A Former Muslim’s Open Letter to Dr. Zakir Naik


[FFIHere’s an open letter from a former fan of Dr. Naik. He is clearly upset that he once trusted Islam’s most popular apologist. We can only hope that more Muslims will take heed.zakir-naik1

Assalamu Alaikum,

Zakir Sahab, 

This is Sarfraz Ahmed from Kolkata (India). You must not remember me, but I volunteered at Park Circus Maidan (Kolkata) when you visited the city in the year 2006 for a session. I have been in Saudi Arabia for five year and was a staunch Ahle Hadith and quite successfully propagated this sect in our locality. I was a member of Jubail Dawah Centre in Saudi Arabia and used to talk people of Islamic universities in there where research is done on Islamic subjects and literatures. I have been a great fan of yours. Being a Ahle-Hadith, I have a pretty good knowledge of Quran and Hadiths but a year back and I used to argue with people of other faiths and other sects and denomination and used to urge Muslim youth to sacrifice their life for Jihad but when I came back from Saudi, I met my school days’ friend, Abid Ali, who is very learned and writes articles sometimes in FFI and Islam-Watch. He enlightened me about Islam. He shuddered me with questions and criticisms raised against Islam. He showed me a few things about your arguments or justifications, like why pork is prohibited in Islam and beef is allowed as swine practice wife swapping and Kaaba is at the centre of the earth, which is indeed a spheroid. And how you proved that Quran says, the earth is egg-shaped which, previously, I was unable to grasp the fallacy of. Here, is the one.

Translations of (Quran-79:30)
Pickthal: “And after that He spread the earth,”
Yusuf Ali: “And the earth, moreover, hath He extended (to a wide expanse)”
Malik: “After that He spread out the earth,”
Arberry: “and the earth-after that He spread it out,”
Shakir: “And the earth, He expanded it after that.”
Sarwar: “After this, He spread out the earth,”
Hilali/Khan: “And after that He spread the earth,”
Maulana Ali: “And the earth, He cast it after that.”
Free Minds: “And the land after that He spread out.”

Zakir Naik: “And the earth, moreover, Hath He made egg shaped.”
(In the Quran and Modern Science: Compatible or Incompatible? Page-11, Chpater-3-Astronomy)

It is only Islamic bogus-scientist who can find a central point even on a spherical object. How disgusting these people are who believe in such absurdities and fallacies.

Islam is the only religion solely running on the lies and the illegitimate income (Haraam ki Kamai) and Arabs are the only creature on the earth which eat without work and earn without labour, while even plants and trees survive on toil by digging into earth. Obviously they would believe in Allah and Muhammad ardently, both the source of their effortless income. While large mass of Ummah live the life of destitution and hardship all over the globe, spending their little hard-earned money on Hajj and Umrah. Religion is an excellent stuff in keeping mass ignorant and content with poverty and misery while the corrupt enjoy every sort of luxury and lavishness. Abid also showed me that you and people of the your organisation and your volunteers decline the challenge of debate between you and Ali Sina, saying it has to be carried out face to face in the presence of thousands of people. Is this how you defend Islam and is this what your pedophile prophet Muhammad taught you? In fact, this is what your prophet taught Ummah, to silence critics, to kill apostates, to non-believers, to kill Jews and Christians, rather everyone who do not believe in the lies of Muhammad. I read all your books and seen all the video you produced, and Abid showed me how you fooled 1 Billion who were desperate to be nincompoop all over this modern world by writing just few thin books. If there is really a hell, then I guarantee your prophet, you and people like you will be in the intense of it. You are extremely corrupt, immoral and fraudulent man, now I feel nauseated by your name.

Mr. Naik, I challenge you that Ali Sina will definitely come to India and will debate in the presence of thousands of Muslims, rather lakhs of them, provided that you remove that verse from Quran which says, apostates should be killed (Q- 4:89), let’s see who is ‘Mard ka Bacha’ (Macho Man). I guarantee Ali Sina would come to debate face to face with you (He is a Real Man of Honour), you just fulfill the condition. Let’s see who is ‘Mard ka Bacha’!

In all religions, scriptures are interpreted as per the meanings from the relevant dictionaries but in Islam Arabic dictionaries are amended as per the contemporary facts and truth which science and technology reveals. In the universities and research centers like IRF and others this perversion, manipulation and amendments are made with extreme care and complete dishonesty.

I wept holding the black cover of Kaaba, now I am weeping why I wept, ignorantly like a jackass. Now, I realized these things nothing but emotional foolishness, which is the main prop, all religions stand on.

Now, I am out of Islam, and this is my testimony to FFI and IW. I feel grateful that Allah did not guide me to the allegedly ‘Siratul Mustaqeem’.

A proud and fresh ex-Muslim, Sarfaraz

18 thoughts on “A Former Muslim’s Open Letter to Dr. Zakir Naik

        • YO CC RIDER,

          Another Shia Sunni Dialogue

          Shia’s Allegation

          Imam khomeini was the great hero of ISLAM who saved it from the trouble makers.
          Sunni Response

          MOHAMMED PBUH FAILED BUT IMAM Khomeini succeeded : )

          The leader of the Iranian revolution, Imam Khomeini writes in his book :

          ‘Every prophet came to establish justice on Earth. His aim was also to establish justice but he was not successful. The same is the position of the Seal of the Prophets who came to reform human society and establish justice but failed during his lifetime.’ (Ittihad wa-yak-jihati:15)

          What a beautiful insult of 40 years worth of Mohammed pbuh !!!
          _______________________________________________

          The rank of an IMAM is higher then that of Messengers
          (No Wonder why shia brothers worships their khomeinis and khamanees and ayatullahs)

          Imam Khomeini writes in his book ‘A1Hukumatul Islamiyah’ (52):
          ‘It is a necessary principle of our faith that our Imams have ranks that exceed those of close angels and the appointed messengers.’

          ________________________________________________

          Mullah Baqir Majilisi (Most prominent shia scholar) comments about Ayesha (R.A.) and Hafsa (R.A.) that:

          “They were both hypocrites.” (Hayatul Quloob: 2:745)

          Imam Khomeini writes about the prestige and worth of the oft-quoted Mullah Baqir:

          ‘Keep on reading the Persian books written by Majlisi so that you do not fall into any other such stupidity.’ (Kashful Asrar: 121)

          But in QURAN Allah himself praises Aisha r.a. , gives his witness of her piousness and raise her honor to the mother of the believers !

          WHy would ALLAH mentions everything in Quran but fails to mention the hypocrisy of Aisha r.a. as shia brothers says?

          Should we trust ALLAh or the iranian Ayatullahs ?

          Reference

          http://www.central-mosque.com/aqeedah/ShiiteBelief.htm

          _______________________________________________________________________________________________

          Where were muslims when Imam hussain r.a. were being killed?

          Answer:

          Where were muslims when Uthman r.a. was being killed ?

          uthman was from Banu Umaayya right ? there should have been millions ‘munafiqs’ to be on his side rather then on Ali’s side lately??

          ____________________

          this simply shows that shia fabricated stories are just a distorted view of the actual scenerio !!.. shiasm is a result of a coward looser mentality of those fire-worshippers who failed to protect their country like men but succeeded to exploit like women the inner weakness and uncertaininity prevailing at that time !

          To be very straight with you…

          Majority of the muslims sahabas were on the borders doing ‘Qittal e Iqdami” as per the order of Rasool ullAlah saw. .. most of the prominent of them were already martryed or far away.. could not reach back to protect uthman in due time.. only few sahabs were in madina .. most of them in their old ages… the youngsters were not able to respond proactively to the rapidly deterioriting conditions due to influx of foriegh elements into islam post martydom of abu bakkar r.a. and omer r.a. !

          Just like Othman r.a. were martryed by the kuffars and hypocrites by exploiting the inner weaknesses .. so were Hussain r.a. martyded.

          HUSSAIN R.A. were adviced by almost all the residents of madina not to trust the koofis bastards ! but he decided not to pay attention to advice of his elders ! but to fight against the tyrant. it was heroic deed but not strategic.

          _______________________________________________________________________________________________

          btw the readers must pay attention to what the supporters of this artifact are actually saying..

          “Mohammed pbuh failed as except ahl-e-bait all the sahabas turned hypocrite and disbeliver…. but KHOMEINI succedded in reviving ISLAM..”

          in otherwords 40 years of Mohammed pbuh life got wasted !!

          Readers.. imagine the gravity of the Gustakhi here !!

          Astaghfirullah.

          For Smart Readers : )

          Following text from the shia books is enough to refuse their stupid claims

          We also read the following, in another Shia book:

          Ali ibn Abi Talib said to Zubair: “(Although) we got angry momentarily at the time of consultation (i.e. Saqifah), we can now see that Abu Bakr is the most deserving of the Caliphate: He was the companion of the Messenger of Allah in the cave. We know of his life and we know that the Messenger of Allah had ordered him to lead the prayers.” And then he (Ali) gave his Baya’ah (to Abu Bakr).

          (Sharh Nahjul-Balagha; Ibn Abi Al-Hadeed; Vol.1, p.132)
          Shia Response

          History History History !!! Words are not enough to argue , Aimal Aisha, Who manipulated Historical Facts this is another debate, However any person writing some damn article about Shiaism should not be taken as authentic, But apart from that i will just share authentic SUNNI historians reported in Book of Bukhari as well
          Sunni historians reported that:

          When Umar came to the door of the house of Fatimah, he said:

          “By Allah, I shall burn down (the house) over you unless you come out and give the oath of allegiance (to Abu Bakr).”
          Sunni References:
          – History of Tabari (Arabic), v1, pp 1118-1120
          – History of Ibn Athir, v2, p325
          – al-Isti’ab, by Ibn Abd al-Barr, v3, p975
          – Tarikh al-Kulafa, by Ibn Qutaybah, v1, p20
          – al-Imamah wal-Siyasah, by Ibn Qutaybah, v1, pp 19-20

          And about Hazrat Aisha and Hafsa What do say about this verse of Quran, following verses of the Qur’an are unanimously agreed by scholars to be referring to Aisha and Hafsa

          ”When the Prophet confided unto one of his wives a matter, but when she divulged it (unto others) and God apprised him therefore, he made known a part of it and avoided a part; so when he informed her of it, said she: ‘Who informed thee of this?’ He said: ‘Informed, me, the All-Knowing, the All-Aware’. If you both (women) repent to Allah, (it is better for you), for your hearts have swerved from the right path and if you supported each other against the Prophet, you should know that Allah is his Protector, and after Him Gabriel and the righteous believers and the angels are his companions and helpers. Happily his Lord if he divorceth you, will give him in your place wives better than you, submissive, faithful, obedient, repentant, prayerful, observers of fast, widows and virgins.
          (Surah at-Tahrim, Ayat 3-5)

          “Some Ahl al-Sunnah assert that since Aisha was the most superior wife then that means that she was the most superior of all women. Not only is the claim that she was the most superior wife baseless, the fact of the matter is in Surah Tahrim, Allah(swt) also states this:

          “Perhaps if he divorces you, his Lord will give him wives who are better than you, who submit and believe” (Qur’an 66:5)- this clearly indicates that there were believing women among the Muslims who were much better than Aisha.”

          And You and we both agree that during Battle of Jamal Bibi Ayesha was on a Camel and in the Battle Ground Against Hazrat Ali a.s irrespective of this ayat of quran which states
          ”O wives of the Prophet! you are not like any other of the women; If you will be on your guard, then be not soft in (your) speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease yearn; and speak a good word. And stay in your houses and do not display your finery like the displaying of the ignorance of yore; and keep up prayer, and pay the poor-rate, and obey Allah and His Messenger.”
          (Surah al-Ahzab, Ayat 32-33)

          They state that the verse clearly instructs the Prophet’s wives to stay in their homes. Aisha’s role in the battle cleary transgresses Allah’s commandment!!!

          And i am surprised on one f your comment that Imam Hussian a.s took a heroic decision and not a strategic one , !!! WOOW… Muslims from all schools of thought never doubt the purity and status of Imam Hussian a.s as the Imam and grandson of our Prophet p.b.u.h.
          Even if it was a strategic decision why did he took his entire family with him , that is all the Bani Hashims Man and women !!!
          If such strategic decisions were taken by Prophets a.s !! just an instance if Abrahim a.s knew he will be thrown in fire yet still he stood with his stance of La Illah , then i guess you would also say that ABharam a.s took a heroic decision !!!! What a biased comment you had passed on the great Shahadat of Imam Hussian a.s !!!
          Yazeed was demanding and oath of allegiance my dear brother , and oath to what you know history better !!!
          May Allah Guide you and me and every Muslim !

          And Btw My dear Brother , No Muslim can ever say that Prophet p.b.u.h failed , He is the biggest Reformer and King of Prophets and being a shia i can tell you that with all of my faith i know, And even if Khomeni said that i reject this statement ( besides i am not here to advocate some body point of view if you need clarification regarding his comment contact his website )
          While just on the concluding remarks , Who is the biggest blasphemous of Prophet p.b.u.h !!!
          To answer that i will just tell you that The blasphemy movie recently made on our Prophet a.s and before that ”Satanic Verses” written by Sulma Rushdi (maloon) , all the history in these two were quoted from SUNNI HISTORICAL BOOKS , i.e Shaih Bukhari , Shaih Muslims and etc etc, If you dont agree with that see Sulman Rushdi ( mallon) book Reference page !!!
          Fee Aman Allah
          Sunni Response

          For readers who want to read in details how SHIA scholars have manipulated the shortcomings of the historians, twisted the truth and exploited the unawareness of common muslims.

          Read this in detail

          http://www.schiiten.com/backup/AhlelBayt.com/www.ahlelbayt.com/articles/history/saqifah.html

          SHIA LIES EXPOSED

          “As for the issue of Sayyidina Umar attacking
          Sayyidina Fatima, then know that it is false.

          ANSWER:
          _________________________________

          They demanded confirmation of the oath, but
          Ali and al-Zubair stayed away. Al-Zubair drew
          his sword (from the scabbard), saying, “I
          will not put it back until the oath of
          allegiance is rendered to Ali.” When this
          news reached Abu Bakr and Umar, the latter
          said, “Hit him with a stone and seize the
          sword.” It is stated that Umar rushed (to the
          door of the House of Fatimah) and brought
          them forcibly while telling them that they
          must give their oath of allegiance willingly
          or unwillingly.

          History of al-Tabari, English version, v9, pp
          188-189

          1. This text is evidently a forged report as

          Ali took pledged allegiance after 6 months,
          as reported in Bukhari and elsewhere.

          2. Secondly, The actual translation is as
          “Take his sword and hit the rocks with it.”

          BITTER RESPONSE To the Allegation
          1. “The above textis no where in Tabari nor
          in Ibn Athir. from where have you invented
          it?”
          2. Al Istiab only mentions Sayyidina Umar
          saying, “I shall do this and that.”

          3. Al Imama Wa Siyasah and Tarikh al Khulafa
          are spurious works attributed to Ibn Qutaybah
          which is now proved that he never authored.

          STOP COPY PASTING Lies FROM SHIACHAT.COM : )

          Source:

          http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/showthread.ph

          p?438-Abu-Bakr-and-Umar-slapped-their-
          Daughters
          4. Ibn Qutaybah, 9th century
          ibn jarir al tabari, 10th century
          ibn abu al-Hadid, 13th century

          you prefer the collected stories of these
          9th, 10th, 13th century historians over
          the fine selected men of Prophet Mohammed
          pbuh ?

          if mohammed pbuh errored in selecting his
          men, then why couldt Hussain r.a. errored
          in trusting Koofians by denying advises of
          his friends at medina ?

          __________________________________________

          Sunni Readers

          Simply read this hadith to cure yourself
          from the fitnah of the defeated sons of
          fire-worshippers of qadsia.
          Volume 5, Book 59, Number 546:
          Narrated ‘Aisha:

          Fatima the daughter of the Prophet sent
          someone to Abu Bakr (when he was a caliph),
          asking for her inheritance of what Allah’s
          Apostle had left of the property bestowed on
          him by Allah from the Fai (i.e. booty gained
          without fighting) in Medina, and Fadak, and
          what remained of the Khumus of the Khaibar
          booty. On that, Abu Bakr said, “Allah’s
          Apostle said, “Our property is not inherited.
          Whatever we leave, is Sadaqa, but the family
          of (the Prophet) Muhammad can eat of this
          property.’ By Allah, I will not make any
          change in the state of the Sadaqa of Allah’s
          Apostle and will leave it as it was during
          the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle, and will
          dispose of it as Allah’s Apostle used to do.”
          So Abu Bakr refused to give anything of that
          to Fatima. So she became angry with Abu Bakr
          and kept away from him, and did not task to
          him till she died. She remained alive for six
          months after the death of the Prophet. When
          she died, her husband ‘Ali, buried her at
          night without informing Abu Bakr and he said
          the funeral prayer by himself. When Fatima
          was alive, the people used to respect ‘Ali
          much, but after her death, ‘Ali noticed a
          change in the people’s attitude towards him.
          So Ali sought reconciliation with Abu Bakr
          and gave him an oath of allegiance. ‘Ali had
          not given the oath of allegiance during those
          months (i.e. the period between the Prophet’s
          death and Fatima’s death). ‘Ali sent someone
          to Abu Bakr saying, “Come to us, but let
          nobody come with you,” as he disliked that
          ‘Umar should come, ‘Umar said (to Abu Bakr),
          “No, by Allah, you shall not enter upon them
          alone ” Abu Bakr said, “What do you think
          they will do to me? By Allah, I will go to
          them’ So Abu Bakr entered upon them, and then
          ‘Ali uttered Tashah-hud and said (to Abu
          Bakr), “We know well your superiority and
          what Allah has given you, and we are not
          jealous of the good what Allah has bestowed
          upon you, but you did not consult us in the
          question of the rule and we thought that we
          have got a right in it because of our near
          relationship to Allah’s Apostle .”

          Thereupon Abu Bakr’s eyes flowed with tears.
          And when Abu Bakr spoke, he said, “By Him in
          Whose Hand my soul is to keep good relations
          with the relatives of Allah’s Apostle is
          dearer to me than to keep good relations with
          my own relatives. But as for the trouble
          which arose between me and you about his
          property, I will do my best to spend it
          according to what is good, and will not leave
          any rule or regulation which I saw Allah’s
          Apostle following, in disposing of it, but I
          will follow.” On that ‘Ali said to Abu Bakr,
          “I promise to give you the oath of allegiance
          in this after noon.” So when Abu Bakr had
          offered the Zuhr prayer, he ascended the
          pulpit and uttered the Tashah-hud and then
          mentioned the story of ‘Ali and his failure
          to give the oath of allegiance, and excused
          him, accepting what excuses he had offered;
          Then ‘Ali (got up) and praying (to Allah) for
          forgiveness, he uttered Tashah-hud, praised
          Abu Bakr’s right, and said, that he had not
          done what he had done because of jealousy of
          Abu Bakr or as a protest of that Allah had
          favored him with. ‘Ali added, “But we used to
          consider that we too had some right in this
          affair (of rulership) and that he (i.e. Abu
          Bakr) did not consult us in this matter, and
          therefore caused us to feel sorry.” On that
          all the Muslims became happy and said, “You
          have done the right thing.” The Muslims then
          became friendly with ‘Ali as he returned to
          what the people had done (i.e. giving the
          oath of allegiance to Abu Bakr).

          Sahi Bukhari
          Volume 5, Book 59, Number 546

          Notes:

          1. Hazrat Fatima r.a. turned angry with
          Hazrat Abu Bakar. r.a. because she did not
          receive a share in the property.

          will a sunni ever utter rubbish that fatima
          r.a. was (nauzibillah) greedy ? and
          quarelling over just a piece of land ??
          Never.. How can a shia open his shitty mouth
          against the life-long friends and slaves of
          Prophet mohammed pbuh ?
          2. Did Abu bakkar r.a. kept property for
          himself and made Palaces for himself instead
          ? Abu bakkar lived same poor life as all
          others, and he even didt appoint next khalifa
          from his own family, rather then he
          established shura !

          .3
          ____________________________________
          Response to your bogus claims in context with
          surah tahrim
          1. So did the prophet mohammed pbuh divorce
          her ? instead he died with his head on the
          laps of Aisha.

          2. since prophet didt divorce her so it
          proves that there was no better women then
          aisha r.a. as Allah and prophet both forgive
          her for : )
          _________________________________________

          Aisha’s crime which earned shias hatred !

          the crime of attracting her husband towards
          herself !

          ********
          Ayesha and Hafsa RA were two youngest wives
          of Prophet SAw in their teens. Prophet had as
          many as 11 wives at one time. Another wife of
          Prophet had a container of pure honey from
          her family. Prophet loved honey, so he
          started stopping to her room more often to
          eat honey. Normally Prophet saw his wives on
          their turn. Being the youngest and teen ages
          wives Ayesha and Hafsa got jealous of the
          wife that had honey that she gets to see
          Prophet every day. So they both decided to
          say to Prophet that his breath smells. After
          these two wives said the same thing, Prophet
          took an oath saying that I shall never eat
          honey again.

