Pakistan: 1600 Women killed in name of Honor Killing


[PPI] KARACHI- At least 1601 women were killed in Pakistan in the name of honor or for other reasons in 2013. According to data provided by the Madadgar National Helpline Founder Zia Ahmed Awan, at least 370 women were raped while 185 incidents of gang-rape were reported across the country. He said that 2133 women were tortured during the same year while 887 faced torture by police. Similarly, 608 women were abducted, some 406 were forcefully married which included 176 cases of Vani.1394203506-7079

He said that 217 women were killed after being raped, 220 of them were killed after being accused of Karo-kari, 1164 women were killed for unknown reasons while 452 committed suicide. Awan added that 193 women were burnt alive, 205 were smuggled and 220 ran away from their houses for different reasons. He said that at least 6516 incidents of crime against women were reported including 2602 in Punjab, 1883 in Sindh, 1181 in Khyber-Pakhtunkhua, and 864 in Balochistan.

He said that the given figures were compiled from different news reports and clients coming to the helpline for help. No such data about crimes against women was available with ministries at provincial and federal level.

He claimed that the given data had only some 10 percent of the incidents in Pakistan. Women who faced such situations were not able to register their cases with police due to their behavior, he said adding that women who face torture in marriage were reluctant to register criminal cases and only insist on divorce. He said that Pakistan could not progress until 51 percent of the population of the country is given its due respect and rights.

33 thoughts on “Pakistan: 1600 Women killed in name of Honor Killing

    • ALLAH AKBAR?

      ALLAH TOLD MUHAMMAD TO WANK BETWEEN THE THIGHS OF 6 YEAR OLD AISHA, & SHOOT HIS CUM ALL OVER HER NAKED BODY!

      ALLAH AKBAR?

      THE WANKING PERVERT FROM MECCA

      A marriage is engaged in by 2 consenting adults.
      Do you really believe a 6 year old child would desire to marry a 51 year old man?
      Do you think that is what she would choose?
      Do you think a 9 year old girl would desire to have sex with a 54 year old?

      The thought of an old man becoming aroused by a child is one of the most disturbing thoughts that makes us cringe as it reminds us of pedophilia and the most despicable people. It is difficult to accept that the “Holy Prophet” of Mecca married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and WANKED BETWEEN HER THIGHS FOR 3 YEARS and consummated/RAPED her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.

      HOW TO THIGH & GET HIGH

      Now let us see how thighing is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

      Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.

      According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

      Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

      Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.

      Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.”Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

      The inquirer asked the following: ‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’

      After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

      That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers'” (Fatwa No. 31409).

      Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

      AISHA WASHING SEMEN FROM MUHAMMAD’S CLOTHES

      From the Hadith of Bukhari:

      Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

      Narrated ‘Aisha:

      I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

      Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

      Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

      I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

      Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

      Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

      I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

      Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

      Narrated ‘Aisha:

      I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

      From the Hadith of Bukhari:

      Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

      Narrated ‘Aisha:

      I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

      Volume 1, Book 4, Number 230:

      Narrated ‘Aisha:

      as above (229).

      Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

      Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

      I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

      Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

      Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

      I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

      Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

      Narrated ‘Aisha:

      I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

      MUHAMMAD RESERVED BABY AISHA FOR HIMSELF, BECAUSE SHE WAS A VIRGIN & HE WANTED A VIRGIN.

      Sahih al-Bukhari, volume 7, book 62, number 17
      Narrated jabir bin ‘abdullah:
      When I got married, Allah’s apostle said to me, “what type of lady have you married?” I replied, “I have married a matron.” he said, “why, don’t you have a liking for the virgins and for fondling them?” Jabir also said: Allah’s apostle said, “why didn’t you marry a young girl so that you might play with her and she with you?”
      Hence, Muhammad’s comments indicate that his reason for marrying Aisha while a young virgin is so that he could fondle and sexually play with her!

      AISHA WAS NOT THE ONLY BABY GIRL MUHAMMAD FANTASIZED ABOUT

      In the classic history, Sirat Rasul Allah (The Life of Muhammad) by Ibn Ishaq, there is an account in which Muhammad expressed a marital interest in a crawling baby. This event seems to have occurred around the time of the battle of of Badr, when he was about 55 years old. He had married Aisha two years earlier, when he was 53 years of age.
      (Suhayli, ii. 79: in the Riwaya of Yunus i. I. Recorded that the apostle saw her (Ummu’lfadl) when she was a baby crawling before him and said,
      ‘if she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’
      but he died before she grew up and sufyan b. Al-aswad b. ‘Abdu’l-asad al-Makhzumi married her and she bore him rizq and lubab… [Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad, Karachi, p. 311]
      Muhammad saw Um Habiba the daughter of Abbas while she was fatim (age of nursing) and he said, “if she grows up while I am still alive, I will marry her.” (Musnad Ahmad, number 25636)

      MUHAMMAD WOULD BATH & FONDLE AISHA

      Bukhari (6:298) – Muhammad would take a bath with the little Aisha and fondle her.
      Narrated ‘Aisha:
      The prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me. While in itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses).

      MUHAMMAD CONSUMMATED HIS MARRIAGE TO BABY AISHA, WHEN SHE WAS 9

      Sunaan abu Dawud: book 11, number 2161:
      Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
      I and the apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) used to lie in one cloth at night while I was menstruating. If anything from me smeared him, he washed the same place (that was smeared), and did not wash beyond it. If anything from him smeared his clothe, he washed the same place and did not wash beyond that, and prayed with it (i.e. The clothe).

      MUHAMMAD WOULD SEXUALLY ABUSE HIS WIVES

      Bukhari (6:300) – Muhammad’s wives had to be available for the prophet’s fondling even when they were having their menstrual period.
      Bukhari volume 1, book 6, number 299:
      Narrated ‘Abdur-rahman bin al-Aswad:
      …(on the authority of his father) ‘Aisha said: “Whenever Allah’s apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used to order her to put on an izar and start fondling her.” ‘Aisha added, “None of you could control his sexual desires as the prophet could.”

      WOMEN ARE SEXUAL OBJECTS

      Allah promoted this abusive sexual behavior:
      “Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will” [Koran 2:223]
      Koran (2:223) likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills. In this verse, Allah also gives divine sanction for anal sex.
      According to Islam, Muhammad is the perfection of humanity and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct. He had sex with Aisha at the age of nine, which amounts to rape of a minor. He also left behind an enduring legacy for aged Muslim men to fulfill their carnal desires contrary to natural law and to the life-long devastation of young girls.

      ALLAH PROMOTES PEDOPHILIA

      Quran 65.4 “and those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘iddah (prescribed divorce period), if you have doubts (about their periods), is three months, and for those who have no courses [(i.e. They are still immature) their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise, except in case of death] . And for those who are pregnant (whether they are divorced or their husbands are dead), their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is until they deliver (their burdens) (give birth) and whosoever fears Allah and keeps his duty to him, he will make his matter easy for him.”
      Sura (65:4) lays down rules for divorce and sets the prescribed period for divorce. It clearly says, Muslim men can marry (and divorce) little girls who have not yet reached menstruation age. This means that Muslim men were allowed to marry baby girls. This is the eternal word of god. This is an eternal law of Allah. All Muslims must believe in this teaching. Otherwise, they are no longer Muslims but apostates of Islam.

      ALLAH ORDAINS RAPE

      “All married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” 4:24
      You can have sex with slaves women captured in war (with whom you may rape or do whatever you like).
      Muhammad established an appalling precedent for abuse of young girls which is continued to be nurtured by the Muslim faithful. For example, Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran gave a fatwa about Quran 65.4:
      “A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man’s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl’s sister.”

      • Lucky bin Satan, have you become bankrupt already??? Don’t you have any NEW material against Islam, dumbie???

        Islam is a very good religion, where people pray five times a day and do NOT drin and do NOT womanise, and their women are treated like pearls, and are in constant remembrance of the creator of the Worlds.

        What will they do now that you have become their “spiritual leader”, wanky???

  1. PAKISTAN TO BE RENAMED PORNISTAN!

    No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan

    By Kelli Morgan
    Published July 13, 2010
    FoxNews.com

    Pakistan Protests Websites

    This article was updated on July 14.

    They may call it the “Land of the Pure,” but Pakistan turns out to be anything but.

    The Muslim country, which has banned content on at least 17 websites to block offensive and blasphemous material, is the world’s leader in online searches for pornographic material, FoxNews.com has learned.

    “You won’t find strip clubs in Islamic countries. Most Islamic countries have certain dress codes,” said Gabriel Said Reynolds, professor of Islamic Studies at the University of Notre Dame. “It would be an irony if they haven’t shown the same vigilance to pornography.”

    So here’s the irony: Google ranks Pakistan No. 1 in the world in searches for pornographic terms, outranking every other country in the world in searches per person for certain sex-related content.

    Pakistan is top dog in searches per-person for “horse sex” since 2004, “donkey sex” since 2007, “rape pictures” between 2004 and 2009, “rape sex” since 2004, “child sex” between 2004 and 2007 and since 2009, “animal sex” since 2004 and “dog sex” since 2005, according to Google Trends and Google Insights, features of Google that generate data based on popular search terms.

    The country also is tops — or has been No. 1 — in searches for “sex,” “camel sex,” “rape video,” “child sex video” and some other searches that can’t be printed here.

    Google Trends generates data of popular search terms in geographic locations during specific time frames. Google Insights is a more advanced version that allows users to filter a search to geographic locations, time frames and the nature of a search, including web, images, products and news.

    Pakistan ranked No. 1 in all the searches listed above on Google Trends, but on only some of them in Google Insights.

    “We do our best to provide accurate data and to provide insights into broad search patterns, but the results for a given query may contain inaccuracies due to data sampling issues, approximations, or incomplete data for the terms entered,” Google said in a statement, when asked about the accuracy of its reports.

    The Embassy of Islamic Republic of Pakistan did not reply to a request for an interview.

    In addition to banning content on 17 websites, including islamexposed.blogspot.com, Pakistan is monitoring seven other sites — Google, Yahoo, Bing, YouTube, Amazon, MSN and Hotmail — for anti-Islamic content, the Associated Press reported in June.

    But it’s not to censor the Pakistani people, Reynolds said. It’s to shut out the rest of the world.

    “[It] could lead to conversion, which would undermine the very order of the state,” he said. “Part of protecting the society is making sure that there is no way it could be undermined in terms of foreign influences.”

    Pakistan temporarily banned Facebook in May when Muslim groups protested the “Everybody Draw Muhammad Day” page, where users were encouraged to upload pictures of the Prophet Muhammad. The page remained on Facebook, but Pakistani users were unable to view it, said Andrew Noyes, manager of Facebook’s Public Policy Communication.

    And while Pakistan is taking measures to prevent blasphemous material from being viewed by its citizens, pornographic material is “certainly” contradictory to Islam, too, Reynolds said.

    The country’s punishment for those charged with blasphemy is execution, but the question remains what — if anything — can be done about people who search for porn on the Web.

    “It’s a new phenomenon,” Reynolds said.

  2. MUHAMMAD INTRODUCED HONOR MURDER TO HIS GANG OF CUT-0THROATS:

    MUHAMMAD THE SERIAL KILLER

    [Muhammad] captured the hearts of the people with his boundless sympathy and human kindness. He ruled justly. He did not swerve from truth and righteousness. He did not oppress even his deadly enemies, men who had sworn to kill him, who pelted him with stones, who turned him out of his homeland, who pitched the whole of Arabia against him—nay, not even those who chewed the raw liver of his dead uncle in a frenzy of vengeance. He forgave them all when he triumphed over them. He never took revenge on anyone for his personal grievances. He never retaliated against anyone for the wrongs perpetrated on him. [1]

    The ethical and the religious history of the world presents perhaps but one instance of acting up to the idealistic saying “Love thy enemy.” The Holy Prophet had nothing but the tenderest treatment to mete out to such dangerous enemies as the hypocrites. He never punished them for their offenses. . . . The Holy Prophet’s generosity even towards his enemies stands unique in the annals of the world. . . . [T]he Holy Prophet’s forgiveness was unbounded. . . . A report from Aishah says that he never avenged any wrong to his own person. . . . Forgiveness was another most radiant gem in the Holy Prophet’s character. It found its perfect manifestation in him. [2]

    There is no ground for the oft-repeated allegation that Islam is intolerant and was propagated by the sword. The Kur’an states clearly “there is no compulsion in religion.” [3]

    These passages have much in common. First, they are modern writings that reflect modern notions about Muhammad. Today’s Muslims typically believe that Muhammad wouldn’t have squashed a mosquito unless the mosquito had first waged war against Islam. Second, modern writings of this sort seldom, if ever, provide references for their assertions. They glorify Muhammad and his gentle nature, but they fail to support their claims with early sources (such as Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah or the Sahih Al-Bukhari). Third, modern writings about Muhammad characteristically ignore historical facts that call Muslim views into question. When they do address such facts, they often deny the evidence, choosing instead to hold to their idealized and unrealistic portrait of Muhammad. Indeed, Muslim “explanations” of difficult passages frequently turn out to be nothing more than circular affirmations of faith in Muhammad. When faced with a concerned questioner, the debate often proceeds as follows:

    Muslim: “Muhammad was the greatest moral example ever! He was so kind and tolerant! He never hurt anyone unless they were waging a war against Islam!”

