Sexual Jihad And Spreading Crabs In The Name Of Prophet Muhammad


160839083-300x300(By SamRolley for Personal Liberty) In Islamic law, fatwa is a legal opinion or decree handed down by an Islamic religious leader known as mufti. While the dictates issued in a particular fatwa are not necessarily binding, extremists have been known to act on the orders, often with devastating results.

One of the most infamous and widely-known fatwas was issued in 1989 when a novel penned by British Indian novelist and essayist Salman Rushdie irritated Iran’s then-supreme leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.  More than two decades later, The Satanic Verses author still lives with the threat that “good Muslims” on a mission toassassinate him could show up at any time.

In the Middle East, fatwas abound, but are often so absurd that they get little attention from Western media. But, with heightened interest in the current struggle between Muslim fundamentalist rebels in the Free Syrian Army and that nation’s lawful government— and the looming prospect of U.S. intervention on the rebels’ behalf— it is worth taking a look at some recent Islamic fatwas.

In June, while the Muslim Brotherhood shill Mohamed Morsi was still in control of Egypt, the country’s fatwa council issued a directive banning Muslims from hunting and killing frogs to sell.

According to Jihad Watch, “the fatwa explains, according to Islam’s prophet Muhammad as recorded in a hadith, a frog’s ‘croaking is praise [to Allah].’ Accordingly, ‘a number of jurists [fuqaha] have relied on this [hadith] to forbid the eating of frogs, under the notion that “that which is banned from being killed, is forbidden from being eaten.”’”

Other animal-related fatwas in the past have ordered radical Muslims to kill Mickey Mouse and to kill all black dogs, among some animal rights decrees.

Later in June, a fatwa was issued in the Syrian city of Aleppo to punish people who dare to eat croissants.

From a previous Personal Liberty post:

According to an interview at China’s English-language Sina news website, one man who’s frustrated with the growing post-revolutionary power of Islamist extremists in Syria explains how fundamentalists are tightening their grip on local rule to an absurd extent.

“Al-Nusra Front fighters come up every day with a new unimaginable fatwa, or religious edict,” such as the fatwa against croissants, said the Syrian, identified only as “Ahmed.” The fundamentalists claim croissants are particularly relished by European infidels as a celebratory food (because of their “symbolic” crescent shape), which they allegedly tear into with gusto to commemorate historic victories over the Muslims.

Syrians originally inspired by a revolution they hoped would ensure stability and expanded freedoms are now taking to the internet to criticize al-Nusra’s growing intolerance of behaviors that fall outside various factions’ interpretations of sharia law. Other recent fatwas have involved women drivers, unveiled young girls, smoking and even listening to music.

Two—dare I note, unfortunately timed—fatwas surfaced in media more recently.

According to Ahlulbayt News, an English-language Shia Islamic television channel, the Free Syrian Army issued a fatwa prohibiting the killing of lice in the Muslim beard or else “be punished with 50 lashes by Sharia.”

A translation of the order from the Sharia Authority in Aleppo explains:

The Sharia Authority in Aleppo has prohibited the killing of lice that appears in the Muslim beard, as some of the Muslim brothers who have released [grown] their beards in accordance with prophet Muhammad PBuH Sunnah [prophet’s doctrine], blessed lice has appeared in their beards, and that’s because of their lack of bathing due to the water non-availability all the time on the Jihad [holy war] fronts, and they have limited to ablution before their prayers (may God accept it), thus their beards became moist and thick, which made of it (in God’s will) a natural place for lice to live in.

The Sharia Authority in Aleppo recommends the Mujahideen [holy fighters] brothers to dye their beards with Henna, like our prophet Muhammad PBuH, the thing that would reduce the itching caused by the lice, and to maintain this lice that would have not appeared in those blessed beards, if it was not from God’s Muslim believing creatures.

If the jihadists are to run around and be mercilessly shelled by the Syrian government all while having itchy beards, at least their sexual appetites will be satiated long before they reach Muhammad and all of those celestial virgins. That is thanks to a separate fatwa becoming popular in some Middle Eastern regions which calls on the widows of al-Qaida commanders and fighters to join the effort through “Sexual Jihad.”

The Assyrian International News Agency reported late last month:

Reports attribute the fatwa to Saudi sheikh Muhammad al-’Arifi, who, along with other Muslim clerics earlier permitted jihadis to rape Syrian women.

Muslim women prostituting themselves in this case is being considered a legitimate jihad because such women are making sacrifices–their chastity, their dignity–in order to help apparently sexually-frustrated jihadis better focus on the war to empower Islam in Syria…

… On the basis of this fatwa, several young Tunisian Muslim girls traveled to Syria to be “sex-jihadis.” Video interviews of distraught parents bemoaning their daughters’ fates are on the Internet, including one of a father and mother holding a picture of their daughter: “She’s only 16–she’s only 16! They brainwashed her!” pleads the father…

..While all these sex-fatwas may seem bizarre, they highlight two important (though little known in the West) points. First, that jihad is the “pinnacle” of Islam–for it makes Islam supreme; and second, the idea that “necessity makes permissible the prohibited.”

And the sex jihad is becoming increasingly popular throughout the Middle Eastern region, which is indicative of a big problem for the U.S. (a problem that has been evident to those paying attention for years) if the President decides to entangle the country in another war to help Syria’s rebels: al Qaida and various other groups of Muslim extremists are running the show in any area that the Western powers help to destabilize.

Via Alsumaria, an independent Iraqi Satellite TV Network:

A local official in Diyala province revealed that Al Qaeda Organization has asked the widows of its commanders and fighters to abide by “Sexual Jihad Fatwa” as a means of support to its guerillas; considering that such a Fatwa is transnational.

“Intelligence cells commissioned with monitoring Al Qaeda’s activities within Diyala’s borders have reported that the highly-ranked officials in the organization urged the widows of the commanders and members to abide by the sexual Jihad Fatwa. This Fatwa allows Al Qaeda’s women to have sexual intercourse with members of the organization to lift their morale”, said Al Khalis district’s administrative official, Oday Al Khadran in a statement to Alsumaria.

“The attempt to implement the Sexual Jihad Fatwa issued by clergymen that support the armed groups in Syria proves that such laws are transnational. This also points out that Al Qaeda’s course of action in Syria or in any other country is closely related to the events that are taking place in Iraq”, he added.

The President of the United States will to contend that the Nation is on some great humanitarian mission when it becomes clear that a Syrian war (to, no doubt, be followed by an Iranian conflict) is imminent— but it certainly will be a lie. In reality, the U.S. will jump headfirst into a holy war in support of the very jihadists who, we are to believe, attempted to bring us to our knees just under a decade and a half ago.

Do you want your tax dollars used in aid of people taking orders from men who advocate such barbarism as forced copulation and the proliferation of pubic lice?

36 thoughts on “Sexual Jihad And Spreading Crabs In The Name Of Prophet Muhammad

  1. Dear Raj, Islam does not defend those “Muslim” perverts as even Quran condemns them!!

    17:32 (SI): And do not approach unlawful sexual intercourse. Indeed, it is ever an immorality and is evil as a way.

    25:68 (SI): “….and do not commit unlawful sexual intercourse. And whoever should do that will meet a penalty”.

    Bad elements who remain within a religion, only in physical form but do not follow the Scriptures are found in every religion :

    9:67 YA: “… Verily the Hypocrites are rebellious and perverse”.

    The issue here is not the muslims or Hindus…but why India, with it’s strict Constitution and with the highest religious beliefs in the world, yet has degenerated so much in morality and broken the barriers of decency, in recent times??? What has led these criminals to their daring evil acts, thus damaging the image of India as a whole??

    Regards

    Plum

    • YO DUMB PLUM,

      MOHAMMED & HIS COMIC, THE QURAN, ARE SCHIZOPHRENIC!

      THEY SAY ONE THING & DO THE OPPOSITE!

      ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF ALLAH.

      ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED THE RAPE OF FEMALE CAPTIVES:

      RAPE JIHAD:

      Sahih Muslim Book 08. N 3371Marriage

      Chapter: Al-Azl (incomplete sexual intercourse): Coitus Interruptus.

      Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women;

      and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them.
      So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him?

      So we asked Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

      REMEMBER:

      ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF GOD

      ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED RAPE

      NOW LISTEN TO A TRUE PROPHET OF GOD:

      THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT

      Matthew ch 5 to Matthew ch 7

      The Beatitudes

      1And seeing the multitudes, He went up on a mountain, and when He was seated His disciples came to Him. 2Then He opened His mouth and taught them, saying:

      3″Blessed are the poor in spirit,
      For theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
      4Blessed are those who mourn,
      For they shall be comforted.
      5Blessed are the meek,
      For they shall inherit the earth.

      6Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
      For they shall be filled.
      7Blessed are the merciful,
      For they shall obtain mercy.
      8Blessed are the pure in heart,
      For they shall see God.
      9Blessed are the peacemakers,
      For they shall be called sons of God.
      10Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake,
      For theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
      11″Blessed are you when they revile and persecute you, and say all kinds of evil against you falsely for My sake. 12Rejoice and be exceedingly glad, for great is your reward in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

      Believers Are Salt and Light
      13 “You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt loses its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? It is then good for nothing but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot by men.
      14″You are the light of the world. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hidden. 15Nor do they light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a lampstand, and it gives light to all who are in the house. 16Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven.

      Christ Fulfills the Law
      17 “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. 19Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20For I say to you, that unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven.

      Murder Begins in the Heart
      21 “You have heard that it was said to those of old, “You shall not murder, and whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment.’ 22But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. And whoever says to his brother, “Raca!’ shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says, “You fool!’ shall be in danger of hell fire. 23Therefore if you bring your gift to the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24leave your gift there before the altar, and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift. 25Agree with your adversary quickly, while you are on the way with him, lest your adversary deliver you to the judge, the judge hand you over to the officer, and you be thrown into prison.
      26Assuredly, I say to you, you will by no means get out of there till you have paid the last penny.

      Adultery in the Heart
      27 “You have heard that it was said to those of old, “You shall not commit adultery.’
      28But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish, than for your whole body to be cast into hell. 30And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish, than for your whole body to be cast into hell.

      Marriage Is Sacred and Binding
      31 “Furthermore it has been said, “Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ 32But I say to you that whoever divorces his wife for any reason except sexual immorality causes her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a woman who is divorced commits adultery.

      Jesus Forbids Oaths
      33 “Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, “You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform your oaths to the Lord.’ 34But I say to you, do not swear at all: neither by heaven, for it is God’s throne; 35nor by the earth, for it is His footstool; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. 36Nor shall you swear by your head, because you cannot make one hair white or black. 37But let your “Yes’ be “Yes,’ and your “No,’ “No.’ For whatever is more than these is from the evil one.

      Go the Second Mile
      38 “You have heard that it was said, “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ 39But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. 40If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also. 41And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him two. 42Give to him who asks you, and from him who wants to borrow from you do not turn away.

      Love Your Enemies
      43 “You have heard that it was said, “You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’
      44But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you, 45that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. 46For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47And if you greet your brethren only, what do you do more than others? Do not even the tax collectors do so? 48Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect.

      Matthew 6

      Do Good to Please God
      1″Take heed that you do not do your charitable deeds before men, to be seen by them. Otherwise you have no reward from your Father in heaven. 2Therefore, when you do a charitable deed, do not sound a trumpet before you as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory from men. Assuredly, I say to you, they have their reward. 3But when you do a charitable deed, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4that your charitable deed may be in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will Himself reward you openly.

      The Model Prayer
      5″And when you pray, you shall not be like the hypocrites. For they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the corners of the streets, that they may be seen by men. Assuredly, I say to you, they have their reward. 6But you, when you pray, go into your room, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father who is in the secret place; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly. 7And when you pray, do not use vain repetitions as the heathen do. For they think that they will be heard for their many words.
      8″Therefore do not be like them. For your Father knows the things you have need of before you ask Him. 9In this manner, therefore, pray:

      Our Father in heaven,
      Hallowed be Your name.
      10Your kingdom come.
      Your will be done
      On earth as it is in heaven.
      11Give us this day our daily bread.
      12And forgive us our debts,
      As we forgive our debtors.
      13And do not lead us into temptation,
      But deliver us from the evil one.
      For Yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. Amen.

      14″For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. 15But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

      Fasting to Be Seen Only by God
      16 “Moreover, when you fast, do not be like the hypocrites, with a sad countenance. For they disfigure their faces that they may appear to men to be fasting. Assuredly, I say to you, they have their reward. 17But you, when you fast, anoint your head and wash your face, 18so that you do not appear to men to be fasting, but to your Father who is in the secret place; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly.

      Lay Up Treasures in Heaven
      19 “Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal; 20but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. 21For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.

      The Lamp of the Body
      22 “The lamp of the body is the eye. If therefore your eye is good, your whole body will be full of light. 23But if your eye is bad, your whole body will be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in you is darkness, how great is that darkness!

      You Cannot Serve God and Riches
      24 “No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.

      Do Not Worry
      25 “Therefore I say to you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink; nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food and the body more than clothing? 26Look at the birds of the air, for they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they?
      27Which of you by worrying can add one cubit to his stature?
      28″So why do you worry about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they neither toil nor spin; 29and yet I say to you that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 30Now if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is, and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will He not much more clothe you, O you of little faith?
      31″Therefore do not worry, saying, “What shall we eat?’ or “What shall we drink?’ or “What shall we wear?’ 32For after all these things the Gentiles seek. For your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. 33But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you. 34Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble.

      Matthew 7

      Do Not Judge
      1 “Judge not, that you be not judged. 2For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. 3And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye?
      4Or how can you say to your brother, “Let me remove the speck from your eye’; and look, a plank is in your own eye? 5Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.
      6″Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces.

      Keep Asking, Seeking, Knocking
      7 “Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. 8For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened. 9Or what man is there among you who, if his son asks for bread, will give him a stone? 10Or if he asks for a fish, will he give him a serpent? 11If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask Him! 12Therefore, whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.

      The Narrow Way
      13 “Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. 14Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.

      You Will Know Them by Their Fruits
      15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.
      19Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

      I Never Knew You
      21 “Not everyone who says to Me, “Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22Many will say to Me in that day, “Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23And then I will declare to them, “I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’

      Build on the Rock
      24 “Therefore whoever hears these sayings of Mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on the rock: 25and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house; and it did not fall, for it was founded on the rock.
      26″But everyone who hears these sayings of Mine, and does not do them, will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand: 27and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house; and it fell. And great was its fall.”
      28And so it was, when Jesus had ended these sayings, that the people were astonished at His teaching, 29for He taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes.

      • Hi Raj/Lucky, Today, we may cover the more interesting “Kissing”…the Western word possibly brought from the Kiss-Feed, where a mum is feeding the chewed food directly into the infant’s mouth, by pressing her lips with the baby’s!!

        Song of Solomon : 1:2
        May he kiss me with the kisses of his mouth,
        for your love is better than wine.

        Kissing was a custom during the Biblical period mentioned in the Proverbs 7:13/16/18/19

        “She grabs him and kisses him; she brazenly says to him,
        I have covered my bed with colored linens from Egypt,
        Come, let’s drink our fill of love until morning. Let’s enjoy each other’s caresses,
        for my husband is not home. He’s away on a long trip.”

        THE TALE OF SAVITRI-MAHABHARATA
        “Came with youth its lovelier graces, as the buds their leaves unfold,
        Slender waist and rounded bosom, image as of burnished gold”,
        “Clasped him in her beating bosom, KISSED his lips with panting breath…,
        (http://hinduism.about.com/library/weekly/extra/bl-mahabharata5.htm)

        Romans called the kissing on mouth for passion : Saveum

        In India, public display of affection is a criminal offense under Section 294 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 with a punishment of imprisonment of up to three months, or a fine, or both.

        Disease transmission!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        Kissing on the lips can result in the transmission of some diseases, including infectious mononucleosis and herpes simplex when the infectious viruses are present in saliva. Research indicates that contraction of HIV via kissing is extremely unlikely, although there was a documented case in 1997 of an HIV infection by kissing. Both the woman and infected man had gum disease. (source : Wiki)

        In Islam : Not mentioned in the Quran!! (But one may or not kiss the Kaaba during Hajj through his devotion).

        In fact the Quran is against such practices : 5:90

        Yusuf Ali: O ye who believe! Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination,- of Satan’s handwork: eschew such (abomination), that ye may prosper.

        Regards

        Plum

        • MOHAMMED EXPOSED:

          MURDER BEGINS IN THE HEART

          21 “You have heard that it was said to those of old, “You shall not murder, and whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment.’ 22But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. And whoever says to his brother, “Raca!’ shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says, “You fool!’ shall be in danger of hell fire. 23Therefore if you bring your gift to the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24leave your gift there before the altar, and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift. 25Agree with your adversary quickly, while you are on the way with him, lest your adversary deliver you to the judge, the judge hand you over to the officer, and you be thrown into prison.
          26Assuredly, I say to you, you will by no means get out of there till you have paid the last penny.
          ADULTERY BEGINS IN THE HEART
          27 “You have heard that it was said to those of old, “You shall not commit adultery.’
          28But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish, than for your whole body to be cast into hell. 30And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish, than for your whole body to be cast into hell.
          MARRIAGE IS SACRED & BINDING
          31 “Furthermore it has been said, “Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ 32But I say to you that whoever divorces his wife for any reason except sexual immorality causes her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a woman who is divorced commits adultery.
          GO THE SECOND MILE
          38 “You have heard that it was said, “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ 39But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. 40If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also. 41And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him two. 42Give to him who asks you, and from him who wants to borrow from you do not turn away.
          LOVE YOUR ENEMIES
          43 “You have heard that it was said, “You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’
          44But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you, 45that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. 46For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47And if you greet your brethren only, what do you do more than others? Do not even the tax collectors do so? 48Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect.
          The NARROW WAY

          13 “Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. 14Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.
          You Will Know Them by Their Fruits
          15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.
          19Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
          I NEVER KNEW YOU
          21 “Not everyone who says to Me, “Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22Many will say to Me in that day, “Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23And then I will declare to them, “I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’
          BUILD ON THE ROCK
          24 “Therefore whoever hears these sayings of Mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on the rock: 25and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house; and it did not fall, for it was founded on the rock.
          26″But everyone who hears these sayings of Mine, and does not do them, will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand: 27and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house; and it fell. And great was its fall.”
          28And so it was, when Jesus had ended these sayings, that the people were astonished at His teaching, 29for He taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes.

        • THE COSMIC JOKE

          YOU DON’T NEED TO KNOW ARABIC TO REALIZE THAT THE QURAN IS A “COSMIC” JOKE

          SO THIS IS ALLAH’S PERFECT BOOK?

          “The Qur’an escapes from the hearts of men faster than a runaway camel.”
          The present text of the Koran, which all Muslims accept as the only non-falsified holy book, was collected 15-20 years after the death of Muhammad in the time of the Caliph Uthman who ordered all previous collections to be burned.
          But you don’t have to dig very deep to find the truth. Even a cursory reading of the Qur’an is sufficient to prove that it is a fraud. There is no way the creator of the universe wrote a book devoid of context, without chronology or intelligent transitions. Such a creative spirit wouldn’t need to plagiarize. He would know history and science and thus wouldn’t have made such a fool of himself. The God who created man wouldn’t deceive him or lead him to hell as Allah does.

          Nor would he order men to terrorize, mutilate, rob, enslave, and slaughter the followers of other Scriptures he claims he revealed, wiping them out to the last. One doesn’t need a scholastic review of the Qur’anic text to disprove its veracity. It destroys itself quite nicely.
          Tradition tells us that Muhammad had not foreseen his death, and so he had made no preparations for gathering his revelations. He left it up to his followers to sift through the conflicting versions.

          There is not a SINGLE idea in the Quran that has not been plagiarized, pirated, plundered or perverted from the belief of others! The only new items in the Quran are the enormous amounts of hate, war, torture & Hellish verses that permeate through its pages.
          Mohammedanism is the Cult of Mohammed & both Quran & Hadithss instruct his followers to slavishly emulate his deeds, thoughts, manner & ideas. This is Cultism.

          Islam provides only one prime source of information on Muhammad and the formation of Islam written within two centuries of the time he lived and it was conceived. Ishaq’s Sira, or Biography, stands alone—a singular and tenuous thread connecting us to a very troubled man and time.

          Over the next two hundred years, other Hadith Collections were compiled by the likes of Tabari, Bukhari, and Muslim.

          Their assemblages of oral reports, or Traditions, were said to have been inspired by Allah. They purport to convey Muhammad’s words and example. They also explain the Qur’an—a book so deficient in context and chronology, it can only be understood when seen through the eyes of the Sunnah writers. Their message is all that Muslims have. Together, the Sunnah and Qur’an are Islam.

          Bragging one day, Muhammad called his surahs a miracle:

          Bukhari:V6B61N504 “Muhammad said, ‘Every Prophet was given miracles because of which people believed. But what I have been given is Divine Inspiration which Allah has revealed to me. So I hope that my followers will outnumber the followers of the other Prophets.’”

          If the Qur’an was his only “miracle,” why would he leave it in such horrid condition? I believe the answer is clear.

          Muhammad knew his recitals had been nothing more than a figment of his less-than-admirable imagination, situational scriptures designed to satiate his cravings. Preserving these recitals would only serve to incriminate him, as this Hadith suggests.

          Muslim: C24B20N4609 “The Messenger said: ‘Do not take the Qur’an on a journey with you, for I am afraid lest it would fall into the hands of the enemy.’ Ayyub, one of the narrators in the chain of transmitters, said: ‘The enemy may seize it and may quarrel with you over it.’”
          A number of Bukhari Hadith suggest that Muhammad’s companions tried to remember what they could of what he had said, but there was a problem. Like today, those who knew the Qur’an were militants. So Abu Bakr feared that large portions would be forgotten. The best Muslims were dying on the battlefield subduing fellow Arabs. In one battle alone, most of the Qur’an’s most knowledgeable reciters were lost, and many Qur’anic passages along with them.

          Bukhari:V6B60N201 “Zaid bin Thabit, the Ansari said, ‘Abu Bakr sent for me after the (heavy) casualties among the warriors (of the battle) of Yamama (where a great number of Muhammad’s Companions were killed). Umar was present with Bakr. “The people have suffered heavy casualties at Yamama, and I am afraid that there will be more casualties among those who can recite the Qur’an on other battlefields. A large part of the Qur’an may be lost unless you collect it.” I replied to Umar, “How can I do something which Allah’s Apostle has not done?” Umar kept on pressing, trying to persuade me to accept his proposal.’ Zaid bin Thabit added, ‘Umar was sitting with Abu Bakr and was speaking (to) me. “You are a wise young man and we do not suspect you of telling lies or of forgetfulness. You used to write the Divine Inspiration for Allah’s Apostle. Therefore, look for the Qur’an and collect it (in one manuscript).” By Allah, if Abu Bakr had ordered me to shift one of the mountains (from its place) it would have been easier for me than the collection of the Qur’an. I said to both of them, “How dare you do a thing which the Prophet has not done?”
          Zaid declared that collecting the Qur’an’s surahs would be an impossible task. He said that it would be easier to move mountains than to turn Muhammad’s string of oral recitals into a book. The reason for this rather troubling statement is obvious: Zaid’s search for Qur’anic passages forced him to rely upon carvings on the leg or thigh bones of dead animals, as well as palm leaves, skins, mats, stones, and bark. But for the most part, he found nothing better than the fleeting memories of the prophet’s Companions, many of whom were dead or dying. In other words, the Qur’an, like the Hadith, is all hearsay.
          There were no Muslims who had memorized the entire Qur’an, otherwise the collection would have been a simple task. Had there been individuals who knew the Qur’an, Zaid would only have had to write down what they dictated. Instead, Zaid was overwhelmed by the assignment, and was forced to “search” for the passages from men who believed that they had memorized certain segments and then compare what he heard to the recollection of others. Therefore, even the official Islamic view of things, the one recorded in their scripture, is hardly reassuring.
          Worse still, the Muslim chosen for this impossible task was the one in the best position to plagiarize the Torah and Talmud. Moreover, it’s obvious he did. Remember:

          Tabari VII:167 “In this year, the Prophet commanded Zayd bin Thabit to study the Book of the Jews, saying, ‘I fear that they may change my Book.’”
          the worse it gets.

          Bukhari:V6B61N511 “Zaid bin Thabit said, ‘I started searching for the Qur’an till I found the last two Verses of Surat At-Tauba with Abi but I could not find them with anyone other than him. They were: ‘Verily there has come to you an Apostle from amongst yourselves.’” [9:128]

          This is incriminating. The 9th surah was the second to last revealed. If only one person could remember it, there is no chance those revealed twenty-five years earlier were retained. Furthermore, this Tradition contradicts the most highly touted Islamic mantra: Most Muslims contend Uthman, not Bakr, ordered the collection of the Qur’an a decade later. And who knows what version they finally committed to paper, if in fact they ever did?

          Bukhari:V6B61N513: “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Gabriel [whom Muhammad said had 600 wings] recited the Qur’an to me in one way. Then I requested him and continued asking him to recite it in other ways, and he recited it in several ways till he ultimately recited it in seven different ways.’”

          So there were at least seven Qur’ans.
          THE QU’RAN CHALLENGE!
          • In Bukhari’s Hadith we find a sea of disturbing and contradictory claims regarding the compilation of Allah’s book. There were differing versions, even in Muhammad’s day:

          Then Abdallah came to him, and he learned what was altered and abrogated.” This is reasonably clear. The Hadith says that portions of the Qur’an were conflicting, changed, and cancelled.

          WHY QURAN WAS WRITTEN DOWN
          • Ibn Abi Dawud, Kitab al-Masahif—Many (of the passages) of the Qur’an that were sent down were known by those who died on the day of Yamama . . . but they were not known (by those who) survived them, nor were they written down, nor had Abu Bakr, Umar or Uthman (by that time) collected the Qur’an, nor were they found with even one (person) after them.

          THE REMAINDER QURAN
          Abu Bakr decided that it was time to gather what remained of the Qur’an in order to prevent more from being lost, and he appointed Zaid ibn Thabit to this task. After Zaid completed his codex around 634 AD, it remained in Abu Bakr’s possession until his death, when it was passed on to Caliph Umar. When Umar died, it was given to Hafsa, a widow of Muhammad. (For a fuller account see Sahih al-Bukhari 4986.)

          THE “PERFECT” QURAN IS MISSING
          When Ibn Umar—son of the second Muslim caliph—heard people declaring that they knew the entire Qur’an, he said to them: “Let none of you say, ‘I have learned the whole of the Koran,’ for how does he know what the whole of it is, when much of it has disappeared? Let him rather say, ‘I have learned what is extant thereof’” (Abu Ubaid, Kitab Fada’il-al-Qur’an).

          UTHMAN’S QURAN
          During Caliph Uthman’s reign, approximately 19 years after the death of Muhammad, disputes arose concerning the correct recitation of the Qur’an. Uthman ordered that Hafsa’s copy of the Qur’an, along with all known textual materials, should be gathered together so that an official version might be compiled. Zaid ibn Thabit, Abdullah bin Az-Zubair, Sa’id bin Al-As, and Abdur-Rahman bin Harith worked diligently to construct a revised text of the Qur’an.

          Bukhari:V4B56N709 “Uthman called Zaid, Abdallah, Said, and Abd-Rahman. They wrote the manuscripts of the Qur’an in the form of a book in several copies. Uthman said to the three Quraishi persons, ‘If you differ with Zaid bin Thabit on any point of the Qur’an, then write it in the language of the Quraysh, as the Qur’an was revealed in their language.’ So they acted accordingly.”

          Because there was such confusion, Uthman ordered competing versions to be burned. But by destroying the evidence, he destroyed the Qur’an’s credibility. Now all Muslims have is wishful thinking.
          WHO BURNT THE FIRST QURANS?
          When it was finished, “Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur’anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt” (Sahih al-Bukhari 4987). The Qur’an we have today is descended from the Uthmanic codex.

          ZAID’S QURAN REJECTED
          Muhammad once told his followers to “Learn the recitation of the Qur’an from four: from Abdullah bin Masud—he started with him—Salim, the freed slave of Abu Hudhaifa, Mu’adh bin Jabal and Ubai bin Ka’b” (Sahih al-Bukhari 3808). Interestingly, Ibn Masud (first on Muhammad’s list) held that the Qur’an should only have 111 chapters (today’s version has 114 chapters), and that chapters 1, 113, and 114 shouldn’t have been included in the Qur’an.

          FLAWED QURAN
          Due to these disputes among Muhammad’s hand-picked reciters, Muslims are faced with a dilemma. If Muslims say that the Qur’an we have today has been perfectly preserved, they must say that Muhammad was horrible at choosing scholars, since he selected men who disagreed with today’s text. If, on the other hand, Muslims say that their prophet would know whom to pick regarding Islam’s holiest book, they must conclude that the Qur’an we have today is flawed!

          2 CHAPTERS MISSING FROM THE “PERFECT” QURAN
          One of Muhammad’s companions, Abu Musa, supported this claim when he said that the early Muslims forgot two surahs (chapters) due to laziness:
          Sahih Muslim 2286

          THE PART THE GOAT EAT

          Aisha also tells us that individual verses of the Qur’an disappeared, sometimes in very interesting ways:
          Sunan ibn Majah 1944—It was narrated that Aishah said: “The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep/goat came in and ate it.”
          The verses on stoning and breastfeeding an adult not in the Qur’an today.

          MISSING PASSAGES
          We know further that large sections of certain chapters came up missing. For instance, Muhammad’s wife Aisha said that roughly two-thirds of Surah 33 was lost:
          Abu Ubaid, Kitab Fada’il-al-Qur’an—A’isha . . . said, “Surat al-Ahzab (xxxiii) used to be recited in the time of the Prophet with two hundred verses, but when Uthman wrote out the codices he was unable to procure more of it than there is in it today [i.e. 73 verses].”

          • Sahih al-Bukhari 5005—Umar said, “Ubayy was the best of us in the recitation (of the Qur’an), yet we leave some of what he recites.” Ubayy says, “I have taken it from the mouth of Allah’s Messenger and will not leave it for anything whatever.”

          • But Ibn Masud wasn’t the only one of Muhammad’s trusted teachers who disagreed with Zaid’s Qur’an. Ubayy ibn Ka’b was Muhammad’s best reciter and one of the only Muslims to collect the materials of the Qur’an during Muhammad’s lifetime. Yet Ibn Ka’b believed that Zaid’s Qur’an was missing two chapters! Later Muslims were therefore forced to reject some of Ibn Ka’b’s recitation:

          • Ibn Masud advised Muslims to reject Zaid’s Qur’an and to keep their own versions—even to hide them so that they wouldn’t be confiscated by the government! He said:
          Jami at-Tirmidhi 3104—“O you Muslim people! Avoid copying the Mushaf and recitation of this man. By Allah! When I accepted Islam he was but in the loins of a disbelieving man”—meaning Zaid bin Thabit—and it was regarding this that Abdullah bin Mas’ud said: “O people of Al-Iraq! Keep the Musahif that are with you, and conceal them.”

          • Because of this (along with hundreds of other textual differences), Ibn Masud went so far as to call the final edition of the Qur’an a deception! He said, “The people have been guilty of deceit in the reading of the Qur’an. I like it better to read according to the recitation of him [i.e. Muhammad] whom I love more than that of Zayd Ibn Thabit” (Ibn Sa’d, Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, Vol. 2, p. 444).

          THE BOOK FROM HELL:
          DEMONS LOVE LISTENING TO THE QURAN

          And Allaah revealed other aayahs in a separate soorah, where He says:
          “Say (O Muhammad): “It has been revealed to me that a group (from three to ten in number) of jinn listened (to this Qur’aan). They said: ‘Verily, we have heard a wonderful Recitation (this Qur’aan)!” [al-Jinn 72:1]

          MUHAMMAD HAD A DEVIL COMPANION WHO BECAME A MUSLIM

          Even the Prophet had a shaytaan with him, his constant companion (qareen) from among the jinn, in the hadeeth which says that the Prophet said:
          “There is no one among you but he has with him a constant companion (qareen) from among the jinn and a constant companion from among the angels.” They said, “You too, O Messenger of Allaah?” He said, “Me too, but Allaah has helped me against him (the devil-companion) and he has become Muslim.”

          The Koran is a book of myths, fables and fairy tales.
          Do your research! The Qur’an is a revised counterfeit of 6th century polytheism, composed of previously existing pagan beliefs, practices and fairy tales.

          For example: The Koran says men were turned into apes because they broke the Sabbath. This was a popular legend in Muhammad’s day (Suras 2:65; 7:163-166).

          The Quran repeats fanciful Arabian fables as if they were true.
          “Arabic legends about the fabulous jinns fill its pages” (G.G. Pfander, Balance of Truth, pp. 283).

          “The story of the she-camel who leapt out of a rock and became a prophet was known long before Muhammad” (Suras 7:73-77,85; 91:14; 54:29).
          The story of an entire village of people who were turned into apes because they broke the sabbath by fishing was a popular legend in Muhammad’s day (Suras 2:65; 7:163-166).

          The gushing 12 springs story found in Sura 2:60 comes from pre-Islamic legends.

          In what is called the “Rip Van Winkle” story, seven men and their animals slept for 309 years in a cave and then woke up perfectly fine (Sura 18:9-26)! This legend is found in Greek and Christian fables as well as Arabian lore.

          The fable of the pieces of four dead, cut-up birds getting up and flying was well known in Muhammad’s time (Sura 2:260).

          It is also clear that Muhammad used such pre-Islamic literature as the Saba Moallaqat of Imra’ul Cays in his composition of Suras 21:96; 29:31,46; 37:59; 54:1, and 93:1.

          Many of the stories in the Quran come from the Jewish Talmud, the Midrash, and many apocryphal works.

          This was pointed out by Abraham Geiger in 1833, and further documented by another Jewish scholar, Dr. Abraham Katsh, of New York University, in 1954 (The Concise Dictionary of Islam, p. 229;

          Jomier, The Bible and the Quran — Henry Regency Co., Chicago, 1959, 59ff; Sell, Studies, pp. 163ff.; Guillaume, Islam, p. 13).

          The source of Sura 3:35-37 is the fanciful book called The Protevangelion’s James the Lesser.
          The source of Sura 87:19 is the Testament of Abraham.
          The source of Sura 27:17-44 is the Second Targum of Esther.

          The fantastic tale that God made a man “die for a hundred years” with no ill effects on his food, drink, or donkey was a Jewish fable (Sura 2:259ff.).

          The idea that Moses was resurrected and other material came from the Jewish Talmud (Sura 2:55, 56, 67).

          • The story in Sura 5:30,31 can also be found in pre-Islamic works from Pirke Rabbi Eleazer, the Targum of Jonathan ben Uzziah and the Targum of Jerusalem.

          The tale of Abraham being delivered from Nimrod’s fire came from the Midrash Rabbah (see Suras 21:51-71; 29:16, 17; 37:97,98). It must be also pointed out that Nimrod and Abraham did not live at the same time.

          Muhammad was always mixing people together in the Quran who did not live at the same time.

          The non-biblical details of the visit of the Queen of Sheba (Saba) in Sura 27:20-44 came from the Second Targum of the Book of Esther.

          The source of Sura 2:102 is no doubt the Midrash Yalkut (chapter 44).

          The story found in Sura 7:171 of God lifting up Mount Sinai and holding it over the heads of the Jews as a threat to squash them if they rejected the law came from the Jewish book Abodah Sarah.

          The making of the golden calf in the wilderness, in which the image jumped out of the fire fully formed and actually mooed (Suras 7:148; 20:88), came from Pirke Rabbi Eleazer.

          The seven heavens and hells described in the Quran came from the Zohar and the Hagigah.

          Muhammad utilized the Testament of Abraham to teach that a scale or balance will be used on the day of judgment to weigh good and bad deeds in order to determine whether one goes to heaven or hell (Suras 42:17; 101:6-9).

          • KAABA

          Kaabah construction DATE was after 4th century AD by “Abu Karb Asa’d” was the first to consecrate Kaabah which reveals that he was the builder of Kaabah.The two Rukuns or stones which were the main elements of worship in the temple were of Yemeni origin. The date on which the Black Stone first appeared in Mecca was at the time of Mohammed’s grandfather between 495 and 520 AD. Islamic tradition was aware of these facts, people invented “Unreliable Quran LIED stories!” to fill the historical gaps.

          Evidence from Sana’a manuscripts found in Yemen in 1972 are the oldest existent version of the Quran.The palimpsest ‘DAM 0 1-27.1’ has been proven to actually contain “4” different Qurans: A complete primary and secondary text, both showing later corrections. Therefore we are not just dealing with one Quran but 4 ‘bad copies’“4 different Qurans” within the “First” Islamic century.If the Uthmanic text had “NOT yet reach” in the mosque upon what correction texts were made for “4 different Qurans”?

          Islam retains much from pre-Islamic Arabia including Allah, the name for Pagan God. The concept of monotheism did exist in the jahiliyya – even the pagans conceived of a supreme God that ruled over all the others. There are hints that some idolatry would remain the Satanic verses. The Ka’ba was the masjid of many tribes as early as 60 BC, and the pagans first had the tradition of kissing the black stone. From Sabaa Mu’allaqat of Imra’ul Qays in Quran (S. 54:1, 29:31&46, 37:69, 21:96, 93:1).

