of the later Shafi’i school of Jurisprudence, and widely acknowledged as the intellectual heir to Imam Shafi’i. He was a renowned scholar and jurist who dedicated his life to the pursuit of Islamic learning.
        About Imam al-Nawawi
        Commentary

        صحيح مسلم بشرح النووي ‏ ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو غَسَّان الْمِسْمَعِيّ ) ‏ ‏هُوَ بِفَتْحِ الْغَيْن الْمُعْجَمَة وَتَشْدِيد السِّين الْمُهْمَلَة , وَيَجُوز صَرْفه وَتَرْكُ صَرْفه . وَالْمِسْمَعِيّ بِكَسْرِ الْمِيم الْأُولَى وَفَتْح الثَّانِي , وَاسْمه مَالِك بْن عَبْد الْوَاحِد , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَانه مَرَّات , لَكِنِّي أُنَبِّه عَلَيْهِ وَعَلَى مِثْله لِطُولِ الْعَهْد بِهِ , كَمَا شَرَطْتهُ فِي الْخُطْبَة . ‏

        ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو رَافِع عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَة ) ‏ ‏اِسْم أَبِي رَافِع : ( نُفَيْع ) وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ أَيْضًا . ‏ ‏قَوْله صَلَّى اللَّه عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : ( إِذَا قَعَدَ بَيْن شُعَبهَا الْأَرْبَع ثُمَّ جَهَدهَا ) ‏ ‏وَفِي رِوَايَة ( أَشْعُبهَا ) اِخْتَلَفَ الْعُلَمَاء فِي الْمُرَاد بِالشُّعَبِ الْأَرْبَع , فَقِيلَ : هِيَ الْيَدَانِ وَالرِّجْلَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالْفَخِذَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالشَّفْرَانِ , وَاخْتَارَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض أَنَّ الْمُرَاد شُعَب الْفَرْج الْأَرْبَع , وَالشُّعَب النَّوَاحِي وَاحِدَتهَا شُعْبَة , وَأَمَّا مَنْ قَالَ : ( أَشْعُبِهَا ) , فَهُوَ جَمْع شُعَب . وَمَعْنَى ( جَهَدَهَا ) حَفَرَهَا كَذَا قَالَهُ الْخَطَّابِيُّ وَقَالَ غَيْره : بَلَغَ مَشَقَّتهَا , يُقَال : جَهِدْته وَأَجْهَدْته بَلَغْت مَشَقَّته , قَالَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض رَحِمَهُ اللَّه تَعَالَى : الْأَوْلَى أَنْ يَكُون جَهَدَهَا بِمَعْنَى بَلَغَ جَهْده فِي الْعَمَل فِيهَا , وَالْجَهْد الطَّاقَة , وَهُوَ إِشَارَة إِلَى الْحَرَكَة وَتَمَكُّن صُورَة الْعَمَل , وَهُوَ نَحْو قَوْله مِنْ حَفَرَهَا أَيْ كَدّهَا بِحَرَكَتِهِ . وَإِلَّا فَأَيّ مَشَقَّة بَلَغَ بِهَا فِي ذَلِكَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . وَمَعْنَى الْحَدِيث أَنَّ إِيجَاب الْغُسْل لَا يَتَوَقَّف عَلَى نُزُول الْمَنِيّ بَلْ مَتَى غَابَتْ الْحَشَفَة فِي الْفَرْج وَجَبَ الْغُسْل عَلَى الرَّجُل وَالْمَرْأَة , وَهَذَا لَا خِلَاف فِيهِ الْيَوْم , وَقَدْ كَانَ فِيهِ خِلَاف لِبَعْضِ الصَّحَابَة وَمَنْ بَعْدهمْ , ثُمَّ اِنْعَقَدَ الْإِجْمَاع عَلَى مَا ذَكَرْنَاهُ , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَان هَذَا . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ الْحَشَفَة فِي دُبُر اِمْرَأَة , أَوْ دُبُر رَجُل , أَوْ فَرْج بَهِيمَة , أَوْ دُبُرهَا , وَجَبَ الْغُسْل سَوَاء كَانَ الْمَوْلَج فِيهِ حَيًّا أَوْ مَيِّتًا , صَغِيرًا أَوْ كَبِيرًا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ ذَلِكَ عَنْ قَصْد أَمْ عَنْ نِسْيَان , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مُخْتَارًا أَوْ مُكْرَهًا , أَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَهُ وَهُوَ نَائِم , وَسَوَاء اِنْتَشَرَ الذَّكَر أَمْ لَا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مَخْتُونًا أَمْ أَغْلَف , فَيَجِب الْغُسْل فِي كُلّ هَذِهِ الصُّوَر عَلَى الْفَاعِل وَالْمَفْعُول بِهِ إِلَّا إِذَا كَانَ الْفَاعِل أَوْ الْمَفْعُول بِهِ صَبِيًّا أَوْ صَبِيَّة فَإِنَّهُ لَا يُقَال وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ لِأَنَّهُ لَيْسَ مُكَلَّفًا , وَلَكِنْ يُقَال صَارَ جُنُبًا فَإِنْ كَانَ مُمَيِّزًا وَجَبَ عَلَى الْوَلِيّ أَنْ يَأْمُرهُ بِالْغُسْلِ كَمَا يَأْمُرهُ بِالْوُضُوءِ , فَإِنْ صَلَّى مِنْ غَيْر غُسْلٍ لَمْ تَصِحّ صَلَاته , وَإِنْ لَمْ يَغْتَسِل حَتَّى بَلَغَ وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ الْغُسْل , وَإِنْ اِغْتَسَلَ فِي الصِّبَى ثُمَّ بَلَغَ لَمْ يَلْزَمهُ إِعَادَة الْغُسْل . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَالِاعْتِبَار فِي الْجِمَاع بِتَغْيِيبِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْ صَحِيح الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ , فَإِذَا غَيَّبَهَا بِكَمَالِهَا تَعَلَّقَتْ بِهِ جَمِيع الْأَحْكَام , وَلَا يُشْتَرَط تَغْيِيب جَمِيع الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ . وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ بَعْض الْحَشَفَة لَا يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام بِالِاتِّفَاقِ إِلَّا وَجْهًا شَاذًّا ذَكَرَهُ بَعْض أَصْحَابنَا أَنَّ حُكْمه حُكْم جَمِيعهَا , وَهَذَا الْوَجْه غَلَط مُنْكَر مَتْرُوك , وَأَمَّا إِذَا كَانَ الذَّكَر مَقْطُوعًا فَإِنْ بَقِيَ مِنْهُ دُون الْحَشَفَة لَمْ يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام , وَإِنْ كَانَ الْبَاقِي قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَحَسْب تَعَلَّقَتْ الْأَحْكَام بِتَغْيِيبِهِ بِكَمَالِهِ , وَإِنْ كَانَ زَائِدًا عَلَى قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَفِيهِ وَجْهَانِ مَشْهُورَانِ لِأَصْحَابِنَا أَصَحّهمَا أَنَّ الْأَحْكَام تَتَعَلَّق بِقَدْرِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْهُ , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَتَعَلَّق شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام إِلَّا بِتَغْيِيبِ جَمِيع الْبَاقِي . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ لَفَّ عَلَى ذَكَرِهِ خِرْقَة وَأَوْلَجَهُ فِي فَرْج اِمْرَأَة فَفِيهِ ثَلَاثَة أَوْجُه لِأَصْحَابِنَا مِنْهَا وَالْمَشْهُور أَنَّهُ يَجِب عَلَيْهِمَا الْغُسْل , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَجِب لِأَنَّهُ أَوْلَجَ فِي خِرْقَة , وَالثَّالِث إِنْ كَانَتْ الْخِرْقَة غَلِيظَة تَمْنَع وُصُول اللَّذَّة وَالرُّطُوبَة لَمْ يَجِب الْغُسْل . وَإِلَّا وَجَبَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَ بَهِيمَة وَجَبَ عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل , وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت ذَكَرًا مَقْطُوعًا فَوَجْهَانِ أَصَحّهمَا يَجِب عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل

        Commentary of Imam Al-Nawawi on the Hadith

        The saying of the prophet – peace be upon him- ‘When he sits between a her fours parts) mostly its home animal (shu’biha Al-arba) and has intercourse with her then fatigues her’

        In another narration the word ‘Ashu’biha’ is used. The scholars have disagreed about the intended meaning of ‘shu’biha Al-arba’ (the fours) for some said that it means the arms and the legs, while others have said that it refers to the legs and thighs, and other said it means the legs and the edge of the pubic area. Al-Qadi Ayad chose the meaning of the four areas surrounding the vagina. The word (Shu’b) means areas, its singular form being (Shu’bah). As for those who say (Ashba’iha) that is the plural of the word (Shu’b).

        The word Aj-hada-ha (fatigue her) means to plow her, which was also stated by Al-Khatabi. Others have said it means to make her reach exhaustion as in the phrase ‘she made him toil and labor till he was exhausted’. Al-Qadi Ayad – may Allah rest his soul- said ‘Primarily, the word (Jahada’ha) means that the man exerted his effort working in a woman, where the word (Juh’d) means energy and refers to motion by describing the type of work. This is similar to his (the prophet) saying ‘he who plowed her’ meaning he who penetrated her by his motion. Otherwise, what other fatigue could a man experience because of her, and Allah knows best.

        The meaning of the hadith is that the necessity to wash is not limited to when semen is ejaculated, rather it is when the penile head (Hash-fa, lit. “the head of the male member,” i.e. head of the penis) penetrates the vagina, then it is necessary for the man and the woman to wash. There is no disagreement on this today, even though there was disagreement on this by some of the early companions and others later. However, an agreement was later reached and this is what we have shown and presented previously.

        Our companions have said that if the penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus, or a man’s anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus then it is necessary to wash whether the one being penetrated is alive or dead, young or old, whether it was done intentionally or absentmindedly, whether it was done willfully or forcefully. This also applies if the woman places the male member inside her while the man is asleep, whether the penis is erect or not, whether the penis is circumcised or uncircumcised. All these situations require that the person committing the act and the one the act is committed on must wash themselves, unless the person committing the act or the person the act is committed on is a young male or female. In that case it cannot be said that the person must wash, for they do not have the responsibility, rather it is said that this person is in a state of impurity. If that person can discern (the sexual act) then his guardian can command him to wash just as he commands him to perform the ablution washing for prayers. For if he prays without washing, his prayer has not been performed correctly; likewise if he doesn’t wash after he reaches puberty he must be forced to wash. If he washed as a youth and then reaches puberty, then he does not have to repeat the washing.

        Our companions have said that intercourse occurs when a healthy male’s penile head completely penetrates (an orifice), as has been unanimously agreed. Thus, when the penile head has completely disappeared (inside the orifice), then all the regulations concerning washing apply. It is unanimously agreed that it is not necessary that the entire penile shaft penetrate to apply the regulations of washing. If part of the penile head penetrates, then the regulations of washing are not imposed as is agreed, except by an odd few of our companions who said that even in this case all the regulations of washing apply. However, this opinion is wrong, rejected and abandoned. If the male member was severed and what remained was less than the length of the penile head, then none of the washing regulations apply. If the part remaining was equal in length to the penile head length then that part must completely penetrate for the regulation of washing to apply. If the part remaining was greater in length to the penile head length then there are two famous opinions for our companions. The most correct is that if the portion that penetrates is equal to the length of the penile head, then the regulations for washing apply. The other opinion is that none of the regulations for washing apply until the entire remaining length of the penile shaft completely penetrates and Allah knows best.

        If a man wraps a sheath around his male member and then ejaculates inside a woman’s vagina, then there are three opinions from our companions. The most famous is that the man must wash. The second is that he does not have to wash because he ejaculated inside the sheath. The third is that if the sheath is thick and prevents climax and wetness (in the vagina) then washing is not necessary, otherwise it is necessary and Allah knows best.

        If a woman inserts (in her vagina) an animal’s penis she must wash, and if she inserts a detached penis (thakaran maktu-an, lit. “a severed male member”) there are two opinions; the most correct is that she must wash.
        Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525 – Commentary
        Islamic scholars

        Some Islamic scholars have ruled that bestiality does not invalidate the hajj or ones fast.
        Sunni Imam Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H) records in his authority work ‘Badaye al-Sanae’ Volume 2 page 216:

        ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه
        “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal, that will not make his hajj void”[16]

        In Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820, the learned Hanafi scholar Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan sets out those acts that do not invalidate one’s fast, and he includes:
        “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”[16]
        Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820

        Others have said it is halal.
        لقد كانت نكاح الحيوانات قبل البعثه منتشره وتروى كثير من الروايات انها حلال لكنها مكروه والاحوط وجوبا ترك هذه العاده التي تسبب الأذى النفسي ويجب عليك الاعتراف لصاحب الاغنام ودفع قيمتها لمالكها

        Sex with animals before the mission (Islam) was wide spread and many narrations are narrated that it is halal but makrooh (disliked). And on the compulsory precaution one should abandon this practice that may cause self harm. And you must admit this to the owner of the sheep and pay the owner.[17]
        Conclusion
        From all of the above, we can certainly see that, unlike the West,
        Islamic societies do not universally harbor negative attitudes towards
        bestiality. Many Muslims seek out gratification or are indifferent to
        this perversion, and in some cases it is even openly promoted and made
        obligatory.
        This is all in stark contrast with their attitudes towards
        homosexuality and their allowance of pedophilia. Therefore to claim that
        the West without the guidance of Islam has allowed bestiality is not
        only false, but hypocritical when you consider that this perversion,
        alongside pedophilia, is left largely unhindered by the Islamic clerisy
        in their societies and runs rampant among followers of Islam.
        Aside from their own embarrassment, we can also see that there is
        little basis for any Shari’ah prohibition of bestiality/zoophilia as
        the Qur’an and the Sahih Hadiths (Bukhari and Muslim) do not prohibit
        this unnatural practice, furthermore the references we have examined
        outside of the two Sahihs are considered weak.

        HOT MOHAMMEDAN SEX

        Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five
        world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
        Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
        Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
        Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
        Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
        Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
        Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
        Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
        Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
        Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
        Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
        Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
        Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
        Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

        MOROCCO
        Morocco is an Islamic country, with 98.7% of the population Muslims.[10] The following is taken from a paper on sexuality in Morocco written by Nadia Kadiri, M.D., and Abderrazak Moussaïd, M.D., with Abdelkrim Tirraf, M.D., and Abdallah Jadid, M.D. Translated by Raymond J. Noonan, Ph.D., and Sandra Almeida.[11]
        In the rural world, zoophilia is still very widespread and not blameworthy. With masturbation, it constitutes an obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality.
        The operative phrase is ‘obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality’. Obligatory. It means in rural Morocco, Muslim males must have sexual intercourse with animals as part of their sexual apprenticeship.
        Also according to the scholars Allen Edwardes and Robert Masters, Ph.D, FAACS, the Muslims of Morocco believe that sexual intercourse with donkeys “make the penis grow big and strong” and masturbation is often scorned by them in favor of bestiality.[12]
        Islamic Scripture
        The above paper does also say “it is prohibited without question by the Shariâ”. But is this alleged prohibition within the Shari’ah extracted (as it must be) from the Qur’an and Hadith, or has this fiqh been derived using external non-Islamic sources?
        Qur’an
        In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur’an has to say on the subject:

        That’s right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur’an’s clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’
        If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.[13]
        Hadith
        There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. The following hadith is taken from the Sunnah Abu-Dawud collection, not Bukari or Muslim.
        Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.
        Abu Dawud 38:4449
        The very next hadith states:
        Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
        Abu Dawud 38:4450
        This is a clear contradiction. How can one hadith say kill the person committing bestiality, and the very next one say there is no prescribed punishment for the same person? Both statements cannot be true.
        Furthermore, these two contradictory hadiths (transmitted through different isnad) have been attributed to the same person. Abu Dawud himself had said the former of the two hadith is “not strong” and the latter further “weakens” it.[14]
        From the above, we can gather that Robert Masters had correctly stated, “bestiality was not specifically prohibited by the Prophet,”[9] so there is little wonder that apologists generally shy away from mentioning 38:4449 in their pronouncements on bestiality.
        Sahih Hadith
        There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. However there does exist a certain hadith and commentary by the renowned Islamic scholar al-Nawawi, which is of interest.
        The following narration does not exist in the English translations of Sahih Muslim, but a similar (but sanitized version) appears in: Sahih Muslim 3:684
        و حدثني ‏ ‏زهير بن حرب ‏ ‏وأبو غسان المسمعي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثناه ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏وابن بشار ‏ ‏قالوا حدثنا ‏ ‏معاذ بن هشام ‏ ‏قال حدثني ‏ ‏أبي ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏ومطر ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏الحسن ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي رافع ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي هريرة ‏ ‏أن نبي الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏إذا جلس بين ‏ ‏شعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ثم جهدها فقد وجب عليه الغسل ‏
        ‏وفي حديث ‏ ‏مطر ‏ ‏وإن لم ينزل ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏زهير ‏ ‏من بينهم بين ‏ ‏أشعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن عمرو بن عباد بن جبلة ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن أبي عدي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏حدثني ‏ ‏وهب بن جرير ‏ ‏كلاهما ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏بهذا الإسناد ‏ ‏مثله غير أن في حديث ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏ثم اجتهد ولم يقل وإن لم ينزل ‏
        Narrated by Zuhair Ibn Harb, narrated by Ghasan Al-Masma’i, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Ibn Bashar, who said that it was narrated by Muath Ibn Hisham, narrated by Abu Qatada, narrated by Mattar, narrated by Al-Hassan, narrated by Abu Rab’i, narrated by Abu Huraira who said:
        “The prophet – peace be upon him – said, ‘If one sits between a woman’s four parts (shu’biha Al-arba’) and then fatigues her, then it necessitates that he wash.’
        In the hadith of Mattar it is added ‘even if he does not ejaculate (yunzil).’ Zuhair narrated among them using the phrase ‘Ashba’iha Al-arba’. It was also narrated by Muhammad Ibn Umar Ibn Ibad Ibn Jablah, narrated Muhammad Ibn Abi Uday, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Wahb Ibn Jarir who both related from Shu’bah who narrated from Qatada who gave this same chain of transmission, except that in the hadith of Shu’bah it has the phrase ‘then he labored’ but did not have the phrase ‘even if he does not ejaculate.’
        Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525
        Imam al-Nawawi (1234 – 1278 AD)
        Below is a short bio of al-Nawawi, whose commentary of Sahih Muslim is second only to Ibn Hajar’s commentary of Sahih Bukhari.[15]
        Imam Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi was born in the village of Nawa in Southern Syria, Nawawi spent most of his life in Damascus where he lived in a simple manner, devoted to Allah, engaging single-mindedly in worship, study, writing and teaching various Islamic sciences. The life of this world seems scarcely to have impinged upon him. He was a versatile and extremely dedicated scholar whose breadth of learning was matched by its depth.
        Imam Nawawi died at the young age of 44 years, leaving behind him numerous works of great importance, the most famous of these being:
        • al-Arba’un Nabawi (An-Nawawis Forty Hadith)
        • Riyadhus saleheen
        • al-Maqasid (Al-Nawawi’s Manual of Islam).
        • Kitab al-Adhkar,
        • Minhaj al-Talibin (a main reference for Shafi’i fiqh)
        • Shar’ Sahih Muslim (he was the first to arrange the sahih of Muslim in the now familiar categories)
        Although best known for his works in hadith, Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi (d. 676/1277) was also the Imam of the later Shafi’i school of Jurisprudence, and widely acknowledged as the intellectual heir to Imam Shafi’i. He was a renowned scholar and jurist who dedicated his life to the pursuit of Islamic learning.
        About Imam al-Nawawi
        Commentary
        صحيح مسلم بشرح النووي ‏ ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو غَسَّان الْمِسْمَعِيّ ) ‏ ‏هُوَ بِفَتْحِ الْغَيْن الْمُعْجَمَة وَتَشْدِيد السِّين الْمُهْمَلَة , وَيَجُوز صَرْفه وَتَرْكُ صَرْفه . وَالْمِسْمَعِيّ بِكَسْرِ الْمِيم الْأُولَى وَفَتْح الثَّانِي , وَاسْمه مَالِك بْن عَبْد الْوَاحِد , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَانه مَرَّات , لَكِنِّي أُنَبِّه عَلَيْهِ وَعَلَى مِثْله لِطُولِ الْعَهْد بِهِ , كَمَا شَرَطْتهُ فِي الْخُطْبَة . ‏
        ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو رَافِع عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَة ) ‏ ‏اِسْم أَبِي رَافِع : ( نُفَيْع ) وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ أَيْضًا . ‏ ‏قَوْله صَلَّى اللَّه عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : ( إِذَا قَعَدَ بَيْن شُعَبهَا الْأَرْبَع ثُمَّ جَهَدهَا ) ‏ ‏وَفِي رِوَايَة ( أَشْعُبهَا ) اِخْتَلَفَ الْعُلَمَاء فِي الْمُرَاد بِالشُّعَبِ الْأَرْبَع , فَقِيلَ : هِيَ الْيَدَانِ وَالرِّجْلَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالْفَخِذَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالشَّفْرَانِ , وَاخْتَارَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض أَنَّ الْمُرَاد شُعَب الْفَرْج الْأَرْبَع , وَالشُّعَب النَّوَاحِي وَاحِدَتهَا شُعْبَة , وَأَمَّا مَنْ قَالَ : ( أَشْعُبِهَا ) , فَهُوَ جَمْع شُعَب . وَمَعْنَى ( جَهَدَهَا ) حَفَرَهَا كَذَا قَالَهُ الْخَطَّابِيُّ وَقَالَ غَيْره : بَلَغَ مَشَقَّتهَا , يُقَال : جَهِدْته وَأَجْهَدْته بَلَغْت مَشَقَّته , قَالَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض رَحِمَهُ اللَّه تَعَالَى : الْأَوْلَى أَنْ يَكُون جَهَدَهَا بِمَعْنَى بَلَغَ جَهْده فِي الْعَمَل فِيهَا , وَالْجَهْد الطَّاقَة , وَهُوَ إِشَارَة إِلَى الْحَرَكَة وَتَمَكُّن صُورَة الْعَمَل , وَهُوَ نَحْو قَوْله مِنْ حَفَرَهَا أَيْ كَدّهَا بِحَرَكَتِهِ . وَإِلَّا فَأَيّ مَشَقَّة بَلَغَ بِهَا فِي ذَلِكَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . وَمَعْنَى الْحَدِيث أَنَّ إِيجَاب الْغُسْل لَا يَتَوَقَّف عَلَى نُزُول الْمَنِيّ بَلْ مَتَى غَابَتْ الْحَشَفَة فِي الْفَرْج وَجَبَ الْغُسْل عَلَى الرَّجُل وَالْمَرْأَة , وَهَذَا لَا خِلَاف فِيهِ الْيَوْم , وَقَدْ كَانَ فِيهِ خِلَاف لِبَعْضِ الصَّحَابَة وَمَنْ بَعْدهمْ , ثُمَّ اِنْعَقَدَ الْإِجْمَاع عَلَى مَا ذَكَرْنَاهُ , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَان هَذَا . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ الْحَشَفَة فِي دُبُر اِمْرَأَة , أَوْ دُبُر رَجُل , أَوْ فَرْج بَهِيمَة , أَوْ دُبُرهَا , وَجَبَ الْغُسْل سَوَاء كَانَ الْمَوْلَج فِيهِ حَيًّا أَوْ مَيِّتًا , صَغِيرًا أَوْ كَبِيرًا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ ذَلِكَ عَنْ قَصْد أَمْ عَنْ نِسْيَان , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مُخْتَارًا أَوْ مُكْرَهًا , أَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَهُ وَهُوَ نَائِم , وَسَوَاء اِنْتَشَرَ الذَّكَر أَمْ لَا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مَخْتُونًا أَمْ أَغْلَف , فَيَجِب الْغُسْل فِي كُلّ هَذِهِ الصُّوَر عَلَى الْفَاعِل وَالْمَفْعُول بِهِ إِلَّا إِذَا كَانَ الْفَاعِل أَوْ الْمَفْعُول بِهِ صَبِيًّا أَوْ صَبِيَّة فَإِنَّهُ لَا يُقَال وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ لِأَنَّهُ لَيْسَ مُكَلَّفًا , وَلَكِنْ يُقَال صَارَ جُنُبًا فَإِنْ كَانَ مُمَيِّزًا وَجَبَ عَلَى الْوَلِيّ أَنْ يَأْمُرهُ بِالْغُسْلِ كَمَا يَأْمُرهُ بِالْوُضُوءِ , فَإِنْ صَلَّى مِنْ غَيْر غُسْلٍ لَمْ تَصِحّ صَلَاته , وَإِنْ لَمْ يَغْتَسِل حَتَّى بَلَغَ وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ الْغُسْل , وَإِنْ اِغْتَسَلَ فِي الصِّبَى ثُمَّ بَلَغَ لَمْ يَلْزَمهُ إِعَادَة الْغُسْل . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَالِاعْتِبَار فِي الْجِمَاع بِتَغْيِيبِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْ صَحِيح الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ , فَإِذَا غَيَّبَهَا بِكَمَالِهَا تَعَلَّقَتْ بِهِ جَمِيع الْأَحْكَام , وَلَا يُشْتَرَط تَغْيِيب جَمِيع الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ . وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ بَعْض الْحَشَفَة لَا يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام بِالِاتِّفَاقِ إِلَّا وَجْهًا شَاذًّا ذَكَرَهُ بَعْض أَصْحَابنَا أَنَّ حُكْمه حُكْم جَمِيعهَا , وَهَذَا الْوَجْه غَلَط مُنْكَر مَتْرُوك , وَأَمَّا إِذَا كَانَ الذَّكَر مَقْطُوعًا فَإِنْ بَقِيَ مِنْهُ دُون الْحَشَفَة لَمْ يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام , وَإِنْ كَانَ الْبَاقِي قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَحَسْب تَعَلَّقَتْ الْأَحْكَام بِتَغْيِيبِهِ بِكَمَالِهِ , وَإِنْ كَانَ زَائِدًا عَلَى قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَفِيهِ وَجْهَانِ مَشْهُورَانِ لِأَصْحَابِنَا أَصَحّهمَا أَنَّ الْأَحْكَام تَتَعَلَّق بِقَدْرِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْهُ , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَتَعَلَّق شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام إِلَّا بِتَغْيِيبِ جَمِيع الْبَاقِي . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ لَفَّ عَلَى ذَكَرِهِ خِرْقَة وَأَوْلَجَهُ فِي فَرْج اِمْرَأَة فَفِيهِ ثَلَاثَة أَوْجُه لِأَصْحَابِنَا مِنْهَا وَالْمَشْهُور أَنَّهُ يَجِب عَلَيْهِمَا الْغُسْل , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَجِب لِأَنَّهُ أَوْلَجَ فِي خِرْقَة , وَالثَّالِث إِنْ كَانَتْ الْخِرْقَة غَلِيظَة تَمْنَع وُصُول اللَّذَّة وَالرُّطُوبَة لَمْ يَجِب الْغُسْل . وَإِلَّا وَجَبَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَ بَهِيمَة وَجَبَ عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل , وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت ذَكَرًا مَقْطُوعًا فَوَجْهَانِ أَصَحّهمَا يَجِب عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل
        Commentary of Imam Al-Nawawi on the Hadith
        The saying of the prophet – peace be upon him- ‘When he sits between a her fours parts) mostly its home animal (shu’biha Al-arba) and has intercourse with her then fatigues her’
        In another narration the word ‘Ashu’biha’ is used. The scholars have disagreed about the intended meaning of ‘shu’biha Al-arba’ (the fours) for some said that it means the arms and the legs, while others have said that it refers to the legs and thighs, and other said it means the legs and the edge of the pubic area. Al-Qadi Ayad chose the meaning of the four areas surrounding the vagina. The word (Shu’b) means areas, its singular form being (Shu’bah). As for those who say (Ashba’iha) that is the plural of the word (Shu’b).
        The word Aj-hada-ha (fatigue her) means to plow her, which was also stated by Al-Khatabi. Others have said it means to make her reach exhaustion as in the phrase ‘she made him toil and labor till he was exhausted’. Al-Qadi Ayad – may Allah rest his soul- said ‘Primarily, the word (Jahada’ha) means that the man exerted his effort working in a woman, where the word (Juh’d) means energy and refers to motion by describing the type of work. This is similar to his (the prophet) saying ‘he who plowed her’ meaning he who penetrated her by his motion. Otherwise, what other fatigue could a man experience because of her, and Allah knows best.
        The meaning of the hadith is that the necessity to wash is not limited to when semen is ejaculated, rather it is when the penile head (Hash-fa, lit. “the head of the male member,” i.e. head of the penis) penetrates the vagina, then it is necessary for the man and the woman to wash. There is no disagreement on this today, even though there was disagreement on this by some of the early companions and others later. However, an agreement was later reached and this is what we have shown and presented previously.
        Our companions have said that if the penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus, or a man’s anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus then it is necessary to wash whether the one being penetrated is alive or dead, young or old, whether it was done intentionally or absentmindedly, whether it was done willfully or forcefully. This also applies if the woman places the male member inside her while the man is asleep, whether the penis is erect or not, whether the penis is circumcised or uncircumcised. All these situations require that the person committing the act and the one the act is committed on must wash themselves, unless the person committing the act or the person the act is committed on is a young male or female. In that case it cannot be said that the person must wash, for they do not have the responsibility, rather it is said that this person is in a state of impurity. If that person can discern (the sexual act) then his guardian can command him to wash just as he commands him to perform the ablution washing for prayers. For if he prays without washing, his prayer has not been performed correctly; likewise if he doesn’t wash after he reaches puberty he must be forced to wash. If he washed as a youth and then reaches puberty, then he does not have to repeat the washing.
        Our companions have said that intercourse occurs when a healthy male’s penile head completely penetrates (an orifice), as has been unanimously agreed. Thus, when the penile head has completely disappeared (inside the orifice), then all the regulations concerning washing apply. It is unanimously agreed that it is not necessary that the entire penile shaft penetrate to apply the regulations of washing. If part of the penile head penetrates, then the regulations of washing are not imposed as is agreed, except by an odd few of our companions who said that even in this case all the regulations of washing apply. However, this opinion is wrong, rejected and abandoned. If the male member was severed and what remained was less than the length of the penile head, then none of the washing regulations apply. If the part remaining was equal in length to the penile head length then that part must completely penetrate for the regulation of washing to apply. If the part remaining was greater in length to the penile head length then there are two famous opinions for our companions. The most correct is that if the portion that penetrates is equal to the length of the penile head, then the regulations for washing apply. The other opinion is that none of the regulations for washing apply until the entire remaining length of the penile shaft completely penetrates and Allah knows best.
        If a man wraps a sheath around his male member and then ejaculates inside a woman’s vagina, then there are three opinions from our companions. The most famous is that the man must wash. The second is that he does not have to wash because he ejaculated inside the sheath. The third is that if the sheath is thick and prevents climax and wetness (in the vagina) then washing is not necessary, otherwise it is necessary and Allah knows best.
        If a woman inserts (in her vagina) an animal’s penis she must wash, and if she inserts a detached penis (thakaran maktu-an, lit. “a severed male member”) there are two opinions; the most correct is that she must wash.
        Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525 – Commentary
        Islamic scholars
        Some Sunni Islamic scholars have ruled that bestiality does not invalidate the hajj or ones fast.
        ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه

        “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal, that will not make his hajj void”
        Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H), Badaye al-Sanae, Vol. 2, p. 216
        “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”
        Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan, Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820
        Others have said it is halal.
        لقد كانت نكاح الحيوانات قبل البعثه منتشره وتروى كثير من الروايات انها حلال لكنها مكروه والاحوط وجوبا ترك هذه العاده التي تسبب الأذى النفسي ويجب عليك الاعتراف لصاحب الاغنام ودفع قيمتها لمالكها

        Sex with animals before the mission (Islam) was wide spread and many narrations are narrated that it is halal but makrooh (disliked). And on the compulsory precaution one should abandon this practice that may cause self harm. And you must admit this to the owner of the sheep and pay the owner.
        Sex with animals Fatwa
        al-Uzma Seyyid Ali al-Sistani
        Conclusion
        From all of the above, we can certainly see that, unlike the West, Islamic societies do not universally harbor negative attitudes towards bestiality. Many Muslims seek out gratification or are indifferent to this perversion, and in some cases it is even openly promoted and made obligatory.
        This is all in stark contrast with their attitudes towards homosexuality and their allowance of pedophilia. Therefore to claim that the West without the guidance of Islam has allowed bestiality is not only false, but hypocritical when you consider that this perversion, alongside pedophilia, is left largely unhindered by the Islamic clerisy in their societies and runs rampant among followers of Islam.
        Aside from their own embarrassment, we can also see that there is little basis for any Shari’ah prohibition of bestiality/zoophilia as the Qur’an and the Sahih Hadiths (Bukhari and Muslim) do not prohibit this unnatural practice, furthermore the references we have examined outside of the two Sahihs are considered weak.
        9• ↑ Robert E.L. Masters – Forbidden Sexual Behavior and Morality – The Julian Press, 1st edition 1966,
        10• Africa :: Morocco – The online Factbook
        11• Read the full text here.
        12• Allen Edwardes and R.E.L. Masters – Cradle of Erotica (pp. 223-224) – Bantam Paperback; New Ed edition (1977), ISBN 0553103016
        13• Judith Worell – Encyclopedia of women and gender: Volume 1 (p. 298) – Academic Press; 1 edition, September 27, 2001, ISBN 9780122272455
        14• Dr. Ahmad Shafaat, “Ahadith About Rajm”, Islamic Perspectives, March 6, 2005 (archived).
        15• ON TASAWWUF Imam Nawawi (d. 676) – Sunnah.org

          • MOHAMMEDANS HATE TO HEAR THE TRUTH ABOUT THEIR STUPID CULT OF DEATH:

            YO GOATBOY,

            I KNEW YOU WERE IGNORANT, BUT I DIDN’T THINK YOU WERE THE BLACK VERSION OF HOMER SIMPSON!

            YOU WERE VERY TOUGH POINTING OUT THE WRONGS OF OBUMA, STICK IT UP YOUR BUM YEAH, BUT WHEN I POINTED OUT TO YOU THAT THE FAGGOT WAS KENYAN & A MOHAMMEDAN, YOU CHANGED THE SUBJECT!

            THIS IS AN OLD MOHAMMEDAN TRICK THAT WORKS ON GULLIBLE NON MOHAMMEDANS, BUT I KNOW YOU ARE ALL POSSESSED BY A LYING DEMON JINN.

            THE INCREDIBLE TEACHINGS OF MOHAMMED

            WOMEN

            Women are deficient in mind and religion.

            Muhammad asked some women, “Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half that of a man?” The women said, “yes,” He said, “This is because of the deficiency of the woman’s mind. ” Vol. 3:826

            Muhammad to women: “I have not seen any one more deficient in intelligence and religion than you.” Vol. 2:541

            The majority of people in hell are women.

            Muhammad said, “I was shown the Hell-fire and that the majority of its dwellers are women. ” Vol. 1:28, 301; Vol. 2:161; Vol. 7:124

            Women are a bad omen.

            Muhammad said, ” Bad omen is in the woman, the house and the horse.” Vol. 7:30

            Women are harmful to men.

            Muhammad said, “After me I have not left any affliction more harmful to men than women.” Vol. 7:33

            Women may not wear wigs.

            Muhammad said, ” Don’t wear false hair for Allah sends His curse upon such ladies who lengthen their hair artificially.” Vol. 7:133

            SEX AND MARRIAGE

            Muhammad’s sexual strength is equal to 30 men.

            Anas said, “The prophet used to visit all his wives in an hour round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.” I asked Anas, “Had the prophet the strength for it?” Anas replied, “We used to say that the prophet was given the strength of thirty (men). ” Vol. 1:268

            Muhammad married a 6-year-old child.

            “Narrated Aisha that the prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old.” Vol. 7:64

            Allah hurries to please Muhammad’s sexual desires.

            When the Quranic verse that allows Muhammad to postpone the turn of any wife was revealed, and when Muhammad said that Allah allowed him to marry his adopted son’s wife, Aisha (one of his wives) told him,

            “O Allah’s Apostle I do not see but that your Lord hurries in pleasing you. ” Vol. 7:48

            When a woman is divorced irrevocably, she can not return to her husband until she marries (including having sexual intercourse) with another man.

            “Narrated Aisha: The wife of Rifaa Al-Qurazi came to Allah’s Apostle and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle, Rifaa divorced me irrevocably. After him I married Abdur-Rahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi who proved to be impotent.’ Allah’s Apostle said to her, ‘Perhaps you want to return to Rifaa? Nay (You cannot return to Rifaa) until you and Abdur-Rahman (the impotent man) engage in sexual intercourse!” Vol. 7:186

            HUMAN RIGHTS

            Islam is to be imposed by force.

            Muhammad said, “I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, “None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, and whoever says, ” None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, his life and property will be saved by me.” (otherwise it will not). Vol. 4:196

            Apostasy is punishable by death.

            Muhammad said, “Whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him.” Vol. 9:57

            A Muslim must not be killed if he kills a non-Muslim.

            Muhammad said, ” No Muslim should be killed for killing a Kafir” (infidel). Vol. 9:50

            Ethnic cleansing is practised.

            Muhammad said to the Jews, “You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle (Mohammed) and I want to expel you from this land (The Arabian Peninsula), so, if anyone owns property, he is permitted to sell it.” Vol. 4:392

            Muhammad’s last words at his deathbed were: “Turn the pagans (non-Muslims) out of the Arabian Peninsula.” Vol. 5:716

            ETERNAL SECURITY
            No assurance of Salvation.

            Muhammad said. “By Allah, though I am the apostle of Allah, yet I do not know what Allah will do to me.” Vol. 5:266

            God punishes a deceased if his relatives weep.

            Muhammad said, “The deceased is punished because of the weeping of his relatives.” Vol. 2:375

            When you speak badly about a deceased, the deceased will go to hell.

            Muhammad said, “You praised this, so Paradise has been affirmed to him, and you spoke badly of this, so hell has been affirmed to him. You people are Allah’s witnesses on earth.” Vol. 2:448

            Urine on your clothes will bring punishment from God.

            Muhammad said, “The deceased person is being tortured in the grave not for a great thing to avoid, it is for being soiled with his urine. ” Vol. 2:460

            Holy war (Jihad) is a guarantee of heaven.

            Muhammad said, “The person who participates in (Holy battles) in Allah’s cause and nothing compels him to do so except belief in Allah and His Apostle, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty (if he survives) or will be admitted to paradise (if he is killed). ” Vol. 1:35

            MEDICINE
            Drinking camel’s urine will make you healthy.

            “The prophet ordered them to follow his camels, and drink their milk and urine, so they followed the camels and drank their milk and urine till their bodies became healthy.” Vol. 7:590

            Fever is from the heat of hell.

            Muhammad said, ” Fever is from the heat of hell, so put it out (cool it) with water.” Vol. 7:619

            A fly in your drink is a cure.

            Muhammad said, “If a housefly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease. ” Vol. 4:537

            How the baby’s looks are determined.

            Muhammad said, “As for the child, if the man’s discharge precedes the woman’s discharge, the child attracts the similarity of the man, and if the woman’s discharge precedes the man’s, then the child attracts the similarity of the woman.” Vol. 5:275

            MISCELLANEOUS
            If you eat garlic don’t come to the place of worship.

            Muhammad said, “Whosoever ate from this plant (i.e. garlic) should not enter the mosque.” Vol. 1:812

            Effect of evil eye

            Mohammed said, “The effect of an evil eye is a fact. ” Vol. 7:636

            Which shoe you should put on first.

            Muhammad said, “If you want to put on your shoes, put on the right shoe first, and if you want them off, take the left one first.” Vol. 7:747

            Breathing in your drink is bad.

            Muhammad said, “Don’t breath into your drinking utensil.” Vol. 1:156

            God frightens his devotees with eclipse.

            Muhammad said, “The sun and the moon are two signs amongst the signs of Allah and they do not eclipse because of the death of someone but Allah frightens His devotees with them. ” Vol. 2:158

            Satan urinates in people’s ears, when they don’t wake up for prayer.

            Narrated Abdullah: the prophet was told that a person had kept on sleeping till morning and had not got up for the prayer. The prophet said, “Satan urinated in his ears.” Vol. 2:245

            Yawning is from Satan.

            The prophet said, “Yawning is from Satan and if anyone of you yawns, he should check his yawning as much as possible, for if anyone of you (during the act of yawning) should say: “Ha”, Satan will laugh at him.” Vol. 2:158

            Stars are missiles, which God uses to hit the devils.

            The creation of stars is for three purposes, i.e., as decoration of the sky, as missiles to hit the devils, and as signs to guide travellers. Vol. 2:158

            STUPID HADITHS

            MOHAMMED CHOKED SATAN WITH HIS BARE HANDS

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet once offered the prayer and said, “Satan came in front of me and tried to interrupt my prayer, but Allah gave me an upper hand on him and I choked him. No doubt, I thought of tying him to one of the pillars of the mosque till you get up in the morning and see him. ….Then Allah made him (Satan) return with his head down (humiliated).”
            Sahih Bukhari 2:22:301

            WATER MIXED WITH DEAD DOGS & MENSTRUAL CLOTHES STILL CLEAN:

            Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri: The people asked the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him): Can we perform ablution out of the well of Buda’ah, which is a well into which menstrual clothes, dead dogs and stinking things were thrown? He replied: Water is pure and is not defiled by anything.
            Abu Dawud 1:66 , See Also Abu Dawud 1:67

            Fever comes from the heat of Hell

            The Prophet said, “Fever is from the heat of Hell, so abate fever with water.”
            Sahih Bukhari 7:71:621, See Also Sahih Bukhari 7:71:619, Sahih Bukhari 7:71:620, Sahih Bukhari 7:71:622

            Wicked wigs

            Narrated Abdullah (bin Mus’ud):
            Allah’s Apostle has cursed the lady who uses false hair.
            Sahih Bukhari 6:60:409

            Divinely cooked and delivered pot of meat fixes Prophet’s performance problems in bed

            Waqidi said: “The prophet of Allah used to say that I was among those who have little strength for intercourse. Then Allah sent me a pot with cooked meat. After I ate from it, I found strength any time I wanted to do the work.”
            Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Volume 8, Page 200

            Sheep owners are humble while horse and camel owners are arrogant

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The main source of disbelief is in the east. Pride and arrogance are characteristics of the owners of horses and camels, and those bedouins who are busy with their camels and pay no attention to Religion; while modesty and gentleness are the characteristics of the owners of sheep.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:520

            A drink that gives you wings

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said “If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease.”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:537

            A crying tree misses the Prophet’s sermons

            Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah: The Prophet used to stand by a tree or a date-palm on Friday. Then an Ansari woman or man said. “O Allah’s Apostle! Shall we make a pulpit for you?” He replied, “If you wish.” So they made a pulpit for him and when it was Friday, he proceeded towards the pulpit (for delivering the sermon). The date-palm cried like a child! The Prophet descended (the pulpit) and embraced it while it continued moaning like a child being quieted. The Prophet said, “It was crying for (missing) what it used to hear of religious knowledge given near to it.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:56:784

            Trees as informers

            Narrated ‘Abdur-Rahman: “I asked Masruq, ‘Who informed the Prophet about the Jinns at the night when they heard the Qur’an?’ He said, ‘Your father ‘Abdullah informed me that a tree informed the Prophet about them.’”
            Sahih Bukhari 5:58:199

            A saluting stone or a delusional Prophet?

            Jabir b. Samura reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: I recognise the stone in Mecca which used to pay me salutations before my advent as a Prophet and I recognise that even now.
            Sahih Muslim 30:5654

            Hellfire complains to Allah

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The (Hell) Fire complained to its Lord saying, ‘O my Lord! My different parts eat up each other.’ So, He allowed it to take two breaths, one in the winter and the other in summer, and this is the reason for the severe heat and the bitter cold you find (in weather).”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:482
            Abdomen contradicts Allah

            Narrated Abu Said: A man came to the prophet and said, ‘My brother has got loose motions. The Prophet said, Let him drink honey.” The man again (came) and said, ‘I made him drink (honey) but that made him worse.’ The Prophet said, ‘Allah has said the Truth, and the abdomen of your brother has told a lie.”
            Sahih Bukhari 7:71:614

            One sneeze, two sneeze, three sneeze, four

            Malik related to me from Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr from his father that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “If a man sneezes, invoke a blessing on him. Then if he sneezes, invoke a blessing on him. Then if he sneezes, invoke a blessing on him. Then if he sneezes, say, ‘You have a cold’.” Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr said, “I don’t know whether it was after the third or fourth.”
            Al-Muwatta 54 2.4

            Allah likes sneezing but hates yawning

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Allah likes sneezing and dislikes yawning, so if someone sneezes and then praises Allah, then it is obligatory on every Muslim who heard him, to say: May Allah be merciful to you (Yar-hamuka-l-lah). But as regards yawning, it is from satan, so one must try one’s best to stop it, if one says ‘Ha’ when yawning, satan will laugh at him.”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:73:242

            Allah, rain there, not here!

            Summary: People’s livestock were dying because of lack of water. On request, Muhammad prayed to Allah who instantly brought so much rain that that caused livestock to die due to excess of water. Then Muhammad told Allah to rain around them, not on them and the rain stopped.

            Narrated Sharik: Anas bin Malik said, “A person entered the Mosque on a Friday through the gate facing the Daril-Qada’ and Allah’s Apostle was standing delivering the Khutba (sermon). The man stood in front of Allah’s Apostle and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle, livestock are dying and the roads are cut off; please pray to Allah for rain.’ So Allah’s Apostle (p.b.u.h) raised both his hands and said, ‘O Allah! Bless us with rain. O Allah! Bless us with rain. O Allah! Bless us with rain!” Anas added, “By Allah, there were no clouds in the sky and there was no house or building between us and the mountain of Silas’. Then a big cloud like a shield appeared from behind it (i.e. Silas Mountain) and when it came in the middle of the sky, it spread and then rained. By Allah! We could not see the sun for a week. The next Friday, a person entered through the same gate and Allah’s Apostle was delivering the Friday Khutba and the man stood in front of him and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! The livestock are dying and the roads are cut off; Please pray to Allah to withhold rain.’ ” Anas added, “Allah’s Apostle raised both his hands and said, ‘O Allah! Round about us and not on us. O Allah!’ On the plateaus, on the mountains, on the hills, in the valleys and on the places where trees grow.’ ” Anas added, “The rain stopped and we came out, walking in the sun.” Sharik asked Anas whether it was the same person who had asked for rain the previous Friday. Anas replied that he did not know.
            Sahih Bukhari 2:17:127

            Fight polytheists by trimming moustache

            Ibn Umar said: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be opon him) said: Act against the polytheists, trim closely the moustache and grow beard.
            Sahih Muslim 2:500, See also: Sahih Muslim 2:501

            Allah loves sneezes (aacchoo!)

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Allah loves sneezing but dislikes yawning; so if anyone of you sneezes and then praises Allah, every Muslim who hears him (praising Allah) has to say Tashmit to him. But as regards yawning, it is from Satan, so if one of you yawns, he should try his best to stop it, for when anyone of you yawns, Satan laughs at him.”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:73:245

            Pus better than poetry

            Abu Sa`id Khudri reported: We were going with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him). As we reached the place (known as) Arj there met (us) a poet who had been reciting poetry. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Catch the satan or detain the satan, for filling the belly of a man with pus is better than stuffing his brain with poetry.
            Sahih Muslim 28:5611

            Spit on the left for protection against bad dreams

            Narrated Abu Qatada: The Prophet said, “A good dream that comes true is from Allah, and a bad dream is from Satan, so if anyone of you sees a bad dream, he should seek refuge with Allah from Satan and should spit on the left, for the bad dream will not harm him.”

            Sahih Bukhari 9:87:115

            Death be upon you, too

            Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar: Allah’s Apostle said, “When the Jews greet you, they usually say, ‘As-Samu ‘alaikum (Death be on you),’ so you should say (in reply to them), ‘Wa’alaikum (And on you).”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:74:274
            The almighty wind

            Narrated Anas: Whenever a strong wind blew, anxiety appeared on the face of the Prophet (fearing that wind might be a sign of Allah’s wrath).
            Sahih Bukhari 2:17:144

            Could someone please lick my hands? Thank you

            Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: The Prophet said,

            ‘When you eat, do not wipe your hands till you have licked it, or had it licked by somebody else.”
            Sahih Bukhari 7:65:366

            The art of dealing with a fart

            Narrated Ali ibn Talq: The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) said: When any of you breaks wind during the prayer, he should turn away and perform ablution and repeat the prayer.
            Abu Dawud 1:205

            Narrated ‘Abbas bin Tamim: My uncle asked Allah’s Apostle about a person who imagined to have passed wind during the prayer. Allah’ Apostle replied: “He should not leave his prayers unless he hears sound or smells something.”
            Sahih Bukhari 1:4:139

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Allah does not accept prayer of anyone of you if he does Hadath (passes wind) till he performs the ablution (anew).”
            Sahih Bukhari 9:86:86

            Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Zam’a: The Prophet forbade laughing at a person who passes wind.
            Sahih Bukhari 8:73:68

            And Allah taught Adam all the names as follows: He taught him the name of everything, down to fart and little fart.
            Tabari I 267

            Allah curses tatooed women

            Narrated Ibn Mas’ud: Allah has cursed those women who practise tattooing or get it done for themselves, and those who remove hair from their faces, and those who create spaces between their teeth artificially to look beautiful, such ladies as change the features created by Allah. Why then shall I not curse those whom Allah’s Apostle has cursed and who are cursed in Allah’s Book too?
            Sahih Bukhari 7:72:826
            Dye your hair because Jews and Christians don’t

            Narrated Abu Huraira :

            The Prophet said, “Jews and Christians do not dye their hair so you should do the opposite of what they do.
            Sahih Bukhari 7:72:786

            Greeting order

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “The young should greet the old, the passer by should greet the sitting one, and the small group of persons should greet the large group of persons. ”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:74:250

            Well hello, hello, hello

            Narrated Anas: Whenever Allah’s Apostle greeted somebody, he used to greet him three times, and if he spoke a sentence, he used to repeat it thrice.
            Sahih Bukhari 8:74:261

            Poke the Peeping Tom

            Narrated Anas: A man peeped into one of the dwelling places of the Prophet. The Prophet got up and aimed a sharp-edged arrow head (or wooden stick) at him to poke him stealthily.
            Sahih Bukhari 9:83:38

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Abul Qasim said, “If any person peeps at you without your permission and you poke him with a stick and injure his eye, you will not be blamed.”
            Sahih Bukhari 9:83:39

            p7S.22 The Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:
            (1) “Were a man to look at you without permission and you threw a rock at him and knocked out his eye, you would not have committed any offense. ”
            (2) “Whoever peeps into a house without its people’s leave, they may put out his eye.”
            Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law
            Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri, Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller

            Allah prefers odd numbers

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah has ninety-nine Names, i.e., one hundred minus one, and whoever believes in their meanings and acts accordingly, will enter Paradise; and Allah is Witr (one) and loves ‘the Witr’ (i.e., odd numbers).
            Sahih Bukhari 8:75:419

            Overweight omen

            Narrated Abu Huraira:
            Allah’s Apostle said, “On the Day of Resurrection, a huge fat man will come who will not weigh, the weight of the wing of a mosquito in Allah’s Sight.” and then the Prophet added, ‘We shall not give them any weight on the Day of Resurrection’
            Sahih Bukhari 6:60:253

            Searching for the meaning in life… and 3 stones

            Narrated Abdullah:
            The Prophet went out to answer the call of nature and asked me to bring three stones. I found two stones and searched for the third but could not find it. So I took a dried piece of dung and brought it to him. He took the two stones and threw away the dung and said, “This is a filthy thing.”
            Sahih Bukhari 1:4:158, See Also Sahih Bukhari 1:4:157, Sahih Bukhari 1:4:162, Sahih Bukhari 1:4:163

            Annoying in-laws, a universal phenomena

            Narrated ‘Uqba bin ‘Amir:
            Allah’s Apostle said, “Beware of entering upon the ladies.” A man from the Ansar said, “Allah’s Apostle! What about Al-Hamu the in-laws of the wife (the brothers of her husband or his nephews etc.)?”

            The Prophet replied:

            The in-laws of the wife are death itself.
            Sahih Bukhari 7:62:159

            Genies like bones and animal dung

            Narrated Abu Huraira:
            That once he was in the, company of the Prophet carrying a water pot for his ablution and for cleaning his private parts. While he was following him carrying it (i.e. the pot), the Prophet said, “Who is this?” He said, “I am Abu Huraira.” The Prophet said, “Bring me stones in order to clean my private parts, and do not bring any bones or animal dung.” Abu Huraira went on narrating: So I brought some stones, carrying them in the corner of my robe till I put them by his side and went away.
            When he finished, I walked with him and asked, “What about the bone and the animal dung?” He said, “They are of the food of Jinns. The delegate of Jinns of (the city of) Nasibin came to me–and how nice those Jinns were–and asked me for the remains of the human food. I invoked Allah for them that they would never pass by a bone or animal dung but find food on them.”
            Sahih Bukhari 5:58:200

            Incantations while having sex

            Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: The Prophet said, “If anyone of you, when having sexual relation with his wife, say: ‘In the name of Allah. O Allah! Protect us from Satan and prevent Satan from approaching our offspring you are going to give us,’ and if he begets a child (as a result of that relation) Satan will not harm it.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:493

            Devils on a leash

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said,

            “When the month of Ramadan comes, the gates of Paradise are opened and the gates of the (Hell) Fire are closed, and the devils are chained.”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:497

            Allah’s advice to his prophets

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “Once while a prophet amongst the prophets was taking a rest underneath a tree, an ant bit him. He, therefore, ordered that his luggage be taken away from underneath that tree and then ordered that the dwelling place of the ants should be set on fire. Allah sent him a revelation:– “Wouldn’t it have been sufficient to burn a single ant?”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:536

            Prostitutes can stay out of Hell by helping a thirsty dog

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “A prostitute was forgiven by Allah, because, passing by a panting dog near a well and seeing that the dog was about to die of thirst, she took off her shoe, and tying it with her head-cover she drew out some water for it. So, Allah forgave her because of that.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:538

            Bodyguard job: Females need not apply

            Narrated Abu Musa: Thy Prophet (p.b.u.h) said, “A time will come upon the people when a person will wander about with gold as Zakat and will not find anybody to accept it, and one man will be seen followed by forty women to be their guardian because of scarcity of men and great number of women”.
            Sahih Bukhari 2:24:495

            Looking at genitals or talking during intercourse may cause disabilities for child

            Narrated by Abi Hurairah that the prophet PBUH said: If one of you got engaged in intercourse, they shouldn’t look at the genital for that inherits blindness, and not talk too much for that inherits aphonia (lack of the ability to talk).
            Hadith translated by FFI forum member

            Say “Allah willing” during intercourse to give birth to Islamic militants

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “Once Solomon, son of David said, ‘(By Allah) Tonight I will have sexual intercourse with one hundred (or ninety-nine) women each of whom will give birth to a knight who will fight in Allah’s Cause.’ On that a (i.e. if Allah wills) but he did not say, Allah willing.’ Therefore only one of those women conceived and gave birth to a half-man. By Him in Whose Hands Muhammad’s life is, if he had said, “Allah willing’, (he would have begotten sons) all of whom would have been knights striving in Allah’s Cause.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:52:74i

            Dirty teeth can invalidate a fast

            Swallowing bits of food that may be left between the teeth is regarded as eating, so it invalidates the fast…

            Ibn Qudaamah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Mughni, 3/260:
            If a person has food between his teeth, one of the following two scenarios must apply:
            1 — It is a small amount that he cannot spit out, so he swallows it. This does not invalidate his fast, because it cannot be avoided. It is like saliva. Ibn al-Mundhir said: The scholars are unanimously agreed on that.
            2 — It is a large amount and he can spit it out. If he spits it out there is no sin on him, but if he swallows it deliberately, his fast is invalidated according to the majority of scholars, because he has swallowed food that he could have spat out willingly when he is mindful of his fast. So this breaks the fast just as if he deliberately started eating. End quote.
            Islam Q&A – Fatwa #78438

            “This Muhammad of yours is a dwarf and fat”

            Narrated AbuBarzah:
            AbdusSalam ibn AbuHazim AbuTalut said: I saw AbuBarzah who came to visit Ubaydullah ibn Ziyad. Then a man named Muslim who was there in the company mentioned it to me.
            When Ubaydullah saw him, he said: This Muhammad of yours is a dwarf and fat. The old man (i.e. AbuBarzah) understood it.
            So he said: I did not think that I should remain among people who would make me feel ashamed of the company of Muhammad (peace be upon him).
            Thereupon Ubaydullah said: The company of Muhammad (peace be upon him) is a honour for you, not a disgrace. He added: I called for you to ask about the reservoir. Did you hear the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) mentioning anything about it? AbuBarzah said: Yes, not once, twice, thrice, four times or five times. If anyone believes it, may Allah not supply him with water from it. He then went away angrily.
            Abu Dawud 40:4731
            The fact that the old man AbuBarzah ‘understood it’ implies that Ubaydullah’s description of Muhammad as a fat dwarf was accurate.