    Questioner: “What about all the men and women he assassinated?”

    Muslim: “Muhammad couldn’t have done such things, because he’s the greatest moral example ever! Shame on his earliest and closest followers and biographers for making up a bunch of immoral stories about him!” [4]

    Questioner: “But how do we know he was the greatest moral example ever?”

    Muslim: “Because of all the historical evidence!”

    Questioner: “What about the historical evidence that he was sometimes a poor moral example?”

    Muslim: “That evidence is all wrong!”

    Questioner: “How do we know it’s wrong?”

    Muslim:

    “Because Muhammad is the greatest moral example ever! Don’t listen to what the early Muslims said about Muhammad’s murders, tortures, robberies, etc. Just listen to what they said about his acts of kindness!”

    This argument may seem convincing to a Muslim who has been taught all his life that Muhammad was morally flawless. But to an unbiased inquirer, such reasoning is silly. If we want to determine whether or not Muhammad was a good moral example, our only reasonable option is to examine the earliest, most reliable writings and to use these writings to get an overall picture of his character. If a Muslim wants to object to a particular story about Muhammad, he should do so on historical grounds, not on dogmatic ones.
    The earliest extant biography of Muhammad is the Sirat Rasul Allah by Muhammad Ibn Ishaq, who was born at the beginning of the eighth century AD in Medina. His grandfather, Yasar, became a Muslim shortly after being captured around AD 634. Yasar’s son Ishaq began collecting traditions about Muhammad, and his grandson Muhammad followed in the footsteps of his father Ishaq. By age thirty, Muhammad Ibn (“son of”) Ishaq was recognized as an authority on the traditions about Muhammad. He compiled the most reliable sources into the Sirat Rasul Allah, providing us with an early, largely accurate, and authoritative source on the life of Muhammad.

    Most of the following accounts are taken from Ibn Ishaq’s work. As the title of this essay implies, I have focused here on cases displaying Muhammad’s cruelty, for these stories are almost always omitted in modern Muslim accounts of the life of Muhammad. However, it must not be forgotten that the Sirat Rasul Allah contains many instances of Muhammad’s kindness and mercy; thus, the following excerpts should be considered alongside the more favorable traditions.

    The Case of Uqba bin Abu Mu’ayt

    Of all the people killed by Muhammad, Uqba was among those most worthy of punishment. He ridiculed and tormented Muhammad while the latter was still in Mecca. Indeed, Uqba was so disrespectful that he once spit in Muhammad’s face, [5] and he later fought the Muslims at Badr. He is only listed here because of the particularly callous response that Muhammad gave him at his execution: “When the apostle ordered him to be killed Uqba said, ‘But who will look after my children, O Muhammad?’ ‘Hell,’ he said.” [6]

    The Case of Ka’b bin al-Ashraf

    When Ka’b heard of all the men who had been killed by Muslims at the Battle of Badr, he wept for the departed and composed a poem in memory of their good works. The Muslims responded with poetry of their own. One Muslim woman answered:
    Would that those weltering in their blood
    Could be seen by those who live between Mecca’s mountains!
    They would know for certain and would see
    How they were dragged along by hair and beard. [7]

    After this, Ka’b wrote poetry against the Muslim women, and Muhammad subsequently called for his assassination:

    The apostle said . . . “Who will rid me of Ibnu’l-Ashraf [Ka’b]?” Muhammad bin Maslama . . . said, “I will deal with him for you, O apostle of God, I will kill him.” [Muhammad] said, “Do so if you can.” . . . The apostle said, “All that is incumbent upon you is that you should try.” [The assassin] said, “O apostle of God, we shall have to tell lies.” He answered, “Say what you like, for you are free in this matter.” [8]

    Muhammad bin Maslama, having received from Muhammad permission to lie, proceeded with his plan to murder Ka’b. The Muslims sent Silkan, a lover of poetry, to befriend Ka’b. Silkan and Ka’b spent some time reciting verses to one another, until the former asked a favor of his new friend. Silkan said that he and his companions wanted to buy some food from Ka’b and that he would put down a number of weapons as a pledge until payment could be made. He did this so that Ka’b “would not take alarm at the sight of weapons when they brought them.” The Muslims came later with their weapons and invited Ka’b to join them for a walk, and he gladly joined them.

    [A]fter a time Abu Na’ila ran his hand through [Ka’b’s] hair. Then he smelt his hand, and said, “I have never smelt a scent finer than this.” They walked on farther and he did the same so that Ka’b suspected no evil. Then after a space he did it for the third time, and cried, “Smite the enemy of God!” So they smote him, and their swords clashed over him with no effect. Muhammad bin Maslama said, “I remembered my dagger when I saw that our swords were useless, and I seized it. Meanwhile the enemy of God had made such a noise that every fort around us was showing a light. I thrust it into the lower part of his body, then I bore down upon it until I reached his genitals, and the enemy of God fell to the ground.” [9]
    The assassination of Ka’b had the desired effect: “Our attack upon God’s enemy cast terror among the Jews, and there was no Jew in Medina who did not fear for his life.” [10]

    The Case of Ibn Sunayna

    Ibn Sunayna was a Jewish merchant whose only crime seems to be that he was in town when the Muslims went on a killing spree:

    The apostle said, “Kill any Jew that falls into your power.” Thereupon Muhayyisa bin Mas’ud leapt upon Ibn Sunayna, a Jewish merchant with whom they had social and business relations, and killed him. Huwayyisa was not a Muslim at the time though he was the elder brother. When Muhayyisa killed him Huwayyisa began to beat him, saying, “You enemy of God, did you kill him when much of the fat on your belly comes from his wealth?” Muhayyisa answered, “Had the one who ordered me to kill him ordered me to kill you I would have cut your head off.” He said that this was the beginning of Huwayyisa’s acceptance of Islam. The other replied, “By God, if Muhammad had ordered you to kill me would you have killed me?” He said, “Yes, by God, had he ordered me to cut off your head I would have done so.” He exclaimed, “By God, a religion which can bring you to this is marvellous!” And he became a Muslim. [11]

    The Case of Mirba bin Qayzi

    News of Muhammad’s victories and assassinations spread rapidly, and many people became angry at him. One such person was a blind man named Mirba bin Qayzi:

    [The Muslims] came out in the territory of Mirba bin Qayzi who was a blind man, a disaffected person. When he perceived the approach of the apostle and his men he got up and threw dust in their faces saying, “You may be the apostle of God, but I won’t let you through my garden!” I was told that he took a handful of dust and said, “By God, Muhammad, if I could be sure that I should not hit someone else I would throw it in your face.” The people rushed on him to kill him, and the apostle said, “Do not kill him, for this blind man is blind of heart, blind of sight.” Sa’d bin Zayd . . . rushed at him before the apostle had forbidden this and hit him on the head with his bow so that he split it open.” [12]
    In Muhammad’s defense, he did order his men not to kill Mirba. Nevertheless, the passage shows how quick the Muslims were to kill anyone who insulted Muhammad, and that they were growing accustomed to doing so. Further, we have no evidence that Muhammad so much as reprimanded Sa’d for bludgeoning the man.

    The Case of the Qurayza Jews

    The men of Qurayza resisted Muhammad and attempted to form an alliance against him. When the alliance faltered, Muhammad acted quickly. His armies surrounded them and “besieged them for twenty-five nights until they were sore pressed and God cast terror into their hearts.” [13] Muhammad selected Sa’d bin Mu’adh to decide their punishment, and al-Aus, an ally of Qurayza, agreed to let Sa’d choose the punishment. Sa’d declared that “the men should be killed, the property divided, and the women and children taken as captives.” [14]

    Then they surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina. . . . Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. . . . There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900. As they were being taken out in batches to the apostle they asked Ka’b what he thought would be done with them. He replied, “Will you never understand? Don’t you see that the summoner never stops and those who are taken away do not return? By Allah it is death!” This went on until the apostle made an end of them. [15]

    Every male who had reached puberty was killed. [16] A woman named Bunanah was beheaded because she had dropped a millstone on one of Muhammad’s men. [17] Muhammad divided the women, children, and property among his men (taking a fifth of everything for himself). Some of the women were sold for horses and weapons, and Muhammad kept one of the captive women, Rayhana, for himself. [18]

    The Case of Sallam Ibn Abu’l-Huqayq

    The events surrounding the death of Sallam are interesting. Two tribes were competing with one another to see who could do the most for Muhammad:

    One of the things which God did for His apostle was that these two tribes of the Ansar, Aus and Khazraj, competed the one with the other like two stallions: if Aus did anything to the apostle’s advantage Khazraj would say, “They shall not have this superiority over us in the apostle’s eyes and in Islam” and they would not rest until they could do something similar. [19]

    The men of Aus had received the honor of assassinating Ka’b bin al-Ashraf, so the men of Khazraj longed to boast of a similar achievement. Hence, they went to Muhammad and asked for permission to murder Sallam Ibn Abu’l-Huqayq, and Muhammad granted their request.

    When they got to Khaybar they went to Sallam’s house by night, having locked every door in the settlement on the inhabitants. Now he was in an upper chamber of his to which a ladder led up. They mounted this until they came to the door and asked to be allowed to come in. His wife came out and asked who they were and they told her that they were Arabs in search of supplies. She told them that their man was here and that they could come in. When we entered we bolted the door of the room on her and ourselves fearing lest something should come between us and him. His wife shrieked and warned him of us, so we ran at him with our swords as he was on his bed. . . . When we had smitten him with our swords Abdullah bin Unays bore down with his sword into his belly until it went right through him.” [20]

    The Case of Kinana bin al-Rabi

    Muhammad and his men conquered a town called Khaybar and distributed its riches and women among themselves. [21] They captured Kinana bin al-Rabi, who was in charge of the treasure of one of the conquered tribes. Muhammad demanded the treasure, but Kinana refused to tell him where it was hidden.
    When [Muhammad] asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave orders to al-Zubayr bin al-Awwam, “Torture him until you extract what he has,” so he kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad bin Maslama and he struck off his head, in revenge for his brother Mahmud [who had been killed in battle while conquering the town]. [22]

    The Case of an Anonymous One-Eyed Shepherd

    After failing at one of their assassination attempts, some Muslims were returning to Muhammad when one of them, an assassin named Amr, went into a cave. He soon encountered a one-eyed shepherd driving a sheep. The one-eyed man laid beside Amr (not realizing that he was a Muslim) and began to sing:
    I won’t be a Muslim as long as I live,
    Nor heed to their religion give. [24]

    Amr didn’t miss his chance to kill an infidel:

    I said (to myself), “You will soon know!” and as soon as the badu was asleep and snoring I got up and killed him in a more horrible way than any man has been killed. I put the end of my bow in his sound eye, then I bore down on it until I forced it out at the back of his neck. [25]
    A couple of other people were killed during this failed expedition, yet when Amr reported the details to Muhammad, the Prophet blessed him for his work. [26]

    The Case of Abu Afak

    Abu Afak, saddened because Muhammad had killed someone named al-Harith, composed the following song in memory of the departed:
    Long have I lived but never have I seen
    An assembly or collection of people
    More faithful to their undertaking
    And their allies when called upon
    Than the sons of Qayla when they assembled,
    Men who overthrew mountains and never submitted.
    A rider who came to them split them in two (saying)
    ‘Permitted’, ‘Forbidden’ of all sorts of things.
    Had you believed in glory or kingship
    You would have followed Tubba. [27]

