Muhammad face (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
(Life of Muhammad from the point of view of an ex Muslim)
Two months ago a movie “The Innocence of Muslims” was uploaded on internet from USA, which showed how Muhammad falsely created his religion, Islam, How he used to kill people in the name of his made-up God, and how he lusted for women and sex.
Muslims as usual couldn´t bear the truth and responded with violence, killing innocent people and vandalizing American and other western embassies and desecrated the flags of those countries.
Now my question is: Should we stop speaking truth about Islam because of the fear of unjustified and violent consequences from the blind Muslims? And should we lose our right of freedom of expression just because a group of people do not have capacity to bear the truth? No, we are not going to accept any of these choices. We shall never stop calling wrong to something what is indeed wrong. We shall never let anyone to snatch our fundamental right of liberty of expression.
On one hand Muslims say that Islam is a peaceful and tolerant religion but on the other hand they do all what is against humanity. Which is the real face of Islam? What is actually Islam?
If we want to know the truth of Islam, first we must go deep into the life of Muhammad to find out whether he was a genuine prophet sent by God or was he simply a child molester, assassin and a self acclaimed prophet?
I am pretty sure, if we find out the truth of Muhammad, we´ll also find out what Islam truly is. It is time to clear all the doubts and to accept the reality. For that purpose I have brought a movie to you on Muhammad´s life which will help you to recognize the truth (expressed from the point of view of an ex Muslim).
After long confusion and a hard fight between my heart and mind, I have decided the title of my movie to be “The Innocent Prophet”. I know it is very similar to the recently released movie “The Innocence of Muslims”. But believe me, I have no intentions to copy that title. I decided to go for the title “The Innocent Prophet”, because I wanted to use it as a taunt on Muhammad. Calling him innocent is like slapping him. It is simply a taunt on Muhammad that how innocent he was that he used to kill people, abuse minors, create false religion, but still he was very innocent.
Here I present you the trailers of the movie “The Innocent Prophet” which is coming soon and being made in several languages like: English, Spanish, Hindi, Urdu and Indonesian. I hope that after watching this movie the non Muslims will be compelled to think whether they should allow Islam to be existed in their modern societies or not. And Muslims will also give a serious thought to their future with Islam, without committing any violence, as the purpose behind making this movie is not to offend any human being but is only to express my point of view on the life of the innocent prophet of Islam which I think is completely true.
Related articles
- Afghan religious scholar puts bounty on anti-Islam film maker (worldbulletin.net)
Most Intolerant Religion 
A MUHAMMADAN’S SERENITY PRAYER
Allah grant me the serenity
to change the things I cannot accept;
courage to change the things I want to;
and wisdom to know the difference.
Killing one Infidel at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time;
Accepting hardships as the Pathway to Jihad;
Changing, as Muhammad did in this Dar-ul-Harb world,
into Dar-us-Salam;
Trusting that Jihad will make all things right
if I surrender to Allah’s Will;
That I may be reasonably miserable in this life
and supremely happy with my 72 Virgins
Forever in the next.
Amen.
PUUUAAAGGGGG!!!!!!
ISLAMIC EXAMPLES OF MUSLIM MEN RAPING THEIR FEMALE SLAVES.
Muhammad had sex with a slave girl named Mariyam. He probably also had sex with another slave girl of his – Rayhana.
Mariyam was a Christian slave girl and she was given to Muhammad as a gift by the governor of Egypt. Muhammad got her pregnant and she gave birth to a son. Afterwards Muhammad married her. The son died 18 months later.
Here is the reference. NOTE: Words in [ ] type brackets are mine
In the “Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir”, mention is made of Mariyah. On page 151, it says
“He [the Lord of Alexandria] presented to the prophet Mariyah, her sister Sirin, a donkey and a mule which was white….The apostle of Allah liked Mariyah who was of white complexion and curly hair and pretty…. Then he cohabited with Mariyah as a handmaid and sent her to his property which he had acquired from Banu al-Nadir.”
The note for the word “handmaid” says “Handmaids gained the status of wedded wives if they bore children. They were called “umm walad” and became free.
