Arab Jihadist group calls for Sunni Jihad in Iran

(RUDAW) ERBIL, Kurdistan – Ansar al-Islam, an umbrella group for Sunni Iraqi and Arabjihadists, has called for Iranian Sunnis to unite in a jihad against their Shiite clerical government.images (79)

In a message on its official website and Facebook page, the jihadist organization said all Sunnis in Iran must “collect under a single banner that is right, and use Jihad,” to make Iran “one nation, a nation of the Quran and the sword.”

AI said that the justification for jihad against the Tehran government was the growing Shiite influence in the country.

AI’s call comes as Iran’s newly-elected President Hassan Rohani – a moderate Shiite cleric — was inaugurated into office recently and vowed to bring more rights to Iran.

AI leaders said that Shiites in Iran were after money, power, the removal of Islam, and that they wanted to “switch religions.”  It said Shiite leaders do not represent the Islamic nation.

“Shiites today are in decision-making positions around the world and their areas of control are rising,” the group said. Their goal is the “dispersion of the identity of Sunni nationalism,” it warned.

The threat comes amid the rising sectarian violence throughout the Middle East, mainly in Iraq and Syria.

Sunnis in Iraq have begun to attack Shiite districts and areas, hoping to ratchet enough pressure to topple the Shiite-dominated government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki.

The attacks came after a peaceful Sunni protest turned bloody as Iraqi Security forces fired upon the crowd in Hawija.

The killings in Iraq have left more than 3,000 dead since the start of April, fearing another bloody sectarian struggle in the country that followed the US.-led invasion of 2003.

Many of the attacks in Kirkuk and Mosul have been claimed by the Ansar aI-Islam.

Links between extremist Islamic organizations in Iraq and Syria have beenestablished in recent months. What was once thought to be a bid for freedom against Bashar al-Assad’s forces, has now turned into what some analyst are calling a holy crusade of Shiites against Sunnis.

The Al Nusra front, which sided with the Free Syrian Army to oust Assad, has admitted links to Al Qaeda’s Iraqi branch.

Both groups want to make Syria an independent Islamic state, and the links have made Western officials fear the intentions of militant Islamic groups both in Iraq and Syria.

Iran has also played a role in the Syrian struggle through the Lebanese Hezbollah, which has admitted to sending fighters to Syria where they have clashed against the Free Syrian Army and the Sunni Al Nusra front.

4 thoughts on “Arab Jihadist group calls for Sunni Jihad in Iran




    And surely thou hast sublime morals
    (Surat Al-Qalam 68:4).
    Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah an excellent exemplar
    (Surat Al-Ahzab 33:21).

    Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly.


    Muslims and many non-Muslim scholars often portray Muhammad as a poor man, who led a very simplistic life and dedicated his life for the service of God and his followers is an absolute falsehood.

    But it simply cannot be true. During his Prophetic career, Muhammad gathered a vast wealth for him and at the time of his death he was one of the richest men in Arabia. He was not shy to admit that he loved money,

    “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been made victorious with terror. The treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand’.” (Bukhari: 4.52.220)

    Terror is Muhammad’s legacy and one of his strongest motivations was money. Another motivation was sex with captured women.
    “The Prophet said, ‘If you live long enough the treasures of Khosrau will be opened and taken as spoils. You will carry out handfuls of gold and silver’.” (Bukhari: 4.56.793)

    “I have been given the keys of the treasures of the world by Allah.” (Bukhari: 4.56.795)

    Ali [Muhammad’s adopted son, son-in-law, and future Caliph] said, ‘Prophet, women are plentiful. You can get a replacement, easily changing one for another.’” (Tabari: VIII. 62, Ishaq: 496).

    The simple reason, Muhammad could not be poor because he maintained a large family. We cannot say exactly, how many times Muhammad got married, but it is generally agreed by all that at one stage he had at least nine wives. Marriages were costly social activities. When Allah allowed Muhammad to marry his daughter-in-law, Zaynab, it is recorded that he celebrated for a week; hundreds of goats were slaughtered to provide lavish meals for the residents of Medina. Throwing such a lavish party for a week for the entire population of Medina can hardly be called a simplistic life style. Today only billionaires can provide such party.

    Secondly, marrying multiple wives was a sign of wealth in Arabia, and still so in these days, which is hardly surprising. An example; King ‘Abd al-‘Aziz of Arabia had 300 wives. Each of Muhammad’s wives had her own house independent of another, maids and slaves to look after them. This is one of the examples of Muhammad’s ‘simplistic’ life-style. On top of this, Muhammad had a good number of slaves, servants, slave girls, personal assistants, and bodyguards. Then there were many mules, horses, donkeys, goats and camels stolen and looted from others. By the way, Muhammad always rode on ‘Yafur’, his legendary donkey (Warraq, 2000, p. 241). He must have appointed a large number of people to look after his livestock, especially for ‘Yafur’. Such a man can be anything but a poor or simple man.

    Muhammad used to take one-fifth share of the booty in Allah’s name which obviously became Muhammad’s wealth at the end. The amount of wealth Muhammad gathered from his raids was not small. As example, the battle of Honein, which was fought on February 1, 630 AD, Muslims captured following booty,

    “24,000 camels, 40,000 sheep and goats, 4,000 ounces of silver and 6,000 prisoners. They were removed to the neighboring valley of Al-jirana and sheltered there” (Shaikh, 1999, p. 20).