          Allah revealed an ayah to Prophet SAW saying
          like Why you make some thing haram that Allah
          has made it halal for you. Allah says
          further, you know you know how to get out of
          such unreasonable oath, Allah is most
          forgiving, most merciful and he will forgive
          you. Then Allah revealed the above Ayahs to
          scold Ayesha and Hafsa and to correct their
          conduct with Prophet SAW caused by jealousy.
          They were extremely sorry and ashamed of
          their wrong act and repented to Allah for
          their forgiveness. Never any wrong act from
          ayesha and Hafsa RA was ever recorded after
          this incident.

          Allah and His Messenger had made every little
          information concerning his household
          available in Ahadith and Quran to believers,
          so Muslim women and men can learn from the
          examples of Prophet’s household life so they
          can live their own livs accordingly.

          ___________

          lol pitty on shia mentality.. .

          how they have converted a matter of love
          attracting and beautiful jealousy into a
          matter of criminal activiy…

          shame on such a mentality !
          two young wife full of younghood decently
          trying that their beloved hubby spend more
          time with them .. but since it caused prophet
          mohammed pbuh to swore on som thing which was
          not good. so ALLAH intervened to mention

          1. Wives shd understand they are not ordinary
          so they should understand that prophet
          mohammed pbuh already have a bizy life in
          spreading islam.. so they should more
          responsible thats it !..
          And stay in your houses and do not display
          your finery like the displaying of the
          ignorance of yore;

          Why did wife of imam hussain r.a. did not
          prefer to stay in home in media and instead
          preferred to go along with immam hussain to
          meet koofi and to wage war against the
          yazeed?

          !!!

          by the way the translation is wrong

          the word is not “deviated” but “inclination”

          secondly

          “The Prophet is closer to the believers than
          their ownselves, and his wives are their
          mothers.” (Quran, 33:6)
          shame on you guys

          AISHA IS THE MOTHER OF THE BELIEVER !

          “The Prophet is closer to the believers than
          their ownselves, and his wives are their
          mothers.” (Quran, 33:6)

          do u believe in half a quran and reject other
          ?

          ____________________________________________________

          “And Btw My dear Brother , No Muslim can ever say that Prophet p.b.u.h failed , He is the biggest Reformer and King of Prophets and being a shia i can tell you that with all of my faith i know, And even if Khomeni said that i reject this statement ( besides i am not here to advocate some body point of view if you need clarification regarding his comment contact his website “

          _______________

          THE KHOMEINI HAS DONE IT.. re read his quotes again.

          ‘Every prophet came to establish justice on Earth. His aim was also to establish justice but he was not successful. The same is the position of the Seal of the Prophets who came to reform human society and establish justice but failed during his lifetime.’ (Ittihad wa-yak-jihati:15)

          so i conclude you agree that any such bastard who has degraced the 40 years work of Rasool Ulllah saw is indeed a bastard and stand amng the ranks of Suleman Rushdie as you mentioned.

          One prince of Paradise Hassan r.a. acted no heroic but strategic and gave allegience to Muaviya r.a. despite of wars between Ali r.a. and Muaviya and Aisha r.a.

          Only a cunning shia would show gutts to claim that Hassan r.a. did taqiya and actually he was pressurized to do it.. so in otherwords Hassan r.a. was not heroic and thus was not “masoom’ ???

          while hussain r.a. laid the life of himself and his family but did not took alligience of yazeed e paleed. that was definately heroic but not strategic.

          if you find it hard to digest along with the poision that has been injected into your viens in ur imman bigaras since your childhood, then you MUST READ MY WORDS.. .

          Mohammad pbuh was heroic in Uhud Badar Tabook but was strategic in Mesaq-e-Medina and Battle of Khandaq ! because this was a strategic plan not a heroic “do and die one” !

          When wil you.. ‘the victims of cunning revenge of the fire-worshippers at qadsia”.. come out of your fantasical love and begin to understand ground realities in all practical way and quit attaching your emmo-exaggerated tales to the simply explainable events.
          Shia’s Response

          Shuff Look my dear Sunni Brothers and Sisters, If any of you is hurt from my comments then my apologies , second Sis Sabahat , like you feel offended , same feelings are shared by shia brothers and sisters,
          Now Aimal Aisha or should i say Mr Ammar, Bro i have liked one of your comment which i considered best of your answer, This debate has moved into Tafseers and from Tafseers it will go on and on to time of revelation of ayah and from that to much much further but wait a sec!!! before going in to all that you know and i know that this debate would not make you SHIA or me SUNNI, so what’s the point !!!
          Ba Khuda i have much much to share here along with your source of COPY and Pasting, from authenticity of your’s Hadith collection to Tafseers of Holy Quran yet i wont get into such a baseless debate ,
          La Kum denna Kum walya deen !!!
          So instead of creating fitna over SHIA SUNNI , try to create Harmony, this is what Quran Says ,
          And plz don’t take my comment as a sign of being defeated ,I am into this when i used to go to MASJID of AHL e SUNNAH for Jumma prayer where my best sunni brothers and friends lost this debate several times !!
          I repeat Ba Khuda i can share allot i.e. where you mentioned Prophet p.b.u.h strategic decisions you forgot to mention his a.s heroic decisions,Where he spent several years in Shaib e Abi-Talib besides your answer didn’t justified the heroic decision of Abrahim a.s ,and your thinking for Imam Hussain a.s is quite visible and regarding Khomeni i will just let you know his famous statement for Muslim Ummah ” You people agitate over issue of praying with open or close hands while your enemy ponders how to cut those hands” And shame on those sick minded people who related vulgar content to the Prophet a.s like this hadith ..Narrated by ‘Aisha ” The Prophet used to lean on my lap and recite Qur’an while I was in menses.”
          ========================
          Volume 1, Book 6, Number 297
          Now i know that you will try to find love from this narration as well as you tried to found from waqiyah of honey in sura e tehreem yet based on these vulgar narration s in yours Sahih Bukhari etc Bastard People are making blasphemous movies on the Tatheer Zaat of Prophet a.s !!!
          But as i said there is no point , Life is too short for you and me to criticize , let me practice my emman and you practice yours , You and I both believe in a life after death where Allah will question us , So let this debate be postponed till that time.
          And Kindly don’t mention my name again as i am done here .
          Thank you
          Fee Aman Allah
          Sunni Response

          ____________________________________________

          The shiasm itself is a fitnah that needs to be addressed.

          ____________________________________________

          This is indeed not basless debate as ignorant sunnahs are getting exposed to your fitnah and come to know what you have been concealing from them ! the worst of the balatant lies and blasphemies. keep posting here. you are helping me expose yourself

          ____________________________________________

          WE DONT BEFRIEND THOSE WHO ABUSES OUR MOTHERS. AN OPEN DECLARED MOTHER FROM GOD HIMSELF.

          When you will cut paste from shia websites where the lies are in plenty and present bogus refrences which have already been exposed, you will have to face tafsirs apparently.

          You have already been caught replacing the word “inclination” with “deviation” from one of the facebooker who knows arabic.

          Your attitude of playing and twisting the words of ALLAH is very clear.

          YOU HAVE BEEN OPENING NEW ARENAS WITHOUT ANSWERING PREVIOUS ONES. YOU ARE TOTALLY IGNORANT OF THE VERSE WHERE AISHA HAS BEEN DECLARED YOUR MOTHER AND YOU ARE NOT ACCEPTING ALLAH’S ORDER THAT PRETTY MAKES YOU A KAFIR !..

          Any person who obeys 4999 commandments of ALLAH and refuse to reject one is obviously a DISBELIEVER

          ____________________________________________

          You may continue to win debate with fools and illeterates just like the qadianis are making some progress in the west.

          _____________________________________________

          temporary proactive self-exile to Shoaib Abi Talib was not the punishment but the defensive strategy of banu hashim to save themselves from the future possible attack of quresh. Abu Talib managed banu hashim and banu mutalib to gather and safely escort prophet mohammed pbuh to shoaib abu talib. This was not directly a offense from Quresh. the remaining poor non-hashmis muslims and slaves like Bilal, Ammar, Sumayya and others were still subjected to worsen brutality from their kafir masters. It were Abu bakkar and Utham who spend their money generoulsy to have these men free.

          tolerating Physical Hardships, Physical Isolation, Financial Losses, Life Losses, Body Injuries all are difference aspects of how sahabas contributed to build the strong pillars of islamic society.

          why you ARE SO INCLINED TO UNDERESTIMATE THE HEROIC DEED OF OMER

          as when no body could openly annouce ISLAM and offer Prayer in Makkah.. Even ALI the sher e khuda could not accomplish this task..btu it was the HEROIC OMER and HAMZA who fought back the quresh, and made way for the muslims to march towards kaaba and demonstrated first ever public face of unity and worship to ALLAH>

          If Ali r.a. was so young at that time and could’t be heroic but strategic, then you are in othwewords agreeing to sunni aqeedah that ALI OMER ABUKAR UTHMAN all are the flowers of the Mohammed pbuh Bouqet. No one is comparable to other. All of them are unique in their contribution to ISLAM.

          for detailed : http://islamic-forum.net/index.php?showtopic=18424

          Names of ALI’s SON – Shia Lies Exposed

          1. Muhammad ibn al-Hanafia
          2. Muhammad al-Asghar
          3. Muhammad il-Awsat

          4. Abbas “abul-fazil”
          5. Abbas al-Asghar

          6. Jafar al-Akbar
          7. Jafar al-Assghar

          8. Abdullah il-Asghar
          9. Abdullah il-Akbar
          10. Abdullah “Abi Ali”

          11. Uthman al-Asghar
          12. Uthman al-Akbar

          13. Umar al-Akbar
          14. Umar al-Asghar.

          15. Abu Bakr ibn Ali

          16. Al-Hasan
          17. Al-Hussain
          18. Awn

          Why did ALI r.a. named his sons on the names of his SUPPOSEDLY WORSEN ENEMIES

          WILL YOU EVER NAME YOUR SON AS ‘YAZID’ OR ‘MUAVIYA’ ?

          source:
          http://www.schiiten.com/backup/AhlelBayt.com/www.ahlelbayt.com/articles/sahabah/sons.html

          ________________________________________________________________________________________

          Regarding Heroic decision of Ibrahim
          What about strategic decision of Moosa a.s. when instead of fighting back the FIRON, he chosen to safely escort his people to some remote area in the hope of peace !
          ??

          why you shias always try to create fantasies out of practical realities ??

          ______________________________________________________________________________________

          Response to Khomeni’s blabbers “you people issue over opening or closing hands…”

          listen to the maloon’s other rubbish

          KHOMEINI SHITTY CLAIMS THAT HIS COMPANIONS WERE BETTER THEN COMPANIONS OF PROPHET MOHAMMAED PBUH

          I dare say that today’s Iranic Nation is far better than the people of Hijaz (Sahabah) in Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s era (Na’uzubillah). [Sahifah-e-Inqalab {Khomeini’s last will and testament}, Pg#46
          “The Islamic and non-Islamic powers of the world will not admit our power till such time that we establish our hold over Makkah and Madinah because these are the centers and citadels of Islam. Hence our domination over these places Is an essential requirement … when as a conqueror I will enter Makkah and Madinah, the first thing to be done at that time by me would be to dig out two idols (Abu Bakr and Umar) lying by the side of the Prophet’s grave.”
          (Ayatullah Khomeini of Iran, while addressing a message for a youth rally).
          Khomeinism and Islam,

          047. When Imam Mehdi will appear, he will first dig out Ayesha (r.a) from Her grave and will reprehend her (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#347 – Published Iran]

          048. Curse upon Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) who gave poison to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#700 – Published Iran]

          Hazrat Aisha r.a., Menses Quran and Prophet Mohammed pbuh
          first of all his mention of this hadith in his particuly shitty way is an evidence of the shitty mind that he posses.A women spend at least 27 days in menstruation. thats almost a month.

          Only a loving husband will understand a woman psychological and physical conditions and will not treat his women as some dirty stuff. infact this attitude was prevailing at the time of prophet mohammaed pbuh that the people used to consider menstruationg women as posses by satan or some thing.

          prophet mohammed pbuh instead used to comfort her by laying his head on her palm, while aisha used to comb his hairs, put oil, and prophet moohammed pbuh used to recite quran and discuss tafsir and to answer questions and to spend good time talking with her

          religiously, this how the women of islam came to know that during menstruation they do not get possesed by the SATAN or devil but instead they need more lovful caring response from their husband.

          Menstruation is a temporary unfit condition of body and come to the level of illness, so a women need extra care. just like you recite quran and make “Dam” when some body is ill, to take good curing effect of Allah’s words, so did Mohammad pbuh.

          SUNNAS.. THE LOVERS OF ALL FAMILY OF RASOOL ULLAH INCLUDING HIS FATHER IN LAWS, AND BEAUTFUL WIVES.

          COME TO KNOW HOW LOW A SHIA BECOMES WHEN HES/SHE ROTTING IN HATRED WITH THE 40 YEARS WORK OF PROPHET MOHAMMED PBUH JUST LIKE ANY OTHER DEFEATED FIRE-WORSHIPPER OF QADSIA !

          _________________________________________
          The real vulgarity is when shia women wears black veils on the night of eid ghadeer, and as per imam’s devilish revelations, goes to IMAN BIGARAH and have Group MUTAH with many unknown men !IN Shiasm the ZINA-UL-IJTAMAI-BIL-RIZA is very sacred ritual .. read it..

          From Rasool-Allah: Jibraeel told me, “Ya Muhammad, Allah said: ‘I will forgive a woman from your Ummah who has engaged in Mutah twice.’” (”Mugni”, Ali ibn Husayn ibn Babaveyh Al Qummi, see scan above)

          The popular Shia website, Al-Shia.com, has included an entire book on Mutah, entitled “Narrations About the Rewards for Doing Mutah.” This book contains authentic Shia Hadith about Mutah.

          In it, we find the following Shia Hadith:

          A woman who lets a man do Mutah with her will have all her sins pardoned. It is narrated by Imam Baqir that the Prophet said, “When I was being taken to Heaven during the Miraj (ascension), Jibraeel met me and told me, ‘O Muhammad, Allah has promised to forgive all the sins of those women who practise Mutah.’”

          و بهذا الإسناد عن أحمد بن علي كذا عن الباقر (عليه السلام) قال : قال رسول الله (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) لما أسري بي إلى السماء لحقني جبرئيل فقال يا محمد إن الله عز و جل يقول إني قد غفرت للمتمتعين من النساء

          (source: Al-Shia.com,
          http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/index.php,
          http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/lib/lib.php?id=4&page=5)

          Mutah Advertisement!
          http://islamic-forum.net/index.php?showtopic=11432

          Nabi ki sub sey pyari biwi par vulgarity ka ilzam lagany sey pehly ye soch lia hota kia tum sey kisi sunni ney poocha ha key kia Ahl-e-Bayt ney bhi Mutah kia tha ?.. ab nam ley kar poochon .. ?? .. phir aag to naheen lagey gee ?

          agar apny mazhab main itney suchy ho to sabit karo Ahl-e-bayt ki khawateen main sey kis kis ney mutah kia tha.. or bundey kon konthey?

          .. Lahola walaqoowata

          Note for the readers.

          Qadsia – The famous battle between the Lions of Prophet Mohammed pbuh and the cunning iranian nation which ended up in the utter defeat of 5,000 old iranian pride. Those sons of fire-worshippers whom couldt fight like men then resorted to backstabbing like women which resulted in chaos among the muslims as they exploited some minor personal conflicts among the legends and complex issues arising due to rapidly deterioting geo-political situation.

    • .Metaphysicsc
      Miscellaneous
      User login
      Username: *
      Password: *
      Create new account
      Request new password
      Log in
      Tue, 09/11/2010 – 19:36 | willingtolearn
      A Brief Description of the Question:
      If the world is a round globe, how can the
      Kaaba be the center of the world? Can a
      globe that has a round surface have a
      center?
      The Answer:
      The answer to the question, “What is the
      oldest building constructed in the
      world?” is definitely “the Kaaba”. No
      center in the world is visited as much as
      the Kaaba. Thus, with the present
      situation, Makkah and the Kaaba has
      become a center that has a uniting,
      combining and gathering role for people
      by eliminating the political borders. In
      no other place are people connected to a
      religious center continuously, 24 hours a
      day.
      “The first House (of worship) appointed
      for men was that at Bakka: full of
      blessing and of guidance for all kinds of
      beings: In it are signs manifest; (for
      example), the Station of Abraham;
      whoever enters it attains security.” (Aal-i
      Imran, 96-97).
      The Kaaba, to which people turn while
      praying, is the center of the Old World
      (Europe, Asia and Africa). It is almost
      equally far away from the three
      continents. It has a strategic importance
      and is located in the focal point of the
      transportation centers.
      If you take hold of a world map and
      draw a straight line from North America
      to Australia and a straight line from
      South-East Asia to South America, you
      will see Makkah, hence the Kaaba in the
      point of junction. You should start from
      the endpoints of the continents while
      drawing the lines.
      Is the center of the lands, Makkah (or
      rather the Kaaba), also the center of the
      world? Geographers divided the word
      into small squares symbolically with
      latitudes and longitudes in order to be
      able to find any point in the world more
      easily and to show them correctly in the
      most practical way. However, the
      beginning points of those lines were
      determined theoretically and arbitrarily.
      There is no definite scientific truth about
      it. For instance, the line of longitude that
      is accepted to pass from Greenwich,
      England is accepted as 0 (zero). It is
      known that the world, which is accepted
      as round, is actually bulgy in the middle.
      The latitude passing from the middle of
      that bulgy region is regarded as the “0”
      latitude. That latitude is known as the
      Equator. It is accepted that the Equator
      relatively divides the world into two
      equal parts.
      The poles are the two endpoints of the
      axis passing from the center of the circle
      formed by the Equator. However, the
      reality is not like that. It is something
      that is accepted. The world has the real
      north and south poles. We know that the
      world rotates on the liquid iron-nickel
      like a dynamo and that during the
      rotation it forms electromagnetic field
      and electricity like a dynamo. That
      magnetic force exits from the north and
      south poles and forms the protective
      outermost layer of the atmosphere called
      the magnetosphere. Therefore, in the
      northern hemisphere, the compasses
      always points to the north pole.
      Why are the poles that the latitudes and
      longitudes show are in different places
      from the magnetic poles that compass
      show? We know that the world has an
      inclination of 23° 27’ elliptically. If the
      world did not have an inclination like
      that, we would always have the same
      season; for instance always the summer
      or the winter. Days draw in and draw
      out because of it. That inclination
      changes the places of the poles, too. If we
      take into consideration the real magnetic
      north pole and the real magnetic south
      pole while drawing the latitudes and
      longitudes, we will have a new Equator.
      Then, that Equator, which is the greatest
      latitude with the number 0, will pass
      from the middle of Makkah. It denotes
      that the Kaaba is in the middle of the
      world.
      On the other hand, the tropics of
      Capricorn and Cancer drawn according
      to the corrected form will pass from the
      block where Makkah is located. The
      latitude drawn in the same way will
      intersect with the tropics and the
      Equator in the same block. The
      intersection point will be Makkah again.
      The fact that those latitudes and
      long

  1. YO DUMB MO,

    WHAT THE HELL DO YOU KNOW ABOUT THE SUPREME BEING?

    YOUR ALLAH IS A BLACK STONE IN THE KAABA!

    WHAT WAS THE NAME OF MOHAMMED’S FATHER?

    ANSWER:

    ABDULLAH! aka SLAVE OF ALLAH!

    MOHAMMED’S FATHER & GRANDFATHER WERE PAGANS.

    ABDULLAH WAS A SLAVE OF ALLAH!

    ABDULLAH WAS A MUSLIM!

    HE WAS A SLAVE OF ALLAH.

    GET IT?

    THE PAGAN ARABS WERE MUSLIMS, BEFORE MOHAMMED!

    PAGAN ARABS WORSHIPPED ALLAH BEFORE ISLAM

    Historical evidences, impartial logic, well versed references and all available circumstantial judgments can very well prove that—(a) Allah name of deity was pre-existed much before the arrival of Islam, (b) Pre-Islamic Pagan peoples worshipped Allah as their supreme deity. Allah’s name existed in pre-Islamic Arab. In ancient Arab the Allah was considered to be the supreme God/deity and Arab Pagans worshipped Allah before Islam arrived.