          The Quran Was Not Preserved
          “We have sent down the Quran and surely We will protect” – The Quran 15:9
          Surat Al-Ĥijr (The Rocky Tract) – سورة الحجر

          Sahih International
          Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur’an and indeed, We will be its guardian.
          Introduction
          Most Muslims are familiar with the above verse from the Quran, which they consider as the concrete proof that the Quran is perfectly preserved. The verse is clear; Allah pledges to protect his book from corruption, which provides Muslims with a much needed assurance that their holy book is reliable. Such assurance was necessary to Muslims whose confidence in the divine scriptures was shaken after the Quran’s repeated accusations to other nations of tampering with their own scriptures.
          Muslims are taught that preservation of the Quran is an accepted fact that distinguishes Islam from the rest. The claim aims to make the Quran stand out as the only true divine book in the procession of mankind today. The Muslims’ claim is a big lie that has proved to be a very successful selling point to converts who often refer to the Quran in that sense.
          It is not advisable to question the authenticity of the Quran with Muslims unless you are sure of their relative tolerance. The Muslims clouded minds quickly moves into circular logic such as: ”Of course, every word in the the Quran is preserved as Allah revealed it to his prophet, this is an absolute fact because Allah vowed to protect his book from any corruption” It would be a struggle to try to point out that a statement in the Quran can not be accepted as a proof of its authenticity.
          From a scientific point of view, the Quran and Islam wouldn’t stand a chance if subjected to proper historical scrutiny (1). Mohammed’s birth and life, the Quran and the beginning of Islam are all shrouded with a thick coat of vagueness and obscurity. But this article discredits the islamic claim on the basis of the accepted Islamic history.
          How the Quran was preserved
          As all Muslims know, the Quran was not Allah’s first book; a few others were revealed centuries before the Quran. None of those scriptures survived to our day because they were tampered with by the very people to whom they were revealed. Fourteen hundreds years ago, Allah decided conclusively to reveal a scripture, once and for all, which He called the Quran, and vowed to protect it from corruption.
          We do not know the reasons why people tampered with the earlier scriptures. Did they gain anything by deliberately making changes to Allah’s words? Why they did not fear Allah, especially with all the stories in those scriptures, about Allah’s punishments to those who dared to disobey Him. We also do not know why Allah allowed his books to be tampered with. Even human writers do not allow any changes to their works.
          As Allah pledges to protect the Quran, one would think that He would create the ideal conditions for His revelation along with man-proof measures to safeguard the Quran. Well, it doesn’t look to us that way. On the contrary, it looks as if Allah made every effort to make the Quran disappear, even before its revelation was completed.
          Let us examine the circumstances of the Quranic revelation:
          The Nation
          The Quran was revealed in the seventh century to the Arabs, one of the most illiterate nations of the time. It was the Arabs first ever book. Before the Quran the Arabs never authored a book and had no idea how books look like or how to handle them. Revealing the Quran to the Arabs sets the scene for mistakes of all kinds.
          The Timing
          The Quran was revealed before the Arabic script was fully developed. The Arabic script was not yet suitable for writing anything with significance because many letters shared the same appearance. The script problem was only solved, decades after Mohammed’s death, by adding dots to the script. It is only fair to wonder why Allah rushed the Quran before the Arabic script was well developed.
          It looks strange that the Arabs used the same script for multiple letters. But before the Quran, the Arabs only managed to write a few pieces of poetry. Reading the script served as a reminder for the reader of what they already knew by heart. As a matter of fact, the Arabic script still suffers of a similar problem in our time.
          There are many Arabic words (not letters) that share exactly the same appearance, even after adding the dots. It is usually left for the reader to work out, from the context, the proper pronunciation of a particular word. To distinguish those words from each other, printing has to include the diacritical marks ( like fat-ha, kasra, and damma ), which the Arabs started to use more than a century after Mohammed’s death. Although used in the Quran, the diacritical marks are rarely used in every day printing of ordinary books or newspapers because they make the words cluttered and printing more demanding.
          The Illiterate Receiver
          At the time of the Quranic revelations, there were some Arabs who were educated enough to be able to read and write. Out of all the Arabs, Allah appointed Mohammed, an illiterate person, to be in charge of the Quran. This is like appointing an illiterate person to be in charge of editing an important newspaper..
          The Scribes
          Mohammed had some scribes working for him in Medina. After a revelation, Mohammed would ask whoever was available of those scribes to write the revealed verse/verses. The scribe service was not available to Mohammed when he was still a weak person with only a handful of followers in Mecca. Therefore, it is fair to assume that the Meccan verses, over one third of the Quran, were not written immediately by scribes.
          Being an illiterate person, Mohammed had no means to check the work of the scribes for errors that could have been made accidentally or on purpose. Being trustworthy himself is meaningless if Mohammed had to leave the work to be completed by ordinary people without supervision.
          The story of Ibn Abu Al Sarh:
          This is a very important and very little known story about the Quran. Muslim scholars make every effort to tuck it away and keep it out of sight of ordinary Muslims.
          In short: Abdulla Ibn Abu Al Sarh was one of the scribes in Medina. Once Mohammed dictated to him a verse, that has one of the common endings like aleem khabeer or hakeem aleem. When Ibn Abu Al Sarh reached the end of the verse he double checked with Mohammed: “Oh prophet of Allah, is it hakeem aleem?” to which Mohammed said ‘yes, it is’. Ibn Abu Al Sarh became suspicious because he thought it was aleem khabeer. Ibn Abu Al Sarh decided to test Mohammed in future verses and noticed that Mohammed accepts his suggestions of aleem khabeer or hakeem aleem or other endings that do not distort the meaning.
          Ibn Abu Al Sarh concluded that Mohammed was not a prophet but an impostor. He denounced Islam and defected to Mecca and told the Quraysh of what happened. Mohammed became very angry and vowed to kill him once he conquers Mecca, which he was preparing for. When Mohammed conquered Mecca, Ibn Abu Al Sarh was arrested but was saved from the death sentence by Uthman, his brother in breast feeding. Ibn Abu Al Sarh survived and had a successful career under the Umayad dynasty, which speaks volumes of the faith of the Umayads!
          We do not know which verses were scribed by Ibn Abu Al Sarh, but we know that at least those verses were not accurate!
          The materials
          The technology necessary for writing was not well developed in Arabia. The scribes used primitive ink and perishable material to accomplish their work. Consequently, by the time Mohammed died, some verses were unreadable or completely missing from the Quran. According to Aysha, Mohammed’s wife, she used to keep the stoning verse under her bed, but it was eaten by a ‘dajen’ (chicken or domestic animal!)
          Inspection
          Until Mohammed’s death, nobody inspected the work of the scribes, which was left to gather dust until after Mohammed’s death. The moment of truth came about two decades later when Caliph Uthman appointed a committee to start the project of collecting the Quran. Only then the discrepancies in the various writings came to light. Uthman’s solution was to burn all existing copies and keep only the formal five copies which were produced by his committee. Many leading Muslims refused to recognize Uthman’s copies and refused to surrender their own to be destroyed because they believed theirs were the accurate ones. Ibn Massoud, a sahabi whose knowledge of the Quran was renowned and commended by Mohammed, was one of those Muslims who refused to recognize Uthman’s copies and refused to surrender his personal, presumably accurate, collection.
          Preserving the Quran in the Muslims’ chests
          Some Muslim scholars claim that all of the above is irrelevant because the Quran was preserved in the Muslims’ chests as well. (Yes, the Quran associates the heart with intelligence, not a word about the brain, and the Muslims believed it). This claim is coupled to a belief that the early Muslims were humans with extra ordinary intelligence. Of course this is completely unfounded and still doesn’t explain the discrepancies between the various collections of the Quran.
          Mohammed could and should have done more to safeguard the Quran, if he really believed it was Allah’ words and the most important document on earth. He had the resources and the authority, as a leader in Medina, to order a supervised writing and proper collection of the Quran. He should have stamped that authenticated copy (Mohammed had a stamp) and devised a system to take care of it after him. But he didn’t because he was busy fighting wars; over seventy of them in a space of ten years. Besides he didn’t really feel the Quran was that important. He probably found the chaotic situation useful, as it gave him the freedom to contradict the earlier verses without being noticed.
          Many Muslims believe that two of Uthman’s copies still exist today and they seem to be sure about it. They do so because they believe their scholars who propagate this lie with apparent confidence, which is not unusual for Muslim scholars.
          Caliph Uthman sent four of his copies to the governors of the newly conquered states and kept one with him in Medina. Those copies were supposed to have been well looked after but there is no trace of them. How can Muslims afford to lose such important divine documents? This is difficult to fathom considering the way today’s Muslims treat the Quran. Muslims are usually reluctant to dispose of their old copies of the Quran because it is not a straight forward matter; it should be burnt and not mixed with the general waste.
          Until the discovery of the Quran of Sanaa, the oldest two copies of the Quran were thought to be the ones in Tashkent and Istanbul. Both copies are partial, not the full Quran and both were dated to some two hundred years after Mohammed’s death. Therefore they are not Uthman’s copies.
          In the 1970s, manuscripts of the Quran were found in Sanaa, Yemen, and were dated to about hundred years after Mohammed’s death. They are believed to be the oldest copy of the Quran. The Yemini authorities stopped the German researchers from completing their work once they noticed the differences between the manuscripts and the existing Quran. It is also interesting to note that independent researchers have no access to do proper studies on the copies in Tahkent and Istanbul.
          Are they hiding something?

          • Hi Raj bin lucky, That is an Old technique from you once more!

            Did you say, “If the Qur’an was his only “miracle,” why would he leave it in such horrid condition?”

            So, let us analyse that briefly, okay?

            The Quran is : 31:3 (SI) : “As guidance and mercy for the doers of good”. Which other book in the world states that??

            And : 17:9 (P) : Lo! this Qur’an guideth unto that which is straightest, and giveth tidings unto the believers who do good works that theirs will be a great reward.

            Here, the Quran guides ONLY those who are righteous.

            2:2 (P) : This is the Scripture whereof there is no doubt, a guidance unto those who ward off (evil).
            2:3 (P) : Who believe in the Unseen, and establish worship, and spend of that We have bestowed upon them.

            You lied when you said, “…leave it in such horrid condition?”.

            What “horrid” condition has the Quran been left in?? In fact, Quran is the only Book in the world that gets the maximum respect. All Muslims, the world over, irrespective of various needless sects, LOVE and respect the Quran.

            So, what bulls of yours are you throwing around saying the Quran has been left in the most horrid condition???

            Quran IS the biggest miracle in itself, written some 1400 years ago in some remote desert area. You may have expected it to contain atleast little bit of pornography like the Bible or other religious books. But Quran has none of it….surprise!!!!

            Regards

            Plum

    • Pakistan’s ‘shame’: Rape cases in 2012

      By Jahanzaib Haque / Ema Anis

      Published: December 31, 2012

      While the New Delhi gang rape case has resulted in outrage that has spilled into the streets across the border, the plight of women who have faced rape and sexual assault in Pakistan has been largely confined to formulaic articles in the press, slow-moving cases in the courts, and frequent dropped charges due to bribes, threats of further violence and family pressure on the victim to avoid further ‘shame’.
      In 2012, The Express Tribune covered over 150 reports on cases of rape and their follow-ups across the country, but the actual number of incidents is likely much higher as the stigma of rape, treatment meted out by police officials and low prosecution rates makes this crime largely unreported.

      While statistics are few and far between, according to a November report by the Awaz Foundation Centre for Development, as many as 2,713 cases of violence against women have been reported in 15 districts of southern Punjab since January 2012, giving some measure of the scale of the issue.

      As such, the reports below can only be considered a small snapshot of the violence being wrought on the women of Pakistan.
      __________________________________________________________

      2012: Rape cases in Pakistan reported by The Express Tribune

      December 2012
      1 Case registered against man for ‘raping’ daughter-in-law
      Tariq*, a resident of Choa Saidan Shah District Chakwal, was accused of raping his 24-year-old daughter-in-law and mother of two kids.
      2 FIR registration: Judge directs woman to approach SHO
      Salim’s son Haider* raped the victim and then detained her for several days.
      3 Political worker accused of raping Hindu girl
      A 14-year-old Hindu girl, N, was raped allegedly by a local leader of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP).
      4 Karak murder case: Alleged murderer arrested on court premises
      Ibrahim is one of the accused in the murder of alleged rape victim Uzma Ayub’s brother.
      5 Bilawal sends flowers to rape victim, vows action
      Bilawal Bhutto Zardari sent a bouquet to six-year-old rape victim of Umerkot district.
      6 Twenty months later, rape survivor Kainat fights on
      Sindh High Court issued warrants to arrest two of the four suspects, who were all acquitted of rape charges in May 2010.
      7 Heinous crime: ‘Child rapist, murderer’ arrested
      Accused first raped and then strangled the girl. He left her body behind a local school and fled.
      8 Strange but true: Police register rape case against eight-year-old
      Mankera police in Bhakkar arrested him for allegedly raping two women.
      9 Under attack: Journalists threatened for reporting rape case
      Reporter received threatening calls for reporting the rape of a six-year-old girl in Meghwadh colony.
      10 Justice delayed: LHC asks judge to probe rape case
      The accused took her daughter to a house in Model Town, raped her and threw the girl in critical condition in front of her relatives’ house.
      11 Accountability: Two rapists jailed for life, fined
      Muhammad Afzal and Muhammad Waqas accused of kidnapping and raping man’s daughter.
      12 Abduction: Child left with internal injuries
      9-year-old son, a grade four student, was kidnapped by three men.
      13 Suo motu: LHC seeks report on gang rape
      Gang rape of a woman and her daughter in Chakwal, led by the woman’s ex-husband and her daughter’s father.
      14 Abuse: Five-year-old girl allegedly raped
      The girl went missing while she was playing on the street outside her house.
      15 Raped for seeking justice
      Cruelty seems to know no bounds in our country with even fewer regards given to basic human rights.
      November 2012
      1 Five peasant girls gang-raped for ‘demanding wages’
      Five peasant girls were gang raped by their employers, because the girls asked them for their wages.
      2 Police rape — a grave failure
      The gang-rape case of a 13-year-old female child victim in Ratta Amral, Rawalpindi, spoke of the baseness of human nature.
      3 Kainat was denied justice but wins battle for compensation
      Four men kept the 13-year old Kainat in their custody for four days and subjected her to sexual assault.
      4 Tribal (in)justice: 9-year-old girl given in Vani to settle dispute
      Village council ordered a father to hand over his nine-year-old daughter as compensation in a rape case.
      5 Men remanded on charges of rape
      The men have also been accused of trying to sell 11-year-old S and her 13-year-old friend into prostitution.
      6 9-year-old girl awarded as ‘compensation’ in rape case
      The worker, Arshad, who goes by one name, was accused of involvement in the abduction and rape of landowner Ali Sher’s daughter.
      7 Crime: Suspected child murderer arrested
      The victim’s two children were injured in the incident, of which one of them died at a hospital.
      8 Police recover woman forced into prostitution
      Victim said she was raped for three months by ‘clients’ as well as Iqbal. She said another pimp also raped her.
      9 Harrowing Journey: Kidnapped girl produced in court
      ‘A’ said that her kidnapper repeatedly raped her and then brought her to Sohrab Machi in Ratodero, where she was sold for Rs50,000.
      10 Violence Against Women: 2,713 cases reported in 2012 so far
      304 cases of rape registered since January 2012.
      11 Violence against women: Three women beaten and humiliated
      Shah Jamal police said Rohina, not her real name, was allegedly gang-raped by four men. She told police that the men also shaved her head.
      October 2012
      1 Age dispute: Boy arrested for child rape
      Father of the girl said that the boy was 15, but the police and the boy’s family claimed he was 10 years old.
      2 Child homicide: Ten months on, Anti-Terrorism Court II yet to hear case
      The girl in the morgue had been allegedly raped, strangled to death and her eyes gouged out.
      3 Alleged rape victim sent home from Darul Aman
      Victim said she was picked up near a market by three police personnel, who raped and tortured her for three days at the Mansehra City Police Station.
      4 Sexual exploitation: ‘Nurse lured to big city, forced into prostitution’
      Victim warned not to tell anyone of the incident as they had made a video of it and would upload it on YouTube if she didn’t remain quiet.
      5 Unidentified armed bandits: Residents panic as gang rape, looting increases
      Incident of around 20 men entering three houses and raping women in Mullazai village has also been associated with the group.
      September 2012
      1 Cleric’s daughter stripped, paraded naked in village
      The daughter of a cleric was allegedly paraded nude in a village by young men seeking revenge for her brother’s ‘indiscretions’.
      2 Crime against children: Six-year-old girl critical after sexual assault
      Suspects raped her and later abandoned her outside her home in an unconscious condition.
      3 Crime: Man held for attempted rape
      Suspect was arrested in a position with his trousers down and the girl crying in his arms.
      4 Conflicting claims: Rape victim retracts statement
      While negating the claim she had made before the media and the judicial magistrate, she said she was not raped but was tortured physically.
      5 Threatened: Gang rape victim fears for her life
      While 20-year-old Bisma* wants to see them punished by the courts, she fears that the threats to her and her family will derail the process.
      6 Kidnap, sexual assault: Girl to continue testimony against suspects on Monday
      The girl said she had been drugged and kidnapped from Karachi two years ago by Jano Mai.
      7 Violence: Man arrested for sexually assaulting minor girl
      Maheen* Bibi, 5, went to her paternal uncle’s house, where her first cousin Tanveer*,14, forcibly took her to a room and assaulted her.
      8 Lured to capital for a job, woman gang raped
      An assistant director of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and an industrialist were among the three men arrested.
      9 Rape, murder of niece: Rapist says actions were motivated by a fictional character
      Khan said that he was reading a fictional story from an Urdu digest wherein a character used to kill his girl victims after raping them.
      10 Incest case: Young woman ‘raped’, tortured by father
      On the complaint of a neighbour, the police raided Sameer’s flat and found Sajida, still in chains.
      11 Crime: Teenager rapes, murders minor niece
      Perpetrator said he first hid the girl in a cupboard but for fears of being caught, he dumped her body in a nearby stream.
      12 Brutal murders: Two boys found dead, rape suspected
      Father accused eight men, with whom he had had a property dispute, of kidnap, rape and murder.
      13 Gang rape: Case registered 12 days after victim dropped off at police station
      The men took her to a house in the outskirts of the city and raped her for four days before dropping her off at the police station.
      14 Hindu gang rape survivor warns of suicide
      The married woman was allegedly gang-raped by influential men of the Allah Rakhio Mahar village.
      15 Murder: Nine-year-old girl raped, killed
      Autopsy revealed that the girl was sexually assaulted multiple times and then killed.
      16 Crime and punishment: Three arrested in two sexual assault cases
      One of the suspects was a minibus driver who had found the child alone in Hafizabad and offered her a ride.
      17 Heinous crime: Minor allegedly raped by school students
      A seven-year-old boy was allegedly raped by two students of class 9 and 10.
      18 In Pakistan, crimes against women increased by 7% this year
      57 districts reported 982 cases in May 2012.
      August 2012
      1 Seeking justice: FIR lodged against four accused of rape
      Her family told the media that if justice is denied, S and her family will commit suicide in protest.
      2 Heinous crime: Minor girl raped
      Maryam Bibi*, had gone to a nearby shop and was returning home when Muhammad Irfan* forcibly took her to a nearby field and raped her.
      3 Rape case: Kainat asks for promised compensation
      The Sindh High Court has asked the Sindh government to consider paying the full compensation amount to rape survivor Kainat Soomro on humanitarian grounds.
      4 Teenager, five-year-old abducted, raped
      Girl was kept in a room and subjected to rape for five consecutive days.
      5 Minor raped: Shopkeeper forces himself on girl
      Victim had gone to buy milk from Rajput’s shop who pushed her into an adjacent room and raped her.
      6 Rape case: Court issues non bailable arrest warrants for three police officers
      Rape victim had allegedly been taken away by some policemen from her home for a DNA test.
      7 Criminal minds: Girl gang-raped, left to die
      S had gone out to buy sweets in the Rasuh Mori area in Kotri.
      8 Assault on a minor: Father lodges FIR against four men
      The girl was reportedly abducted by armed men and taken to an undisclosed location.
      9 ‘Rape during police detention’: Two SHOs suspended, inquiry committee formed
      Sophia* claimed she had been gang-raped by nine police officials of Mansehra and Kaghan for five days.
      10 Child abuse: Police arrest rape suspect
      Shaukhat sexually assaulted the girl in the guestroom of his house, following which she had to be rushed to the hospital in a critical condition.
      11 Illegal detention: Teenaged girl allegedly gang-raped by Mansehra police
      A teenager, who eloped with the boy of her dreams, ended up a rape victim after he abandoned her.
      12 Crime: Two men detained in child rape case
      Suspect’s family was threatening father of victim with dire consequences if he did not withdraw the FIR.
      13 Heinous crime: Pregnant rape victim asked to deliver baby
      The court has bound rape victim to give birth to the illegitimate child, whose chances of survival are slim.
      July 2012
      1 Sexual assault: Four men remanded to police for three days
      Victim sexually assaulted for three days before the suspects abandoned her in a field near her home.
      2 Gender-based crime: Assault case against 6, including 3 cops
      Victim said she was attacked by the rape suspects and their lawyer.
      3 ‘Panchayat raj’ and a woman stoned
      Maryam Bibi was cutting grass in the fields of a local landlord who forced her to submit to his sexual advances. When she refused, the landlord levelled allegations against the woman.
      4 Finally home: After 3-year ordeal, girl gets freedom
      The accused allegedly raped her and she gave birth to a boy, who is now two years old.
      5 Domestic violence against women surges by 25%: Report
      10.88% decrease in incidents of rapes and gang rapes of women in 2011.
      6 Sexual assault: Three held on rape charges
      Bibi, a mother of four, said that the three men entered her house at night while she was asleep with her children and fled after raping her.
      7 Law and order: Rape victim attacked in front of court
      Sexual assault victim and her brother were beaten up allegedly by one of the two men accused of raping her.
      8 Heinous crime: Woman abducted, gang raped
      Three men took the victim to some unknown place and raped her repeatedly for two days.
      9 Abduction: Woman ‘raped by three villagers’
      The woman said that seven men from the village had jumped her when she reached the village well.
      10 Caught, escaped, killed: Fugitive in child rape and murder case shot, killed
      A child rape and murder suspect was shot and killed in an encounter.
      11 Acid attack: Mother, son sent to jail
      Danish had tried to rape the victim, while she was visiting their house. When she screamed for help, he and Nasreen threw acid at her.
      June 2012
      1 Ratta Amral rape case: Punjab IGP, prosecutor summoned
      Supreme Court summoned IG Punjab, prosecutor for second time in rape case of 13-year-old. A resident of Ratta Amral had alleged that three men forcibly took his daughter to their house and raped her in March.
      2 Activists demand end to out-of-court rape case settlements
      A domestic worker was abducted and reportedly raped by a lawyer in DHA and police pressurized the victim to take back the case. Activists demanded lawyer’s license to be revoked.
      3 Narowal village: Christian family pleads for justice after child rape, stillbirths
      A 13-year-old Christian girl was drugged and raped by her employee and his friends on March 29. The accused tortured the family into withdrawing case. Police started siding with the accused and declared one accused innocent.
      4 Ratta Amral case: Scolded for laxity, Punjab police chief and prosecutor told to submit report today
      Supreme Court expresses dismay over attitude of police officials in the case, “who collude with the aggressors instead of the helping the victims”.
      5 Combating subversion: SC asks LHC to hear gang rape case appeal
      An illegal jirga held in Ratta Amral reached an out-of-court settlement of a rape case. Punjab prosecutor general files appeal against the acquittal of the accused men, which is forwarded to LHC by SC.
      6 Five girls gang-raped by border military police
      Five teenage girls reached Fort Monro hill station from Lahore for vacations. They were held captive and gang-raped by border military police.
      7 Barbarism: 13-year-old raped, forced to swallow acid
      A balloon-seller’s daughter got abducted by a shopkeeper in Bahawalpur when she went to buy some eatables. He took her to a school building to rape her.
      8 Fort munro incident: President orders action against ‘rapists’
      Interior Minister also took notice of five teenage girls being raped by border military police, sought report from Punjab chief secretary and IG Punjab.
      9 Fort Munro gang rape: Three border police officials surrender
      Two accused remained at large, one claimed the victims were “call girls”. Victims said they could recognize all the accused.
      10 45-year-old woman raped to settle loan
      Farid Gul from Peshawar offered relative to sleep with his 45-year-old wife to settle a loan.
      11 Karak rape case: Investigation team submits polygraph test results
      Uzma Ayub was allegedly raped by 13 people, including three police officials in 2010. The Peshawar High Court had ordered that 17 people, including the victim, be tested after DNA tests failed to identify the culprits.
      12 ‘Rape’: Father approaches court for ‘fair probe’
      Mian Ali Imran’s daughter was promised a job by a woman and was raped on April 19 when she went for the job interview. Imran said police took bribe from the suspect to declare the rape as “consensual sex” in the report.
      13 Fort Monroe station: Three border policemen remanded in rape case
      Preliminary investigations revealed victims had hidden their true identity. Husband of one victim said police investigators had beaten two girls to make them change their statements.
      14 Fort Munro victims’ alleged perpetrators undergo medical, DNA tests
      Five teenage girls reached Fort Monro hill station from Lahore for vacations. They were held captive and gang-raped by border military police.
      15 Child rape: DSP, SHO suspended for negligence
      A class two student in Faisalabad was abducted by three teenage boys at gunpoint. They took her to a house and raped her, filming and taking pictures of her.
      16 Rape allegations: Factory area SHO suspended
      Lahore Cantt SP was directed to register FIR against SHO and four other constables for alleged rape. There were no details of the rape.
      17 Six-year-old ‘sexually assaulted’, murdered
      A 6-year-old girl found strangled to death in Jaranwala after she had gone missing a day earlier. Police registered case of murder and said rape section will be added to FIR if autopsy confirms rape.
      18 Uzma Ayub hearing: PHC dismisses Karak rape case, tells trial court to take over
      Uzma Ayub said she did not want to contest the case any longer. Court said four inquiries were done but it could not reach any conclusion.
      19 Heinous crime: Two deaf-mute sisters gang-raped
      Two sisters taken to Naseem’s house who allegedly runs a brothel. Then they were taken to an unknown place on a rickshaw, where they were sedated and raped for two days. They were thrown semi-conscious, semi-naked on the roads later.
      20 Sexual assault: Four accused of raping a neighbour
      Saleem accuses two neighbours and two unidentified people in Bahawalpur for kidnapping and sexually assaulting him on gunpoint.
      21 ‘Police inaction’ in rape case condemned
      A 15-year-old girl was sexually assaulted for over eight months by her colleague. The colleague had promised to marry her but turned her away after learning about her pregnancy.
      22 Crimes against our children rise
      Six-year-old girl in Karachi was abducted by three men, who kept her in a windowless room, repeatedly assaulted her. They later strangled her, gouged out her eyes and dumped her body.
      23 Fort Munro gang rape: DNA report finds one official guilty
      One border military force official found guilty of raping Salma* – one of the five girls who were gang-raped in Fort Monro.
      24 WAR seminar: Research points to systemic imbalances in prosecuting rapists
      War Against Rape researchers lament that country’s law books were devoid of specific punishments for object rape, incest, digital rape necrophilia, marital rape and other forms of sexual violence.
      25 Kidnap-murder: Rickshaw driver confesses to killing six-year-old girl
      Rickshaw driver Nadeem strangled a barber’s daughter in Faisalabad after raping her and then dumped the body in a field.
      May 2012
      1 Acid attacks: Police delays suspect’s production ‘to complete interrogation’
      Shazia Bibi* from Muradpur Basti accused Hussain, and his two accomplices of kidnapping her and trying to rape her. She said the three men threw acid on her and fled.
      2 Crime: Teenager arrested in child rape case
      Medical examination confirms that a teenage boy raped a four-year-old relative when her parents were away from home.
      3 Siding with bad guys: Punjab police officials found guilty of negligence
      Inquiry report said police officials were guilty of delaying the registration of FIR in the Ratta Amral gang-rape case.
      4 Man, daughter attempt self-immolation
      Abdul Rasheed from Javed Colony said a relative Shahid and Nadeem had kidnapped his 15-year-old daughter on February 18. Girl said she was raped for 15 days.
      5 Vigilante justice: Man beaten up, paraded ‘for visiting woman’
      A woman’s relatives in Faisalabad accuse a man of trying to break into her house. Police registered rape case against the man on complaint filed by the woman’s uncle.
      6 Sexual assault: Family asked to back up charge with medical report
      Eight-year-old girl was raped by teacher at her seminary during the lunch break on March 12. The suspect had also raped four other students whose parents had earlier been reluctant to take the matter to the police.
      7 Heinous Crime: Stepfather assaults daughter
      Seven-year-old, M, was allegedly sexually assaulted by her stepfather, AS and his friends at her home when her mother was out.
      8 Ratta Amral rape case: Suspended DSP challenges police order in LHC
      DSP was earlier suspended for misuse of authority and delaying the registration of the rape case by almost one month.
      9 Sexual assault: Woman sent to Nishter Hospital
      A woman in Multan was kidnapped and raped on May 6 by unidentified men. She said she was cut by razor blades on resisting the assault.
      10 Police finally register rape case
      Girl’s family said a hotel owner wanted illicit relations with the girl but she refused. He picked her from her home, took her away and raped her.
      11 Busted: Man arrested for raping daughter-in-law
      R was raped by her father-in-law when she was alone at home. She informed her husband, whom she had married nine months ago, of the incident but he “tortured” her and kept her in detention.
      12 Three cops arrested for delaying case registration
      Rawalpindi police had registered a criminal case against three for one-month delay in the registration of Ratta Amral rape case.
      13 Swindled: Woman raped by spiritual healer
      Zarrina Bibi, 22, resident of Chowk Taranda Mohammad Panah, said that she had visited the man to get a charm.
      14 No escape: Beaten, humiliated, charged with rape
      Residents of Chak 662 beat a man after a woman accused him of entering her sister-in-law’s room and raping her while the men of the family were away at work.
      15 Forensic evidence: LHC dismisses bail plea of rape accused
      Rao Hanif raped his niece for five months at her house and left her pregnant.
      16 Samples sent for DNA test
      A 10-year-old girl was abducted on her way home from her school in Mohallah Nokar of Lahore and raped on May 15.
      17 Gang rape: Burki police yet to arrest suspects
      On May 18 Fariha* and Fauzia* of Phularwan village, Lahore were pulled into crop fields by three men, identified as Naseem Akram, Jameel Akbar and Kaka. Fariha was gang raped by the men.
      18 Sixth grade student allegedly raped, police seeking suspect
      A 13-year-old girl in Islamabad claimed she was returning from school while a young boy with a knife threatened to kill her. He took her to a secluded place near a stream and raped her.
      19 Sexual slavery: SHO directed to hear woman’s complaint
      A woman was lured to the City Railway Station by Jahangir, Khandad, Sabir and Chanda Bibi on the pretext that they had arranged a job for her. They took her to Victoria Restaurant where they kept her hostage for a year and a half in a room, repeatedly raped by various men who would pay her captors.
      20 At gun point: Woman raped by brother in-law
      A woman was allegedly raped by her brother-in-law on gun-point in Taranda Saway Khan when her husband was out of town.
      21 Grieving family accuse police of protecting landlord behind murder
      Shumaila Parveen, 16, was stabbed to death at her home on May 18, allegedly by a landlord and his servant. They had allegedly tried to rape her before killing her.
      22 Follow up: Cases filed against 35 for rape and torture
      A man had married a widow from his neighbourhood and moved to Jhang. The woman’s family registered an abducting case against the man and accused him of “wooing” their daughter into marrying him. They later abducted he and his wife and beat him in public.
      April 2012
      1 Medical exam confirms rape of child
      A four-year-old girl was raped and thrown in a field where she was found lying unconscious by a relative.
      2 Gang rape case: Of 6 suspects police manage to arrest just one
      Two girls, both students of class 9, were abducted from Jhangi Syeda and raped by six men.
      3 Where is one safe?: LGH clerk suspended over kidnap and rape charges
      Muhammad Rizwan, a hospital clerk, abducted a 29-year-old patient with help from two accomplices and took her to a quarter on Ghazi Road in Millat Park, where she was raped.
      4 Rape victim downs over 40 pills
      The two ninth graders were allegedly abducted from a street while returning from school by six men. They were taken to a nearby real estate office and were raped for hours.
      5 Major Crimes: Gang rape, kidnapping reported
      Neelum* was attacked by Sher Alam, Rashid and an unidentified. The attackers sexually assaulted her.
      6 Gang rape case: One girl was raped, the other was ‘only’ harassed, say police
      The rape of two schoolgirls in Islamabad took place at the hands of one boy, the main accused, while the others waited outside the room.
      7 Refusal To Prostitute: Woman ‘escapes rape attempt by brothers-in-law’
      Kausar Bibi* said her mother-in-law and brothers-in-law had been pressing her to take up sex work since her husband left for work in Karachi. Her brothers-in-law tried to sexually assault her ‘for being disobedient’.
      8 Gang rape allegations: Five accused of sexual assault, kidnap
      Saleema Bibi* had accused an Ahmedpur resident and his four accomplices of kidnapping her daughter Saima* and detaining and sexually assaulting her for 13 days.
      9 Heinous crime: 10 yr old girl raped, tortured to death
      A 10-year-old girl, Kaniza Rukia, was found critically injured, and later succumbed to her wounds. Her doctor said her body bore numerous torture marks, and she might have been sexually assaulted.
      10 ‘Family feud’: Girl, 15, raped by relative
      A relative, along with some other people, came to Faryal’s* house when she was alone. They gave her a pack of juice and she fainted after drinking it. She was tied up and raped for two weeks.
      11 Sexual assault: Medical examination confirms rape
      A 15-year-old girl had been sexually assaulted allegedly by a relative and his two accomplices.
      12 Rape: Doctor arrested after bail dismissed
      Dr Imtiaz Ahmed raped the dispenser at his clinic in Nawankot.
      13 Woman stripped, paraded: Police take notice after road-block
      Shazia* was stripped and paraded through the streets by one suspect and his accomplices over resistance to landlord Ghulam Ahmed’s* bid to rape her.
      14 No arrests: Woman raped, burnt with cigarettes
      Naveed* along with a friend, entered Mavra’s* house, gagged her and tied her. She repeatedly burnt her with cigarette butts and raped and beat her.
      15 Karak Rape Case: Court orders lie detector tests for victim, accused
      DNA tests failed to ascertain the parentage of Uzma Ayub’s baby girl.
      16 Treating a headache: Woman raped by ‘healer’
      Hameeda Bibi,* resident of Mohallah Ghafoorabad, was raped at Peer Bawa Hayat Shah’s abode. Shah had locked the room and first chanted some stuff to ‘cure the headache’ but then harassed her with a gun and he and one Mudassir had raped her.
      17 PHC grants bail to accused killers of Uzma Ayub’s brother
      Rape victim Uzma Ayub’s brother Alamzeb Khattak was shot dead on December 9, 2011, while escorting Uzma for a hearing for her rape case at Karak courts.
      18 Dismissed: Three accused of rape released
      Two rape victims said an arrested man and two women were not to be blamed for the rape and a misunderstanding had resulted in registration of the case.
      19 Busted: Teenager arrested for rape
      Irfan Dayo, 16, sexually assaulted four-year-old Shazia in Nazar Mohalla. Shazia was while she was playing outside her house.
      20 Cases settled: Three released from rape and murder cases
      Allah Rakhi said her daughter had gone to Arshad’s shop to buy some goods on October 12, 2011, but did not return. She went looking for her daughter and some children told her that she was being held in the shop where she was allegedly raped.
      21 Child abuse: Boy assaulted by neighbor
      Mohammad Hussain said that his eight-year-old son was abducted by a neighbour and raped at gunpoint.
      22 Uzma Ayub case: Family to move apex court in murder case
      Peshawar High Court’s (PHC) had passed verdict to bail out four men who were accused of murdering Uzma’s brother Alamzeb Khattak.
      March 2012
      1 Acquaintance rape: Probe initiated into kidnap-assault-detention charges
      Shazia Bibi* said she had escaped the house where Arshad and his two accomplices detained her. She said she had been allegedly sexually assaulted and tortured for three days.
      2 Search Operation: Police on the hunt for alleged rapist
      Five men tried to rape Naheed Channa, 35, but when they couldn’t they attacked her with a knife.
      3 When will justice be served?
      So far, the police have not been able to catch a single culprit, or even ascertain if the rape-murders were carried out by the same perpetrators.
      4 Rape survivor tells incensed court police favouring accused for law minister ties
      Rape survivor S* informed the court that police had detained Mushtaq, the sole witness of the rape, and tortured him for three days.
      5 Sexual assault: Child raped ‘by neighbour’
      A 10-year-old deaf-and-dumb girl was alone at her home when her neighbour broke in and sexually assaulted her.
      6 Eve of Women’s Day: Policeman, aide rape 14-year-old girl
      A 14-year-old girl was raped at gunpoint by a police constable and another man, while her grandparents were tied and gagged in another room of their house.
      7 Karak rape case: Six accused approach court seeking bail
      Thirteen men had allegedly abducted Uzma Ayub and kept her in detention for 13 months.
      8 Attempted rape: Six-year-old girl found unconscious
      A 12-year-old boy, Ameer Mallah, allegedly tried to rape his six-year-old cousin.
      9 Supreme Court: Faisalabad CPO reprimanded for failing to arrest suspect
      Saima Mukhtar* said Asghar Ali called her to his office for a job interview but he and four other people had raped her.
      10 Uzma Ayub case: Witness in rape case to undergo DNA test
      Uzma Ayub’s brother said DNA test of main eyewitness Jamal was a plot to trap him.
      11 Gilgit Gang Rape: Three men remanded in police custody
      Three men were accused of gang-raping two sisters who had reportedly run away from their home.
      12 Minor girl sexually assaulted in Haripur

      13 Injury and insult: Worker accused of rape over minimum wage demand
      Shabana*, five, had gone to buy groceries from a store in the neighbourhood, where she was assaulted by the shopkeeper’s son.
      14 Karak rape case: Six suspects test negative
      Alleged rape victim Uzma Ayub had accused 13 people, including three police officials and an army official, of raping her after she was abducted and kept in custody for 13 months.
      15 Supreme Court continues with police lament
      The court was hearing three cases jointly – one a petition for the recovery of a maid abducted from Lahore, the second concerning a murder during an incident of illegal dispossession, and the third concerning the arrest of the alleged ring leader in a gang rape case who is said to be a friend of Law Minister Rana Sanaullah.
      16 Sexual assault: Blind woman raped
      35-year-old Khanim Bibi* was kidnapped on her way home in Ahmedpur village and raped allegedly by Muhammad Ameer.
      17 Bartering women: Apex court declares ‘jirgas’ unconstitutional
      The apex court expressed concern over lack of convictions in cases of acid crimes and a recent rape incident in Shiekhupura.
      18 Rule of law: 3 policemen arrested for biased investigation
      The victim had told the court that despite several requests the police did not registered an FIR.
      19 Heinous Crime: 4 arrested for raping disabled woman
      A 22-year-old physically disabled woman said she was kidnapped from her house by four men who took her to a vacant house. She was raped by Sarfaraz, while his accomplices Latif Gujjar, Aslam Rath and Riaz Arain watched the house.
      20 Woman climbs pole to protest alleged rape
      22-year-old Neha claimed she was raped by spiritual healer Ashraf on January 15. She had gone to the peer after having an argument with her husband.
      21 Rape case: SC displeased with police report in Sonia Naz case
      The CJ was astonished that former Superintendent of Police (SP) Faisalabad Ahmed Raza Tahir, against whom substantial evidence was provided, was posted as Regional Police Officer (RPO) Lahore.
      February 2012
      1 Smooth ascend: On average, three children assaulted every day
      A report by NGO Sahil said a total of 4,846 attackers abused 2,303 children in 2011. The total number of sexual abuse cases in 2011, stood at a staggering 2,303.
      2 Assault, homicide: Neighbour arrested for child’s rape, murder
      A 12-year-old boy sexually assaulted and killed. In another incident, mutilated body of a woman found in a field who was apparently sexually assaulted and murdered.
      3 Vulnerable: Rape and harassment lead to attempted suicides
      A 25-year-old woman was alone at home, when two men from the same locality broke into the house and raped her. When news of her rape spread and people taunted her, she consumed poison.
      4 Gang rape victim: Strengthening resolve to seek justice in Karak
      Rape victim Uzma Ayub vowed to fight for justice till she breathes her last.
      5 Karak rape case: Uzma Ayub’s new-born baby girl hospitalised
      Rape victim Uzma Ayub gave birth to a baby girl Zeba on January 20 who became a key evidence in the rape case.
      6 Karak rape case: Victim’s last hope hangs by a thread
      Uzma Ayub’s baby, a key evidence in the rape case, was hospitalised in a critical condition.
      7 Karak Rape Case: Journalists offer their side of the story
      Uzma Ayub’s daughter Zeba went missing from the hospital soon after she was born, but was later found.
      8 Alarming figures: 12 women killed, two raped in Hazara division this year
      Two married women were gang-raped in Haripur, while two women, including a teenage girl, attempted suicide.
      9 Gang rape: Six men sentenced to death in seven-year-old case
      Suspects kidnapped Razia* and sexually assaulted for to avenge the alleged kidnapping of a suspect’s daughter by a friend of Razia’s father.
      10 Child kidnapped, badly hurt in rape attempt
      A five-year-old child was hospitalised with a severe head injury and several cuts he suffered in an assault allegedly by two men who were attempting to rape him.
      11 Abuse of power: Teenaged school girl accuses a police official of rape
      The sub-inspector of the Rescue 15 police has been accused of assaulting a 15-year-old schoolgirl after harassing and blackmailing her.
      12 Nick of time: Man held for attempting to rape 11-year-old girl
      An 11-year-old girl’s shrieking and crying for help saved her from attempted rape at the hands of a family acquaintance, a 22-year-old single man living in the same street as her.
      13 Karak rape case: PHC dissatisfied with judicial inquiry
      The Peshawar High Court (PHC) expressed dissatisfaction with the inquiry report on how Uzma Ayub’s baby was handed over to an NGO.
      14 Sexual slavery: ‘Cancel bail of rape, abduction perpetrators’
      A woman moved a bail-cancellation plea for five people who she says kidnapped her, raped her repeatedly for two years, broke her knees and rendered her unable to walk.
      15 Journalistic ethics: How the media traumatises rape victims
      Uzma Ayub has been hounded by journalists from her house to her hospital bed, narrating her experiences of abduction and gang-rape to reporters and millions of viewers across the globe – again and again.
      16 ‘Moro scandal’: Woman constable alleges DSP attempted to rape her
      DSP Alan Khan Abbasi said Police head constable Hamida Bhan was “corrupt” and ran a brothel in the police station.
      17 Karak rape case: DNA samples of six accused taken
      Suspects who were named by Uzma Ayub, the rape victim, were brought to the Khyber Medical Centre where their blood samples were taken.
      18 Karak Rape Case: Court rejects bail pleas of accused
      The four persons were arrested when Zafran, Uzma’s other brother, registered a complaint with the police, accusing the officials and Ibrahim Shah, the ASI’s brother, of killing Alamzeb on court premises.
      19 Raped and murdered: Body of five-year-old found in empty plot
      The girl, ‘S’, was kidnapped outside her house in Muslimabad when she went to buy candy from a nearby store.
      20 Child sexual abuse: For some children, home is the most dangerous place
      Victims, age no bound, are left physically, psychologically and socially scarred. They suffer from deep depression, anxiety, and often lose their trust and confidence in everyone.
      21 Sexual assault: Rapist sentenced to five years
      Muhammad Khurram visited the house when the homeowner was away and added sedatives to their milk. He then raped the 16-year-old daughter after the family lost consciousness.
      January 2012
      1 Heinous crime: Man arrested for kidnapping child, assault
      Two man sexually assaulted an 11-year-old child after kidnapping her from near her house.
      2 Fighting intimidation: Raped and robbed, victim appeals for justice
      Nazia*, 25, was asleep with her two minor children when two persons entered her room after scaling the boundary wall. They held her at gunpoint, looted Rs1,80,000 cash and raped her.
      3 Two girls abducted, gang raped
      Saima*, 18, was gang raped after being abducted at gun point. Four people kidnapped Farah* when she was carrying cattle feed from her house.
      4 Karak rape case: Victim gives birth to baby girl
      An inquiry committee was formed to investigate the rape case after victim Uzma Ayub said she was pregnant.
      5 Karak rape case: Stolen baby reunited with mother
      Uzma Ayub accused NGO of taking her baby away without her permission, shortly after she was born at Hayatabad Medical Complex
      6 Karak rape case: Accused sent on five-day judicial remand
      Nasibullah, who was serving in Air Defence in the Pakistan Army, had escaped from the area after the FIR nominated him.
      7 Kidnapping & murder: 7-year-old abducted, ‘raped’, murdered by neighbours
      Asiya, 7, was allegedly abducted by her neighbor Salman along with his accomplice Abid Husainand was killed due to non-payment of ransom.
      8 Cover up?: Court orders registration of case against seven policemen
      Rukhsana Bibi alleged that policemen entered her house and tried to rape her daughter, Samina*. When the girl resisted, the two sub-inspectors slit her throat.

      More in Pakistan
      Bodies of 9 TTP militants found in North Waziristan
      This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, redistributed or derived from.
      Unless otherwise stated, all content is copyrighted © 2013 The Express Tribune News Network.

      Technical feedback? webmaster@tribune.com.pk

      • Hi Raj/Lucky, Maybe this all happens because of this verse, the world over and not strictly amongst Indo-stanis (India and pakistan) :

        (Numbers 31:7-18 NLT)
        “Now kill all the boys and all the women who have slept with a man. Only the young girls who are virgins may live; you may keep them for yourselves”. Those bulls is what Moses allowed in the Bible and now the whole world is suffering from the “pillage’ of our daughters!!!!!

        Can I quote the “beautiful” verses…only if you promise to go through them, okay?

        7 They attacked Midian as the Lord had commanded Moses, and they killed all the men. 8 All five of the Midianite kings—Evi, Rekem, Zur, Hur, and Reba—died in the battle. They also killed Balaam son of Beor with the sword.

