Muslim Mob Stabbed Police for stopping Cow Slaughter in India


Details of the event:

-Sansrod is a village in Karjan taluka of Vadodara district in central Gujarat. It is located next to national highway no.8. This Muslim dominated village has around 10,000 population. Village sarpanch is Muslim.cow slaughter-On Id-Ul-Zuha(Bakr Eid) day (Wednesday, 16th October 2013) Shinor police’s ASI Bhupendrasinh Gumansinh was in Karjan where Karjan CPI(Circle Police Inspector) Vala received information about slaughter of cows. The information was passed on by wellknown local animal right activist Jatin Vyas.

-A team of police visited Sansrod to raid the place where slaughter was being carried out. When police team reached, two deadbodies of calves were lying there, photos of which are published in some Gujarati newspapers today.

-Four butchers were caught red-handed. Later police involved itself in panchnama procedure.

-According to head constable/driver Bhagvangiri Shankargiri, suddenly there was a voice like a siren from the mosque. Soon a large mob of over 200 Muslims gathered there. Some of them were possessing sharp weapons.

-Bhupendrasinh was attacked with sharp weapon on his chest and back, and was also beaten up with bamboo stick.

-Other police men were injured in heavy stone pelting.

-PSI Sagar fired two rounds in air. 22 tear gas shells were lobbed.

-Muslims snatched PSI Sagar’s revolver and threw it to rain water channel. A JCB excavator machine was employed on urgent basis to recover revolver. After hours of efforts, revolver was found out.

-Police men FD Solanki, Rajendrasinh Lallubhai and Jesingbhai and Vanraj Bharwad ran away and had shelter in one house owned by local Hindu Vasantbhai Bhatt. Muslims surrounded the house from all sides and refused policemen to allow to leave. This situation continued for three hours.

-District police chief and other senior police officials got the details of the incident and rushed to the village, but choose to camp outside the village at Hindustan Petroleum pump on national highway no.8. District Collector, DySP and others also rushed to the the petrol pump.

-One police man abducted by villagers escaped successfully. He managed to get basic medical treatment nearby and reached petrol pump.

-At petrol pump, District police chief called local Muslim leaders one-by-one to talk about release of abducted policemen.

-Local Muslim leaders Altaf Yakul Saleh, Sarpanch Abbasbhai Asodwala and Babu Bavla made condition that they would free the abducted cops only in exchange of release of four butchers arrested from the village. The DSP clearly told Muslims, “this is not Kashmir. If you wish to kill abducted policemen, go ahead, we will do what we need to do, but culprits will not be released.”

-After 12.00 the three police men were released and taken to petrol pump in police vehicle. They said they were not harmed during abduction.

-According to a report in local newspaper, 200 strong mob gathered to attack the police men only after an announcement from mosque. Women were kept on front side. Police was first attacked with chilly powder, and later with stones.

-Those arrested are Ismael Ahmed Limdawala, Harukh Mohammadhussain Bau Diwan, Abdul Ibrahim Limdawala, Mayuddin Umarji Ghanina.

-Muslims torched one police jeep.

-Muslim teenagers blocked a road connecting to the village by putting a tree and a bullock cart to prevent police’s entry.

-Police has filed complaint against a mob of 100-124 persons. More than 39 were identified within ours.

-All 100-125 are now facing charged under sections 307, 326, 395, 397, 353, 186, 332, 333, 224, 427, 428, 429, 435, 201.

9.55: Police raided Sansrod village
10.20: Gau Raksha volunteer ran away to rescue his life.
10.28: Attack on police.
10.50: PSI and others injured taken to hospital.
11.03:DySP Usha Rada arrived and camped outside the village.
11.28: Police team was waiting for more force to arrive.
11.45: DSP Sandip Sinh arrived at petrol pump.
11.51: Village leader Altaf Saleh met DSP.
11.59: Sarpanch Abbas Asodwala arrived at petrol pump and met the DSP.
12.07: Village leader Babu Bavla met the DSP.
12.13: DSP held meeting with village leaders.
12.15: Police team went inside the village in a jeep with local Muslim leaders.
12.20:Three abducted police men were taken to petrol pump.
1.22: District collector reached petrol pump.
3.00:Range IG Anupamsinh Gehlot reached petrol pump and met the DSP.
6.15: Police complaint filed.

			

42 thoughts on “Muslim Mob Stabbed Police for stopping Cow Slaughter in India

  1. Exclusive offers, product discounts and complimentary gift bags will be available too
    all attendees. By gently exfoliating the surface over a series of weekly sessions, years of dull build up will be whisked
    away revealing a more beautiful you. I don’t have the money for tjat and besides, it’s pretty good exercise.

    • More bulls from India :

      Babulal Nagar a former Rajasthan minister, accused of rape!!

      The woman, in her report to the police, has alleged that the 53-year-old leader had raped and assaulted her at his official bungalow on September 11 after taking her there on the pretext of giving her a job.(ndtv)
      ———————————————–

      See what the Old Rooster cock-a-doodle-doos :

      “Don’t make me PM, make me the ‘chowkidaar’: Narendra Modi”!(ndtv)

      ‘chowkidaar’ of what he was asked and this money hungry cock said “Treasury” of India! It means he considers himself worth to become the minister of finance only and NOT PM’s job…his eyes, mind and heart is set to go for the treasury of India!

      His party currently has only 10 MPs from UP .. to get close to his Delhi DREAM, his party will have to perform considerably better in the next general elections. So according to him what will he do? The Old Cockerel ‘doos’ that he will go for the treasury with burning hands!

      Isn’t that a sign enough to show the Old Cockerel is a retard?

      • MUHAMMAD WOULD NEVER APPROVE OF RAPE

        It is against Islam to rape Muslim women, but Muhammad actually encouraged the rape of others captured in battle. This hadith provides the context for the Qur’anic verse (4:24):
        The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives.
        Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah were reluctant to have sexual intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24)
        “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)
        Actually, as the hadith indicates, it wasn’t Muhammad, but “Allah the Exalted” who told the men to rape the women in front of their husbands – which is all the more reason not to think of Islam as being the same as other religion.
        Note also that the husbands of these unfortunate victims were obviously alive after battle. This is important because it flatly contradicts those apologists who like to argue that the women Muhammad enslaved were widowed and thus unable to fend for themselves. (Even if the apologists were right, what sort of a moral code is it that forces a widow to choose between being raped and starving?)
        There are several other episodes in which Muhammad is offered the clear opportunity to disavow raping women – yet he instead offers advice on how to proceed. In one case, his men were reluctant to devalue their new slaves for later resale by getting them pregnant. Muhammad was asked about coitus interruptus in particular:
        “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.” (Bukhari 34:432)
        As indicated, the prophet of Islam did not mind his men raping the women, provided they ejaculated within the bodies of their victims.
        As one might imagine, Muhammad’s obvious approval of raping women captured in battle and his own personal participation as recorded in many places is of intense inconvenience to the Muslim apologists of our time. For this reason, some of them attempt to explain away these many episodes and Qur’anic references to sex with captives by pretending that these are cases in which women have fled bad marriages and sought refuge with the Muslims. Some apologists even refer to them as “wives,” even though the Qur’an makes a clear distinction between “those whom thy right hand possesses” and true wives (see Sura 33:50).
        Beyond the desperation of the 21st century apologist however, there is absolutely nothing in the historical text that supports this rosy revision of Muslim history. The women of the Banu Mustaliq were sold into slavery following their rape:
        “We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter” (Sahih Muslim 3371)
        In fact, female slaves were traded like any other simple commodity by Muhammad and his bad of devoted followers:
        “Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu’l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons.” (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham/Hisham 693)
        Is it Islamic to sell one’s wife for horses? Clearly these were not wives!
        More importantly, by definition a “captured” woman is not one who is fleeing her husband. She is fleeing her captor (ie. the Muslim slave raider). This hadith describes a typical raid, in which the women and children are captured as they are attempting to flee the attacking Muslims:
        “…and then we attacked from all sides and reached their watering-place where a battle was fought. Some of the enemies were killed and some were taken prisoners. I saw a group of persons that consisted of women and children [escaping in the distance]. I was afraid lest they should reach the mountain before me, so I shot an arrow between them and the mountain. When they saw the arrow, they stopped. So I brought them, driving them along” (Sahin Muslim 4345)
        The Muslim narrator (who happens to be Muhammad’s adopted son) sees the women trying to escape (following the massacre of their men) and cuts off their route by shooting an arrow into their path. These aren’t women trying to seek refuge with the Muslims. They are trying to avoid capture by the Muslims.
        The same hadith goes on to recount that Muhammad personally demanded one of the captured women for his own use:
        I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: “Give me that girl.” (Sahih Muslim 4345)

        The prophet of Islam and his companions used war to collect women for personal sexual use and for trading. Unless she was arbitrarily declared as someone’s wife, the woman became a sex slave. In no case was her fate tied to anything that she had personally done, nor was she given a choice about her future.

        THE RELIGION OF RAPE
        From the Islamic scriptures I will start with:
        Koran verse 004.024
        YUSUFALI: Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.
        The meaning of what “right hands possess” is explained in Islamic Law, the Koran, and the ahadith.
        “The Reliance of the Traveller, A Classic Manual of Islamic Scared Law”
        This book has the stamp of approval of Al Azhar, the highest learning Islamic school in the world.
        Justice Chapter: Jihad
        THE RULES OF WARFARE
        o9.13 When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.
        This is backed up by other Koran verses.
        033.050
        YUSUFALI: O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee;and daughters of thy paternal uncles and aunts, and daughters of thy maternal uncles and aunts, who migrated (from Makka) with thee; and any believing woman who dedicates her soul to the Prophet if the Prophet wishes to wed her;- this only for thee, and not for the Believers (at large); We know what We have appointed for them as to their wives and the captives whom their right hands possess;- in order that there should be no difficulty for thee. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
        008.069
        YUSUFALI: But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good: but fear Allah: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
        While Islam does not consider this rape, it sure sounds like kidnapping, slavery, and rape to me.
        The ahadith even go into more detail on how Mohammad approved of him, and his merry men raping women.
        Volume 5, Book 59, Number 459:
        Narrated Ibn Muhairiz:
        I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Said said, “We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and
        we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, ‘How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among us?” We asked (him) about it and he said, ‘It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist.”
        By Mohammad’s words we can see that he did not care that his men raped the women, nor did he care if the women were impregnated by their rapist. What a guy.
        After raiding a town and defeating the “enemy”, Mohammad picked a female captive of his own.
        Volume 3, Book 34, Number 437:
        Narrated Anas bin Malik:
        The Prophet came to Khaibar and when Allah made him victorious and he conquered the town by breaking the enemy’s defense, the beauty of Safiya bint Huyai bin Akhtab was mentioned to him and her husband had been killed while she was a bride. Allah’s Apostle selected her for himself and he set out in her company till he reached Sadd-ar-Rawha’ where her menses were over and he married her. Then Hais (a kind of meal) was prepared and served on a small leather sheet (used for serving meals). Allah’s Apostle then said to me, “Inform those who are around you (about the wedding banquet).” So that was the marriage banquet given by Allah’s Apostle for (his marriage with) Safiya. After that we proceeded to Medina and I saw that Allah’s Apostle was covering her with a cloak while she was behind him. Then he would sit beside his camel and let Safiya put her feet on his knees to ride (the camel).
        Are we really supposed to believe that Safiya willingly married Mohammad, after him and his army killed her husband? Only a blind following Muslim would believe that.
        Volume 5, Book 59, Number 513:
        Narrated ‘Abdul ‘Aziz bin Suhaib:
        Anas bin Malik said, “The Prophet took Safiya as a captive. He manumitted her and married her.” Thabit asked Anas, “What did he give her as Mahr (i.e. marriage gift)?” Anas replied. “Her Mahr was herself, for he manumitted her.”
        Here we read of the official rape, of what was obviously a petrified girl. (She was a Jewish girl that was 17 at the time.)
        Volume 5, Book 59, Number 523:
        Narrated Anas bin Malik:
        The Prophet stayed with Safiya bint Huyai for three days on the way of Khaibar where he consummated his marriage with her. Safiya was amongst those who were ordered to use a veil.
        KUWAIT ACTIVIST:
        “I HOPE THAT KUWAIT WILL ENACT A LAW FOR SEX SLAVES

        Translated from the original Arabic by Al Mutarjim

        This video (transcript below) was translated from a video posted on YouTube on May 25, 2011, by a female Kuwaiti activist and former candidate for Kuwaiti parliament, Salwa al-Mutairi, in which she called for a revival of the Islamic law for sex-slaves.
        Later she was interviewed about this by the Kuwaiti paper al-Siyasa; the translation of a story on that interview from al-Arabiya is also included below the transcript from the video.

        For more on this story, you can also read the articles posted by Raymond Ibrahim and Nonie Darwish a couple of weeks ago (special thanks to Nonie Darwish as well for sending this in and helping out with the translation).

        Peace, mercy, and blessings of Allah be upon you. My name is Salwa al-Mutairi. I received a message that was a little strange. A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. The topic that he brought up is an old topic. I have been working on it for two years now.

        I was working with this man, a young man, who (liked) women a lot. I was sympathetic to his situation, and also dedicated to my work. I was given the opportunity to visit Mecca, and when I did so, I brought up (this man’s) situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”
        The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
        “Is this forbidden by Islam?,” I asked.
        “Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not–she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”

        Of course, I also asked religious experts in Kuwait (about this issue), and they told me about the problem with the passionate man, or even the man who is committed to his religion. For every good man in our religion, the only solution for him–when forbidden women come around, if he’s tempted to sin, then the solution to this issue is for him to purchase sex slaves. I hope that Kuwait will enact the law for this category, this category of people–the sex slaves.

        I have also seen a situation in Kuwait, where a woman was abandoned by her family and so forth. She was given a home in Kuwait, where she cooked, and took care of the house, and helped out, and so forth. She was very much in a situation where she was like a slave. It is better to follow the shari’a like this than to go about doing that which is forbidden. Thankfully this house took her in, because her family abandoned her, and failed to shelter her.

        I hope that a law will be enacted for this category, and they will open the door for this, just as they have opened the door for servants (to come into the country). They should open the door for sex slaves, by enacting a sound law, so that our children don’t waste away in the abyss of adultery and moral depravity. Allah-willing, this will work out. I believe, look, the (sex slaves could come from) a country like Chechnya, where there is a war between an (Islamic) state and another state. Certainly there are prisoners. These prisoners could be purchased. They could be purchased and sold to the merchants in Kuwait. This is better than (the merchants) committing that which is forbidden. There is nothing wrong with this.

        Harun al-Rashid had many more sex slaves than this. When he died he had 2,000 sex slaves. But he only had one wife. This was not forbidden. Our shari’a permits such a thing as this. Praise be to Allah, here in Kuwait there are many merchants who are committed (to Islam). I hope the best for Kuwait, Allah-willing.
        Article translated from al-Arabiya, June 4, 2011:

        A female activist and former candidate for the Kuwaiti People’s Assembly, Salwa al-Mutairi, called for “the enactment of a law for sex-slaves, to protect men from corruption, and to prevent children from falling into the abyss of adultery.”

        Al-Mutairi said to the Kuwaiti journal “al-Siyasa, on Saturday, 4 June 2011, that “Many Kuwaitis resort to becoming (too) close with women, and forgetting their religion, and taking mistresses for themselves without marrying them. This leads to sin, the spread of disease, and children being born out of wedlock. This issue needs to be dealt with in a way that does not contradict the religion (of Islam), and in which men’s desires are provided for. This is something which cannot be accomplished except by resurrecting the system of sex slaves, and putting legal controls on its use.”

        She added that, “The female sex-slaves existed for the policy, because the religion (of Islam) permitted their possession, on condition that they were prisoners from raids carried out by Islamic countries against non-Muslim countries.” She suggested that the sex slaves be taken from Russian prisoners held in Chechnya, or from Russia or other countries.

        According to the former candidate, the law should be put in place quickly to establish an organization to bring the sex slaves and take ownership of them, in order to preserve the rights of both parties. Wherefore, she suggests that, “The one who desires to own the sex slave, should pay a price of 2,500 dinars. He should pay to the offices which bring the sex slaves, which will quickly establish offices which employ workers, 500 dinars. Two thousand dinars would be placed in an account for the sex slave, which she would not be able to access until 5 years after entering the care of her owner.”

        Al-Mutairi also proposes that, “A monthly salary be set at 50 dinars, to be withdrawn monthly from the account of the sex slave’s owner. Knowing that any citizen can own whatever sex slave he wants, this is done aiming to get rid of any motive for jealousy between (the sex slaves). It also would not be permitted to bring any sex slave under the age of 15, or over the age of 25. In the proposed law, these sex slaves would be termed “girlfriends of the house.” They should be treated with justice, and their rights to salary, care, and to pursue education, if they desire, should be maintained.”

        Al-Mutairi recorded her position on sex slaves in a video which was broadcast on the internet. To support the truth of her position, she cited the fact that Harun al-Rashid was married to one woman but had 2,000 sex slaves.

        EGYPTIAN SHAYKH:
        JIHAD IS SOLUTION TO MUSLIM’S FINANCIAL PROBLEMS
        Translated from the original Arabic by Al Mutarjim

        In this short audio file, prominent Egyptian Shaykh Abi-Ishaq al-Huwayni explains that Muslims’ financial difficulties are due to the fact that they have abandoned jihad.
        The solution? Go on jihadist raids a few times a year, and bring back prisoners, including women and children, which can be sold in the market “like groceries” to bring in extra income when times are tough.

        The subtitled video is below, and the transcript follows that (thanks to Nonie Darwish for sending this one in):

        We are in the era of jihad. The era of jihad has come over us, and jihad in the path of Allah is a pleasure. It is a real pleasure. The companions (of the Prophet) used to compete to (perform jihad). The poverty that we’re in—is it not due to our abandonment of jihad? But if we could conduct one, two, or three jihadist operations every year, many people throughout the earth would become Muslims. And whoever rejected this da’wa, or stood in our way, we would fight against him and take him prisoner, and confiscate his wealth, his children, and his women—all of this means money. Every mujahid who returned from jihad, his pockets would be full. He would return with 3 or 4 slaves, 3 or 4 women, and 3 or 4 children. Multiply each head by 300 dirhams, or 300 dinar, and you have a good amount of profit. If he were to go to the West and work on a commercial deal, he would not make that much money. Whenever things became difficult (financially), he could take the head (i.e. the prisoner) and sell it, and ease his (financial) crisis. He would sell it like groceries. Of those who are–(cuts off)

        SHAYKH AL-HUWAYNI:
        “When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her”
        Translated from the original Arabic by Al Mutarjim

        After Egyptian Shaykh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni’s controversial comments about jihad and slavery (see above) were published on YouTube, Facebook, and also in Egyptian press, he was given the opportunity to respond in a telephone interview aired on the Islamic satellite television station al-Hikma on May 22, 2011. In his approximately 20-minute response, he contended that his words in that clip were taken out of context–he was talking within the larger topic of offensive jihad. In this interview he explained the meaning of offensive jihad, and established through sources in the Qur’an and sayings of Muhammad that both offensive jihad and the taking of spoils of war, namely slaves and “sex-slaves,” are legitimate under Islam.

        The 20-minute interview has been condensed down to about 8 and a half minutes; the subtitled video is below, and the transcript follows:
        […] It is clear that offensive jihad, which I was talking about in that interview, that its purpose is to call people to Islam, and it is not permissible for anyone to hide the divine guidance from the people, under any name. They rejected Islam and the jizya, that’s it. The Prophet (PBUH) said:

        “If they refuse, then seek Allah’s aid and fight them.” If fighting occurs, there is going to be a winner and a loser. If the army of the Muslims is victorious, it will take spoils. Taking spoils is a fixed ruling in the Qur’an. Allah permitted it at the day of the Battle of Badr, as it is (recorded) in Surat al-Anfal.

        Allah Almighty said: “And know that out of all the booty that ye may acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to Allah,- and to the Messenger, and to near relatives, orphans, the needy, and the wayfarer,- if ye do believe in Allah and in the revelation We sent down to Our servant on the Day of Testing,- the Day of the meeting of the two forces. For Allah hath power over all things” [Qur’an 8:41].

        This (position) on spoils is clear. There is also the saying in the two Sahihs [Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim] from Abi-Hurayra, the first of which is, “One among the prophets (PBUH) raided…” In the other hadith from Yush’a bin Nun, the Prophet (PBUH) said, “When Allah saw our weakness, he made it permissible for us,” meaning spoils. The Prophet (PBUH) said, “Spoils were not permitted for any masters besides you.” Allah Almighty forbade (the taking of) spoils for all nations before us. He permitted it on the day of the Battle of Badr, as agreed to by all scholars. Not a single Muslim scholar has a problem with this.

        ‘Spoils’ refers to what? It refers to people and wealth. The people are those who are taken prisoner. I want to say that it is not at all permissible to take prisoners from among Muslims, even if they are heretics, because the rule for Muslims is that they are free, and not prisoners. Jihad, as I stated in the beginning, is between Muslims and non-Muslims, from among the infidels. But if two Muslims fought each other, like from Iraq and Iran for example; if Iraq invaded Iran to occupy it, it would not be permissible for an Iraqi man to take a Shi’ite woman captive, because she is Muslim, even though she’s a heretic. Likewise if Iran invaded Iraq, it would not be permissible for one of their men to take a Muslim woman captive, because she is free.

        Therefore jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. That between Muslims and Muslims is called oppression, or fighting: “If two parties among the believers fall into a quarrel…” [Qur’an 49:9]. They are called ‘believers,’ and this name is not taken from them, even though they are fighting. “If one of them transgresses beyond bounds against the other, then fight ye (all) against the one that transgresses…” Here they are called transgressors, but the name of believers is still not taken away from them. In the verse directly following this one, Allah Almighty says: “The believers are but a single brotherhood…” They were brothers, even though a party of them transgressed against the other, and some of them fought each other. But the name of believers was not taken from them.
        Do you understand what I’m saying? Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars–there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.

        When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Qur’an 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point–there is no disagreement from any of them.
        These are called slaves. The Prophet (PBUH) talked about them in the hadith narrated by al-Bukhari in his Book of Jihad:

        “Allah is delighted at a people who enter the Garden in chains.” Also as narrated by Abu-Dawud: “They are led to the Garden in chains.” Naturally, many people might not understand someone being jerked along in chains in order to enter the Garden. This is because all people, even the worst of the unbelievers, say the garden is for them and no others. They run to the Garden without anybody pulling them in chains.
        The meaning of the hadith is this: these slaves were in a religion other than Islam. However, when they were conquered, and defeated, and taken prisoner, they came to live in the land of Islam. Then when they witnessed the justice, compassion, and mercy of Islam, they became Muslims. These did not convert to Islam except in the chains of war. If they had not been chained, bound, and had their freedom taken from them, they would not have converted to Islam. Therefore this hadith is referring to these slaves.
        I am very shocked and surprised at those who say that we permit slavery. We don’t call people to become slaves. In fact, there are vows to free the necks (i.e. slaves). The same Islam which permits us to take slaves, also urges us to free their necks.
        […]
        I am very shocked, for example, by a country like the United States or others like it which occupies the inhabitants of the earth. It doesn’t enslave individuals, but rather it enslaves entire countries. What is being done in Afghanistan? What is being done in Iraq? What is being done with regards to dividing up Sudan? Those who are in Chechnya, or Eritrea, or any Muslim country are being burned, and taken and thrown in prisons and in Guantanamo and so forth. They say that this is a war against terrorism. This action is the same as slavery, but it is injustice and aggression. But Islam in the case of Chosroes was not like that.

        I have entered into the well-known conditions and restrictions (on offensive jihad), of which I mentioned only a few, because it is a long topic. I know that I am in an interview, and perhaps I have carried on too long for your guests. But I will close Allah-willing, and I won’t go on more than a couple of minutes. I say that this is requisite with the justice, mercy, and care of Islam for the slaves. Yet they still come and blame us for this supposed blemish, while they are guilty of the same thing many times over. They are tyrants and oppressors who attack the lands of the Muslims especially, more than they do any others. Now when I say spoils, it does not refer only to money, but it also means slaves.

        When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her. I choose the man I like, one with strong muscles, or if I want a boy to work in the house, and so forth. I choose one, and pay him a wage. I employ him in a variety of different tasks, and then I sell him afterwards. Now, the country that I entered and took captive its men and women–does it not also have money, gold, and silver? Is that not money? When I say that jihad–offensive jihad–with the well-known conditions that I already mentioned from the hadith of the Prophet (PBUH), from the hadith of Burayda in Sahih Muslim, the coffers of the Muslims were full. Would someone who is pious and intelligent–would he say that this is a type of poverty? Or that it is a type of wealth? No–this will fill the coffers of the Muslims with riches and wealth, but as we said, with the recognized conditions. […]

        ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF ALLAH.

        ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED THE RAPE OF FEMALE CAPTIVES:

        RAPE JIHAD:

        Sahih Muslim Book 08. N 3371Marriage

        Chapter: Al-Azl (incomplete sexual intercourse): Coitus Interruptus.

        Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women;

        and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them.
        So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him?

        So we asked Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

        REMEMBER:

        ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF GOD

        ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED RAPE

        Al-‘Azl
        Al-‘Azl, (العزل) also known as coitus interruptus, is the practice of having sexual intercourse with a woman but withdrawing the penis before ejaculation. Apparently al-‘Azl with female captives and slaves was a pretty important topic for Muhammad and his companions as evidenced by the abundance of Hadith material on the subject.
        Practiced during Muhammad’s lifetime & ALL OVER EUROPE TODAY
        Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle .
        Sahih Bukhari 7:62:135
        Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interrupt us while the Quran was being revealed. Jabir added: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle while the Quran was being Revealed.
        Sahih Bukhari 7:62:136
        When RAPING your captive, it’s better if you do not pull out at the end
        THIS IS ISLAM

        Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus(RAPE WITHOUT PREGNANCY)?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to PULL OUT. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.”

        Sahih Bukhari 3:34:432

        Abu Said said, “We went with Allah’s Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the ‘Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah’s Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence.”
        Sahih Bukhari 3:46:718

        We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. ………
        We asked (him) about it and he said, “It is better for you not to PULL OUT, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist.”
        Sahih Bukhari 5:59:459

        Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: That during the battle with Bani Al-Mustaliq they (Muslims) captured females and wanted sexual relation with them without impregnating them. So they asked the Prophet about coitus interruptus. He said, “It is better that you leave it in, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.” Qaza’a said, “I heard Abu Sa’id saying that the Prophet said, ‘No soul is ordained to be created but Allah will create it.”
        Sahih Bukhari 9:93:506

        RAPE JIHAD
        Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah’s Apostle about it and he said, “Do you really do that?” repeating the question thrice, “There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection.”
        Sahih Bukhari 7:62:137

        THE REASON WHY THERE ARE FEW VIRGINS LEFT!

        Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: That while he was sitting with the Prophet a man from the Ansar came and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get slave girls from the war captives and we love property; what do you think about coitus interruptus?” Allah’s Apostle said, “Do you do that? It is better for you not to pull out, for there is no soul which Allah has ordained to come into existence but will be created.”
        Sahih Bukhari 8:77:600
        Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.
        Sahih Muslim 8:3371, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3372
        Yahya related to me from Malik from Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman from Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Habban that Ibn Muhayriz said, “I went into the mosque and saw Abu Said al-Khudri and so I sat by him and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said al-Khudri said, ‘We went out with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, on the expedition to the Banu al-Mustaliq. We took some Arabs prisoner, and we desired the women as celibacy was hard for us. We wanted the ransom, so we wanted to practise coitus interruptus. We said, ‘Shall we practise coitus interruptus while the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, is among us before we ask him?’ We asked him about that and he said, ‘You don’t have to not do it. There is no self which is to come into existence up to the Day of Rising but that it will come into existence.’ ”
        Al-Muwatta 29 32.95b
        It’s okay to practice ‘azl when having sex with your slave-girl
        Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri: A man said: Apostle of Allah, I have a slave-girl and I withdraw the penis from her (while having intercourse), and I dislike that she becomes pregnant. I intend (by intercourse) what the men intend by it. The Jews say that withdrawing the penis (azl) is burying the living girls on a small scale. He (the Prophet) said: The Jews told a lie. If Allah intends to create it, you cannot turn it away.
        Abu Dawud 11:2166
        Jabir (Allah be pleased with him) reported that a man came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: I have a slave-girl who is our servant and she carries water for us and I have intercourse with her, but I do not want her to conceive. He said: Practise ‘azl, if you so like, but what is decreed for her will come to her. The person stayed back (for some time) and then came and said: The girl has become pregnant, whereupon he said: I told you what was decreed for her would come to her.
        Sahih Muslim 8:3383
        Your slave-girl is your field, so water it or leave it thirsty if you want
        Yahya related to me from Malik from Damra ibn Said al-Mazini from al-Hajjaj ibn Amr ibn Ghaziya that he was sitting with Zayd ibn Thabit when Ibn Fahd came to him. He was from the Yemen. He said, “Abu Said! I have slave-girls. None of the wives in my keep are more pleasing to me than them, and not all of them please me so much that I want a child by them, shall I then practise coitus interruptus?” Zayd ibn Thabit said, “Give an opinion, Hajjaj!” “I said, ‘May Allah forgive you! We sit with you in order to learn from you!’ He said, ‘Give an opinion! ‘I said, ‘She is your field, if you wish, water it, and if you wish, leave it thirsty. I heard that from Zayd.’ Zayd said, ‘He has spoken the truth.’ ”
        Al-Muwatta 29 32.99b
        “You don’t need your slave-girl’s permission to practice ‘azl with her.”
        Yahya related to me from Malik from Humayd ibn Qays al-Makki that a man called Dhafif said that Ibn Abbas was asked about coitus interruptus. He called a slave-girl of his and said, “Tell them.” She was embarrassed. He said, “It is alright, and I do it myself.” Malik said, “A man does not practise coitus interruptus with a free woman unless she gives her permission. There is no harm in practising coitus interruptus with a slave-girl without her permission. Someone who has someone else’s slave-girl as a wife, does not practise coitus interruptus with her unless her people give him permission.”
        Al-Muwatta 29 32.100b
        Additional Hadith about ‘azl
        Sahih Muslim
        Sa’d b. Abu Waqqas (Allah be pleased with him) reported that a person came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: I do ‘azi with my wife. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Why do you do that? The person said: I fear harm to her child or her children. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (way peace be upon him) said: If that were harmful it would harm the Persians and the Greeks.
        Sahih Muslim 8:3394
        Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl with them. We then asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) about it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born until the Day of judgment must be born.
        Sahih Muslim 8:3373
        Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) (was asked if he had heard it himself), to which he said: Yes. (I heard) Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: There is no harm if you do not practise it, for it (the birth of the child) is something ordained (by Allah).
        Sahih Muslim 8:3374, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3375
        Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) was asked about ‘azl, whereupon he said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for it (the birth of the child) is something ordained. Muhammad (one of the narrators) said: (The words) La ‘alaykum (there is no harm) implies its Prohibition.
        Sahih Muslim 8:3376
        Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that mention was made of ‘azl in the presence of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) whereupon he said: Why do you practise it? They said: There is a man whose wife has to suckle the child, and if that person has a sexual intercourse with her (she may conceive) which he does not like, and there is another person who has a slave-girl and he has a sexual intercourse with her, but he does not like her to have conception so that she may not become Umm Walad, whereupon he (the Holy Prophet) said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for that (the birth of the child) is something pre- ordained. Ibn ‘Aun said: I made a mention of this hadith to Hasan, and he said: By Allah, (it seems) as if there is upbraiding in it (for ‘azl).
        Sahih Muslim 8:3377, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3378 and Sahih Muslim 8:3379
        Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: Mention was made about al-‘azl in the presence of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), whereupon he said: Why any one of you practises it? (He did not say: One of you should not do it), for there is no created soul, whose creator is not Allah.
        Sahih Muslim 8:3380
        Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) was asked about ‘azl, whereupon he said: The child does not come from all the liquid (sermen) and when Allah intends to create anything nothing can prevent it (from coming into existence).
        Sahih Muslim 8:3381, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3382
        Jabir b. ‘Abdullah (Allah be pleased with them) reported that a person asked Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) saying: I have a slave-girl and I practise ‘azl with her, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: This cannot prevent that which Allah has decreed. The person then came (after some time) and said: Messenger of Allah, the slave-girl about whom I talked to you has conceived, whereupon Allah’s Messeuger (may peace be upon him) said: I am the servant of Allah and His Messenger.
        Sahih Muslim 8:3384
        Al-Muwatta
        Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’n-Nadr, the mawla of Umar ibn Ubaydullah from Amir ibn Sad ibn Abi Waqqas from his father that he used to practise coitus interruptus.
        Al-Muwatta 29 32.96b
        Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’n-Nadr, the mawla of Umar ibn Ubaydullah from Ibn Aflah, the mawla of Abu Ayyub al-Ansari from an umm walad of Abu Ayyubal-Ansari that he practised coitus interruptus.
        Al-Muwatta 29 32.97b
        Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar did not practise coitus interruptus and thought that it was disapproved.
        Al-Muwatta 29 32.98b
        Yahya said that Malik related from Ibn Shihab from Salim ibn Abdullah ibn Umar from his father that Umar ibn al-Khattab said, “What’s the matter with men who have intercourse with their slave-girls and then dismiss them? No slave-girl comes to me whose master confesses that he has had intercourse with her but that I connect her child to him, whether or not he has practised coitus interruptus or stopped having intercourse with her.”
        Al-Muwatta 36 23.24b
        Malik related to me from Nafi that Safiyya bint Abi Ubayd informed him that Umar ibn al-Khattab said, “What is the matter with men who have intercourse with their slave-girls and then leave them to go? No slave-girl comes to me whose master confesses that he has had intercourse with her but that I connect her child to him, whether or not he has practised coitus interruptus or left off from intercourse with her.” Yahya said that he heard Malik say, “What is done in our community about an umm walad who commits a crime is that her master is liable for what she has done up to her value. He does not have to surrender her, and he cannot be made to bear more than her value for her crime.”
        Al-Muwatta 36 23.25b
        “I’ll SEND THAT KUFFAR BITCH STRAIGHT TO HELL”!
        Groomed for sex then thrown into a canal and killed: Life for man who murdered white girl for ‘shaming’ Muslim family
        By Paul Sims
        UPDATED: 08:16 GMT, 22 December 2011

        A vulnerable teenager was stabbed and thrown into a canal to die after she brought ‘shame’ on an Asian family, a court heard yesterday.
        Laura Wilson, 17, who was groomed for sex by a string of British Pakistani men, was repeatedly knifed by 18-year-old Ashtiaq Asghar.