            Watermelons and cucumbers

            “If a man makes a hole in a watermelon, or a piece of dough, or a leather skin, or a statue, and has sex with it, then this is the same as what we have said about other types of masturbation [i.e., that it is halaal in the same circumstances given before, such as being on a journey]. In fact, it is easier than masturbating with one’s hand”.

            “If a woman does not have a husband, and her lust becomes strong, then some of our scholars say: It is permissible for the woman to take an akranbij, which is a piece of leather worked until it becomes shaped like a penis, and insert it in herself. She may also use a cucumber”.

            Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim (Islamic scholar), page 129

            A Muslim Shia website notes: “Maybe this is another reason why ‘Umar the Khalifa never went on jihad: somebody had to stay behind and organize the cucumber distribution.”

            Companions of Muhammad masturbated during Jihad

            “If a man is torn between continued desire or releasing it, and if this man does not have a wife or he has a slave-girl but he does not marry, then if a man is overwhelmed by desire, and he fears that he will suffer because of this (someone like a prisoner, or a traveller, or a pauper), then it is permissible for him to masturbate, and Ahmad (ibn Hanbal) is explicit on this. Furthermore, it is narrated that the Companions of the Prophet (s) used to masturbate while they were on military expeditions or travelling”.

            Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim (Islamic scholar), page 129

            Don’t flash Allah

            Narrated Abu Huraira:
            The Prophet had forbidden: (A) the Mulamasa and Munabadha (bargains), (B) the offering of two prayers, one after the morning compulsory prayer till the sun rises, and the others, after the ‘Asr prayer till the sun sets (C) He also forbade that one should sit wearing one garment, nothing of which covers his private parts (D) and prevent them from exposure to the sky; (E) he also forbade Ishtimal-as-Samma’.
            Sahih Bukhari 7:72:709

            Doodling is a sin!

            The scholars of the Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas said:

            Whatever is images of animate beings such as insects and other living beings is not permissible, even if it is drawn on a blackboard or on paper, and even if the purpose of it is to help in teaching, because it is not essential and because of the general meaning of the evidence concerning that. (Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 1/685)

            What is prohibited is making images of animate beings, whether that is engraving or painting on walls or fabric or paper or woven cloth, and whether it is done with a feather or a pen or other equipment, whether the thing is drawn as it is or whether some imaginary element is introduced, so it is made smaller or larger or more beautiful or more ugly, or it is drawn as a stick figure. (Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 1/696)

            Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
            One of the most serious of evils is making images of animate beings and keeping them and using them. There is no difference between that which is three dimensional and that which is on paper, whether it is produced by machines or otherwise. This meaning was mentioned by al-Nawawi in Sharh Saheeh Muslim, and he mentioned that it is the view of the four imams. The hadeeths which emphatically warned against that are well known. (Fataawa Rasaa’il Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem, 13/173)

            Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen said:
            Making images of animate beings, whether they are human or otherwise, is undoubtedly haraam and is a major sin, because it is proven that the one who does that is cursed by the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). This is clear, whether they are three-dimensional or drawn by hand. (Majmoo’ Fataawa wa Rasaa’il Ibn ‘Uthaymeen 2/288)
            Islam Q&A – Fatwa No. 129446

            Animals and living things

            Muttaqi (God-fearing) monkeys

            Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun: During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.
            Sahih Bukhari 5:58:188

            According to `Amr b. Maymûn : I was in Yemen. Amongst the female goats of my people, I saw that at a heightened place, a male monkey brought along a female monkey and slept while keeping her hand beneath his head. During this time, a young monkey came and signaled the female monkey. She softly removed her hand from beneath the male monkey’s head and went with the young monkey. She fornicated with him and I was watching it. After that, the female monkey returned and was softly trying to put her hand back under the male monkey’s head that he woke up bewildered and smelled her and then screamed.

            All the monkeys gathered thereafter. He would point towards her and scream constantly (i.e. she has committed adultery). At last the other monkeys went towards the right left and brought along that young monkey whom I recognized. They dug a hole for this young monkey and the female one and stoned them to death. So I saw monkeys stoning to death too besides the human race.
            Taiseer-ul-Baari, volume 2, Page 626

            This is consistent with the Qur’an in its claim that Jews (who at one time practiced stoning) were turned into apes:

            “And you know well the story of those among you who broke Sabbath. We said to them: “Be apes—despised and hated by all. Thus We made their end a warning to the people of their time and succeeding generation, and an admonition for God-fearing people.”
            Qur’an 2:65

            Unpaid debt to turn into talking snake on Judgement Day

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “On the Day of Resurrection the Kanz (Treasure or wealth of which, Zakat has not been paid) of anyone of you will appear in the shape of a huge bald-headed poisonous male snake and its owner will run away from it, but it will follow him and say, ‘I am your Kanz.’” The Prophet added, “By Allah, that snake will keep on following him until he stretches out his hand and let the snake swallow it.” Allah’s Apostle added, “If the owner of camels does not pay their Zakat, then, on the Day of Resurrection those camels will come to him and will strike his face with their hooves.”
            Sahih Bukhari 9:86:89

            Monkeys and pigs are humans who once played music

            Narrated Abu ‘Amir or Abu Malik Al-Ash’ari: that he heard the Prophet saying, “From among my followers there will be some people who will consider illegal sexual intercourse, the wearing of silk, the drinking of alcoholic drinks and the use of musical instruments, as lawful. And there will be some people who will stay near the side of a mountain and in the evening their shepherd will come to them with their sheep and ask them for something, but they will say to him, ‘Return to us tomorrow.’ Allah will destroy them during the night and will let the mountain fall on them, and He will transform the rest of them into monkeys and pigs and they will remain so till the Day of Resurrection.”
            Sahih Bukhari 7:69:494

            Zoophilia pardonable but not homosexuality

            Abu Dawud 38:4448 prescribes the death sentence for an unmarried man who commits sodomy but there is no prescribed punishment for having sex with an animal:
            Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
            Abu Dawud 38:4450

            Sheeps prefer female babies

            Narrated Umm Kurz: I heard the Prophet (may peace be upon him) say: Let the birds stay in their roosts. She said: I also heard him say: Two sheep are to be sacrificed for a boy and one for a girl, but it does you no harm whether they are male or female.
            Abu Dawud 15:2829

            Have flu? Try fresh camel urine
            The climate of Medina did not suit some people, so the Prophet ordered them to follow his shepherd, i.e. his camels, and drink their milk and urine (as a medicine). So they followed the shepherd that is the camels and drank their milk and urine till their bodies became healthy.
            Sahih Bukhari 7:71:590

            YOU AIN’T NOTHING BUT A HOUND DOG!

            Narrated ‘Aisha: The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, “Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying people).” I said, “You have made us (i.e. women) dogs… ”

            Sahih Bukhari 1:9:490

            Goat ate my Qur’an
            ‘Aisha: “The verse of the stoning and of suckling an adult ten times were revealed, and they were (written) on a paper and kept under my bed. When the messenger of Allah expired and we were preoccupied with his death, a goat entered and ate away the paper.”
            Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal. vol. 6, p. 269; Sunan Ibn Majah, p. 626; Ibn Qutbah, Tawil Mukhtalafi ‘l-Hadith (Cairo: Maktaba al-Kulliyat al-Azhariyya. 1966) p. 310; As-Suyuti, ad-Durru ‘l-Manthur, vol. 2, p. 13

            HOLY COCKS & DEVIL DONKEYS

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “When you hear the crowing of cocks, ask for Allah’s Blessings for (their crowing indicates that) they have seen an angel. And when you hear the braying of donkeys, seek Refuge with Allah from satan for (their braying indicates) that they have seen a satan.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:522

            COWGATE

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Once Allah’s Apostle; offered the Morning Prayer and then faced the people and said, “While a man was driving a cow, he suddenly rode over it and beat it. The cow said, “We have not been created for this, but we have been created for sloughing.” On that the people said astonishingly, “Glorified be Allah! A cow speaks!” The Prophet said, “I believe this, and Abu Bakr and ‘Umar too, believe it, although neither of them was present there.

            PART 2

            While a person was amongst his sheep, a wolf attacked and took one of the sheep. The man chased the wolf till he saved it from the wolf, where upon the wolf said, ‘You have saved it from me; but who will guard it on the day of the wild beasts when there will be no shepherd to guard them except me?” The people said surprisingly, “Glorified be Allah! A wolf speaks!” The Prophet said, “But I believe this, and Abu Bakr and ‘Umar too, believe this, although neither of them was present there.”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:56:677

            More horse dung and urine equals more heavenly rewards
            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “If somebody keeps a horse in Allah’s Cause motivated by his faith in Allah and his belief in His Promise, then he will be rewarded on the Day of Resurrection for what the horse has eaten or drunk and for its dung and urine.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:52:105

            Lost camels can be returned to their owners but not sheep

            Narrated Zaid bin Khalid Al-Juhani
            A man asked the Prophet about the picking up of a “Luqata” (fallen lost thing). The Prophet replied, “Recognize and remember its tying material and its container, and make public announcement (about it) for one year, then utilize it but give it to its owner if he comes.” Then the person asked about the lost camel. On that, the Prophet got angry and his cheeks or his Face became red and he said, “You have no concern with it as it has its water container, and its feet and it will reach water, and eat (the leaves) of trees till its owner finds it.” The man then asked about the lost sheep. The Prophet replied, “It is either for you, for your brother (another person) or for the wolf.”
            Sahih Bukhari 1:3:91

            A house may be set on fire by a mouse

            This hadith has been reported on the authority of Jabir through another chain of transmitters but with a slight variation of words:” The mouse may set the house on fire over its inhabitants.”
            Sahih Muslim 23:4994

            Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’z-Zubayr al-Makki from Jabir ibn Abdullah that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “Lock the door, tie the waterskin, turn the vessel over or cover it, and put out the lamp. Shaytan does not open a locked door or untie a tied knot, or uncover a vessel. A mouse may set fire to people’s houses about them.”
            Al-Muwatta 49 10.21

            YOU DIRTY RAT!

            The Prophet said, “A group of Israelites were lost. Nobody knows what they did. But I do not see them except that they were cursed and changed into rats, for if you put the milk of a she-camel in front of a rat, it will not drink it, but if the milk of a sheep is put in front of it, it will drink it.”

            PART 2

            I told this to Ka’b who asked me, “Did you hear it from the Prophet ?” I said, “Yes.” Ka’b asked me the same question several times; I said to Ka’b. “Do I read the Torah? (i.e. I tell you this from the Prophet.)”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:524

            Race relations, the Islamic way

            Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, “Listen and obey (your chief) even if an Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin were made your chief.”
            Sahih Bukhari 1:11:662

            In a dream, Satan cannot imitate the Prophet

            Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, “Whoever has seen me in a dream, then no doubt, he has seen me, for Satan cannot imitate my shape.
            Sahih Bukhari 9:87:123, See also Sahih Bukhari 9:87:124, Sahih Bukhari 9:87:125, and Sahih Bukhari 9:87:126

            Don’t be late, the angels are watching
            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “On every Friday the angels take heir stand at every gate of the mosques to write the names of the people chronologically (i.e. according to the time of their arrival for the Friday prayer and when the Imam sits (on the pulpit) they fold up their scrolls and get ready to listen to the sermon.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:433

            Allah wants to see you…naked

            Narrated Ibn Abbas: The Prophet said, “You will meet Allah barefooted, naked, walking on feet, and uncircumcised.”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:76:531, See also Sahih Bukhari 8:76:532, Sahih Bukhari 8:76:533, and Sahih Bukhari 8:76:533

            Women are just like camels

            Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar: I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, “Women are just like camels, out of one hundred, one can hardly find a single camel suitable to ride.”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:76:505

            Flag fixed behind the buttocks

            It is narrated on the authority of Abu Sa’id that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: On the Day of Judgment there will be a flag fixed behind the buttocks of every person guilty of the breach of faith.
            Sahih Muslim 19:4309

            Satanic influences

            Satan ties three knots at back of our head while we sleep
            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “During your sleep, Satan knots three knots at the back of the head of each of you, and he breathes the following words at each knot, ‘The night is, long, so keep on sleeping,’ If that person wakes up and celebrates the praises of Allah, then one knot is undone, and when he performs ablution the second knot is undone, and when he prays, all the knots are undone, and he gets up in the morning lively and gay, otherwise he gets up dull and gloomy. ”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:491

            SATAN’S LULLABY

            Narrated ‘Abdullah : A person was mentioned before the Prophet (p.b.u.h) and he was told that he had kept on sleeping till morning and had not got up for the prayer. The Prophet said, “Satan urinated in his ears.”

            Sahih Bukhari 2:21:245

            WHY DO ARABS HAVE BIG NOSES?

            Abu Huraira reported: The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) said. When any one of you awakes up from sleep and performs ablution, he must clean his nose three times, for the devil spends the night in the interior of his nose.
            SATAN’S LULLABY

            Narrated ‘Abdullah : A person was mentioned before the Prophet (p.b.u.h) and he was told that he had kept on sleeping till morning and had not got up for the prayer. The Prophet said, “Satan urinated in his ears.”

            Sahih Bukhari 2:21:245

            Sahih Muslim 2:462

            Satan tries to interrupt Muhammad
            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet offered a prayer, and (after finishing) he said, “Satan came in front of me trying persistently to divert my attention from the prayer, but Allah gave me the strength to over-power him.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:504

            Satan gets unlimited hospital passes
            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “When any human being is born. Satan touches him at both sides of the body with his two fingers, except Jesus, the son of Mary, whom Satan tried to touch but failed, for he touched the placenta-cover instead.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:506

            Satan & yawning

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Yawning is from Satan and if anyone of you yawns, he should check his yawning as much as possible, for if anyone of you (during the act of yawning) should say: ‘Ha’, Satan will laugh at him.”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:509

            Man talks to Satan for 3 nights and Satan steals his food
            Narrated Abu Huraira
            Allah’s Apostle deputed me to keep Sadaqat (al-Fitr) of Ramadan. A comer came and started taking handfuls of the foodstuff (of the Sadaqa) (stealthily). I took hold of him and said, “By Allah, I will take you to Allah’s Apostle .” He said, “I am needy and have many dependents, and I am in great need.” I released him, and in the morning Allah’s Apostle asked me, “What did your prisoner do yesterday?” I said, “O Allah’s Apostle! The person complained of being needy and of having many dependents, so, I pitied him and let him go.” Allah’s Apostle said, “Indeed, he told you a lie and he will be coming again.” I believed that he would show up again as Allah’s Apostle had told me that he would return. So, I waited for him watchfully. When he (showed up and) started stealing handfuls of foodstuff, I caught hold of him again and said, “I will definitely take you to Allah’s Apostle. He said, “Leave me, for I am very needy and have many dependents. I promise I will not come back again.” I pitied him and let him go.

            In the morning Allah’s Apostle asked me, “What did your prisoner do.” I replied, “O Allah’s Apostle! He complained of his great need and of too many dependents, so I took pity on him and set him free.” Allah’s Apostle said, “Verily, he told you a lie and he will return.” I waited for him attentively for the third time, and when he (came and) started stealing handfuls of the foodstuff, I caught hold of him and said, “I will surely take you to Allah’s Apostle as it is the third time you promise not to return, yet you break your promise and come.” He said, “(Forgive me and) I will teach you some words with which Allah will benefit you.” I asked, “What are they?” He replied, “Whenever you go to bed, recite “Ayat-al-Kursi”– ‘Allahu la ilaha illa huwa-l-Haiy-ul Qaiyum’ till you finish the whole verse. (If you do so), Allah will appoint a guard for you who will stay with you and no satan will come near you till morning. ” So, I released him. In the morning, Allah’s Apostle asked, “What did your prisoner do yesterday?” I replied, “He claimed that he would teach me some words by which Allah will benefit me, so I let him go.” Allah’s Apostle asked, “What are they?” I replied, “He said to me, ‘Whenever you go to bed, recite Ayat-al-Kursi from the beginning to the end —- Allahu la ilaha illa huwa-lHaiy-ul-Qaiyum—-.’ He further said to me, ‘(If you do so), Allah will appoint a guard for you who will stay with you, and no satan will come near you till morning.’ (Abu Huraira or another sub-narrator) added that they (the companions) were very keen to do good deeds. The Prophet said, “He really spoke the truth, although he is an absolute liar. Do you know whom you were talking to, these three nights, O Abu Huraira?” Abu Huraira said, “No.” He said, “It was Satan.”
            Sahih Bukhari 3:38:505t

            FARTING SATAN

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “When the Adhan is pronounced Satan takes to his heels and passes wind with noise during his flight in order not to hear the Adhan. When the Adhan is completed he comes back and again takes to his heels when the Iqama is pronounced and after its completion he returns again till he whispers into the heart of the person (to divert his attention from his prayer) and makes him remember things which he does not recall to his mind before the prayer and that causes him to forget how much he has prayed.”

            Sahih Bukhari 1:11:582

            SATAN THE CHILD MOLESTER

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “When any human being is born. Satan touches him at both sides of the body with his two fingers, except Jesus, the son of Mary, whom Satan tried to touch but failed, for he touched the placenta-cover instead.”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:506

            Narrated Said bin Al-Musaiyab: Abu Huraira said, “I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, ‘There is none born among the off-spring of Adam, but Satan touches it. A child therefore, cries loudly at the time of birth because of the touch of Satan, except Mary and her child.” Then Abu Huraira recited: “And I seek refuge with You for her and for her offspring from the outcast Satan.” (3.36)

            Sahih Bukhari Book 55 No. 641

            Call of nature related to offensive and wicked things

            Narrated Anas: Whenever the Prophet went to answer the call of nature, he used to say, “Allah-umma inni a’udhu bika minal khubuthi wal khaba’ith i.e. O Allah, I seek Refuge with You from all offensive and wicked things (evil deeds and evil spirits).”

            Sahih Bukhari 1:4:144

            PARADISE: “appetizing vaginas” & “ever-erect” penises

            Abu Umama narrated: “The Messenger of God said, ‘Everyone that God admits into paradise will be married to 72 wives; two of them are houris and seventy of his inheritance of the [female] dwellers of hell. All of them will have libidinous sex organs and he will have an ever-erect penis.’ ”

            Sunan Ibn Maja, Zuhd (Book of Abstinence) 39

            PART 2

            “Each time we sleep with a Houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [i.e. Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetizing vaginas.”
            Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Qur’an, p. 351

            Allah punishes Muhammad for Safiyah’s capture by making him fall off a camel

            Safiyah bint Huyay was a woman that Muhammad captured and married, after killing her husband.
            Narrated Anas bin Malik: We were in the company of the Prophet while returning from ‘Usfan, and Allah’s Apostle was riding his she camel keeping Safiya bint Huyay riding behind him. His she camel slipped and both of them fell down. Abu Talha jumped from his camel and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! May Allah sacrifice me for you.” The Prophet said, “Take care of the lady.” So, Abu Talha covered his face with a garment and went to Safiya and covered her with it, and then he set right the condition of their she camel so that both of them rode, and we were encircling Allah’s Apostle like a cover. When we approached Medina, the Prophet said, “We are returning with repentance and worshipping and praising our Lord.” He kept on saying this till he entered Medina.
            Sahih Bukhari 4:52:318

            Tortured in the grave for peeing on himself

            Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: Once the Prophet, while passing through one of the grave-yards of Medina or Mecca heard the voices of 2 persons who were being tortured in their graves. The Prophet said, “These 2 persons are being tortured not for a major sin (to avoid).” The Prophet then added, “Yes! (they are being tortured for a major sin). Indeed, 1 of them never saved himself from being soiled with his urine while the other used to go about gossiping.

            PART 2

            The Prophet then asked for a green leaf of a date-palm tree, broke it into two pieces and put one on each grave. On being asked why he had done so, he replied, “I hope that their torture might be lessened, till these get dried.”
            Sahih Bukhari 1:4:215

            TURN YOUR ARSE WEST, MY BOY!

            Narrated Abu Aiyub Al-Ansari: Allah’s Apostle said, “If anyone of you goes to an open space for answering the call of nature he should neither face nor turn his back towards the Qibla; he should either face the east or the west

            Sahih Bukhari 1:4:215

            BLACK DOGS ARE DEVILS

            Abu Dharr reported: The Messenger of ‘Allah (may peace be upon him) said: When any one of you stands for prayer and there is a thing before him equal to the back of the saddle that covers him and in case there is not before him (a thing) equal to the back of the saddle, his prayer would be cut off by (passing of an) ass, woman, and black Dog.

            PART 2

            I said: O Abu Dharr, what feature is there in a black dog which distinguish it from the red dog and the yellow dog? He said: O, son of my brother, I asked the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) as you are asking me, and he said: The black dog is a devil.
            Sahih Muslim 4:1032

            Playing chess is evil

            Buraida reported on the authority of his father that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: He who played chess is like one who dyed his hand with the flesh and blood of swine.
            Sahih Muslim 28:5612

            SHINE YOUR LIGHT ON ME

            Aminah and her vagina light

            According to accepted sirat, Muhammad’s mother had light coming out of her vagina when giving birth to him.
            When the prophet came out of his mothers vagina, the light covered the east and the west which reached all the way to Sham (Syria today)
            sirat ibn hisham 166

            Free a Muslim slave, and save your private parts

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “If somebody manumits a Muslim slave, Allah will save from the Fire every part of his body for freeing the corresponding parts of the slave’s body, even his private parts will be saved from the Fire) because of freeing the slave’s private parts.”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:79:706

            Don’t ever raise your head

            The sin of raising your head before the imam is so great, your face will transform into a donkey.
            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Isn’t he who raises his head before the Imam afraid that Allah may transform his head into that of a donkey or his figure (face) into that of a donkey?”

            Sahih Bukhari 1:11:660

            He pees like a woman

            Narrated Amr ibn al-’As: AbdurRahman ibn Hasanah reported: I and Amr ibn al-’As went to the Prophet (peace be upon him). He came out with a leather shield (in his hand). He covered himself with it and urinated. Then we said: Look at him. He is urinating as a woman does. The Prophet (peace be upon him), heard this and said: Do you not know what befell a person from amongst Banu Isra’il (the children of Israel)? When urine fell on them, they would cut off the place where the urine fell; but he (that person) forbade them (to do so), and was punished in his grave.
            Abu Dawud 1:22

            COMMITT SUICIDE

            Whoso is wont to think (through envy) that Allah will not give him (Muhammad) victory in the world and the Hereafter (and is enraged at the thought of his victory), let him stretch a rope up to the roof (of his dwelling), and let him hang himself. Then let him see whether his strategy dispelleth that whereat he rageth!.
            Qur’an 22:15

            Drunk water while standing up? Puke it out!

            Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: None of you should drink while standing; and if anyone forgets, he must vomit.
            Sahih Muslim 23:5022

            2 things the Prophet loves: perfume and women

            Al-Hasan al-Basri wrote: “The Messenger of God said, “The only two things I cherish of the life of this world are women and perfume.
            Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Volume 1, Page 380
            Aisha said “The Prophet of God liked three things of this world: Perfume, women, and food; he had the [first] two, but missed food.”
            Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Volume 1, Page 380

            Don’t look up!

            Jabir b. Samura reported: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: The people who lift their eyes towards the sky in Prayer should avoid it or they would lose their eyesight.
            Sahih Muslim 4:862
            Abu Huraira reported: People should avoid lifting their eyes towards the sky while supplicating in prayer, otherwise their eyes would be snatched away.
            Sahih Muslim 4:863

            15. Harm No. 14: Leads to Masturbation
            . . .
            Just as it is unlawful and forbidden to commit sexual intercourse with a strange man or woman, it is likewise forbidden to masturbate.
            Unfortunately, this sin has become widespread in this day and age. In some narrations of Hadith there are severe warnings against this sin. It has been mentioned that the person who masturbates shall be resurrected on the Day of Judgment with a pregnant hand. It has also been mentioned that the ناکح الید (the one who masturbates) is under the curse of Allah. Fulfilling one’s sexual desires in an unlawful manner is obviously impermissible. But one should also be cautious of excessive permissible sex. Too much sexual intercourse spoils the health and drains one’s strength.

            Spiritually, one does not get enjoyment in worship and Zikr. If also causes the child to be born weak and frail. It is for this very reason that the Buzurgs have advised to preserve the semen. After 15 to 30 days when there is a strong urge to have sex, only then should one fulfill one’s desire. The lion copulates once a year and from that it breeds offspring.
            Similarly, those people who have intercourse after long intervals of time produce strong and healthy children. Therefore, moderation is necessary in sexual relations with one’s wife, otherwise excessive sex can even lead to death. My Shaikh, Hazrat Phoulpoori (رحمۃ اللہ علیہ) narrated to us the incident of an Alim who had a very beautiful wife. Whenever he would come home from running errands and would see his wife, then he would not be able to control himself. He used have so much sexual relations that after six months, instead of discharging semen, blood started to ejaculate from his penis. This eventually led to a severe fever after which he died. Beauty was the cause of his death. This is why I advise to have moderation in permissible things as well. As for the unlawful, then my advice is not to even go near Haraam. May Allah Ta’ala grant us the ability to practice upon what has been said. Amen
            The 14 Harms Of Casting Evil Glances
            Shaikh ul Arab wal Ajam Hazrat Maulana Shah Hakeem Muhammad Akhtar Saheb

            Muhammad the inadvertent trend-setter has a temper tantrum

            Narrated Ibn. ‘Umar: Allah’s Apostle wore a gold ring or a silver ring and placed its stone towards the palm of his hand and had the name ‘Muhammad, the Apostle of Allah’ engraved on it. The people also started wearing gold rings like it, but when the Prophet saw them wearing such rings, he threw away his own ring and said. “I will never wear it,” and then wore a silver ring, whereupon the people too started wearing silver rings. Ibn Umar added: After the Prophet Abu Bakr wore the ring, and then Umar and then ‘Uthman wore it till it fell in the Aris well from ‘Uthman. bin ‘Umar : Allah’s Apostle wore a gold ring, then he threw it and said, “I will never wear it.” The people also threw their (gold) rings.
            Sahih Bukhari 7:72:756, See also: Sahih Muslim 24:5210, and Sahih Bukhari 7:72:755

            Wanna have an affair and steal things? Go ahead!

            Narrated Abu Dhar: The Prophet said, “Gabriel said to me, ‘Whoever amongst your followers die without having worshipped others besides Allah, will enter Paradise (or will not enter the (Hell) Fire).” The Prophet asked. “Even if he has committed illegal sexual intercourse or theft?” He replied, “Even then.”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:445

            Prophet Muhammad’s BO-scented perfume, anyone?

            Narrated Thumama: Anas said,

            “Um Sulaim used to spread a leather sheet for the Prophet and he used to take a midday nap on that leather sheet at her home.” Anas added, “When the Prophet had slept, she would take some of his sweat and hair and collect it (the sweat) in a bottle and then mix it with Suk (a kind of perfume) while he was still sleeping. “When the death of Anas bin Malik approached, he advised that some of that Suk be mixed with his Hanut (perfume for embalming the dead body), and it was mixed with his Hanut.
            Sahih Bukhari 8:74:298

            Moses slaps the Angel of Death

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The angel of death was sent to Moses and when he went to him, Moses slapped him severely, spoiling one of his eyes. The angel went back to his Lord, and said, “You sent me to a slave who does not want to die.”…..
            Sahih Bukhari 2:23:423,

  2. Raj, dude, indeed, if Qur’an isn’t true, it isn’t true. But you have to prove first and your proofs are old.

    • Dear MM, good to “see” you back!

      Let me ask you, which IS the MOST read and MEMORISED Book in the World??

      Which IS the Book whose verses are recited FIVE times a day for 365 days, NOT forgetting the Taraweer where the memorised Quran IS recited in full for 30 days?

        • Lucky bin Dafty, …Larry Silverstein was the person in charge of renting the Twin Towers, wasn’t he? YOUR NAME??

          How come in those FOUR Super Boeings, the American Jet liners, that there were hardly 240 Passengers in TOTAL including the “terrorists??????????

          And yet in ONE, single, Malaysian Boeing there were 239 Pax…ALMOST THE SAME NUMBER!! How come???

          Maybe it was “HARRY POTTER X 4 who piloted those planes!?! Please, EXPLAIN!

          • THE SHOULD HAVE USED AIR MECCA & BURAQ

            Have you pieced together the puzzle of missing flight 370 to Beijing China ?? If not, here are your missing pieces.Patents Patents Patents

            Four days after the missing flight MH370 a patent is approved by the Patent Office, 4 of the 5 Patent holders are Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX.
            Patent is divided up on 20% increments to 5 holders.
            Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20%)
            Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20%)
            Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20%)
            Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20%)
            Freescale Semiconductor (20%)

            If a patent holder dies, then the remaining holders equally share the dividends of the deceased if not disputed in a will. If 4 of the 5 dies, then the remaining 1 Patent holder gets 100% of the wealth of the patent.
            That remaining live Patent holder is Freescale Semiconductor.
            Who owns Freescale Semiconductor ??
            Jacob Rothschild through Blackstone who owns Freescale.
            Here is your motive for the missing Beijing plane.
            As all 4 Chinese members of the Patent were passengers on the missing plane.
            Patent holders can alter the proceeds legally by passing wealth to their heirs. However, they cannot do so until the Patent is approved. So when the plane went missing, the patent had not been approved.
            Thus, Rothschild gets 100% of Patent once Patent holders declared deceased

          • Lucky bin Adam and Eve Baby, …you may sit at the other end of the internet like a devil, smirking your filth on a person who is already dead. IF OTHERS WERE TO TALK ILL OF YOUR DEAD GRAND PA or MA, would you accept even if that “ILL” was the “Truth”?

            Do you think that Muslims will ever accept bad spread against their beloved Prophet?? I tell you NOT to use vulgar vernacular against anybody especially the Prophet!

            When it was possible to remove the “anti” Muhammad video from the YouTube recently, would it be impossible to stop a flimsy dude’s site….the Most Intolerant Religion?

            Stop vulgar and repulsive language but argue with some sense and make your comments short to enable others go through them!

            There is nothing wrong with distant cousin marriages as you were the product of the same from the time of Adam and Eve!

          • MOHAMMEDANS TO GET A KNEW NAME – MUSHROOMS!

            YOU KEEP THEM IN THE DARK & FEED THEM BULLSHIT!

            SUNNI MORALITY!

            YO GOATBOY,

            SHIA PEN:
            REVEALING THE TRUTH
            Chapter Eight: Examples of Sunni morality

            As we stated in the previous chapter, Dr. Salamah and Ibn al-Hashmi have made a big mistake by attempting to argue that Shi’ite hadeeth literature legitimises immorality. All that we have discussed leaves no doubt that Mut’ah is in no way immoral, and that it was sanctioned by Allah (swt) and His Prophet (s). Conversely, the Sunni hadeeth literature abounds with some of the most lurid and disgusting tales. The Sunni fiqh is, at times, even worse. Some notable examples of the public immorality of some companions and Sunni ‘ulama are given below, as well as some of the blasphemous stories attributed to the Holy Prophet (s) himself. For the sake of taste, we would normally not bring such issues up; but Dr. Salamah and Ibn al-Hashmi have uttered words of utter blasphemy against Allah, His Prophet, and His Religion, as well as forging numerous hadeeths against them. Since Dr. Salamah has decided to make a moral argument, than we will see how “moral” the Sunni belief system, hadeeth literature, and law is:

            (1) First example of Sunni morality
            SALAFI “ULAMA RULED THAT MASTURBATION (WANKING) IS HALAL

            Shamsuddin Ibn Qayyim al Jawziya who is one of the only scholars that the Wahabis do not reject and who was a student of Ibn Taymiyya. Let us quote what he writes in his Bada’i al-Fuwa’id, page 129:
            “Ibn ‘Aqeel, and many of our scholars, and our Shaykh [Ibn Taymiyya] have ruled that masturbation is makruh (disliked), and never explicitly said he that it was haram”.
            Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 129
            He then presents his own discussion on the conditions that make masturbation halaal:
            “If a man is torn between continued desire or releasing it, and if this man does not have a wife or he has a slave-girl but he does not marry, then if a man is overwhelmed by desire, and he fears that he will suffer because of this (someone like a prisoner, or a traveller, or a pauper), then it is permissible for him to masturbate, and Ahmad (ibn Hanbal) is explicit on this. Furthermore, it is narrated that the Companions of the Prophet (s) used to masturbate while they were on military expeditions or travelling”.

            COMMENT:

            The polytheists at the dawn of Islam must have been terrified by that scene:
            (AN ARMY OF WANKERS)
            an army of pious companions, their pants nice and short, their beards stretching down to their wastes, their swords held high with one hand while they heartily masturbate with the other. If this was the type of scene going on, we might be able to understand why so many companions refused to go on jihad. Would Dr. Salamah march off to battle with only an army of masturbators to protect him? Or was this tactic of masturbatory jihad supposed to be some sort of an offensive stratagem, to strike fear into the hearts of the enemy? Indeed, these companions were masters at the art of war!
            We appeal for justice: who is promoting debauchery, the Sunnis or the Shi’a? There are a lot of Ahkam surrounding travelling mentioned by the Prophet (s) and the Imams (as): the obligation to pray two rakaat for zuhr instead of four, or the obligation to break one’s fast. This Sunni ‘alim, who is one of the singularly most distinguished Sunni’ ulama and is adored by the Wahabis, has offered another hukm for travelling the permissibility of masturbating. And yet when a Shi’a says that a man is allowed to contract temporary marriage in order to satisfy his desires, Dr. Salamah passes a hukm of takfir. One is allowed to masturbate but not contract a temporary marriage? Is this not the peak of insanity?

            (2) Second example of Sunni morality:
            SUNNI ‘ULAMA LEGITIMISED THE USE OF DILDOS (FEMALE SEX TOYS)

            After this ingenious fatwa, Ibn Qayyim then goes on to make permissible the use of a dildoe by women. It is only logical; when the husbands leave to go masturbate and spread Islam by the sword, they need something to do with themselves. On the same page as quoted above, Ibn Qayyim writes:
            “If a woman does not have a husband, and her lust becomes strong, then some of our scholars say: It is permissible for the woman to take an akranbij, which is a piece of leather worked until it becomes shaped like a penis, and insert it in herself. She may also use a cucumber”.

            COMMENT:

            Now, according to Dr. Salamah’s logic, the Saudi government should therefore purchase a large number of such dildoes, and distribute them to old widows or otherwise unattractive women who cannot marry. Since anything that is permissible, according to Dr. Salamah, requires stand sanction and support, than clearly a dildoe distribution office needs to be immediately established in the great Islamic state of Saudi Arabia.
            Maybe this is another reason why ‘Umar the Khalifa never went on jihad: somebody had to stay behind and organize the cucumber distribution.

            (3) Third example of Sunni morality –
            SUNNI ‘ULAMA HAVE RULED ON PERMISSIBILITY OF HAVING SEX WITH WATERMELONS

            That was not a typographical error. Ibn Qayyim continues this discussion, which exemplifies the morals espoused by Sunni Islam:
            “If a man makes a hole in a watermelon, or a piece of dough, or a leather skin, or a statue, and has sex with it, then this is the same as what we have said about other types of masturbation [i.e., that it is halaal in the same circumstances given before, such as being on a journey]. In fact, it is easier than masturbating with one’s hand”.

            COMMENT:

            All the Muslims should certainly be grateful that Ibn Qayyim has offered this advice on the easiest way to masturbate, and clearly Ibn Qayyim has done a lot of personal research on this issue. This is the ruling of the “saved sect”: Contracting temporary marriage with a woman is haram, but contracting temporary marriage with a watermelon is halaal. In his defence, perhaps Ibn Qayyim only meant that it is allowed to marry a watermelon with the intent of divorcing it, for doing Mut’ah with a watermelon would clearly be an act of fornication.
            Let us remember the words of Dr. Salamah quoted at the beginning of this book:
            Mut’ah, on the other hand, is an open license for sexual pleasure with as many women as one can financially afford. The women who engage in Mut’ah are hired women; thus, it can be performed with all women irrespective of their age, character, conduct or religion. It requires no witnesses, nor is there any obligation on the man’s part to provide food and shelter to the woman.

            • Well, it seems that in the Nasibi logic having sex with as many women as one can afford is utterly immoral, but having sex with as many watermelons as one can afford is not. Based on this, let us ask him some questions about the Ahkam related to having sex with watermelons: Are there any conditions as to the age of the watermelon? For example, is it allowed to perform a marriage with the intent to divorce with a newly grown watermelon, or must one wait until the watermelon is nine years old?
            • Must it be a pious watermelon, or is it permissible to contract a marriage with the intent to divorce with a watermelon that is known to “get around”?
            • May a pious brother share his watermelon with another pious brother, or would the second man’s marriage with the intent to divorce constitute an act of fornication unless the watermelon observes proper ‘iddah?
            • Are witnesses required in the marriage with the intent to divorce of a watermelon? May other watermelons serve as witnesses in that marriage, since according to Sunni fiqh all marriages require witnesses? Applying the Sunni principle of Qiyas (analogy), we can strongly argue that if it is allowed to marry (with intention of divorce) a watermelon, than certainly it is allowed for a watermelon to bear witness to another watermelon’s blessed and chaste marriage.
            • What about oranges?

            Really, we have to ask all reasonable Muslims: would you rather follow ‘ulama that rule on the permissibility of having sex with fruits and vegetables, or follow the pious path of the Holy Imams (as), of whom Allah (swt) has said:
            We intend, O Family of the Prophet, to remove from you all impurity, and to give you a through purification.
            Al-Qur’an, Surah Al-Ahzab, Ayah 33
            Does somebody who spends his time thinking about whether or not it is permissible to have sex with watermelons really sound like somebody who has been removed of all impurity? Why is Ibn Qayyim even thinking about such things? What kind of personal life does such a person have that would lead him to debate such issues in his mind? What happened in Ibn Qayyim’s life that one day he woke up and said: “I really need to find out if its halaal to have sex with watermelons.” Is the type of clergymen who openly rules for the permissibility of having sex with watermelons (with conditions, of course, such as that one is on a journey) be the kind of person you would want to meet in a dark alley, much less do taqlid of?

            (4)Fourth example of Sunni morality –
            A SALAFI WOMAN CAN SUCKLE A SALAFI MAN WITH A BEARD

            We read in Sahih Muslim Hadith Number 3426:
            Ibn Abu Mulaika reported that al-Qasim b. Muhammad b. Abu Bakr had narrated to him that ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail b. ‘Amr came to Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Messenger of Allah, Salim (the freed slave of Abu Hudhaifa) is living with us in our house, and he has attained (puberty) as men attain it and has acquired knowledge (of the sex problems) as men acquire, whereupon he said: Suckle him so that he may become unlawful (in regard to marriage) for you He (Ibn Abu Mulaika) said: I refrained from (narrating this hadith) for a year or so on account of fear. I then met al-Qasim and said to him: You narrated to me a hadith which I did not narrate (to anyone) afterwards. He said: What is that? I informed him, whereupon he said: Narrate it on my authority that ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) had narrated that to me.

            COMMENT:

            This reference is especially for Dr Salamah who has accused the Shi’a of being filthy proponents of Mut’ah, what right do you have to attack us when have the above Fatwa of Ayesha allowing your women to suckle men with beards so as to make them mahram? How many pubescent Salafi men has your mother suckled so that they can enter your house? When your madhab allows your mothers / daughters to breast feed men with beards what gives you the right to attack the practice of Mut’ah? If today any Nasibi tries to suggest that this practice no longer exists in their school and it was only Ayesha who had issued the fatwa then we shall present the thoughts of their Imam Ibn Tamiyah as quoted by one of the revered scholars of Salafies Ibn Uthaimeen:
            واختار شيخ الإسلام ابن تيميه رحمه الله التفصيل وقال إذا دعت الحاجة إلى إرضاع الكبير وأرضع ثبت التحريم
            “Sheikh ul-Islam ibn Taymia (may Allah’s mercy be upon him) chosed to explain in details and said that if the breast suckling by an adult was necessary and he suckled, then the prohibition (of marriage) is established.”
            Fatawa Nur Ala Aldarb, Volume 10 page 204
            Imam Ibn Hazm records:
            ورضاع الكبير محرم ولو انه شيخ يحرم كما يحرم رضاع الصغير
            “The breast suckling by an adult prohibits (marriage) even if he is an old man just like it prohibits (marriage) in the case of suckling by a child”
            Al-Muhala, Volume 10 page 17
            Now compare this morality to the comments of a contemporary Salafi scholar from “Islamic Fatawa Regarding Women” compiled by Muhammed al-Musnad and translated by Jamal Zarabozo. In Chapter 19, Questions of a Miscellaneous Nature under the sub heading Ruling Concerning Women Driving Automobiles’, Imam of the Salafi Nasibi Shaykh bin Baz stated:
            There have been numerous questions concerning the ruling of women driving automobiles. The response is the following:
            There is no doubt that such is not allowed. Women driving leads to many evils and negative consequences. Included among these is her mixing with men without her being on her guard. It also leads to the evil sins due to which such an action is forbidden. The Pure Law forbids those acts that lead to forbidden acts and considers those means to be forbidden also. Allah has ordered the wives of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the women of the believers to remain in their houses, to wear hijab and not to display their adornments to non-mahram males as that leads to promiscuity that overruns a society.
            Now on the one side these moralistic Salafi have this kind of fatawa prohibiting their women from (Allah forbid) driving a car as this may cause promiscuity, and on the other hand they deem it permissible for their women to suckle men with beards! Women driving ‘leads to many evils and negative consequences’, but if the same women were to remain at home suckling men with beards, that’s fine!

            (5) Fifth example of Sunni morality –
            BESTIALITY CAN BE PERFORMED DURING HAJJ

            Sunni Imam Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H) records in his authority work ‘Badaye al-Sanae’ Volume 2 page 216:
            ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه
            “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal that will not make his hajj void”

            (6) Sixth example of Sunni morality –
            PEDOPHILIA, BESTIALITY & NECROPHILIA CAN BE PERFORMED WHILST ONE IS FASTING

            In Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603:
            “It was narrated by Ahmed that a man came to him that feared that he would ejaculate while he was fasting. Ahmed said: “What I see is that he can release semen without ruining the fast, he can masturbate using his hands or the hands of his wife, If he has an “Ammah” whether be it a girl or a little child, she can masturbate for him using her hands, and if she was a non-believer, he can sleep with her without releasing (his semen), if he released it in her, it becomes impermissible”.
            Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603
            Not to be hard done by, the Hanafi’s follow suit. In Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820, the learned Hanafi scholar Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan sets out those acts that do not invalidate one’s fast, and he includes:
            “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”
            Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820

            COMMENT:

            What can we say about such Fatwas of morality? Fasting in Islam, is viewed as a means via which a believer purifies himself, via self-discipline, he dedicates that time to the remembrance of Allah (swt) and keeps aloof from sinful thoughts and acts. That is the theory, but the Hanbali and Hanafi madhab allows a man (whilst fasting) to have sex with kaffir women, animals, and dead people, the only proviso being that no ejaculation takes place! Ibn Hanbal was however more considerate to his adherents allowing for a man to ejaculate whilst fasting, providing the deed is achieved via masturbation, and to this end he can do it himself, or seek the help of his wife or a small child! Is this is not evidence that Ibn Hanbal was endorsing paedophilia? Would any decent man (Muslim or Non Muslim) find it appropriate to use a child for sexual stimulation? If we put together these type of fatwas one shudders to think of the image of these great Salaf, entering the war whilst fasting, their buttocks exposed, having sex with melons at the ready. This image would have terrified the opposition!

            (7) Seventh Example of Sunni morality –
            THE PERMISSIBILITY OF PRAYING BEHIND A DRUNKEN PERSON

            According to the great Salafi Ibn Taymiyyah, it is entirely permissible to pray behind a drunkard. We read in the his Majmu’ al-Fatawa, p. 271
            The Companions would pray behind people whom they knew to be open transgressors, such as when Abd ‘Allah ibn Mas’ud and other Companions would pray behind Walid ibn ‘Uqba ibn Abi Mu’it, who may have recently drunken alcohol (when he was praying) and would wind up praying four rakaats.
            COMMENTARY:
            The salat is the pillar of the religion, and yet here we see it being stated that it is permissible to pray behind someone who is drunk at the time, and who is so intoxicated that he prays four rakaats for the morning prayer. Yet let us remember that, according to Ibn Taymiyyah, it is entirely impermissible to pray behind a Shi’a!

            (8) Eighth Example of Sunni morality –
            THE PERMISSIBILITY TO PAY FOR SEX, WITHOUT FEAR OF ISLAMIC PUNISHMENT

            We read in Dur al-Mukhthar, Volume 2, Page 474 (a compilation of the great Fatwas of Imam Abu Hanifa) as follows:
            We read in Fathul Qadeer that if a man informs a woman that he is paying her for sex then he cannot be subject to any manner of Islamic penalty.
            Dur al-Mukhtar, Volume 2, page 474
            It is indeed sad to say that the Hanafi madhab whilst catering for a man’s sexual appetite is very prejudicial to monkeys. In Sahih al Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 188 we read the very sad plight of this immoral, promiscuous monkey:
            Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:
            During the pre-Islamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.
            If this Hanafi had paid this she monkey for sex he would have been absolved of any Islamic penalty, whilst this poor she monkey who releases her animal instincts is stoned to death!

            (9) Ninth example of Sunni Morality Fatwa of Abu Hanifa on –
            THE PERMISSIBILITY OF HAVING SEX WITH ONE’S MOTHER

            Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan writes in his book of fatwa, Volume 4, p. 820:
            Of things which are haram but for which there is no Islamic penalty, these include… marrying your wife’s sister, or her mother, or a woman who is already married.
            Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Volume 4, page 820
            On the very next page Qadhi Khan records a classic Fatwa of Imam Abu Hanifa
            “if a person marries a mahram (mother, sister, daughter, aunt etc.) and has sexual intercourse with them and even admits the fact that he knew while performing the marital rites that it was Haraam for him to do that even then according to Imam Abu Hanifa, he is not subject to any type of Islamic penalty”.
            Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Volume 4, Ppage 821
            We read in another authority Hanafi work, Fatwa Alamgiri:
            “If someone marries five women at a time or marries a fifth woman while already having four wives or marries his sister in law or mother in law and then performs intercourse with her and then says that I knew that it is haram for me or performs nikah al mutah with a woman then there will be no plenty of adultery on him in all of these situations though he confessed that he knew it was haram on him”
            Fatwa Alamgiri, Volume 3 page 264

            COMMENTARY

            Let us understand this then: in accordance with the fatwa of ‘Umar, the Sunni position is that anybody who contract Mut’ah should be executed. However, if somebody marries his mother, not just commits incest, but actually pronounces a formal marriage, there is no penalty for that person.
            This should demonstrate the degree to which Sunni Islam is nothing but an artificial construction, designed solely to be a bulwark against the mission of the Ahl al-Bayt (as). When a sincere reader sees that these individuals have ruled that there is no Islamic penalty for marrying one’s mother, but that there is for doing Mut’ah, does not reason dictate that such fatwas about Mut’ah are motivated only by bigotry and hatred of the Shi’a? When a Sunni rules that it is permissible to pray behind a drunk person who is so intoxicated he can’t even keep track of the number of rakaats he has prayed, but then says that it is not permissible to pray behind a sober Shi’a, what should one think? Does this seem like the religion of the Prophet (s), or the religion of a group of hate-filled scholars?

            (10) Tenth example of Sunni morality –
            THE “HONOURABLE” TACTIC OF AMR BIN AAS TO SURVIVE IMMINENT DEATH ON THE BATTLEFIELD

            As we are intending on highlighting the morals presented by a favourite of the Salafi and Nasibi we have chosen to rely on the following authentic Sunni sources:
            1. Al Bidayah wa al Nihayah, Volume 7 page 293
            2. Al Akhbar at Tawaal, page 177 Dhikr Sifeen
            3. Al Manaqib al Khwarizmi page 162 Dhikr Sifeen
            4. Al Fusul al Muhimma, page 91 Dhikr Sifeen
            5. Tadhkira al Khawwas al Ummah, page 51 Dhikr Sifeen
            6. Mutalib al Saul, page 122 Dhikr Sifeen
            7. Nur al Absar, page 94 Dhikr Sifeen
            8. Aqd al Fareed, page 235 Dhikr Sifeen
            9. Al Imam wa al Siyasa, page 99 Dhikr Sifeen

            We read in al Bidaya:
            “One day ‘Ali attacked Amr ibn Aas, he threw a spear and Amr fell to the ground, Amr fell to the ground and he then exposed his buttocks. ‘Ali then turned away his face [people said] this was Amr bin Aas. ‘Ali replied he showed me his anus and this made me merciful to him. When Amr ibn Aas returned, Mu’awiya said ‘You should praise Allah and your anus”.
            Al Bidayah wa al Nihayah, Volume 7 page 293
            Allamah Abu Hanifa Ahmed bin Dawud Dinori in ‘Akhbar al Tawaal’ has reported the flashing incident in the same manner, with the words of Mu’awiya to his beloved Commander as follows:
            “You should shower praises on Allah (swt) and that black anus that saved your life today”

            COMMENT:

            Islam has a code of ethics for all scenarios, including behaviour during Jihad, we are yet to find any code wherein Rasulullah (s) authorised the Sahaba to expose their buttocks as a means of sickening the opposition! In Karachi a Nasibi scholar said to his blind followers ‘Had Mu’awiya not entered on the plains of Sifeen the entire continent of Europe would have been conquered’. We agree with this conclusion but it would have been achieved through the battle tactics of Amr ibn Aas, since not even the greatest military tactitioner would not have accounted for this ‘shock and awe’ tactic! Our appeal to our Rafidi brethren is to control the illiterates in our community from throwing mud at Amr ibn Aas for this immoral act: after all had Amr not survived that day, who would have been enlightened enough to place the Qur’an on spears? Who would have dishonestly made Mu’awiya the khalifa during the negotiations? The Salafi are no doubt ever indebted to Amr bin Aas, for all future events such the rise to power of their fifth Khalifa Mu’awiya as Khalifa was all through the Sadaqa of the anus of Amr ibn Aas.

            (11) Eleventh example of Sunni morality –
            THE DEOBANDI DEATH RITUAL

            We read in Ahl’ul Sunnah’s recognised masterpiece ‘Maqamath Badhaya al Zaman’, page 26, Maqama 8, by Abu Fadhl Ahmad bin Husayn bin Yahya bin Saeed al Madani:
            “Abu Fathah narrates ‘On one occasion I had the opportunity to see a dead body and I said ‘He is not dead but alive’. People asked ‘How do you know?’ I replied ‘When a man dies his anus goes cold, and I have made this comment in light of this fact, verily he is alive’. Upon saying this all of those present placed their fingers in the body’s anus and concluded he is not dead but is alive”.

            COMMENT:

            Dr Salamah is very lucky, when he dies an immediate inquiry shall be conducted as to whether he is alive or dead and all of his Hanafi adherents will converge upon him and insert their fingers into his ‘blessed’ anus to determine this fact. The normal practice to ascertain death is checking a person’s pulse, but the Deobandi are so immoral that they even seek sexual gratification by fondling the deceased’s anus under the false pretence that they are checking for signs of life. Now let us cite some of the moral depictions of Rasulullah (s) from the great Sunni works…

            (12) Twelfth example of Sunni morality
            AISHA WOULD GIVE SEX ADVICE TO THE SAHABA

            We read Sahih Muslim Book 3, Number 0684:
            Abu Musa reported:
            There cropped up a difference of opinion between a group of Muhajirs (Emigrants and a group of Ansar (Helpers) (and the point of dispute was) that the Ansar said: The bath (because of sexual intercourse) becomes obligatory only-when the semen spurts out or ejaculates. But the Muhajirs said: When a man has sexual intercourse (with the woman), a bath becomes obligatory (no matter whether or not there is seminal emission or ejaculation). Abu Musa said: Well, I satisfy you on this (issue). He (Abu Musa, the narrator) said: I got up (and went) to ‘A’isha and sought her permission and it was granted, and I said to her: 0 Mother, or Mother of the Faithful, I want to ask you about a matter on which I feel shy. She said: Don’t feel shy of asking me about a thing which you can ask your mother, who gave you birth, for I am too your mother. Upon this I said: What makes a bath obligatory for a person? She replied: You have come across one well informed! The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: When anyone sits amidst four parts (of the woman) and the circumcised parts touch each other a bath becomes obligatory.
            This has been reported similarly in Kashaf al Ghumma Volume 1 page 56.

            COMMENT:

            Just look at how little self respect these Sahaba of Rasulullah (s) had, leaving Rasulullah’s elderly wives they would seek the opinion of his young wife on this sensitive matter. Could Dr Salamah inform us whether he would ask his mother such a sensitive question? Is it morally correct to query one’s mother about sexual penetration? These Nasibi should take note of these filthy traditions that they take pride of. We would urge Salafi’s and Deobandi’s to approach their Shaykh’s wives and learn the rules of Ghusl directly from them. These wives should also follow the Sunnah of Ayesha and provide a commentary as to when the organs meet.

            (13) Thirteenth example of Sunni morality –
            RASULALLAH (s) WOULD GIVE SEX ADVICE SESSIONS TO THE SAHABA IN THE PRESENCE OF AISHA

            Sahih Muslim Book Haid 003, Number 0685:
            “‘A’isha the wife of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) reported. A person asked the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) about one who has sexual intercourse with his wife and parts away (without orgasm) whether bathing is obligatory for him. ‘A’isha was sitting by him. The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: I and she (the Mother of the Faithful) do it and then take a bath”.