        9 Then the Israelite army captured the Midianite women and children and seized their
        cattle and flocks and all their wealth as plunder. 10 They burned all the towns and villages where the Midianites had lived. 11 After they had gathered the plunder and captives, both people and animals, 12 they brought them all to Moses and Eleazar the priest, and to the whole community of Israel, which was camped on the plains of Moab beside the Jordan River, across from Jericho. 13 Moses, Eleazar the priest, and all the leaders of the community went to meet them outside the camp. 14 But Moses was furious with all the generals and captains[a] who had returned from the battle.

        15 “Why have you let all the women live?” he demanded. 16 “These are the very ones who followed Balaam’s advice and caused the people of Israel to rebel against the Lord at Mount Peor. They are the ones who caused the plague to strike the Lord’s people. 17 So kill all the boys and all the women who have had intercourse with a man. 18 Only the young girls who are virgins may live; you may keep them for yourselves.

        What do you understand by ; 15 “Why have you let all the women live?”

        Very sad as this is against the Bible itself :

        Exodus 20:13 “Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be prolonged in the land which the LORD your God gives you. 13″You shall not murder. 14″You shall not commit adultery.…”. Double standards…hmmm…!!!!!

        Regards

        plum

        • YO DUMB PLUM,

          MOSES IN HEAVEN?

          The Prophet said, “On the night of my Ascent to the Heaven, I SAW MOSES who was a tall brown curly-haired man as if he was one of the men of Shan’awa trib

          The Prophet’s Night Journey to Jerusalem (Arabic: Israa) and Ascent to the Heavens (Arabic: Miraj)

          Volume 5, Book 58, Number 228:

          Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:

          Regarding the Statement of Allah”

          “And We granted the vision (Ascension to the heavens) which We made you see (as an actual eye witness) was only made as a trial for the people.” (17.60)

          Ibn Abbas added: The sights which Allah’s Apostle was shown on the Night Journey when he was taken to Bait-ul Maqdis (i.e. Jerusalem) were actual sights, (not dreams). And the Cursed Tree (mentioned) in the Quran is the tree of Zaqqum (itself) .

          Volume 4, Book 54, Number 462:

          Narrated Ibn Abbas:

          The Prophet said, “On the night of my Ascent to the Heaven, I saw Moses who was a tall brown curly-haired man as if he was one of the men of Shan’awa tribe, and I saw Jesus, a man of medium height and moderate complexion inclined to the red and white colors and of lank hair. I also saw Malik, the gate-keeper of the (Hell) Fire and Ad-Dajjal amongst the signs which Allah showed me.” (The Prophet then recited the Holy Verse): “So be not you in doubt of meeting him’ when you met Moses during the night of Mi’raj over the heavens” (32.23)

          Narrated Anas and Abu Bakra: “The Prophet said, “The angels will guard Medina from Ad-Dajjal (who will not be able to enter the city of Medina).”

          Volume 5, Book 58, Number 227:

          Narrated Abbas bin Malik:

          Malik bin Sasaa said that Allah’s Apostle described to them his Night Journey saying, “While I was lying in Al-Hatim or Al-Hijr, suddenly someone came to me and cut my body open from here to here.” I asked Al-Jarud who was by my side, “What does he mean?” He said, “It means from his throat to his pubic area,” or said, “From the top of the chest.” The Prophet further said, “He then took out my heart. Then a gold tray of Belief was brought to me and my heart was washed and was filled (with Belief) and then returned to its original place. Then a white animal which was smaller than a mule and bigger than a donkey was brought to me.” (On this Al-Jarud asked, “Was it the Buraq, O Abu Hamza?” I (i.e. Anas) replied in the affirmative). The Prophet said, “The animal’s step (was so wide that it) reached the farthest point within the reach of the animal’s sight. I was carried on it, and Gabriel set out with me till we reached the nearest heaven.

          When he asked for the gate to be opened, it was asked, ‘Who is it?’ Gabriel answered, ‘Gabriel.’ It was asked, ‘Who is accompanying you?’ Gabriel replied, ‘Muhammad.’ It was asked, ‘Has Muhammad been called?’ Gabriel replied in the affirmative. Then it was said, ‘He is welcomed. What an excellent visit his is!’ The gate was opened, and when I went over the first heaven, I saw Adam there. Gabriel said (to me). ‘This is your father, Adam; pay him your greetings.’ So I greeted him and he returned the greeting to me and said, ‘You are welcomed, O pious son and pious Prophet.’ Then Gabriel ascended with me till we reached the second heaven. Gabriel asked for the gate to be opened. It was asked, ‘Who is it?’ Gabriel answered, ‘Gabriel.’ It was asked, ‘Who is accompanying you?’ Gabriel replied, ‘Muhammad.’ It was asked, ‘Has he been called?’ Gabriel answered in the affirmative. Then it was said, ‘He is welcomed. What an excellent visit his is!’ The gate was opened.

          When I went over the second heaven, there I saw Yahya (i.e. John) and ‘Isa (i.e. Jesus) who were cousins of each other. Gabriel said (to me), ‘These are John and Jesus; pay them your greetings.’ So I greeted them and both of them returned my greetings to me and said, ‘You are welcomed, O pious brother and pious Prophet.’ Then Gabriel ascended with me to the third heaven and asked for its gate to be opened. It was asked, ‘Who is it?’ Gabriel replied, ‘Gabriel.’ It was asked, ‘Who is accompanying you?’ Gabriel replied, ‘Muhammad.’ It was asked, ‘Has he been called?’ Gabriel replied in the affirmative. Then it was said, ‘He is welcomed, what an excellent visit his is!’ The gate was opened, and when I went over the third heaven there I saw Joseph. Gabriel said (to me), ‘This is Joseph; pay him your greetings.’ So I greeted him and he returned the greeting to me and said, ‘You are welcomed, O pious brother and pious Prophet.’ Then Gabriel ascended with me to the fourth heaven and asked for its gate to be opened. It was asked, ‘Who is it?’ Gabriel replied, ‘Gabriel’ It was asked, ‘Who is accompanying you?’ Gabriel replied, ‘Muhammad.’ It was asked, ‘Has he been called?’ Gabriel replied in the affirmative. Then it was said, ‘He is welcomed, what an excel lent visit his is!’

          The gate was opened, and when I went over the fourth heaven, there I saw Idris. Gabriel said (to me), ‘This is Idris; pay him your greetings.’ So I greeted him and he returned the greeting to me and said, ‘You are welcomed, O pious brother and pious Prophet.’ Then Gabriel ascended with me to the fifth heaven and asked for its gate to be opened. It was asked, ‘Who is it?’ Gabriel replied, ‘Gabriel.’ It was asked. ‘Who is accompanying you?’ Gabriel replied, ‘Muhammad.’ It was asked, ‘Has he been called?’ Gabriel replied in the affirmative. Then it was said He is welcomed, what an excellent visit his is! So when I went over the fifth heaven, there I saw Harun (i.e. Aaron), Gabriel said, (to me). This is Aaron; pay him your greetings.’ I greeted him and he returned the greeting to me and said, ‘You are welcomed, O pious brother and pious Prophet.’ Then Gabriel ascended with me to the sixth heaven and asked for its gate to be opened. It was asked. ‘Who is it?’ Gabriel replied, ‘Gabriel.’ It was asked, ‘Who is accompanying you?’ Gabriel replied, ‘Muhammad.’ It was asked, ‘Has he been called?’ Gabriel replied in the affirmative. It was said, ‘He is welcomed. What an excellent visit his is!’

          When I went (over the sixth heaven), there I saw Moses. Gabriel said (to me),’ This is Moses; pay him your greeting. So I greeted him and he returned the greetings to me and said, ‘You are welcomed, O pious brother and pious Prophet.’ When I left him (i.e. Moses) he wept. Someone asked him, ‘What makes you weep?’ Moses said, ‘I weep because after me there has been sent (as Prophet) a young man whose followers will enter Paradise in greater numbers than my followers.’ Then Gabriel ascended with me to the seventh heaven and asked for its gate to be opened. It was asked, ‘Who is it?’ Gabriel replied, ‘Gabriel.’ It was asked,’ Who is accompanying you?’ Gabriel replied, ‘Muhammad.’ It was asked, ‘Has he been called?’ Gabriel replied in the affirmative. Then it was said, ‘He is welcomed. What an excellent visit his is!’

          So when I went (over the seventh heaven), there I saw Abraham. Gabriel said (to me), ‘This is your father; pay your greetings to him.’ So I greeted him and he returned the greetings to me and said, ‘You are welcomed, O pious son and pious Prophet.’ Then I was made to ascend to Sidrat-ul-Muntaha (i.e. the Lote Tree of the utmost boundary) Behold! Its fruits were like the jars of Hajr (i.e. a place near Medina) and its leaves were as big as the ears of elephants. Gabriel said, ‘This is the Lote Tree of the utmost boundary) . Behold ! There ran four rivers, two were hidden and two were visible, I asked, ‘What are these two kinds of rivers, O Gabriel?’ He replied,’ As for the hidden rivers, they are two rivers in Paradise and the visible rivers are the Nile and the Euphrates.’

          Then Al-Bait-ul-Ma’mur (i.e. the Sacred House) was shown to me and a container full of wine and another full of milk and a third full of honey were brought to me. I took the milk. Gabriel remarked, ‘This is the Islamic religion which you and your followers are following.’ Then the prayers were enjoined on me: They were fifty prayers a day. When I returned, I passed by Moses who asked (me), ‘What have you been ordered to do?’ I replied, ‘I have been ordered to offer fifty prayers a day.’ Moses said, ‘Your followers cannot bear fifty prayers a day, and by Allah, I have tested people before you, and I have tried my level best with Bani Israel (in vain). Go back to your Lord and ask for reduction to lessen your followers’ burden.’ So I went back, and Allah reduced ten prayers for me. Then again I came to Moses, but he repeated the same as he had said before. Then again I went back to Allah and He reduced ten more prayers. When I came back to Moses he said the same, I went back to Allah and He ordered me to observe ten prayers a day. When I came back to Moses, he repeated the same advice, so I went back to Allah and was ordered to observe five prayers a day.

          When I came back to Moses, he said, ‘What have you been ordered?’ I replied, ‘I have been ordered to observe five prayers a day.’ He said, ‘Your followers cannot bear five prayers a day, and no doubt, I have got an experience of the people before you, and I have tried my level best with Bani Israel, so go back to your Lord and ask for reduction to lessen your follower’s burden.’ I said, ‘I have requested so much of my Lord that I feel ashamed, but I am satisfied now and surrender to Allah’s Order.’ When I left, I heard a voice saying, ‘I have passed My Order and have lessened the burden of My Worshippers.”

          • Hi Raj/Lucky, Some Muslims grapple with the Quran’s verses to understand what God has actually said to them and at times follow the opinions of men, and Hadiths, thus creating their own sects and creeds simply passing on the baggage of non-Quranic theology from generation to generation.

            Such stories, as well as kissing the Kaaba, are not sanctioned by the Quran but are legitimised as having a religious connotation must be seriously questioned in light of the Quran.
            So where does the following verse, inferred as referring to ‘Mirage”, indicate that Allah took the Prophet to heaven?

            17:1 Pickthall: “Glorified be He Who carried His servant by night from the Inviolable Place of Worship to the Far distant place of worship the neighbourhood whereof We have blessed, that We might show him of Our tokens! Lo! He, only He, is the Hearer, the Seer’.

            Muslims believe that Allah has all the powers to do what He Wills. In the above verse, Allah is Glorifying Himself, by transporting His Servant by night, from an Inviolable place of worship to a far distant place of worship….not indicating whether Spiritually or in bodily form. Since Allah is Great, there Is no doubt that he did carry His servant, by His Powers.

            Do Hindus ever doubt that their gods ‘churned’ the oceans to get a bottle of Amrit, the life drug and drunk it?? Why?
            Do the Christians ever doubt that Jesus resurrected? Why?

            The opening statement: “Glorified be He Who carried His servant by night from the Holy place of worship to the farther place of worship… ” (verse 1) itself indicates that it was an extraordinary event which took place by dint of the infinite power of God.

            And why are you that dumbstruck to be referring, over and again to hadiths which all of them are doubtful and contravene the Quran??

            Ohhh…can’t you give us something more interesting, whacky??

            Regards

            Plum

      • I know they were Muslims but Islam is not responsible for this. This is first case in which some stupid Muslims were involved. You’ve observed them but you are blind to look at the rape of 15 years old girls by HINDU RELIGIOUS LEADER. Shame on this religion which teaches his followers to rape young girls, devdasis etc. Check this in which 7 years old girl has been raped.
        http://www.policymic.com/articles/59839/another-horrible-rape-case-in-india-7-year-old-raped-on-a-train

        • ALL SUNNI MUSLIMS ARE SODOMITES

          Satan Attends Every Childbirth; He Touches Every Infant
          Except for Mary and her Son Jesus, all babies cry during their birth, because Satan touches them… (Sahih Bukhari, 4.55.641)

          Whenever a child is born, Satan pricks it; that is why the child cries. Only Mary and Jesus were not pricked by Satan…(Sahih Muslim, 30.5837, 5838)
          Say prayer during sexual intercourse, and Satan will not touch your child…(Sahih Bukhari, 4.54.503

          Arabic poetry to glorify homosexuality, take their famous poet Abu Nuwas:
          O the joy of sodomy!
          So now be sodomites, you Arabs.
          Turn not away from it–
          therein is wondrous pleasure.
          Take some coy lad with kiss-curls
          twisting on his temple
          and ride as he stands like some gazelle
          standing to her mate.
          A lad whom all can see girt with sword
          and belt not like your whore who has
          to go veiled.
          Make for smooth-faced boys and do your
          very best to mount them, for women are
          the mounts of the devils

          ARAB POET Abu Nuwas:

          ALL SUNNI MUSLIMS FINGER F—-D BY SATAN AT BIRTH

          In a broadcast on the UK’s Fadak TV on May 24, 2012, London-based Shiite cleric named Yasser Habib calmly and dispassionately asserts that all non-Shiite males — especially the Shiites’ Muslim rivals, the Sunnis — are sodomized at birth by the devil, and grow up to become “passive homosexuals”, i.e., the “bottom” of a homosexual pair who is penetrated in anal sex.

          EVEN MOHAMMED & HIS COMPANIONS

          ISLAMIC CLERIC CONFIRMS MUSLIM MEN ARE SODOMITES

          You know how some people insult Muslims by calling them crude names that are the equivalents of sodomites and bestialists (butt- and goat-f**kers)? It turns out at least the sodomite insult is true! We have it straight from the mouth of none other than a Muslim cleric — a London-based Shiite cleric named Yasser Habib.
          In a broadcast on the UK’s Fadak TV on May 24, 2012, Habib calmly and dispassionately asserts that all non-Shiite males — especially the Shiites’ Muslim rivals, the Sunnis — are sodomized at birth by the devil, and grow up to become “passive homosexuals”, i.e., the “bottom” of a homosexual pair who is penetrated in anal sex.
          TRANSCRIPTION OF YASSER HABIB:
          “Anyone who consents to being called ‘Emir of the Believers’ is a passive homosexual. Omar Ibn Al-Khattab, for example, who willingly assumed this title, was, without a doubt, a passive homosexual. The same goes for the caliphs Othman Ibn Affan, Muawiyya, Yazid, and the rules and sultans of the Umayyad and Abbasid dynasties, as well as some of the rulers and sultans of our day and age.

          For example, the king of Morocco bears this title. This is how you know that he is a passive homosexual. This is in addition to the evidence revealed by Western media, which showed that the current king of Morocco is indeed a passive homosexual who belongs to the homosexual community. This was leaked from his palace by his assistants, his servants, and his ‘boys,’ whom he would penetrate and who would penetrate him. They fled to Europe, sought asylum, and exposed all this.

          CLERIC YASSER HABIB EXPOSES UMAR

          It is told (in the hadith) that Umar Ibn Al-Khattab had an anal disease, which could be cured only by semen. One should know that this is a well-known medical condition, which is also mentioned in sacred texts. Someone who, God forbid, has been penetrated in the anus, a worm grows within him, due to the semen discharged in him…
          A disease develops in his anus, and as a result, he cannot calm down, unless. he is penetrated again and again.

          The Shiites are undoubtedly protected from this disease, and from committing this abominable and hideous act. As for the Nasibis (who hated the prophet Muhammad’s family), they are definitely afflicted with this homosexuality.
          One of the devils is present at the birth of every human being. If Allah knows that the newborn is one of our Shiites, He fends off that devil, who cannot harm the newborn. But if the newborn is not one of our Shiites, the devil inserts his index finger into the anus of the newborn, who thus becomes a passive homosexual. If the newborn is not a Shiite, the devil inserts his index finger into this newborn’s anus, and when he grows up, he becomes a passive homosexual.
          If the newborn is a female, the devil inserts his index finger into her vagina, and she becomes a whore. At that moment, the newborn cries loudly, as he comes out of his mother’s womb. Note that some children cry normally at birth, while others cry loudly and incessantly. You should know that this is the work of that devil, according to this narration.”

          Islam is NOT a religion, but an insane political system and sex cult populated by the severely mentally impaired.”

          When cleric Yasser Habib “says ‘passive homosexual’, he is referring to the receptive, submissive, female-equivalent partner. Dominant, inserting male homosexual activity is universally accepted in Islam. He has no problem with that. It’s grown men ‘catching’ that he has a problem with.”
          Hey, all you gays-lesbians-bisexuals-trannies and “liberated” women of the “Progressive” Left!According to a cleric of the religion you so vehemently defend, you had all been butt-f*cked by the devil at birth!
          THERE ARE NO INNOCENT MOHAMMEDANS! THEY ARE ALL CLOSET PERVERTS

          The recent film “Innocence of Muslims” has sparked outrage in the cult following of Islam. In a religion that states that those who insult its “prophet” Mohammad should be put to death, the insanity is self evident. Muslims have cornered the market on cult insanity. If Muhammad was a respectable individual, then maybe this would not be such an issue. The problem lies in the Quran’s documentation of its “prophet”, and the Islamic belief that the Koran is without fault or mistake. “Not one word is incorrect in the Quran”, My Mohammedan friend Ahmed tells me.
          My first response is always…”What about Aisha”????
          You see, Muhammad was a documented Pedophile. He forced his friend Abu Bakr to give him his daughter. He said he had a dream about her and since Allah made him dream about this SIX YEAR OLD GIRL, then it was “gods will” that they be married. Not wanting to offend Allah, Abu Bakr gave his six year old daughter over to Muhammad to be raped.
          (Yes! Any sex with a six year old is rape. There is no possibility for comprehension or consensual sex with a six year old.)
          So the Prophet of Allah had Pedophile dreams about a six year old girl and used god as an excuse to get her into his tent for nightly rapes.
          That is all anyone needs to know about Islam. End of story. Its a sick cult with a perverted old man originating the sick, war loving religion.
          Now let’s look at what the Quran says about the events of the criminal Pedophile act.
          First he took her from her family and married her at six years old:

          Was Muhammad a Pedophile?
          An Examination of Muhammad’s Relationship with a Nine-Year-Old Girl

          For the Western mind, perhaps the most disturbing fact about Islam is that its founder had a sexual relationship with a nine-year-old girl. Because of this, it has become increasingly popular in some circles to refer to the Prophet of Islam as a “pedophile.” This is, of course, extremely offensive to Muslims, who view Muhammad as the ideal servant of God and as the greatest example of what a man should strive to be. Nevertheless, Muhammad’s relationship with a young girl presents a problem for Muslims, especially for those who want to share their faith with others.
          Since much of the following information will come as a shock to those who are unfamiliar with this issue, we must be careful not to jump to hasty conclusions about Muhammad. Pedophilia is one of the most serious charges that can be leveled against a person, so the term “pedophile” should not be used lightly. We must also remember that, if a man has a sexual relationship with a young girl in a culture where such a union is permissible, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the man is a “sexual predator,” as the term “pedophile” implies. Christians especially should be wary of flippant name-calling. With that said, let us carefully examine Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha, recalling the Western principle that a man is innocent until proven guilty.

          FIRST MUSLIM DEFENSE: Aisha was older than nine years old.
          Faced with the arguments of Western critics, Muslim apologists sometimes piece together information from various accounts in an attempt to deny that Aisha was as young as critics often claim:
          The popular misconception as to Aishah’s age may be removed here. . . . Isabah, speaking of the Holy Prophet’s daughter Fatimah, says that she was about five years older than Aishah. It is a well-established fact that Fatimah was born when the Ka’bah was being rebuilt, i.e., five years before the Call. Aishah was therefore born in the year of the Call or a little before it, and she could not have been less than ten years at the time of her marriage with the Holy Prophet in the tenth year of the Call. . . . And as the period between her marriage and its consummation was not less than five years, because the consummation took place in the second year of the Flight, it follows that she could not have been less than fifteen at that time. The popular account that she was six years at marriage and nine years at the time of consummation is decidedly not correct because it supposes the period between the marriage and its consummation to be only three years, and this is historically wrong.[1]

          RESPONSE: The evidence for Muhammad’s marriage to the nine-year-old Aisha is too strong to be ignored.
          The problem with the selective and carefully edited defense just given (other than the complete lack of references) is that it ignores the numerous accounts we now possess which record Aisha’s age when Muhammad consummated his marriage to her. Many of these accounts are from Aisha herself. Indeed, the evidence for Muhammad’s marriage to the young Aisha is as strong as the evidence for just about any other fact in Islam. We have copious traditions relating Muhammad’s marriage proposal when Aisha was six or seven years old, as well as his consummation of that marriage when she was nine:
          Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated that the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) married her when she was six years old, and he consummated her in marriage when she was nine years old. Then she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).[2]
          Khadijah died three years before the Prophet (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) departed to Madina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old.[3]
          Urwa narrated: The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years.[4]
          Aisha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.[5]
          Aisha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and she was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.[6]
          This is just a sample of the early Muslim traditions reporting Muhammad’s marriage to the young Aisha, but it is sufficient to show that she certainly wasn’t fifteen years old at the time of the consummation, as some Muslims claim.

          In addition to traditions regarding Aisha’s age, the Hadith also provides details about how the relationship began and progressed:
          Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated that the Prophet (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) said to her: “You have been shown to me twice in my dream. I saw you pictured on a piece of silk and someone said (to me), ‘This is your wife.’ When I uncovered the picture, I saw that it was yours. I said: ‘If this is from Allah, it will be done.’”[7]

          After having this dream about Aisha, Muhammad proceeded to ask her father Abu Bakr for her hand in marriage. Abu Bakr understandably objected at first, but Muhammad was able to persuade him to agree. Aisha was later taken to Muhammad’s house:
          The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) asked Abu Bakr for Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said: “But I am your brother.” The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”[8]

          Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated: The Prophet (the blessing and peace of
          Allah be upon him) married me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Madina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Umm Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said: “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.[9]

          Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated: When the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) married me, my mother came to me and made me enter the house (of the Prophet) and nothing surprised me but the coming of Allah’s Apostle to me in the forenoon.[10]

          Once Aisha was a part of Muhammad’s household, she became his favorite wife, even after he married several other women. Indeed, Muhammad’s other wives had to plead with him for treatment equal to that of Aisha:[11]
          The wives of Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) were in two groups. One group consisted of Aisha, Hafsa, Safiyya and Sauda; and the other group consisted of Umm Salama and the other wives of Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him). The Muslims knew that Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) loved Aisha, so if any of them had a gift and wished to give it to Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him), he would delay it, till Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) had come to Aisha’s home . . . The group of Umm Salama discussed the matter together and decided that Umm Salama should request Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) to tell the people to send their gifts to him in whatever wife’s house he was. . . .

          [Muhammad replied]: “Do not hurt me regarding Aisha, as the Divine Inspiration did not reveal it to me on any of the beds except that of Aisha.” . . . Then the group of Umm Salama called Fatimah, the daughter of Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) and sent her to Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) to say to him: “Your wives request to treat them and the daughter of Abu Bakr on equal terms.”[12]

          Thus, Aisha held a place of special favor among Muhammad’s wives, which caused a great deal of tension among the women. Since it may be taken as historically certain that Aisha was very young when her marriage to Muhammad was consummated, critics sometimes charge that Muhammad’s preference for Aisha reveals his preference for young girls. The Hadith offers a certain amount of support for this view:

          When I took the permission of Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him), he asked me whether I had married a matron. He said: “Why hadn’t you married a virgin that would play with you, and you would play with her?” I replied: “O Allah’s Apostle! My father died and I have young sisters, so I felt it not proper that I should marry a young girl like them who would neither teach them manners nor serve them.”[13]
          Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him), and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) would call them to join and play with me.[14]

          Nevertheless, it must be noted that, if Muhammad had truly been obsessed with young girls, he could have taken many others as his wives. Muhammad eventually held complete power in Medina and later in Mecca, yet he didn’t build himself a harem of young girls. Since there isn’t enough evidence to support the charge that Muhammad had a perverted obsession with prepubescent girls, critics should be careful when making such a claim.

          To sum up, the evidence makes it abundantly clear (1) that Muhammad had sexual intercourse with Aisha when she was very young, (2) that this relationship was pursued by Muhammad after he dreamed about her, and (3) that she was his favorite wife. With so much historical data reporting the age of Aisha, it should be obvious that Muslims who deny Muhammad’s relationship with her only do so out of embarrassment.

          SECOND MUSLIM DEFENSE: Morality is relative to one’s culture.
          Another method of defending Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha is the Muslim appeal to moral relativism. According to this view, since different cultures have different standards of morality, it is wrong to criticize the standards of others based on one’s own ethical system. Consider the following responses by Maqsood Jafri and Abdur Rahman Squires:
          The Arabs practiced polygamy. In the wake of custom the Prophet Muhammad married some ladies. Hazrat Khadijah was fifteen years older [than] him at the time of marriage. Most of them were his age sake. In his fifties he married Hazrat Aiysha, the daughter of Hazrat Abu Bakr when she was just bloomed to youth. Hinting this marriage some of the orientalists charge Prophet Muhammad as a “pedophile”. It was not only the Prophet Muhammad who had married a young girl [but] even the father of Hazrat Aiysha, Hazrat Abu Bakr had also married a young girl in his sixties. It was . . . part of the prevalent Arab culture and custom. Hence not to be taken seriously.[15]

          The large majority of Islamic jurists say that the earliest time which a marriage can be consummated is at the onset of sexual maturity (bulugh), meaning puberty. Since this was the norm of all Semitic cultures and it still is the norm of many cultures today—it is certainly not something that Islam invented.[16]
          Thus, since the practice of marrying young girls was “part of the prevalent Arab culture and custom,” it is “not to be taken seriously” as a criticism of Islam.

          RESPONSE: Islam is utterly inconsistent with moral relativism.
          This defense is truly amazing, for, when defending Muhammad’s moral perfection, Muslims often maintain that Muhammad condemned the Arab culture for the prevalent immorality:

          After spending his life in such chaste, pure and civilized manner, there comes a revolution in [Muhammad’s] being. He wearies of the darkness and ignorance, corruption, immorality, idolatry, and disorder which surround him on all sides. . . . He wants to get hold of that power with which he might bring about the downfall of the corrupt and disorderly world and lay the foundations of a new and better one. . . . He wanted to change the whole structure of society which had been handed down to them from time immemorial.[17]

          Muslims are quick to point out immorality around the world, especially in the West. It seems, then, that they are suggesting a very inconsistent message. When confronted with an immoral practice in another culture, Muslims cry out in one accord, “We condemn these practices, for they are against the eternal, perfect, and unalterable Law of God!” Yet, whenever the moral character of Muhammad is being scrutinized, Muslims suddenly say, “Don’t judge Muhammad! You should remember that he was from a different culture! Marrying young girls was common in Arabia, and it still is, thanks to Muhammad’s precedent. Different people have different moral standards, so no one should worry about Muhammad’s sexual relationship with a nine-year-old girl.”
          This convenient switch from moral absolutism to moral relativism is logically unacceptable. If it is wrong to judge the practices of another culture, then both Muhammad and the Qur’an were wrong for condemning immoral practices in Arabia. But if condemning immoral practices is acceptable, then Muslim apologists need a better response to criticisms of Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha.

          THIRD MUSLIM DEFENSE: Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha was part of God’s plan.
          Muslim apologists have developed another answer to Muhammad’s critics, namely, that Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha was part of God’s divine plan (i.e. God had an important reason for it):
          It should be borne in mind that, like all acts of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him), even this marriage had a Divine purpose behind it. Hazrat Aisha was a precocious girl and was developing both in mind and body with rapidity peculiar to such rare personalities. She was admitted to the house of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) just at the threshold of her puberty, the most impressionable and formative period of her life. It was the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) who nurtured her sensibilities and directed the growth of her faculties to the most fruitful channel and thus she was made to play an eminent role in the history of Islam. Moreover, she was the only virgin lady to enter the House of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) and was thus very competent to share the feelings of other ladies of younger age who had numerous questions to ask from the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) with regard to sexual ethics and morality. These ladies felt shy of asking them through the elderly wives of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) out of modesty. They could speak out their minds comparatively more freely to Aisha who was more or less of their own age group.[18]
          Puberty is a biological sign which shows that a woman is capable of bearing children. Can anyone logically deny this? Part of the wisdom behind the Prophet Muhammad’s marriage to Aishah just after she reached puberty is to firmly establish this as a point of Islamic Law, even though it was already a cultural norm in all Semitic societies (including the one Jesus grew up in).[19]

          Here Muslim apologists argue that Muhammad married Aisha for a divine purpose. Young girls who had questions about sex needed someone to talk to, and who better for this task than the young wife of the Prophet? Further, Muhammad wanted to establish puberty as an appropriate age for marriage, so he decided to demonstrate this rule by marrying Aisha.

          RESPONSE: Muslims have failed to offer a sufficient reason for God to ordain the marriage.
          There are numerous problems with this defense. First, such a response could be used to justify nearly any behavior. Consider a husband on trial for beating his wife. When he takes the stand, he explains, “Your Honor, many women are victims of spousal abuse, and they need someone to talk to. Out of the kindness of my heart, I decided to beat my wife, so that she would be able to comfort other women whose husbands beat them.” Such an explanation would never be accepted (except, perhaps, in countries under Islamic rule, where the Qur’an guarantees a husband’s right to beat his wife[20]). Besides, if Muhammad had outlawed sex with children instead of becoming a willing participant, little girls wouldn’t have to worry about sex, and they wouldn’t need to question Aisha.

          Second, it isn’t necessary for a lawgiver to institute laws by performing actions that create a precedent. In other words, Muhammad didn’t need to marry a young girl in order establish a law about marrying girls who had reached puberty. Muhammad, as Islam’s lawgiver, could have simply issued a decree. For instance, Muhammad allowed husbands to beat their wives. Was it necessary for Muhammad to beat his wives in order to establish this as a law? Certainly not. Similarly, when an American lawmaker says that killing someone in self-defense is acceptable, no one argues that the lawmaker must go out and kill someone in self-defense if his law is to stand. Hence, the argument that Muhammad needed to marry a young girl to establish puberty as the appropriate age for marriage completely fails.

          Third, the Muslim claim that Aisha was a “precocious child” strains the evidence. Aisha herself reports that, when she was taken to Muhammad’s house, she was playing on a swing with her friends. She was also still playing with dolls. Based on the evidence, Aisha sounds like a normal little girl, not like a young adult. Besides, Muhammad didn’t marry her because she was precocious; he married her because he was dreaming about her.

          Fourth, it is unlikely that God was using Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha to establish puberty as the appropriate age for marriage, since the Qur’an itself seems to allow marriage to prepubescent girls. According to Surah 65:4, a man must wait three months to divorce a wife who hasn’t yet reached menses. If Islam allows a man to divorce a girl who isn’t old enough to have her period, it follows that Islam also allows a man to marry a girl who hasn’t yet reached menses. And if the Qur’an allows marriage to prepubescent girls, then Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha would in no way rule out such a practice. (In the spirit of interpretive charity, I’m open to alternative interpretations of the Qur’an here. That is, I’m willing to give Muslims the benefit of the doubt if they offer another reasonable view of this passage. Based solely on 65:4, I would say that several interpretations of the text are possible. However, if we consider early Muslim commentaries on the verse, the understanding I give above appears strongest.

          Fifth, Muslims search for reasons to justify Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha because they are convinced that everything Muhammad did had a divine purpose behind it. When critics point out Muhammad’s numerous murders and assassinations, Muslims claim that these violent acts were just. When critics note the extent of Muhammad’s polygamy, or his participation in the slave-trade, or his countless robberies,[21] Muslims provide answers based on the view that Muhammad was an outstanding moral example. Similarly, when Muslims are confronted with the evidence for Muhammad’s sexual encounters with Aisha, they assume that there must have been a reason for it. They then invent reasons for Muhammad’s behavior (i.e. the other little girls needed someone to talk to about sex), and they offer these reasons as a defense of Muhammad’s morality. However, non-Muslims do not share this confidence in Muhammad’s moral perfection. Indeed, when non-Muslims hear about Muhammad’s violence, his greed, his polygamy, and his support of spousal abuse, we aren’t as quick to say “He must have had a reason” as Muslims seem to be. Because of this, Muslim justifications for Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha sound hollow when presented as a logical defense of his actions.
          Finally, Muslim explanations for Muhammad’s behavior fail to take into account the dangers that accompany sex at a young age. Many Muslims claim that, as soon as a young girl gets her first period, she is ready to bear children. This “old enough to bleed, old enough to breed” mentality, aside from being disgusting, is completely false. A nine-year-old girl isn’t ready for sex or children, even if she reaches menses earlier than other little girls. Children that young are still growing; when they become pregnant, their bodies divert nutritional resources to the developing fetus, depriving the growing girls of much-needed vitamins and minerals. Further, complications often result from adolescent pregnancies, because the bodies of the young girls simply aren’t ready to give birth.

          The West has discerned the dangers posed by adolescent pregnancies. Muslim apologists often claim that marriage to young girls was common in biblical times. This may be correct, but it is because these marriages were part of the culture, not because God endorsed them. Whereas many Christian countries have recognized the potential harms brought on by pregnancies among adolescent girls and have raised the legal age for marriage, Muslim countries are often kept from such advancements because of Muhammad. This is very interesting, for Muslims often claim that Muhammad was scientifically enlightened and that the Qur’an is a scientific masterpiece.[22] In reality, Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha is injuring young girls across the Middle East and North Africa. The dangers have even been noted by the United Nations, which issued the following report in an attempt to curb the practices supported by Islam:

          Traditional cultural practices reflect values and beliefs held by members of a community for periods often spanning generations. Every social grouping in the world has specific traditional cultural practices and beliefs, some of which are beneficial to all members, while others are harmful to a specific group, such as women. These harmful traditional practices include female genital mutilation (FGM); forced feeding of women; early marriage; the various taboos or practices which prevent women from controlling their own fertility; nutritional taboos and traditional birth practices; son preference and its implications for the status of the girl child; female infanticide; early pregnancy; and dowry price. Despite their harmful nature and their violation of international human rights laws, such practices persist because they are not questioned and take on an aura of morality in the eyes of those practicing them.

          Child marriage robs a girl of her childhood-time necessary to develop physically, emotionally and psychologically. In fact, early marriage inflicts great emotional stress as the young woman is removed from her parents’ home to that of her husband and in-laws. Her husband, who will invariably be many years her senior, will have little in common with a young teenager. It is with this strange man that she has to develop an intimate emotional and physical relationship. She is obliged to have intercourse, although physically she might not be fully developed.

          Health complications that result from early marriage in the Middle East and North Africa, for example, include the risk of operative delivery, low weight and malnutrition resulting from frequent pregnancies and lactation in the period of life when the young mothers are themselves still growing.

          Early pregnancy can have harmful consequences for both young mothers and their babies. According to UNICEF, no girl should become pregnant before the age of 18 because she is not yet physically ready to bear children. Babies of mothers younger than 18 tend to be born premature and have low body weight; such babies are more likely to die in the first year of life. The risk to the young mother’s own health is also greater. Poor health is common among indigent pregnant and lactating women.

          In many parts of the developing world, especially in rural areas, girls marry shortly after puberty and are expected to start having children immediately. Although the situation has improved since the early 1980’s, in many areas the majority of girls under 20 years of age are already married and having children. Although many countries have raised the legal age for marriage, this has had little impact on traditional societies where marriage and child-bearing confer “status” on a woman.
          An additional health risk to young mothers is obstructed labor, which occurs when the baby’s head is too big for the orifice of the mother. This provokes vesicovaginal fistulas, especially when an untrained traditional birth attendant forces the baby’s head out unduly.[23]

          Contrary to Muslim claims, a nine-year-old girl just isn’t ready for sexual intercourse or for its possible ramifications (i.e. pregnancy, giving birth, breast-feeding, and raising a child). It is unnecessarily dangerous, for a much safer relationship could be crafted if the marriage were to take place several years later, when the girl reaches her late teens. Muslims may respond to this by arguing, “But Aisha never became pregnant, so none of this matters.” Yet it does matter. Every year, countless young girls, still playing with dolls, are taken to live with much older husbands. If these husbands were to be challenged, they wouldn’t respond by saying, “But it’s part of Arabic culture”; instead, they would reply, “It can’t be wrong, because Muhammad did it.” In other words, even if we grant the bizarre claim that Aisha was somehow ready for sex and marriage, most nine-year-old girls aren’t ready for sex and marriage. Yet the practice of marrying children continues to this day in many Muslim countries, largely because Muslims hold up Muhammad as their highest role model.

          FOURTH MUSLIM DEFENSE: The average lifespan in Muhammad’s day was so low that people had to marry young.
          Osama Abdallah argues that Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha was understandable because people in Muhammad’s day needed to marry early:
          Life 1400 years ago was very rough in the too hot desert. From my personal knowledge, the average life span back then was 50 years. People used to die from all kinds of diseases. Both parents of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) for instance, died natural deaths before he even knew them.[24]
          On this view, since people could die at any time in the “hot desert,” they would get married at a very early age to make sure they had as many years together as possible.

          RESPONSE: Muhammad was already more than fifty years old when he consummated his marriage to Aisha, so there was no need for him to marry such a young girl.
          Abdallah’s claim might make sense if Muhammad had been nine or ten years old when he married Aisha. But the Prophet of Islam was already well advanced in years. He was far closer to death than any young woman he might marry, so why not marry a young woman instead of a young girl? Why not marry a fully developed twenty-year-old instead of a little girl playing on a swing? By marrying Aisha when she was so young, Muhammad was, in effect, condemning her to a life of widowhood, for the Qur’an prohibited the marrying of Muhammad’s widows (33:53). Beyond all this, Abdallah’s argument ignores the facts. Muhammad didn’t marry Aisha because the average life span was fifty years old; instead, he married her because (1) he had been dreaming about her, and (2) he had the power to persuade Abu Bakr to give him his daughter in marriage.

          FIFTH MUSLIM DEFENSE: Other people have done it too—even Christians!
          Abdallah also employs an “everybody’s doing it, so it’s okay” defense:
          Not only was it a custom in the Arab society to Engage/Marry a young girl, it was also common in the Jewish society. The case of Mary the mother of Jesus comes to mind. In non biblical sources she was between 11-14 years old when she conceived Jesus. Mary had already been “BETROTHED” to Joseph before conceiving Jesus. Joseph was a much older man. Therefore Mary was younger than 11-14 years of age when she was “BETHROED” to Joseph. We Muslims would never call Joseph a Child Molester, nor would we refer to the “Holy Ghost” of the Bible, that “Impregnated” Mary as a “Rapist” or “Adulterer.”.[25]

          RESPONSE: Besides committing the “tu quoque” fallacy, this defense misses the point of the criticism against Muhammad.
          Tu quoque is a type of fallacy that attempts to ignore a criticism because of some hypocrisy found in the critic. For instance, suppose I’m a thief. One day, I catch someone stealing my car, and I say, “Stop, Thief!” If the person stealing my car turns to me and says, “But you’re a thief too, so it’s not wrong for me to steal,” he will be committing the tu quoque fallacy.

          Muslims rely heavily on the tu quoque. When people criticize Islam for terrorism, it’s common to hear Muslims say, “But Americans are killing Arabs!” as if this were a meaningful response to the charge. Likewise, when someone says, “Look at all the people Muhammad killed,” Muslims respond by saying, “But people were killed in the Bible too.”
          To say that Joseph married a young girl in the Bible does nothing to address the problem of Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha. At best, such a defense would only show that Christians are being inconsistent. But in reality, the Muslim defense doesn’t even show this, since their comparison fails for several reasons.
          First, there is no real historical data reporting the age of Mary when she married Joseph. True, given the custom of the time, she was probably fairly young, perhaps as young as twelve or thirteen. But since we have no historical references to her age, we can’t rule out the possibility that Mary was twenty years old. The point here is this: people criticize Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha based on what we know (i.e. that Aisha was nine years old), whereas Muslims reply based on what we don’t know (i.e. the age of Mary).

          Second, we must not forget that thirteen years old is very different from nine years old. Nine-year-old girls typically haven’t reached menses. In a best case scenario, a girl that young may have entered the beginning stages of puberty. A thirteen-year-old girl, on the other hand, may be coming to the end of puberty. Thus, even if we grant a young age for Mary, there would still be a world of difference between her and Aisha.

          Third, Muslim apologists seem to miss the fact that Joseph is not the standard of morality in Christianity. When critics point to the age of Aisha, they are arguing something like this: “You’re trying to tell me that Muhammad was the greatest moral example of all time and that I should believe everything he says? I can’t believe that a person who would have sex with a little girl was the greatest man ever.” More simply, Muhammad is foundational to Islam. If there is a problem with Muhammad, there is a problem with Islam. If Muhammad was immoral, then it becomes difficult to take his teachings seriously. Thus, it makes no sense for a Muslim to say, “Well, Joseph married a young girl too.” Joseph isn’t foundational to Christianity. If an ancient text were found tomorrow, and this ancient text proved that Joseph was a thief and a murderer, this wouldn’t affect Christianity at all, because Christians don’t consider him to be a prophet, or a bringer of revelation, or even an important figure in Christianity. Thus, if Muslims want to show that Christians are being inconsistent, they need to show that Jesus, or Peter, or Paul, or someone central to Christianity, did the things that Muhammad did. Fortunately, Jesus was sinless, and the apostles lived exemplary lives once they had committed themselves to Jesus.

