Preachers of hate who spread their violent word on British TV channels

Muslim fundamentalists have used British television channels to preach in favour of violent crime and killing “apostates”.

Mohammed Farooq Nizami told NOOR TV that "Whoever shows disrespect for Prophet Muhammad will be given death penalty"

Mohammed Farooq Nizami told NOOR TV that “Whoever shows disrespect for Prophet Muhammad will be given death penalty”

The communications watchdog, Ofcom, has made a series of rulings against channels which allowed “inflammatory” material to be broadcast in breach of rules which forbid extreme opinions gaining a platform on British television.

The cases, disclosed today, include examples of an imam telling viewers that those who disrespect the prophet Mohammed should be killed, and another broadcaster saying homosexuals should be beaten and tortured.

The stations were found to have committed serious breaches of the broadcasting code by allowing the extreme opinions to be aired unchallenged.

Last night experts warned that the extent and seriousness of the broadcasting breaches raises questions over whether extreme Muslim speakers who were previously confined to small audiences in mosques are able to reach thousands more people by broadcasting intolerant teachings on television.

Although the channels have tiny audiences compared to the mainstream, they are targeted at Muslim communities, including people of Pakistani background, with some of the content being broadcast in Urdu and other languages.

The cases identified by Ofcom include:

* An Islamic scholar who told viewers: “It is your duty … to kill those who insult Prophet Mohammed.”

* A preacher banned from coming to Britain who used the channel – which he co-owns – to say anyone who left Islam should be put to death.

* A phone-in presenter who advocated “eliminating” anyone who disrespected Mohammed.

In some cases the channels had also breached a rule which states that they must keep recordings of all their output, raising the possibility that other inflammatory material has been broadcast but cannot be traced.

With the exception of one radio broadcaster, the channels ruled against by Ofcom are broadcast on the satellite provider Sky. It has no legal responsibility for what is broadcast on the channels it carries. It is up to the stations themselves to make sure they meet Ofcom’s standards and they can be fined or taken off the air if they do not.

The disclosure of the rulings by the broadcasting regulator comes despite a report in 2010 which warned that extremist material was being broadcast.

Tala Rajab, the researcher who wrote the report for Quilliam, the anti-extremist think-tank, said the fresh findings by Ofcom raised serious questions over the regulation of broadcast material.

“Some of these recent incidents have been quite shocking,” he said.

“If this had happened in a mosque the police would be right in pursuing a criminal investigation. But because they are being broadcast on television channels for some reason there seems to be little appetite for looking into these extreme messages.

“If these kind of comments were made against black people, for example, you can imagine a channel being shut down overnight, particularly if they had incited violence against a minority.”

The 2010 report found that the Islam Channel, Britain’s largest Islamic broadcaster, had continued to ignore Ofcom rules about impartiality and allowed controversial viewpoints to be aired despite a fine and other sanctions being imposed. It is not among the subjects of the five Ofcom rulings disclosed today.

In December a Leeds radio station, Radio Asian Fever, was fined £4,000 for breaching broadcasting rules in programmes involving a presenter called “Sister Ruby Ramadan”.

She told listeners that homosexuals should be beaten and tortured.

“If there are two such persons among you, that do this evil, the shameful act, what do you have to do? Torture them; punish them; beat them and give them mental torture,” said the presenter.

Jabbar Karim, the station’s managing director, said: “We are very embarrassed. This was a one-off incident which will never be repeated.”

Takbeer TV, based in Nottingham, has been found in breach of the code twice in 18 months for programmes which denigrated the minority Ahmadi Muslim sect. Founded in the 19th century its followers are considered by some mainstream Muslims to be misguided or even heretical.

Contributors to the most recent programmes investigated by Ofcom said Ahmadis had a “disease” and “monstrous” intentions.

Ofcom said Takbeer TV had subjected the sect’s followers to “abusive treatment” and that they would now consider an appropriate sanction such as a fine.

An Ofcom spokesman said: “The majority of Islamic channels comply with our rules. However, where we identify issues through our monitoring or complaints we investigate fully and take firm enforcement action.”

He said it was Ofcom’s duty to regulate licence holders rather than the responsibility of carriers such as Sky. However, carriers are free to decide which channels they offer, he added.

A Sky spokesman said: “Sky operates an open and regulated platform. This means any broadcaster with an appropriate Ofcom licence is free to seek distribution over the satellite platform.”

There are 14 Muslim TV free-to-air channels in Britain but their audiences are not measured by BARB, the source of viewing figures.