    These words were too much for Muhammad to bear, so the Prophet of Islam flew into a rage that ended with the death of Abu Afak. [28]

    The Case of Asma

    A woman named Asma (who had five sons) was appalled at the murder of Abu Afak, so she wrote a poem against the Muslims in retaliation. Ibn Ishaq relates the account of what followed:
    When the apostle heard what she had said he said, “Who will rid me of Marwan’s daughter?” Umayr bin Adiy al-Khatmi who was with him heard him, and that very night he went to her house and killed her. In the morning he came to the apostle and told him what he had done and he said, “You have helped God and His apostle, O Umayr!” When he asked if he would have to bear any evil consequences the apostle said, “Two goats won’t butt their heads about her,” so Umayr went back to his people. [29]

    The Case of Abdullah bin Khatal and His Two Singing Girls

    Abdullah bin Khatal was a Muslim who later apostatized. He had two singing girls who sang satirical songs about the Prophet. As soon as Muhammad had the power, he ordered that all three be killed. Abdullah was killed by two Muslims. One of the singing girls was killed. The other was later given immunity, for unknown reasons. [30]

    The Case of al-Huwayrith

    All that is known of al-Huwayrith is that he insulted Muhammad, that Muhammad demanded he be killed, and that Ali carried out Muhammad’s wishes. [31]

    The Case of Sara, a Freed Slave

    Sara was a freed slave who had insulted Muhammad in Mecca. Muhammad commanded his men to kill her wherever they find her. She was eventually found and trampled to death by a mounted soldier. [32]

    Assessment

    Muhammad ordered the murders of numerous people, often because they had insulted him years earlier or written poems against Islam, and he permitted lying as long as it would lead to the deaths of his enemies. He also commanded that apostates be killed. [33] Muhammad’s followers murdered both men and women, including a blind man, and they beheaded hundreds of Jews who had surrendered to the Muslims.

    Of course, these assassinations and executions do not necessitate the conclusion that Muhammad was a bloodthirsty tyrant, as is often claimed about him in Christian and Jewish writings. As I have previously stated, Muhammad also performed many kind and noble deeds, and he forgave many who fought against him. However, while Muhammad probably wasn’t as bad as some of his critics now claim, neither was he nearly as good as his admirers claim. As Thomas Lippman has noted,

    It seems safe to say that Muhammad was sincere, dedicated, courageous, generous, compassionate, and committed to social justice and reform. The uncritical admiration of him that one hears from ordinary Muslims, however, overlooks the evidence that the Prophet was also sometimes vengeful, spiteful, and duplicitous. He was, after all, human and ambitious too. [34]

    The completely gentle, infinitely forgiving, perfectly merciful Prophet who is proclaimed in Muslim writings simply never existed. The historical Muhammad bears more resemblance to the above passage from Lippman. Yet if Muslims truly believe that Muhammad was the most wonderful moral example in history, they should embrace all of his actions, not just the ones that fit in with the Christian morality that has been advanced in the West. In Islamic thought, Muhammad is the standard with which everyone else is to be compared; that is, whatever Muhammad did is, by definition, moral. If another standard of comparison is introduced, Islamic belief falls to pieces. For instance, when Muslims try so desperately to explain away Muhammad’s atrocities, they are attempting to show that Muhammad fits in with Christian moral standards. But such an attempt is absurd. Muhammad killed countless people (torturing many of them), robbed people, married thirteen women (one of them a juvenile), took part in the slave trade, and permitted women to be beaten by their husbands. [35] When he is judged by the standards laid down by Jesus, Muhammad fails miserably. Thus, when Muslims find themselves defending the moral character of Muhammad, they may be doing so because they find the moral standards of Jesus more compelling than the moral standards of Muhammad, and they may be consciously or unconsciously trying to replace the spotted life of Muhammad with the spotless life of Jesus. If so, it is time for Muslims to look to a different messenger, one who is truly worthy of our admiration, praise, reverence, and worship.

    Notes

    [1] Abul, A’la Mawdudi, Towards Understanding Islam (New York: Islamic Circle of North America, 1986), p. 60.
    [2] Maulana Muhammad Ali, Muhammad the Prophet (St. Lambert: Payette and Sims, 1993), pp. 144-145, 165, 169.
    [3] Allama Sir Abdullah Al-Mamun Al-Suhrawardy, The Wisdom of Muhammad (New York: Citadel Press, 2001), p. 17.
    [4] For instance, Maulana Muhammad Ali responds to allegations of murders and assassinations with the following:
    “How could the Prophet in the face of such a plain injunction order the murder of those who abused him, and how could the Muslims carry out an order which was directly opposed to the Holy Qur’an? It was simply impossible, and if Ibn Hisham or Waqidi says that the Prophet ordered the assassination of his abusers, it is Ibn Hisham or Waqidi—a frail authority after all—that must be rejected” (Ali, p. 199).
    The “plain injunction” that supposedly refutes all the historical details of Muhammad’s assassinations is found in the Qur’an:
    “You shall certainly be tried respecting your wealth and your souls, and you shall certainly hear from those who have been given the Book before you and from those who are polytheists much annoying talk; and if you are patient and guard (against evil), surely this is one of the affairs (which should be) determined upon” (3:186).
    This passage doesn’t seem sufficient to overrule the numerous historical accounts of Muhammad’s atrocities.
    [5] Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah (The Life of Muhammad), A. Guillaume, tr. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980), p. 164.
    [6] Ibid., p. 308.
    [7] Ibid., p. 366.
    [8] Ibid., p. 367. This account is corroborated in Sahih Al-Bukhari, Dr. Muhammad Matraji, tr. (New Delhi: Islamic Book Service, 2002), Number 3032.
    [9] Ibid., p. 368.
    [10] Ibid., p. 368.
    [11] Ibid., p. 369.
    [12] Ibid., pp. 372-373.
    [13] Ibid., p. 461.
    [14] Ibid., p. 464.
    [15] Ibid., p. 464. See also Al-Tabari, The History of Al-Tabari: Volume 8, Michael Fishbein, tr. (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997), pp. 27-41.
    [16] Al-Tabari, Volume 8, p. 38.
    [17] Ibid., p. 41
    [18] Ibn Ishaq, p. 466.
    [19] Ibid., p. 482.
    [20] Ibid., pp. 482-483.
    [21] Ibid., pp. 510-517.
    [22] Ibid., p. 515.
    [23] Sahih Al-Bukhari, Dr. Muhammad Matraji, tr. (New Delhi: Islamic Book Service, 2002), Number 3022. This assassination is confirmed in Numbers 3023, 4038, 4039, 4040.
    [24] Ibn Ishaq, p. 674.
    [25] Ibid., p. 674.
    [26] Ibid., p. 675.
    [27] Ibid., p. 675.
    [28] Ibid., p. 675.
    [29] Ibid., p. 676.
    [30] Ibid., p. 551.
    [31] Ibid., p. 551. See also Al-Tabari, pp. 179-181.
    [32] Ibid., p. 551.
    [33] Al-Bukhari, Number 3017 relates that Muhammad said, “If somebody discards his religion, kill him.”
    [34] Thomas W. Lippman, Understanding Islam: An Introduction to the Muslim World (New York: Penguin Putnam Inc., 2002), p. 52.
    [35] For references, see “Islam Beheaded.”

    • Lucky bin Satan, you verily said :

      “Yet if Muslims truly believe that Muhammad was the most wonderful moral example in history, they should embrace all of his actions, not just the ones that fit in with the Christian morality that has been advanced in the West. In Islamic thought, Muhammad is the standard with which everyone else is to be compared; that is, whatever Muhammad did is, by definition, moral. If another standard of comparison is introduced, Islamic belief falls to pieces.”

      So, can you mention ONE Christian “morality” that Islam has embraced?

      A. Christian Morality=Women Nudity=Pornography=Women’s Rights Groups=Alcohol=Homo Sexuality= Same sex Marriages=Drugs=Spread of AIDS and STDs=Random Divorces= Concubines in name of GFs=Children Trafficking=Maximum Sexual Molestations=Pregnancy without Marriage=Rapings=Pork Eating=NightClubs and Loud Music=Separation from Parents=Fake Trinity=Useless Morality.

      B. Islamic Morality=Dress Code=Respect of Women=Decency=No Alcohol=No Gayship=No Same sex Marriage=No Drugs=No Spread of Aids=No STDS=No Random Divorces=No GFs unless Marriage=NO Children Trafficking=NO sexual Molestations=NO Pregnancy without marriage=No Rapings=No Nightclubs and No loud music=No separation from the Elderly parents=Only ONE GOD=VERY GOOD Morality!!!

      Which of the two would you wish your grand kids to follow…A or B????

      • THE PERFECT EXAMPLE

        THE PERFECT MUSLIM

        And surely thou hast sublime morals
        (Surat Al-Qalam 68:4).

        Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah an excellent exemplar
        (Surat Al-Ahzab 33:21).

        Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly.
        MUHAMMED WAS A MURDERING, RAPING, CHILD MOLESTING, ENSLAVING, THIEVING ARABIAN THUG!

        THE QUR’AN, SUNNAH, HADITHS & SIRA ALL PROVE THESE FINDINGS!
        REMEMBER!
        FROM THEIR OWN “HOLY BOOKS”, THE PERVERT OF MECCA IS EXPOSED!

        ALLAH’S ARITHMETIC: 54 INTO 9 GOES NICELY

        THE WANKING PERVERT FROM MECCA

        A marriage is engaged in by 2 consenting adults.
        Do you really believe a 6 year old child would desire to marry a 51 year old man?
        Do you think that is what she would choose?
        Do you think a 9 year old girl would desire to have sex with a 54 year old?

        The thought of an old man becoming aroused by a child is one of the most disturbing thoughts that makes us cringe as it reminds us of pedophilia and the most despicable people. It is difficult to accept that the “Holy Prophet” of Mecca married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and WANKED BETWEEN HER THIGHS FOR 3 YEARS and consummated/RAPED her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.

        MUHAMMAD: HIS SEX LIFE, SEX ABUSE & CHILD MOLESTING

        Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly. Let us investigate how did the prophet live Islam; how did the prophet apply the eternal teachings of God in his daily life? In this search for the historical Muhammad, we will utilize the Islam’s holy books, its own writings.

        MUHAMMAD’S MOLESTATION OF BABY AISHA

        Muhammad fantasized about baby Aisha before soliciting her from her father.
        Sahih Bukhari 9.140
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        Allah’s apostle said to me, “you were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘if this is from Allah, then it must happen.

        AISHA’S FATHER DID NOT APPROVE AT FIRST

        Aisha’s father, Abu Bakr, wasn’t on board at first, but Muhammad explained how the rules of their religion made it possible. This is similar to the way that present-day cult leaders manipulate their followers into similar concessions.
        Sahih Bukhari 7.18
        Narrated ‘Ursa:
        The prophet asked abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “but I am your brother.” the prophet said, “you are my brother in Allah’s religion and his book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”

        MUHAMMAD WOULD THIGH WITH BABY AISHA

        HOW TO THIGH & GET HIGH

        Now let us see how thighing is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

        Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.

        According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

        Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

        Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.

        Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.”Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

        The inquirer asked the following: ‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’

        After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

        That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers'” (Fatwa No. 31409).

        Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

        AISHA WASHING SEMEN FROM MUHAMMAD’S CLOTHES

        From the Hadith of Bukhari:

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

        Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

        I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

        Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

        I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

        From the Hadith of Bukhari:

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 230:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        as above (229).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

        Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

        I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

        Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

        I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

        MUHAMMAD, 50, MARRIES BABY AISHA AGE 6

        Sahih Bukhari volume 5, book 58, number 234
        Narrated Aisha: the prophet engaged (married) me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, um ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became alright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some ansari women who said, “best wishes and Allah’s blessing and a good luck.” then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

        Sahih bukhari volume 8, book 73, number 151
        Narrated ‘Aisha: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the prophet would call them to join and play with me. (the playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-bari page 143, vol.13)

        Muhammad’s father in law, Umar bin Khattab, the second rightly guided khalifa, married a child, Umm Kulthum. Umm Khultum was about 9 years old when she was married. Umar was certainly not doing wrong according to Islam, Muhammad once said that even the devil would step aside when he met Umar in an alley. Islam is indeed the true religion for pedophiles, rapists, sadistics etc.
        Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3310:
        ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 65
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that ‘Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death).” what you know of the Quran (by heart)’

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 88
        Narrated ‘Ursa:
        The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with ‘Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).
        Some Muslims claim that it was Abu Bakr who approached Muhammad asking him to marry his daughter. This is of course not true and here is the proof.