            COMMENT:

            Here we see that Rasulullah (s) whilst sitting with Aisha stated “I and she (the Mother of the Faithful) do it and then take a bath”. Will Dr. Salamah reinstate this Sunnah of Rasulullah (s) by opening ‘drop in’ sex advice sessions explaining sexual matters whilst sitting with their wives. The behaviour this tradition ascribes to the Holy Prophet (saws) is extremely uncivil, and out of context with the Islamic Ahkam according to which the Holy Prophet (saws) would conduct his behaviour. Does this hadeeth really fit with the verse of Qur’an where Allah (swt):
            “Indeed, you have in the Prophet a beautiful pattern of conduct”
            Al-Qur’an, Surah Al-Ahzab, Ayah 21
            It is the kind of behaviour that may be expected of a drugged out hippie couple, yet here it is falsely attributed to the Holy prophet (saws) in a clear attempt to slander his character.
            We read the following absolutely bizarre hadeeth in Sahih Muslim – Book 009, Number 3506:
            Jabir b. ‘Abdullah (Allah be pleased with them) reported: Abu Bakr (Allah be pleased with him) came and sought permission to see Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him). He found people sitting at his door and none amongst them had been granted permission, but it was granted to Abu Bakr and he went in. Then came ‘Umar and he sought permission and it was granted to him, and he found Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) sitting sad and silent with his wives around him. He (Hadrath ‘Umar) said: I would say something which would make the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) laugh, so he said: Messenger of Allah, I wish you had seen (the treatment meted out to) the daughter of Khadija when you asked me some money, and I got up and slapped her on her neck. Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) laughed and said: They are around me as you see, asking for extra money. Abu Bakr (Allah be pleased with him) then got up went to ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) and slapped her on the neck, and ‘Umar stood up before Hafsa and slapped her saying: You ask Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) which he does not possess. They said: By Allah, we do not ask Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) for anything he does not possess. Then he withdrew from them for a month or for twenty-nine days. Then this verse was revealed to him:” Prophet: Say to thy wives… for a mighty reward” (xxxiii. 28). He then went first to ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) and said: I want to propound something to you, ‘A’isha, but wish no hasty reply before you consult your parents. She said: Messenger of Allah, what is that? He (the Holy Prophet) recited to her the verse, whereupon she said: Is it about you that I should consult my parents, Messenger of Allah? Nay, I choose Allah, His Messenger, and the Last Abode; but I ask you not to tell any of your wives what I have said He replied: Not one of them will ask me without my informing her. God did not send me to be harsh, or cause harm, but He has sent me to teach and make things easy.

            COMMENT:

            What kind of bizarre circus is this? Everybody coming together to smack their daughters around for supposedly asking for money, while the Prophet (s) laughs? What Sunni can justify such talk about the Prophet (s) and his wives, as well as the companions? We would ask anybody who has doubt to imagine how they would feel if they went to visit their local ‘alim, and him there with his two father-in-laws engaged in this slap-stick behaviour. This hadeeth is a slur on the wives, the Prophet (s), and Abu Bakr and ‘Umar. We can only quote the Qur’an again, where Allah (swt) says:
            Indeed, you have in the Prophet a beautiful pattern of conduct.
            Does this insane behaviour seem like a beautiful pattern of conduct? This narration is almost comical, but a more sad and disturbing one is that which Imam of Ahl as-Sunnah Abdul Hammed Ghazzali records the following in his classic Ihya Ulum-id-din:
            “Once there was an altercation between the Prophet and Hazrat Ayesha when they found Hazrat Abu Bakr as judge. Hazrat Ayesha said to the Prophet: You speak but don’t speak except truth. At once Hazrat Abu Bakr gave her such a slap that blood began to ooze out from her mouth”.
            Ihya Ulum-id-din by Imam Ghazali, Volume 2 page 37, Chapter “The secrets of marriage”, English translation by Maulana Fazlul Karim
            Here we see a great companion hitting his young daughter so hard she began to bleed. Islamic law requires at least an equal punishment, i.e., that Abu Bakr be punched in the mouth so hard that he begins to bleed as well. And yet Dr. Salamah claims that the Shi’a hadeeth literature is immoral?

            (14) Fourteenth example of Sunni morality –
            MU’AWIYA LEGITIMISED THE ADULTERY OF HIS FATHER

            We have already quoted this disgraceful act of Mu’awiya, and in this connection the comments in Tarikh Kamil Volume 3 page 225 are interesting:
            “Mu’awiya’s declaring that Ziyad was his brother, was the first act that was in open contradiction to the laws of Shari’ah because Rasulullah (s) said that the legitimate child is one born from wedlock”
            Moreover Al Hafidh Jalaluddeen Suyuti also acknowledges this in Tareekh ul Khulafa page 175:
            “Mu’awiya’s declaring Ziyad to be the son of Abu Sufyan was the first act that contradicted an order of Rasulullah”.

            COMMENT:

            Here we see the most incredible behaviour on the part of the “Companions.” Mu’awiyah openly allowed the adultery of his father to be acknowledged, and then instead of defending his family honour, rather used it as an excuse to justify his father’s illegitimate off-spring, Ziyad.
            It was, of course, not merely Ziyad that was illegitimate, but Mu’awiyah as well. Other Sunni ‘ulama have not only acknowledged this but praised the illegitimacy of such individuals. Allamah Ragihb Asfahani quoted the words of Allamah Qadamah in his book ‘Al Muhazraat’:
            Qadamah stated: ‘A child born out of fornication is exalted due to the fact that a man does so with lust and effort hence birth is more complete, whilst what a man does by Halal means, a man will be doing so just with an affectation in front of a woman.’
            Al Muhazraat, Volume 1 page 356
            Worthy of note is the content of the letter which Muawiya had written to Ziyad as recorded by Ibn Abi al-Hadeed in Sharah Nahjul Balagha, Volume 4 page 94. Muawiya addressed Ziyad with the words ‘O son of Sumayya’. Amongst the Arabs there was a tradition that if one’s ancestry was questionable, then that individual would be called by his mother’s name. In the same way that Imam Hasan referred to Marwan as ‘Ibn Zurqa’- Mu’awiya sought to mock Ziyad by calling him the son of Sumayya. Ziyad replied to Mu’awiya with these words: ‘If I am Ibn Sumayya then you are Ibn Jamaat [son of a group]‘.
            How can such a belief system claim that Shi’ism is immoral, when it legitimises and acknowledges the most nefarious fornication acts their Imams (the Companions).

            (15) Fifteenth example of Sunni morality –
            RASULLAH (s) WOULD READ THE QURAN USING AISHA’S LAP WHILST SHE WAS MENSTRUATING

            We learn in Sahih al Bukhari Bab il Haidh Volume 1, Book 6, Number 295:
            Narrated ‘A’isha:
            The Prophet used to lean on my lap and recite Qur’an while I was in menses.

            COMMENT:

            Just look at they way that these Nasibi disrespect Rasulullah (s). We believe that in the same way that place the Qur’an next to something impure is disrespect, Rasulullah’s placing his blessed head next to impurity also constitutes disrespect. The Banu Ummaya Nasibi’s in their efforts to praise Ayesha sought to defame Rasulullah (s) and their Nasibi adherents embraced such as traditions as a part of their Deen. Do these Nasibi Mullah’s follow this Sunnah? Do you see them taking their wives with them to the Mosque and using them as head rests whilst they recite the Qur’an? If you saw a Mullah behaving in such a manner would you not seem this to be an act of disgrace? If so, then why do you believe that Rasulullah (s) would act in such a manner?
            Such is the desire of the frustrated Wahabi scholars (it says more about the relations these dirty old men had with their own wives) that they start loosing the plot totally, and shoot themselves in the foot: note the following tradition, designed to elevate Ayesha as the holder of some kind of secret carnal knowledge, which actually has the Holy Prophet (saws) thereby sinning and breaking the explicit injunctions of the Qur’an (may God forbid!)

            (16) Sixteenth example of Sunni morality –
            RASULULLAH (s) & AISHA WOULD PERFORM GHUSL WHILST SITTING IN THE SAME BATH

            We read in Sahih al Bukhari Bab ai Ghusl Volume 1, Book 5, Number 261:
            Narrated A’isha:
            The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot of water and our hands used to go in the pot after each other in turn.
            COMMENT:
            What was the need for Aisha to report such a private matter to a male Sahaba Urwa? Even the most obscene daughter of a man would state such matter to another man in a manner that Aisha is alleged to have done. In short, there is no need to mention to any individual matter to another man. What knowledge was Aisha seeking to convey by leaking such information? If a woman sleeps with her husband, she doesn’t go and tell the whole world about it. If this is not immoral then what on earth is?

            (17) Seventeenth example of Sunni morality –
            AISHA PERFORMED GHUSL IN FRONT OF MEN

            We read in Sahih al Bukhari, Bab Ghusl Volume 1, Book 5, Number 251:
            Narrated Abu Salama: ‘Aisha’s brother and I went to ‘A’isha and he asked her about the bath of the Prophet. She brought a pot containing about a Sa’ of water and took a bath and poured it over her head and at what time there was a screen between her and us.
            The author of Fath al-Bari Volume 1 page 356, Bab Ghusl then comments upon this hadeeth, writing:
            Qadi Ayad says: It is apparent that they could see her actions from her head and the top half of her body, because they were allowed to do as she was a milk-aunt to Abu Salamah and his brother from her sister Umm Kulthum. As for the lower part of her body, this was covered.

            COMMENT:

            Here we have it: The Prophet (s)’s wife stood up before Abu Salamah and exposed the entire upper half of her body, hair, breasts, and all. The author says that this is permissible because the sister of ‘A’isha had nursed Abu Salamah and his brother. Let us ask Dr. Salamah then: how would you feel if your mother always walked around the house without a shirt on, exposing her breasts? Would this seem normal to you? Would you be happy if she did this while your cousins (her nephews) were over?
            These Nasibi who always insist that Aisha should act as a role model for women should take heed of this alleged tradition. If you believe in this filth then we suggest that you visit the homes of Bilal Philips, Shaykh Faisal, Azam Tariq and request that their wives strip down and perform Ghusl-e-Janaba in front of other men. The wives of these scholars should not feel any shame, after all if these Nasibi are to be believed such actions would constitute adherence to the Sunnah of Ayesha. We ask Dr. Salamah this question:
            ‘If you were to return home one day your wife demonstrating the performance of Ghusl before two men would you tolerate it? If you have an ounce of honesty and self respect we are sure that you would not. This being the case do you not have an ounce of shame when you believe that Aisha the wife of Rasulullah (s) had done just that?
            May be some of them may not seize to look at some parts of their family women which needs to be covered since they believe:
            “There is no problem for a man to look at the hair, chest, curl, breast, arm and leg of his mother, adult daughter, sister and every Mahram female like the grandmother, child, grandchild and aunt. He should not look at her back, belly and what is between her navel and knee and so with every mahram through suckling or affinity…. The Sahih is whatever is touch and stare without a cover, whatever you can touch and look at”
            Online Fatawa Alamgiri
            From the traditions attributed to Rasulullah (s) and Aisha we can see clearly that the Nasibi are individuals that have slandered Rasulullah (s) and Aisha and portrayed them as immoral.

            Furthermore, one can see that these Sahaba were so disgraceful that rather than seek the advice of the elderly wives of Rasulullah (s) they sought it more appropriate to turn to the young wife of Rasulullah (s). Why the needs for Ayesha to perform a full re-run? Why did the two Sahaba present not refrain her?
            (18) Eighteenth example of Sunni morality – Rasulullah’s touching a woman before marriage
            Whilst Mut’ah carries some conditions / rules, the Ahl as-Sunnah have presented our Holy Prophet (s) in such a disgraceful manner, that destroys the idea that Rasulullah (s) was a paragon of moral virtue, or possessed of any morality at all. This is evidenced by the episode of Jauniyya in Sahih al Bukhari Volume 7, hadith number 182:
            We went out with the Prophet to a garden called Ash-Shaut till we reached two walls between which we sat down. The Prophet said, “Sit here,” and went in (the garden). The Jauniyya (a lady from Bani Jaun) had been brought and lodged in a house in a date-palm garden in the home of Umaima bint An-Nu’man bin Sharahil, and her wet nurse was with her. When the Prophet entered upon her, he said to her, “Give me yourself (in marriage) as a gift.” She said, “Can a princess give herself in marriage to an ordinary man?” The Prophet raised his hand to pat her so that she might become tranquil. She said, “I seek refuge with Allah from you.” He said, “You have sought refuge with One Who gives refuge. Then the Prophet came out to us and said, “O Abu Usaid! Give her two white linen dresses to wear and let her go back to her family.” Narrated Sahl and Abu Usaid: The Prophet married Umaima bint Sharahil, and when she was brought to him, he stretched his hand towards her. It seemed that she disliked that, whereupon the Prophet ordered Abu Usaid to prepare her and to provide her with two white linen dresses.

            COMMENT:

            Here, we see the Final Prophet of Islam asking this woman to marry him without a dowry (hence use of the phrase “as a gift”). She refuses and gets angry, and he tries to touch her on her back, even though they are not even married. This is Sunni Islam: it is halaal to touch woman on the back whom you are not married to, but haram to contract a temporary marriage.

            (19) Nineteenth example of Sunni morality –
            RASULULLAH (s) WOULD DISCUSS MATTERS RELATING TO MALE GENITALIA (PENIS) WITH A NON-MAHRAM WOMAN

            We read this outrageous tradition in the Muwatta of Imam Malik “Section: Wudu on Account of Touching the Genitals”. Book 2, Number 2.16.60:
            Yahya related to me from Malik that Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr ibn Muhammad ibn Amr ibn Hazim heard Urwa ibn az-Zubayr saying, “I went to see Marwan ibn al-Hakam and we talked about what you had to do Wudu for, and Marwan said, ‘You have to do Wudu if you touch your penis.’ Urwa said, ‘I didn’t know that.’ Marwan ibn al-Hakam said that Busra bint Safwan had told him that she heard the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, say, ‘If any of you touches his penis he should do Wudu.’ “

            COMMENT:

            Now why on earth would Rasulullah (s) convey a sensitive matter concerning a man touching his genitalia to a non mahram woman / a matter that would bear no relevance to her life whatsoever? Why would he say to a non mahram woman ‘If any of you touches his penis he should do Wudu.’ – didn’t Rasulullah (s) know that he was chatting to a woman? This is the perfect example of how Ahl’ul Sunnah have depicted Rasulullah (s) in such a shameless manner that he would even discuss the male sexual organ with a woman!

            (20) Twentieth example of Sunni morality –
            YAZID BIN MU’AWIYA WAS AN INCESTUOUS HOMOSEXUAL BUT ALSO A KHALIFA OF RASULULLAH & A SUNNI MUSLIM

            Imam Dhahabi records the following words from the sermon of Abdul Malik bin Marwan in ‘Tarkeeh Islam’ Volume 1 page 634:
            ولست بالخليفة المستضعف – يعني عثمان – ولا الخليفة المداهن – يعني معاوية – ولا الخليفة المأبون – يعني يزيد
            “I am not weak like Uthman and I am not cunning like Mu’awiya and I am not a homosexual like Yazid”
            The tradition is also recorded in old transcripts of ‘Al Bidayah wal Niahayh’ while in the present transcripts available on the internet, the filthy Nawasib have done Tahreef in the word Ma’bun (homosexual) and have made it Ma’un (secure).
            We also read in Tabaqath al Kabeera Volume 5 page 66 Dhikr Abdullah bin Hanzala and Volume 4 page 283:
            “Abdullah bin Hanzala the Sahaba stated ‘By Allah we opposed Yazeed at the point when we feared that stones would reign down on us from the skies. He was a fasiq who copulated with his mother, sister and daughters, who drank alcohol and did not offer Salat”
            Now how do you think Dr Salamah’s madhab would grade such an individual? After all the moralistic Dr Salamah is a man so outraged by the Shi’a practise of Mut’ah that he has graded it as debauchery. Surely his view of an incestuous homosexual will be even more extreme, wouldn’t it? Curiously not in Sharh fiqh Akbar page 70 ‘Dhikr Fadail Uns Bad un Nabi’ we read:
            “Rasulullah (s) said that the Deen shall remain strong as long as these twelve Khalifas are at the helm, and the twelve are Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, ‘Ali, Mu’awiya, Yazid, Abdul Malik bin Marwan, Walid bin Abdul Malik bin Marwan, Sulayman bin Abdul Malik bin Marwan, Umar bin Abdul Aziz, Yazid bin Abdul Malik bin Marwan, Hasham bin Abdul Malik bin Marwan”
            Sharah Fiqah Akbar, Page 70
            If this is not bad enough, we read in Sharh Qaseeda Amali, Page 16:
            “Other than a kaffir, it is not permissible to curse a Muslim and Yazeed was not a kaffir but was a Sunni Muslim”
            Sharah Qaseeda Amali, Page 16
            Dr Salamah must be proud of himself; after all he adheres to an esteemed moralistic madhab that has described an incestuous, homosexual to be the Sixth Sunni Khalifa of Rasulullah (s).
            Let us now turn to some of the examples of morality that had been set by Umar…

            (21) Twenty first example of Sunni morality –
            UMAR PLACED HIS HAND IN A CAMEL’S ANUS

            We read in Ahl’ul Sunnah’s esteemed work Al-Tabaqat Al Kubra by Ibn Sa’d – Part Three Page 286.
            Umar ibn al Khattab placed his hand inside a camel’s anus and commented ‘I’m afraid that someone might ask me what is wrong with you.’
            Al-Tabaqat Al Kubra by Ibn Sa’d, Part 3, Page 286

            COMMENT

            This is indeed a fascinating narration! We would like to ask the Dr Salamah, the moralistic defender of Umar, what on earth was your al Farooq seeking to achieve by inserting his hand up a camel’s back passage? Since the Salafi love mentioning Umar’s immense acumen and intelligence, what was meant from this great comment ‘I’m afraid that someone might ask me what is wrong with you’. What was ‘Umar afraid of? Had he done something to this camel that he didn’t want people finding out about? What was he hoping to keep people from discovering by inserting his hand into this camel’s anus?
            Well, in any case it remains to be seen what ‘Umar did to this camel, and what action he had done to it that he was attempting to cover up. Perhaps he was attempting to apply the anal medication that he famously used on himself quite often, as we read in the following information on medicines as found in ‘Ahlaaj al Mureez page’ 309 by Hakeem Ajmul Khan Dehlavi Part 8, Dialogue 14:
            “The medicine that is needed to treat anal diseases was used extensively by the second Khalifa, this medicine is prepared by grinding certain chemicals and then preparing a solution in either vinegar or wine and is then inserted into the anus of the patient”
            One can only guess as to where Umar learnt this great medicinal technique, this skill may have been passed to him via the effeminate men that lived with, that according to Sahih al Bukhari Volume 8 hadith 815 he eventually removed from his home. Perhaps he had learned something from his maternal uncle Abu Jahl, and was applying it to this camel. We read in ‘Majma al-Amthaal’ page 250 – Chapter 7 “fi ma aula al kha” by Allamah Madani:
            Abu Jahl had an addiction to the anus. His anus had white spots and he used to paint it with saffron so that customers would not be repulsed”.
            Abu Jahl had learned how to cover up certain things involving his anus; perhaps ‘Umar was doing Qiyas and applying the same technique towards this camel!
            In any case, let us get Dr. Salamah’s point straight: having sexual relations with as many women as a man can afford is haram, but putting one’s hand (and apparently other things) into as many camel anuses as one wants is entirely permissible.

            (22) Twenty second example of Sunni morality –
            UMAR’S SPECIAL MALE “ASSISTANCE” WITH ABLUTION

            We read in Ahl’ul Sunnah’s authentic, Fatawa Abdul Hai, Volume 1 page 154:
            “The Servant of Umar narrates when Umar would urinate he would call out to me to bring something with which he could clean himself, I would bring him a piece of wood or a stone, would hold Hadhrat Umar’s penis and rub it against a wall or on the ground, Behaqi stated that this is the most Sahih tradition in this chapter and so has been narrated by Muhadith Dehalwi [rh]“
            Fatawa Abdul Hai, Volume 1 page 154

            COMMENT:

            If this is the way that Umar would clean himself, then we poor Shi’a have every right to ask how a simple man who hasn’t got an understanding of urinating and cleaning his backside would be able to go to his wives at night for more complex matters? Would he also keep his Servants at his side to aid him on these occasions? What can we say about this great Khalifa, who would even turn to his Servants to clean him, we ask for forgiveness with regards to the level of immorality that exists in this narration – one wherein a Servant would take a hold of Umar’s penis before the people and place it on a wall!

            (23) Twenty third example of Sunni morality –
            UMAR WOULD ASK QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO SEX FROM HIS OWN DAUGHTER

            We read in History of the Khalifas who took the right way (the partial translation of Tareekh ul Khulafa by Suyuti) page 142 that Umar went to his daughter…
            “…’I want to ask you about a matter which concerns me, dispel it for me. How long does a woman long for her husband?’ She lowered her head and was shy. He said, ‘Truly Allah is not shy of the truth’. She gestured her hand indicating three months, and if that was not possible then four months”
            History of the Khalifas who took the right way, page 142

            COMMENT:

            If today’s Muslims are shocked by liberal Western Society where attitudes to sex are so casual, that parents have no shame in discussing this topic with their children, then our Sunni brethren should know that there should be no reason to feel outraged, for such frankness is in accordance with the Sunnah of Umar, whose morals were such that he could even discuss the topic of female sexual desire with his daughter. We wonder if Dr Salamah also adheres the standard set by his Khalifa, preferring to discuss sexual matters with his daughter rather than his wife, after all as Umar has said – ‘Allah is not shy of the truth’

            (24) Twenty fourth example of Sunni morality –
            IT IS PERMISSIBLE TO STARE & SCREAM AT WOMEN WHO ANSWER THE CALL OF NATURE

            We read in Sahih al Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 4, Hadith Number 148: book of Ablutions (Wudu’)
            Narrated ‘A’isha:
            The wives of the Prophet used to go to Al-Manasi, a vast open place (near Baqia at Medina) to answer the call of nature at night. ‘Umar used to say to the Prophet “Let your wives be veiled,” but Allah’s Apostle did not do so. One night Sauda bint Zam’a the wife of the Prophet went out at ‘Isha’ time and she was a tall lady. ‘Umar addressed her and said, “I have recognized you, O Sauda.” He said so, as he desired eagerly that the verses of Al-Hijab (the observing of veils by the Muslim women) may be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of “Al-Hijab” (A complete body cover excluding the eyes).

            COMMENT:

            The Ahl as-Sunnah clearly are a people devoid of sense. This incident demonstrates how shameless Umar was, and yet the Ahl as-Sunnah cite this as an example of his esteemed rank. If shouting at the wife of Rasulullah (s) is a virtue then the terms ‘shameless’ and ‘immoral’ are merely words that carry no meaning. If this is a virtue then we would urge the Sipah-e-Sahaba ‘ulama in Pakistan to implement this act of worship, when the women of your village leave for the field to answer the call of nature, you should shout and scream at them, the Deen will be illuminated by such a noble moral act

            (25) Twenty fifth example of Sunni morality –
            THE SUNNI METHOD OF KNOWING THE GENDER OF THE UNBORN

            Let us now present the following gift to Dr Salmah, Nawasib belonging to Sipah-e- Sahabah (Kr-hcy.com) & those of http://www.ahlelbayt.com. Renowned Shafiyee scholar Shakyh Kamaluddin Muhammad bin Musa Damiri (742 – 808 H) in his esteemed work ‘Hayat ul Hewan’ records the following method:
            “If a man wants to know whether it’s a boy or a girl in the womb of a pregnant woman then a man should capture and place a lice over his palm and the pregnant woman shall take out a drop of her milk and put it there (means over the palm of the man where he had put the lice). Thus, if the lice is successful to come out of the drop of the milk then the gender is female but if it is unsuccessful to come out of the drop of milk then it’s a male.”
            Hayat al Hewan (Urdu), Volume 2 page 567

            CONCLUSION:
            The list of such obscenities is quite long, and we have only narrated a small percentage. What more needs to be said about the immorality of Sunni Islam? Every manner of immorality is justified and accepted, and even attributed to the Holy Prophet (s). The Nasibi Dr. Salamah should not have opened the door to this debate. He attempted to prove that Mut’ah was immoral, but being unable to establish this on the basis of actual Shi’ite hadeeths, he had to resort to falsification and lies. These hadeeths and fatwa, however, are all well known, and any reader may peruse the relevant narrations in the English versions of Bukhari and Muslim that are widely available. The sincere reader must now ask himself: which madhab is preaching immorality, Sunni or Shi’a?

            According to these illustrious Sunni ‘ulama, it is permissible for women to wash themselves in front of outside men, to masturbate, and to have sex with fruits and vegetables. Does this really sound like the words of the “saved sect,” or the words of the people following the Sunnah of the Prophet (s)?

            Shia Pen Newsletter
            About Us
            Shia Pen is a volunteer project, which is undertaken by members from around the world. Our sole goal is to refute the false propaganda against Shia and the teachings of Islam.
            Here we go through thorough research for every article that we undertake, and try our best to check the references carefully, before anything goes on to publication. We also try our level best to rely on the authentic texts and every effort is made to only use the reliable Hadeeths in our articles, which will leave no room for the Nasibis to answer us back.
            We are always looking forward to your comments, feedback, ideas or even complaints that we may have raised un-intentionally.
            Shia Pen is not linked or affiliated with any kind of organisation. We are completely independent and do not receive or accept any financial backing from any third party.

      • Admin, ….you said : “but Islam has a particular problem here…”, correct? So we ASK you, to which CATEGORY of people is Islam a PROBLEM??

        The above is already a very ambiguous statement and that needs some explanation :

        Do you mean to say that Islam is a problem to the Muslims? That would be an absurd statement……. as EVERY believer of ANY religion has FAITH in the Scriptures of that religion as FAITH is a “blind trust”. You cannot change the FACT that a person can ONLY change his religion through his OWN FREE WILL, if he desires the change.

        But if your above statement refers to the second category of people who do NOT believe in the Quran, that is those who are NOT Muslims then it DOES NOT matter to the Muslims….as those people WILL ALWAYS CRITICISE Islam!

        Muslims respect the Quran with the UTMOST CARE and that care does NOT apply to the Hadiths. Hadiths do NOT form ANY part of the Quran or of Islamic Sharia and they do NOT fall in the ambit of Islamic Jurisprudence. The Quran expunges any other book besides the Quran by this verse :

        Quran 45:6 ( SI) : These are the verses of Allah which We recite to you in truth. Then in what statement after Allah and His verses will they believe?

        On the issue of “OBEY”, the Quran IS explicitly clear! in that would you “DO” as the teacher DOES in school OR “follow” what he TEACHES as long as it is consistent with SYLLABUS? To OBEY the Prophet means to “follow” what he said as long it was for the expansion of Islam and in line with the Quran. Are we clear on that??

        Quran 6:114 “Then is it other than Allah I should seek as judge while it is He who has revealed to you the Book explained in detail?”

        On the “borrowed” sources of the Quran, NO Muslim will buy that stuff…and the Quran has SET a challenge on that. To win that challenge, use the books of those sources you keep quoting from where the Quran has plagiarised and write just ONE chapter something similar to ANY chapter in the Quran!

        Quran 2:23-4 : Pickthall: “And if ye are in doubt concerning that which We reveal unto Our slave (Muhammad), then produce a surah of the like thereof; But if you do not – and you will never be able to…”

        And finally, Quran 31:6 Pickthall: And of mankind is he who payeth for mere pastime of discourse, that he may mislead from Allah’s way without knowledge, and maketh it the butt of mockery.

        Like the way you want to creep in the Hadiths to foster your Anti-Islam Agenda!!

        • ALL MOHAMMEDANS ARE JINN POSSESSED

          MUHAMMAD’S MASSACRES & SEX SLAVES

          Muhammad, the prophet of Islam and the apostle of Allah, had ordered at least 60 raids and wars often involving massacres and personally participated in 27 of them. The exemplary example and the perfection of humanity and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct that he was—Muhammad massacred, beheaded, tortured, terrorized, raped, and looted in the name of God. Described below are three of his massacres and a partial listing of his sex-slaves from the Muslim holy books and Islamic writings.

          • In the Massacre of Banu Quraiza, Muhammad order the beheading of 600 to 900 adult men (determined by pubic-hair growth) and he himself chopped off a few heads. He enslaved all the women and children of the Jewish tribe. The women were kept as sex-slaves with Muhammad himself taking a beautiful Jewish woman as his own sex-slave and sold the rest of the captives into slavery. He also looted the property of the murdered Jews and took possession of all their wealth and properties. Allah, like a godfather and mafia chieftain of the Muhammad’s criminal gang, rejoiced this barbarous and heinous acts of slaughtering the Jews and enslavement of their women and children by creating 5 teachings in the Koran as the Eternal Laws of God.

          • At the Massacre of Khaybar, Muhammad brutally tortured a Jewish chieftain for extracting information about where he had hidden his treasures. When the treasure was uncovered, the chieftain was beheaded. This chieftain was the husband of the most beautiful Jewish woman of Khaybar, the 17-year-old Safiyaah. Safiyaah’s family members had been annihilated by Muhammad at the Banu Qurayza massacre. Now having beheaded her husband, the Prophet took Safiyah as his sex-slave and copulated on the same night.

          • In the massacre of the Jewish Settlement of Bani Mustaliq, Muhammad captured their women and took twenty-year-old Jewish girl, Juwayriya as his sex-slave.

          The Massacre of Banu Quraiza

          Angel Gabriel Appears To Muhammad And Orders Him To Attack The Rich Jewish Settlement Of Banu Quraiza
          Sahi Bukhari :Volume 5, Book 59, Number 443:
          Narrated ‘Aisha:
          When the Prophet returned from the battle of Al-Khandaq (i.e. Trench) and laid down his arms and took a bath, Gabriel came and said (to the Prophet), “you have laid down your arms? By Allah, we angels have not laid them down yet. So set out for them.” The Prophet said, “Where to go?” Gabriel said, “Towards this side,” pointing towards Banu Quraiza. So the Prophet went out towards them. (Book 019, Number 4368)
          Sahi Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 444:
          Narrated Anas:
          “As if I am just now looking at the dust rising in the street of Banu Ghanm (in Medina) because of the marching of Gabriel’s regiment when Allah’s Apostle set out to Banu Quraiza (to attack them).”
          These traditions about Gabriel’s leadership are designed to give divine support for the atrocity that Muhammad was about to be unleashed upon Banu Qurayza. Today, we may see this as fanciful, but to millions of Muslims this is real and divine.

          Muhammad Besieges Banu Quraiza For 25 Days. After The Jews Unconditionally Surrender All Men Are Beheaded, Women and Young Girls Raped and Sold into Slavery. Their Property was Looted.
          Sahi Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 448

          So Allah’s Apostle went to them (i.e. Banu Quraiza) (i.e. besieged them). They then surrendered to the Prophet’s judgment (unconditionally after 25 days of fierce resistance) but he directed them to Sad (ally) to give his verdict concerning them. Sad said, “I give my judgment that their warriors should be killed, their women and children should be taken as captives, and their properties distributed.”
          The Prophet said, “You have judged according to the King’s (Allah’s) judgment.” (Hadith No. 447, Vol. 5)
          The sentence was Death by decapitation for around 300—600 men and pubescent boys, and enslavement for the women and children. Ibn Ishaq says that the number may have been as high as 800—900 (p. 464).
          The text of Sirat [Ibn Ishaq, page 464]:

          Then they surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina in the quarter of d. al-Harith, a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. Among them was the enemy of Allah Huyayy b. Akhtab and Ka`b b. Asad their chief. There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900. As they were being taken out in batches to the apostle they asked Ka`b what he thought would be done with them. He replied, ‘Will you never understand? Don’t you see that the summoner never stops and those who are taken away do not return? By Allah it is death!’ This went on until the apostle made an end of them.
          Huyayy was brought out wearing a flowered robe in which he had made holes about the size of the finger-tips in every part so that it should not be taken from him as spoil, with his hands bound to his neck by a rope. When he saw the apostle he said, ‘By God, I do not blame myself for opposing you, but he who forsakes God will be forsaken.’ Then he went to the men and said, ‘God’s command is right. A book and a decree, and massacre have been written against the Sons of Israel.’ Then he sat down and his head was struck off.

          Muhammad ordered and participated in the digging of the trench into which the massacred Jews were to be thrown. He STRUCK OFF the heads of at least two of those captives.

          How Did The SS Jihadist Executioners Decide on Which Jewish Boys To Slaughter Or Leave Alive To Be Sold Into Slavery

          To separate the young Jewish men from the minors, Muhammad ordered that their pants be pulled down and the youngsters genital area examined SS style for pubic hairs and if they had grown any pubic hair, it was enough to behead them.
          Book 38, Number 4390:
          Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
          I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

          Aisha’s Description of the Only Woman Murdered: She was Delirious Because Her Husband Had Just Been Beheaded. She was taken by the SS Jihadist and Beheaded.

          Book 14, Number 2665:
          Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
          No woman of Banu Qurayzah was killed except one. She was with me, talking and laughing on her back and belly (extremely), while the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) was killing her people with the swords. Suddenly a man called her name: Where is so-and-so? I asked: What is the matter with you? She said: I did a new act. The man took her and beheaded her. I will not forget that she was laughing extremely although she knew that she would be killed.

          Muhammad Took One Of The Jewish Women As His Sex-slave

          The apostle had chosen one of their women for himself, Rayhana bint Amr . . . one of the women of . . . Qurayza, and she remained with him until she died, in his power. The apostle had proposed to marry and put a veil on her, but she said: “Nay, leave me in your power, for that will be easier for me and for you.” So he left her. She had shown repugnance towards Islam when she was captured and clung to Judaism. (Ibn Ishaq p. 466)

          The Looted Property And The Jewish Women And Children Were Divided Among the Muslims

          More specifically, Ibn Ishaq says the spoils were divided among the Muslims thus:
          Then the apostle divided the property, wives, and children . . . among the Muslims, and he made known on that day the shares of horse and men, and took out the fifth. A horseman got three shares, two for the horse and one for the rider. A man without a horse got one share (p. 466). Then the apostle sent Sa’d b. Zayd al-Ansari brother of b. ‘Abdu’l-Ashhal with some of the captive women of B. Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons. [page 466]

          Allah Allows Muhammad and His Jihadists To Have Sex With Their Sex-slaves
          Allah also allows jihadists to have sex with female slaves. Sources: Ibn Ishaq, pp. 464-66; Tabari, vol. 8, pp. 27-41.

          Muhammad Enriches Himself

          Muhammad had captured huge spoils from his “final solution” of Jews of Banu Qurayza. Muhammad gets one-fifth of the Jewish property (movable, immovable and human), and his jihadist followers get the rest. The tribe of Banu Qurayza likely consisted of about 500 families, who were wealthiest in Medina. Therefore, Muhammad enriched himself with the wealth of about 100 rich families as well as their women and children from this single act of successful Jihad.
          Here is how Allah sanctions the enrichment of Muhammad and his Jihadist followers from his expedition:
          Quran-8:41— “And know that out of all the booty that ye may acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to Allah,- and to the Messenger, and to near relatives, orphans, the needy, and the wayfarer,- if ye do believe in Allah and in the revelation We sent down to Our servant on the Day of Testing,- the Day of the meeting of the two forces. For Allah hath power over all things.

          Why Does Muhammad Not Show Mercy?

          It is Allah who guides Muhammad into committing these heinous, barbaric cruelty against the people of Arabia. Below are a list of Allah’s commands to Muhammad to carry out those acts of carnage:
          Allah celebrates this slaughter and enslavement of the Jews in the Koran:
          Quran-33:25- “Allah turned back the unbelievers [Meccans and their allies] in a state of rage, having not won any good, and Allah spared the believers battle. Allah is, indeed, Strong and Mighty.”
          Quran-33:26- “And He brought those of the People of the Book [Jewish people of Banu Qurayza] who supported them from their fortresses and cast terror into their hearts, some of them you slew (beheaded) and some you took prisoners (captive)”

          Quran-33:27- “And He made you heirs of their lands, their houses, and their goods, and of a land which ye had not frequented (before). And Allah has power over all things.” [Merciful Allah asked Prophet Muhammad to confiscate entire properties of surrendered Jews]
          Quran-8:67—“It is not fitting for an Apostle that he should have prisoners of war until He thoroughly subdued the land….” (Allah insisting Prophet to kill all the prisoners, and should not keep any surrendered prisoners alive until He (Prophet) occupied entire Arabia.”

          Quran-8:17—It is not ye who Slew them; it is God; when thou threwest a handful of dust, it was not Thy act, but God’s…..” (Allah said, the killing of surrendered soldiers were done by the wish of Allah)
          These above Quranic verses revealed some unpleasant truths:
          The verses: 33:25-27 were revealed to describe Banu Qurayza incident and clearly talking about the unbelievers (Quresh pagans, and their allies Jews of Banu Quraiza). Specifically, verse-33:27 talks of ow by the judgement of Sa’d ibn Muaz all the men were slaughtered and women and children were captivated. And Jewish land and property were taken as Booty….Sa’d delivered his justice according to Bible; hence Muhammad said—“your judgement was like God.”

          Allah permitted the enslavement and beheading of Jews, so any Muslim familiar with the background of this verse knows that beheading as such has been assimilated into the Quran.
          What is so troubling about the verse 33:26 is that Allah (Himself) celebrates the “terror” that He threw into the Jews’ hearts. Indeed, when Abu Lubabah the mediator approached the Jews during negotiations, the women and children were crying. Allah of course had heavily terrorized them.
          The Prophet Muhammad had already expelled two other Jewish tribes (Qaynuqa and Nadir) from Medina, and the Banu Qurayza Jews begged for for the same punishment to them. But the Islam’s prophet of peace and mercy declined this relatively more merciful and humane option.
          Such a heartless, evil incarnate was the prophet of Islam!

          The Conquest And Massacre of Khaybar

          Muhammad Attacks The Rich Jewish Settlement of Khaybar Without Warning and Takes Safiya As His Sex Slave After Murdering Her Husband
          Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512:
          Narrated by Anas:
          The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaybar when it was still dark and then said, “Allahu-Akbar! Khaybar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.” Then the inhabitants of Khaybar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet . The Prophet made her manumission as her ‘Mahr’. Muhammad was sixty (60) when he married Safiyyahh, a young girl of seventeen. She became his eighth wife.

          Distribution Of War Booty In Khaybar:
          Sahi Buchari Hadiths #143, page-700:
          Sulaiman Ibne Harb…Aannas Ibne Malek (ra) narrated, “in the war of Khayber after the inhabitants of Banu Nadir were surrendered, Allah’s apostle killed all the able/adult men, and he (prophet) took all women and children as captives (Ghani mateer maal).. Among the captives Safiyya Bint Huyy Akhtab was taken by Allah’s Apostle as booty whom He married after freeing her and her freedom was her Mahr.”
          At first Dihyah al-Kalbi, a Muslim Jihadist asked for Safiyyah. But when Muhammad saw her exquisite beauty, he chose her for himself and gave her two cousins to Dihyah.

          Muhammad Horribly Tortured Safiya’s Husband To Get Information About His Hidden Gold Treasure. He Was Beheaded After He Refused To Give Up The Treasure.

          Prophet Muhammad accused Safiyyah’s husband Kinanah of hiding wealth, which he had received during his marriage with Safiyyah. A renegade Jew divulged the secret of Kinanah’s hidden gold treasures to Muhammad. Kinanah and his cousin were captured and tortured by Muhammad to extract information about the whereabouts of his treasures. He was tormented by branding his chest with a heated stake and then he was beheaded in Islamic style.
          Sourcing Ibn Ishak, Tabari writes:
          ‘Kinanah b. al-Rabi b. al-Huqyaq who had the treasure of B. Nadir was brought to the Messenger of God, who questioned him; but he denied knowing where it was. Then the messenger of God was brought a Jew who said to him, “I have seen Kinanah walk around this ruin every morning.” The Messenger of God said to Kinanah: “What do you say? If we find it in your possession, I will kill you.” “All right,” he answered. The Messenger of God commanded that the ruin should be dug up, and some of the treasure was extracted from it. Then he asked him for the rest of it. Kinanah refused to surrender it; so the Messenger of God gave orders concerning him to al-Zubayr b. al-‘Awwam, saying, “torture him until you root out what he has.” Al-Zubayr kept twirling his firestick in his breast until Kinanah almost expired; then the Messenger of God gave him to Muhammad b. Maslamah, who beheaded him to avenge his brother Mahmud b. Maslamah.”‘

          The Looted Property And Women And Children Were Distributed Among The Jihadists:

          Muhammad now allowed the Muslim Jihadists to take possession of the women and children of the Jews of Khaybar.
          Allah’s Messenger occupied the Jewish land:
          Sahih Muslim writes:Book 010, Number 3759:
          Ibn Umar (Allah be pleased with them) reported: Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) handed over the land of Khaibar (on the condition) of the share of produce of fruits and harvest, and he also gave to his wives every year one hundred wasqs: eighty wasqs of dates and twenty wasqs of barley. When ‘Umar became the caliph he distributed the (lands and trees) of Khaibar, and gave option to the wives of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) to earmark for themselves the land and water or stick to the wasqs (that they got) every year. They differed in this matter. Some of them opted for land and water, and some of them opted for wasqs every year. ‘A’isha and Hafsa were among those who opted for land and water.
          Enjoying special Booty (Gani-maater-maal): Muhammad Takes Safiya As Booty To Be His Sex Slave
          Safiya bint Huyai/Huyayy was a captive Mohammed married after slaughtering her father, brother, husband and the men at Khaibar, according to Bukhari vol.2 book 14 ch.5 no.68 p.35; vol.4 book 52 ch.74 no.143 p.92; vol.4 book 52 ch.168 no.280 p.175 and Tabari vol.39 p.185.

          Muhammad at 60 Takes 17-Year-Old Safiyah as Sex-slave

          After securing beautiful Safiyaah daughter of Huyayy for himself, Prophet Muhammad bedded her in his tent on the same night. Here is the story: Merciful Prophet asked Bilal, the Negro crier of prayer to fetch Safiyyah to his (Muhammad’s) camp. Bilal brought Safiyyah and her cousin straight across the battlefield strewn with dead-bodies, passing by the corpses of Kinana and his cousin. The two cousins of Safiyyah shrieked in horror when they witnessed the gruesome scene of the dead-bodies of their dear and near relatives. When brought to his presence, Muhammad cast his mantle around Safiyyah indicating that she was to be his own. Muhammad consoled a frustrated Dhiya by giving him Safiyyah’s cousin sisters. According to Ibn Sa’d Prophet Muhammad purchased Safiyyah from Dhiyah for seven camels. On the same night, Muhammad took Safiyyah to bed. This was, of course, an exemplary character of the holy Prophet of Islam!
          Here is what Ibn Sa’d writes:
          “-.when it was night, he entered a tent and she entered with him. Abu Ayyub came there and passed the night by the tent with a sword keeping his head at the tent. When it was morning and the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him.”
          To hide the lascivious character of Muhammad, Muslim biographers often mention that he married Safiyyahh before he slept with her. But they forget to mention that Muhammad did not follow the rule of waiting period (three monthly periods) to sleep with Safiyyahh. He slept with her the same day she was captured.

          Islamic Intolerance: Kill All The Jews: The First Final Solution

          • Book 019, Number 4366:
          It has been narrated by ‘Umar b. al-Khattib that he heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say: “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.” [This single sahi hadiths tells everything about Islamic intolerance]

          • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 176 Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar:
          Allah’s Apostle said, “You (i.e. Muslims) will fight with the Jews till some of them will hide behind stones. The stones will (betray them) saying, ‘O ‘Abdullah (i.e. slave of Allah)! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.’ ”

          • “the Apostle of Allah said, ‘Kill any Jew that falls into your power.” [Ibn Ishaq, Siratul Rasul, v. 553]

          The Massacre of Banu Mustaliq

          Muhammad Attacks The Jewish Settlement of Banu Mustaliq: He Captures And Rapes A Twenty Year Old Jewish Girl – Juwairiya
          Bukhari yol 3,Book46, No. 717
          “Narrated Ibn Aun:
          Prophet had suddenly attacked Banu Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day and raped her.
          Juwairiya bint Harith/al-Harith was a captive in this raid, [Bukhari 3.46.13.717, p431-432]. Sahih Muslim 2.2349, p.520 says that Mohammed attacked the Banu Mustaliq tribe without any warning while they were heedlessly grazing their cattle. Juwairiya was a daughter of the chief. Sahih Muslim 3.4292, p.942 and Abu Dawud 2.227, p728 and al-Tabari 39, p.182-183 also say Juwairiya/Juwairiyyah was captured in a raid on the Banu Mustaliq tribe. She had been married to Musafi’ bin Safwan, who was killed in battle.
          Juwayriyyah bint al-Harith bin Abi Birar bin Habib, great grandson of Jadhimah al-Mustaliq of the Khuza’ah group, was taken as booty when Muslims raided the al-Mustaliq tribe. Her husband, Musafi’ bin Safwan Dhu al-Shuir bin Abi Asrb bin Malik bin Jadhimah was killed in the battle. She was a prisoner of war who agreed to marry Mohammed. al-Tabari 39:p182-183; al-Tabari 9:p133.
          Juwayriyya married Mohammed when she was 20 years old. al-Tabari 39:p184.

          Sex Slaves: Muhammad And Those His Right Hand Possesses

          • Sahih Bukhari: Volume 9, Book 93, Number 506:
          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:
          That during the battle with Bani Al-Mustaliq they (Muslims) captured some females and intended to have sexual relation with them without impregnating them. So they asked the Prophet about coitus interrupt us. The Prophet said, “It is better that you should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.” Qaza’a said, “I heard Abu Sa’id saying that the Prophet said, ‘No soul is ordained to be created but Allah will create it.”

          • Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 337:
          Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

          • Sunan Abu Dawud Book 11, Number 2166:
          Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri:
          A man said: Apostle of Allah, I have a slave-girl and I withdraw the penis from her (while having intercourse), and I dislike that she becomes pregnant. I intend (by intercourse) what the men intend by it. The Jews say that withdrawing the penis (azl) is burying the living girls on a small scale. He (the Prophet) said: The Jews told a lie. If Allah intends to create it, you cannot turn it away.
          From Quran, “…abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess – for (in their case) they are free from blame,” Sura 23:5-6. See also Sura 4:24

          “He [Mohammed] replied, ‘Conceal your private parts except from your wife and from whom your right hands possess (slave-girls).’” [Abu Dawud vol.3, no.4006, p.1123.]
          Abu Dawud vol.3 no.4443-4445 p.1244 shows that having sex with a slave-girl a man owns is fine.
          As was typical of wealthy Arab men, Mohammed apparently had need of a few slave girls too. See Bukhari vol.7 book 64 ch.6 no.274 p.210.

          Mohammed briefly had a “very beautiful” captive before he gave her to Mahmiyah b. Jaz’ al-Zubaydi. al-Tabari vol.8 p.151

          One of the slave girls belonging to Mohammed house committed fornication with someone else. It is the “someone else” part that was a problem. Abu Dawud vol.3 no.4458 p.1249
          Mohammed called a black slave-girl to come and conceal Abu Dharr behind a curtain while he was taking a bath. Abu Dawud vol.1 no.332 p.87

          Mention Umm Ayman (=Barakah), a client (slave-girl) of the prophet. al-Tabari vol.39 p.287
          In general, Abu Dawud vol.3 no.4443-4445 p.1244 teaches that having sex with a slave-girl a man owns is OK.

          But, having sex with a wife’s slave girl is OK if the wife made her lawful for him. Note that he did not have to be married to the slave girl. Ibn-i-Majah vol.4 no.2551 p.12
          Mohammed “had intercourse with her [Mary] by virtue of her being his property.” al-Tabari vol.39, p194. Footnote 845 explains, “That is, Mariyah was ordered to veil herself as did the Prophet’s wives, but he did not marry her.”

          Conclusion

          Muhammad’s unprovoked, murderous attacks of Jewish tribes described above are acts of utter barbarity. His extermination and genocide of the whole community, such as that of Banu Qurayza, makes it worse.
          His institution of slavery as a divine order of society was one of the worst curse that could happen to humanity. Allowing sex with slave-girls made it worse. His trading of slaves, such as selling some Banu Qurayza captives in Nejd, was another evil institution.

          Muhammad engaged in all these cruel, dehumanizing and horrible acts with the divine sanctions of Allah. Muhammad and his brainchild Allah were the worst evils to befall humankind, the detriment of which continues to afflict humanity with no end in site.

          • Lucky bin Bukhari, where did you get :”Muhammad’s unprovoked, murderous attacks of Jewish tribes”, that information from? Does the Jewish history indicate that Muhammad subjugated and killed them himself????? Do they have ANY record from their side of the story…about how Mohammed slaughtered them???? I don’t think so!!

            These are those bulls that you have cherry-picked from the Lucky bin Bukhari Hadiths!

          • REAL ISLAM & JIHAD

            The Truth about ISLAM: in its own words

            In the words of the prophet Muhammad.

            Bukhari:V4B52N220 “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been made victorious with terror. The treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.”

            Bukhari:V4B52N260 “The Prophet said, ‘If a Muslim discards his religion, kill him.”

            Bukhari:V7B67N427 “The Prophet said, ‘If I take an oath and later find something else better than that, then I do what is better and expiate my oath.”

            EARLY HISTORY OF PEACEFUL ISLAM:

            Islamic leaders and politicians constantly tell us in English that “Islam is a peaceful religion”, but one can’t help wondering if they would say it quite so often if they were absolutely sure it was true.

            Some recorded massacres of Muslim history:

            On December 30, 1066, Joseph HaNagid, the Jewish vizier of Granada, Spain, was crucified by an Arab mob that proceeded to raze the Jewish quarter of the city and slaughtered its 5,000 inhabitants. The riot was apparently incited by Muslim preachers that had angrily objected to what they saw as inordinate Jewish political power. Similarly, in 1465, Arab mobs in Fez slaughtered thousands of Jews, leaving only 11 alive, after a Jewish deputy vizier treated a Muslim woman in “an offensive manner.” The killings touched off a wave of similar massacres throughout Morocco. Other mass murders of Jews in Arab lands occurred in Morocco in the 8th century, where whole communities were wiped out by Muslim ruler Idris I; North Africa in the 12th century, where the Almohads either forcibly converted or decimated several communities; Libya in 1785, where Ali Burzi Pasha murdered hundreds of Jews; Algiers, where Jews were massacred in 1805, 1815 and 1830 and Marrakesh, Morocco, where more than 300 hundred Jews were murdered between 1864 and 1880.

            Decrees ordering the destruction of synagogues were enacted in Egypt and Syria (1014, 1293-4, 1301-2), Iraq (854¬859, 1344) and Yemen (1676). Despite the Qur’an’s purported prohibition, Jews were forced to convert to Islam or face death in Yemen (1165 and 1678), Morocco (1275, 1465 and 1790-92) and Baghdad (1333 and 1344). Some escaped, but the Jews of Arabia who remained were pretty much completely wiped out. Islamic revisionists claim they were killed because they were literally asking for it, is their apologetic rubbish propaganda. These Islamic revisionists (Islamaniacs) claim that the Jews demanded it as per their own law. I mean that’s like the Nazis claiming they were only accommodating the Jews demand to get warm by the ovens. Like Goebbels said, the bigger the lie, the easier it is for others to believe it.

            In the violent, nearly 1,400-year relationship between Muslims and non-Muslims, Jihad and Dhimmitude were firmly established by the 8th century. Perhaps the pre-eminent Islamic scholar in history, Ibn Khaldun (d. 1406), summarized five centuries of prior Muslim jurisprudence with regard to the uniquely Islamic institution of jihad:

            In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the [Muslim] mission and [the obligation to] convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force… The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense… Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations.

            Between 1894-96, the Ottoman Turks massacred over 200,000 (Dhimmi) Christian Armenians, followed by the first formal genocide of the 20th century, in 1915, at which time they slaughtered an additional 600,000 to 800,000 Armenians. Contemporary accounts from European diplomats confirm that these brutal massacres were perpetrated in the context of a formal Jihad against the Armenians who had attempted to throw off the yoke of Dhimmitude by seeking equal rights and autonomy. Regarding the 1894-96 massacres, the Turkish-speaking interpreter of the British embassy reported:

            …[The perpetrators] are guided in their general action by the prescriptions of the Sheri [Sharia] Law. That law prescribes that if the “rayah” [dhimmi] Christian attempts, by having recourse to foreign powers, to overstep the limits of privileges allowed them by their Mussulman [Muslim] masters, and free themselves from their bondage, their lives and property are to be forfeited, and are at the mercy of the Mussulmans. To the Turkish mind the Armenians had tried to overstep those limits by appealing to foreign powers, especially England. They therefore considered it their religious duty and a righteous thing to destroy and seize the lives and properties of the Armenians…”

            The scholar Bat Yeor confirms this reasoning, noting that the Armenian quest for reforms invalidated their “legal status,” which involved a “contract” (i.e., with their Muslim Turkish rulers).
            This …breach…restored to the umma [the Muslim community] its initial right to kill the subjugated minority [the dhimmis], [and] seize their property…

            In the following chronology, note how closely Islam’s inception is associated with war. From 623 to 777, a span of 154 years, there are 83 military conflicts involving the Muslims…. Muslims tell us Islam is a religion of peace, but all historical facts seem to discredit that claim rather convincingly.

            Chronology of early Islam

            • 570 – Birth of Muhammad in Mecca into the tribe of Quraish.
            • 577 – Muhammad’s mother dies.
            • 595 – Muhammad marries, starts to have children.
            • 605 – Placement of Black Stone in Ka’aba.
            • 610 – Mohammed, in a cave, hears an angel tell him that Allah is the only true God.
            • 613 – Muhammad’s first public preaching of Islam at Mt. Hira. Gets few converts.
            • 615 – Muslims persecuted by the Quraysh.
            • 619 – Marries Sau’da and Aisha
            • 620 – Institution of five daily prayers .
            • 622 – Muhammad immigrates from Mecca to Medina, gets more converts.
            • 623 – Battle of Waddan
            • 623 – Battle of Safwan
            • 623 – Battle of Dul-‘Ashir
            • 624 – Raids on caravans to fund the movement begin.
            • 624 – Zakat becomes mandatory
            • 624 – Battle of Badr
            • 624 – Battle of Bani Salim
            • 624 – Battle of Eid-ul-Fitr & Zakat-ul-Fitr
            • 624 – Battle of Bani Qainuqa’
            • 624 – Battle of Sawiq
            • 624 – Battle of Ghatfan
            • 624 – Battle of Bahran
            • 625 – Battle of Uhud. 70 Muslims killed.
            • 625 – Battle of Humra-ul-Asad
            • 625 – Battle of Banu Nadir
            • 625 – Battle of Dhatul-Riqa
            • 626 – Battle of Badru-Ukhra
            • 626 – Battle of Dumatul-Jandal
            • 626 – Battle of Banu Mustalaq Nikah
            • 627 – Battle of the Trench
            • 627 – Battle of Ahzab
            • 627 – Battle of Bani Qurayza
            • 627 – Battle of Bani Lahyan
            • 627 – Battle of Ghaiba
            • 627 – Battle of Khaibar
            • 628 – Muhammad signs treaty with Quraish. (The 628 Al-Hudaybiyya agreement, between the Prophet and the Meccan tribe of Quraish, was signed for a period of 10 years, which became, in Islamic tradition, the time limit for any agreement with non-Muslims. The agreement was broken after 18 months, Muhammad’s army then conquered Mecca)
            • 630 – Muhammad conquers Mecca.
            • 630 – Battle of Hunain.
            • 630 – Battle of Tabuk
            • 632 – Muhammad dies. The reign of the Caliphs begins.
            • 632 – Abu-Bakr, Muhammad’s father-in-law, along with Umar, begin a military move to enforce Islam in Arabia.
            • 633 – Battle at Oman
            • 633 – Battle at Hadramaut.
            • 633 – Battle of Kazima
            • 633 – Battle of Walaja
            • 633 – Battle of Ulleis
            • 633 – Battle of Anbar
            • 634 – Battle of Basra,
            • 634 – Battle of Damascus
            • 634 – Battle of Ajnadin.
            • 634 – Death of Hadrat Abu Bakr. Hadrat Umar Farooq becomes the Caliph.
            • 634 – Battle of Namaraq
            • 634 – Battle of Saqatia.
            • 635 – Battle of Bridge.
            • 635 – Battle of Buwaib.
            • 635 – Conquest of Damascus.
            • 635 – Battle of Fahl.
            • 636 – Battle of Yermuk.
            • 636 – Battle of Qadsiyia.
            • 636 – Conquest of Madain.
            • 637 – Battle of Jalula.
            • 638 – Battle of Yarmouk.
            • 638 – The Muslims defeat the Romans and enter Jerusalem.
            • 638 – Conquest of Jazirah.
            • 639 – Conquest of Khuizistan and movement into Egypt.
            • 641 – Battle of Nihawand
            • 642 – Battle of Rayy in Persia
            • 643 – Conquest of Azarbaijan
            • 644 – Conquest of Fars
            • 644 – Conquest of Kharan.
            • 644 – Umar is murdered. Othman becomes the Caliph.
            • 647 – Conquest of Cypress island.
            • 644 – Uman dies, succeeded by Caliph Uthman.
            • 648 – Byzantine campaign begins.
            • 651 – Naval battle against Byzantines.
            • 654 – Islam spreads into North Africa
            • 656 – Uthman is murdered. Ali become Caliph.
            • 658 – Battle of Nahrawan.
            • 659 – Conquest of Egypt
            • 661 – Ali is murdered.
            • 662 – Egypt falls to Islam rule.
            • 666 – Sicily is attacked by Muslims
            • 677 – Siege of Constantinople
            • 687 – Battle of Kufa
            • 691 – Battle of Deir ul Jaliq
            • 700 – Sufism takes root as a sect.
            • 700 – Military campaigns in North Africa
            • 702 – Battle of Deir ul Jamira
            • 711 – Muslims invade Gibraltar
            • 711 – Conquest of Spain
            • 713 – Conquest of Multan
            • 716 – Invasion of Constantinople
            • 732 – Battle of Tours in France.
            • 740 – Battle of the Nobles.
            • 741 – Battle of Bagdoura in North Africa
            • 744 – Battle of Ain al Jurr.
            • 746 – Battle of Rupar Thutha
            • 748 – Battle of Rayy.
            • 749 – Battle of lsfahan
            • 749 – Battle of Nihawand
            • 750 – Battle of Zab
            • 772 – Battle of Janbi in North Africa
            • 777 – Battle of Saragossa in Spain

        • Lucky bin Rothschild, refer to this : Bible: Psalm 127:4 >

          “As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man; so are children of the youth”. = ROTHSCHILD…..only THE DUMB understand that referring to the FIVE sons of Patent!