        He then pushed her into the water, using the point of the knife to force her head below the surface as she fought to stay alive.

        Laura Wilson had a brief fling with near neighbour Ishaq Hussain, 22, and gave birth to their daughter in June last year but he refused to accept the child was his, the court was told

        Asghar was furious after the young mother revealed details of their sexual relationship to his Muslim family and was on ‘a mission to kill’, the court was told.

        He exchanged a series of texts with married friend and mentor Ishaq Hussain, 22, who had also had an affair with Laura, and who the judge described as a man who regarded white girls as ‘sexual targets, not human beings’.

        In one message, sent a day before he killed Miss Wilson, Asghar wrote: ‘I’m gonna send that kuffar (non-Muslim) bitch straight to Hell.’

        Ashtiaq Asghar admitted murdering the 17-year-old after making a dramatic plea-change mid-way through trial

        In another he wrote: ‘I need to do a mission.’ He talked of buying a pistol and ‘making some beans on toast’, a reference to spilling blood used in Four Lions, a satirical film about suicide bombers.

        Last night, Asghar was told he must serve a minimum of 17-and-a-half years after he pleaded guilty to murder and was jailed for life. Mr Hussain was acquitted of murder by joint enterprise after a retrial.

        Sentencing Asghar, Lord Justice Davis told him: ‘I take the view you came under the influence of Mr Hussain who is something of a mentor to you.

        ‘He seems to have regarded girls, white girls, simply as sexual targets. He does not treat them as human beings at all. You got into that mindset yourself.
        ‘You no doubt once had feelings for Laura but treated her with contempt in the latter stages.’

        The judge added: ‘I am sure there was a plan between you and Mr Hussain and that was a plan initiated by you.

        ‘You talked about getting out your hit list. Mr Hussain then encouraged you in it. I am quite sure he was lying when he said there was no plan.’

        After killing Miss Wilson he went to a snooker hall ‘without a care in the world’ and tried to hide the evidence.

        Miss Wilson was a troubled teenager who was first identified as being at risk of sexual exploitation by British Pakistani men when she was 12.
        She had developed several links with Asian men in her home town of Rotherham, South Yorkshire.

        In 2007, when she was 13, she and her family appeared on The Jeremy Kyle Show. During the programme – about out-of-control children – her sister warned her that ‘your attitude is going to get you in big danger’.

        Workers at a child sexual exploitation project later sent a report to social services, but no action was taken to remove her from what became a continuing spiral of sexual abuse.
        By the time she was 16, she had embarked on an affair with Mr Hussain, who was then 20 and already married.

        The teenager’s body was found in this canal in Rotherham, Yorkshire
        She gave birth to a daughter in June last year, but Mr Hussain refused to accept that the child was his.

        Four months later, and just days before she was murdered on October 12, she ‘shamed’ Asghar and Mr Hussain by informing their families of her relationship with both men.
        She told Asghar’s mother she loved her son and ‘wanted to have babies’ by him. But Mrs Asghar was furious and attempted to hit Miss Wilson with a shoe, branding her ‘a dirty white bitch’ who should ‘keep your legs closed’, the trial was told.

        Nicholas Campbell QC, prosecuting, said that in subsequent text messages Asghar mounted ‘a mission to kill Laura Wilson’.

        Asghar and Mr Hussain had decided that Miss Wilson was ‘a loose cannon and they had to get rid of her’, Sheffield Crown Court was told.

        Asghar then lured her to a late-night meeting by the Sheffield and Keadby Canal near her home and stabbed her several times. One wound was seven inches deep.

        Rotherham Safeguarding Children Board, which co-ordinates agency work, undertook a serious case review after Miss Wilson’s murder but its findings have not been published.
        Earlier this year, the issue of vulnerable white girls being targeted by Asian men for sex prompted Jack Straw, the former home secretary, to claim some British Pakistani men regard white girls as ‘easy meat’.

        He spoke out after two Asian men who raped girls in Derby were given indefinite jail terms.

        ‘We need to get the Pakistani community to think much more clearly about why this is going on and to be more open about the problems that are leading to a number of Pakistani heritage men thinking it is OK to target white girls in this way,’ he said.

        Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2077205/Teenage-mother-stabbed-death-thrown-canal-bringing-shame-family.html#ixzz1rLeygNdR

        Does Islam allow Muslims to rape female sex-slaves or keep unmarried concubines?

        By Abu Amina Elias for FaithinAllah.org

        Question:
        Your book says, “Those who guard their private parts, except from their wives or those whom their right hands possess…” (70:29-30). Does this mean Muslims can keep unmarried concubines and female sex-slaves they can rape whenever they want?
        Answer:
        In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful
        Islam encourages the freeing of slaves and their joining in marriage as a means for their emancipation and the improvement of their status in society, and Islam forbids rape in all cases as it is a major sin in the category of adultery.
        Regarding the marriage of slaves, Allah says:
        وَمَن لَّمْ يَسْتَطِعْ مِنكُمْ طَوْلًا أَن يَنكِحَ الْمُحْصَنَاتِ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ فَمِن مَّا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُم مِّن فَتَيَاتِكُمُ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَمُ بِإِيمَانِكُم بَعْضُكُم مِّن بَعْضٍ فَانكِحُوهُنَّ بِإِذْنِ أَهْلِهِنَّ وَآتُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ مُحْصَنَاتٍ غَيْرَ مُسَافِحَاتٍ وَلَا مُتَّخِذَاتِ أَخْدَانٍ
        Whoever among you cannot find the means to marry free, believing women, then he may marry from those whom your right hands possess of believing slave girls, and Allah is most knowing about your faith. You believers are of one another. So marry them with the permission of their people and give them their due compensation according to what is acceptable. They should be chaste, neither of those who commit unlawful intercourse randomly nor those who take secret lovers.
        Surah An-Nisa 4:25
        Muhammad Asad comments on this verse:
        Contrary to the popular view and the practice of many Muslims in the past centuries, neither the Quran nor the life-example of the Prophet provides any sanction for sexual intercourse without marriage…
        Literally, “and not taking unto themselves secret love-companions.” This passage lays down in an unequivocal manner that sexual relations with female slaves are permitted only on the basis of marriage, and that in this respect there is no difference between them and free women; consequently, concubinage is ruled out.
        Source: Message of the Quran, verses 4:3 and 4:25
        Likewise, Allah says in another verse:
        وَأَنكِحُوا الْأَيَامَىٰ مِنكُمْ وَالصَّالِحِينَ مِنْ عِبَادِكُمْ وَإِمَائِكُمْ إِن يَكُونُوا فُقَرَاءَ يُغْنِهِمُ اللَّهُ مِن فَضْلِهِ وَاللَّهُ وَاسِعٌ عَلِيمٌ
        Marry the unmarried among you and the righteous among your male slaves and female slaves. If they should be poor, Allah will enrich them from His bounty, and Allah is All-Encompassing and Knowing.
        Surah An-Nur 24:32
        In the original Arabic, the verb “marry” (ankihu) is in the imperative form, meaning that the Muslims have been commanded to marry their slaves. For this reason, Muhammad Asad says:
        As in verse 4:25, the above verse rules out all forms of concubinage and postulates marriage as the only basis of lawful sexual relations between a man and his female slave.
        Source: Message of the Quran, verse 24:32
        Regarding the freeing of slaves, this is a virtue mentioned in the Quran. Allah says:
        وَمَا أَدْرَاكَ مَا الْعَقَبَةُ فَكُّ رَقَبَةٍ
        What will make you know what is the difficult path (to Paradise)? It is the freeing of a slave…
        Surah Al-Balad 90:12-13
        The Prophet encouraged the Muslims to marry their female slaves as a means toward their emancipation.
        Abu Burda reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
        وَرَجُلٌ كَانَتْ عِنْدَهُ أَمَةٌ فَأَدَّبَهَا فَأَحْسَنَ تَأْدِيبَهَا وَعَلَّمَهَا فَأَحْسَنَ تَعْلِيمَهَا ثُمَّ أَعْتَقَهَا فَتَزَوَّجَهَا فَلَهُ أَجْرَانِ
        There is a double reward for a man who owns a servant girl and he mentors her, teaches her beautiful manners, educates her in the best way, and then he emancipates her and marries her.
        Source: Sahih Bukhari 97, Grade: Sahih
        Abu Musa reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
        مَنْ أَعْتَقَ جَارِيَتَهُ وَتَزَوَّجَهَا كَانَ لَهُ أَجْرَانِ
        Whoever frees his slave-girl and then marries her will have a double reward.
        Source: Sunan Abu Dawud 2053, Grade: Sahih
        Not only did the Prophet preach this, he practiced it in his personal life.
        Anas ibn Malik reported:
        النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَعْتَقَ صَفِيَّةَ وَجَعَلَ عِتْقَهَا صَدَاقَهَا
        The Prophet emancipated Safiya and made her emancipation as her marriage dowry.
        Source: Sahih Bukhari 4798, Grade: Mutafiqun Alayhi
        Furthermore, some of the companions of the Prophet considered sexual intercourse with slave-girls to be equivalent to adultery.
        Habeeb ibn Salim reported: A man had sexual intercourse with the servant girl of his wife, so the matter was referred to Nu’man ibn Basheer. He said:
        لَأَقْضِيَنَّ فِيهَا بِقَضَاءِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ لَئِنْ كَانَتْ أَحَلَّتْهَا لَهُ لَأَجْلِدَنَّهُ مِائَةً وَإِنْ لَمْ تَكُنْ أَحَلَّتْهَا لَهُ رَجَمْتُهُ
        I will judge them according to the judgment of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him. If his wife had given him permission, I will lash him one hundred times; and if she did not give him permission, I will stone him.
        Source: Sunan At-Tirmidhi 1451, Grade: Hasan
        Regarding the crime of rape, the Prophet applied the legal punishment of adultery to those who committed this terrible crime.
        Abu Alqama reported: A women went out to pray during the time of the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and she was met by a man who attacked her and raped her. She said, “This man has done such-and-such to me!” The Prophet said to the man who attacked her:
        ارْجُمُوهُ
        He is condemned to death.
        Source: Sunan Abu Dawud 4379, Grade: Hasan
        Likewise, in the time of the Caliph Umar, a man was condemned to death for raping a female captive he had acquired during the war.
        Harun ibn Al-Asim reported: Umar ibn Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, sent Khalid ibn Al-Waleed with the army and Khalid sent Dirar ibn Al-Azwar along with a company and they invaded a district belonging to the tribe of Asad. They captured a beautiful girl and Dirar was impressed with her. He asked his companions to give her to him and they did, then he had intercourse with her. A letter was sent to Umar and he replied:
        فَكَتَبَ عُمَرُ أَنْ أَرْضِخْهُ بِالْحِجَارَةِ
        He should be stoned to death.
        Source: Sunan Al-Kubra Al-Bayhaqi 16761
        For these reasons, the founding jurists of the schools of Islamic law considered the crime of rape to be in the category of adultery.
        Ash-Shafi’ee said:
        وَإِذَا اغْتَصَبَ الرَّجُلُ الْجَارِيَةَ ثُمَّ وَطِئَهَا بَعْدَ الْغَصْبِ وَهُوَ مِنْ غَيْرِ أَهْلِ الْجَهَالَةِ أُخِذَتْ مِنْهُ الْجَارِيَةُ وَالْعُقْرُ وَأُقِيمَ عَلَيْهِ حَدُّ الزِّنَا
        If a man acquires a slave girl by force and then he rapes her – and he is not an ignorant person – then the slave girl is taken from him. He must pay the fine and the legal punishment for adultery will be applied to him.
        Source: Al-Umm 253
        It is also untrue, as some anti-Muslim websites have claimed, that a woman who is raped should be punished.
        Malik said:
        وَالْعُقُوبَةُ فِي ذَلِكَ عَلَى الْمُغْتَصِبِ وَلَا عُقُوبَةَ عَلَى الْمُغْتَصَبَةِ فِي ذَلِكَ كُلِّهِ
        The legal punishment is applied to the rapist and there is no punishment for the woman who was raped in any case.
        Source: Muwatta 1418
        In conclusion, it is not lawful for a Muslim man to rape a woman under any circumstances. Rather, the only lawful sexual relations in Islam are those in a valid marriage between a man and a woman.
        Success comes from Allah, and Allah knows best.
        Related Articles:
        • Benefits of Marriage in Islam: Faith, Family, Society, and Love
        • Are women inferior or deficient in religion, reason, and testimony?
        • Does the Quran let Muslims beat their wives?
        • An-Nawawi on Kindness to Women
        • Why does Islam allow polygamy and plural marriages?
        Tags: Community الجماعة, Compulsion إكراه, Islamophobia الخوف من الإسلام, Manners الأدب, Marriage نكاح, Prophetic Biography السيرة, Public Welfare مصلحة, Slavery استعباد, Women النساء
        Category: Noble Qur’an
        – See more at: http://www.faithinallah.org/does-islam-allow-muslims-to-rape-female-sex-slaves-or-keep-unmarried-concubines/#sthash.cYHrRd6y.dpuf

    • You guys didn’t learn from Gujarat or Muzaffarnagar? Go on like this and they will be a tea party compared to what happens to you people in the future. You can’t poke the majority in the eye and expect communal peace. Unfortunately it’s your women and innocents in your community who bear the brunt of the retribution since you cowards run away at the first sign of danger

  2. Raj, you have really twisted the whole story which goes like this :

    Mob attacks police for raiding illegal abattoir; six hurt! This happened in the Old Cockerel’s home area of Gujarat, Vadodara.

    You must understand that the Muslims were NOT slaughtering the cows in an open place but in an abattoir but since the Old Cockerel has been imposing Laws to suit his personal beliefs thus disregarding the beliefs of others, he has made it illegal in Gujarat imposing fines up to seven years!

    In which country in the world is the cattle slaughter banned besides some states in India? Why do those states ban cattle slaughter when it is sanctioned in their scriptures???????

    (zeenews.india.com/news/gujarat/guj-mob-attacks-police-for-raiding-illegal-abattoir-six-hurt_883703.htm)

    India produced 3.643 million metric tons of beef in 2012, of which 1.963 million metric tons was consumed domestically and 1.680 million metric tons was exported. India ranks 5th in the world in beef production, 7th in domestic consumption and 1st in exporting.[5] Most of the exported beef is buffalo meat.(wiki)

    In several cases, such as Mohd. Hanif Qureshi v. State of Bihar (AIR 1959 SCR 629), Hashumatullah v. State of Madhya Pradesh, Abdul Hakim and others v. State of Bihar (AIR 1961 SC 448) and Mohd. Faruk v. State of Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court has held that, “A total ban [on cattle slaughter] was not permissible if, under economic conditions, keeping useless bull or bullock be a burden on the society and therefore not in the public interest.”

    Why do you distort stories Raj???

  3. Neetu Dabodia, Delhi’s top gangster, killed in encounter!!

    A man on Delhi Police’s most wanted list, Neetu Dabodia, was killed…including two of Dabodia’s aides were also killed in the encounter that took place near a hotel in Vasant Kunj area of south Delhi.

    He was involved in several cases of extortion, contract killing and murder and carried a reward of Rs. seven lakh. Dabodia had escaped from Haryana Police’s custody in August last year when he was being brought from Saket court from Bhondsi Jail in Gurgaon.(ndtv)

    Was he a muslim???…why are such dudes not labelled “hindu terrorists”???????

    ____________________

    A sleeping Gold Smuggler!

    The passenger, V Habeer of Ramanathapuram of Tamil Nadu had kept the gold bars in his laptop bag when he embarked the flight, had planned to tape the gold bars on his leg inside the toilet just before the flight landed at Kochi.

    However, his plans went haywire as he dozed off and woke up after the flight reached Kochi airport at 5:20 am yesterday and the passengers had started disembarking, customs sources said. This passenger, who was arrested before he left Kochi airport, was booked under the Customs Act, 1962.(ndtv)

    Why is gold so much worshipped in India? Why doesn’t Mama Laxshmi bring diamonds from saturn and distribute it to all the Indians?….maybe she will not help them because the Indian dudes worship her for money’s sake! If this Mama was to…. to become poor would the Hindus ever worship her ever again?…maybe she should become an ascetic as Buddha!

    • Plum,

      I think you are learned enough to know the difference between gangster, terrorist, rapist and etc..

      You yourself know why he is not labelled as a terrorist, leave aside Hindu terrorist.. Muslims have purchased the copyright of the word Terrorism, and it is exclusive for them only..

      Thanks

          • Raj, see Be Good, Do Good in Islam :

            25:63 And the servants of (Allah) Most Gracious are those who walk on the earth in humility, and when the ignorant address them, they say, “Peace!”

            31:18 Turn not thy cheek in scorn toward folk, nor walk with pertness in the land. Lo! Allah loveth not each braggart boaster.

            5:8 O ye who believe! Be steadfast witnesses for Allah in equity, and let not hatred of any people seduce you that ye deal not justly. Deal justly, that is nearer to your duty.

            42:40 The guerdon of an ill-deed is an ill the like thereof. But whosoever pardoneth and amendeth, his wage is the affair of Allah. Lo! He loveth not wrong-doers.

            And finally : “Thy Lord hath decreed that ye worship none but Him, and that ye be kind to parents. Whether one or both of them attain old age in thy life, say not to them a word of contempt, nor repel them, but address them in terms of honor. And out of kindness, lower to them the wing of humility, and say: ‘My Lord! bestow on them Thy Mercy even as they cherished me in childhood’ “(17:23-24).

            And many more in the Quran…the best guidance on morality too!!

            Regards

            Plum

          • Plum,

            See, Don’t be good to Non-Muslims

            Quran 47:35:So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and Allah is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds.

            Quran 2:216: Fighting has been enjoined upon you while it is hateful to you. But perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you; and perhaps you love a thing and it is bad for you. And Allah Knows, while you know not.

            Quran 4:74: So let those fight in the cause of Allah who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter. And he who fights in the cause of Allah and is killed or achieves victory – We will bestow upon him a great reward.

            Quran: 47: 4: So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islam), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allah to continue in carrying out Jihad against the disbelievers till they embrace Islam (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been Allah’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost,

            Quran: 9:14: Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people,

            Quran:9:73: O Prophet, fight against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and be harsh upon them. And their refuge is Hell, and wretched is the destination.

            Quran: 61:4: Verily, Allah loves those who fight in His Cause in rows (ranks) as if they were a solid structure.

            There are much much more verses, than I have provided you here.

            Thanks

          • Raj, the verses that you quoted : 47:35, 2:216, 4:74, 47:4, 9:14, 9:73 and 61:14 all either encourage the believers to strive against unbelievers when they pose any threat to Islam or not to weaken in the battle field. Islam is NOT a dandia playing religion nor Muslims are to become softies but to persevere with patience however hard the battle.

            That is what every country legislates in its constitution for the citizens. Doesn’t the Indian Constitution say that too on those who dishonour the country, rebels and militants, mischief makers, spies, corruption, etc…?

            The above verses that you quoted are not in any violation of :

            25:63 And the servants of (Allah) Most Gracious are those who walk on the earth in humility, and when the ignorant address them, they say, “Peace!”

            31:18 Turn not thy cheek in scorn toward folk, nor walk with pertness in the land. Lo! Allah loveth not each braggart boaster.

            5:8 O ye who believe! Be steadfast witnesses for Allah in equity, and let not hatred of any people seduce you that ye deal not justly. Deal justly, that is nearer to your duty.

            42:40 The guerdon of an ill-deed is an ill the like thereof. But whosoever pardoneth and amendeth, his wage is the affair of Allah. Lo! He loveth not wrong-doers.

            Regards

            Plum

        • THE REAL HISTORY OF THE RELIGION OF PEACE:

          REAL ISLAM & JIHAD

          Early History of Peaceful Islam:

          Islamic leaders and politicians constantly tell us in English that “Islam is a peaceful religion”, but one can’t help wondering if they would say it quite so often if they were absolutely sure it was true.

          Some recorded massacres of Muslim history:

          On December 30, 1066, Joseph HaNagid, the Jewish vizier of Granada, Spain, was crucified by an Arab mob that proceeded to raze the Jewish quarter of the city and slaughtered its 5,000 inhabitants. The riot was apparently incited by Muslim preachers that had angrily objected to what they saw as inordinate Jewish political power. Similarly, in 1465, Arab mobs in Fez slaughtered thousands of Jews, leaving only 11 alive, after a Jewish deputy vizier treated a Muslim woman in “an offensive manner.” The killings touched off a wave of similar massacres throughout Morocco. Other mass murders of Jews in Arab lands occurred in Morocco in the 8th century, where whole communities were wiped out by Muslim ruler Idris I; North Africa in the 12th century, where the Almohads either forcibly converted or decimated several communities; Libya in 1785, where Ali Burzi Pasha murdered hundreds of Jews; Algiers, where Jews were massacred in 1805, 1815 and 1830 and Marrakesh, Morocco, where more than 300 hundred Jews were murdered between 1864 and 1880.

          Decrees ordering the destruction of synagogues were enacted in Egypt and Syria (1014, 1293-4, 1301-2), Iraq (854­859, 1344) and Yemen (1676). Despite the Qur’an’s purported prohibition, Jews were forced to convert to Islam or face death in Yemen (1165 and 1678), Morocco (1275, 1465 and 1790-92) and Baghdad (1333 and 1344). Some escaped, but the Jews of Arabia who remained were pretty much completely wiped out. Islamic revisionists claim they were killed because they were literally asking for it, is their apologetic rubbish propaganda. These Islamic revisionists (Islamaniacs) claim that the Jews demanded it as per their own law. I mean that’s like the Nazis claiming they were only accommodating the Jews demand to get warm by the ovens. Like Goebbels said, the bigger the lie, the easier it is for others to believe it.

          In the violent, nearly 1,400-year relationship between Muslims and non-Muslims, Jihad and Dhimmitude were firmly established by the 8th century. Perhaps the pre-eminent Islamic scholar in history, Ibn Khaldun (d. 1406), summarized five centuries of prior Muslim jurisprudence with regard to the uniquely Islamic institution of jihad:

          In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the [Muslim] mission and [the obligation to] convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force… The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense… Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations.

          Between 1894-96, the Ottoman Turks massacred over 200,000 (Dhimmi) Christian Armenians, followed by the first formal genocide of the 20th century, in 1915, at which time they slaughtered an additional 600,000 to 800,000 Armenians. Contemporary accounts from European diplomats confirm that these brutal massacres were perpetrated in the context of a formal Jihad against the Armenians who had attempted to throw off the yoke of Dhimmitude by seeking equal rights and autonomy. Regarding the 1894-96 massacres, the Turkish-speaking interpreter of the British embassy reported:

          …[The perpetrators] are guided in their general action by the prescriptions of the Sheri [Sharia] Law. That law prescribes that if the “rayah” [dhimmi] Christian attempts, by having recourse to foreign powers, to overstep the limits of privileges allowed them by their Mussulman [Muslim] masters, and free themselves from their bondage, their lives and property are to be forfeited, and are at the mercy of the Mussulmans. To the Turkish mind the Armenians had tried to overstep those limits by appealing to foreign powers, especially England. They therefore considered it their religious duty and a righteous thing to destroy and seize the lives and properties of the Armenians…”

          The scholar Bat Yeor confirms this reasoning, noting that the Armenian quest for reforms invalidated their “legal status,” which involved a “contract” (i.e., with their Muslim Turkish rulers).

          This …breach…restored to the umma [the Muslim community] its initial right to kill the subjugated minority [the dhimmis], [and] seize their property…

          In the following chronology, note how closely Islam’s inception is associated with war. From 623 to 777, a span of 154 years, there are 83 military conflicts involving the Muslims…. Muslims tell us Islam is a religion of peace, but all historical facts seem to discredit that claim rather convincingly.

          Chronology of early Islam

          • 570 – Birth of Muhammad in Mecca into the tribe of Quraish.

          • 577 – Muhammad’s mother dies.

          • 595 – Muhammad marries, starts to have children.

          • 605 – Placement of Black Stone in Ka’aba.

          • 610 – Mohammed, in a cave, hears an angel tell him that Allah is the only true God.

          • 613 – Muhammad’s first public preaching of Islam at Mt. Hira. Gets few converts.

          • 615 – Muslims persecuted by the Quraysh.

          • 619 – Marries Sau’da and Aisha

          • 620 – Institution of five daily prayers .

          • 622 – Muhammad immigrates from Mecca to Medina, gets more converts.

          • 623 – Battle of Waddan

          • 623 – Battle of Safwan

          • 623 – Battle of Dul-‘Ashir

          • 624 – Raids on caravans to fund the movement begin.

          • 624 – Zakat becomes mandatory

          • 624 – Battle of Badr

          • 624 – Battle of Bani Salim

          • 624 – Battle of Eid-ul-Fitr & Zakat-ul-Fitr

          • 624 – Battle of Bani Qainuqa’

          • 624 – Battle of Sawiq

          • 624 – Battle of Ghatfan

          • 624 – Battle of Bahran

          • 625 – Battle of Uhud. 70 Muslims killed.

          • 625 – Battle of Humra-ul-Asad

          • 625 – Battle of Banu Nadir

          • 625 – Battle of Dhatul-Riqa

          • 626 – Battle of Badru-Ukhra

          • 626 – Battle of Dumatul-Jandal

          • 626 – Battle of Banu Mustalaq Nikah

          • 627 – Battle of the Trench

          • 627 – Battle of Ahzab

          • 627 – Battle of Bani Qurayza

          • 627 – Battle of Bani Lahyan

          • 627 – Battle of Ghaiba

          • 627 – Battle of Khaibar

          • 628 – Muhammad signs treaty with Quraish. (The 628 Al-Hudaybiyya agreement, between the Prophet and the Meccan tribe of Quraish, was signed for a period of 10 years, which became, in Islamic tradition, the time limit for any agreement with non-Muslims. The agreement was broken after 18 months, Muhammad’s army then conquered Mecca)

          • 630 – Muhammad conquers Mecca.

          • 630 – Battle of Hunain.

          • 630 – Battle of Tabuk

          • 632 – Muhammad dies. The reign of the Caliphs begins.

          • 632 – Abu-Bakr, Muhammad’s father-in-law, along with Umar, begin a military move to enforce Islam in Arabia.

          • 633 – Battle at Oman

          • 633 – Battle at Hadramaut.

          • 633 – Battle of Kazima

          • 633 – Battle of Walaja

          • 633 – Battle of Ulleis

          • 633 – Battle of Anbar

          • 634 – Battle of Basra,

          • 634 – Battle of Damascus

          • 634 – Battle of Ajnadin.

          • 634 – Death of Hadrat Abu Bakr. Hadrat Umar Farooq becomes the Caliph.

          • 634 – Battle of Namaraq

          • 634 – Battle of Saqatia.

          • 635 – Battle of Bridge.

          • 635 – Battle of Buwaib.

          • 635 – Conquest of Damascus.

          • 635 – Battle of Fahl.

          • 636 – Battle of Yermuk.

          • 636 – Battle of Qadsiyia.

          • 636 – Conquest of Madain.

          • 637 – Battle of Jalula.

          • 638 – Battle of Yarmouk.

          • 638 – The Muslims defeat the Romans and enter Jerusalem.

          • 638 – Conquest of Jazirah.

          • 639 – Conquest of Khuizistan and movement into Egypt.

          • 641 – Battle of Nihawand

          • 642 – Battle of Rayy in Persia

          • 643 – Conquest of Azarbaijan

          • 644 – Conquest of Fars

          • 644 – Conquest of Kharan.

          • 644 – Umar is murdered. Othman becomes the Caliph.

          • 647 – Conquest of Cypress island.

          • 644 – Uman dies, succeeded by Caliph Uthman.

          • 648 – Byzantine campaign begins.

          • 651 – Naval battle against Byzantines.

          • 654 – Islam spreads into North Africa

          • 656 – Uthman is murdered. Ali become Caliph.

          • 658 – Battle of Nahrawan.

          • 659 – Conquest of Egypt

          • 661 – Ali is murdered.

          • 662 – Egypt falls to Islam rule.

          • 666 – Sicily is attacked by Muslims

          • 677 – Siege of Constantinople

          • 687 – Battle of Kufa

          • 691 – Battle of Deir ul Jaliq

          • 700 – Sufism takes root as a sect.

          • 700 – Military campaigns in North Africa

          • 702 – Battle of Deir ul Jamira

          • 711 – Muslims invade Gibraltar

          • 711 – Conquest of Spain

          • 713 – Conquest of Multan

          • 716 – Invasion of Constantinople

          • 732 – Battle of Tours in France.

          • 740 – Battle of the Nobles.

          • 741 – Battle of Bagdoura in North Africa

          • 744 – Battle of Ain al Jurr.

          • 746 – Battle of Rupar Thutha

          • 748 – Battle of Rayy.

          • 749 – Battle of lsfahan

          • 749 – Battle of Nihawand

          • 750 – Battle of Zab

          • 772 – Battle of Janbi in North Africa

          • 777 – Battle of Saragossa in Spain

          Undeniably, Christians have in the past also committed despicable acts in the name of God, and in recent history the Serbia conflicts and the Protestant-Catholic Northern-Ireland clashes stand out as examples. But there are three major differences and distinctions that can be drawn between those crimes and the acts committed in Islam’s name.

          The first difference is that the unfortunate events were limited in both time and scope, they had an end.

          The second distinction is that terrorists acting from Christian cultures always did their vile deeds in violation of scriptural teaching and the example of Christ, not in fulfilment of it, as in Islam.

          The third dissimilarity is that people from Christian cultures who perform terrorist acts against others are recognized as criminals, not worshiped as heroes. To expect Muslims to drop their belligerence toward the West, which has existed since Islam’s founding in the 7th century, is to expect them to jettison core values of their faith — something for which there is no precedent in Islamic history. Although nowadays nothing seems less tolerated than pessimism, yet in relation to Islam this attitude is in fact simply just realism.

          Most Americans have a benignly positive attitude toward religion, but is our civic piety, allied with political correctness, blinding us and keeping us from asking reasonable questions about Islam, questions upon which the survival of our civilization may depend. Do Western cultures, obsessed with tolerance, render us incapable of drawing reasonable conclusions about Islam’s core values and designs? The general reluctance to criticize any non-Christian religion and the almost universal public ignorance about Islam make for a dangerous potentially lethal mix.

          Unlike Constitutional provisions in the US, there is no cultural or scriptural mandate for separation of church and state in Islam, making secular democracy an alien and hostile concept. Women have few rights over and against their husbands, who may legally beat their wives and concubines. Enslaving infidels and raping infidel women are justified under Qura’nic law (and still occur in some Muslim lands). Grotesque punishments for crimes — beheadings and the like — are not medieval holdovers; on the contrary, they will forever be part of authentic Islam as long as the Qur’an is revered as the perfect Words of Allah.

          While Muslims in the West live in peace, prosperity and religious liberty, Christians and other “Infidels” in Muslim lands have been, are now, and will continue to be persecuted, sometimes unto death. Turkey is the only Muslim country that could be called democratic, and that’s probably a stretch. The example of Turkey is laudable, but sadly it shows that secularist values can only be imposed on Islamic societies by force, and will therefore remain tenuous. Because Islam demands death for heretics, moderate Muslims will always risk their lives if they offer more liberal interpretations of their faith.

          The problem is that for all its schisms, sects, and multiplicity of voices, Islam’s violent elements are firmly rooted in its central texts; as such, Islam cannot be other than a religion of violence. It would be too pessimistic to say that there are no peaceful strains of Islam, but it would be imprudent to ignore the fact that deeply imbedded in the central documents of the religion is an all-encompassing vision of a theocratic state that is intractable and fundamentally different from (and opposed toward) democratic values and Western governments based on them.

          THE QURAN’S VIEW OF JEWS & CHRISTIANS:

          A basic principle of Islamism holds that humanity is divided according to a strict hierarchy of worth. At the top of this hierarchy are free Muslim males, the cream of humanity. Below them, in descending order of humanity, are: Muslim male slaves, free Muslim women, Muslim female slaves, the males of the “People of the Book” (Jews and Christians), and, then, the females of the ‘People of the Book’. Finally, the rest of humanity comes in dead last (excuse the pun), because they lack a soul they are regarded as worthless having no rights whatsoever. This unfortunate final grouping includes Buddhists, Hindus, Mormons, atheists, agnostics, and others. But before Jews and Christians celebrate escaping last-place in this uniquely Islamic popularity contest, the fine print should first be carefully studied.