          The internet is filled with examples of Muslims responses of this sort. Muslim websites constantly note that young girls are married in various countries and that these young girls sometimes give birth. No one doubts this. The problem is that this has nothing to do with whether or not marriage to a nine-year-old girl is morally acceptable for a mighty prophet. The fact that Muslims are forced to resort to an “everyone’s doing it” defense shows that they have run out of responses.

          ASSESSMENT: While the evidence isn’t enough to condemn Muhammad as a “pedophile,” his sexual relationship with Aisha is unacceptable.
          Muhammad has been accused of pedophilia in numerous writings, sermons, and conversations. We have seen that the earliest Muslim traditions offer support for this view. However, the evidence sustaining the charge of pedophilia is perhaps too limited to warrant such a harsh conclusion. We know that Muhammad had a sexual relationship with a young girl, and that this was reprehensible. Yet we must take cultural differences into consideration in formulating an accurate appraisal of a person’s character. In Muhammad’s society, sexual intercourse was acceptable when a girl reached menses, and Muhammad may have waited until Aisha had reached this age. (Note: There’s no good historical evidence that Muhammad waited for Aisha to reach menses. However, I think it’s important to be generous in our interpretations as much as possible, so I’m willing to grant, for the sake of argument, that Aisha had reached puberty.)
          Similarly, we don’t have enough information to call Muhammad a “pervert.” While Muhammad’s sexual acts may seem startling, we don’t know enough about the nature of these acts to condemn him as a sexual deviant or a predator.

          Nevertheless, Muslims are too hasty in dismissing Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha. We can’t simply ignore a prophet’s marriage to a nine-year-old girl. Muslims view Muhammad as the highest example of a moral life, but his marriage to Aisha conflicts with that view. If they want to put Muhammad forward as the standard of morality, Muslims need to come to terms with the many questionable things Muhammad did, as well as the awful impact of these actions.

          There is a simple, but highly explicit, way to evaluate the importance of Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha. We must begin by trying to get a mental picture of a morally perfect man. For Muslims, this will include all the things they have been taught about Muhammad. According to their picture, he is kind, generous, patient, humble, and trustworthy. He protects orphans and widows, endures persecution, helps the needy, and promotes justice. He prays faithfully, fasts regularly, and obeys God in everything. He is loyal to his friends and patient with his enemies. He never gives in when tempted with evil. Now we must picture that same man in a room with an innocent little girl. He takes away her doll, climbs on top of her, and puts his penis inside her. She doesn’t know what is happening because she is too young to know much about sex. Frightened and confused, she cries because of the pain and bleeds on her bed, but she tries to remain quiet out of respect for her new husband, who, in return, endangers her life.

          If a person is able to keep the same vision of moral perfection throughout that description, he may have the faith necessary to be a Muslim. But if his vision of the perfect man is at odds with what Muhammad did on numerous occasions, he will need to look elsewhere for an ideal human being.

          Notes:
          [1] Maulana Muhammad Ali, Muhammad the Prophet (St. Lambert: Payette and Sims, 1993), pp. 183-184.
          [2] Sahih Al-Bukhari, Dr. Muhammad Matraji, tr. (New Delhi: Islamic Book Service, 2002), Number 5133. See also 5134.
          [3] Ibid., Number 3896.
          [4] Ibid., Number 5158.
          [5] Sahih Muslim, Abdul Hamid Siddiqi, tr., Number 3310.
          [6] Ibid, Number 3311.
          [7] Sahih Al-Bukhari, Number 3895. See also Number 5078.
          [8] Ibid., Number 5081.
          [9] Ibid., Number 3894.
          [10] Ibid., Number 5160.
          [11] The Qur’an commands husbands to treat their wives equally (4:3), a command that Muhammad clearly violated. Of course, the same verse also forbids husbands to marry more than four women, but Muhammad received a revelation granting him immunity from this law (33:50).
          [12] Ibid., Number 2581.
          [13] Ibid., Number 2967.
          [14] Ibid., Number 6130.
          [15] Professor Maqsood Jafri, “On The Character of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).”
          [16] Abdur Rahman Squires, “The Young Marriage of Aishah.”
          [17] Abul A’la Mawdudi, Towards Understanding Islam (Islamic Circle of North America, 1986), pp. 53, 56.
          [18] Sahih Muslim, Note 1860 (p. 716).
          [19] Squires, “The Young Marriage of Aishah.”
          [20] According to the Quran, “Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great” (v. 4:34, M.H. Shakir Translation).
          [21] For references, see “Islam Beheaded.”
          [22] For more on this, see “Talking Ants and Shrinking Humans.”
          [23] Office of the High Commissioner for Human rights, Fact Sheet No. 23, “Harmful Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children.” (Online source) The actual report is much longer than the selections quoted here.
          [24] See http://www.answering-islam.com/aisha.htm.
          [25] Ibid.

          • Are you an idiot? Who listens to Yasser al Habib? Listen to Khomeini/Khamenei. All Sunni Muslims aren’t homosexuals. I’m a Shia Muslim.

            Well, you’re a Devil’s student. We’re here to rescue you from anti-Islam. You’re not conscious. We’re here to wake you up.

        • ADULTERY & RAPE ARE THE WILL OF ALLAH

          “That which you have been given is but a fleeting comfort of this life. Better and more enduring is that which Allah has for those who believe and put their trust in Him; who avoid gross sins and indecencies and, when angered, are willing to forgive; who obey their Lord, attend to their prayers, and conduct their affairs by mutual consent; who bestow in alms a part of that which We have given them and, when oppressed, seek to redress their wrongs.”
          (Qur’an, Ash-Shura 42:36-39)

          ‘Blood Money (Ad-Diyat)’ of Sahih Bukhari.

          1 Narrated ‘Abdullah: A man said, “O Allah’s Apostle! Which sin is the greatest in Allah’s Sight?” The Prophet said, “To set up a rival unto Allah though He Alone created you . ” The man said, “What is next?” The Prophet said, “To kill your son lest he should share your food with you.” The man said, “What is next?” The Prophet said, “To commit illegal sexual intercourse with the wife of your neighbor.”

          So Allah revealed in confirmation of this narration:– ‘And those who invoke not with Allah, any other god. Nor kill, such life as Allah has forbidden except for just cause nor commit illegal sexual intercourse. And whoever does this shall receive the punishment.’ (25.68)

          Bible
          You shall not commit adultery. Exodus 20:14(NIV)
          لاَ تَزْنِ. ٢٠ :١٤
          It is God’s will that you should be sanctified: that you should avoid sexual immorality; that each of you should learn to control his own body in a way that is holy and honorable, not in passionate lust like the heathen, who do not know God; 1Thessalonians 4:3-5 (NIV)
          فَإِنَّ مَشِيئَةَ اللهِ هِيَ هَذِهِ: قَدَاسَتُكُمْ. وَذَلِكَ بِأَنْ تَمْتَنِعُوا عَنِ الزِّنَى، ٤: ٣
          وَأَنْ يَعْرِفَ كُلُّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْكُمْ كَيْفَ يَحْفَظُ جَسَدَهُ فِي الطَّهَارَةِ وَالْكَرَامَةِ ٤ :٤
          غَيْرَ مُنْسَاقٍ لِلشَّهْوَةِ الْجَامِحَةِ كَالْوَثَنِيِّينَ الَّذِينَ لاَ يَعْرِفُونَ اللهَ، ٤ :٥
          Qur’an
          Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and slaves) whom your right hands possess. Thus has Allâh ordained for you. All others are lawful, provided you seek (them in marriage) with Mahr (bridal money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage) from your property, desiring chastity, not committing illegal sexual intercourse, so with those of whom you have enjoyed sexual relations, give them their Mahr as prescribed; but if after a Mahr is prescribed, you agree mutually (to give more), there is no sin on you. Surely, Allâh is Ever All-Knowing, All-Wise. Surah An-Nisâ’ 4:24 (Translated by Muhammad Al-Hilali and Muhammad Khan.)
          وَالْمُحْصَنَاتُ مِنَ النِّسَاء إِلاَّ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُمْ كِتَابَ اللّهِ عَلَيْكُمْ وَأُحِلَّ لَكُم مَّا وَرَاء ذَلِكُمْ أَن تَبْتَغُواْ بِأَمْوَالِكُم مُّحْصِنِينَ غَيْرَ مُسَافِحِينَ فَمَا اسْتَمْتَعْتُم بِهِ مِنْهُنَّ فَآتُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ ف َرِيضَةً وَلاَ جُنَاحَ عَلَيْكُمْ فِيمَا تَرَاضَيْتُم بِهِ مِن بَعْدِ الْفَرِيضَةِ إِنَّ اللّهَ كَانَ عَلِيمًا حَكِيمًا ٤ :٢٤
          Adultery
          Voluntary sexual intercourse between a married man and someone other than his wife or between a married woman and someone other than her husband.
          Rape
          Sexual intercourse with a woman by a man without her consent.
          The Qur’an states that a Muslim man cannot have sex with another man’s wife. However, there is an important exception when he is at liberty to have sex with another man’s wife. This exception applies to a married woman who is his captive or slave. If a married woman consents to having sex with her Muslim master, then it is adultery. If a married woman is forced by her Muslim captor, then it is rape. In either case, the Qur’an is in direct violation to the immutable moral law of Allah, the Judge of the Last Day. The divine Law given by Allah to Moses (Musa) states, “You shall not commit adultery.”
          The Companions of Muhammad used the captive/slave exception to have affairs with the married women under their control. During the lifetime of Muhammad, they followed their passionate lusts just like the heathen who do know not Allah (1Thes 4:5). The traditional hadiths record that Muhammad’s Companions raised a question about birth control and whether it should be practiced in their adulterous affairs with their captive women.
          In Sahih Muslim, Book 8 Chapter 22 in the section on Al ‘Azl or Incomplete Sexual Intercourse, Muhammad told his Companions to go ahead and have illicit sex with their captive married women without practicingcoitus interruptus (al-‘azl). There did not seem to be a question whether or not it was morally right to have sex with these women who were married to another man. It was assumed that these adulterous affair were approved by Muhammad and Allah, since these immoral acts were sanctioned in the Qur’an. The only real question was the adultery technique itself. The Muslim men were worried that they might get their female victims pregnant. And, if their female victims became pregnant, then their ransom value would be diminished or lost completely. So, in the minds of Muhammad’s followers, they faced a dilemma of either 1) practicing al-‘Azl and maintaining their women’s ransom value or 2) not using this caution during sexual intercourse and possibly losing their female slave’s ransom value. They wished they could avoid this dilemma, because they were keen to give full rein to their heathen lust as well as to receive a full ransom for their female captives. Imam Muslim’s records the traditional account of their dilemma and Muhammad’s answer.
          Sahih Muslim
          Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. Sahih Muslim Book 8 Number 3371
          Muhammad was quick to give his answer, and his answer was music to their ears. Muhammad said that they did not have to practice al-‘azl. Now, on the surface, it seems that Muhammad’s unlearned followers knew more about embryology and human reproduction than Muhammad himself. They knew that semen was required in the process of human reproduction that is why they thought it would be better to practice al-‘azl. It might be suggested that Muhammad had a lapse in memory. But, this is unlikely, since this form of birth control was common knowledge throughout world history. Rather, he seemed eager to reward his Companions with every sensual pleasure, as long as they willing plundered, killed, and enslaved anyone at his command. In his cunning, he had the necessary revelation from Allah to make captive married women eligible sex providers (Qur’an 4:24) for his Companions who lacked moral self-control.
          Muhammad turned the issue into a spiritual one, making it seem as if Allah would approve of forcing married women to have sex without prophylactic caution. In other words, Muhammad stated indirectly that having sex with female captives would have nothing to do with any children being born into the world. Because, according to Muhammad, “every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.” So, if a child were born to a captive female, it would have been born as a result of the divine decree (al-Qadr) of Allah, not as a result of the sexual act of the Muslim rapist. In other words, Muhammad’s Companions would not be responsible for a child being born. Allah and Allah’s divine decree would be responsible for the baby’s birth. If a captive woman became pregnant, she had no right to be angry with Muhammad’s men. She should blame Allah, because it was Allah who decreed her pregnancy by her Muslim captor. So, in effect, Muhammad shifted the moral blame from his sexually ravenous Companions and pointed to Allah as the real culprit.
          Furthermore, Muhammad’s statement is a logical tautology or a statement that must always be true. The word, tautology comes from the Greek language and means redundant. In its simplest form, it is like saying, “an apple is an apple.” Of course, it is true that an apple is an apple. Likewise, it is true by definition that every child that is to be born will be born. With this answer, Muhammad dodged the whole moral issue of using married female captives to gratify the sensual lusts of his Companions, and he was deceptive about the biological facts of sexual intercourse too.
          Muhammad stood against the weak and helpless victims, so the powerful could satisfy their immoral desires. He made it appear that Allah was on the side of those who wanted to engage in the passionate sexual lusts of the pagans. What must the violated women thought as they looked towards the heavens knowing they were being used as sex slaves in the name of Allah, the Merciful and the Compassionate? Was there no mercy or compassion for them? What kind of prophet was this who turned upside down creation’s moral order? Why did the Muhammad falsely claim that Allah disregarded the sanctity of a woman’s marital covenant with her own husband while she was a Muslim captive?
          Muhammad seemed to be impatient with his companions. He could not grasp their hesitation to engage in illicit sex immediately. He seemed eager, even sexually stimulated, to have the adulterous orgy begin and to have it begin immediately without the inconvenience of al-‘azl. He shouted out his command three times,”Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it!” They obeyed, and Shaitan smiled.
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl with them. We then asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) about it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born until the Day of judgment must be born. (emphasis added) Sahih Muslim Book 8 Number 3373
          Imam Muslim wanted his reader not to be in doubt about the issue. He gave several supporting hadiths to establish firmly his point.
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) (was asked if he had heard it himself), to which he said: Yes. (I heard) Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: There is no harm if you do not practise it, for it (the birth of the child) is something ordained (by Allah). Sahih Muslim Book 8 Number 3374
          This hadith is reported on the authority of Abu Sa’id with the same chain of transmitters but with a slight variation (of words). Sahih Muslim Book 8 Number 3375
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) was asked about ‘azl, whereupon he said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for it (the birth of the child) is something ordained. Muhammad (one of the narrators) said: (The words) La ‘alaykum (there is no harm) implies its Prohibition. Sahih Muslim Book 8 Number 3376
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that mention was made of ‘azl in the presence of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) whereupon he said: Why do you practise it? They said: There is a man whose wife has to suckle the child, and if that person has a sexual intercourse with her (she may conceive) which he does not like, and there is another person who has a slave-girl and he has a sexual intercourse with her, but he does not like her to have conception so that she may not become Umm Walad, whereupon he (the Holy Prophet) said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for that (the birth of the child) is something pre- ordained. Ibn ‘Aun said: I made a mention of this hadith to Hasan, and he said: By Allah, (it seems) as if there is upbraiding in it (for ‘azl). Sahih Muslim Book 8 Number 3377
          Malik’s Muwatta
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman from Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Habban that Ibn Muhayriz said, “I went into the mosque and saw Abu Said al-Khudri and so I sat by him and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said al-Khudri said, ‘We went out with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, on the expedition to the Banu al-Mustaliq. We took some Arabs prisoner, and we desired the women as celibacy was hard for us. We wanted the ransom, so we wanted to practise coitus interruptus. We said, ‘Shall we practise coitus interruptus while the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, is among us before we ask him?’ We asked him about that and he said, ‘You don’t have to not do it. There is no self which is to come into existence up to the Day of Rising but that it will come into existence.’ ” Malik’s Muwatta, Section: Coitus Interruptus, Book 29, Number 29.32.95
          What must their husbands have thought as they had to stand by and watch Muhammad’s Companions copulate their wives like dogs? For those unbelievers who sincerely loved their wives, it was a horrific experience. For unbelievers who did not love their wives, the promise of wealth, plunder, raids, and sex slaves was an attractive incentive to join Muhammad’s new religion. It is an incentive engraved into the very heart of the Qur’an and Hadiths.
          Sunan Abu Dawud
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri said: The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, send down the Qur’anic verse: “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand possess.”[Surah 4:24] …Sunan Abu Dawud, Book V, Chapter 711, Number 2150
          Sahih Muslim Book 008, Hadith Number 3371.
          Sahih Muslim Book 08. Marriage
          Chapter: Al-Azl (incomplete sexual intercourse): Coitus Interruptus.

          Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women;

          and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them.

          So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

          Qur’an, Hadith and Scholars:Al-‘Azl
          Al-‘Azl, (العزل) also known as coitus interruptus, is the practice of having sexual intercourse with a woman but withdrawing the penis before ejaculation. Apparently al-‘Azl with female captives and slaves was a pretty important topic for Muhammad and his companions as evidenced by the abundance of Hadith material on the subject.
          Practiced during Muhammad’s lifetime
          Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle .
          Sahih Bukhari 7:62:135
          Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interrupt us while the Quran was being revealed. Jabir added: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle while the Quran was being Revealed.
          Sahih Bukhari 7:62:136
          When RAPING your captive, it’s better if you do not pull out at the end
          THIS IS ISLAM

          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus(RAPE WITHOUT PREGNANCY)?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to PULL OUT. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.”

          Sahih Bukhari 3:34:432

          Abu Said said, “We went with Allah’s Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the ‘Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah’s Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence.”
          Sahih Bukhari 3:46:718

          We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. ………
          We asked (him) about it and he said, “It is better for you not to PULL OUT, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist.”
          Sahih Bukhari 5:59:459

          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: That during the battle with Bani Al-Mustaliq they (Muslims) captured females and wanted sexual relation with them without impregnating them. So they asked the Prophet about coitus interruptus. He said, “It is better that you leave it in, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.” Qaza’a said, “I heard Abu Sa’id saying that the Prophet said, ‘No soul is ordained to be created but Allah will create it.”
          Sahih Bukhari 9:93:506

          RAPE JIHAD
          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah’s Apostle about it and he said, “Do you really do that?” repeating the question thrice, “There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection.”
          Sahih Bukhari 7:62:137

          THE REASON WHY THERE ARE FEW VIRGINS LEFT!

          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: That while he was sitting with the Prophet a man from the Ansar came and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get slave girls from the war captives and we love property; what do you think about coitus interruptus?” Allah’s Apostle said, “Do you do that? It is better for you not to pull out, for there is no soul which Allah has ordained to come into existence but will be created.”
          Sahih Bukhari 8:77:600
          Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.
          Sahih Muslim 8:3371, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3372
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman from Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Habban that Ibn Muhayriz said, “I went into the mosque and saw Abu Said al-Khudri and so I sat by him and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said al-Khudri said, ‘We went out with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, on the expedition to the Banu al-Mustaliq. We took some Arabs prisoner, and we desired the women as celibacy was hard for us. We wanted the ransom, so we wanted to practise coitus interruptus. We said, ‘Shall we practise coitus interruptus while the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, is among us before we ask him?’ We asked him about that and he said, ‘You don’t have to not do it. There is no self which is to come into existence up to the Day of Rising but that it will come into existence.’ ”
          Al-Muwatta 29 32.95b
          It’s okay to practice ‘azl when having sex with your slave-girl
          Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri: A man said: Apostle of Allah, I have a slave-girl and I withdraw the penis from her (while having intercourse), and I dislike that she becomes pregnant. I intend (by intercourse) what the men intend by it. The Jews say that withdrawing the penis (azl) is burying the living girls on a small scale. He (the Prophet) said: The Jews told a lie. If Allah intends to create it, you cannot turn it away.
          Abu Dawud 11:2166
          Jabir (Allah be pleased with him) reported that a man came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: I have a slave-girl who is our servant and she carries water for us and I have intercourse with her, but I do not want her to conceive. He said: Practise ‘azl, if you so like, but what is decreed for her will come to her. The person stayed back (for some time) and then came and said: The girl has become pregnant, whereupon he said: I told you what was decreed for her would come to her.
          Sahih Muslim 8:3383
          Your slave-girl is your field, so water it or leave it thirsty if you want
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Damra ibn Said al-Mazini from al-Hajjaj ibn Amr ibn Ghaziya that he was sitting with Zayd ibn Thabit when Ibn Fahd came to him. He was from the Yemen. He said, “Abu Said! I have slave-girls. None of the wives in my keep are more pleasing to me than them, and not all of them please me so much that I want a child by them, shall I then practise coitus interruptus?” Zayd ibn Thabit said, “Give an opinion, Hajjaj!” “I said, ‘May Allah forgive you! We sit with you in order to learn from you!’ He said, ‘Give an opinion! ‘I said, ‘She is your field, if you wish, water it, and if you wish, leave it thirsty. I heard that from Zayd.’ Zayd said, ‘He has spoken the truth.’ ”
          Al-Muwatta 29 32.99b
          “You don’t need your slave-girl’s permission to practice ‘azl with her.”
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Humayd ibn Qays al-Makki that a man called Dhafif said that Ibn Abbas was asked about coitus interruptus. He called a slave-girl of his and said, “Tell them.” She was embarrassed. He said, “It is alright, and I do it myself.” Malik said, “A man does not practise coitus interruptus with a free woman unless she gives her permission. There is no harm in practising coitus interruptus with a slave-girl without her permission. Someone who has someone else’s slave-girl as a wife, does not practise coitus interruptus with her unless her people give him permission.”
          Al-Muwatta 29 32.100b
          Additional Hadith about ‘azl
          Sahih Muslim
          Sa’d b. Abu Waqqas (Allah be pleased with him) reported that a person came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: I do ‘azi with my wife. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Why do you do that? The person said: I fear harm to her child or her children. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (way peace be upon him) said: If that were harmful it would harm the Persians and the Greeks.
          Sahih Muslim 8:3394
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl with them. We then asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) about it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born until the Day of judgment must be born.
          Sahih Muslim 8:3373
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) (was asked if he had heard it himself), to which he said: Yes. (I heard) Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: There is no harm if you do not practise it, for it (the birth of the child) is something ordained (by Allah).
          Sahih Muslim 8:3374, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3375
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) was asked about ‘azl, whereupon he said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for it (the birth of the child) is something ordained. Muhammad (one of the narrators) said: (The words) La ‘alaykum (there is no harm) implies its Prohibition.
          Sahih Muslim 8:3376
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that mention was made of ‘azl in the presence of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) whereupon he said: Why do you practise it? They said: There is a man whose wife has to suckle the child, and if that person has a sexual intercourse with her (she may conceive) which he does not like, and there is another person who has a slave-girl and he has a sexual intercourse with her, but he does not like her to have conception so that she may not become Umm Walad, whereupon he (the Holy Prophet) said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for that (the birth of the child) is something pre- ordained. Ibn ‘Aun said: I made a mention of this hadith to Hasan, and he said: By Allah, (it seems) as if there is upbraiding in it (for ‘azl).
          Sahih Muslim 8:3377, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3378 and Sahih Muslim 8:3379
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: Mention was made about al-‘azl in the presence of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), whereupon he said: Why any one of you practises it? (He did not say: One of you should not do it), for there is no created soul, whose creator is not Allah.
          Sahih Muslim 8:3380
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) was asked about ‘azl, whereupon he said: The child does not come from all the liquid (sermen) and when Allah intends to create anything nothing can prevent it (from coming into existence).
          Sahih Muslim 8:3381, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3382
          Jabir b. ‘Abdullah (Allah be pleased with them) reported that a person asked Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) saying: I have a slave-girl and I practise ‘azl with her, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: This cannot prevent that which Allah has decreed. The person then came (after some time) and said: Messenger of Allah, the slave-girl about whom I talked to you has conceived, whereupon Allah’s Messeuger (may peace be upon him) said: I am the servant of Allah and His Messenger.
          Sahih Muslim 8:3384
          Al-Muwatta
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’n-Nadr, the mawla of Umar ibn Ubaydullah from Amir ibn Sad ibn Abi Waqqas from his father that he used to practise coitus interruptus.
          Al-Muwatta 29 32.96b
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’n-Nadr, the mawla of Umar ibn Ubaydullah from Ibn Aflah, the mawla of Abu Ayyub al-Ansari from an umm walad of Abu Ayyubal-Ansari that he practised coitus interruptus.
          Al-Muwatta 29 32.97b
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar did not practise coitus interruptus and thought that it was disapproved.
          Al-Muwatta 29 32.98b
          Yahya said that Malik related from Ibn Shihab from Salim ibn Abdullah ibn Umar from his father that Umar ibn al-Khattab said, “What’s the matter with men who have intercourse with their slave-girls and then dismiss them? No slave-girl comes to me whose master confesses that he has had intercourse with her but that I connect her child to him, whether or not he has practised coitus interruptus or stopped having intercourse with her.”
          Al-Muwatta 36 23.24b
          Malik related to me from Nafi that Safiyya bint Abi Ubayd informed him that Umar ibn al-Khattab said, “What is the matter with men who have intercourse with their slave-girls and then leave them to go? No slave-girl comes to me whose master confesses that he has had intercourse with her but that I connect her child to him, whether or not he has practised coitus interruptus or left off from intercourse with her.” Yahya said that he heard Malik say, “What is done in our community about an umm walad who commits a crime is that her master is liable for what she has done up to her value. He does not have to surrender her, and he cannot be made to bear more than her value for her crime.”
          Al-Muwatta 36 23.25b

          How a Woman Must Prove Rape

          Question:

          Why are rape victims often punished by Islamic courts as adulterers?

          Summary Answer:

          Under Islamic law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape, without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience, are actually confessing to having sex. If they or the accused happens to be married, then it is considered to be adultery.

          The Qur’an:
          Qur’an (2:282) – Establishes that a woman’s testimony is worth only half that of a man’s in court (there is no “he said/she said” gridlock in Islam).

          Qur’an (24:4) – “And those who accuse free women then do not bring four witnesses (to adultery), flog them…” Strictly speaking, this verse addresses adultery (revealed at the very time that Muhammad’s favorite wife was being accused of adultery on the basis of only three witnesses, coincidentally enough) however it is a part of the theological underpinning of the Sharia rule.

          Qur’an (24:13) – “Why did they not bring four witnesses of it? But as they have not brought witnesses they are liars before Allah.”

          Qur’an (2:223) – “Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will…” There is no such thing as rape in marriage, as a man is permitted unrestricted sexual access to his wives.

          From the Hadith:
          Bukhari (5:59:462) – The background for the Qur’anic requirement of four witnesses to adultery. Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was accused of cheating [on her polygamous husband]. Three witnesses corroborated the event, but Muhammad apparently did not want to believe it, and so established the arbitrary rule that four witnesses are required.

          Additional Notes:

          Rape is virtually impossible to prove under strict Islamic law (Sharia). If the man claims that the act was consensual sex, there is very little that the woman can do to refute this. Islam places the burden of avoiding sexual encounters of any sort on the woman.

          A recent fatwa from a mainstream Islamic site echoes this rule and even chides a victim of incest for complaining when she has no “evidence”:
          However, it is not permissible to accuse the father of rape without evidence. Indeed, the Sharee’ah put some special conditions for proving Zina (fornication or adultery) that are not required in case of other crimes. The crime of Zina is not confirmed except if the fornicator admits it, or with the testimony of four trustworthy men, while the testimony of women is not accepted.

          Hence, the statement of this girl or the statement of her mother in itself does not Islamically prove anything against the father, especially that the latter denies it.

          Therefore, if this daughter has no evidence to prove that her accusations are true, she should not have claimed that she was raped by her father and she should not have taken him to the court. (IslamWeb.net, Image)

          Since it is incredibly unlikely that a child molester will violate his victim in front of “four trustworthy men”, Islamic law amounts to a free pass for sexual predators.

          Islamic law rejects forensic evidence (such as DNA) in favor of testimony. An interesting situation thus sometimes develops in cases where a victim alleges rape and the man denies that sex even took place. In the absence of four male witnesses, rape cannot be proven. The woman’s testimony then becomes a “confession” of adultery. She can be stoned, even though the male is unpunished, since he never “confessed” to a sexual act!

          Some clerics blame rape on the woman. Australian Sheik Feiz recently said a rape victim “has no one to blame but herself. She displayed her beauty to the entire world… to tease man and appeal to his carnal nature.”

          Also, there can be no such thing as rape in marriage, even if the husband has to hit the wife in order to bring about her submission. Another recent fatwa reminds a woman, she “does not have the right to refuse her husband, rather she must respond to his request every time he calls her.” (Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 33597).

          Keep in mind that most Muslim countries do not operate under strict Islamic law, but rather under legal codes imported from the West. Therefore rape victims in these countries can and often do receive justice under more reasonable standards of proof.

          THE LIE
          “That which you have been given is but a fleeting comfort of this life. Better and more enduring is that which Allah has for those who believe and put their trust in Him; who avoid gross sins and indecencies and, when angered, are willing to forgive; who obey their Lord, attend to their prayers, and conduct their affairs by mutual consent; who bestow in alms a part of that which We have given them and, when oppressed, seek to redress their wrongs.”
          (Qur’an, Ash-Shura 42:36-39)

          ‘Blood Money (Ad-Diyat)’ of Sahih Bukhari.
          1 Narrated ‘Abdullah: A man said, “O Allah’s Apostle! Which sin is the greatest in Allah’s Sight?” The Prophet said, “To set up a rival unto Allah though He Alone created you . ” The man said, “What is next?” The Prophet said, “To kill your son lest he should share your food with you.” The man said, “What is next?” The Prophet said, “To commit illegal sexual intercourse with the wife of your neighbor.”
          PART 2
          So Allah revealed in confirmation of this narration:– ‘And those who invoke not with Allah, any other god. Nor kill, such life as Allah has forbidden except for just cause nor commit illegal sexual intercourse. And whoever does this shall receive the punishment.’ (25.68)

          Jewish Bible
          You shall not commit adultery. Exodus 20:14
          لاَ تَزْنِ. ٢٠ :١٤

          Mohammedan Qur’an
          Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and slaves) whom your right hands possess.

          Mohammedan Rape
          Sexual intercourse with a woman by a man without her consent.
          The Qur’an states that a Muslim man cannot have sex with another man’s wife. However, there is an important exception when he is at liberty to have sex with another man’s wife. This exception applies to a married woman who is his captive or slave. If a married woman consents to having sex with her Muslim master, then it is adultery.

          MOHAMMEDAN ADULTERY & RAPE VS THE LAW OF GOD

          If a married woman is forced by her Muslim captor, then it is rape. In either case, the Qur’an is in direct violation to the immutable moral law of Allah, the Judge of the Last Day. The Law given by Allah to Moses (Musa) states,
          “You shall not commit adultery.”

          And what about the Western women, who freely join this SICK, PERVERTED CULT OF EVIL?
          Jeremiah 17:9-10; OT, James 1:12-18 PROVES that the essence of EVIL comes from our own HEART & MIND.
          Satan is a Zoroastrian MYTH that migrated into Talmudic Judaism & Christianity.
          WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR OWN EVIL THOUGHTS & ACTIONS.
          Talmudic Judaism – Romanism – Mohammedanism, 3 jihadic Cults, whose roots are in Zoroastrianism.

        • Hi MM/Raj, God men or fraud men? They are all, from the biggest to the smallest fraud men.

          Stop believing in them for once and all. Believe me, they have done nothing for the spread of Hinduism. In fact, they have helped in dividing the illusionary religion into various sects and subsects.

          I was recently seated with a Hindu priest and when we came to deities he did not know anything about the Trinity or the Rigvedas and other Puranas!!

          These guys are not good, as after Asaram Bapu-the 800 thousand rupee rich- > ALL “God-men” are not holy Cows anymore!. Watch the video where a Hindu religious person says how the “miracle” performing is actually cheating and duping the people of India!!

          It is all deception : in 2008 a child from Asaram Bapu’s(rapist) Ashram went missing and later his body was found mutilated…poor kid.

          Do you remember the death of Narendra Debolkar…whatever..the rationalist.in my comments, recently?

          http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/we-the-people/holy-men-unholy-acts/289009?vod-mostpopular

          now what happens to his millions of rupees stashed away that he collected by duping the malnourished poor poor people of india??? What transformation will go through those millions of followers and who considered him god?? God raping…caught in the act!!! …how many more minors suffered from penetration of his dirty ding dong???

          Regards

          Plum

        • Hi MM, it does not matter what sect of religion one is but the most important thing is that what the Quran says : 3:108 Pickthall:

          “And hold fast, all of you together, to the cable of Allah, and do not separate”.

          The Cable of Allah is the Quran. Follow the Quran and whatever else that explains the Quran, only if and only if you are sure that, that IS the Truth!!

          All Hadiths are fake, just to distort the beautiful moral message of the Quran, for which the Prophet struggled and risked his life on many occasions. A few make fun of Islam because of the Hadiths…and today, very sadly, Hadiths are taken as the truth, without even knowing the history of the collectors and narrators!

          These very Hadiths, which the Muslims defend, are the very poison that has brought about enmity amongst Muslims themselves. Actually, many do not follow the Quran anymore or rather do not know the Quran but Hadiths are learnt by heart. I’ve never understood why they go like sheep to a slaughterhouse, when they very well know that every sect will hold to it’s own Hadiths and the Rope of Allah will be forgotten for good. Muslims ought to respect the fellow Muslims as well as all those who are not Muslims.

          25:30 Pickthall: And the messenger saith: O my Lord! Lo! mine own folk make this Qur’an of no account.

          Ponder over that and see round the world, how true that verse stands!! We, Mankind, are all brothers and sisters. And more we should respect every person and reason with thoughts and references, logically.

          Also, we should not be one way traffic remembering the on coming traffic as well. My prayers go with you as well as all those who put their time here.
          Life is very short and in between us the way is to hold to the Rope of Allah extended to all mankind.

          The only Rope of Allah is the Quran which is the best Guidance on the Planet for attaining morality and Wisdom.

          Regards

          Plum

          • Hi MM/Raj, That is a nice assumption, but thoughts are what they are…just building blocks…..upon blocks and …..further blocks, …endless..from where they come nobody knows, as dreams…. When asleep..images come…how?

            Regards

            plum

        • The Myth:

          Muhammad Would Never Approve of Rape

          The Truth:

          It is against Islam to rape Muslim women, but Muhammad actually encouraged the rape of others captured in battle. This hadith provides the context for the Qur’anic verse (4:24):

          The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives.

          Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)

          Actually, as the hadith indicates, it wasn’t Muhammad, but “Allah the Exalted” who told the men to rape the women in front of their husbands – which is all the more reason not to think of Islam as being the same as other religion.

          Note also that the husbands of these unfortunate victims were obviously alive after battle. This is important because it flatly contradicts those apologists who like to argue that the women Muhammad enslaved were widowed and thus unable to fend for themselves. (Even if the apologists were right, what sort of a moral code is it that forces a widow to choose between being raped and starving?)

          There are several other episodes in which Muhammad is offered the clear opportunity to disavow raping women – yet he instead offers advice on how to proceed. In one case, his men were reluctant to devalue their new slaves for later resale by getting them pregnant. Muhammad was asked about coitus interruptus in particular:

          “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.” (Bukhari 34:432)
          As indicated, the prophet of Islam did not mind his men raping the women, provided they ejaculated within the bodies of their victims.

          As one might imagine, Muhammad’s obvious approval of raping women captured in battle and his own personal participation as recorded in many places is of intense inconvenience to the Muslim apologists of our time. For this reason, some of them attempt to explain away these many episodes and Qur’anic references to sex with captives by pretending that these are cases in which women have fled bad marriages and sought refuge with the Muslims. Some apologists even refer to them as “wives,” even though the Qur’an makes a clear distinction between “those whom thy right hand possesses” and true wives (see Sura 33:50).

          Beyond the desperation of the 21st century apologist however, there is absolutely nothing in the historical text that supports this rosy revision of Muslim history. The women of the Banu Mustaliq were sold into slavery following their rape:

          “We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter” (Sahih Muslim 3371)

          In fact, female slaves were traded like any other simple commodity by Muhammad and his bad of devoted followers:

          “Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu’l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons.” (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham/Hisham 693)
          Is it Islamic to sell one’s wife for horses? Clearly these were not wives!

          More importantly, by definition a “captured” woman is not one who is fleeing her husband. She is fleeing her captor (ie. the Muslim slave raider). This hadith describes a typical raid, in which the women and children are captured as they are attempting to flee the attacking Muslims:

          “…and then we attacked from all sides and reached their watering-place where a battle was fought. Some of the enemies were killed and some were taken prisoners. I saw a group of persons that consisted of women and children [escaping in the distance]. I was afraid lest they should reach the mountain before me, so I shot an arrow between them and the mountain. When they saw the arrow, they stopped. So I brought them, driving them along” (Sahin Muslim 4345)
          The Muslim narrator (who happens to be Muhammad’s adopted son) sees the women trying to escape (following the massacre of their men) and cuts off their route by shooting an arrow into their path. These aren’t women trying to seek refuge with the Muslims. They are trying to avoid capture by the Muslims.

          The same hadith goes on to recount that Muhammad personally demanded one of the captured women for his own use:

          I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: “Give me that girl.” (Sahih Muslim 4345)
          The prophet of Islam and his companions used war to collect women for personal sexual use and for trading. Unless she was arbitrarily declared as someone’s wife, the woman became a sex slave. In no case was her fate tied to anything that she had personally done, nor was she given a choice about her future.