    “The Apostle held a large number of captives. There were 6,000 women and children prisoners. He had captured so many sheep and camels they could not be counted.” (Ishaq: 592)

    In another expedition, Muhammad suddenly attacked Banu Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives. In this war, Muhammad captured following booty and captives,

    “600 were taken prisoners by the Muslims. Among the booty there were 2,000 camels and 5,000 goats.” (Bukhari: 3.46.717)

    Now, one fifth of the above amount Muhammad earned from each battle. Considering the number of battles Muhammad had fought in his lifetime and countless number of women and children he captured as slaves; no doubt he died as one of the richest man in Arabia. But the sad part is that, even after receiving so much for his valuable service to Allah, Muhammad was not satisfied. He even grasped the property of other Muslims also. As per Sunaan Abu Dawud, 18:2895, Muhammad was the inheritor of those who had no heir. Muhammad had very little respect for his dead companions.

    Muhammad was greedy. When he conquered Khaibar, he enslaved the Jews, executed many of them and stole their property. One of Muhammad’s most brutal acts involved a prisoner named Kinana. When Muhammad wanted him to reveal where some buried treasure was hidden, Kinana refused. Muhammad gave the order, “Torture him until you extract what he has.” This is what the criminals do to obtain people’s money or possessions. How much plunder was sufficient for Muhammad? Muhammad had already gained the possessions of Khaibar. No doubt he had already obtained great wealth. Was it necessary for Muhammad to do this to Kinana?

    Now we will see who all other people benefited from Islam. The character which Ibn Ishaq gave to the companions of Muhammad in ‘Sirat Rasul Allah’ was rarely pleasing. The companions of Muhammad and the early Caliphs gathered large wealth and lived a luxurious life. As example, Muhammad’s cousin Zubair was found to be having estates of total value of fifty million and two hundred thousand dirhams. Fabulous figures are quoted for other companions of Muhammad also. A son of the pious Omar had 1000 slaves at the time of his death. Within short decades after Muhammad’s death Mecca and Medina were transformed from obscure settlements to the religious and political capitals of a mighty empire (Margoliouth, 1914, p. 136-7). Needless to say, huge fortunes were built up out of the plunder which reached Mecca and Medina in camel loads from Persia, Syria and Egypt.

    Narcissists are “interpersonally exploitative”, i.e., uses others to achieve his or her own ends. Muhammad never put his life in danger by fighting a battle. But when it is time for collecting booty or women, he was well ahead of others. His followers died happily for his cause. They thought they were fighting for Allah’s cause, but actually they laid down their lives to fulfill the narcissistic desires of Muhammad.
    Muhammad enjoyed everything whatever he needed in his life. From a destitute orphan to a shepherd to a humble messenger of God to a desert bandit to one of the richest men of Arabia – he slowly transformed himself as opportunities came to him. No doubt he was a man of caliber.

    Though Muhammad was one of the richest men of Arabia at the time of his death, the financial conditions of the common Muslims deteriorated with time. Muhammad convinced the Muslims that Allah loves poverty and illiteracy and hates wealth, prosperity, education and the rich people. This is recorded by Imam Ghazali.

    According to Ghazali (al- Ghazali, 1993, p. 2.28, 3.181, 3.201); prayer, a big family and poverty will ensure Paradise. To promote further admiration of poverty among the Muslims, he writes that Allah and His Prophet praised one who remains satisfied with poverty. Ghazali even goes to the extent to exhort Muslims to condemn wealth but praise poverty; poverty is better than wealth. But it never occurred in Ghazali’s mind – if Allah really loves poverty, why Muhammad gathered so much wealth?

    Though, the economy of Mecca and Medina prospered, the living standard of the common Muslims deteriorated. There were large scale deaths in warfare leaving women and children of the dead Muslims helpless, which neither bothered Muhammad nor the early Muslim rulers.

    “I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, ‘Allah guarantees that He will admit the Muslim fighter into Paradise if he is killed, otherwise He will return him to his home safely with rewards and booty’.” (Bukhari: 4.52.46).

    “The Believers fight in Allah’s cause, they slay and are slain, kill and are killed” (Quran: 9.112).

    What is the difference between ‘Allah’s cause’ and ‘Muhammad’s cause’? If the Muslim fighter dies Muhammad loses nothing, but if he returns back with booty and women; Muhammad takes one fifth share of the booty and the woman of his choice. Muhammad glorified poverty for his self-serving purposes. If Muslims remain poor, then Muhammad and his companions could gather more wealth. Muhammad’s thinking was simple – fight the infidels, gather booty and capture women for me. Allah will give you much more after your death. If you obey me you will enter Allah’s Paradise and if you don’t obey you will go to hell. For Muhammad, the Muslims were mere instruments. Vaknin (1999, p. 115) wrote,

    “A Narcissist sees no reason in dedicating thought to their needs, wishes, wants, desires and fears. He derails their life with easy and benevolent ignorance”.