          Is that verse zooming in your head to date when you learnt about Rothschild in the kindergarten days? This son of “Moses” believed in keeping the Patents within the family circles through intermarriages with cousins and so kept succeeding until he flaunted that rule already established in Islam and came tumbling down the hill like Jack!

          Thus the fifth child, Jacob bin Rothschild, did NOT touch the blackstone but the empty brain of Lucky bin Rothschild, when he was searching for an answer that Plum to date, that question being : :

          HOW and WHEN did the Israelites migrate to Germany to be eventually killed in the holocaust by their brothers the Nazis??

          Rothschild group definitely helped create the word “JEW” from “GEW” meaning : “GErmany Walter”, later “G” being replaced by “J”… Israel was NEVER a JEWISH state ever before 1947 and it came into form because of WALTER ROTHSCHILD and the UK.
          Thus they settled the Germans in the land of poor Palestinians….do you understand that, dumbie????

          Now read this from wiki : “In 1917 Walter Rothschild, was the addressee of the Balfour Declaration to the Zionist Federation, which committed the British government to the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people”.
          …a future Israel to settle the Germans using the British by mouth-feeding their failing Bank of England, through their dominating financial structure….. but they “forgot” to leave behind any historical records as NOBODY dares to write their “Patents” save for my dumbie friend, Lucky bin Rothschild himself!!

          • WHY MOHAMMEDANS ARE RETARDED: Council of Islamic Ideology is against ban of underage marriage, calls it un-Islamic [Pak Tribune] ISLAMABAD: The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) on Tuesday ruled that Pakistani laws prohibiting marriage of underage children are un-Islamic. At the end of its two-day session on Tuesday, the CII said that according to Islam there is no minimum age of marriage. Islam does not forbid marriage of young children, the council said. However, the rukhsati (consummation of marriage) is allowed only in the case that both husband and wife have reached puberty. The CII’s ruling comes a day after its chairman, Maulana Muhammad Khan Sheerani said laws regarding second marriage of a man in the presence of the first wife were against religious principles. “Sharia allows men to have more than one wife and we demand that the government should amend the law,” he told reporters after a CII meeting. The laws require a man to have written approval from his existing wife or wives for another marriage. Sheerani urged the government to formulate sharia-compliant laws related to nikah, divorce, adulthood and “will”. According to the constitution, the CII is a recommendatory body that advises parliament in the law-making process, but cannot enact laws on its own. On Monday a meeting of the CII held under the chair of Maulana Sheerani discussed exhaustively the Islamic Family Laws 1961. The CII declared one section of the law un-Islamic under which a man is bound to seek explicit approval from his first wife for second marriage. “Under shariah a man is not bound to seek approval for second marriage from the first wife,” declared Maulana Sherani. NEW IRAQI LAW LEGALIZES RAPE “If passed, the law will apply to Iraq’s Shia Muslims, the majority of the population. Provisions include prohibiting Muslim men from marrying non-Muslim women, legalising rape inside marriage by declaring that a husband has a right to sex regardless of consent, and prohibiting women from leaving the house without their husband’s permission,” reports Breitbart.com. IRAQ CONSIDERS LEGALIZING MARRIAGE FOR 9 YEAR OLDS by Nick Hallett 14 Mar 2014, The Iraqi parliament is considering a law that would legalize marriage for nine-year-old girls. The ‘Personal Status law’ will also restrict women’s rights in matters of divorce and inheritance, making it much easier to men to abuse their spouses. The draft law is based on the Jaafari School of Shia law, which was founded by the sixth Shia imam, Jaafar al-Sadiq. It was approved by Iraq’s Council of Ministers in February and must now be approved by the Iraqi parliament. If passed, the law will apply to Iraq’s Shia Muslims, the majority of the population. Provisions include prohibiting Muslim men from marrying non-Muslim women, legalizing rape inside marriage by declaring that a husband has a right to sex regardless of consent, and prohibiting women from leaving the house without their husband’s permission. The age of marriage will also be lowered to nine years old for girls and 15 for boys. Girls below the age of nine will also be able to marry with their parents’ permission. Commenting on the proposed law, Human Rights Watch said: “The draft law violates the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), which Iraq ratified in 1986, by giving fewer rights to women and girls on the basis of their gender. “It also violates the Convention on Rights of the Child, which Iraq ratified in 1994, by legalizing child marriage, putting girls at risk of forced and early marriage and susceptible to sexual abuse, and not requiring decisions about children in divorce cases to be made in the best interests of the child. They added that the law also “ignores article 2 of the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women by legalizing marital rape” Their deputy Middle East and North Africa director, Joe Stork, added: “[The] passage of the Jaafari law would be a disastrous and discriminatory step backward for Iraq’s women and girls. This personal status law would only entrench Iraq’s divisions while the government claims to support equal rights for all.” MUSLIM INBREEDING: IMPACTS ON INTELLIGENCE, SANITY, HEALTH & SOCIETY Massive inbreeding within the Muslim culture during the last 1.400 years may have done catastrophic damage to their gene pool. The consequences of intermarriage between first cousins often have serious impact on the offspring’s intelligence, sanity, health and on their surroundings The most famous example of inbreeding is in ancient Egypt, where several Pharaonic dynasties collapsed after a couple of hundred years. In order to keep wealth and power within the family, the Pharaohs often married their own sister or half-sister and after a handful of generations the offspring were mentally and physically unfit to rule. Another historical example is the royal houses of Europe where royal families often married among each other because tradition did not allow them to marry people of non-royal class. The high amount of mentally retarded and handicapped royalties throughout European history shows the unhealthy consequences of this practice. Luckily, the royal families have now allowed themselves to marry for love and not just for status. The Muslim culture still practices inbreeding and has been doing so for longer than any Egyptian dynasty. This practice also predates the world’s oldest monarchy (the Danish) by 300 years. A rough estimate shows that close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred: In Pakistan, 70 percent of all marriages are between first cousins (so-called “consanguinity”) and in Turkey the amount is between 25-30 percent (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 More stillbirths among immigrants” Statistical research on Arabic countries shows that up to 34 percent of all marriages in Algiers are consanguine (blood related), 46 percent in Bahrain, 33 percent in Egypt, 80 percent in Nubia (southern area in Egypt), 60 percent in Iraq, 64 percent in Jordan, 64 percent in Kuwait, 42 percent in Lebanon, 48 percent in Libya, 47 percent in Mauritania, 54 percent in Qatar, 67 percent in Saudi Arabia, 63 percent in Sudan, 40 percent in Syria, 39 percent in Tunisia, 54 percent in the United Arabic Emirates and 45 percent in Yemen (Reproductive Health Journal, 2009 Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs.). A large part of inbred Muslims are born from parents who are themselves inbred – which increase the risks of negative mental and physical consequenses greatly. The amount of blood related marriages is lower among Muslim immigrants living in the West. Among Pakistanis living in Denmark the amount is down to 40 percent and 15 percent among Turkish immigrants (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 More stillbirths among immigrants”.). More than half of Pakistani immigrants living in Britain are intermarried: The research, conducted by the BBC and broadcast to a shocked nation on Tuesday, found that at least 55% of the community was married to a first cousin. This is thought to be linked to the probability that a British Pakistani family is at least 13 times more likely than the general population to have children with recessive genetic disorders.” (Times of India, 17/11 2005 Ban UK Pakistanis from marrying first cousins). The lower percentages might be because it is difficult to get the chosen family member to the country, or because health education is better in the West. LOW INTELLIGENCE Several studies show that children of consanguineous marriages have lower intelligence than children of non-related parents. Research shows that the IQ is 10-16 points lower in children born from related parents and that abilities related to social behavior develops slower in inbred babies: “Effects of parental consanguinity on the cognitive and social behavior of children have been studied among the Ansari Muslims of Bhalgapur, Bihar. IQ in inbred children (8-12 years old) is found to be lower (69 in rural and 79 in suburban populations) than that of the outbred ones (79 and 95 respectively). The onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies.” (Indian National Science Academy, 1983 Consanguinity Effects on Intelligence Quotient and Neonatal Behaviours of nsari Muslim Children”). The article “Effects of inbreeding on Raven Matrices” concludes that “Indian Muslim school boys, ages 13 to 15 years, whose parents are first cousins, were compared with classmates whose parents are genetically unrelated on the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices, a nonverbal test of intelligence. The inbred group scored significantly lower and had significantly greater variance than the non-inbred group, both on raw scores and on scores statistically adjusted to control for age and socioeconomic status.” (Behaviour Genetics, 1984). Another study shows that the risk of having an IQ lower than 70 goes up 400 percent from 1.2 percent in children from normal parents to 6.2 percent in inbred children: “The data indicate that the risk for mental retardation in matings of normal parents increases from 0.012 with random matings to 0.062 for first-cousin parentage.” (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1978 Effect of inbreeding on IQ and mental retardation”). The study A study of possible deleterious effects of consanguinity concludes, that “The occurrence of malignancies, congenital abnormalities, mental retardation and physical handicap was significantly higher in offspring of consanguineous than non-consanguineous marriages.” MENTAL & PHYSICAL DISEASES & DEATH The risk of stillbirth doubles when parents are first cousins (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 More stillbirths among immigrants). One study analyzed the risk of perinatal death (the child dies during its own birth), infant death (child dies while still infant) and autosomal recessive disorders (serious and often deadly genetic diseases such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy): Perinatal mortality in the Pakistani children was 1.5 times higher than that in the Norwegian children, and infant mortality in the Pakistani children was more than double that in the Norwegian children. Deaths due to autosomal recessive disorders were 18 times more common in the Pakistani children. Similarly, deaths due to multiple malformations, which may be part of unrecognized autosomal recessive syndromes, were 10 times more common. (BMJ, 1994 Infant death and consanguineous marriage. There are also evidence suggesting that inbred people has a higher risk of developing mental disorders: “The clinical observations indicated that depression is very high in some communities where the consanguinity of marriages is also high.” (Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 2009 “Relationship between consanguinity and depression in a south Indian population”. Another study focused on the relationship between intermarriage and schizophrenia: “The closer the blood relative, the more likely was there to be a schizophrenic illness.” (American Psychiatric Press, 1982 The role of genetic factors in the ethiology of the schizophrenic disorders. The increased risk of insanity among children of marriages between cousins might explain why immigrant patients are stressing the psychiatric system and are strongly overrepresented among insane criminals: “In Sct. Hans Hospital, which has the biggest ward for clinically insane criminals in Denmark, more than 40 percent of the patients have an immigrant background.” (Kristeligt Dagblad, 26/6 2007 Ethnic minorities overrepresented among the criminal insane). IMPLICATIONS FOR THE WESTERN & MUSLIM WORLD The consequences for offspring of consanguineous marriages are unpleasantly clear: Death, low intelligence or even mental retardation, handicaps and diseases often leading to a slow and painful death. Other consequences are: Limited social skills and understanding, limited ability to manage education and work procedures and painful treatment procedures. The negative cognitive consequences also influence the executive functions. The impairment of concentration and emotional control most often leads to anti-social behavior. The economic costs and consequences for society of inbreeding are of course secondary to the reality of human suffering. However, inbreeding among Muslims has severe implications for both the Western societies and the Muslim world. Expenses related to mentally and physically handicapped Muslim immigrants drains the budget for other public services: “When cousins have children together, they are twice as likely to have a disabled child – it costs municipal funds dearly. Disabled immigrant children costs Danish municipalities millions. In Copenhagen County alone, the number of disabled children in the overall increase of 100 percent at 10 years. … Meredith Lefelt has contacted 330 families with disabled children in Copenhagen. She estimates that one third of their clients have a foreign cultural background.” (BT, 10/11 2003 Immigrants inbreeding costing one million. On top come the expenses for Muslim immigrants who – because of different consequences of being born from blood related parents – are not able to live up to the challenges of our Western work market: Muslim immigrants and their descendants in Europe have a very high rate of unemployment. The same goes for Muslims in USA, where the Gallup Institute made a study involving 300.000 people concluding “The majority of Muslims in USA have a lower income, are less educated and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.” (Berlingske Tidende, d. 3. marts 2009: Muslims thrive in USA. The cognitive consequences of Muslim inbreeding might explain why non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the Danish army’s intelligence test than native Danes: “19.3% of non-Western immigrants are not able to pass the Danish army’s intelligence test. In comparison, only 4.7% of applicants with Danish background do not pass.” (TV 2 Nyhederne, 13/6 2007 Immigrants flunk army test. It probably also explains – at least partly – why two thirds of all immigrant school children with Arabic backgrounds are illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system: “Those who speak Arabic with their parents have an extreme tendency to lack reading abilities – 64 percent are illiterate. … No matter if it concerns reading abilities, mathematics or science, the pattern is the same: The bilingual (largely Muslim) immigrants’ skills are exceedingly poor compared to their Danish classmates.” (Rockwool Foundation Research Unit, May 2007: Ethnic students does not make Danish children worse. The high expenses on special education for slow learners consumes one third of the budget for the Danish schools. “Immigrant children are clearly overrepresented on Copenhagen’s schools for retarded children and children with physical handicaps. … 51 percent of the children on the three schools in Copenhagen for children with physical and mental handicaps har immigrant back ground and on one of the schools the amount is 70 percent. … These amounts are significantly higher than the share of immigrant children in the municipality, which is 33 percent. The many handicapped children are a clear evidence that there are many intermarried parents in the immigrant families.” (Jydske Vestkysten, 4/4 2009 Tosprogede i overtal på handicapskoler). Our high level of education may also make it harder for inbred students to follow and finish their studies: “Young people with minority backgrounds have a significantly higher dropout rate at secondary schools than youth with a Danish background. For trade school education, the dropout rate among immigrants is 60 percent, twice as high among adolescents with a Danish background…. There is great variation in educational outcomes when compared with national origin. For example, dropout among young people with Lebanese or Iranian background is far greater than among people of Vietnamese background.” (Center for Knowledge on Integration in Randers, May 2005 “Youth, education and integration“). ”Among immigrant children that are born and raised in Denmark, more than a third has no education. Among native Danes it is less than one fifth that do not get an education. (Statistics Denmark: “Indvandrere i 2007”. The negative consequences of inbreeding are also vast for the Muslim world. Inbreeding may thus explain why only nine Muslims ever managed to receive the prestigious Nobel Prize (5 of them won the “Peace Prize” – for peace that turned out not to last for very long). The limited ability to understand, appreciate and produce knowledge following a limited IQ is probably also partly the reason why Muslim countries produce 1/10 of the World average when it comes to scientific research: “In 2003, the world average for production of articles per million inhabitants was 137, whereas none of the 47 OIC countries for which there were data achieved production above 107 per million inhabitants. The OIC average was just 13.” (Nature 444, p. 26-27, 1. November 2006 ”Islam and science: The data gap”. The lack of interest in science and human development in the Muslim World is also clear in the UN Arab Human Development Reports (AHDR). AHDR concludes that there have been fewer books translated into Arabic in the last thousand years than the amount of books translated within the country of Spain every year: “The Arab world translates about 330 books annually, one fifth of the number that Greece translates. The cumulative total of translated books since the Caliph Maa’moun’s [sic] time (the ninth century) is about 100,000, almost the average that Spain translates in one year.” (Eugene Rogan ”Arab Books and human development”. Index of Censorship, vol. 33, issue 2 April 2004, p. 152-157). “70 percent of the Turkish citizens never read books.”(APA, 23 February 2009 “). CONCLUSION There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. The overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences have been explained above. Compassion for the health of future generations should be enough to ban intermarriage among first cousins. The economic and societal consequences do also count. Such a ban would also lessen Muslim immigration to the West because many Muslim families would like to be able to continue their practice of intermarriage in order to live up to cultural and religious traditions and keep wealth and power inside their family. A legislative ban on first cousin marriages is a logical and compassionate imperative for both the Muslim world, for EU and our Western national governments. JIHAD CHEERLEADERS: Germany’s “Jihad Cheerleaders,” Running Off To Marry Islamist Terrorists Florian Flade (2014-03-12) BERLIN — Sonya* disappeared during the fall school vacation in the German state of Baden-Württemberg. The 16-year-old high school student, the daughter of an Algerian and a German, left her family’s house in Konstanz and never returned. Sonya’s parents called the police fearing the worst. Had their daughter been kidnapped? Was she possibly the victim of some other crime? Neither turned out to be the case: Sonya had left Konstanz to fulfill a dream — to become the wife of an Islamic “holy warrior.” The young Muslim girl had packed her bag and headed for Stuttgart. At the airport, she presented a phony parental letter of authorization that gave the under-age girl permission to travel alone. Then she boarded the plane and flew to Turkey. From there, Sonya is believed to have headed for Syria. Via Facebook, the teenager had been in contact with German Islamists in Syria who urged her to leave school and join the jihad against the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Their propaganda apparently radicalized her so much that she decided to migrate to the war-torn area, leaving behind baffled parents who feared for their daughter’s life. Sonya’s case confirms a trend that Germany’s inland security forces are currently monitoring. Muslim women and girls are increasingly traveling from Germany to Syria, inspired by the wish to join the “Holy War,” marry a jihadist and become the widow of a martyr. According to the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), some 300 Islamists have already left Germany. Among them at least 20 women acting on their “own jihadist motivations” — as Germany’s domestic intelligence service describes it — have sought their way to Syria. “Jihad cheerleaders” At first glance this may seem surprising, because the concept of jihad is pretty much regarded as a male domain. But experts say that has been changing for some time now. Women are increasingly taking on important roles in the radical Islamist scene, particularly in the areas of propaganda, fund-raising, logistics and networking. And today’s radicals of the fairer sex often emulate female role models from early Islamic times — Aisha, for example, the Prophet Mohammed’s youngest wife, who is said to have accompanied warriors astride a camel into battle in what is present-day Iraq in 656 AD. Many Islamist women today obviously believe this image of the fighting Muslim woman, the “mujahida” (holy female warrior), is considered worthy of imitation. “Islamist women see themselves in the role of supporters,” a BfV agent explains. “They support the men’s fight morally and with propaganda work. They urge them on and sometimes also have a radical effect. They’re almost like jihad cheerleaders.” Just how active women are within the radical Islamist scene is clear from the Internet. Within the anonymous forums, blogs and social networks, there’s a kind of “jihadist emancipation” going on. Here, Islamist women discuss, comment and act often as men’s equals. “We’ve noticed that some of the women have a profound knowledge of theology,” the BfV agent confirms. “They frequently know more parts of the Koran and more of the utterances of the prophets than most men. They know exactly what’s allowed and what isn’t.” On Facebook and various Islamist Internet forums, meanwhile, several German-language women’s groups have been created. Here, intense discussions revolve around emigration and jihad, and the role of Muslim women. “Nowadays most men aren’t real men. They hold back from practicing jihad and instead sit on the sofa watching TV,” a woman writes on one of these Facebook pages. “The result is that women are increasingly becoming more masculine in that they are taking over the duties of their husbands.” Women consider those men who did find their way into battle, and were eventually killed, heroes. “He was a lion of this ummah [community]!” one woman wrote about a terrorist killed in Syria. “Where are the lions to follow in his path? Where are the real men?” Perhaps German Islamist women — either at their husbands’ side, or on their own — are making the trip to war zones because there is so little approval and moral support from elsewhere. In accordance with the rules of the Koran, their hope is for a life in a Muslim country as the wife of a “holy warrior.” “In conservative Muslim tradition, a woman shouldn’t actually be traveling unaccompanied by a husband or male relative,” the BfV agent explains. “But now there are scholars whose interpretation of the Koran makes it acceptable for a woman to travel alone when jihad is at stake.” Targeting women with German passports And they are. Just like Sonya from Konstanz, some 20 other Islamist women once living in Germany have gone on jihad — one of them published regular daily entries from Syria on her blog last year. In the blog, she was philosophical about the alleged oppression of Muslims in Europe, and about the 9/11 terror attacks. “And now I’m here. In the land of jihad, the land of honor, in Syria,” the anonymous woman wrote. “I am the wife of a mujahid.” The woman goes on to write that the feeling of being in Syria is indescribable. “I can finally be free, wear my niqab [face veil] as I want to without being made fun of. If I feel like it, I wear a further two or three niqabs. Nobody can do anything to me here.” This is kitschy jihad romanticism addressed to Muslim women who have stayed in Germany. Yet the idea of an ideal Muslim life under Sharia law is appealing to many Muslim women. Some of them openly seek jihadists to marry on the social networks, and online mail-order marriage agencies have started to crop up. “Jihad marriages” is how the BfV characterizes these unions. “We’re even seeing marriages being arranged on Facebook,” says one analyst at the inland intelligence service. It’s a phenomenon that worries the intelligence community because there is the possibility that it is a targeted strategy on the part of Islamic terror groups — jihadists with no previous access to Germany acquiring wives with German passports. “Pregnant, the woman may return to Germany. And then at some point there’s a family reunion,” says a BfV agent. “That’s when the husband, a jihadist with fighting experience, turns up in Germany.” To avoid such scenarios, the police and intelligence service have adopted a policy of direct communication. If there are indications that somebody is planning a trip to Syria, that person is contacted so that they know they are on the police radar and that their travel is being monitored. And it is made clear to the person that supporting a terrorist organization in Syria is a criminal offence in Germany. The tactic is in many cases extremely successful. But the Islamic scene continues to recruit intensively for Syria. Fund-raisers across Germany collect money for Syria, and the BfV agents suspect that much of what’s collected goes to support Syrian rebels. There is another such event soon happening at a Berlin mosque — “for women only.” *Not her real name. MUHAMMAD MARRIED HIS FIRST COUSIN: ZAYNAB BINT JAHSH Zaynab bint Jahsh (Arabic: زينب بنت جحش‎) (c.590-641) was a cousin[1] and wife of Muhammad and therefore a Mother of the Believers.[2] EARLY LIFE Zaynab’s father was Jahsh ibn Riyab, an immigrant from the Asad ibn Khuzayma tribe who had settled in Mecca under the protection of the Umayya clan. Her mother was Umama bint Abdulmuttalib, a member of the Hashim clan of the Quraysh tribe and a sister of Muhammad’s father.[3] Hence Zaynab and her five siblings were the first cousins of Muhammad. The name of her first husband is not known, but he had died by 622.[4] At that time Zaynab, who had become a Muslim, was among those who accompanied her brother Abdullah on the Hijra to Medina.[5] SECOND MARRIAGE Around 625 Muhammad proposed to Zaynab that she marry his adopted son, Zayd ibn Harithah. Zayd had been born into the Kalb tribe but as a child he had been kidnapped by slave-traders. He had been sold to a nephew of Khadija bint Khuwaylid, who in her turn had given him as a wedding present to her husband Muhammad. After some years, Muhammad had manumitted Zayd and had adopted him as his son.[6] Zaynab, supported by her brother Abdullah, at first refused the proposal on the grounds that, “I am the widow of a Quraysh.”[7] They presumably meant that Zaynab’s social status was too high to allow her to marry an ex-slave. Ibn Kathir asserts that these social differences were precisely the reason why Muhammad wanted to arrange the marriage: “The Prophet was well aware that it is a person’s standing in the eyes of Allah that is important, rather than his or her status in the eyes of the people … their marriage would demonstrate that it was not who their ancestors were, but rather their standing in the sight of Allah, that mattered.”[8] It has also been suggested that he wanted to establish the legitimacy and right to equal treatment of the adopted.[9] By contrast, Montgomery Watt points out that Zayd was high in Muhammad’s esteem. “She can hardly have thought that he was not good enough. She was an ambitious woman, however, and may already have hoped to marry Muhammad; or she may have wanted to marry someone with whom Muhammad did not want his family to be so closely allied.”[10] When Muhammad announced a new verse of the Qur’an 33:36, Zaynab acquiesced and married Zayd.[11][12] The marriage lasted less than two years.[13] There was conflict between the couple, and eventually Zaynab shut Zayd out of the bedroom.[14] He divorced her in December 626.[15] MARRIAGE TO MUHAMMAD Muhammad expected criticism if he married Zaynab. Pre-Islamic custom disapproved of marriage between a man and his son’s former wife [16] Arab society would have viewed this union as profoundly wrong; because they considered an adopted son was truly a “son”, for a man to marry his adopted son’s wife – even if she was divorced – was considered incestuous.[17][18] Therefore he “hid in his heart” the idea that he might marry her. This internal conflict is mentioned in the Qur’an 33:37: Behold! Thou didst say to one who had received the grace of Allah and thy favour: “Retain thou (in wedlock) thy wife, and fear Allah.” But thou didst hide in thy heart that which Allah was about to make manifest: thou didst fear the people, but it is more fitting that thou shouldst fear Allah. Then when Zaid had dissolved (his marriage) with her, with the necessary (formality), We joined her in marriage to thee: in order that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the Believers in (the matter of) marriage with the wives of their adopted sons, when the latter have dissolved with the necessary (formality) (their marriage) with them. And Allah’s command must be fulfilled. After this verse was revealed, Muhammad proceeded to reject the existing Arabian norms.[19][20] He married Zaynab as soon as her waiting-period from her divorce was complete, on 27 March 627.[21] Thereafter the legal status of adoption was not recognised under Islam. Zayd reverted to being known by his original name of “Zayd ibn Harithah” instead of “Zayd ibn Muhammad”.[22] Critics have pointed to this Sura as an example of a self-serving revelation that reflected the Propet’s desires rather than the will of God.[23][24][25][26][27] DEATH Zaynab died during the caliphate of Umar bin Khattab in the summer of 641, being the first of Muhammad’s widows to die after him.[28] She was 53 (lunar) years old.[29] References 1. Bewley/Saad 8:72; Al-Tabari, Vol. 8, p. 4; Al-Tabari, Vol. 39, p. 180; cf Guillaume/Ishaq 3; Maududi (1967), Tafhimul Quran, Chapter Al Ahzab 2. Abdulmalik ibn Hisham, Notes to Ibn Ishaq’s “Life of the Prophet”, Note 918. 3. Muhammad ibn Saad, Tabaqat vol. 8. Translated by Bewley, A. (1995). The Women of Madina, p. 33. London: Ta-Ha Publishers. 4. Muhammad ibn Jarir Al-Tabari, Tarikh al-Rusual wa’l-Muluk vol. 39. Translated by Landau-Tasseron, E. (1998). Biographies of the Prophet’s Companions and Their Successors, p. 180. New York: State University of New York Press. 5. Muhammad ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah. Translated by Guillaume, A. (1955). Life of Muhammad, p. 215. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 6. Landau-Tasseron/Tabari, pp. 6-10. 7. Landau-Tasseron/Tabari, p. 180. 8. Ibn Kathir, “Zaynab bint Jahsh” in Wives of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW). 9. Caesar E. Farah, Islam: Beliefs and Observances, p.69 10. Watt, W. M. (1956). Muhammad at Medina, p. 331. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. 11. Al-Jalalayn, Tafsir on Q33:36-38. 12. Ibn Hisham note 918. 13. Maududi (1967), vol. 4, p. 112-3 14. Landau-Tasseron/Tabari, p. 181. 15. Landau-Tasseron/Tabari, p. 182. 16. “For in the time of ignorance they regarded the marriage with an adopted son’s wife as illegal as that with the wife of a natural son.” Koelle, S. W. (1889). Mohammed and Mohammedanism Critically Considered (p. 497). London: Rivingtons. 17. “…the marriage of a man with the wife of his adopted son, even though divorced, was looked upon by the Arabs as a very wrong thing indeed.” Sell, E. (1905). The Historical Development of the Quran (pp. 149–150). London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. 18. “This liberality did not prevent severe comments from those who regarded adopted sonship as real sonship—for which view Mohammed’s institution of brotherhoods gave some support—and who, therefore, regarded this union as incestuous.” Margoliouth, D. S. (1905). Mohammed and the Rise of Islam (Third Edition., p. 321). New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons. 19. Lecker, M (2002). “Zayd B. Haritha”. Encyclopaedia of Islam 11 (2nd ed.). Brill Academic Publishers. p. 475. ISBN 9004127569. 20. Watt, W. M. (1956). Muhammad at Medina, pp. 330-331. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. 21. Muhammad ibn Jarir Al-Tabari, Tarikh al-Rusual wa’l-Muluk vol. 39. Translated by Landau-Tasseron, E. (1998). Biographies of the Prophet’s Companions and Their Successors, p. 182. New York: State University of New York Press. 22. Landau-Tasseron/Tabari, p. 9. 23. “Being the wife of an adopted son, she was unlawful to the Prophet, but a pretended revelation (see Qur’ān, Sūrah xxxiii. 37) settled the difficulty, and Muḥammad married her.” Hughes, T. P. (1885). A Dictionary of Islam: Being a Cyclopædia of the Doctrines, Rites, Ceremonies, and Customs, together with the Technical and Theological Terms, of the Muhammadan Religion. London: W. H. Allen & Co. 24. “However, Muhammad did this, and had to justify his action by alleging that he had for it the direct sanction of God. It was first necessary to show that God did not approve of the general objection to marriage with wives of adopted sons, and so the revelation came thus: Nor hath He made your adopted sons to be as your sons.—Súratu’l Ahzáb (33) v. 4. … Having thus settled the general principle, the way was clear for Muhammad to act in this particular case, and to claim divine sanction for setting at nought the sentiment of the Arab people. So the revelation goes on to say: And remember when thou (i.e. Muhammad) said to him (i.e. Zaid), unto whom God had shown favour and to whom thou also hadst shown favour, ‘Keep thy wife to thyself and fear God;’ and thou didst hide in thy mind what God would bring to light and thou didst fear man; but more right had it been to fear God. And when Zaid had settled to divorce her, we married her to thee, that it might not be a crime in the faithful to marry the wives of their adopted sons when they have settled the affairs concerning them. And the order of God is to be performed. No blame attaches to the Prophet where God hath given him a permission.—Súratu’l Ahzáb (33) vv. 37–8. This relaxation of the moral law for Muhammad’s benefit, because he was a prophet, shows how easy the divorce between religion and morality becomes in Islám.” Sell, E. (1905). The Historical Development of the Quran (pp. 150–152). London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. 25. “But we learn the same lesson from all such investigations, and that is how completely Muḥammad adapted his pretended revelations to what he believed to be the need of the moment. The same thing is true with regard to what we read in Sûrah Al Aḥzâb regarding the circumstances attending his marriage with Zainab, whom his adopted son Zaid divorced for his sake. The subject is too unsavoury for us to deal with at any length, but a reference to what the Qur’ân itself (Sûrah XXXIII., 37) says about the matter, coupled with the explanations afforded by the Commentators and the Traditions, will prove that Muḥammad’s own character and disposition have left their mark upon the moral law of Islâm and upon the Qur’ân itself.” Tisdall, W. S. C. (1911). The Original Sources of the Qur’ân (pp. 278–279). London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. 26. “But at Medina he seems to have cast off all shame; and the incidents connected with his marital relations, more especially the story of his marriage with Zainab the wife of his adopted son Zaid, and his connexion with Mary the Coptic slave-girl, are sufficient proof of his unbridled licentiousness and of his daring impiety in venturing to ascribe to GOD Most High the verses which he composed to sanction such conduct.” Tisdall, W. S. C. (1895). The Religion of the Crescent, or Islâm: Its Strength, Its Weakness, Its Origin, Its Influence. Non-Christian Religious Systems (p. 177). London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. 27. “The scandal of the marriage was removed by this extraordinary revelation, and Zeid was thenceforward called not “the son of Mahomet,” as heretofore, but by his proper name, “Zeid, the son of Hârith.” Our only matter of wonder is, that the Revelations of Mahomet continued after this to be regarded by his people as inspired communications from the Almighty, when they were so palpably formed to secure his own objects, and pander even to his evil desires. We hear of no doubts or questionings; and we can only attribute the confiding and credulous spirit of his followers to the absolute ascendancy of his powerful mind over all who came within its influence.” Muir, W. (1861). The Life of Mahomet (Vol. 3, p. 231). London: Smith, Elder and Co. 28. Bewley/Saad, pp. 79-81. 29. Landau-Tasseron/Tabari, p. 182. IBN KATHIR: ZAYNAB BINT JAHSH – IN “WIVES OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD”. ZAYNAB bint Jahsh Zaynab bint Jahsh, may Allah be pleased with her, married the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) in 5 AH, when she was thirty-five and the Prophet was fifty-eight, but only after her pervious marriage, which had been arranged by the Prophet himself, had ended in divorce. As with all the marriages of the Prophet Muhammad, there was much for all the Muslims to learn from it. Zaynab bint Jahsh was the Prophet Muhammad’s cousin, her mother Umayma being the daughter of Abdul Muttalib, Muhammad’s grandfather, who, while he was alive, had ensured the safety of his grandson, thanks to his position as one of the most respected leaders of the Quraish. Thus Zaynab bint Jahsh came from one of the noblest families of the Quraish, and everyone expected her to eventually marry a man with the same high social status. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) was well aware that it is a person’s standing in the eyes of Allah that is important, rather than his or her status in the eyes of the people. He wanted her to marry a young man called Zayd ibn Harith, whose background was very different to that of Zaynab bint Jahsh. Zayd had been taken prisoner while he was still a child during one of the inter-tribal wars that had been common before the coming of Islam. He had been sold as a slave to a nephew of Khadijah (may Allah be pleased with her) who had given Zayd to her as a gift. In turn, Khadijah had given him to the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) in the days before the revelation of the Qur’an had begun, and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) had given him his freedom and adopted him as his own son, at the age of eight. The Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) had watched both Zayd and Zaynab grow up, and thought they would make a good couple, and that their marriage would demonstrate that it was not who their ancestors were, but rather their standing in the sight of Allah, that mattered. When the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) asked for her hand on behalf of Zayd, Zaynab had her family were shocked at the idea of her marrying a man who in their eyes was only a freed slave. Moreover, Zaynab had wanted to marry the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) himself and in fact he had already been asked by her family whether or not he would like to marry her. At first both she and her brother refused, but then the following ayat was revealed: It is not for a believing man or a believing woman, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger, to have any say in their decision; and whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger has most clearly gone astray. (Quran 33:36) When Zayd, who had also had misgivings about the proposed match, and Zaynab realized that there was no difference between what the Prophet wanted and what Allah wanted, they both agreed to the marriage, the Prophet providing a handsome dowry for Zaynab on Zayd’s behalf. The marriage, however, was not a success. Although both Zaynab and Zayd were the best of people, who loved Allah and His Messenger, they were very different and in the end they could not overcome their incompatibility. Zayd asked the Prophet’s permission to divorce Zaynab more than once, and although he was counseled to hold onto his wife and to fear Allah, in the end the divorce took place. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) then was ordered by Allah to marry Zaynab bint Jahsh, while he did in 5 AH, when he was fifty-eight years old, and she was thirty-five years old. In doing so, he demonstrated beyond doubt that in Islam an adopted son is not regarded in the same light as a natural son, and that although a father may never marry a woman whom his natural son has married and then divorced, the father of an adopted son is permitted to marry a woman who was once, but is no longer, married to that adopted son. Furthermore, by marrying Zaynab, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) also confirmed that it is permissible for cousins to marry, and , at the same time, Zaynab was given her heart’s desire to be married to the Best of Creation. The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) received the command to marry Zaynab while he was with A’isha. After he had received the revelation, he smiled and said, “Who will go and give Zaynab the good news?” and he recited the ayat that he had received. Some say that it was Zayd himself who told her the good news. When Zaynab heard the news, she stopped what she was doing and prayed to thank Allah. Afterwards, she was fond of pointing out that her marriage had been arranged by Allah. It was at this point that the Prophet changed her name from Barra to Zaynab. Zaynab’s wedding feast was also the occasion for another ayat of Qur’an to be sent down. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) sacrificed a sheep and then commanded his servant, Anas, to invite the people to partake of it. After they had eaten, two men remained there after the meal chatting. The Messenger of Allah went out and said goodnight to his other wives and then came back and the two men were still there chatting. It was very hard on the Prophet who did not like to criticize people directly, and so he waited patiently until they left. Then Allah sent down the following ayat which is known as “The Ayat of Hijab”: O you who believe! Do not go into the Prophet’s rooms except after being given permission to come and eat, not waiting for the food to be prepared, However, when you are called, then go in and when you have eaten, then disperse, and do not remain wanting to chat together. If you do that, it causes injury to the Prophet though he is too reticent to tell you. But Allah is not reticent with the truth. When you ask his wives for something, ask them from behind a screen. That is purer for your hearts and their hearts. It is not for you to cause injury to the Messenger of Allah nor ever to marry his wives after him. TO do that would be something dreadful in the sight of Allah. Whether you make something known or conceal it, Allah has knowledge of all things. There is no blame on them regarding their fathers or their sons or their brothers or their brothers’ s sons or their sisters’ s sons or their women or those their right hands own. Have fear of Allah. Allah is witness over everything. Allah and His angels pray blessings of the Prophet. O you who believe! Pray blessings on him and ask for peace for him. (Quran 33:53-56) Zaynab was a woman who was constantly immersed in the worship of Allah. It is related by Anas ibn Malik that once the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) entered the mosque and found a rope hanging down between two of the pillars, and so he said, “What is this?” He was told, “It is for Zaynab. She prays, and when she loses concentration or feels tired, she holds onto it.” At this time the Prophet said, “Untie it. Pray as long as you feel fresh, but when you lose concentration or become tired, you should stop.” Zaynab bint Jahsh (may Allah be pleased with her) was with the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) for six years, and lived for another nine years after his death, dying at the age of fifty, in 20 AH, and thus fulfilling the Prophet’s indication that she would be the first of his wives to die aftehim. Zaynab bint Jahsh, like Zaynab bint Khuzayma before her, was very generous to the poor, and indeed the Prophet said, when speaking of her to his other wives, “She is the most generous among you.” It has been related by A’isha that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) once said to his wives, “The one who has the longest hands among you will meet me again the soonest.” A’isha added, “They use to measure each other’s hands to see whose as longest, and it was the hand of Zaynab that was the longest, because she used to work by hand and give away (what she earned) in charity.” The Messenger of Allah said to Umar, “Zaynab bint Jahsh is one who is full of prayer.” A man said, “Messenger of Allah, what is that?” He said, “The one who is humble and earnest in prayer.” A’isha also said that Zaynab, “I have never seen a woman so pure as Zaynab, so God-fearing, so truthful, so attentive to family ties, so generous, so self-sacrificing in everyday life, so charitable, and thus so close to Allah, the Exalted.” Several years after the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) had died, when Umar was the khalif, great wealth came to the Muslims as a result of their victories in fighting the Persians. The immense treasures of Chosroes, the Persian Emperor, fell into their hands, and when Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) sent Zaynab a pile of gold as her share of the treasure, she called her maid servant and told her to take a handful of it to so-and-so, naming one of the poor people of Medina. One after another, she named all the poor people whom she knew, until they had all received a share of the treasure. Then she told her maidservant to see what was left. All that remained of the large pile of gold was eighty dinars, and this she accepted as her share, thanking Allah for it; but, because she believed so much money was a temptation, she asked Allah that she would never witness such a large distribution of wealth again. By the time a year had passed, when Umar again came to distribute money amongst those wives of the Prophet who were still alive, her prayer had been granted for she had already passed away, may Allah be pleased with her. MUHAMMAD’S MOTHER-IN-LAW WAS HIS AUNT Umama bint Abdulmuttalib Umama (or Umayma) bint Abdulmuttalib was an aunt of Muhammad. She was born in Mecca, the daughter of Abdulmuttalib ibn Hashim and Fatimah bint Amr al-Makhzumiya.[1][2] She married Jahsh ibn Riyab, an immigrant from the Asad ibn Khuzayma tribe,[3][4] and they had six children. 1. Abdullah.[5][6][7][8] 2. Ubaydullah.[9][10][11] 3. Zaynab, later a wife of Muhammad.[12][13][14][15][16][17] 4. Abd, who was always known as an adult by his kunya, Abu Ahmad.[18][19][20][21] 5. Habiba, also known as Umm Habib.[22][23] 6. Hamna.[24][25][26] It is not recorded that Umama ever became a Muslim, and she did not accompany her children on their Hijra to Medina in 621.[27] She was still alive in 628, when Muhammad assigned her an annual pension of 40 wasqs of dates from Khaybar.[28] REFERENCES 1. Ibn Hisham note 97. 2. Muhammad ibn Saad, Tabaqat vol. 8. Translated by Bewley, A. (1995). The Women of Madina, p. 33. London: Ta-Ha Publishers. 3. Muhammad ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah. Translated by Guillaume, A. (1955). The Life of Muhammad, p. 116. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 4. Bewley/Saad, p. 33. 5. Guillaume/Ishaq, pp. 116, 146, 168, 215-217, 230, 286-289, 388, 401. 6. Bewley/Saad, p. 173. 7. Watt/McDonald/Tabari, p. 139. 8. Al-Tabari, Tarikh al-Rusul wa’l-Muluk, vol. 7. Translated by McDonald, M. V. (1987). The Foundation of the Community, pp. 18-23, 29, 134, 137. New York: State University of New York Press. 9. Guillaume/Ishaq, pp. 99, 146, 529. 10. Bewley/Saad, p. 68. 11. Poonawala/Tabari, p. 133. 12. Guillaume/Ishaq, pp. 215, 495. 13. Ibn Hisham note 918. 14. Bewley/Saad, pp. 72-81. 15. Al-Tabari, Tarikh al-Rusul wa’l-Muluk, vol. 8. Translated by Fishbein, M. (1997). The Victory of Islam, pp. 1-4, 61. New York: State University of New York Press. 16. Al-Tabari, Tarikh al-Rusul wa’l-Muluk, vol. 9. Translated by Poonawala, I. K. (1990). The Last Years of the Prophet, pp. 23, 127, 134, 137, 168. New York: State University of New York Press. 17. Al-Tabari, Tarikh al-Rusul wa’l-Muluk, vol. 39. Translated by Landau-Tasseron, E. (1998). Biographies of the Prophet’s Companions and Their Successors, pp. 9, 180-182. New York: State University of New York Press. 18. Guillaume/Ishaq, pp. 116, 215-217, 230. 19. Ibn Hisham note 918. 20. Bewley/Saad, pp. 33, 80-81. 21. Al-Tabari, Tarikh al-Rusul wa’l-Muluk, vol. 6. Translated by Watt, W. M., & McDonald, M. V. (1988). Muhammad at Mecca, p. 139. 22. Guillaume/Ishaq, pp. 215, 523. 23. Bewley/Saad, pp. 170-171. 24. Guillaume/Ishaq, pp. 215, 389, 495, 499, 522. 25. Bewley/Saad, pp. 33, 170. 26. Fishbein/Tabari, pp. 61, 63. 27. Guillaume/Ishaq p. 215. 28. Bewley/Saad p. 33. MOHAMMEDANS ARE A BREED OF RETARDS, FROM MARRYING THEIR NIECES & FIRST COUSINS. SCIENTIFIC FACT! 70% OF ALL PAKISTANIS ARE INBREED – 25% OF TURKS. IN BRITAIN 55% OF PAKISTANIS ARE MARRIED TO FIRST COUSINS. PAKISTANIS ARE 3.4% OF BIRTHS, BUT HAVE 30% OF BIRTH DEFECTS! IF PARENTS ARE COUSINS: THERE IS AN AVERAGE DECREASE OF 10 – 15 IQ POINTS. THE RISK OF IQ BEING LOWER THAN 70 (RETARDED) INCREASES BY 400%. DENMARK: ONE THIRD OF ALL HANDICAPPED ARE MOHAMMEDANS. 64% OF MOHAMMEDANS ARE ILLITERATE EVEN AFTER 10 YEARS OF SCHOOLING. THE NON MOHAMMEDAN WORLD CAN NOW UNDERSTAND WHY MOHAMMEDANS ARE MENTAL CASES – INBREEDING! A BUNCH OF MORONIC RETARDS! WHO ELSE WOULD FOLLOW THE RETARDED PERVERT OF MECCA, ONLY OTHER RETARDED PERVERTS! MUHAMMAD MARRIED HIS DAUGHTER IN LAW: LET US SEE HOW MOHAMMEDANS ATTEMPT TO GET AROUND THE ADULTERY OF MUHAMMAD WITH HIS DAUGHTER IN LAW: Did Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him really marry his daughter in law? It is quite ironic that the haters of Islam try with their best attempts to discredit the True and Wonderful Religion of Allah Almighty, Islam, even if it were a lie and they knew that it was a lie. One of the constant points that are usually brought up by the anti-Islamics against our beloved Prophet peace be upon him and Islam is the one where Muhammad married his adopted son’s wife after they got divorced. According to the Western culture, an adopted son becomes an actual son. But this law does not exist in Islam. Let us look at Noble Verses 33:4-5 “Allah has not Made for any man two hearts in his (one) body: nor has He made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers: nor has He Made your adopted sons your sons. Such is (only) your (manner of) speech by your mouths. But Allah Tells (you) the Truth, and He Shows the (right) Way.” Zihar is the divorce done by pagan Arabs before Islam, where a man would say to his wife you are to me like my mother. The man could marry another woman, where the woman couldn’t marry another man, which was very degrading to all women. Zayd’s, the Prophet’s alleged “adopted son” by the haters of Islam, wife, was the one who wanted to divorce him and marry the Prophet. She was not forced into the marriage by any means. Let us look at Noble Verse 58:1 “God has indeed heard (and accepted) the statement of the woman who pleads with thee concerning her husband and carries her complaint (in prayer) to God: and God (always) hears the arguments between both sides among you: for God hears and sees (all things).” Let us look at Noble Verse 33:37 “Behold! thou didst say to one who had received the grace of Allah and thy favour: ‘Retain thou (in wedlock) thy wife, and fear Allah.’ But thou didst hide in thy heart that which Allah was about to make manifest: thou didst fear the people, but it is more fitting that thou shouldst fear Allah. Then Zayd had dissolved (his marriage) with her, with the necessary (formality), we joined her in marriage to thee: In order that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the believers in (the matter) of marriage with the wives of their adopted sons, when the latter have dissolved with the necessary (formality) (their marriage) with them. And Allah’s command must be fulfilled.” According to Islamic laws, where from the above Noble Verses do we see our beloved Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him marrying his daughter in law?! According to Noble Verses 33:4-5 above, we clearly see that an adopted son is NOT in the place of an actual son. An adopted son is a son from a stranger person. The foster father would still have to treat the adopted son with kindness and fulfill all of his needs. But the adopted son can never be an actual son. According to Noble Verse 33:37 above, we clearly see that Allah Almighty allowed for the Muslims to marry the former wives of their adopted sons!. If a man called another’s son “his son”, it might create complications with natural and normal relationships if taken too literally. The truth is the truth and can not be altered by men’s adopting “sons”. “Adoption” in the technical sense is not allowed in Muslim Law. Those who have been “wives of your sons proceeding from your loins” are within the Prohibited Degrees of marriage, but this does not apply to “adopted” sons; “Prohibited to you (for marriage) are your mothers, daughters, sisters; father’s sisters, mother’s sisters; brother’s daughters, sister’s daughters; foster-mothers (who gave you suck), foster-sisters; your wives’ mothers; your step-daughters under your guardianship, born of your wives to whom ye have gone in no prohibition if ye have not gone in (those who have been) wives of your sons proceeding from your loins; and two sisters in wedlock at one and the same time, except for what is past for Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. (The Noble Quran, 4:23)” Conclusion Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him did not marry his daughter in law as the deceivers from the anti-Islamics always claim. Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him is a Great Messenger from Allah Almighty. Allah Almighty in the Noble Quran does not recognize an adopted son as a real son, because He, the Almighty, has His Great Wisdom behind it, to save us from complications and genetically and cultural problems. WHAT THESE MORONIC, IGNORANT MOHAMMEDANS FAIL TO REALIZE IS THAT MUHAMMAD “CREATED” HIS QURAN TO FIT EVERY FUCKED-UP SITUATION HE GOT HIMSELF INTO! MUHAMMAD GOT CAUGHT SCREWING MARIA, IN HAFSA’S BED: ALLAH FROWNS OVER ABSTAINING FROM SEX WITH SLAVE GIRLS (Surah No. 66, AT-TAHRIM) CONTEXT OF THE SURAH ** It was Hafsa’s turn to sleep with the Prophet . Her maid Maria Quptia ( a gift from King of Alexandria) was also in her room when prophet walked in.. Maria was a very attractive and voluptuous young teenager.. She aroused carnal desires in any man who looked at her; then our Prophet was not any man, he was endowed with 30 man libido* by Allah… * Bukhari Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268: Narrated Qatada: “ Prophet was given the sexual strength of thirty men” To be alone with Maria, Prophet sent Hafsa to her Dad’s house with a phony excuse that Umar wanted to see her. UMAR WAS AWAY PERFORMING SUNNA Umar was not home, when Hafsa reached her Dad’s place few houses down the street. Hafsa: “Mom Where is Dad”? Mother: “He has gone to the Al Manasi field near Baqia to defecate”… Hafsa: “Why doesn’t he go to the field behind our house”.. Mother: “Because it is a sunna to relieve yourself at the place where Prophet relieves himself”.. Hafsa: “I will wait for him” . Mother: ”It may be a long wait. He hides there afterwards to spy on the prophet’s wives.” Hafbsa: “Spy on the prophet’s wives, what for?” Mother: “To make sure they are veiled according to aya 33.59 when they come to relieve themselves. As you know this aya was sent* by Allah at your Dad’s request.” *Bukhari Volume 8, Book 74, Number 257: Narrated ‘Aisha: (the wife of the Prophet) ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab used to say to Allah’s Apostle “Let your wives be veiled” But he did not do so. The wives of the Prophet used to go out to answer the call of nature at night only at Al-Manasi.’ Once Sauda, the daughter of Zam’a went out and she was a tall woman. ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab saw her while she was (defecating) in a group, and said, “I have recognized you, O Sauda!” He (‘Umar) said so as he was anxious for some Divine orders regarding the veil (the veiling of women.) So Allah revealed the verse of veiling 33.59. (Al-Hijab; a complete body cover excluding the eyes). (See Hadith No. 148, Vol. 1) *Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 395: Narrated ‘Umar (bin Al-Khattab): Allah agreed with me on three things and revealed ayas, one of them was the verse of the veiling of the women (33.59) . Hafsa: “Well I cant wait that long. It is my turn with Prophet , he must be in bed waiting for me.” PROPHET IN BED BUT NOT WAITING When Hafsa returned, she found the Prophet in bed but not waiting. He was in action with her maid Maria. Hafsa was outraged (she had the temper of her Dad Umar) and started hollering at him. Hafsa: “Rasulullah you lied and deceived me to screw my maid”? Prophet: “Hafsa mind your language. Aya 33.32* says you should talk to Allah’s Prophet in an honorable manner.” (33.32: “O wives of the Prophet! Speak to the prophet in an honorable manner”) Hafsa: “I will speak honorably to the prophet when the Prophet stops acting dishonorably himself”. Prophet: “Having sex with slave girls is not dishonorable. Allah has made* them halal for me.” (33.50 “Mohammed, sex with slave girls and captured women is halal for you) Hafsa: “I don’t give a rat’s behind who is halal for you and who is not .. You can have sex with a she camel for all I care. But I don’t want it in my bed and on my night”. Prophet: “Hafsa, calm down. I will tell you something. If you keep this incident a secret between you and me and don’t tell any one, I take an oath that I will never touch Maria again. And Please cool down first . Go have a drink of cold water….” Hafsa: “ O.K., I have to go pee also…” AYA 66.1 AND 66.2 REVEALED Hafsa returned after a short while and found her husband again screwing with Maria. Hafsa: “Rasulullah, You have a short memory. You had just said you will not touch her again”. Prophet: “Yes I did, but Allah revealed aya 66.1 after you left, it says “Mohammed why do you forbid yourself what Allah has made lawful to you just to please your wife” Hafsa: “What about the oath you took.” Prophet: “Allah dissolved my oath” by aya 66.2 which says “Allah has ordained for you the dissolution of your oath. And Allah is your Maula.” ALLAH SPIED FOR THE PROPHET Next morning when Prophet returned from Fajr prayer, his wives gave him dirty looks and a silent treatment instead of happily greeting him like every day… As smart as our prophet was, he knew right away that Hafsa, had ratted and had divulged last night’s incident to all other wives who incidentally hated Maria for her beauty and the prophet’s fondness for her. Prophet was pissed off and rushed into Hafsa’s room: “When I told you to keep last night’s incident with Maria a secret to yourself, I trusted you; why did you spread it”? Hafsa: “Who informed you that I spread it”? Prophet: “Allah informed me” (“The prophet had trusted one of his wives with a certain incident, then she spread it, and GOD let him know about it. He then told his wife, she asked him, “Who informed you of this?” He said, “I was informed by Allah” (Q 66.3) Hafsa started trembling with fear. She had no idea Allah spied for the prophet and told tales to him about his wives private talks and gossips. MISBEHAVING WIVES WILL BURN IN HELL FIRE An angry Prophet then gathered all his resentful wives and conveyed the following chilling message from Allah to them which had just arrived. Quran 66.5: “If Mohammed divorced you all, Allah will give him in exchange wives better than you who are submissive and devout”. That message was a death sentence to the scared wives. A divorce meant starving to death since no body was allowed to marry Prophet’s wife according to an earlier aya… The Prophet continued: Quran 66.10-11: “On one hand wives of Allah’s prophets Noah and Lut misbehaved with their husbands and they were put in hell fire. On the other hand wife of the kafir Pharoah was well behaved and she was awarded paradise”.. ONE MONTH BREAK EXCLUSIVELY WITH MARIA All the wives started wailing. Starving to death was one thing ; burning in hellfire for ever was something else. They grabbed his feet and begged him for mercy. The merciful prophet then took pity on them and decided to apply abstention clause of aya 4.34 (abstaining from sex with wives as a disciplinary action ) He could have divorced them like Allah suggested or beaten them under scouging clause of aya 4.34 . The Koran (Quran) allows men to beat their wifes, and here are the rules. After watching this, you will no longer be able to claim ignorance of Islam. QURAN 4:34 – “Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme.” He stayed away from all his wives for a month* and slept exclusively with Maria to humiliate them further and make them jealous. * Bukhari: Volume 3, Book 43, Number 648: “The Prophet did not go to his wives because of the secret which Hafsa had disclosed to ‘Aisha, and he said that he would not go to his wives for one month as he was angry with them when Allah admonished him for his oath that he would not approach Maria.” Allah also decided to pitch-in in the misery of Prophet’s wives by making Maria pregnant with a baby boy (Ibrahim), something Mo desired most and which could not be delivered by any of the nine resident wives. NOTE: Several embarrassed sahabis made false hadiths later about this sura to protect the “good” name of Mohammed. They fabricated the story and said it was honey and not Maria which prophet took an oath to abstain from. That is ridiculous and does not make any sense. Here is what Ibn Saad wrote in “Tabaqat” “Waqidi has informed us that Abu Bakr has narrated that the messenger of Allah (PBUH) had sexual intercourse with Maria in the house of Hafsa.. She told the prophet, O Messenger of Allah, do you do this in my house and during my turn? The messenger said, control yourself and let me go because I make her haram to me. Hafsa said, I do not accept, unless you swear for me. That Hazrat (his holiness) said, by Allah I will not contact her again.” [Tabaqat v. 8 p. 223 Publisher Entesharat-e Farhang va Andisheh Tehran 1382 solar h ( 2003) Translator Dr. Mohammad Mahdavi Damghani] The Koran (Quran) allows men to beat their wives, and here are the rules. After watching this, you will no longer be able to claim ignorance of Islam. QURAN 4:34 – “Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded t
        • Dear MM, I do NOT know about that as I do NOT seek for mistakes nor verify any divinity because “divinity” is the faith, a belief but what I may propose , after going through most of the Scriptures in relation to Positive Principles, is that the Quran establishes the MORAL code of CONDUCT and ETHICS…the ONLY BOOK to do so.