        Sahih Bukhari 7.18
        Narrated ‘Ursa:
        The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “But I am your brother.” The Prophet said, “You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”
        Arabs were a primitive lot with little rules to abide. Yet they had some code of ethics that they honored scrupulously. For example, although they fought all the year round, they abstained from hostilities during certain holy months of the year. They also considered Mecca to be a holy city and did not make war against it. A adopted son’s wife was deemed to be a daughter in law and they would not marry her. Also it was customary that close friends made a pact of brotherhood and considered each other as true brothers. The Prophet disregarded all of these rules anytime they stood between him and his interests or whims.
        Abu Bakr and Muhammad had pledged to each other to be brothers. So according to their customs Ayesha was supposed to be like a niece to the “Holy Prophet” of Mecca. Yet that did not stop him asking Abu Bakr for her hand, even when she was only six years old.
        But this moral relativist “Holy Prophet” of Mecca would use the same excuse to reject a woman he did not like.

        Sahih Bukhari V.7, B62, N. 37
        Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:
        It was said to the Prophet, “Won’t you marry the daughter of Hamza?” He said, “She is my foster niece (brother’s daughter). ”
        Hamza and Abu Bakr both were the foster brothers of Muhammad. But Ayesha must have been too pretty for the “Holy Prophet” of Mecca to abide by the codes of ethics and custom.
        In the following Hadith he confided to Aisha that he had dreamed of her before soliciting her from her father.

        Sahih Bukhari 9.140
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        Allah’s Apostle said to me, “You were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘Uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘If this is from Allah, then it must happen.
        Whether Muhammad had actually such a dream or he just said it to please Aisha is not the point. What matters here is that it indicates that Aisha was a baby being “carried” by an angel when the Prophet dreamed of her.
        There are numerous hadithes that explicitly reveal the age of Ayesha at the time of her marriage. Here are some of them.

        Sahih Bukhari 5.236.
        Narrated Hisham’s father:
        Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married ‘Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.

        Sahih Bukhari 5.234
        Narrated Aisha:
        The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.
        And in another Hadith we read.

        Sunan Abu-Dawud Book 41, Number 4915, also Number 4916 and Number 4917
        Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
        The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) married me when I was seven or six. When we came to Medina, some women came. according to Bishr’s version: Umm Ruman came to me when I was swinging. They took me, made me prepared and decorated me. I was then brought to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him), and he took up cohabitation with me when I was nine. She halted me at the door, and I burst into laughter.
        In the above hadith we read that Aisha was swinging, This is a play of little girls not grown up people. The following Hadith is particularly interesting because it shows that Aisha was so small that was not aware what was going on when the Holy Prophet “surprised” her by going to her.

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 90
        Narrated Aisha:
        When the Prophet married me, my mother came to me and made me enter the house (of the Prophet) and nothing surprised me but the coming of Allah’s Apostle to me in the forenoon.

        Must have been quite a surprise! But the following is also interesting because it demonstrates that she was just a kid playing with her dolls. Pay attention to what the interpreter wrote in the parenthesis. (She was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty)

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 73, Number 151
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13)

        Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3311
        ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.
        The holy Prophet died when he was 63. So he must have married Aisha when he as 51 and went to her when he was 54.

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 73, Number 33
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        I never felt so jealous of any woman as I did of Khadija, though she had died three years before the Prophet married me, and that was because I heard him mentioning her too often, and because his Lord had ordered him to give her the glad tidings that she would have a palace in Paradise, made of Qasab and because he used to slaughter a sheep and distribute its meat among her friends.

        Khadija died in December of 619 AD. That is two years before Hijra. At that time the Prophet was 51-years-old. So in the same year that Khadija died the prophet married Aisha and took her to his home 3 years later, i.e. one year after Hijra. But until she “grew up” he married Umm Salama.

        In another part Aisha claims that as long as she remembers her parents were always Muslims.

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 245
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        (the wife of the Prophet) I never remembered my parents believing in any religion other than the true religion (i.e. Islam),
        If Ayesha was older i.e. 16 or 18 as some Muslims claim, she would have remembered the religion of her parents prior to becoming Muslims.

        Now someone may still claim that all these hadithes are lies. People are free to say whatever they want. But truth is clear like the Sun for those who have eyes.

        No sane person would be aroused by a 6-year-old child. Decent people wince at the thought of this shameful act. Yet some Muslims deny them. The question is why so many followers of Muhammad would fabricate so many false hadithes about the age of Aisha, which incidentally confirm each other?

        MUHAMMAD RESERVED BABY AISHA FOR HIMSELF, BECAUSE SHE WAS A VIRGIN & HE WANTED A VIRGIN.

        Sahih al-Bukhari, volume 7, book 62, number 17
        Narrated jabir bin ‘abdullah:
        When I got married, Allah’s apostle said to me, “what type of lady have you married?” I replied, “I have married a matron.” he said, “why, don’t you have a liking for the virgins and for fondling them?” Jabir also said: Allah’s apostle said, “why didn’t you marry a young girl so that you might play with her and she with you?”
        Hence, Muhammad’s comments indicate that his reason for marrying Aisha while a young virgin is so that he could fondle and sexually play with her!

        AISHA WAS NOT THE ONLY BABY GIRL MUHAMMAD FANTASIZED ABOUT

        In the classic history, Sirat Rasul Allah (The Life of Muhammad) by Ibn Ishaq, there is an account in which Muhammad expressed a marital interest in a crawling baby. This event seems to have occurred around the time of the battle of of Badr, when he was about 55 years old. He had married Aisha two years earlier, when he was 53 years of age.
        (Suhayli, ii. 79: in the Riwaya of Yunus i. I. Recorded that the apostle saw her (Ummu’lfadl) when she was a baby crawling before him and said,
        ‘if she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’
        but he died before she grew up and sufyan b. Al-aswad b. ‘Abdu’l-asad al-Makhzumi married her and she bore him rizq and lubab… [Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad, Karachi, p. 311]
        Muhammad saw Um Habiba the daughter of Abbas while she was fatim (age of nursing) and he said, “if she grows up while I am still alive, I will marry her.” (Musnad Ahmad, number 25636)

        MUHAMMAD WOULD BATH & FONDLE AISHA

        Bukhari (6:298) – Muhammad would take a bath with the little Aisha and fondle her.
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        The prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me. While in itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses).

        MUHAMMAD CONSUMMATED HIS MARRIAGE TO BABY AISHA, WHEN SHE WAS 9

        Sunaan abu Dawud: book 11, number 2161:
        Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
        I and the apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) used to lie in one cloth at night while I was menstruating. If anything from me smeared him, he washed the same place (that was smeared), and did not wash beyond it. If anything from him smeared his clothe, he washed the same place and did not wash beyond that, and prayed with it (i.e. The clothe).

        MUHAMMAD WOULD SEXUALLY ABUSE HIS WIVES

        Bukhari (6:300) – Muhammad’s wives had to be available for the prophet’s fondling even when they were having their menstrual period.
        Bukhari volume 1, book 6, number 299:
        Narrated ‘Abdur-rahman bin al-Aswad:
        …(on the authority of his father) ‘Aisha said: “Whenever Allah’s apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used to order her to put on an izar and start fondling her.” ‘Aisha added, “None of you could control his sexual desires as the prophet could.”

        WOMEN ARE SEXUAL OBJECTS

        Allah promoted this abusive sexual behavior:
        “Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will” [Koran 2:223]
        Koran (2:223) likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills. In this verse, Allah also gives divine sanction for anal sex.
        According to Islam, Muhammad is the perfection of humanity and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct. He had sex with Aisha at the age of nine, which amounts to rape of a minor. He also left behind an enduring legacy for aged Muslim men to fulfill their carnal desires contrary to natural law and to the life-long devastation of young girls.

        ALLAH PROMOTES PEDOPHILIA

        Quran 65.4 “and those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘iddah (prescribed divorce period), if you have doubts (about their periods), is three months, and for those who have no courses [(i.e. They are still immature) their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise, except in case of death] . And for those who are pregnant (whether they are divorced or their husbands are dead), their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is until they deliver (their burdens) (give birth) and whosoever fears Allah and keeps his duty to him, he will make his matter easy for him.”
        Sura (65:4) lays down rules for divorce and sets the prescribed period for divorce. It clearly says, Muslim men can marry (and divorce) little girls who have not yet reached menstruation age. This means that Muslim men were allowed to marry baby girls. This is the eternal word of god. This is an eternal law of Allah. All Muslims must believe in this teaching. Otherwise, they are no longer Muslims but apostates of Islam.

        ALLAH ORDAINS RAPE

        “All married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” 4:24
        You can have sex with slaves women captured in war (with whom you may rape or do whatever you like).
        Muhammad established an appalling precedent for abuse of young girls which is continued to be nurtured by the Muslim faithful. For example, Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran gave a fatwa about Quran 65.4:
        “A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man’s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl’s sister.”

        MARRIAGE IN ISLAM: A WHOREHOUSE FOR MEN, A JAILHOUSE FOR WOMEN

        In the Quran, there is no word for marriage. The only word used is nikah, which means ‘having sex’ or ‘sexual intercourse’ in Arabic.

        WIVES IN ISLAM

        According to Quran a wife is some one with whom you have sex with.
        Different types of wives are:
        1. A paid wife with an open ended contract (House wife)
        2. A paid wife with a fixed term contract (Muta wife)
        3. A paid visitation only wife with a visitation contract (Misyar wife)
        4. Slave girl (bought gifted or captured)
        The price paid for vagina is called Mahr. Thus according to Quran a contract wife is like a whore who gets paid for her vagina called Mahr while a slave girl wife is like a whore who does not get paid a Mahr for her vagina.
        Q 4.24: Seek out wives by means of your wealth, and give those with whom ye have cohabited their price.

        APPROACH HER IN ANY WAY YOU WANT

        A wife has no say in the way the husband approaches her for enjoyment.
        Prophet said (Bukhari: Volume 7, Book 62, Number 81): “you are given the right to enjoy the women’s private parts”.
        Q 2.223: Your women are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth (have sexual relations in any manners), when or how you will. (trs. Hilali & Khan)

        WIVES CAN BE DUMPED AT WILL

        Like a client can dump a whore at will and pick up another one, the Quran says a husband can dump his wife and get another one.
        Q 4.20. If you want to exchange one wife for another than don’t take back any part of what you paid her.
        Hadiths say that Hasan Bin Ali, Prophet Mohammad’s beloved grand son, who died young, went through more than 70 wives in his short life.
        The husband is like a client of a whore. Once a wife is paid Mahr she is obliged to submit her private parts 24/7 to him.

        WHORES CAN DUMP A CLIENT, MUSLIM WIVES CANNOT DUMP HER HUSBAND

        If a whore changes her mind and does not want sex she can. She can return the money and kick him out. However, in Islam a wife does not have that liberty. Once the Mahr is paid her vagina is his to enjoy. She must submit to him any time he gets an urge.
        Ibn Majah 1854: “Prophet said if he asks her to surrender herself to him for sexual intercourse on a camel’s back, she should not refuse him even on a camel’s saddle.”
        However in our prophet’s case, whenever he had a huge urge (erection) and his child-wife got scared and ran away during foreplay, he had to catch her, bribe her with a new doll and drag her back to bed.

        SAYING NO COSTS ISLAMIC WIVES WHIPPING AND DIVINE CURSING

        If a wife refuses sex to a husband Allah ordered husbands to give her a good whipping.
        Quran 4.34: Scourge (whip) your wife if she does not obey.
        And ordered angels to curse her all night.
        Bukhari 4.54.460: “If a husband calls his wife to his bed for sex and if she , he angels will curse her till morning”.