    The lure of Paradise and fear of hell turned early Muslims into moths eager to cremate themselves on the flame of the ‘Allah’s cause’, i.e., holy Jihad. Muhammad knew this side of human weakness very well. If we make a careful study of the Qur’an and Ahadith, we will find there are umpteen numbers of cases where Muhammad had benefited at the cost of his followers. There were many situations where common Muslims had laid down their lives in the name of Allah, just for a small and minor benefit of Muhammad.
    Muhammad saw those around them as objects, targets, or opportunities or anything but Human being. Most probably, Muhammad had no true friendship with anyone in his band. He had only partners in crime and victims. As it is going to be shown shortly; his accomplices frequently ended up as victims. For Muhammad the ends always justified the means. There is no place for feelings of remorse, shame, or guilt. Muhammad felt justified in all his actions because he considered himself the ultimate moral arbiter. Nothing gets in the way of a malignant Narcissist.

    Muhammad demanded to be recognized as superior without any tangible achievement at any cost. His followers died for him to make him rich and to make his mission successful. Today if a billion plus Muslims adore Muhammad as their Prophet it was possible because of those early brainwashed followers who laid down their lives happily to make Muhammad what he is today. Without them, what was Muhammad’s contribution in the success of Islam?

    But Muhammad did not recognize the individuality or rights of those people. He only recognized himself as human. He never hesitated to tell lie or deceive his devoted followers. Muhammad’s needs were greater than his followers, but he denied it to all. A Narcissist doesn’t know how to feel sorry for what he does. He does not like to put himself in the shoes of his victims. Life was a superficial game for him and his followers are pawns on his board.


    Vaknin (1999, p. 11) wrote

    “Anyone who comes in contact with a Narcissist is bound to be a loser. Narcissism is a mental epidemic and a curse to mankind. It is a destructive, evil and torturous disease, which affects not only the Narcissist, but it also infects and forever changes people who are in daily contact with the Narcissist”.

    One of the very strange things to deal with after being the victim of a Narcissist is that most people will not want to believe what happened to the victim, even if they saw it with their own eyes! This is the height of the manipulative capability of a Narcissist. Narcissists often reverse the role with his victims. The victim is represented as mentally disordered and the Narcissist – the suffering soul.

    The Narcissist is forever the same. It is the victim who changes. They are unable to separate themselves from the Narcissist. There is no place for feelings of remorse, shame, or guilt. On the contrary they scapegoat the followers and blame them. Blame is a powerful reinforcer of passivity and obedience, producing guilt, shame, terror, and conformity in the followers.

    Even after all the above miseries caused to the victims, still there is something more terrible. Narcissism is a contagious disease. It spoils the lives of the victims even when their Narcissist leader is no more. The influence is really that much. Slowly, the victims absorb the Narcissist’s way of destructive thinking. It means, though the Narcissist leader is dead or has abandoned his victim, the force of narcissism will still haunt the followers. The Narcissist is still alive deep inside the traumatic memories waiting for an opportunity to act out. The victims of a Narcissist are modified and they are not even aware of it, as we read in the science fictions of alien snatching the human bodies. As a summary, any sane person who has put a single grain of trust on his Narcissist leader is destined to suffer.

    In case of Muhammad, almost anyone who came in contact with him had suffered. The seventh century Arabs, though illiterate, hotheaded and superstitious; were generally innocent. They had high sense of self respect and they were ready to die for it. But when they came within the narcissistic grip of Muhammad, they became murderous and greedy. Now they are ready to die for Allah’s cause instead of dying for the preservation of self-respect. Now they are the mental slaves of their leader. A slave has no honor, no self-respect.

    With the deterioration of their character, the early Arabs had suffered miserably in every possible way. Those early companions of Muhammad not only lost their property and self-respect but the lives of their children, relatives even their own lives. At the end of the day they returned with empty hands, disappointed and disillusioned. All of them were pathetic losers. Almost all of them died a dog’s death. And this had happened only because they had blindly trusted Muhammad, their Narcissist leader and followed his guidance. Muhammad had changed their mind and attitude completely. They were completely modified by the powerful force of narcissism of Muhammad, so much so that now they are nothing but a shadow of their former selves. Now they have contracted the disease of narcissism. They have been infected and poisoned. They have been branded.
    I cannot say for sure when demoralizing influence of Muhammad’s teaching began to be felt, but in all probability it started when Muhammad became the head of a criminal gang. It was then that Muslims who had never broken an oath were convinced that they might evade their obligations, and to those Muslims to whom the blood of their clan had been as their own, began to shed it with impunity in the “cause of Allah”. Also, lying and treachery in the cause of Islam received Divine approval. Muslims learnt that raiding innocents, murdering them, enslaving them and raping their wives were Divine acts which please God. Muslims also learnt from their Prophet that by committing all these brutal acts they would enter Paradise.

    This is distortion of reality. No doubt, initially many of his followers became suspicious about the true Divine origin of the revelations, but slowly they absorbed Muhammad’s way of destructive thinking. The mindset of the Muslims changed as they lost their self-worth and honor.

    Booty is always easy money. When the Muslims were addicted to this source of easy money, they lost their productivity and the sense of ethical values. Their moral faculty was so much deteriorated that even after Muhammad was dead; the force of his narcissistic maneuverability was still conning his followers. Muhammad, the malignant Narcissist was still alive deep inside the traumatic memories of his early companions waiting for an opportunity to act out. In sum, the early victims of Muhammad were modified even without being aware that they were victimized by their master.

    Here I want to discuss about some prominent companions of Muhammad, namely; Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali and Fatima, to show how the force of Muhammad’s narcissism was still acting strongly in them causing all of them to be completely ruined. They lost their happiness, distrusted each other, conspired and fought with each other violently, caused death and destruction not only to others but their families also. Because of their closeness to Muhammad; they were more open to Muhammad’s narcissistic grips. No doubt, they were most devoted Muslims and put their complete trust on Muhammad but neither Allah nor Islam had given them anything in return.