          With quotes referencing Christians and Jews from the Quran like: – “WORST OF CREATURES, PERVERSE, FRIENDS OF SATAN”, it seems impossible to characterize Islam as a tolerant religion harmless to others. By one widely accepted definition of a ‘Religion’; … “An organization dedicated to raising the spiritual awareness and moral standards and actions of its followers, and in improving peaceful relationships with others”, Islam seems to fall well short of qualifying. Early Islam was clearly neither harmless nor tolerant of non-believers. Intolerance seems the cruel norm in Islamic societies, while tolerance, charity and kindness towards different cultures and religions is glaringly absent. The fruits of extreme Islam are bitter indeed, and it is by their fruits that we should judge them.

          The clear direction appears to be that Muslims are not allowed to even be friends or take favours from Jews and Christians, unless the devotion and tax is extracted by force or threat of force.

          Quran 98:1 Those who disbelieve from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and among Al-Mushrikun (polytheists) were not going to leave (their disbelief) until there came to them clear evidence.

          Quran 98:6 Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islam, the Quran and Prophet Muhammad) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikun will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.

          Quran 5:51 O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliya’ (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but Auliya’ to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliya’, then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allah guides not those people who are the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong & shy; doers and unjust).

          Quran 58:19. Shaitan (Satan) has overtaken them (the Jews). So he has made them forget the remembrance of Allah. They are the party of Shaitan (Satan). Verily, it is the party of Shaitan (Satan) that will be the losers!

          Quran 4:76 Those who believe, fight in the Cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve, fight in the cause of Taghut (Satan, etc.). So fight you against the friends of Shaitan (Satan); Ever feeble indeed is the plot of Shaitan (Satan).

          Quran 47:35 So be not weak and ask not for peace (from the enemies of Islam), while you are having the upper hand. Allah is with you, and will never decrease the reward of your good deeds.

          Christians and Jews then and now hold a special place in Islamic theology. In the end, they were regarded with contempt by Muhammad, and were presented in a hateful manner in the Qur’an and in modern Islamic theology today. The final direction appears to be this: When the Muslims have the upper hand, they are not to seek peace, but instead they are expected to sacrifice and toil for the continued destruction of all their enemies. The final words reported from the mouth of the dying Muhammad were a curse on the favoured ‘People of the Book’.

          From Ibn Sa’d page 322: When the last moment of the prophet was near, he used to draw a sheet over his face; but when he felt uneasy, he removed it from his face and said:

          “Allah’s damnation be on the Jews and the Christians who made the graves of their prophets objects of worship.”

          The bitterness of this final utterance from their beloved prophet, as he died a painful death at the hands of a Jewish girl (Shiias say it was Abu Bakr, Umar & their two daughters, Aisha & Hafsa, who poisoned him), obviously still weighs heavy on the minds and hearts of all of Islam. Revenge is a glorified mandate for Muslims yesterday and today.

          “MOHAMMEDANISM IS THE SAME YESTERDAY, TODAY & FOREVER”!

          THE QURAN ON RELATIONS WITH NON-MUSLIM FAMILY MEMBERS

          Islam has an anti-family element, causing Muslims to fight and kill even their relatives if they reject Muhammad’s rule. Family ties, devotions, and sensibilities form the backbone of Western civilizations, from which we derive our strength and teach morality. In Islam, even normal, natural family bonds are subservient and must yield to Muhammad’s vision of Islam. That is why in many Muslim communities and households each family member is expected to police the acts, thoughts, and expressions of other members in the household. On a slightly broader scale, communities are expected to monitor the conduct of families in their neighbourhoods. So in Islamic lands, the control structure in place extends from the highest branches of the government (including the Judiciary), to the lowliest family member. The consequences imposed for failure to support the official family, neighbourhood, tribal, national policy with respect to violent Jihad vary by tribe and region, but are often quite brutal.

          Quran 48:29 Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe (or ruthless, vehement) against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves.

          Quran 58:22 You (O Muhammad) will not find any people who believe in Allah and the Last Day, making friendship with those who oppose Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad), even though they were their fathers, or their sons, or their brothers, or their kindred (people). For such He has written Faith in their hearts, and strengthened them with Ruh (proofs, light and true guidance) from Himself. And We will admit them to Gardens (Paradise) under which rivers flow, to dwell therein (forever). Allah is pleased with them, and they with Him. They are the Party of Allah. Verily, it is the Party of Allah that will be the successful.

          In the officially state-sponsored Wahhabi controlled elementary schools in Saudi Arabia (our alleged ally in the war on terror), there is a fifth-grade lesson book that reads as follows:

          “It is forbidden for a Muslim to be a friend of one who does not believe in God and his Messenger or who fights the Islamic religion. God has severed the [link of] friendship between Muslims and infidels. The Muslim, even if he lives far away, is your brother-in-belief, while the infidel, even if he is your brother of kin, is your enemy by religion.”

          When one takes into consideration all that Muhammad and his devoted followers ask of the faithful, the direction to have no Muslim friends makes perfect sense. It’s all part of the psychology of violence. Built-in natural human feelings of empathy and all impulses of conscience must first be overcome before an individual can perform an act of violence on another. Normal feelings of affection, respect, and trust toward a friend would get in the way of an Islamic Jihad movement. So not only does Muhammad dehumanize non-Muslims, he also specifically tells followers not to develop personal relationships with others. This philosophy and psychology, when internalized, is designed to groom the Muslim believer into becoming an effective, non-thinking, non-feeling Jihadist warrior (i.e. a killing machine). Not exactly in line with his oft repeated claim that ‘God is most merciful, most forgiving, most loving and charitable’, but that contradiction does not seem to register. Certainly any personal dilemma resulting from such contradictions are easily dismissed once fully immersed in the blood-lust and lynch-mob mentality of Islamic Militants. Apparently ‘most-merciful’ in their minds only applies to Muslims, or to survivors who agree to pay tribute, or in other words, an eternal ‘survivor tax’.

          THE INESCAPABLE INFERENCES:

          Instead of trying to comprehend and facing the true roots of militant Islam, we have preferred to hope that Islamic violence is just the pernicious work of a few individuals or radical groups. We hope that by destroying the al-Qaida network the threat of Islamic terrorism will cease. We can then put it out of our minds and hope and pretend that it will no longer affect us. We are captivated by sports, Harry Potter, the Lord of the Rings, and rock stars. We are happy that the DOW is back up and interest rates have lowered, and hope the recession will soon be over. Yet, those planning our destruction are still living among us and saying that Islam is a religion of peace. All the while, just as Maslama deceived his good friend Ka’b b. al-Ashraf in order to murder him, militant Muslims are prudently, patiently planning their next acts of terrorism.

          VITAL QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
          (1) What are the teachings of real Islam found in the Qur’an, Hadith, and Sira with respect to the use of violence, call it jihad if you like, to aggressively spread it’s power over non-Muslims, and are these teachings valid and applicable today?

          ANSWER: It should be obvious that real Islam still calls for the use of jihad, force and violence, when able, to spread Islam’s power over non-Muslim people. The jihad may take the form of passing out literature for Islam, or it may take the form of assassination, or a bombing of a building, or a massacre, for worse. These teachings are valid and applicable even today.

          (2) Is real Islam behind and does it condone the murder of hundreds of thousands of victims all over the world, or are these Muslim terrorists doing something well outside Muhammad’s religion?

          ANSWER: Yes. Real Islam is behind the murder of hundreds of thousands of victims all over the world. Official Islamic theology taught in most parts of the world justify violent acts to further the cause of converting all to Islam, especially acts designed to weaken the “Great Satan- America”, deemed the biggest threat to that cause.

          (3) What does the future hold for Islam and the West?

          ANSWER: Continued Islamic violence. Would that it could be said otherwise, but it appears likely that Muslims will yet perform many large and small acts of murderous violence against us. If given the chance they may, one day, detonate a nuclear warhead, or warheads, as many in the movement see it as their only viable option. In order to advance Muslim theology as they see it, these militants know that the West must be brought low, regardless of the cost. They are dedicated and may eventually succeed in obtaining the bombs or bomb material from Iran, Pakistan, Korea or perhaps from a former Soviet Republic Country. Muslim militants are cognizant of how to go about this, their goal is our incapacitation, and they believe the best way to accomplish this is through the use of WMD’s.

          So, why is it that so many Muslims want to see the West broken or destroyed?

          The West is a powerful. Its military strength and cultural power represents the best hope against the violent spread of Islam. Obviously, if the West is weakened or incapacitated, then Muslim terrorists can begin to act with more impunity throughout the world.

          CONCLUSION

          By their own words and works, Islam is apparently a violent religion after all, and large parts of it continue to condone and allow the use of aggressive violence to spread its dominion over non-Muslims. The war that Muhammad launched long ago continues today, but the stakes are getting higher. America, European and Asian nations will continue to be adversely affected by the actions of real Muslims – those that are obeying their “God and Prophet” – as they have been in the past. The West previously insulated by distance and oceans are no longer safe and have become the relatively new targets of expansionist Islam. For all the cries against Zionism by Muslims, it is in truth Islam that has the most aggressive ambitions and designs on other peoples and lands.

          “Will you listen to me O Meccans? By him who holds my life in His hand I bring you slaughter.” (Muhammad, some of the earliest words spoken in Mecca, shortly after his first visit by “Gabriel”, to people who rejected his claim to prophethood). “The Life of Muhammad”, by A. Guillaume, page 131.

          “Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle (Muhammad) have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled.”

          We see that Muhammad had many people murdered. By request, by command, by implication, Muhammad had many killed, some while they slept. There were no trials, no judgments, and no dialog. If you insulted Muhammad, if you doubted his credibility, or if you spoke out, you were killed. Men and women, young and old, all were killed because of Muhammad’s intolerance, anger, hatred, and disdain towards those who spoke out against him. Today, Fatwas continue to be issued demanding that faithful kill any perceived to insult the prophet or discredit his divinity. One wonders if the thin skin and short temper of Islam is due to insecurity stemming from the inherent weaknesses of its doctrine. The fact remains that challenging the doctrine of Islam or hearsay against the prophet carries the penalty of death to this day. The intellectually insincere individual full of hatred will certainly not benefit from this article; rather he will undoubtedly be greatly offended by the facts outlined herein. As the saying goes,

          “A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still”.

          A closed mind will forever be unable to draw correct inferences from a set of facts plainly laid out before him.

          Make no mistake about it: By any standard of any age, Muhammad deployed murderous tactics that can only be described as terrorist in nature. Muhammad, indeed, taught his followers to oppress or kill non-Muslims. Today’s Muslim terrorists are following his actions literally, … like prophet, like followers.

          Today’s Muhammedan terrorists commit their acts with full understanding and belief that they are based upon what Muhammad said and did, and what he expects of them. Based upon Muhammad’s actions and teachings, large parts of Islam continues to practice, justify, support, finance, or tolerate terrorism against non-Muslims today. The life of Muhammad is and will continue to be used by militants as justification to attack and murder those who differ from them.

          Muhammad taught his followers that Islam is the final and universal religion. Where Islamic law has been instituted, no other religion is tolerated, unless it agrees to submit to Islamic rule. Today, more than forty nations have a majority population of Muslims, and Muslim leaders have spoken of their goal to spread Islam in the West, until Islam becomes a dominant, global power. That global agenda is in keeping with Muhammad’s final clear orders: convert… pay with submission … or die.

          Muslims who Leave Islam:

          Under Islamic law [the Sharia is based on the Qur’an, the example of Muhammad (sunna) and the consensus (ijmaa)], anyone falling away from faith in Islam commits an “unforgivable sin”. Such “apostates” must be taken into custody by force, and called on to repent. Anyone so confronted and who does not immediately repent and turn back to Islam has forfeited his life, and is to be put to death by the state. While this is not carried out on a regular basis in the many Islamic lands practicing Sharia, the threat is ever present. One of Islam’s most respected theologians and prolific writers in the last century, Pakistani Abu’l Ala Mawdudi, insists that both Qur’an and Hadith demand an apostate’s execution. He quotes the Qur’an (9:11-12) and the canonized Hadith: “Any person, i.e. Muslim, who has changed his religion, kill him” (Al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, p. 45). The Islamic scholar, Majid Khadduri, agrees that Qur’anic commentaries say a believer who turns back from his religion must be killed if he persists in disbelief (p. 150). Today “Islamic jihad” draws on religious texts whose interpretations, some genuinely peaceful Muslims dispute. They challenge this interpretation of jihad because they wish to live in peace with non-Muslim peoples and nations, and as a result, their lives are also threatened. Muhammad was not content to conquer by force, or kill those that merely opposed him verbally. Muhammad also taught that Muslims who leave the Islamic faith are to be murdered as well. Here are some quotes from Bukhari’s collection of Hadith. Remember, Bukhari’s Hadith is the second most important writing in Islam, following the Quran.

          Bukhari, volume 9, #17

          “Narrated Abdullah: Allah’s Messenger said, “The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Messenger, cannot be shed except in three cases: in Qisas (equality in punishment) for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (Apostate) and leaves the Muslims.”

          Bukhari volume 9, #57

          Narrated Ikrima, “Some atheists were brought to Ali and he burnt them. The news of this event, reached Ibn Abbas who said, “If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah’s messenger forbade it, saying, “Do not punish anybody with Allah’s punishment (fire).” I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Messenger, “Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.”

          Bukhari volume 9, #64

          Narrated Ali, “Whenever I tell you a narration from Allah’s messenger, by Allah, I would rather fall down from the sky, then ascribe a false statement to him, but if I tell you something between me and you, (not a Hadith), then it was indeed a trick (i.e., I may say things just to cheat my enemy). No doubt I heard Allah’s messenger saying, “During the last days there will appear some young foolish people, who will say the best words, but their faith will not go beyond their throats (i.e. they will leave the faith) and will go out from their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So, wherever you find them, kill them, for whoever kills them shall have reward on the Day of Resurrection.”

          Not only did Muhammad teach that Muslims are to murder those that have left Islam, “wherever you find them”, he further taught that a Muslim who commits this type of murder of fellow Muslims will also be doing God’s service and will be rewarded. It is in this spirit and understanding that many ‘honour’ killings occur in Muslim communities.

          THE MURDER OF KABAA BIN AL-ASHRAF

          Ka’b bin al-Ashraf, a chief of the Jewish tribe of Banu Nadi, was a victim of Muhammad’s rise to power which personifies the prophet’s moral failings. Once Muhammad gained political power and the ability for force his will on others, some of the Jewish tribes around him grew mistrustful and opposed both his message and his rising influence. Muhammad ordered Ka’b bin al-Ashraf’s murder, and authorized deception in the process.

          Muhammad was driven by power; however he tried to disguise it or sublimate it by his invocation of Allah, and the Jews who lived in the town of Yathrib and elsewhere in the Arabian Peninsula who would not submit to his iron rule simply got in the way. The Jew that got in the way, that opposed the will or whim of this vicious man who covered his worldly ambitions with Allah’s mantle, was promptly dispatched to Sheol.

          The Fifth Commandment, if Muhammad knew it expressly at all, did not apply to Muhammad in his view. He doubtfully read Exodus, since he was supposed to be illiterate. Perhaps it might have done him some good had he read, “Thou shalt not MURDER. (Exodus 20:13; Deuteronomy. 5:17) It would also have done him well to have heard Jesus’ angle on that commandment. (Matthew. 5:21-22). He certainly seems not to have been open to the divine injunction that prohibited murder that was contained in the recesses of his heart, i.e., the natural law.

          But in Muhammad’s view, there was no need to read the Scriptures prior to his supposed revelations; they were corrupted on Muhammad’s account (See Qur’an 5:13, 41.). And whatever was therein contained was of no moment since, by the supposed revelations of Allah which came to us through the mouth of Muhammad, whatever Muhammad did was perfect. If the Fifth Commandment has to take a back seat to Muhammad’s “perfect” desires, and if the unwritten law of God in the heart of every man that says one should not MURDER an innocent man had to be squelched, then so be it: Allah and his messenger know best.

          Unlike the God of the Jews, Allah did not say, “Thou shalt not MURDER.” Rather, Allah said, “Thou shalt MURDER.” Or so Muhammad would have it where it was to his political advantage.

          Though Muhammad had ostensibly entered into an informal treaty with the Jewish tribes in the town of Yathrib (which later was known as Medina), there was tension between Muhammad’s followers and the Jewish tribes, including the Banu Nadi. (This seems to be a chronic feature of Islam’s relationship with its neighbours, even to this day.)

          Al-Ashraf, it may be conceded, was an opponent of Muhammad, believed Muhammad a false prophet, and opposed himself to Muhammad’s worrisome rise.

          After Muhammad’s victory at the battle of Badr, al-Ashraf grew particularly concerned.

          THAT WAS NOT A CRIME!

          It was from Muhammad’s vantage point. In Muhammad’s eyes, opposition to him and his doctrine and will was anathema: nay, it was more than that; it was a virtual death sentence.

          “He [al-Ashraf] inveighed against the apostle,” wrote a plaintive poem at the loss by the Quraysh tribe defeated at Badr, and “composed amatory verses of an insulting nature about Muslim women,” Muhammad’s biographer Ibn Ishaq tells us.

          This was the extent of his alleged crimes.

          The enmity between al-Ashraf and Muhammad and Muhammad’s response to it is found in several sources, including Sahih al-Bukhari 3.45.687 and 5.59.369. The second hadith is particularly long, so only parts will be quoted here. The hadith begins:

          “Allah’s messenger said ‘Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His apostle?’

          Thereupon Maslama got up saying, ‘O Allah’s messenger! Would you like that I kill him?’
          The prophet said, ‘Yes.’

          Maslama said, ‘Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e., to deceive Ka’b).’ The prophet said, ‘You may say it.'”

          So here we have two moral lapses by Muhammad to the Realpolitik of the day. The first: a willingness to put a political opponent to death–political murder. The second: a willingness to use all manners of deceit to advance the political murder–lying. Here we find an instance of the questionable doctrine of taqiyya, or dissimulation, approved by the alleged prophet of Allah, the Arab war idol and transformed moon god who–unlike Jesus Christ who says, “I am the truth” (John 14:6)—Allah says of himself that he is the “best of deceivers,” Allahu khayru al-makirina, (Qur’an 3:54).

          Based on the pretence that, as an opponent of Muhammad, he wanted to borrow a camel load or two of food, Maslama visited al-Ashraf at night and, together with his foster brother Abu Naila, was invited into Maslama’s fort. The plan among the conspiring assassins was to compliment al-Ashraf on his perfumed hair, and, when he was distracted, to cut off his head.

          The plan worked, and together Maslama and Abu Naila cut of Muhammad’s enemy’s head.

          According to the Muslim historian Ibn Ishaq, the Muslim poet Ka’b bin Malik (who should be distinguished from the murdered Jewish poet and political enemy of Muhammad, Ka’b ibn al-Ashraf) said:

          “Sword in hand we cut [Ka’b] down.
          By Muhammad’s order when he sent secretly by night Ka’b’s brother to go to Ka’b.
          He beguiled him and brought him down with guile.
          Mahmoud [bin Maslama] was trustworthy, bold.”

          Ibn Sa’d’s Tabaqat records Muhammad’s delight at the successful murder of his political opponent:

          “Then they cut his head and took it with them [and] . . . they cast his head before him [Muhammad]. He (the prophet) praised Allah on his being slain.”

          Allahu akhbar. The pseudo-prophet can rejoice at an innocent man’s death, just like many of his followers could rejoice at the countless attack, and the deaths of millions who did none of their killers wrong. This is what happens when you are the prosecutor, the alleged victim, and the judge. The defendant, even if innocent, has no voice. This is because, in Islam, Allah and his messenger know best, Allahu wa rasulluhu a’lam.

          This is the Muslim mantra that blinds him to the fact that his alleged prophet is a sinner, a violator of the natural law, and most certainly not an authentic prophet.

          • Lucky, you said “Real Islam is behind the murder of hundreds of thousands of victims all over the world. Official Islamic theology taught in most parts of the world justify violent acts, especially acts designed to weaken the “Great Satan- America”, deemed the biggest threat to that cause”.

            Questions :

            1. What is “Real Islam”?

            2. How did you know that “Real Islam” is behind the murder of hundreds of thousands of victims all over the world?

            3. Can you state here the “Official Islamic theology”?

            4. Where is this ‘Official Islamic theology’ taught in most parts of the world”. Where is most parts of the World??

            5. How does Islamic theology “justify violent acts”??? Please expound on that!!

            6. Please quote a single instance in recent 200 years that Islam justifies violent acts.

            7. Who said “Great Satan- America”?

            Kindly answer the above before you copy paste long, longer…longest lists!

            Regards

            Plum

  4. Mr plum I think I made myself clear on the Eid raping issue earlier and was refering to the people involved only ..I know cattle is halal but since it does not have to be a cow just for the sake of good relationships cant other cattle can be scarified?…If the quran ordered you guys to to a qurbani of cow I would not have said anything . Please try to understand I am not trying to pick a fight or teach you what Muslims should or should not do ….a simple gesture which is not against Islam would go a long way toward establishing a cordial environment thats all..Again I say Had Cow qurbani been a mandatory thing that means Muslims Had to kill a cow other cattle wont do , I would had said nothing.

    • Ligjtman, Of course you are 100% right in saying that… since cows are worshipped by Hindus then they should NOT be slaughtered in front of them by Muslims.

      But cows are slaughtered in abattoirs which are meatwork facilities, in designated areas- where animals are killed for consumption as food products. Every town, village…has an abattoir. Muslims should slaughter cattle only in the nearest abattoirs.

      Who are you referring to when you say, “you guys”?

      Indian Muslims are former Hindus and thus being brothers to hindus should know how to live with them as per Quran : 6:108

      “Revile not those unto whom they pray beside Allah lest they wrongfully revile Allah through ignorance. Thus unto every nation have We made their deed seem fair. Then unto their Lord is their return, and He will tell them what they used to do”.

      Finally, do NOT judge others!

      • By “you guys” I meant those who follow Islam….Thanks for showing some Understanding and No I am not judging anybody, nor am I in a position to do so. anyway if still any of my words have hurt you in anyway I humbly ask for forgiveness

        • Ligjtman, my personal thoughts..my religion….. Be Good, Do Good!

          Ask the sick, “would you exercise if cured?”

          Certainly, the healthy and the cured must exercise.
          On this wonderful planet it is fun to be able to jog a little here and jog a little there. There is plenty of water to give the best exercise – swimming.
          Maybe, that is why fishes have such good slimy bodies!! They seem to be always
          healthy! Can we smile a little here?
          And you may carry a few stones too which are for free!
          Can an exercise a day keep a man physically fit? Just ask the sick!

          Re-consider before jumping

          Before you take ANY action,
          • Visualise the impact, the effect you will leave behind, just as if the action had already taken place.
          • Now, ask yourself, “Is it worth taking this action? If yes, then
          • Make sure that you approach the subject in the most tactful, prudent way possible.
          Re-consider before jumping into any action.

          Kind regards,

          Plum

          • Plum,

            Thanks for sharing your personal thought, Be Good, Do Good.. But you Islam does not believe in be good, do good.

            Its preaches, be Good to Muslims, and can do as much bad to Non-Muslims..

            Thanks

      • YO DUMB PLUM,

        EDUCATING MOHAMMEDANS ABOUT THEIR RELIGION OF “PEACE”:

        ISLAM & SLAVERY: INDIA

        Islam’s Indian slave trade
        Islam’s genocidal slavery

        Indian Kingdoms ca 6th Century AD (Modern names added as a reference)
        India has a deep, long cultural history. Hinduism began there around 1,500 BC and Buddhism around the 6th century BC. This culture had evolved impressive intellectual, religious and artistic pursuits. Pre and post the early days of Islam, Indian scholars took their works in science, maths (zero, algebra, geometry, the decimal system, so-called ‘Arabic’ numbers are actually Hindu ones!), medicine, philosophy etc to the courts of others (including Muslims e.g Baghdad).

        Others came to study in India’s established universities. Indian children (boys and girls) were educated in the relatively widespread education system in a wide variety of subjects eg science, medicine and philosophy. India’s art and architecture was magnificent. They were a prosperous people. Then came Islam – slaughter, slavery, rape, violence, pillage; destruction of religious sites, art and architecture; poverty, exploitation, humiliation, famine, forced conversion, decline in intellectual pursuits, social destruction and a worsening of social ills. To Islam, anything that is not Islamic is from a time of ignorance –Jahiliyya- and must be destroyed (or appropriated and called Islam’s!). The onslaught created the Roma (gypsies), destroyed ‘Hindu’ Afghanistan and formed Pakistan (Kashmir) and Bangladesh .
        The cost of the Muslim invasions is massive in lives, wealth and culture. Estimates suggest that 60-80 MILLION died at the hands of Muslim invaders and rulers between 1000 and 1525 alone (ie over 500 years-the population FELL). (Lal cited in Khan p 216) Impossible you think? In the war of Independence of Bangladesh, 1971, the Muslim Pakistani army killed 1.5-3 million people (mainly Muslims …) in just 9 MONTHS. (Khan p 216). The world looked the other way—but don’t we always when it’s Muslims committing the violence!

        Based on the figures that are available, the number of Indians enslaved is enormous!

        The Muslim conquest of India was probably the bloodiest in history:

        The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with utmost glee and pride of the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave-markets, and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by the sword in this period” (historian Durant cited in Khan p 201)

        And Rizwan Salim (1997) writes what the Arab invaders really did:

        ‘ savages at a very low level of civilization and no culture worth the name, from Arabia and West Asia, began entering India from the early century onwards. Islamic invaders demolished countless Hindu temples, shattered uncountable sculpture and idols, plundered innumerable forts and palaces of Hindu kings, killed vast numbers of Hindu men and carried off Hindu women. ………but many Indians do not seem to recognize that the alien Muslim marauders destroyed the historical evolution of the earth’s most mentally advanced civilisation, the most richly imaginative culture, and the most vigorously creative society.” (cited in Khan p 179)
        Of course Indians pre-Islam, fought, but it was NOT the practice to enslave or ravage, or massacre, or destroy religious sites, or damage crops and farmers. Battles were usually conducted on open soil between military personnel. (Khan p 205-207) There was no concept of ‘booty’ so Indians were unprepared for Islam’s onslaught. Indigenous Indians were forced to flee to jungles and mountains, or face gruelling exploitation and taxes, slaughter or enslavement while their society was demeaned and destroyed. Muslims constantly attacked the indigenous, idolatrous population and also fought against each other in ceaseless revolts by generals, chiefs and princes during the entire time of Islamic rule (Khan p 205).
        Slavery: Initially ‘India’ included part of today’s Pakistan (Sindh), Bangladesh/Bengal and Kashmir. Hinduism and Buddhism flourished in Afghanistan pre the Islamic takeover (7th century). In the 16th century Afghanistan was divided between the Muslim Mogul (Mughal) Empire of India and the Safavids of Persia.
        The damaged armless image of the bodyguard of Shiva-Maheshwara as depicted at the Hoysaleshwara Temple complex at Halebid. Hindu temples and works of art built in the ancient were desecrated and destroyed by Muslims invaders.

        Initially the godless Umayyads, allowed Hindus dhimmi status – possibly because of their large numbers, resistance to Islam and their value as a source of tax income. This violates Islamic text and law which demands death or conversion for idolaters and polytheists. When Sultan Iltutmish (d 1236) was asked why Hindus weren’t given the choice between death and Islam, he replied:

        “but at the moment in India…the Muslims are so few that they are like salt (in a large dish) …however after a few years when in the capital and the regions and all the small towns, when the Muslims are well established and the troops are larger….it would be possible to give Hindus the choice of death or Islam” (cited in Lal [c] p 538) (Can we learn anything from this???)

        Despite their supposed ‘dhimmi’ status, mass slaughter, mass forced conversion and mass enslavement with the resulting forced conversion to Islam were practiced throughout Islamic rule and into the 20th century as many demanded the idolaters/polytheists convert or die. Hindu fighters and males were slaughtered with women and children enslaved. Eunuch slavery was practiced on young boys.

        Often actual numbers aren’t given, just comments like ‘countless captives/slaves,’ or ‘all the women and children were taken.’ Where numbers are recorded, they are terrifying. Along with people, the Muslims took everything they could—coins, jewels, cloths, clothes, furniture, idols, animals, grain etc or destroyed it.
        Muslim rulers were foreigners. Until the 13th century, most slaves were sent out of India but following the Sultanate of Delhi (1206) they were retained to work for the sultanate, sold in India or sent elsewhere. Slaves from elsewhere were imported and Muslim armies were composed of a wide array of foreign slave groups ‘converted’ to Islam and ‘Hindus’ and Indian ‘converts.’

        Slaves were the promised booty from allah and obtaining them was a strong motivation for jihad.

        “slaves were so plentiful that they became very cheap; men…were degraded….but this is the goodness of god, who bestows honors on his own religion and degrades infidelity”. (Muslim chronicler Utbi on Sultan Subuktigin of Ghazni’s slave raid [942-997] in Sookdheo p166)

        In Sindh (first area attacked successfully) the early ‘Muslim’ community was composed mainly of slaves forced into Islam and a small number of Arab masters (Khan p 299). Initially slaves were forced out of India eg Qasim (Arab), the conquerer of Sindh sent by Hajjaj bin Yusuf Sakifi in the caliphate of Walid I, took 300,000 from a 3 year campaign in 712-715 (Khan p 299, Trifkovic p 109). Muslim fighters came from everywhere to partake in this ‘jihad.’ Qasim was suddenly recalled and executed (possibly by being sown in an animal’s hide) for supposedly violating 2 Sindhi princesses destined for the caliph’s harem!!(Lal [c] p 439)
        Many raids taking slaves were carried out under various caliphs in the 8th and 9th century.

        The Ghaznivids-Turks from Ghazni, Afghanistan (997-1206) who subdued the Punjab.

        From 17 raids (997-1030) Sultan Muhmud Ghazni (Turk from Afghanistan, 997-1030) sent hundreds of thousands of slaves to Ghanzi (Afghanistan) resulting in a loss of about 2 million people via slaughter or enslavement and sale outside India (Khan p 315). Chroniclers (eg Utbi, the sultan’s secretary) provide some numbers eg -from Thanesar, the Muslim army brought 200,000 captives back to Ghazni (Afghanistan). In 1019, 53,000 were taken. At one time the caliph’s 1/5th share was 150,000 suggesting 750,000 captives. 500,000 were taken in one campaign (at Waihind)(Lal [c] p 551) Mahmud’s secretary al-Utbi records:
        Mahmud of Ghazni Mahmud of Ghazni (971-1030) was the first sultan of the Ghaznavid dynasty in Afghanistan.

        “Swords flashed like lightening amid the blackness of clouds, and fountains of blood flowed like the fall of setting star. The friends of god defeated their opponents….the Musalmans wreaked their vengeance on the infidel enemies of god killing 15,000 of them…making them food of the beasts and birds of prey….god also bestowed on his friends such an amount of booty as was beyond all bounds and calculations, including 500,000 slaves beautiful men and women” (Khan p 191)
        The Ghaznivid’s ruled in the ‘Islamic sultanate of the Punjab’ till 1186. Attacks in Kashmir, Hansi, and districts of the Punjab resulted in mass slaughter and enslavement eg 100,000 in a 1079 attack in the Punjab (Tarik –i-Alfi in Khan p 276-7, Lal [d] p 553).

        The Gaurivid invasion: The Delhi Sultanate 1206-1526) Turks who conquered northwestern India, and the Gangetic valley.

        1)Under the Ghaurivid rulers (Turks) eg Muhammad Ghauri (Afghani) and his military commander then ruler, Qutbuddin Aibak (r1206-1210), the Delhi sultanate was set up. Mass beheadings, enslavements, forced conversions, plunder and the destruction of temples continued. Slaves were incredibly plentiful. In 1195, Aibak took 20,000 slaves from Raja Bhim and 50,000 at Kalinjar (1202) (Lal [c] p 536).
        “even the poor (Muslim) householder became owner of numerous slaves.’ (Khan 103, Lal [c] p 537).

        Muhammad Ghori,Mohammad Ghauri, etc., originally named Muizz-ad-din, b.1162 – d.1206, was a Ghurid emperor and the governor of Ghazni from 1173 to 1206.
        Following the formation of the Delhi Sultanate (1206) slavery and attacks across India escalated from the Delhi base. Slave trading centres operated in India selling slaves to merchants and ordinary Muslims. Slaves could be taken anywhere. While 1/5 of the booty including slaves was nolonger automatically sent to the caliph, slaves were still sent at times to Caliphs and other prominent Muslims and as gifts eg to China.

        2) Sultan Iltutmish (d 1236) continued to enslave and force Islam onto slaves (Lal [c] p 538). The ‘slave’ commander Ulugh Khan Balban (1250s-1260s) took so many captives they ‘couldn’t be counted.’ A chronicler records –
        “all the infidel’s wives, sons and dependents…and children ..fell into the hands of the victors.” (Chronicler in Lal [c] p 538)

        At Katehar, Balban ordered a general massacre of the male population OVER 8 years of age and carried away women and children (Lal [c] p 539).
        Throughout ‘Hindustan’ towns and villages were raided, people enslaved in droves. Hindus returned to villages decimated by fire and sword but the Turkish Muslim armies returned (Lal [c] p 539). Slaves were lost forever!