        A WHIPPED WIFE MUST BE PUT ON AN INJURED LIST

        Once a wife is whipped badly, she cannot lie down and have sex without severe pain, seriously limiting the ways a husband can approach her thus violating aya 2.223. Our prophet told the momins to postpone sex with her.
        Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 132:
        The Prophet said, “When you flog your wife like you flog your slave then postpone the sexual intercourse.”

        VAGINA CONTRACTS
        OPEN-ENDED CONTRACT (REGULAR WIFE)

        A n open ended contract is signed for a negotiated price for an undetermined period. In addition wife gets boarding lodging and clothing. However if the husband decides to dump her, he can break the contract verbally and kick her out (4.20) any time he wants to but he cannot get any money back he paid for her vagina even if he used it for five minutes.
        Q 4.20: if you replace a wife by another, you cannot get any part of Mahr back even if it was a large sum.
        A broken contract cannot be renewed until the her vagina is used by another momin and is then released (halala).
        Q 2.230: And if he has divorced her, then she is not lawful unto him thereafter until she has sex with another husband. And if he has divorced her then she is not lawful unto him thereafter until she has married another husband. Then, if the other husband divorces her, it is no sin on both of them that they reunite.
        On the other hand a wife has no right to break a contract similarly. She can only break it if she can prove him to be impotent or insane in a court of law.

        SHORT-TERM CONTRACT or MUTA WIFE

        A man can sign a contract with a woman to use her vagina for a pre-determined period at negotiated price.
        The contract can be renewed without the requirement of interim use of her vagina by another man.

        VISITATION CONTRACT (MISYAR WIFE)

        In this contract a husband visits a misyar wife for sexual pleasure and pays her for each visit. The husband does not have to provide her boarding and lodging.

        WAYS TO ACQUIRE SLAVE GIRLS

        A slave girl doesn’t get paid Mahr for her vagina. She is acquired as a free gift (Maria was a free gift for Prophet from Egyptian king), bought from another owner (sometimes prophet took away pretty girls for free from their owners*) or captured after killing her father or husband (prophet took 20% of the captured women from a raid booty).
        Sahih Muslim, Book 019, Number 4345:
        It has been narrated on the authority of Salama (b. al-Akwa’) who said: We fought against the Fazara and Abu Bakr was the commander over us. Abu Bakr bestowed a young girl upon me as a prize. She was one of the prettiest girls in Arabia. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her (had not have sex with her) when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: Give me that girl, O Salama. I said: Messenger of Allah, she has fascinated me. I had not yet disrobed her. When on the next day, the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me again in the street (Salama was parading the young beauty to make other jihadis jealous). Prophet said: O Salama, give me that girl, may God bless your father. I said: She is for you. Messenger of Allah! By Allah, I have not yet disrobed her.

        SLAVE GIRLS ARE THE BEST BARGAINS IN ISLAM

        Quranic ayas 4.3, 4.24, 23.6, 33.50 & 70.30 allow a Muslim man to have sex with slave girls. A slave girl can be bought or acquired by killing infidels and capturing their wives and daughters.
        Slave girls are the best bargain Islam has to offer to Muslim men but unfortunately Muslims are denying themselves this great reward from Allah just to appease infidel west. The uses of a slave-girl are:
        1. They provide sex 24/7.
        2. They are used as house maid
        3. Offered as sex partners to overnight house guests.
        4. Offered as gifts to family and friends for a few days or for good*.
        (*The History of Tabari, vol 8, pge 29-30: From his share of captive women, prophet gave his son-in-law, Ali a slave girl, Raytah bt Hilal to enjoy her at his will. He also presented Uthman b. Affan, his son-in-law, another slave girl Zainab b. Hayan, and bestowed another girl (name unknown) to his father in-law Omar Ibn Khattab. Omar gave that girl to his son Abdullah. Most of Prophet’s other elite companions received slave girls as gifts).
        5. Sold to raise cash, if the need be.

        SLAVE GIRLS ARE INCOME PROPERTIES

        Islam is the only religion which allows momins to pimp the bodies of their slave girls for side incomes. Thus Quran taught 1400 years back what modern day pimps are learning now, that is to control many prostitutes and get rich on their income.
        However Islam is a very compassionate religion. While many pimps force their prostitutes to sell their bodies, Islam prefers that momins avoid coercion.
        Q 24.33. Do not compel your slave girls to prostitution to drive income from her body if they are not willing.
        But of course Allah is a forgiving God. In case momins do beat them up and force them to prostitute, Allah said he will forgive them.
        Q 24.33. (continued) But if you did force her to prostitute Allah can forgive you because he is forgiving and compassionate.

        • Lucky bin Satan, hahaaa…you are funny! In your frustration this came out from your sick box : “MUHAMMED WAS A MURDERING, RAPING, CHILD MOLESTING, ENSLAVING, THIEVING ARABIAN THUG!”

          No, NOT even ONE of the 1.5 billion Muslims believes in the above shit that your sick, demented mind has portrayed above.

          Who wants to know the Truth? According to your fake hadiths did he rape? Child Molest?……but that is NOT mentioned in the Quran!

          So, you have lied again!

      • IT WAS DUMB PLUM & HIS DIRTY CHUMS, FUCKING MONKEYS IN AFRICA THAT GAVE THE WORLD A.I.D.S.

        WE GIVE AID TO AFRICA & THEY IN TURN GIVE US A.I.D.S

        Increased mortality and AIDS-like immunopathology in wild chimpanzees infected with SIVcpz
        Brandon F. Keele1,17, James Holland Jones4, Karen A. Terio5, Jacob D. Estes6, Rebecca S. Rudicell2, Michael L. Wilson7,8, Yingying Li1, Gerald H. Learn1, T. Mark Beasley3, Joann Schumacher-Stankey8, Emily Wroblewski8, Anna Mosser9, Jane Raphael9, Shadrack Kamenya9, Elizabeth V. Lonsdorf10, Dominic A. Travis11, Titus Mlengeya12, Michael J. Kinsel5, James G. Else13, Guido Silvestri14, Jane Goodall15, Paul M. Sharp16, George M. Shaw1, Anne E. Pusey8 & Beatrice H. Hahn1,2

        1. Department of Medicine,
        2. Department of Microbiology,
        3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA
        4. Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
        5. University of Illinois Zoological Pathology Program, Maywood, Illinois 60153, USA
        6. The AIDS and Cancer Virus Program, Science Applications International Corporation-Frederick Inc., National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland 21702, USA
        7. Department of Anthropology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
        8. Jane Goodall Institute’s Center for Primate Studies, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA
        9. Gombe Stream Research Centre, The Jane Goodall Institute, Kigoma, Tanzania
        10. The Lester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes and,
        11. Department of Conservation and Science, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, Illinois 60614, USA
        12. Tanzania National Parks, Arusha, Tanzania
        13. Division of Animal Resources, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA
        14. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA
        15. The Jane Goodall Institute, Arlington, Virginia 22203, USA
        16. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
        17. Present address: The AIDS and Cancer Virus Program, Science Applications International Corporation-Frederick Inc., National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland 21702, USA.
        Correspondence to: Beatrice H. Hahn1,2 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to B.H.H. (Email: bhahn@uab.edu).

        African primates are naturally infected with over 40 different simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIVs), two of which have crossed the species barrier and generated human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2)1, 2. Unlike the human viruses, however, SIVs do not generally cause acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in their natural hosts3. Here we show that SIVcpz, the immediate precursor of HIV-1, is pathogenic in free-ranging chimpanzees. By following 94 members of two habituated chimpanzee communities in Gombe National Park, Tanzania, for over 9 years, we found a 10- to 16-fold higher age-corrected death hazard for SIVcpz-infected (n = 17) compared to uninfected (n = 77) chimpanzees. We also found that SIVcpz-infected females were less likely to give birth and had a higher infant mortality rate than uninfected females. Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization of post-mortem spleen and lymph node samples from three infected and two uninfected chimpanzees revealed significant CD4+ T-cell depletion in all infected individuals, with evidence of high viral replication and extensive follicular dendritic cell virus trapping in one of them. One female, who died within 3 years of acquiring SIVcpz, had histopathological findings consistent with end-stage AIDS. These results indicate that SIVcpz, like HIV-1, is associated with progressive CD4+ T-cell loss, lymphatic tissue destruction and premature death. These findings challenge the prevailing view that all natural SIV infections are non-pathogenic and suggest that SIVcpz has a substantial negative impact on the health, reproduction and lifespan of chimpanzees in the wild.
        Perspective
        Nature Medicine 15, 861 – 865 (2009)
        doi:10.1038/nm.2013
        Toward an AIDS vaccine: lessons from natural simian immunodeficiency virus infections of African nonhuman primate hosts
        Donald L Sodora1,15, Jonathan S Allan2,15, Cristian Apetrei3,4,15, Jason M Brenchley5,15, Daniel C Douek6,15, James G Else7,15, Jacob D Estes8,15, Beatrice H Hahn9,15, Vanessa M Hirsch5,15, Amitinder Kaur10,15, Frank Kirchhoff11,15, Michaela Muller-Trutwin12,15, Ivona Pandrea3,4,15, Jörn E Schmitz13,15 & Guido Silvestri7,14,15

        Abstract

        The design of an effective AIDS vaccine has eluded the efforts of the scientific community to the point that alternative approaches to classic vaccine formulations have to be considered. We propose here that HIV vaccine research could greatly benefit from the study of natural simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infections of African nonhuman primates. Natural SIV hosts (for example, sooty mangabeys, African green monkeys and mandrills) share many features of HIV infection of humans; however, they usually do not develop immunodeficiency. These natural, nonprogressive SIV infections represent an evolutionary adaptation that allows a peaceful coexistence of primate lentiviruses and the host immune system. This adaptation does not result in reduced viral replication but, rather, involves phenotypic changes to CD4+ T cell subsets, limited immune activation and preserved mucosal immunity, all of which contribute to the avoidance of disease progression and, possibly, to the reduction of vertical SIV transmission. Here we summarize the current understanding of SIV infection of African nonhuman primates and discuss how unraveling these evolutionary adaptations may provide clues for new vaccine designs that might induce effective immune responses without the harmful consequences of excessive immune activation.
        Letter
        Nature 460, 515-519 (23 July 2009) | doi:10.1038/nature08200; Received 21 April 2009; Accepted 5 June 2009

        CHIMPS & HIV:
        THE STORY BEHIND THE STUDY
        By Sharon Schmickle | 07/28/09

        When Vincent’s enemies dumped his battered corpse into a Tanzanian creek bed, University of Minnesota Professor Michael L. Wilson rushed to the scene of the killing, salvaged the body, stowed it in a freezer and alerted scientists back in the United States.

        Though terribly unlucky in life, Vincent had considerable scientific value in death. He was the first wild chimpanzee known to be infected with SIV — the primate version of the HIV/AIDS virus — whose body would be available for research.

        Findings from nine years of study on Vincent and other wild chimps came together in breakthrough news published last week in the journal Nature.
        Contrary to prevailing wisdom, chimpanzees get an AIDS-like illness and die from it, said the research team — which included Wilson as well as Prof. Anne Pusey and several others with U of M connections. Dr. Beatrice Hahn of the University of Alabama at Birmingham led the team.

        Scientists had known for years that African primates are naturally infected with more than 40 different simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIVs). They also knew that two of the viruses had crossed the species barrier to generate HIV-1 and HIV-2, which cause AIDS in humans. But primates were thought to have escaped the devastation AIDS has visited on humans.

        ‘Missing link’ in understanding HIV evolution
        Many scientists not connected with the study hailed the new findings as a “missing link” in the understanding of the evolution of HIV.

        “It is a pretty momentous study,” Danny Douek, chief of the human immunology section of the National Institutes of Health vaccine research center in Bethesda, Md. told the Los Angeles Times.
        “You can regard the study as one that provides a missing link in the history of the HIV pandemic,” said Douek, who is searching for possible AIDS vaccines. “If we identify the evolutionary adaptations, that opens up therapeutic avenues for HIV disease.”

        The findings also shed new light on causes of deaths of wild chimpanzees, which are an endangered species.

        Evolved from SIV
        The story behind this study is nearly as interesting as the findings.

        Warning: It could shatter romantic notions about the adventurous work of the wildlife researcher. These scientists muck around in chimp droppings.