    Allah wrote in the Qur’an,

    “He is the one who has strengthened you and the believers with His help through putting affection in their hearts. If you had spent all that is in the earth, you could not have so united their hearts; but Allah has united them. He is Mighty, Wise. O Prophet! Allah is all-sufficient for you and for the believers who follow you” (Q: 8. 61-64)

    But in reality, in spite of uniting these people God had cursed them by bringing them division and hatred. Abu Bakr, the closest male friend of Muhammad, was the first of the so-called four “rightly guided” Caliphs. He ruled for two years then died. Other three Caliphs; namely, Utman, Umar and Ali were murdered. Fatima, the daughter of Muhammad, died some six months after Muhammad. When Muhammad died, he left a huge wealth which he had earned by plunder, extortion, murder and all sort of criminal activities. Greed overcame all the above people and the thought of Islamic faith or Allah never appeared in their mind.

    Before death, Muhammad proclaimed that he would not be leaving inheritance to his family members (Muslim: 19.4355). But the very next day of Muhammad’s death, nasty and hateful events began to transpire. Fatima, Ali and Al-Abbas came to Abu Bakr to demand share in the inheritance. But Abu Bakr refused to give any thing to Fatimah (Muslim: 19.4349). This made her very angry and she left and did not talk to him till her death (Tabari: 9.196, 197). Abu Bakr died two years after assuming the caliphate and Umar became caliph. But, Ali and Ibn Abbas had never allowed the dispute to die out – they still wanted the money. Greed was equally displayed by Muhammad’s wives also (Muslim: 19.4351).

    So, Muhammad’s dead body was barely cold and here they were demanding their share of inheritance. There was no real period of mourning, no spiritual reflection or drawing close together of Muhammad’s near and dear ones. Instead of all these, people were moving on the money right away as if they were waiting for Muhammad to die. Their minds were completely filled up by greed and hatred. With deep hatred they started calling each other a “sinful, treacherous, dishonest, liar!” (Muslim: 19.4349). No doubt; a number of dark and powerful negative sentiments were at work there. The hatred continued for a long time and ultimately it resulted in bloodshed.
    There was another dispute. At the time of his death, Muhammad did not declare a successor. There was strong disagreement about who should become the next ruler (Warraq, 2003, p. 40). On Muhammad’s death, his most intimate friends, Abu Bakr and Umar abandoned the corpse of their dead master, and left it without a burial place, in a hurry to ensure his political succession (Warraq, 2000, p. 182). This resulted in strong arrogance and rebellion. At the time of Muhammad’s death, the Muslim community was not at all unified; rather, they were nearly at each other throats!

    After Muhammad’s death; Ali wanted to be the Caliph but Abu Bakr became a Caliph because Umar supported him. Seeing this, Al-Zubayr drew his sword, saying, “I will not put it back until the oath of allegiance is rendered to Ali.” (Tabari: 9.188, 189). However Abu Bakr became Caliph without bloodshed. Ali was compelled to give a token pledge of allegiance to Abu Bakr. In his heart he rejected Abu Bakr.

    When Abu Bakr became Caliph, Abu Sufyan was very unhappy. He deeply hated Abu Bakr, because Abu Bakr was coming from a lowly clan of Mecca. Sufyan even agreed to a future bloodshed if it would be required to rid this perceived wrong (Tabari: 9.199). Abu Bakr was inferior to him, but Sufyan would have to take orders from this lowly nobody. Sufyan was a shrewd politician and had his eye on power.
    After deep hatred and greed, which came next, was ambivalence, moral corruption and murder. After Abu Bakr, Umar became the Caliph but he was murdered by one of his slave who claimed to have been cheated by Umar.

    Uthman was chosen as the next Caliph. Under his leadership, life became more difficult for Muslims. There were charges of clan partiality, financial mismanagement, corruption and elitism against Uthman. This made him very unpopular (Tabari: 15.143, 162, 167). Soon a large Muslim army rose up in arms against him and three large bodies of men, from Egypt, Kufa, and Basra, moved against Uthman and marched on Medina (Tabari: 15.186,187). Even Uthman’s own adopted son rose against him. The dark attitudes that were implanted in the Muslim’s hearts and minds by Muhammad’s force of narcissism found an opportunity to grow, spread roots, and more blooms of Islam’s real fruit started blossoming.

    Uthman called for help from his various governors, but nobody came. The tribesmen of Uthman, did little or nothing to defend their Caliph. They knew that if he fell, they could possibly become the Caliph (Tabari: 15.185). Ultimately Uthman was murdered and one of his murderers was Muhammad b. Abi Bakr (Abu Bakr’s son). Tabari recorded how cruelly Uthman was killed,

    “He came over to him with a broad iron headed arrow and stabbed him in the head with it…. They gathered round him and killed him.” (Tabari: 15.190, 191).

    Uthman was stabbed nine times, throttled and one of his hands was severed. After killing him, one of the murderers rejoice declared,

    “By Allah, I have never seen anything softer than his throat. By God, I throttled him until I saw his soul shaking in his body like the soul of a jinn”. (Tabari: 15.205).