This story is also supported by Tabari’s History, volume 39, page 194. Here is the quote: (my words are in ( ) parenthesis).
“He (Muhammad) used to visit her (Mariyam) there and ordered her to veil herself, [but] he had intercourse with her by virtue of her being his property.”
The note (845) on this says, “That is, Mariyah was ordered to veil herself as did the Prophet’s wives, but he did not marry her.”
We see that Muhammad had sex with his female slave without marrying her, that it was legal in Islam for Muslim men to have sex with their female slaves. They were after all, the Muslim man’s property. Although the slave girls had some human rights, when it came to satisfying their master’s desires they had to comply.
Let’s examine some background material found in the Hadith’s of Bukhari, Muslim, and Abu Dawud, and in the Sirat literature of Ibn Ishaq’s – “Sirat Rasulallah”, and Ibn Sa’d’s “Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir”. Note that both Sirat works were written BEFORE the Hadith, but they do not supersede the Hadith or Quran in authenticity according to Muslim scholars.
FROM SAHIH BUKHARI – VOLUME 3, #432:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri that while he was sitting with Allah’s messenger we said, “Oh Allah’s messenger, we got female captives as our booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?” The prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.”
(also refer to Bukhari Vol. 3, #718)
FROM SAHIH BUKHARI – VOLUME 9, #506:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri that during the battle with Bani Al-Mustaliq they (Muslims) captured some females and intended to have sexual relations with them without impregnating them. So they asked the prophet about coitus interruptus. The prophet said, “It is better that you should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection”.
Qaza’a said, “I heard Abu Said saying that the prophet said, “No soul is ordained to be created but Allah will create it.””
(also ref. Bukhari 5:459).
FROM SAHIH BUKHARI – VOLUME 5, #637:
Narrated Buraida: The prophet sent Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (part of the war booty) and I hated Ali, and Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, “Don’t you see this (i.e. Ali)? When we reached the prophet I mentioned that to him. He said, “O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?” I said, “Yes.” He said, “Do you hate him for he deserves more than that from the Khumus.”
The note for 637 explains that Buraida hated Ali for taking from the Khumus, and Buraida thought that was not good.
FROM SAHIH MUSLIM, VOLUME 2, #3371
Abu Sirma said to Abu Said al Khudri: “O Abu Said, did you hear Allah’s messenger mentioning about al-azl (coitus interruptus)?” He said, “Yes”, and added: “We went out with Allah’s messenger on the expedition to the Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing azl” (withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: “We are doing an act whereas Allah’s messenger is amongst us; why not ask him?” So we asked Allah’s messenger and he said: “It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born”.
FROM SAHIH MUSLIM, VOLUME 2, #3432
Abu Said al-Khudri reported that at the Battle of Hunain Allah’s messenger sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah’s messenger seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: “And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (Quran – 4:24), (i.e. they were lawful for them when their Idda (menstrual) period came to an end).
FROM THE HADITH OF THE SUNAN OF ABU DAWUD, VOLUME 2, # 2150:
Abu Said al-Khudri said: “The apostle of Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Quranic verse, “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess”. That is to say, they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.” [The Quran verse is 4:24].
The note on this Hadith says that “After the distribution of the spoils of war a man may have intercourse with the female slave after passing one menstrual period, if she is not pregnant. If she is pregnant one should wait till she delivers the child. This is the view held by Malik, al-Shafi and Abu Thawr. Abu Hanifah holds that if both the husband and wife are captivated together, their marriage tie still continues; they will not be separated. According to the majority of scholars, they will be separated. Al-Awzai maintains that their marriage tie will continue till they remain part of the spoils of war. If a man buys them, he may separate them if he desires, and cohabit with the female slave after one menstrual period.
FROM THE HADITH OF THE SUNAN OF ABU DAWUD, VOLUME 2, #2167:
Muhaririz said: “I entered the mosque and saw Abu Said al-Khudri. I sat with him and asked about withdrawing the penis (while having intercourse), Abu Said said: We went out with the Apostle of Allah on the expedition to Banu al-Mustaliq, and took some Arab women captive, and we desired the women, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, and we wanted ransom; so we intended to withdraw the penis (while having intercourse with the slave-women). But we asked ourselves: “Can we draw the penis when the apostle of Allah is among us before asking him about it?” So we asked him about it. He said, “It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.””