          ISLAM SANCTIONS RAPE
          IN
          THE QUR’AN
          Rape, sometimes called sexual assault, is an assault by a person involving sexual intercourse with or sexual penetration of another person without his or her consent. Rape is generally considered a serious sex crime as well as a civil assault. The International Criminal Tribunal established by the United Nations defined rape as:
          “A physical invasion of a sexual nature committed on a person under circumstances which are coercive.”
          In other words, a physical invasion of a sexual nature committed on a person under circumstances in which the victim is in no position to decline or refuse. Sex-slaves and war captives fit this category because the circumstances under which they are subjected to sexual intercourse make it either impossible or extremely difficult to object. Thus, sex with captives is considered as statuary rape because the victims are in no position to decline. It is vital to note that the absence of objection does not, of itself, constitute consent. Duress, in which the victim may be threatened or subjected to overwhelming force or violence, may result in absence of objection to intercourse. War rape is a typical situation where absence of objection may occur.
          The International Criminal Tribunal also defined rape as an institutionalized weapon of war. It also stated that rape is a crime of genocide under international law. The systematic rape of a civilian population by an occupying army is considered a war crime. (Fourth Annual Report of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to the General Assembly)
          We will now consider the subject of Rape in Islam as sanctioned by Allah and his Prophet. In some specific instances, rape is not a sin and is both permitted and encouraged in Islam.Islam is the only religious political system in the world that includes rules for rape. Incredible as it may seem, Allah gave Muslim men the right to rape women who are taken as prisoners of war. Muhammad himself had forced sex (rape) with several of his women captives of war. Later these victims of rape were either sold or kept as sex-slaves by their Muslim masters. Islam considers slave-women as property; therefore, Muslim men are allowed to rape them at will. Islam also permits unlimited sex with women taken as prisoners of war. Raping captives and slaves was widespread amongst the Muslims during the “golden days” of Islam. The founder of Islam personally carried out this wicked act after he came into power. Muhammad was a rapist.
          Allah allows Muslims to have sex with female slaves who are: (1) Taken captive in war (2) Purchased by money (3) Received as a gift (4) The female offspring of their slaves.
          For depraved godless men without morality, compassion or justice, the promise of wealth, plunder, and sex with captives was an attractive incentive to join Muhammad’s new religion.It is an incentive engraved in the Qur’an – the very heart of Islam. Since Muslims will not accept any interpretation that is extraneous to their sources, we will oblige them by relying solely on their own approved Islamic sources. We will use these documented evidences to prove beyond any doubt that Islam approves, codifies and legalizes rape in its sacred text.
          One of Muhammad’s warriors declared:
          Tabari IX:25: “By Allah, I did not come to fight for nothing. I wanted a victory over Ta’if so that I might obtain a slave girl from among them and make her pregnant.” (See also Sirat Rasul Allah by Ibn Ishak, p.590.)
          Prophet Muhammad Promises Women to his Warriors
          Ibn Hisham recorded the words of Muhammad in Al Rod Al Anf, Volume 2, page 182:
          “You see God will soon make you inherit their land, their treasures and make you sleep with their women.” (Literally: make their women beds for you).
          While promising women to his warriors, Muhammad said it is Allah who will “make you sleep with their women.” Now ask yourself, would the true God act as a pimp by providing women for the sexual gratification of his worshippers? In this case, it is even worse, for these women are not prostituting themselves for Allah to act as a pimp but they are the innocent wives, daughters, mothers and sisters of the unfortunate men who were either captured or killed.
          Allah’s Blessings for Muhammad and Muslims – Illicit Sex
          Surah 23:1, 5-6: “Triumphant indeed are the believers… (who) restrain their carnal desires except with their spouses and slave-girls. The practice of carnal relations is lawful with them.” (Sarwar)
          Surah 23:5-6: Who abstain from sex, Except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or the captives whom their right hands possess, – for in their case they are free from blame. (Yusuf Ali)
          In the words of this Qur’anic verse, it means Muslim men do not have to restrain themselves from gratifying their carnal (sexual) desires with their war captives, slave-girls and, of course, with their wives. As stated earlier, slave-girls are either purchased from the slave market or obtained by capture through warfare. Captured women are enslaved and shared among the Muslim warriors. These slave-girls are the defenseless mothers, wives daughters, and sisters of men slain in battle by the Muslim warriors. This utterly shameful conduct is sanctioned by Allah and enshrined in the Qur’an and the Hadith. Allah tells his Prophet:
          Surah 33:50: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowriesand those whom thy right hand possesseth of thosewhom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war…”(Pickthall)
          “Prophet, We have made lawful for you your wives whom you have given their dowry, slave girls whom God has given to you as gifts…” (Sarwar)
          Just as it is lawful for Muhammad to engage in sexual intercourse with his legal wives, Allah has also made it lawful for Muhammad to engage in sexual intercourse with the women captives of war. Once again, it is stated in the above Qur’anic verse that it is Allah who provides these girls as gifts to his Prophet for sexual enjoyment. Muslims must ponder, why should Allah take such keen interest in the sexual indulgence of his Prophet? What lesson is Allah teaching the rest of the Muslim community by authorizing this depraved behavior for his Prophet? The only lesson that is taught here by Allah is that it is fair to rape helpless captive women. That is why Muslim men are also given the same rights as their Prophet. They too are given the right to enjoy the same illicit pleasure as the following Qur’anic verse confirms. Allah tells the Muslim men:
          Surah 4:24: “Also forbidden for you are married women,except those who have fallen in your hands as prisoners of war.” (Malik)
          “And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you.” (Pickthall)
          This means that while a Muslim man is prohibited from engaging in sex with a married woman, there is an exception to this rule if the married woman happens to fall into his hands as a captive of war, then under such circumstances, he is allowed to rape themarried captive.
          Maududi, a highly respected commentator on the Qur’an interprets the plain meaning of the above Qur’anic verse, saying that sex with slave-girls is lawful without the benefit of marriage:
          Two categories of women have been excluded from the general command of guarding the private parts: (a) wives, (b) women who are legally in one’s possession, i.e. slave-girls. Thus, the verse clearly lays down the law that one is allowed to have sexual relation with one’s slave-girl as with one’s wife, the basis being possession and not marriage. If marriage had been the condition, the slave-girl also would have been included among the wives, and there was no need to mention them separately. (Sayyid Abul A’La Maududi, The Meaning of the Qur’an, vol. 3p. 241, note 7)
          In the above commentary, Maududi made it very clear that according to the scriptures of Allah, marriage is not a prerequisite for a Muslim man to have sex with his slave-girls. In Islamic theology, a Muslim man has the right to demand sex from his legal wife. By virtue of the fact that Allah grants a Muslim manthis same right with his slave-girls based on possession and not marriage, she, too, must provide sex on demand. As this right to sexual intercourse is granted by Allah, her consent is not required. Also, deemed as his property, a slave-girl does not have the right to stop the sexual advances even if she does not consent to his uninvited invasion on her person. Does not this unwanted intrusion on her body categorically amount to an act of rape? Would you join a religion that codifies an edict in its holy book that permits the raping of innocent women? A vital fact that we must remember is that this law is still in force in Islam.
          As stated earlier, Surah 4:24 permits Muslim men to have sexual intercourse with married women who became slaves through capture. We will now look at the circumstances under whichSurah 4:24 was revealed. The following Hadiths will aid us to identify the incident that led to the revelation of Surah 4:24.
          Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Number 3432:
          Abu Sa’idal-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hunain, Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: “And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (Qur’an 4:24)”
          Sunan Abu Dawud Volume 2, Book V, Chapter 711, Number 2150:
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri said: The Apostle of Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain.They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers.So Allah, the Exalted, send down the Qur’anic verse: “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand possess.” – Surah 4 An-Nisa 24.
          Surah 4:24 was revealed in a specific context when Muslim fighters got female captives whose husbands were still alive. And some of the holy warriors had been a little hesitant to have intercourse with the captive women in the presence of their husbands. Therefore, they consulted with their supreme leader. Muhammad realised that if Allah did not include married women in his authorization to rape captive women, then his holy warriors’ motivation to fight the next jihad will soon diminish. He immediately sought Allah’s intervention and right away, Allah revealed Surah 4:24 to sanction both rape and adultery.Because of this Qur’anic verse, the wives of the infidel captives became lawful to the conquering jihadist. The warriors who were reluctant moments ago were given the assurance that they could rape these women, both married and single, with Allah’s blessings. They now raped these women with an untroubled conscience. Whatever trace of decency that were with them just moments ago were now obliterated by Allah.
          Muslims must consider how Allah, who claims to be a holy God, can reveal verses to the effect that it progressively increases the depravity of his worshippers. Human decency and justice would dictate that no sex should take place between female prisoners of war and their captors under any circumstance. Having sex with women in their most desperate condition as war captives is not only morally wrong but it is also an act that is extremely evil.
          The raping of a civilian population by an occupying army is considered a war crime even by the laws of mere humans. Yet, this sexual crime is authorized by Allah. Thus, the laws of Allah are not only lower than that of man’s but also animalistic. Allah is guilty of promoting one of the most depraved, animalistic sexual behaviour among his worshippers by codifying the act of rape as an acceptable deed in the Qur’an. It is one thing for some soldiers in any army to strike out on their own and rape women. All armies have criminal soldiers who commit this wrong act. However, it is quite another to approve and codify rape in a sacred text. Thus, Islam is the only religion in the world that legitimizes rape and Surah 4:24 testifies to this disgraceful fact.
          The following Tafsir (Commentary) by renowned scholar, Ibn Kathir, reiterates the shocking ungodly decision of Allah to sanction rape in the Qur’an. Please read this commentary carefully:
          Tafsir Ibn Kathir on Surah 4:24:
          The Ayah (verses) means Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess.), you are prohibited from marrying women who are already married. Except those whom your right hands possess) except those whom you acquire through war, for you are allowed such women after making sure they are not pregnant. Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri said, “We captured some women from the area of Awtas who were already married, and we disliked having sexual relations with them because they already had husbands. So, we asked the Prophet about this matter, and this Ayah was revealed, (Also (forbidden are) women already married,except those whom your right hands possess).Accordingly, we had sexual relations with these women.” This is the wording collected by At-Tirmidhi An-Nasa’i, Ibn Jarir and Muslim in their Sahih.
          Through this verse in the Qur’an and verified by a number of Hadiths there emerges a clear picture of divine authorization of rape, adultery and fornication. Allah took it upon himself to sanction the raping of women, including married ones, who unfortunately became captives of the Muslim warriors. Thus, the divine approval of rape is engraved in Islam’s theology. Only the most debased religion will sanction rape. Can a religion that permits men to have forced sex with their captives come from mankind’s Creator? Absolutely not!
          The Islamic Legal Manual “Umdat al-Salik,” which carries the endorsement of Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, states the following:
          “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” Why? So that they are free to become the concubines of their captors. The Qur’an permits Muslim men to have intercourse with their wives and their slave girls: “Forbidden to you are … married women, except those whom you own as slaves” (Surah 4:23-24).
          Women and children are distributed among the holy warriors after Muhammad received one-fifth of the war booty. Women captives are either sold or forced to become sex-slaves and concubines of the conquering jihadists. This depravity of Allah is too severe for any rational person to ignore. It goes against the very nature of God in whose image we are created.
          Acts of Rape During the Holy Wars of Allah
          Sahih Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 46, Number 718:
          Narrated Ibn Muhairiz: I saw Abu Said and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said said, “We went with Allah’s Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the ‘Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus.We asked Allah’s Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence.”
          Sahih Muslim, Volume 2, Number 3371:
          …Abu Sirma said to Abu Said al Khudri: “O Abu Said, did you hear Allah’s messenger mentioning about al-azl (coitus interruptus)?” He said, “Yes”, and added: “We went out with Allah’s messenger on the expedition to the Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing azl” (withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: “We are doing an act whereas Allah’s messenger is amongst us; why not ask him?” So we asked Allah’s messenger and he said: “It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born”.
          Muhammad’s men inquired him with an ethical question regarding “coitus interruptus.” Having taken some women captives, they wanted to do coitus interruptus with them. They asked Muhammad whether it was permissible. He told them, “It is better that you should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.”When Muhammad said “it is better that you should not do it,” he was referring to coitus interruptus and not to the act of raping the captives. The subject of a soul coming into existence will not be necessary if sex or in this case rape is not permitted in the first place. He made it clear to them that “coitus interruptus”will be pointless because “every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.” Clearly, rape was on the agenda and it was not an issue with Muhammad. The only real question was the technique itself. Since Allah has already sanctioned rape, it is definitely not an issue with his Muslims warriors.
          Notice, Muhammad was quick to give his answer because he knew that Allah had already approved the raping of these captives. These immoral acts were already sanctioned in the Qur’an. Therefore, while Muhammad allowed the women to be raped, he did not approve coitus interruptus. Muhammad did not prohibit this extremely immoral practice of raping captives just when the time was right to forbid it. Instead, he allowed his men to rape the women and assuredly told them not to be unduly worried about impregnating them. For, according to him, it is with Allah as to which seed is destined to become fertilized. He stated that having sex with female captives would have nothing to do with any children being born into the world because, “every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.”
          In other words, if a child were to be born to a female captive of war, it would have been born as a result of a divine decree of Allah and not because of the sexual act of the Muslim rapist. Thus, Muhammad’s companions would not be responsible for the child being born. Allah’s divine decree alone would be responsible for the birth of that child. Muhammad was eager to reward his companions with every sensual pleasure, as long as they willingly plundered, killed, and enslaved others at his command. There did not seem to be a question, whether or not it was morally right, to have sex with the women who were married to another man. Muhammad the greatest exemplar for all mankind took his stand against the weak and helpless victims, so the powerful could satisfy their immoral animalistic desires.
          In another account, Muhammad even seemed to be impatient with his companions.He was eager, even sexually stimulated, to have the adulterous orgy begin. He wanted to have his companions rape the women immediately. At this point, it did not matter to him if they practiced coitus interruptus or not. He shouted out his command three times, “Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it!”
          Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Number 3373:
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported:“We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl with them. We then asked Allah’s Messenger (pbuh) about it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born until the Day of Judgment must be born.”
          Well, they obeyed and they raped. In the course of our discussion, we need to keep clear in mind the objective of this article. The issue at hand is rape and not coitus interruptus. Whether these monsters practiced coitus interruptus or not, it does not in any way diminish or absolve the culpability of their evil crimes. Muhammad, Allah and Islam sanctioned rape and that is what concerns us in our discussion. Coitus interruptus will not be an issue if rape is strictly forbidden by Allah. It is really unbelievable how Muslims can trust and submit to a deity who morality is so debased. Any human being with a trace of decency will shudder at the acts permitted by Allah for his male worshippers. Let us now look at some of the noble acts of the Prophet of Islam.
          The War Trophies of the Prophet of Islam
          Sahih Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 46, Number 717:
          Narrated Ibn Aun: Prophet had suddenly attackedBani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day.
          And she is not the only war trophy for our noble Prophet.
          “Sirat Rasul Allah” by Ishaq, pg. 464:
          After 800-900 male adults of Bani Quraiza were beheaded in batches, and thrown in trenches dug in Madina, the apostle divided their property, wives and children as booty… He took Rayhana d. Amr b. Khunafa for himself.
          Muhammad destroyed the Bani Quraiza tribe. All the adult male Jews were beheaded so that no husbands were left. This verdict was carried out despite the fact that the tribe of Bani Quraiza had surrendered unconditionally. The women and children were taken as prisoners and their wealth were divided among the Muslim warriors. Then, the Prophet of Islam took one of the widows he had just made – Rayhana bint Amr – for himself. What Muhammad did was grossly wicked, evil, cruel, immoral, unholy and satanic. You could be a happily married woman living your own life, but if Muhammad and his holy warriors attacked your town and captured you, you would lose all your rights. And while your husband is being killed or enslaved, you would be given to a Muslim warrior who would rape you with Allah’s blessings. This is the evil path that Muhammad has trodden and this is the evil path that he has left for his followers to emulate for all eternity.
          Safiyah bint Huyeiy Ibn Akhtab was another Jewish woman who was captured when Muhammad’s troops attacked and brought her to the Prophet as part of his share of the booty. Safiyah was seventeen and beautiful. Acting under the orders of Muhammad, Muslims killed her father, husband and many of her relatives. Muhammad ordered Kinana, the young husband of Safiyah to be tortured to death to make him reveal the whereabouts of the treasure of the town. Muhammad could not control his sexual desire. He had sex with the young widow he had just made on the very night after he had wiped out her entire family.
          Ibn Hisham, Book of Tabaqat:
          “Safiyah was born in Medinah. She belonged to the Jewish tribe of Banu ‘I-Nadir. When this tribe was expelled from Medinah in the year 4 A.H, Huyaiy was one of those who settled in the fertile colony of Khaibar together with Kinana ibn al-Rabi’ to whom Safiyah was married a little before the Muslims attacked Khaibar. She was then seventeen. One mile from Khaibar. Here the Prophet married Safiyah. She was groomed and made-up for the Prophet by Umm Sulaim, the mother of Anas ibn Malik. They spent the night there. Abu Ayyub al-Ansari guarded the tent of the Prophet the whole night. When, in the early dawn, the Prophet saw Abu Ayyub strolling up and down, he asked him what he meant by this sentry-go; he replied: “I was afraid for you with this young lady. You had killed her father, her husband and many of her relatives, and until recently, she was an unbeliever. I was really afraid for you on her account.” The Prophet prayed for Abu Ayyub al-Ansari (p. 766).
          Muhammad made widows out of young women so that he could sexually assault them. The fact that he could not restrain his sexual urges to allow this young widow to mourn her loved ones – who were brutally killed by him and his warriors only moments ago – shows the debased moral character of this evil man. There is no compassion in this imposter. The young and beautiful became his wives. Just think, which woman would want to marry the killer of her father, husband and many of her relatives, particularly moments after their brutal death? The other captives whom he felt were not good enough for him were either sold or used as sex-slaves. Muhammad is not only a confirmed rapist but also a common thief and murderer.
          Muslims who defend the evil acts of their Prophet must be completely perverse in their values for failing to see the absolute evil nature of this man. Killing men and possessing their women are acts of savagery. There is nothing exemplary in the heinous crimes of this exceedingly evil man.
          Surah 48:20: “Allah promiseth you much booty that ye will capture, and hath given you this in advance,and hath withheld men’s hands from you, that it may be a token for the believers, and that He may guide you on a right path.” (Pickthall)
          Allah has promised Muslim warriors “with much booty that they will capture.” And this means more slave-girls. And Allah“hath withheld men’s hands” so that Muslim men can rape their wives with ease. Can you imagine having a pimp as your god and a rapist as your prophet? Muslims have the full right granted by Allah to murder, rape, enslave and loot the property of unbelievers. There is no such thing as the “Golden Rule” of Christianity in Islam.
          Pause for a moment and contemplate on the utterly destructive nature of Islam. Can you picture the agony and shame the husbands must have suffered, watching strangers violate the bodies of their loved ones? Can any man face a humiliation more intense than this? Feel the unbearable torment and agony of these men. Imagine, what thoughts of self-condemnation must have passed through their minds, as they had to stand by helplessly and watch Muhammad’s companions sexually assault their wives like animals. For these unfortunate men whose wives mean everything to them, to say it was a horrific experience is an understatement.
          Now think about it from the women’s point of view. She just experienced one of the most horrifying events in her life – the destruction of her people and family. Her people were attacked and her side lost. Many of the husbands, fathers, and sons are now dead. Some of the men have been captured alive either to be sold or to be kept as personal slaves. The women and children are taken as captives. The captives are now distributed amongst the Muslim men as slaves. Her children are separated from her. She does not know of their whereabouts. She is uncertain of her own future, as well as those of her children. The loss of her beloved husband haunts her. He is either dead or enslaved. She is now in the total power of her captors. The holy Muslim warrior has been separated from his wife for a while. Now out on the field of battle, the sexually hungry predator moves lustfully towards her to ravage her sexually. Do you think that she will now offer herself willingly to copulate with the very man who brought death and destruction to her people?
          What woman do you think would look upon with loving eyes at the very man who brought death and destruction upon her loved ones, family and people? And this is the utter nonsense that Muslim apologists want us to believe. They want us to believe that these women accepted and converted to Islam with open hearts. They want us to believe that these women delivered themselves to be raped with open arms and legs to the conquering jihadist. Such are the lies and deceptions of Islam and its defenders. Can any true conversion into Islam really take place under such circumstances? To protect their children, many widows who were victims of Muslim conquest, readily agreed to conversion so that their children were spared from slavery and were raised as Muslims. Just as the saying goes that there are no atheist in foxholes, fear can produce willing converts.
          When you undertake the study of Islam, it is as if you have left the sanity of our universe and entered a totally different alien world where rape, murder, enslavement, looting, massacres, terror, violence, and pedophilia are no longer crimes against humanity and no longer sins against the laws of God but are the very laws of God.
          We will now consider an event that will further reveal Islam’s stand on rape. It will expose the morally debased nature of Islam and its Prophet. It will also disclose the utterly uncaring attitude that Islam has towards the helpless victims of rape. This event will show the ease with which women are subjected to rape. It also serves to confirm that Islam can never be the religion of the true God. The Islamic laws that directly contribute to the humiliation and the sufferings of millions of helpless women can never come from the true God who is the essence of love.
          Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 637:
          Narrated Buraida: The Prophet sent ‘Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated Ali, and ‘Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, “Don’t you see this (i.e. Ali)?” When we reached the Prophet, I mentioned that to him. He said, “O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?” I said, “Yes.” He said, “Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumus.
          “Khumus” is one-fifth of the spoils of war that is reserved for Muhammad. According to the notes provided for the above Hadith, Buraida hated Ali not because he had raped a slave-girl but for taking from the Khumus without permission. Let us analyze the above incident:
          The Prophet sent Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and… Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus).
          What was Muhammad’s response to Buraida who reported this incident to him?
          Do you hate Ali for this? . . . Do not hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumus.
          This Hadith clearly reveals that Muslims are actually permitted torape their victims. This single episode is sufficient to see the dark side of Islam and Muhammad. Ali took a newly captured female prisoner of war and had sex with her. When Muhammad was informed of this, he did not voice a single objection against the wrong committed on the helpless prisoner of war. Neither was he concerned about the welfare of this unfortunate woman. Nor was he shocked by the serious attack on the decency of this poor victim. Why? Because raping slave-girls and war-captives is a norm in Allah’s religion. Muhammad’s only concern was for the rights of the rapist. In his view, these women are nothing more than objects of sex to gratify the sexual urges of Muslim men.
          Ali was the husband of Muhammad’s daughter, Fatima. Even in today’s sexually permissive world, how many fathers-in-law would defend the rights of their sons-in-law to engage in illicit sexual intercourse? How many fathers-in-law would defend the rights of their sons-in-law to rape defenceless women? But, Muhammad did so in accordance to the dictates and norms of Islam. He defended his son-in-law by saying that “he deserves more than that from the Khumus.” The implication of his statement suggests that Ali deserves to rape more women from the captives. After all, are not captives of war fair games to be raped at will in Islam? After all, does not Allah permit and encourage rape? After all, is Islam not an utterly depraved religion?
          According to the edict of Islam, rape is jihad. In the ethics of jihad, it is not considered a sin to have forced sex with a woman as long as she is a non-Muslim captive or slave. In fact, it is not only encouraged in the teachings of Islam but it is also supported by the example of the Prophet of Islam. In Islamic theology, jihad is a like a magical wand. It transforms sinful practices like murder, looting, destruction of property and rape into acts of virtue.
          Please read the following Hadith carefully. This Hadith describes a typical raid, in which women and children are captured as they attempt to flee the attacking Muslims.
          Sahih Muslim, Book 19, Number 4345:
          “…and then we attacked from all sides and reached their watering-place where a battle was fought. Some of the enemies were killed and some were taken prisoners. I saw a group of persons that consisted of women and children[escaping in the distance]. I was afraid lest they should reach the mountain before me, so I shot an arrow between them and the mountain. When they saw the arrow, they stopped. So I brought them, driving them along.”
          The Muslim narrator is Muhammad’s adopted son. He sees the women trying to escape (following the massacre of their men) and he cuts off their route by shooting an arrow into their path. These women are not trying to seek refuge with the jihadist, as Muslim apologist wants us to believe but are fleeing from the Muslims. The Hadith goes on to recount that Muhammad personally demanded one of the captured women for his own use. Let’s continue with our reading of the Hadith:
          “I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) met me in the street and said: “Give me that girl.”
          The words of Muhammad’s adopted son, “I had not yet disrobed her” reveal the sickening condition in Islam. Whenever the Muslim army conducted a raid, they always had the thirst for the succulent bodies of infidel women. Each woman captive serves as an opportunity for the pious to rape. And Muhammad was no different. In fact, he could not wait to satisfy his lust. He shamelessly ordered his son, “Give me that girl.” This is a typical scene from the glorious golden days of Islam. Sexual predators from prophet to foot soldiers. Shame, honor, virtue and self-respect are alien to the religion of Islam.
          As one might conclude, Muhammad’s obvious approval of raping women captured in battle, and his own personal participation in it is of intense inconvenience to the Muslim apologists of our time. Try as they might to defend Muhammad’s actions, the overbearing evidences incriminate Muhammad at every turn. All the above verses from the Qur’an and Hadith prove that Muhammad allowed Muslims to do to female slaves what are clearly undeniable acts of rape. Muhammad and his men were allowed by the eternal laws of Allah to rape their slaves and captives. Rape is considered as a serious crime to all descent human beings but not to Allah and his Prophet. Religion is supposed to condemn crimes which are committed against another human being but that is not the case with the religion of Islam. Muslims must ask themselves, “How can Allah give laws that are criminal in nature?”
          The entire Islamic moral universe devolves solely from the life and teachings of Muhammad. Everything that has been discussed up to now is not only history but also Sunnah (the example of the perfect pattern of action and morality practiced by Muhammad). All morality in Islam is patterned after the example of Muhammad. Everything that he did and said defines what is permitted or forbidden. Muhammad repeatedly sanctioned forced sex (rape) with infidel females after they were captured. The Hadith clearly reports that he got first choice of the women. So if Muhammad was involved in the rape of infidels, then rape is a virtue. It is not a sin because Muhammad did it. And he set the pattern for Muslims to follow for all eternity.
          All these facts from Islamic sources themselves clearly demonstrate that Allah who sanctions rape in the Qur’an simply cannot be the true God. And Muhammad simply cannot be the prophet of the true God. Allah’s directive in the Qur’an is in direct violation of the divine Laws of the Almighty God, Jehovah. The teachings of Allah in the Qur’an also stand condemned by the divine Laws of Jehovah who stated centuries before the Qur’an was revealed:
          Exodus 20:17: “You must not desire your neighbor’s wife.”
          1 Thessalonians 4:3-5, 7: “For this is the will of God, your sanctification, that you should abstain from fornication. That every one of you should know how to get possession of his own wife in sanctification and honor: Not in the passion of lust, like the Gentiles that know not God… For God hath not called us unto uncleanness, but unto sanctification.”
          Exodus 20:14: “Thou shall not commit adultery.”
          Matthew 5:27-28: “You have heard that it was said to them: ‘Thou shalt not commit adultery.’ But I say to you, that whosoever shall look on a woman to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart.”
          These are the Laws of a Holy God. If Jehovah even forbids his worshipper to develop a covetous sexual craving for another person’s wife, do you think he will authorize his worshipper to rape her? Just think, would the true God inspire a verse sanctioning rape and adultery centuries after it is taught in the Bible that even looking at a woman in a lustful manner is immoral? We would rightfully expect the true God to maintain the same holy standard of morality. Thus, the Qur’an cannot be the Word of God. For a Christian man, there is no place for sex, let alone rape, outside the confinements of his marital union with a single wife.
          Jesus also gave his followers the following divine command:
          Matthew 22:39: “Thou shall love thy neighbor as thyself.”
          Any religion that sanctions rape is both dangerous and destructive. Our mothers, sisters, wives and daughters are not safe as long as this abomination is allowed to exist. Perversion and lust knows no boundaries especially when it is religiously sanctified. Therefore, it is imperative to act and expose this evil cult before it consumes everything that is righteous, true and good. This religion grows and strives by committing evil.
          Muslims consider Islam as the best and the perfect religion. So, how can you improve on something that is already perfect? Thus, Islam will always remain evil. This also means that if the situation changes and Muslims become stronger once again, they will resume their policy of enslavement and rape. The laws of Allah are written on stones – they are unchangeable. The danger lies in the fact that Islam is a violent and expansionist religion that seeks the destruction or subjugation of all other religions, especially Christianity. Violence against non-Muslims is and has always been an integral aspect of Islam. And the natural consequence of this destructive ideology is murder, enslavement and rape. Islammeans Submission. The principle of submission could not be any clearer. By definition, a slave is the most submissive of all people. A slave will submit completely to her master. Islam leads to Jihadand jihad leads to Sexual Slavery and sexual slavery leads toRape and rape leads to Submission and submission leads toIslam. The cycle of evil begins and ends with Islam.
          Given below is a recent Fatwa (Islamic ruling) from a widely respected mufti.
          ISLAMIC QUESTION & ANSWER, ONLINE WITH MUFTI EBRAHIM DESAI, SOUTH AFRICA, ASK THE IMAM:

          “It may, superficially, appear distasteful to copulate with a woman who is not a man’s legal wife, but once Shariah makes something lawful, we have to accept it as lawful, whether it appeals to our taste, or not; and whether we know its underlying wisdom or not.”
          We have come to the conclusion of our analysis on the subject concerning the sanction of rape in Islam. The evidences provided in this article are by no means exhaustive but are sufficient enough to assist sincere seekers of truth, both Muslims and non-Muslims to see the dangers of Islam. Women who are tempted to convert to this religion must stop and think before it is too late for them. They must realize that according to Allah it is “lawful and good” to rape women.
          Surah 8:69: “But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good.” (Yusuf Ali)
          Not only does Allah grant permission for women to be captured and raped, but he also allows Muslims to enjoy raping these poor women in the presence of their husbands. Can a religion as debased as this originate with the true God? You be the judge.

        • MOHAMMEDANS TREAT ALL WOMEN AS SEX OBJECTS:

          RELIANCE OF THE TRAVELLER:

          A CLASSIC MANUAL OF ISLAMIC SACRED LAW

          Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri

          w45.0 A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS (from m5.I, end)
          A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS IN THE SHAFI’I SCHOOL
          *
          w45.1 (Abu Ishaq Shirazi:) A woman is not obliged to serve her husband by baking, grinding flour, cooking, washing, or any other kind of service, because the marriage contract entails, for her part, ONLY THAT SHE LET HIM ENJOY HER SEXUALLY, and she is not obligated to do other thar. that. (A: Rather, it is considered sunna in our school for the wife to do the housework, and the husband (who is obliged to support her) to earn the living, since this is how the Prophet (Allah bless him and give.
          him peace) divided the work between Fatima and ‘Ali (Allah be well pleased with them)) (alMuhadhdhab fi fiqh ai-Imam al-Shafi’i (yI25), 2.68).

          A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS IN THE HANAFI SCHOOL

          w45.2 (Nahlawi:) The wife’s serving her husband at home-by cooking, cleaning, and baking bread-is religiously obligatory for her, and if she does not, she is committing a sin, though it is not something that she may be forced to do by the court (al-Durar al-mubaha fi ai-hazr wa ai-ibaha
          (y99),I72).

          THE SEALED NECTAR OF MOHAMMEDANISM.
          THE PERFECT MUSLIM
          And surely thou hast sublime morals
          (Surat Al-Qalam 68:4).

          Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah an excellent exemplar
          (Surat Al-Ahzab 33:21).

          Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly.

          Muhammad fantasized about baby Aisha before soliciting her from her father

          Sahih Bukhari 9.140 Narrated ‘Aisha:

          Allah’s apostle said to me, “you were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘if this is from Allah, then it must happen.

          Muhammad, 50, marries baby Aisha at age 6

          Sahih Bukhari volume 5, book 58, number 234

          Narrated Aisha: the prophet engaged (married) me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, um ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me.

          …….she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some ansari women who said, “best wishes and Allah’s blessing and a good luck.” then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

          Bukhari vol 8, bk 73, no 151

          Narrated ‘Aisha: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the prophet, & my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the prophet would call them to join & play with me. (the playing with the dolls & similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-bari page 143, vol.13)

          HOW TO THIGH

          Now let us see how thighing is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

          Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.
          According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

          Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

          Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.

          Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.“Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

          The inquirer asked the following:‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’
          After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

          That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers’” (Fatwa No. 31409).

          Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

          AISHA WASHING SEMEN FROM MUHAMMED’S CLOTHES

          From the Hadith of Bukhari:

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

          Narrated ‘Aisha:

          I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

          Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

          I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

          Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

          I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

          Narrated ‘Aisha:

          I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

          From the Hadith of Bukhari:

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

          Narrated ‘Aisha:

          I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 230:

          Narrated ‘Aisha:

          as above (229).

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

          Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

          I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

          Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

          I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

          Narrated ‘Aisha:

          I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

          Mohammed heard one of his wives was leaving him, so he rushed home where he found her on the carpet in front of the tent with her belongings; he sat down beside her & said, “I heard you were planning to leave me?”
          She replied, “Yes, I heard your other wives saying, you were a pedophile!”
          Mohammed thinks for a minute or so & then responds,
          “that’s a mighty big word for a 6 year old child.”
          THE QURAN
          &
          MARRYING LITTLE GIRLS

          Islam does allow you to marry pre-menstruating girls. The following verse is from At-Talaq (or Divorce). Islam’s main concern during a divorce is knowing who the father is (in case of a pregnancy). The waiting period is known as iddah.

          65.4 Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the prescribed period, if you have any doubts, is three months, AND FOR THOSE WHO HAVE NO COURSES (it is the same): for those who are pregnant, their period is until they deliver their burdens: and for those who fear Allah, He will make things easy for them.

          Tafsir al-Jalalayn (Commentary)
          And [as for] those of your women who (read allā’ī or allā’i in both instances) no longer expect to menstruate, if you have any doubts, about their waiting period, their prescribed [waiting] period shall be three months, and [also for] those who have NOT YET MENSTRUATED, because of their YOUNG AGE, their period shall [also] be three months — both cases apply to other than those whose spouses have died; for these [latter] their period is prescribed in the verse: they shall wait by themselves for four months and ten [days] [Q. 2:234]. And those who are pregnant, their term, the conclusion of their prescribed [waiting] period if divorced or if their spouses be dead, shall be when they deliver. And whoever fears God, He will make matters ease for him, in this world and in the Hereafter.

          Tafsir Asbab Al-Nuzul by Al-Wahid
          (And for such of your women as despair of menstruation…) [65:4]. Said Muqatil: “When the verse (Women who are divorced shall wait, keeping themselves apart…), Kallad ibn al-Nu‘man ibn Qays al-Ansari said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, what is the waiting period of the woman who does not menstruate and the woman who has not menstruated yet? And what is the waiting period of the pregnant woman?’ And so Allah, exalted is He, revealed this verse”. Abu Ishaq al-Muqri’ informed us Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn Hamdun> Makki ibn ‘Abdan Abu’l-Azhar Asbat ibn Muhammad Mutarrif Abu ‘Uthman ‘Amr ibn Salim who said: “When the waiting period for divorced and widowed women was mentioned in Surah al-Baqarah, Ubayy ibn Ka‘b said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, some women of Medina are saying: there are other women who have not been mentioned!’ He asked him: ‘And who are they?’ He said: ‘Those WHO ARE TOO YOUNG [such that they have not started menstruating yet], those who are too old [whose menstruation has stopped] and those who are pregnant’. And so this verse (And for such of your women as despair of menstruation…) was revealed”.

          Islamic Websitehttp://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/12667
          “And those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘Iddah (prescribed period), if you have doubt (about their periods), is three months; and for those who have no courses [(i.e. they are still immature) their ‘Iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise…”

          Tafsir ibn Kathir (Read at your own leisure)
          http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=65&tid=54223

          AIN’T GONNA FOLLOW NO CHILD MOLESTER

          They try to tell me my religion is wrong

          They try to tell me to follow Islam

          They said their prophet was a righteous dude

          But I found out none of their words were true

          I read the Quran and I read the hadith

          And the sickness of Muhammad was apparent to me

          He justified perversion in the name of Allah

          When he married a girl too young for a bra

          II

          She was playing with dolls when the prophet came

          Her childhood was stolen in Allah’s name

          Aisha was nine when he took her to bed

          Don’t tell me that fool’s not sick in the head

          Ain’t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, prophet pretender.

          Ain’t gonna follow no child molester,

          Islam is not for me.

          Islam is not for me.

          III

          The sickness of the Islamic mind

          Has caused the Mullahs to be blind

          To justify their prophet they would justify sin

          So the sins of the prophet are repeated again

          All over the world in Islamic states

          9 year old girls suffer cruel fate

          Sold into marriage to twisted men

          And Aisha’s sad story is repeated again

          IV

          Ain’t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, prophet pretender.

          Ain’t gonna follow no child molester,

          Islam is not for me.

          Islam is not for me.

          Do you care about women all over the world?

          Do you care about those little girls?

          Then stand up and fight for human rights

          Speak out against the laws of Islam

          V

          Ain’t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, prophet pretender.

          Ain’t gonna follow no child molester,

          Islam is not for me.

          Islam is not for me.

          Islam is not for me.
          MUSLIM WOMEN ARE SPECIAL
          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: Once Allah’s Apostle went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) o ‘Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, “O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women).” They asked, “Why is it so, O Allah’s Apostle ?” He replied, “You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you.

          A cautious sensible man could be led astray by you.” The women asked, “O Allah’s Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?” He said, “Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?” YES! He said, “This is the deficiency in her intelligence.
          Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?” YES!.
          He said, “This is the deficiency in her religion.” Bukhari (Book #6, Hadith #301)
          MUSLIM WOMEN ARE DOGS, PIGS,
          Allah hated women with a passion. He despised all female homo sapiens both Muslim and infidel women. With such a deep hatred and loathing I don’t even know why he bothered to create Eve. Being God, why didn’t he just create man with both a penis and vagina and reproductive organs. Following are the immoral, depraved, insane, despicable LAWS of an immoral, depraved, despicable insane GOD.
          No rational, normal person can believe in such a God of hate.
          Muhammad described women as “unclean” creatures. Muhammad says, “3 things corrupt prayer: Women, dogs, and donkeys.” There are several other sayings in which Muhammad reduced women to the level of an animal. “Woman is a vile beast,” and “I think that women were created for nothing but evil.”

          The right to be treated as a dog, a pig, a monkey, or an ass
          Sahih Bukhari – 1.9.490, 493, 498 Sahih Muslim – 4.1039;
          Sunaan Abu Dawud – 11.2155; Mishkat ul-Masabih – vol 2, p.114, Hadis no. 789
          The right of ordinary women to be treated as crows
          Ghazali – vol 2, p. 34
          BABY TILTHS:

          65.4 You can marry little girls who have not yet reached menstruation age.

          Muhammad married Ayesha at age 6 to comply with this aya. He had to restrict himself to thighing before age of 9.

          Thighing is defined by Islamic scholar Khomeini in “Tahrirolvasyleh” fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990 as follows:

          “Thighing is a means for an adult male to enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.”

          The following is from a committee of muslim ulema answering the question:
          “the Prophet, the peace of Allah be upon him, practiced “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers – may Allah be pleased with her.”
          SEX AFTER FLOGGING:
          Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 132:
          Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Zam’a:

          The Prophet said, “None of you should flog his wife as he flogs a slave and then have sexual intercourse with her in the last part of the day.”
          Ideally when you flog one of your wives, let her recuperate that day and sleep with your other wives or your slave girls
          HOW TO BEAT YOUR WIFE TO AVOID BREAKING HER BONES
          Islamic way of beating or flogging wives is striking at their padded areas to avoid breaking any bones. Here is an example how considerate our prophet was when he beat his wives on their padded parts.

          Muslim Book 004, Number 2127:
          Ayesha narrated. “He struck me on the chest which caused me pain.”
          (However if your wife is breast feeding, prefer to strike on her buttocks
          CIRCUMCISION OF WOMEN:

          It was customary to cut the external female genitalia completely when circumcising women. The Prophet instructed to do cutting in moderation. That showed his kindness and concern for women’s pleasure in love making.

          Sunan Abu Dawud B 41, N5251:

          Narrated Umm Atiyyah al-Ansariyyah:

          A woman used to perform circumcision in Medina. The Prophet (peace be upon him) said to her: Do not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband.

          ONE NIGHT SEX PERKS FOR PROPHET:

          33.50 Mohammed, any woman who offered herself to you is halal for you.
          Obligation to practice this aya made logistics a big problem for Muhammad who already had nine wives, his concubines, and a regular supply of captured women from jihadi raids. But Allah’s wishes had to be carried out.
          Bukhari,Volume 7, Book 62, Number 24:
          A woman came to Allah’s Apostle and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! I have come to give you myself.

          Bukhari,V 7, B 62, N 48:
          Narrated Hisham’s father:
          Khaula bint Hakim was one of those ladies who presented themselves to the Prophet. ‘Aisha said, “Doesn’t a lady feel ashamed for presenting herself to a man?”

          Bukhari,V 7, B 62, N 53:
          Narrated Thabit Al-Banani:
          “A woman came to Allah’s Apostle and presented herself to him, saying, ‘O Allah’s Apostle, have you any need for me?’ “Thereupon Anas’s daughter said, “What a shameless lady she was! Shame! Shame!” Anas said, “She was better than you; she had a liking for the Prophet.

          ISLAM & THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN

          These are called in Islam the “golden rights and provisions for all Muslim women:”
          The right to be treated as diseased and as sex toys
          The Qur’an – 2:222; Sahahi Bukhari -3.31.172
          The right to be used as a sowing field
          The Qur’an – 2:223
          The right to enjoy another husband after the third divorce from the previous husband (hilla marriage)
          The Qur’an – 2:230; Sahih Bukhari – 8.73.107; Sahih Bukhari – 7.63.187
          The right to engage in Islamic prostitution through Mut’a marriage
          The Qur’an – 4:24;Sahih Bukhari – 8.3246, 3247, 3248;
          Sahih Muslim – 8:3252, 8:3253, 8:3258
          The right to be treated as impure or as a drunkard
          The Qur’an – 4:32; The Qur’an – 16:92
          To uphold the inalienable superiority of men over women and the right to be beaten by husbands—no questions asked
          The Qur’an – 16:92; Sunaan Abu Dawad – 11.2142; Abdur Rahman – 1 DOI, the recognized authority on Sharia in his book, Women in Society”
          To uphold the right of the husband to have four wives at any time and any number sex-slaves for all times; in case of objection by any wife, the husband can beat her
          The Qur’an – 4:3; Sunan Abu Dawad – 30.2.13; The Qur’an – 23:5-6, 70:29-30
          The right to be treated as a dog, a pig, a monkey, or an ass
          Sahih Bukhari – 1.9.490, 493, 498 Sahih Muslim – 4.1039;
          Sunaan Abu Dawud – 11.2155; Mishkat ul-Masabih – vol 2, p.114, Hadis no. 789
          The right of a Muslimah to be stupid and to become a servant
          Sahih Bukhari – 1.6.301; Ghazali – vol 2, p. 34
          Muslim women forfeit their right to travel alone
          Sahih Bukhari – 2.20.192, 193; Sahih Bukhari – 3.29.85, 4.52.250

          Women must keep their sexual organs ready at all times for the husband to enjoy them unhindered at any time—night or day
          Sahih Bukhari – 4.54.460, 7.62.81; Sahih Muslim – 8.3367, 3368;
          Ghazali – vol 2, p. 43
          Women have the right to breast-feed an unrelated bearded man to make him haram (forbidden to her in marriage)
          Sahih Muslim – 8.3424, 3425, 3426, 3427, 3428
          Women are slaves (prisoners) and men are their masters (owners)
          Ghazali – vol 2, p. 33; Hedaya – p. 47
          Islamic marriage is about sex for money (prostitution)
          Sunaan Abu Dawud – 11.2105, 2.11,2106; Milik’s Muwatta – 28.4.12;
          Sunaan Abu Dawud – 11.2126; Hedaya – p. 44
          If a woman wishes to get rid of her tyrannical husband she must refund the ‘sex money’ (Mahr) she received from him during marriage
          Sahih Muslim – 7.63.197, 198, 199; Sunaan Abu Dawud – 12,2220;
          Malik’s Muwatta – 29.10.32
          Women have the right to undergo female circumcision (FGM)
          Sunaan Abu Dawud – 41.5251
          Women are slaves and infidels—they are not fit to join the moral police force
          Ghazali – vol 2, p.186
          A husband has the right to have sex with his wife by force (the right to rape)
          Hedaya – p. 141
          Women are cheap—you can have sex with a woman by simply teaching her how to recite a few verses from the Qur’an
          Sahih Buhkari – 6.61.547, 548; Ghazali – vol 2, 31
          Barren women should be confined at home—they are fit only to be in the house-prison
          Ghazali – vol 2, p. 24; Sunaan Abu Dawud – 3.29.3911
          A woman has no say when her husband decides to add more wives in his harem; she can’t even ask her husband to divorce her
          Sahih Bukhari – p. 141
          A wife has the right to decorate her husband when he goes out to have sex with his other wives
          Sahih Bukhari – 1.5.270
          A woman should never be selected or elected as a ruler
          Sahih Bukhari – 5.59.709; Ghazali – vol 2, p. 34
          Muslim women uphold the right of Islamic Jihadists to rape captive women right in front of their vanquished husbands
          The Qur’an – 4:24; Sahih Muslim – 8.3371, 3373, 3374, 3377;
          Sunaan Abu Dawud – 2.11.2150, 8.77.598
          Women are devils; they are as dirty and filthy as private parts are
          Sahih Muslim – 8.3240, 3242; Ghazali – vol 2, p. 26, vol 2, p. 43
          Fear the company of women—they bring bad luck
          Sahih Bukhari – 7.62.30, 31; Bukhari – 4.52.110, 111;
          Malik’s Muwatta – 54.821, 22; Sahih Muslim – 36.6603. 6604;
          Ghazali – vol 3, p. 86, 87
          Women have very little intelligence—their own testimony is inadmissible in rape cases; in other matters their testimony is half to that of a man
          The Qur’an – 4:14, 2:282; Sunaan Abu Dawud – 3.40.4662
          Women are less human—they get one-third of blood money, no booty (for Jihad) for them
          Malik’s Muwatta – 43.64b; Sahih Muslim – 19.4458
          Women are worse than dead persons—they cannot follow a bier
          Sahih Muslim – 4.2039
          Men should always oppose women
          Ghazali – vol 2, p. 34
          Women are easily expendable—a divorced woman gets no maintenance or alimony from her ex-husband
          Sahih Muslim – 9.3519, 3522
          A woman has the right to stay at home solely to provide sex to her husband
          Hedaya – p. 54
          A woman becomes a harlot when she wears perfume
          Mishkat al-Masabih – vol 2, p. 255

          YOU TUBE
          Pedophilia in Islam , thighing children , fondling underage girls pedophilia – whole film

          by Hoplit300•

          What is “thighing”?

          by neotropic9•

          **Thighing**Mufakhathat

          by bigtone1979Taiwan•

          Thighing of Female Children In Islam
          by Thomas Ahmed•
          Child Bride in Islam.