    Let us examine below some valid questions and answers:

    Did the Pagan Arabs in pre-Islamic times worship 360 gods? Yes
    Did the pagans Arabs worship the sun, moon and the stars? Yes
    Did the Arabs built temples to the Moon-god? Yes
    Did different Arab tribes give the Moon-god different names/titles? Yes
    What were some of the names/titles? Sin, Hubul, Ilumquh, Al-ilah.
    Was the title “al-ilah” (the god) used as the Moon-god? Yes
    Was the word “Allah” derived from “al-ilah?” Yes
    Was the pagan “Allah” a high god in a pantheon of deities? Yes.
    Was he worshipped at the Kabah? Yes.
    Was Allah only one of many Meccan gods? Yes
    Did they place a statue of Hubul on top of the Kabah? Yes.
    At that time was Hubul considered the Moon-god? Yes.
    Was the Kabah thus the “house of the Moon-god”? Yes.
    Did the name “Allah” eventually replace that of Hubul as the name of the Moon god? Yes.
    Did they call the Kabah the “house of Allah”? Yes.
    Were al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat called “the daughters of Allah”? Yes.
    Yusuf Ali explains in fn. 5096, pg. 1445, that Lat, Uzza and Manat were known as “the daughters of God [Allah]”
    Did the Qur’an at one point tell Muslims to worship al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat? Yes. In Surah 53:19-20.
    Have those verses been “abrogated” out of the present Qur’an? Yes.
    What were they called? “The Satanic Verses.”

    The variable names (Sin, Hubul, llumquh, Al-ilah) of moon god were used by various tribes of pagan Arabs. Pagan god SIN was the name of Moon-god.

    WHO ACTUALLY IS ALLAH?

    According to Islamic Theologians (Mullahs, Maulana, Moulavis, etc.), or Islamic teachings– Allah is the supreme God or creator who (suddenly one day?) talked or introduced Himself with Mohammed through an Angel named Gabriel, disclosing the truth that it is the Allah who created everything in the universe. Surprisingly, Qur’an never defines the word “Allah” as to who actually Allah was or what was the relation of Allah with pagans. I believe, 99% percent of Mohammedans believe that—Allah’s name was invented or started right from the time when Gabriel disclosed the truth (?) to Muhammad in the cave of Hira Parvat (Mountain) and gave him the Quran. They believe that before this truth was revealed—pagan Arabs were in total darkness (Andhakar Zuug) and they used to worship various puppet goddess and that the pagans were very evil people.

    I can bet on this fact that no mullahs ever told Mohammedans the real truth, neither do they believe this clear truth that “Allah” was in fact a pre-existing deity in pagan Arabia.

    WHAT HYPOCRISY!

    Some important factors which will suggest that the name “Allah” was already in use by Pagans as their chief God/deity:

    (A) In pre-Islamic days, that Mohammedans call the Days of ignorance, the religious background of the Arabs was pagan, and basically animistic. Through Moon, Sun, Stars, Planets, Animals, wells, trees, stones, caves, springs, and other natural objects Arabs made contact with the deity. At Mekka, “Allah” was the chief of the gods and the special deity of the Quraish, the prophet’s tribe.

    Allah had three daughters: Al Uzzah (Venus) most revered of all and pleased with human sacrifice; Manah, the goddess of destiny, and Al Lat, the goddess of vegetable life. These three daughters of Allah (there is a Quranic verse about them) were considered very powerful over all things. Therefore, their intercessions on behalf of their worshippers were of great significance.

    (B) Arabs used to give their children names such as—Abdullah (slave of Allah). Clean proof was the fact that, Mohammed’s father’s name was “Abdullah”. Logical analogy here is—had there been no “Allah” in pre-Islamic Arab, there could be no Abdullah or slave of Allah in Arabia.

    (C) Even today, in the entire Arab World, not only Mohammedans but all other non-Mohammedans (Jews, Christians, Sabians, Bahai, and atheists etc.) Arabs says—“Ya Allah” as the expression of surprise or unhappiness/sorrow.

    (D). Albert Hourani’s statement:

    “The Islamic name used for God was “Allah”, which was already in use for one of the local Gods (it is now used by Arabic-speaking Jews and Christians as the name of God (A history Of Arab people by Albert Hourani, 1991, page-16, Belknap press of Harvard University, USA)

    History tells us two theories of Allah’s existence in and around the Kaba Sharif:

    (1) Pagans used to call the largest Statue amongst the 360 deities as ALLAH—whom they used to consider the chief/supreme deity (god).

    Or,

    (2) Pagan Arabs used to worship 360 deities inside Kaba Sharif, and they used to consider them different smaller deities under the total control of a single most powerful chief deity called “ALLAH” who was invisible (Nirakar) and was the all-powerful, all-knowing, and totally unknowable.

    Now some factors which will suggest “Allah” was the Moon-god of Arab pagans:

    In the Qur’an there are at least a dozen verses in which Allah repeatedly swears by the names such as moon, sun, stars, planets, night, wind etc. It is a mystery why the creator Allah (?) should swear by his creations. Normally, we swear by the name of something much superior to us, such as we swear by God or by the name of our father (who is considered senior or superior to us). But we never swear by the name of something inferior to us. Here in the Quran swearing fashions of Allah (God) by moon or stars hinting us that Allah considered these things superior to himself. And this makes us to think (otherwise) as to who actually acted as Allah in the Quran? However, in his explanation of why the Qur’an swears by the moon in Surah 74:32,

    “Nay, verily by the Moon,” Yusuf Alli comments, “The moon was worshipped as a deity in times of darkness”(fn. 5798, pg. 1644).

    Perhaps, this swearing of Allah was due to the usual/cultural habits of worshipping the moon as their God in pagan customs.

    (B) Yousuf Ali stated (Page-1921-1623 of his English Translation of Holy Quran):

    “Moon-worship was equally popular in various forms………Apollo and Diana—the twin brother and sister, representing the sun and moon. …in the Vedic religion of India the moon god was Soma, the lord of the planets…….the moon was male divinity in ancient India. The moon was also male divinity in ancient Semitic religion, and the Arabic word for the moon “qamar’ is of the masculine gender, on the other hand, the Arabic word for sun “shams” is feminine gender. The pagan Arabs evidently looked upon the sun as a goddess and the moon as a God.

    The Pagan deities best known in the Ka’ba and round about Mecca were Lat, Uzza, and Manat.…the 360 idols established by the Pagans in the Ka’ba probably represented the 360 days of an inaccurate solar year. This was the actual modern pagan worship as known to the Quraish contemporary with our prophet”

    (C) Influence of Moon in Islam:

    Who can deny the paramount influences of the moon in a Mohammedan’s life? In Islam, the moon is considered the holiest astronomical object, and the moon is the guiding light of all Islamic rituals/festivals. Contradictions and conflicts are very common with the dates of Eids and Ramadan and obviously it is a chronic problem and the moon is the nucleus of this problem. The crescent moon and stars are the symbolic sign in the national flags of many Muslim countries, and it is present over the Mosques, in the Mohammedan graveyard etc.

    Mohammed compromised to Pagans to establish Islam in Arabia:

    Mohammed did his clever tactics of adapting many rites of paganism into Islam, in order to accommodate Islam among the pagan Arabs. He made lots of political pacts with the Pagan Leaders such as Abu Suffian to accommodate his new idea of religion and he agreed to incorporate many of the Pagan rituals in Islam. Mohammed asked the pagans to worship only the “Allah” the largest God, and destroy the idols of all other gods and goddesses that existed in Kabah. To establish oneness (monotheist) of God, he repeatedly asked them not to make any partners to Allah (That is why we can find hundreds of Quranic verses “asking not to make any partners to Allah). Finally, the Prophet was able to convince (by force of course) the pagans to destroy all idols, and on return (he) agreed (perhaps) to keep the “Names” of the goddess of the most famous Pagan tribes as the alternative names of Allah—hence Islam has 99 NAMES of Allah.

    Mohammed did command his followers to participate in these pagan ceremonies while the pagans were still in control of Mecca.

    (Please See Yusuf Ali, fn. 214, pg. 78). … “the whole of the [pagan] pilgrimage was spiritualized in Islam…” (Yusuf Ali: fn. 223 pg. 80).

    In the Tafsir (of Quran-2:200) maoulana Yousuf Ali stated:

    “After Pilgrimage, in Pagan times, the pilgrims used to gather in assemblies in which the praises of ancestors were sung. As the whole of the pilgrimage rites were spiritualized in Islam, so this aftermath of the Pilgrimage was also spiritualized. It was recommended for pilgrims to stay on two or three days after the pilgrimage, but they must use them in prayer and praise to God”.

    (#223 of Shane’nazul by Maoulana Yousuf Ali, page-81)

    In Islam many rituals performed (today) by devoted Mohammedans in the name of Allah are connected to the pagan worship that existed before Islam. Pagans practices of the Pilgrimage of Kabah once a year–the Fast of Ramadan, running around the Kabah seven times, kissing the black stone, shaving the head, animal sacrifices, running up and down two hills, throwing stones at the devil, snorting water in and out the nose, praying several times a day toward Mecca, giving alms, Friday prayers, etc. are strictly followed by Mohammedans today. Nobody can deny the fact that, all the above rituals of Mohammedan’s hajj today—existed well before the arrival of Islam.

    It is highly plausible to consider the fact that by incorporating much of the Pagan’s rituals in the new religion of Islam—Mohammed successfully reduced the pagan-risk and it was perhaps one of the most important milestone-attempts to conquer the minds of Pagans resulting in massive breakdown of the Pagans’ moral support to oppose Islam.

    The central shrine at Mekka was the Pagan’s Kaaba (called House of Allah), a cube like stone structure which still stands though many times rebuilt. Imbedded in one corner is the black stone, probably a meteorite, the kissing of which is now an essential part of the Mohammedan’s pilgrimage.

    It is the historical fact that the Ka’aba, the sacred shrine which contains the Black Stone, in Mecca was used for pagan idol worship before Islam and even called the House of Allah at that time. The name of the God whom the Arabs worshipped was the god of pantheon—Ali-ilah the god, the supreme, the predeterminer of everybody’s life or destiny—the chief God “Allah”

    Who has not read the story of the BLACK STONE which was very sacred (povitra) to all various tribes of Quraish. When one day this sacred stone was needed to transfer from one place to another, there was a quarrel amongst the various tribes, as to who will carry that sacred stone? Then young Mohammed invented the solution of this serious problem. He (Mohammed) put this sacred stone over a Chaddor (piece of cloth) and asked one representative from each tribe to hold the Chaddor and carry the stone. I narrated this story briefly just to prove that—black stone did exist long before Islam was invented.

    In summary, it has been truthfully and logically proven with all possible available circumstantial evidences/rational that, Islam was not a new religion but it is Reformed Paganism.

    I believe that all these monotheistic religions have more or less similar origins. This idea of monotheistic religion was not a brand new invention. Monotheistic thought was declared by Ancient Pharaoh Kings, and Mesopotamia’s king Hamarubi (3000 B.C.). Differences were, these kings demanded that they themselves were the God whom everybody should worship.

    References:

    1. The Holy Qur’an, Translated by A. Yousuf Ali, Published by Amana Corporation, Brentwood, Maryland, 1983
    2. Buchari Sharif, Bengali Translation by Maulana Muhammad Mustafizur Rahman, Sulemani Printers and Publishers, Dhaka, Second edition-1999
    3. A History of the Arab peoples, by Albert Hourani, the Belknap press of Harvard University press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1991
    4. Dr. Robert Morey, 1996 Research and Education Foundation.
    5. Gilchrist, The Temple, The Ka’aba, and the Christ (Benoni, South Africa, 1980), p. 16.
    6. G. J. O. Moshay, Who Is This Allah?, (Dorchester House, Bucks, UK, 1994), pg. 138
    7. Ibn Warraq, Why I Am Not A Muslim, (Prometheus, Amherst, 1995) p. 42.

    8. Encyclopedia of Islam, eds. Lewis, Menage, Pellat, Schacht (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1971, II:1093.)
    9. Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics (ed. Hastings), I:326.

    10.The Ultimate Encyclopedia of Mythology, Arthur Cotterell and Rachel Storm, Lorenz Books, New York 10011, Anness Publishing Limited 1999
    11. Roots of the Western Tradition, (a short history of ancient world) by C.Warren Hollister, Library of congress cataloging-in-publication data, 6th edition, 1

    ALLAH THE MOON GOD
    The Archaeology of the Middle East
    The religion of Islam has as its focus of worship a deity by the name of “Allah.” The Muslims claim that Allah in pre-Islamic times was the biblical God of the Patriarchs, prophets, and apostles. The issue is thus one of continuity. Was “Allah” the biblical God or a pagan god in Arabia during pre-Islamic times?
    The Mohammed’s claim of continuity is essential to their attempt to convert Jews and Christians for if “Allah” is part of the flow of divine revelation in Scripture, then it is the next step in biblical religion.
    Thus we should all become Mohammedans. But, on the other hand, if Allah was a pre-Islamic pagan deity, then its core claim is refuted. Religious claims often fall before the results of hard sciences such as archeology. We can endlessly speculate about the past or go and dig it up and see what the evidence reveals. This is the only way to find out the truth concerning the origins of Allah.
    As we shall see, the hard evidence demonstrates that the god Allah was a pagan deity. In fact, he was the Moon-god who was married to the sun goddess and the stars were his daughters.
    Archaeologists have uncovered temples to the Moon-god throughout the Middle East. From the mountains of Turkey to the banks of the Nile, the most wide-spread religion of the ancient world was the worship of the Moon-god. In the first literate civilization, the Sumerians have left us thousands of clay tablets in which they described their religious beliefs. As demonstrated by Sjoberg and Hall, the ancient Sumerians worshipped a Moon-god who was called many different names. The most popular names were Nanna, Suen and Asimbabbar. His symbol was the crescent moon.
    Given the amount of artifacts concerning the worship of this Moon-god, it is clear that this was the dominant religion in Sumeria. The cult of the Moon-god was the most popular religion throughout ancient Mesopotamia. The Assyrians, Babylonians, and the Akkadians took the word Suen and transformed it into the word Sin as their favorite name for the Moon-God. As Prof. Potts pointed out,
    “Sin is a name essentially Sumerian in origin which had been borrowed by the Semites.”

    In ancient Syria and Cana, the Moon-god Sin was usually represented by the moon in its crescent phase. At times the full moon was placed inside the crescent moon to emphasize all the phases of the moon. The sun-goddess was the wife of Sin and the stars were their daughters. For example, Istar was a daughter of Sin. Sacrifices to the Moon-god are described in the Pas Shamra texts. In the Ugaritic texts, the Moon-god was sometimes called Kusuh. In Persia, as well as in Egypt, the Moon-god is depicted on wall murals and on the heads of statues. He was the Judge of men and gods.
    The Old Testament constantly rebuked the worship of the Moon-god (see: Deuteronomy. 4:19;17:3; II Kings. 21:3,5; 23:5; Jeremiah. 8:2; 19:13; Zephaniah. 1:5, etc.) When Israel fell into idolatry, it was usually the cult of the Moon-god. As a matter of fact, everywhere in the ancient world, the symbol of the crescent moon can be found on seal impressions, steles, pottery, amulets, clay tablets, cylinders, weights, earrings, necklaces, wall murals, etc. In Tell-el-Obeid, a copper calf was found with a crescent moon on its forehead. An idol with the body of a bull and the head of man has a crescent moon inlaid on its forehead with shells. In Ur, the Stela of Ur-Nammu has the crescent symbol placed at the top of the register of gods because the Moon-god was the head of the gods. Even bread was baked in the form of a crescent as an act of devotion to the Moon-god. The Ur of the Chaldees was so devoted to the Moon-god that it was sometimes called Nannar in tablets from that time period.

    A temple of the Moon-god has been excavated in Ur by Sir Leonard Woolley. He dug up many examples of moon worship in Ur and these are displayed in the British Museum to this day. Harran was likewise noted for its devotion to the Moon-god. In the 1950’s a major temple to the Moon-god was excavated at Hazer in Palestine. Two idols of the moon god were found. Each was a stature of a man sitting upon a throne with a crescent moon carved on his chest. The accompanying inscriptions make it clear that these were idols of the Moon-god. Several smaller statues were also found which were identified by their inscriptions as the “daughters” of the Moon-god. What about Arabia? As pointed out by Prof. Coon,
    “Muslims are notoriously loath to preserve traditions of earlier paganism and like to garble what pre-Islamic history they permit to survive in anachronistic terms.”

    During the nineteenth century, Amaud, Halevy and Glaser went to Southern Arabia and dug up thousands of Sabean, Minaean, and Qatabanian inscriptions which were subsequently translated. In the 1940’s, the archeologists G. Caton Thompson and Carleton S. Coon made some amazing discoveries in Arabia. During the 1950’s, Wendell Phillips, W.F. Albright, Richard Bower and others excavated sites at Qataban, Timna, and Marib (the ancient capital of Sheba). Thousands of inscriptions from walls and rocks in Northern Arabia have also been collected. Reliefs and votive bowls used in worship of the “daughters of Allah” have also been discovered. The three daughters, al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat are sometimes depicted together with Allah the Moon-god represented by a crescent moon above them.
    The archeological evidence demonstrates that the dominant religion of Arabia was the cult of the Moon-god.

    In Old Testament times, Nabonidus (555-539 BC), the last king of Babylon, built Tayma, Arabia as a center of Moon-god worship. Segall stated,
    “South Arabia’s stellar religion has always been dominated by the Moon-god in various variations.”
    Many scholars have also noticed that the Moon-god’s name “Sin” is a part of such Arabic words as “Sinai,” the “wilderness of Sin,” etc. When the popularity of the Moon-god waned elsewhere, the Arabs remained true to their conviction that the Moon-god was the greatest of all gods. While they worshipped 360 gods at the Kabah in Mecca, the Moon-god was the chief deity. Mecca was in fact built as a shrine for the Moon-god.

    This is what made it the most sacred site of Arabian paganism. In 1944, G. Caton Thompson revealed in her book, The Tombs and Moon Temple of Hureidha, that she had uncovered a temple of the Moon-god in southern Arabia. The symbols of the crescent moon and no less than twenty-one inscriptions with the name Sin were found in this temple. An idol which may be the Moon-god himself was also discovered. This was later confirmed by other well-known archeologists.

    The evidence reveals that the temple of the Moon-god was active even in the Christian era. Evidence gathered from both North and South Arabia demonstrates that Moon-god worship was clearly active even in Mohammed’s day and was still the dominant cult. According to numerous inscriptions, while the name of the Moon-god was Sin, his title was al-ilah, i.e. “the deity,” meaning that he was the chief or high god among the gods. As Coon pointed out, “The god Il or Ilah was originally a phase of the Moon God.” The Moon-god was called al- ilah, i.e. the god, which was shortened to Allah in pre-Islamic times. The pagan Arabs even used Allah in the names they gave to their children. For example, both Mohammed’s father and uncle had Allah as part of their names.

    The fact that they were given such names by their pagan parents proves that Allah was the title for the Moon-god even in Mohammed’s day. Prof. Coon goes on to say,
    “Similarly, under Mohammed’s tutelage, the relatively anonymous Ilah, became Al-Ilah, The God, or Allah, the Supreme Being.”

    This fact answers the questions,
    “Why is Allah never defined in the Qur’an?
    Why did Muhammad assume that the pagan Arabs already knew who Allah was?”
    Muhammad was raised in the religion of the Moon-god Allah. But he went one step further than his fellow pagan Arabs. While they believed that Allah, i.e. the Moon-god, was the greatest of all gods and the supreme deity in a pantheon of deities, Mohammed decided that Allah was not only the greatest god but the only god.

    In effect he said,
    “Look, you already believe that the Moon-god Allah is the greatest of all gods. All I want you to do is to accept that the idea that he is the only god. I am not taking away the Allah you already worship. I am only taking away his wife and his daughters and all the other gods.”
    This is seen from the fact that the first point of the Mohammed creed is not, “Allah is great” but “Allah is the greatest,” i.e., he is the greatest among the gods. Why would Mohammed say that Allah is the “greatest” except in a polytheistic context? The Arabic word is used to contrast the greater from the lesser. That this is true is seen from the fact that the pagan Arabs never accused Mohammed of preaching a different Allah than the one they already worshipped. This “Allah” was the Moon-god according to the archeological evidence. Mohammed thus attempted to have it both ways. To the pagans, he said that he still believed in the Moon-god Allah. To the Jews and the Christians, he said that Allah was their God too. But both the Jews and the Christians knew better and that is why they rejected his god Allah as a false god.