    So at each progressive step in the history of Islam, the picture becomes darker and darker. Within a generation of Muhammad’s death, the true fruit of Islam ripen. Now the most precious Islamic blood is being spilt, and that at the hand of the best Muslims.

    Muhammad’s companions were now murdering each other. Men that fought side by side in the most difficult early days of Islam now turned their swords upon each other. The Islamic empire was now beset with moral, political, and financial corruption from Medina to its outskirts. Muhammad’s best friend’s son has just murdered the forth person to believe in and follow Muhammad. The supreme ruler of the Islamic empire has just been butchered in his own home, and the Islamic community was no where to be found. They had turned a blind eye, or turned their backs on their ruler, indulgent as he was.
    What should we say about Qur’anic Sura 8:61-64 now?

    The Islamic community’s heart had become so full of sin that their emotions were now giving way to brutal actions. The top Muslim was just cut down. And this was not a one man affair. Several of Muhammad’s companions moved against their former friend and murdered him. The Muslims who should have been defending Uthman walked away from him and left him to his fate and in less than 15 years the Islamic community began to become corrupt. Muslims that had stood with Muhammad through thick and thin, had fought side by side with him, now clashing against each other. They desired power, wealth, and vainglory, and for this they hated, betrayed and murderrd each other. In less than one generation the Islamic community had become a pack of dogs set on devouring each other. Spiritual corruption had established itself from the Caliphate on down and now this spiritual death bore its fruits in the physical realm.

    Up to this point we’ve seen the evil seeds of greed, hatred, envy, and discord grow from deep within the hearts of several prominent Muslims. Following Uthman’s murder, confusion began to spread in the Islamic community, and the search was on for a new leader. Eventually, in Medina, Ali was recognized as the Caliph. But Aisha, Muhammad’s most beloved wife moved against Ali. She gave a passionate speech in Mecca, heating the desert blood within the Muslim’s hearts. She cried for justice and vengeance (Tabari: 16.41, 43, 51, 53). Implicitly, she implicated Ali in Uthman’s murder, and the people knew that fighting for justice would be fighting against Ali.

    Finally, Ali marched towards Basrah and Aisha and her followers gathered their strength to meet him. Soon the battle started and it was violent and neither side yielded much ground. Men from both sides were fierce, brave warriors. They did not fear death that day and fought like lions. In Islamic history, this battle is known as ‘Battle of Camel’. The various accounts of the casualty count were very high.

    “Those killed at the Battle of the Camel around the camel numbered 10,000, half from Ali’s followers, and half from Aisha’s. …. It was said that in the first battle 5000 Basrans were killed and a further 5000 in the second battle [there was a pause during the battle], totaling 10,000 Basran fatalities and 5,000 Kufans”. (Tabari: 16.164).

    In battle of camel, two prominent Muslims Talha and Zubayr died, both of them were most beloved of Muhammad’s companions. However, more bloodshed lay in store for Ali after battle of camel ended. The long underlying conflict between Muhammad and Abu Sufyan re-appeared and the bitterness revived. Ali and Mu’awiyah – Abu Sufyan’s son, play the opposing roles. Mu’awiyah’s father was a shrewd politician and he taught his sons well. Sufyan secretly desired to achieve political power.

    When Mu’awiyah came to know that Ali is on his way to confront him, he gave order,

    “In that case, Oh Abu Abdallah, prepare the men!” (Tabari: 17.2)

    In the history of Islam, this battle is known as ‘Battle of Siffin’, which continued for a long time. It was actually a series of day by day battles. Ali tried to negotiate with Mu’awiyah to end the battle, but he received much humiliation. Negotiators from each side started insulting, cursing and vilifying each other by quoting Qur’anic passages and hurling them against each other (Tabari: 17. 92). In this battle, one notable person Ubaydallah, the son of the second “rightly guided” Caliph Umar was murdered (Tabari: 17. 63). After Uthman was murdered, he joined up with Mu’awiyah. After Ali’s humiliation, Mu’awiyah turned to Egypt, where Muhammad b. Abi Bakr (Uthman’s murderer and Abu Bakr’s son) was appointed as governor. Soon Muhammad bin Abu Bakr was captured and murdered by Mu’awiyah.

    Slowly Mu’awiyah gained in power. By seeing Ali in a miserable condition, his hand picked governors, his own relatives and friends rebelled against him (Tabari: 17.210, 211). Eventually Ali was murdered. By hearing the news about Ali’s death, Aisha rejoiced.

    “And she threw down her staff and settled upon her place of abode, like the traveler happy to return home” (Tabari: 17.224).

    After Mu’awiyah died his son Yazid claimed the Caliphate. But Ali’s son and Muhammad’s grandson Husayn opposed Yazid and likewise claimed the Caliphate. This again led to war. At this point Yazid was very powerful. Husayn encountered Yazid’s force near Karbala. During this time he had with him about 45 horsemen and 100 foot soldiers. In the battle, Husayn was beheaded and his severed head was sent to Yazid (Tabari: 19.167, 176).