Takbeer TV failed to respond when asked to comment.


3 thoughts on “Preachers of hate who spread their violent word on British TV channels

  1. The Mohammedans are AFRAID to have Mohammed exposed as the PERVERT he was!

    Exposing Islam

    Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly. Let us investigate how did the prophet live Islam; how did the prophet apply the eternal teachings of god in his daily life? In this search for the historical Muhammad, we will utilize the Islam’s holy books, its own writings.

    Muhammad fantasized about baby Aisha before soliciting her from her father

    Sahih Bukhari 9.140 Narrated ‘Aisha:

    Allah’s apostle said to me, “you were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘if this is from Allah, then it must happen.
    Sahih al-Bukhari, volume 7, book 62, number 17 Narrated jabir bin ‘abdullah:

    When I got married, Allah’s apostle said to me, “what type of lady have you married?” I replied, “I have married a matron.” he said, “why, don’t you have a liking for the virgins and for fondling them?” Jabir also said: Allah’s apostle said, “why didn’t you marry a young girl so that you might play with her and she with you?”

    Muhammad, 50, marries baby Aisha at age 6

    Sahih Bukhari volume 5, book 58, number 234

    Narrated Aisha: the prophet engaged (married) me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, um ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became alright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some ansari women who said, “best wishes and Allah’s blessing and a good luck.” then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

    Sahih bukhari volume 8, book 73, number 151

    Narrated ‘Aisha: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the prophet would call them to join and play with me. (the playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-bari page 143, vol.13)

    Allah promotes pedophilia

    Quran 65.4 “and those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘iddah (prescribed divorce period), if you have doubts (about their periods), is three months, and for those who have no courses [(i.e. They are still immature) their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise, except in case of death] . And for those who are pregnant (whether they are divorced or their husbands are dead), their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is until they deliver (their burdens) (give birth) and whosoever fears Allah and keeps his duty to him, he will make his matter easy for him.”
    Sura (65:4) lays down rules for divorce and sets the prescribed period for divorce. It clearly says, Muslim men can marry (and divorce) little girls who have not yet reached menstruation age. This means that Muslim men were allowed to marry baby girls. This is the eternal word of god. This is an eternal law of Allah. All Muslims must believe in this teaching. Otherwise, they are no longer Muslims but apostates of Islam.

    Now let us see how it is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was six years old until she reached nine years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith, which was quoted earlier, mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of nine (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

    Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.
    According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

    Imagine a man of fifty-one removing the clothes of a six-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

    Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of nine.

    Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.“Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

    The inquirer asked the following:‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’

    After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

    That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers’” (Fatwa No. 31409).



    Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)


    It is an undeniable fact, that the so-called ‘Muslims’ follow the Sunna (the lifestyle, the manners, doings and sayings) of Muhammad even if and when it contradicts the Quran in such instances as the number of prayers, the punishment for fornication, the alleged prohibition of drinking wine etc.

    By definition, those who emulate a human being, belong to a CULT and NOT a RELIGION. Mohammedanism is in actuality, the CULT of MUHAMMAD.

    Being called a Mohammedan Muslim is similar in context as calling someone a Buddhist or a Christian.

    Any Monotheist is automatically a Muslim.
    All Israelites, all Jews, all Hanifs and all Christians – who believe in Jesus as a prophet only – are of course Monotheists and hence are Muslimoon.

    Jews are Muslimoon of the Mosaic faith while the Arabs – in general – and Pakistanis, Somalis, Chechen, etc, and others for example, are Muslimoon but are followers of Muhammad’s version of ‘Islam’.

    Just because a general perception is wrong, it does not mean it should not be corrected especially since theQuran itself defines who and what a Muslim is; one who submits to the will of the One and Only Allah; a Monotheist.

    Not every Muslim is a Muhammadan/follower of Muhammad; but most followers ofMuhammad/Muhammadans are Muslimoon.

    Since the Quran asserts that the Arabs were ignorant of previously revealed Scriptures, then it is utterly useless to try to find ‘proofs’ contradicting their claims of ‘prior knowledge’ of Biblical events. TheQuran makes it crystal clear, that they were both unlearned and illiterate people.

    The historical and archaeological records moreover, show them to be a people without writing and without even the rudiments of a meaningful structured and vibrant civilization.

    All their claims to the contrary are false, and are totally based on wishful-thinking to give themselves ‘roots’ and a worthy ‘ ancestry’ so as to compete with, and even attempt to supersede the People of the Book.