    Al-Kindi, one of the early Christian apologists against Islam, pointed out that Islam and its god Allah did not come from the Bible but from the paganism of the Sabeans. They did not worship the God of the Bible but the Moon-god and his daughters al-Uzza, al-Lat and Manat.
    Dr. Newman concludes his study of the early Christian-Mohammedan debates by stating,
    “Islam proved itself to be…a separate and antagonistic religion which had sprung up from idolatry.”
    Islamic scholar Caesar Farah concluded
    “There is no reason, therefore, to accept the idea that Allah passed to the Mohammedans from the Christians and Jews.”
    The Arabs worshipped the Moon-god as a supreme deity. But this was not biblical monotheism. While the Moon-god was greater than all other gods and goddesses, this was still a polytheistic pantheon of deities. Now that we have the actual idols of the Moon-god, it is no longer possible to avoid the fact that Allah was a pagan god in pre-Islamic times.
    Is it any wonder then that the symbol of Islam is the crescent moon? That a crescent moon sits on top of their mosques and minarets? That a crescent moon is found on the flags of Islamic nations? That the Mohammedans fast during the month which begins and ends with the appearance of the crescent moon in the sky?
    CONCLUSION
    PAGAN ARABIA
    The pagan Arabs worshipped the Moon-god Allah by praying toward Mecca several times a day; making a pilgrimage to Mecca; running around the temple of the Moon-god called the Kabah; kissing the black stone; killing an animal in sacrifice to the Moon-god; throwing stones at the devil; fasting for the month which begins and ends with the crescent moon; giving alms to the poor, etc.,

    The Mohammedan’s claim that Allah is the God of the Bible and that Islam arose from the religion of the prophets and apostles is refuted by solid, overwhelming archeological evidence. Islam is nothing more than a revival of the ancient Moon-god cult. It has taken the symbols, the rites, the ceremonies, and even the name of its god from the ancient pagan religion of the Moon-god. As such, it is sheer idolatry and must be rejected by all those who follow the Torah and Gospel.

    The religion of ancient Israel was based on revelation; the Old Testament says that God appeared in diverse places and spoke to the Patriarchs; there they raised altars of undressed stones, called Beth-el—or House of God. Man’s sensual imagination soon led him “to collect his gods in the dust and fashion them as he pleased,” imagining that God resided in these Stones. Thus it became Beth-aven or House of Vanity. Beth-el abounded in Chaldea, Asia, Egypt, Africa, Greece, in remote parts of Europe, among the Druids, Gauls, and Celto-Scythians, and in North and South America.

    In the Hebrew language, stones fallen from the sky are called Bethel (Heb. “House of God”). After dreaming of a ladder reaching to heaven, Jacob called his stone pillow a Bethel-stone (Genesis 28:10-22).

    “The Pagans imitated the Beth-el of Jacob and consecrated them with oil and blood, making them gods, calling them Betyles (betylus, baetyl, betyles). In classical antiquity a stone, either natural or artificially shaped, venerated as of divine origin, or as a symbol of divinity. There were a number of these sacred stones in Greece, the most famous being on the omphalos at Delphi. Likewise there were the so-called animated or oracular stones. “Strabo, Pliny, Helancius (Hellanicus) or Beth-al-Jupiter, Cybele, Venus, Mithras). The greater part of the natural Betyles were the black meteorites or fire-balls fallen from the heavens and regarded by the Sabeists as heavenly divinities. These meteorites were the Cabiri, and the Pelasgi—whose most noted worshippers were wandering or dispersed men” (The Trail of the Serpent, by Inquire Within, Boswell Publishing Co., Limited, London (1936) p. 10).

    Meteorites-cults are common in Greco-Roman civilizations. According to the religious historian Mircea Eliade, the Temple of Artemis (Diana) at Ephesus contained a squat statue of the mother-goddess, carved from a meteorite that fell from Jupiter (Acts 19:26-35). The Palladium of Troy and the conic black stone or (Baetyl) of Elagabal in Emesa, Syria, are believed to be of meteoric origin. Likewise, the Phrygian mother goddess Cybele worshipped in Pessinus (later Rome) was a stone; doubtless a meteorite. A further example is the meteorite of Pessinunt in Phrygia, which was worshipped as “the needle of Cybele,” brought to Rome in a powerful procession after the Punic war on advice from the Delphic oracle; there the meteorite was worshipped as a fertility goddess for further 500 years.

    “The most famous of all of the stone fetishes of Arabia was, of course, the Black Stone in the sanctuary of Mecca. The Kabah was, and still is, a rectangular stone structure. Built into its Eastern corner is the Black Stone which had been an object of worship for many centuries before Mohammed appropriated the Kabah for his new religion, and made the pilgrimage to this holy place one of the pillars of Islam.”
    (Mohammed: The man and his faith, Tor Andrae, 1936, Translated by Theophil Menzel, 1960, p. 13-30; Britannica, Arabian Religions, p. 1059, 1979).
    The “Hadschar al Aswad” in the Kabah is the most well known example of meteorite worship in newer times. Despite the prohibition of portraying God and adoration of objects, pilgrims to Mecca kiss this “Hadschar al Aswad” (Black Stone) which, according to the prophet is “Yamin Allah” (the right hand of God), supposedly a divine meteorite or Bethel-stone predating creation that fell at the feet of Adam and Eve. It is presently embedded in the southeastern corner of the Kabah. Muslims touch and kiss the black stone during Hajj.

    NEANDERTHALS WERE CLEANER THAN MOHAMMEDANS

    HYGIENE

    Many visitors to Islamic countries (Earthly Paradises) are often taken aback when they observe the horrifying hygienic condition in these countries, either in public places, or in the privacy of its Islamic citizens. For example, in Islamic countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sudan, Nigeria, Mauritania…and so on, people often spit anywhere they like; urinate and defecate in public places, whenever opportunity permits, oblivious to the fact that human saliva and excrement are potential carriers of deadly germs and viruses. In many Islamic Paradises, public places, such as parks, recreation centres, sports facilities etc., are often littered with obnoxious objects including human faeces. The open sewers on both sides of the road, the raw sewage infested railway tracks, the dirt, and litter in uncultivated or unoccupied spaces often produce revulsion to any visitors who dare to experience such horrible unhygienic conditions in many Islamic Paradises.

    HAS ISLAM ANYTHING TO DO WITH SUCH TERRIBLE HEALTH HAZARDS?

    Let us examine the sources of Islam to gauge the truth. The readers will note that many unhygienic practices followed in such Islamic Paradises (Dar al Islam) emanate directly from the practices of Muhammad as described in a number of ahadith (Muhammad’s act or sunna). These ahadith tell us that Muhammad and his companions, including his wives, lived in terrible unhygienic conditions. They had very little regard for a healthy, clean and disease free environment. They were inured to the dirty, unclean, and often unhealthy practices of the desert Bedouins.

    Here are three ahadith to learn about the pathetic personal hygiene of Muhammad and his followers:
    Some jihadist’s lice fell from their heads on their faces…(Sahih Bukhari, 5.59.503)

    Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 503
    Narrated Kab bin Ujra:
    The Prophet came to me at the time of Al-Hudaibiya Pledge while lice were falling on my face. He said, “Are the lice of your head troubling you?” I said, “Yes.” He said, “Shave your head and fast for three days, or feed six poor persons, or slaughter a sheep as sacrifice.” (The sub-narrator, Aiyub said, “I do not know with which of these three options he started.”)

    Muhammad visited Umm Haram and she looked for lice on his head…(Sahih Bukhari, 9.87.130)
    Sahih Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 87, Number 130:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle used to visit Um Haram bint Milhan she was the wife of ‘Ubada bin As-Samit. One day the Prophet visited her and she provided him with food and started looking for lice in his head. Then Allah’s Apostle slept and afterwards woke up smiling. Um Haram asked, “What makes you smile, O Allah’s Apostle?” He said, “Some of my followers were presented before me in my dream as fighters in Allah’s Cause, sailing in the middle of the seas like kings on the thrones or like kings sitting on their thrones.” (The narrator Ishaq is not sure as to which expression was correct). Um Haram added, ‘I said, “O Allah’s Apostle! Invoke Allah, to make me one of them;” So Allah’s Apostle invoked Allah for her and then laid his head down (and slept). Then he woke up smiling (again). (Um Haram added): I said, “What makes you smile, O Allah’s Apostle?” He said, “Some people of my followers were presented before me (in a dream) as fighters in Allah’s Cause.” He said the same as he had said before. I said, “O Allah’s Apostle! Invoke Allah to make me from them.” He said, “You are among the first ones.” Then Um Haram sailed over the sea during the Caliphate of Muawiya bin Abu Sufyan, and she fell down from her riding animal after coming ashore, and died.

    Muhammad’s companions were manual labourers; they had stinky body odour…(Sahih Bukhari 3.34.285)
    Sahih Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 34, Number 285:
    Narrated Aisha:
    The companions of Allah’s Apostle used to practise manual labor, so their sweat used to smell, and they were advised to take a bath.
    No wonder then, that, today, most of Muhammad’s ardent followers carry on with his tradition or Sunna—because it is compulsory for every Muslim to emulate Muhammad in all aspects, including his personal hygiene habits (see verses 3:31, 3:132, 4:13, 33:21, 33:36, and 68:4).

    SALIVA, DIRT & POLLUTED WATER

    To prove his divinity and supernatural power Muhammad often resorted to horrid practices. Such practices involved asking people to use the water he had polluted through ablution, bath, or mouthwash, or even by spitting on it.

    Sahih Bukhari (1.4.187) sates that people used to collect the leftover water after Muhammad’s ablution. He asked people to drink the water from the tumbler on which he had washed his hands, and threw a mouthful of water in it.

    To prove his divine authority, Muhammad even let a sick boy drink the leftover water after he had performed ablution (Sahih Bukhari, 1.4.189). Another boy drank the leftover water/milk that Muhammad had drunk (Sahih Bukhari, 3.40.541, 554)

    One grotesque unhygienic practice of Muhammad was the use of his saliva to influence illiterate, uninformed believers to his claim of possession of supernatural power. In earlier episodes we already witnessed many examples of this extremely unhygienic practice. Here are a few more samples of Muhammad’s fixation with his spittle.

    Muhammad used his saliva to soften a date, and then gave it to an infant to suck…(Sahih Bukhari, 25.5340, 5341, 5345)

    When Anas’s son was born Muhammad fed him with dates mixed with his (Muhammad’s) saliva and gave him the name Abdullah…(Sahih Bukhari, 31.6013)

    Muhammad’s saliva is good for children. He used to spit into the mouth of suckling children, and his saliva would satisfy them until nightfall…(Ash Shifa, p.184)

    If a baby sucked Muhammad’s tongue, the baby became quiet…(Ash Shifa, p.184)

    He gave al Hasan and al Husayn his tongue to suck. They had been weeping from thirst and upon sucking Muhammad’s tongue they became quiet…(Ash Shifa, p.184)

    People rubbed Muhammad’s spittle on their faces…(Ash Shifa, p.237)

    Muhammad recommended that you can spit on your cloth and then fold it and rub it…(Sahih Muslim, 4.1121)

    Spit three times to the left when someone questions who created Allah…(ibn Ishaq, p.270)

    DIRTY, UNHEALTHY & REPULSIVE

    Not only that Muhammad had poor personal hygiene habits, he also recommended many of his followers to resort to extremely dirty, unhealthy, and repulsive acts.

    A fasting person often develops terrible stench in his mouth. In Islam, it is considered quite a healthy habit to possess such a bad breath when a Muslim is fasting. A hadis is Sahih Bukhari (7.72.811) states that the smell of the mouth of a fasting person is better to Allah than the smell of musk. This means that a Muslim is not obliged to resort to good oral hygiene during the month of Ramadan. This also means that other people will get reward for smelling the bad odour of a fasting Muslim.

    Another incredible hadis in Sunaan Abu Dawud (1.0067) states that water polluted by dead dogs, menstruating clothes and excrement of people is suitable for use for anything.
    It is worthwhile to read the full hadis:

    Sunaan Abu Dawud, Book 1, Number 0067:
    Narrated Abu Sa’id al-Khudri:
    I heard that the people asked the Prophet of Allah (peace_be_upon_him): Water is brought for you from the well of Buda’ah. It is a well in which dead dogs, menstrual clothes and excrement of people are thrown. The Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) replied: Verily water is pure and is not defiled by anything.

    Another hadis in Sahih Bukhari (1.5.260) says that after sexual intercourse, clean the private parts with hand; rub the hand in wall, and then wash the hand.

    Let us read this hadis in full.

    Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Number 260:
    Narrated Maimuna:
    The Prophet took the bath of Janaba. (sexual relation or wet dream). He first cleaned his private parts with his hand, and then rubbed it (that hand) on the wall (earth) and washed it. Then he performed ablution like that for the prayer, and after the bath he washed his feet.

    Here are a few more ahadith on the Islamic hygiene:

    If you cover your feet with dust for Allah’s cause, then Allah will save them from hell fire…(Sahih Bukhari, 2.13.30)

    If you have a bad dream then spit on your left and seek refuge from Allah…(Sahih Bukhari, 9.87.133)

    Share a tooth pick between two persons…(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 1.0050)

    If you touch a carcass, no need to wash your hands…(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 1.0186)

    You can use polluted water for ablution…(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 1.0066)

    SWEET SMELLING SWEAT

    Ash Shifa (p.35) states that women collected Muhammad’s sweat, because his sweat smelled perfume. Asha Shifa continues:

    The messenger of Allah slept on a rug in the house of Anas and perspired. Anas’s mother brought a long necked bottle in which to put his sweat. The Messenger of Allah asked her about this she said,

    “We put it in our perfume and it is the most fragrant of scents.”

    • Lucky, talking to you is a wastage of time. If you’re attacked by the Taliban, I will not condemn that attack. Death of people like you is a relief. I’m talking about peace here. I’m a Muslim but, by God, I hate terrorists. What else do you want? Do you want Muslims to kill the terrorists? Yes, that’s what we’re doing in Iran and Pakistan. What else?

      • OH YOU DUMB, MORONIC, IGNORANT KAFIR SHIA,

        Modest Muslim
        February 5, 2014 at 7:53 am

        Lucky, talking to you is a wastage of time.

        If you’re attacked by the Taliban, I will not condemn that attack.

        Death of people like you is a relief.

        I’m talking about peace here.

        I’m a Muslim but, by God, I hate terrorists.

        What else do you want?

        Do you want Muslims to kill the terrorists?

        Yes, that’s what we’re doing in Iran and Pakistan.

        What else?

        LET US READ THAT AGAIN:

        Modest Muslim
        February 5, 2014 at 7:53 am

        Lucky, talking to you is a wastage of time. If you’re attacked by the Taliban, I will not condemn that attack. Death of people like you is a relief. I’m talking about peace here. I’m a Muslim but, by God, I hate terrorists. What else do you want? Do you want Muslims to kill the terrorists? Yes, that’s what we’re doing in Iran and Pakistan. What else?

        AND AGAIN:

        Modest Muslim
        February 5, 2014 at 7:53 am

        Lucky, talking to you is a wastage of time. If you’re attacked by the Taliban, I will not condemn that attack. Death of people like you is a relief. I’m talking about peace here. I’m a Muslim but, by God, I hate terrorists. What else do you want? Do you want Muslims to kill the terrorists? Yes, that’s what we’re doing in Iran and Pakistan. What else?

        SO, YOU SAY:

        (1) IF I’M ATTACKED BY THE TALIBAN, YOU WILL NOT CONDEMN THAT ATTACK!

        (2) DEATH OF PEOPLE LIKE ME IS A RELIEF!

        (3) YOU ARE TALKING PEACE!

        (4) YOU ARE A MUSLIM, BUT BY GOD YOU HATE TERRORISTS!

        (5) WHAT DO I WANT?

        (6) DO I WANT MUSLIMS TO KILL THE TERRORISTS?

        (7) THAT’S WHAT YOU ARE DOING IN IRAN & PAKISTAN!

        (8) WHAT ELSE?

        MO YOU NEED TO SEE A PSYCHIATRIST!

        YOU ARE BONKING CRAZY MAD!

        IS THIS ONE OF THE TERRORISTS YOU WANT KILLED?

        Ayatollah Tortured, Near Death, in Iran for Criticizing Political Islam

        by Shadi Paveh
        February 5, 2014 at 5:00 am

        Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s condition has reportedly worsened as of January 28, 2014, when he suffered severe body tremors and was motionless for hours in his cell. The authorities still refuse to transfer him to a medical facility and are denying him the most basic medical care. We ask for intervention to save his life.

        Ayatollah Hossein-Kazamani Boroujerdi, a senior member of the Shiite Muslim clergy, is presently serving the eighth year of an 11-year sentence handed down to him by the Islamic Republic’s courts for advocating the separation of state and religion inside Iran. He has also spoken against political Islam and its leaders. As a result, during his time in prison, he has been exposed to torture especially reserved for the Islamic Republic’s dissident clergy and political prisoners. Boroujerdi has endured the rape of his spouse in front of other family members. He has been purposely exposed to toxic chemical agents while kept in a small solitary cell. As a result, he now suffers permanent neurological damage, further aggravated by group beatings. Urgent medical attention has been systematically withheld for his long list of ailments, which are mostly a direct result of years of torture and malnutrition.

        On September 29, 2013, for example, Ayatollah Boroujerdi suffered a heart attack in prison for which he was refused medical intervention. His condition has reportedly worsened as of January 28, 2014, when he had severe body tremors and was motionless for hours in his cell, where he presently remains with no medical care.

        Possibly due to Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s prominence, the regime has apparently chosen not to execute him, but instead to kill him silently in prison. There were two failed attempts on his life by poisoning inside prison in 2012. His mother, detained at the same time, was also poisoned and died as a result. Previously, in November 2011, a prisoner on death row was told by the authorities that if he succeeded in killing Boroujerdi he would be set free. The attempt failed when other prisoners intervened.

        To protest the violent crimes of political Islam in the Islamic Republic, Boroujerdi announced via audio tape from prison that: “I am not inclined anymore to wear this frock; this frock has no credit or value in Iran or the international community” and removed his clerical robes.

        Ayatollah Boroujerdi descends from a long line of renowned Shiite clergy; both his father and grandfather were staunch opponents of religious leaders in politics. As a result, both of his parents, along with his brother, were killed by the authorities under mysterious circumstances, as is the regime’s custom.

        Despite his critical medical condition in prison, he remains defiant and his spirit remains unbreakable: he has stated hopes that his case will serve as a strong indictment of the Islamic Republic’s despotic rule and unspeakable human rights violations.

        Ayatollah Boroujerdi has risked losing his life slowly under torture by writing letters from inside prison to then-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and to the United Nations, speaking of the absolute lack of freedom inside Iran, the grotesque human rights violations and the imminent danger of political Islam. Further, he recently urged people of Iran to boycott the so-called elections on June 14, 2013. As a direct result of this statement his tortures recommenced despite his extremely fragile medical condition.

        Ms. Roya Araghi, an advocate of Boroujerdi who herself was jailed and tortured for defending the him, and has since fled Iran, believes that without medical treatment and international intervention, Ayatollah Boroujerdi will most likely die soon under torture.

        On June 29, 2013, members of Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s family went to Evin prison to visit him, and were shocked to see nature of his physical condition in the seventh year of his 11-year sentence. He has developed acute heart disease, which has led to the severe swelling of his feet and knees. He also suffers from ocular, pulmonary and respiratory disorders, but has been denied medical treatment by officials until he “repents “and “mends his ways”.

        On July 8, 2013, Boroujerdi was interrogated for an extended period of time by government agents for his refusal to concede to the demands of the regime by signing a letter of “repentance.” He was informed that “the pressures and tortures will increase until he has been destroyed”. He has thus far refused to surrender.

        In a rare phone call to his family that followed this episode, he stated that he “will never give in to a single threat or intimidation tactic of the regime.” His family stated that he also added, “he does not regret any of his actions and stands by his word, as he is prepared to die”.

        After their visit, the Boroujerdi family announced that the tyrannical regime of the Islamic Republic’s fanatics continue systematically to exterminate political prisoners and prisoners of conscience through well-planned prolonged torture; both psychological and physical.

        Despite a statement by then-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2012 and a plea by the UN Special Rapporteur on Iran, Dr. Ahmad Shaheed, to release Ayatollah Boroujerdi, the Iranian regime continues to torture this man of God whose only crime is advocating separation of religion from politics, democracy and human rights.

        On July 24, 2013, Andrew Bennett, Canada’s Ambassador to the Office of Religious Freedom, condemned the prolonged detention of Grand Ayatollah Boroujerdi by Iranian authorities, but to no avail.

        The regime of Iran is silently executing Mr. Boroujerdi, without a bullet or a noose — away from the eyes of the world. These silent executions are now a common method of killing political prisoners in Iran as the regime tries to hide its grotesque human rights violations and its escalating rate of executions of opponents.

        The human rights activists for democracy in Iran would like to bring to the immediate attention of all international human rights organizations and governments that Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s life is in grave danger due to deliberate withholding of necessary medical care by the authorities in Iran. We ask for an intervention on his behalf, to save his life.

        Related Topics: Iran
        Iran: Letter from Hussein Boroujerdi, Political Prisoner in Evin Prison
        Excerpts

        by Hussein Boroujerdi
        February 5, 2014 at 4:30 am

        http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4159/hussein-boroujerdi-letter

        Translated by Banafsheh Zand
        Print Send Comment RSS Share: Facebook Twitter Google +1
        Be the first of your friends to like this.