        Before touching that indelicate subject, we need to look back to 1981, when dozens of young gay men in California and New York died from a mysterious pneumonia. We now know the cause was an HIV virus that led to AIDS. Since then, the virus has killed more than 32 million people worldwide and infected at least 65 million.

        Beyond the staggering loss of lives, the quest for a cure or a vaccine has cost tens of billions of dollars.

        One part of conquering the disease involved learning where it came from. Studies have shown that HIV evolved from SIV, probably in the cells of hunters who had killed infected apes and monkeys for the lucrative “bush meat” trade in Africa.

        A logical place to look further for the virus’s natural reservoirs was in chimpanzees, the closest relatives to humans. Hahn, the AIDS researcher at the University of Alabama, had established links between HIV-1 and a type of the virus called SIVcpz, which infected chimps.

        But her early work was criticized because the studies were done on chimps in captivity. So Hahn set out to find and study infected wild chimps.

        A stage already set
        This is where the Minnesota role begins.

        Wild chimpanzees are very elusive. And there are ever fewer of them to study. During the 20th century their numbers plummeted from 2 million to 150,000 because of diseases, poaching and destruction of the forests where they live.

        One place, though, where chimps were accessible was in Tanzania’s Gombe National Park. Primatologist Jane Goodall began documenting their behavior there in the 1960s. Pusey, the U of M professor, worked there in the 1970s as Goodall’s research assistant.

        Later, Pusey discovered that field notes she, Goodall and others had painstakingly recorded were deteriorating in musty trunks in Goodall’s house. So in the 1990s, Pusey and colleagues transferred more than 320,000 pages of the records to Minnesota and created the Jane Goodall Institute’s Center for Primate Studies on the U’s St. Paul Campus.
        Wilson and many other young scientists came to the center Pusey directs, dividing their time between desk work there and field studies in Gombe. Now, the center houses a rich record of the Gombe chimps, documenting everything from their daily diets to their sexual partners.

        Indeed, scientists know more about the chimps than anyone could learn about human HIV subjects because the chimps do everything in the open, from mating to defecating.

        “These chimps are completely used to us,” Pusey said in an interview. “We see most chimps most days. We keep track of where they go, what they eat, who they interact with. … Then sometimes we find bodies when they die, which is hard to do. Nobody studying chimps in other places has had much luck finding bodies.”

        Every bit of information comes back to St. Paul, where it is computerized.

        In other words, the scene already was set for the research Hahn wanted done.

        Clues in chimp droppings
        One rule at Gombe, though, is that research be non-invasive. Watch but don’t touch. Only on rare occasions have field workers darted a chimpanzee to knock it out and check for an illness that might endanger the other animals.

        So scientists recruited for Hahn’s studies relied initially on urine samples, typically collected under trees where chimps slept at night. That yielded valuable clues, but not the actual virus the researchers wanted. Eventually, Hahn’s team developed techniques to extract the virus from chimp feces.

        At the time, Wilson was working in Tanzania on a three-year stint as director of field research for Gombe Stream Research Center. He oversaw the collection of feces and other data needed for the SIV study.

        It wasn’t sufficient to pick up any old piles of chimp droppings. Because a goal of the research was to learn whether SIV-infected chimps got sick, workers watched to see which chimp did which pile and scoop it up right away.

        “If somebody pooped and we saw it, I made sure that it got collected, and I kept track of the samples,” Wilson said.

        A wealth of information
        Not that he’s complaining. Feces had served up a wealth of scientific information about the Gombe chimps long before the SIV study.

        “You can find out what the chimpanzees have been eating, and all of this wonderful molecular stuff,” Wilson said. “You can find their own genetic information in there, what they have in terms of parasites, and hormones and also the genetics of whatever is infecting them.”

        Back in the lab, the payload was treated with a salt solution to prevent RNA and DNA from decomposing. Then it was packed for shipping to the United States.

        Few of us have struggled through the bureaucratic demands of shipping feces from an endangered species. It’s complicated.

        Wilson had to transport the packages across Tanzania to a building in Dar es Salaam called the Ivory Room. Long ago, ivory was cleared for export there. Now, it’s the place where trophy hunters and reptile exporters wait for clearance to take away their bounty.

        “There I am with a box of poop to weigh and pack and for the inspector to look at and make sure it’s poop and not something else,” Wilson said.

        But Wilson’s work on the project went further, and it continued after he returned to Minnesota, where he now is a professor of anthropology as well as of ecology, evolution and behavior.

        Enter Vincent
        Vincent, the chimp who met a violent end in that stream bed, was of great interest to Wilson — whose main academic focus is studying aggression.

        The alpha male had lived a tough 28 years. Among other mishaps, he had fallen from a tall tree while trying to steal a monkey some younger chimps had caught to eat. He survived the broken bones, but his weakened state made him a prime target for other aggressive males. So he spent much of his time alone.
        On top of everything else, Vincent was SIV positive. No wild chimp known to have the virus ever had been available for the post-mortem examination called a necropsy.

        So on the night two young male chimps killed Vincent in December 2004, field workers put in a radio call to Wilson — who got up before dawn and hiked to Gombe’s remote northern reaches.

        “We had to be very careful because he had to be treated like an AIDS patient,” Wilson said. “He had a very high level of the virus in his system. We already knew that from his feces.”

        Dominic Travis from the Lincoln Park Zoo and Michael Kinsel from the University of Illinois came to Tanzania to join local veterinarians for the necropsy, along with Dr. Titus Mlengeya from Tanzania National Parks and Dr. Ephata Kaaya from Muhimbili University College of Health Sciences.

        Ultimately more infected chimps died and their tissue was shipped to American labs for further study and for comparison with non-infected chimps.

        Shocking findings
        To everyone’s surprise, the infected chimps’ immune systems were damaged, much as they would be in a human AIDS patient.

        “It was a shock,” Pusey said. “It is not fun to find out there is another disease in your population.”

        Among other measures, the infected chimps had unusually low counts of a type of T-cell white blood proteins. The cells are vital to immunity, and their loss is a classic indication of AIDS in humans.

        Meanwhile, the team in Minnesota knew, usually to the day, the age of all 94 chimps in the study, so they were able to work with James Holland Jones of Stanford University on sophisticated mortality analysis.

        Putting everything together, the researchers reported that the infected chimps were 10 to 16 times more likely to die than those not infected. They also reported that infected females were less likely to give birth and that all of the infants born to infected mothers died within a year.

        Four others with U of M ties were authors on the study. Doctoral candidate Emily Wroblewski sequenced DNA from fecal samples and came up with a genetic bar code to identify each chimp. Research Administrator Joann Schumacher-Stankey matched new findings from Gombe with birth dates and everything else known about each chimp. Elizabeth Lonsdorf, who earned a Ph.D. in the Minnesota studies in 2003 and went to work at Lincoln Park Zoo in Chicago, led a health-monitoring project at Gombe. And Anna Moser, who got her Ph.D. in 2008, directed research at Gombe.

        Pusey cautioned that the sample size is small and more study will be needed. One remaining puzzle is why SIV infection is patchy in chimps across Africa. It hasn’t been found, for example, in a chimp population in Uganda, which borders Tanzania.

        “You can have a population here that has it and a population right next door that doesn’t have it,” Pusey said.

        Where the disease does strike, treating chimps with therapies developed for humans is not an option. Nor is it possible to contain the spread by educating chimps. No safe-sex campaigns in the wild.

        There is reason to hope, though, that the virus isn’t as deadly for chimps as it is for humans. Though the study found infected chimps were more likely to die, the risk isn’t as high as it is for humans.

        There also is hope the findings could help save more chimps from hunters.

        “One lesson we can draw from it is that it’s a really bad idea to eat chimpanzees,” Wilson said.

        Sharon Schmickle writes about science, international affairs and other topics.

        • Lucky bin Chimpanzee, THIS WILL OPEN YOUR WICKED SATANIC EYES FOR ONCE AND ALL!!

          How come there was NO AIDS virus in Africa till the time the USA came to the rescue of UNITA in Angola in 1979-82? And immediately the virus started affecting the USA citizens in 1982 before any reported cases in any other part of the world??

          Cuba deployed an estimated 36 000 troops to Angola to support the MPLA in 1975.
          To counter that the USA supported South African troops and by 1979 the troops numbered 60000. USA support for UNITA and the Cuban military support for the MPLA continued into the 1980s, in Angola.

          These troops fought in the jungles of Angola. It was ONLY then that the FIRST case of AIDS was detected, in the USA in 1982…only after the coming of the USA to the forests of Angola. How come??? Did the USA troops have sex with those chimpanzees in the jungle or were they exposed to their blood when they ate them??

          Now see this coincidence :

          “We know that the virus has existed in the United States since at least the mid- to late 1970s. From 1979–1981 rare types of pneumonia, cancer, and other illnesses were being reported by doctors in Los Angeles and New York among a number of male patients who had sex with other men. These were conditions not usually found in people with healthy immune systems.

          In 1982 public health officials began to use the term “acquired immunodeficiency syndrome,” or AIDS, to describe the occurrences of opportunistic infections, Kaposi’s sarcoma (a kind of cancer), and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in previously healthy people. Formal tracking (surveillance) of AIDS cases began that year in the United States.

          In 1983, scientists discovered the virus that causes AIDS. The virus was at first named HTLV-III/LAV (human T-cell lymphotropic virus-type III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus) by an international scientific committee. This name was later changed to HIV (human immunodeficiency virus).

          For many years scientists theorized as to the origins of HIV…then in 1999, they found out that a subspecies of chimpanzees native to west equatorial Africa had been identified as the original source of the virus.” (source:The AIDS Institute)

          Lucky bin chimpanzee “reported by doctors in Los Angeles and New York among a number of male patients who had sex with OTHER men.

          STILL YOU DON’T BELIEVE ISLAM IS BETTER???

          • ANIMALS & MOHAMMEDANS: THE MISSING LINK!

            ANIMAL LOVING MUSLIMS:

            ISLAM & ZOOPHILIA

            Pakistan has banned content on more than a dozen websites because of “offensive” and “blasphemous” material, while they themselves rank No. 1 for certain sex-related search terms, including “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.[1]

            IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD

            AFGHANISTAN

            In a society where homosexuals and adulterers are stoned to death for “sexual immorality” you would expect a similar outcome for someone caught having sex with an animal. Surprisingly this is not the case.
            An Afghan soldier was detained by police after being caught having sex with a donkey in southeastern Afghanistan, a police officer told AFP.

            The soldier was discovered with the donkey in an abandoned house in a small village of Gardez, the capital of Paktia province, last week, a local police officer said.

            “He was caught in the act by a small boy who immediately told police about what he had seen and police arrested him in action,” the Gardez-based officer told AFP, requesting anonymity.
            The soldier claimed he committed the act because he did not have enough money to get married.
            After being caught with the donkey in a village about 100km south of the capital Kabul, he was jailed for four days and then released without charge.

            According to tradition in south and southeastern Afghanistan, a suitor must pay around $US5,000 ($A6,800) to the parents of the girl he wishes to marry.
            Soldier caught with his pants down
            The Age, March 16, 2004
            Could it be that the soldier was released without charge because there is nothing in the Qur’an that prohibits bestiality?

            PALESTINE

            In 1923, the Director of Health in the British Mandate government in Palestine sent out a questionnaire to his Principal Medical and Health Officers in the country, asking them to report on various sexual practices and attitudes among the Muslim Arab population.
            As a result, the British discovered that the Muslim Arabs engaged in bestiality.
            The Nablus officer finds sodomy and “similar vices” “not uncommon in some of the towns but less so in the villages where…bestiality is by no mean unknown” and “immorality…rather lightly regarded” in those villages that are closer to the larger towns. He comments, “in the villages there seems to be curiously little feeling against bestiality which I have heard admitted in a very airy way on more than one occasion. Sodomy is considered disgraceful but not I think more so than ordinary immorality” (III).
            “Unnatural Vices” or Unnatural Rule? The Case of a Sex Questionnaire and the British Mandate
            Ellen L. Fleischmann, Jerusalem Quarterly File, Issue 10, 2000

            PAKISTAN

            In Southern Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh and Balochistan, sex with animals is a common practice among rural youths and considered a rite of passage into adulthood.
            In southern Punjab, much of NWFP, Sindh and Balochistan sodomy and bestiality are common among rural youths. In fact, he caught two boys trying to rape a goat in the vicinity of the mazar of Hazrat Sultan Bahu. The punishment meted out to them was 10 blows with a chhittar (shoe) each on their butts. They protested however that in many rural areas having sex with an animal was considered a rite of passage on the way to becoming full members of the male society!
            Desegregation of the sexes and promiscuity
            Ishtiaq Ahmed (associate professor of political science at Stockholm University), Daily Times, June 27, 2006

            DONKEY KILLED AFTER BEING RAPED

            In June 2011, a male who was caught having sex with another man’s donkey was fined Rs 50,000. This fine was not imposed for having sex with an animal, but for committing adultery. The raped donkey was labelled a ‘kari’ (an adultress) and eventually honor killed by its owner.