          The CATHOLICS are the BIGGEST ANTI-ISLAM ones in this world and upload their “cooked-up” videos in which there are their own artists “PLANTED” being “Muslims” like MEMRI.TV and later upload to Youtube to incite the public against Islam. They normally do that on pretext of fight against imaginary terrorism as Bush did to Iraq but the whole intention is to bring Islam down! Surprising, MOST Muslims are aware of their EVIL intention!

          Women are Highly respected in Islam…as they are considered MORE valuable than diamonds. Their dressing for the bosom covering is of the highest on morality as that is the biggest culprit in the holier than thou Western society.

          The Quran reprimands the Pagan, the Idol worshipper who believes in infanticide : 81:8-9 Pickthall:
          “And when the girl-child that was buried alive is asked for WHAT sin she was slain?”

          The BIBLE is filled with lies of PAUL who expunged various other books using his cronies like Luke, Mark, John…, like Book of Thomas, Book of Barnabas which were later found in the “Dead Sea Scrolls”! How can WORD of God be expunged?

          The “sweet” taste of devouring others land through colonisation, by imposing their FAKE religion in the minds of people, when they were about to gulp down their throats for good and that is….is NOT forgotten when Islam removed that from their mouths. Islam grew and injustices were curbed as the Quran directs for fight against injustices and corruption by others…thus the fight for Independence.

          Ask yourself : Fight for Independence from who? Was it ARABS?

        • THE ERROR FREE QURAN? MORE LIKE A SWISS CHEESE Internal Contradictions: Who suffers loss if Muhammad was wrong? Sura 34:50 commands Muhammad to say, “If I go astray, I go astray only to my own loss,” which is a severe factual error in the Qur’an as well as contradicting the teaching of the Qur’an in a number of other verses. Allah, Adam, and the Angels. There are a great number of problems and inconsistencies between the several accounts of Adam’s creation, Allah’s command to prostrate before Adam, Satans refusal, etc. Who Was the First Muslim? Muhammad [6:14, 163], Moses [7:143], some Egyptians [26:51], or Abraham [2:127-133, 3:67] or Adam, the first man who also received inspiration from Allah [2:37]? Can Allah be seen and did Muhammad see his Lord? Yes [S. 53:1-18, 81:15-29], No [6:102-103, 42:51]. Were Warners Sent to All Mankind Before Muhammad? Allah had supposedly sent warners to every people [10:47, 16:35-36, 35:24], Abraham and Ishmael are specifically claimed to have visited Mecca and built the Kaaba [2:125-129]. Yet, Muhammad supposedly is sent to a people who never had a messenger before [28:46, 32:3, 34:44, 36:2-6]. This article also raises other issues: What about Hud and Salih who supposedly were sent to the Arabs? What about the Book that was supposedly given to Ishmael? Etc. What will be the food for the people in Hell? The food for the people in Hell will be only “Dhari” [Sura 88:6], or only foul pus from the washing of wounds [S. 69:36], or will they also get to eat from the tree of Zaqqum [S. 37:66]? Together, these verses constitute three contradictions. Can Angels Cause the Death of People? The Qur’an attacks those who worship anyone besides God (e.g. angels or prophets) because those can neither create, nor give life, nor cause anyone to die. Yet, the Qur’an explicitly states that one angel or several angels are causing certain people to die [Sura 4:97, 16:28, 32, 32:11]. Confusion Concerning Identity of the Spirit and Gabriel (a long discussion of dozens of references) ‘Iddah rules for divorced and widowed women appear to be arbitrary and inconsistent. Is there a minimum age of marriage for girls? To Marry or Not to Marry? The Qur’an forbids believers to marry idolatrous women [Sura 2:221], and calls Christians idolaters and unbelievers [9:28-33], but still allows Muslims to marry Christian women [5:5]. Will it be accepted of them or not? Will Allah reward the good deeds of Unbelievers? S. 9:17 and 9:69 clearly say no. However, S. 99:7 implies yes. Moreover, S. 2:62 promises Christians reward for their good deeds. But S. 9:28-33; 5:17, 72-73 calls Christians idolaters, and S. 9:17 is very clear that idolaters will have no reward. Should Muslims Accept Peace or Not? Fighting All People Until They Do What? Compel them or Not? Can They Disbelieve in the Last Day and be Safe? Should Muslims show kindness to their parents? On the one hand, the Quran commands all Muslims to show kindness to their parents, even if they are disbelievers [17:23-24, 31:14-15, 29:8, etc.]. On the other hand, it demands not to show any love or friendship to those who oppose Muhammad, even if they are their parents [9:23, 58:22]. Can one be a believer in God and oppose Muhammad at the same time? How many mothers does a Muslim have? Only one [58:2, the woman who gave birth and none else], or two [4:23, including the mother who nursed him], or at least ten [33:6]? And it just doesn’t add up: Sura 4:11-12 and 4:176 state the Qur’anic inheritance law. When a man dies, and is leaving behind three daughters, his two parents and his wife, they will receive the respective shares of 2/3 for the 3 daughters together, 1/3 for the parents together [both according to verse 4:11] and 1/8 for the wife [4:12] which adds up to more than the available estate. A second example: A man leaves only his mother, his wife and two sisters, then they receive 1/3 [mother, 4:11], 1/4 [wife, 4:12] and 2/3 [the two sisters, 4:176], which again adds up to 15/12 of the available property. How many angels were talking to Mary? When the Qur’an speaks about the announciation of the birth of Jesus to the virgin Mary, Sura 3:42,45 speaks about (several) angels while it is only one in Sura 19:17-21. (This article has received many Muslim responses which are quoted or linked and/or discussed at the end of the article.) Further numerical discrepancies Does Allah’s day equal to 1,000 human years (Sura 22:47, 32:5) or 50,000 human years (Sura 70:4)? — According to Sura 56:7 there will be THREE distinct groups of people at the Last Judgement, but 90:18-19, 99:6-8, etc. mention only TWO groups. — There are conflicting views on who takes the souls at death: THE Angel of Death [32:11], THE angels (plural) [47:27] but also “It is Allah that takes the souls (of men) at death.” [39:42] Angels have 2, 3, or 4 pairs of wings [35:1]; but Gabriel had 600 wings. [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 54, Number 455] How many days did Allah need to destroy the people of Aad? One day [54:19] or several days [41:16; 69:6,7] Six or eight days of creation? Sura 7:54, 10:3, 11:7, and 25:59 clearly state that God created “the heavens and the earth” in six days. But in 41:9-12 the detailed description of the creation procedure adds up to eight days. (This topic also includes many Muslim responses and further discussion.) Quick or Slow Creation? Allah creates the heavens and the earth in six days [7:54] and many Muslims want to be modern and scientific, and make that six eons, but then again, He creates instantaneously [2:117], “Be! And it is”. Heavens or Earth? Which was created first? First earth and then heaven [2:29], heaven and after that earth [79:27-30]. Calling together or ripping apart? In the process of creation heaven and earth were first apart and are called to come together [41:11], while 21:30 states that they were originally one piece and then ripped apart. What was man created from? A blood clot [96:1-2], water [21:30, 24:45, 25:54], “sounding” (i.e. burned) clay [15:26], dust [3:59, 30:20, 35:11], nothing [19:67] and this is then denied in 52:35, earth [11:61], a drop of thickened fluid [16:4, 75:37] What were jinn created from? The descent of the Quran: Piecemeal or all at once? Examining the inherent problems with the descent of the Quran Is half the Quran already fully detailed? Fully Detailed Or Incomplete? The Qur’an claims for itself to be (fully) detailed, that nothing is left out of the book [6:38, 6:114, 12:111, 16:89 etc.]. However there are plenty of important issues which are left unclear in the Qur’an. This article discusses the confusion found in the quranic statements on wine. Is the Quran Completely Clear or Not? The Perspicuity of the Quran and It’s Mysterious Letters Worshiping the Same or a Different God? Muhammad is commanded to speak to the disbelievers: … nor do you worship what I worship [109:3]. However, other verses in the Qur’an state clearly that those disbelieving his message are in fact worshiping the same God, Allah. Did the Meccan Polytheist Believe That Allah Was The Supreme Being? To Intercede or Not To Intercede? – That is the Question! The Qur’an makes contradictory statements whether on the Day of Judgment intercession will be possible. No: [2:122-123, 254; 6:51; 82:18-19; etc.]. Yes: [20:109; 34:23; 43:86; 53:26; etc.]. Each position can be further supported by ahadith. How the Islamic Doctrine of Intercession undermines Allah’s Omniscience Where is Allah and his throne? Allah is nearer than the jugular vein [50:16], but he is also on the throne [57:4] which is upon the water [11:7], and at the same time so far away, that it takes between 1,000 and 50,000 years to reach him [32:5, 70:4]. The origin of calamity? Is the evil in our life from Satan [38:41], Ourselves [4:79], or Allah [4:78]? How merciful is Allah’s mercy? He has prescribed mercy for himself [6:12], yet he does not guide some, even though he could [6:35, 14:4]. Does Allah command to do evil? No [7:28, 16:90]. Yes [17:16, ]. Two examples are also given, where Allah clearly commanded or permitted indecent actions [2:229-230, 2:187]. Should Muhammad Get Paid Or Shouldn’t He? A Contradiction Regarding Muhammad’s Fatherhood Will there be inquiry in Paradise? “neither will they question one another” [23:101] but nevertheless they will be “engaging in mutual inquiry” [52:25], “and they will … question one another” [37:27]. Are angels protectors? “NO protector besides Allah” [2:107, 29:22]. But in Sura 41:31 the angels themselves say: “We are your protectors in this life and the Hereafter.” And also in other suras is their role described as guarding [13:11, 50:17-18] and protecting [82:10]. Is Allah the only Wali? On the one hand, Allah is supposedly the only wali (protector, helper, friend) [9:116, 17:111, 32:4, 42:28], on the other hand, the messenger and the believers are walis [5:55, 9:71], Allah has walis [10:62], and he raises walis [4:75]. Does Allah Act Alone Or Does He Have Partners That Assist Him? Is Allah the Only Judge or Not? Is Allah the only sovereign or isn’t he? Are all obedient and prostrating to Allah? That is the claim in 16:49 and 30:26, but dozens of verses speak of the proud disobedience of Satan [7:11, 15:28-31, 17:61, 20:116, 38:71-74, 18:50] as well of many different human beings who reject His commands and His revelations. Does Allah forgive shirk? Shirk is considered the worst of all sins, but the author of the Qur’an seems unable to decide if Allah will ever forgive it or not. No [4:48, 116], Yes [4:153, 25:68-71]. Abraham committed this sin of polytheism as he takes moon, sun, stars to be his Lord [6:76-78], yet Muslims believe that all prophets are without any sin. Abraham and the Sun Abraham’s Monotheism Abraham’s Progeny? How the Qur’an messed up Abraham’s family tree Did All Prophets Receive the Same Book? The event of worship of the golden calf: The Israelites repented about worshipping the golden calf BEFORE Moses returned from the mountain [7:149], yet they refused to repent but rather continued to worship the calf until Moses came back [20:91]. Does Aaron share in their guilt? No [20:85-90], yes [20:92, 7:151]. Was Jonah cast on the desert shore or was he not? “Then We cast him on a desert shore while he was sick” [37:145] “Had not Grace from his Lord reached him, he would indeed have been cast off on the naked shore while he was reprobate.” [68:49] Moses and the Injil? Jesus is born more than 1,000 years after Moses, but in 7:157 Allah speaks to Moses about what is written in the Injil [the book given to Jesus]. Can slander of chaste women be forgiven? Yes [24:5], No [24:23]. How do we receive the record on Judgment Day? On Judgement day the lost people are given the Record (of their bad deeds): Behind their back [84:10], or in their left hand [69:25]. Can angels disobey? No angel is arrogant, they all obey Allah [16:49-50], but: “And behold, we said to the ANGELS: ‘Bow down to Adam’. And THEY bowed down, EXCEPT Iblis. He refused and was haughty.” [2:34]. This article includes links to answers to four Muslim responses. How many wings does an angel have? Angels have 2, 3, or 4 wings [35:1]; but Gabriel had 600 wings according to Sahih al-Bukhari. Is Satan an angel or a jinn? Three contradictions in 2:97 and 16:101-103 Who brings the revelation from Allah to Muhammad? The ANGEL Gabriel [2:97], or the Holy Spirit [16:102]? The new revelation confirms the old [2:97] or substitutes it [16:101]? The Qur’an is PURE Arabic [16:103] but there are numerous foreign, non-Arabic words in it. Do not say, “Three”!? It is impossible to recite Sura 4:171 without transgressing the command contained in it. The infinite loop problem Sura 26:192,195,196: “It (the Qur’an) is indeed a revelation from the Lord of the Worlds, … in clear Arabic speech and indeed IT (the Qur’an) is in the writings of the earlier (prophets).” Now, the ‘earlier writings’ are the Torah and the Injil for example, written in Hebrew and Greek. HOW can an ARABIC Qur’an be contained in books of other languages? Furthermore, it would have to contain this very passage of the Qur’an since the Qur’an is properly contained in them. Hence these earlier writings have to be contained in yet other earlier writings and we are in an infinite loop, which is absurd. Is the Torah like the Qur’an, or is it not? The Muslim claim of the corruption of the Bible leads to a contradiction between S. 2:24 and 17:88 on the one hand, and 28:49 and 46:10 on the other. Should Jews and Christians follow the Bible or the Quran? “An old woman” and God’s character About the story of Lot: “So we delivered him and his family, – all exept an old woman who lingered behind.” [Sura 26:170-171] And again: “But we saved him and his family, exept his wife: she was of those who lagged behind. [Sura 7:83]. Either this is a contradiction or if indeed Lot’s wife is derogatorily called “an old woman” then this does not show much respect for her as a wife of a prophet. More problems with the story of Lot “And his people gave NO answer but this: They said, “Drive them out of your city: these are indeed men who want to be clean and pure!” [Sura 7:82 & 27:56]. Yet: “But his people gave NO answer but this: They said: “Bring us the Wrath of Allah if thou tellest the truth.” [Sura 29:29]. Obviously these answers are different. The “pleasure” of Allah? Is God’s action of punishment or mercy and guidance or misguidance arbitrary? Did Abraham smash the idols? The accounts of Abraham, Suras 19:41-49, 6:74-83 differ quite a bit from Sura 21:51-59. While in Sura 21 Abraham confronts his people strongly, and even destroys the idols, in Sura 19 Abraham shuts up after his father threatens him to stone him for speaking out against the idols. And he seems not only to become silent, but even to leave the area (“turning away from them all”). What about Noah’s son? According to Sura 21:76, Noah and his family is saved from the flood, and Sura 37:77 confirms that his seed survived. But Sura 11:42-43 reports that Noah’s son drowns. Was Noah driven out? “Before them *the people of Noah* rejected (their messenger): They rejected Our servant and said, ‘Here is One possessed!’ And he was driven out.” [Sura 54:9] Now, if he is driven out [expelled from their country] how come they can scoff at him while he is building the ark since we read “Forthwith he (starts) constructing the Ark: Every time that the Chiefs of *his people* passed by him, they threw ridicule on him.” [Sura 11:38] He cannot be both: Driven out and near enough that they can regularly pass by. Pharaoh’s Magicians: Muslims or Rejectors of Faith? Did the Magicians of Pharaoh, Egyptians, become believers in the God of Moses [7:103-126; 20:56-73; S. 26:29-51] or did only Israelites believe in Moses [10:83]? How many gods did the Egyptians worship? Pharaoh’s repentance in the face of death? According to Sura 10:90-92, Pharaoh repented “in the sight of death” and was saved. But Sura 4:18 says that such a thing can’t happen. Abrogation? “The words of the Lord are perfect in truth and justice; there is NONE who can change His words.” [Sura 6:115] Also see 6:34 and 10:64. But then Allah (Muhammad?) sees the need to exchange some of them for “better ones” [Sura 2:106, 16:101]. And it is not for ignorant people to question Allah because of such practices! Guiding to truth? “Say: ‘God – He guides to the truth; and which is worthier to be followed …?” [Sura 10:35] But how much is left over of this worthiness when we also read: “Allah leads astray whom he pleases, and he guides whom He pleases, …” [Sura 14:4]. And how do we know in which of Allah’s categories of pleasure we fall? How sure can a Muslim be that he is one of those guided right and not one of those led astray? What is the punishment for adultery? Flogging with a 100 stripes (men and women) [24:2], “confine them to houses until death do claim them (lifelong house arrest – for the women) [4:15]. For men: “If they repent and amend, leave them alone” [4:16]. 24:2 contradicts both the procedure for women and men in Sura 4. And why is the punishment for women and men equal in Sura 24 but different in Sura 4? How are the sexually immoral supposed to be punished? The Problem of Divine Sovereignty, Predestination, Salvation and Human Free Will Who suffers the consequence of sins? The Qur’an declares that everyone will be held responsible only for his own sins [S. 17:13-15, 53:38-42]. Yet, the Qur’an accuses the Jews of Muhammad’s day for the sins committed some 2000 years earlier by other Jews, e.g. worshipping the Golden Calf idol. Will Christians enter Paradise or go to Hell? Sura 2:62 and 5:69 say “Yes”, Sura 5:72 (just 3 verses later) and 3:85 say “No”. God alone or also men? Clear or incomprehensible? The Qur’an is “clear Arabic speech.” [16:103] Yet “NONE knows its interpretation, save only Allah.” [3:7]. Actually, “men of understanding do grasp it.” [3:7] Was Pharaoh Drowned or Saved when chasing Moses and the Israelites? Saved [10:92], drowned [28:40, 17:103, 43:55]. When Commanded Pharaoh the Killing of the Sons? When Moses was a Prophet and spoke God’s truth to Pharaoh [40:23-25] or when he was still an infant [20:38-39]? When/how are the fates determined? “The night of power is better than a thousand months. The angels and spirit descend therein, by the permission of their Lord, with all decrees.” [97:3,4] “Lo! We revealed it on a blessed night.” [44:3] To Muslims, the “Night of Power” is a blessed night on which fates are settled and on which everything relating to life, death, etc., which occurs throughout the year is decreed. It is said to be the night on which Allah’s decrees for the year are brought down to the earthly plane. In other words, matters of creation are decreed a year at a time. Contradicting this, Sura 57:22 says, “No affliction befalls in the earth or in your selves, but it is in a Book before we create it.” This means it is written in the Preserved Tablet, being totally fixed in Allah’s knowledge before anyone was created. All of the above is contradicted by “And every man’s fate We have fastened to his own neck.” This says that man alone is responsible for what he does and what happens to him. [17:13] Wine: Good or bad? Strong drink and … are only an infamy of Satan’s handiwork. [5:90, also 2:219]. Yet on the other hand in Paradise are rivers of wine [47:15, also 83:22,25]. How does Satan’s handiwork get into Paradise? Good News of Painful Torture? Obviously, announcing torment and suffering to anyone is bad news, not good news. However, the Qur’an announces the good news of painful torment [3:21, 4:138, 9:3, 9:34, 31:7, 45:8, and 84:24]. Jinns and men created for worship or for Hell? Created only to serve God [Sura 51:56], many of them made for Hell [Sura 7:179]. Preferred for Hell? S. 17:70 says that Allah prefers (all) the children of Adam over many of his creatures, but S. 98:6 declares the majority of men to be the worst of creatures, many of them being even created specifically for Hell (S. 7:179). Will people stay in Hell forever, or not? Will all Muslims go to Hell? According to Sura 19:71 every Muslim will go to Hell (for at least some time), while another passage states that those who die in Jihad will go to Paradise immediately. Will Allah disgrace Muslims? On the day of judgment Allah will not humiliate or disgrace the Prophet and those who believe in him [S. 66:8]. However, 19:71 says that everyone will enter Hell, and 3:192 states that whomsoever Allah sends to Hell, is disgraced thereby. Will Jesus burn in Hell? Jesus is raised to Allah, [Sura 4:158], near stationed with him [Sura 3:45], worshiped by millions of Christians, yet Sura 21:98 says, that all that are worshiped by men besides Allah will burn in Hell together with those who worship them. Is Jesus God or Not? In Sura 16:17, 20-21 and S. 25:3 we find a criterion to distinguish the true God from false gods. Yet, according to S. 3:49, 55, 4:157-158, 5:110, 6:2, and 38:71-72 Jesus satisfies the definition and should be considered true Deity. Is Jesus Like Adam? S. 3:59 makes this claim, but how many aspects of likeness are there really? Can there be a son without a consort? Allah cannot have a son without a consort [Sura 6:101], but Mary can have a son without a consort because that is easy for Allah [Sura 19:21]. Who is the father of Jesus? A more involved argument that is difficult to summarize in one sentence. Begetting and Self-sufficiency A self-contradiction on account of confused terminology. Could Allah have a son? Sura 39:4 affirms and Sura 6:101 denies this possibility. Did Jesus Die already? Sura 3:144 states that all messengers died before Muhammad. But 4:158 claims that Jesus was raised to God (alive?). One Creator or many? The Qur’an uses twice the phrase that Allah is “the best of creators” [23:14, 37:125]. What other creators are in mind? On the other hand, many verses make clear that Allah alone is “the creator of all things” [e.g. 39:62]. There is nothing left for others to be a creator of. From among all nations or from Abraham’s seed? Sura 29:27 states that all prophets came Abraham’s seed. But 16:36 claims that Allah raised messengers from among every people. Marrying the wives of adopted sons? It is important that Muslims can marry the divorced wives of adopted sons [Sura 33:37], yet it is forbidden to adopt sons [Sura 33:4-5]. Messengers were never sent to other than their own people? So it is claimed in Sura 14:4 and 30:47. However, the Bible and the Qur’an, and the Muslim traditions confirm that Jonah was sent to a different nation. Messengers Were Sent Only to Their Own People? Sura 14:4 states that never was a messenger sent except in the language of his own people. Yet, the Quran itself claims that Jesus is supposed to be a sign to all people, that the Torah and Gospel are for all people, that Moses was sent to Pharaoh of Egypt, and that Muhammad is sent to all of mankind. The hadith also claim that Noah was sent to “the inhabitants of the earth”. Did Allah give a Greek Injil to the Jews? The Injil: A Greek Book for the Children of Israel? The Quran makes the following three statements: And in their footsteps, We sent ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) confirming the Taurat (Torah) that had come before him, and We gave him the Injeel (Gospel), in which was guidance and light and confirmation of the Taurat (Torah) that had come before it, a guidance and an admonition for Al-Muttaqun (the pious – see V.2:2). S. 5:46 Al-Hilali & Khan; cf. S. 57:27 And will make him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] a Messenger to the Children of Israel (saying): “I have come to you with a sign from your Lord, that I design for you out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, and breathe into it, and it becomes a bird by Allah’s Leave; and I heal him who was born blind, and the leper, and I bring the dead to life by Allah’s Leave. And I inform you of what you eat, and what you store in your houses. Surely, therein is a sign for you, if you believe. S. 3:49 Al-Hilali & Khan And We sent not a Messenger except with the language of his people, in order that he might make (the Message) clear for them. Then Allah misleads whom He wills and guides whom He wills. And He is the All-Mighty, the All-Wise. S. 14:4 Al-Hilali & Khan To summarize the three points that are important for this article: Jesus was one of the messengers sent by Allah, and the message given to Jesus is the Injil (S. 5:46). Jesus was sent to the Children of Israel (S. 3:49). Allah sent all of his messengers with (a message in) the language of the people of the messenger, i.e. the messenger delivered the message in his own language. (For a detailed discussion of S. 14:4 see the article, Allah, his messengers, and their language.) Any two of these three statements may be possible to harmonize, but all three passages together result in a logical contradiction, as we will explain in the following. It is generally recognized that “Injil” is a Greek word, or more precisely, that it is derived from the Greek word for gospel, euangelion: The Injil … (or Injeel) is one of the five Islamic Holy Books the Qur’an records as revealed by God, the others being the Suhuf-i-Ibrahim, Zabur, Tawrat and Qur’an. The word Injil is generally held by non-Muslim historians to be an abbreviation of the Greek word Ευαγγελιον, sometimes rendered in English as “evangel” (literal meaning “good news”). It is usually translated as “Gospel”, as in the four Gospels of the New Testament. (Wikipedia, Injil, 20 July 2008; underline emphasis ours; cf. the entry Injil in Arthur Jeffery’s The Foreign Vocabulary of the Qur’an, pages 71-72) The Arabic edition of Wikipedia states: الإنجيل كلمة معربة من اليونانية ايوانجيليون التي تعني البشارة السارة Al-Injeel is an Arabized word (derived) from the Greek Evangelion which means “the good news”. (Source; accessed 28 August 2008; translation ours) On a website that is published by the highest Shia authority in Lebanon, we find this statement: إنّ كلمة الأناجيل كلمة يونانية تعني الخبر السار The word Anajeel [lit. Gospels; Anajeel is the plural form of the singular Injeel] is a Greek word which means “good news”. (Arabic source; accessed 28 August 2008; translation and explanation in square brackets ours) When speaking in one’s own language about a book that is written in a different language, one either quotes the title in the original language (perhaps in some kind of transliteration), as the Qur’an did in case of the Torah, or translates the title into a term or phrase in one’s own language, as the Qur’an did in case of the Psalms (Zabur). Injil is not an Arabic word but this name is easily recognized as being derived from the Greek word for Gospel (probably via the Ethiopian wangel), i.e. the author of the Qur’an did not translate the name of the book of ‘Isa (Jesus), but spoke about it by using a transliteration of the original title. Note: According to S. 5:46, the Injil was a book given to ‘Isa by Allah. That means, it is not the New Testament or the Gospels contained in the NT, because those books were not given to Jesus during his life on earth, but they were written by his disciples (under divine inspiration) after the death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus. That alone is a serious error in the Islamic understanding of what the Gospel is, but this error is not the topic of this article.[1] For this article, we are talking about the book that is allegedly given by Allah to Jesus (whether directly or through the angel Gabriel) and which bears the name Injil. The fact that the Injil is a message/book with a Greek title implies that the book is in Greek. But here is the conflict with the other claims of the Qur’an. Greek was not the language of the people of Jesus (although it was probably understood by many of them). The common language of the Jews of Jesus’ time was Aramaic. Since the time when Alexander the Great established his vast empire, Greek became the “world language” of that time (like English today) and was thus also understood by many of the Jews. However, it was not the native language of the Jews. Rather, it was the language of people who had invaded and occupied their land. Therefore, the above three claims of the Qur’an are in conflict. If Jesus had been sent to the people in Israel in his/their own language, then it would have been Aramaic, and his message would also have had an Aramaic name, just as the Aramaic translation of the New Testament (the Peshitta) uses the term “ha-bishara” (the good news) for the Greek Ευαγγελιον. If Jesus’ book/message and its title had originally been in Aramaic, then the author of the Qur’an would have referred to it using either its Aramaic title, or an Arabic translation of the meaning of that title, but certainly not by using a transliteration of a Greek term.[2] In fact, the Arabic al-bishara is nearly identical to the Aramaic name. The use of the Greek title is an indirect confirmation that the book itself was originally in Greek, i.e. that this name is its original and authentic title. Any way one turns it, these three passages of the Qur’an cannot all be true. The use of the Greek title indicates one or more of the following. The author of the Qur’an didn’t know the language of the Jews. Jesus was not sent to the Jews. The language of the Jews was Greek. Jesus was a messenger who was sent to people with a language that is not theirs. The Greek Gospel is recognized by the Quran to be the Gospel of ‘Isa. Option (1) destroys the claim of divine inspiration of the Qur’an. Option (2) implies that S. 3:49 (and others) are wrong. Option (3) is a serious historical error. Option (4) means that S. 14:4 is wrong. Finally, option (5) means that the Greek Gospel, Christian NT is the Injil after all and, consequently, the Quranic claim of a “Gospel of ‘Isa” cannot be upheld and S. 5:46 is also wrong. What kind of book is the Injil? The Quran makes the following statements about the Injil: And in their footsteps, We sent ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) confirming the Taurat (Torah) that had come before him, and We gave him the Injeel (Gospel), in which was guidance and light and confirmation of the Taurat (Torah) that had come before it, a guidance and an admonition for Al-Muttaqun (the pious – see V.2:2). S. 5:46 Al-Hilali & Khan; cf. S. 57:27 He [Jesus] said, “Lo, I am God’s servant; God has given me the Book, and made me a Prophet.” S. 19:30 Arberry It is He Who has sent down the Book (the Qur’an) to you (Muhammad SAW) with truth, confirming what came before it. And he sent down the Taurat (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel). S. 3:3 Al-Hilali & Khan Sura 5:46 states that the Injil was given to Jesus by Allah. Sura 19:30 and 3:3 then clarify that the Injil is a book just as the Qur’an and the Torah are books that were sent down by Allah. The Qur’an also contains a second set of statements regarding the Injil: Let the people of the Injeel (Gospel) judge by what Allah has revealed therein. … S. 5:47 Al-Hilali & Khan Say: “People of the Book, you do not stand on anything, until you perform the Torah and the Gospel [Injil], and what was sent down to you from your Lord.” … S. 5:68 Arberry Those who follow the messenger, the Prophet who can neither read nor write, whom they will find described in the Torah and the Gospel [Injil] (which are) with them. S. 7:157 Pickthall [Say (O Muhammad SAW)] “Shall I seek a judge other than Allah while it is He Who has sent down unto you the Book (The Qur’an), explained in detail.” Those unto whom We gave the Scripture [the Taurat (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)] know that it is revealed from your Lord in truth. So be not you of those who doubt. S. 6:114 Al-Hilali & Khan These verses make clear that the Injil is the book of the Christians, the book that is with them and which they believe in. The author of the Qur’an even admonishes the Christians to fully obey (the Torah and) the Injil that they have. The Contradiction However, here is the problem: when we look at the New Testament, the book which is the Scripture of the Christians, we see that it nowhere makes the claim that it is a book that was “given to Jesus”. On the contrary, the New Testament consists of several books that were written by followers of Jesus (under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit) AFTER the ascension of Jesus. Therefore, the Injil can EITHER be a book given to Jesus, OR it can be the book that the Christians hold as they Holy Scriptures, but it cannot be both. Muhammad apparently assumed that the Scripture of the Christians (and Jews) would be very similar to the Qur’an, the book which he thought he received from Allah. However, Muhammad was clearly ignorant of the matter. The essential nature of the Qur’an and the Bible are very different. A book “given to Jesus” in a similar way as Muhammad claims to have received the Qur’an does not exist and Christians have never claimed that such a book existed at any time. This claim of S. 5:46 is merely a wrong idea that sprang from the mind of Muhammad. Had the author of the Qur’an made only statements like those found in S. 5:46 and 19:30, it might have been an option for Muslims to claim that the Injil of Jesus was simply lost. Jesus indeed received such a book but, somehow, it disappeared. Muslims could have said that the NT clearly is something very different from the Injil as defined by the Qur’an, and could have concluded that therefore they do not believe in the Christian New Testament since the Qur’an does not endorse it. However, the second set of statements above prevents this explanation. The Qur’an identifies the Injil as the Scripture of the Christians. Thus, since the Injil is the book of the Christians, the Qur’an makes a blatantly wrong claim about the basic nature of the Injil. It neither is nor ever was a book given to Jesus. The Source? How could this error arise in the mind of Muhammad? He may have heard statements like in the first verse of the Gospel according to Mark: The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, … and mistakenly thought that this meant the same as “the Torah of Moses” i.e. a revelation given to a prophet in form of a book. However, reading the context shows that it means “this is the beginning of the Gospel ABOUT Jesus Christ”; the Gospel is the message telling us about the life and teaching of Jesus, written up by his followers, not a book given to Jesus himself. Muhammad projected his own experience of receiving revelation of a book (the Qur’an) on Jesus and simply assumed that the book OF Jesus that was held sacred by his followers must also have been a book given TO Jesus (like the sacred book of the Muslims is the book given TO Muhammad). However, Muhammad was wrong about this, and this mistake exposes the Qur’an as a forgery. The Qur’an is not divine revelation but a collection of mistaken assumptions by its author. But the Bible is corrupted! In most cases when the Qur’an contradicts the Bible, Muslims shout, “but the Bible is corrupted”, as if that is the answer and solution to every such problem. There are at least two reasons why this response will not solve the problem. First, the Qur’an never claims that the Injil is corrupted. There are certain accusations against the Jews, but no charge that the Christians corrupted their Scripture. The section, What the Qur’an says about the Bible, investigates this matter closely and shows that the Qur’an does not support the Muslim claim of Bible corruption. Second, even if there had been some corruption of certain passages, small changes resulting in certain shifts of meaning, this cannot possibly explain the above contradiction in the Qur’an. Here we have a fundamental difference in the nature of the book which cannot be accounted for either with gradual changes or with a sudden change. For illustration: The Qur’an is (allegedly) a book that was “sent down” from Allah to Muhammad. It was (supposedly) not written by Muhammad but given to him by Allah. On the other hand, the Hadith are memories of the companions and followers of Muhammad, formulated and written up by Muslims long after the death of Muhammad. They are their recollection of what Muhammad said and did. Would it be possible for anyone to change the Qur’an (the book given to Muhammad) into a collection of hadiths without the Muslim community realizing that their scripture had changed into something entirely different? Without doubt, the Muslim answer will be a resounding NO. But if that is impossible for the Muslim book and community, why would any Muslim think that this would have been possible in the Christian community? Originally, the Christians had a “book given to Jesus” but one day they woke up and their scripture had turned into a collection of writings by followers of Jesus and nobody realized the change, and nobody protested against it? Believing such a theory demands a lot of blind faith in the Qur’an. It is impossible. Anyone with the least bit of common sense will have to conclude that this cannot possibly have happened, and this implies that the author of the Qur’an simply made an error regarding the nature of the Christian Scripture. Messengers Amongst the Jinns and Angels? Allah sent only men as messengers [Suras 12:109, 21:7-8, 25:20-21] but there seemingly are messengers from Jinns and Angels [6:130; 11:69,77; 22:75; etc., see article for details]. Messengers Amongst the Jinns and Angels? The Quran claims that Allah sent messengers from among the Jinn and men: “O ye assembly of JINNS and men! came there not UNTO you messengers FROM AMONGST YOU, setting forth unto you My Signs, and warning you of the meeting of this Day of yours?” They will say: “We bear witness against ourselves.” It was the life of this world that deceived them. So against themselves will they bear witness that they rejected Faith. S. 6:130 This passage poses a rhetorical question to both the Jinn and men, telling them to recall the fact that Allah sent messengers from amongst them to warn them of the Day of Judgment. The question that naturally arises is what could it possibly mean that Allah sent messengers from the Jinn to warn them about Allah’s judgment? Does Allah actually call on immaterial entities to preach amongst their own kind? The following verses say yes: “Allah chooses messengers from angels and from men, for Allah is He Who hears and sees (all things).” S. 22:75 All praise is due to Allah, the Originator of the heavens and the earth, the Maker of the angels, apostles flying on wings, two, and three, and four; He increases in creation what He pleases; surely Allah has power over all things. S. 35:1 Shakir It should be noted that certain Muslims were of the opinion that the Jinn are a class of angelic creatures. The following traditions are taken from The History of al-Tabari: General Introduction and From the Creation to the Flood, volume 1, translated by Franz Rosenthal and published, State University of New York Press, Albany, 1989. All bold emphasis ours: According to al-Qasim b. al-Hasan- al-Husayn b. Dawud- Hajjaj- Ibn Jurayj- Ibn `Abbas: Iblis was one of the most noblest angels and belonged to the most honored tribe among them. He was a keeper of Paradise. He had authority to rule over the lower heaven as well as earth. According to al-Qasim- al-Husayn- Hajjaj- Ibn Jurayj- Salih, the mawla of al-Taw’amah and Sharik b. Abir Namir, either one or both of them- Ibn `Abbas: There was an angelic tribe of jinn, and Iblis belonged to it. He governed all in between the heaven and the earth. According to Musa b. Harun al-Hamdani- `Amr b. Hammad- Asbat- al-Suddi- Abu Malik and Abu Salih- Ibn `Abbas. Also (al-Suddi)- Murrah al-Hamdani- Ibn Mas’ud and some (other) companions of the Prophet: Iblis was ruler over the lower heaven. He belonged to a tribe of angels called jinn. They were called jinn because they were keepers of Paradise (al-jannah). In addition to being ruler, Iblis was a keeper (of Paradise). According to `Abdan al-Marwazi- al-Husayn b. al-Faraj- Dahhak b. Muzahim, commenting on God’s word: “They prostrated themselves, except Iblis. He was one of the jinn”: Ibn `Abbas used to say: Iblis was one of the noblest angels and belonged to their most honored tribe. He was a keeper of Paradise, and his was the rule over the lower heaven as well as the earth. According to Ibn Humayd- Salamah- Abu al-Azhar al-Mubarak b. Mujahid- Sharik b. `Abdallah b. Abi Namir- Salih, the mawla of al-Taw’amah- Ibn `Abbas: There is an angelic tribe called jinn. Iblis belonged to them. He used to rule all in between heaven and earth. Then he became disobedient, and God therefore transformed him into a stoned Satan. According to al-Qasim- al-Husayn- Hajjaj- Ibn Jurayj, commenting on: “And whoever among them says: I am a god besides Him”: Whichever angel says: “I am a god besides Him” calls to worship of himself, and only Iblis said that. Thus, this verse was revealed with reference to Iblis. (Ibid., pp. 250-251) One of the events that took place during the rule of the enemy of God while he was (still) obedient to God is what was mentioned to us on the authority of Ibn `Abbas in a report told us by Abu Kurayb- `Uthman b. Sa’id- Bishr b. `Umarah- Abu Rawq- al-Dahhak- Ibn `Abbas: Iblis belonged to a tribal group of angels called jinn. Among the angels it was they who were created from the fire of simoom. He continued. His name was al-Harith. He continued. He was one of the keepers of Paradise. He continued. All the angels except this tribal group were created from light. He continued. The jinn mentioned in the Qur’an were created “from a bright flame (marij) of fire”- (marij being) a tongue of fire blazing on its side(s and top). He continued. And He created man from clay. The first to dwell on earth were the jinn. They caused corruption on it and shed blood and killed each other. He continued. God sent Iblis to them with an army of angels. They were that tribal group called jinn. Iblis and those with him caused a bloodbath among them and eventually banished them to the islands in the oceans and the mountainsides. His success went to his head, and he said: I have done something nobody has ever done before. He continued. God was aware of how Iblis felt, but the angels who were with him were not. (Ibid., pp. 252-253) Ibn Humayd gave us about the same account again, reporting from Salamah- Ibn Ishaq- Khallad b. `Ata’- Tawus or Abu sl-Hajjaj Mujahid- Ibn `Abbas, and others. However, he said: (Iblis) was an angel named Azazil. He was one of the dwellers and cultivators on earth. The dwellers on earth from among the angel used to be called jinn.” (Ibid., p. 254) Ibn Kathir also cites traditions which support the idea of Jinn being angels: “There were many traditions about Iblis at the time of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Ibn Mas’ud, Ibn ‘Abbas, and a group of the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said that Iblis had been the head of the angels in the worldly heavens. Ibn ‘Abbas said in one narration that his name was ‘Azazil, and in another narration he said it had been Al-Harith. Ibn ‘Abbas also said that Iblis was a jinn and that they had once been the keepers of Paradise, with Iblis the most honorable, the most learned and the most pious of them. Another tradition says that he had been one of the famous four possessors of wings (i.e., angels), before Allah transformed him into the accursed Satan.” (Stories of the Prophets by Ibn Kathir, translated by Sheikh Muhammad Mustafa Geme’ah, Office of the Grand Imam, Sheikh Al-Ahzar, edited by Aelfwine Acelas Mischler [El-Nour For Publishing and Distribution and Translation Est.; 38 Al-Madina Al-Monawara St., Toryl Al-Gadida], p. 13; bold emphasis ours) And: … Here are some of the descriptions of Satan prior to his disobedience: he was from the community of the angels called Jinn, and was their master. He was a keeper of the Gardens and had power in the sky and on earth… (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, Part 1, Surah Al-Fatiah Surah Al-Baqarah, ayat 1 to 141, abridged by Sheikh Muhammad Nasib Ar-Rafa’i [Al-Firdous Ltd., London, 1998: second edition], pp. 101-102; bold emphasis ours) If this is the case then the statement that Allah chose messengers from among the angels may be referring to spirit beings like Gabriel and Michael as well as individual Jinn. The following comments are taken from Moiz Amjad in response to a question relating to this very issue: Just as no Jinn could be sent as a prophet towards the human race, no human being could be sent as a prophet towards the race of the Jinn. One of the basic reasons for this general rule is that a prophet of God is not merely a deliverer of God’s messages to that race, but he is also meant to be an example for them to follow. Thus, just as an angel or a jinn could not be an example for the human race, similarly, a human being could not be an example for the Jinn or the angels to emulate. Thus, when the rejecters objected to believing in a human being as a messenger and representative of God, saying that were God to send a messenger, He should have sent an angel as His messenger, the Qur’an responded: Had the earth been inhabited by angels, We would then indeed have sent an angel from the heavens as a messenger towards them. (Al-Israa 17: 94) In the light of the foregoing explanation, it should be clear that the prophets from among Jinn are from among themselves, not from among humans … (source) If Mr. Amjad’s claim is taken seriously this would imply that those angels that Allah chose as his messengers could have only been sent to other angels, which would also include Jinn (that is, of course, assuming that the Jinn are indeed angelic beings). Yet Mr. Amjad’s claim contradicts the following passage: And follow that which the devils falsely related against the kingdom of Solomon. Solomon disbelieved not; but the devils disbelieved, teaching mankind magic and that which was revealed to the two ANGELS in Babel, Harut and Marut (alal-malakayni bi-Baabila Haaruuta wa Maaruut). Nor did they (the two angels) teach it to anyone till they had said: We are only a temptation, therefore disbelieve not (in the guidance of Allah). And from these two (angels) people learn that by which they cause division between man and wife; but they injure thereby no-one save by Allah’s leave. And they learn that which harmeth them and profiteth them not. And surely they do know that he who trafficketh therein will have no (happy) portion in the Hereafter; and surely evil is the price for which they sell their souls, if they but knew. S. 2:102 Pickthall The Dictionary of Islam states: “HARUT WA MARUT … Two angels mentioned in the Qur’an. They are said to be two angels who, in consequence of their compassion of the frailties of mankind, were sent down to earth to be tempted. They both sinned, and being permitted to choose whether they would be punished now or hereafter, chose the former, and are still suspended by the feet at Babel in a rocky pit, where they are great teachers of magic.” (T. P. Hughes, Dictionary of Islam [Kazi Publications, Chicago IL. 1994], pp. 167-168; bold emphasis ours) Yusuf Ali comments: “This verse has been interpreted variously. Who were Harut and Marut? What did they teach? Why did they teach? The view which commends itself to me is that of the Tafsir Haqqani, following Baidhawi and the Tafsir Kabir. The word ‘angels’ as applied to Harut and Marut is figurative. It means ‘good men, of knowledge, science (or wisdom), and power’. In modern languages the word ‘angel’ is applied to a good and beautiful woman. The earlier tradition made angels masculine, and applied to them the attributes which I have mentioned, along with the attribute of beauty, which was implied in goodness, knowledge, wisdom and power… Among the Jewish traditions in the Midrash (Jewish Tafsirs) was a story of two angels who asked God’s permission to come down to earth but succumbed to temptation and were hung by their feet at Babylon for punishment. Such stories about sinning angels who were cast down to punishment were believed by the early Christians also … There may be an allusion about sinning angels here, but much spiritualized and we are expressly warned against dabbling in magic or believing that anything can hurt us except by God’s will, and God is just and righteous.” (Ali, Holy Quran, f. 104, p. 45) The major problem with Ali’s assertion is that the Quran never uses the term “angels” for human beings. The closest the Quran ever comes to calling a human being an angel is in S. 12:31, and even then it is in a metaphorical sense: And when she heard of their sly talk, she sent to them and prepared for them a cushioned couch (to lie on at the feast) and gave to every one of them a knife and said (to Joseph): Come out unto them! And when they saw him they exalted him and cut their hands, exclaiming: Allah Blameless! This is not a human being. This is not other than some gracious angel. Pickthall (cf. 7:20) In fact, angels are called messengers but humans are never called angels. (Cf. 11:69, 77, 81; 15:57; 22:75; 35:1) One may argue that S. 2:102 is the exception to this norm, and that Harut and Marut were in fact human beings. Yet the burden of proof is upon the one making such a claim to show that this is the case. Claiming it isn’t the same as proving it. Muslim Scholar Mahmoud Ayoub comments on S. 2:102: “Commentators likewise have disagreed with regard to the meaning of the phrase ‘and that which was sent down to the two angels in Babel, Harut and Marut.’ Tabari relates on the authority of Ibn ‘Abbas, ‘The word ma means “not” [instead of its alternate meaning, “that which”]; that is to say, magic was not sent down [ma unzila] to the two angels. Thus the exegesis of the verse would be, “And they followed the magic which the satans recited concerning the reign of Solomon; yet neither did Solomon reject faith, nor did God send down magic to the two angels. Rather, satans rejected faith in that they taught people magic in Babel, that is, Harut and Marut.”‘ (This tradition assumes that Harut and Marut were the people who learned magic from the satans in Babel; thus they were not angels. The two angels are taken to be Gabriel and Michael.) ‘This is because magicians among Jews used to claim that God sent down magic to Solomon by the tongues of Gabriel and Michael. Thus God revealed their false claim, for Gabriel and Michael never brought down magic. Harut and Marut were therefore two men who learned magic from the satans’ (Tabari, II, pp. 419-420). Tabari also cites Qatadah, who said, ‘ “Ma” means “that which,” or “what.” Thus Harut and Marut were two of the angels. They taught men magic, but were charged not to teach anyone until they said, “We are surely a temptation; do not, therefore, reject faith.’ Magic here is of two kinds: one which the satans taught, and another which was taught by the two angels’ (Tabari, II, p. 420). “Most early commentators have agreed, however, that Harut and Marut were two angels. Their story appears very early in the history of tafsir on the authority of the first masters of science among the Companions and their Successors. The story, as related by Tabari on the authority of Ibn Mas’ud and Ibn ‘Abbas, is as follows: ‘When the children of Adam had increased in the earth and committed acts of disobedience, the angels, heavens, earth and mountains invoked God against them, saying, “Our Lord, would You not destroy them?” God revealed to the angels, “Were I to put lust in your hearts and give Satan authority over you, and were you to descend to earth, you would do the same.” The angels thought in their hearts that if they were sent down, they would not sin. God, then revealed to them, “Choose two of the best angels among you,” and they chose Harut and Marut. They were thus sent down to earth, and Venus was sent down as a beautiful Persian woman. They fell into sin [by lusting after her]. They were therefore given the choice between the punishment of this world or that of the world to come, but they chose the punishment of this world’ (Tabari, II, pp. 428). “This tradition presents the basic elements of the story, accepted by most classical commentators. Some traditions, however, related the story of the two angels to God’s saying, ‘Behold I am about to place a vicegerent in the earth’ (see above, Q. 2:30). According to this view, God sent down Harut and Marut to demonstrate to the prostrating angels man’s uniqueness as a creature endowed with special faculties which even angels could not possess without also falling into sin and disobedience (see Nisaburi, I, p. 391, who relates the story on the authority of Ibn ‘Abbas). Razi, on the other hand, for reasons which are discussed below, asserts that the two angels were sent down at the time of the prophet Enoch (Idris) (Razi, III, p. 220).” (Mahmoud M. Ayoub, The Qur’an and its Interpreters [State University of New York Press, Albany 1984], pp. 130-131; bold emphasis ours) Ayoub cites al-Qurtubi as denying that Harut and Marut were angels, believing that they were satans instead. The only problem with this view is that Harut and Marut are specifically called angels. This implies that if Qurtubi is correct then these satans were at one time angels that disobeyed. Furthermore, even if they were satans this still wouldn’t resolve Mr. Amjad’s contradiction since this still would leave us with spirit entities being sent to teach mankind. Finally, Ibn Kathir: There is a difference of opinion regarding this story. It was said that this Ayah denies that anything was sent down to the two angels, as al-Qurtubi stated and then referred to the Ayah … saying, “The negation applies in both cases. Allah then said … . The Jews claimed that Gabriel and Michael brought magic down to the two angels, but Allah refuted this false claim.” Also, Ibn Jarir reported, that Al-‘Awfi said that Ibn ‘Abbas said about Allah’s statement … “Allah did not send magic.” Also, Ibn Jarir narrated that Ar-Rabi‘ bin Anas said about … , “Allah did not send magic down to the [sic] them.” Ibn Jarir, “This is the correct explanation for this Ayah … meaning, magic. However, neither did Solomon disbelieve nor did Allah send magic with the two angels. The devils, on the other hand, disbelieved and taught magic to the people of the Babylon of Harut and Marut.” Ibn Jarir continued; “If someone asks about explaining this Ayah in this manner, we say that … means, magic. Solomon neither disbelieved nor did Allah send magic with the two angels. However, the devils disbelieved and taught magic to the people in the Babylon of Harut and Marut, meaning of Gabriel and Michael, for Jewish sorcerers claimed that Allah sent magic by the words of Gabriel and Michael to Solomon, son of David. Allah denied this false claim and stated to His Prophet Muhammad that Gabriel and Michael were not sent with magic. Allah also exonerated Solomon from practicing magic, which the devils taught to the people of Babylon by the hands of two men, Harut and Marut. Hence, Harut and Marut were two ordinary men (not angels or Gabriel and Michael).” These are the words of At-Tabari, and this explanation is not plausible. Many among the Salaf, said that Harut and Marut were angels who came down from heaven to earth and did what they did as the Ayah stated. To conform this opinion with the fact that angels are immune from error, we say that Allah had eternal knowledge what these angels would do, just as He had eternal knowledge that Iblis would do as he did, while Allah refered [sic] to him as being among the angels … and so forth. However, what Harut and Marut did was less offensive than what Iblis, may Allah curse him, did. Al-Qurtubi reported this opinion from ‘Ali, Ibn Mas‘ud, Ibn ‘Abbas, Ibn ‘Umar, Ka‘b Al-Ahbar, As-Suddi and Al-Kalbi. … Al-Hasan Al-Basri said that this Ayah means, “The angels were sent with magic, so that the people whom Allah willed would be tried and tested. Allah made them promise that they would not teach anyone until first proclaiming, ‘We are a test for you, do not fall into disbelief’” … (Tafsir Ibn Kathir (Abridged), Volume 1, Parts 1 and 2 (Surat Al-Fatihah to Verse 252 of Surat Al-Baqarah), abridged by a group of scholars under the supervision of Shaykh Safiur-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri [Darussalam Publishers & Distributors, Riyadh, Houston, New York, London, Lahore; First Edition: January 2000], pp. 314-317; bold emphasis ours) Interestingly, other passages state that Allah sent spirit messengers appearing as men to certain individuals: Behold! the angels said: ‘O Mary! Allah hath chosen thee and purified thee- chosen thee above the women of all nations. O Mary! worship thy Lord devoutly: Prostrate thyself, and bow down (in prayer) with those who bow down.’ This is part of the tidings of the things unseen, which We reveal unto thee (O Messenger.) by inspiration: Thou wast not with them when they cast lots with pens (or arrows), as to which of them should be charged with the care of Mary: Nor wast thou with them when they disputed (the point). Behold! the angels said: “O Mary! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honor in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah. He shall speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. And he shall be (of the company) of the righteous.” She said: “O my Lord! How shall I have a son when no man hath touched me?” He said: “Even so; Allah createth what He willeth: When He hath decreed a plan, He but saith to it, ‘Be,’ and it is!” S. 3:42-47 Relate in the Book (the story of) Mary, when she withdrew from her family to a place in the East. She placed a screen (to screen herself) from them; then We sent her Our Spirit, and he appeared before her as a man in all respects. She said: “I seek refuge from thee to (Allah) Most Gracious: (come not near) if thou dost fear Allah.” He said: “Nay, I am only a messenger from thy Lord, (to announce) to thee the gift of a pure son.” She said: “How shall I have a son, seeing that no man has touched me, and I am not unchaste?” He said: “So (it will be): thy Lord saith, ‘That is easy for Me: and (We wish) to appoint him as a Sign unto men and a Mercy from Us’. It is a matter (so) decreed.” S. 19:16-21 There came Our Messengers to Abraham with glad tidings. They said, “Peace!” He answered, “Peace!” and hastened to entertain them with a roasted calf. But when he saw their hands not reaching towards the (meal), he felt some mistrust of them, and conceived a fear of them. They said: “Fear not: We have been sent against the people of Lüt.” And his wife was standing (there), and she laughed: But We gave her glad tidings of Isaac, and after him, of Jacob. She said: “Alas for me! shall I bear a child, seeing I am an old woman, and my husband here is an old man? That would indeed be a wonderful thing!” They said: “Dost thou wonder at Allah’s decree? The grace of Allah and His blessings on you, o ye people of the house! for He is indeed worthy of all praise, full of all glory!” When fear had passed from (the mind of) Abraham and the glad tidings had reached him, he began to plead with Us for Lüt’s people. For Abraham was, without doubt, forbearing (of faults), compassionate, and given to penitence. O Abraham! Seek not this. The decree of thy Lord hath gone forth: for them there cometh a chastisement that cannot be turned back! When Our Messengers came to Lüt, he was grieved on their account and felt himself powerless (to protect) them. He said: This is a distressful day.” And his people came rushing towards him, and they had been long in the habit of practicing abominations. He said: “O my People! Here are my daughters: they are purer for you (if ye marry)! Now fear Allah, and cover me not with disgrace about my guests! Is there not among you a single right-minded man?” They said: “Well dost thou know we have no need of thy daughters: indeed thou knowest quite well what we want!” He said: “Would that I had power to suppress you or that I could betake myself to some powerful support.” (The Messengers) said: “O Lüt! We are Messengers from thy Lord! By no means shall they reach thee! now travel with thy family while yet a part of the night remains, and let not any of you look back: but thy wife (will remain behind): To her will happen what happens to the people. Morning is their time appointed: Is not the morning nigh?” When Our Decree issued, We turned (the cities) upside down, and rained down on them brimstones hard as baked clay, spread, layer on layer,- Marked as from thy Lord: Nor are they ever far from those who do wrong! S. 11:69-83 Tell them about the guests of Abraham. When they entered his presence and said, “Peace!” He said, “We feel afraid of you!” They said: “Fear not! We give thee glad tidings of a son endowed with knowledge.” He said: “Do ye give me glad tidings even though old age has seized me? Of what, then, is your good news?” They said: “We give thee glad tidings in truth: be not then in despair!” He said: “And who despairs of the mercy of his Lord, but such as go astray?” Abraham said: “What then is the business on which ye (have come), O ye messengers (of Allah)?” They said: “We have been sent to a people (deep) in sin, Excepting the adherents of Lüt: them We are certainly (charged) to save (from harm),- All – Except his wife, who, We have ascertained, will be among those who will lag behind.” At length when the messengers arrived among the adherents of Lüt, He said: “Ye appear to be uncommon folk.” They said: “Yea, we have come to thee to accomplish that of which they doubt. We have come to thee with the truth, and assuredly we tell the truth. Then travel by night with thy household, when a portion of the night (yet remains), and do thou go behind them: let no one amongst you look back, but pass on whither ye are ordered.” And We made known this decree to him, that the last remnants of those (sinners) should be cut off by the morning. The inhabitants of the City came in (mad) joy (at news of the young men). Lüt said: “These are my guests: disgrace me not: But fear Allah, and shame me not.” They said: “Did we not forbid thee (to speak) for all and sundry?” He said: “There are my daughters (to marry), if ye must act (so).” Verily, by thy life (O Prophet), in their wild intoxication, they wander in distraction, to and fro. But the (mighty) Blast overtook them at sunrise, And We turned (the cities) upside down, and rained down on them brimstones hard as baked clay. S. 15:51-74 Someone may interject here and claim that the spirit entities were not sent to people in general, but rather to God’s appointed messengers. The only problem with this interpretation is that the angels didn’t just appear to Abraham and Lot, but also to Mary, Sarah and to the people of Sodom and Gomorrah. These individuals were not messengers or prophets. In fact, the hadith claims that Gabriel actually appeared to Muhammad in the presence of others: Narrated Abu Huraira: One day while the Prophet was sitting in the company of some people, (The angel) Gabriel came and asked, “What is faith?”… Then that man (Gabriel) left and the Prophet asked his companions to call him back, but they could not see him. Then the Prophet said, “That was Gabriel who came to teach the people their religion.” Abu ‘Abdullah said: He (the Prophet) considered all that as a part of faith. (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 2, Number 47) Narrated Abu Uthman: I got the news that Gabriel came to the Prophet while Um Salama was present. Gabriel started talking to the Prophet and then left. The Prophet said to Um Salama, “(Do you know) who it was?” (or a similar question). She said, “It was Dihya (a handsome person amongst the companions of the Prophet ).” Later on Um Salama said, “By Allah! I thought he was none but Dihya, till I heard the Prophet talking about Gabriel in his sermon.” (The Sub-narrator asked Abu ‘Uthman, “From where have you heard this narration?” He replied, “From Usama bin Zaid.”) (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 56, Number 827) “… Umar ibn al-Khattab, told me: One day we were sitting in the company of Allah’s Apostle (peace be upon him) when there appeared before us a man dressed in pure white clothes, his hair extraordinarily black. There were no signs of travel on him. None amongst us recognized him. At last he sat with the Apostle (peace be upon him) He knelt before him placed his palms on his thighs and said: Muhammad, inform me about al-Islam. The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: Al-Islam implies that you testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and you establish prayer, pay Zakat, observe the fast of Ramadan, and perform pilgrimage to the (House) if you are solvent enough (to bear the expense of) the journey. He (the inquirer) said: You have told the truth. He (Umar ibn al-Khattab) said: It amazed us that he would put the question and then he would himself verify the truth … He (the narrator, Umar ibn al-Khattab) said: Then he (the inquirer)
          • Islam is for those who believe in the Quran. I do NOT understand why the Catholics and ONLY the Catholics make mockery of Islam?