          Sure 65:4 Mufa’ Khathat – thighing ISLAM

          by Merauder2000•
          wwwislamqacom wwwislamqacom wwwaltafsircom schnellmannorg

          Muhammad Aisha Pedophile Child Rape Muslim Marriage Law 1 Muhaddithorg
          by AwesomeIslam•

          SHARIA LAW:

          A FATHER CANNOT BE EXECUTED FOR MURDERING HIS WIVES OR CHILDREN.
          In Saudi Arabia, the human rights group “Women to Drive” is protesting the light sentence given a Muslim preacher for the torture, rape and murder of his five-year old daughter, on suspicion that she was not a virgin. According to various reports, it is said that according to sharia law, a father cannot be executed for murdering his children, nor a husband for murdering his wives.

          The following ruling is promulgated by orthodox Sunni Islam; a parent is “not subject to retaliation” (or, retribution) “for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring.” Jihad Watch attributes the worldwide epidemic in honor killings to the spread of Muslims worldwide. According to some Islamic scholars, honor killings predate all the major contemporary religions of the world, and are part of the common primitive, tribal and patriarchal prehistory of mankind.

          However, international surveys indicate that many Muslims believe their religion sanctions honor killings. The recent ruling from Saudi Arabia indicates honor killing continues to be countenanced by Muslim jurists in majority Muslim countries. As to the meaning of “blood money,” it pertains to paying for the economic loss suffered by the victim or next of kin.

          According to the Talmud, in the case of a loss due to simple negligence, it is equal to three components: (A) medical expenses, (B) the loss of wages, and (C) the amount a person of similar status would pay to avoid the pain and suffering. In the case of a loss due to criminal negligence short of premeditated murder, the law of retribution (“eye for an eye”) pertains, although the victim could exercise mercy and accept only blood money. In the case of premeditated murder, there can be no mercy. That there is a distinction between simple negligence (such as an industrial accident) and criminal negligence is made clear in Deuteronomy Chapter 19.

          The law of retribution is thus confined to crimes as opposed to mere torts; and even in the case of criminal negligence, mercy might be exercised. While we are on the subject of “eye for an eye,” I will comment briefly of what Jesus had to say. He said “whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.” (Matthew 5:39) Being hit on the right check is to be hit with the left or weak hand of the offender. It’s a Jewish idiom for being insulted. Jesus said do not return insult for insult, but see if an actual harm follows. In my Army days, we put it this way, don’t get into a pissing contest. (Somehow, I don’t think Jesus would put it that way.) Why even school children know this. They say, “sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.”

          Getting back to the law retribution, we could say that a parent is presumed to love his children and, so, in the absence of strong evidence, will only be held liable for blood money when responsible for the death of a child. If sharia law merely establishes a refutable presumption, it would make sense. Indeed, if you think that both revelation and reason are witnesses to the truth, reason would guide your interpretation of the Koran. This is how conservative Jews approach the Bible. We say you have to realize the texts come from a culture and literary style where allegory, exaggeration, sarcasm and humor are often employed, even where there are degrees of “no.” But, in Islam, the orthodox have been in charge for a long time now, and they almost insist that sharia law is to be followed even if it contradicts reason. I will conclude with a consideration of how faithful the Islamic scholars are the principle of restitution. As a forensic economist, I have numerous times offered my expert opinion to courts of law dealing with economic loss calculation. To be sure, I would adjust my calculation according to any specific information regarding the earnings potential or life expectancy of a particular person. In the absence of such information, I can only go by averages. Considering the per capita GDP of Saudi Arabia ($25,000), her work life expectancy (from 21 to 62), and the time value of money (at 6%), the economic loss suffered by the girl’s death is approximately $400,000. Not the puny amount $50,000 that has been reported! Those who claim they are doing justice are liars. And that they claim to do justice in the Name of God, they are damn liars! The man who killed this girl should, according to sharia law, be sold into slavery if he cannot pay $400,000, even if it accepted that he killed the girl out of a simple negligence. But, it is obvious that more than simple negligence was involved.

          Saudi Arabia’s Royal Family has intervened in the case of a leading cleric who raped and tortured his five-year-old daughter to death, causing outrage at home and abroad.
          Lama al-Ghamdi was admitted to hospital in the town of Hotat Bani Tamim in November with a crushed skull, broken back and shattered ribs. Social workers said that she had been repeatedly raped and her body burnt.

          REMEMBER Lama al-Ghamdi

          Lama al-Ghamdi a five year old child, was raped & tortured to death by her celebrity cleric father Fayhan al-Ghamdi.
          Lama al-Ghamdi’s back was broken and she had been raped and burned. She died in October from her injuries after seven months in hospital. Her father Fayhan al-Ghamdi, a prominent Islamist preacher, admitted beating her. Her mother Syeda Mohammed Ali, has said she will bring a case against her ex-husband.

          5 Feb 2013

          REMEMBER Lama al-Ghamdi, the 5 year old Saudi child who was RAPED & MURDERED by her MUSLIM PREACHER father. He paid BLOOD MONEY & WALKED FREE.

        • ISLAM SANCTIONS RAPE IN THE QUR’AN

          Rape, sometimes called sexual assault, is an assault by a person involving sexual intercourse with or sexual penetration of another person without his or her consent. Rape is generally considered a serious sex crime as well as a civil assault. The International Criminal Tribunal established by the United Nations defined rape as:
          “A physical invasion of a sexual nature committed on a person under circumstances which are coercive.”
          In other words, a physical invasion of a sexual nature committed on a person under circumstances in which the victim is in no position to decline or refuse. Sex-slaves and war captives fit this category because the circumstances under which they are subjected to sexual intercourse make it either impossible or extremely difficult to object. Thus, sex with captives is considered as statuary rape because the victims are in no position to decline. It is vital to note that the absence of objection does not, of itself, constitute consent. Duress, in which the victim may be threatened or subjected to overwhelming force or violence, may result in absence of objection to intercourse. War rape is a typical situation where absence of objection may occur.
          The International Criminal Tribunal also defined rape as an institutionalized weapon of war. It also stated that rape is a crime of genocide under international law. The systematic rape of a civilian population by an occupying army is considered a war crime. (Fourth Annual Report of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to the General Assembly)
          We will now consider the subject of Rape in Islam as sanctioned by Allah and his Prophet. In some specific instances, rape is not a sin and is both permitted and encouraged in Islam.Islam is the only religious political system in the world that includes rules for rape. Incredible as it may seem, Allah gave Muslim men the right to rape women who are taken as prisoners of war. Muhammad himself had forced sex (rape) with several of his women captives of war. Later these victims of rape were either sold or kept as sex-slaves by their Muslim masters. Islam considers slave-women as property; therefore, Muslim men are allowed to rape them at will. Islam also permits unlimited sex with women taken as prisoners of war. Raping captives and slaves was widespread amongst the Muslims during the “golden days” of Islam. The founder of Islam personally carried out this wicked act after he came into power. Muhammad was a rapist.
          Allah allows Muslims to have sex with female slaves who are: (1) Taken captive in war (2) Purchased by money (3) Received as a gift (4) The female offspring of their slaves.
          For depraved godless men without morality, compassion or justice, the promise of wealth, plunder, and sex with captives was an attractive incentive to join Muhammad’s new religion.It is an incentive engraved in the Qur’an – the very heart of Islam. Since Muslims will not accept any interpretation that is extraneous to their sources, we will oblige them by relying solely on their own approved Islamic sources. We will use these documented evidences to prove beyond any doubt that Islam approves, codifies and legalizes rape in its sacred text.
          One of Muhammad’s warriors declared:
          Tabari IX:25: “By Allah, I did not come to fight for nothing. I wanted a victory over Ta’if so that I might obtain a slave girl from among them and make her pregnant.” (See also Sirat Rasul Allah by Ibn Ishak, p.590.)
          Prophet Muhammad Promises Women to his Warriors
          Ibn Hisham recorded the words of Muhammad in Al Rod Al Anf, Volume 2, page 182:
          “You see God will soon make you inherit their land, their treasures and make you sleep with their women.” (Literally: make their women beds for you).
          While promising women to his warriors, Muhammad said it is Allah who will “make you sleep with their women.” Now ask yourself, would the true God act as a pimp by providing women for the sexual gratification of his worshippers? In this case, it is even worse, for these women are not prostituting themselves for Allah to act as a pimp but they are the innocent wives, daughters, mothers and sisters of the unfortunate men who were either captured or killed.
          Allah’s Blessings for Muhammad and Muslims – Illicit Sex
          Surah 23:1, 5-6: “Triumphant indeed are the believers… (who) restrain their carnal desires except with their spouses and slave-girls. The practice of carnal relations is lawful with them.” (Sarwar)
          Surah 23:5-6: Who abstain from sex, Except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or the captives whom their right hands possess, – for in their case they are free from blame. (Yusuf Ali)
          In the words of this Qur’anic verse, it means Muslim men do not have to restrain themselves from gratifying their carnal (sexual) desires with their war captives, slave-girls and, of course, with their wives. As stated earlier, slave-girls are either purchased from the slave market or obtained by capture through warfare. Captured women are enslaved and shared among the Muslim warriors. These slave-girls are the defenseless mothers, wives daughters, and sisters of men slain in battle by the Muslim warriors. This utterly shameful conduct is sanctioned by Allah and enshrined in the Qur’an and the Hadith. Allah tells his Prophet:
          Surah 33:50: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowriesand those whom thy right hand possesseth of thosewhom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war…”(Pickthall)
          “Prophet, We have made lawful for you your wives whom you have given their dowry, slave girls whom God has given to you as gifts…” (Sarwar)
          Just as it is lawful for Muhammad to engage in sexual intercourse with his legal wives, Allah has also made it lawful for Muhammad to engage in sexual intercourse with the women captives of war. Once again, it is stated in the above Qur’anic verse that it is Allah who provides these girls as gifts to his Prophet for sexual enjoyment. Muslims must ponder, why should Allah take such keen interest in the sexual indulgence of his Prophet? What lesson is Allah teaching the rest of the Muslim community by authorizing this depraved behavior for his Prophet? The only lesson that is taught here by Allah is that it is fair to rape helpless captive women. That is why Muslim men are also given the same rights as their Prophet. They too are given the right to enjoy the same illicit pleasure as the following Qur’anic verse confirms. Allah tells the Muslim men:
          Surah 4:24: “Also forbidden for you are married women,except those who have fallen in your hands as prisoners of war.” (Malik)
          “And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you.” (Pickthall)
          This means that while a Muslim man is prohibited from engaging in sex with a married woman, there is an exception to this rule if the married woman happens to fall into his hands as a captive of war, then under such circumstances, he is allowed to rape the married captive.
          Maududi, a highly respected commentator on the Qur’an interprets the plain meaning of the above Qur’anic verse, saying that sex with slave-girls is lawful without the benefit of marriage:
          Two categories of women have been excluded from the general command of guarding the private parts: (a) wives, (b) women who are legally in one’s possession, i.e. slave-girls. Thus, the verse clearly lays down the law that one is allowed to have sexual relation with one’s slave-girl as with one’s wife, the basis being possession and not marriage. If marriage had been the condition, the slave-girl also would have been included among the wives, and there was no need to mention them separately. (Sayyid Abul A’La Maududi, The Meaning of the Qur’an, vol. 3p. 241, note 7)
          In the above commentary, Maududi made it very clear that according to the scriptures of Allah, marriage is not a prerequisite for a Muslim man to have sex with his slave-girls. In Islamic theology, a Muslim man has the right to demand sex from his legal wife. By virtue of the fact that Allah grants a Muslim manthis same right with his slave-girls based on possession and not marriage, she, too, must provide sex on demand. As this right to sexual intercourse is granted by Allah, her consent is not required. Also, deemed as his property, a slave-girl does not have the right to stop the sexual advances even if she does not consent to his uninvited invasion on her person. Does not this unwanted intrusion on her body categorically amount to an act of rape? Would you join a religion that codifies an edict in its holy book that permits the raping of innocent women? A vital fact that we must remember is that this law is still in force in Islam.
          As stated earlier, Surah 4:24 permits Muslim men to have sexual intercourse with married women who became slaves through capture. We will now look at the circumstances under whichSurah 4:24 was revealed. The following Hadiths will aid us to identify the incident that led to the revelation of Surah 4:24.
          Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Number 3432:
          Abu Sa’idal-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hunain, Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: “And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (Qur’an 4:24)”
          Sunan Abu Dawud Volume 2, Book V, Chapter 711, Number 2150:
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri said: The Apostle of Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain.They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers.So Allah, the Exalted, send down the Qur’anic verse: “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand possess.” – Surah 4 An-Nisa 24.
          Surah 4:24 was revealed in a specific context when Muslim fighters got female captives whose husbands were still alive. And some of the holy warriors had been a little hesitant to have intercourse with the captive women in the presence of their husbands. Therefore, they consulted with their supreme leader. Muhammad realised that if Allah did not include married women in his authorization to rape captive women, then his holy warriors’ motivation to fight the next jihad will soon diminish. He immediately sought Allah’s intervention and right away, Allah revealed Surah 4:24 to sanction both rape and adultery.Because of this Qur’anic verse, the wives of the infidel captives became lawful to the conquering jihadist. The warriors who were reluctant moments ago were given the assurance that they could rape these women, both married and single, with Allah’s blessings. They now raped these women with an untroubled conscience. Whatever trace of decency that were with them just moments ago were now obliterated by Allah.
          Muslims must consider how Allah, who claims to be a holy God, can reveal verses to the effect that it progressively increases the depravity of his worshippers. Human decency and justice would dictate that no sex should take place between female prisoners of war and their captors under any circumstance. Having sex with women in their most desperate condition as war captives is not only morally wrong but it is also an act that is extremely evil.
          The raping of a civilian population by an occupying army is considered a war crime even by the laws of mere humans. Yet, this sexual crime is authorized by Allah. Thus, the laws of Allah are not only lower than that of man’s but also animalistic. Allah is guilty of promoting one of the most depraved, animalistic sexual behaviour among his worshippers by codifying the act of rape as an acceptable deed in the Qur’an. It is one thing for some soldiers in any army to strike out on their own and rape women. All armies have criminal soldiers who commit this wrong act. However, it is quite another to approve and codify rape in a sacred text. Thus, Islam is the only religion in the world that legitimizes rape and Surah 4:24 testifies to this disgraceful fact.
          The following Tafsir (Commentary) by renowned scholar, Ibn Kathir, reiterates the shocking ungodly decision of Allah to sanction rape in the Qur’an. Please read this commentary carefully:
          Tafsir Ibn Kathir on Surah 4:24:
          The Ayah (verses) means Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess.), you are prohibited from marrying women who are already married. Except those whom your right hands possess) except those whom you acquire through war, for you are allowed such women after making sure they are not pregnant. Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri said, “We captured some women from the area of Awtas who were already married, and we disliked having sexual relations with them because they already had husbands. So, we asked the Prophet about this matter, and this Ayah was revealed, (Also (forbidden are) women already married,except those whom your right hands possess).Accordingly, we had sexual relations with these women.” This is the wording collected by At-Tirmidhi An-Nasa’i, Ibn Jarir and Muslim in their Sahih.
          Through this verse in the Qur’an and verified by a number of Hadiths there emerges a clear picture of divine authorization of rape, adultery and fornication. Allah took it upon himself to sanction the raping of women, including married ones, who unfortunately became captives of the Muslim warriors. Thus, the divine approval of rape is engraved in Islam’s theology. Only the most debased religion will sanction rape. Can a religion that permits men to have forced sex with their captives come from mankind’s Creator? Absolutely not!
          The Islamic Legal Manual “Umdat al-Salik,” which carries the endorsement of Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, states the following:
          “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” Why? So that they are free to become the concubines of their captors. The Qur’an permits Muslim men to have intercourse with their wives and their slave girls: “Forbidden to you are … married women, except those whom you own as slaves” (Surah 4:23-24).
          Women and children are distributed among the holy warriors after Muhammad received one-fifth of the war booty. Women captives are either sold or forced to become sex-slaves and concubines of the conquering jihadists. This depravity of Allah is too severe for any rational person to ignore. It goes against the very nature of God in whose image we are created.
          Acts of Rape During the Holy Wars of Allah
          Sahih Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 46, Number 718:
          Narrated Ibn Muhairiz: I saw Abu Said and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said said, “We went with Allah’s Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the ‘Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus.We asked Allah’s Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence.”
          Sahih Muslim, Volume 2, Number 3371:
          …Abu Sirma said to Abu Said al Khudri: “O Abu Said, did you hear Allah’s messenger mentioning about al-azl (coitus interruptus)?” He said, “Yes”, and added: “We went out with Allah’s messenger on the expedition to the Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing azl” (withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: “We are doing an act whereas Allah’s messenger is amongst us; why not ask him?” So we asked Allah’s messenger and he said: “It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born”.
          Muhammad’s men inquired him with an ethical question regarding “coitus interruptus.” Having taken some women captives, they wanted to do coitus interruptus with them. They asked Muhammad whether it was permissible. He told them, “It is better that you should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.”When Muhammad said “it is better that you should not do it,” he was referring to coitus interruptus and not to the act of raping the captives. The subject of a soul coming into existence will not be necessary if sex or in this case rape is not permitted in the first place. He made it clear to them that “coitus interruptus”will be pointless because “every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.” Clearly, rape was on the agenda and it was not an issue with Muhammad. The only real question was the technique itself. Since Allah has already sanctioned rape, it is definitely not an issue with his Muslims warriors.
          Notice, Muhammad was quick to give his answer because he knew that Allah had already approved the raping of these captives. These immoral acts were already sanctioned in the Qur’an. Therefore, while Muhammad allowed the women to be raped, he did not approve coitus interruptus. Muhammad did not prohibit this extremely immoral practice of raping captives just when the time was right to forbid it. Instead, he allowed his men to rape the women and assuredly told them not to be unduly worried about impregnating them. For, according to him, it is with Allah as to which seed is destined to become fertilized. He stated that having sex with female captives would have nothing to do with any children being born into the world because, “every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.”
          In other words, if a child were to be born to a female captive of war, it would have been born as a result of a divine decree of Allah and not because of the sexual act of the Muslim rapist. Thus, Muhammad’s companions would not be responsible for the child being born. Allah’s divine decree alone would be responsible for the birth of that child. Muhammad was eager to reward his companions with every sensual pleasure, as long as they willingly plundered, killed, and enslaved others at his command. There did not seem to be a question, whether or not it was morally right, to have sex with the women who were married to another man. Muhammad the greatest exemplar for all mankind took his stand against the weak and helpless victims, so the powerful could satisfy their immoral animalistic desires.
          In another account, Muhammad even seemed to be impatient with his companions.He was eager, even sexually stimulated, to have the adulterous orgy begin. He wanted to have his companions rape the women immediately. At this point, it did not matter to him if they practiced coitus interruptus or not. He shouted out his command three times, “Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it!”
          Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Number 3373:
          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported:“We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl with them. We then asked Allah’s Messenger (pbuh) about it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born until the Day of Judgment must be born.”
          Well, they obeyed and they raped. In the course of our discussion, we need to keep clear in mind the objective of this article. The issue at hand is rape and not coitus interruptus. Whether these monsters practiced coitus interruptus or not, it does not in any way diminish or absolve the culpability of their evil crimes. Muhammad, Allah and Islam sanctioned rape and that is what concerns us in our discussion. Coitus interruptus will not be an issue if rape is strictly forbidden by Allah. It is really unbelievable how Muslims can trust and submit to a deity who morality is so debased. Any human being with a trace of decency will shudder at the acts permitted by Allah for his male worshippers. Let us now look at some of the noble acts of the Prophet of Islam.
          The War Trophies of the Prophet of Islam
          Sahih Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 46, Number 717:
          Narrated Ibn Aun: Prophet had suddenly attackedBani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day.
          And she is not the only war trophy for our noble Prophet.
          “Sirat Rasul Allah” by Ishaq, pg. 464:
          After 800-900 male adults of Bani Quraiza were beheaded in batches, and thrown in trenches dug in Madina, the apostle divided their property, wives and children as booty… He took Rayhana d. Amr b. Khunafa for himself.
          Muhammad destroyed the Bani Quraiza tribe. All the adult male Jews were beheaded so that no husbands were left. This verdict was carried out despite the fact that the tribe of Bani Quraiza had surrendered unconditionally. The women and children were taken as prisoners and their wealth were divided among the Muslim warriors. Then, the Prophet of Islam took one of the widows he had just made – Rayhana bint Amr – for himself. What Muhammad did was grossly wicked, evil, cruel, immoral, unholy and satanic. You could be a happily married woman living your own life, but if Muhammad and his holy warriors attacked your town and captured you, you would lose all your rights. And while your husband is being killed or enslaved, you would be given to a Muslim warrior who would rape you with Allah’s blessings. This is the evil path that Muhammad has trodden and this is the evil path that he has left for his followers to emulate for all eternity.
          Safiyah bint Huyeiy Ibn Akhtab was another Jewish woman who was captured when Muhammad’s troops attacked and brought her to the Prophet as part of his share of the booty. Safiyah was seventeen and beautiful. Acting under the orders of Muhammad, Muslims killed her father, husband and many of her relatives. Muhammad ordered Kinana, the young husband of Safiyah to be tortured to death to make him reveal the whereabouts of the treasure of the town. Muhammad could not control his sexual desire. He had sex with the young widow he had just made on the very night after he had wiped out her entire family.
          Ibn Hisham, Book of Tabaqat:
          “Safiyah was born in Medinah. She belonged to the Jewish tribe of Banu ‘I-Nadir. When this tribe was expelled from Medinah in the year 4 A.H, Huyaiy was one of those who settled in the fertile colony of Khaibar together with Kinana ibn al-Rabi’ to whom Safiyah was married a little before the Muslims attacked Khaibar. She was then seventeen. One mile from Khaibar. Here the Prophet married Safiyah. She was groomed and made-up for the Prophet by Umm Sulaim, the mother of Anas ibn Malik. They spent the night there. Abu Ayyub al-Ansari guarded the tent of the Prophet the whole night. When, in the early dawn, the Prophet saw Abu Ayyub strolling up and down, he asked him what he meant by this sentry-go; he replied: “I was afraid for you with this young lady. You had killed her father, her husband and many of her relatives, and until recently, she was an unbeliever. I was really afraid for you on her account.” The Prophet prayed for Abu Ayyub al-Ansari (p. 766).
          Muhammad made widows out of young women so that he could sexually assault them. The fact that he could not restrain his sexual urges to allow this young widow to mourn her loved ones – who were brutally killed by him and his warriors only moments ago – shows the debased moral character of this evil man. There is no compassion in this imposter. The young and beautiful became his wives. Just think, which woman would want to marry the killer of her father, husband and many of her relatives, particularly moments after their brutal death? The other captives whom he felt were not good enough for him were either sold or used as sex-slaves. Muhammad is not only a confirmed rapist but also a common thief and murderer.
          Muslims who defend the evil acts of their Prophet must be completely perverse in their values for failing to see the absolute evil nature of this man. Killing men and possessing their women are acts of savagery. There is nothing exemplary in the heinous crimes of this exceedingly evil man.
          Surah 48:20: “Allah promiseth you much booty that ye will capture, and hath given you this in advance,and hath withheld men’s hands from you, that it may be a token for the believers, and that He may guide you on a right path.” (Pickthall)
          Allah has promised Muslim warriors “with much booty that they will capture.” And this means more slave-girls. And Allah“hath withheld men’s hands” so that Muslim men can rape their wives with ease. Can you imagine having a pimp as your god and a rapist as your prophet? Muslims have the full right granted by Allah to murder, rape, enslave and loot the property of unbelievers. There is no such thing as the “Golden Rule” of Christianity in Islam.
          Pause for a moment and contemplate on the utterly destructive nature of Islam. Can you picture the agony and shame the husbands must have suffered, watching strangers violate the bodies of their loved ones? Can any man face a humiliation more intense than this? Feel the unbearable torment and agony of these men. Imagine, what thoughts of self-condemnation must have passed through their minds, as they had to stand by helplessly and watch Muhammad’s companions sexually assault their wives like animals. For these unfortunate men whose wives mean everything to them, to say it was a horrific experience is an understatement.
          Now think about it from the women’s point of view. She just experienced one of the most horrifying events in her life – the destruction of her people and family. Her people were attacked and her side lost. Many of the husbands, fathers, and sons are now dead. Some of the men have been captured alive either to be sold or to be kept as personal slaves. The women and children are taken as captives. The captives are now distributed amongst the Muslim men as slaves. Her children are separated from her. She does not know of their whereabouts. She is uncertain of her own future, as well as those of her children. The loss of her beloved husband haunts her. He is either dead or enslaved. She is now in the total power of her captors. The holy Muslim warrior has been separated from his wife for a while. Now out on the field of battle, the sexually hungry predator moves lustfully towards her to ravage her sexually. Do you think that she will now offer herself willingly to copulate with the very man who brought death and destruction to her people?
          What woman do you think would look upon with loving eyes at the very man who brought death and destruction upon her loved ones, family and people? And this is the utter nonsense that Muslim apologists want us to believe. They want us to believe that these women accepted and converted to Islam with open hearts. They want us to believe that these women delivered themselves to be raped with open arms and legs to the conquering jihadist. Such are the lies and deceptions of Islam and its defenders. Can any true conversion into Islam really take place under such circumstances? To protect their children, many widows who were victims of Muslim conquest, readily agreed to conversion so that their children were spared from slavery and were raised as Muslims. Just as the saying goes that there are no atheist in foxholes, fear can produce willing converts.
          When you undertake the study of Islam, it is as if you have left the sanity of our universe and entered a totally different alien world where rape, murder, enslavement, looting, massacres, terror, violence, and pedophilia are no longer crimes against humanity and no longer sins against the laws of God but are the very laws of God.
          We will now consider an event that will further reveal Islam’s stand on rape. It will expose the morally debased nature of Islam and its Prophet. It will also disclose the utterly uncaring attitude that Islam has towards the helpless victims of rape. This event will show the ease with which women are subjected to rape. It also serves to confirm that Islam can never be the religion of the true God. The Islamic laws that directly contribute to the humiliation and the sufferings of millions of helpless women can never come from the true God who is the essence of love.
          Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 637:
          Narrated Buraida: The Prophet sent ‘Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated Ali, and ‘Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, “Don’t you see this (i.e. Ali)?” When we reached the Prophet, I mentioned that to him. He said, “O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?” I said, “Yes.” He said, “Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumus.
          “Khumus” is one-fifth of the spoils of war that is reserved for Muhammad. According to the notes provided for the above Hadith, Buraida hated Ali not because he had raped a slave-girl but for taking from the Khumus without permission. Let us analyze the above incident:
          The Prophet sent Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and… Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus).
          What was Muhammad’s response to Buraida who reported this incident to him?
          Do you hate Ali for this? . . . Do not hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumus.
          This Hadith clearly reveals that Muslims are actually permitted torape their victims. This single episode is sufficient to see the dark side of Islam and Muhammad. Ali took a newly captured female prisoner of war and had sex with her. When Muhammad was informed of this, he did not voice a single objection against the wrong committed on the helpless prisoner of war. Neither was he concerned about the welfare of this unfortunate woman. Nor was he shocked by the serious attack on the decency of this poor victim. Why? Because raping slave-girls and war-captives is a norm in Allah’s religion. Muhammad’s only concern was for the rights of the rapist. In his view, these women are nothing more than objects of sex to gratify the sexual urges of Muslim men.
          Ali was the husband of Muhammad’s daughter, Fatima. Even in today’s sexually permissive world, how many fathers-in-law would defend the rights of their sons-in-law to engage in illicit sexual intercourse? How many fathers-in-law would defend the rights of their sons-in-law to rape defenceless women? But, Muhammad did so in accordance to the dictates and norms of Islam. He defended his son-in-law by saying that “he deserves more than that from the Khumus.” The implication of his statement suggests that Ali deserves to rape more women from the captives. After all, are not captives of war fair games to be raped at will in Islam? After all, does not Allah permit and encourage rape? After all, is Islam not an utterly depraved religion?
          According to the edict of Islam, rape is jihad. In the ethics of jihad, it is not considered a sin to have forced sex with a woman as long as she is a non-Muslim captive or slave. In fact, it is not only encouraged in the teachings of Islam but it is also supported by the example of the Prophet of Islam. In Islamic theology, jihad is a like a magical wand. It transforms sinful practices like murder, looting, destruction of property and rape into acts of virtue.
          Please read the following Hadith carefully. This Hadith describes a typical raid, in which women and children are captured as they attempt to flee the attacking Muslims.
          Sahih Muslim, Book 19, Number 4345:
          “…and then we attacked from all sides and reached their watering-place where a battle was fought. Some of the enemies were killed and some were taken prisoners. I saw a group of persons that consisted of women and children[escaping in the distance]. I was afraid lest they should reach the mountain before me, so I shot an arrow between them and the mountain. When they saw the arrow, they stopped. So I brought them, driving them along.”
          The Muslim narrator is Muhammad’s adopted son. He sees the women trying to escape (following the massacre of their men) and he cuts off their route by shooting an arrow into their path. These women are not trying to seek refuge with the jihadist, as Muslim apologist wants us to believe but are fleeing from the Muslims. The Hadith goes on to recount that Muhammad personally demanded one of the captured women for his own use. Let’s continue with our reading of the Hadith:
          “I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) met me in the street and said: “Give me that girl.”
          The words of Muhammad’s adopted son, “I had not yet disrobed her” reveal the sickening condition in Islam. Whenever the Muslim army conducted a raid, they always had the thirst for the succulent bodies of infidel women. Each woman captive serves as an opportunity for the pious to rape. And Muhammad was no different. In fact, he could not wait to satisfy his lust. He shamelessly ordered his son, “Give me that girl.” This is a typical scene from the glorious golden days of Islam. Sexual predators from prophet to foot soldiers. Shame, honor, virtue and self-respect are alien to the religion of Islam.
          As one might conclude, Muhammad’s obvious approval of raping women captured in battle, and his own personal participation in it is of intense inconvenience to the Muslim apologists of our time. Try as they might to defend Muhammad’s actions, the overbearing evidences incriminate Muhammad at every turn. All the above verses from the Qur’an and Hadith prove that Muhammad allowed Muslims to do to female slaves what are clearly undeniable acts of rape. Muhammad and his men were allowed by the eternal laws of Allah to rape their slaves and captives. Rape is considered as a serious crime to all descent human beings but not to Allah and his Prophet. Religion is supposed to condemn crimes which are committed against another human being but that is not the case with the religion of Islam. Muslims must ask themselves, “How can Allah give laws that are criminal in nature?”
          The entire Islamic moral universe devolves solely from the life and teachings of Muhammad. Everything that has been discussed up to now is not only history but also Sunnah (the example of the perfect pattern of action and morality practiced by Muhammad). All morality in Islam is patterned after the example of Muhammad. Everything that he did and said defines what is permitted or forbidden. Muhammad repeatedly sanctioned forced sex (rape) with infidel females after they were captured. The Hadith clearly reports that he got first choice of the women. So if Muhammad was involved in the rape of infidels, then rape is a virtue. It is not a sin because Muhammad did it. And he set the pattern for Muslims to follow for all eternity.
          All these facts from Islamic sources themselves clearly demonstrate that Allah who sanctions rape in the Qur’an simply cannot be the true God. And Muhammad simply cannot be the prophet of the true God. Allah’s directive in the Qur’an is in direct violation of the divine Laws of the Almighty God, Jehovah. The teachings of Allah in the Qur’an also stand condemned by the divine Laws of Jehovah who stated centuries before the Qur’an was revealed:
          Exodus 20:17: “You must not desire your neighbor’s wife.”
          1 Thessalonians 4:3-5, 7: “For this is the will of God, your sanctification, that you should abstain from fornication. That every one of you should know how to get possession of his own wife in sanctification and honor: Not in the passion of lust, like the Gentiles that know not God… For God hath not called us unto uncleanness, but unto sanctification.”
          Exodus 20:14: “Thou shall not commit adultery.”
          Matthew 5:27-28: “You have heard that it was said to them: ‘Thou shalt not commit adultery.’ But I say to you, that whosoever shall look on a woman to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart.”
          These are the Laws of a Holy God. If Jehovah even forbids his worshipper to develop a covetous sexual craving for another person’s wife, do you think he will authorize his worshipper to rape her? Just think, would the true God inspire a verse sanctioning rape and adultery centuries after it is taught in the Bible that even looking at a woman in a lustful manner is immoral? We would rightfully expect the true God to maintain the same holy standard of morality. Thus, the Qur’an cannot be the Word of God. For a Christian man, there is no place for sex, let alone rape, outside the confinements of his marital union with a single wife.
          Jesus also gave his followers the following divine command:
          Matthew 22:39: “Thou shall love thy neighbor as thyself.”
          Any religion that sanctions rape is both dangerous and destructive. Our mothers, sisters, wives and daughters are not safe as long as this abomination is allowed to exist. Perversion and lust knows no boundaries especially when it is religiously sanctified. Therefore, it is imperative to act and expose this evil cult before it consumes everything that is righteous, true and good. This religion grows and strives by committing evil.
          Muslims consider Islam as the best and the perfect religion. So, how can you improve on something that is already perfect? Thus, Islam will always remain evil. This also means that if the situation changes and Muslims become stronger once again, they will resume their policy of enslavement and rape. The laws of Allah are written on stones – they are unchangeable. The danger lies in the fact that Islam is a violent and expansionist religion that seeks the destruction or subjugation of all other religions, especially Christianity. Violence against non-Muslims is and has always been an integral aspect of Islam. And the natural consequence of this destructive ideology is murder, enslavement and rape. Islammeans Submission. The principle of submission could not be any clearer. By definition, a slave is the most submissive of all people. A slave will submit completely to her master. Islam leads to Jihadand jihad leads to Sexual Slavery and sexual slavery leads toRape and rape leads to Submission and submission leads toIslam. The cycle of evil begins and ends with Islam.
          Given below is a recent Fatwa (Islamic ruling) from a widely respected mufti.
          ISLAMIC QUESTION & ANSWER, ONLINE WITH MUFTI EBRAHIM DESAI, SOUTH AFRICA, ASK THE IMAM:
          “It may, superficially, appear distasteful to copulate with a woman who is not a man’s legal wife, but once Shariah makes something lawful, we have to accept it as lawful, whether it appeals to our taste, or not; and whether we know its underlying wisdom or not.”
          We have come to the conclusion of our analysis on the subject concerning the sanction of rape in Islam. The evidences provided in this article are by no means exhaustive but are sufficient enough to assist sincere seekers of truth, both Muslims and non-Muslims to see the dangers of Islam. Women who are tempted to convert to this religion must stop and think before it is too late for them. They must realize that according to Allah it is “lawful and good” to rape women.
          Surah 8:69: “But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good.” (Yusuf Ali)
          Not only does Allah grant permission for women to be captured and raped, but he also allows Muslims to enjoy raping these poor women in the presence of their husbands. Can a religion as debased as this originate with the true God? You be the judge.

          • Hi Lucky/Raj, Let us see your alleges :

            24:32 Pickthall: And marry such of you as are solitary and the pious of your slaves and maid-servants. If they be poor, Allah will enrich them of His bounty. Allah is of ample means, Aware.

            90:12 Pickthall: Ah, what will convey unto thee what the Ascent is!
            :13 Pickthall: (It is) to free a slave

            4:25 : Yusuf Ali: If any of you have not the means wherewith to wed free believing women, they may wed believing girls from among those whom your right hands possess:

            4:3 Pickthall: And if ye fear that ye will not deal fairly by the orphans, marry of the women, who seem good to you, two or three or four; and if ye fear that ye cannot do justice (to so many) then one (only) or (the captives) that your right hands possess.

            The above verses enforce marriage to captives and slave girls in Islam.

            Now, we refer to 8:70 Pickthall: O Prophet! Say unto those captives who are in your hands: If Allah knoweth any good in your hearts He will give you better than that which hath been taken from you, and will forgive you. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

            8:69 : Does NOT say “have sex with the captives”. It says : Pickthall: “Now enjoy what ye have won, as lawful and good, and keep your duty to Allah. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful”.

            Read Quranic verses in entirety, to understand better.

            Yet we shall go to some nice Biblical verses too!

            Deut 20:16-17 However, in the cities of the nations the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes. 17 Completely destroy.

            1 Samuel 15:2-4 : God Almighty says : Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.

            Psalm 137:8-9 Happy is the one who seizes your infants
            and dashes them against the rocks.

            The pedophilic Biblical verses are Numbers 31:17-18 and Numbers 31:35-40. Just refer to them, okay?

            Regards

            Plum

          • Hi Lucky/Raj, wow….you write so long….longer…..longest…..phew..what to make of it? Yet, you did NOT quote a single verse from the Quran. Why??

            Regards

            Plum

      • PEDOPHILIA & BESTIALITY IN ISLAM

        Pedophilia is legal in Islam.