The note on 2167 says: “This means that the Companions wanted to have intercourse with the slave girls, but they were afraid of conception. In case they were pregnant and gave birth to a child they could not be sold as it was prohibited that a slave mother should be sold. So they withdrew the penis while having intercourse with them. By this they meant to sell the slave girls and obtain the ransom.”
COMMENT ON HADITH
All of these Hadith relate to Muslim soldiers having sexual relations with newly captured female slaves. In some cases the women’s husbands were still alive. After a battle, the captured women and children were divided between the Muslim soldiers as “booty”, or spoils of war.
In Bukhari Volume 5 #637, it is shown that Ali had sex with one of the females before the distribution of “Khumus” occurred. This “Khumus” was 1/5 of the war booty to be used by Muhammad and his family, (Ali was Muhammad’s son-in-law), and be used and distributed to the poor and needy. Here, Khalid, himself a member of Muhammad’s family, took part of the Khumus prior to the distribution. That is why Buraida hated him in this case. Note that Muhammad supported Ali in this. There was no reproof at all. If anything, Muhammad thought Ali deserved more!
Here is the point: Muslim men were allowed to use female slaves for sex. If the slave was not pregnant she could be sold at a slave market. This is what Muhammad’s soldiers intended to do.
CORROBORATING MATERIAL FROM THE SIRAT LITERATURE
Ibn Ishaq’s biography of Muhammad, “Sirat Rasulallah”, is the most reliable extent biography of Muhammad available today. It corroborates the events with the Mustaliq on pages 490 and 493. This event took place just before Aisha was accused of having sexual relations with another man.
It also corroborates the events at Autas on pages 574-576. This event took place just after the initial battle of Hunain.
Ibn Sa’d corroborates the events at Autas (Awtus) on pages 187, 188. He notes that 6000 slaves were taken.
ANALYSIS
The Hadith I quoted show that:
1) The Muslim men were out in the field, and took female captives following a battle.
2) They were divided up between the men and the men were very horny. They were without their wives who were back home.
3) So, the men prepared to have sex with the females, out on the field, away from home, and asked Muhammad about coitus interruptus. They didn’t want to get the females pregnant because they wanted to later sell the female slaves for money. Had they gotten them pregnant the Muslim men would be forced to be responsible for the children.
4) Marriage wasn’t required to have sex with the females. Listen to the men’s own words…. “we were interested in their prices”, i.e., they wanted to sell them. No Muslim man would marry a women intending to sell her later. That is not what “nikah” – marriage was all about. These men wanted to have sex with their slaves, enjoy them, and they later sell them.
5) And if you note what Ali did, – had sex with a female before the “human booty” was divided up between the Muslim soldiers. Muhammad allowed him to do this.
What does all of this boil down to? Muslim men were allowed to have intercourse with their female slaves after the slaves had had one menstrual period. The reason for waiting one menstrual cycle was to insure that the female slaves were not already pregnant prior to being captured.
In some cases, the female slave’s husbands were also captives and it was still legal for the Muslim men to have sex with the female captives. Muhammad received a “revelation” allowing the Muslim men to have sex with the female slaves while there were still married to their captive husbands. A note on the Hadith says that according to Islam, when the married couple is captured, their marriage is automatically annulled!
Muslims did not need to marry the female slave or give her any type of dowry in order to have sex with her.
Muslims did not need to have the female slave’s permission to have intercourse with her. She was his property, (as was noted by Tabari), and thus, as property, the Muslim owner had an Allah-given right to have intercourse with her if he desired. I have yet to find one Quranic verse or Hadith that says that the female’s slave’s permission was required. All Hadith and Quranic verses that pertain to Muslim men having intercourse with female slaves always put the option on the slave-owning man, whether he wants it or not. The slaves were not given a choice.
THE MUSLIM MEN WERE RAPING THEIR FEMALE SLAVES AND MUHAMMAD ALLOWED IT!