    Both the Quran and their own history show that ‘Islam’ – which in reality is Muhammadanism – is basically a severe, uncompromising and hatemongering cult belief syatem.

    Almost every learned leader among the Muhammadan ‘divines’ from Khomeini to Nasrallah as well as in all their media of information, all one hears or reads are words of anger, accusations, hate, bloodcurdling calls for death and destruction to any and all so called ‘unbelievers’.

    The Muhammadan sects themselves, do not escape this ingrained and loathsome hatred as they accuse each other of blasphemy, idolatry and Shirk as can be seen between the Sunnis and Shias – for example – all over the ‘Muslim’ world.

    The greatest threat to Muhammadan Islam is the Truth, the whole Truth and nothing but the Truth as well as INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE.

    The greatest allies of Muhammadan Islam are IGNORANCE and STUPIDITY.

    Because in reality, the Muhammadan version of Islam is nothing more than a tossed salad ofplagiarised, pirated, plundered and/or perverted precepts, ideas, concepts, thoughts, fetishes and traditions from the Bible, New Testament, Zoroasterian religion and pagan Arabian religion.

    Almost all the traditions of the ‘Muslim’ followers of Muhammad are repackaged Arabian paganism disguised under the mantle of ‘Islam’.

    This is why the followers of Muhammad are prohibited from reading the Bible since this would make them aware of the sources from which most of the Quranic ideas, stories and legislation, both religious and judicial, come from.

    Becoming aware of these differences induces in the thinking person the seeds of doubt. To overcome doubt, one must investigate even more; contrasting and comparing sources so as to arrive to some conclusion.

    An indepedently thinking Muhammadan, becomes a danger to himself – his beliefs – and his immediate entourage.

    Of over 53 countries in the world that have a majority of Muhammadans, only ONE, Turkey is a true democracy; all the others are despotic or authoritarian regimes which control all sources of information,turning their people into unthinking robots and zombies. So much for the none existent justice, compassion, equality etc, etc that the Muhammadans brag about.

    There are very few sane ‘theologians’ among the plethora of demented and perverted multitudes ofMullas, Imams and Ayatoullas since any among them – or even among the laity – who do not conform to the fundamentals of the faith, are automatically and very quickly labelled heretics and then summarily murdered and eliminated.

    It is the only ‘religion’ that decrees the murder of any Muhammadan who changes his/her mind to get out of the faith.

    It is wishful thinking and an extremely short-sighted view to believe, that it is a few’fundamentalists’ who are hijacking ‘peaceful Islam’. The facts are, that the greatest majority ofMuhammadans are fundamentalists since they totally believe in the precepts, doctrines, instructions and dogmas of both the Quran and its interpreters among their leaders.

    That is why one sees them in demonstrations in ‘Palestine’, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Egypt, Yemen etc celebrating the death and destruction brought about by the murderers of September 11th as well as when any Americans or ‘none-believers’ are blown to pieces such as happened in Kenya and Bali for example.

    Even if 99% of them are ‘peace loving’, the remaining 1% terrorists constitute 12,000,000hate mongering and suicidal fanatics that this world cannot possibly afford to let roam free.

    The Muhammadan world is full of fanaticism, bigotry, hate, jealousy, anger, hypocrisy and endemic ignorance fanned every Friday by the sermons of their ‘religious’ leaders. The greatest enemy ofMuhammadanism are not the imaginary and perceived West, the Christians, the Hindus, the Israelis etc. butthe Truth, the whole truth and nothing but the Truth.

    Their greatest enemy is the QURAN that incites them to hate, to discriminate, to dehumanize, to insult, to denigrate, to dispise, to enslave, to conquer and or to mass murder all those who do not believe as they do, the UNBELIEVERS, who constitute the majority 85% of humanity.

    Because their enemy is from within, they are not willing to face reality – which would be excruciatingly painful – and admit fault. They blame their self inflicted ‘misfortunes’ on all and sundry, because it is much more comforting and easier to do, than to look in the mirror and admit ugliness.

    Any psychiatrist worth a grain of salt would tell, that to cure oneself and exorcise one’s demons is attained first by looking truthfully at oneself and admitting guilt, mistakes, ugliness etc otherwise one cannot ever be cured.