            Incredible though it may sound, a donkey was declared ‘Kari’ and shot dead here in a remote area on Monday. The Jirga imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the alleged ‘Karo’.
            The reports said that in Village Ghahi Khan Jatoi, a villager Ghazi Khan alias Malang shot dead his donkey on being ‘Kari’ with Sikandar Ali alias Deedo. He attempted to kill Sikander too but the alleged Karo managed to escape and surrendered himself to an influential person of the area.
            Sources said the influential person summoned both the parties and imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the Karo. They said Sikander and his family were forced to pay Rs 50,000 on the spot and the remaining amount in two installments.
            The sources added that the alleged Karo pleaded innocence at the Jirga, but the Jirga members paid no attention to it. Sikander’s family said he paid Rs 50,000 to save his life otherwise he would have been killed.
            Donkey declared ‘Kari’ killed
            The News International, July 19, 2011
            Pakistan ranks number 1 for such varied search terms as “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.
            The Muslim country, which has banned content on at least 17 websites to block offensive and blasphemous material, is the world’s leader in online searches for pornographic material
            . . .
            Google ranks Pakistan No. 1 in the world in searches for pornographic terms, outranking every other country in the world in searches per person for certain sex-related content.
            Pakistan is top dog in searches per-person for “horse sex” since 2004, “donkey sex” since 2007, “rape pictures” between 2004 and 2009, “rape sex” since 2004, “child sex” between 2004 and 2007 and since 2009, “animal sex” since 2004 and “dog sex” since 2005, according to Google Trends and Google Insights, features of Google that generate data based on popular search terms.
            The country also is tops — or has been No. 1 — in searches for “sex,” “camel sex,” “rape video,” “child sex video” and some other searches that can’t be printed here.
            No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan
            Kelli Morgan, Fox News, July 13, 2010

            OTHER COUNTRIES & BESTIALITY — RELATED SEARCHES

            Pakistani Muslims are not alone in their search for porn.
            Google, the world’s most popular Internet search engine, has found in a survey that mostly Muslim states seek access to sex-related websites and Pakistan tops the list. Google found that of the top 10 countries – searching for sex-related sites – six were Muslim, with Pakistan on the top. The other Muslim countries are Egypt at number 2, Iran at 4, Morocco at 5, Saudi Arabia at 7 and Turkey at 8. Non-Muslim states are Vietnam at 3, India at 6, Philippines at 9 and Poland at 10.
            Pakistan most sex-starved
            Khalid Hasan, Daily Times, May 17, 2006
            Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
            Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
            Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
            Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
            Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
            Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
            Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
            Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
            Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
            Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
            Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
            Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
            Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
            Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

            MIDDLE EAST

            Bestiality is common among boys of tribal Arab cultures.
            Miner and DeVos (1960) comment that amongst Arab tribal cultures, “Bestiality with goats, sheep, or camels provides another outlet. These practices are not approved but they are recognized as common among boys.” Havelock-Ellis [note 52] states “The Arabs, according to Kocher, chiefly practice bestiality with goats, sheep and mares. The Annamites, according to Mondiere, commonly employ sows and (more especially the young women) dogs.”
            Historical And Cultural Perspectives On Zoophilia
            Serving History
            There is also a certain saying which remains popular among the Arabs:
            The Arabs have never taken quite so condemnatory an attitude towards the practice, and indeed a popular Arab saying had it that

            “The pilgrimage to Mecca is not complete without copulating with the camel.”[9]

            SUDAN

            In February 2006, a man caught having sex with a neighbor’s goat was not punished, but ordered by the council of elders to pay the neighbor a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) and marry the animal because he “used it as his wife”.
            A Sudanese man has been forced to take a goat as his “wife”, after he was caught having sex with the animal.
            The goat’s owner, Mr Alifi, said he surprised the man with his goat and took him to a council of elders.
            They ordered the man, Mr Tombe, to pay a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) to Mr Alifi.
            “We have given him the goat, and as far as we know they are still together,” Mr Alifi said.
            Sudan man forced to ‘marry’ goat
            BBC News, February 24,2006

            MOROCCO
            Morocco is an Islamic country, with 98.7% of the population Muslims.[10] The following is taken from a paper on sexuality in Morocco written by Nadia Kadiri, M.D., and Abderrazak Moussaïd, M.D., with Abdelkrim Tirraf, M.D., and Abdallah Jadid, M.D. Translated by Raymond J. Noonan, Ph.D., and Sandra Almeida.[11]
            In the rural world, zoophilia is still very widespread and not blameworthy. With masturbation, it constitutes an obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality.
            The operative phrase is ‘obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality’. Obligatory. It means in rural Morocco, Muslim males must have sexual intercourse with animals as part of their sexual apprenticeship.
            Also according to the scholars Allen Edwardes and Robert Masters, Ph.D, FAACS, the Muslims of Morocco believe that sexual intercourse with donkeys “make the penis grow big and strong” and masturbation is often scorned by them in favor of bestiality.[12]

            SLAMIC SCRIPTURE

            The above paper also says “it is prohibited without question by the Shariâ”. But is this alleged prohibition within the Shari’ah extracted (as it must be) from the Qur’an and Hadith, or has this fiqh been derived using external non-Islamic sources?

            QURAN

            In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur’an has to say on the subject:
            That’s right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur’an’s clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’
            If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.[13]

            HADITH

            There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. The following hadith is taken from the Sunnah Abu-Dawud collection, not Bukari or Muslim.
            Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.
            Abu Dawud 38:4449
            Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? And it is. Just look at the very next hadith.
            Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
            Abu Dawud 38:4450
            This is a very clear contradiction. How can one hadith say kill the person committing bestiality, and the very next one say there is no prescribed punishment for the same person? Both statements cannot be true.
            What’s worse; these two contradictory hadiths (transmitted through different isnad) have been attributed to the same person. Abu Dawud himself had said the former of the two hadith is “not strong” and the latter further “weakens” it.[14]

            From the above, we can gather that Robert Masters had correctly stated, “bestiality was not specifically prohibited by the Prophet,”[9] so there is little wonder that Islamists generally shy away from mentioning Abu Dawud 38:4449 in their pronouncements on bestiality.

            SAHIH (AUTHENTIC) HADITH

            As we have previously mentioned, there is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs (Authentic). However there does exist a certain hadith and commentary by the renowned Islamic scholar al-Nawawi, which is of interest.

            The following narration does not exist in the English translations of Sahih Muslim, but a similar (but sanitized version) appears in: Sahih Muslim 3:684

            و حدثني ‏ ‏زهير بن حرب ‏ ‏وأبو غسان المسمعي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثناه ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏وابن بشار ‏ ‏قالوا حدثنا ‏ ‏معاذ بن هشام ‏ ‏قال حدثني ‏ ‏أبي ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏ومطر ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏الحسن ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي رافع ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي هريرة ‏ ‏أن نبي الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏إذا جلس بين ‏ ‏شعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ثم جهدها فقد وجب عليه الغسل ‏
            ‏وفي حديث ‏ ‏مطر ‏ ‏وإن لم ينزل ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏زهير ‏ ‏من بينهم بين ‏ ‏أشعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن عمرو بن عباد بن جبلة ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن أبي عدي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏حدثني ‏ ‏وهب بن جرير ‏ ‏كلاهما ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏بهذا الإسناد ‏ ‏مثله غير أن في حديث ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏ثم اجتهد ولم يقل وإن لم ينزل ‏
            Narrated by Zuhair Ibn Harb, narrated by Ghasan Al-Masma’i, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Ibn Bashar, who said that it was narrated by Muath Ibn Hisham, narrated by Abu Qatada, narrated by Mattar, narrated by Al-Hassan, narrated by Abu Rab’i, narrated by Abu Huraira who said:
            “The prophet — peace be upon him — said, ‘If one sits between a woman’s four parts (shu’biha Al-arba’) and then fatigues her, then it necessitates that he wash.’

            In the hadith of Mattar it is added ‘even if he does not ejaculate (yunzil).’ Zuhair narrated among them using the phrase ‘Ashba’iha Al-arba’. It was also narrated by Muhammad Ibn Umar Ibn Ibad Ibn Jablah, narrated Muhammad Ibn Abi Uday, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Wahb Ibn Jarir who both related from Shu’bah who narrated from Qatada who gave this same chain of transmission, except that in the hadith of Shu’bah it has the phrase ‘then he labored’ but did not have the phrase ‘even if he does not ejaculate.’
            Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525

            IMAM AL-NAWAWI (1234 — 1278 AD)

            Below is a short bio of al-Nawawi, whose commentary of Sahih Muslim is second only to Ibn Hajar’s commentary of Sahih Bukhari.[15]
            Imam Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi was born in the village of Nawa in Southern Syria, Nawawi spent most of his life in Damascus where he lived in a simple manner, devoted to Allah, engaging single-mindedly in worship, study, writing and teaching various Islamic sciences. The life of this world seems scarcely to have impinged upon him. He was a versatile and extremely dedicated scholar whose breadth of learning was matched by its depth.
            Imam Nawawi died at the young age of 44 years, leaving behind him numerous works of great importance, the most famous of these being:
            • al-Arba’un Nabawi (An-Nawawis Forty Hadith)
            • Riyadhus saleheen
            • al-Maqasid (Al-Nawawi’s Manual of Islam).
            • Kitab al-Adhkar,
            • Minhaj al-Talibin (a main reference for Shafi’i fiqh)

            • Shar’ Sahih Muslim (he was the first to arrange the sahih of Muslim in the now familiar categories)
            Although best known for his works in hadith, Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi (d. 676/1277) was also the Imam of the later Shafi’i school of Jurisprudence, and widely acknowledged as the intellectual heir to Imam Shafi’i. He was a renowned scholar and jurist who dedicated his life to the pursuit of Islamic learning.
            About Imam al-Nawawi