        3) Rule by the Kiljis (1290-1320) and Tughlaqs (1320- 1413).
        Through the 13/14th century ruled by the Khilji (Khaljis) and Tughlaq’s, slavery grew as Islam spread. Thousands of slaves were sold at a low price everyday (Khan p 280). Alauddin Khilji’s (r 1296-1316) capture of slaves was stupendous and he shackled, chained and humiliated slaves (Lal [c] p 540). In the sack of Somnath alone he:

        “took captive a great number of handsome and elegant maidens, amounting to 20,000 and children of both sexes ..more than the pen can enumerate. The Mohammadan army brought the country to utter ruin, destroyed the lives of inhabitants, and plundered the cities and captured their offspring.” (historian cited in Bostom p 641, Lal [c] p 540)

        Many thousands were massacred. Alauddin Khilji (r 1296-1316) had 50,000 slave BOYS in his personal service and 70,000 slaves worked continuously on his buildings.(Lal [c] p 541)

        Women practiced Jauhar (burning or killing oneself to avoid enslavement and rape) and sati.

        The Sufi Amir Khusrau notes “the Turks, whenever they please, can seize, buy or sell any Hindu” (Lal [c] p 541)

        ALA-UD-DIN-KHILJI extended the boundaries of the Delhi Sultanate and brought almost the whole of India under his rule.

        The slave markets had a continuous supply of slaves e.g Delhi. A Hindu chronicle of the end of the 13th/early 14th century notes violent campaigns across extensive areas which resulted in death or enslavement of perhaps millions of Hindus. It reports instructions to Turkish Muslim invaders (ie to Gori Malik in the sack of Bhinmal) to spread terror, cut down the Brahmanas, and kill cows. The Turks enslaved, ransacked and burnt (Bostom p 643-4)

        Muhammad Tughlaq’s (r 1325-1351) enslavement of others outstripped Alauddin Khilji.

        Commentators write:

        “The Sultan never ceases to show the greatest zeal in making war upon infidels….everyday thousands of slaves are sold at a very low price, so great is the number of prisoners.” (Lal [c] p 541)

        Sultan Firoz Shah Tughlaq (1351-1388) had 180,000 slaves (he collected young males) including 40,000 guards of his palace. He told his fief-holders and officers to capture slaves whenever they were at war and send him the best. (Sookdheo p165-167, Lal [c] p 542)

        Shams Siraj Afif, a contemporary historian notes: “slaves became too numerous.” “TheSultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq institution took root in every centre of the land” and continued even when the sultanate fractured into kingdoms. (Lal [c] p 542)
        Traveller throughout India, Ibn Battuta noted that villages after villages were deserted (Lal [c] p 544).

        Slave trading centres for Indian slaves outside India were Khurasan, Ghazni, Samarkhand (Central Asia) and Kabul and Kandahar. Caravans also arrived there from Istanbul, Iraq, and China..(Khan p 318). Foreign slaves were also bought by ‘Indian’ Muslims as they were less likely to cause uprisings. Even in Akbar’s court (1556-1605), where some Hindus were employed, most were foreign (Khan p 318).

        Timur/Tamerlane 1398/99. Destroyed the Delhi sultanate:

        A raid by pious Timurlane (Amir Timur –a Turkic/Mogul from Central Asia) in 1398/99 saw 100,000 slaves slaughtered in cold-blood before he attacked Delhi and possibly 200,000-250,000 (or more) plus craftsmen enslaved and taken out of India (to Samarkand, Central Asia).(Khan p 282, Lal [c] p 544). In his memoirs on the attack on Delhi, Timur claims his 15,000 Turks EACH “secured from 50 to 100 prisoners……there was no man with less than 20” and that was on just one day, the 17th! “The other booty was immense”…”women were obtained in such quantities as to exceed all count.” The areas of Delhi occupied by Muslims weren’t sacked. The slaughter, mass enslavement and plunder continued as he headed towards his home Samarkand, Central Asia. (Timur’s memoirs, Bostom p 648).

        The Sayyid and Lodi dynasties (1400-1525)- returning the Delhi sultanate
        Following Timur’s destruction of Turkish Muslim rule in Delhi, he installed others that paid tribute to him till 1506.

        Sayyid sultans attacked, enslaved, killed and plundered in Katehar (1422), Malwa (1423) and Alwar (1425)(Khan p 282)

        Then the Lodi Sultans (1451-1526) restored the sultanate. Nothing changed for the Hindus. Enslavement and slaughter by Sultan Bahlul depopulated Nimsar. Sikandar Lodi repeated this in Rewa and Gwaloir (Khan p 282).

        Mughal rule 1526-1707.

        (1) Jahiruddin Shah Babur (1483-1530) defeated Lodi. Babur, known for his quotes from the Koran, jihad and piles of heads also enslaved women and children (Khan p 282-3, Lal[b] p 438-459). Leadership contests ensued.

        (2) Akbar the great (1556-1605) –Babur’s grandson
        Raiding a village without reason and enslaving the inhabitants became common and, although Akbar (1556-1605) tried to stop this practice, it continued unabated. Most parts of India came under Akbar’s control. Illiterate Akbar is considered tolerant and many of his acts are contrary to Islam eg he rejected Islam, allowed others into his court and attempted to synthesize a new composite religion called Din-i-Ilahi –religion of god (Khan p 152). He adopted Hindu and Zoroastrian festivals and practices (Trifkovic p 112). He stopped the jizya though other taxes remained. Yet in many ways he remained ‘Islamic.’ While declaring independence from foreign Islamic overlordship he still sent ‘gifts’ to Mecca, Medina and elsewhere (Khan p 163). He owned slaves including thousands of women. He hated ‘paganism.’(Note in his memoirs –‘Barburnama- Sultan Babur [1483-1530] noted that most of Hindustan’s inhabitants were pagans; “they call a pagan a Hindu”!! Bostom p 80). Thousands of peasants (30,000)(lower caste Hindus) in Chittor who took up arms alongside their Rajput rulers (8,000 Rajputs) were put to the sword or enslaved and their property taken. (Khan p 88, 113, Trifkovic p 112)
        “the order was given for a general massacre of the infidels as punishment …by mid-day nearly 2000 had been slain….those of the fortress who escapes the sword, men and women were made prisoners, and their property came into the hands of the Musulmans. The place being cleared of the infidels, his majesty remained there three days” (cited in Sookdheo p 265).

        Akbar’s sex slavery: Akbar had 5,000 females in his harem (Khan p 102)
        While Akbar supposedly attempted to halt mass slavery in battle, it vigorously continued under his commanders. Chroniclers and reports record that raiding villages without justification and enslaving people was fashionable. (Khan p 283). Children were stolen, kidnapped and purchased then males were castrated (Islam’s famous eunuch slavery), particularly in Bengal. Abdullah Khan Uzbeg, one of Akbar’s generals boasted,

        “I made prisoners of 5 lacs (500,000) of men and women and sold them. They all became Muhammadans. From their progeny, there will be crores (one crore=10 million) by the day of judgement.”(cited in Khan p 103)

        Slave markets popped up all over India. Slaves became very cheap—everyone (Muslim) had several! (Khan p 316).

        A witness noted:
        “in his reign, servants and slaves were so numerous and cheap that everybody, even of mean fortune, keeps a great family and is splendidly attended’ (cited in Khan p 283)

        Akbar’s son and grandson returned to orthodox Islam.

        (3) Jahangir (1605-27CE Akbar’s son) wrote that 500,000-600,000 people were slaughtered during the combined rule of his father –Akbar- and his own!!! (Lal [b] p 459, Khan p 200). In 1619-20 alone he sent 200,000 Indian slaves to Iran for sale. Children were castrated and given as slaves to pay tax collectors (Khan 285)

        (4) Shah Jahan (1628-58, Akbar’s grandson) The condition of Hindu peasants became unbearable—adults and children were enslaved to pay taxes (Khan p 283-4). Yet you will read of this as the Mughal period’s greatest prosperity—while non-Muslim Indians were reduced to destitution. Shah Jahan’s religious violence; destruction of Hindu and Christian sites; offer of death or Islam to 4,000 at Agra while young females were sent to harems; slaughter of 10,000 at Hugh and INCEST with his daughters is reported in part K and Trifkovic p 112. Shah Jahan built the Taj Mahal to his 3rd wife who died bearing her 14th child in 19 years! (What a romantic!!)

        Slaves from foreign nations also flowed into India –eg Sultan Aurangzeb purchased Tatar and Uzbek women as harem guards (war-like) and European women as sex–slaves .(Khan 317)

        (5) Aurangzeb (Akbar’s great grandson, r 1658-1707) aimed to conquer, enslave or convert all of India (Khan p 104). He revived Islam. Temples and schools were destroyed and infidels slaughtered. Islam’s dhimmitude laws were applied with a vengence. (Khan p 98). Hindus revolted against paying the jizyah. In a campaign against the Rajputs, his generals

        “employed themselves in laying waste to the country, destroying temples and buildings, cutting down fruit trees, and making prisoners of the women and children of the infidels ..” (Sookdheo p 265 –complies with jihad laws eg Reliance of the Traveller; Laws o9.13 – enslave women and children and o9.15 p 604 –OK to cut down trees and destroy buildings ).

        A French Physician living in India noted that children “were carried away as slaves” to pay taxes (Khan p 284)

        Slavery continued from within India and outside even though the British, who halted slavery, had begun to enter India in the 18th century:

        In 1713-1719: Mughal Furrukhsiyar, attacked the Sikh fortress of Gurdaspur in Punjab, killing thousands and sending others in collars and chains to the emperor (Sookdheo p 265)

        In 1738, Nadir Shah of Iran invaded India, slaughtered 200,000, plundered and enslaved, returning home with thousands of slaves, including a few thousand beautiful girls and immense treasure (Khan p 104, p 199).

        Reign of Terror – After his accession to the throne of Delhi, Farrukh-Siyar launched the sternest proceedings against the Sikhs, who had under Banda Singh Bahadur freed much of the Punjab from mughal rule.

        The British captured Bengal in 1757 yet Muslim rulers continued their slave taking around India.

        Afghani, Ahmad Shah Abdali attacked 3 times (1757, 1760, 1761) around Mattra, Delhi, Luni, winning the Third Battle of the Panipat against the resistant Marathas in 1761. He slaughtered hundreds of thousands, beheaded and burnt people alive and looted, all in accordance with Islam. Massacres occurred in cold blood after the battle. Severed heads were piled up and people enslaved -22,000 in one case. Victims were humiliated, abused and suffered atrocities. His prisoners were deprived of food and drink and paraded in long lines before being beheaded . (Khan p 104, Bostom p 657).

        Islamic violence and enslavement of others continued to the end. The last independent Muslim ruler Tipu Sultan (1750-1799), a nationalist hero for standing up to the British, killed 10,000 Hindus and Christians and enslaved 7000 in his wars against Travancore. The enslaved were forced into Islam. A Muslim chronicler notes 70,000 Coorgis were forced into Islam. (Khan p 200)

        The East India company passed the Indian slavery Act V banning slavery in 1843—at the time slavery existed in Bengal, Madras, Bombay (Khan p 335)
        In reality there were continued attacks, abductions and rapes by Muslims. During the partition of India into India and Pakistan 1947, (a Muslim land grab), Muslims kidnapped hundreds of thousands of Hindu and Sikh women and married them to Muslims. In November 1947, Muslim Pathan raiders enslaved Hindu and Sikh girls in Kashmir and sold them in Pakistan markets (Jhelum) (Khan p 284). Women committed Jauhar—jumping into fires, jumping into a well, or taking poison in preference to abduction, slavery and rape. (Khan p 252). Non-Muslims fled to ‘India’. In an ‘ethnic/religious’ cleansing attempt, Muslims slaughtered, forcibly converted and enslaved particularly in the area that would become and became Pakistan in an effort to create a pure Islamic state free of polluting others. Pakistan means ‘land of the pure’ and of course, only Muslims are pure! (see detail, part K)
        Today in Pakistan and Bangladesh (separated from Pakistan in 1971, formerly East Pakistan/East Bengal), Hindu, Sikh, Jain and Christian girls etc are abducted, raped and forced into Islam. Literally millions of non-Muslims have fled to India.
        Hunting those that fled the Islamic conquest: Islam’s sadism:

        Those resisting Islamic control, enslavement, rape and those whose entire property and family had been taken (rich or poor) or were unable to meet crushing taxes , had fled to the jungles. Islam never had complete control and millions resisted –they were not subjects (Khan p 98-99). People left the land resulting in famines killing thousands. Some became robbers.

        Several Muslim rulers hunted people referred to as bandits and rebels (Muwattis), slaughtering the males and enslaving their women and children or slaughtering them too as Islamic law allows if they ‘resist’ (Reliance of the Traveller, Law o9.10 p 603).

        Sultan Tipu
        Eg under Ghiyasuddin Balban (r 1265-85) as he cleared the jungles and areas around Delhi:

        “the blood of the rioters ran in streams, heaps of slain were to be seen near every village and jungle and the stench of the dead reached as far as the Ganges” (Khan p 250)

        Muslim traveller Ibn Buttuta(about 1345) witnessed SADISM towards Hindu prisoners and their wives and children under Sultan Ghayasuddin (Ghiyath al-Din)
        “All the infidels found in the jungle were taken prisoners; they had stakes sharpened at both ends and made the prisoners’ carry them on their shoulders. Each was accompanied by his wife and children and they were thus led into the camp……. In the morning, the Hindus who were made prisoners the day before, were divided into four groups, and each of these was led to one of the four gates of the main enclosure. There they were impaled on the posts they had themselves carried. Afterwards their wives were butchered and tied to the stakes by their hair. The children were massacred on the bosoms of their mothers, and their corpses left there. Then they struck camp and started cutting down trees in another forest, and all the Hindus who were made captive were treated in the same manner” (translation of Buttuta’s notes quoted in Bostom p644, also Sookdheo p 263, )
        An 80 year old leader was apparently treated well until they had taken everything from him , then they killed him and stuffed his skin with straw and hung it on a wall!! (Sookdheo p 263) (note this is during the ‘Turkish’ rule of India, a century BEFORE Vlad 111Dracula [1431-1476] spent his youth as a Turkish/Ottoman hostage see part G)
        .
        Sultan Muhammad Tughlaq (1325-51) hunted the jungle hideouts:

        “the whole of that country was plundered and laid waste and the heads of the Hindus were brought in and hung upon the ramparts of the fort of Baran” (cited in Khan p 251)

        Babur (1483-1540) noted the rebelliousness of the people who hid in the jungles. He wrote of his arrival in Agra:

        “neither grain for ourselves or corn for our horses was to be had. The villagers out of hostility and hatred to us, had taken to thieving and highway robbery; there was no moving on the roads….All the inhabitants had run away to jungles in terror.”(Khan p 95).

        But he slaughtered making piles of bodies and heads (Babur’s memoirs in Bostom p 651-3)

        Emperor Jahangir hunted such rebels, enslaving and sending 200,000 (1619-20) to slave markets in Iran on one occasion (Khan p 251). A traveller in India (1612-14) noted Jahangir’s wealth and the extreme poverty of ordinary people.
        Creating the Roma or Roma chave people:

        Roma can mean man and Roma chave means sons of the Indian god Rama. Many people fled India to avoid enslavement or conversion –they are the Romanies or gypsies of today found throughout Europe (Hitler killed them too) and the US. Gypsy legends give their origin as India. ‘Researches based on their language, customs, rituals, and physiogonomy affirm that it is Hindus from India who form the bulk of these people in Europe.’ (Lal [a] p451).

        Their 1st exodus seems to have occurred around the 7th century, coinciding with the Arab invasion of Sind. Mahmud Ghazni took them away in every campaign (997-1030) . The biggest group exited across Afghanistan to Europe in the 12th and 13th centuries following the defeat of Prithviraj Chauhan by Muhammad Ghauri. THEY ARE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE, and skilled craftspeople with a remarkable talent for music. (Lal [a] p 451-2)

        Slave uses: forced to serve Islam while Indian culture was trashed. What true Indian can tolerate this?

        The slave armies of the Sultanate had Turks, Persians, Seljuks, Oghus (Iraqi Turkmen), Afghans and Khiljis and black slaves . When the Khilji’s came to power (1290-1320), the first non-slave rulers of India, enslaved and forcibly converted Indians appeared in the army, despite objections, because they feared an attack from outside India. They had just ousted the previous ‘Turkish’ rule and couldn’t trust the loyalty of any in the army! Sultan Firoz Tughlaq (r 1351-88) fearing attack by Islamized Mongols, allowed some Hindus into the army.

        Indian soldiers, generally converted slaves with the lowest rank, cared for animals (elephants, horses) and performed personal service to higher ranks. They cleared jungles, made roads, set up camp and were in the front line of attacks to absorb the initial blows. Escape was impossible. Very few converted slaves rose to prominent position through valour and loyalty to the Muslim ruler (Khan p 304).

        .
        Particularly following the formation of the Delhi sultanate (1206) many slaves were retained in India, employed in every possible occupation –from cleaning up filth, labouring, cutting jungles to playing music and singing (Lal [d] p 553) They were forced to build mosques, minarets and palaces using the materials from destroyed religious sites, libraries or monasteries etc of their own. The ‘might of Islam’ mosque (Qwat-ul-islam) in Delhi is built over an idol temple and uses materials from 27 destroyed Hindu and Jain temples. Likewise for Deli’s Qutb Minar minaret where the wonderful sculptured Hindu figures on the stones are defaced or upside down or concealed (Khan p 299-300)

        Slaves worked in royal karkhana (factories or workhouses) particularly in the Sultanate and Mogul periods. They made everything from gifts, saddles, textiles, weapons…thousands were involved (Khan p 305)

        Slaves served at court minded wives and concubines (Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan had 5,000-6,000 women each in 1556-1658). Slaves were guards and administrators. Slaves danced, sang, played musical instruments, cared for hunting and food animals and were physicians. Sultan Muhammad Shah Tughlaq had 1,200 physicians and 10,000 falconers plus 1,000 slave musicians who taught music (Khan p 306).

        As usual, females and young boys provided sexual services. A Dutchman visiting India in the 17th century noted the sexual indulgence of Muslim rulers and noblemen who were pampered and entertained by concubines and wives and freely ‘enjoyed’ the concubines in the presence of the wife (Khan p310)

        In the Sindh (Bahawalpur), before it was incorporated into Pakistan (1954), the last Nawab had over 390 women and needed a wide range of tools to satisfy them eg 600 dildos (Khan p 311)

        Huge numbers of slaves were involved in building—e.g 70,000 for Sultan Alauddin Khilji (1296-1316). Building great monuments to themselves never stopped as when one ruler died or was removed, the successor built his own new monuments and palaces eg abandoning Iltutmish’s old city, Sultan Ghiysuddin Balban (r1265-85) built the Qasr-i-Lal (Red Fort) in Delhi. Delhi was a series of cities built by different Muslim rulers.

        Sultan Firoz Tughlaq (r1351-1388) had 180,000slaves. Of these a contingent of masons and builders with 12,000 slaves may have been involved in stone cutting alone! (Khan p 301). The buildings constructed during Islamic rule were designed and built by skilled Indian slave craftsmen, artisans and labourers at all levels, watched over by Muslim masters with whips (Korrah) (Khan p 301).
        Suffering slaves:

        Humiliation and cruelty: When Sultan Mahmud (997-1030) brought Hindu King Jaipal of Kabul to Ghanzi and subjected him to extreme humiliation, Jaipal jumped into a fire. (Khan p 291). Balban (about 1260) brought Hindu leading men and men of position, bound, shackled and chained to Delhi where Sultan Nasiruddin had the leading men executed –rendering others ‘tamed.’ (Lal [c] p 542) As we have seen many times in this series, Islam does everything to strip others of their dignity, equality, honor and self-respect. The excessive Jizya tax is paid in a public humiliation procedure.

        People were caught via lassos or ropes dragged around groups. They were tied, sometimes with iron shackles on the feet, sometimes around the neck and chained –until their spirit was broken and they were forcibly converted but they remained slaves. People capable of bearing arms were beheaded (Lal [d] p 552) . They were hit around the neck (no doubt reminding them they could be beheaded as they do when kafirs pay the jizya), forced on brutally long marches, exposed to the burning sun during the day and freezing cold at night, starved and given little water. Children were separated from parents. People writhed in agony and wailed (15th century report in Lal [c] p 543, Khan p 292)

        Eunuchs: All over the Islamic world, the conquered were castrated, including in India. This was done so men could guard harems, provide carnal indulgence for rulers, give devotion to the ruler as they had no hope of a family of their own and of course, this quickly reduced the breeding stock of the conquered. Castration was a common practice throughout Muslim rule possibly contributing to the DECLINE in India’s population from 200 million in 1000 CE to 170 million in 1500 CE (Khan p 314)

        Once Sultan Bakhtiyar Khilji conquered Bengal in 1205, it became a leading supplier of castrated slaves. This remained the case into the Mogul period (1526-1857).

        Akbar the Great (1556-1605) owned eunuchs. Said Khan Chaghtai owned 1,200 eunuchs (an official of Akbar’s son Jahangir)! In Aurangzeb’s reign, in 1659 at Golkunda (Hyderabad), 22, 000 boys were emasculated and given to Muslim rulers and governors or sold. (Khan 313).

        Sultan Alauddin Khilji (r 1296-1316) had 50,000 boys in his personal service; Sultan Muhammad Tughlaq (r1325-51) had 20,000 and Sultan Firoz Tughlaq (r 1351-1388) had 40,000 (Firoz Tulghlaq liked to collect boys in any way and had 180,000 slaves in total (Lal [c] p 542). Several commanders under various sultans were eunuchs. Muslim historians record the ‘infatuation’ of sultans Mahmud Ghazni, Qutbuddin Aibak, and Sikandar Lodi –for handsome young boys! Sultan Mahmud was infatuated by his Hindu commander Tilak (Khan p 314)
        Islam’s impact:

        (1) Worsening of social ills:

        In an effort to avoid enslavement and rape certain social ills increased and new ones developed.

        (a) Sati: where a wife throws herself on the funeral pyre was commendable but not compulsory in Indian society. This possibly increased during Muslim invasions when many men were killed and women left vulnerable.

        (b) Child marriage: Girls were betrothed to young Hindu boys to protect the girls from Muslim predators…The British also attempted to stop this practice (Khan p 253)

        (c) Caste system: Egalitarian Islam is a lie—the low caste who converted were still despised by upper ranks of Muslims and couldn’t enter mosques etc and this continues today eg ‘Bengal’ (Khan p 249-250). Many lower caste Indians were the strongest fighters against Islam which is a very white Arab supremacist, apartheid system.

        Nehru notes Islam: “made its caste system, which still had an element of flexibility in it, more rigid and fixed’ (Khan p 250)

        Under Islam the lower castes increased as people were stripped of their wealth and position right down to farmers whose property was taken while people were subjected to crushing taxes –hence many were pushed to the lowest level.
        These began under Islam, but stopped under British rule.

        (d) Jauhar:–unknown in pre-Islamic India. The earliest record occurs in the Chachnama by Muslim chronicler al-Kufi (Bostom p 81). Hindu women committed suicide by jumping into the fire (or other acts) to avoid enslavement and sexual violation by Muslims. When Qasim conquered Sindh, palace women set themselves on fire (Fort at Raor) (Lal [a] p 438). In Chittor jauhar occurred 3 times at least eg 1303 under attack by Alauddin Khilji, again in 1535 under attack by Bahadur Shah of Gujarat and in 1568 under attack by Akbar (possibly 8,000 women) Even in the time of partition into India and Pakistan (1947), it occurred again as non-Muslims eg Hindus were attacked (Khan p 252).

        (e) Thuggee cult (Thags): these were a religio-cultural cult of the goddess Kali who engaged in night-time robbery and murder. The British eradicated them through selective assassination, infiltration, police work and offering clemency for those who surrendered and cooperated.

        In the reign of Feroz Shah Khilji (1290-96) reports record him capturing 1000 Thags —the cult seems to have developed following the Islamic invasion and devastation.
        Reports from others pre-Islam eg visitors from China, suggest that such crime was not the case pre-Islam. (Khan p 255)

        While the British removed or attempted to remove these social ills and stopped enslavement, Muslims not only failed to stop social ills but worsened them. Indeed slavery and rape; child marriage; violence to women and to children who don’t pray, violence to non-Muslims; taking the property of non-Muslims; and an apartheid system of Muslim/non-Muslim, Male/female, white Arab/black Indian and many other ‘delights’ are part of Islam’s text, laws and ‘culture.’

        (2) Cultural, artistic and religious destruction; Backwardness and destruction of learning.

        Even Nehru who gives a rosy picture of Islam noted:

        “The Moslems who came to India from outside brought no new technique or political or economic structure. In spite of a religious belief in the brotherhood of Islam, they were class bound and feudal in outlook. In technique and in the methods of production and industrial organisation, they were inferior to what prevailed in India..” (cited in Khan p 185)

        Nehru noted the Muslims didn’t build one good college in 8 centuries! (Khan p 248)
        Despite being a creative and learned population initially, India made no notable contribution to science, philosophy and literature during Islamic rule (Khan p 249). Pre-Islamic control, India had significant achievements in science, mathematics (zero, algebra, geometry, decimal system), literature, philosophy, medicine, astronomy, architecture and music. Pre-Islam’s arrival eg in 630-650s a Chinese pilgrim describes Indian boys and girls from age 7 studying grammar, science of arts and crafts, medicine, logic, and philosophy and that primary education was relatively widespread. Muslim Caliphs hired Indian mathematicians and physicians who set up hospitals and medical schools in Baghdad. (Khan p 201-204). Muslims from Baghdad came to Taxila (Takshashila) University to study medicine. Muslim students and others came to India to learn science, mathematics, medicine, pharmacology, toxicology and more. The large number of reputed universities were eventually all destroyed by Muslims. At times Hindus rebuilt temples and returned to teaching only to have them repeatedly destroyed. Muslims set up madrassas for Muslims.

        In 770, an Indian scholar brought two highly important mathematical works to Baghdad e.g Brahmasiddhanta (Sindhind to Arabs) by the great 7th century Indian mathematician Brahmagupta –a mathematician and astronomer –which contained early ideas of algebra. The second manuscript contained a revolutionary system of denoting number and the concept of zero. In the 9th century, Muslim Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi took this work, combined it with Greek geometry (The Greek contribution in science, medicine, philosophy is huge), to become what we call today as algebra. Indian numerals were used by al-Khwarizmi in algorithms (a Latinized version of his name) to solve certain mathematical problems. Hence Muslims may have contributed but they certainly did not discover either zero or algebra and our so-called ‘Arabic Numerals’ are actually Indian (Hindu) Numerals.(Khan p 202) In Brahmagupta’s Khandakhadyaka (Arkanda), Arabs first became acquainted with a scientific system of astronomy in the 8th century. Books of medicine, toxicology, philosophy, chemistry and more were also taken into the Islamic world and translated. Indian mathematics became wide spread. Even a Spanish Muslim (11th century) praised the Indians for their superior knowledge in astronomy, mathematics, medicine, pharmacology, chemistry… .(Khan p 203-4). (Note Mayans also developed zero long before Islam entered the world!)
        India’s greatest mathematical system, the decimal system used today was the work of 3 great mathematicians—Bhashkaracharya and his daughter, Lilavati, and Brahmagupta.

        Marco Polo noted the praiseworthy female Rudramani Devi who ruled Telugu for 40 years (Khan p 255).

        Islam drove women into their homes and under the veil (Nehru in Khan p 255).
        As Islam spread Indian culture was debased and degraded. Centres of learning and libraries were destroyed. To Islam, everything else is jahiliyya (ignorance). Brahmans were accused of teaching ‘wicked sciences’ so schools and temples were constantly destroyed (Khan p 199)

        Alberuni (973-1050), a Persian scholar captured by Sultan Mahmud Ghazni (r 997-1030) was brought to India and travelled for 20 years studying Indian mathematics, philosophy, civil and religious law, geography, religion, astronomy (knowledge of the distance to planets, solar and lunar eclipses), physics and metaphysics and also India’s geography (cities etc) and customs. He wrote detailed books about these which informed invaders and facilitated their attacks and subjugation of India (Lal [a] p 448). He recorded the Muslim conquests of India, noting:

        “Mahmud utterly ruined the prosperity of the country …..Hindu sciences have retired far away from those parts of the country conquered by us, and have fled to places which our hands cannot yet reach (recorded in his book 1030-cited in Khan p 89, p 191, Bostom p 83, Trifkovic p 110, full quote part J)

        As for art, architecture, and religion – Muslim historians record with great delight the massive destruction of the religious sites of Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs etc on a scale with few parallels. The destruction of the temple that took 200 years to build in Mathura is utterly distressing (Trifkovic p 110). Ever heard of Angkor Wat and Angkor Tom and the whole complex built in Cambodia? Angkor Wat was built around the 12century to honour the Hindu god Vishnu—while in India, equally magnificent temple areas with their magnificent ‘human’ decoration (so offensive to Islam) were being destroyed! Despite being a UNESCO area, I fear for these and similar areas in Asia as Islam penetrates and takes control!

        Tragically Indian builders and artists were forced into the service of Islam with its endless restrictions on representations of human s and other animals—but some evidence of India’s fabulous art with its wonderful representations of people (vigorous and sensual, Trifkovic p 110) etc still exists and hopefully will fully revive. It’s too distressing to think of what was destroyed!

        What Islam has, it stole from others as the Arabian Peninsula tribes lagged well behind the social, political and civilisational development of India, Persia, Egypt and Syria (Khan p 175)(and look what happened when Islam arrived!!) Bringing in a watermelon doesn’t require or excuse the utter destruction and abuse carried out under the text and laws of Islam.

        (3) Dhimmitude, destitution and decline of native, non-Muslim Indians: Indians became dhimmis subjected to extreme degradation, exploitation and humiliation in their own country. (see articles this site on dhimmitude in general and its economic, social, political and religious aspects –see Bat Ye’Or’s work.). Islamic text, the Pact of Umar and Islamic laws defining dhimmitude remain till the day of Judgement. The humiliating payment of the substantial jizya with its accompanying threat of death is only one of a mass of taxes, threats and abuses non-Muslims were subjected to. When scholar Qazi Mughisuddin advised Sultan Alauddin Khilji (r 1296-1316) on collection of the Kharaj (land tax causing extreme economic deprivation) he also suggested a humiliating procedure including:

        “should the collector choose to spit into his mouth, he opens it. The purpose of this extreme humility on his part and the collector’s spitting into his mouth, is to show the extreme subservience incumbent on his class, the glory of Islam and the orthodox faith, and the degradation of the false religion (Hinduism).” (cited in Khan p 107-108).

        Exploitative taxes were used to enrich the treasury and force people into Islam outside mass conversion by the sword.

        Hindus became ‘serfs’ in their own land, forced to pay taxes and customs which considerably exceeded those required under Hindu law (Khan p 160). Conquests were for exploitation.

        From Qasim on, extracting jizya was a political and religious duty exacted:
        “with vigour and punctuality, and frequently with insult..” “The native population had to feed every Muslim traveller for 3 days and nights and had to submit to many other humiliations which are mentioned by Muslim historians” (Lal [a] p 439)
        Sultan Alauddin Khilji (reigned1296-1316) took 50-75% of the peasants produce in taxes (mainly the Kharaj) reducing peasants to bonded government slaves subjected to humiliation and destitution. Many sold their family to pay taxes or fled to the jungle (Khan p 108, 172). “The Hindu women and children went out begging at the doors of the Musalmans” (Sufi saint Shamsuddin Turk commenting on Alauddin in Khan p 191)

        During Aurangzeb reign (Akbar’s great grandson, r1658-1707), a European courtier, Niccolao Manucci, living in India noted Hindus converted to avoid taxes (Khan p 109-110).

        Eyewitnesses report in the 17th and 18th century that destitute peasants, their wives and children (males were castrated) were taken and sold by tax collectors to pay taxes. The people had become beggars in their own country (Khan p 88, 94, 283-4).

        Also removal of livelihood, position and false charges were used to force others into Islam. The council of Surat noted in 1668:

        “The Muhammadan would lodge a complaint to the Kazi (judge) that he had called the Prophet names or spoken contumaciously of their religion, produce a false witness or two and the poor man was forced to circumcision and made to embrace Islam.” (cited in Khan p 110)

        Mass slaughter, enslavement, forced conversion, castration of young boys and the use of females as sex/reproductive slaves producing Muslims, plus the entry of Muslims from elsewhere caused a fast increase in Muslims plus a decline in others. Violence and exploitation forced people to ‘convert.’ Villages were deserted. The loss of people, property, farm animals and grain (all booty) caused poverty and famine, killing thousands of ordinary Hindus.

        (4) Plunder of India’s wealth.