    It was just a dark Shakespearian tragedy unfolded in front of us. Hatred, jealousy, and bitterness, are rooted in the hearts of the leaders of the Islamic community. Some foresaw civil war down the road even before the death of Muhammad. The Allah of Islam had failed to “knit together” the hearts of the Muslims. There was absolutely no brotherly love between all of these leading Muslims. The seeds of narcissistic wickedness ran deep within the hearts and minds of these, the best Muslims, from the beginning.
    So, this is the type of brotherhood and fellowship practiced by Muhammad’s followers after his death. All the seven deadly sins (shamelessness, magical thinking, arrogance, envy, entitlement, exploitation and bad boundaries) of a Narcissist were prominently present in the early followers of Muhammad. It was possible because, they were very close to Muhammad and came in contact with him more often than others. Muhammad’s narcissism infected them and changed them completely. Not only they were changed, but it even changed their sons also. Even the sons of the so-called, “Rightly Guided” Caliphs of Islam were striving to kill each other! The greed and lust for power was so strong that even Muhammad’s wives could not come out from this.

    I cannot see any type of love and brotherhood amongst them; instead I can see war, hatred, envy, lies, deceit, bitterness and massive bloodshed in the lust for power. Also, there were wholesale slaughter, cruel brutalities and bitter oppression and absolutely no spiritual fruit worth mentioning. In stead of spiritually building them up, Muhammad’s narcissistic force had poisoned them, ruined them and completely destroyed them. Little by little, Muhammad’s narcissistic poison worked in the spiritual bloodstream of these Muslims, degraded them and demonized them. They would have been better if they did not have sold their soul to a Narcissist like Muhammad.

    Where is the root of all these negative qualities that poisoned them? If we make a careful study of Muhammad’s biography, we can see that all these evils originated from Muhammad. The greed, last for power, hatred, envy, lies, deceit, bitterness, shamelessness, exploitation, bloodshed – practically all the evil actions were the trademarks of Muhammad.

    In every community, there are good and bad people. The tragedy is, Islam’s poison strengthens the wicked side of a good man and subdues their moral faculty. Each of the players of early stage of Islam shed the blood of tens of thousands of Muslims only to secure what they thought they were entitled for. But at the end they got nothing and most of them died miserably like stray dogs on the streets.

  2. Jihad with sword is not allowed in the absence of a direct order from God. If only they had followed the People of the Household, they wouldn’t have gone astray.




      And surely thou hast sublime morals
      (Surat Al-Qalam 68:4).

      Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah an excellent exemplar
      (Surat Al-Ahzab 33:21).

      Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly.

      Muhammad fantasized about baby Aisha before soliciting her from her father

      Sahih Bukhari 9.140 Narrated ‘Aisha:

      Allah’s apostle said to me, “you were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘if this is from Allah, then it must happen.

      Sahih al-Bukhari, volume 7, book 62, number 17 Narrated jabir bin ‘abdullah:

      When I got married, Allah’s apostle said to me, “what type of lady have you married?” I replied, “I have married a matron.” he said, “why, don’t you have a liking for the virgins and for fondling them?” Jabir also said: Allah’s apostle said, “why didn’t you marry a young girl so that you might play with her and she with you?”

      Muhammad, 50, marries baby Aisha at age 6

      Sahih Bukhari volume 5, book 58, number 234

      Narrated Aisha: the prophet engaged (married) me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, um ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me.

      …….she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some ansari women who said, “best wishes and Allah’s blessing and a good luck.” then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

      Bukhari vol 8, bk 73, no 151

      Narrated ‘Aisha: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the prophet, & my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the prophet would call them to join & play with me. (the playing with the dolls & similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-bari page 143, vol.13)


      Quran 65.4 “and those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘iddah (prescribed divorce period), if you have doubts (about their p The most striking thing about his statement, however, was that it was not an apology; it was a logical, proud justification for preserving the death penalty as a punishment for apostasy. Al-Qaradawi sounded matter-of-fact, indicating no moral conflict, nor even hesitation, about this policy in Islam. On the contrary, he asserted the legitimacy of Islamic laws in relying on vigilante street justice through fear, intimidation, torture & murder against any person who might dare to leave Islam.
      eriods), is three months, and for those who have no courses [(i.e. They are still immature) their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise, except in case of death] .

      And for those who are pregnant (whether they are divorced or their husbands are dead), their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is until they deliver (their burdens) (give birth) and whosoever fears Allah and keeps his duty to him, he will make his matter easy for him.”

      Sura (65:4) lays down rules for divorce and sets the prescribed period for divorce. It clearly says, Muslim men can marry (and divorce) little girls who have not yet reached menstruation age. This means that Muslim men were allowed to marry baby girls. This is the eternal word of god. This is an eternal law of Allah. All Muslims must believe in this teaching. Otherwise, they are no longer Muslims but apostates of Islam.


      Now let us see how thighing is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith, which was quoted earlier, mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

      Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.
      According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

      Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

      Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.

      Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.“Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

      The inquirer asked the following:‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’
      After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

      That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers’” (Fatwa No. 31409).

      Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

      Mohammed heard one of his wives was leaving him, so he rushed home where he found her on the carpet in front of the tent with her belongings; he sat down beside her & said, “I heard you were planning to leave me?”
      She replied, “Yes, I heard your other wives saying, you were a pedophile!”
      Mohammed thinks for a minute or so & then responds,
      “that’s a mighty big word for a 6 year old child.”

      YOU TUBE
      Pedophilia in Islam , thighing children , fondling underage girls pedophilia – whole film

      by Hoplit300•

      What is “thighing”?

      by neotropic9•


      by bigtone1979Taiwan•

      Thighing of Female Children In Islam
      by Thomas Ahmed•
      Child Bride in Islam.