Think about it from the women’s point of view. A battle is fought and her side lost. Many of the husbands, fathers, and sons are now dead. Some have been captured. The women and children are also taken as captives. Imagine the horror of the females. Family members dead, homes and possessions are now gone, they are in the total power of their captors.
The captives are distributed amongst the Muslim men as slaves, husband and wife captives are separated. As soon as a female has her menstrual cycle her owner appears. He has been separated from his wife for a while out on the field of battle, sexually hungry, and he proceeds to have sex with his female slave.
Do you think that this female slave willingly has intercourse with him? Is that her wish? She has just experienced one of the most horrible events in her life, – the destruction of her tribe and family, the taking of her possessions, and being made someone’s slave, and now she willing consents to have sex with the very men who brought this disaster upon her!? Of course not! What women would look upon with loving eyes the men that brought destruction upon her family and tribe!
Would Jesus Christ allow soldiers to rape female slaves?
What would the world say if Israel allowed its soldiers to take Palestinian females prisoner and rape with them? There would be a horrible outcry!
Examine the events in Kosovo and Bosnia. Here the same situation occurred. The Muslims were defeated by the Serbs and some Serbs raped Muslims. It is a horrible crime and we all condemn it. But if we examine what Muhammad allowed his soldiers to do we see that their actions are identical. Muhammad’s standards were no better and actually worse than Serbs who raped Muslim women. It is worse because Muhammad gave it religious sanction and validity for all Muslim men.
The Japanese did this to the Chinese, Korean and Filipino women during WWII. The Germans did likewise to the Russian women. In a similar way the Muslim soldiers only waited a few weeks to do likewise to their female captives.
Muhammad and his soldiers treated these female slaves just like the Japanese did to their female captives. Much has been written condemning the treatment of black slaves in the West: how much more should a man who claimed to be a prophet of God be condemned for these acts?
Hi,
Mohammed(pbuh) allowed, in his days, for Muslims to marry slave girls too. Was it wrong?
And for your information Mariam(RA), the Coptic girl, was his wife! Any of your concern?
Hi masum peigambar, recite from the Quran your alleges and not story books. How many know today the Babylonian, Sanscrit, Avestian, Hebrew, etc languages?
Quranic Arabic was non existent before Quran’s revelation and became obsolete soon after the completion of Quran. Why? Ponder!
regards
plum
Dear Plum,
I don’t know how much people know Hebrew, Avestian and etc languages, but yes I do know that Pundits in India know Sanskrit at-least. Now coming to your claim that Quranic Arabic was non-existence before Quran, this is simply not true. Even Quran can refute this claim of yours. The Quran say :-
41:44 “And if We had made it a non-Arabic Qur’an, they would have said, “Why are its verses not explained in detail [in our language]? Is it a foreign [recitation] and an Arab [messenger]?” Say ….”
Now please understand what it says, that he was revealed his book in Arabic, which people can understand. Now you say that the Quranic Arabic was non-existent before Quran, then how come Allah say that he has revealed a book in that language, which people can already understand.
Regards
Hi Dear Raj, We have already dealt with the alleged “pedophile” verses as there are non to be found in the Quran!
Do you know why the Vedas were written in Sanskrit? Do you know why Quran was revealed in Quranic-Arabic?
The reason is to prevent it from adulteration and distortions, throughout Ages and till the End of Time!
What other language would your esteemed selves suggest that the Quran should have been written in, when the Messenger(pbuh) was an Arab, living in Arabia?
Quran is like a fountain, from which rivulets begin ending in the largest basins, the Oceans, easiest to reach the furthest ends, revealed in a language of its own, to maintain its authenticity, credibility and authority, readily translated to other languages and non corruptibility!
Also,easy to memorize.
Quran, though in unique Arabic is meant for the whole of mankind who are not averse to it!
As a Muslim before, you must have known the unique beauty of ease of being able to memorize and the chanting effects of its verses, right?
Quran IS for ONLY those who believe in it.
It certainly excludes infidels and mockers and hypocrites.
Kind Regards
Plum
Hi, this guy is not a Pakistani neither a former Muslim.
Muslims love their Prophet and this video proves nothing against Islam! Muslims are serious believers in their Religion and are not morons and do not like to be mocked in jest!