        “The fact is that if the God-hating and blasphemous regime’s elite do not act violently, those who oppose them and their revolution, and their so-called Republic, would pour out into the streets so that the people of the world could get a good look at the hidden realities inside this ravaged country.” — Hussein Boroujerdi, January 2014

        The Shah’s rule so saturated society with faith and ignited the passion for the ‘Shia family’ (Ahl al-Bayt) among people, that they gambled everything they had on the Shia authority. Keeping one’s faith became the price of the whims and perversities of the power-grabbing clergy who were and are the main reason for the downfall of religious values. And now the religion of the rulers has emptied the hearts of the people from any will to be fraudulent clerics, and has filled them with hatred, revenge, and contempt for anything and everything that smacks of Islam. As a result of the monarchic Mullahs’ ceaseless lies and the teflon accusations of the regime-run media, we have a country whose problems and troubles are unprecedented and do not exist anywhere else in the world.

        Today, the gangs of the authoritarian regime’s insiders celebrate their anniversary; they gather around a sumptuous table with full and brimming pockets and then kick up their heels and dance on the corpses of innocent peasants and a crushed nation. Expenses for the coronation ceremonies held for the supreme leader and plans for the celebrations of the revolution… are a dagger which tears at ill-fated Iranians year after year. Now I ask the world, does that somehow prove this regime’s legitimacy?

        The murdering rulers claim that every citizen of our country is a follower and fan of their revolution. But we say that the overwhelming majority of the children of this land systematically oppose political Islam. As proof, the December 30th, 2013 (9th of the month of Dey, 1392) rally, which cost large sums of money, was a show of force by the regime’s own supporters; however when the regime forces turned up in Palestine Square in Tehran and saw the embarrassingly thin turnout and real lack of support, the Basiji commander, Mohammad-Reza Naghdi, walked out for fear of being discredited. The fact is that if the God-hating and blasphemous regime’s elite do not act violently, those who oppose them and their revolution, and their so-called Republic, would pour out into the streets so that the people of the world could get a good look at the hidden realities inside this ravaged country.

        Seyyed Hossein Kazemeini-Boroujerdi

        • Yes, I said that and I repeat it. If you’re killed by a terrorist, I wouldn’t condemn it. You are just like a terrorist. Always abusing and spreading hate. I still ask you to debate with me. Debate like a friend. If you won, I would leave Islam. Your answer will show whether my comment was proper or not.

          • YO DUMB MO,

            BEHOLD YOUR “HOLY SECT” SHIISM!

            AYATOLLAH TORTURED, NEAR DEATH, IN IRAN FOR CRITICIZING POLITICAL ISLAM
            by Shadi Paveh
            February 5, 2014

            Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s condition has reportedly worsened as of January 28, 2014, when he suffered severe body tremors and was motionless for hours in his cell. The authorities still refuse to transfer him to a medical facility and are denying him the most basic medical care. We ask for intervention to save his life.

            Ayatollah Hossein-Kazamani Boroujerdi, a senior member of the Shiite Muslim clergy, is presently serving the eighth year of an 11-year sentence handed down to him by the Islamic Republic’s courts for advocating the separation of state and religion inside Iran. He has also spoken against political Islam and its leaders. As a result, during his time in prison, he has been exposed to torture especially reserved for the Islamic Republic’s dissident clergy and political prisoners. Boroujerdi HAS ENDURED THE RAPE OF HIS SPOUSE IN FRONT OF OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS. He has been purposely exposed to toxic chemical agents while kept in a small solitary cell. As a result, he now suffers permanent neurological damage, further aggravated by group beatings. Urgent medical attention has been systematically withheld for his long list of ailments, which are mostly a direct result of years of torture and malnutrition.

            Ayatollah Hossein-Kazamani Boroujerdi, in better times (left) and in his prison cell (right).
            On September 29, 2013, for example, Ayatollah Boroujerdi suffered a heart attack in prison for which he was refused medical intervention. His condition has reportedly worsened as of January 28, 2014, when he had severe body tremors and was motionless for hours in his cell, where he presently remains with no medical care.

            Possibly due to Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s prominence, the regime has apparently chosen not to execute him, but instead to kill him silently in prison. There were two failed attempts on his life by poisoning inside prison in 2012. His mother, detained at the same time, was also poisoned and died as a result. Previously, in November 2011, a prisoner on death row was told by the authorities that if he succeeded in killing Boroujerdi he would be set free. The attempt failed when other prisoners intervened.
            To protest the violent crimes of political Islam in the Islamic Republic, Boroujerdi announced via audio tape from prison that: “I am not inclined anymore to wear this frock; this frock has no credit or value in Iran or the international community” and removed his clerical robes.

            Ayatollah Boroujerdi descends from a long line of renowned Shiite clergy; both his father and grandfather were staunch opponents of religious leaders in politics. As a result, both of his parents, along with his brother, were killed by the authorities under mysterious circumstances, as is the regime’s custom.

            Despite his critical medical condition in prison, he remains defiant and his spirit remains unbreakable: he has stated hopes that his case will serve as a strong indictment of the Islamic Republic’s despotic rule and unspeakable human rights violations.

            Ayatollah Boroujerdi has risked losing his life slowly under torture by writing letters from inside prison to then-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and to the United Nations, speaking of the absolute lack of freedom inside Iran, the grotesque human rights violations and the imminent danger of political Islam. Further, he recently urged people of Iran to boycott the so-called elections on June 14, 2013. As a direct result of this statement his tortures recommenced despite his extremely fragile medical condition.
            Ms. Roya Araghi, an advocate of Boroujerdi who herself was jailed and tortured for defending the him, and has since fled Iran, believes that without medical treatment and international intervention, Ayatollah Boroujerdi will most likely die soon under torture.

            On June 29, 2013, members of Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s family went to Evin prison to visit him, and were shocked to see nature of his physical condition in the seventh year of his 11-year sentence. He has developed acute heart disease, which has led to the severe swelling of his feet and knees. He also suffers from ocular, pulmonary and respiratory disorders, but has been denied medical treatment by officials until he “repents “and “mends his ways”.

            On July 8, 2013, Boroujerdi was interrogated for an extended period of time by government agents for his refusal to concede to the demands of the regime by signing a letter of “repentance.” He was informed that “the pressures and tortures will increase until he has been destroyed”. He has thus far refused to surrender.

            In a rare phone call to his family that followed this episode, he stated that he “will never give in to a single threat or intimidation tactic of the regime.” His family stated that he also added, “he does not regret any of his actions and stands by his word, as he is prepared to die”.

            After their visit, the Boroujerdi family announced that the tyrannical regime of the Islamic Republic’s fanatics continue systematically to exterminate political prisoners and prisoners of conscience through well-planned prolonged torture; both psychological and physical.

            Despite a statement by then-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2012 and a plea by the UN Special Rapporteur on Iran, Dr. Ahmad Shaheed, to release Ayatollah Boroujerdi, the Iranian regime continues to torture this man of God whose only crime is advocating separation of religion from politics, democracy and human rights.

            On July 24, 2013, Andrew Bennett, Canada’s Ambassador to the Office of Religious Freedom, condemned the prolonged detention of Grand Ayatollah Boroujerdi by Iranian authorities, but to no avail.
            The regime of Iran is silently executing Mr. Boroujerdi, without a bullet or a noose — away from the eyes of the world. These silent executions are now a common method of killing political prisoners in Iran as the regime tries to hide its grotesque human rights violations and its escalating rate of executions of opponents.

            The human rights activists for democracy in Iran would like to bring to the immediate attention of all international human rights organizations and governments that Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s life is in grave danger due to deliberate withholding of necessary medical care by the authorities in Iran. We ask for an intervention on his behalf, to save his life.

    • Lucky, so, you have touched the core of Islam, the pulmonary artery, for the first time!

      So, a few points for you to ponder :

      So…..which god is real???? Of which religion????????? Please answer.

      So, who gave the names to the Jews and Christians and Hindus before the Rig-vedas and before the Bible?? Where did the names such as Jesus, Joseph, Jacob, Rambhai, Krishna, ..come from before the advent of the scriptures?

      So, what were those persons named before they adopted their respective religions? What were they called before…shall we dig into their nomenclature too?

      So, you have admitted that Allah existed before Islam? And is that the reason why Abdullah is called the slave of god?
      Correct….and that IS what all the muslims believe in.
      Pagans were muslims before they became pagans over time as the the creation started from a single couple who had submitted itself to the Will of God.

      So, for YOUR kind information ‘al-illah’ is NOT equal to Allah… as ‘Kinder’ is not equal to ‘Kindle’. Illah means “my God” and Allah means ONE God.

      So, you said there is no description of Allah in the Quran? Wrong…Read Chapter 112.

      So, according to Muslims, Islam existed from the beginning of the creation of the Universe…as Islam means the submission/bowing/subjugating to the Will of Allah.

      So, Muslims ARE the most hygienic people and some who live on poverty lines should NOT be ostracised or be rebuked. All the faults you have quoted are from the Hadiths which ARE fake!!!!!

      Muslims wash their butts with water and do ablution five times a day. I wish you visit the nearest muslim family to you and you will be surely stupefied with your negative thoughts and unhygienic alleges about muslims.

      In conclusion I would like to submit that you ARE the biggest of all the balls over the entire universe especially the internet!

      • THE DEMONIC “GOD” OF MOHAMMEDANISM:

        DIVINELY SANCTIONED

        1.5 billion Muslims believe that Allah sanctioned their pervert prophet to marry a 6 year old child and wank between her thighs for 3 years, shooting his cum all over her little, naked body and when the child was 9 years he fucked her. She was never able to have a child after this ordeal.

        THE WANKING PERVERT FROM MECCA

        A marriage is engaged in by 2 consenting adults.
        Do you really believe a 6 year old child would desire to marry a 51 year old man?
        Do you think that is what she would choose?
        Do you think a 9 year old girl would desire to have sex with a 54 year old?

        The thought of an old man becoming aroused by a child is one of the most disturbing thoughts that makes us cringe as it reminds us of pedophilia and the most despicable people. It is difficult to accept that the “Holy Prophet” of Mecca married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and WANKED BETWEEN HER THIGHS FOR 3 YEARS and consummated/RAPED her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.
        MUHAMMAD: HIS SEX LIFE, SEX ABUSE & CHILD MOLESTING

        Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly. Let us investigate how did the prophet live Islam; how did the prophet apply the eternal teachings of God in his daily life? In this search for the historical Muhammad, we will utilize the Islam’s holy books, its own writings.

        THE PERFECT MUSLIM

        And surely thou hast sublime morals
        (Surat Al-Qalam 68:4).

        Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah an excellent exemplar
        (Surat Al-Ahzab 33:21).

        Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly.

        MUHAMMAD’S MOLESTATION OF BABY AISHA

        Muhammad fantasized about baby Aisha before soliciting her from her father.
        Sahih Bukhari 9.140
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        Allah’s apostle said to me, “you were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘if this is from Allah, then it must happen.

        AISHA’S FATHER DID NOT APPROVE AT FIRST

        Aisha’s father, Abu Bakr, wasn’t on board at first, but Muhammad explained how the rules of their religion made it possible. This is similar to the way that present-day cult leaders manipulate their followers into similar concessions.
        Sahih Bukhari 7.18
        Narrated ‘Ursa:
        The prophet asked abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “but I am your brother.” the prophet said, “you are my brother in Allah’s religion and his book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”

        MUHAMMAD, 50, MARRIES BABY AISHA AGE 6

        Sahih Bukhari volume 5, book 58, number 234
        Narrated Aisha: the prophet engaged (married) me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, um ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became alright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some ansari women who said, “best wishes and Allah’s blessing and a good luck.” then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.
        Sahih bukhari volume 8, book 73, number 151
        Narrated ‘Aisha: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the prophet would call them to join and play with me. (the playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-bari page 143, vol.13)
        Muhammad’s father in law, Umar bin Khattab, the second rightly guided khalifa, married a child, Umm Kulthum. Umm Khultum was about 9 years old when she was married. Umar was certainly not doing wrong according to Islam, Muhammad once said that even the devil would step aside when he met Umar in an alley. Islam is indeed the true religion for pedophiles, rapists, sadistics etc.
        Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3310:
        ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 65
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that ‘Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death).” what you know of the Quran (by heart)’
        Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 88
        Narrated ‘Ursa:
        The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with ‘Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).
        Some Muslims claim that it was Abu Bakr who approached Muhammad asking him to marry his daughter. This is of course not true and here is the proof.
        Sahih Bukhari 7.18
        Narrated ‘Ursa:
        The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “But I am your brother.” The Prophet said, “You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”
        Arabs were a primitive lot with little rules to abide. Yet they had some code of ethics that they honored scrupulously. For example, although they fought all the year round, they abstained from hostilities during certain holy months of the year. They also considered Mecca to be a holy city and did not make war against it. A adopted son’s wife was deemed to be a daughter in law and they would not marry her. Also it was customary that close friends made a pact of brotherhood and considered each other as true brothers. The Prophet disregarded all of these rules anytime they stood between him and his interests or whims.
        Abu Bakr and Muhammad had pledged to each other to be brothers. So according to their customs Ayesha was supposed to be like a niece to the “Holy Prophet” of Mecca. Yet that did not stop him asking Abu Bakr for her hand, even when she was only six years old.
        But this moral relativist “Holy Prophet” of Mecca would use the same excuse to reject a woman he did not like.
        Sahih Bukhari V.7, B62, N. 37
        Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:
        It was said to the Prophet, “Won’t you marry the daughter of Hamza?” He said, “She is my foster niece (brother’s daughter). ”
        Hamza and Abu Bakr both were the foster brothers of Muhammad. But Ayesha must have been too pretty for the “Holy Prophet” of Mecca to abide by the codes of ethics and custom.
        In the following Hadith he confided to Aisha that he had dreamed of her before soliciting her from her father.
        Sahih Bukhari 9.140
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        Allah’s Apostle said to me, “You were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘Uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘If this is from Allah, then it must happen.
        Whether Muhammad had actually such a dream or he just said it to please Aisha is not the point. What matters here is that it indicates that Aisha was a baby being “carried” by an angel when the Prophet dreamed of her.
        There are numerous hadithes that explicitly reveal the age of Ayesha at the time of her marriage. Here are some of them.
        Sahih Bukhari 5.236.
        Narrated Hisham’s father:
        Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married ‘Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.
        Sahih Bukhari 5.234
        Narrated Aisha:
        The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.
        And in another Hadith we read.
        Sunan Abu-Dawud Book 41, Number 4915, also Number 4916 and Number 4917
        Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
        The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) married me when I was seven or six. When we came to Medina, some women came. according to Bishr’s version: Umm Ruman came to me when I was swinging. They took me, made me prepared and decorated me. I was then brought to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him), and he took up cohabitation with me when I was nine. She halted me at the door, and I burst into laughter.
        In the above hadith we read that Aisha was swinging, This is a play of little girls not grown up people. The following Hadith is particularly interesting because it shows that Aisha was so small that was not aware what was going on when the Holy Prophet “surprised” her by going to her.
        Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 90
        Narrated Aisha:
        When the Prophet married me, my mother came to me and made me enter the house (of the Prophet) and nothing surprised me but the coming of Allah’s Apostle to me in the forenoon.

        Must have been quite a surprise! But the following is also interesting because it demonstrates that she was just a kid playing with her dolls. Pay attention to what the interpreter wrote in the parenthesis. (She was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty)

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 73, Number 151
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13)

        Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3311
        ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.
        The holy Prophet died when he was 63. So he must have married Aisha when he as 51 and went to her when he was 54.
        Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 73, Number 33
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        I never felt so jealous of any woman as I did of Khadija, though she had died three years before the Prophet married me, and that was because I heard him mentioning her too often, and because his Lord had ordered him to give her the glad tidings that she would have a palace in Paradise, made of Qasab and because he used to slaughter a sheep and distribute its meat among her friends.

        Khadija died in December of 619 AD. That is two years before Hijra. At that time the Prophet was 51-years-old. So in the same year that Khadija died the prophet married Aisha and took her to his home 3 years later, i.e. one year after Hijra. But until she “grew up” he married Umm Salama.
        In another part Aisha claims that as long as she remembers her parents were always Muslims.
        Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 245
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        (the wife of the Prophet) I never remembered my parents believing in any religion other than the true religion (i.e. Islam),
        If Ayesha was older i.e. 16 or 18 as some Muslims claim, she would have remembered the religion of her parents prior to becoming Muslims.

        Now someone may still claim that all these hadithes are lies. People are free to say whatever they want. But truth is clear like the Sun for those who have eyes.
        No sane person would be aroused by a 6-year-old child. Decent people wince at the thought of this shameful act. Yet some Muslims deny them. The question is why so many followers of Muhammad would fabricate so many false hadithes about the age of Aisha, which incidentally confirm each other?

        MUHAMMAD WOULD THIGH WITH BABY AISHA

        HOW TO THIGH & GET HIGH

        Now let us see how thighing is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

        Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.

        According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

        Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

        Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.

        Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.”Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

        The inquirer asked the following: ‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’

        After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

        That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers'” (Fatwa No. 31409).

        Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

        AISHA WASHING SEMEN FROM MUHAMMAD’S CLOTHES

        From the Hadith of Bukhari:

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

        Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:
        I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”
        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

        Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

        I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

        From the Hadith of Bukhari:

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 230:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        as above (229).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

        Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

        I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

        Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

        I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

        MUHAMMAD RESERVED BABY AISHA FOR HIMSELF, BECAUSE SHE WAS A VIRGIN & HE WANTED A VIRGIN.

        Sahih al-Bukhari, volume 7, book 62, number 17
        Narrated jabir bin ‘abdullah:
        When I got married, Allah’s apostle said to me, “what type of lady have you married?” I replied, “I have married a matron.” he said, “why, don’t you have a liking for the virgins and for fondling them?” Jabir also said: Allah’s apostle said, “why didn’t you marry a young girl so that you might play with her and she with you?”
        Hence, Muhammad’s comments indicate that his reason for marrying Aisha while a young virgin is so that he could fondle and sexually play with her!

        AISHA WAS NOT THE ONLY BABY GIRL MUHAMMAD FANTASIZED ABOUT

        In the classic history, Sirat Rasul Allah (The Life of Muhammad) by Ibn Ishaq, there is an account in which Muhammad expressed a marital interest in a crawling baby. This event seems to have occurred around the time of the battle of of Badr, when he was about 55 years old. He had married Aisha two years earlier, when he was 53 years of age.
        (Suhayli, ii. 79: in the Riwaya of Yunus i. I. Recorded that the apostle saw her (Ummu’lfadl) when she was a baby crawling before him and said,
        ‘if she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’
        but he died before she grew up and sufyan b. Al-aswad b. ‘Abdu’l-asad al-Makhzumi married her and she bore him rizq and lubab… [Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad, Karachi, p. 311]
        Muhammad saw Um Habiba the daughter of Abbas while she was fatim (age of nursing) and he said, “if she grows up while I am still alive, I will marry her.” (Musnad Ahmad, number 25636)

        MUHAMMAD WOULD BATH & FONDLE AISHA

        Bukhari (6:298) – Muhammad would take a bath with the little Aisha and fondle her.
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        The prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me. While in itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses).

        MUHAMMAD CONSUMMATED HIS MARRIAGE TO BABY AISHA, WHEN SHE WAS 9

        Sunaan abu Dawud: book 11, number 2161:
        Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
        I and the apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) used to lie in one cloth at night while I was menstruating. If anything from me smeared him, he washed the same place (that was smeared), and did not wash beyond it. If anything from him smeared his clothe, he washed the same place and did not wash beyond that, and prayed with it (i.e. The clothe).

        MUHAMMAD WOULD SEXUALLY ABUSE HIS WIVES

        Bukhari (6:300) – Muhammad’s wives had to be available for the prophet’s fondling even when they were having their menstrual period.
        Bukhari volume 1, book 6, number 299:
        Narrated ‘Abdur-rahman bin al-Aswad:
        …(on the authority of his father) ‘Aisha said: “Whenever Allah’s apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used to order her to put on an izar and start fondling her.” ‘Aisha added, “None of you could control his sexual desires as the prophet could.”

        WOMEN ARE SEXUAL OBJECTS

        Allah promoted this abusive sexual behavior:
        “Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will” [Koran 2:223]
        Koran (2:223) likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills. In this verse, Allah also gives divine sanction for anal sex.

        According to Islam, Muhammad is the perfection of humanity and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct. He had sex with Aisha at the age of nine, which amounts to rape of a minor. He also left behind an enduring legacy for aged Muslim men to fulfill their carnal desires contrary to natural law and to the life-long devastation of young girls.

        ALLAH PROMOTES PEDOPHILIA

        Quran 65.4 “and those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘iddah (prescribed divorce period), if you have doubts (about their periods), is three months, and for those who have no courses [(i.e. They are still immature) their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise, except in case of death] . And for those who are pregnant (whether they are divorced or their husbands are dead), their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is until they deliver (their burdens) (give birth) and whosoever fears Allah and keeps his duty to him, he will make his matter easy for him.”
        Sura (65:4) lays down rules for divorce and sets the prescribed period for divorce. It clearly says, Muslim men can marry (and divorce) little girls who have not yet reached menstruation age. This means that Muslim men were allowed to marry baby girls. This is the eternal word of god. This is an eternal law of Allah. All Muslims must believe in this teaching. Otherwise, they are no longer Muslims but apostates of Islam.