      Sure 65:4 Mufa’ Khathat – thighing ISLAM

      by Merauder2000•
      wwwislamqacom wwwislamqacom wwwaltafsircom schnellmannorg

      Muhammad Aisha Pedophile Child Rape Muslim Marriage Law 1 Muhaddithorg
      by AwesomeIslam•

      The Qur’an and Marrying Little Girls

      Islam does allow you to marry pre-menstruating girls. The following verse is from At-Talaq (or Divorce). Islam’s main concern during a divorce is knowing who the father is (in case of a pregnancy). The waiting period is known as iddah.

      65.4 Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the prescribed period, if you have any doubts, is three months, AND FOR THOSE WHO HAVE NO COURSES (it is the same): for those who are pregnant, their period is until they deliver their burdens: and for those who fear Allah, He will make things easy for them.

      Tafsir al-Jalalayn (Commentary)
      And [as for] those of your women who (read allā’ī or allā’i in both instances) no longer expect to menstruate, if you have any doubts, about their waiting period, their prescribed [waiting] period shall be three months, and [also for] those who have NOT YET MENSTRUATED, because of their YOUNG AGE, their period shall [also] be three months — both cases apply to other than those whose spouses have died; for these [latter] their period is prescribed in the verse: they shall wait by themselves for four months and ten [days] [Q. 2:234]. And those who are pregnant, their term, the conclusion of their prescribed [waiting] period if divorced or if their spouses be dead, shall be when they deliver. And whoever fears God, He will make matters ease for him, in this world and in the Hereafter.

      Tafsir Asbab Al-Nuzul by Al-Wahid
      (And for such of your women as despair of menstruation…) [65:4]. Said Muqatil: “When the verse (Women who are divorced shall wait, keeping themselves apart…), Kallad ibn al-Nu‘man ibn Qays al-Ansari said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, what is the waiting period of the woman who does not menstruate and the woman who has not menstruated yet? And what is the waiting period of the pregnant woman?’ And so Allah, exalted is He, revealed this verse”. Abu Ishaq al-Muqri’ informed us Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn Hamdun> Makki ibn ‘Abdan Abu’l-Azhar Asbat ibn Muhammad Mutarrif Abu ‘Uthman ‘Amr ibn Salim who said: “When the waiting period for divorced and widowed women was mentioned in Surah al-Baqarah, Ubayy ibn Ka‘b said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, some women of Medina are saying: there are other women who have not been mentioned!’ He asked him: ‘And who are they?’ He said: ‘Those WHO ARE TOO YOUNG [such that they have not started menstruating yet], those who are too old [whose menstruation has stopped] and those who are pregnant’. And so this verse (And for such of your women as despair of menstruation…) was revealed”.

      Islamic Website
      “And those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘Iddah (prescribed period), if you have doubt (about their periods), is three months; and for those who have no courses [(i.e. they are still immature) their ‘Iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise…”

      Tafsir ibn Kathir (Read at your own leisure)


      In Saudi Arabia, the human rights group “Women to Drive” is protesting the light sentence given a Muslim preacher for the torture, rape and murder of his five-year old daughter, on suspicion that she was not a virgin. According to various reports, it is said that according to sharia law, a father cannot be executed for murdering his children, nor a husband for murdering his wives.

      The following ruling is promulgated by orthodox Sunni Islam; a parent is “not subject to retaliation” (or, retribution) “for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring.” Jihad Watch attributes the worldwide epidemic in honor killings to the spread of Muslims worldwide. According to some Islamic scholars, honor killings predate all the major contemporary religions of the world, and are part of the common primitive, tribal and patriarchal prehistory of mankind.

      However, international surveys indicate that many Muslims believe their religion sanctions honor killings. The recent ruling from Saudi Arabia indicates honor killing continues to be countenanced by Muslim jurists in majority Muslim countries. As to the meaning of “blood money,” it pertains to paying for the economic loss suffered by the victim or next of kin.

      According to the Talmud, in the case of a loss due to simple negligence, it is equal to three components: (A) medical expenses, (B) the loss of wages, and (C) the amount a person of similar status would pay to avoid the pain and suffering. In the case of a loss due to criminal negligence short of premeditated murder, the law of retribution (“eye for an eye”) pertains, although the victim could exercise mercy and accept only blood money. In the case of premeditated murder, there can be no mercy. That there is a distinction between simple negligence (such as an industrial accident) and criminal negligence is made clear in Deuteronomy Chapter 19.

      The law of retribution is thus confined to crimes as opposed to mere torts; and even in the case of criminal negligence, mercy might be exercised. While we are on the subject of “eye for an eye,” I will comment briefly of what Jesus had to say. He said “whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.” (Matthew 5:39) Being hit on the right check is to be hit with the left or weak hand of the offender. It’s a Jewish idiom for being insulted. Jesus said do not return insult for insult, but see if an actual harm follows. In my Army days, we put it this way, don’t get into a pissing contest. (Somehow, I don’t think Jesus would put it that way.) Why even school children know this. They say, “sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.”