        The law ordering pedophilia is in chapter 65, entitled ‘The Divorce’ and qualified by Islamic law, which is based on the sunnah, the ‘perfect example’ of Muhammad recorded in the hadiths, traditions. The context deals with the issue of the waiting period for divorce, and remarriage. The Quran orders Muslim men to wait a period of three months in the case of women who either are no longer menstruating or haven’t yet started their menstrual cycles.
        وَاللَّائِي يَئِسْنَ مِنَ الْمَحِيضِ مِن نِّسَائِكُمْ إِنِ ارْتَبْتُمْ فَعِدَّتُهُنَّ ثَلَاثَةُ أَشْهُرٍ وَاللَّائِي لَمْ يَحِضْنَ وَأُوْلَاتُ الْأَحْمَالِ أَجَلُهُنَّ أَن يَضَعْنَ حَمْلَهُنَّ وَمَن يَتَّقِ اللَّهَ يَجْعَل لَّهُ مِنْ أَمْرِهِ يُسْرًا
        (4. Those in menopause among your women, for them the `Iddah, if you have doubt, is three months; AND FOR THOSE WHO HAVE NO MENSTRUATION. And for those who are pregnant, their `Iddah is until they lay down their burden; and whosoever has Taqwa of Allah, He will make his matter easy for him.)
        (5. That is the command of Allah, which He has sent down to you; and whosoever has Taqwa [fear] of Allah, He will expiate from him his sins, and will increase his reward.) Qur’an chapter 65:4
        ISLAMIC LAW
        Islamic law is based on the rules of the Qur’an and the sunnah, the ‘perfect example’ of Muhammad, the Muslim prophet, recorded in the hadiths, traditions. All Muslims are ordered to imitate Muhammad’s ‘perfect example’ in thought, word and deed. They are ordered to regard Muhammad as the ideal human being and Islam as the best system for humanity forever, a system that Islamic law orders must rule the world and abolish all other religions, cultures and laws.
        The definition of the word consummate: In Sahih Bukhari, vol. 7, #64, the root word used is dakhala. Hans-Wehr Arabic-English Dictionary p273: it means ‘to enter, to pierce, to penetrate, to consummate, cohabit, to have sex with a female’.
        PEDOPHILIA LAWS FROM ISLAM Q&A
        (www.islam-qa.com)
        Question #22442: The ruling on marrying young girls
        Question #12708: Is it acceptable to marry a girl who has not yet started her menses?
        Answer: Marriage to a young girl before she reaches puberty is permissible according to sharee’ah, and it was narrated that there was scholarly consensus on this point.
        1 – Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
        “And those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘Iddah (prescribed period), if you have doubt (about their periods), is three months; and for those who have no courses [(i.e. they are still immature) their ‘Iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise” [al-Talaaq 65:4]
        In this verse we see that Allaah states that for those who do not menstruate – because they are young and have not yet reached the age of puberty – the ‘iddah in the case of divorce is three months. This clearly indicates that it is permissible for a young girl who has not started her periods to marry.
        Question #27305: Is it permissible to marry a thirteen year old girl?
        The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) married ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) when she was six years old, and he consummated the marriage with her when she was nine, and at that time he was over fifty.
        Al-Bukhaari (3894) and Muslim (1422) narrated that ‘Aa’ishah said: The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) married me when I was six years old and consummated the marriage with me when I was nine.
        It was narrated from ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) married her when she was six years old, he consummated the marriage with her when she was nine and she stayed with him for nine years.
        If she has not reached the age of puberty, then her father has the sole right to arrange her marriage and does not have to ask her permission. With regard to the wedding-party of a young married girl at the time of consummating the marriage, if the husband and the guardian of the girl agree upon something that will not cause harm to the young girl, then that may be done. If they disagree, then Ahmad and Abu ‘Ubayd say that once a girl reaches the age of nine then the marriage may be consummated even without her consent, but that does not apply in the case of who is younger.There is nothing in the hadeeth of ‘Aa’ishah to set an age limit or to forbid that in the case of a girl who is able for it before the age of nine.
        Question #8981: What is the punishment for a girl found guilty of adultery if she has not even reached her puberty – she is still a minor?
        Answer: Al-Qurtubi said: The followers of all religions are agreed that adultery is forbidden; no religion regards it as permissible. Hence the punishment for it is one of the most severe punishments, because it is a crime against honour and lineage, which is one of the five basic principles that Islam seeks to protect, namely life, religion, lineage, reason and wealth.
        Tafseer al-Qurtubi, 24/20, 21
        1 – If a woman has been previously married i.e., a legitimate marriage with her has been consummated, then her punishment is to be stoned to death.
        2 – If the woman is a virgin i.e., she is not married yet or the marriage contract has been done but her husband has not yet consummated the marriage with her – then the punishment is one hundred lashes and exile from her country for a year. If the adulterer or adulteress is a minor below the age of puberty, then there is no punishment to be carried out, according to all scholars.
        PEDOPHILIA LAWS FROM ISLAMIC-FATWA.NET
        Question 1809
        After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwahs (religious decrees) reviewed the question forwarded by the grand scholar of the committee with reference number 1809 issued on 3/5/1453 and 7/5/1421 (Islamic calendar)
        Question: ‘It has become widespread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufa’khathat of the children. (mufa’khathat – literally translated, it means “placing between the thighs” which means placing the male member between the thighs of a child) What is the opinion of scholars, knowing full well that the prophet, the peace of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers – may Allah be pleased with her.’
        Answer: After studying the issue, the committee has answered as follows:
        As for the prophet, thighing his fiancée Aisha when she was six years of age and not able to consummate the relationship due to her small age. That is why the Prophet used to place his male member between her thighs and massage it, as the prophet had control of his male member not like other men.
        Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89 said in his official statements:
        “A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband’s house rather than her father’s home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven.”
        Khomeini, “Tahrirolvasyleh” fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990
        “It is not illegal for an adult male to ‘thigh’ or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.”
        Ayatu Allah Al Khumaini’s “Tahrir Al wasila” p. 241, issue number 12
        “Young boys or girls in full sexual effervescence are kept from getting married before they reach the legal age of majority. This is against the intention of divine laws. Why should the marriage of pubescent girls and boys be forbidden because they are still minors, when they are allowed to listen to the radio and to sexually arousing music?”
        “The Little Green Book” “Sayings of the Ayatollah Khomeini”, Bantam Books
        MUHAMMAD, THE PROPHET OF ISLAM
        PART 1 MECCA
        An Arab is regarded as an old man, a sheik, when he is fifty.
        Muhammad married Aisha when she was six years old in Mecca and she joined him in Medina three years later when he was 53. He began having sex with Aisha when she was nine years old and still playing with dolls.
        This is the original story told by the ONLY valid biographers of Muhammad and Islam, Ibn Ishaq and Tabari, and the hadiths of Bukhari and Muslim. Refer also to the works of the Qur’an commentators Ibn Kathir and Ibn Qayyim. (Ibn Kathir, The Life of the Prophet Muhammad (Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya), Volume II, translated by professor Trevor Le Gassick, Garnet Publishing Limited, UK. The Center for Muslim Contribution to Civilization, 2000. pp. 93-94)
        (Ibn Qayyim Al-Juaziyyah, Zad-ul Ma’ad fi Hadyi Khairi-l ‘Ibad (Provisions for the Hereafter, From the Guidance of Allah’s Best Worshipper) translated by Jalal Abualrub, [Madinah Publishers & Distributors, December 2000] Volume I, pp. 157-158)
        Muhammad said that he had dreamed of Aisha before demanding her from her father, and his own brother in Islam, Abu Bakr, claiming special ‘prophets rights’ when Abu Bakr was reluctant to give her to him.
        Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 235: Narrated ‘Aisha: That the Prophet said to her, “You have been shown to me twice in my dreams. I saw you pictured on a piece of silk and someone said to me, ‘This is your wife.’ When I uncovered the picture, I saw that it was yours. I said, ‘If this is from Allah, it will be done.”
        Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 18: Narrated ‘Ursa: The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “But I am your brother!”
        The Prophet said, “You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”
        Marriage to a female already offered to another was illegal in Arab law. Abu
        Bakr had already arranged for Aisha to marry Djubayr Mutim.
        Muhammad married ‘A’isha in Mecca when she was a child of seven and lived with her in Medina when she was nine or ten. She was the only virgin that he married. Her father, Abu Bakr, married her to him and the apostle gave her four hundred dirhams. (Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasulullah (The Life of Muhammad) translated by Alfred Guillaume [Oxford University Press, p. 792)
        Tabari VII:7 “The Prophet married Aisha in Mecca three years before the Hijrah, after the death of Khadija. At the time she was six.”
        Tabari IX:128 “When the Prophet married Aisha, she was very young and not yet ready for consummation.” [The History of Al-Tabari: The Foundation of the Community] translated by M.V. McDonald annotated by W. Montgomery Watt [State University of New York Press, Albany 1987], Volume VII, pp. 6-7) (The History of Al-Tabari: The Last Years of the Prophet, translated and annotated by Ismail K. Poonawala [State University of New York Press, Albany 1990], Volume IX, pp. 129-130)
        Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 236: Narrated Hisham’s father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married ‘Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old.
        PART 2 MEDINA
        Ishaq:281 “When the Apostle came to Medina he was fifty-three.”
        “In May, 623 A.D./A.H. 1, Allah’s Messenger consummated his marriage to Aisha. This was in Dhu al-Qa‘dah (May-June 623) eight months after his arrival in Medina according to some accounts, or in Shawwal (April-May 623) seven months after his arrival according to others. He had married her in Mecca three years before the Hijrah, after the death of Khadijah. At that time she was six or according to other accounts, seven years old. [The History of Al-Tabari: The Foundation of the Community, Volume VII, pp. 6-7]
        The Prophet married ‘A’ishah in Shawwal in the tenth year after the [beginning of his] prophethood, three years before Emigration. He consummated the marriage in Shawwal, eight months after Emigration. On the day he consummated the marriage with her she was nine years old. According to Ibn ‘Umayr al-Waqidi: ‘A’ishah was asked when the Prophet consummated his marriage with her, and she said: The Prophet left us and his daughters behind when he emigrated to Medina. Having arrived at Medina, he sent Zayd b. Harithah and his client Abu Rafi’ for us. I was sitting in the litter together with my mother, and she started exclaiming “Alas, my daughter, alas you bride!” We then arrived at Medina, and I stayed with Abu Bakr’s children, and Abu Bakr went to the Prophet. The latter was then busy building the mosque and our homes around it, where he later housed his wives. We stayed in Abu Bakr’s house for a few days; then Abu Bakr asked the Prophet “O Messenger of Allah, what prevents you from consummating the marriage with your wife?” The Prophet said “The bridal gift (sadaq).” Abu Bakr gave him the bridal gift, twelve and a half ounces of gold, and the Prophet sent for us. He consummated our marriage in my house, the one where I live now and where he passed away.’ The History of Al-Tabari: Biographies of the Prophet’s Companions and Their Successors, Volume XXXIX, pp. 171-173
        Tabari IX:131 “My mother came to me while I was being swung on a swing between two branches and got me down. My nurse took over and wiped my face with some water and started leading me. When I was at the door she stopped so I could catch my breath. I was brought in while Muhammad was sitting on a bed in our house. My mother made me sit on his lap. The other men and women got up and left. The Prophet consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old.”
        Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 234: Narrated Aisha: The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six years. We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew again and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became alright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me for the marriage. Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.
        ‘A’isha reported that she used to play with dolls in the presence of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and when her playmates came to her they left (the house) because they felt shy of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), whereas Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) sent them to her. [Sahih Muslim, Book 031, Number 5981]
        Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 73, Number 151: Narrated ‘Aisha: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle used to enter they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13)
        Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 163, 118: Narrated ‘Aisha: The
        Prophet was screening me with his Rida’ (garment covering the upper part of the body) while I was looking at the Ethiopians who were playing in the courtyard of the mosque. I continued watching till I was satisfied. So you may deduce from this event how a little girl who has not reached the age of puberty who is eager to enjoy amusement should be treated in this respect.
        Muhammad claimed that he received his revelations from Allah while he was in bed with this little girl and while he was wearing her clothes…
        Tabari VII:7 Aisha said, “There are special features in me that have not been in any woman except for what Allah bestowed on Maryam bt. Imran. I do not say this to exalt myself over any of my companions.’ ‘What are these?’ someone asked. Aisha replied, ‘The angel brought down my likeness; the Messenger married me when I was seven; my marriage was consummated when I was nine; he married me when I was a virgin, no other man having shared me with him; Inspiration came to him when he and I were in a single blanket.
        Bukhari:V5B57N119 “The people used to send presents to the Prophet on the day of Aisha’s turn [for sex]. Aisha said, ‘His other wives gathered in the apartment of Um Salama [wife number two] and said, “Um, the people send presents on the day of Aisha’s turn and we too love the good presents just as much as she does. You should tell Allah’s Apostle to order the people to send their presents to him regardless of whose turn it may be.” Um repeated that to the Prophet and he turned away from her. When the Prophet returned to Um, she repeated the request again. The Prophet again turned away. After the third time, the Prophet said, “Um, don’t trouble me by harming Aisha, for by Allah, the Divine Inspiration never came to me while I was under the blanket of any woman among you except her.”
        Sahih Bukhari, Hadith Number: 2393 Volume Title, “Grace and its Virtues.” Chapter Title, “What was Granted to the Companions and the Wives.” Narrated by Ismail, narrated by his brother, narrated by Sulaiman, narrated by Hisham Ibn Urwah, narrated by his father, narrated by Aisha, who related that the wives of the prophet were divided into two groups. One group consisted of Aisha, Hafsa, Safiya and Sawdah while the other group consisted of Um Salamah and the rest of the women that belonged to the prophet. The Muslims had learned of the great love that the prophet had for Aisha so that if one of them had a gift he desired to give to the prophet, he would delay giving it until the prophet came to Aisha’s house. Then the group who sided with Um Salamah came to Um Salamah and asked her to tell the prophet that he should command the people that if any of them had a gift to give to the prophet, they should give it him in whatever house of his wives the prophet was in at the time. So Um Salamah went and talked with the prophet but he did not respond to her. When the group asked her what the prophet said she told them that he did not respond. So they asked her to go talk to him again until he responds. Then the prophet said to her, “Do not hurt me with Aisha, for the inspiration did not come upon me when I was wearing a woman’s clothes (Thowb) except that of Aisha.” http://hadith.al-islam.com/Display/Display.asp?hnum=2393&doc=0
        Years later, fat and elderly, Muhammad wanted to claim A BABY GIRL.
        Ibn Ishaq: Suhayli, 2.79: In the riwaya of Yunus Ibn Ishaq recorded that the apostle saw her (Ummu’l-Fadl) when she was baby crawling before him and said, ‘If she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’ (ref.10, p. 311)
        Muhammad saw Um Habiba the daughter of Abbas while she was fatim (age of nursing) and he said, “If she grows up while I am still alive, I will marry her.” (Musnad Ahmad, Number 25636)
        If there are no children available, an animal will do:
        A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However, he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village; however, selling the meat to the next door village should be fine.
        Khomeini’s book, “Tahrirolvasyleh” fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990
        “If one commits the act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrement become impure, and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed and as quickly as possible and burned.”
        The Little Green Book, Sayings of Ayatollah Khomeini, Political,
        Philosophical, Social and Religious, ISBN number 0-553-14032-9, page 47

        II. 10
        On Eating and Drinking

        There are eighteen principles to be observed at mealtime; washing one’s hands before the meal; washing and drying one’s hands after the meal; the head of the house beginning eating before any of his guests and finishing after them; he must wash his hands before the meal ahead of the others, and be followed by the person who sits at his right, and then the next, and so on, until reaching the one seated at his left; beginning the meal by invoking the name of Allah; but if several courses are served, it is recommended that this be repeated before each course; taking with one’s right hand; eating with three fingers, leaving the other two free; taking small quantities of food in each mouthful; stretching the meal out as long as possible; chewing one’s food at length; praising Allah at the end of the meal; licking one’s fingers; cleaning one’s teeth after the meal with a toothpick, which must not be made of pomegranate wood, basil wood, reed, or palm leaves; gathering up the remains of the meal in order to eat them later, but if the meal is eaten in the desert it is better to leave such remains for the birds and animals; eating at the beginning of the day and at nightfall, and abstaining there from during the day and during the night; resting on one’s back after eating, and putting the right leg over the left; taking salt at the beginning and the end of the meal; washing all fruit before it.

        There are eleven things to be avoided during meals; eating when one is not hungry; eating too much, which is frowned upon by the Almighty; watching others while eating; eating things that are too hot; blowing on a dish or into a glass to cool the food or drink;
        starting to eat as soon as the bread has been put on the table; cutting bread with a knife; putting bread under one’s plate; cleaning a meat bone so there is nothing left on it; peeling fruit; throwing away half-eaten fruit.

        There are six principles to be observed while drinking water: sucking it up rather than gulping it down; drinking upright invoking the name of Allah before and after drinking; drinking in three steps; drinking of one’s own free will; recalling the martyrdom of Hazrat Abu Abdullah and his family, and cursing their murderers, after drinking.

        There are five things to be avoided during the absorption of water: drinking to excess; drinking after a heavy meal; drinking standing up during the night; taking the water jug in one’s left hand; drinking from a place where the jug is chipped or broken or at the location of the handle.

        Among the organs of fowl, game, domestic animals, fish, and so on whose flesh of you are permitted to eat, there are fifteen which are proscribed: blood; excrement; the penis; the vagina; the uterus; the glands; the testicles; the central part of the brain; the little chickpea shaped ball at the back side of the brain; the nerves located on either side of the spinal column; the gallbladder; the liver; the bladder; the eye; matter accumulated under the claws.

        It is forbidden to consume the excrement of animals or their nasal secretions. But if such are mixed in minute proportions into other foods their consumption is not forbidden.
        The meat of horses, mules, or donkeys is not recommended. It is strictly forbidden if the animal was sodomized while alive by a man.

        In that case, the animal must be taken outside the city and sold.
        If one commits an act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrements become impure, and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed as quickly as possible and burned, and the price of it paid to its owner by him who sodomized it.

        Drinking wine or alcoholic beverages is a mortal sin, and is strictly forbidden. Whoever consumes an alcoholic beverage retains only a part of his soul, that part of it which is deformed and nasty; he is damned by Allah, His archangels, His prophets, and His believers.

        Such a man’s daily prayers are rejected by Allah for forty days. On the day of the resurrection of the dead, his face will turn black, his tongue will hang out of his mouth, his saliva will run down his chest, and he will remain forever thirsty.

        II. 11
        On Pure and Impure Things

        There are eleven things which are impure: urine, excrement, sperm, bones, blood, dogs, pigs, non-Muslim men and women, wine, beer, and the sweat of the excrement-eating camel.

        The urine and feces of man and any animal whose blood spurts when a vein or artery of its body is opened are impure. But flyspecks or the droppings of mosquitoes or other such small insects whose blood does not gush are pure.

        The urine and feces of any excrement-eating animal are impure. This is equally true of the urine and feces of any animal which has been sexually possessed by a human; and of the urine and feces of sheep which have been fed on sow’s milk.

        The sperm of any animal whose blood spurts when its throat is cut is impure.

        The bones of an animal found dead or an animal slaughtered otherwise than according to Muslim rites are impure; fish, on the other hand, is never impure, even if found dead in the water, for its blood does not spurt.

        The hairs, bones, and teeth of dead animals are pure, unless they come from animals such as the dog which are impure themselves.

        The egg taken from the entrails of a chicken is not impure, provided its shell is sufficiently hard. However, it must be washed before being eaten.

        The meat, fat, and skins on sale in a Muslim bazaar on being handled by a Muslim are pure, unless such products come from animals which were not slaughtered according to the Muslim rites.

        The blood of man and any animal whose blood spurts when the throat is cut is impure; on the other hand, the blood of the fish, mosquito, or any other animal whose blood does not spurt remains pure.

        The blood that may flow out between one’s teeth is pure if diluted with saliva; it is permitted to swallow that saliva.

        Blood coagulated and accumulated under the nails or in any other part of the human body is pure if its appearance has been so modified that one can no longer call it blood; if that is not the case, every effort must be made to rid oneself of it before performing one’s ablutions.

        The pus of a healing wound is pure; provided one can be sure it is not mixed with blood.
        Dog and pig, unless they live in water, are impure, as are their hairs, their bones, their claws, and their excrements; on the other hand, sea dogs and pigs are pure.

        Every part of the body of a non-Muslim individual is impure, even the hair on his hand and his body hair, his nails, and all the secretions of the body.

        Any man or woman who denies the existence of Allah, or believes in His partners [the Christian Trinity], or else does not believe in His Prophet Muhammad, is impure (in the same way as are excrement, urine, dog, and wine). He is so even if he doubts any one of these principles.

        A child who has not reached puberty is impure if his parents and grandparents are not Muslims, but if he has one Muslim in his ancestry he is pure.
        A Muslim who insults one of the Twelve Imams or declares himself their enemy is impure.

        Wine and all other intoxicating beverages are impure, but opium and hashish are not.

        Beer is impure, but brewer’s yeast is not.

        The sweat of an excrement-eating animal is impure; the sweat of other animals, which do not eat the same detritus, is not.

        The sweat of a man who has just ejaculated is not impure; yet it is preferable for him not to pray so long as his body or his clothing retains traces of that sweat.

        If a man has had sexual relations with his wife during periods of prescribed abstinence, such as the fast of Ramadan, he must avoid saying his prayers so long as he still has upon him the traces of postcoital sweat.

        If a part of the body that is sweating comes into contact with something impure and the sweat runs onto other parts of the body, all such parts become impure, although the rest of the body remains pure.

        Bloodstained nasal secretions or expectorations are impure, whereas those which have not been soiled by blood are pure; if the nasal secretions or the expectoration touch the nose or mouth even lightly the part of the skin which has been so touch must be purified; but the untouched part remains pure.

        An object which enters a human body and comes into contact with something impure (stool or blood) remains pure when withdrawn from that body if it has no traces of the impure matter left upon it; thus, the instrument introduced into the rectum for an enema or the surgeon’s scalpel are not impure if they bear no trace of these impurities. The same applies to saliva or nasal secretions which mix with blood inside the mouth or nose, but show no trace of it when they are expectorated.

        It is forbidden to touch a page of the Qur’an with anything impure; if such a thing should happen, the page must immediately be washed.

        It is forbidden to place upon the Qur’an such impure matter as blood or human or animal bones if the matter is dried; should the matter already have been placed on it, it must absolutely be removed.

        It is forbidden to write out verses of the Qur’an with impure ink, even though one writes but one letter thereof. In case it has already been done, it must be washed away or erased with a knife or some other sharp instrument.

        One must avoid giving the Qur’an to an infidel; it is even recommended that it be forcibly taken away from him if he already has it in his hands.

        If a page of the Qur’an, or a piece of paper with the name of Allah or the Prophet or one of the Imams on it should fall into a toilet, it is absolutely indispensable to withdraw it from there, even if this should prove costly. In case this is impossible, such a toilet must never be used until it has been ascertained that the paper has rotted away.

        It is forbidden to eat or drink anything that is impure; it is also forbidden to give anything impure to children to eat, whether or not it may be harmful to them; but it is not forbidden to feed children food which has been only indirectly touched by something impure.

        It is not required that one point out to a person that he is eating impure food or that he is praying while wearing impure clothing.

        If the head of a household notices during the course of a meal that one or more of the dishes being served are impure, he must impart this information to his guests; but if it is one of the guest who notices it, he is not obliged to do the same.

        II. 14
        On Ablution [ Body Purification ]

        There are two kinds of ablutions; the kind known as “step by step,” which consists of washing the different parts of the body one after the other, and the kind known as “total,” in which the whole body is immersed in water.

        In step-by-step ablutions, one must begin by proclaiming in both loud and a low voice that one is planning to perform his ablutions; after that, one should wash one’s head and the back of the neck, then the right side of the body, followed by the left side. If this precise order is not followed, whether deliberately or out of ignorance, the ablutions are not valid. It is to be pointed out that the right side of the navel and the right side of the genitals must be washed with the right side of the body, and the left side of the navel and genitals with the left side of the body. However, it is more prudent to was navel and genitals in their entirety along with each side of the body. If once the ablution is completed, one suspects that some part of the body has been overlooked, the ritual must be repeated; in that case, if the overlooked part is on the left side of the body, it is enough to wash only that part, but if it is on the right side of the body, after washing that part, the whole left side of the body must be washed again.

        In a total ablution, one must immerse the entire body in water, after having proclaimed in both a loud and a low voice that this is one’s intention. If one notices, after the ablution, that some part of the body remained outside the water, even though one may not know exactly which part of the body it was, the entire ritual must be repeated.

        It is necessary that during ablution not one part of the body remain unwashed; however, it is not required that one wash those parts which are not visible, such as the inside of the ears or nose. In the case of ears that are pierced, the holes in them must be washed if they are large enough so the insides of them can be seen; otherwise, this is not necessary.

        During ablution, one must wash the shortest hairs on the body, but it is recommended that even the longest be washed. If one washes his anus in the water of a public bath, one must first obtain the permission of the owner of this bath for the ablution to be valid. If
        during ablution, one breaks wind or urinates, the ritual remains valid. If one performs his ablutions after having ejaculated and one has a verse of the Qur’an or the name of Allah written or tattooed on his body, one’s hand must not touch that part of the body during the ablution, but that part must be washed without being touched.

        Sperm is always impure, whether it results from actual coitus or from an emission while one is either conscious or asleep, whether it is abundant or not, whether or not it results from sexual pleasure, whether emission is intentional or not.

        It is recommended that one urinate after ejaculation; if one does not, the discharge that might follow one’s ablution would have to be considered to be sperm, even though it seems doubtful.

        During sexual intercourse, if the penis enters a woman’s vagina or a man’s anus, fully or only as far as the circumcision ring, both partners become impure, even if they have not reached puberty; they must consequently perform their ablutions.

        If the man thinks that he has not entered the woman’s vagina beyond the circumcision ring, ablution is not required.

        If a man – Allah protect him from it! – fornicates with an animal and ejaculates, ablution is necessary.

        If a sperm moves inside the penis but does not come out, or if there is doubt about whether it actually was emitted, ablution is not required.

        A man who has ejaculated and has not yet performed his ablutions must avoid the following ten acts: eating; drinking; reading more than seven verses of the Qur’an; touching the binding of the Qur’an, or the margins of its pages, or the spaces between the lines; carrying the Qur’an on his person; sleeping; dyeing his beard with henna; anointing himself with grease or oil; having sexual intercourse after having ejaculated in his sleep.

        If a man has sexual intercourse with his wife during the periods of prescribed abstinence, such as the month’s fast of Ramadan, his sweat is impure, and he may not say his daily prayers while in such a state.

        If a man becomes aroused by a woman other than his wife but then has intercourse with his own wife, it is preferable for him not to pray if he has sweated; but if he first has intercourse with his spouse and then with another woman, he may say his prayers even though he be in a sweat.

        A man who has ejaculated as a result of intercourse with a woman other than his wife, and who then ejaculates again while having coitus with his legal wife, does not have the right to say his prayers while still sweating; but if he had intercourse with his wife first and then with a woman not his wife, he may say his prayers even though still sweating.

        If a fly or any other insect settled first on something impure that is moist and then on something pure that is moist, the latter in turn becomes impure, provided one can be certain that the former was impure; failing that, it remains pure.

        Besides the ablutions that are necessary and unavoidable there are a number of ablutions that are highly recommended in order to please Allah. A few of them are:

        Ablution performed Friday between dawn and noon.

        Ablution performed on the eve of the first day of Ramadan and the eves of all the odd days of that month, (third, fifth, seventh, and so on). The ablutions on the eves of the first, fifteenth, seventeenth, nineteenth, twenty-first, twenty-third, twenty-fifth, twenty-seventh, and twenty-ninth days of Ramadan are especially recommended. On the eve of the twenty-third day, one would be well advised to perform two ablutions, one at the beginning and the other at the end of the night.

        Ablution performed by a woman who has used perfume for a man other than her husband.

        Ablution of the man who has fallen asleep while in a drunken state.

        Ablution of a man or woman who, during a total eclipse of the sun or the moon, have not said their prayers.

        Ablution of one who has witnessed the hanging of a person condemned to death. If he did not witness it of his own free will, ablution is not necessarily required.

        II. 17
        On Fasting

        Sexual intercourse is a breaking of the fast, even if the penis enters the vagina only as far as the circumcision ring, and even if no ejaculation results.

        If the penis enters less deeply into the vagina and there is no ejaculation, the fast has not been broken.

        If the man cannot determine with certainty what length of his penis entered into the vagina, and if he has gone in beyond the circumcision ring, his fast has not been broken.

        If a man has intercourse because he has forgotten that he is in a fasting period, or if someone forces him to have intercourse, his fast has not been broken. But if he remembers the fast while the sex act is taking place, or if he is no longer forcibly constrained to complete the coitus, he must interrupt it immediately.

        If a man during a fasting period masturbates and brings himself to ejaculation, his fast has been broken.

        If a man ejaculates involuntarily, his fast remains valid, but if he himself does anything whatsoever to help along his involuntary ejaculation, the fast is considered to be null and void.

        Taking an enema, even for medically therapeutic reasons, breaks the fast; but the use of suppositories is not forbidden; however, it is preferable to abstain from using opium suppositories.

        The fast of one who, in thought, or word, or deed, bears false witness against Allah, or His Prophet or his successors, is immediately invalidated, even though he may confess on the spot to having lied and proclaim his repentance. In all likelihood, Saint Fatima
        [Daughter of Muhammad and wife of Ali], as well as the other prophets and their successors, are also included among those against whom one may not blaspheme.

        If, during the fast, one attributes in all good faith some statement to Allah or to His Prophet, and one afterward learns that his as in error, the fast remains valid. If one intentionally attributes some false quotation to Allah or to His Prophet or his successors, the fast loses its value’ but if one is only repeating such a quotation heard from a
        third party, the fast remains valid.

        The fast is invalidated if one plunges his entire head under water, but if one immerses only the right side and then the left side, the value of the fast remains intact. One’s head must not be immersed in rose water; however, it may be immersed in other waters in solution, or in other liquids.

        If, in order to rescue a person from drowning, one’s head becomes immersed during a period of fasting, one’s fast is invalidated, even if there was no other way of saving the drowning person’s life.

        If one has ejaculated and abstains from performing the prescribed ablutions during the vigil of the month of Ramadan, the fast loses its value.

        If a person believes hewill have sufficient time, before a Ramadan vigil, to complete his ablutions after ejaculation, but discovers afterward that he does not have time enough, he may postpone his ablutions in order to begin the fast.

        If a fly enters the month of a person during a period of fasting, he is not forced to take it out, if it has not gone too far into the throat; if it has remained in the mouth, he must take it out even if that causes vomiting which invalidates the fast.

        If by inadvertence one eats something during the fast, and then one realizes it, one must not attempt to retrieve the part of it which has already been swallowed.

        The following practices are inadvisable during fasts;

        putting drops in one’s eyes; having a blood transfusion or taking a bath; pinching snuff or smelling aromatic plants; taking sitz baths (applies to women only); taking suppositories; getting one’s clothes wet; having teeth pulled or undergoing any other surgery which might cause blood to flow into the mouth brushing one’s teeth with moist wood; becoming intimate with one’s wife, even without the intention of coming to ejaculation, or deliberately arousing oneself (if ejaculation is deliberately brought about, the fast is invalidated).

        II. 19
        On Marriage, Adultery, and Conjugal Relations

        A woman may legally belong to a man in one of two ways; by continuing marriage or temporary marriage. In the former, the duration of the marriage need not be specified; in the latter, it must be stipulated, for example, that it is for a period of an hour, a day, a
        month, a year, or more.
        Marriage, whether continuing or temporary, must be sealed by a religious formula spoken either by the woman or by the man, or by one of their representatives.

        As long as the woman and man have not contracted a religious marriage, they are not entitled to look upon one another. To allow that, it is not enough to assume that the marriage formula has been spoken, but if the person representing them states that it has been spoken, then that is enough to validate the marriage.

        If a woman authorizes someone to marry her to a man for a period of ten days, for example, without specifying the exact date, the man may contract the marriage at his pleasure, but if the woman has specified a precise day and hour, the formula must be spoken at the specified time.

        The legal marriage formula must be read in Arabic, but if one cannot speak that language correctly, it may be spoken in a different language.

        A father or a paternal grandfather has the right to marry off a child who is insane or who has not reached puberty by acting as its representative. The child may not annul such a marriage after reaching puberty or regaining his sanity, unless the marriage is to his manifest disadvantage.

        Any girl who is of age, that is, capable of understanding what is in her own best interest, if she wishes to get married and is a virgin, must procure authorization of her father or paternal grandfather.

        The permission of her mother or brother is not required.

        If a father or paternal grandfather marries off prepubescent son or grandson, the latter will be responsible once he has reached puberty, for taking care of his wife’s material needs.

        A marriage is annulled if a man finds that his wife is afflicted with one of the seven following debilities: madness, leprosy, eczema, blindness, paralysis with aftereffects, malformation of the urinary and genital tracts or of the genital tract and rectum through
        conjoining thereof, or vaginal malformation making coitus impossible.

        If a wife finds out after marriage that her husband is suffering from mental illness, that he is a castrate, impotent, or has had his testicles excised, she may apply for annulment of her marriage.

        If a wife has her marriage annulled because her husband is unable to have sexual relations with her either vaginally or anally, he must pay her as damages one-half of the dowry specified in the marriage contract. If the husband or wife annuls the marriage for any of the above-mentioned reasons, the man owes nothing to the woman if they have had sexual relations together; if they have not, he must pay her the full amount of the dowry.
        It is forbidden to marry one’s mother, sister, or stepmother.

        It is forbidden to marry one’s mother-in-law, or one’s wife’s maternal or paternal grandmother or any of her great-grandmothers, even though one’s marriage to her may never have been consummated.

        A man who marries a woman and has sexual relations with her may not marry her daughter or granddaughter, even if these be by a different marriage.

        A man may not marry his wife’s daughter, even if their marriage has not been consummated.

        Aunts of the bride’s father and the aunts of her grandparents need not wear the veil in the presence of the groom; the father, grandfather, and great-grandfather of the groom, as well as his sons, grandsons, and all his male descendants, may freely look upon the bride.

        A man may not marry the nieces of his wife without the latter’s consent; if he should nevertheless do so without getting consent, but his wife raises no objection, then there is no problem.

        A man who has committed adultery with his aunt must not marry her daughters, that is to say, his first cousins.

        If a man who has married his first cousin commits adultery with her mother, the marriage is not thereby annulled.

        If a man commits adultery with a woman other than his aunt, it is highly recommended that he not marry the daughter of that woman.

        If he marries a woman, consummates the marriage, and then commits adultery with her mother, the marriage is not thereby annulled. Nor is it automatically annulled in the case of his having committed such adultery before the marriage was consummated, but in that case it is better if the husband voluntarily annuls the marriage.

        A Muslim woman may not marry a non-Muslim man; nor may a Muslim man marry a non-Muslim woman in continuing marriage, but he may take a Jewish or Christian woman in temporary marriage.

        A man who marries an already married woman must break off his marriage with her and refrain from ever marrying her again.

        A married woman remains legally married after having committed adultery; however, should she not repent and should she continue to be unfaithful to her husband, it is preferable for the latter to repudiate her, but with full payment to her of her dowry.

        The mother, sister, or daughter of a man who has been sodomized by another man may not marry the latter, even if both men or one of them had not yet reached puberty at the time; but if one who was the victim of the act cannot prove it, his mother, sister, or daughter is allowed to marry the other man.

        If a man who has married a girl who has not reached puberty possesses her sexually before her ninth birthday, inflicting traumatisms upon her, he has no right to repeat such an act with her.

        If a man sodomizes the son, brother, or father of his wife after their marriage, the marriage remains valid.

        A woman who has contracted a continuing marriage does not have the right to go out of the house without her husband’s permission; she must remain at his disposal for the fulfillment of any one of his desires, and may not refuse herself to him except for a religiously valid reason. If she is totally submissive to him, the husband must provide her with her food, clothing, and lodging, whether or not he has the means to do so.

        A woman who refuses herself to her husband is guilty, and may not demand from him food, clothing, lodging, or any later sexual relations; however, she retains the right to be paid damages if she is repudiated.

        A husband is not obligated to pay any travel expenses incurred by his wife which exceed what her expenses would have been at home; but if travel was undertaken at his own suggestion, then he must take care of the expenses.

        A wife who scrupulously obeys her husband has the right to be paid the daily household expenses for any of the husband’s assets, in the case the latter refuses voluntarily to pay for them. But if she is forced to meet such expenses out of her on pocket, she is not obligated to obey her husband.

        A man who has contracted a continuing marriage may not leave his wife for so long a time as to allow her to question the validity if the marriage; however, he is not obligated to spend one night out of every four with her.

        A husband must have sexual relations with his wife at least once in every four months.

        If, at the time of contracting the marriage, no specific time was indicated at which the husband was to pay the dowry to his wife, the wife may refuse herself to her husband for so long as that amount of money has not been paid her. But once she has agreed to have sexual relations with her husband, she can no longer later refuse to, except for religiously valid reasons.

        A temporary marriage, even though only one of convenience, is nevertheless legal.

        A man must not abstain from having sexual relations with his temporary wife for more than four months.

        If the temporary marriage contract includes a clause specifying that the husband is not entitled to have normal sexual relations with his wife, such a clause must be respected. He must then be satisfied with giving her pleasures in other ways. But as soon as the wife consents to it, he may perform the natural sex act with her.

        A woman ho has been temporarily married in exchange for a previously established dowry has no right to demand that her daily expenses be paid by her husband, even when she becomes pregnant.

        A temporarily married wife may not inherit from her husband; nor may he inherit from her.

        A temporarily married woman is entitled to go out of the house without asking her husband’s permission, unless the fact of her so going out harms him in one way or another.

        If a father (or paternal grandfather) marries off his daughter (or granddaughter) in her absence without knowing for a certainty that she is alive, the marriage becomes null and void as soon as it is established that she was dead at the time of the marriage.

        It is forbidden for a man to look upon the body of a woman who is not his wife, under any pretext whatsoever. It is equally forbidden for a woman to look upon the body of a man who is not her husband.

        To look upon the face and hair of a girl who has not reached puberty, if it is done without intention of enjoyment thereof, and if one is not afraid of succumbing to temptation, may be tolerated. It is however recommended that one not look upon her belly or thighs, which must remain covered.

        To look upon the faces and hands of Jewish or Christian women, if this is not done with intention of enjoyment thereof, and if one does not fear temptation, is tolerated.

        A woman must hide her body and her hair from the eyes of men. It is highly recommended that she also hide them from those of prepubescent boys, if she suspects that they may look upon her with lust.

        It is forbidden to look upon the genitals of another person, even from behind a glass, or in a mirror, or in standing water. It is even expressly recommended to abstain from looking at the genitals of a child who knows the difference between good and evil. But it is
        permitted for husband and wife to look upon each other in all parts of their bodies.

        A man must not look upon the body of another man with lustful intent. Likewise, a woman may not look upon another woman with such intent.
        It is not forbidden for a man to photograph a woman other than his wife, but if in order to do so he must touch her, then he must not photograph her.

        If a woman is called upon to give an enema to a woman or to a man other than her husband, or to wash their genitals, then she must cover her hand so as not to come into direct contact with the genital organs; the same precautions must be taken by a man where another man or a woman other than his wife are concerned.

        If a man is called upon, for medical reasons, to look upon a woman other than his wife and to touch her body, he is permitted to do so, but if he can give such care by only looking at the body he must not touch it, and if he can give it by only touching, he must not look at it.

        If a man or woman be forced, in order to administer medical care, to look upon the genitals of another person, he or she must do so indirectly, in a mirror, except in case of absolute necessity.

        If the husband has included in the marriage contract a clause guaranteeing his wife’s virginity, he may annul the marriage if it turns out that she was not a virgin.

        If a woman abjures her faith before her marriage is consummated, the marriage is annulled; the like is true after conclusion of the marriage, if she is menopausal. But if she is not menopausal and returns to her Muslim beliefs within a hundred days after the breaking off of marriage, it again becomes valid.

        A man whose father or mother as a Muslim at the time of his conception, and who himself embraced the Muslim faith after reaching puberty, will have his marriage automatically abolished if he becomes an apostate.

        The marriage of a man born of non-Muslim parents but who himself became a convert to Islam is automatically annulled if he renounces his faith before consummating the marriage. If he renounces his faith after having sexual relations with his wife, she must wait one hundred days after the annulment of the marriage before marrying again, if she is of age to have menstrual periods. Thus, the marriage remains valid if during those one hundred days the husband returns to the Muslim fold; otherwise, the annulment is irreversible.

        If the woman inserts into the marriage contract a cause binding her husband not to mover her away from the city, and the husband accepts such a clause, then he must abide by it.

        The husband of a woman who has had a daughter by a previous marriage may marry that daughter to a son of his by a previous marriage. He himself has the right to marry the mother of a girl married to his son.

        A woman who becomes pregnant as a result of adultery must not have an abortion.
        If a man commits adultery with an unmarried woman, and subsequently marries her, the child born of that marriage will be a bastard unless the parents can be sure it was conceived after they were married.

        One need not believe a woman who claims to have entered menopause. On the one hand, she must be believed if she asserts that she is not married.

        It is highly recommended that a girl be married off as soon as she reaches the age of puberty. One of the blessings of man is to have his daughter experience her first period not in her father’s house, but in that of her husband.

        A child born of an adulterous father is legitimate.

        It is a sin to have sexual relations with one’s wife during the fast of Ramadan or while she is having her menses, but the child born of such relations is legitimate.

        If a man marries a woman and possesses her sexually, he may no longer marry any girl whom this woman has breast-fed.

        A man may not marry a wet nurse who has breast-fed his wife.

        A man may not marry a girl who was ever breast-fed by his mother or his grandmother.

        The best person to breast-feed a newborn baby is its own mother. It is preferable that she not ask to be paid for such services, but that her husband pay her for it of his own free will. If the sum the mother asks for is greater than that charged by a wet nurse, the husband is free to take the child from its mother and turn it over to the wet nurse.

        It is recommended that the wet nurse be a faithful Shi’ite, intelligent, modest, and pretty. On the other hand, it is most inadvisable that she be feebleminded, a nonbeliever in the Twelve Imams, ugly, or a bastard, or of bad character. It is equally inadvisable to select as wet nurse a woman who has an illegitimate child.

        It is recommended that every child be breast-fed for two whole years.

        II. 20
        On Divorce

        A man who repudiates his wife must be of sound mind and past the age of puberty. He must do so of his own free will and without any constraint; thereof, if the formula for divorce is spoken in jest the marriage is not annulled.

        The woman must not be having her period at the time of the divorce, and the husband must not have had sexual relations with her since her last period.

        In three cases, a man may repudiate his wife while she is having her period: if he has had no sexual relations with her since their marriage; if she is pregnant while the husband believes she is having her period, and it is learned only later that she was pregnant at the
        time of the repudiation; if he is not certain, because of the distance that separated them, whether his wife is them having her period.

        A man who has had sexual relations with his wife after her last menstrual period must wait for her to have her next one before he may divorce her. But he may divorce his wife if she has not yet reached her ninth birthday, or is pregnant, or is menopausal.

        If a husband who has had sexual relations with his wife between menstrual periods, divorces her during this time and learns later that she was pregnant when the divorce took place, the latter remains valid.

        A women temporarily married, say, for a month or a year, has her marriage automatically annulled at the end of that time, or at any other time when the husband releases her from the balance of her engagement. It is not necessary for this that there be any witnesses, or that the woman have had her period.

        A woman who has not yet reached the age of nine or a menopausal woman may remarry immediately after divorce, without waiting the hundred days that are otherwise required.

        A woman who has had her ninth birthday or who has not yet entered menopause, must wait for three menstrual periods after her divorce before being allowed to remarry.

        If a woman who has not reached her ninth birthday or who has not entered menopause gets temporarily married, she must, at the end of the contract or when the husband has released her from part of it, wait two menstrual periods or forty-five days before marrying again.

        If a man commits adultery with a woman he knows is not his wife, while the woman is unaware that the man is not her husband, she must wait one hundred days before remarrying.

        If a man encourages a married woman to leave her husband so as to marry him, they are both committing a great sin, but the divorce and their marriage remain in force.

        If the father or paternal grandfather of a boy has him marry a woman for a temporary marriage, he may prematurely cancel it in the boys interest, even if the marriage was contracted before the boy reached the age of puberty. If, for example, a fourteen-year-old boy has been married off to a woman for a period of two years, they may return her freedom to the woman before this time has run its course; but a continuing marriage cannot be broken in this way.

        If a man repudiates his wife without informing her of it, and continues to meet her expenses for a period of, say, a year, and at the end of that time informs her that he got a divorce a year earlier and shows her proof of it, he may require that she return to him anything he has bought or given her during that time, provided that she has not used it up or consumed it, in which case he cannot demand its return.

    • RELIANCE OF THE TRAVELLER:
      A CLASSIC MANUAL OF ISLAMIC SACRED LAW
      Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri

      w45.0 A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS (from m5.I, end)
      A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS IN THE SHAFI’I SCHOOL
      *
      w45.1 (Abu Ishaq Shirazi:) A woman is not obliged to serve her husband by baking, grinding flour, cooking, washing, or any other kind of service, because the marriage contract entails, for her part, ONLY THAT SHE LET HIM ENJOY HER SEXUALLY, and she is not obligated to do other thar. that. (A: Rather, it is considered sunna in our school for the wife to do the housework, and the husband (who is obliged to support her) to earn the living, since this is how the Prophet (Allah bless him and give.
      him peace) divided the work between Fatima and ‘Ali (Allah be well pleased with them)) (alMuhadhdhab fi fiqh ai-Imam al-Shafi’i (yI25), 2.68).