        ALLAH ORDAINS RAPE

        “All married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” 4:24
        You can have sex with slaves women captured in war (with whom you may rape or do whatever you like).
        Muhammad established an appalling precedent for abuse of young girls which is continued to be nurtured by the Muslim faithful. For example, Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran gave a fatwa about Quran 65.4:
        “A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man’s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl’s sister.”

        MARRIAGE IN ISLAM:

        A WHOREHOUSE FOR MEN, A JAILHOUSE FOR WOMEN

        In the Quran, there is no word for marriage. The only word used is nikah, which means ‘having sex’ or ‘sexual intercourse’ in Arabic.

        WIVES IN ISLAM

        According to Quran a wife is some one with whom you have sex with.

        Different types of wives are:
        1. A paid wife with an open ended contract (House wife)
        2. A paid wife with a fixed term contract (Muta wife)
        3. A paid visitation only wife with a visitation contract (Misyar wife)
        4. Slave girl (bought gifted or captured)
        The price paid for vagina is called Mahr. Thus according to Quran a contract wife is like a whore who gets paid for her vagina called Mahr while a slave girl wife is like a whore who does not get paid a Mahr for her vagina.
        Q 4.24: Seek out wives by means of your wealth, and give those with whom ye have cohabited their price.

        APPROACH HER IN ANY WAY YOU WANT

        A wife has no say in the way the husband approaches her for enjoyment.
        Prophet said (Bukhari: Volume 7, Book 62, Number 81): “you are given the right to enjoy the women’s private parts”.
        Q 2.223: Your women are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth (have sexual relations in any manners), when or how you will. (trs. Hilali & Khan)

        WIVES CAN BE DUMPED AT WILL

        Like a client can dump a whore at will and pick up another one, the Quran says a husband can dump his wife and get another one.
        Q 4.20. If you want to exchange one wife for another than don’t take back any part of what you paid her.
        Hadiths say that Hasan Bin Ali, Prophet Mohammad’s beloved grand son, who died young, went through more than 70 wives in his short life.
        The husband is like a client of a whore. Once a wife is paid Mahr she is obliged to submit her private parts 24/7 to him.

        WHORES CAN DUMP A CLIENT, MUSLIM WIVES CANNOT DUMP HER HUSBAND

        If a whore changes her mind and does not want sex she can. She can return the money and kick him out. However, in Islam a wife does not have that liberty. Once the Mahr is paid her vagina is his to enjoy. She must submit to him any time he gets an urge.
        Ibn Majah 1854: “Prophet said if he asks her to surrender herself to him for sexual intercourse on a camel’s back, she should not refuse him even on a camel’s saddle.”
        However in our prophet’s case, whenever he had a huge urge (erection) and his child-wife got scared and ran away during foreplay, he had to catch her, bribe her with a new doll and drag her back to bed.

        SAYING NO COSTS ISLAMIC WIVES WHIPPING AND DIVINE CURSING

        If a wife refuses sex to a husband Allah ordered husbands to give her a good whipping.
        Quran 4.34: Scourge (whip) your wife if she does not obey.
        And ordered angels to curse her all night.
        Bukhari 4.54.460: “If a husband calls his wife to his bed for sex and if she , he angels will curse her till morning”.

        A WHIPPED WIFE MUST BE PUT ON AN INJURED LIST

        Once a wife is whipped badly, she cannot lie down and have sex without severe pain, seriously limiting the ways a husband can approach her thus violating aya 2.223. Our prophet told the momins to postpone sex with her.
        Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 132:
        The Prophet said, “When you flog your wife like you flog your slave then postpone the sexual intercourse.”

        VAGINA CONTRACTS
        OPEN-ENDED CONTRACT (REGULAR WIFE)

        A n open ended contract is signed for a negotiated price for an undetermined period. In addition wife gets boarding lodging and clothing. However if the husband decides to dump her, he can break the contract verbally and kick her out (4.20) any time he wants to but he cannot get any money back he paid for her vagina even if he used it for five minutes.

        Q 4.20: if you replace a wife by another, you cannot get any part of Mahr back even if it was a large sum.
        A broken contract cannot be renewed until the her vagina is used by another momin and is then released (halala).

        Q 2.230: And if he has divorced her, then she is not lawful unto him thereafter until she has sex with another husband. And if he has divorced her then she is not lawful unto him thereafter until she has married another husband. Then, if the other husband divorces her, it is no sin on both of them that they reunite.
        On the other hand a wife has no right to break a contract similarly. She can only break it if she can prove him to be impotent or insane in a court of law.

        SHORT-TERM CONTRACT or MUTA WIFE

        A man can sign a contract with a woman to use her vagina for a pre-determined period at negotiated price.
        The contract can be renewed without the requirement of interim use of her vagina by another man.

        VISITATION CONTRACT (MISYAR WIFE)

        In this contract a husband visits a misyar wife for sexual pleasure and pays her for each visit. The husband does not have to provide her boarding and lodging.

        WAYS TO ACQUIRE SLAVE GIRLS

        A slave girl doesn’t get paid Mahr for her vagina. She is acquired as a free gift (Maria was a free gift for Prophet from Egyptian king), bought from another owner (sometimes prophet took away pretty girls for free from their owners*) or captured after killing her father or husband (prophet took 20% of the captured women from a raid booty).
        Sahih Muslim, Book 019, Number 4345:
        It has been narrated on the authority of Salama (b. al-Akwa’) who said: We fought against the Fazara and Abu Bakr was the commander over us. Abu Bakr bestowed a young girl upon me as a prize. She was one of the prettiest girls in Arabia. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her (had not have sex with her) when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: Give me that girl, O Salama. I said: Messenger of Allah, she has fascinated me. I had not yet disrobed her. When on the next day, the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me again in the street (Salama was parading the young beauty to make other jihadis jealous). Prophet said: O Salama, give me that girl, may God bless your father. I said: She is for you. Messenger of Allah! By Allah, I have not yet disrobed her.

        SLAVE GIRLS ARE THE BEST BARGAINS IN ISLAM

        Quranic ayas 4.3, 4.24, 23.6, 33.50 & 70.30 allow a Muslim man to have sex with slave girls. A slave girl can be bought or acquired by killing infidels and capturing their wives and daughters.
        Slave girls are the best bargain Islam has to offer to Muslim men but unfortunately Muslims are denying themselves this great reward from Allah just to appease infidel west. The uses of a slave-girl are:
        1. They provide sex 24/7.
        2. They are used as house maid
        3. Offered as sex partners to overnight house guests.
        4. Offered as gifts to family and friends for a few days or for good*.
        (*The History of Tabari, vol 8, pge 29-30: From his share of captive women, prophet gave his son-in-law, Ali a slave girl, Raytah bt Hilal to enjoy her at his will. He also presented Uthman b. Affan, his son-in-law, another slave girl Zainab b. Hayan, and bestowed another girl (name unknown) to his father in-law Omar Ibn Khattab. Omar gave that girl to his son Abdullah. Most of Prophet’s other elite companions received slave girls as gifts).
        5. Sold to raise cash, if the need be.

        SLAVE GIRLS ARE INCOME PROPERTIES

        Islam is the only religion which allows momins to pimp the bodies of their slave girls for side incomes. Thus Quran taught 1400 years back what modern day pimps are learning now, that is to control many prostitutes and get rich on their income.

        However Islam is a very compassionate religion. While many pimps force their prostitutes to sell their bodies, Islam prefers that momins avoid coercion.
        Q 24.33. Do not compel your slave girls to prostitution to drive income from her body if they are not willing.
        But of course Allah is a forgiving God. In case momins do beat them up and force them to prostitute, Allah said he will forgive them.
        Q 24.33. (continued) But if you did force her to prostitute Allah can forgive you because he is forgiving and compassionate.

  2. YO M&M,

    SHUT UP!

    YOU ARE A SHIITE KUFFER.

    NOW READ ABOUT THE SUNNI GENIUS:

    “Shaikh Abd-al-Aziz Ibn Abd-Allah Ibn Baaz” (the name means – Servant of the almighty Allah, or, son of the servant of Allah).

    A Tribute to a Muslim Genius

    by Sujit Das

    12 November, 2006

    [A note to the readers: It’s not long since I am writing critical to Islam. Though I cherish no malice against Muslims, but, whenever an article of mine is published, I get many hate mails from Muslim readers. Muslims often say that there are many scholars in Islam who had contributed enough to the mankind. After few days of extensive Google search, I came across a great Muslim scholar, named Ibn Baz. This article is a humble and sincere attempt to glorify his wonderful contribution to the mankind.

    Every effort has been made to write a very serious one, but Muslim readers might wrongly find this article a satire or a spoof! Please don’t blame me for your mistakes! This article is, indeed, a very serious one. I will always appreciate Ibn Baz’s enthusiasm and salute him with deep sense of respect for his massive contribution to the modern science. Hope, this time I will be able to please the Muslim readers. Thank you.]

    One of the mystifying capabilities of the human brain is embodied in the genius. A genius is an individual with astounding creative talents and distinguished mental abilities. They are able to generate new ideas. A new idea cannot be called creative unless it is quite hard to come by. It is a common mistaken idea that geniuses are born, not made. If we look at the lives of world’s greatest geniuses like, Shakespeare, Da Vinci, Socrates, Einstein, Gutenberg, Ibn Baz, Edison, Newton and many others; we will soon realize that almost all of them have many common personality characteristics. Any common people can develop these characteristics and operate on a genius level.

    As per Dr. Barrios (1980), geniuses have a strong desire to work hard and for long and continually accumulate information. Thomas Alva Edison said “Genius is ninety-nine percent perspiration and one percent inspiration”. Geniuses are highly motivated and do not bother about what common people will think if they are different. They have the courage to do something which others might consider impossible. These characteristics enable geniuses to come up with and develop new and fruitful ideas, which simpletons of their days cannot think of.

    The common folks had seen many geniuses and have benefited from their extraordinary constructive talents from time to time. One such genius is Ibn Baz. He hailed from Saudi Arabia (the land of Prophet Muhammad) and his full name is “Shaikh Abd-al-Aziz Ibn Abd-Allah Ibn Baaz” (the name means – Servant of the almighty Allah, or, son of the servant of Allah). He is better known by the short name ‘Ibn Baz’ (though there are many uncanny similarities between Mr. Ibn Baz and Mr. Bin, these are coincidental only). From the very childhood days he was very fond of memorizing Koran and learning Islamic religious scriptures (Saudi Gazette, 1999). He believed that there could not be any knowledge beyond Koran and Ahadith; and hence it was unnecessary to learn anything else other than the religious scriptures of Islam.

    At the age of sixteen, Ibn Baaz contracted a serious eye infection. His sight deteriorated and by the age of twenty he was completely blind. But, since he was a true genius, he never gave up. Despite of his blindness, he determinedly continued to study Islam under the direction of some of the most renowned Islamic thinkers of his day, such as the Sheikh Shanqeeti and many other Islamic scholars of different pedigree. An article published in ‘Saudi Gazette’ highlighted the educational background of this genius, as follows

    “The subjects he studied included Arabic language and Islamic science including the interpretation of Holy Qur’an, the Prophet’s (pbuh) Traditions, jurisprudence and Islamic history. As an Islamic visionary he fully understood the influence of history on the Ummah and worked hard to ensure that the evil influences which did affect people in the past did not repeat itself in the present age.” (Anon, 1999)

    Shortly, his creative Muslim brain was completely Islamized and, hardly any Islamic scriptures were left for him to study. By this way he became a great scholar and highly respectable nobleman in Saudi Arabia. There were no science left in Koran and Ahadith which he did not pull out and learn. In infidel world there are many scholars who can be called a ‘walking encyclopedia’, but Ibn Baz soon became a ‘walking Koran & Ahadith’.

    Throughout his life, this great Islamic genius was totally devoted to comprehend scientific miracles of Koran and had issued many fataawa (fataawa – plural of “fatwa”, means edicts) for the development of human civilization, starting from 1940 onwards (Wikipedia, 2006). A staff writer of ‘Arab News’ (a leading newspaper published from Saudi Arabia) reported on 15th May 1999 , “He has issued thousands of fatwas on various contemporary social and economic issues on the basis of the Qur’an and Sunnah”.

    His first fatwa was ‘employment of non-Muslims in the Arabian Gulf forbidden by Islam.’ After few decades, this genius gave another fatwa ‘Non-Muslim troops should be deployed on Saudi Arabia soil to defend the Kingdom from the Iraqi army’ (Kepel, 2004). This fatwa seems to be just a reversal of the first one, but we have to understand that geniuses always think differently and they develop new creative ideas from time to time. It is not easy for a simpleton to understand the creative capacities of a genius.

    He had authored many books to benefit mankind which are full of wisdom. His books are always best-sellers within Muslim world only. The most famous of his discovery is that which is stated in the book named,

    “Evidence that the Earth is Standing Still.”

    This scientific research work was published by Islamic University of Medina, Saudi Arabia, during 1974. On page 23 of this academic research work he talked about his brilliant discovery and cited many references from Koran and Ahadith. He confidently challenged the age-old belief of earth’s rotation and quoted as follows,

    “If the earth is rotating as they claim, the countries, the mountains, the trees, the rivers, and the oceans will have no bottom and the people will see the eastern countries move to the west and the western countries move to the east.”

    Parvez Hoodbhoy had mentioned the above valuable scientific conclusion of Ibn Baz, in his book “Islam and Science: Religious Orthodoxy and the Battle for Rationality”. On page 49, he wrote,

    “.. The Sheikh (Abdul Aziz Ibn Baz) authored … a book in Arabic entitled Jiryan Al-Shams Wa Al-Qammar Wa-Sukoon Al-Arz. This translates into Motion of the Sun and Moon, and Stationarity of the Earth… In an earlier book, he had threatened dissenters with the dire fatwa or takfir (disbelief), but did not repeat the threat in the newer version.” (Language and grammar unchanged)

    The news of this great discovery of Ibn Baz spread like a wild fire throughout the world and soon many Muslims probably had accepted the credibility of ‘motionless geocentric earth theory’. However, the infidel world (including many western educated Muslims) was hesitant to accept his opinion. Judith Miller, wrote in his book ‘God has Ninety-Nine Names’, on page 114,

    “When he (Sheikh Bin Baz) had condemned what he termed the Copernican ‘heresy,’ insisting, as the Koran said, that the sun moved, Egyptian journalists, much to President Nasser’s delight, had mercilessly mocked the leading cleric as a reflection of Saudi primitiveness.”

    So, the Egyptian journalists did not value his ‘freedom of speech’. It is a ‘crime’ to subdue the creative competence of a great genius like Ibn Baz at the beginning stage. It is a ‘stupidity’ to ridicule great geniuses like Ibn Baz.

    Again, during 1993, the fertile Islamic brain of this Muslim genius again started working overtime. On one fine morning, the great genius opened his personal copy of Holy Koran, pulled out some scientific miracles from Allah’s Holy book and came out with a new discovery that ‘earth is flat’. This was recorded by Carl Sagan in his book “The Demon-haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark”. Sagan wrote,

    “In 1993, the supreme religious authority of Saudi Arabia, Sheik Abdel-Aziz ibn Baaz, issued a edict, or fatwah, declaring that the world is flat. Anyone of the round persuasion does not believe in God and should be punished.” (Language and grammar unchanged)

    and,

    “That is a well-known religious edict, or fatwa, issued two years ago by Sheik Abdel-Aziz ibn Baaz, the supreme religious authority of Saudi Arabia. The blind theologian’s status gives his fatwas great weight, though his opinions have often raised eyebrows or embarrassed worldly Saudis…” (Language and grammar unchanged)

    Soon the whole world (except the infidels and civilized Muslims) started accepting the new scientific discovery. As example; on 12th February, 1995, on page A-14 an article was published under the title “Muslim Edicts take on New Force”, where Yousef Mohammad Ibrahim wrote “The earth is flat. Whoever claims it is round is an atheist deserving of punishment.” There are many verses in Koran as well as there are many Ahadith, which indicate that earth is flat (Sina, n.d).

    But again, the great Islamic scholar Ibn Baz changed his mind as before. He denied that he had described the ‘Flat earth theory’ (Kepel, 2004), when his theory was gaining popularity amongst Muslims. There was no clue available why he suddenly abandoned his excellent scientific conclusion. Perhaps, this is one of the characteristics of a genius. However, he confirmed that his koranic belief about “the motionless state of the earth and sun revolves around the earth” is still intact even after so much ‘merciless’ mockery of Egyptian journalists (Kepel, 2004). Another Islamic scholar, Sheikh Muhammad Tantawi said “he (Ibn Baz) did not fear any criticism while expressing his Islamic viewpoints”, (Arab News, 1999). His strong determination proved that he was a true genius. Probably those ‘shameless’ journalists were not aware of his professional achievements.

    This great scholar held the position of Grand Mufti of the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Head of the Council of Ulema (Senior Scholars) – 1993 to 1999 CE. This position refers to the highest official of religious law in a Sunni Muslim country. The Grand Mufti issues legal opinions and edicts, fatwa, on interpretations of Islamic law both for assisting judges in deciding cases as well as for private clients.

    Other remarkable achievements include (Saudi Gazette, 1999; Riyadh Daily, 1999; Arab News, 1999),

    Vice President, and later President of the Islamic University in Medina, 1960 CE to 1970 CE

    Chairman of the government department of Scientific Research and Ifta (guidance) with the rank of Minister. 1974 H to 1993 H.

    President of the Permanent Committee for Islamic Research and Fataawa.

    Judge of Kharj For 14 years ,

    Honorable teacher amongst faculty of Shariah [Islamic Law] of Riyadh Institute of Science from 1951 CE to 1960 CE.

    In 1981 CE, he was awarded the King Faisal International Prize for Service to Islam.

    In addition to his intensive activities, he used to attain seminars and deliver lectures in different Islamic universities till his death (Riyadh Daily, 1999). His favourite topic was – the importance of adherence to Sunnah (the Prophet’s teachings). Today, most of the prominent judges and religious scholars, University lecturers, scientists and top government officials of Saudi Arabia are his students which also includes the Education Minister of Saudi Arabia.

    Though his success story was quite impressive, he never received any award from outside Saudi Arabia. The infidel world did not pay serious attention to his discoveries, though there was much curiosity about this Muslim genius and many newspapers of western world published his ‘flat, rigid, geocentric earth and rotation of sun’ fataawa. Ibn Baz died during 1999. The Mullahs allover the Islamic world must have used local mosques’ loud speaker to inform Allah about the mighty arrival of Ibn Baz to paradise. It is hoped that Ibn Baz did not have to wait much to get a rightful place in Islamic heaven.

    This is the misfortune with many great geniuses. Often geniuses are misunderstood at the beginning. Sometimes they are laughed at and ridiculed or thought to be crazy. The fact is that, geniuses are so advanced that the society of their day rejects their ideas. It is the future generation, who confirm their status of genius. As example, when Galileo challenged the existing cosmic map and geocentric earth theory, he was ordered imprisoned which was later commuted to house arrest by the Catholic Church (During 1992, Pope John Paul II expressed regret for how the Galileo affair was handled), when Sir Isaac Newton was inspired to formulate his theory of universal gravitation by the fall of an apple from a tree, he was ridiculed. There were cartoons which suggested that the apple actually hit Newton’s head, and that impact and pain in fact sensitized him of the force of gravity (no pain, no gain!). Similarly, when Ibn Baz condemned the ‘heliocentric Copernican system’, the Egyptian journalists targated him mercilessly with mockery. Another great philosophical genius was Socrates who was accused of corrupting the youth and interfering with the religion of the state and sentenced to death. At least Ibn Baz did not have to die to defend his scientific discovery. Darwin’s evolution theory was also not accepted at the beginning by the academicians. Einstein’s research paper on general relativity was not liked and thought to be wrong by most of the members of Royal Astronomical Society of England. Similarly, the ‘Motionless earth, Flat earth and Sun revolve around the earth’ discoveries of Muslim genius Ibn Baz are not taken seriously yet. It is just a matter of time.

    That day is not far away, when the great discoveries of this Islamic scholar will be recognized by the whole world. With the further advancement of science and technology, in the future, the infidels will agree that the earth is really motionless and flat, and the sun revolves around the earth. This will prove that the scientific miracles of Koran and Ahadith are not laughable matter at all and on that day Islam will take over and rule the flat and motionless earth from one edge to another and the leftover Infidels will be thrown ‘overboard’ from the edge of the flat earth for not believing in Koran. Muslims will offer their five time obligatory prayer on the flat and motionless earth and the sun will circle around Makkah ‘round the clock’ by Allah’s divine instruction.