How can you tolerate somebody insulting your mother? Prophet is more dear to Muslims than their own parents! So, when one insults other’s faith then that person becomes intolerant. Here the video’s sound, audio editor, is the most intolerant person and desires to show intolerance of Muslims but instead the culpability of an envious, sick and intolerant mind is envisaged behind the video. Keep it up!
With the fucking Islam, zero tolerance.
Dear Plum,
Again its a blatant lie to claim that Imran is neither Pakistani, nor a Muslim? How you know that, where is the source of such rubbish information. I have seen Muslims leaving their faith, so why can’t he. He know what real Islam looks like, and I salute him for that.
You said, “Prophet is more dear to Muslims than their own parents! So, when one insults other’s faith then that person becomes intolerant. ”
Just one question, why is he more dearer to Muslims than their parents, is it mentioned in Quran? Whatever he was, he was just a mere man, not God himself, if Muhammad claims to be prophet, he must pass all the test to be qualified as a Prophet. Now what if, I stand and rape a child, and claim that it is permissible to me, because I am a prophet. Does it sound good to you. What if a murder or kill people from a particular race, and say that I can, because I have divine commands for that. Is it again ok with you. I guess No..
If he really was a prophet, then who will decide, his blind followers? Obviously not, the free thinkers, and religion can be criticized and even the prophet too.
Regards
Dearest Raj, I know Pakistanis through accent and looks. But that is my opinion and I’m entitled to one, right?
Again, I’ve given you my opinion of Prophet and the love of him as next to Allah.
I’ve answered regarding pedophile and killing verses before! So why enforce oft repeated questions?
Yes, criticize him through Quran and not through false stories
Regards
Plum
Hi, what you have got is from the Hadiths, which is not Word of Allah. Please quote from the Quran, as you are reinforcing the fake Hadiths instead! Just a waste of space and time!
Fuck Quran!!
Muhammad pedophile.
Allah absurd and stupid superstition, that “thing” does not exist and has a ridiculous name.
Hi, talk through logic rather than depict your crudeity behind the veil of a repugnant mind! Evolution or creation finally produced such an archaic sick mentality? What good can such a dementia patient with frivolous and trivial mind produce in this age? Simple arrogance!
Pingback: मासूम पैगंबर – हिन्दी ट्रेलर « The False Prophet
Stop Islam!!!!!
Why?
Pingback: Finally! The Innocent Prophet is with us | Espacio de roberto
Mohammed and the 10 Commandments
Muslims are always very quick to point out that Islam recognizes the Prophets before Mohammed, especially Jesus and Moses. But they are shy about mentioning what Moses is famous for, and that is the Ten Commandments. There is an obvious reason for this as Mohammed actually broke the Ten Commandments and left a legacy such that his followers would also break the Ten Commandments by following his example. Of course, muslims are told that Mohammed set the “perfect example” for muslims to follow [Q33.21] and also that Mohammed conforms to “sublime morality. [Q68.4] It is important then to investigate whether Mohammed did indeed follow the teachings of Moses and Jesus and support “the Law” which had stood for over 2,000 years by the time Mohammed appeared in 611AD.
The Law appears in two places in the Old Testament, first in Exodus 20:2-17 and then in Deuteronomy 5:6-21. Jesus then reconfirmed the Law and its importance in the New Testament in Matthew 5:17-18. [7]
Importance of the Law
Moses was given the Ten Commandments circa 1450BC on Mt Sinai after he had led the Israelites out of Egypt. [2] When Jesus started his ministry circa 29AD, he reinforced the importance of the Law:
“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” [Matt 5:17-18]
Notice that not only did Jesus reinforce the Law but stated that the Law should stand till “all be fulfilled”.
Jesus also simplified the Law:-
“Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. “
“And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. “ [Matt 22:37-39]
Let us consider then the Ten Commandments and examine Mohammed’s life to see if he followed what Moses passed on, and understood that Jesus claimed the Law stood “till all be fulfilled”.