      A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS IN THE HANAFI SCHOOL

      w45.2 (Nahlawi:) The wife’s serving her husband at home-by cooking, cleaning, and baking bread-is religiously obligatory for her, and if she does not, she is committing a sin, though it is not something that she may be forced to do by the court (al-Durar al-mubaha fi ai-hazr wa ai-ibaha
      (y99),I72).

      MUFTIS SAY:

      UNCOVERED KAFFIR WOMEN ARE LIKE MEAT; IT IS THEIR FAULT IF THEY GET RAPED BY MUSLIM MEN

      Three Hindu minor girls were raped in West Bengal when they are passing through Muslim majority area.

      Wednesday, July 14, 2010

      SANTIPUR : 3 HINDU GIRLS RAPED AND BRUTALLY TORTURED

      Three teen age Hindu Girls have been raped by the Muslim goons on 12th July at Middepara Lichutala under Santipur police station in Nadia district of West Bengal.
      The names of the girls are :
      (1) Chaitali Ghosh, age 13 yrs, D/O, Keshto Ghosh
      (2) Sangita Ghosh, age 13 yrs, D/O, Dilip Ghosh
      (3) Susmita Ghosh, age 14 yrs, D/O, Ashok Ghosh.
      All these three girls are residents of Baliadanga village of Nadia district and they are students of Haripur High School. On 12 July they were returning from school after appearing in school exam. Some Muslim girls too were with them who were their classmates. The way back goes through a Muslim dominated locality called Middepara, where a Muslim religious fair known as Ghazir Mela was going on. At 11.30 am, when they were passing through Muslim dominated Middepara, about 400 Muslim youths chased and surrounded the hapless Hindu girls. They were in a joyous mood. The Muslim girls fled.

      The Muslim boys snatched the scarves (dupatta) of the 3 Hindu girls and poured liquor on their whole body. The girls were absolutely scared and unable to resist.
      The girls were molested, raped and brutally tortured in broad daylight. Nobody came in their rescue as the area is Muslim area.

      When the girls did not return to home in time, their guardians proceeded towards their school to enquire. On way, they saw with horror that the girls were lying beside the road fully senseless. The guardians were shocked immensely. They immediately took the girls to nearest Santipur government hospital. The girls are still senseless. Totally overwhelmed and traumatized by this bestial abuse they are sometimes regaining their senses intermittently then again sinking back to unconsciousness.
      The Hindus of the area could not tolerate this horrible incident. They enquired from the local Muslim girls who are classmates of the victims and witnesses of this gruesome incident. But they refused to tell the names of the Muslim culprits.
      Then more than one thousand aggrieved Hindus rushed to the Santipur police station, but the police is reluctant. So, the Hindus first demonstrated in front of police station demanding arrest of the culprits. But seeing lukewarm response of the police, they blocked the National Highway no. 34. Hindu Samhati leaders of the Nadia district are with the aggrieved Hindus and are guiding and leading the agitation.

      The administration brought in RAF (rapid Action Force) police to control the situation.

      Written complaint has been lodged naming 20 Muslim miscreants. Hindus are determined to punish the culprits.
      (Courtesy http://hindusamhati.blogspot.com/).

      Women are abandoned “meat” and are like temptations from Satan. All this justifies Sharia provisions about veiling and other ridiculous conditions on women ( in accordance with Koranic verse 24:031) and thus, raping infidel women is part of the overall imperative of Islam to impose Sharia (Allah’s law) on infidels.

      Koran 24:030

      “And ask the believing men to (be modest and) lower their gaze and maintain their chastity. That is righteous and better. Allah is quite familiar with what they do.”

      And

      Koran 24:031

      “Ask the believing women to lower their gaze, guard their chastity, and not leave bare their beauty and charm, except that which becomes apparent by itself. Ask them to pull their veil-cloths down across their bosom, and not show their adornments to anyone except their husbands, fathers, husband’s father, sons, husband’s sons, brothers and their sons, sister’s sons, their women, the female slaves they own, the men-servants too old to have erotic desires, and boys not yet old enough to have awareness of the carnal. Ask them not to stamp their feet hard, in order to display (and jingle the jewelry worn on their feet and other) hidden adornments (under their outer garments). Oh you believers! Turn all of you towards Allah in repentance. Perhaps you will prosper.”

      This is what an Australian Mufti Al-Hilali has to say on women victims (Not Just Muslim Women) and Muslim rapists: Women not covering themselves with Hijab are like uncovered meat with the risk of getting raped:

      In a Ramadam sermon in a Sydney mosque, Sheik al-Hilali suggested that a group of Muslim men recently jailed for many years for gang rapes were not entirely to blame.
      There were women, he said, who ‘sway suggestively’ and wore make-up and immodest dress “and then you get a judge without mercy and gives you 65 years. But the problem, but the problem all began with who?” he said, referring to the women victims.
      Addressing 500 worshippers on the topic of adultery, Sheik al-Hilali added: “If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it..whose fault is it – the cats or the uncovered meat?

      “The uncovered meat is the problem.”

      He went on: “If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab (veil), no problem would have occurred.”

      Women, he said, were ‘weapons’ used by Satan to control men.

      This is what BBC also has to say on this.
      Australia fury at cleric comments

      Australia’s most senior Muslim cleric has prompted an uproar by saying that some women are attracting sexual assault by the way they dress.
      Sheikh Taj el-Din al-Hilali said women who did not wear a hijab (head dress) were like “uncovered meat”.
      But he has now apologised for any offence caused by his comments, The Australian newspaper reports.
      Leading Muslim women condemned the comments and PM John Howard said the remarks were “appalling”.
      “The idea that women are to blame for rapes is preposterous,” Mr Howard told reporters.
      In a statement released on Thursday, Sheikh Hilali said he had been quoting another, unnamed, source and did not mean his words to condone rape.
      “I unreservedly apologise to any woman who is offended by my comments. I had only intended to protect women’s honour,” the statement published in The Australian said.
      SHEIKH TAJ EL-DIN AL-HILALI
      • Born in Egypt
      • Aged 64
      • Imam in Sydney
      • Appointed mufti of Australia in 1989
      “Women in our Australian society have the freedom and the right to dress as they choose.
      “Whether a man endorses or not a particular form of dress, any form of harassment of women is unacceptable.”
      A spokesman for Sheikh Hilali earlier said the quote had been taken out of context and referred not to sexual assault, but to sexual infidelity.
      The sermon was targeted against men and women who engaged in extra-marital sex and did so through alluring types of clothes, he said.
      Ban threat
      The leader of Australia’s largest Islamic organisation has threatened to ban the cleric from teaching at Lakemba Mosque in Western Sydney.
      Tom Zreika, president of the Lebanese Muslim Association, which owns the mosque, said he condemned Sheikh Hilali’s words.
      “The board [of the LMA] has unlimited powers in respect of his teachings in the mosque. We can do anything that’s required to prevent him from teaching in our mosque. If you haven’t got the backing of Australia’s largest and most established Islamic organisation then you are out on a limb,” he is quoted as saying in The Australian.
      “ If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred ”
      Sheikh Hilali
      But Mr Zreika said the LMA had yet to fully review the contents of the sermon and Sheik Hilali should be offered the benefit of the doubt until any offence had been proved.
      A copy of the cleric’s comments delivered in a sermon to some 500 worshippers in Sydney last month during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan was initially published in The Australian.
      “If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside… and the cats come and eat it… whose fault is it, the cats’ or the uncovered meat?” he asked.
      The uncovered meat is the problem, he went on to say.
      “If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred,” he added.
      Sheikh Hilali also condemned women who swayed suggestively and wore make-up, implying they attracted sexual assault.
      “Then you get a judge without mercy… and gives you 65 years,” he added.
      Sheikh Hilali’s critics have previously accused him of praising suicide bombers and claiming the attacks in the United States on 11 September 2001 were “God’s work against oppressors”.
      High-profile case
      The BBC’s Nick Bryant in Sydney says the cleric’s latest comments are seen as particularly insensitive because Sydney was the scene six years ago of a series of gang rapes committed by a group of Lebanese Australians, who received long prison sentences.
      Finance Minister Peter Costello called on Muslims to condemn the speech.
      “If you have a significant religious leader like this preaching to a flock in a situation where we’ve had gang rapes, in a way that seems to make it justifiable, then people that listen to that kind of comment can get the wrong idea,” he said.
      “They can actually think that it’s not as bad as it is.”
      A number of leading Muslim women have already spoken out against the sermon, describing it as repulsive and offensive.
      Federal Sex Discrimination Commissioner Pru Goward said the comments could be an incitement to crime.
      “Young Muslim men who now rape women can cite this in court, can quote this man… their leader in court,” she told Australian media.
      She added that the cleric should be deported for inciting rape.
      Story from BBC NEWS:
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/asia-pacific/6086374.stm

      Published: 2006/10/26 10:13:39 GMT

      This problem is not limited to Australia. Europe also has this problem. In Sweden alone Muslims account for more than 50% rape crimes. Some even say this could be as high as 80%:
      April 27, 2009
      Sweden Tops Europe for Number of Rapes = Muslim Rape Jihad
      Sweden is now experiencing the results of multiculturalism and and its facilitating of Islamization. Now Sweden leads Europe in the number of reported rapes – more specifically Rape Jihad.
      “Sweden, 46 incidents of rape are reported per 100,000 residents. This figure is double as many as in the UK which reports 23 cases, and four times that of the other Nordic countries, Germany and France. The figure is up to 20 times the figure for certain countries in southern and eastern Europe……Over 5,000 rapes are reported in Sweden per annum while reports in other countries of a comparable size amounted to only a few hundred.” see below article
      Way back in July of 2005, well known blogger Fjordman warned of Sweden’s escalating rape crisis but unlike the below article – which tries to cover up the real facts and blame the increase in rapes to “party lifestyles” – the evidence clearly shows that the rape crisis is directly due to MUSLIM immigration into the Country:
      “According to a new study from the Crime Prevention Council, Brå, it is four times more likely that a known rapist is born abroad, compared to persons born in Sweden. Resident aliens from Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia dominate the group of rape suspects. According to these statistics, almost half of all perpetrators are immigrants.
      “…….Sweden has a larger immigrant, including Muslim, population than any other country in northern Europe. The numbers there are likely to be at least as bad as with its Scandinavian neighbors. The actual number is thus probably even higher than what the authorities are reporting now, as it doesn’t include second generation immigrants. Lawyer Ann Christine Hjelm, who has investigated violent crimes in Svea high court, found that 85 per cent of the convicted rapists were born on foreign soil or by foreign parents.” LINK
      The Local news report, posted in article below, also does not mention the number of rapes against Swedish children is also on the rise:
      According to Swedish Radio on Tuesday, statistics from Sweden’s National Council for Crime Prevention (Brottsförebyggande rådet) show that the number of reported paedophile rapes against children is on the rise. The figures have nearly doubled in the last ten years: 467 rapes against children under the age of 15 were reported in 2004 compared with 258 in 1995. LINK

      Now what does the Quran/Islam tell us about muslim men raping kafir or non-muslim girls?:
      “Islam gives an open license to Muslim men to have sexual intercourse with women as long as these women are not Muslims and/or when these Muslim men are living in an infidel country.” Link
      and in regards to paedophilia –This is what Imam Khomeini, the top shia authority says:
      “A Muslim man can have sexual pleasure with a little girl as young as a baby. But he should not penetrate her vaginally, however he can sodomize her”. (Tehriro vasyleh, fourth edition, Qom, Iran, 1990) Link
      And even more disgusting and representative of the muslim attitude towards Western women comes this:
      Some Muslim immigrants admit their bias quite openly. An Islamic Mufti in Copenhagen sparked a political outcry after publicly declaring that women who refuse to wear headscarves are “asking for rape.” Apparently, he’s not the only one thinking this way. “It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,” says Hamid. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably fucked before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity until she marries.” It was no coincidence that it was a Swedish girl that was gang raped in Rissne – this becomes obvious from the discussion with Ali, Hamid, Abdallah and Richard. All four have disparaging views on Swedish girls, and think this attitude is common among young men with immigrant background. “It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore…… girl, I mean;” says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. “Many immigrant boys have Swedish girlfriends when they are teenagers. But when they get married, they get a proper woman from their own culture who has never been with a boy. That’s what I am going to do. I don’t have too much respect for Swedish girls. I guess you can say they get fucked to pieces.” LINK
      Clearly the above Islamic rationalizations for rape do not fit into Western laws or civilization yet our daughters, mothers, wives, sisters, aunts, friends, etc, on a near daily basis, pay a violent, humiliating and unacceptable high price for the muslim colonisation of Europe and the ludicrous pandering that the governments, religious leaders, police and liberals have given to the ever growing muslim population. What is also clear is that political leaders do not want to admit their failed ideology of multiculturalism regardless of who pays the price for their stubborness. Political correctness more often than not gags the media from accurately reporting muslim crime statistics. Thus, non-muslim victims of muslim violence, particularly rape, are not being acknowledged and reported for what they obviously are: – VICTIMS OF MUSLIM HATE CRIME (OR RAPE JIHAD).
      Article in full:
      Sweden Tops European Rape League
      Sweden has the highest incidence of reported rapes in Europe – twice as many as “runner up” the UK, a new study shows.
      Researchers behind the EU study, which will be presented on Tuesday, conclude that rape appears to be a more common occurrence in Sweden than in continental European countries.

      In Sweden, 46 incidents of rape are reported per 100,000 residents.

      This figure is double as many as in the UK which reports 23 cases, and four times that of the other Nordic countries, Germany and France. The figure is up to 20 times the figure for certain countries in southern and eastern Europe.

      The study, which is financed by the Brussels-based EU fund Daphne II, compared how the respective judicial systems managed rape cases across eleven EU countries. Sweden is shown in an unfavourable light, according to the study.

      The high figures in Sweden are not only due to an increased tendency to report rapes, and even other more minor sexual offences.

      The opposite is in fact the case, the researchers argue; rape simply appears to be a more common occurrence in Sweden than in the other EU countries studied.

      Over 5,000 rapes are reported in Sweden per annum while reports in other countries of a comparable size amounted to only a few hundred.

      The figures can however be somewhat distorted as it is often only assault rapes by strangers and aggravated acquaintance rapes that are reported in many of these countries – as was the case in Sweden 40 years ago.

      The high incidence of rape in Sweden has a strong connection to nightlife and partying, specifically after-club parties in private homes.

      Early sexual debuts, high alcohol consumption, “free sexuality” and the “right to say no” quite simply results in more rapes, the study concludes.

      The Daphne II fund ran from 2004-2008 and was set up by the European Parliament as a specific programme to prevent and combat violence against children, young people and women and to protect victims and groups at risk.

      In 2007 Daphne III was launched to continue the work and is funded up to 2013.
      Swedish Welfare State Collapses as Immigrants Wage War
      From the desk of Fjordman on Tue, 2006-03-28 21:49
      Last year I wrote an article about how Swedish society is disintegrating and is in danger of collapsing, at least in certain areas and regions. The country that gave us Bergman, ABBA and Volvo could become known as the Bosnia of northern Europe. The “Swedish model” would no longer refer to a stable and peaceful state with an advanced economy, but to a Eurabian horror story of utopian multiculturalism, socialist mismanagement and runaway immigration. Some thought I was exaggerating, and that talk of the possibility of a future civil war in Sweden was pure paranoia. Was it?
      In a new sociological survey (pdf in Swedish, with brief English introduction) entitled “Vi krigar mot svenskarna” (“We’re waging a war against the Swedes”), young immigrants in the troubled city of Malmö have been interviewed about why they are involved in crime. Although it is not stated, most of the immigrant perpetrators are Muslims. In one of the rare instances where the Swedish media actually revealed the truth, the newspaper Aftonbladet reported several years ago that 9 out of 10 of the most criminal ethnic groups in Sweden came from Muslim countries. This must be borne in mind whilst reading the following newspaper article:
      Immigrants are “waging war” against Swedes through robbery
      The wave of robberies the city of Malmö has witnessed during this past year is part of a “war against the Swedes.” This is the explanation given by young robbers from immigrant backgrounds when questioned about why they only rob native Swedes, in interviews with Petra Åkesson for her thesis in sociology. “I read a report about young robbers in Stockholm and Malmö and wanted to know why they rob other youths. It usually does not involve a lot of money,” she says. She interviewed boys between 15 and 17 years old, both individually and in groups.
      Almost 90% of all robberies reported to the police were committed by gangs, not individuals. “When we are in the city and robbing we are waging a war, waging a war against the Swedes.” This argument was repeated several times. “Power for me means that the Swedes shall look at me, lie down on the ground and kiss my feet.” The boys explain, laughingly, that “there is a thrilling sensation in your body when you’re robbing, you feel satisfied and happy, it feels as if you’ve succeeded, it simply feels good.” “It’s so easy to rob Swedes, so easy.” “We rob every single day, as often as we want to, whenever we want to.” The immigrant youth regard the Swedes as stupid and cowardly: “The Swedes don’t do anything, they just give us the stuff. They’re so wimpy.” The young robbers do not plan their crimes: “No, we just see some Swedes that look rich or have nice mobile phones and then we rob them.”

      Why do they hate the Swedes so much? “Well, they hate us,” Petra Åkesson reports them as answering. “When a Swede goes shopping, the lady behind the counter gives him the money back into his hand, looks into his eyes and laughs. When we go shopping, she puts the money on the counter and looks the other way.” Åkesson, who is adopted from Sri Lanka and hence does not look like a native Swede, says it was not difficult to get the boys to talk about their crimes. Rather they were bragging about who had committed the most robberies. Malin Åkerström,a professor in sociology, sees only one solution to the problem: “Jobs for everybody. If this entails a deregulation of the labor market to create more jobs, then we should do so.”
      It is interesting to note that these Muslim immigrants state quite openly that they are involved in a “war,” and see participation in crime and harassment of the native population as such. This is completely in line with what I have posited before. The number of rape charges in Sweden has quadrupled in just above twenty years. Rape cases involving children under the age of 15 are six times as common today as they were a generation ago. Most other kinds of violent crime have rapidly increased, too. Instability is spreading to most urban and suburban areas. Resident aliens from Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia dominate the group of rape suspects. Lawyer Ann Christine Hjelm found that 85 per cent of the convicted rapists were born on foreign soil or from foreign parents. The phenomenon is not restricted to Sweden. The number of rapes committed by Muslim immigrants in Western nations is so extremely high that it is difficult to view these rapes as merely random acts of individuals. It resembles warfare. This is happening in most Western European countries, as well as in other non muslim countries such as India. European jails are filling up with Muslims imprisoned for robberies and all kinds of violent crimes, and Muslims bomb European civilians. One can see the mainstream media are struggling to make sense of all of this. That is because they cannot, or do not want to, see the obvious: this is exactly how an invading army would behave: rape, pillage and bombing. If many of the Muslim immigrants see themselves as conquerors in a war, it all makes perfect sense.
      Malmö in Sweden, set to become the first Scandinavian city with a Muslim majority within a decade or two, has nine times as many reported robberies per capita as Copenhagen, Denmark. Yet the number one priority for the political class in Sweden during this year’s national election campaign seems to be demonizing neighboring Denmark for “xenophobia” and a “brutal” debate about Muslim immigration. During last years Jihad riots in France, Sweden’s Social Democratic Prime Minister Göran Persson criticised the way the French government handled the unrest in the country. “It feels like a very hard and confrontational approach.” Persson also rejected the idea of more local police as a “first step” in Sweden. “I don’t believe that’s the way we would choose in Sweden. To start sending out signals about strengthening the police is to break with the political line we have chosen to follow,” he said. Meanwhile, as their authorities have largely abandoned their third largest city to creeping anarchy, there is open talk among the native Swedes still remaining in Malmö of forming vigilante groups armed with baseball bats out of concern for their children’s safety. As I argued in another essay: If Arnold Schwarzenegger fails to get re-elected as Governor of California he may like to do a sequel to “Conan the Barbarian.” He could shoot it in Malmö. He will get the extras for free.
      What happened to the famous Swedish nanny state, you say? Don’t Swedes pay the highest tax rates in the world? Yes, they do. But tens of billions of kroner, some say several hundred billions, are being spent every year on propping up rapidly growing communities of Muslim immigrants. Sweden has become the entire world’s welfare office, because the political elites have decided that massive Muslim immigration is “good for the economy.” Soon Sweden’s “army” may comprise no more than 5,000 men, five thousand troops to defend a nation more than three times the area of England. Moreover, it may take up to a year to assemble all of them, provided they are not on peacekeeping missions abroad. That Sweden might soon need a little peacekeeping at home seems to escape the establishment. In 2006 the celebrated Swedish welfare state has become the world’s largest pyramid scheme, an Enron with a national flag.
      Although Sweden is an extreme example, similar stories could be told about much of Western Europe. As Mark Steyn points out, the Jihad in the streets of France looked like the early skirmishes of an impending Eurabian civil war, brought on by massive Muslim immigration and Multicultural stupidity. Law and order is slowly breaking down in major and even minor cities across the European continent, and the streets are ruled by aggressive gangs of Muslim youngsters. At the same time, Europeans are paying some of the highest taxes in the world. We should remind our authorities that the most important task of the state – some would even claim it should be the only task of the state – is to uphold the rule of law in exchange for taxation. Since it is becoming pretty obvious that this is no longer the case in Eurabia, we should question whether these taxes are still legitimate, or whether they are simply disguised Jizya paid in the form of welfare to Muslims and our new Eurocrat aristocracy. Although not exactly the Boston Tea Party, perhaps the time has now come for a pan-European tax rebellion: We will no longer pay taxes until our authorities restore law and order and close the borders to Muslim immigration.
      This is urgent. When enough people feel that the system is no longer working and that the social contract has been breached, the entire fabric of democratic society could unravel. What happens when the welfare state system breaks down, and there is no longer enough money to “grease” the increasing tensions between immigrants and native Europeans? And what happens when people discover that their own leaders, through the EU networks and the Euro-Arab Dialogue described by Bat Ye’or in her book “Eurabia,” have been encouraging all these Muslims to settle here in the first place? There will be massive unemployment, and tens of millions of people will feel angry, scared and humiliated, betrayed by the system, by society and by their own democratic leaders. This is a situation in some ways similar to the Great Depression that led to the rise of the Nazis in the 1930s. Is this where we are heading once again, with fear, rising Fascism and political assassinations? The difference is that the “Jewish threat” in the 1930s was entirely fictional, whereas the “Islamic threat” now is very real. However, it is precisely the trauma caused by the events of 70 years ago that is clouding our judgement this time, since any talk at all about the threat posed by Muslim immigration or about preserving our own culture is being dismissed as “the same rhetoric as the Nazis used against the Jews.” Europeans have been taught to be so scared of our own shadows that we are incapable of seeing that darkness can come from the outside, too. Maybe Europe will burn again, in part as a belated reaction to the horrors of Auschwitz.

      The number of rape charges in Sweden has quadrupled in just above twenty years. Rape cases involving children under the age of 15 are six times as common today as they were a generation ago. Most other kinds of violent crime have rapidly increased, too. Instability is spreading to most urban and suburban areas. Resident aliens from Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia dominate the group of rape suspects. Lawyer Ann Christine Hjelm found that 85 per cent of the convicted rapists were born on foreign soil or from foreign parents.

      And yet again, we have another Islamic mufti in Copenhagen, Shahid Mehdi saying this: “women who do not wear headscarves are asking for rape”.

      A small excerpt from this report:

      An Islamic mufti in Copenhagen, Shahid Mehdi, has sparked political outcry from the left-wing Unity List and right-wing Danish People’s Party, after stating in a televised interview that women who do not wear headscarves are “asking for rape.” Unity List equality spokesman Pernille Rosenkrantz-Theil has threatened to file suit for defamation against the mufti on behalf of herself and all the women of Denmark. The Danish People’s Party has urged Justice Minister Lene Espersen and Integration Minister Bertel Haarder to stop the mufti’s religious activities in Copenhagen.
      If one wants to know more on what devout Muslims say on this connection between Hijab and rapes, one can listen to the following video program aired on a Egyptian channel: “Unveiled women invite rape”

      If one wants more evidence of intolerance and their attitude towards Kafir women, just watch the below video in which Muslim protesters are openly threatening about taking Kafir women as sex slaves:

      And finally tall claims about non existent Islamic super morality, esp. in comparisons to Non Muslims, can be understood from this report on Pakistan as the No 1 country in the search of pornography on the net. Recently Pakistan has banned many websites including facebook.com for so called blasphemy and Un-Islamic content.

      RAPE IN ISLAM

      “A victim of rape every minute somewhere in the world. Why? No one to blame but herself. She displayed her beauty to the entire world. She dagraded herself by being an object of sexual desire and thus becoming vulnerable to man who looks at her for gratification of his sexual urge…” Sheik Faiz Mohamad, speech at Bankstown Town Hall, Sydney, Australia, on March 18th 2005. Source: ” Veiled threat an insult to all.” by Miranda Devine, The Sun Herald April 24, 2005,

      Does Islam permit rape? What is the status of women in Islam? And what does the Qur’an have to say about women?

      “If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive/slave) that your right hand possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice.” Qur’an 4:3.

      “Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will….” Qur’an 2:223.

      “And all the married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives/slaves) whom your right hand possess….” Qur’an 4:24

      The part that your right hand possess refers to slavegirls.

      I often receive emails from irate Muslims – male and female – who vehemently insist that I got the situation of women in Islam all wrong, that Islam respects women and has given women rights when they had non. Some of them blame the media for giving their religion a bad name, others blame tradition and nearly all are angered with anyone criticizing Islam, even though the criticism is justified by facts and scripture.

      The issue of women and Islam is in the spotlight yet again. In one of his sermons, Sydney based, Sheik Hilaly likened women to pieces of meat which is left uncovered for the cats to eat. He quotes a highly esteemed, Islamic scholar Rafii who lays the blame for rape and adultery on the woman. Furthermore, he implies that Muslim men cannot and should not be expected to exercise control over their actions and therefore not be responsible if they are “led astray” by uncovered women and commit rape or adultery.

      Here’s the sermon:

      Those atheists, people of the book (Christians and Jews), where will they end up? In Surfers Paradise? On the Gold Coast?

      Where will they end up? In hell. And not part-time. For eternity. They are the worst of God’s creation.

      Who commits the crimes of theft? The man or the woman? The man. That’s why the man was mentioned before the women when it comes to theft because his responsibility is providing.

      But when it comes to adultery, it’s 90 per cent the women’s responsibility. Why? Because a woman possesses the weapon of seduction. It is she who takes off her clothers, shortens them, flirts, puts on make-up and powder and takes to the streets, God protects us, dallying. It’s she who shortens, raises and lowers. Then it’s a look, then a smile, then a conversation, then a date, then a meeting, then a crime, then Long Bay jail. [Hilaly laughs}.

      Then you get a judge, who has no mercy, and he gives you 65 years.

      But when it comes to this disaster, who started it? In his literature, scholar al Rafii says: “If I came across a rape crime – kidnap and violation of honour – I would discipline the man and order that the woman be arrested and jailed for life.”

      Why would you do this, Rafii?

      He says because if she had not left the meat uncovered, the cat wouldn’t have snatched it…

      If you take uncovered meat and put it on the street, on the pavement, in the garden, in a park or in the back yard, without a cover and the cats eat it, is it the fault of the cat or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem.

      If the meat was covered, the cats wouldn’t roam around it. If the meat is inside the fridge, they won’t get it.

      If the woman is in her boudoir, in her house and if she’s wearing the veil and if she shows modesty, disasters don’t happen…

      Satan sees women as half his soldiers…Satan tells women you are my weapon to bring down any stubborn man…

      The woman was behind Satan playing a role when she disobeyed God and went out all dolled up and unveiled and made of herself palatable food that rakes and perverts would race for. She was the reason behind this sin taking place.

      Even though the uncovered meat analogy is quoted from scholar al-Rafii, we can gather the following beliefs about women:

      • Rape and adultery are women’s fault.
      • Women are Satan’s weapon in causing men to sin.
      • Unless women are at home and fully covered, they are provoking men, in other words, asking for it.
      • Men should not be held responsible for rape.
      • Non-Muslims are evil.

      What I like about Sheik Hilaly is that he calls the spade a spade! None of this rubbish about Islam respecting women that we often get from Islamic apologists. Like every body else, the Sheik has the right to free speech. However, if his view leads to someone committing rape then he would be partly responsible.

      I am glad that the Sheik’s true feelings are out in the open. Those misguided multiculturalists and those who are ignorant of the dangers that Islam and religion in general pose to the world, will hopefully wake up, pull their heads out of the sand and face facts. The Sheik’s sermon was intended only for his flock, unfortunately for him, and for the Muslims who think, it leaked out and now more and more people know about the hatred for women and the West that is preached in mosques. Their hatred for the US, is understandable, it’s the deep hatred for women and the West which I find terrifying.

      It seems that the main reason that Muslims hate the West is because of the freedoms that Western women enjoy, they live in constant fear that Muslim women will also demand the same freedoms. They are so sensitive on the matter of women in Islam, that anyone who speaks out about it, puts his/her life at risk. In 2004, Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh was murdered by a Muslim fanatic for making a documentary –“Submission” – about the plight of Muslim women. Bangladeshi writer Taslima Nasrin is living in hiding because she too, rightly, criticized Islam’s treatment of women. Dutch parliamentarian Ayan Hirsi Ali, also lives in fear of her life after assisting Van Gogh with the making of “Submission” and for speaking out against the abuse of women in Muslim communities. Prior to entering politics, Ayan worked as an interpreter at battered women’s shelters and recalls the disproportionate number of Muslim women trying to escape violence.

      Sheik Hilaly’s sermon was not simply his opinion of women but a reflection of Islamic thought and culture.

      According to the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, every two hours a woman is raped in Pakistan and every eight hours a woman is subjected to gang rape. The Hudood Ordinances are a set of laws in Pakistan intended to make the criminal justice system conform with Islamic law. These laws cover offences including Zina crimes (unlawful sexual intercourse including adultery and rape) and Qazf (wrongful accusation of Zina crimes).

      The maximum punishment for Zina crimes is death by stoning. Many women are imprisoned for years, convicted or awaiting trial for Zina crimes.

      These laws place an almost impossible burden of proof on women and girls who are raped. If they report a rape to the police they are often charged with Zina crimes because they have in effect admitted to sexual intercourse outside of marriage and been unable to prove absence of consent. In such cases, the victims are more likely to be convicted than the perpetrators. Pakistani law is punishing victims of rape as though they were criminals while the perpetrators go free.[1]

      When Muslims migrate to countries where the culture is diametrically opposed to Muslim norms, it’s inevitable that there will be a conflict of cultures. This conflict manifested itself in the rapes of Anglo-saxon women. The rapists were Lebanese Muslims and they specifically targeted Australian girls whom they called sluts, pigs, whores etc. At that time, Sheik Hilaly condemned the rapes and flatly told the rapists’ parents that “Your sons, are rapists”. Yet in his latest sermon he puts the blame for rape on the women and excuses the rapists. It seems that we have two versions of Islam, one for the Western media and one for the mosque. We know now to take everything they (the Islamists) say with a grain of salt.

      Indeed, it is the Muslim men’s behavior which contributed to the Cronala riots. The problem has been brewing for some years now. Young Muslim males would be marauding the beach, harassing non-Muslim women, calling them sluts and whores. The locals had have enough. The situation exploded when a group of Lebanese males beat up three lifeguards. The locals retaliated with various other groups from outside the area joining in and indiscriminately targeting anyone with ethnic appearance. Could the riots have been prevented if the authorities have taken action from the beginning? Probably.

      Could the harassing of non-Muslim women not have occurred if imams and Muslim parents have not taught their sons that non-Muslim women are sluts and therefore fair game? Definitely. And how do I know what Muslim males think? I went to school with them and I observed their attitude towards female teachers and women in general. In Sydney, a cosmopolitan city, there are over a hundred different nationalities. Why is it that we do not have Greek, Vietnamese, Italian or South American rape gangs. Why are the gangs composed of mainly Muslims and why do they target Australian women?

      It’s not because they cannot find willing partners for sex or because they cannot restrain themselves at the sight of unveiled women, it is because they resent the freedoms that Australian women enjoy and are terrified of the thought of their own women demanding the same freedoms, That is why they use rape as a weapon in putting and keeping women in their place.

      There are rapists in all cultures, religions and nationalities. Let’s not forget the horrific rape, torture and murder of Anita Cobby and the more recent rapes commited certain football players. However, we do not support rapists and we do not punish the victims.

      Of course, rape is not problem in Islamic countries because women stay home and are protected by the hijab or the burqa. Right?

      Now let’s look at the reality, recent efforts in Pakistan to reform the rape laws in order to make them fairer to the victims have met with opposition from clerics and conservatives who claim that the reforms are against Islam. That’s right; justice for rape victims is against Islam!

      Clerics have also opposed proposed laws that would punish perpetrators of honor killings.

      What many Muslims do not understand is that a piece of cloth will not protect a woman from rape, if only it was that simple! In some parts of the Amazon forest there are tribes where women, and men, wear little more than a loin cloth, yet these tribes are not experiencing an epidemic of rape, why?

      When Christian missionaries first arrived in the Pacific Islands two hundred years ago, they were horrified to see women running around with bare breasts. The Polynesians at that time regarded bare breasts as a means for feeding babies and not as sexual objects. As soon as the missionaries managed to convert the islanders to Christianity, they proceeded in covering the women in mother hubbards (long baggy dresses). You see, modesty is in the eye of the beholder.

      In the Netherlands where there is equality of the sexes and a healthy attitude towards women and sex, there are very few rapes committed by Scandinavian males. Most of the rapes in those countries are committed by migrant Muslim males. [2]

      [1] Rape laws in Pakistan: http://web.amnesty.org/wire/July2004/Pakistan

      [2] Muslim Rape Epidemic in Sweden and Norway – Authorities Look the Other Way, because of multiculturalism: http://fjordman.blogspot.com/2005/02/muslim-rape-epidemic-in-sweden-and.html

      Raped in Oslo: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1754

      Unveiled women invite rape and Muslim girls disfigured for not wearing the hijab:
      http://www.dhushara.com/book/sakina/stoningetc/hijabrape.htm

      Rape: Nothing to do with Islam? http://www.islam-watch.org/Fjordman/Islam&Rape.htm
      Rape: Nothing To Do With Islam?
      Posted on April 4, 2012 by violenceagainstwhites
      http://www.islam-watch.org/Fjordman/Islam&Rape.htm
      Rape: Nothing to do with Islam?
      by Fjordman
      01 Aug, 2006
      I got some comments, among others from Norwegian blogger Bjørn Stærk, to my posts about the Norwegian government covering up the number of rapes committed by immigrants. The Swedish government is probably even worse, but Sweden is in many ways collapsing. Although he agreed that the statistics should be published, he questioned whether these rapes have anything to do with Islam. It is true that mass rapes of “the enemy’s women”, in part to humiliate the enemy’s men, is not unique to Islam. It has been done at times of war by the Vikings, the Mongols, the Germans and the Russians during WW2, and all the way up to the Balkans in the 1990s. That’s also my point. The number of rapes committed by Muslim immigrants in Western nations are so extremely high that it is difficult to view them only as random acts of individuals. It resembles warfare. This happens in most Western European countries, as well as in other infidels countries such as India. In Bradford, England, Channel 4 pulled a documentary about Pakistani and other Muslim men sexually abusing white English girls, some as young as 11. Writer Theodore Dalrymple thinks that “thanks to their cultural inheritance, (Muslim) abuse of women is systematic rather than unsystematic as it is with the whites and blacks.” In France, grotesque reports about systematic gang rapes of French or “too Western” Muslim girls keep coming in. At the same time, European jails are getting filled up with Muslims imprisoned for robberies and all kinds of violent crimes, and Muslims bomb European civilians. You can see the mainstream media are struggling to make sense of all of this. That’s because they can’t, or don’t want to, see the obvious: This is exactly how an invading army would behave. Rape, pillage and bomb.
      I disagree that this has nothing to do with Islam. Muhammad himself had forced sex (rape) with several of his slave girls/concubines. This is perfectly allowed, both in the sunna and in the Koran. If you postulate that many of the Muslims in Europe view themselves as a conquering army and that European women are simply war booty, it all makes perfect sense and is in full accordance with Islamic law. And Muslims do follow their medieval religious laws, even today:
      Robert Spencer on rape and jihad
      What does rape, then, have to do with these religious conflicts? Unfortunately, everything. The Islamic legal manual ‘Umdat al-Salik, which carries the endorsement of Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, stipulates: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” Why? So that they are free to become the concubines of their captors. The Qur’an permits Muslim men to have intercourse with their wives and their slave girls: “Forbidden to you are … married women, except those whom you own as slaves” (Sura 4:23-24).
      After one successful battle, Muhammad tells his men, “Go and take any slave girl.” He took one for himself also. After the notorious massacre of the Jewish Qurayzah tribe, he did it again. According to his earliest biographer, Ibn Ishaq, Muhammad “went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for [the men of Banu Qurayza] and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches.” After killing “600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900,” the Prophet of Islam took one of the widows he had just made, Rayhana bint Amr, as another concubine.
      Emerging victorious in another battle, according to a generally accepted Islamic tradition, Muhammad’s men present him with an ethical question: “We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl [coitus interruptus] with them.” Muhammad told them: “It is better that you should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.’” When Muhammad says “it is better that you should not do it,” he’s referring to coitus interruptus, not to raping their captives. He takes that for granted.
      Here’s what Vice Director of Jihad Watch, Hugh Fitzgerald, whom I rate in league with Ali Sina and Ibn Warraq as among the best commentators of Islam in this age, has to say about the issue (scroll down):
      ‘For her to be absolved from guilt, a raped woman must have shown good conduct’
      For non-Muslim women, they are in every respect — the way they walk, the way they talk, those bedroom eyes we all know so well — simply asking for it, and Muslim men have every right to do what they wish.
      It is not understood that Western women are not so much regarded by most Muslims as individuals, but as “their women,” the women who “belong” to hostile Infidels. They are booty, to be taken, just as the land of the Infidels someday will drop, it is believed, into Muslim hands — by demographic conquest rather than military conquest. It has worked in many parts of Africa; and if Muslims fail to reproduce even faster than they do, there is always the expedient of killing the remaining Infidels.
      All over France there are cases of rapes, by MUslim gangs, of French girls. In Australia, in 2000, Bankstown and Greenacre (in Sydney) had a succession of gang-rapes, in which the victims testified to the particularly gruesome details of being assaulted by a dozen or more men at a time, screaming at them for being “Aussies” or “Christians.” It made a big splash in Sydney, when the cases came to trial in 2002. Alan Jones, an Australian commentator, noted: “Let’s not mince words here — these are racist attacks against ordinary Australian girls carried out by out of control Muslim Lebanese….” The girls themselves all testified to the fact that the attacks were full of observations about, not race, but religion — and the confusion of Jones here is understandable. The Western world is still groping to understand something of which it had been so remarkably and indeed, in some ways so fortunately unaware; it is the attitudes engendered toward Infidels — a Frenchman who is beaten to death for trying to retrieve his daughter’s stolen bicycle, a mother and her year-old-child assaulted on an RER train near Louvres, the thousands of assaults which are a modern version of the rape and pillage that Muslim conquerors were permitted whenever they conquered Infidel lands. This is not mere crime, but ideologically-justified crime or rather, in Muslim eyes, attacks on Infidels scarcely qualify as crime.
      Have we forgotten the mass rapes, at the hands of Muslims (Turks, Kurds, and in the Syrian Desert, Arabs) of the Armenian women, those helpless “giavours,” in the first full-scale massacres in modern times, those of 1894-1895, and then the genocidal campaign that began in 1915 and went on for years? Have we all forgotten what happened to the Assyrian Christian women during the Assyrian massacres of 1933, when — just a few months after the British left — Muslim Iraqis had a high old time wiof the Christian women, kidnapped in Ramadi, Iraq last year — never to be returned to their husbands, and now the permanent property of the Muslims who kidnapped them? Shall one recall what happened to the Christian Maronites in Damur, at the hands of the PLO? What about the Copts, in Egypt? Or, during the Algerian War the mass rape of Christian and Jewish women by the FLN (scarcely given enough attention in Alastair Horne’s reticent “A Savage War of Peace” but given much more by such writers as Jacques Soustelle, the great ethnographer of Mexican culture, and a perceptive analyst of the Algerian situation and the real nature of Islam — akin, in his way, to Andre Servier).
      The figures on Muslim rape of Western women in Europe are astounding. In Denmark and Norway, between 65% and 70% of all rapes are committed by Muslims, who as yet still less than 5% of the population. One local judge in Norway actually exonerated one rapist by accepting his defense that the victim’s dress was taken by him to mean that she was egging him on. Her dress was nothing special to Norwegians, but the judge found it to be unbearably provocative to this poor Muslim immigrant. A curious argument, is it not? Even if she had been dressed a la Gisele Bundchen doing a shoot for Victoria’s Secret — and she of course was not — rape is not an acceptable response.
      The argument now seems to be: Western mores are offensive. Western women are cheap and offensive. We Muslims are here, here to stay, and we have a right to take advantage of this situation. It is our view of the matter that should prevail. Western goods, like the land on which we now live, belong to Allah and to the best of men — his Believers. Western women, too, essentially belong to us — our future booty. Western laws may “apply” but not in any sense that really counts or that we reocgnize. We recognize Islamic law, the sharia, and according to that we are simply exhibiting the attiudes toward Infidels that are drummed into us, that are right and according to the laws of Allah. Why should we act differently? Oh, and if we happen to act, as some of the Islamic websites tell us we can act, in accordance with the local laws — but only insofar as they do not contradict Islam — that is only because of darura, the doctrine of necessity — and that necessity, that darura, is of course only temporary.
      In other words, when in Rome, if you are Muslim, do any damn thing you please and justify it by saying you didn’t realize you were in Rome, or what the Romans did, and anyway, the Romans are Infidels so who cares what they do, or expect. A fascinating attitude. The sooner this is fully grasped by Infidels, the fewer victims, ultimately, there will be.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s