    The death of this genius was a great loss not only to Saudi Arabia, but also for the whole Muslim world. When this great scholar died, the loss of “his erudition and reputation for intransigence” was so great the Saudi government was said to have “found itself staring into a vacuum” unable to find a figure able to “fill bin Baaz’s shoes.” (Kepel, 2004). ‘Arab News’ reported (1999) that more than fifty thousand people came forward to carry his body to his burial ground at Makkah, while millions of Muslims performed funeral prayers. King Fahd said that the Islamic world was shoked hearing the sad news (Arab News, 1999). The news of his death was so unbearable that many Muslims must had been wallowing on the ground as if they were orphaned. Many of them must have been soaking their long beards with endless teardrops.

    The death of Ibn Baz is a great loss to the mankind as a whole. In fact the whole world is still “staring into a vacuum” because a genius like Ibn Baz is very rare to find out. He was an original genius of too high standard. There is not another genius in ten million like him. It is difficult to replace him.

    Life is an ocean of grief and sorrow. Modern fast lifestyle, work pressure, unhealthy competition, jealousy, political unrest (intentionally, I did not mention the Islamic terrorism, because in this article I am glorifying a Muslim genius and it is a wrong place to talk about Islamic terrorism) are increasing day by day and no way leveling off. Everywhere, there are lifeless, sad, and long faces to see. It looks like, slowly people are forgeting to smile. This is the time when the whole world looks forward for the geniuses like Ibn Baz. However, it is not late yet. The present Islamic scholars should try to fill up the “vacuum” as early as possible and start digging up new scientific miracles from the Holy Koran and Holy Ahadith and put up the new findings in the form of many fataawa for the whole world to see. There are enough scientific miracles in Holy Koran and Holy Ahadith which can amuse the infidels for next several decades, if not centuries. This is the only way Muslim scholars can make a positive contribution to the mankind by bringing back the long lost smile on others face.

    Reference list

    Anonimous, (1999), Staunch Defender of Islam, An article published in Saudi Gazette on 14 May 1999.

    Arab News, (1999), pp. 1, 2; 15 May 1999

    Barrious A (1980), 24 Qualities That Geniuses Have in Common; National Enquirer/Transworld Features. URL: http://www.hightechbiz.com/pub/genius.htm

    Kepel G., (2004); The War for Muslim Minds: Islam and the West,. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. pp.184, 186

    Riyadh Daily Staff Reporter (1999), Sheikh Bin Baz: A life devoted to Islam, Riyadh Daily (Daily newspaper published from Saudi Arabia) dated, 14 May 1999.

    Saudi Gazette staff reporter (1999); Biography of Sheikh Bin Baz, Saudi Gazette (Daily newspaper published from Saudi Arabia) dated, 14 May 1999

    Sina A., (n.d); Absurdities of Hadith and Muslim’s Denial,Faith Freedom International. URL: http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/sina/denialhadith.htm

    Wikipedia (2006); Abd-al-Aziz ibn Abd-Allah ibn Baaz (Name). URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abd-al-Aziz_ibn_Abd-Allah_ibn_Baaz#Name

    • o bhai na tu behes krda he…na theek tarah tu gal krda he,,tu chahnda ki he? damagh kharab kr rkha he…ya to behes kr nahi to nikal ja….ajeed aadmi he!

      • A STOREY OF LOVE & FORGIVENESS

        A man had two sons. The younger son said to his father, ‘Father, give me my share of the property.’ So the father divided his property between his two sons.
        After a few days, the younger son gathered his possessions and left for a country far away from home. There he wasted everything he had on a wild lifestyle. He had nothing left when a severe famine spread throughout that country. He had nothing to live on. So he got a job from someone in that country and was sent to feed pigs in the fields. No one in the country would give him any food, and he was so hungry that he would have eaten what the pigs were eating.

        Finally, he came to his senses. He said, ‘How many of my father’s hired men have more food than they can eat, while I’m starving to death here? I’ll go at once to my father, and I’ll say to him, “Father, I’ve sinned against heaven and you. I don’t deserve to be called your son anymore. Make me one of your hired men.”’

        FORGIVENESS
        “So he went at once to his father. While he was still at a distance, his father saw him and felt sorry for him. He ran to his son, put his arms around him, and kissed him. Then his son said to him, ‘Father, I’ve sinned against heaven and you. I don’t deserve to be called your son anymore.’
        The father said to his servants, ‘Hurry! Bring out the best robe, and put it on him. Put a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet. Bring the fattened calf, kill it, and let’s celebrate with a feast. My son was dead and has come back to life. He was lost but has been found.’ Then they began to celebrate.
        “His older son was in the field. As he was coming back to the house, he heard music and dancing. 26 He called to one of the servants and asked what was happening.
        “The servant told him, ‘Your brother has come home. So your father has killed the fattened calf to celebrate your brother’s safe return.’
        “Then the older son became angry and wouldn’t go into the house. His father came out and begged him to come in. But he answered his father, ‘All these years I’ve worked like a slave for you. I’ve never disobeyed one of your commands. Yet, you’ve never given me so much as a little goat for a celebration with my friends. But this son of yours spent your money on prostitutes, and when he came home, you killed the fattened calf for him.’
        “His father said to him, ‘My child, you’re always with me. Everything I have is yours. But we have something to celebrate, something to be happy about. This brother of yours was dead but has come back to life. He was lost but has been found.’”

        THE LOVE THAT MOTIVATED THE FATHER
        I may speak all the languages of the world. But if I don’t have love, I am a loud gong or a clashing cymbal. I may have the gift to speak what God has revealed, and I may understand all mysteries and have all knowledge. I may even have enough faith to move mountains. But if I don’t have love, I am nothing. I may even give away all that I have and give up my body to be burned. But if I don’t have love, none of these things will help me.
        Love is patient. Love is kind. Love isn’t jealous. It doesn’t sing its own praises. It isn’t arrogant. It isn’t rude. It doesn’t think about itself. It isn’t irritable. It doesn’t keep track of wrongs. It isn’t happy when injustice is done, but it is happy with the truth. Love never stops being patient, never stops believing, never stops hoping, and never gives up.
        Love never comes to an end.

        A GODLY WOMAN
        “Who can find a wife with a strong character?
        She is worth far more than jewels.
        Her husband trusts her with all his heart,
        and he does not lack anything good.
        She helps him and never harms him all the days of her life.
        “She seeks out wool and linen with care
        and works with willing hands.
        She is like merchant ships.
        She brings her food from far away.
        She wakes up while it is still dark
        and gives food to her family
        and portions of food to her female slaves.
        “She picks out a field and buys it.
        She plants a vineyard from the profits she has earned.
        She puts on strength like a belt
        and goes to work with energy.
        She sees that she is making a good profit.
        Her lamp burns late at night.
        “She puts her hands on the distaff,
        and her fingers hold a spindle.
        She opens her hands to oppressed people
        and stretches them out to needy people.
        She does not fear for her family when it snows
        because her whole family
        has a double layer of clothing.
        She makes quilts for herself.
        Her clothes are made of linen and purple cloth.
        “Her husband is known at the city gates
        when he sits with the leaders of the land.
        “She makes linen garments and sells them
        and delivers belts to the merchants.
        She dresses with strength and nobility,
        and she smiles at the future.
        “She speaks with wisdom,
        and on her tongue there is tender instruction.
        She keeps a close eye on the conduct of her family,
        and she does not eat the bread of idleness.
        Her children and her husband
        stand up and bless her.
        In addition, he sings her praises, by saying,
        ‘Many women have done noble work,
        but you have surpassed them all!’
        “Charm is deceptive, and beauty evaporates,
        but a woman who has the fear of God should be praised.
        Reward her for what she has done,
        and let her achievements praise her at the city gates.”

  3. That man was not enlightened out about; he was darkened about it. That’s a challenge I’m ready to accept. Do you think that earth in flat according to Qur’an? No, it’s not Spreading the earth means God created it easy for us to travel; created it and arranged it for us to live. Earth is round but we feel it’s flat because we see’n walk it like a carpet. Thus, God reminded us of the same experience.

    • YO MO,

      TELL US ABOUT THE FLYING DONKEY!

      THE QUESTION EVERY MOHAMMEDAN MUST ANSWER:

      DO MOHAMMEDANS BELIEVE IN SANTA?

      SANTA HAS HIS RUDOLPH & MUHAMMAD HAD HIS BURAQ

      AIR BURAQ

      Buraq The Red Nosed Donkey

      Buraq, the red-nosed Donkey
      had a very shiny nose
      and if you ever saw it
      you would even say it glows.

      All of the other Donkeys
      used to laugh and call him names
      They never let poor Buraq
      play in any Donkey games.

      Then one foggy Ramadan eve
      Muhammad came to say:
      “Buraq with your nose so bright,
      won’t you guide me to Heaven tonight?”

      Then all the Donkeys loved him
      as they shouted out with glee,
      Buraq the red-nosed Donkey,
      you’ll go down in history!

      MUHAMMAD’S NIGHT JOURNEY

      No Muslim can deny the importance of Mohammed’s night journey in Islam, because this trip determined the Islamic rituals of praying five times a day, and performing ablution – or washing before prayer. In other words Mohammed’s night journey should impact the lives of 1.5 billion Muslims all over the world – five times – each and every day.

      Qur’an, sura 17.1

      “Glory to (Allah) Who did take His servant for a Journey by night from the Sacred Mosque to the farthest Mosque, whose precincts We did bless,- in order that We might show him some of Our Signs: for He is the One Who heareth and seeth (all things)”.

      Mohammed’s alleged overnight trip covered the 1,000 miles from Mecca to Jerusalem, a trip to heaven, and a return to Mecca by morning, and is described in part as follows:

      Sahih Muslim, Book 001, Number 0309:
      It is narrated on the authority of Anas b. Malik that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: I was brought al-Buraq Who is an animal white and long, larger than a donkey but smaller than a mule, who would place his hoof a distance equal to the range of vision. I mounted it and came to the Temple (Bait Maqdis in Jerusalem), then tethered it to the ring used by the prophets. I entered the mosque and prayed two rak’ahs in it, and then came out and Gabriel brought me a vessel of wine and a vessel of milk.

      So Mohammed flew on al-Buraq to the temple in Jerusalem, tied it up to a ring “the prophets” had used in the past, and went on in to the Temple to pray. Because of the fantastic nature of Mohammed’s claims, some 21st century Muslims try to suggest that this was a vision or dream, but according to perhaps the most highly regarded historian of Islam:

      Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 228:
      Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:
      The sights which Allah’s Apostle was shown on the Night Journey when he was taken to Bait-ul-Maqdis (i.e. Jerusalem) were actual sights, (not dreams). And the Cursed Tree (mentioned) in the Quran is the tree of Zaqqum (itself).

      Additionally, the rock enshrined in the Dome of the Rock on the temple mount, is supposed to be where Mohammed and Baraq launched from, for the leg of the trip to heaven. So it would be untenable to suggest that Mohammed’s journey was a dream or vision, while at the same time claiming that he launched from a very much physical and tangible rock, on the temple mount.

      Doubtless there were many skeptics when Mohammed recounted the details of his trip the morning after his night journey on the flying animal. As Dr. Rafat Amari points out in the introduction to “Islam: In Light of History”, Abu Bakar (the first assistant of Mohammed who became his first Caliph) confirmed Mohammed’s descriptions of the temple he had visited, because Abu Baker claimed he had once taken a journey to Jerusalem and had seen the temple himself, and remembered it to be just as Mohammed had described it.

      There is, however, a little difficulty with their accounts. The temple had been torn down over 500 years before their claims of personal visits to it. Indeed if Mohammed had actually hitched his flying animal anywhere near where the temple had been, as he claimed “the prophets” had hitched theirs, at the time in history that his night flight is supposed to have occurred, he would have found that the temple mount was being used as a garbage dump. The Muslim’s own Caliph Omar would have observed this when he marched into Jerusalem in 639 AD, not very many years after Mohammed offered his account detailed above.

      While Mohammed and Bakr didn’t need to be concerned about their largely illiterate followers traveling the 1,000 miles from Mecca to Jerusalem, to scrutinize their accounts, what excuse do today’s Muslims have in this 21st century information age?

      “In light of all this, we ask the following questions:

      * What Temple did Muhammad visit, enter and pray at before ascending to heaven?
      * Seeing that the Quran mentions a journey to a Mosque that did not exist during the lifetime of Muhammad, how can you consider the Quran to be 100% the word of God?
      * In light of the fact that both the Quran and the Islamic traditions contain this historical error, how can you trust either source to provide you with reliable information on the life of Muhammad and the first Muslims?
      * Does not the fact that the Quran mentions a Mosque which was only erected in AD 691 prove that there were Muslims who unashamedly and deceitfully added stories to the Quranic text and passed them off as revelation from God?
      * If you cannot find an answer to this historical problem within the Quran, why do you still remain a Muslim?”

      • SHIA’S VIEW OF MOHAMMED’S WIVES

        The Shia insult the wives of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.), even though the Quran refers to Prophet Muhammad’s wives as Mothers of the Believers.
        Let’s examine what the Shia’s books say:

        1. When Shia’s Imam Mahdi (the 12th Shia Imam) comes, he will bring Prophet Mohammad’s wife, Aisha, back to life, whip her as a punishment to avenge Prophet Muhammad’s daughter, Fatima. (Al-Shafi, Vol. 2, p. 108), (Haq-ul-Yaqeen, p. 139 & 347) & (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. 2, p. 901)

        2. Prophet Mohammad’s wives, Aisha and Hafsa, are accused of poisoning Prophet Mohammad. (Jila-ul-Ayoun, p. 118)

        3. Abu Bakr, Omar, Aisha & Hafsa poisoned Mohammad. (Quran Translation by Shia Scholar, Maqbool H. Dehlevi, Chap. 28, p. 894)

        4. Aisha is insulted and described negatively. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 879) & (Tohfa-e-Hanfia Dar Jawab Tohfa-e-Jaffria, p. 271 & p. 334)

        5. Aisha and Hafsa were hypocrite and infidel women. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, p. 900)

        6. Aisha was a hypocrite. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, p. 867)

        7. Aisha was an infidel woman. (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, p. 726)

        8. Aisha is accused of committing adultery. (Quran Majeed by Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi, p. 840)

        9. An insult to Aisha and prophet Mohammad’s companion, Muawiyah. (Tohfa-e-Hanfia Dar Jawab Tohfa-e-Jaffria, p. 65)

        10. Prophet Mohammad’s wife, Hafsa, was an indecent woman. (Tohfa-e-Hanfia Dar Jawab Tohfa-e-Jaffria, p. 123)

        Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 713:
        Narrated Ibn Abbas:

        ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab used to let Ibn Abbas sit beside him, so ‘AbdurRahman bin ‘Auf said to ‘Umar, “We have sons similar to him.” ‘Umar replied, “(I respect him) because of his status that you know.” ‘Umar then asked Ibn ‘Abbas about the meaning of this Holy Verse:– “When comes the help of Allah and the conquest of Mecca . . .” (110.1)

        Ibn ‘Abbas replied, “That indicated the death of Allah’s Apostle which Allah informed him of.” ‘Umar said, “I do not understand of it except what you understand.”

        Narrated ‘Aisha: The Prophet in his ailment in which he died, used to say, “O ‘Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison.”

        end quote.

        Okay, so Aisha is alleging here the Prophet Muhammad al-Mustafa(SAWW) allegedly died from alleged poison he ate at the battle of Khaibar. This is impossible!!! The battle of Khaibar happened in around 6 AH or 7 AH (at the latest); that is in the “common era” 628 C.E. or 629 C.E. (at the latest). All the sources tell us the Prophet Muhammad al-Mustafa(SAWW) died in 10 AH or 632 C.E. in the “common era”. So that means the Prophet(SAWW) lived for 3 to 4 years after the battle of Khaibar!!! Have you ever heard of someone allegedly eating poison in a food; and then allegedly living for another 3 or 4 years. ALSO CRITICALLY keep in mind there is no evidence that the Prophet(SAWW) was sick during this 3 or 4 year period, at the very minimum we’d expect to see signs of someone suffering throughout those 3 or 4 years with the effects of the poison! Obviously there was no poison presented over this 3 or 4 years, it was aisha bint abi bakr and hafsa bint umar who carried out the evil crime on the orders of their sinful fathers Abu Bakr and Umar ibn al-Khattab the homosexual drunkard.