The 10 Commandments
1. I am the Lord your God, you shall have no other Gods before me.
2. You shall not take the name of God in vain.
3. Keep Holy the Lord’s day.
4. Honor your Father and Mother.
5. You shall not kill.
6. You shall not commit adultery.
7. You shall not steal.
8. You shall not bear false witness before your neighbour.
9. You shall not covet your neighbour’s wife.
10. You shall not covet your neighbour’s goods.
The first three commandments are about God, the last seven are about “love thy neighbour”.
We shall consider each commandment in turn, working back from number 10, and look at how history shows Mohammed’s actions and deeds.
10. You shall not covet your neighbour’s goods.
After the death of his wife Khadja, Mohammed found himself without an income and took to raiding passing caravans from Syria on their way to Mecca to live off stolen goods.
Consider one example of Mohammed’s behavior with the Khaybar Jews in 628AD. [1]
Now Mohammed was resentful towards the Banu Nadir Jews after the Battle of the Trench and especially towards their leader Abu Rafi. In 627AD he sent Ali on an expedition to Khaybar who managed to steal some camels and flocks. He then sent assassins who used deception to expose and then kill Abu Rafi.
Mohammed had heard about a large treasure and to find its location, he tortured the grandson of Abu Rafi, a man named Kinana, by placing fire on his chest. The treasure was found and Kinana put to death.
After the victory, men of fighting age were killed, the children and women were taken as captives. [Bukhari 2.14.68] And the women of the Khybar were distributed among the Muslims, records Ibn Ishaq.
So in this one example, Mohammed broke Commandments #10, #8, #7 and #6.
9. You shall not covet your neighbour’s wife
Consider now the story of Zainab, the wife of Mohammed’s stepson.
Kitab al Tabaqat, 8:101-102; Muhammed Ibn Yahya Hayyan narrated:
“The Messenger of God came to Zaid Ibn Haritha’s house seeking him. Zainab Bint Hahsh stood up to meet him in a housedress… and the Prophet was filled with admiration for her.”
In summary, Zainab talked to Zaid when he came home, and Zaid realised that Mohammed desired his wife so he divorced her. Mohammed conveniently received a revelation Sura 33.37 saying that Allah had married them in Heaven. Also came Sura 33.4 which absolved the practise of adoption in the Muslim world and got Mohammed “out of a jam”.
In fact, Mohammed condoned the practise of slavery and from the Battles of Banu Qurayza and Khaybar, married women were handed around to his soldiers as prizes.
Mohammed also produced a Sura 4.3 allowing Muslims to have sex with those “whose your right hand possesses” which includes married women. In this way Mohammed broke Commandment #9.
8. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbour
Consider previous revelation championed by both Moses and Jesus.
“You shall not bear false witness” [Exodus 20:16, Deut 5:20]
“The Lord detests a lying tongue, a lying witness who testifies falsely” [Proverbs 6:17,19]
There are so many examples where Mohammed condoned and encouraged lying, even to have an adversary killed. He produced a Sura 16.106 which allows a Muslim to lie if “threatened”.
Islam has Doctrines of Taqiyya (lying for faith) and Kithman (lying by omission) which also condone lying.
Bukhari Vol 5, 59.369, Narrated by Jabir bin Abdullah. [4]
“Allah’s Apostle said ‘ who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashral who has hurt Allah and His Apostle? Muhammed bin Maslama said ‘would you like me to kill him?’ The Prophet said ‘Yes’.
Muhammed bin Maslama said “then allow me to say a false thing” The Prophet said “you may say it’.
Mohammed thus broke Commandments #8 and #5.
7. You shall not steal
Mohammed not only condoned and encouraged “looting” but he provided rules whereby the Prophet of Allah received one fifth of the booty.
Sura 8.41 And know that out of all the booty that ye may acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to Allah,- and to the Messenger, and to near relatives, orphans, the needy, and the wayfarer.” [3]
When his followers raided a caravan near Nakhla and killed muslims during the sacred month of Rajab, again Mohammed produced 2 new Suras to get them “off the hook”. [Sura 2.214, 2.218]
From Mohammed’s examples with the Banu Qurayza in 627AD and at Khaybar in 628AD, booty was accepted as part of the deal, and Muslims followed this practise ‘religiously” when they exploded out of the Arabian desert into the surrounding lands, raiding, robbing and raping.