        India’s wealth in its people or its resources and products were taken by Muslims and sent to markets or Islamic centres of power eg Ghazni (Afghanistan) or Samarkand (Central Asia). Wealth was also sent as tribute, gifts and slaves for caliphs in Damascus, Baghdad, Cairo or Tashkent until Akbar (Mughal) and also to Islam’s holy cities of Mecca and Medina, Rum (Constantinople), Persia and others even in the Mughal period. India’s wealth was transferred to the wider Islamic world while India was depleted and reduced to misery. From Mohammad, Islamic conquests were to plunder and loot the wealth of the conquered and to enslave and ‘convert’ and to impose heavy taxes on the remaining non-Muslims to keep the treasuries going. Because Islam also aims to spread Islam over all, it destroys the culture, religions, sacred and precious objects, and history of others.
        Muslim rulers:

        “founded its luxury on India’s general poverty’ and India, under Muslim rule, experienced a series of famines, a fabulous death rate, …(Khan p 262)
        A nearly contemporary account of Mahmud Ghazni’s attacks in India reveals the incredible wealth taken. At one stage Mahmud had a throne of gold and silver built (see the historians account Bostom p 632-639) and he rebuilt Ghazni costing 7 million gold coins (Lal [a] p 447)

        Endless accounts from the beginning to the end describe the slaves, gold and silver idols and other objects, coins, precious stones, jewellery, furniture, clothes, cloths, indigo, Indian steel, equipment, grain, livestock (for food or used in battle, farming or transport), indeed everything was taken and usually what was left was burnt. Dead bodies were stripped of decent clothes, and pockets searched for coins, jewels etc (see Lal, Bostom, Khan).

        The loss of bullion (gold, silver) destabilised and devalued Indian currency so Indian merchants lost credit with foreign merchants. India’s balance of trade was also adversely affected. India was nolonger a seller of raw and finished goods. Indian merchants couldn’t continue their trade. Some had to do deals with externally based Muslim rulers eg Mahmud of Ghazni (around 1012) to facilitate trade and allow caravans to travel unmolested! (Lal [a] p 444)

        Why would people be creative, innovative or work hard when a Muslim could take it all?

        (5) White Arab supremacy:
        Indians are dark skinned and hence subjected to Islam’s hatred of black/dark skinned people (see Mohammad’s and Islam’s antiBlack racism. Part D in Islam’s genocidal slavery:.). Also, non-Arab converts to Islam are always second class. Islam is a white Arab supremacist ideology where converts must turn on their own history and culture and obliterate them, then they must revere Arab culture, the Arab language etc. For legitimacy, rulers tried to claim a relationship to the Arabs particularly to Mohammad’s tribe (Quraysh). ‘Well into the 20th century, the dark-skinned Nawab of Bahawalpur (Sindh) who had an obsession for white women for producing brighter children, fanatically claimed his ancestry to the Abbasid family of the Quraysh clan’ (Khan p 181) This same absurdity is found amongst non-Arab Muslim leaders in many areas over time (eg Africa).

        Hatred of black people is revealed in comments by Muslim conquerors of India in parts J, K which examine the jihad against India from comments made by the conquerors themselves or their chroniclers.

        Conclusion:

        The inhuman behaviour applied to the whole population by Muslims was the same whether the Muslims were Sufis, Arabs, Afghanis, Turks, or Mogul as all followed Islam’s laws, text and the fine example of Mohammad. It should also be noted that the violence and enslavement continued even after they had virtual control over India because the aim was not merely to conquer but to force all into Islam. Muslims did not come to join Indian society, they came to wipe it out and replace it with Islam—which tells them that they own everything because it’s the booty promised by allah. The pagans/idolaters, polytheists had to convert or die and only then could there be (Islamic) peace! Slaves were the just reward for Islam’s fighters–part of the booty promised by allah.
        ________________________________________
        References:
        1) Bostom, A. G. ‘The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic holy war and the fate of the non-Muslims.’ Prometheus Books. New York. 2005.
        2) Khan, M. A. ‘Islamic Jihad: A legacy of forced conversion, imperialism and slavery.’ iUniverse, Bloomington, IN. 2009. (An Indian ex-Muslim)
        3) Lal [a], K.S. Muslims invade India p 433-455 in Bostom (1) above.
        4) Lal [b], K.S. Jihad under the Turks and jihad under the Mughals p 456-461 in Bostom (1) above.
        5) Lal [c], K.S. Slave-taking during Muslim rule p535-548 in Bostom (1) above.
        6) Lal [d], K.S. Enslavement of Hindus by Arab and Turkish invaders p 549-554 in bostom (1) above.
        7) Lal [e], K.S. The Origins of Muslim slave system p 529-534 in bostom (1) above.
        8) Reliance of the Traveller: A classic manual of Islamic sacred law. In Arabic with facing English Text, commentary and appendices edited and translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller Al-Misri, Ahmad ibn Naqib; Amana publications Maryland USA 1994.
        9) Sookhdeo, P. ‘Global Jihad: The future in the face of Militant Islam.’ Isaac Publishing. 2007.
        10) Trifkovic, S. ‘The sword of the prophet.’ Regina Orthodox Press, Inc. 2002.
        11) Ye’or, Bat. ‘Islam and Dhimmitude: Where civilisations collide’ translated from the French by Miriam Kochan and David Littman. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press 2002, reprint 2005.

        • Raj, your truncated knowledge about Islam has led you to its hatred.

          Imam Jafar gave a Christian some water and when his slave asked him whether it was allowed to give charity to a Christian no rot, he replied, ‘yes, in the time of need.’ (Wasa’il al Shia, volume #2, page #50)

    • I agree Mr. Modest Muslim and I know that true Islam has nothing to do with it but still some ignorant muslims do it . People who have no Idea about Authentic Islam perform acts which are hurtful to others( same goes for ignorant Hindus as well) many of my Muslim friends dont eat beef at all, when I asked them the reason for it they say that they are following what Islam orders them to do. As beef eating is not a compulsory act in Islam and as Hindus are hurt by cow slaughter its more Islamic to not eat Beef . Thanks for understanding and for showing your support.

      • Ligjtman, ask yourself, what are shoes made of? Aren’t most of them made out of tanned leather from the slaughtered cows whom you call “mothers”? The big question comes : Who owns most of the shoe manufacturing companies in India?

        The whole world slaughters cattle, …eats its meat and …drinks the milk…save for very few orthodox, superstitious, mytho and barbaric idol worshippers, correct? Yet tons of thousand of hindus in diaspora as well as in India DO chew cattle products!

        Once more ask yourself : Do the cows produce milk for only the Indian babies? How come the rest of the world does NOT worship the cow as God? Is the rest of the world silly? What proof does one need to prove the highest cattle consumption in India to begin with????????

        Do you get hurt when the Chinese, Russians, ALL Eastern countries, Africans, Australians, both of Americas, Europe…etc., slaughter cattle? you must be silly to go against cattle slaughter when your fake gods made some barbecue out of the cattle meat in your Scriptures!

        Quran : 5:3 READ VERY CAREFULLY:

        Yusuf Ali: “Forbidden to you (for food) are: dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and that on which hath been invoked the name of other than Allah; that which hath been killed by strangling, or by a violent blow, or by a headlong fall, or by being gored to death; that which hath been (partly) eaten by a wild animal; unless ye are able to slaughter it (in due form); that which is sacrificed on stone (altars); (forbidden) also is the division (of meat) by raffling with arrows: that is impiety. This day have those who reject faith given up all hope of your religion: yet fear them not but fear Me. THIS DAY have I PERFECTED your religion for you, completed My favour upon you, and have CHOSEN FOR YOU ISLAM AS YOUR RELIGION. But if any is forced by hunger, with no inclination to transgression, Allah is indeed Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

        Join Islam….CHOSEN FOR YOU ISLAM AS YOUR RELIGION.

      • Ligjtman

        Do you know that 99% of hindus do NOT know the Vedas and Puranas nor the Sanscrit??????????

        So for you to turn people to hinduism is impossible and that means Hinduism IS decreasing and NOT increasing, correct?

        Siddhartha Buddha NEVER believed in any god and so the people who follow his teachings have never been Hindus! Jainism does NOT believe in Hindu gods too nor does Sikhism! So how many mytho, superstitious, barbaric Hindus do we remain with who worship Idols, which have NO brains nor can lift a finger as gods?

        The rest of the Hindus are all divided into hundreds of sects. Do you know that Yonis have thousand of bacterias and they worship that too?

        Though Muslims have wrongfully divided themselves into some sects yet all of them…
        every Muslim believes in the Quran as their ultimate source and must be knowing some or all parts of the Quran by heart!

        Whether cattle eating is compulsory or not in Islam is NONE of your business and the Quran IS an open Guidance for ALL to go through written some 1400 years ago, yet it IS the BEST book on morality on the face of the earth. Stop reading the fake Hadiths!

        • Dear Mr Plum, All I was writing about was a simple gesture which would encourage friendliness between communities but you Sir instead of understanding my context have started an all out war by attacking me and My faith in this manner, Please remember tolerance is a two way street.

          Tell me do you really think that all muslims follow the the Islamic guidelines word for word? Ofcourse not its their choice and Islam cant be held responsible for what they do. Similarly not all Hindus or Sanatan Dharmis are religious some are so swayed by money that they will do anti dharmic activities for it , remember its Humans we are talking about here there are bound to be variations in their actions. So a hindu owning a cow leather plant is doing Anti Dharmic activity and yes we feel equally bad when cows are slaughtered anywhere and by anyone we dont single out muslims and if someone does that He/she is wrong .

          Please do inform me that how in the world did you come up with the info that” 99% of Sanatan Dharmis dont know their Dharma”??? As far as I know there has been no official census in that regard. Several Dharmic Organizations are working day and night to Spread the Light of Rishi Dharma in the lives of millions of people.

          My own organization Chinmaya Mission this very year conducted a competition called ” Transforming Indians to transform India ” this project alone reached out to about Two Lakh people. Our TV series ” Upanishad Ganga” reaches out to billions through various TV channels both in India and US and through YouTube as well. Regular Geeta Gyan Yagyas har held in almost every city of India and US which are attended by hundreds of Hindus and non Hindus alike…Now these are just some of the activities of just one organization there are other organizations big and small involved in similar activities and Let me assure you that the Hindu of today know even more about his faith than any generation of the past ever did.

          Your mentioning of other faiths like Jainism , Buddhism and Sikhism indicates that you sir have no understanding or information about the two major Groups of world religions , almost all the religions of the world belong to either one of the Groups..but what are the two Groups????? They are as follows– The Western Religions of Judaism , Christianity and Islam form the group of ABRAHAMICAL RELIGIONS & the Eastern Religions of Sanatan Dharma , Jainism , Buddhism and Sikhism form the Group of DHARMIC RELIGIONS.

          Now there is a reason Why these religions are grouped together, you mentioned that the other three Dharmic Faiths of Jainism , Buddhism and Sikhism dont believe in Vedic Principals( an extremely misinformed comment ) so I will explain the reason why these four faiths are grouped together.

          First not all Hindus worship the Sakar or With form aspect of Brahmn many like myself are adwaitis and follow the Adwait Siddhanta or Adwait Doctrine of Adi Shankara ..Those who follow the the Dwaita , Vishistadwait ,Shuddhadwaita or the Achintya BhedaBhed Siddhanta do Sakar Upasana or worship a personal aspect of Brahmn..Now it must be clear that you dont have to worship a personal form of God in order to be a hindu and even if you do Vedanta finds nothing wrong with that as Brahman is defined as” Nirgunam-Gun Sashwatam” meaning being formless and having a form at the same time how is that possible? Well because Brahmn is not ruled by material laws like we are Brahmn is further defined as ” Kartum akartum anytha kartum samartha” meaning Brahmn has the capacity do one thing & the opposite of that thing and a completely different thing At The Same Time…I would like to continue but we will stray from the topic…

          You ignorantly commented that Jainism, Sikkhism and Buddhism dont follow Vedic Principles…Well my dear friend please allow me to correct you…Lets see what Vedic Principles and Ideas are shared by all four Dharmic Faiths of the world.

          1)Firstly Jain Dharma Bauddh Dharma , Sikkh Dharm and of course Sanatan Dharma all believe in the Vedic Principle of the existence of the Atma ,this Atma is not the same as “Soul” of Abrahamical Religions .Atma is and was ever eternal nor was it born nor will it die and is beyond pain and pleasure but is itself the source of infinite bliss.
          Unlike the linear view of life taken in Abrahamic religions, for Sanatanis the Jainis , the Bauddh & the Sikhs, life, birth and death are repeated, for each person, in a continuous cycle

          2)Secondly All Four believe in the Law of Karma …Death is nothing but the act of us changing bodies but the results of the good and bad deeds stay with us even when we take a new birth

          3) All Four Believe in Guru Parampara or the tradition of enlightened masters and their students .

          4) All believe in the Idea of Reincarnation.

          5) All four want to reach the state of Nirwan or Moksh when the Atma becomes free of the bondage of Karma and does not have to return to the material world .

          6) All four preach Ahimsa. JainDharma and Bauddh Dharma follow it more stringently whereas Sanatan Dharma and Sikh Dharma follow a much more flexible outlook for example Vedic Rishis state “Ahimsa Paramo Dharma
          Dharma himsa tathaiva cha” meaning Non-violence is the supreme dharma. So too is violence in service of Dharma.
          Guru Gobind SinghJi the tenth Sikh Guru states something similar. He writes”The positive values of ahimsa like compassion, love, universal brotherhood, freedom and self respect must prevail. However, if these are violated, man must resist. When all peaceful methods for such resistance are exhausted, the use of sword, is lawful .

          7) Believe in the existance of Maya -The world is just a temporary illusion and some get enchanted with this illusion and forget their real nature .

          I can continue with the detailed discussion of the sacred texts of these Dharmic Faiths but that wold make this reply way too long and I guess I have already made my point.

          Lastly Sir , the attitude of” My religion is better than yours” has created enough hate and havock which is enough for several lifetimes lets stop this and begin to understand and respect other faiths …I my entire response I have not even once insulted , defamed or attacked your religion Islam, as I think its the sign of a weak and low character when we do that to any religion. I might sometimes comment on certain actions of some muslims but never the faith of Islam.
          ….and as far as your comment on me converting to Islam well…Sorry Sir,
          Its impossible to convert me now sir as my Gurudev has coloured me in his colour from head to heart , but still thanks for the offer.

          I hope that you will understand what I tried and wanted to convey in this reply.
          No hard feelings.

          Best Wishes.

          • Ligjtman, thank you for clearing the air and the respect you have of other religions as well. My personal religious beliefs matter less but I would like to apply justice where it is due for Islam or any other religion. I personally respect people on merit and not for the religion they follow.

            Maybe we may discuss a few points in retrospect :

            Your comments : “encourage friendliness between communities” can NEVER be matched by your open remarks like : “Another example in the long list of worldwide violence and barbarism committed by the followers of the religion of “peace”, ” What else can the religion of “peace” do? NO surprises here , Cow slaughter is not mandatory in Bakar Eid but its done just to hurt, insult and aggravate the Hindus” and “the raping of the minors during Idd festivities”. Your above comments are NOT reasonable as they do NOT “encourage friendliness between communities”.

            You are right when you said not all muslims follow Islam strictly.

            I said : “Do you know that 99% of hindus do NOT know the Vedas and Puranas nor the Sanscrit”?
            I stand by that as if they would have understood Sanskrit then there would have been the religion of One God only and that is called Islam! (Ref : Bhagavad Gita 7:20 Those who worship demi gods are lost, Chandogya Upanishad 6:2:1 Begets not nor is begotten, Svetasvatara Upanishad 4:19 is unique…no likeness of Him, same chap vs 4:20 formless, “There is no image of Him.” Yajurveda 32:3)

            In hinduism (a misnomer) there should be worship of only ONE God as per their Scriptures. If those Hindus knew the sanskrit and their scriptures they would have realised their folly of worshipping demi gods!!! I have gone backwards in history and can assert that hindus do NOT even know how their religion came into existence in the first place! If you …can give us a few names…of the clever Rishis who composed the Vedas will do…..!!

            I wish you well and success in your endeavors but would ask you to preach the truth about One God as per your scriptures rather than roll into abyss of darkness as some Babas do!

            Sikhism : O brother, you worship gods and goddesses. What can you ask of them and what can they give to you? O brother, the stones/idols you wash with water sink in water (in other words how could these stones help you cross the ocean of worldly temptations)” Aad Guru Granth Sahib – page 637(wiki)

            Jainism : Mahavira, is revered as their prophet though they too do NOT know who founded their religion!!! Jainism is a distinct religion of India and not a branch of any other religion. The sacred books of the Hindus like Vedas, etc. are not accepted by the Jainas and the Hindus also do not recognize even a single scripture of the Jainas. As Hinduism is a sacrificial religion, the performance of several sacrifices for a variety of reasons and for different duration has got an important place in it. This is not the case with Jainism and especially the animal sacrifices practiced by the Hindus have absolutely no place in Jainism.

            No concept of God in Jainism!!

            Buddhism : belongs to the category of ‘Founded Religion’ as it was founded by a specific person viz.. Lord Gautama Buddha, at a particular period of time i.e.. in the sixth century B.C.!! That is called “Cult” and is NOT a religion!!

            And finally you said : “I my entire response I have not even once insulted , defamed or attacked your religion Islam, as I think its the sign of a weak and low character when we do that to any religion”.

            Whose character is lower when you commented : “Another example in the long list of worldwide violence and barbarism committed by the followers of the religion of “peace”, ” What else can the religion of “peace” do? NO surprises here , Cow slaughter is not mandatory in Bakar Eid but its done just to hurt, insult and aggravate the Hindus” and “the raping of the minors during Idd festivities”.

            For your kind information cattle slaughter is sanctioned by the Quran. Muslims slaughter animals NOT to hurt others’ “feelings” but for food because it IS allowed in their religion to eat of the cattle products. They do NOT become holier than thou as some Hindus do!!!

          • I made that remark as a sarcasm , my reply to Mr. Moderate Muslim , where I clearly mention that some Ignorant Muslims are responsible and have included ignorant Hindus as well, I think clears my views on this topic ..

            As I mentioned Before please dont quote Vedic Verses out of context and make the wrong assumption that they ask us to follow islam..Ofcource Vedanta believes in One God but there is a huge difference in how vedanta aspires to attain Godhead ..One Brahmn expresses itself in various forms. The many gods outsiders see are not separate entities to the Vedantist , All are aspects of the one and the same Brahmn.Hindu monotheism is very interesting and attractive subject. Hindu Monotheism is far different from Judaist (abrahmic) monotheism ( i.e. monotheism of Jew, Christen and Islam). It is not ideology or any dogmatism, it is just common belief of all Hindu that the God of mankind is one.

            Here is one very famous verse we recite every morning in Kailash Ashram and is a fine example of Hindu Monotheism infact the Vedic Viewpoint is more close to Monism than to Monotheism .

            “Akashat patitam toyam sagaram prati gacchati, sarva deva namaskaram Keshavam prati gacchati,Ruchinam vaichitryad rijukutil nana path jusham; nrinam ekogamyastvamasi pyasamarnavmiti”- This means Al the water fallen from the sky goes to the sea, salutations to all the gods reaches to the one Lord , Due to the differences in individual dispositions, people follow different paths, but you are the only destination of all of them, just as the sea is the destination of all the waters.

            Hinduism is called Sanatan dharma that means its eternal and no body can formulate or invent something which is eternal. The Vedas are divine and we believe that the Vedas is Brahmn expressing itself in the form of pure knowledge here is the manta that clearly states the same “sabdam-brahma dadhad vapuh” -meaning “Appearing in Your transcendental form as the Vedas and as the personal feature of the Absolute Truth…. ” and just like the religion ,the Vedas have always been there and verbally continued through the Strict Guru Parampara . It was Vyas deva who first compiled the Vedas ( We dont credit Vyas deva for writing the Vedas …it cannot be done as they were always there and available to all enlightened masters) and even then the Vedas are ever expanding , they include the knowledge of the four volumes complied by Vyas Deva but are not limited to them.

            I never wrote that the Four Dharmic Religions of Sanatan , Jain, Baudh & Sikh are one and the same religion …but because they are all Dharmic in nature they share certain basics with Vedanta , They dont argue about Dharma itself but have a different opinion on how that Dharma is best realized. There are differences but there are similarities as well for example the Adwait Siddhanta of Adi Shankara ( the one I follow) is strikingly close to the teachings of the Sikh Gurus.

            The Bhagwad Geeta verse you mentioned is

            kamais tais tair hrta-jnanah
            prapadyante ‘nya-devatah
            tam tam niyamam asthaya
            prakrtya niyatah svaya

            Here is the actual translation

            Those whose minds are distorted by material desires surrender unto demigods and follow the particular rules and regulations of worship according to their own natures.

            This is not indicative of the faulty notion that Vedanta and Islam are one and all Hindus should follow an Abrahamical Faith. There are basic differences between the philosophies of Dharmic Religions and Abrahamical Religions which can never coincide with each other .

            Here is the defination of the above mentioned verse according to Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu who is considered to be an Incarnation of Sri Krishna and one of the major acharyas of the Vedic Dharma , We already have our acharyas telling us what our scriptures say and as such there is no room for comment by an outsider, Just like Hazrat Muhammad’s words are final for you guys similarly the words of our acharyas are final for us , our scripture mean what Greats like Sri Chaitanya and Adi Shankara tell us what they mean and thats it.

            Any way on with the defination of the Geeta verse.

            Those who are freed from all material contamination surrender unto the Supreme Lord and engage in His devotional service. As long as the material contamination is not completely washed off, they are by nature non-devotees. But even those who have material desires and who resort to the Supreme Lord are not so much attracted by external nature; because of approaching the right goal, they soon become free from all material lust. In the Srimad-Bhagavatam it is recommended that whether one is free from all material desires, or is full of material desires, or desires liberation from material contamination, or is a pure devotee and has no desire for material sense gratification, he should in all cases surrender to Vasudeva and worship Him.
            It is said in the Bhagavatam that less intelligent people who have lost their spiritual sense take shelter of demigods for immediate fulfillment of material desires. Generally, such people do not go to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, because they are in particular modes of nature (ignorance and passion) and therefore worship various demigods. Following the rules and regulations of worship, they are satisfied. The worshipers of demigods are motivated by small desires and do not know how to reach the supreme goal, but a devotee of the Supreme Lord is not misguided. Because in Vedic literature there are recommendations for worshiping different gods for different purposes (e.g., a diseased man is recommended to worship the sun), those who are not devotees of the Lord think that for certain purposes demigods are better than the Supreme Lord. But a pure devotee knows that the Supreme Lord Krsna is the master of all. In the Caitanya-caritamrta it is said that only the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Krsna, is master and all others are servants. Therefore a pure devotee never goes to demigods for satisfaction of his material needs.

            Demigods are not fake or made-up entities We call them Devatas but there is only one Ishwar or Parmatma ..Devatas can be many and are more close to the concept of Angels in western religions. Even this shloka does not negate the existence of Devatas . Devatas are to be respected by offering pooja etc BUT only Brahmn is to be worshipped .I see nothing wrong with showing respect to the angelic helpers by the means of Pooja as long as we dont forget the supreme God.

            The other Verses you mentioned belong to the Adwait Siddhant and hence glorify the formless aspect of Brahmn , but let me share some other Adwaiti verses with you .We Adwaitis believe that there are four most important mantras in the Vedas these are known as MahaVakyas they are 1- Aham Brahsmi ( I am Brahmn) 2- Tat Twam Asi ( thou are that god or Brahmn) 3- Ayam atma brahma ( Atma and Brahmn are one and the same) 4-Sarvam khalvidam brahma ( All of this is brahmn )

            Advaita, which means non-duality, not-two. If this little planet were to fall into the sun and burn up, there would no longer be any religionists or philosophers, but that which truly “is” still “is.” Advaita is exactly what it says it is, Advaita, not-two, which stands alone. To transcend all of the levels of false identity so as to “Be” that Reality of Advaita is the Knowledge or Jnana that is sought. It is only the most sincere and longing of aspirants who seek and Know this in direct experience. For others, it is merely an arena of philosophical and religious debate. For those who Know, Advaita stands alone.

            I have tried to explain Adwaita Siddhanta as briefly as I can and Hope I can get the message through, Now please Sir contemplate on the Non Form worship of Vedanta and tell me how is this philosophy close to Islam? I dont mean any disrespect when I write this BUT the entire building of Islam will fall the moment it accepts Adwaita Siddhanta ..and yet still some muslims in ignorance tell us Adwaiti verses and then want us to accept Islam . Either one can accept Adwait Siddhanta or one can accept Islam you cannot do both at the same time so the quoting of these verses by Muslims is nothing more than an oxymoron . ( again I dont want to be disrespectful)

            Just like there are Verses which glorify the Nirakar swaroop ( formless aspect) of Brahmn there are Vedic Mantras which glorify the Sakar Swaroop( personal aspect) of Brahmn.

            Let me share some with you

            Rigveda 6/47/18 :- “Roopam Roopam Pratirropa Babhoova Tadasya Roopam ..Prati Chakshanaya.. Indromayibh Pururoopa Eeyate”

            Means the One God Assumes Various forms with his Divine powers…

            Rigveda (1/164/46):-“Indram Mitram Varunmagni Mahuratho Divyah Sa Suparno Garutman..EKAM Sadvipra Bahudha Vadantyagni Yamam Matarishwan Mahuh..”

            Means:- ” Indra, Mitra, Varuna, Agni ,etc..are the various forms and Names of God… But God is only ONE who has Infinite Deeds , Forms & Names.”

            Bhagwatam -“bahuni santi namani rupani ca sutasya te guna-karmanurupani.”

            Means:-For this son of yours(referring to Sri Krishna) there are many forms and names according to His transcendental qualities.

            yat tv anama-rupa evayam bhagavan harir isvarah/ akarteti ca yo vedaih smritibhis cabhidhiyate–
            Means:-It is the Personality of Godhead, Lord Hari, whom the Vedas and smritis describe as that which has no name or form and which does nothing.

            There are many other verses but right now these are the ones which came to mind.

            So you see The Vedic literature glorifies both the aspects of the lord and accepting one does not mean we reject the other .

            Really sorry for such a long reply but I had no choice …Vedic Dharma is a vast topic and I made my best efforts to explain its various sides as concisely as possible. Please have patience and read through it slowly. Sorry again

            Regards.

      • ALL MOHAMMEDANS ARE IGNORANT:

        THE JIMMY SAVILE OF MECCA

        THE SEALED NECTAR OF ISLAM

        THE PERFECT MUSLIM

        And surely thou hast sublime morals
        (Surat Al-Qalam 68:4).

        Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah an excellent exemplar
        (Surat Al-Ahzab 33:21).

        Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly.

        Muhammad fantasized about baby Aisha before soliciting her from her father.

        Muhammad said: “I had a dream, a wet dream, about a little girl”!

        Sahih Bukhari 9.140 Narrated ‘Aisha:

        Allah’s apostle said to me, “you were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘if this is from Allah, then it must happen.

        Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 7.18 Narrated by Ursa
        The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage.
        Abu Bakr exclaimed “But I am your brother.”
        The Prophet said, “You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she is lawful for me to marry.”

        *** Abu Bakr was so shocked at Muhammad’s proposal to marry his child Aisha of six years that he told him ‘but I am your brother’.

        This word ‘BUT’ which in Arabic is “INNAMA” brings out the true disbelief of Abu Bakr regarding the request, which of course turned out to be an unchallengeable demand.

        Abu Bakr’s shock is evidence that what Muhammad was demanding was against the social norms of even the pagans of 1400 years ago. Since his companions actually believed him as the messenger of Allah, Muhammad was able to fulfill each and every one of his fantasies, lusts & desires.

        Muhammad was able to receive alleged divine verses sanctifying his deeds with MADE to ORDER revelations from his accomplice, the ever obedient and willing Allah***

        Muhammad, 50, marries baby Aisha at age 6

        Sahih Bukhari volume 5, book 58, number 234

        Narrated Aisha: the prophet engaged (married) me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, um ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me.

        …….she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some ansari women who said, “best wishes and Allah’s blessing and a good luck.” then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

        Bukhari vol 8, bk 73, no 151

        Narrated ‘Aisha: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the prophet, & my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the prophet would call them to join & play with me. (the playing with the dolls & similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-bari page 143, vol.13)

        HOW TO THIGH

        Now let us see how thighing is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

        Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.
        According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

        Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

        Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.

        Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.“Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

        The inquirer asked the following:‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’
        After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

        That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers’” (Fatwa No. 31409).

        Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

        AISHA WASHING SEMEN FROM MUHAMMAD’S CLOTHES

        From the Hadith of Bukhari:

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

        Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

        I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

        Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

        I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

        From the Hadith of Bukhari:

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 230:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        as above (229).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

        Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

        I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

        Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

        I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

        Mohammed heard one of his wives was leaving him, so he rushed home where he found her on the carpet in front of the tent with her belongings; he sat down beside her & said, “I heard you were planning to leave me?”
        She replied, “Yes, I heard your other wives saying, you were a pedophile!”
        Mohammed thinks for a minute or so & then responds,
        “that’s a mighty big word for a 6 year old child.”

        THE QURAN & MARRYING LITTLE GIRLS

        Islam does allow you to marry pre-menstruating girls. The following verse is from At-Talaq (or Divorce). Islam’s main concern during a divorce is knowing who the father is (in case of a pregnancy). The waiting period is known as iddah.

        65.4 Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the prescribed period, if you have any doubts, is three months, AND FOR THOSE WHO HAVE NO COURSES (it is the same): for those who are pregnant, their period is until they deliver their burdens: and for those who fear Allah, He will make things easy for them.

        Tafsir al-Jalalayn (Commentary)
        And [as for] those of your women who (read allā’ī or allā’i in both instances) no longer expect to menstruate, if you have any doubts, about their waiting period, their prescribed [waiting] period shall be three months, and [also for] those who have NOT YET MENSTRUATED, because of their YOUNG AGE, their period shall [also] be three months — both cases apply to other than those whose spouses have died; for these [latter] their period is prescribed in the verse: they shall wait by themselves for four months and ten [days] [Q. 2:234]. And those who are pregnant, their term, the conclusion of their prescribed [waiting] period if divorced or if their spouses be dead, shall be when they deliver. And whoever fears God, He will make matters ease for him, in this world and in the Hereafter.

        Tafsir Asbab Al-Nuzul by Al-Wahid
        (And for such of your women as despair of menstruation…) [65:4]. Said Muqatil: “When the verse (Women who are divorced shall wait, keeping themselves apart…), Kallad ibn al-Nu‘man ibn Qays al-Ansari said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, what is the waiting period of the woman who does not menstruate and the woman who has not menstruated yet? And what is the waiting period of the pregnant woman?’ And so Allah, exalted is He, revealed this verse”. Abu Ishaq al-Muqri’ informed us Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn Hamdun> Makki ibn ‘Abdan Abu’l-Azhar Asbat ibn Muhammad Mutarrif Abu ‘Uthman ‘Amr ibn Salim who said: “When the waiting period for divorced and widowed women was mentioned in Surah al-Baqarah, Ubayy ibn Ka‘b said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, some women of Medina are saying: there are other women who have not been mentioned!’ He asked him: ‘And who are they?’ He said: ‘Those WHO ARE TOO YOUNG [such that they have not started menstruating yet], those who are too old [whose menstruation has stopped] and those who are pregnant’. And so this verse (And for such of your women as despair of menstruation…) was revealed”.

        Islamic Websitehttp://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/12667
        “And those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘Iddah (prescribed period), if you have doubt (about their periods), is three months; and for those who have no courses [(i.e. they are still immature) their ‘Iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise…”

        Tafsir ibn Kathir (Read at your own leisure)
        http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=65&tid=54223

        AIN’T GONNA FOLLOW NO CHILD MOLESTER

        They try to tell me my religion is wrong

        They try to tell me to follow Islam

        They said their prophet was a righteous dude

        But I found out none of their words were true

        I read the Quran and I read the hadith

        And the sickness of Muhammad was apparent to me

        He justified perversion in the name of Allah

        When he married a girl too young for a bra

        II

        She was playing with dolls when the prophet came

        Her childhood was stolen in Allah’s name

        Aisha was nine when he took her to bed

        Don’t tell me that fool’s not sick in the head

        Ain’t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, prophet pretender.

        Ain’t gonna follow no child molester,

        Islam is not for me.

        Islam is not for me.

        III

        The sickness of the Islamic mind

        Has caused the Mullahs to be blind

        To justify their prophet they would justify sin

        So the sins of the prophet are repeated again

        All over the world in Islamic states

        9 year old girls suffer cruel fate

        Sold into marriage to twisted men

        And Aisha’s sad story is repeated again

        IV

        Ain’t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, prophet pretender.

        Ain’t gonna follow no child molester,

        Islam is not for me.

        Islam is not for me.

        Do you care about women all over the world?

        Do you care about those little girls?

        Then stand up and fight for human rights

        Speak out against the laws of Islam

        V

        Ain’t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, prophet pretender.

        Ain’t gonna follow no child molester,

        Islam is not for me.

        Islam is not for me.

        Islam is not for me.

        THE RAPE OF AISHA:-

        The modern followers of Muhammad understanding perfectly well the implications of a fifty three years old man having sex with a nine years old child, do their worst to either deny or pervert the very Muhammadan records that tell us this sordid story.

        It is one of the more sordid episodes in Muhammad’s conduct that even the modern Muhammadan scholars do their utmost to hide.

        According to tradition, Muhammad ‘married’ Aisha her when she was a child of six years of age and he was fifty years old; so young in fact, that she brought with her, her toys; this evidence alone shows that psychologically and socially, she was still an innocent and immature child.

        Muhammad consummated his ‘marriage’ with her at the age of nine years, when he was fifty three years old.
        The waiting period of three years had to do with the FACT that at that time Aisha had contracted a disease, whereby she temporarily lost all her hair.