        PROPHET MUHAMMAD WAS MURDERED

        Section : Articles || Date : 2010 / 06 / 17 || Reading : 16020

        This article is the transcription of a lecture delivered by His Eminence Shaykh Yasser Al-Habib, on “Who Killed Allah’s Messenger?”
        Even today the Muslims know very little of their Prophet’s history (Peace be upon him and his pure family). Therefore, they believe he died a natural death, but in fact, he had been assassinated. This fact should not come as a surprise to anyone, given the fact that the Holy Quran had predicted it clearly in Chapter Aal Imran as Allah the Almighty said:”And Muhammad is no more than a messenger; many were the messengers that passed away before him; if then he died or is killed will you then turn back upon your heels? And whoever turns back upon his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah; and Allah will reward the grateful.” (144:3).
        Let’s pay particular attention to this section: “if then he died or is killed”. It confirms that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) would not die a natural death. Rather, it confirms that he would be killed. The conjunctive (or) in this verse means “Rather”. In Arabic, sometimes (or) indicates uncertainty and probability. In other contexts, it imparts correction. Since it is next to impossible that anyone should suspect Allah’s word, since He has insight into the unknown, Allah must have intended to impart the other meaning. Accordingly, the meaning of the verse is: “If he died, rather, he is killed, you turn upon your heels.” By analogy, Allah said in Chapter Al Saffat, speaking of Prophet Yunis (Peace be upon him); “And We sent him to a hundred thousand, or they exceeded.” (37:147) That is, “And We sent him to a hundred thousand, rather they exceeded.”
        In Hadiths, even those reported by the Bakri sect, it is confirmed that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) was martyred. For example, Ahmed Ibn Hanbal, Al-Tabarani and Al-Sanaani among other famous scholars of the Bakri sect, reported Abdullah Ibn Massoud, a companion to Allah’s Prophet, saying: “I am willing to take an oath nine times that the Prophet was murdered, but I am not willing to take an oath even once that he was not. This is because Allah made him a Prophet and a martyr as well.”(Refer: Masnad Ahmed, Vol I, Page 408; Mojam Al-Tabrani, Vol X, Page 109; Musannaf Al-Sanaani, Vol V, Page 268).
        How then was the Prophet murdered, and who were the perpetrators of such a heinous crime? In fact, it is from this point that the paths of Shiites and the Bakri sect diverge. While Bakri sect claim that the Prophet was poisoned by the Jews, Shiites stress that he was poisoned by his two wives Ayesha and Hafsa, as commanded by their fathers Abu Bakr and Omar. Let us take a look at the evidences of each party to decide which one is true.
        Bakri sect says that when the Prophet’s army won the Kheibar battle defeating the army of the Jews, a Jewish woman, Zeinab Bint Al-Harith invited him and his companions to a banquet. That woman wanted to take revenge upon the Prophet because her brother Murhab Bin Al-Harith, who was commander of the Jewish Army, had been killed by Imam Ali (Peace be upon him) and this had led to the victory of the Muslim Army. The Jewish leaders used the woman’s desire to take revenge and goaded her into assassinating the Prophet. She poisoned the meat she cooked for the Prophet and his fellows. The Prophet died after having the poisoned meat.
        This is the belief of Bakri sect, but it can easily be refuted by the following scientific evidence:
        Firstly, the Khaibar Battle took place in the seventh year of Hegira. While the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) died in the eleventh year. This means that there is a time gap of four years between the two incidents. It is very unlikely that a person dies because of a poison he had taken so many years ago. It is also because generally the effect of poison is immediate and even if it takes time it cannot exceed a few months in which the health condition deteriorates gradually. In the case of the Prophet, we notice that he had been in the peak of his health and throughout the said four years he had no unusual health complaints. He would participate in the battles to defend Muslims as usual. Thus, it defies any logic that his health deteriorated suddenly and he died of a poison he had had taken more than four years ago despite the fact that he enjoyed good health throughout that intervening period.
        Secondly, if we accept that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) consumed that poisoned food, it will be a proof of his not being a true Prophet– May Allah forbid! This is because it was the Jews and the woman who wanted to put the Prophet under trial by means of their scheme. Is he truly a Prophet who gets revelation from Allah? If he was a Prophet, he would know that this food was poisoned and would not consume it. If not, he would consume it. Authentic Hadiths provide that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) knew it and did not consume the food. He admonished his retinue not to consume it either. This was one of his miracles due to which the Jewish woman was so impressed that she converted to Islam, for that she earned the Prophet’s forgiveness and exemption from punishment.
        Al-Bukhari and Al-Darami and other famous scholars of Bakri Sect relate that “When Muslims won the battle of Kheibar, the Jews invited the Prophet to a banquet in which they had served poisoned mutton. The Prophet ordered his followers to call up all the Jews to speak to them. When they were present, he asked them: “If I ask you something, will you answer me honestly?” “Yes”, they answered. “Have you put poison in this mutton?” he asked. “Yes”, they answered. “Why?” he wondered. “We wanted to know whether you are a true prophet or not” they answered. “If you are a true prophet, this would not hurt you. But, if you are not, we would get rid of you”. (Refer: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol IV, Page 66; Sunan Al-Darmi, Vol I, Page 33).
        Al-Khateb relates: “A Jewish woman cooked poisoned mutton and offered it to the Prophet and his retinue. The Prophet said to his retinue: “Do not consume this food. It is poisoned. He then asked the woman: “Why have you done this?”, to which question she answered, “So that I can tell whether you are a true or false prophet? If you are true, Allah will reveal you that this food is poisoned so you won’t consume it. But, if you were false, you would eat it and die. Thereby, I would relieve people of you.” (Refer: History of Baghdad, Vol VII, Page 384).
        Contrary to these Hadiths, there are other Hadiths that tell that the Prophet actually consumed some of that food. In the process, he admonished his followers to stop eating, and that one of them did really die. The Prophet ordered to have the woman killed. Obviously, these Hadiths are not authentic, and cannot be trusted. As we have already pointed out, this is because they mean that the Prophet was false, having discovered that the food was poisoned so late that one of his followers had already become a victim.
        It should be noted that Al-Baihiqi and Abu Dawood and other famous scholars of the Bakri Sect confirmed that the Prophet neither killed, nor punished Zeinab Bint Al-Harith. (Refer: Sunann Al-Baihiqi Vol VIII, Page 46; Sunan Abu Dawood , Vol II, Page 369).
        Al-Zohri, a great ancient scholar, confirmed that the Jewish woman was not killed although this was commonly believed by some people. Rather, she converted to Islam, and was forgiven by the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family). (Refer: Musannaf Al-Sanaani, Vol XI, Page 29, Prophet’s Biography by Ibn Kathier, Vol III, Page 389).
        Third: a most significant Hadith as maintained by the Bakri sect to ascribe Prophet’s sudden death to the poisoning attempt by the Jews four years ago, is one that was reported by Bukhari from Ayesha. She relates: “Allah’s Prophet told me on his death bed, ‘Ayesha, since I consumed that poisoned food after the Kheibar Battle, I have been in pain. Now it is the time for my heart to stop beating because of that poison.” (Refer: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol V, Page 137).
        We cannot trust that Hadith for many reasons: one of which is the fact that Ayesha is an infamous liar. She would lie even to the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family). Al-Bukhari reported Ayesha saying: “Allah’s Prophet was eating honey at Zeinab Bint Jahsh place. So Hafsa and I agreed to tell him, upon his return that he smelled of Maghafeer”. (Refer: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol 6, Page 68. Maghafeer is a substance extracted from a tree. It has a sweet taste but very foul smell.)
        Ayesha knew that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) had taken honey from his other wife, Zeinab Bint Jahsh. Being jealous of her, she agreed with her friend, Hafsa, to hurt the Prophet by claiming that he smelled foul when he consumed that honey. Thereby, he would stop eating it, and consequently stop visiting his wife, Zeinab.
        That was a lie. A woman, who would not abstain from lying to the noblest prophet, would not abstain from lying to ordinary people, either. Therefore, the Hadiths reported by her cannot be trusted, especially when she, herself, was accused of being involved in the murder of the Prophet. Naturally, she would try to divert suspicion by pointing fingers at others.
        Let us not forget that the Holy Quran stated that Ayesha and Hafsa were sinful wrongdoers whose hearts deviated from the true path. Allah warned them that by merely marrying the Prophet, they would not be exempted from going to hell. This was set forth in the Chapter Al Tahreem: “If you both turn to Allah, then indeed your hearts are already inclined (to this); and if you back up each other against him, then surely Allah is his Guardian, and Jibreel and the believers that do good, and the angels after that are the helpers. (…) Allah sets forth an example to those who disbelieve the wife of Nuh and the wife of Lut: they were both under two of our righteous servants, but they acted treacherously towards them so they availed them naught against Allah, and it was said: Enter both the fire with those who enter.” (66:10 &4)
        Two women who lie and receive harsh words from Allah in a full chapter would not abstain from lying. Undoubtedly, they were poised to commit any misdeed, even if it was the assassination of the Prophet himself.
        Let us not forget that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) had described Ayesha as “The spearhead of disbelief and the horn of Satan”. Ahmed Ibn Hanbal and other famous scholars of Bakri Sect related: “The Prophet, (Peace be upon him), emerged from Ayesha’s room saying this is the spearhead of disbelief! It is from here that Satan’s horn emerges”! (Refer: Masnad Ahmed, Vol II, Page 23).
        A woman condemned by Allah as wrongdoer, and threatened to be tortured in hell if she does not repent, and one described by the Prophet as the spearhead of disbelief and Satan’s horn; one who confesses to having lied to the Prophet is a woman whose Hadiths cannot be trusted, especially if they seem to be in her favour.
        One of the reasons why we should not believe in Ayesha’s Hadith about poisoning the Prophet is that she contradicts herself in another Hadith. She claimed that the Prophet did not die because of the Jewish woman’s poison. Rather, the cause of his death was because of another disease! According to Abu Yoalla, Ayesha also said that: “Allah’s Prophet, (Peace be upon him), died of an ailment Dhatul Janb”! (Refer: Masnad Abu Yoalla, Vol. VIII, Page 258. Dhadul Janb is an internal tumour that forms on man’s side. It leads to death when it explodes.)
        Ayesha claimed that, although the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) had ruled out the possibility of the Prophet developing such a tumour due to its being a demonic one that a Prophet would not develop. The Prophet said of that tumour: “It is Satanic, and I cannot develop it because Allah has delivered me from any of Satan’s powers”. (Refer: The Beginning and the End, Ibn Katheir, Vol. V, Page 245).
        It seems that Ayesha was confused while putting her point before the general public with regard to the issue of Prophet’s killing. When she claimed he died because of that Jewish woman’s poison consumed four years ago, people did not find that very plausible. Therefore, she came up with another cause of death. Therefore, she made up another reason, namely that of the lateral tumor. Thereby, she contradicted herself. This confusion itself points fingers at her and even gives rise to suspicions about her.
        Now that we are sure of the implausibility of the Bakri version of the Prophet’s murder (Peace be upon him and his pure family) due to the shortcomings, contradictions and poor evidence. Now, we can move on to the Shiite version.
        Generally, Shiite Hadiths are more credible. They are a set of the statements by the Imams from the Prophet’s family (Peace be upon them all). Undoubtedly, those Imams were far better informed of their grandfather’s, the Prophet’s, history and of his religion. None of them may lie, because the Quran confirmed their innocence against the sins. The Prophet had ordered that their words and deeds be followed. All Muslims agree to the fact that those Imams were very truthful, noble, faithful and chaste.
        The Imams confirmed that their grandfather, the Prophet, had been poisoned in his last days by Ayesha and Hafsa, at the order of their fathers, Abu Bakr and Omar. Abu Bakr and Omar were conspiring to usurp the throne after the demise of the Prophet. However, the Prophet would also stress that his rightful successor would be his cousin, and the husband of his daughter, Imam Ali (Peace be upon him). He even coerced them once to pledge allegiance to him on the Ghadir Day.
        At the same time, the Prophet brought to light the fact that some of his companions and wives would turn against his successor. He warned his followers against this, stressing that it would be their test from Allah. Those who would show their allegiance to the rightful successor would pass the test and go to heaven. While those who would let him down and support the rebels, would go to the eternal hell since they would be apostates. That is, deserters who converted back to disbelief, even if they called themselves Muslims.
        Sometimes, the Prophet would confront Abu Bakr, Omar, Ayesha and Hafsa with the fact that they hated his heir, predicting in their presence that their conspiracy would succeed to oust him from power. The Prophet did that as ordered by Allah to put those four into a further test.
        One of the famous ancient Shia interpreters of Quran relates a Hadith as reported by the Imams that further elaborates on the Prophet’s assassination. That interpreter is Ali Ibn Ibrahim Al-Qommi, a great scholar who lived in the days of Imam Al-Hassan Al-Askry (Peace be upon him). He was known among Shias for his veracity and honesty in the way he related Hadith from Imams.
        The Hadith reported by Ali Ibn Ibrahim says: “The Prophet said to Hafsa: I will tell you a secret. If you divulge it, Allah, His Angels and people will curse you. So, what is it? wondered Hafsa. The Prophet said: Abu Bakr will be able to seize the Caliphate and power after me, and will be succeeded by your father, Omar. Hafsa wondered: Who informed you of this? Allah, the Omnipresent, the Omniscient informed me. On the same day, Hafsa divulged the secret to her friend, Ayesha. In turn, Ayesha divulged the secret to her father, Abu Bakr. So, Abu Bakr came to Omar and said: My daughter Ayesha told me a secret reported by Hafsa, but I cannot always trust what Ayesha says. So, you ask your daughter Hafsa, make sure and tell me. Omar went over to Hafsa, and asked her. In the beginning, she was startled and denied it. But, Omar said to her: If you have indeed heard this secret, then, tell us so we can immediately seize power and get rid of Muhammad”. So, Hafsa said, yes, he told me that. At this point, those four got together and conspired to poison the Prophet” (Refer: Tafseer al-Qommi, Vol II, Page 367, Bihar-ul-Anwar by Allama al-Majlisi, Vol XXII, Page 239).
        There is another great ancient scholar of the Quran, Muhammad Ibn Massoud al-Ayashi who also belonged to the Bakri sect, but was later divinely guided to the true faith and converted to Shia faith and believed in the Imams. That scholar lived till the end of Third Century Hegira. Scholars have ever since relied on his book that he wrote to interpret the Holy Quran (Tafseer).
        When this great scholar reaches the point where he interpreted the verse I have referred to earlier, he relates a Hadith reported by al-Imam al-Sadiq (Peace be upon him) in which he confirms that Abu Bakr, Omar, Ayesha and Hafsa had committed the crime. Imam al-Sadiq (Peace be upon him) was sitting with a group of his followers, and asked them: “Do you know whether the Prophet died a natural death or was murdered? Allah the Almighty says: “if then he died or is killed”. The truth is that the Prophet was poisoned in his last days before he died. Ayesha and Hafsa administered poison in his food. Upon hearing this, the Imam Sadiq’s followers said that they and their fathers were among the worst villains ever created by Allah.” (Refer: Tafseer al-Ayashi, Vol I, Page 200; Bihar-ul-Anwar, by Allama Al-Majlisi, Vol XXII, Page 516)
        Al-Ayshi relates another Hadith attributed to Imam Al-Sadiq (Peace be upon him) in which he says: “al-Hussein Ibn Munther asked Imam Al-Sadiq about Allah’s words “if then he dies or is killed will you turn back upon your heels”. Does it mean that the Prophet died a natural death or was murdered? Imam Al-Sadiq said: In this verse, Allah refers to the Prophet’s companions who committed the misdeed”. (Refer: Tafseer Al Ayash, Vol I, Page 200; Bihar-ul-Anwar, By Allama Al-Majlisi, Vol XX, Page 91)
        These Hadiths confirm beyond doubt that the Supreme Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) was killed by poison administered in his last days and not which was allegedly given four years prior to his death. They also confirm that the crime was an act of treachery by his two wives and their fathers. Jews had nothing to do with this.
        If we take a closer look at the Quranic verse that speaks of the Prophet’s death, we notice its consistency with these Hadiths. The verse says: “And Muhammad is no more than an apostle; the apostles have already passed away before him; if then he dies or is killed will you turn back upon your heels? And whoever turns back upon his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah and Allah will reward the grateful.” (3:144).
        In that verse, Allah addresses the Prophet’s companions and not the Jews. The verse associates the (Prophet’s death) and the (turning back), which means apostasy. We hereby understand that the assassination of the Prophet was to be followed by turning back and apostasy. This actually happened, and turned in favour of the rebels who seized power, i.e. Abu Bakr and Omar. Thus, it was addressed to the accused in the first place and not to the Jews who were no longer a threat in Medina .
        It is true that the verse was quoted in relation to the Uhud battle, to reprimand the Prophet’s companions who had let him down, by fleeing and leaving him alone with Imam Ali amidst the non-Muslim warriors. But, the verse also speaks of the future. It says that a group of people would turn back and become apostates. They would bring no harm to Allah, because they would actually be harming themselves as they would go to hell. On the other hand, another group of people would keep their faith and would be well rewarded by Allah and enter the Heaven. This is because they were grateful to Allah for His blessings by keeping their allegiance to His Prophet and his rightful successor.
        It is now evident that the crime was described by these Hadiths and this is in consistence with the Quran. Therefore, it is obvious that the Shiite version of the Prophet’s assassination is trustworthy.
        But is there any evidence in the resources of Bakri sect, that supports the Shiite version and shows involvement of the Prophet’s two wives in the crime?
        In fact, most of the Hadiths that reach us through the pious Imams from among the Prophet’s descendants (peace be upon all of them) are supported by Hadiths in Bakri resources, even if implicitly. It is here that the power of Shiism, as it does not rely only on Shiite resources. Rather, it brings forth supporting evidence from the sources of other sects for the facts put forth by the Imams.
        There is a Hadith related by the famous scholars of Bakri sect like Bukhari, Muslim, Ahmed Ibn Hanbal and Ibn Kathier. In that Hadith, Ayesha confesses that when the Prophet was sleep during his illness she put a strange substance into his mouth with the help of the other wives. Ayesha did it intentionally despite Prophet’s prohibition. When the Prophet woke up, he saw the residuals of the substance that they had put into his mouth. He angrily asked what it was and who had disobeyed his orders. Ayesha and her collaborators justified their action saying that it was just a medication. Following that, they accused the Prophet’s uncle, Al-Abbas Ibn Abdul Muttalib. However, the Prophet acquitted his uncle and ordered that those who were with him in the room should be punished by having the same substance put into their mouths.
        Ayesha relates: “When Allah’s Prophet contracted the terminal disease, he told us: Don’t put the medicine in my mouth. But we disobeyed him on the ground that every patient dislikes medication! So, we put the substance in his mouth. When he
        regained his senses, he wondered: Who did that? Have I not admonished you not to do that? So, we said: It is your uncle Al-Abbas who thought that you might have contracted a lateral tumour! The Prophet said: This disease is caused by the Devil. I cannot contract it. The Prophet ordered that everyone in the house must put the same substance into their mouths, except Al-Abbas, as the Prophet said: He was not with you”. (Refer: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol VIII, Page 42; Sahih Muslim, Vol VII, Page 42; Masnad Ahmed Ibn Hanbal, Vol VI, Page 53; Prophet’s Biography by Ibn Kathier, Vol. IV, Page 446).
        It seems that people were confused about what had happened to the Prophet. This was the matter that forced Ayesha to relate this Hadith in an attempt to falsify and conceal the truth. She wanted to hide the truth of the substance that she put into the mouth of the Prophet, claiming that it was a medication. She explained that what she made was “lad”, which means administering medication to a side of the mouth.
        What exactly was that strange substance? Why did Ayesha and her collaborators intend to put it into the Prophet’s mouth during his sleep? Why did Ayesha and her collaborators falsely accuse Al-Abbas of the crime? Why did the Prophet order to have them punished by putting the substance into their mouth? Basically… how could Ayesha and her collaborators disobey the word of the Prophet?
        These controversies prove that a serious crime was perpetrated against the Prophet. If there had been no crime, the Prophet would not have ordered to punish the perpetrators. If that substance had been indeed a medicine, the Prophet would not have forbidden it to be put into his mouth. This would not have stirred his anger.
        Therefore, that substance must have been the poison that the Prophet’s children spoke of later. Those who helped Ayesha prepare it must have been Hafsa, Abu Bakr and Omar whose names were not revealed by Ayesha in her Hadith on that strange substance. Their interest was associated with the Prophet’s homicide, as they were going to seize power and oust his family from there.
        There remains a question unanswered: Can the two wives of the Prophet dare to kill him? Is it possible that Abu Bakr and Omar, who were among the Prophet’s companions, dared to commit such a crime?
        The answer is: It is not unlikely at all, because the Quran mentioned that the two wives of the prophets, Noah and Lut betrayed them and would go to hell. These verses in the Chapter Al Tahreem were revealed in the first place to address Ayesha and Hafsa by citing this example. In the same chapter, Allah testified the infidelity and wrongdoing of Ayesha and Hafsa. He threatened them strongly should they fail to repent, as I explained earlier.
        Quran predicted that the Prophet’s companions would turn against him as I have said earlier. The Prophet had also predicted in his several Hadiths that most of his companions would go to hell. History reveals that most betrayals and acts of treacheries that occurred after the Prophets were committed by their wives and companions.
        Al-Bukhari related that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) said: “On doomsday, when I will be at the water pond delivering water to those who will be thirsty among my followers, a group of my followers will come to drink but the angels will drive them away and take them to Hell! And I’ll say: Oh, God! They are my companions! But God will tell me: You do not know what they did after your death. They degraded themselves to apostasy. Following that, another group of my companions will come to drink but the angels will drive them away and take them to Hell. And I’ll say: Oh, God! They are my companions! But God will tell me: You do not know what they did after your death. They degraded themselves to apostasy. Thus, only small number of my companions will escape like deserted camels in the desert.” (Refer: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol VII, Page 206).
        No one can claim that Abu Bakr cannot be among those people who will be driven to Hell, since the Prophet himself did not exempt him from that.
        Imam of the Malki school of thought, Malik Ibn Anas, relates that the Prophet prophesied to the Muslim martyrs of Uhud that they would go to Heaven. So, Abu Bakr wondered: “Aren’t we their brothers who have submitted to Islam just as they did, and fought in jihad just as they did; so, why don’t you give us the good news that we will go to heaven? The Prophet said: “It is absolutely true that you are their brothers, but I do not know what you will do after my death”. (Refer: Al Muatta of Malik Ibn Anas, Vol II, Page 642).
        Therefore, we should not exempt Abu Bakr and Omar from the crime of having taken the life of the Prophet, especially when they had tried that once before when the Prophet was on his way back from the city of Tabuk. He had to go past a rough road up a mountain. That road is called Al-Aqaba by Arabs. Those who have to go down it, on a camel for example; must choose a camel with a very quiet disposition. Should it panic, it will trip and its rider will fall and die. Abu Bakr and Omar conspired with a group of the Prophet’s hypocrite companions. They would lie in wait for the Prophet at the time of his crossing this Aqaba to frighten his camel so that she falls and he dies. This fact was reported also by the Bakri resources in clear terms, but the Bakri people try to hide and deny this fact.
        Ibn Hazm Al-Alndulsi, a famous scholar of Bakri Sect, lashed at Al-Waleed Ibn Jamia, dismissing him as a liar. But why? Ibn Hazm says: “Because he related Hadiths that state that Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman, Talha and Sa’ad Ibn Abi Waqqas wanted to kill the Prophet and made sure that he met with the accident in Tabuk”. (Refer: Al Mohalla of Ibn Hazm, Vol. IX, Page 224).
        Al-Walid Ibn Jamia was not a Shiite. He belonged to the Bakri sect. Contrary to what Ibn Hazm said about him, he is so widely known for veracity and credibility that Ibn Habban would say “May Allah be pleased with him”, whenever his name was mentioned. The famous scholar of Bakri Sect in this field, “Al-Thahabi” also testified the truthfulness and credibility of this man. If he had not been honest, he would not have his Hadiths related by the famous compilers of Hadith like Muslim, Al-Baihiqi, Ahmed Ibn Hanbal and Ibn Shabba.
        So, Al-Walid Ibn Jamia is not a liar. This proves that Abu Bakr, Omar and their group indeed tried to murder the Prophet as he was passing through Al-Aqaba on his way back from Tabuk. This is a famous incident in which Allah saved the life of His Prophet by a miracle. The Prophet forgave the perpetrators and refrained from punishing them.
        Thereby, we can be sure that Abu Bakr and Omar indeed wanted to kill the Prophet. Though, their plan in Aqaba failed, their next plan succeeded by collusion with their daughters Ayesha and Hafsa who administered poison to the Prophet during his sleep. Just as the Prophet forgave those who tried to kill him in Al-Aqaba, Imam Ali did the same after the martyrdom of the Prophet, fulfilling the will of the Prophet so that Allah’s test continues for them and for the humanity as a whole.
        In fact, the Prophet was just a normal patient. During his sleep, Ayesha and Hafsa administered this poison in the Prophet’s mouth, in order to hasten the seizure of power by their fathers, while ousting the rightful successor, Ali Ibn Abi Talib. It was in this way the greatest and the noblest Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) fell prey to the treachery of his two wives and companions. This is a fact that most Muslims are not aware of.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s