6. You shall not commit adultery
After the battle of Qurayza, Mohammed claimed a beautiful woman named Rayhana, whose family had just been killed, and took her to his bed that same evening. Mohammed set an example of sharing married women among his followers after each battle, technically committing adultery every time. In fact, he received a convenient revelation that allowed him and his fellow Muslims to have sex with married captive women. [Sura 4.3] Married women are defined as those “whom your right hand possesses”. [1]
5. You shall not kill
Probably the best example here is the killing of over 800 Banu Qurayza Jews whom Mohammed had declined to go into exile, and instead took part in the beheading of all males “with pubic hair”.
The Quran tells the story in Sura 33:26-27, with Mohammed himself chopping off the heads of two Jewish leaders. As mentioned in Commandment 8, Mohammed was complicit in the murder of people that irritated him, and so in every sense, breaks Commandment #5.
So from an investigation of Commandments 5-10, we find Mohammed guilty of lying and deceit, of stealing, of raping married women and of killing. Indeed, this can be expressed as follows:
Mohammed’s 3 “R”s of Education: [Raiding, Robbing, Raping]
4. Honour your Father and Mother
Accepting the fact that Mohammed’s father Abdullah died before he was born and his Mother when he was but a small child, it still remains that his actions of lying and deceit, robbing, killing, raping women and setting captives into slavery, in every sense means that he has “dishonoured his Father and Mother”.
Summary of Commandments 4-10.
By examining Mohammed’s life and deeds, we have shown conclusively that he broke all of the Commandments relating to “Love thy neighbour”, not once but on many occasions, thus showing a callous disregard for the Ten Commandments of Moses.
It is now left to examine the first three Commandments that relate to God.
1. I am the Lord your God, you shall have no other Gods before me.
2. You shall not take the name of God in vain.
3. Keep Holy the Lord’s day.
Mohammed borrowed Friday as his “Holy Day” from the Pagan Arabs. [5]
In Islam most of the rituals performed (today) by devoted Muslims in the name of Allah are connected to the pagan worship that existed before Islam. Pagans practices of the Pilgrimage of Kabah once a year–the Fast of Ramadan, running around the Kabah seven times, kissing the black stone, shaving the head, animal sacrifices, running up and down two hills, throwing stones at the devil, snorting water in and out the nose, praying several times a day toward Mecca, giving alms, Friday prayers, etc. are strictly followed by Muslims today. Nobody can deny the fact that, all the above rituals of Muslim’s hajj today—existed well before the arrival of Islam. [6]
It is not how you write “Allah” in Arabic or that Allah means God that justifies worshiping Allah as the Supreme creator. The Nature of God is determined by the fruits of his prophets.
And Allah’s prophet coveted his neighbour’s goods, stole, killed, raped, set captives into slavery, encouraged adultery by having sex with married captive women and condoned lying and deceit to get revenge. Allah has also demanded that all Jews be killed “at the last hour” [Muslim book 41 number 6985], even though the God of the Bible declare Israel as “his chosen people forever”. [Isaiah 44]
It is obvious that Allah is NOT the God of the Bible, the God of Mohammed and of Jesus.
Conclusion
By examining history and the life and deeds of Mohammed, it is obvious that he broke the last seven Commandments, which according to Jesus, defined the principle of “love one another”. Given that Mohammed worshipped Allah, not the true God, he also broke the greatest Commandment. In other words Mohammed didn’t understand or follow the TEN Commandments as given to Moses and then reinforced by Jesus circa 29AD. Mohammed also fulfils the description of the False Prophet, as he promises sexual rewards in Heaven.
A Question for all Muslims
How can you follow the prophet Mohammed who by his actions and examples broke the TEN Commandments of Moses and the Commandments of Jesus to love one another, a Commandment that was meant to stand “till all be fulfilled”?
________________________________________
References:
1. Khan M.A. Islamic Jihad; A legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery
2. Rohl D. A Test of Time: The Bible; from Myth to History
3. The Quran on-line
4. The Hadith on-line
5. Yahweh or Hubal
6. Pagan origins of Islam
7. The Bible on-line