        The so called ‘disease’ was actually due to the immense shock of a child being handed over to a much older person. Such psychological traumas can and do produce almost INSTANT side effects, such as loss of hair or even hair turning white.

        Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 6.399 Narrated by Yusuf bin Mahik
        I was in the house of ‘Aisha, the mother of the Believers.
        She said, “This revelation: ‘Nay, but the Hour is their appointed time (for their full recompense); and the Hour will be more previous and most bitter,’ (54.46) was revealed to Muhammad at Mecca while I was a playful little girl.”

        Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 7.18 Narrated by Ursa
        The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage.
        Abu Bakr exclaimed “But I am your brother.”
        The Prophet said, “You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she is lawful for me to marry.”

        *** Abu Bakr was so shocked at Muhammad’s proposal to marry his child Aisha of six years that he told him ‘but I am your brother’.

        This word ‘BUT’ which in Arabic is “INNAMA” brings out the true disbelief of Abu Bakr regarding the request, which of course turned out to be an unchallengeable demand.

        Abu Bakr’s shock is evidence that what Muhammad was demanding was against the social norms of even the pagans of 1400 years ago. Since his companions actually believed him as the messenger of Allah, Muhammad was able to fulfill each and every one of his fantasies, lusts & desires.

        Muhammad was able to receive alleged divine verses sanctifying his deeds with MADE to ORDER revelations from his accomplice, the ever obedient and willing Allah***

        Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 5.234 Narrated byAisha

        The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down.
        Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. She halted me at the door, and I burst into laughter.

        I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage).
        Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

        *** The date of their so called marriage was c. 621CE, one or two years after the Hijra. It is obvious that he did not consummate his ‘marriage’ to her earlier because of her illness.

        An illness that came about due to the shock of the events that were taking place around a little uncomprehending child girl. Aisha’s very DETALED report above, proves without a doubt what a nervous and uncomprehending little girl she was***

        Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 9.139/40 Narrated by Aisha
        Allah’s Apostle said to me, “You were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you.
        I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘Uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘If this is from Allah, then it must happen.’
        Then you were shown to me, the angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said (to him), ‘Uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘If this is from Allah, then it must happen.’ ”

        *** Muhammad started having wet dreams of Aisha when she was less than six years of age. He wasted no time fulfilling his desire in spite of the fact that the object of his lust was a mere child. Is it ‘normal’ for a man of 50 to dream of a union with a baby girl?

        As usual, Muhammad created a scene in association with the angels and Allah to justify the immoral and the unjustifiable ***

        Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3311
        ‘A’isha reported that Allah’s Apostle married her when she was seven years old, and she was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he died she was eighteen years old.
        The holy Prophet died when he was 63. So he must have married Ayesha when he as 51 and went to her when he was 54.

        Sahih Bukhari Volume5, Book58, Number 245 Narrated’Aisha:
        I never remembered my parents believing in any religion other than the true religion (i.e. Islam),

        *** If Aisha was older i.e. 16 or 18 as some Muslims claim, she would have remembered the PAGAN religion of her parents PRIOR to becoming Muslims***

        Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 7.88 Narrated by Ursa
        The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with ‘Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)

        Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 8.151 Narrated by Aisha
        I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me.

        (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13) explains the obvious:
        The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, NOT yet reached the age of puberty.

        *** Muhammad, was invariably PERMITTED by the ever obliging Allah to have Allah’s rules BROKEN only in his case.

        Once again another Muhammadan scholar confirms that Aisha had NOT then reached PUBERTY ***

        Sunan of Abu-Dawood Hadith 2380 Narrated by Aisha,
        The Prophet used to kiss her and suck her tongue when he was fasting.

        Al-Tirmidhi Hadith 6182 Narrated by Aisha
        Gabriel brought a picture of her on a piece of green silk to Allah’s Messenger and said, “This is your wife in this world and the next.”

        *** In this Hadith, Gabriel brought a PICTURE of Aisha BUT not Aisha herself.

        It seemsis obvious that Allah found a great deal of time to accommodate and be at the beck and call of Muhammad’s personal needs as well as those of his household. None of the Hebrew prophets ever received such minutae of attention to their personal requirements and comfort even those with whom he befriended (Abraham) or talked to direct (Moses) ***

        Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith1.229-33 Narrated by Aisha
        I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it.

        Sahih Al-Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 17.Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah When I got married, Allah’s Apostle said to me, “What type of lady have you married?” I replied, “I have married a matron’
        He said, “Why, don’t you have a liking for the virgins and for fondling them?” Jabir also said: Allah’s Apostle said, “Why didn’t you marry a young girl so that you might play with her and she with you?’

        In the classic history of “The Life of Muhammad” (Sirat Rasul Allah) by Ibn Ishaq page 311, there is an account in which Muhammad expressed a marital interest in a CRAWLING BABY.

        This event seems to have occurred around the time of the Battle of of Badr which would have made Muhammad approximately 55 years old. He had married Aisha two years earlier, when he was 53 years of age.

        Suhayli, ii. 79: In the riwaya of Yunus I.
        Ibn Ishaq recorded that the apostle saw her (Ummu’lFadl) when she was a baby crawling before him and said, ‘If she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’ But he died before she grew up ….

        So, Muhammad’s interest in young girls extended beyond Aisha.
        Why would anyone think that Muhammad’s sexual interest in babies be “the timeless expression of the Will of Allah?”

        How does such a prurient desire support Muhammad’s claim to be a prophet of Allah?
        Such a desire by an old man is contrary to nature, and it is a perversion against the moral order of Allah’s universe (IF Allah is the same as the God of Moses and Jesus).

        Ladies & gentlemen, so called Believers & Unbelieving Kuffar, be aware that in the Arabic language of Muhammad’s time a single word NIKAHH meant having sexual intercourse, marriage or rape.

        Since Aisha was six years old when she was so called ‘married’ to Muhammad – NAKAHHAHA – which is way below the age of intelligent consent, as the Hadiths very clearly demonstrate, then Aisha was his unwilling partner.

        When he penetrated her at the age of nine, the same word NAKAHHAHA is used.

        Yet again consent was not given. Hence, based entirely upon all the evidence at hand, this is purely a case of RAPE. Muhammad RAPED Aisha.

        As an aside, although Muhammad preferred to have sex with the young Aisha more than any of the other EIGHT wives, she was not able to conceive. It should be pointed out that he most probably damaged her reproductive system by penetrating her at such a very early age.

        So called Believers, go to Google and investigate this subject and you will find to your SHOCK & AMAZEMENT that the current Muhammadan sources tell you that he married her at age 10-11 and consummated their marriage at age 14, 18 or 19.

        Why try to deliberately pervert the original Hadiths and deceive the readers if it was a morally, culturally and biologically acceptable case of under age marriage?

        THE CHILD BRIDE

        The thought of an old man becoming aroused by a child is one of the most disturbing thoughts that makes us cringe as it reminds us of pedophilia and the most despicable people. It is difficult to accept that the Holy Prophet married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and consummated his marriage with her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.

        Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3310:
        ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.
        Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 65
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that ‘Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death).” what you know of the Quran (by heart)’
        Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 88
        Narrated ‘Ursa:
        The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with ‘Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).
        Some Muslims claim that it was Abu Bakr who approached Muhammad asking him to marry his daughter. This is of course not true and here is the proof.
        Sahih Bukhari 7.18
        Narrated ‘Ursa:
        The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “But I am your brother.” The Prophet said, “You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”
        Arabs were a primitive lot with little rules to abide. Yet they had some code of ethics that they honored scrupulously. For example, although they fought all the year round, they abstained from hostilities during certain holy months of the year. They also considered Mecca to be a holy city and did not make war against it. An adopted son’s wife was deemed to be a daughter in law and they would not marry her. Also it was customary that close friends made a pact of brotherhood and considered each other as true brothers. The Prophet disregarded all of these rules anytime they stood between him and his interests or whims.
        Abu Bakr and Muhammad had pledged to each other to be brothers. So according to their customs, Ayesha was supposed to be like a niece to the Holy Prophet. Yet that did not stop him to ask her hand even when she was only six years old.
        But this moral relativist Prophet would use the same excuse to reject a woman he did not like.
        Sahih Bukhari V.7, B62, N. 37
        Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:
        It was said to the Prophet, “Won’t you marry the daughter of Hamza?” He said, “She is my foster niece (brother’s daughter).”
        Hamza and Abu Bakr both were the foster brothers of Muhammad. But Aisha must have been too pretty for the Prophet to abide by the codes of ethics and custom.
        In the following Hadith he confided to Aisha that he had dreamed of her before soliciting her from her father.
        Sahih Bukhari 9.140
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        Allah’s Apostle said to me, “You were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘Uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘If this is from Allah, then it must happen.’ Then you were shown to me, the angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said (to him), ‘Uncover (her), and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘If this is from Allah, then it must happen.'”
        Whether Muhammad had actually such dream or he just said it to please Ayesha is not the point. What matters here is that it indicates that Aisha was a baby being “carried” by an angel when the Prophet dreamed of her.
        There are numerous hadithes that explicitly reveal the age of Aisha at the time of her marriage. Here are some of them.
        Sahih Bukhari 5.236.
        Narrated Hisham’s father:
        Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married ‘Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.
        Sahih Bukhari 5.234
        Narrated Aisha:
        The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became All right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.
        And in another Hadith we read.
        Sunan Abu-Dawud Book 41, Number 4915, also Number 4916 and Number 4917
        Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
        The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) married me when I was seven or six. When we came to Medina, some women came. according to Bishr’s version: Umm Ruman came to me when I was swinging. They took me, made me prepared and decorated me. I was then brought to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him), and he took up cohabitation with me when I was nine. She halted me at the door, and I burst into laughter.
        In the above hadith we read that Aisha was swinging, This is a play of little girls not grown up people. The following Hadith is particularly interesting because it shows that Ayesha was so small that was not aware what was going on when the Prophet “surprised” her by going to her.
        Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 90
        Narrated Aisha:
        When the Prophet married me, my mother came to me and made me enter the house (of the Prophet) and nothing surprised me but the coming of Allah’s Apostle to me in the forenoon.
        Must have been quite a surprise! But the following is also interesting because it demonstrates that she was just a kid playing with her dolls. Pay attention to what the interpreter wrote in the parenthesis. (She was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty)
        Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 73, Number 151
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13)
        Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3311
        ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.
        The holy Prophet died when he was 63. So he must have married Aisha when he as 51 and went to her when he was 54.
        Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 73, Number 33
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        I never felt so jealous of any woman as I did of Khadija, though she had died three years before the Prophet married me, and that was because I heard him mentioning her too often, and because his Lord had ordered him to give her the glad tidings that she would have a palace in Paradise, made of Qasab and because he used to slaughter a sheep and distribute its meat among her friends.
        Khadija died in December of 619 AD. That is two years before Hijra. At that time the Prophet was 51-years-old. So in the same year that Khadija died the prophet married Aisha and took her to his home 3 years later, i.e. one year after Hijra. But until she grew up he married Umm Salama.
        In another part Aisha claims that as long as she remembers her parents were always Muslims.
        Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 245
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        (the wife of the Prophet) I never remembered my parents believing in any religion other than the true religion (i.e. Islam),
        If Ayesha was older, i.e. 16 or 18 as some Muslims claim, she would have remembered the religion of her parents prior to becoming Muslims.
        Now someone may still claim that all these hadithes are lies. People are free to say whatever they want. But truth is clear like the Sun for those who have eyes.
        No sane person would be aroused by a 9-year-old child. Decent people wince at the thought of this shameful act. Yet some Muslims deny them. The question is why so many followers of Muhammad would fabricate so many false hadithes about the age of Aisha, which incidentally confirm each other?
        I can tell you why people would attribute false miracles to their prophet. Babis believes that Bab started to praise God as soon as he was born. There is a Hadith like that also about Muhammad. Christians believe the birth of the Christ was miraculous and the Jews believe Moses opened a dry passageway through the Red Sea. Believers love to hear these stories. It confirms their faith. There are many absurd miracles attributed to Muhammad in the hadiths, despite the fact that he denied being able to perform any miracles. But why should anyone fabricate a lie about the age of Aisha that would portray his Prophet as a pedophile?
        When we say Muhammad had sex with 9 year old child, Muslims brush it away and bring all sorts of excuses to justify this shameful act. This is the nature of blind faith and cognitive dissonance. Maybe by visualizing it, some of them will would come to their senses and realize how evil this fiend they call prophet, was. There is not a single proof that this man was a prophet while there are tons of evidences that he was an evil man.
        Controversies About the Age of Aisha
        The majority of Muslims agree that Aisha was only 9 years old when the Prophet married her. Some Muslim sites makes no apology for her young age and accuses the modernists for humbugging the Westerns morality and denying the truth.
        They also defends Muhammad for marrying Aisha at 9 claiming that girls reach puberty at that age and therefore are considered adult and having sex with them at such tender age is acceptable.
        However there are some “modernist” Muslims who dispute this fact.
        They argue: (taken from this site http://www.understandingislam.com)
        According to the generally accepted tradition, Aisha (ra) was born about eight years before Hijrah. But according to another narrative in Bukhari (kitabu’l-tafseer) Aisha (ra) is reported to have said that at the time Surah Al-Qamar, the 54th chapter of the Qur’an, was revealed, “I was a young girl”. The 54th surah of the Qur’an was revealed nine years before Hijrah. According to this tradition, Aisha (ra) had not only been born before the revelation of the referred surah, but was actually a young girl (jariyah), not an infant (sibyah) at that time. Obviously, if this narrative is held to be true, it is in clear contradiction with the narratives reported by Hisham ibn `urwah. I see absolutely no reason that after the comments of the experts on the narratives of Hisham ibn `urwah, why we should not accept this narrative to be more accurate.
        Answer:
        Even if we assume this narrative to be accurate, we have no reason to give it more weight than those that are so detailed about Aisha ’s age, describing her playing with her dolls, talking about her girlfriends coming to play with her and hiding when Muhammad entered the room, her memories of playing on the swing when her mother called her and washed her face and took her to Muhammad, her ignorance of what was going on and her “surprise” when Muhammad got into action taking his role as the husband, etc. These events are more likely to be remembered by someone of her childhood than when a particular Surah was revealed. It is more probable that a person confuse one Surah with the other than confuse all those details of her own life.
        • According to a number of narratives, Aisha (ra) accompanied the Muslims in the battle of Badr and Uhud. Furthermore, it is also reported in books of hadith and history that no one under the age of 15 years was allowed to take part in the battle of Uhud. All the boys below 15 years of age were sent back. Aisha ‘s (ra) participation in the battle of Badr and Uhud clearly indicate that she was not nine or ten years old at that time. After all, women used to accompany men to the battle fields to help them, not to be a burden on them.
        Answer:
        This is a weak excuse. When the Battle of Badr and Ohud occurred Aisha was 10 to 11 years old. She did not go to be a warier, like the boys. She went to keep Muhammad warm during the nights. Boys who were less than 15 were sent back, but this did not apply to her.
        • According to almost all the historians Asma (ra), the elder sister of Aisha (ra) was ten years older than Aisha (ra). It is reported in Taqri’bu’l-tehzi’b as well as Al-bidayah wa’l-nihayah that Asma (ra) died in 73 hijrah when she was 100 years old. Now, obviously if Asma (ra) was 100 years old in 73 hijrah she should have been 27 or 28 years old at the time of hijrah. If Asma (ra) was 27 or 28 years old at the time of hijrah, Aisha (ra) should have been 17 or 18 years old at that time. Thus, Aisha (ra), if she got married in 1 AH (after hijrah) or 2 AH, was between 18 to 20 years old at the time of her marriage.
        Answer:
        When someone gets that old, people don’t care too much about her exact age. It is very easy to say she was 100 years old when in fact she was only 90. The difference is not noticeable to the younger folks and 100 is a round figure. Assuming the Hadith is authentic, it could be an honest mistake. Since in those days people did not carry birth certificates, it is very much likely that the person who reported her age to be 100 did not know that she was 10 years older than Aisha and did not sit to make the calculations and deductions. She was not an important person and it did not occur to anyone that 1300 years later it would become the subject of a controversy. This could be a genuine mistake by the narrator of the Hadith.
        • Tabari in his treatise on Islamic history, while mentioning Abu Bakr (ra) reports that Abu Bakr had four children and all four were born during the Jahiliyyah — the pre Islamic period. Obviously, if Aisha (ra) was born in the period of jahiliyyah, she could not have been less than 14 years in 1 AH — the time she most likely got married.
        Answer:
        Tabari’s narratives do not have the distinction to be known Sahih. Even if we assumed that this narratives is not forged, there is no reason to discard all those strong, detailed and explicit hadithes that concord with each other and confirm the age of Aisha was 9 when she married the Prophet, to accept this narrative that, could very well be also an innocent slip on the part of the narrator. People remember important events better than those that are relatively insignificant. The date of the birth of the children of Abu Bakr was not an important subject for Muslims to record. But the details of the Prophet’s marriages were more important. As you can read in the story of Safiyah’s wedding even the kind of food served is recorded.
        • According to Ibn Hisham, the historian, Aisha (ra) accepted Islam quite some time before Umar ibn Khattab (ra). This shows that Aisha (ra) accepted Islam during the first year of Islam. While, if the narrative of Aisha ‘s (ra) marriage at seven years of age is held to be true, Aisha (ra) should not have been born during the first year of Islam.
        Answer:
        The apologist fails to provide the references to the hadithes that he quotes. But obviously this is an error. To understand and accept a religion, one must he at least intelligent enough to make such decision. That is about 15 years old. But let us be generous and say that age is about 12. If Aisha accepted Islam during the first year of Islam, she must have been 26 years old when Muhammad married her. (12 + 14) First of all, in those days girls married at much younger age. No one stayed that long to get married. And it is very unlikely that a 26-year-old woman plays with her dolls. It shows that some of the Muslim apologists are embarrassed of what the Prophet did and are desperately looking for excuses to exonerate him of his improprieties.
        • Tabari has also reported that at the time Abu Bakr planned on migrating to Habshah (8 years before Hijrah), he went to Mut`am — with whose son Aisha (ra) was engaged — and asked him to take Aisha (ra) in his house as his son’s wife. Mut`am refused, because Abu Bakr had embraced Islam, and subsequently his son divorced Aisha (ra). Now, if Aisha (ra) was only seven years old at the time of her marriage, she could not have been born at the time Abu Bakr decided on migrating to Habshah. On the basis of this report it seems only reasonable to assume that Aisha (ra) had not only been born 8 years before hijrah, but was also a young lady, quite prepared for marriage.
        Answer:
        It was an Arab tradition to betroth a girl to a boy even when the girl was a newborn. This tradition is still carried on in many Islamic countries. This is no proof that Aisha was a grown up.
        • According to a narrative reported by Ahmad ibn Hanbal, after the death of Khadijah (ra), when Khaulah (ra) came to the Prophet (pbuh) advising him to marry again, the Prophet (pbuh) asked her regarding the choices she had in her mind. Khaulah said: “You can marry a virgin (bikr) or a woman who has already been married (thayyib)”. When the Prophet (pbuh) asked about who the virgin was, Khaulah proposed Aisha ‘s (ra) name. All those who know the Arabic language, are aware that the word “bikr” in the Arabic language is not used for an immature nine year old girl. The correct word for a young playful girl, as stated earlier is “Jariyah”. “Bikr” on the other hand, is used for an unmarried lady, and obviously a nine year old is not a “lady”.
        Answer:
        This explanation is absolutely incorrect. Bikr means virgin and, just as in English is not age specific. In fact Aisha was the second wife of Muhammad (after Khadijah) but Muhammad did not consummate his marriage with her for three years because she was too young. Instead he had to content himself with Umma Salamah, until Aisha matured a little bit more. It would not have made sense to marry a beautiful woman like Aisha and wait for three years to take her home.
        • According to Ibn Hajar, Fatimah (ra) was five years older than Aisha (ra). Fatimah (ra) is reported to have been born when the Prophet (pbuh) was 35 years old. Thus, even if this information is taken to be correct, Aisha (ra) could by no means be less than 14 years old at the time of hijrah, and 15 or 16 years old at the time of her marriage.
        Answer:
        Of course this information cannot be taken as correct. If Aisha was five years older than Fatimah, and Fatimah was born when the Prophet was 35 years old, then Aisha was only 30 years younger than the Prophet. So at the time of her marriage when the Prophet was 54, Aisha must have been 24 yeas old. This is not certainly correct, for the reasons explained above and also it contradicts the Hadith that the apologist quoted about the age of Asma, Aisha ’s sister, who according to that Hadith was 10 years older that Aisha and died in 73 Hijra. So at the time of Hijra Asma must have been 100 –73 = 27 years old, but according to this Hadith she was 34 years old. The discrepancy between these two hadithes quoted by the same apologist, demonstrate their inaccuracy. It all goes to show that in those days numbers did not mean much. It is more likely that people forget the dates. But events are better remembered. The reports of the tender age of Aisha is consistent with the stories of her childhood, playing with her toys, her girlfriends hiding when Muhammad entered the room, the Prophet playing with her, her ignorance and “surprise” in the night of the nuptials, etc. All those hadithes confirm that she was a little girl. Those who deny the facts and try to prove otherwise, demonstrate their embarrassment of the acts of the Prophet. Perhaps they should be credited for having some scruples and realizing that what the Prophet did was wrong but we cannot praise them for their intellectual honesty or lack of it. Finally the apologist concludes:
        • “In my opinion, neither was it an Arab tradition to give away girls in marriage at an age as young as nine or ten years, nor did the Prophet (pbuh) marry Aisha (ra) at such a young age. The people of Arabia did not object to this marriage, because it never happened in the manner it has been narrated.”
        Answer:
        I respect his opinion, but disagree with him completely. Not only this WAS the tradition of the Arabs, it is still their tradition and it has become the tradition of other counties that converted to Islam. Even up to this day it is very common to find girls as young as 9-years given for matrimony. Of course the reason that no one objected to the marriage of Muhammad and a 9-year-old girl, is because it was a costume. The reason when it was reported in so many hadithes that neither the author nor the scholars objected is because it was nothing out of the ordinary.
        Just a few weeks ago I read in the news that in Iran a 9-year-old girl filed for divorce from her 15-year-old husband just after 20 days of marriage because he would constantly beat her. When the young man was questioned he said: “She neglects her housework and plays with her dolls all the time”.
        I agree that morality is relative and we should not judge the ancient people’s morality with our modern morality.
        Obviously we all cringe when we think of pedophilia and acknowledge that it is a shameful act of immorality. But during the time of Muhammad, and even today in some Islamic countries, marrying a 9-year-old child was not immoral. In fact Aisha was given to Muhammad with the consent of her parents and no one raised an eyebrow. The question is, if sleeping with a nine year old child was not deemed bad and therefore was not considered immoral, was it ok? Not everything that a society accepts as moral is right. Having sex with a minor may not have been immoral for Arabs 1400 years ago, but it is now, as it was then, unethical. Moralities are defined by circumstances, but ethics transcend time and space. They are rooted in logics. Morality can vary from culture to culture, from time to time and from person to person. Who is to determine what is moral and what is not? “
        Having sex with a minor may not have been immoral for Muhammad and his contemporaries in that uncivilized culture, but it was ethically wrong. If Muhammad was a messenger of God or an honorable man, as he made his Allah to proclaim him thus, he should have known that what he was doing was dishonorable and unethical.
        Although it is true that in the past people married at very young age. And it is also true that occasionally wealthy old men married very young girls. We have to realize that these people acted on their culture. We do not condemn them for they did not know better. What they did was the norm. But we do condemn those cultures.
        However, we cannot forgive with the same amnesty those who claimed to be the standard of rectitude amongst mankind. If average people could not distinguish the right from the wrong, the messengers of God, if they were from God, should have known better. If their claim was true, if their knowledge was divine, if they were inspired, they should not have followed the tradition of their people but should have set the example. Muhammad followed the morality of his people. But that morality was ethically wrong. He claimed to be the best human and the last messenger of God. According to him God has said to people all he wanted to say in the Quran and his religion is complete. There is no more guidance to come and his examples and teachings are all we need to know and follow for eternity. Yet what he did and said, under the light of modern values prove to be very wrong.
        Now we realize that we cannot live by his examples any more, nor can we practice his teachings. Our morality has changed. We would certainly put a man in jail if he wanted to follow the Sunnah of the prophet in this day and age and “marry” a 9-year-old child. We would not allow someone to take people as slaves or trade in slavery as Muhammad did.
        If we cannot follow the morality of Muhammad any more, if what he said and did do not fit in this modern day, why we need Muhammad? What part of his teachings should we accept and what part should we discard? Who will determine that? This is an important question. If we give ourselves the freedom to pick and choose the teachings that most suit us we should give the same freedom to others.
        Suppose you believe that marriage to a minor should be outlawed, or you do not feel that polygyny is appropriate any more for this day and age. Suppose you disagree with slavery, male or female circumcision, beating of the wives and do not believe in Jihad any more. You prefer to concentrate on other parts of Islam that you like, e.g. Salat, Zikat, Haj, etc. This is your choice. But can you deny other Muslims whose choices are distinct from yours? How could you stop a Muslim who wants to follow those teachings of Islam that you consider outdated? By what authority can you dissuade one who wants to spread Islam by Jihad, like Muhammad did? How can you prohibit him not to assault sexually a 9-year-old child by marrying her? What would you say to a Muslim who wishes to marry up to four wives and decides to punish them by beating them if they are disobedient, as the Prophet instructed him to do? If you use logic in picking the teachings that are best, you are saying that logic is superior to revelation and therefore you are subscribing to the freethinker’s way of thinking not Muhammad’s.
        Many Islamic countries have realized that true Islam is impractical. Very few of them can practice it faithfully; they all have modified it to certain extent and have incorporated secularism into their laws to make life bearable. Those that do follow Islam are hells on Earth. Interestingly the civility and the progress of these countries are proportionate to the level of their secularization. In the Middle Ages, when religion had plunged Europe into the dark ages, Islamic countries were progressive and prosperous. This was possible because of the tolerance of the rulers of those days, their independence from the Mosque and their disinterest to implement Islam.
        Zakaria Ar-Razi, one of the greatest minds of Islamic world, attacked religion in general and Islam in particular with a force unthinkable in this day. He wrote:
        “The prophets—these billy goats with long beards, cannot claim any intellectual or spiritual superiority. These billy goats pretend to come with a message from God, all the while exhausting themselves in spouting their lies, and imposing on the masses blind obedience to the “words of the master.” The miracles of the prophets are impostures, based on trickery, or the stories regarding them are lies. The falseness of what all the prophets say is evident in the fact that they contradict one another: one affirms what the other denies, and yet each claims to be the sole depository of the truth; thus the New Testament contradicts the Torah, the Koran the New Testament. As for the Koran, it is but an assorted mixture of “absurd and inconsistent fables,” which has ridiculously been judged inimitable, when, in fact, its language, style, and its much vaunted “eloquence” are far from being faultless. Custom, tradition, and intellectual laziness lead men to follow their religious leaders blindly. Religions have been the sole cause of the bloody wars that have ravaged mankind. Religions have also been resolutely hostile to philosophical speculation and to scientific research. The so-called holy scriptures are worthless and have done more harm than good, whereas the “writings of the ancients like Plato, Aristotle, Euclid, and Hippocrates have rendered much greater service to humanity.”
        This kind of criticism of Islam today, would carry the death sentence. Can any intellectual speak so freely against Islam calling the prophets “Billy Goats” as Ar-Razi called them disdainfully in these days and live? Does the fatwa against Salman Rushdie ring a bell? It is clear that in those days of the golden age of Islam, Islamic countries enjoyed a freedom and a level of secularization that has since been disappeared. And along with that, the glory of Islamic world also has ebbed. Islam can be used as an index of barbarity and backwardness. The more a country applies Islam, the more uncivilized and uncultured it becomes.
        I have no doubt that if Islam was eliminated completely, we’ll regain the past glory of those secular days and even surpass it. There is no reason to believe that the black-eyed race of Middle East is inferior to the blue-eyed Europeans. The number of Middle Eastern scientists, academics and scholars in the West is an indication that given the opportunity we are no less intelligent than any other race. The reason that we are backward, uncivilized and barbaric in our native countries is because Islam has taken away our dignity, humanity and intelligence. Islam has brainwashed us, and like a drug has damaged the minds of our people.

  5. Ligjtman, Please help, are the following verses from Hindu scriptures talking about making Bhajias?

    [Aitareya Brahman, Book 2, para 6 and 7]

    “6. …Turn the animal’s feet northwards. Make its EYES go to the Sun, dismiss its breath to the wind, its life to the space, its hearing to the directions, its body to the earth. Take of the entire skin without cutting it. Before opening the navel TEAR out the omentum. Stop its breathing within (by stopping its mouth).

    Make of its breast …..make of its thighs (two pieces like) two shields, … take out its twenty-six ribs according to their order; preserve every limb of its in its integrity. Thus he benefits all its limbs. Dig a ditch in the earth to hide its excrements. 7. Present the evil spirits with the blood.”

    Rigveda 10/28/3 : पचन्ति ते वर्षभानत्सि तेषां पर्क्षेण यन्मघवन हूयमानः

    “Your worshippers express with the stone fast flowing exhilarating Soma-juices for you. You drink them. They roast bulls for you, you eat them when you are invoked, Maghavan, to the sacrificial food.”

    Yajurveda 13/48 :
    “O Agni, don’t harm this our cow, the giver of thousands of comforts, the source of immense milk, yielding butter for the people. I point out to you the FOREST COW Let the wild forest cow be HARMED by you…..”

    So accordingly a forest cow is NOT a cow! Then what is it?

    Brihadaranyak Upanishad 6/4/18 suggests a ‘super-scientific’ way of giving birth to a super intelligent child. It says,

    “If a man wishes that a son should be born to him who will be a famous scholar, frequenting assemblies and speaking delightful words, a student of all the Vedas and an enjoyer of the full term of life, he should have rice cooked with the meat of a young bull or of one more advanced in years and he and his wife should eat it with clarified butter. Then they should be able to beget such a son.”

    You see most Christians, Chinese and Japanese, Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, Millions of Hindus, all traditional Africans DO EAT MEAT!

    Cattle meat(cows, goats, sheep) is lawful and you should not make FAKE stats as “its done just to hurt, insult and aggravate the Hindus”!

    • Extremely wrong translation and interpretation of Vedic texts wont lead you nowhere as I have been studying the Vedic Liturature since I was a child..The Max Muller and company translation of the vedic verses is not only wrong but they are extremely laughable as well and shows the extremely limited knowledge of Sanskrit Grammer of the western scholars. Many verses which appear in the books of these so called scholars are not what the original texts mention For Example

      this is the mantra u provided…

      अद्रिणा ते मन्दिन इन्द्र तूयान सुन्वन्ति सोमान पिबसि तवमेशाम |

      पचन्ति ते वर्षभानत्सि तेषां पर्क्षेण यन्मघवन हूयमानः ||

      first of all this mantra is incorrect…there are grammatical mistakes in the mantra will lead to to conclude bloody hell things….

      this is the correct form of mantra…

      अद्रिणा ते मन्दिन इन्द्र तुयान्त्सुन्वन्ति सोमान्पिबसि त्वमेषाम ।

      पचन्ति ते वृषभाँ अत्सी तेषां पृक्षेण यन्मधवनहूयमान : ।। (ऋग्वेद 10-28 -3 )

      But its not about what western idiots write , If you read some of the western interpretations of the Quran you will die laughing such is the level of ignorance of some of the scholars when it comes to eastern scriptures. One of my Muslim friend pointed out more than 75 incorrect interpretations of the Quran in a certain english book , and its these books which create a wrong image of Islam in the western Mind.

      So friend If you want to know about authentic Vedanta come to us and not to some British or German professor Similarly if We want to truely understand Islam We must reach out to moderate muslims and not read some American or French book by a professor

      Who says Hindus dont eat meat? Its not about eating meat , Its not even about Islam as I am friends with many muslims who are against cow slaughter on Bakar Eid ( since it is not a compulsory act to perform qurbani of cows in Islam other animals can be chosen) I know all cattel are: Lawful” meat in Islam but when members of another religion feel bad I think its ok to choose another animal , as I said many muslims already do that and Islam itself says that if members of other faith are hurt by any act it should not be performed if its not mandatory.

      Best wishes

  6. What else can the religion of “peace” do? NO surprises here , Cow slaughter is not mandatory in Bakar Eid but its done just to hurt, insult and aggravate the Hindus. Another example in the long list of worldwide violence and barbarism committed by the followers of the religion of “peace”.

    • Ligtman . Please don’t blame the muslims for all this, it is the stupid Hindus [ Congress Party ] who let it happen. Like in Saudi Arabia you can’t have any pig product or non halal food or even Bible can’t be taken in. So India MUST also do the same pass a law that slaughter of cows is forbidden by law. Do you know that Pakistan changed its Constitution so as to declare Ahmadias non muslims , on Eid day they were NOT allowed to slaughter cows in Lahore or any animal for sacrifice Sooner the people realise that islam is an EVIL cult the better. .

        • Lucky hated Islam and Muslims because he wants to hate them. He is just an ordinary anti-Muslim. He has no proof for his allegations on Islam. If he had any, he wouldn’t be so hard and stern.

          • THE JIMMY SAVILE OF MECCA

            THE SEALED NECTAR OF MOHAMMEDANISM

            THE PERFECT MUSLIM
            And surely thou hast sublime morals
            (Surat Al-Qalam 68:4).

            Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah an excellent exemplar
            (Surat Al-Ahzab 33:21).

            Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly.

            Muhammad fantasized about baby Aisha before soliciting her from her father.

            Muhammad said: “I had a dream, a wet dream, about a little girl”!

            Sahih Bukhari 9.140 Narrated ‘Aisha:

            Allah’s apostle said to me, “you were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘if this is from Allah, then it must happen.

            Muhammad, 50, marries baby Aisha at age 6

            Sahih Bukhari volume 5, book 58, number 234

            Narrated Aisha: the prophet engaged (married) me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, um ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me.

            …….she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some ansari women who said, “best wishes and Allah’s blessing and a good luck.” then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

            Bukhari vol 8, bk 73, no 151

            Narrated ‘Aisha: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the prophet, & my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the prophet would call them to join & play with me. (the playing with the dolls & similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-bari page 143, vol.13)

            HOW TO THIGH

            Now let us see how thighing is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

            Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.
            According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

            Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

            Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.

            Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.“Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

            The inquirer asked the following:‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’
            After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

            That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers’” (Fatwa No. 31409).

            Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

            AISHA WASHING SEMEN FROM MUHAMMAD’S CLOTHES

            From the Hadith of Bukhari:

            Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

            Narrated ‘Aisha:

            I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

            Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

            Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

            I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

            Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

            Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

            I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

            Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

            Narrated ‘Aisha:

            I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

            From the Hadith of Bukhari:

            Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

            Narrated ‘Aisha:

            I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

            Volume 1, Book 4, Number 230:

            Narrated ‘Aisha:

            as above (229).

            Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

            Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

            I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

            Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

            Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

            I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

            Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

            Narrated ‘Aisha:

            I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

            Mohammed heard one of his wives was leaving him, so he rushed home where he found her on the carpet in front of the tent with her belongings; he sat down beside her & said, “I heard you were planning to leave me?”
            She replied, “Yes, I heard your other wives saying, you were a pedophile!”
            Mohammed thinks for a minute or so & then responds,
            “that’s a mighty big word for a 6 year old child.”

            THE QURAN
            &
            MARRYING LITTLE GIRLS

            Islam does allow you to marry pre-menstruating girls. The following verse is from At-Talaq (or Divorce). Islam’s main concern during a divorce is knowing who the father is (in case of a pregnancy). The waiting period is known as iddah.

            65.4 Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the prescribed period, if you have any doubts, is three months, AND FOR THOSE WHO HAVE NO COURSES (it is the same): for those who are pregnant, their period is until they deliver their burdens: and for those who fear Allah, He will make things easy for them.

            Tafsir al-Jalalayn (Commentary)
            And [as for] those of your women who (read allā’ī or allā’i in both instances) no longer expect to menstruate, if you have any doubts, about their waiting period, their prescribed [waiting] period shall be three months, and [also for] those who have NOT YET MENSTRUATED, because of their YOUNG AGE, their period shall [also] be three months — both cases apply to other than those whose spouses have died; for these [latter] their period is prescribed in the verse: they shall wait by themselves for four months and ten [days] [Q. 2:234]. And those who are pregnant, their term, the conclusion of their prescribed [waiting] period if divorced or if their spouses be dead, shall be when they deliver. And whoever fears God, He will make matters ease for him, in this world and in the Hereafter.

            Tafsir Asbab Al-Nuzul by Al-Wahid
            (And for such of your women as despair of menstruation…) [65:4]. Said Muqatil: “When the verse (Women who are divorced shall wait, keeping themselves apart…), Kallad ibn al-Nu‘man ibn Qays al-Ansari said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, what is the waiting period of the woman who does not menstruate and the woman who has not menstruated yet? And what is the waiting period of the pregnant woman?’ And so Allah, exalted is He, revealed this verse”. Abu Ishaq al-Muqri’ informed us Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn Hamdun> Makki ibn ‘Abdan Abu’l-Azhar Asbat ibn Muhammad Mutarrif Abu ‘Uthman ‘Amr ibn Salim who said: “When the waiting period for divorced and widowed women was mentioned in Surah al-Baqarah, Ubayy ibn Ka‘b said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, some women of Medina are saying: there are other women who have not been mentioned!’ He asked him: ‘And who are they?’ He said: ‘Those WHO ARE TOO YOUNG [such that they have not started menstruating yet], those who are too old [whose menstruation has stopped] and those who are pregnant’. And so this verse (And for such of your women as despair of menstruation…) was revealed”.

            Islamic Websitehttp://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/12667
            “And those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘Iddah (prescribed period), if you have doubt (about their periods), is three months; and for those who have no courses [(i.e. they are still immature) their ‘Iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise…”

            Tafsir ibn Kathir (Read at your own leisure)
            http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=65&tid=54223

            AIN’T GONNA FOLLOW NO CHILD MOLESTER

            They try to tell me my religion is wrong

            They try to tell me to follow Islam

            They said their prophet was a righteous dude

            But I found out none of their words were true

            I read the Quran and I read the hadith

            And the sickness of Muhammad was apparent to me

            He justified perversion in the name of Allah

            When he married a girl too young for a bra

            II

            She was playing with dolls when the prophet came

            Her childhood was stolen in Allah’s name

            Aisha was nine when he took her to bed

            Don’t tell me that fool’s not sick in the head

            Ain’t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, prophet pretender.

            Ain’t gonna follow no child molester,

            Islam is not for me.

            Islam is not for me.

            III

            The sickness of the Islamic mind

            Has caused the Mullahs to be blind

            To justify their prophet they would justify sin

            So the sins of the prophet are repeated again

            All over the world in Islamic states

            9 year old girls suffer cruel fate

            Sold into marriage to twisted men

            And Aisha’s sad story is repeated again

            IV

            Ain’t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, prophet pretender.

            Ain’t gonna follow no child molester,

            Islam is not for me.

            Islam is not for me.

            Do you care about women all over the world?

            Do you care about those little girls?

            Then stand up and fight for human rights

            Speak out against the laws of Islam

            V

            Ain’t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, prophet pretender.

            Ain’t gonna follow no child molester,

            Islam is not for me.

            Islam is not for me.

            Islam is not for me.

            MUSLIM WOMEN ARE SPECIAL
            Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: Once Allah’s Apostle went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) o ‘Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, “O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women).” They asked, “Why is it so, O Allah’s Apostle ?” He replied, “You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you.

            A cautious sensible man could be led astray by you.” The women asked, “O Allah’s Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?” He said, “Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?” YES! He said, “This is the deficiency in her intelligence.
            Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?” YES!.
            He said, “This is the deficiency in her religion.” Bukhari (Book #6, Hadith #301)

            MUSLIM WOMEN ARE DOGS, PIGS,
            Allah hated women with a passion. He despised all female homo sapiens both Muslim and infidel women. With such a deep hatred and loathing I don’t even know why he bothered to create Eve. Being God, why didn’t he just create man with both a penis and vagina and reproductive organs. Following are the immoral, depraved, insane, despicable LAWS of an immoral, depraved, despicable insane GOD.
            No rational, normal person can believe in such a God of hate.
            Muhammad described women as “unclean” creatures. Muhammad says, “3 things corrupt prayer: Women, dogs, and donkeys.” There are several other sayings in which Muhammad reduced women to the level of an animal. “Woman is a vile beast,” and “I think that women were created for nothing but evil.”

            The right to be treated as a dog, a pig, a monkey, or an ass
            Sahih Bukhari – 1.9.490, 493, 498 Sahih Muslim – 4.1039;
            Sunaan Abu Dawud – 11.2155; Mishkat ul-Masabih – vol 2, p.114, Hadis no. 789
            The right of ordinary women to be treated as crows
            Ghazali – vol 2, p. 34

            BABY TILTHS:

            65.4 You can marry little girls who have not yet reached menstruation age.

            Muhammad married Ayesha at age 6 to comply with this aya. He had to restrict himself to thighing before age of 9.

            Thighing is defined by Islamic scholar Khomeini in “Tahrirolvasyleh” fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990 as follows:

            “Thighing is a means for an adult male to enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.”

            The following is from a committee of muslim ulema answering the question:
            “the Prophet, the peace of Allah be upon him, practiced “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers – may Allah be pleased with her.”

            SEX AFTER FLOGGING:
            Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 132:
            Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Zam’a:

            The Prophet said, “None of you should flog his wife as he flogs a slave and then have sexual intercourse with her in the last part of the day.”
            Ideally when you flog one of your wives, let her recuperate that day and sleep with your other wives or your slave girls

            HOW TO BEAT YOUR WIFE TO AVOID BREAKING HER BONES
            Islamic way of beating or flogging wives is striking at their padded areas to avoid breaking any bones. Here is an example how considerate our prophet was when he beat his wives on their padded parts.

            Muslim Book 004, Number 2127:
            Ayesha narrated. “He struck me on the chest which caused me pain.”
            (However if your wife is breast feeding, prefer to strike on her buttocks

            CIRCUMCISION OF WOMEN:

            It was customary to cut the external female genitalia completely when circumcising women. The Prophet instructed to do cutting in moderation. That showed his kindness and concern for women’s pleasure in love making.

            Sunan Abu Dawud B 41, N5251:

            Narrated Umm Atiyyah al-Ansariyyah:

            A woman used to perform circumcision in Medina. The Prophet (peace be upon him) said to her: Do not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband.

            ONE NIGHT SEX PERKS FOR PROPHET:

            33.50 Mohammed, any woman who offered herself to you is halal for you.
            Obligation to practice this aya made logistics a big problem for Muhammad who already had nine wives, his concubines, and a regular supply of captured women from jihadi raids. But Allah’s wishes had to be carried out.
            Bukhari,Volume 7, Book 62, Number 24:
            A woman came to Allah’s Apostle and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! I have come to give you myself.

            Bukhari,V 7, B 62, N 48:
            Narrated Hisham’s father:
            Khaula bint Hakim was one of those ladies who presented themselves to the Prophet. ‘Aisha said, “Doesn’t a lady feel ashamed for presenting herself to a man?”

            Bukhari,V 7, B 62, N 53:
            Narrated Thabit Al-Banani:
            “A woman came to Allah’s Apostle and presented herself to him, saying, ‘O Allah’s Apostle, have you any need for me?’ “Thereupon Anas’s daughter said, “What a shameless lady she was! Shame! Shame!” Anas said, “She was better than you; she had a liking for the Prophet.

            ISLAM & THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN

            These are called in Islam the “golden rights and provisions for all Muslim women:”
            The right to be treated as diseased and as sex toys
            The Qur’an – 2:222; Sahahi Bukhari -3.31.172
            The right to be used as a sowing field
            The Qur’an – 2:223
            The right to enjoy another husband after the third divorce from the previous husband (hilla marriage)
            The Qur’an – 2:230; Sahih Bukhari – 8.73.107; Sahih Bukhari – 7.63.187
            The right to engage in Islamic prostitution through Mut’a marriage
            The Qur’an – 4:24;Sahih Bukhari – 8.3246, 3247, 3248;
            Sahih Muslim – 8:3252, 8:3253, 8:3258
            The right to be treated as impure or as a drunkard
            The Qur’an – 4:32; The Qur’an – 16:92
            To uphold the inalienable superiority of men over women and the right to be beaten by husbands—no questions asked
            The Qur’an – 16:92; Sunaan Abu Dawad – 11.2142; Abdur Rahman – 1 DOI, the recognized authority on Sharia in his book, Women in Society”
            To uphold the right of the husband to have four wives at any time and any number sex-slaves for all times; in case of objection by any wife, the husband can beat her
            The Qur’an – 4:3; Sunan Abu Dawad – 30.2.13; The Qur’an – 23:5-6, 70:29-30
            The right to be treated as a dog, a pig, a monkey, or an ass
            Sahih Bukhari – 1.9.490, 493, 498 Sahih Muslim – 4.1039;
            Sunaan Abu Dawud – 11.2155; Mishkat ul-Masabih – vol 2, p.114, Hadis no. 789
            The right of a Muslimah to be stupid and to become a servant
            Sahih Bukhari – 1.6.301; Ghazali – vol 2, p. 34
            Muslim women forfeit their right to travel alone
            Sahih Bukhari – 2.20.192, 193; Sahih Bukhari – 3.29.85, 4.52.250

            Women must keep their sexual organs ready at all times for the husband to enjoy them unhindered at any time—night or day
            Sahih Bukhari – 4.54.460, 7.62.81; Sahih Muslim – 8.3367, 3368;
            Ghazali – vol 2, p. 43
            Women have the right to breast-feed an unrelated bearded man to make him haram (forbidden to her in marriage)
            Sahih Muslim – 8.3424, 3425, 3426, 3427, 3428
            Women are slaves (prisoners) and men are their masters (owners)
            Ghazali – vol 2, p. 33; Hedaya – p. 47
            Islamic marriage is about sex for money (prostitution)
            Sunaan Abu Dawud – 11.2105, 2.11,2106; Milik’s Muwatta – 28.4.12;
            Sunaan Abu Dawud – 11.2126; Hedaya – p. 44
            If a woman wishes to get rid of her tyrannical husband she must refund the ‘sex money’ (Mahr) she received from him during marriage
            Sahih Muslim – 7.63.197, 198, 199; Sunaan Abu Dawud – 12,2220;
            Malik’s Muwatta – 29.10.32
            Women have the right to undergo female circumcision (FGM)
            Sunaan Abu Dawud – 41.5251
            Women are slaves and infidels—they are not fit to join the moral police force
            Ghazali – vol 2, p.186
            A husband has the right to have sex with his wife by force (the right to rape)
            Hedaya – p. 141
            Women are cheap—you can have sex with a woman by simply teaching her how to recite a few verses from the Qur’an
            Sahih Buhkari – 6.61.547, 548; Ghazali – vol 2, 31
            Barren women should be confined at home—they are fit only to be in the house-prison
            Ghazali – vol 2, p. 24; Sunaan Abu Dawud – 3.29.3911
            A woman has no say when her husband decides to add more wives in his harem; she can’t even ask her husband to divorce her
            Sahih Bukhari – p. 141
            A wife has the right to decorate her husband when he goes out to have sex with his other wives
            Sahih Bukhari – 1.5.270
            A woman should never be selected or elected as a ruler
            Sahih Bukhari – 5.59.709; Ghazali – vol 2, p. 34
            Muslim women uphold the right of Islamic Jihadists to rape captive women right in front of their vanquished husbands
            The Qur’an – 4:24; Sahih Muslim – 8.3371, 3373, 3374, 3377;
            Sunaan Abu Dawud – 2.11.2150, 8.77.598
            Women are devils; they are as dirty and filthy as private parts are
            Sahih Muslim – 8.3240, 3242; Ghazali – vol 2, p. 26, vol 2, p. 43
            Fear the company of women—they bring bad luck
            Sahih Bukhari – 7.62.30, 31; Bukhari – 4.52.110, 111;
            Malik’s Muwatta – 54.821, 22; Sahih Muslim – 36.6603. 6604;
            Ghazali – vol 3, p. 86, 87
            Women have very little intelligence—their own testimony is inadmissible in rape cases; in other matters their testimony is half to that of a man
            The Qur’an – 4:14, 2:282; Sunaan Abu Dawud – 3.40.4662
            Women are less human—they get one-third of blood money, no booty (for Jihad) for them
            Malik’s Muwatta – 43.64b; Sahih Muslim – 19.4458
            Women are worse than dead persons—they cannot follow a bier
            Sahih Muslim – 4.2039
            Men should always oppose women
            Ghazali – vol 2, p. 34
            Women are easily expendable—a divorced woman gets no maintenance or alimony from her ex-husband
            Sahih Muslim – 9.3519, 3522
            A woman has the right to stay at home solely to provide sex to her husband
            Hedaya – p. 54
            A woman becomes a harlot when she wears perfume
            Mishkat al-Masabih – vol 2, p. 255

            RELIANCE OF THE TRAVELLER:
            A CLASSIC MANUAL OF ISLAMIC SACRED LAW
            Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri

            w45.0 A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS (from m5.I, end)
            A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS IN THE SHAFI’I SCHOOL
            *
            w45.1 (Abu Ishaq Shirazi:) A woman is not obliged to serve her husband by baking, grinding flour, cooking, washing, or any other kind of service, because the marriage contract entails, for her part, ONLY THAT SHE LET HIM ENJOY HER SEXUALLY, and she is not obligated to do other thar. that. (A: Rather, it is considered sunna in our school for the wife to do the housework, and the husband (who is obliged to support her) to earn the living, since this is how the Prophet (Allah bless him and give.
            him peace) divided the work between Fatima and ‘Ali (Allah be well pleased with them)) (alMuhadhdhab fi fiqh ai-Imam al-Shafi’i (yI25), 2.68).

            A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS IN THE HANAFI SCHOOL

            w45.2 (Nahlawi:) The wife’s serving her husband at home-by cooking, cleaning, and baking bread-is religiously obligatory for her, and if she does not, she is committing a sin, though it is not something that she may be forced to do by the court (al-Durar al-mubaha fi ai-hazr wa ai-ibaha
            (y99),I72).

            AN ISLAMIC MARRIAGE COURSE:

            When a young Muslim tells his father he wants to get married, his father tells him to “come out back & I will teach you a few tricks”!

            He cuts a branch off a tree & gathers a pile of rocks.

            “Now son, on your wedding night, when she comes on all “lovey dovey”, give her the Mother of All Beatings”. She will begin to cry,

            “But I didn’t do anything wrong”!

            But you tell her, “That’s in case you EVER think of doing anything wrong”!

            The father tells him, “Son, in Islam we marry the VAGINA, THE PUSSY & its to be always ready for us to “play” with:

            RELIANCE OF THE TRAVELLER:
            A CLASSIC MANUAL OF ISLAMIC SACRED LAW
            Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri

            w45.0 A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS (from m5.I, end)
            A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS IN THE SHAFI’I SCHOOL
            *
            w45.1 (Abu Ishaq Shirazi:) A woman is not obliged to serve her husband by baking, grinding flour, cooking, washing, or any other kind of service, because the marriage contract entails, for her part, ONLY THAT SHE LET HIM ENJOY HER SEXUALLY, and she is not obligated to do other thar. that. (A: Rather, it is considered sunna in our school for the wife to do the housework, and the husband (who is obliged to support her) to earn the living, since this is how the Prophet (Allah bless him and give.
            him peace) divided the work between Fatima and ‘Ali (Allah be well pleased with them)) (alMuhadhdhab fi fiqh ai-Imam al-Shafi’i (yI25), 2.68).

            A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS IN THE HANAFI SCHOOL

            w45.2 (Nahlawi:) The wife’s serving her husband at home-by cooking, cleaning, and baking bread-is religiously obligatory for her, and if she does not, she is committing a sin, though it is not something that she may be forced to do by the court (al-Durar al-mubaha fi ai-hazr wa ai-ibaha
            (y99),I72).

            “Now son, if you tell her you want to “play” with PUSSY, then she has to drop everything, especially her knickers & get up them stairs”.

            “If she doesn’t, then give her a couple of wallops of the stick & that will teach her manners.”

            “And what are the rocks for Dad?”

            “Well son, there might come a time when she feels like running away & you have to defend your HONOR. This is were the rocks come in handy.

            Dig a big hole in the backyard; put her into a sack & hop the rocks of her head. She won’t run away again”!

            “Women have a knack of having a “headache”, when you want your “iron”!

            “Well, just show her the stick & rocks & tell her,

            “I’ll give you all the headaches you want, if you don’t behave yourself!

            Get up them stairs & warm the bed. I’m feeling horny just thinking about it”!

            ALLAH ROCKS!

            Have you heard the lovely Aryana singing about the plight of Afghan women?
            Here are the full lyrics of her song:
            I am the Lady of the Land of Fire
            I am incurable wound of this earth
            I am so full of hurt, pain and suffering
            That even Death says Bravo! to me
            I am the Lady of the Land of Fire
            I am incurable wound of this earth
            Each step takes me to a different direction
            The target of ambush by Monsters and Predators
            This is who I am
            This is who I am
            I am the Daughter of Afghan Land
            Even though I am Sweet and Innocent
            Who says I am a Mother to this World?
            I am nothing but a burden on the Son’s shoulders
            I am a slave because I am a Wife
            I am a headache when I am a Sister
            This is who I am
            This is who I am
            I am the Daughter of Afghan Land
            Even though I am Sweet and Innocent
            The moment my heart expresses suffocation
            I get bombarded by the stones of the world around
            Both my own and strangers alike
            Come forward for belligerence against me
            This is who I am
            This is who I am
            I am the Daughter of Afghan Land
            Even though I am Sweet and Innocent
            I am the Lady of the Land of Fire
            I am incurable wound of this earth
            I am the subject of stoning by the nation
            I am a dishonor to culture and tradition
            I am a black mark on faith and religion
            I am the Lady of the Land of Fire!

        • LuckybinRaj,

          I disagree with you as your statement should have read : Millions of dreaming Indian cows visit Brihadeeswara Temple which is also known for bad luck, known as the Big Temple, which was built by a dreaming bull called Raja Chola…who got the “instructions” …in a dream…. to raise up a temple> by using billions of rupees snatched from poor poor poor Indian cows as they are always available to be milked!!

          See what wiki says : “There is widespread belief that a visit to the temple has politically disastrous implications – the claim is supported by a few events. A visit to the temple for an event related to King Rajaraja by former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi along with the then Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu M G Ramachandran in 1984 was followed by bad course of events later for both the leaders – Mrs Gandhi was assassinated by her own bodyguards in October that year, and MGR fell seriously ill with a stroke”.

          And still these Indian cows call themselves Hindus!!!!!!!!!

          • THE WISDOM OF MOHAMMED:

            MOHAMMED CHOKED SATAN WITH HIS BARE HANDS

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet once offered the prayer and said, “Satan came in front of me and tried to interrupt my prayer, but Allah gave me an upper hand on him and I choked him. No doubt, I thought of tying him to one of the pillars of the mosque till you get up in the morning and see him. ….Then Allah made him (Satan) return with his head down (humiliated).”
            Sahih Bukhari 2:22:301

            WATER MIXED WITH DEAD DOGS & MENSTRUAL CLOTHES STILL CLEAN:

            Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri: The people asked the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him): Can we perform ablution out of the well of Buda’ah, which is a well into which menstrual clothes, dead dogs and stinking things were thrown? He replied: Water is pure and is not defiled by anything.
            Abu Dawud 1:66 , See Also Abu Dawud 1:67

            Fever comes from the heat of Hell

            The Prophet said, “Fever is from the heat of Hell, so abate fever with water.”
            Sahih Bukhari 7:71:621, See Also Sahih Bukhari 7:71:619, Sahih Bukhari 7:71:620, Sahih Bukhari 7:71:622

            Wicked wigs

            Narrated Abdullah (bin Mus’ud):
            Allah’s Apostle has cursed the lady who uses false hair.
            Sahih Bukhari 6:60:409

            Divinely cooked and delivered pot of meat fixes Prophet’s performance problems in bed

            Waqidi said: “The prophet of Allah used to say that I was among those who have little strength for intercourse. Then Allah sent me a pot with cooked meat. After I ate from it, I found strength any time I wanted to do the work.”
            Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Volume 8, Page 200

            Sheep owners are humble while horse and camel owners are arrogant

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The main source of disbelief is in the east. Pride and arrogance are characteristics of the owners of horses and camels, and those bedouins who are busy with their camels and pay no attention to Religion; while modesty and gentleness are the characteristics of the owners of sheep.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:520

            A drink that gives you wings

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said “If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease.”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:537

            A crying tree misses the Prophet’s sermons

            Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah: The Prophet used to stand by a tree or a date-palm on Friday. Then an Ansari woman or man said. “O Allah’s Apostle! Shall we make a pulpit for you?” He replied, “If you wish.” So they made a pulpit for him and when it was Friday, he proceeded towards the pulpit (for delivering the sermon). The date-palm cried like a child! The Prophet descended (the pulpit) and embraced it while it continued moaning like a child being quieted. The Prophet said, “It was crying for (missing) what it used to hear of religious knowledge given near to it.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:56:784

            Trees as informers

            Narrated ‘Abdur-Rahman: “I asked Masruq, ‘Who informed the Prophet about the Jinns at the night when they heard the Qur’an?’ He said, ‘Your father ‘Abdullah informed me that a tree informed the Prophet about them.’”
            Sahih Bukhari 5:58:199

            A saluting stone or a delusional Prophet?

            Jabir b. Samura reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: I recognise the stone in Mecca which used to pay me salutations before my advent as a Prophet and I recognise that even now.
            Sahih Muslim 30:5654

            Hellfire complains to Allah

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The (Hell) Fire complained to its Lord saying, ‘O my Lord! My different parts eat up each other.’ So, He allowed it to take two breaths, one in the winter and the other in summer, and this is the reason for the severe heat and the bitter cold you find (in weather).”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:482
            Abdomen contradicts Allah

            Narrated Abu Said: A man came to the prophet and said, ‘My brother has got loose motions. The Prophet said, Let him drink honey.” The man again (came) and said, ‘I made him drink (honey) but that made him worse.’ The Prophet said, ‘Allah has said the Truth, and the abdomen of your brother has told a lie.”
            Sahih Bukhari 7:71:614

            One sneeze, two sneeze, three sneeze, four

            Malik related to me from Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr from his father that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “If a man sneezes, invoke a blessing on him. Then if he sneezes, invoke a blessing on him. Then if he sneezes, invoke a blessing on him. Then if he sneezes, say, ‘You have a cold’.” Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr said, “I don’t know whether it was after the third or fourth.”
            Al-Muwatta 54 2.4

            Allah likes sneezing but hates yawning

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Allah likes sneezing and dislikes yawning, so if someone sneezes and then praises Allah, then it is obligatory on every Muslim who heard him, to say: May Allah be merciful to you (Yar-hamuka-l-lah). But as regards yawning, it is from satan, so one must try one’s best to stop it, if one says ‘Ha’ when yawning, satan will laugh at him.”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:73:242

            Allah, rain there, not here!

            Summary: People’s livestock were dying because of lack of water. On request, Muhammad prayed to Allah who instantly brought so much rain that that caused livestock to die due to excess of water. Then Muhammad told Allah to rain around them, not on them and the rain stopped.

            Narrated Sharik: Anas bin Malik said, “A person entered the Mosque on a Friday through the gate facing the Daril-Qada’ and Allah’s Apostle was standing delivering the Khutba (sermon). The man stood in front of Allah’s Apostle and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle, livestock are dying and the roads are cut off; please pray to Allah for rain.’ So Allah’s Apostle (p.b.u.h) raised both his hands and said, ‘O Allah! Bless us with rain. O Allah! Bless us with rain. O Allah! Bless us with rain!” Anas added, “By Allah, there were no clouds in the sky and there was no house or building between us and the mountain of Silas’. Then a big cloud like a shield appeared from behind it (i.e. Silas Mountain) and when it came in the middle of the sky, it spread and then rained. By Allah! We could not see the sun for a week. The next Friday, a person entered through the same gate and Allah’s Apostle was delivering the Friday Khutba and the man stood in front of him and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! The livestock are dying and the roads are cut off; Please pray to Allah to withhold rain.’ ” Anas added, “Allah’s Apostle raised both his hands and said, ‘O Allah! Round about us and not on us. O Allah!’ On the plateaus, on the mountains, on the hills, in the valleys and on the places where trees grow.’ ” Anas added, “The rain stopped and we came out, walking in the sun.” Sharik asked Anas whether it was the same person who had asked for rain the previous Friday. Anas replied that he did not know.
            Sahih Bukhari 2:17:127

            Fight polytheists by trimming moustache

            Ibn Umar said: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be opon him) said: Act against the polytheists, trim closely the moustache and grow beard.
            Sahih Muslim 2:500, See also: Sahih Muslim 2:501

            Allah loves sneezes (aacchoo!)

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Allah loves sneezing but dislikes yawning; so if anyone of you sneezes and then praises Allah, every Muslim who hears him (praising Allah) has to say Tashmit to him. But as regards yawning, it is from Satan, so if one of you yawns, he should try his best to stop it, for when anyone of you yawns, Satan laughs at him.”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:73:245

            Pus better than poetry

            Abu Sa`id Khudri reported: We were going with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him). As we reached the place (known as) Arj there met (us) a poet who had been reciting poetry. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Catch the satan or detain the satan, for filling the belly of a man with pus is better than stuffing his brain with poetry.
            Sahih Muslim 28:5611

            Spit on the left for protection against bad dreams

            Narrated Abu Qatada: The Prophet said, “A good dream that comes true is from Allah, and a bad dream is from Satan, so if anyone of you sees a bad dream, he should seek refuge with Allah from Satan and should spit on the left, for the bad dream will not harm him.”

            Sahih Bukhari 9:87:115

            Death be upon you, too

            Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar: Allah’s Apostle said, “When the Jews greet you, they usually say, ‘As-Samu ‘alaikum (Death be on you),’ so you should say (in reply to them), ‘Wa’alaikum (And on you).”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:74:274
            The almighty wind

            Narrated Anas: Whenever a strong wind blew, anxiety appeared on the face of the Prophet (fearing that wind might be a sign of Allah’s wrath).
            Sahih Bukhari 2:17:144

            Could someone please lick my hands? Thank you

            Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: The Prophet said,

            ‘When you eat, do not wipe your hands till you have licked it, or had it licked by somebody else.”
            Sahih Bukhari 7:65:366

            The art of dealing with a fart

            Narrated Ali ibn Talq: The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) said: When any of you breaks wind during the prayer, he should turn away and perform ablution and repeat the prayer.
            Abu Dawud 1:205

            Narrated ‘Abbas bin Tamim: My uncle asked Allah’s Apostle about a person who imagined to have passed wind during the prayer. Allah’ Apostle replied: “He should not leave his prayers unless he hears sound or smells something.”
            Sahih Bukhari 1:4:139

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Allah does not accept prayer of anyone of you if he does Hadath (passes wind) till he performs the ablution (anew).”
            Sahih Bukhari 9:86:86

            Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Zam’a: The Prophet forbade laughing at a person who passes wind.
            Sahih Bukhari 8:73:68

            And Allah taught Adam all the names as follows: He taught him the name of everything, down to fart and little fart.
            Tabari I 267

            Allah curses tatooed women

            Narrated Ibn Mas’ud: Allah has cursed those women who practise tattooing or get it done for themselves, and those who remove hair from their faces, and those who create spaces between their teeth artificially to look beautiful, such ladies as change the features created by Allah. Why then shall I not curse those whom Allah’s Apostle has cursed and who are cursed in Allah’s Book too?
            Sahih Bukhari 7:72:826
            Dye your hair because Jews and Christians don’t

            Narrated Abu Huraira :

            The Prophet said, “Jews and Christians do not dye their hair so you should do the opposite of what they do.
            Sahih Bukhari 7:72:786

            Greeting order

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “The young should greet the old, the passer by should greet the sitting one, and the small group of persons should greet the large group of persons. ”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:74:250

            Well hello, hello, hello

            Narrated Anas: Whenever Allah’s Apostle greeted somebody, he used to greet him three times, and if he spoke a sentence, he used to repeat it thrice.
            Sahih Bukhari 8:74:261

            Poke the Peeping Tom

            Narrated Anas: A man peeped into one of the dwelling places of the Prophet. The Prophet got up and aimed a sharp-edged arrow head (or wooden stick) at him to poke him stealthily.
            Sahih Bukhari 9:83:38

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Abul Qasim said, “If any person peeps at you without your permission and you poke him with a stick and injure his eye, you will not be blamed.”
            Sahih Bukhari 9:83:39

            p7S.22 The Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:
            (1) “Were a man to look at you without permission and you threw a rock at him and knocked out his eye, you would not have committed any offense. ”
            (2) “Whoever peeps into a house without its people’s leave, they may put out his eye.”
            Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law
            Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri, Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller

            Allah prefers odd numbers

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah has ninety-nine Names, i.e., one hundred minus one, and whoever believes in their meanings and acts accordingly, will enter Paradise; and Allah is Witr (one) and loves ‘the Witr’ (i.e., odd numbers).
            Sahih Bukhari 8:75:419

            Overweight omen

            Narrated Abu Huraira:
            Allah’s Apostle said, “On the Day of Resurrection, a huge fat man will come who will not weigh, the weight of the wing of a mosquito in Allah’s Sight.” and then the Prophet added, ‘We shall not give them any weight on the Day of Resurrection’
            Sahih Bukhari 6:60:253

            Searching for the meaning in life… and 3 stones

            Narrated Abdullah:
            The Prophet went out to answer the call of nature and asked me to bring three stones. I found two stones and searched for the third but could not find it. So I took a dried piece of dung and brought it to him. He took the two stones and threw away the dung and said, “This is a filthy thing.”
            Sahih Bukhari 1:4:158, See Also Sahih Bukhari 1:4:157, Sahih Bukhari 1:4:162, Sahih Bukhari 1:4:163

            Annoying in-laws, a universal phenomena

            Narrated ‘Uqba bin ‘Amir:
            Allah’s Apostle said, “Beware of entering upon the ladies.” A man from the Ansar said, “Allah’s Apostle! What about Al-Hamu the in-laws of the wife (the brothers of her husband or his nephews etc.)?”