    Sahih Al-Bukhari HadithHadith 8.9 Narrated byAsma bint Abu Bakr
    My mother came to me, hoping (for my favor) during the lifetime of the Prophet. I asked the Prophet, “May I treat her kindly?” He replied, “Yes.” Ibn ‘Uyaina said, “Then Allah revealed: ‘Allah forbids you not with regards to those who fought not against you because of religion, and drove you not out from your homes, that you should show them kindness and deal justly with them.’…….(60.8)”

    Sahih Al-Bukhari HadithHadith 7.115 Narrated byIbn Umar
    During the lifetime of the Prophet we used to avoid chatting leisurely and freely with our wives lest some Divine inspiration might be revealed concerning us. But when the Prophet had died, we started chatting leisurely and freely (with them).

    *** This INNOCENT statement was DIVINELY SAVED FROM THE AX OF ABROGATION, which speaks VOLUMES about the state of mind of Muhammad’s followers as long as he was alive. A STATE OF PERPETUAL FEAR ***

    Muhammadanism is a CULT which is warmongering in outlook, extremist in action and utterly totalitarian in its objectives. It is a belief system that cannot ever be compared to theJudeo-Christian ethics but fully compatible with National Socialism and Bolshevism since all of them arrogate only to themselves every conceivable right while denying for all others any political, social, cultural or religious legitimacy.

    It was Muhammad, after all, who – contrary to all the traditions of even the pagan Arabians – took up arms against his own tribe and deliberately and wilfully destroyed all the bonds that held the individual honour bound in fidelity and defence of his kith and kin.

    It was Muhammad who turned sons against fathers, sisters against brothers and parents against their own families unless they believed in
    “Allah and his messenger”.

    It is important to point out, that Muhammad preceded Stalin and Hitler in creating the ultimate ‘Cult of Personality’ where-by all his followers swore fealty only to himself and would murder father, mother, brother or sister at his orders.
    (Ibn Ishaq’s/A. Guillaume, The Life of Muhammad p.369).

    It was Muhammad who broke every single rule of ‘prohibitions’ among the pagan Arabiansand justified these wanton deeds with the ‘MADE TO ORDER’ “then it was revealed”verses.

    In his Quran, Muhammad, SUBCONSCIOUSLY, described himselfFLAWLESSLY –

    2: 204 There is the type of man whose speech about this world’s life may dazzle thee and he calls Allah to witness about what is in his heart; yet is he the most contentious of enemies.

    Muhammad fits this MAN PERFECTLY.

    Allah, it seems, was at Muhammad’s beck and call for almost twenty three years during which, Muhammad received personal divine sanctions regarding everything that Muhammad coveted or required such as:

    He was sanctioned to ‘marry’ as many women as he needed to satisfy his sexual appetite.

    To change Arabian law so that he could marry his own adopted son’s wife whom he lusted for.

    To marry and have intercourse with the nine years old child Aisha.

    To conduct Piratical attacks against the caravans of the Quraysh during the FORBIDDEN MONTHS.

    To Slaughter those whom he disliked even if they were in the SANCTUARY of the Ka’ba.

    To Slay and conduct war against all UNBELIEVERS until they either CONVERT, be SUBJUGATED or be SLAUGHTERED.

    To Rob, Steal, Plunder and Loot anyone or any group that he feels inclined to and then collect20% of the ILL BEGOTTEN ‘rewards’

    All of which were very CONVENIENTLY and READILY SANCTIONED by the forever willing and ready Allah. It seems that Allah, the creator of the universe, paid more attention toMuhammad’s personal needs than to any other of his prophets or even his People.

    All the above ANOMALIES and observations can be perfectly EXPLAINED andUNDERSTOOD when one comes to the simple CONCLUSION that the Quran is actuallyMuhammad’s own


    projected into the unsuspecting mouth of Allah, the Rock god of the Ka’ba,the


    • These are common lies and petty arguments.

      For example:

      “Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine.”


      This is BS and a lie.

    • Hi Bad Luck Stain,

      “And lo! this your religion is one religion and I am your Lord, so keep your duty unto Me” “So leave them in their error till a time” 23 : 52 ,54

      That is why you are a bad luck silverstain gorilla!! Allah is our creator as He was of if ever lived: Ram, Krishna, Parvati, “Jesus”,Vishnu, Brahma, Swaraswati the beloved wife of the four headed and Lakshmi giving dreams of riches to you, and the sandalwood putty made Ganesh!!

      Allah is the Creator of the universe and love of our hearts as He has given us life as a gift, not to attack and insult him but to revere and worship Him!!



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s