            Matthew 16:18 (KJV)
            “And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church.”
            Did Jesus build a Church on that rock?

            John 15:19 (KJV)
            “If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.”
            But the Muslims don’t hate Jesus!

            The Catholics believe in the pantheon of Catholic saints just as Sufi in Islam and that is why they are NOT considered Muslims and are persecuted all over the world!

            But still the believers of Mary as their Saint go thumping the beliefs of Muslims, why???

      • Lucky bin SATAN, ………..why do you love the fake Bukhari Hadiths? YOUR former Christian world misunderstood ISLAM in that they looked at the tyranny of some Muslim despots who used their cruel mode of rule to subjugate others forgetting their own dictators and mass murderers!

        In fact the Christian world condoned the mass genocide committed on the Iraqis and Afghans by the Bush administration without even an ado of remorse. Why??

        Why didn’t the Christian world ask itself, how come the total number of passengers in those four American Boeing Airliners were ONLY 240? Compare that to the lost ONE Malaysian plane which carried 240 paxs!

        Islam and Muslims are different. Islam is based on the Quran and DOES NOT condone violence save for injustice and corruption…it is sound and clear. Muslims are the followers of Islam but do NOT forget that they are Humans and being that very few of them have tendencies of usurping power by force, thus killing thousands in the name of Islam.

        Every Nation in the world has such bad elements who become murderers due to their own grudges. But why blame Islam for that? Of course Islam will retaliate when attacked, like any other religion, and NOT stay behind with its hands tied behind its back.

        The Catholic Church has been the MAIN Culprit behind ALL the ILLS in this world…as the POPE is the actual ruler of this world…if not directly then indirectly by using the powerful Nations to create Havoc in the Muslim world. But its treachery has been exposed and No longer is the Catholic Church a threat to the ISLAM!!!!!

          • Lucky bin Satan, let me ask you this simple question and you will get the answer to what drugs I am on, okay?

            Is the USA a country with the Majority Catholic Christians? Did Bush and his wife used to attend Catholic Church? Did the USA have ANY Pope from the USA soil? YES!!!
            Visits from USA presidents to the Vatican :

            J. Kennedy visited Paul(6) in July 1963. This Pope WAS from the USA!!
            Obama met the Pope Francis(NOT his real name) in March 2014.
            Woodrow met the Pope Benedict(15) in Jan 1919, to end the WW1.
            Eisenhower visited John(23) in Dec 1959.
            Kennedy visited Paul(6) in July 1963.
            Lyndon visited Paul (6) in Dec 1967.
            Nixon visited X2 Paul(6) in Mar 1969 and Sep 1970.
            Ford visited Paul(6) in June 1975.
            Carter visited Paul(2) in June 1980.
            Reagan visited X2 Paul 2 in June 1982 and June 1987.
            George Bush visited X2 Paul(2) in May 1989 and Nov 1991.
            Clinton visited Paul(2) June 1994. Infact Clinton clashed with pope on abortion and WAR! Pope advised the USA and had “clashes” with the USA government!!

            Baby Bush, the mass murderer, son of the Big Bush, visited the Vatican, on X 4 occasions. 1. May 2002 met John2. 2. June 2004 met John2. 3. June 2007 met Benedict and June 2008 met Benedict!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
            Obama X 2 in July 2009 met Benedict16 and Francis in March 2014!

            Visits of Popes to USA :
            On Oct. 4, 1965, Pope Paul VI met with President Johnson in New York City
            Benedict XVI visited the Bush White House in April of 2008.
            John Paul II came to Washington on Oct. 6, 1979.
            On May 2, 1984, President Ronald Reagan met with Pope John Paul II in Fairbanks, Alaska.
            President Reagan and Pope John Paul II also came together on Sept. 10, 1987 in Miami, Fla.
            President Bill Clinton and Pope John Paul II spoke to thousands of students on Aug. 12, 1993 in Denver, Colo.
            Clinton and Pope John Paul II also met on Oct. 4, 1995, in Newark, N.J., and in St. Louis, Mo., on Jan. 26, 1999.

            George W. Bush traveled to Castel Gandolfo, Italy, to meet Pope John Paul II on Jan. 23, 2001.

            Lucky bin Satan, when the “Excellency’s” and “His Highness’s” met did they meet to play chess? Ask yourself, doesn’t that signify that the USA is a PAULIAN Catholic Nation???

            Did you know of all those visits?? Why visit a religious Clerk, Imam or a Mufti?

            The Pope rules the world and anybody can be killed on the orders of his cronies!
            The pope’s cronies can escape even after committing paedophilia and child molestations ThE sAmE wAy CiNtOn’S DiCk WaS ‘mOlEsTeD bY mAmA lEwInSkI!!

            Regarding the drug that I have taken : It is called TRUTHSPEAKTODUMBIES!!

          • YO GOATBOY:

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

            TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!

          • Lucky bin SATAN, …you fairly said : “TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMAN CATHOLICISM – MOHAMMEDANISM ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!”. You ARE very much correct!!

            But Nazarene SPRUNG from Catholicism, right SATAN?

            And, ISLAM is NOT Muhammadanism.

            If you want a Chinese baby for free then apply here : Chinese parents, trapped in one-child web, give babies away on Internet(ndtv)

            Expectant couples, unwilling or unable to keep their children, go to the website looking for adoptive parents rather than abort their babies or abandon them.

            http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/chinese-parents-trapped-in-one-child-web-give-babies-away-on-internet-

            He may become a Nazarene like you…it will be ONE added to 2 million Nazarenes the world over in total and now the new figure will change to 2’000’001 from 2M.

          • TO THE DEMON/JINN POSSESSED GOATBOY,

            MUHAMMADANISM:

            It is a grave but a generally serious error to allow people who follow the CULT of Muhammad, to arrogate only to themselves the title Muslimoon as if they were/are the first and only Monotheists on the planet.
            It is an undeniable fact, that the so-called ‘Muslims’ follow the Sunna (the lifestyle, the manners, doings and sayings) of Muhammad even if and when it contradicts the Quran in such instances as the number of prayers, the punishment for fornication, the alleged prohibition of drinking wine etc.
            By definition, those who emulate a human being, belong to a CULT and NOT a RELIGION.

            MUHAMMADANISM is in actuality, the CULT of MUHAMMAD.

            Being called a Muhammadan Muslim is similar in context as calling someone a Buddhist or a Christian.
            Any Monotheist is automatically a Muslim.
            All Israelites, all Jews, all Hanifs and all Christians – who believe in Jesus as a prophet only – are of course Monotheists and hence are Muslimoon.
            Jews are Muslimoon of the Mosaic faith while the Arabs – in general – and Pakistanis, Somalis, Chechen, etc, and others for example, are Muslimoon but are followers of Muhammad’s version of ‘Islam’.
            Just because a general perception is wrong, it does not mean it should not be corrected especially since the Quran itself defines who and what a Muslim is; one who submits to the will of the One and Only Allah; a Monotheist.

            Not every Muslim is a Muhammadan/follower of Muhammad; but most followers of Muhammad/Muhammadans are Muslimoon.

            Since the Quran asserts that the Arabs were ignorant of previously revealed Scriptures, then it is utterly useless to try to find ‘proofs’ contradicting their claims of ‘prior knowledge’ of Biblical events. The Quran makes it crystal clear, that they were both unlearned and illiterate people.

            The historical and archaeological records moreover, show them to be a people without writing and without even the rudiments of a meaningful structured and vibrant civilization.

            All their claims to the contrary are false, and are totally based on wishful-thinking to give themselves ‘roots’ and a worthy ‘ ancestry’ so as to compete with, and even attempt to supersede the People of the Book.
            Both the Quran and their own history show that ‘Islam’ – which in reality is Muhammadanism – is basically a severe, uncompromising and hatemongering cult belief syatem.

            Almost every learned leader among the Muhammadan ‘divines’ from Khomeini to Nasrallah as well as in all their media of information, all one hears or reads are words of anger, accusations, hate, bloodcurdling calls for death and destruction to any and all so called ‘unbelievers’.

            The Muhammadan sects themselves, do not escape this ingrained and loathsome hatred as they accuse each other of blasphemy, idolatry and Shirk as can be seen between the Sunnis and Shias – for example – all over the ‘Muslim’ world.

            The greatest threat to Muhammadan Islam is the Truth, the whole Truth and nothing but the Truth as well as INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE.

            The greatest allies of Muhammadan Islam are IGNORANCE and STUPIDITY.

            Because in reality, the Muhammadan version of Islam is nothing more than a tossed salad of plagiarised, pirated, plundered and/or perverted precepts, ideas, concepts, thoughts, fetishes and traditions from the Bible, New Testament, Zoroasterian religion and pagan Arabian religion.

            Almost all the traditions of the ‘Muslim’ followers of Muhammad are repackaged Arabian paganism disguised under the mantle of ‘Islam’.

            This is why the followers of Muhammad are prohibited from reading the Bible since this would make them aware of the sources from which most of the Quranic ideas, stories and legislation, both religious and judicial, come from.

            Becoming aware of these differences induces in the thinking person the seeds of doubt. To overcome doubt, one must investigate even more; contrasting and comparing sources so as to arrive to some conclusion.

            An indepedently thinking Muhammadan, becomes a danger to himself – his beliefs – and his immediate entourage.

            Of over 53 countries in the world that have a majority of Muhammadans, only ONE, Turkey is a true democracy; all the others are despotic or authoritarian regimes which control all sources of information, turning their people into unthinking robots and zombies. So much for the none existent justice, compassion, equality etc, etc that the Muhammadans brag about.

            There are very few sane ‘theologians’ among the plethora of demented and perverted multitudes of Mullas, Imams and Ayatoullas since any among them – or even among the laity – who do not conform to the fundamentals of the faith, are automatically and very quickly labelled heretics and then summarily murdered and eliminated.

            It is the only ‘religion’ that decrees the murder of any Muhammadan who changes his/her mind to get out of the faith.

            It is wishful thinking and an extremely short-sighted view to believe, that it is a few ‘fundamentalists’ who are hijacking ‘peaceful Islam’. The facts are, that the greatest majority of Muhammadans are fundamentalists since they totally believe in the precepts, doctrines, instructions and dogmas of both the Quran and its interpreters among their leaders.

            That is why one sees them in demonstrations in ‘Palestine’, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Egypt, Yemen etc celebrating the death and destruction brought about by the murderers of September 11th as well as when any Americans or ‘none-believers’ are blown to pieces such as happened in Kenya and Bali for example.
            Even if 99% of them are ‘peace loving’, the remaining 1% terrorists constitute 12,000,000 hate mongering and suicidal fanatics that this world cannot possibly afford to let roam free.

            The Muhammadan world is full of fanaticism, bigotry, hate, jealousy, anger, hypocrisy and endemic ignorance fanned every Friday by the sermons of their ‘religious’ leaders. The greatest enemy of Muhammadanism are not the imaginary and perceived West, the Christians, the Hindus, the Israelis etc. but the Truth, the whole truth and nothing but the Truth.

            Their greatest enemy is the QURAN that incites them to hate, to discriminate, to dehumanize, to insult, to denigrate, to dispise, to enslave, to conquer and or to mass murder all those who do not believe as they do, the UNBELIEVERS, who constitute the majority 85% of humanity.

            Because their enemy is from within, they are not willing to face reality – which would be excruciatingly painful – and admit fault. They blame their self inflicted ‘misfortunes’ on all and sundry, because it is much more comforting and easier to do, than to look in the mirror and admit ugliness.

            Any psychiatrist worth a grain of salt would tell, that to cure oneself and exorcise one’s demons is attained first by looking truthfully at oneself and admitting guilt, mistakes, ugliness etc otherwise one cannot ever be cured.

            Sahih Al-Bukhari HadithHadith 8.9 Narrated byAsma bint Abu Bakr
            My mother came to me, hoping (for my favor) during the lifetime of the Prophet. I asked the Prophet, “May I treat her kindly?” He replied, “Yes.” Ibn ‘Uyaina said, “Then Allah revealed: ‘Allah forbids you not with regards to those who fought not against you because of religion, and drove you not out from your homes, that you should show them kindness and deal justly with them.’…….(60.8)”
            Sahih Al-Bukhari HadithHadith 7.115 Narrated byIbn Umar
            During the lifetime of the Prophet we used to avoid chatting leisurely and freely with our wives lest some Divine inspiration might be revealed concerning us. But when the Prophet had died, we started chatting leisurely and freely (with them).

            *** This INNOCENT statement was DIVINELY SAVED FROM THE AX OF ABROGATION, which speaks VOLUMES about the state of mind of Muhammad’s followers as long as he was alive. A STATE OF PERPETUAL FEAR ***

            Muhammadanism is a CULT which is warmongering in outlook, extremist in action and utterly totalitarian in its objectives. It is a belief system that cannot ever be compared to the Judeo-Christian ethics but fully compatible with National Socialism and Bolshevism since all of them arrogate only to themselves every conceivable right while denying for all others any political, social, cultural or religious legitimacy.
            It was Muhammad, after all, who – contrary to all the traditions of even the pagan Arabians – took up arms against his own tribe and deliberately and wilfully destroyed all the bonds that held the individual honour bound in fidelity and defence of his kith and kin.

            It was Muhammad who turned sons against fathers, sisters against brothers and parents against their own families unless they believed in “Allah and his messenger”.
            It is important to point out, that Muhammad preceded Stalin and Hitler in creating the ultimate ‘Cult of Personality’ where-by all his followers swore fealty only to himself and would murder father, mother, brother or sister at his orders.
            (Ibn Ishaq’s/A. Guillaume, The Life of Muhammad p.369).

            It was Muhammad who broke every single rule of ‘prohibitions’ among the pagan Arabians and justified these wanton deeds with the ‘MADE TO ORDER’ “then it was revealed” verses.
            In HIS Quran, Muhammad, SUBCONSCIOUSLY, described himself FLAWLESSLY –

            Sura 2: 204 There is the type of man whose speech about this world’s life may dazzle thee and he calls Allah to witness about what is in his heart; yet is he the most contentious of enemies.
            Muhammad fits this MAN PERFECTLY.

            Allah, it seems, was at Muhammad’s beck and call for almost twenty three years during which, Muhammad received personal divine sanctions regarding everything that Muhammad coveted or required such as:

            He was sanctioned to ‘marry’ as many women as he needed to satisfy his sexual appetite.
            To change Arabian law so that he could marry his own adopted son’s wife whom he lusted for.
            To marry and have intercourse with the nine years old child Aisha.
            To conduct Piratical attacks against the caravans of the Quraysh during the FORBIDDEN MONTHS.
            To Slaughter those whom he disliked even if they were in the SANCTUARY of the Ka’ba.
            To Slay and conduct war against all UNBELIEVERS until they either CONVERT, be SUBJUGATED or be SLAUGHTERED.
            To Rob, Steal, Plunder and Loot anyone or any group that he feels inclined to and then collect 20% of the ILL BEGOTTEN ‘rewards’
            All of which were very CONVENIENTLY and READILY SANCTIONED by the forever willing and ready Allah. It seems that Allah, the creator of the universe, paid more attention to Muhammad’s personal needs than to any other of his prophets or even his People.
            All the above ANOMALIES and observations can be perfectly EXPLAINED and UNDERSTOOD when one comes to the simple CONCLUSION that the Quran is actually Muhammad’s own ALTER EGO projected into the unsuspecting mouth of Allah, the Rock god of the Ka’ba, the BLACK STONE.

            THE CULT OF PAGAN MOHAMMEDANISM

            As Mohammed developed Mohammedanism he borrowed from the other regional religions present in the Mideast. These religions include Judaism, Christianity, Sabeanism, Zoroastrianism, and forms of paganism. Judaism is the largest contributor to Islam, followed by Christianity, then followed by the various pagan religions, and Muhammad’s mind. These pagan borrowings constitute significant facets of Islam and this article details some of these pagan contributions.

            (1) PAGANISM IN MOHAMMEDANISM

            Mohammedan theology has some of its roots in various pagan beliefs. Primary to Mohammedanism is it’s most holiest shrine: the Kaba.

            THE KABA

            The Kaba is now the most revered sanctuary of Mohammedanism. It is located in Mecca. Mohammedans throughout the world direct their prayers toward the Kaba.

            PHYSICAL SHAPE

            The Kaba’s shape is somewhat cubical. Of note in the Kaba’s structure is a black rock built into the wall in its eastern corner. The black rock’s diameter is about 12 inches. It is reddish black in color, and has red and yellow particles. The black rock is kissed during the perambulation, (the circulation of the Mohammeds around the Kaba). The Kaba is about 50 feet high, and the walls are about 40 feet long. The facade contains the door, which starts at 7 feet off the ground, and faces N.E.. To enter the Kaba, a ladder must be used. Also built in the eastern corner, is another stone called “lucky”. This stone is only touched, not kissed.

            KNOWN PAGAN HISTORY

            Apart from Mohammedan myths, little is really known about the history of the Kaba. About 60 years before the Prophet Jesus of Nazareth, the Roman historian Diodorus Siculus commented that there was in Arabia a temple greatly revered by the Arabs. It is probable that he had the Kaba in mind. It was later mentioned to have existed in the 2nd century; Ptolemy, the geographer mentions it in his work, calling it the ‘macoraba’. The Kaba was a sanctuary dedicated to one or more pagan deities. The accounts of the campaigns of Abraha note that it was a place of pagan worship in the 6th century. Information on the distribution of the offices among the sons of Kusayy show that the worship of the sanctuary had developed into a regulated cult several generations before Muhammad.

            One historian (Hurgronjes) said that sacred worship may have developed around the area because the Zamzam spring was found in this waterless place.

            Pre-Mohammedan history tells us that many Arabian tribes were STONE WORSHIPPERS. This is also mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol 5, #661. Mohammed incorporated the Kaba’s paganistic roots into Islam to give the Mohammedans a sense of identity, legitimacy, and uniqueness. He also wanted to ease the Arab’s strain of moving from paganism to Mohammedanism, by continuing the practices of their fathers.

            REMEMBER MOHAMMED WORSHIPPED ALLAH AS A PAGAN AT KABA!

            PAGAN GODS AND RITUALS

            There were 360 idols around the Kaba. The pilgrimages to the Kaba were all pagan pilgrimages, the ritual processions around the Kaba were part of pagan beliefs and custom, the white robes worn by the pilgrims were from pagan faiths, the veneration of the Kaba and black stone are derived from pagan rituals and beliefs. Pagans called out the names of their pagan gods as they circled the Kaba, today, Mohammedans call out their pagan Allah’s name. Pagans ran between the nearby hills, Mohammed authorized Mohammedans to do that in the Quran, as he ran between the hills himself.

            The chief pagan god worshipped there was Hubal, who could be called the god of Mecca and of the Kaba. Hubal is not mentioned in the Quran. The goddesses al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat were also worshipped there and are mentioned in the Quran.

            It is thought that the Kaba was originally set up for astral worship. Golden suns and moons are repeatedly mentioned as the votive gifts. Some pagans regarded the Kaba as a temple devoted to the sun, moon, and 5 planets.
            ALLAH & HUBAL
            Regarding the nature of Hubal, it has been ascertained that traditionally, the idol is Moabite in origin. Martin Lings states as follows:
            So ‘Abd al-Muttalib continued to dig without any actual move being made to stop him; and some of the people were already leaving the sanctuary when suddenly he struck the well’s stone covering and uttered a cry of thanksgiving to God. The crowd reassembled and increased; and when he began to dig out the treasure which Jurhum had buried there, everyone claimed the right to share in it. ‘Abd al-Muttalib agreed that lots should be cast for each object, as to whether it should be kept in the sanctuary or go to him personally or be divided amongst the tribe. This had become the recognised way of deciding an issue of doubt, and it was done by means of divining arrows inside the Ka’bah, in front of the Moabite idol Hubal…
            Hence it has always been known that the idol Hubal is a Moabite import (i.e. Baal), hence demolishing another of the missionary’s accusations. Hitti seems to concur with the Moabite origins of Hubal by stating that:
            Hubal (from Aram. for vapour, spirit), evidently the chief deity of al-Ka’bah, was represented in human form. Beside him stood ritual arrows used for divination by the soothsayer ( kahin, from Aramaic) who drew lots by means of them. The tradition in ibn-Hisham, which makes ‘Amr ibn-Luhayy the importer of this idol from Moab or Mesopotamia, may have a kernel of truth in so far as it retains a memory of the Aramaic origin of the deity. At the conquest of Makkah by Muhammad Hubal shared the lot of the other idols and was destroyed.
            Allah (allah, al-ilah, the god) was the principal, though not the only, deity of Makkah. The name is an ancient one. It occurs in two South Arabic inscriptions, one a Minean found at al-‘Ula and the other Sabean, but abounds in the form HLH in the Lihyanite inscriptions of the fifth century B.C. Lihyan, which evidently got the god from Syria, was the first center of the worship of this deity in Arabia. The name occurs as Hallah in the Safa inscriptions five centuries before Islam and also in a pre-Islamic Christian Arabic inscription found in umm-al-Jimal, Syria, and ascribed to the sixth century. The name of Muhammad’s father was ‘Abd-Allah (‘Abdullah, the slave or worshiper of Allah). The esteem in which Allah was held by the pre-Islamic Makkans as the creator and supreme provider and the one to be invoked in time of special peril may be inferred from such koranic passages as 31:24, 31; 6:137, 109; 10:23. Evidently he was the tribal deity of the Quraysh. (History of the Arabs from the Earliest Times to the Present, revised tenth edition, new preface by Walid Khalidi [Palgrave Macmillan, 2002; ISBN: 0-333-63142-0 paperback], pp. 100-101; underlined emphasis ours)
            Hitti affirms that Allah was the Quraysh’s tribal deity. We also cited Ibn Kathir who agreed that Hubal was the chief god of Muhammad’s family:
            Ibn Ishaq stated,
            “It is claimed that when ‘Abd al-Muttalib received such opposition from Quraysh over the digging of zamzam, he vowed that if ten sons were born to him who grew up and protected him, he would sacrifice one of them for God at the ka‘ba.”
            Eventually he had ten sons grown up whom he knew would give him protection. Their names were al-Harith, al-Zubayr, Hajl, Dirar, al-Muqawwim, Abu Lahab, al-‘Abbas, Hamza, Abu Talib, and ‘Abd Allah. He assembled them and told them of his vow and asked them to honour his pledge to God, Almighty and All-glorious is He. They obeyed, and asked him what he wanted them to do. He asked each of them to take an arrow, write his name on it and return to him.
            They did so and went with them inside the ka‘bato the site of THEIR god HUBAL, where there was the well in which offerings to the ka‘ba would be placed. There, near Hubal, were seven arrows which they would use for divining a judgement over some matter of consequence, a question of blood-money, kinship, or the like. They would come to Hubal to seek a resolution, accepting whatever they were ordered to do or to refrain from.” (The Life of the Prophet Muhammad (Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya), Volume I, translated by professor Trevor Le Gassick, reviewed by Dr. Ahmed Fareed [Garnet Publishing Limited, 8 Southern Court, south Street Reading RG1 4QS, UK; The Center for Muslim Contribution to Civilization, 1998], pp. 125-126;)

            THE BLACK STONE

            The black stone played a prominent role in pagan worship. The pagans offered animal sacrifices there. But the idol of the black stone replaced the alter; on the black stone they smeared the blood of the sacrificed animals.

            QURANIC MYTHS

            Mohammed made up historical references for the Kaba. Mohammed claimed that Abraham and Ishmael laid the foundations of the Kaba (Quran. 2:127). Mohammed claimed that God ordained the Kaba as a sacred house (Quran. 5:97). Mohammed also claimed that it was the first temple ever built for mankind (Quran. 3:97).

            Only Mohammed claimed that it was a place built by Abraham. In looking in the Torah we find no mention of Abraham traveling to Mecca to build a house of worship.

            Further, the late Taha Hussein, one of the most famous Egyptian professors of Arabic literature said that the Islamic myth of Abraham building the Kaba came into vogue just before the rise of Islam. He comments:

            “The case of this episode is very obvious because it is of recent date, and came into vogue just before the rise of Mohammedanism. Mohammedanism exploited it for religious reasons”. Quoted in ‘Mizar al-Islam’ by Anwar al-Jundi.

            THEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS

            Every man living in Mecca before and during Mohammed’s life had some relationship with the Kaba. If the Kaba was the house of God, why did Mohammed order his followers to face Jerusalem? Mohammed’s ‘revelation’ in the Quran says that when Allah had Mohammed change prayer directions, it was a test of the Mohammedans. This sounds like a lame excuse on Mohammed’s part. What’s the test? Face another direction? That does not appear to be such an incredible challenge!

            Probably the real answer is that through his early contacts with Christians and Jews, Mohammed knew that their faiths, centered in Jerusalem, where monotheistic. Mohammed changed his polytheistic worship, consequently he aligned himself with faiths that he believed were from the true God. He selected Jerusalem as the direction of prayer. He hoped that the Jews would receive him as a prophet.

            About a year and a half after the migration to Medina, after the Jews had thoroughly rejected him, he turned the direction of prayer to Mecca – the center of pagan worship in the Arabian Peninsula (Quran. 2:144). Just as he had compromised with the pagan idol worshippers in Mecca, by sanctioning and worshipping the pagan goddesses Lat, Uzza, and Manat, so now he hoped to gain favor with the pagan Arab tribes that worshipped at the Kaba in Mecca. He authenticated the pagan focus of attention.

            After Mohammed took Mecca, he cleansed the Kaba. Inside the Kaba were many representations of the prophets. When his men began to cleanse the Kaba, and wash out the representations, Mohammed placed his hands on the pictures of Jesus and Mary, and said, “Wash out all except what is below my hands”. Again, Mohammed went against his own principles, and sanctioned his definition of idolatry.

            Mohammed then sanctioned the pagan rituals concerning the Kaba, i.e. kissing the black stone, touching the Kaba, circling the structure, running between the two hills, etc. Later, Umar said to the black stone “I know that you are a stone, that neither helps nor hurts, and if the messenger of god had not kissed you, I would not kiss you”. (Sahih al-Bukhari, volume 2, #667). But then he kissed the stone. Like Umar, many other Mohammedans follow the prophet in their practice of veneration of a pagan idol.

            Before Mohammed, there was a group of people in Arabia who also abhorred idolatry. They were known as the Hanifites. Even the Hanifites saw that kissing the black stone was pagan idolatry. During one of the pre-Islamic Eids, the Qurayshi were worshipping their idols, slaying sacrifices, praying, and making circuits around the Kaba. Just as they did each year for this festival. Some Hanifites saw them, and stood apart from them, and said:

            “By the Lord!, our people have nothing left of the faith of Abraham. What is this stone that we should encircle it? It can neither hear nor speak, neither hurt nor help. O our people, look out for your souls, for by the Lord are you altogether wanting.”

            One of the Hanifites was Obeidallah… later he embraced Islam. He immigrated to Abyssinia with other Mohammedans. Later he became a Christian. After his conversion, he said to his Mohammedan friends ‘We (Christians) see, but you are only blinking’ – that is, cannot see plainly.

            So, why then does Mohammed kiss the black stone? Why did he incorporate paganism into his faith? There is even the Quranic story of Abraham – how he chided those who worshipped idols sura 6, 21, etc., and said it was sinful in God’s sight. Yet here we have Mohammed walking around the Kaba, just like the pagans, kissing the stone, just like the pagans. Even Umar knew it was empty and false, yet he followed Mohammed in kissing the stone.

            It cannot be denied that an entire pagan theology and ritual, was adopted by Mohammedanism, after Mohammed had one of his convenient ‘revelations’ and made it ‘religiously’ correct.

            Another Mohammedan myth, concerning the Kaba, is that ‘anyone who prays under the Kaba’s water-pipe becomes as pure as on the day when his mother bore him’. Mohammedans have a hard time accepting Jesus’ atonement, but will allow for total forgiveness of sins by uttering a prayer under a spout!

            POST MUHAMMAD HISTORY

            In one of the early Mohammedan civil wars (a.d. 683), al-Zubayr in Mecca was besieged by al-Husayn. Husayn’s men used catapults and damaged the Kaba. It looked like ‘the torn bosoms of mourning women’. Zubayr and his men pitched their tents next to the Kaba, and a conflagration caught the Kaba on fire. The Kaba was severely damaged, and the black stone was split into three pieces.

            A short time later, al-Hadjdjadj conquered Mecca and killed Zubayr. He modified the Kaba’s structure.

            In 929, the Karmatians invaded Mecca and carried off the black stone! 20 years later it was returned.

            Other natural events (bad weather) have also caused the Kaba to need repair.

            Mohammedans erroneously claim that God has protected the Quran from corruption, yet their god was not able to protect his sacred house!

            POST MOHAMMED MYTHOLOGY

            Later Mohammedan theologians invented a number of myths about Mecca and the Kaba.

            One Mohammedan tradition is – according to Ibn Abbas: Mohammed said,

            ‘The black stone came from Paradise and at the time of its descent it was whiter than milk, but that the sins of the children of Adam have caused it to be black, by their touching it. That on the Day of Resurrection, when it will have two eyes, by which it will see and know all those who touched it and kissed it, and when it will have a tongue to speak, it will give evidence in favor of those who touched and kissed it’!

            Mohammedan writers also said that the Kaba was first constructed in heaven, 2000 years before the creation of the world, where a model of it still remains. Adam erected the first Kaba on earth exactly below the spot its perfect model occupies in heaven! 10,000 angels were appointed to guard Adam’s Kaba, but obviously they didn’t do a good job! God then instructed Abraham to rebuild it.

            There are a number of other myths about the Kaba. Among them are that Mecca is the navel of the world, that the Kaba was established at the creation of the world, destroyed during the flood, re-built by Abraham, that Gabriel provided the black stone. There are also legends about the Zamzam water from the nearby well.

            Some Mohammedans say that there are references to the Kaba in the Torah.

            Here are a few mistaken claims:

            (1) Mohammedans hope that Genesis 35:4, 14, 15 refers to the Kaba. Since “Beth-El” = House of God, and that the Jewish temple wasn’t built until much later. But as the Bible shows, Bethel is a town, in Palestine – Genesis chapter 12. Also, Jacob built an altar, not a temple to God. Abraham also built an altar to the Lord in Genesis 12:7.

            (2) Mohammedans claim that David mentions the Kaba in Psalm 84:6. If ‘Baca’ was a location, it was not known where it existed in the Bible. But a more correct interpretation, taken in context of the whole Psalm, is that since ‘baca’ means weeping, it means ‘valley of tears’. David could be saying that he longs for the presence of God, and that even through difficult times (baca) God will be with him, and will turn his tears to joy.

            (3) Mohammedans also think that Isaiah 60:7 “All the flocks of Kedar” refers to Arabian people worshipping at the Kaba. Reading through Isaiah 60:7, it shows that Kedar’s flocks are going to be sacrificed on the alter. Are Mohammedans saying that Arabs were going to be human sacrifices?

            (4) Some Mohammedans think that since the New Jerusalem in the book of Revelation is cubic, it also resembles the Kaba and thus is a prophecy of the Kaba! But the Kaba is not a perfect cube, not even close. The structure is 50 ft high, with a sloping roof, the shorter walls are 35 feet long, and the facade is 40 ft. long.

            SUMMARY FOR THE MOHAMMEDAN RITES CENTERED ON THE KABA

            Every Mohammedan that makes the Hajj, every Mohammedan that runs between the hills, every Mohammedan that bestows a kiss on the black stone, is performing pagan rituals, founded on pagan superstitions, sanctioned by Mohammed himself.

            Muslims have accused Christianity of incorporating paganism, and to an extent, some exterior cultural aspects have been. But paganism is an integral root of Islam; paganism is part of its theology, history, ceremony, and veneration.

            My references for this section are from the original Hughes Dictionary of Islam (not the recent one that has been sanitized by a Mohammedan publisher), the Shorter Ency. of Islam, and the Ency. of Islam, pub. by E. J. Brill, and ‘The Sources of Islam’ by Tisdall.

            MORE MOHAMMEDAN PAGANISM

            THE NIGHT JOURNEY

            The Night Journey describes Mohammed’s ascent into heaven. It is briefly mentioned in sura 17:1, and described in Sahih al-Bukhari, in several of his volumes, notably in vol 1, #345.

            Mohammed’s story parallels a Zoroastrian story. It is found in an old Pahlavi book known as “The Book of Arta Viraf”. The Zoroastrian story describes the journey of a saintly priest (Arta Viraf), who went into a trance and his spirit went up to the heavens under the guidance of an angel named Sarosh. He passed from one utopia (7 heavens?) to another until he reached the presence of Ormazd, the great deity of the whole universe. When Arta saw everything in heaven and that the inhabitants were very happy, Ormazd commanded him to return to earth as his ‘messenger’ and to tell the people all that he saw and heard.

            Also, the Zoroastrians taught, long before Mohammedanism, there was a marvelous tree in Paradise called ‘humaya’, which corresponds very closely to the ‘sidrah’, the lote tree of Mohammedanism.

            Finally, there is another Zoroastrian work the ‘Zerdashtnama’, which has a story of how Zoroaster himself ascended into the heavens and obtained permission to visit hell, where he found Ahriman, the Devil.

            All of these stories are paralleled in the Quran. No doubt Mohammed heard these stories and decided to put himself on a level with Zoroaster and others. So, now we have Mohammed copying the Zoroastrian stories and claiming to have these experiences.

            Again, while Mohammedans claim that paganism influenced Christianity, we see that paganism is part of the core of Mohammedanism faith and theology.

            AZAZIL – THE DEVIL

            In the Mohammedan Hadith, the Devil has a certain name – Azazil.

            The name does not occur in the Quran. The name may come from Leviticus 16:8, 10, 26 – the scapegoat in Hebrew is Azazil. From another source it means ‘the demon of the desert’.

            There are Apocrypha Jewish books – Enoch and Apocalypse of Abraham that mention Azazil. Mohammedan traditions – Hadiths develop their story. Mohammedans associate Azazil with the fallen angels Harut and Marut. Ibn Abbas tradition has the strongest Mohammedan reference developing it as Satan’s name, before the fall of Adam.

            Here is Tisdall’s view on it (taken from “The Sources of Islam”):

            Mohammedans take the name Azazil from the Jews, but put the Zoroastrian story behind the name. Mohammedans believe that God created Azazil, who worshipped God for a 1000 years while he was in the 7th hell. Then he ascended a stage at a time, all the while worshipping God. Finally, he reached the earth. Elsewhere, Mohammedan tradition says he stayed 3000 years by the gate of paradise, with hostile intentions against Adam and Eve. He was very jealous of them.

            Compare the above with the Zoroastrian account:

            Ahriman (Azazil) remained in the abyss, there to commit hurt and injury, and mischief and darkness. Ormazd (God) knew of his existence and plans. It went on like this for 3000 years. The evil spirit was ignorant of Ormazd’s existence, but eventually rising out of the pit, saw Ormazd’s light. Then Ahriman was filled with hostility and envy, he set out to destroy.

            THE SABEANS

            Who were the Sabeans? Why did Mohammed regard them as believers in the true God? The Sabeans are mentioned at least 3 times in the Quran:

            (1) 2:62 – “Believers, Jews, Christians, and Sabeans; whoever believes in God and the last day and does what is right, shall be rewarded by their Lord; they have nothing to fear or regret.”

            (2) 5:69 – “Believers, Jews, Sabeans and Christians; whoever believes in God and the last day and does what is right, shall have nothing to fear or to regret.”

            (3) 22:17 – “As for the true believers, the Jews, the Sabeans, the Christians, the Magians, and the pagans, God will judge them on the day of Resurrection. God bears witness to all things.”

            Although what is known about the Sabeans is not comprehensive, enough has been written about them to determine a basic understanding of their practices and beliefs. Most of the writings are from Mohammedan sources. Some of the writers are Ibn Hazm in ‘Fisal wa-Milal’, Ibn al-Nadim in the ‘Fihrist’, Shahrastani in ‘The Treaty on Sects’, and Masudi in ‘Muruj al-Dhahab.

            Ibn Hazm, writing in ‘Fisal wa-Milal’, identifies the people then known as ‘Harranians’ as the ‘Sabeans’ mentioned in the Quran. Hazm writes that they honored the seven planets and the twelve constellations, they have 5 times of prayer, (the same times as the Mohammedans pray), they fast in Ramadan, they venerate and turn to the Kaba in prayer. Hazm also says they also worshipped the stars and idols. Hazm further claims that Allah sent Abraham to turn them away from pagan worship, but Abraham didn’t succeed.

            Comparing all the early writings on the Sabeans, we find that they inhabited Syria, and spread from there, they were definitely pagans, having a mixture of Babylonian and Helenic religion. The ‘prophets’ they professed to follow were Hermes and Agathodaemon, who they identified in Shahrastani’s time with Seth and Idris (Old.Testament. Enoch). Gods who were worshipped were the gods of the 7 week-days, the god of the Jinn, the lord of the Hour, the god who makes arrows fly, the god Tammuz (a variation of the one previously mentioned), Hamam the prince, the father of the gods, the god ‘North’, the lord ‘Fortune’, etc. They also kept the Eid of their own. Further, the Sabeans made star worship a chief characteristic of their system.

            So, did Mohammedanism get the 5 times a day prayer?–From the star worshipping Sabeans!. What about fasting during Ramadan? – from the Sabeans! The Eid? – from the Sabeans!

            It seems very odd to me that Mohammed, the man who’s central doctrine was the oneness of God, would include pagan worshippers as those who were believers in the true God. If Mohammed were truly a prophet, how could he have made such a big mistake? How did astral worshippers get included into the Quran as those that worship the true God? How could Mohammed’s ‘revelation’ be in such error?

            It is noteworthy that just as Mohammed incorporated the pagan veneration of the Kaba and black stone into Islam, so he incorporated the Sabean times of prayer, Eid, and fasting into Mohammedanism.

            Once again, Mohammed didn’t fully know the subject he was synthesizing into Mohammedanism. I have read nothing about their doctrine that would have led Mohammed to include them as followers of the one true God he preached about. Perhaps he learned a small portion about their religion, and believed it to be right. Little did he know that under that veneer of words, lay many theological differences.

            HOURIS

            The Quran mentions ‘houris’ several times 44:50, 52:20, 55:60, 56:20, 78:33. Who or what are they? They are ‘bashful virgins’, ‘fair as coral and ruby’, ‘dark eyed youths’, ‘high bosomed maidens (big breasted)’. In sum, they are creatures put in Paradise, primarily for men’s sexual pleasures. Each man will have at least two of them.

            This concept is derived from the Zoroastrian sources. In Zoroastrian writings they are referred to as ‘Faries’ – spirits in bright array and beautiful to captivate the heart of man. The name ‘Houris’ comes from a Pehlavi source, as does the Mohammedan ‘Jinn’ for Genie.

            CONCLUSION

            It’s not difficult to see how Mohammed heard various sacred religious stories, and incorporated them into Mohammedanism. Perhaps he thought that parts of those religions contained truth, so he adopted what he thought to be correct. But nevertheless, part of the foundation of Mohammedanism is PAGAN..

  3. This the same schtick – that is found at answering-islam. That site is world wonder! Every anti-Islam/Muslim lands there . . .

    Adopts their views and spans same thing over and over and over. Naik is another miracle. No end of argument are directed at him. Power of the TV!

    – – –

    It doesn’t matter to these people that their errors ar repeatedly shown up. . . but they will ignore this – and spread spiel like this.

    Look what author of this site is doing.

    He posts these up – he tried having a “debate” – when he couldn’t answer – he just stopped replying.

    – – –

    Take this:

    “Thus to counter the “flat earth” charge, some Muslims have adopted an apologetic stance that merely replaces one error with another and this latter is worse in that it’s linguistic basis is weak to say the least and requires substantial meaning being read into the text itself.”

    The flat Earth charge was bogus in the first place. It has LONG blown up. It is pretty simple – Quran does NOT advocate a flat earth – anywhere.

    The original author stated:

    “Sadly for Dr. Naik et al, whilst the earth is a (marginally) oblate spheroid an egg is a markedly prolate and asymmetric spheroid. Simply: an oblate spheroid is bigger “around the middle” (equator – which is always a circle by definition) whereas a prolate one is bigger “north to south”. Thus even if we were to accept the apologists’ argument theshape of the world in the Koran is still completely wrong. (In fact physics makes such an earth-sized world-shape as impossible as a disc-world in our universe.)”

    This is one of those things you can go backwards and forwards either way – it will never be resolved!

    However the author in his haste to copy and paste – forgot the what kind of egg!

    The reference to an egg in deep etymology of the word refers to an ostrich egg. Which is more or less an “oblate spheroid”.

    However the whole argument of Ostrich eggs is marginal.

    • THE PERFECT EXAMPLE FOR MANKIND

      THE PERFECT MUSLIM

      And surely thou hast sublime morals
      (Surat Al-Qalam 68:4).

      Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah an excellent exemplar
      (Surat Al-Ahzab 33:21).

      Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly.

      ALLAH’S ARITHMETIC: 54 INTO 9 GOES NICELY

      THE WANKING PERVERT FROM MECCA

      A marriage is engaged in by 2 consenting adults.
      Do you really believe a 6 year old child would desire to marry a 51 year old man?
      Do you think that is what she would choose?
      Do you think a 9 year old girl would desire to have sex with a 54 year old?

      The thought of an old man becoming aroused by a child is one of the most disturbing thoughts that makes us cringe as it reminds us of pedophilia and the most despicable people. It is difficult to accept that the “Holy Prophet” of Mecca married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and WANKED BETWEEN HER THIGHS FOR 3 YEARS and consummated/RAPED her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.
      MUHAMMAD: HIS SEX LIFE, SEX ABUSE & CHILD MOLESTING

      Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly. Let us investigate how did the prophet live Islam; how did the prophet apply the eternal teachings of God in his daily life? In this search for the historical Muhammad, we will utilize the Islam’s holy books, its own writings.

      MUHAMMAD’S MOLESTATION OF BABY AISHA

      Muhammad fantasized about baby Aisha before soliciting her from her father.
      Sahih Bukhari 9.140
      Narrated ‘Aisha:
      Allah’s apostle said to me, “you were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘if this is from Allah, then it must happen.
      AISHA’S FATHER DID NOT APPROVE AT FIRST
      Aisha’s father, Abu Bakr, wasn’t on board at first, but Muhammad explained how the rules of their religion made it possible. This is similar to the way that present-day cult leaders manipulate their followers into similar concessions.
      Sahih Bukhari 7.18
      Narrated ‘Ursa:
      The prophet asked abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “but I am your brother.” the prophet said, “you are my brother in Allah’s religion and his book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”

      MUHAMMAD WOULD THIGH WITH BABY AISHA

      HOW TO THIGH & GET HIGH

      Now let us see how thighing is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

      Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.

      According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

      Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

      Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.

      Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.”Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

      The inquirer asked the following: ‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’

      After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

      That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers'” (Fatwa No. 31409).

      Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

      AISHA WASHING SEMEN FROM MUHAMMAD’S CLOTHES

      From the Hadith of Bukhari:

      Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

      Narrated ‘Aisha:

      I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

      Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

      Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

      I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

      ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED THE RAPE OF FEMALE CAPTIVES:

      RAPE JIHAD:

      Sahih Muslim Book 08. N 3371Marriage

      Chapter: Al-Azl (incomplete sexual intercourse): Coitus Interruptus.

      Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women;

      and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them.
      So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him?

      So we asked Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

      REMEMBER:

      ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF GOD

      ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED RAPE

      Al-‘Azl
      Al-‘Azl, (العزل) also known as coitus interruptus, is the practice of having sexual intercourse with a woman but withdrawing the penis before ejaculation. Apparently al-‘Azl with female captives and slaves was a pretty important topic for Muhammad and his companions as evidenced by the abundance of Hadith material on the subject.
      Practiced during Muhammad’s lifetime & ALL OVER EUROPE TODAY
      Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle .
      Sahih Bukhari 7:62:135
      Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interrupt us while the Quran was being revealed. Jabir added: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle while the Quran was being Revealed.
      Sahih Bukhari 7:62:136
      When RAPING your captive, it’s better if you do not pull out at the end

      THIS IS ISLAM

      Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus(RAPE WITHOUT PREGNANCY)?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to PULL OUT. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.”

      Sahih Bukhari 3:34:432

      Abu Said said, “We went with Allah’s Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the ‘Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah’s Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence.”
      Sahih Bukhari 3:46:718

      ISLAMIC CLERIC CONFIRMS ALL SUNI MUSLIM MEN ARE SODOMITES

      You know how some people insult Muslims by calling them crude names that are the equivalents of sodomites and bestialists (butt- and goat-f**kers)? It turns out at least the sodomite insult is true! We have it straight from the mouth of none other than a Muslim cleric — a London-based Shiite cleric named Yasser Habib.

      ‘PERFUMED GARDEN’

      by Abu Nuwas:

      O the joy of sodomy!
      So now be sodomites, you Arabs.
      Turn not away from it–
      therein is wondrous pleasure.
      Take some coy lad with kiss-curls
      twisting on his temple
      and ride as he stands like some gazelle
      standing to her mate.
      A lad whom all can see girt with sword
      and belt not like your whore who has
      to go veiled.
      Make for smooth-faced boys and do your
      very best to mount them, for women are
      the mounts of the devils

      THIS IS REAL MOHAMMEDANISM:

      Surah 8:69: “But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good.” (Yusuf Ali)

      ISLAMIC QUESTION & ANSWER, ONLINE WITH MUFTI EBRAHIM DESAI, SOUTH AFRICA, ASK THE IMAM:

      “It may, superficially, appear distasteful to copulate with a woman who is not a man’s legal wife, but once Shariah makes something lawful, we have to accept it as lawful, whether it appeals to our taste, or not; and whether we know its underlying wisdom or not.”

      ALL SUNNI MUSLIMS ARE SODOMITES

      Satan Attends Every Childbirth; He Touches Every Infant
      Except for Mary and her Son Jesus, all babies cry during their birth, because Satan touches them… (Sahih Bukhari, 4.55.641)
      Whenever a child is born, Satan pricks it; that is why the child cries. Only Mary and Jesus were not pricked by Satan…(Sahih Muslim, 30.5837, 5838)
      Say prayer during sexual intercourse, and Satan will not touch your child…(Sahih Bukhari, 4.54.503

      ALL SUNNI MUSLIMS FINGER FC-KED BY SATAN AT BIRTH

      In a broadcast on the UK’s Fadak TV on May 24, 2012, Habib calmly and dispassionately asserts that all non-Shiite males — especially the Shiites’ Muslim rivals, the Sunnis — are sodomized at birth by the devil, and grow up to become “passive homosexuals”, i.e., the “bottom” of a homosexual pair who is penetrated in anal sex.

      EVEN MUTT & HIS COMPANIONS

      Islamic cleric confirms Muslim men really are sodomites
      You know how some people insult Muslims by calling them crude names that are the equivalents of sodomites and bestialists (butt- and goat-f**kers)? It turns out at least the sodomite insult is true! We have it straight from the mouth of none other than a Muslim cleric — a London-based Shiite cleric named Yasser Habib.
      In a broadcast on the UK’s Fadak TV on May 24, 2012, Habib calmly and dispassionately asserts that all non-Shiite males — especially the Shiites’ Muslim rivals, the Sunnis — are sodomized at birth by the devil, and grow up to become “passive homosexuals”, i.e., the “bottom” of a homosexual pair who is penetrated in anal sex.

      TRANSCRIPTION OF YASSER HABIB:

      “Anyone who consents to being called ‘Emir of the Believers’ is a passive homosexual. Omar Ibn Al-Khattab, for example, who willingly assumed this title, was, without a doubt, a passive homosexual. The same goes for the caliphs Othman Ibn Affan, Muawiyya, Yazid, and the rules and sultans of the Umayyad and Abbasid dynasties, as well as some of the rulers and sultans of our day and age.

      For example, the king of Morocco bears this title. This is how you know that he is a passive homosexual. This is in addition to the evidence revealed by Western media, which showed that the current king of Morocco is indeed a passive homosexual who belongs to the homosexual community. This was leaked from his palace by his assistants, his servants, and his ‘boys,’ whom he would penetrate and who would penetrate him. They fled to Europe, sought asylum, and exposed all this.

      Cleric Yasser Habib exposes Kalifa Umar as a Sodomite

      It is told (in the hadith) that Umar Ibn Al-Khattab had an anal disease, which could be cured only by semen. One should know that this is a well-known medical condition, which is also mentioned in sacred texts. Someone who, God forbid, has been penetrated in the anus, a worm grows within him, due to the semen discharged in him…
      A disease develops in his anus, and as a result, he cannot calm down, unless. he is penetrated again and again.

      The Shiites are undoubtedly protected from this disease, and from committing this abominable and hideous act. As for the Nasibis (who hated the prophet Muhammad’s family), they are definitely afflicted with this homosexuality.
      One of the devils is present at the birth of every human being. If Allah knows that the newborn is one of our Shiites, He fends off that devil, who cannot harm the newborn. But if the newborn is not one of our Shiites, the devil inserts his index finger into the anus of the newborn, who thus becomes a passive homosexual. If the newborn is not a Shiite, the devil inserts his index finger into this newborn’s anus, and when he grows up, he becomes a passive homosexual.

      If the newborn is a female, the devil inserts his index finger into her vagina, and she becomes a whore. At that moment, the newborn cries loudly, as he comes out of his mother’s womb. Note that some children cry normally at birth, while others cry loudly and incessantly. You should know that this is the work of that devil, according to this narration.”

      Islam is NOT a religion, but an insane political system and sex cult populated by the severely mentally impaired.”

      When cleric Yasser Habib “says ‘passive homosexual’, he is referring to the receptive, submissive, female-equivalent partner. Dominant, inserting male homosexual activity is universally accepted in Islam. He has no problem with that. It’s grown men ‘catching’ that he has a problem with.”

      • Lucky bin Pussyfart,

        Abu Dhabi court upholds Indian’s death sentence for rape(NDTV)

        You are really retarded! Can’t you see the difference between the East and West….on morality, gayship, nudity, prostitution, murder, rapes on daily bases… All the evils in NON ISLAMIC areas, why??

        Because Islam is a SANE political, social and economic system and is NOT a sex cult as your retarded handicapped brain spurts.

        An appeals court in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on Sunday upheld the death sentence of an Indian janitor for raping a seven-year-old schoolgirl in Abu Dhabi.

        The 56-year-old man, identified only as IK, was found guilty of raping the Emirati girl in the kitchen of a private school in the country’s capital, The National reported.

        The defendant was earlier awarded death sentence by a lower court.

        On the day of the incident, a teacher had asked the youngster to take some papers to the school administration.

        IK saw the girl and pulled her into a kitchen and raped her. What is wrong with these microphallus Indians??

        http://www.ndtv.com/article/diaspora/abu-dhabi-court-upholds-indian-s-death-sentence-for-rape-499260

        • ALLAH SAYS ONLY MOHAMMEDANS ALLOWED TO RAPE:

          ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF ALLAH.

          ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED THE RAPE OF FEMALE CAPTIVES:

          RAPE JIHAD:

          Sahih Muslim Book 08. N 3371Marriage
          Chapter: Al-Azl (incomplete sexual intercourse): Coitus Interruptus.
          Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women;
          and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them.
          So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him?
          So we asked Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

          REMEMBER:
          ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF GOD
          ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED RAPE

          Al-’Azl
          Al-’Azl, (العزل) also known as coitus interruptus, is the practice of having sexual intercourse with a woman but withdrawing the penis before ejaculation. Apparently al-’Azl with female captives and slaves was a pretty important topic for Muhammad and his companions as evidenced by the abundance of Hadith material on the subject.
          Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle .

          Sahih Bukhari 7:62:135

          Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interrupt us while the Quran was being revealed. Jabir added: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle while the Quran was being Revealed.
          Sahih Bukhari 7:62:136

          When RAPING your captive, it’s better if you do not pull out at the end

          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus(RAPE WITHOUT PREGNANCY)?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to PULL OUT. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.”
          Sahih Bukhari 3:34:432
          Abu Said said, “We went with Allah’s Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the ‘Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah’s Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence.”

          Sahih Bukhari 3:46:718

          We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. ………
          We asked (him) about it and he said, “It is better for you not to PULL OUT, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist.”

          Sahih Bukhari 5:59:459

          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: That during the battle with Bani Al-Mustaliq they (Muslims) captured females and wanted sexual relation with them without impregnating them. So they asked the Prophet about coitus interruptus. He said, “It is better that you leave it in, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.” Qaza’a said, “I heard Abu Sa’id saying that the Prophet said, ‘No soul is ordained to be created but Allah will create it.”

          Sahih Bukhari 9:93:506

          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah’s Apostle about it and he said, “Do you really do that?” repeating the question thrice, “There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection.”

          Sahih Bukhari 7:62:137

          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: That while he was sitting with the Prophet a man from the Ansar came and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get slave girls from the war captives and we love property; what do you think about coitus interruptus?” Allah’s Apostle said, “Do you do that? It is better for you not to pull out, for there is no soul which Allah has ordained to come into existence but will be created.”

          Sahih Bukhari 8:77:600

          Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3371, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3372

          Yahya related to me from Malik from Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman from Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Habban that Ibn Muhayriz said, “I went into the mosque and saw Abu Said al-Khudri and so I sat by him and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said al-Khudri said, ‘We went out with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, on the expedition to the Banu al-Mustaliq. We took some Arabs prisoner, and we desired the women as celibacy was hard for us. We wanted the ransom, so we wanted to practise coitus interruptus. We said, ‘Shall we practise coitus interruptus while the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, is among us before we ask him?’ We asked him about that and he said, ‘You don’t have to not do it. There is no self which is to come into existence up to the Day of Rising but that it will come into existence.’ ”

          Al-Muwatta 29 32.95b

          It’s okay to practice ‘azl when having sex with your slave-girl
          Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri: A man said: Apostle of Allah, I have a slave-girl and I withdraw the penis from her (while having intercourse), and I dislike that she becomes pregnant. I intend (by intercourse) what the men intend by it. The Jews say that withdrawing the penis (azl) is burying the living girls on a small scale. He (the Prophet) said: The Jews told a lie. If Allah intends to create it, you cannot turn it away.

          Abu Dawud 11:2166

          Jabir (Allah be pleased with him) reported that a man came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: I have a slave-girl who is our servant and she carries water for us and I have intercourse with her, but I do not want her to conceive. He said: Practise ‘azl, if you so like, but what is decreed for her will come to her. The person stayed back (for some time) and then came and said: The girl has become pregnant, whereupon he said: I told you what was decreed for her would come to her.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3383

          Your slave-girl is your field, so water it or leave it thirsty if you want
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Damra ibn Said al-Mazini from al-Hajjaj ibn Amr ibn Ghaziya that he was sitting with Zayd ibn Thabit when Ibn Fahd came to him. He was from the Yemen. He said, “Abu Said! I have slave-girls. None of the wives in my keep are more pleasing to me than them, and not all of them please me so much that I want a child by them, shall I then practise coitus interruptus?” Zayd ibn Thabit said, “Give an opinion, Hajjaj!” “I said, ‘May Allah forgive you! We sit with you in order to learn from you!’ He said, ‘Give an opinion! ‘I said, ‘She is your field, if you wish, water it, and if you wish, leave it thirsty. I heard that from Zayd.’ Zayd said, ‘He has spoken the truth.’ ”

          Al-Muwatta 29 32.99b

          “You don’t need your slave-girl’s permission to practice ‘azl with her.”
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Humayd ibn Qays al-Makki that a man called Dhafif said that Ibn Abbas was asked about coitus interruptus. He called a slave-girl of his and said, “Tell them.” She was embarrassed. He said, “It is alright, and I do it myself.” Malik said, “A man does not practise coitus interruptus with a free woman unless she gives her permission. There is no harm in practising coitus interruptus with a slave-girl without her permission. Someone who has someone else’s slave-girl as a wife, does not practise coitus interruptus with her unless her people give him permission.”

          Al-Muwatta 29 32.100b

          Additional Hadith about ‘azl

          Sahih Muslim

          Sa’d b. Abu Waqqas (Allah be pleased with him) reported that a person came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: I do ‘azi with my wife. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Why do you do that? The person said: I fear harm to her child or her children. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (way peace be upon him) said: If that were harmful it would harm the Persians and the Greeks.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3394

          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl with them. We then asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) about it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born until the Day of judgment must be born.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3373

          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) (was asked if he had heard it himself), to which he said: Yes. (I heard) Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: There is no harm if you do not practise it, for it (the birth of the child) is something ordained (by Allah).

          Sahih Muslim 8:3374, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3375

          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) was asked about ‘azl, whereupon he said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for it (the birth of the child) is something ordained. Muhammad (one of the narrators) said: (The words) La ‘alaykum (there is no harm) implies its Prohibition.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3376

          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that mention was made of ‘azl in the presence of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) whereupon he said: Why do you practise it? They said: There is a man whose wife has to suckle the child, and if that person has a sexual intercourse with her (she may conceive) which he does not like, and there is another person who has a slave-girl and he has a sexual intercourse with her, but he does not like her to have conception so that she may not become Umm Walad, whereupon he (the Holy Prophet) said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for that (the birth of the child) is something pre- ordained. Ibn ‘Aun said: I made a mention of this hadith to Hasan, and he said: By Allah, (it seems) as if there is upbraiding in it (for ‘azl).

          Sahih Muslim 8:3377, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3378 and Sahih Muslim 8:3379

          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: Mention was made about al-’azl in the presence of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), whereupon he said: Why any one of you practises it? (He did not say: One of you should not do it), for there is no created soul, whose creator is not Allah.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3380

          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) was asked about ‘azl, whereupon he said: The child does not come from all the liquid (sermen) and when Allah intends to create anything nothing can prevent it (from coming into existence).

          Sahih Muslim 8:3381, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3382

          Jabir b. ‘Abdullah (Allah be pleased with them) reported that a person asked Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) saying: I have a slave-girl and I practise ‘azl with her, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: This cannot prevent that which Allah has decreed. The person then came (after some time) and said: Messenger of Allah, the slave-girl about whom I talked to you has conceived, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: I am the servant of Allah and His Messenger.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3384

          Al-Muwatta

          Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’n-Nadr, the mawla of Umar ibn Ubaydullah from Amir ibn Sad ibn Abi Waqqas from his father that he used to practise coitus interruptus.

          Al-Muwatta 29 32.96b

          Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’n-Nadr, the mawla of Umar ibn Ubaydullah from Ibn Aflah, the mawla of Abu Ayyub al-Ansari from an umm walad of Abu Ayyubal-Ansari that he practised coitus interruptus.

          Al-Muwatta 29 32.97b
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar did not practise coitus interruptus and thought that it was disapproved.

          Al-Muwatta 29 32.98b

          Yahya said that Malik related from Ibn Shihab from Salim ibn Abdullah ibn Umar from his father that Umar ibn al-Khattab said, “What’s the matter with men who have intercourse with their slave-girls and then dismiss them? No slave-girl comes to me whose master confesses that he has had intercourse with her but that I connect her child to him, whether or not he has practised coitus interruptus or stopped having intercourse with her.”

          Al-Muwatta 36 23.24b

          Malik related to me from Nafi that Safiyya bint Abi Ubayd informed him that Umar ibn al-Khattab said, “What is the matter with men who have intercourse with their slave-girls and then leave them to go? No slave-girl comes to me whose master confesses that he has had intercourse with her but that I connect her child to him, whether or not he has practised coitus interruptus or left off from intercourse with her.” Yahya said that he heard Malik say, “What is done in our community about an umm walad who commits a crime is that her master is liable for what she has done up to her value. He does not have to surrender her, and he cannot be made to bear more than her value for her crime.”

          Al-Muwatta 36 23.25b

      • Lucky bin Homo, …homo sexuality is a taboo, a proscription in Islam as well as in the Asian and African communities. When Obama came to Africa to spread his homo message, he was snubbed and NOT welcomed by the people of Africa. Did you read that, Robert Spencer Lucky bin Homo?

        Hours after arriving on African soil, US President Barack Obama’s backing of equal gay rights came face to face with the reality of a continent that largely criminalises same-sex relationships.

        The delicate subject cropped up yesterday in Senegal on Obama’s first stop of a three-country tour where he told Africans that gays deserve equality under the law.

        “I want the African people to just hear what I believe,” said Obama, speaking in one of Africa’s 38 states that outlaw homosexuality.

        “My basic view is that regardless of race, regardless of religion, regardless of gender, regardless of sexual orientation, when it comes to how the law treats you… people should be treated equally.”

        His Senegalese counterpart Macky Sall responded that though Senegal was “very tolerant”, it was “not ready yet to decriminalise homosexuality”.

        Obama’s visit comes amid fresh warnings on discrimination faced by gays in Africa.

        Amnesty International warned this week homophobia in sub-Saharan Africa had reached “dangerous levels” with more countries passing laws criminalising same-sex relations.

        It said in the last five years, South Sudan and Burundi have introduced new laws criminalising same-sex relations, while Uganda, Liberia and Nigeria are pushing bills that would toughen existing penalties.

        Even in South Africa, the only country that allows same-sex marriage, black lesbians are targeted for “corrective rape” by men trying to “cure” their homosexuality.

        Other cases include two men in Zambia on trial for sodomy which carries a potential 14-year sentence, and the arrest of an activist for lobbying for gay rights on live television.

        “In some African countries political leaders target sexual orientation issues to distract attention from their overall human rights record,” Amnesty said.

        “Religious leaders too, sometimes influenced by US-based churches, have contributed to the climate of fear and loathing,” it added.

        Emira Woods, of the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, said America’s right wing churches were part of the problem in the targeting of sexual minorities in Africa.

        These had “financed and really sustained the voices of a very draconian view of the world and harsh and harmful discrimination of sexual minorities,” she said.

        “So I think the US, particularly in those instances, had a greater burden to shift the balance away from the right wing evangelical toward a much more human policy and practice.”

        Obama’s backing of equal gay rights is also seen as aimed at voters who have been disappointed in other areas.
        http://www.citypress.co.za/politics/obama-brings-gay-rights-cause-to-africa/

        Did you get that Lucky bin Homo???

        • YO, GOATBOY!

          BARACK HUSSAIN OBAMA IS A MUSLIM.

          GAY RIGHTS “KENYAN” ACTIVIST & US PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSAIN OBUMA, STICK IT UP YOUR BUM YEAH, IS A MUSLIM.

          [US President Barack Obama’s backing of equal gay rights came face to face with the reality of a continent that largely criminalises same-sex relationships.]

          Obamas Father WAS Muslim and buried as One

          | Posted October 8, 2008 | Washington

          Obama Jr’s African Roots Obama Jr. says his quest for the presidency was “inspired” by his “love of the country Africa that allowed his father to triumph against astonishing odds.”

          Obama Jr’s father was born a member of the Luo tribe in Nyangoma-Kogelo, Siaya District, Kenya. Senior’s Luo father (Obama Jr’s grandfather), Hussein Onyango Obama, was a prominent and wealthy farmer who converted from Christianity to Islam.

          In Obama Jr’s book, Dreams From My Father, his step-grandmother Sarah Obama traces his male ancestral line in Africa back 12 generations. Obama Jr. has at least one great and revered Luo leader on the African side of his ancestry. One of Obama Jr’s great grandfathers (several generations back), “Owiny” was said to be a powerful leader of the Luo tribe, which moved into Kenya some 400 years ago from the Arabian Region.

          http://www.usvetdsp.com/jan08/gifs/obama_sara… !

          Sarah Obama, a devout Muslim, was quoted telling Obama Jr. “What your grandfather respected was strength. Discipline. This is also why he rejected the Christian religion, I think. For a brief time he converted to Christianity, and even changed his name to Johnson. But he could not understand such ideas as mercy towards your enemies, or that this man Jesus could wash away a man’s sins. To your grandfather, this was a foolish sentiment, something to comfort women.

          And so he converted to Islam-he thought its practices conformed more closely to his beliefs.” Obama Jr’s grandfather, for whom he was given the middle name, Hussein, was “fiercely devoted to Islam.” He had at least 3 wives: Helima, who had no children, Akuma who gave birth to Sarah Obama, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. and Auma Obama.

          The third wife was Sarah, who Obama Jr. refers to as his “grandmother.” Sarah became the primary care giver for Senior after his mother, Akuma, left the family when her children were still young. At 18, Obama Jr’s father, Barack Obama Sr.(Senior), married a girl called Kezia from a local village.

          Four years later (1957) Obama Sr., because of his father’s wealth and influence, was awarded an American sponsored scholarship in economics to the University of Hawaii. The presumption was that Obama Sr. would return to Africa and use his “Western-honed skills in a new Kenya.” At the age of 23, Obama Sr. left behind his pregnant wife Kezia and their children to become the first African student enrolled at the University of Hawaii.

          Obama Sr’s other wives While still married to Kezia, Obama Sr. married fellow University of Hawaii student Anna Dunham, an 18 year old white anthropology major. Anna gave birth to a son on August 4th, 1961. in Honolulu. Obama Sr., a Muslim, chose the Muslim Koranic name, Barack Hussein Obama, for his son. The middle name “Hussein” to honor Muslim grandfather Hussein Onyango Obama. Two years later, Obama Sr. abandoned Anna and Obama Jr. for a scholarship to pursue a PhD program in economics at Harvard University.

          In June 1964, Obama Sr. returned to Kenya to work for the Jomo Kenyatta administration. Soon after, he married another white woman, his third wife, an American-born teacher called Ruth, who he met at Harvard. She followed him back home to Africa and conceived 2 children by him.

          He fathered 2 more children by his FIRST wife Kezia. Anna divorced Obama Sr. when Obama Jr. was 6 to marry Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian Muslim. Soetoro moved his new family to Indonesia, the worlds most populous Muslim country. Obama’s half-sister, Maya Soetoro was born in Indonesia.

          Obama Senior died in 1982, the result of an alcohol-related car accident (his second) in Kenya. He left behind three wives, one mistress, six sons and a daughter — also a possible eighth child by a mistress. Although Obama Jr. claims Senior was an atheist, Senior was buried as a Muslim.

          GOATBOY,

          OBAMA SENIOR WAS DRUNK BEFORE HE DIED?

          WHERE IS HE NOW?

          HE ALSO HAD A MISTRESS OR A SEX SLAVE!

          BUT THEN AGAIN HE WAS A KENYAN MUSLIM!

          WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM SUCH PEOPLE?

          • Lucky the Western Monkey,

            ..do you know that all the Blacks in the world have their roots in Africa? Now, you can see that even Muhamed Ali, the former Christian- Cacius Clay and George Forman are Africans too! The Africans, despite of stealing their resources by the Western world, despite of buying them as slaves for cheap labour in Jamaica and the Western world, despite of controlling them through the IMF and World Bank…they have still come up to tremendous heights in every field of leadership….until even the USA president is an African.

            Imagine what will happen to the whites in another 50 years…as people can forgive but CANNOT forget. Today, Blacks teach you sports and lead you in most of the fields in spite of them being a complete minority! The Africans of the the Black race are very good people NO different from any other race!

            Africans are NOT “goat boys” and that is a very biased, racialist remark…completely unforgivable!

          • YO GOATBOY,

            THE HINDUS WILL LOVE THIS ONE, BECAUSE THEY WILL SEE HOW IGNORANT “GOATBOY” REALLY IS:

            MUHAMMAD’S ALI’S IRISH ANCESTRY
            by Dick Eastman

            Despite America’s melting pot of nationalities, I don’t often hear of Irish ancestry when reading about Black American genealogy. However, history teaches us that many American Blacks have white, Indian, or other ancestry. Muhammad Ali’s ancestry includes Irish immigrants and freed blacks.

            An 1855 land survey of Ennis, a town in county Clare, Ireland, contains a reference to John Grady, who was renting a house in Turnpike Road in the center of the town. His rent payment was fifteen shillings a month. A few years later, his son Abe Grady immigrated to the United States.

            Also, around the year 1855, a man and a woman who were both freed slaves, originally from Liberia, purchased land in or around Duck Lick Creek, Logan, Kentucky. The two married, raised a family, and farmed the land. These free blacks went by the name, Morehead, the name of white slave owners of the area.

            Odessa Grady Clay, Cassius Clay’s mother, was the great-granddaughter of the freed slave Tom Morehead and of John Grady of Ennis, whose son Abe had emigrated from Ireland to the United States. She named her son Cassius in honor of a famous Kentucky abolitionist of that time. When he changed his name to Muhammad Ali in 1964, the famous boxer remarked,

            “Why should I keep my white slave-master’s name visible and my black ancestors invisible, unknown, unhonored?”

            You can read more about Muhammad Ali’s (Cassius Clay’s) ancestry at
            http://www.genealogy.com/famousfolks/muhammada/index.html and at

            http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/10/25/specials/ali-heritage.html.

            IRELAND’S GREATEST LEGEND?

            I’ve always thought there was something Irish about Muhammad Ali. Perhaps it was the way he talked ¬that verbal exuberance and earthy wit, combined with rootsy toughness. Now in a global exclusive with massive implications for Irish sporting history, the Irish Post has found proof that the boxing legend is indeed an Irishman!
            “Staff at the Clare Heritage Center at Corofin have discovered that the three-times world boxing champion’s great grandfather was Abe Grady – who was born in the town of Ennis in the 1840s,” the paper reveals.
            “According to genealogist Antoinette O’Brien the legendary boxer’s great grandfather hailed from the Turnpike area of Ennis and emigrated to America in the 1860s from Cappa Harbour, near Kihrush in west Clare. Some time after arriving in the U.S., Mr. Grady married and African-American woman. Their son also married an African-American and one of the couple’s children was Ali’s mother Odessa Lee Grady.
            I understand that staff at Clare Heritage Center is now carefully scrutinizing the family trees of Jesse Owens, Olga Korbut and Mark Spitz. (The Catholic Herald, England, 2-22-02)

            Ancestry of Muhammad Ali

            Muhammad Ali began boxing at the age of 12 after his bicycle was stolen and the police officer he reported the theft to invited him to start training. He has thrown punches opposite many of the 20th century’s other boxing icons including Joe Frazier, Sonny Liston and George Foreman. Today he lives in Michigan with his wife Lonnie. Born
            Cassius Clay, Muhammad Ali is perhaps best known for his glib tongue and the controversy that surrounded him when he converted to the Muslim faith and changed his name to Muhammad Ali.

            1. Muhammad1 Ali (Cassius Marcellus2 Clay, Herman H.3, John4), son of Cassius Marcellus Clay and Odessa Grady, was born in Louisville, Jefferson, Kentucky 17 Jan 1942.

            2. Cassius Marcellus2 Clay (Herman H.3, John4) was born in Jefferson Co., Kentucky 11 Nov 1912. Cassius died 8 Feb 1990 in Jefferson Co., Kentucky, at 77 years of age.

            He married Odessa Grady. Odessa was born in Hopkins County, Kentucky 12 Feb 1917.(1) Odessa is the daughter of John L. Grady and Birdie Morehead.

            Clare: Ennis link for world champion

            The Clare Heritage Centre in Corofin has hit the headlines after staff there discovered Irish roots for former world boxing champion Muhammad Ali. The research, which was carried out for television station TG4 for a forthcoming television programme, uncovered the information that the boxer’s great-grandfather came from the Turnpike area of Ennis and emigrated to the US in the 1860s, leaving from Cappa Harbour near Kilrush. No one in Ennis had been aware of the illustrious connection and now the chairman of the council, Michael Corley, has said they are considering inviting Muhammed Ali to visit
            Ennis.

            Clare champion

            So Muhammad Ali’s great grandfather was from Ennis in Clare, which might explain the county’s hurlers’ fondness for pugilism.

            Genaeologists at the Corofin Heritage Centre have ”just discovered” what many people have already known for years (the ‘Information Age’ obviously hasn’t spread too quickly to that part of the Banner), namely, that the three-times world boxing champion’s ”great gran-paw” was Abe Grady, who was born in Turnpike, Ennis, in the famine era and
            emigrated to America in the post-Civil War 1860s from Cappa Harbour, near Kilrush.

            He settled in Kentucky, marrying an African-American emancipated slave. A son from this marriage became the father of Odessa Grady, Ali’s mother, who married Cassius Marcellus Clay Snr in the 1930s. They settled in Louisville, Kentucky, before their son Cassius Clay Jr was born in 1942.

            I’ve an old photo at home, taken when Ali visited Croke Park in July 1972 to fight Al ”Blue” Lewis – the boxing legend’s one and only visit to his ancestral homeland. It shows Eddie Keher looking on as The Greatest ”tries his hand” at controlling a sliotar on a hurley. However, like the eejit I was (am) as a youngster, I decided to draw a pair of glasses on Keher with a biro. The caption told how the fight was ”in aid of handicapped children” (of course it’s politically incorrect to use the ‘h’ word nowadays) and that ”the GAA provided Croke Park free of charge and handled all the stewarding arrangements.” I doubt Liam Mulvihill & co. would afford Messrs. Tyson and Lewis the same hospitality.

            MUHAMMAD ALI’S JEWISH GRANDSON

            ‘Greatest Fighter of All Time,’ who famously converted to Islam in 1964, attends bar mitzva of his daughter’s boy, Jacob
            By Asher Zeiger June 6, 2012, 7:58 pm 6

            It is unlikely that even Billy Crystal could have guessed how closely life would prove to imitate the art of his comedy.

            On July 11, 1977, Crystal appeared on “The Tonight Show” and performed a dead-on impersonation of then-world heavyweight boxing champion Muhammad Ali, a role that he re-introduced on his 1985 comedy album “Mahvelous.”

            In each of these skits, Billy Crystal/Ali claimed to have found “new religious beliefs.” On the album “Mahvelous,” he told interviewer Howard Cosell (also played by Crystal): “From now on, I want to be known as Izzy Itzkowitz.” This of course, was playing on the fact that Ali, whose original name was Cassius Clay and who was raised as a Baptist, revealed in 1964 that he was a member of the Nation of Islam, changing his moniker to the now-household name Muhammad Ali. In 1975 he converted again, this time to the more mainstream Sunni Islam.

            Throughout his career and since his retirement from the ring, Ali has been known as a social activist, espousing the message of peace, love and understanding, an ironic message for a man widely revered as the world’s greatest boxer. Now it would appear as though his own progeny has taken that message to heart.

            The boxing website thesweetscience.com reported on Wednesday that Ali attended Shabbat services at Congregation Rodeph Shalom in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in April, to celebrate the bar mitzva of his grandson, Jacob Wertheimer.

            The former champion’s biographer Thomas Hauser wrote on the website that Ali’s daughter, Khaliah Ali-Wertheimer, was raised as a Muslim, but described herself to Hauser as “not into organized religion” and “more spiritual than religious.” Her husband, attorney Spencer Wertheimer, is Jewish and their son, according to Khaliah, chose to have a bar mitzva because he “felt a kinship with Judaism and Jewish culture,” the Inquirer reported.

            According to Islam, a child’s religion is passed down from the father, while according to traditional Judaism it is passed down through the mother. This means that Islam, the religion of Jacob’s mother, considers him to be Jewish, and his father’s Jewish religion considers him to be a Muslim.

            Read more: Muhammad Ali’s Jewish grandson | The Times of Israel http://www.timesofisrael.com/bar-mitzva-of-the-greatests-grandson/#ixzz2uXRhpKoa

            Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook

            AFRICAN SLAVES IN THE ARAB WORLD

            Over 28 Million Africans have been enslaved in the Muslim world during the past 14 centuries While much has been written concerning the Transatlantic slave trade, surprisingly little attention has been given to the Islamic slave trade across the Sahara, the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean.
            While the European involvement in the Transatlantic slave trade to the Americas lasted for just over three centuries, the Arab involvement in the slave trade has lasted fourteen centuries, and in some parts of the Muslim world is still continuing to this day. A comparison of the Muslim slave trade to the American slave trade reveals some interesting contrasts.

            While two out of every three slaves shipped across the Atlantic were men, the proportions were reversed in the Muslim slave trade.

            Two women for every man were enslaved by the Muslims.

            While the mortality rate for slaves being transported across the Atlantic was as high as 10%, the percentage of slaves dying in transit in the Transsahara and East African slave trade was between 80 and 90%!
            While almost all the slaves shipped across the Atlantic were for agricultural work, most of the slaves destined for the Muslim Middle East were for sexual exploitation as concubines, in harems, and for military service.

            While many children were born to slaves in the Americas, and millions of their descendants are citizens in Brazil and the USA to this day, very few descendants of the slaves that ended up in the Middle East survive.

            MUSLIM ARABS CASTERATED MOST BLACK MALE SLAVES
            WHY DID ARAB MUSLIMS CASTERATE MALE BLACK SLAVES & USE BLACK WOMEN AS BROOD MARES?

            Greek philosopher Aristotle (384 – 322 BC) made major contributions to biological and reproductive theory that would hold sway until the Renaissance period. For instance, his notion that conception originates solely from male seed, implanted into an otherwise dormant female body dominated reproductive discourse for centuries after his death.

            More than 2,000 years after Aristotle asserted that men were the real reproductive powerhouses, Dr. Martin Berry finally figured out that it takes two to make a thing go right. At last disproving the ancient Greek philosopher, Berry established that human conception occurs when sperm fertilizes an egg.
            While most slaves who went to the Americas could marry and have families, most of the male slaves destined for the Middle East were castrated, and most of the children born to the women were killed at birth.
            It is estimated that possibly as many as 11 million Africans were transported across the Atlantic (95% of which went to South and Central America, mainly to Portuguese, Spanish and French possessions. Only 5% of the slaves went to the United States).

            A comparison of the Muslim slave trade to the American slave trade reveals some interesting contrasts. While two out of every three slaves shipped across the Atlantic were men, the proportions were reversed in the Muslim slave trade. Two women for every man were enslaved by the Muslims.

            While the mortality rate for slaves being transported across the Atlantic was as high as 10%, the percentage of slaves dying in transit in the Transsahara and East African slave trade was between 80 and 90%!

            While almost all the slaves shipped across the Atlantic were for agricultural work, most of the slaves destined for the Muslim Middle East were for sexual exploitation as concubines, in harems, and for military service.

            While many children were born to slaves in the Americas, and millions of their descendants are citizens in Brazil and the USA to this day, very few descendants of the slaves that ended up in the Middle East survive.
            While most slaves who went to the Americas could marry and have families, most of the male slaves destined for the Middle East were castrated, and most of the children born to the women were killed at birth. It is estimated that possibly as many as 11 million Africans were transported across the Atlantic (95% of which went to South and Central America, mainly to Portuguese, Spanish and French possessions. Only 5% of the slaves went to the United States).

            While Christian Reformers spearheaded the antislavery abolitionist movements in Europe and North America, and Great Britain mobilized her Navy, throughout most of the 19th Century, to intercept slave ships and set the captives free, there was no comparable opposition to slavery within the Muslim world.
            Even after Britain outlawed the slave trade in 1807 and Europe abolished the slave trade in 1815, Muslim slave traders enslaved a further 2 million Africans. This despite vigorous British Naval activity and military intervention to limit the Muslim slave trade.

            By some calculations the number of victims of the 14 centuries of Muslim slave trade could exceed 180 million. Nearly 100 years after President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in America, and 130 years after all slaves within the British Empire were set free by parliamentary decree, Saudi Arabia and Yemen, in 1962, and Mauritania in 1980, begrudgingly removed legalized slavery from their statute books.

            And this only after international pressure was brought to bear. Today numerous international organizations document that slavery still continues in some Muslim countries.

            Reports on slavery in Sudan, Mauritania for instance needs looking into. Recently, a former slave from the Nuba Mountains of Sudan, Mende Nazer, had her autobiography: “Slave: My True Story” published. Mende Nazer was an alleged slave in Sudan. She was made famous by her transfer to England to serve a diplomatic family.

            Mende Nazer reports that she was abducted and sold into slavery in Sudan when she was a child of twelve or thirteen (she doesn’t know when she was born). She lived in a village of the Karko Nuba in the Nuba mountains of Sudan with her family. The village was attacked one night. Mende fled with her family into the mountains.

            She became separated from her family, and when a man caught her and told her he would protect her, she believed him. She had already seen people killed in front of her. The man told her to stay with a group of children.

            Later, the raiders came and took all of the children to the town of Dilling, there the children were taken by families to serve as servants.

            Mende also reports that she was taken by a woman from Khartoum whom she served for six or seven years. She had to do all the hard work of the household, and sleep on the floor of the garden shed.
            She was never paid anything for her labor, and was frequently beaten. She wanted to leave, but had no money and nowhere to go, and was afraid to go to the police. The woman of the house said that she owned Mende, and called Mende her ‘Abda’, or slave.

            Eventually Mende was sent to London to work as a domestic. After several months Mende escaped and claimed asylum. At first, the Home Office rejected her claim in October 2002. In November, the Home Office overturned its decision and granted Mende asylum.
            http://www.africanecho.co.uk

            THE RACISM & SLAVERY OF ISLAM

            Racism is one of the greatest criminal acts practiced by man against man. And Islam is the most racist, bigoted, discriminatory ideology ever created by man.

            Racism is the belief that inherent different traits in human racial groups justify discrimination. It is applied especially to the practice or advocacy of racial discrimination of a pernicious nature (i.e. which harms particular groups of people). Modern usage often equates “racism” and “racial discrimination” and defines the latter term only as applying to pernicious practices.

            Racism is popularly associated with various activities that are illegal or commonly considered harmful, such as extremism, hatred, xenophobia, (malignant or forced) exploitation, separatism, racial supremacy, mass murder (for the purpose of genocide), genocide denial, vigilantism (hate crimes, terrorism), etc.

            WHY ISLAM IS THE MOST RACIST IDEOLOGY EVER CONCEIVED BY MAN?

            As you will read, Arabs believe they are a superior race and have the right to rape, torture, kill because the Quran being in Arabic non-Arabic people are inferior and are to be treated like slaves. This is sanctified by God in the Quran.

            RACISM AND SLAVERY ARE DIVINE ETERNAL INSTITUTIONS OF GOD

            All human beings, irrespective of race or color, are created equal in terms of rights and dignity. Assuming that one human being is lesser than another and worth being a slave or property of another person is abhorrent to civilized conscience. Slavery is one of the vilest institutions ever created by man. Slavery is a form of vile racism.

            In Islam, God is a slaver, who sanctions enslaving other people by Muslims in the Quran. Prophet Muhammad was a slaver, who took 20% from the profits derived from the sale of slaves. He also owned 40 slaves. He beat and raped his slaves. He hated the Blacks and compared them to Satan. Some 120 million Blacks were murdered by Muslims, the greatest holocaust in history. Of hunted Black slaves, some 75% of them died on the way to Islamic markets. All Black male slaves were castrated. While most black slaves sent to the Americas could marry and have families, most of the male black slaves destined for the Muslim world were castrated. Millions more died in the unhygienic operation for castrating them, and most of the black children born to the women were killed at birth.

            It was noted that black slaves were castrated “based on the assumption that the blacks had an ungovernable sexual appetite.

            Below are some of the commands of Islamic God, sanctioning slavery:
            Sura 2 (The Cow), Verse 178:
            “O you who believe! retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the slain, the free for the free, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female, but if any remission is made to any one by his (aggrieved) brother, then prosecution (for the bloodwit) should be made according to usage, and payment should be made to him in a good manner; this is an alleviation from your Lord and a mercy; so whoever exceeds the limit after this he shall have a painful chastisement.”
            Slavery is mentioned in this verse as part of Islam’s criminal law clearly indicating that slavery is an eternal divine institution in Islam, a part and parcel of Islamic societies.
            Sura 24 (The Light), Verse 31:
            “And say to the believing women that they cast down their looks and guard their private parts and do not display their ornaments except what appears thereof, and let them wear their head-coverings over their bosoms, and not display their ornaments except to their husbands or their fathers, or the fathers of their husbands, or their sons, or the sons of their husbands, or their brothers, or their brothers’ sons, or their sisters’ sons, or their women, or those whom their right hands possess, or the male servants not having need (of women), or the children who have not attained knowledge of what is hidden of women; and let them not strike their feet so that what they hide of their ornaments may be known; and turn to Allah all of you, O believers! so that you may be successful.”
            This is the famous Sura enjoining the veiling of women. Those before whom the Muslim women need not veil themselves are “those whom their right hands possess”, which means “slaves”. Again God mentions slavery in this verse as a part and parcel of Muslim households. Therefore, slaves are an inseparable part of Muslim societies.
            Sura 23 (The Believers), Verses 1-6:
            “Successful indeed are the believers, Who are humble in their prayers, And who keep aloof from what is vain, And who are givers of poor-rate, And who guard their private parts, Except before their mates or those whom their right hands possess, for they surely are not blameable.”
            This verses not only sanctions the practice of slavery, but also gives the slave owner unfettered right to use female slaves sexual pleasures.
            Sura 24 (The Light), Verse 32:
            “And marry those among you who are single and those who are fit among your male slaves and your female slaves; if they are needy, Allah will make them free from want out of His grace; and Allah is Ample-giving, Knowing.”

            This is said to sanction marriages of slaves with slaves and slaves with free persons (including the owner). Owners did not usually marry slaves as they could use them for sexual purposes at will. This dispensation has been used to make slaves marry other slaves. In Islam a child born to a slave couple also is a slave from birth, so this verse gives a great incentive to slave owners to breed slaves. This is another obnoxious aspect of Islamic slavery. Whatever be the other circumstances in which people are made into slaves to make a new-born infant a slave is one of the most cruel and callous. Ye this did not evoke a protest from the Prophet and has been extensively resorted to by Muslims.

            Sura 16 (The Bee), verse 75:
            “Allah sets forth a parable: (consider) a slave, the property of another, (who) has no power over anything, and one whom We have granted from Ourselves a goodly sustenance so he spends from it secretly and openly; are the two alike? (All) praise is due to Allah!”
            This is one of the clearest instances where the institution of slavery is justified in the Quran as a divine dispensation. It deserves close scrutiny. This “parable” contrasts two people a slave who is owned by another and is completely powerless and a freeman on whom Allah has granted “a goodly sustenance” which he can spend openly or secretly as he pleases (perhaps acquiring slaves for himself). Since Allah claims for himself the position of the granter of all benefits (or lack of them) both the freeman’s fortune and the slave’s misfortune are ultimately determined by Allah. By his rhetorical question — “Are the two alike?” — Allah was actually justifying the inequality between the slave and the freeman as a natural thing. Thus a Muslim will have no compunctions or qualms in employing and exploiting slaves (subject only to any conditions that Muhammad may have imposed) because it is what Allah has ordained and “all praise is due to Allah”.

            Sura 33 (The Clans), Verse 50:
            “O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those [slaves] whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war, and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts, and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who fled with you; and a believing woman if she gave herself to the Prophet, if the Prophet desired to marry her – specially for you, not for the (rest of) believers; We know what We have ordained for them concerning their wives and those whom their right hands possess in order that no blame may attach to you; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful”.
            As stated before – here, as elsewhere, the term “possessions of the right hand” mean slaves. It is expressly stated that Muhammad’s slaves are given to him by Allah himself to be taken out of his share of the captives in war. It also records the special dispensation given to Muhammad, not available to other Muslims, in the number of wives.

            Sura 39 (The Companions), Verses 29:
            “Allah sets forth an example: There is a slave in whom are (several) partners differing with one another, and there is another slave wholly owned by one man. Are the two alike in condition? (All) praise is due to Allah. Nay! most of them do not know.”

            The example set out here compares joint ownership of a slave by many owners and the single ownership by one person. Allah asks rhetorically whether the two cases are the same. Of course, they are not and it is clear that Muhammad prefers single ownership. In fact, this is why he established the rule that after a military campaign the captives were allocated to each of his soldiers individually not collectively, with himself keeping a fifth of the captives as his personal slaves.

            Sura 70 (The Ways of Ascent), verses 29-35:
            “And those who guard their private parts, Except in the case of their wives or those whom their right hands possess — for these surely are not to be blamed, But he who seeks to go beyond this, these it is that go beyond the limits — And those who are faithful to their trusts and their covenant And those who are upright in their testimonies, And those who keep a guard on their prayer, Those shall be in gardens, honored.”
            These verses are similar to Sura 23.93-96 and gives the right to slave owners to have sexual relation with female slaves. The only difference is that the earlier reference may leave some doubt as to whether both males and female slaves are meant. These verses clearly show that it is only female slaves that are meant.

            Quran 4:3:
            “Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice.”

            This verse is saying a Muslim man can have sex with his female slaves (obtained in war) just like with married wives (up to four). The divine institution of Islamic slavery, including the sex-slavery, is the vilest of institutions ever created in history.
            Allah, the Islamic God, thus, sanctions slavery as well as use of female slaves for pleasures of men – the vilest practice, albeit an divinely-sanctioned one, ever exercised by man. (For article titled, Islam, Slavery and Rape, go to: http://www.islamreform.net/new-page-62.htm)

            SLAVERY IN PROPHETIC TRADITIONS

            Following is just a small sample of more teachings of God’s divine institution of slavery.
            Muhammad’s position on freeing slaves
            1) In one instance, a man freed a slave that he kept as a sexual partner. When Muhammad heard what happened, he auctioned the boy and sold him for 800 dirhams to Na-eem Ebn Abdullah Al- Nahham. (Sahih Muslim, vol. 7, p. 83)
            2) According to Muhammad, the punishment for committing adultery is different with a free-woman and a slave-woman. The man must be flogged one-hundred stripes and be exiled for one year. The free woman must be stoned to death. But the slave-woman (since she has a monetary value) will not be exiled or killed, she is to be flogged one-hundred stripes. If the violation is repeated, the slave-woman is to be sold. (Sahih Al Bukhari vol. 8:821 & 822)

            Islam Looked Down on Blacks

            Islam’s sacred texts contain explicit denigrating remarks about black people.
            Muhammad referred to Blacks as “raisin heads”. (Sahih al-Bukhari 1.662, 9.256).
            In another Hadith, Muhammad is quoted as saying that Blacks are “pug-nosed slaves”. (Sahih Muslim vol. 9, p. 46-47).

            A Slave is not Entitled to Property or Money

            Ibn Hazm says in Vol. 6, Part 9,
            “The slave is not permitted to write a will when he dies, nor can he bequeath (anything) because his entire possessions belong to his master.”
            Testimony of Slaves inadmissible
            In Vol. 35, p. 409 Ibn Timiyya remarks:
            “The Shafi’i, Malik, and Abu Hanifa, who are the legists of Islam, assert that the testimony of the slave is not acceptable.”
            The “Ordinances of the Qur’an” by the Shafi’i (part II, p. 142), stipulates that,
            “The witnesses must be from among our freeman, not from our slaves, but from freeman who belong to our religion!”

            BLACK SLAVES ON MATTERS OF SEX & MARRIAGE

            1. The Slave cannot choose for himself.
            This was confirmed by all the Muslim scholars on the authority of Muhammad. In Vol. 6, Part 9, p. 467, Ibn Hazm said,
            “If a slave gets married without the permission of his master, his marriage will be invalid and he must be whipped because he has committed adultery. He must be separated from his wife. She is also regarded as an adulteress because Muhammad said, ‘Any slave who gets married without the approval of his master is a prostitute.'”
            The same text is quoted by Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (Part 5, p. 117 of “Zad al-Maad”), as well as Ibn Timiyya (Vol. 32, p. 201). Malik Ibn Anas relates (Vol. 2, Part 4) more than that. He says (pp. 199, 201, 206),
            “The slave does not get married without the approval of his master. If he is a slave to two masters, he has to obtain the approval of both men.”
            2. The male slave and the female slave are forced to get married.
            Malik Ibn Anas says explicitly,
            “The master has the right to force his male or female slave to marry without obtaining their approval” (Vol. 2, p. 155).
            “The master does not have the right to force the female slave to wed to an ugly black slave if she is beautiful and agile unless in case of utmost necessity” (refer to Ibn Hazm, Vol. 6, Part 9, p. 469).
            In matters of sex and marriage, Ibn Timiyya states:
            “The one who owns the mother also owns her children. Being the master of the mother makes him the owner of her children whether they were born to a husband or they were illegitimate children. Therefore, the master has the right to have sexual intercourse with the daughters of his maid-slave because they are his property, provided he does not sleep with the mother at the same time” (Vol. 35, p. 54).
            Price of Slaves
            “If an owned slave assaults somebody and damages his property, his crime will be tied to his neck. It will be said to his master, ‘If you wish, you can pay the fine for the damages done by your slave or deliver him to be sentenced to death.’ His master has to choose one of the two options – either the value of the slave and his price or the damage the slave has caused” (Vol. 32, p. 202, Ibn Timiyya).
            Ishaq, p. 243:
            “I heard the Apostle say: ‘Whoever wants to see Satan should look at Nabtal!’ He was a black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks…. Allah sent down concerning him: ‘To those who annoy the Prophet there is a painful doom.” [9:61] “Gabriel came to Muhammad and said, ‘If a black man comes to you his heart is more gross than a donkey’s.'”
            Ishaq, p. 144:
            “A rock was put on a slave’s chest. When Abu Bakr complained, they said, ‘You are the one who corrupted him, so save him from his plight.’ I will do so,’ said Bakr. ‘I have a black slave, tougher and stronger than Bilal, who is a heathen. I will exchange him. The transaction was carried out.”
            Tabari, II:11:
            “Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African’s color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks.”
            Tabari, II:21:
            “Ham [Africans] begat all those who are black and curly-haired, while Japheth [Turks] begat all those who are full-faced with small eyes, and Shem [Arabs] begat everyone who is handsome of face with beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham’s descendants would not grow beyond their ears, and that whenever his descendants met Shem’s, the latter would enslave them.”
            Ishaq, p. 450:
            “It is your folly to fight the Apostle, for Allah’s army is bound to disgrace you. We brought them to the pit. Hell was their meeting place. We collected them there, black slaves, men of no descent.”
            Bukhari 4.52.137:
            “The Prophet said, ‘Let the negro slave of Dinar perish. And if he is pierced with a thorn, let him not find anyone to take it out for him…. If he [the black slave] asks for anything it shall not be granted, and if he needs intercession [to get into paradise], his intercession will be denied.'”
            Slavery, raping slave girls, owning slaves, selling boys and women as trophies of war, sharing the booty (including slaves) obtained in raids and wars with Allah are all central teachings of Islam. Slavery was one of the major driving forces behind the expansion of Islam. After assuming his prophetic career, Prophet Muhammad enslaved large number of men and women, owned dozens of slaves, he sold many slaves as well as used the female captives as sex-slaves on top his dozen wives. Islam is such as vile, evil cult, which has been embraced by today’s civilized world’s 1.2 billion people as the perfect guide to life and its Prophet as perfect human being, the greatest apostle of God, a man of peace.
            Today, tens of millions of Blacks—whose forefathers were the worst victim of Muhammad’s cult—also eulogize this man, and call themselves proud Muslims. There cannot be anything more shameful than this.

      • Lucky been Homo, read this once more :

        Jesus makes a FALSE Prophecy!

        10 “For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost”.

        But Jesus was killed by fellow Jews and hung on a tree after being slain.. When Jesus could NOT SAVE himself from the wrath of Satan how could he save others??
        What did he save?

        Acts 5:30 King James Version (KJV)

        30 The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom You SLEW and HANGED on a tree!!!

        • KENYAN BUM BANDITS:

          BLACK BUM BOY OBAMA IS A MUSLIM

          Obamas Father WAS Muslim and buried as One

          Obama Jr’s African Roots Obama Jr. says his quest for the presidency was “inspired” by his “love of the country Africa that allowed his father to triumph against astonishing odds.”

          Obama Jr’s father was born a member of the Luo tribe in Nyangoma-Kogelo, Siaya District, Kenya. Senior’s Luo father (Obama Jr’s grandfather), Hussein Onyango Obama, was a prominent and wealthy farmer who converted from Christianity to Islam.

          In Obama Jr’s book, Dreams From My Father, his step-grandmother Sarah Obama traces his male ancestral line in Africa back 12 generations. Obama Jr. has at least one great and revered Luo leader on the African side of his ancestry. One of Obama Jr’s great grandfathers (several generations back), “Owiny” was said to be a powerful leader of the Luo tribe, which moved into Kenya some 400 years ago from the Arabian Region.

          http://www.usvetdsp.com/jan08/gifs/obama_sara… !

          Sarah Obama, a devout Muslim, was quoted telling Obama Jr. “What your grandfather respected was strength. Discipline. This is also why he rejected the Christian religion, I think. For a brief time he converted to Christianity, and even changed his name to Johnson. But he could not understand such ideas as mercy towards your enemies, or that this man Jesus could wash away a man’s sins. To your grandfather, this was a foolish sentiment, something to comfort women.

          And so he converted to Islam-he thought its practices conformed more closely to his beliefs.” Obama Jr’s grandfather, for whom he was given the middle name, Hussein, was “fiercely devoted to Islam.” He had at least 3 wives: Helima, who had no children, Akuma who gave birth to Sarah Obama, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. and Auma Obama.

          The third wife was Sarah, who Obama Jr. refers to as his “grandmother.” Sarah became the primary care giver for Senior after his mother, Akuma, left the family when her children were still young. At 18, Obama Jr’s father, Barack Obama Sr.(Senior), married a girl called Kezia from a local village.

          Four years later (1957) Obama Sr., because of his father’s wealth and influence, was awarded an American sponsored scholarship in economics to the University of Hawaii. The presumption was that Obama Sr. would return to Africa and use his “Western-honed skills in a new Kenya.” At the age of 23, Obama Sr. left behind his pregnant wife Kezia and their children to become the first African student enrolled at the University of Hawaii.

          Obama Sr’s other wives While still married to Kezia, Obama Sr. married fellow University of Hawaii student Anna Dunham, an 18 year old white anthropology major. Anna gave birth to a son on August 4th, 1961. in Honolulu. Obama Sr., a Muslim, chose the Muslim Koranic name, Barack Hussein Obama, for his son. The middle name “Hussein” to honor Muslim grandfather Hussein Onyango Obama. Two years later, Obama Sr. abandoned Anna and Obama Jr. for a scholarship to pursue a PhD program in economics at Harvard University.

          In June 1964, Obama Sr. returned to Kenya to work for the Jomo Kenyatta administration. Soon after, he married another white woman, his third wife, an American-born teacher called Ruth, who he met at Harvard. She followed him back home to Africa and conceived 2 children by him.

          He fathered 2 more children by his FIRST wife Kezia. Anna divorced Obama Sr. when Obama Jr. was 6 to marry Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian Muslim. Soetoro moved his new family to Indonesia, the worlds most populous Muslim country. Obama’s half-sister, Maya Soetoro was born in Indonesia.

          Obama Senior died in 1982, the result of an alcohol-related car accident (his second) in Kenya. He left behind three wives, one mistress, six sons and a daughter — also a possible eighth child by a mistress. Although Obama Jr. claims Senior was an atheist, Senior was buried as a Muslim.

          Obama Jr’s mother, Anna, died of cancer a few months after the publication of his 1995 memoir. Obama Jr’s Muslim schooling Soetoro enrolled Obama Jr. in an Indonesian Catholic school and later in one of Jakarta’s Muslim controlled public schools.

          During his time in Indonesia, Obama Jr, was known as Barry Soetoro. He attended first grade at a Catholic elementary school near his home, St. Francis of Assisi Foundation School, which accepted students of any religion. Barry’s primary school teacher said he registered as a Muslim and that he attended Koranic religious class. “At that time, Barry was also praying in a Catholic way, but Barry was Muslim.

          He was registered as a Muslim because his father was Muslim.” Barry’s first-grade teacher Israella Dharmawan told the San Francisco Times, “Barry was a Muslim. He went to the mosque,” boyhood buddy Zulfin Adi told the Times. “My whole family was Muslim, and most of the people I knew were Muslim,” half sister Maya told another reporter.

          In the third grade, Obama transferred to a public school, where he also registered as a Muslim. Students at the school attended weekly religion lessons about Islam which were taught by Muslims.

          In his autobiography, Dreams From My Father, Obama mentioned studying the Quran and describing the public school as “a Muslim school.” Obama Jr’s American Schooling At age 10 Obama’s mother sent him to live with his white grandparents in Hawaii and attend the prestigious Punahou Academy.

          After high school, Obama Jr. attended Columbia University and then to the streets of Chicago as a community organizer and the Trinity United Church of Christ of Chicago.

          Obama Jr. denies that he has ever been a Muslim, He says he is a Christian with “deep faith rooted in the Christian tradition.”

          He points to his membership in the Trinity United Church of Christ, which bears the motto “Unashamedly Black and Unapologetically Christian.”

          Trinity United’s web site declares its congregation to be “an African people” who remain true to “our native land, the mother continent, the cradle of civilization.” _

          Barack Hussein Obama IS NOT AN American._ HIS HEART BELONGS to AFRICA.

          Revealing the Truth about Barrack Hussein Obama
          Some Facts about Obama in simple words.

          1. He was born from Muslim blood. (Which in Islam makes him automatically a Muslim)

          2. He was educated in a school where as Muslim he was educated on Islam for a minimum of two hours weekly.

          3. For a better education he attended a Catholic school, which many Muslims do.

          4. He had nothing to do with Christianity until he married his wife.

          5. He joined a cult church, a non-Christian church.

          a. The church teaches separatism (black and white)
          b. They teach black theology, not Christ Theology
          c. The church honors and respects Islam and Muslims to the point they welcome Muslims to be members of the church and gave Louis Farrakhan an award for being the man who will unite the true Christian to the true Muslim to the true Jew. WHAT A CHRISTIAN CHURCH!
          d. Why would Obama leave Islam to join such a church? He joined skillfully to cover-up, knowing that a Muslim in America would have little chance to become a senator or the president.
          e. When you believe in Mohammad you deny Christ.

          6. He never denounced Islam or Mohammad or the Qur’an.

          7. There is no record that he was baptized.

          8. From his own words, we can judge him, for he made fun of Christianity, the Bible, Old Testament and New Testament, which proves he is not a Christian.

          9. When a Muslim leaves Islam to Christianity, there would be a 100% fatwa (decree for him to be killed) issued against his life.
          a. A Fatwa has never been issued on Obama. But the opposite is true, for the Muslim world is endorsing and supporting him. This includes Louis Farrakkan’s endorsement. Some may say that Obama has distanced himself for his radical minister and from Louis Farrakkan but my response is very simple, it is an act because he, his pastor , and Farrakkan, know if he does not say that. he will lose the vote of the rest of the country.
          b. He was welcomed to Kenya as a Muslim hero recently.

          c. Muslims in America support him, even financially “One dollar for one nation under God “(Allah).
          d. As a senator, he has and continues to employ members of The Nation of Islam. Cynthia K. Miller was the treasurer of His U.S. Senate campaign. Jennifer Mason is Obama’s director of Constituent Services in his U.S. Senate office and is also in charge of selecting Obama’s senate interns. – (debbieschlussel.com)

          10. His agenda for the Whitehouse clearly shows he is Muslim.
          a. Remove our army immediately from the Middle East.
          b. He sits and eats dinner with Muslim jihadist.
          c. Removing the idea of the use of nuclear weapons in any circumstance.
          d. Passing a hate crime bill that will silence anyone who speaks against Islam.

          11. His stance on the issue of gay marriage and abortion proves he is not a Christian.

          • Lucky bin Chimpanzee, if OBAMA is a person with roots in Africa then you should know that an African is Leading the WORLD, right now!

            ALL the black people in the world have their roots in Africa and that includes people like Bolt who shattered the unbreakable world record, Oparah, all the singers like Maria Carey- the greatest ever, Beyonce, Chubby Chuker, Mohammed Ali the greatest boxer of all time, Pele,…and all those great Artist like Michael Jackson and Tyson, Hollyfield who have been entertaining and giving thrills to your dumby gay asses…are Africans in their DNA origin!!

            So, don’t call Africans Goatboys and Monkeys because you ARE a Chimpanzee and we need beasts of your kind for our Animal Orphanages, in Africa!!

            These Africans have supported the Church so much that now you have the audacity of calling them Goat Boys!