      Getting back to the law retribution, we could say that a parent is presumed to love his children and, so, in the absence of strong evidence, will only be held liable for blood money when responsible for the death of a child. If sharia law merely establishes a refutable presumption, it would make sense. Indeed, if you think that both revelation and reason are witnesses to the truth, reason would guide your interpretation of the Koran. This is how conservative Jews approach the Bible. We say you have to realize the texts come from a culture and literary style where allegory, exaggeration, sarcasm and humor are often employed, even where there are degrees of “no.” But, in Islam, the orthodox have been in charge for a long time now, and they almost insist that sharia law is to be followed even if it contradicts reason. I will conclude with a consideration of how faithful the Islamic scholars are the principle of restitution. As a forensic economist, I have numerous times offered my expert opinion to courts of law dealing with economic loss calculation. To be sure, I would adjust my calculation according to any specific information regarding the earnings potential or life expectancy of a particular person. In the absence of such information, I can only go by averages. Considering the per capita GDP of Saudi Arabia ($25,000), her work life expectancy (from 21 to 62), and the time value of money (at 6%), the economic loss suffered by the girl’s death is approximately $400,000. Not the puny amount $50,000 that has been reported! Those who claim they are doing justice are liars. And that they claim to do justice in the Name of God, they are damn liars! The man who killed this girl should, according to sharia law, be sold into slavery if he cannot pay $400,000, even if it accepted that he killed the girl out of a simple negligence. But, it is obvious that more than simple negligence was involved.

      Saudi Arabia’s Royal Family has intervened in the case of a leading cleric who raped and tortured his five-year-old daughter to death, causing outrage at home and abroad.
      Lama al-Ghamdi was admitted to hospital in the town of Hotat Bani Tamim in November with a crushed skull, broken back and shattered ribs. Social workers said that she had been repeatedly raped and her body burnt.

      REMEMBER Lama al-Ghamdi

      Lama al-Ghamdi a five year old child, was raped & tortured to death by her celebrity cleric father Fayhan al-Ghamdi.
      Lama al-Ghamdi’s back was broken and she had been raped and burned. She died in October from her injuries after seven months in hospital. Her father Fayhan al-Ghamdi, a prominent Islamist preacher, admitted beating her. Her mother Syeda Mohammed Ali, has said she will bring a case against her ex-husband.

      5 Feb 2013

      The mother of a five-year-old Saudi girl who was tortured to death by her ‘celebrity cleric’ father, has said she wants him brought to justice.
      Lama al-Ghamdi died in October having suffered multiple injuries including a crushed skull, broken ribs and left arm as well as extensive bruising.
      It has been alleged that she had also been repeatedly raped and that the injuries she sustained from the sexual abuse had been burned.

      Lama suffered multiple injuries including a crushed skull, broken ribs and back, bruising and burns. She had been raped repeatedly and died of her injuries in October
      It was previously reported that her father Fayhan al-Ghamdi, a prominent Islamist preacher who regularly appears on television in Saudi Arabia, had been released after paying ‘blood money’ to his ex-wife, and Lama’s mother, Syeda Mohammed Ali.
      It has now emerged that Lama’s mother is bringing her own case against al-Ghamdi, who is still in prison.

      ‘Even BABIES must wear the burka’: Saudi cleric says newborn girls should have their faces veiled to help ward off sex attacks
      Taliban shooting victim Malala, 15, nominated for Nobel Peace Prize for ‘commitment so threatening to the extremists they tried to kill her’
      Welcome to Bin Laden Land! Pakistan plans £19million amusement park with zoo, mini-golf and ski ramp in town where Al Qaeda leader was killed
      ‘My dear child is dead, and all I want now is justice so I can close my eyes and know she didn’t die in vain,’ Syeda Mohammed Ali, told CNN, adding that her daughter was ‘brutally tortured in the most shocking ways.’
      She is divorced from al-Ghamdi who is remarried and has two more children, and claims the torture happened whilst Lama was in her father’s care in March last year.
      ‘The state needs to even consider taking his two children from him and his wife away because I fear for their lives,’ she added.

      Torture: Saudi preacher Fayhan al-Ghamdi admitting beating his daughter with a cable and is said to have been concerned about his five-year-old daughter’s virginity
      ‘These are not some unfounded accusations, but everything is based on the medical examination by the hospital and the team of physicians who treated Lama when she was first admitted.’
      She said al-Ghamdi had voiced concerns about five-year-old Lama’s virginity.
      According to the Saudi Arabian Human Rights Commission, al-Ghamdi has been imprisoned for the past eight months and that the case is still under review.
      Syeda Mohammed Ali said her ex-husband has admitted to the torture and will face justice when the next hearing in the case takes place in two weeks.
      Activists from the group Women to Drive said the preacher had doubted Lama’s virginity and had her checked up by a medic.
      Randa al-Kaleeb, a social worker from the hospital where Lama was admitted, said the girl’s back was broken and that she had been repeatedly raped and her injuries burned.
      It was reported that al-Ghamdi agreed to pay £31,000 ($50,000) in blood money, a fact denied by Lama’s mother who says al-Ghamdi did not rape Lama.
      Activists say under Islamic laws a father cannot be executed for murdering his children. Husbands can also not be executed for murdering their wives, the group say.
      Three Saudi activists, including Manal al-Sharif, who started the women’s right to drive campaign, have raised objections to the case as it highlights the urgent need for legislation to protect women and children from domestic abuse.
      Manal al-Sharif has launched a campaign on Twitter using the hashtag ‘Ana Lama’, which is translated as I am Lama, calling for an improvement on the judicial treatment of women and children.
      Local reports say public anger in Saudi Arabia is also growing and authorities have said they will create a 24-hour hotline to take calls about child abuse.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s