            The Prophet replied:

            The in-laws of the wife are death itself.
            Sahih Bukhari 7:62:159

            Genies like bones and animal dung

            Narrated Abu Huraira:
            That once he was in the, company of the Prophet carrying a water pot for his ablution and for cleaning his private parts. While he was following him carrying it (i.e. the pot), the Prophet said, “Who is this?” He said, “I am Abu Huraira.” The Prophet said, “Bring me stones in order to clean my private parts, and do not bring any bones or animal dung.” Abu Huraira went on narrating: So I brought some stones, carrying them in the corner of my robe till I put them by his side and went away.
            When he finished, I walked with him and asked, “What about the bone and the animal dung?” He said, “They are of the food of Jinns. The delegate of Jinns of (the city of) Nasibin came to me–and how nice those Jinns were–and asked me for the remains of the human food. I invoked Allah for them that they would never pass by a bone or animal dung but find food on them.”
            Sahih Bukhari 5:58:200

            Incantations while having sex

            Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: The Prophet said, “If anyone of you, when having sexual relation with his wife, say: ‘In the name of Allah. O Allah! Protect us from Satan and prevent Satan from approaching our offspring you are going to give us,’ and if he begets a child (as a result of that relation) Satan will not harm it.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:493

            Devils on a leash

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said,

            “When the month of Ramadan comes, the gates of Paradise are opened and the gates of the (Hell) Fire are closed, and the devils are chained.”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:497

            Allah’s advice to his prophets

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “Once while a prophet amongst the prophets was taking a rest underneath a tree, an ant bit him. He, therefore, ordered that his luggage be taken away from underneath that tree and then ordered that the dwelling place of the ants should be set on fire. Allah sent him a revelation:– “Wouldn’t it have been sufficient to burn a single ant?”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:536

            Prostitutes can stay out of Hell by helping a thirsty dog

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “A prostitute was forgiven by Allah, because, passing by a panting dog near a well and seeing that the dog was about to die of thirst, she took off her shoe, and tying it with her head-cover she drew out some water for it. So, Allah forgave her because of that.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:538

            Bodyguard job: Females need not apply

            Narrated Abu Musa: Thy Prophet (p.b.u.h) said, “A time will come upon the people when a person will wander about with gold as Zakat and will not find anybody to accept it, and one man will be seen followed by forty women to be their guardian because of scarcity of men and great number of women”.
            Sahih Bukhari 2:24:495

            Looking at genitals or talking during intercourse may cause disabilities for child

            Narrated by Abi Hurairah that the prophet PBUH said: If one of you got engaged in intercourse, they shouldn’t look at the genital for that inherits blindness, and not talk too much for that inherits aphonia (lack of the ability to talk).
            Hadith translated by FFI forum member

            Say “Allah willing” during intercourse to give birth to Islamic militants

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “Once Solomon, son of David said, ‘(By Allah) Tonight I will have sexual intercourse with one hundred (or ninety-nine) women each of whom will give birth to a knight who will fight in Allah’s Cause.’ On that a (i.e. if Allah wills) but he did not say, Allah willing.’ Therefore only one of those women conceived and gave birth to a half-man. By Him in Whose Hands Muhammad’s life is, if he had said, “Allah willing’, (he would have begotten sons) all of whom would have been knights striving in Allah’s Cause.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:52:74i

            Dirty teeth can invalidate a fast

            Swallowing bits of food that may be left between the teeth is regarded as eating, so it invalidates the fast…

            Ibn Qudaamah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Mughni, 3/260:
            If a person has food between his teeth, one of the following two scenarios must apply:
            1 – It is a small amount that he cannot spit out, so he swallows it. This does not invalidate his fast, because it cannot be avoided. It is like saliva. Ibn al-Mundhir said: The scholars are unanimously agreed on that.
            2 – It is a large amount and he can spit it out. If he spits it out there is no sin on him, but if he swallows it deliberately, his fast is invalidated according to the majority of scholars, because he has swallowed food that he could have spat out willingly when he is mindful of his fast. So this breaks the fast just as if he deliberately started eating. End quote.
            Islam Q&A – Fatwa #78438

            “This Muhammad of yours is a dwarf and fat”

            Narrated AbuBarzah:
            AbdusSalam ibn AbuHazim AbuTalut said: I saw AbuBarzah who came to visit Ubaydullah ibn Ziyad. Then a man named Muslim who was there in the company mentioned it to me.
            When Ubaydullah saw him, he said: This Muhammad of yours is a dwarf and fat. The old man (i.e. AbuBarzah) understood it.
            So he said: I did not think that I should remain among people who would make me feel ashamed of the company of Muhammad (peace be upon him).
            Thereupon Ubaydullah said: The company of Muhammad (peace be upon him) is a honour for you, not a disgrace. He added: I called for you to ask about the reservoir. Did you hear the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) mentioning anything about it? AbuBarzah said: Yes, not once, twice, thrice, four times or five times. If anyone believes it, may Allah not supply him with water from it. He then went away angrily.
            Abu Dawud 40:4731
            The fact that the old man AbuBarzah ‘understood it’ implies that Ubaydullah’s description of Muhammad as a fat dwarf was accurate.

            Watermelons and cucumbers

            “If a man makes a hole in a watermelon, or a piece of dough, or a leather skin, or a statue, and has sex with it, then this is the same as what we have said about other types of masturbation [i.e., that it is halaal in the same circumstances given before, such as being on a journey]. In fact, it is easier than masturbating with one’s hand”.

            “If a woman does not have a husband, and her lust becomes strong, then some of our scholars say: It is permissible for the woman to take an akranbij, which is a piece of leather worked until it becomes shaped like a penis, and insert it in herself. She may also use a cucumber”.

            Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim (Islamic scholar), page 129

            A Muslim Shia website notes: “Maybe this is another reason why ‘Umar the Khalifa never went on jihad: somebody had to stay behind and organize the cucumber distribution.”

            Companions of Muhammad masturbated during Jihad

            “If a man is torn between continued desire or releasing it, and if this man does not have a wife or he has a slave-girl but he does not marry, then if a man is overwhelmed by desire, and he fears that he will suffer because of this (someone like a prisoner, or a traveller, or a pauper), then it is permissible for him to masturbate, and Ahmad (ibn Hanbal) is explicit on this. Furthermore, it is narrated that the Companions of the Prophet (s) used to masturbate while they were on military expeditions or travelling”.

            Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim (Islamic scholar), page 129

            Don’t flash Allah

            Narrated Abu Huraira:
            The Prophet had forbidden: (A) the Mulamasa and Munabadha (bargains), (B) the offering of two prayers, one after the morning compulsory prayer till the sun rises, and the others, after the ‘Asr prayer till the sun sets (C) He also forbade that one should sit wearing one garment, nothing of which covers his private parts (D) and prevent them from exposure to the sky; (E) he also forbade Ishtimal-as-Samma’.
            Sahih Bukhari 7:72:709

            Doodling is a sin!

            The scholars of the Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas said:

            Whatever is images of animate beings such as insects and other living beings is not permissible, even if it is drawn on a blackboard or on paper, and even if the purpose of it is to help in teaching, because it is not essential and because of the general meaning of the evidence concerning that. (Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 1/685)

            What is prohibited is making images of animate beings, whether that is engraving or painting on walls or fabric or paper or woven cloth, and whether it is done with a feather or a pen or other equipment, whether the thing is drawn as it is or whether some imaginary element is introduced, so it is made smaller or larger or more beautiful or more ugly, or it is drawn as a stick figure. (Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 1/696)

            Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
            One of the most serious of evils is making images of animate beings and keeping them and using them. There is no difference between that which is three dimensional and that which is on paper, whether it is produced by machines or otherwise. This meaning was mentioned by al-Nawawi in Sharh Saheeh Muslim, and he mentioned that it is the view of the four imams. The hadeeths which emphatically warned against that are well known. (Fataawa Rasaa’il Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem, 13/173)

            Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen said:
            Making images of animate beings, whether they are human or otherwise, is undoubtedly haraam and is a major sin, because it is proven that the one who does that is cursed by the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). This is clear, whether they are three-dimensional or drawn by hand. (Majmoo’ Fataawa wa Rasaa’il Ibn ‘Uthaymeen 2/288)
            Islam Q&A – Fatwa No. 129446

            Animals and living things

            Muttaqi (God-fearing) monkeys

            Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun: During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.
            Sahih Bukhari 5:58:188

            According to `Amr b. Maymûn : I was in Yemen. Amongst the female goats of my people, I saw that at a heightened place, a male monkey brought along a female monkey and slept while keeping her hand beneath his head. During this time, a young monkey came and signaled the female monkey. She softly removed her hand from beneath the male monkey’s head and went with the young monkey. She fornicated with him and I was watching it. After that, the female monkey returned and was softly trying to put her hand back under the male monkey’s head that he woke up bewildered and smelled her and then screamed.

            All the monkeys gathered thereafter. He would point towards her and scream constantly (i.e. she has committed adultery). At last the other monkeys went towards the right left and brought along that young monkey whom I recognized. They dug a hole for this young monkey and the female one and stoned them to death. So I saw monkeys stoning to death too besides the human race.
            Taiseer-ul-Baari, volume 2, Page 626

            This is consistent with the Qur’an in its claim that Jews (who at one time practiced stoning) were turned into apes:

            “And you know well the story of those among you who broke Sabbath. We said to them: “Be apes—despised and hated by all. Thus We made their end a warning to the people of their time and succeeding generation, and an admonition for God-fearing people.”
            Qur’an 2:65

            Unpaid debt to turn into talking snake on Judgement Day

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “On the Day of Resurrection the Kanz (Treasure or wealth of which, Zakat has not been paid) of anyone of you will appear in the shape of a huge bald-headed poisonous male snake and its owner will run away from it, but it will follow him and say, ‘I am your Kanz.'” The Prophet added, “By Allah, that snake will keep on following him until he stretches out his hand and let the snake swallow it.” Allah’s Apostle added, “If the owner of camels does not pay their Zakat, then, on the Day of Resurrection those camels will come to him and will strike his face with their hooves.”
            Sahih Bukhari 9:86:89

            Monkeys and pigs are humans who once played music

            Narrated Abu ‘Amir or Abu Malik Al-Ash’ari: that he heard the Prophet saying, “From among my followers there will be some people who will consider illegal sexual intercourse, the wearing of silk, the drinking of alcoholic drinks and the use of musical instruments, as lawful. And there will be some people who will stay near the side of a mountain and in the evening their shepherd will come to them with their sheep and ask them for something, but they will say to him, ‘Return to us tomorrow.’ Allah will destroy them during the night and will let the mountain fall on them, and He will transform the rest of them into monkeys and pigs and they will remain so till the Day of Resurrection.”
            Sahih Bukhari 7:69:494

            Zoophilia pardonable but not homosexuality

            Abu Dawud 38:4448 prescribes the death sentence for an unmarried man who commits sodomy but there is no prescribed punishment for having sex with an animal:
            Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
            Abu Dawud 38:4450

            Sheeps prefer female babies

            Narrated Umm Kurz: I heard the Prophet (may peace be upon him) say: Let the birds stay in their roosts. She said: I also heard him say: Two sheep are to be sacrificed for a boy and one for a girl, but it does you no harm whether they are male or female.
            Abu Dawud 15:2829

            Have flu? Try fresh camel urine
            The climate of Medina did not suit some people, so the Prophet ordered them to follow his shepherd, i.e. his camels, and drink their milk and urine (as a medicine). So they followed the shepherd that is the camels and drank their milk and urine till their bodies became healthy.
            Sahih Bukhari 7:71:590

            YOU AIN’T NOTHING BUT A HOUND DOG!

            Narrated ‘Aisha: The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, “Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying people).” I said, “You have made us (i.e. women) dogs… ”

            Sahih Bukhari 1:9:490

            Goat ate my Qur’an
            ‘Aisha: “The verse of the stoning and of suckling an adult ten times were revealed, and they were (written) on a paper and kept under my bed. When the messenger of Allah expired and we were preoccupied with his death, a goat entered and ate away the paper.”
            Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal. vol. 6, p. 269; Sunan Ibn Majah, p. 626; Ibn Qutbah, Tawil Mukhtalafi ‘l-Hadith (Cairo: Maktaba al-Kulliyat al-Azhariyya. 1966) p. 310; As-Suyuti, ad-Durru ‘l-Manthur, vol. 2, p. 13

            HOLY COCKS & DEVIL DONKEYS

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “When you hear the crowing of cocks, ask for Allah’s Blessings for (their crowing indicates that) they have seen an angel. And when you hear the braying of donkeys, seek Refuge with Allah from satan for (their braying indicates) that they have seen a satan.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:522

            COWGATE

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Once Allah’s Apostle; offered the Morning Prayer and then faced the people and said, “While a man was driving a cow, he suddenly rode over it and beat it. The cow said, “We have not been created for this, but we have been created for sloughing.” On that the people said astonishingly, “Glorified be Allah! A cow speaks!” The Prophet said, “I believe this, and Abu Bakr and ‘Umar too, believe it, although neither of them was present there.

            PART 2

            While a person was amongst his sheep, a wolf attacked and took one of the sheep. The man chased the wolf till he saved it from the wolf, where upon the wolf said, ‘You have saved it from me; but who will guard it on the day of the wild beasts when there will be no shepherd to guard them except me?” The people said surprisingly, “Glorified be Allah! A wolf speaks!” The Prophet said, “But I believe this, and Abu Bakr and ‘Umar too, believe this, although neither of them was present there.”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:56:677

            More horse dung and urine equals more heavenly rewards
            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “If somebody keeps a horse in Allah’s Cause motivated by his faith in Allah and his belief in His Promise, then he will be rewarded on the Day of Resurrection for what the horse has eaten or drunk and for its dung and urine.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:52:105

            Lost camels can be returned to their owners but not sheep

            Narrated Zaid bin Khalid Al-Juhani
            A man asked the Prophet about the picking up of a “Luqata” (fallen lost thing). The Prophet replied, “Recognize and remember its tying material and its container, and make public announcement (about it) for one year, then utilize it but give it to its owner if he comes.” Then the person asked about the lost camel. On that, the Prophet got angry and his cheeks or his Face became red and he said, “You have no concern with it as it has its water container, and its feet and it will reach water, and eat (the leaves) of trees till its owner finds it.” The man then asked about the lost sheep. The Prophet replied, “It is either for you, for your brother (another person) or for the wolf.”
            Sahih Bukhari 1:3:91

            A house may be set on fire by a mouse

            This hadith has been reported on the authority of Jabir through another chain of transmitters but with a slight variation of words:” The mouse may set the house on fire over its inhabitants.”
            Sahih Muslim 23:4994

            Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’z-Zubayr al-Makki from Jabir ibn Abdullah that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “Lock the door, tie the waterskin, turn the vessel over or cover it, and put out the lamp. Shaytan does not open a locked door or untie a tied knot, or uncover a vessel. A mouse may set fire to people’s houses about them.”
            Al-Muwatta 49 10.21

            YOU DIRTY RAT!

            The Prophet said, “A group of Israelites were lost. Nobody knows what they did. But I do not see them except that they were cursed and changed into rats, for if you put the milk of a she-camel in front of a rat, it will not drink it, but if the milk of a sheep is put in front of it, it will drink it.”

            PART 2

            I told this to Ka’b who asked me, “Did you hear it from the Prophet ?” I said, “Yes.” Ka’b asked me the same question several times; I said to Ka’b. “Do I read the Torah? (i.e. I tell you this from the Prophet.)”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:524

            Race relations, the Islamic way

            Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, “Listen and obey (your chief) even if an Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin were made your chief.”
            Sahih Bukhari 1:11:662

            In a dream, Satan cannot imitate the Prophet

            Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, “Whoever has seen me in a dream, then no doubt, he has seen me, for Satan cannot imitate my shape.
            Sahih Bukhari 9:87:123, See also Sahih Bukhari 9:87:124, Sahih Bukhari 9:87:125, and Sahih Bukhari 9:87:126

            Don’t be late, the angels are watching
            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “On every Friday the angels take heir stand at every gate of the mosques to write the names of the people chronologically (i.e. according to the time of their arrival for the Friday prayer and when the Imam sits (on the pulpit) they fold up their scrolls and get ready to listen to the sermon.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:433

            Allah wants to see you…naked

            Narrated Ibn Abbas: The Prophet said, “You will meet Allah barefooted, naked, walking on feet, and uncircumcised.”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:76:531, See also Sahih Bukhari 8:76:532, Sahih Bukhari 8:76:533, and Sahih Bukhari 8:76:533

            Women are just like camels

            Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar: I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, “Women are just like camels, out of one hundred, one can hardly find a single camel suitable to ride.”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:76:505

            Flag fixed behind the buttocks

            It is narrated on the authority of Abu Sa’id that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: On the Day of Judgment there will be a flag fixed behind the buttocks of every person guilty of the breach of faith.
            Sahih Muslim 19:4309

            Satanic influences

            Satan ties three knots at back of our head while we sleep
            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “During your sleep, Satan knots three knots at the back of the head of each of you, and he breathes the following words at each knot, ‘The night is, long, so keep on sleeping,’ If that person wakes up and celebrates the praises of Allah, then one knot is undone, and when he performs ablution the second knot is undone, and when he prays, all the knots are undone, and he gets up in the morning lively and gay, otherwise he gets up dull and gloomy. ”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:491

            SATAN’S LULLABY

            Narrated ‘Abdullah : A person was mentioned before the Prophet (p.b.u.h) and he was told that he had kept on sleeping till morning and had not got up for the prayer. The Prophet said, “Satan urinated in his ears.”

            Sahih Bukhari 2:21:245

            WHY DO ARABS HAVE BIG NOSES?

            Abu Huraira reported: The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) said. When any one of you awakes up from sleep and performs ablution, he must clean his nose three times, for the devil spends the night in the interior of his nose.
            SATAN’S LULLABY

            Narrated ‘Abdullah : A person was mentioned before the Prophet (p.b.u.h) and he was told that he had kept on sleeping till morning and had not got up for the prayer. The Prophet said, “Satan urinated in his ears.”

            Sahih Bukhari 2:21:245

            Sahih Muslim 2:462

            Satan tries to interrupt Muhammad
            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet offered a prayer, and (after finishing) he said, “Satan came in front of me trying persistently to divert my attention from the prayer, but Allah gave me the strength to over-power him.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:504

            Satan gets unlimited hospital passes
            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “When any human being is born. Satan touches him at both sides of the body with his two fingers, except Jesus, the son of Mary, whom Satan tried to touch but failed, for he touched the placenta-cover instead.”
            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:506

            Satan & yawning

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Yawning is from Satan and if anyone of you yawns, he should check his yawning as much as possible, for if anyone of you (during the act of yawning) should say: ‘Ha’, Satan will laugh at him.”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:509

            Man talks to Satan for 3 nights and Satan steals his food
            Narrated Abu Huraira
            Allah’s Apostle deputed me to keep Sadaqat (al-Fitr) of Ramadan. A comer came and started taking handfuls of the foodstuff (of the Sadaqa) (stealthily). I took hold of him and said, “By Allah, I will take you to Allah’s Apostle .” He said, “I am needy and have many dependents, and I am in great need.” I released him, and in the morning Allah’s Apostle asked me, “What did your prisoner do yesterday?” I said, “O Allah’s Apostle! The person complained of being needy and of having many dependents, so, I pitied him and let him go.” Allah’s Apostle said, “Indeed, he told you a lie and he will be coming again.” I believed that he would show up again as Allah’s Apostle had told me that he would return. So, I waited for him watchfully. When he (showed up and) started stealing handfuls of foodstuff, I caught hold of him again and said, “I will definitely take you to Allah’s Apostle. He said, “Leave me, for I am very needy and have many dependents. I promise I will not come back again.” I pitied him and let him go.
            In the morning Allah’s Apostle asked me, “What did your prisoner do.” I replied, “O Allah’s Apostle! He complained of his great need and of too many dependents, so I took pity on him and set him free.” Allah’s Apostle said, “Verily, he told you a lie and he will return.” I waited for him attentively for the third time, and when he (came and) started stealing handfuls of the foodstuff, I caught hold of him and said, “I will surely take you to Allah’s Apostle as it is the third time you promise not to return, yet you break your promise and come.” He said, “(Forgive me and) I will teach you some words with which Allah will benefit you.” I asked, “What are they?” He replied, “Whenever you go to bed, recite “Ayat-al-Kursi”– ‘Allahu la ilaha illa huwa-l-Haiy-ul Qaiyum’ till you finish the whole verse. (If you do so), Allah will appoint a guard for you who will stay with you and no satan will come near you till morning. ” So, I released him. In the morning, Allah’s Apostle asked, “What did your prisoner do yesterday?” I replied, “He claimed that he would teach me some words by which Allah will benefit me, so I let him go.” Allah’s Apostle asked, “What are they?” I replied, “He said to me, ‘Whenever you go to bed, recite Ayat-al-Kursi from the beginning to the end —- Allahu la ilaha illa huwa-lHaiy-ul-Qaiyum—-.’ He further said to me, ‘(If you do so), Allah will appoint a guard for you who will stay with you, and no satan will come near you till morning.’ (Abu Huraira or another sub-narrator) added that they (the companions) were very keen to do good deeds. The Prophet said, “He really spoke the truth, although he is an absolute liar. Do you know whom you were talking to, these three nights, O Abu Huraira?” Abu Huraira said, “No.” He said, “It was Satan.”
            Sahih Bukhari 3:38:505t

            FARTING SATAN

            Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “When the Adhan is pronounced Satan takes to his heels and passes wind with noise during his flight in order not to hear the Adhan. When the Adhan is completed he comes back and again takes to his heels when the Iqama is pronounced and after its completion he returns again till he whispers into the heart of the person (to divert his attention from his prayer) and makes him remember things which he does not recall to his mind before the prayer and that causes him to forget how much he has prayed.”

            Sahih Bukhari 1:11:582

            SATAN THE CHILD MOLESTER

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “When any human being is born. Satan touches him at both sides of the body with his two fingers, except Jesus, the son of Mary, whom Satan tried to touch but failed, for he touched the placenta-cover instead.”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:506

            Narrated Said bin Al-Musaiyab: Abu Huraira said, “I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, ‘There is none born among the off-spring of Adam, but Satan touches it. A child therefore, cries loudly at the time of birth because of the touch of Satan, except Mary and her child.” Then Abu Huraira recited: “And I seek refuge with You for her and for her offspring from the outcast Satan.” (3.36)

            Sahih Bukhari Book 55 No. 641

            Call of nature related to offensive and wicked things

            Narrated Anas: Whenever the Prophet went to answer the call of nature, he used to say, “Allah-umma inni a’udhu bika minal khubuthi wal khaba’ith i.e. O Allah, I seek Refuge with You from all offensive and wicked things (evil deeds and evil spirits).”

            Sahih Bukhari 1:4:144

            PARADISE: “appetizing vaginas” & “ever-erect” penises

            Abu Umama narrated: “The Messenger of God said, ‘Everyone that God admits into paradise will be married to 72 wives; two of them are houris and seventy of his inheritance of the [female] dwellers of hell. All of them will have libidinous sex organs and he will have an ever-erect penis.’ ”

            Sunan Ibn Maja, Zuhd (Book of Abstinence) 39

            PART 2

            “Each time we sleep with a Houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [i.e. Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetizing vaginas.”
            Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Qur’an, p. 351

            Allah punishes Muhammad for Safiyah’s capture by making him fall off a camel

            Safiyah bint Huyay was a woman that Muhammad captured and married, after killing her husband.
            Narrated Anas bin Malik: We were in the company of the Prophet while returning from ‘Usfan, and Allah’s Apostle was riding his she camel keeping Safiya bint Huyay riding behind him. His she camel slipped and both of them fell down. Abu Talha jumped from his camel and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! May Allah sacrifice me for you.” The Prophet said, “Take care of the lady.” So, Abu Talha covered his face with a garment and went to Safiya and covered her with it, and then he set right the condition of their she camel so that both of them rode, and we were encircling Allah’s Apostle like a cover. When we approached Medina, the Prophet said, “We are returning with repentance and worshipping and praising our Lord.” He kept on saying this till he entered Medina.
            Sahih Bukhari 4:52:318

            Tortured in the grave for peeing on himself

            Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: Once the Prophet, while passing through one of the grave-yards of Medina or Mecca heard the voices of 2 persons who were being tortured in their graves. The Prophet said, “These 2 persons are being tortured not for a major sin (to avoid).” The Prophet then added, “Yes! (they are being tortured for a major sin). Indeed, 1 of them never saved himself from being soiled with his urine while the other used to go about gossiping.

            PART 2

            The Prophet then asked for a green leaf of a date-palm tree, broke it into two pieces and put one on each grave. On being asked why he had done so, he replied, “I hope that their torture might be lessened, till these get dried.”
            Sahih Bukhari 1:4:215

            TURN YOUR ARSE WEST, MY BOY!

            Narrated Abu Aiyub Al-Ansari: Allah’s Apostle said, “If anyone of you goes to an open space for answering the call of nature he should neither face nor turn his back towards the Qibla; he should either face the east or the west

            Sahih Bukhari 1:4:215

            BLACK DOGS ARE DEVILS

            Abu Dharr reported: The Messenger of ‘Allah (may peace be upon him) said: When any one of you stands for prayer and there is a thing before him equal to the back of the saddle that covers him and in case there is not before him (a thing) equal to the back of the saddle, his prayer would be cut off by (passing of an) ass, woman, and black Dog.

            PART 2

            I said: O Abu Dharr, what feature is there in a black dog which distinguish it from the red dog and the yellow dog? He said: O, son of my brother, I asked the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) as you are asking me, and he said: The black dog is a devil.
            Sahih Muslim 4:1032

            Playing chess is evil

            Buraida reported on the authority of his father that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: He who played chess is like one who dyed his hand with the flesh and blood of swine.
            Sahih Muslim 28:5612

            SHINE YOUR LIGHT ON ME

            Aminah and her vagina light

            According to accepted sirat, Muhammad’s mother had light coming out of her vagina when giving birth to him.
            When the prophet came out of his mothers vagina, the light covered the east and the west which reached all the way to Sham (Syria today)
            sirat ibn hisham 166

            Free a Muslim slave, and save your private parts

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “If somebody manumits a Muslim slave, Allah will save from the Fire every part of his body for freeing the corresponding parts of the slave’s body, even his private parts will be saved from the Fire) because of freeing the slave’s private parts.”
            Sahih Bukhari 8:79:706

            Don’t ever raise your head

            The sin of raising your head before the imam is so great, your face will transform into a donkey.
            Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Isn’t he who raises his head before the Imam afraid that Allah may transform his head into that of a donkey or his figure (face) into that of a donkey?”

            Sahih Bukhari 1:11:660

            He pees like a woman

            Narrated Amr ibn al-‘As: AbdurRahman ibn Hasanah reported: I and Amr ibn al-‘As went to the Prophet (peace be upon him). He came out with a leather shield (in his hand). He covered himself with it and urinated. Then we said: Look at him. He is urinating as a woman does. The Prophet (peace be upon him), heard this and said: Do you not know what befell a person from amongst Banu Isra’il (the children of Israel)? When urine fell on them, they would cut off the place where the urine fell; but he (that person) forbade them (to do so), and was punished in his grave.
            Abu Dawud 1:22

            COMMITT SUICIDE

            Whoso is wont to think (through envy) that Allah will not give him (Muhammad) victory in the world and the Hereafter (and is enraged at the thought of his victory), let him stretch a rope up to the roof (of his dwelling), and let him hang himself. Then let him see whether his strategy dispelleth that whereat he rageth!.
            Qur’an 22:15

            Drunk water while standing up? Puke it out!

            Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: None of you should drink while standing; and if anyone forgets, he must vomit.
            Sahih Muslim 23:5022

            2 things the Prophet loves: perfume and women

            Al-Hasan al-Basri wrote: “The Messenger of God said, “The only two things I cherish of the life of this world are women and perfume.
            Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Volume 1, Page 380
            Aisha said “The Prophet of God liked three things of this world: Perfume, women, and food; he had the [first] two, but missed food.”
            Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Volume 1, Page 380

            Don’t look up!

            Jabir b. Samura reported: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: The people who lift their eyes towards the sky in Prayer should avoid it or they would lose their eyesight.
            Sahih Muslim 4:862
            Abu Huraira reported: People should avoid lifting their eyes towards the sky while supplicating in prayer, otherwise their eyes would be snatched away.
            Sahih Muslim 4:863

            15. Harm No. 14: Leads to Masturbation
            . . .
            Just as it is unlawful and forbidden to commit sexual intercourse with a strange man or woman, it is likewise forbidden to masturbate.
            Unfortunately, this sin has become widespread in this day and age. In some narrations of Hadith there are severe warnings against this sin. It has been mentioned that the person who masturbates shall be resurrected on the Day of Judgment with a pregnant hand. It has also been mentioned that the ناکح الید (the one who masturbates) is under the curse of Allah. Fulfilling one’s sexual desires in an unlawful manner is obviously impermissible. But one should also be cautious of excessive permissible sex. Too much sexual intercourse spoils the health and drains one’s strength.

            Spiritually, one does not get enjoyment in worship and Zikr. If also causes the child to be born weak and frail. It is for this very reason that the Buzurgs have advised to preserve the semen. After 15 to 30 days when there is a strong urge to have sex, only then should one fulfill one’s desire. The lion copulates once a year and from that it breeds offspring.
            Similarly, those people who have intercourse after long intervals of time produce strong and healthy children. Therefore, moderation is necessary in sexual relations with one’s wife, otherwise excessive sex can even lead to death. My Shaikh, Hazrat Phoulpoori (رحمۃ اللہ علیہ) narrated to us the incident of an Alim who had a very beautiful wife. Whenever he would come home from running errands and would see his wife, then he would not be able to control himself. He used have so much sexual relations that after six months, instead of discharging semen, blood started to ejaculate from his penis. This eventually led to a severe fever after which he died. Beauty was the cause of his death. This is why I advise to have moderation in permissible things as well. As for the unlawful, then my advice is not to even go near Haraam. May Allah Ta’ala grant us the ability to practice upon what has been said. Amen
            The 14 Harms Of Casting Evil Glances
            Shaikh ul Arab wal Ajam Hazrat Maulana Shah Hakeem Muhammad Akhtar Saheb

            Muhammad the inadvertent trend-setter has a temper tantrum

            Narrated Ibn. ‘Umar: Allah’s Apostle wore a gold ring or a silver ring and placed its stone towards the palm of his hand and had the name ‘Muhammad, the Apostle of Allah’ engraved on it. The people also started wearing gold rings like it, but when the Prophet saw them wearing such rings, he threw away his own ring and said. “I will never wear it,” and then wore a silver ring, whereupon the people too started wearing silver rings. Ibn Umar added: After the Prophet Abu Bakr wore the ring, and then Umar and then ‘Uthman wore it till it fell in the Aris well from ‘Uthman. bin ‘Umar : Allah’s Apostle wore a gold ring, then he threw it and said, “I will never wear it.” The people also threw their (gold) rings.
            Sahih Bukhari 7:72:756, See also: Sahih Muslim 24:5210, and Sahih Bukhari 7:72:755

            Wanna have an affair and steal things? Go ahead!

            Narrated Abu Dhar: The Prophet said, “Gabriel said to me, ‘Whoever amongst your followers die without having worshipped others besides Allah, will enter Paradise (or will not enter the (Hell) Fire).” The Prophet asked. “Even if he has committed illegal sexual intercourse or theft?” He replied, “Even then.”

            Sahih Bukhari 4:54:445

            Prophet Muhammad’s BO-scented perfume, anyone?

            Narrated Thumama: Anas said,

            “Um Sulaim used to spread a leather sheet for the Prophet and he used to take a midday nap on that leather sheet at her home.” Anas added, “When the Prophet had slept, she would take some of his sweat and hair and collect it (the sweat) in a bottle and then mix it with Suk (a kind of perfume) while he was still sleeping. “When the death of Anas bin Malik approached, he advised that some of that Suk be mixed with his Hanut (perfume for embalming the dead body), and it was mixed with his Hanut.
            Sahih Bukhari 8:74:298

            Moses slaps the Angel of Death

            Narrated Abu Huraira: The angel of death was sent to Moses and when he went to him, Moses slapped him severely, spoiling one of his eyes. The angel went back to his Lord, and said, “You sent me to a slave who does not want to die.”…..
            Sahih Bukhari 2:23:423,

        • Lucky….hhaaaa …tihs IS the funienst hdatith taht you qetoud!!

          “The angel of death was sent to Moses and when he went to him, Moses slapped him severely, spoiling one of his eyes. The angel went back to his Lord, and said, “You sent me to a slave who does not want to die.”…..
          Sahih Bukhari 2:23:423”

          Lkcuy…tanhk you for yuor tborlue…..but mnay msilums do not blviee in scuh hhiadts!

          Some muslims do not make an effort of reading the fake hadith literature just as hindus who do not read their vedas to know the truth of ONE God.

          Who has opened the world’s eyes more, is it one-single Naik or the thousands of bishops and Babas??????????? In other words who would you admire more…the one who speaks so courageously on the orthodox pagan homeland of Hindus or their fake Babas like shree?? shree?…shree??? Ravi Shankar who praises Naik in one video but criticizes in the next one???

          This Ravi dude is he a gay? Ramdev doesn’t seem to be one but fake they all surely ARE. I would like to see Ramdev debating Naik since Ravi was a disaster who did not quote anything from the Vedas…went by mistake completely unprepared…having written lies in a book on Islamic teachings….oh a total flop….this gay…sorry Ravi!!

          Why do Hindus believe all these fake dudes when they have their scriptures sound and clear…..or ..are those scriptures NOT very clear and need dudes like Ravi to get a chance of milking them???

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s