          • YO GOATBOY, I KNEW YOU WERE IGNORANT, BUT I DIDN’T THINK YOU WERE THE BLACK VERSION OF HOMER SIMPSON! YOU WERE VERY TOUGH POINTING OUT THE WRONGS OF OBUMA, STICK IT UP YOUR BUM YEAH, BUT WHEN I POINTED OUT TO YOU THAT THE FAGGOT WAS KENYAN & A MOHAMMEDAN, YOU CHANGED THE SUBJECT! THIS IS AN OLD MOHAMMEDAN TRICK THAT WORKS ON GULLIBLE NON MOHAMMEDANS, BUT I KNOW YOU ARE ALL POSSESSED BY A LYING DEMON JINN. THE INCREDIBLE TEACHINGS OF MOHAMMED WOMEN Women are deficient in mind and religion. Muhammad asked some women, “Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half that of a man?” The women said, “yes,” He said, “This is because of the deficiency of the woman’s mind. ” Vol. 3:826 Muhammad to women: “I have not seen any one more deficient in intelligence and religion than you.” Vol. 2:541 The majority of people in hell are women. Muhammad said, “I was shown the Hell-fire and that the majority of its dwellers are women. ” Vol. 1:28, 301; Vol. 2:161; Vol. 7:124 Women are a bad omen. Muhammad said, ” Bad omen is in the woman, the house and the horse.” Vol. 7:30 Women are harmful to men. Muhammad said, “After me I have not left any affliction more harmful to men than women.” Vol. 7:33 Women may not wear wigs. Muhammad said, ” Don’t wear false hair for Allah sends His curse upon such ladies who lengthen their hair artificially.” Vol. 7:133 SEX AND MARRIAGE Muhammad’s sexual strength is equal to 30 men. Anas said, “The prophet used to visit all his wives in an hour round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.” I asked Anas, “Had the prophet the strength for it?” Anas replied, “We used to say that the prophet was given the strength of thirty (men). ” Vol. 1:268 Muhammad married a 6-year-old child. “Narrated Aisha that the prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old.” Vol. 7:64 Allah hurries to please Muhammad’s sexual desires. When the Quranic verse that allows Muhammad to postpone the turn of any wife was revealed, and when Muhammad said that Allah allowed him to marry his adopted son’s wife, Aisha (one of his wives) told him, “O Allah’s Apostle I do not see but that your Lord hurries in pleasing you. ” Vol. 7:48 When a woman is divorced irrevocably, she can not return to her husband until she marries (including having sexual intercourse) with another man. “Narrated Aisha: The wife of Rifaa Al-Qurazi came to Allah’s Apostle and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle, Rifaa divorced me irrevocably. After him I married Abdur-Rahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi who proved to be impotent.’ Allah’s Apostle said to her, ‘Perhaps you want to return to Rifaa? Nay (You cannot return to Rifaa) until you and Abdur-Rahman (the impotent man) engage in sexual intercourse!” Vol. 7:186 HUMAN RIGHTS Islam is to be imposed by force. Muhammad said, “I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, “None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, and whoever says, ” None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, his life and property will be saved by me.” (otherwise it will not). Vol. 4:196 Apostasy is punishable by death. Muhammad said, “Whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him.” Vol. 9:57 A Muslim must not be killed if he kills a non-Muslim. Muhammad said, ” No Muslim should be killed for killing a Kafir” (infidel). Vol. 9:50 Ethnic cleansing is practised. Muhammad said to the Jews, “You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle (Mohammed) and I want to expel you from this land (The Arabian Peninsula), so, if anyone owns property, he is permitted to sell it.” Vol. 4:392 Muhammad’s last words at his deathbed were: “Turn the pagans (non-Muslims) out of the Arabian Peninsula.” Vol. 5:716 ETERNAL SECURITY No assurance of Salvation. Muhammad said. “By Allah, though I am the apostle of Allah, yet I do not know what Allah will do to me.” Vol. 5:266 God punishes a deceased if his relatives weep. Muhammad said, “The deceased is punished because of the weeping of his relatives.” Vol. 2:375 When you speak badly about a deceased, the deceased will go to hell. Muhammad said, “You praised this, so Paradise has been affirmed to him, and you spoke badly of this, so hell has been affirmed to him. You people are Allah’s witnesses on earth.” Vol. 2:448 Urine on your clothes will bring punishment from God. Muhammad said, “The deceased person is being tortured in the grave not for a great thing to avoid, it is for being soiled with his urine. ” Vol. 2:460 Holy war (Jihad) is a guarantee of heaven. Muhammad said, “The person who participates in (Holy battles) in Allah’s cause and nothing compels him to do so except belief in Allah and His Apostle, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty (if he survives) or will be admitted to paradise (if he is killed). ” Vol. 1:35 MEDICINE Drinking camel’s urine will make you healthy. “The prophet ordered them to follow his camels, and drink their milk and urine, so they followed the camels and drank their milk and urine till their bodies became healthy.” Vol. 7:590 Fever is from the heat of hell. Muhammad said, ” Fever is from the heat of hell, so put it out (cool it) with water.” Vol. 7:619 A fly in your drink is a cure. Muhammad said, “If a housefly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease. ” Vol. 4:537 How the baby’s looks are determined. Muhammad said, “As for the child, if the man’s discharge precedes the woman’s discharge, the child attracts the similarity of the man, and if the woman’s discharge precedes the man’s, then the child attracts the similarity of the woman.” Vol. 5:275 MISCELLANEOUS If you eat garlic don’t come to the place of worship. Muhammad said, “Whosoever ate from this plant (i.e. garlic) should not enter the mosque.” Vol. 1:812 Effect of evil eye Mohammed said, “The effect of an evil eye is a fact. ” Vol. 7:636 Which shoe you should put on first. Muhammad said, “If you want to put on your shoes, put on the right shoe first, and if you want them off, take the left one first.” Vol. 7:747 Breathing in your drink is bad. Muhammad said, “Don’t breath into your drinking utensil.” Vol. 1:156 God frightens his devotees with eclipse. Muhammad said, “The sun and the moon are two signs amongst the signs of Allah and they do not eclipse because of the death of someone but Allah frightens His devotees with them. ” Vol. 2:158 Satan urinates in people’s ears, when they don’t wake up for prayer. Narrated Abdullah: the prophet was told that a person had kept on sleeping till morning and had not got up for the prayer. The prophet said, “Satan urinated in his ears.” Vol. 2:245 Yawning is from Satan. The prophet said, “Yawning is from Satan and if anyone of you yawns, he should check his yawning as much as possible, for if anyone of you (during the act of yawning) should say: “Ha”, Satan will laugh at him.” Vol. 2:158 Stars are missiles, which God uses to hit the devils. The creation of stars is for three purposes, i.e., as decoration of the sky, as missiles to hit the devils, and as signs to guide travellers. Vol. 2:158 STUPID HADITHS MOHAMMED CHOKED SATAN WITH HIS BARE HANDS Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet once offered the prayer and said, “Satan came in front of me and tried to interrupt my prayer, but Allah gave me an upper hand on him and I choked him. No doubt, I thought of tying him to one of the pillars of the mosque till you get up in the morning and see him. ….Then Allah made him (Satan) return with his head down (humiliated).” Sahih Bukhari 2:22:301 WATER MIXED WITH DEAD DOGS & MENSTRUAL CLOTHES STILL CLEAN: Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri: The people asked the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him): Can we perform ablution out of the well of Buda’ah, which is a well into which menstrual clothes, dead dogs and stinking things were thrown? He replied: Water is pure and is not defiled by anything. Abu Dawud 1:66 , See Also Abu Dawud 1:67 Fever comes from the heat of Hell The Prophet said, “Fever is from the heat of Hell, so abate fever with water.” Sahih Bukhari 7:71:621, See Also Sahih Bukhari 7:71:619, Sahih Bukhari 7:71:620, Sahih Bukhari 7:71:622 Wicked wigs Narrated Abdullah (bin Mus’ud): Allah’s Apostle has cursed the lady who uses false hair. Sahih Bukhari 6:60:409 Divinely cooked and delivered pot of meat fixes Prophet’s performance problems in bed Waqidi said: “The prophet of Allah used to say that I was among those who have little strength for intercourse. Then Allah sent me a pot with cooked meat. After I ate from it, I found strength any time I wanted to do the work.” Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Volume 8, Page 200 Sheep owners are humble while horse and camel owners are arrogant Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The main source of disbelief is in the east. Pride and arrogance are characteristics of the owners of horses and camels, and those bedouins who are busy with their camels and pay no attention to Religion; while modesty and gentleness are the characteristics of the owners of sheep.” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:520 A drink that gives you wings Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said “If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease.” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:537 A crying tree misses the Prophet’s sermons Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah: The Prophet used to stand by a tree or a date-palm on Friday. Then an Ansari woman or man said. “O Allah’s Apostle! Shall we make a pulpit for you?” He replied, “If you wish.” So they made a pulpit for him and when it was Friday, he proceeded towards the pulpit (for delivering the sermon). The date-palm cried like a child! The Prophet descended (the pulpit) and embraced it while it continued moaning like a child being quieted. The Prophet said, “It was crying for (missing) what it used to hear of religious knowledge given near to it.” Sahih Bukhari 4:56:784 Trees as informers Narrated ‘Abdur-Rahman: “I asked Masruq, ‘Who informed the Prophet about the Jinns at the night when they heard the Qur’an?’ He said, ‘Your father ‘Abdullah informed me that a tree informed the Prophet about them.\'” Sahih Bukhari 5:58:199 A saluting stone or a delusional Prophet? Jabir b. Samura reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: I recognise the stone in Mecca which used to pay me salutations before my advent as a Prophet and I recognise that even now. Sahih Muslim 30:5654 Hellfire complains to Allah Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The (Hell) Fire complained to its Lord saying, ‘O my Lord! My different parts eat up each other.’ So, He allowed it to take two breaths, one in the winter and the other in summer, and this is the reason for the severe heat and the bitter cold you find (in weather).” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:482 Abdomen contradicts Allah Narrated Abu Said: A man came to the prophet and said, ‘My brother has got loose motions. The Prophet said, Let him drink honey.” The man again (came) and said, ‘I made him drink (honey) but that made him worse.’ The Prophet said, ‘Allah has said the Truth, and the abdomen of your brother has told a lie.” Sahih Bukhari 7:71:614 One sneeze, two sneeze, three sneeze, four Malik related to me from Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr from his father that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “If a man sneezes, invoke a blessing on him. Then if he sneezes, invoke a blessing on him. Then if he sneezes, invoke a blessing on him. Then if he sneezes, say, ‘You have a cold’.” Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr said, “I don’t know whether it was after the third or fourth.” Al-Muwatta 54 2.4 Allah likes sneezing but hates yawning Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Allah likes sneezing and dislikes yawning, so if someone sneezes and then praises Allah, then it is obligatory on every Muslim who heard him, to say: May Allah be merciful to you (Yar-hamuka-l-lah). But as regards yawning, it is from satan, so one must try one’s best to stop it, if one says ‘Ha’ when yawning, satan will laugh at him.” Sahih Bukhari 8:73:242 Allah, rain there, not here! Summary: People’s livestock were dying because of lack of water. On request, Muhammad prayed to Allah who instantly brought so much rain that that caused livestock to die due to excess of water. Then Muhammad told Allah to rain around them, not on them and the rain stopped. Narrated Sharik: Anas bin Malik said, “A person entered the Mosque on a Friday through the gate facing the Daril-Qada’ and Allah’s Apostle was standing delivering the Khutba (sermon). The man stood in front of Allah’s Apostle and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle, livestock are dying and the roads are cut off; please pray to Allah for rain.’ So Allah’s Apostle (p.b.u.h) raised both his hands and said, ‘O Allah! Bless us with rain. O Allah! Bless us with rain. O Allah! Bless us with rain!” Anas added, “By Allah, there were no clouds in the sky and there was no house or building between us and the mountain of Silas’. Then a big cloud like a shield appeared from behind it (i.e. Silas Mountain) and when it came in the middle of the sky, it spread and then rained. By Allah! We could not see the sun for a week. The next Friday, a person entered through the same gate and Allah’s Apostle was delivering the Friday Khutba and the man stood in front of him and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! The livestock are dying and the roads are cut off; Please pray to Allah to withhold rain.’ ” Anas added, “Allah’s Apostle raised both his hands and said, ‘O Allah! Round about us and not on us. O Allah!’ On the plateaus, on the mountains, on the hills, in the valleys and on the places where trees grow.’ ” Anas added, “The rain stopped and we came out, walking in the sun.” Sharik asked Anas whether it was the same person who had asked for rain the previous Friday. Anas replied that he did not know. Sahih Bukhari 2:17:127 Fight polytheists by trimming moustache Ibn Umar said: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be opon him) said: Act against the polytheists, trim closely the moustache and grow beard. Sahih Muslim 2:500, See also: Sahih Muslim 2:501 Allah loves sneezes (aacchoo!) Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Allah loves sneezing but dislikes yawning; so if anyone of you sneezes and then praises Allah, every Muslim who hears him (praising Allah) has to say Tashmit to him. But as regards yawning, it is from Satan, so if one of you yawns, he should try his best to stop it, for when anyone of you yawns, Satan laughs at him.” Sahih Bukhari 8:73:245 Pus better than poetry Abu Sa`id Khudri reported: We were going with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him). As we reached the place (known as) Arj there met (us) a poet who had been reciting poetry. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Catch the satan or detain the satan, for filling the belly of a man with pus is better than stuffing his brain with poetry. Sahih Muslim 28:5611 Spit on the left for protection against bad dreams Narrated Abu Qatada: The Prophet said, “A good dream that comes true is from Allah, and a bad dream is from Satan, so if anyone of you sees a bad dream, he should seek refuge with Allah from Satan and should spit on the left, for the bad dream will not harm him.” Sahih Bukhari 9:87:115 Death be upon you, too Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar: Allah’s Apostle said, “When the Jews greet you, they usually say, ‘As-Samu ‘alaikum (Death be on you),’ so you should say (in reply to them), ‘Wa’alaikum (And on you).” Sahih Bukhari 8:74:274 The almighty wind Narrated Anas: Whenever a strong wind blew, anxiety appeared on the face of the Prophet (fearing that wind might be a sign of Allah’s wrath). Sahih Bukhari 2:17:144 Could someone please lick my hands? Thank you Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: The Prophet said, ‘When you eat, do not wipe your hands till you have licked it, or had it licked by somebody else.” Sahih Bukhari 7:65:366 The art of dealing with a fart Narrated Ali ibn Talq: The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) said: When any of you breaks wind during the prayer, he should turn away and perform ablution and repeat the prayer. Abu Dawud 1:205 Narrated ‘Abbas bin Tamim: My uncle asked Allah’s Apostle about a person who imagined to have passed wind during the prayer. Allah’ Apostle replied: “He should not leave his prayers unless he hears sound or smells something.” Sahih Bukhari 1:4:139 Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Allah does not accept prayer of anyone of you if he does Hadath (passes wind) till he performs the ablution (anew).” Sahih Bukhari 9:86:86 Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Zam’a: The Prophet forbade laughing at a person who passes wind. Sahih Bukhari 8:73:68 And Allah taught Adam all the names as follows: He taught him the name of everything, down to fart and little fart. Tabari I 267 Allah curses tatooed women Narrated Ibn Mas’ud: Allah has cursed those women who practise tattooing or get it done for themselves, and those who remove hair from their faces, and those who create spaces between their teeth artificially to look beautiful, such ladies as change the features created by Allah. Why then shall I not curse those whom Allah’s Apostle has cursed and who are cursed in Allah’s Book too? Sahih Bukhari 7:72:826 Dye your hair because Jews and Christians don’t Narrated Abu Huraira : The Prophet said, “Jews and Christians do not dye their hair so you should do the opposite of what they do. Sahih Bukhari 7:72:786 Greeting order Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “The young should greet the old, the passer by should greet the sitting one, and the small group of persons should greet the large group of persons. ” Sahih Bukhari 8:74:250 Well hello, hello, hello Narrated Anas: Whenever Allah’s Apostle greeted somebody, he used to greet him three times, and if he spoke a sentence, he used to repeat it thrice. Sahih Bukhari 8:74:261 Poke the Peeping Tom Narrated Anas: A man peeped into one of the dwelling places of the Prophet. The Prophet got up and aimed a sharp-edged arrow head (or wooden stick) at him to poke him stealthily. Sahih Bukhari 9:83:38 Narrated Abu Huraira: Abul Qasim said, “If any person peeps at you without your permission and you poke him with a stick and injure his eye, you will not be blamed.” Sahih Bukhari 9:83:39 p7S.22 The Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said: (1) “Were a man to look at you without permission and you threw a rock at him and knocked out his eye, you would not have committed any offense. ” (2) “Whoever peeps into a house without its people’s leave, they may put out his eye.” Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri, Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller Allah prefers odd numbers Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah has ninety-nine Names, i.e., one hundred minus one, and whoever believes in their meanings and acts accordingly, will enter Paradise; and Allah is Witr (one) and loves ‘the Witr’ (i.e., odd numbers). Sahih Bukhari 8:75:419 Overweight omen Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “On the Day of Resurrection, a huge fat man will come who will not weigh, the weight of the wing of a mosquito in Allah’s Sight.” and then the Prophet added, ‘We shall not give them any weight on the Day of Resurrection’ Sahih Bukhari 6:60:253 Searching for the meaning in life… and 3 stones Narrated Abdullah: The Prophet went out to answer the call of nature and asked me to bring three stones. I found two stones and searched for the third but could not find it. So I took a dried piece of dung and brought it to him. He took the two stones and threw away the dung and said, “This is a filthy thing.” Sahih Bukhari 1:4:158, See Also Sahih Bukhari 1:4:157, Sahih Bukhari 1:4:162, Sahih Bukhari 1:4:163 Annoying in-laws, a universal phenomena Narrated ‘Uqba bin ‘Amir: Allah’s Apostle said, “Beware of entering upon the ladies.” A man from the Ansar said, “Allah’s Apostle! What about Al-Hamu the in-laws of the wife (the brothers of her husband or his nephews etc.)?” The Prophet replied: The in-laws of the wife are death itself. Sahih Bukhari 7:62:159 Genies like bones and animal dung Narrated Abu Huraira: That once he was in the, company of the Prophet carrying a water pot for his ablution and for cleaning his private parts. While he was following him carrying it (i.e. the pot), the Prophet said, “Who is this?” He said, “I am Abu Huraira.” The Prophet said, “Bring me stones in order to clean my private parts, and do not bring any bones or animal dung.” Abu Huraira went on narrating: So I brought some stones, carrying them in the corner of my robe till I put them by his side and went away. When he finished, I walked with him and asked, “What about the bone and the animal dung?” He said, “They are of the food of Jinns. The delegate of Jinns of (the city of) Nasibin came to me–and how nice those Jinns were–and asked me for the remains of the human food. I invoked Allah for them that they would never pass by a bone or animal dung but find food on them.” Sahih Bukhari 5:58:200 Incantations while having sex Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: The Prophet said, “If anyone of you, when having sexual relation with his wife, say: ‘In the name of Allah. O Allah! Protect us from Satan and prevent Satan from approaching our offspring you are going to give us,’ and if he begets a child (as a result of that relation) Satan will not harm it.” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:493 Devils on a leash Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “When the month of Ramadan comes, the gates of Paradise are opened and the gates of the (Hell) Fire are closed, and the devils are chained.” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:497 Allah’s advice to his prophets Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “Once while a prophet amongst the prophets was taking a rest underneath a tree, an ant bit him. He, therefore, ordered that his luggage be taken away from underneath that tree and then ordered that the dwelling place of the ants should be set on fire. Allah sent him a revelation:– “Wouldn’t it have been sufficient to burn a single ant?” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:536 Prostitutes can stay out of Hell by helping a thirsty dog Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “A prostitute was forgiven by Allah, because, passing by a panting dog near a well and seeing that the dog was about to die of thirst, she took off her shoe, and tying it with her head-cover she drew out some water for it. So, Allah forgave her because of that.” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:538 Bodyguard job: Females need not apply Narrated Abu Musa: Thy Prophet (p.b.u.h) said, “A time will come upon the people when a person will wander about with gold as Zakat and will not find anybody to accept it, and one man will be seen followed by forty women to be their guardian because of scarcity of men and great number of women”. Sahih Bukhari 2:24:495 Looking at genitals or talking during intercourse may cause disabilities for child Narrated by Abi Hurairah that the prophet PBUH said: If one of you got engaged in intercourse, they shouldn’t look at the genital for that inherits blindness, and not talk too much for that inherits aphonia (lack of the ability to talk). Hadith translated by FFI forum member Say “Allah willing” during intercourse to give birth to Islamic militants Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “Once Solomon, son of David said, ‘(By Allah) Tonight I will have sexual intercourse with one hundred (or ninety-nine) women each of whom will give birth to a knight who will fight in Allah’s Cause.’ On that a (i.e. if Allah wills) but he did not say, Allah willing.’ Therefore only one of those women conceived and gave birth to a half-man. By Him in Whose Hands Muhammad’s life is, if he had said, “Allah willing’, (he would have begotten sons) all of whom would have been knights striving in Allah’s Cause.” Sahih Bukhari 4:52:74i Dirty teeth can invalidate a fast Swallowing bits of food that may be left between the teeth is regarded as eating, so it invalidates the fast… Ibn Qudaamah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Mughni, 3/260: If a person has food between his teeth, one of the following two scenarios must apply: 1 — It is a small amount that he cannot spit out, so he swallows it. This does not invalidate his fast, because it cannot be avoided. It is like saliva. Ibn al-Mundhir said: The scholars are unanimously agreed on that. 2 — It is a large amount and he can spit it out. If he spits it out there is no sin on him, but if he swallows it deliberately, his fast is invalidated according to the majority of scholars, because he has swallowed food that he could have spat out willingly when he is mindful of his fast. So this breaks the fast just as if he deliberately started eating. End quote. Islam Q&A – Fatwa #78438 “This Muhammad of yours is a dwarf and fat” Narrated AbuBarzah: AbdusSalam ibn AbuHazim AbuTalut said: I saw AbuBarzah who came to visit Ubaydullah ibn Ziyad. Then a man named Muslim who was there in the company mentioned it to me. When Ubaydullah saw him, he said: This Muhammad of yours is a dwarf and fat. The old man (i.e. AbuBarzah) understood it. So he said: I did not think that I should remain among people who would make me feel ashamed of the company of Muhammad (peace be upon him). Thereupon Ubaydullah said: The company of Muhammad (peace be upon him) is a honour for you, not a disgrace. He added: I called for you to ask about the reservoir. Did you hear the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) mentioning anything about it? AbuBarzah said: Yes, not once, twice, thrice, four times or five times. If anyone believes it, may Allah not supply him with water from it. He then went away angrily. Abu Dawud 40:4731 The fact that the old man AbuBarzah ‘understood it’ implies that Ubaydullah’s description of Muhammad as a fat dwarf was accurate. Watermelons and cucumbers “If a man makes a hole in a watermelon, or a piece of dough, or a leather skin, or a statue, and has sex with it, then this is the same as what we have said about other types of masturbation [i.e., that it is halaal in the same circumstances given before, such as being on a journey]. In fact, it is easier than masturbating with one’s hand”. “If a woman does not have a husband, and her lust becomes strong, then some of our scholars say: It is permissible for the woman to take an akranbij, which is a piece of leather worked until it becomes shaped like a penis, and insert it in herself. She may also use a cucumber”. Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim (Islamic scholar), page 129 A Muslim Shia website notes: “Maybe this is another reason why ‘Umar the Khalifa never went on jihad: somebody had to stay behind and organize the cucumber distribution.” Companions of Muhammad masturbated during Jihad “If a man is torn between continued desire or releasing it, and if this man does not have a wife or he has a slave-girl but he does not marry, then if a man is overwhelmed by desire, and he fears that he will suffer because of this (someone like a prisoner, or a traveller, or a pauper), then it is permissible for him to masturbate, and Ahmad (ibn Hanbal) is explicit on this. Furthermore, it is narrated that the Companions of the Prophet (s) used to masturbate while they were on military expeditions or travelling”. Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim (Islamic scholar), page 129 Don’t flash Allah Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet had forbidden: (A) the Mulamasa and Munabadha (bargains), (B) the offering of two prayers, one after the morning compulsory prayer till the sun rises, and the others, after the ‘Asr prayer till the sun sets (C) He also forbade that one should sit wearing one garment, nothing of which covers his private parts (D) and prevent them from exposure to the sky; (E) he also forbade Ishtimal-as-Samma’. Sahih Bukhari 7:72:709 Doodling is a sin! The scholars of the Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas said: Whatever is images of animate beings such as insects and other living beings is not permissible, even if it is drawn on a blackboard or on paper, and even if the purpose of it is to help in teaching, because it is not essential and because of the general meaning of the evidence concerning that. (Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 1/685) What is prohibited is making images of animate beings, whether that is engraving or painting on walls or fabric or paper or woven cloth, and whether it is done with a feather or a pen or other equipment, whether the thing is drawn as it is or whether some imaginary element is introduced, so it is made smaller or larger or more beautiful or more ugly, or it is drawn as a stick figure. (Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 1/696) Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem (may Allah have mercy on him) said: One of the most serious of evils is making images of animate beings and keeping them and using them. There is no difference between that which is three dimensional and that which is on paper, whether it is produced by machines or otherwise. This meaning was mentioned by al-Nawawi in Sharh Saheeh Muslim, and he mentioned that it is the view of the four imams. The hadeeths which emphatically warned against that are well known. (Fataawa Rasaa’il Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem, 13/173) Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen said: Making images of animate beings, whether they are human or otherwise, is undoubtedly haraam and is a major sin, because it is proven that the one who does that is cursed by the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). This is clear, whether they are three-dimensional or drawn by hand. (Majmoo’ Fataawa wa Rasaa’il Ibn ‘Uthaymeen 2/288) Islam Q&A – Fatwa No. 129446 Animals and living things Muttaqi (God-fearing) monkeys Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun: During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them. Sahih Bukhari 5:58:188 According to `Amr b. Maymûn : I was in Yemen. Amongst the female goats of my people, I saw that at a heightened place, a male monkey brought along a female monkey and slept while keeping her hand beneath his head. During this time, a young monkey came and signaled the female monkey. She softly removed her hand from beneath the male monkey’s head and went with the young monkey. She fornicated with him and I was watching it. After that, the female monkey returned and was softly trying to put her hand back under the male monkey’s head that he woke up bewildered and smelled her and then screamed. All the monkeys gathered thereafter. He would point towards her and scream constantly (i.e. she has committed adultery). At last the other monkeys went towards the right left and brought along that young monkey whom I recognized. They dug a hole for this young monkey and the female one and stoned them to death. So I saw monkeys stoning to death too besides the human race. Taiseer-ul-Baari, volume 2, Page 626 This is consistent with the Qur’an in its claim that Jews (who at one time practiced stoning) were turned into apes: “And you know well the story of those among you who broke Sabbath. We said to them: “Be apes—despised and hated by all. Thus We made their end a warning to the people of their time and succeeding generation, and an admonition for God-fearing people.” Qur’an 2:65 Unpaid debt to turn into talking snake on Judgement Day Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “On the Day of Resurrection the Kanz (Treasure or wealth of which, Zakat has not been paid) of anyone of you will appear in the shape of a huge bald-headed poisonous male snake and its owner will run away from it, but it will follow him and say, ‘I am your Kanz.\'” The Prophet added, “By Allah, that snake will keep on following him until he stretches out his hand and let the snake swallow it.” Allah’s Apostle added, “If the owner of camels does not pay their Zakat, then, on the Day of Resurrection those camels will come to him and will strike his face with their hooves.” Sahih Bukhari 9:86:89 Monkeys and pigs are humans who once played music Narrated Abu ‘Amir or Abu Malik Al-Ash’ari: that he heard the Prophet saying, “From among my followers there will be some people who will consider illegal sexual intercourse, the wearing of silk, the drinking of alcoholic drinks and the use of musical instruments, as lawful. And there will be some people who will stay near the side of a mountain and in the evening their shepherd will come to them with their sheep and ask them for something, but they will say to him, ‘Return to us tomorrow.’ Allah will destroy them during the night and will let the mountain fall on them, and He will transform the rest of them into monkeys and pigs and they will remain so till the Day of Resurrection.” Sahih Bukhari 7:69:494 Zoophilia pardonable but not homosexuality Abu Dawud 38:4448 prescribes the death sentence for an unmarried man who commits sodomy but there is no prescribed punishment for having sex with an animal: Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal. Abu Dawud 38:4450 Sheeps prefer female babies Narrated Umm Kurz: I heard the Prophet (may peace be upon him) say: Let the birds stay in their roosts. She said: I also heard him say: Two sheep are to be sacrificed for a boy and one for a girl, but it does you no harm whether they are male or female. Abu Dawud 15:2829 Have flu? Try fresh camel urine The climate of Medina did not suit some people, so the Prophet ordered them to follow his shepherd, i.e. his camels, and drink their milk and urine (as a medicine). So they followed the shepherd that is the camels and drank their milk and urine till their bodies became healthy. Sahih Bukhari 7:71:590 YOU AIN’T NOTHING BUT A HOUND DOG! Narrated ‘Aisha: The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, “Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying people).” I said, “You have made us (i.e. women) dogs… ” Sahih Bukhari 1:9:490 Goat ate my Qur’an ‘Aisha: “The verse of the stoning and of suckling an adult ten times were revealed, and they were (written) on a paper and kept under my bed. When the messenger of Allah expired and we were preoccupied with his death, a goat entered and ate away the paper.” Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal. vol. 6, p. 269; Sunan Ibn Majah, p. 626; Ibn Qutbah, Tawil Mukhtalafi ‘l-Hadith (Cairo: Maktaba al-Kulliyat al-Azhariyya. 1966) p. 310; As-Suyuti, ad-Durru ‘l-Manthur, vol. 2, p. 13 HOLY COCKS & DEVIL DONKEYS Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “When you hear the crowing of cocks, ask for Allah’s Blessings for (their crowing indicates that) they have seen an angel. And when you hear the braying of donkeys, seek Refuge with Allah from satan for (their braying indicates) that they have seen a satan.” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:522 COWGATE Narrated Abu Huraira: Once Allah’s Apostle; offered the Morning Prayer and then faced the people and said, “While a man was driving a cow, he suddenly rode over it and beat it. The cow said, “We have not been created for this, but we have been created for sloughing.” On that the people said astonishingly, “Glorified be Allah! A cow speaks!” The Prophet said, “I believe this, and Abu Bakr and ‘Umar too, believe it, although neither of them was present there. PART 2 While a person was amongst his sheep, a wolf attacked and took one of the sheep. The man chased the wolf till he saved it from the wolf, where upon the wolf said, ‘You have saved it from me; but who will guard it on the day of the wild beasts when there will be no shepherd to guard them except me?” The people said surprisingly, “Glorified be Allah! A wolf speaks!” The Prophet said, “But I believe this, and Abu Bakr and ‘Umar too, believe this, although neither of them was present there.” Sahih Bukhari 4:56:677 More horse dung and urine equals more heavenly rewards Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “If somebody keeps a horse in Allah’s Cause motivated by his faith in Allah and his belief in His Promise, then he will be rewarded on the Day of Resurrection for what the horse has eaten or drunk and for its dung and urine.” Sahih Bukhari 4:52:105 Lost camels can be returned to their owners but not sheep Narrated Zaid bin Khalid Al-Juhani A man asked the Prophet about the picking up of a “Luqata” (fallen lost thing). The Prophet replied, “Recognize and remember its tying material and its container, and make public announcement (about it) for one year, then utilize it but give it to its owner if he comes.” Then the person asked about the lost camel. On that, the Prophet got angry and his cheeks or his Face became red and he said, “You have no concern with it as it has its water container, and its feet and it will reach water, and eat (the leaves) of trees till its owner finds it.” The man then asked about the lost sheep. The Prophet replied, “It is either for you, for your brother (another person) or for the wolf.” Sahih Bukhari 1:3:91 A house may be set on fire by a mouse This hadith has been reported on the authority of Jabir through another chain of transmitters but with a slight variation of words:” The mouse may set the house on fire over its inhabitants.” Sahih Muslim 23:4994 Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’z-Zubayr al-Makki from Jabir ibn Abdullah that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “Lock the door, tie the waterskin, turn the vessel over or cover it, and put out the lamp. Shaytan does not open a locked door or untie a tied knot, or uncover a vessel. A mouse may set fire to people’s houses about them.” Al-Muwatta 49 10.21 YOU DIRTY RAT! The Prophet said, “A group of Israelites were lost. Nobody knows what they did. But I do not see them except that they were cursed and changed into rats, for if you put the milk of a she-camel in front of a rat, it will not drink it, but if the milk of a sheep is put in front of it, it will drink it.” PART 2 I told this to Ka’b who asked me, “Did you hear it from the Prophet ?” I said, “Yes.” Ka’b asked me the same question several times; I said to Ka’b. “Do I read the Torah? (i.e. I tell you this from the Prophet.)” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:524 Race relations, the Islamic way Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, “Listen and obey (your chief) even if an Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin were made your chief.” Sahih Bukhari 1:11:662 In a dream, Satan cannot imitate the Prophet Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, “Whoever has seen me in a dream, then no doubt, he has seen me, for Satan cannot imitate my shape. Sahih Bukhari 9:87:123, See also Sahih Bukhari 9:87:124, Sahih Bukhari 9:87:125, and Sahih Bukhari 9:87:126 Don’t be late, the angels are watching Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “On every Friday the angels take heir stand at every gate of the mosques to write the names of the people chronologically (i.e. according to the time of their arrival for the Friday prayer and when the Imam sits (on the pulpit) they fold up their scrolls and get ready to listen to the sermon.” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:433 Allah wants to see you…naked Narrated Ibn Abbas: The Prophet said, “You will meet Allah barefooted, naked, walking on feet, and uncircumcised.” Sahih Bukhari 8:76:531, See also Sahih Bukhari 8:76:532, Sahih Bukhari 8:76:533, and Sahih Bukhari 8:76:533 Women are just like camels Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar: I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, “Women are just like camels, out of one hundred, one can hardly find a single camel suitable to ride.” Sahih Bukhari 8:76:505 Flag fixed behind the buttocks It is narrated on the authority of Abu Sa’id that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: On the Day of Judgment there will be a flag fixed behind the buttocks of every person guilty of the breach of faith. Sahih Muslim 19:4309 Satanic influences Satan ties three knots at back of our head while we sleep Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “During your sleep, Satan knots three knots at the back of the head of each of you, and he breathes the following words at each knot, ‘The night is, long, so keep on sleeping,’ If that person wakes up and celebrates the praises of Allah, then one knot is undone, and when he performs ablution the second knot is undone, and when he prays, all the knots are undone, and he gets up in the morning lively and gay, otherwise he gets up dull and gloomy. ” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:491 SATAN’S LULLABY Narrated ‘Abdullah : A person was mentioned before the Prophet (p.b.u.h) and he was told that he had kept on sleeping till morning and had not got up for the prayer. The Prophet said, “Satan urinated in his ears.” Sahih Bukhari 2:21:245 WHY DO ARABS HAVE BIG NOSES? Abu Huraira reported: The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) said. When any one of you awakes up from sleep and performs ablution, he must clean his nose three times, for the devil spends the night in the interior of his nose. SATAN’S LULLABY Narrated ‘Abdullah : A person was mentioned before the Prophet (p.b.u.h) and he was told that he had kept on sleeping till morning and had not got up for the prayer. The Prophet said, “Satan urinated in his ears.” Sahih Bukhari 2:21:245 Sahih Muslim 2:462 Satan tries to interrupt Muhammad Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet offered a prayer, and (after finishing) he said, “Satan came in front of me trying persistently to divert my attention from the prayer, but Allah gave me the strength to over-power him.” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:504 Satan gets unlimited hospital passes Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “When any human being is born. Satan touches him at both sides of the body with his two fingers, except Jesus, the son of Mary, whom Satan tried to touch but failed, for he touched the placenta-cover instead.” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:506 Satan & yawning Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Yawning is from Satan and if anyone of you yawns, he should check his yawning as much as possible, for if anyone of you (during the act of yawning) should say: ‘Ha’, Satan will laugh at him.” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:509 Man talks to Satan for 3 nights and Satan steals his food Narrated Abu Huraira Allah’s Apostle deputed me to keep Sadaqat (al-Fitr) of Ramadan. A comer came and started taking handfuls of the foodstuff (of the Sadaqa) (stealthily). I took hold of him and said, “By Allah, I will take you to Allah’s Apostle .” He said, “I am needy and have many dependents, and I am in great need.” I released him, and in the morning Allah’s Apostle asked me, “What did your prisoner do yesterday?” I said, “O Allah’s Apostle! The person complained of being needy and of having many dependents, so, I pitied him and let him go.” Allah’s Apostle said, “Indeed, he told you a lie and he will be coming again.” I believed that he would show up again as Allah’s Apostle had told me that he would return. So, I waited for him watchfully. When he (showed up and) started stealing handfuls of foodstuff, I caught hold of him again and said, “I will definitely take you to Allah’s Apostle. He said, “Leave me, for I am very needy and have many dependents. I promise I will not come back again.” I pitied him and let him go. In the morning Allah’s Apostle asked me, “What did your prisoner do.” I replied, “O Allah’s Apostle! He complained of his great need and of too many dependents, so I took pity on him and set him free.” Allah’s Apostle said, “Verily, he told you a lie and he will return.” I waited for him attentively for the third time, and when he (came and) started stealing handfuls of the foodstuff, I caught hold of him and said, “I will surely take you to Allah’s Apostle as it is the third time you promise not to return, yet you break your promise and come.” He said, “(Forgive me and) I will teach you some words with which Allah will benefit you.” I asked, “What are they?” He replied, “Whenever you go to bed, recite “Ayat-al-Kursi”– ‘Allahu la ilaha illa huwa-l-Haiy-ul Qaiyum’ till you finish the whole verse. (If you do so), Allah will appoint a guard for you who will stay with you and no satan will come near you till morning. ” So, I released him. In the morning, Allah’s Apostle asked, “What did your prisoner do yesterday?” I replied, “He claimed that he would teach me some words by which Allah will benefit me, so I let him go.” Allah’s Apostle asked, “What are they?” I replied, “He said to me, ‘Whenever you go to bed, recite Ayat-al-Kursi from the beginning to the end —- Allahu la ilaha illa huwa-lHaiy-ul-Qaiyum—-.’ He further said to me, ‘(If you do so), Allah will appoint a guard for you who will stay with you, and no satan will come near you till morning.’ (Abu Huraira or another sub-narrator) added that they (the companions) were very keen to do good deeds. The Prophet said, “He really spoke the truth, although he is an absolute liar. Do you know whom you were talking to, these three nights, O Abu Huraira?” Abu Huraira said, “No.” He said, “It was Satan.” Sahih Bukhari 3:38:505t FARTING SATAN Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “When the Adhan is pronounced Satan takes to his heels and passes wind with noise during his flight in order not to hear the Adhan. When the Adhan is completed he comes back and again takes to his heels when the Iqama is pronounced and after its completion he returns again till he whispers into the heart of the person (to divert his attention from his prayer) and makes him remember things which he does not recall to his mind before the prayer and that causes him to forget how much he has prayed.” Sahih Bukhari 1:11:582 SATAN THE CHILD MOLESTER Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “When any human being is born. Satan touches him at both sides of the body with his two fingers, except Jesus, the son of Mary, whom Satan tried to touch but failed, for he touched the placenta-cover instead.” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:506 Narrated Said bin Al-Musaiyab: Abu Huraira said, “I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, ‘There is none born among the off-spring of Adam, but Satan touches it. A child therefore, cries loudly at the time of birth because of the touch of Satan, except Mary and her child.” Then Abu Huraira recited: “And I seek refuge with You for her and for her offspring from the outcast Satan.” (3.36) Sahih Bukhari Book 55 No. 641 Call of nature related to offensive and wicked things Narrated Anas: Whenever the Prophet went to answer the call of nature, he used to say, “Allah-umma inni a’udhu bika minal khubuthi wal khaba’ith i.e. O Allah, I seek Refuge with You from all offensive and wicked things (evil deeds and evil spirits).” Sahih Bukhari 1:4:144 PARADISE: “appetizing vaginas” & “ever-erect” penises Abu Umama narrated: “The Messenger of God said, ‘Everyone that God admits into paradise will be married to 72 wives; two of them are houris and seventy of his inheritance of the [female] dwellers of hell. All of them will have libidinous sex organs and he will have an ever-erect penis.’ ” Sunan Ibn Maja, Zuhd (Book of Abstinence) 39 PART 2 “Each time we sleep with a Houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [i.e. Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetizing vaginas.” Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Qur’an, p. 351 Allah punishes Muhammad for Safiyah’s capture by making him fall off a camel Safiyah bint Huyay was a woman that Muhammad captured and married, after killing her husband. Narrated Anas bin Malik: We were in the company of the Prophet while returning from ‘Usfan, and Allah’s Apostle was riding his she camel keeping Safiya bint Huyay riding behind him. His she camel slipped and both of them fell down. Abu Talha jumped from his camel and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! May Allah sacrifice me for you.” The Prophet said, “Take care of the lady.” So, Abu Talha covered his face with a garment and went to Safiya and covered her with it, and then he set right the condition of their she camel so that both of them rode, and we were encircling Allah’s Apostle like a cover. When we approached Medina, the Prophet said, “We are returning with repentance and worshipping and praising our Lord.” He kept on saying this till he entered Medina. Sahih Bukhari 4:52:318 Tortured in the grave for peeing on himself Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: Once the Prophet, while passing through one of the grave-yards of Medina or Mecca heard the voices of 2 persons who were being tortured in their graves. The Prophet said, “These 2 persons are being tortured not for a major sin (to avoid).” The Prophet then added, “Yes! (they are being tortured for a major sin). Indeed, 1 of them never saved himself from being soiled with his urine while the other used to go about gossiping. PART 2 The Prophet then asked for a green leaf of a date-palm tree, broke it into two pieces and put one on each grave. On being asked why he had done so, he replied, “I hope that their torture might be lessened, till these get dried.” Sahih Bukhari 1:4:215 TURN YOUR ARSE WEST, MY BOY! Narrated Abu Aiyub Al-Ansari: Allah’s Apostle said, “If anyone of you goes to an open space for answering the call of nature he should neither face nor turn his back towards the Qibla; he should either face the east or the west Sahih Bukhari 1:4:215 BLACK DOGS ARE DEVILS Abu Dharr reported: The Messenger of ‘Allah (may peace be upon him) said: When any one of you stands for prayer and there is a thing before him equal to the back of the saddle that covers him and in case there is not before him (a thing) equal to the back of the saddle, his prayer would be cut off by (passing of an) ass, woman, and black Dog. PART 2 I said: O Abu Dharr, what feature is there in a black dog which distinguish it from the red dog and the yellow dog? He said: O, son of my brother, I asked the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) as you are asking me, and he said: The black dog is a devil. Sahih Muslim 4:1032 Playing chess is evil Buraida reported on the authority of his father that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: He who played chess is like one who dyed his hand with the flesh and blood of swine. Sahih Muslim 28:5612 SHINE YOUR LIGHT ON ME Aminah and her vagina light According to accepted sirat, Muhammad’s mother had light coming out of her vagina when giving birth to him. When the prophet came out of his mothers vagina, the light covered the east and the west which reached all the way to Sham (Syria today) sirat ibn hisham 166 Free a Muslim slave, and save your private parts Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “If somebody manumits a Muslim slave, Allah will save from the Fire every part of his body for freeing the corresponding parts of the slave’s body, even his private parts will be saved from the Fire) because of freeing the slave’s private parts.” Sahih Bukhari 8:79:706 Don’t ever raise your head The sin of raising your head before the imam is so great, your face will transform into a donkey. Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Isn’t he who raises his head before the Imam afraid that Allah may transform his head into that of a donkey or his figure (face) into that of a donkey?” Sahih Bukhari 1:11:660 He pees like a woman Narrated Amr ibn al-‘As: AbdurRahman ibn Hasanah reported: I and Amr ibn al-‘As went to the Prophet (peace be upon him). He came out with a leather shield (in his hand). He covered himself with it and urinated. Then we said: Look at him. He is urinating as a woman does. The Prophet (peace be upon him), heard this and said: Do you not know what befell a person from amongst Banu Isra’il (the children of Israel)? When urine fell on them, they would cut off the place where the urine fell; but he (that person) forbade them (to do so), and was punished in his grave. Abu Dawud 1:22 COMMITT SUICIDE Whoso is wont to think (through envy) that Allah will not give him (Muhammad) victory in the world and the Hereafter (and is enraged at the thought of his victory), let him stretch a rope up to the roof (of his dwelling), and let him hang himself. Then let him see whether his strategy dispelleth that whereat he rageth!. Qur’an 22:15 Drunk water while standing up? Puke it out! Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: None of you should drink while standing; and if anyone forgets, he must vomit. Sahih Muslim 23:5022 2 things the Prophet loves: perfume and women Al-Hasan al-Basri wrote: “The Messenger of God said, “The only two things I cherish of the life of this world are women and perfume. Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Volume 1, Page 380 Aisha said “The Prophet of God liked three things of this world: Perfume, women, and food; he had the [first] two, but missed food.” Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Volume 1, Page 380 Don’t look up! Jabir b. Samura reported: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: The people who lift their eyes towards the sky in Prayer should avoid it or they would lose their eyesight. Sahih Muslim 4:862 Abu Huraira reported: People should avoid lifting their eyes towards the sky while supplicating in prayer, otherwise their eyes would be snatched away. Sahih Muslim 4:863 15. Harm No. 14: Leads to Masturbation . . . Just as it is unlawful and forbidden to commit sexual intercourse with a strange man or woman, it is likewise forbidden to masturbate. Unfortunately, this sin has become widespread in this day and age. In some narrations of Hadith there are severe warnings against this sin. It has been mentioned that the person who masturbates shall be resurrected on the Day of Judgment with a pregnant hand. It has also been mentioned that the ناکح الید (the one who masturbates) is under the curse of Allah. Fulfilling one’s sexual desires in an unlawful manner is obviously impermissible. But one should also be cautious of excessive permissible sex. Too much sexual intercourse spoils the health and drains one’s strength. Spiritually, one does not get enjoyment in worship and Zikr. If also causes the child to be born weak and frail. It is for this very reason that the Buzurgs have advised to preserve the semen. After 15 to 30 days when there is a strong urge to have sex, only then should one fulfill one’s desire. The lion copulates once a year and from that it breeds offspring. Similarly, those people who have intercourse after long intervals of time produce strong and healthy children. Therefore, moderation is necessary in sexual relations with one’s wife, otherwise excessive sex can even lead to death. My Shaikh, Hazrat Phoulpoori (رحمۃ اللہ علیہ) narrated to us the incident of an Alim who had a very beautiful wife. Whenever he would come home from running errands and would see his wife, then he would not be able to control himself. He used have so much sexual relations that after six months, instead of discharging semen, blood started to ejaculate from his penis. This eventually led to a severe fever after which he died. Beauty was the cause of his death. This is why I advise to have moderation in permissible things as well. As for the unlawful, then my advice is not to even go near Haraam. May Allah Ta’ala grant us the ability to practice upon what has been said. Amen The 14 Harms Of Casting Evil Glances Shaikh ul Arab wal Ajam Hazrat Maulana Shah Hakeem Muhammad Akhtar Saheb Muhammad the inadvertent trend-setter has a temper tantrum Narrated Ibn. ‘Umar: Allah’s Apostle wore a gold ring or a silver ring and placed its stone towards the palm of his hand and had the name ‘Muhammad, the Apostle of Allah’ engraved on it. The people also started wearing gold rings like it, but when the Prophet saw them wearing such rings, he threw away his own ring and said. “I will never wear it,” and then wore a silver ring, whereupon the people too started wearing silver rings. Ibn Umar added: After the Prophet Abu Bakr wore the ring, and then Umar and then ‘Uthman wore it till it fell in the Aris well from ‘Uthman. bin ‘Umar : Allah’s Apostle wore a gold ring, then he threw it and said, “I will never wear it.” The people also threw their (gold) rings. Sahih Bukhari 7:72:756, See also: Sahih Muslim 24:5210, and Sahih Bukhari 7:72:755 Wanna have an affair and steal things? Go ahead! Narrated Abu Dhar: The Prophet said, “Gabriel said to me, ‘Whoever amongst your followers die without having worshipped others besides Allah, will enter Paradise (or will not enter the (Hell) Fire).” The Prophet asked. “Even if he has committed illegal sexual intercourse or theft?” He replied, “Even then.” Sahih Bukhari 4:54:445 Prophet Muhammad’s BO-scented perfume, anyone? Narrated Thumama: Anas said, “Um Sulaim used to spread a leather sheet for the Prophet and he used to take a midday nap on that leather sheet at her home.” Anas added, “When the Prophet had slept, she would take some of his sweat and hair and collect it (the sweat) in a bottle and then mix it with Suk (a kind of perfume) while he was still sleeping. “When the death of Anas bin Malik approached, he advised that some of that Suk be mixed with his Hanut (perfume for embalming the dead body), and it was mixed with his Hanut. Sahih Bukhari 8:74:298 Moses slaps the Angel of Death Narrated Abu Huraira: The angel of death was sent to Moses and when he went to him, Moses slapped him severely, spoiling one of his eyes. The angel went back to his Lord, and said, “You sent me to a slave who does not want to die.”….. Sahih Bukhari 2:23:423,
          • Lucky bin Kindergarten Ape, you spitted your cobra venom by mistake on Obama…who has been serving the 2nd term in his office as the President of USA, legal voted in office by the Christian masses in a Christian country, for the First and now for the Second term, when you said :

            “His agenda for the Whitehouse clearly shows he is Muslim.”

            Americans uphold the Christian values more than any other Continent, so……why did
            they vote for a MUSLIM leader, Kindergarten Ape????????

            I, Plum, know that a failed playgroup mentally retarded APE CANNOT fathom that!!

  4. It would be nice if you attributed this article to it’s original author, flattered as I am that you have used it.
    Jon MC

    • Respected Sir,

      Sure I do it most of the time, but rarely I forget to mention the source and author of the article, I did attached a link to the original article. Anyways thanks for writing such a brilliant article.

      Regards

      • Not only – you post up other people’s work – the above author has done it also – but then you cannot defend it either.

        You tried – you lost – you “shut-up” – yet the hocus-pocus continues!

        • Shrien Dewani to be extradited to South Africa on April 7(NDTV)

          An Indian-origin British businessman accused of plotting the murder of his Indo-Swedish wife on their honeymoon in Cape Town, will be extradited to South Africa on April 7, according to a media report today.

          Prosecutors in South Africa allege Dewani ordered the killing of his wife, who was a Swedish national.

          • BJP candidate’s walk of shame, on schoolchildren’s backs(ndtv)

            A BJP candidate in Narendra Modi’s Gujarat has been caught on camera walking on children’s backs at an event.

            http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/news/bjp-candidate-s-walk-of-shame-on-schoolchildren-s-backs/314328?relatedviaplayer

            The brain behind Modi is Rajnath, that bald tall dude! The Old Cockerel-Modi, has kuku brain! Today, this baldy Rajnath, the driver of BJP taka taka truck made a war veteran and BJP’s staunchest supporter, Mr Jaswant Singh(76), CRY! He said “even a peon is NOT like this and BJP has betrayed the people of India”, as tears flowed down his cheeks he further added that “Rajnath had a “conspiracy” against him and is the brain behind Modi”!!

            Watch Times Now.

            BJP is NO good as Rajnath has a remote control with which he controls the Old Cock-Modi!

        • I THANK JESUS FOR MUHAMMAD!

          WITHOUT MUHAMMAD I WOULD NOT KNOW THE ESSENCE OF EVIL!
          WITHOUT MUHAMMAD I WOULD NOT KNOW THE ESSENCE OF HATE!
          WITHOUT MUHAMMAD I WOULD NOT KNOW THE ESSENCE OF DEPRAVITY!
          WITHOUT MUHAMMAD I WOULD NOT KNOW THE ESSENCE OF DARKNESS!
          WITHOUT MUHAMMAD I WOULD NOT KNOW THE ESSENCE OF SENSUALITY!
          WITHOUT MUHAMMAD I WOULD NOT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A TRUE PROPHET & A FALSE ONE!
          WITHOUT MUHAMMAD I WOULD NOT KNOW THE ESSENCE OF IGNORANCE!
          WITHOUT MUHAMMAD I WOULD NOT HAVE SEEN THE FACE OF HEDONISM.
          WITHOUT MUHAMMAD I WOULD NOT HAVE SEE A DEMON IN HUMAN FORM.

          MUHAMMAD WAS THE MOON!
          JESUS IS THE SUN!
          THE MOON CAN ONLY REFLECT THE LIGHT OF THE SUN!
          THE SUN GIVES LIFE!

          JESUS IS THE TRUTH.
          HE IS THE TRUE PROPHET!
          HIS WORDS GIVE LIFE!

          MUHAMMAD WAS THE LIE!
          MUHAMMAD WAS A FALSE PROPHET!
          HIS WORDS BRING DEATH!

          JESUS IS THE WAY, THE TRUTH & THE LIFE!
          JESUS IS NOT GOD, HE IS FROM GOD!
          JESUS IS THE WAY TO THE LIFE FORCE – THE CREATOR!
          JESUS BRINGS LIFE, EVEN TO THE DEAD!

          MAY THE LIFE FORCE BE WITH YOU!

          • WHY THE VIRGIN BIRTH IN ISLAM?
            By Sami Zaatari

            We the Muslims just like the Christians believe that Mary gave birth to Jesus as a virgin, and not the result of sexual intercourse. Both us and the Christians agree that this was a mighty miracle and sign from God, however so the differences between us and the Christian arise when we discuss why the virgin birth was done, both of us have different reasons, and in this article I shall talk about why Allah choose to carry out such a great miracle.

            To begin with, here are the relevant passages from the Quran:

            QURAN:
            003.045

            YUSUFALI: Behold! the angels said: “O Mary! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honour in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah;

            003.046
            YUSUFALI: “He shall speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. And he shall be (of the company) of the righteous.”

            003.047

            YUSUFALI: She said: “O my Lord! How shall I have a son when no man hath touched me?” He said: “Even so: Allah createth what He willeth: When He hath decreed a plan, He but saith to it, ‘Be,’ and it is!

            Ibn Kathir’s tafsir writes:
            Delivering the Good News to Maryam of `Isa’s Birth
            This Ayah contains the glad tidings the angels brought to Maryam that she would give birth to a mighty son who will have a great future. Allah said,

            Remember) when the angels said: “O Maryam! Verily, Allah gives you the glad tidings of a Word from Him,) a son who will come into existence with a word from Allah, `Be’, and he was. This is the meaning of Allah’s statement (about Yahya)

            Believing in the Word from Allah.) [3:39], according to the majority of the scholars.
            (His name will be Al-Masih, `Isa, the son of Maryam) and he will be known by this name in this life, especially by the believers. `Isa was called “Al-Masih” (the Messiah) because when he touched (Mash) those afflicted with an illness, they would be healed by Allah’s leave. Allah’s statement,
            (`Isa, the son of Maryam) relates `Isa to his mother, because he did not have a father.
            (Held in honor in this world and in the Hereafter, and will be one of those who are near to Allah.) meaning, he will be a leader and honored by Allah in this life, because of the Law that Allah will reveal to him, sending down the Scripture to him, along with the other bounties that Allah will grant him with. `Isa will be honored in the Hereafter and will intercede with Allah, by His leave, on behalf of some people, just as is the case with his brethren the mighty Messengers of Allah, peace be upon them all.
            `Isa was Created Without a Father
            When Maryam heard the good news that the angels conveyed from Allah, she said;
            (“O my Lord! How shall I have a son when no man has touched me.”)
            Mary said, “How can I have a son while I did not marry, nor intend to marry, nor am I an indecent woman, may Allah forbid” The angel conveyed to Maryam, Allah’s answer,
            (So (it will be) for Allah creates what He wills.)
            He is Mighty in power and nothing escapes His ability. Allah used the word `create’ here instead of the word `does’ as in the tale about Zakariyya [3:40], to eradicate any evil thought concerning `Isa. Allah next emphasized this fact when He said,
            When He has decreed something, He says to it only: “Be! ? and it is.) meaning, what Allah wills, comes into existence instantly and without delay. In another Ayah, Allah said,
            (And Our commandment is but one as the twinkling of an eye.) [54:50], meaning, “We only issue the command once, and it comes into existence instantly, as fast as, and faster than, a blink of the eye. ”
            So from this we can conclude one reason why Allah did this why to show his strength and how he can do what he wills whenever he wills, he just says be and it is. As the tafsir says, he is mighty in power and nothing escapes his ability, this is showing that Allah is able to do all things, including a birth of a child with no father, and also a birth of a child with no father and mother, such as in the case of Adam.
            The Quran touches on the virgin birth again in Surah Maryam:

            QURAN:
            019.016

            YUSUFALI: Relate in the Book (the story of) Mary, when she withdrew from her family to a place in the East.
            019.017

            YUSUFALI: She placed a screen (to screen herself) from them; then We sent her our angel, and he appeared before her as a man in all respects
            019.018

            YUSUFALI: She said: “I seek refuge from thee to (Allah) Most Gracious: (come not near) if thou dost fear Allah.”
            019.019

            YUSUFALI: He said: “Nay, I am only a messenger from thy Lord, (to announce) to thee the gift of a holy son.
            019.020

            YUSUFALI: She said: “How shall I have a son, seeing that no man has touched me, and I am not unchaste?”
            019.021

            YUSUFALI: He said: “So (it will be): Thy Lord saith, ‘that is easy for Me: and (We wish) to appoint him as a Sign unto men and a Mercy from Us’:It is a matter (so) decreed

            Here we see why Allah carried out the virgin birth, as verse 21 says, Allah wanted to make Jesus as a sign for man. What this basically means is that Allah wanted the virgin birth to signify a mighty miracle and mighty proof and sign of God, because such a thing was impossible and unthinkable, and that the only way that such a thing could happen is only if a divine being carried this act out.

            And what better proof do we need than the existence of a divine being and creator than a virgin birth? This is a very strong proof for the Children of Israel, and mankind, and only a fool would deny the existence of God with such a miraculous sign.

            verse 21 also shows us that Allah said that causing a birth even with the fact that no man has touched Mary is easy for him, this once again demonstrates God’s mighty power and how all things are possible with him.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s