            COMMENTARY
            صحيح مسلم بشرح النووي ‏ ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو غَسَّان الْمِسْمَعِيّ ) ‏ ‏هُوَ بِفَتْحِ الْغَيْن الْمُعْجَمَة وَتَشْدِيد السِّين الْمُهْمَلَة , وَيَجُوز صَرْفه وَتَرْكُ صَرْفه . وَالْمِسْمَعِيّ بِكَسْرِ الْمِيم الْأُولَى وَفَتْح الثَّانِي , وَاسْمه مَالِك بْن عَبْد الْوَاحِد , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَانه مَرَّات , لَكِنِّي أُنَبِّه عَلَيْهِ وَعَلَى مِثْله لِطُولِ الْعَهْد بِهِ , كَمَا شَرَطْتهُ فِي الْخُطْبَة . ‏
            ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو رَافِع عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَة ) ‏ ‏اِسْم أَبِي رَافِع : ( نُفَيْع ) وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ أَيْضًا . ‏ ‏قَوْله صَلَّى اللَّه عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : ( إِذَا قَعَدَ بَيْن شُعَبهَا الْأَرْبَع ثُمَّ جَهَدهَا ) ‏ ‏وَفِي رِوَايَة ( أَشْعُبهَا ) اِخْتَلَفَ الْعُلَمَاء فِي الْمُرَاد بِالشُّعَبِ الْأَرْبَع , فَقِيلَ : هِيَ الْيَدَانِ وَالرِّجْلَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالْفَخِذَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالشَّفْرَانِ , وَاخْتَارَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض أَنَّ الْمُرَاد شُعَب الْفَرْج الْأَرْبَع , وَالشُّعَب النَّوَاحِي وَاحِدَتهَا شُعْبَة , وَأَمَّا مَنْ قَالَ : ( أَشْعُبِهَا ) , فَهُوَ جَمْع شُعَب . وَمَعْنَى ( جَهَدَهَا ) حَفَرَهَا كَذَا قَالَهُ الْخَطَّابِيُّ وَقَالَ غَيْره : بَلَغَ مَشَقَّتهَا , يُقَال : جَهِدْته وَأَجْهَدْته بَلَغْت مَشَقَّته , قَالَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض رَحِمَهُ اللَّه تَعَالَى : الْأَوْلَى أَنْ يَكُون جَهَدَهَا بِمَعْنَى بَلَغَ جَهْده فِي الْعَمَل فِيهَا , وَالْجَهْد الطَّاقَة , وَهُوَ إِشَارَة إِلَى الْحَرَكَة وَتَمَكُّن صُورَة الْعَمَل , وَهُوَ نَحْو قَوْله مِنْ حَفَرَهَا أَيْ كَدّهَا بِحَرَكَتِهِ . وَإِلَّا فَأَيّ مَشَقَّة بَلَغَ بِهَا فِي ذَلِكَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . وَمَعْنَى الْحَدِيث أَنَّ إِيجَاب الْغُسْل لَا يَتَوَقَّف عَلَى نُزُول الْمَنِيّ بَلْ مَتَى غَابَتْ الْحَشَفَة فِي الْفَرْج وَجَبَ الْغُسْل عَلَى الرَّجُل وَالْمَرْأَة , وَهَذَا لَا خِلَاف فِيهِ الْيَوْم , وَقَدْ كَانَ فِيهِ خِلَاف لِبَعْضِ الصَّحَابَة وَمَنْ بَعْدهمْ , ثُمَّ اِنْعَقَدَ الْإِجْمَاع عَلَى مَا ذَكَرْنَاهُ , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَان هَذَا . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ الْحَشَفَة فِي دُبُر اِمْرَأَة , أَوْ دُبُر رَجُل , أَوْ فَرْج بَهِيمَة , أَوْ دُبُرهَا , وَجَبَ الْغُسْل سَوَاء كَانَ الْمَوْلَج فِيهِ حَيًّا أَوْ مَيِّتًا , صَغِيرًا أَوْ كَبِيرًا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ ذَلِكَ عَنْ قَصْد أَمْ عَنْ نِسْيَان , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مُخْتَارًا أَوْ مُكْرَهًا , أَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَهُ وَهُوَ نَائِم , وَسَوَاء اِنْتَشَرَ الذَّكَر أَمْ لَا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مَخْتُونًا أَمْ أَغْلَف , فَيَجِب الْغُسْل فِي كُلّ هَذِهِ الصُّوَر عَلَى الْفَاعِل وَالْمَفْعُول بِهِ إِلَّا إِذَا كَانَ الْفَاعِل أَوْ الْمَفْعُول بِهِ صَبِيًّا أَوْ صَبِيَّة فَإِنَّهُ لَا يُقَال وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ لِأَنَّهُ لَيْسَ مُكَلَّفًا , وَلَكِنْ يُقَال صَارَ جُنُبًا فَإِنْ كَانَ مُمَيِّزًا وَجَبَ عَلَى الْوَلِيّ أَنْ يَأْمُرهُ بِالْغُسْلِ كَمَا يَأْمُرهُ بِالْوُضُوءِ , فَإِنْ صَلَّى مِنْ غَيْر غُسْلٍ لَمْ تَصِحّ صَلَاته , وَإِنْ لَمْ يَغْتَسِل حَتَّى بَلَغَ وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ الْغُسْل , وَإِنْ اِغْتَسَلَ فِي الصِّبَى ثُمَّ بَلَغَ لَمْ يَلْزَمهُ إِعَادَة الْغُسْل . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَالِاعْتِبَار فِي الْجِمَاع بِتَغْيِيبِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْ صَحِيح الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ , فَإِذَا غَيَّبَهَا بِكَمَالِهَا تَعَلَّقَتْ بِهِ جَمِيع الْأَحْكَام , وَلَا يُشْتَرَط تَغْيِيب جَمِيع الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ . وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ بَعْض الْحَشَفَة لَا يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام بِالِاتِّفَاقِ إِلَّا وَجْهًا شَاذًّا ذَكَرَهُ بَعْض أَصْحَابنَا أَنَّ حُكْمه حُكْم جَمِيعهَا , وَهَذَا الْوَجْه غَلَط مُنْكَر مَتْرُوك , وَأَمَّا إِذَا كَانَ الذَّكَر مَقْطُوعًا فَإِنْ بَقِيَ مِنْهُ دُون الْحَشَفَة لَمْ يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام , وَإِنْ كَانَ الْبَاقِي قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَحَسْب تَعَلَّقَتْ الْأَحْكَام بِتَغْيِيبِهِ بِكَمَالِهِ , وَإِنْ كَانَ زَائِدًا عَلَى قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَفِيهِ وَجْهَانِ مَشْهُورَانِ لِأَصْحَابِنَا أَصَحّهمَا أَنَّ الْأَحْكَام تَتَعَلَّق بِقَدْرِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْهُ , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَتَعَلَّق شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام إِلَّا بِتَغْيِيبِ جَمِيع الْبَاقِي . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ لَفَّ عَلَى ذَكَرِهِ خِرْقَة وَأَوْلَجَهُ فِي فَرْج اِمْرَأَة فَفِيهِ ثَلَاثَة أَوْجُه لِأَصْحَابِنَا مِنْهَا وَالْمَشْهُور أَنَّهُ يَجِب عَلَيْهِمَا الْغُسْل , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَجِب لِأَنَّهُ أَوْلَجَ فِي خِرْقَة , وَالثَّالِث إِنْ كَانَتْ الْخِرْقَة غَلِيظَة تَمْنَع وُصُول اللَّذَّة وَالرُّطُوبَة لَمْ يَجِب الْغُسْل . وَإِلَّا وَجَبَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَ بَهِيمَة وَجَبَ عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل , وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت ذَكَرًا مَقْطُوعًا فَوَجْهَانِ أَصَحّهمَا يَجِب عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل
            Commentary of Imam Al-Nawawi on the Hadith
            The saying of the prophet — peace be upon him- ‘When he sits between her fours parts) mostly its a home animal (shu’biha Al-arba) and has intercourse with her then fatigues her’

            In another narration the word ‘Ashu’biha’ is used. The scholars have disagreed about the intended meaning of ‘shu’biha Al-arba’ (the fours) for some said that it means the arms and the legs, while others have said that it refers to the legs and thighs, and other said it means the legs and the edge of the pubic area. Al-Qadi Ayad chose the meaning of the four areas surrounding the vagina. The word (Shu’b) means areas, its singular form being (Shu’bah). As for those who say (Ashba’iha) that is the plural of the word (Shu’b).

            The word Aj-hada-ha (fatigue her) means to plow her, which was also stated by Al-Khatabi. Others have said it means to make her reach exhaustion as in the phrase ‘she made him toil and labor till he was exhausted’. Al-Qadi Ayad — may Allah rest his soul- said ‘Primarily, the word (Jahada’ha) means that the man exerted his effort working in a woman, where the word (Juh’d) means energy and refers to motion by describing the type of work. This is similar to his (the prophet) saying ‘he who plowed her’ meaning he who penetrated her by his motion. Otherwise, what other fatigue could a man experience because of her, and Allah knows best.

            The meaning of the hadith is that the necessity to wash is not limited to when semen is ejaculated, rather it is when the penile head (Hash-fa, lit. “the head of the male member,” i.e. head of the penis) penetrates the vagina, then it is necessary for the man and the woman to wash. There is no disagreement on this today, even though there was disagreement on this by some of the early companions and others later. However, an agreement was later reached and this is what we have shown and presented previously.
            Our companions have said that if the penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus, or a man’s anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus then it is necessary to wash whether the one being penetrated is alive or dead, young or old, whether it was done intentionally or absentmindedly, whether it was done willfully or forcefully.

            This also applies if the woman places the male member inside her while the man is asleep, whether the penis is erect or not, whether the penis is circumcised or uncircumcised. All these situations require that the person committing the act and the one the act is committed on must wash themselves, unless the person committing the act or the person the act is committed on is a young male or female. In that case it cannot be said that the person must wash, for they do not have the responsibility, rather it is said that this person is in a state of impurity. If that person can discern (the sexual act) then his guardian can command him to wash just as he commands him to perform the ablution washing for prayers. For if he prays without washing, his prayer has not been performed correctly; likewise if he doesn’t wash after he reaches puberty he must be forced to wash. If he washed as a youth and then reaches puberty, then he does not have to repeat the washing.

            Our companions have said that intercourse occurs when a healthy male’s penile head completely penetrates (an orifice), as has been unanimously agreed. Thus, when the penile head has completely disappeared (inside the orifice), then all the regulations concerning washing apply. It is unanimously agreed that it is not necessary that the entire penile shaft penetrate to apply the regulations of washing. If part of the penile head penetrates, then the regulations of washing are not imposed as is agreed, except by an odd few of our companions who said that even in this case all the regulations of washing apply. However, this opinion is wrong, rejected and abandoned. If the male member was severed and what remained was less than the length of the penile head, then none of the washing regulations apply. If the part remaining was equal in length to the penile head length then that part must completely penetrate for the regulation of washing to apply. If the part remaining was greater in length to the penile head length then there are two famous opinions for our companions. The most correct is that if the portion that penetrates is equal to the length of the penile head, then the regulations for washing apply. The other opinion is that none of the regulations for washing apply until the entire remaining length of the penile shaft completely penetrates and Allah knows best.
            If a man wraps a sheath around his male member and then ejaculates inside a woman’s vagina, then there are three opinions from our companions. The most famous is that the man must wash. The second is that he does not have to wash because he ejaculated inside the sheath. The third is that if the sheath is thick and prevents climax and wetness (in the vagina) then washing is not necessary, otherwise it is necessary and Allah knows best.
            If a woman inserts (in her vagina) an animal’s penis she must wash, and if she inserts a detached penis (thakaran maktu-an, lit. “a severed male member”) there are two opinions; the most correct is that she must wash.

            Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525 – Commentary

            ISLAMIC SCHOLARS

            Some Sunni Islamic scholars have ruled that bestiality does not invalidate the hajj or ones fast.
            ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه

            “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal, that will not make his hajj void”
            Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H), Badaye al-Sanae, Vol. 2, p. 216
            “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”
            Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan, Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820
            Others have said it is halal.
            لقد كانت نكاح الحيوانات قبل البعثه منتشره وتروى كثير من الروايات انها حلال لكنها مكروه والاحوط وجوبا ترك هذه العاده التي تسبب الأذى النفسي ويجب عليك الاعتراف لصاحب الاغنام ودفع قيمتها لمالكها

            Sex with animals before the mission (Islam) was wide spread and many narrations are narrated that it is halal but makrooh (disliked). And on the compulsory precaution one should abandon this practice that may cause self harm. And you must admit this to the owner of the sheep and pay the owner.
            Sex with animals Fatwa
            al-Uzma Seyyid Ali al-Sistani

            CONCLUSION

            From all of the above, we can certainly see that, unlike the West, Islamic societies do not universally harbor negative attitudes towards bestiality. Many Muslims seek out gratification or are indifferent to this perversion, and in some cases it is even openly promoted and made obligatory.
            This is all in stark contrast with their attitudes towards homosexuality and their allowance of pedophilia. Therefore to claim that the West without the guidance of Islam has allowed bestiality is not only false, but hypocritical when you consider that this perversion, alongside pedophilia, is left largely unhindered by the Islamic clerisy in their societies and runs rampant among followers of Islam.
            Aside from their own embarrassment, we can also see that there is little basis for any Shari’ah prohibition of bestiality/zoophilia as the Qur’an and the Sahih Hadiths (Bukhari and Muslim) do not prohibit this unnatural practice, furthermore the references we have examined outside of the two Sahihs are considered weak.

            References

            1. ↑ Kelli Morgan – No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan – Fox News, July 13, 2010
            2. ↑ Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2010 Douglas Harper
            3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Bestiality – Dictionary.com
            4. ↑ Collins English Dictionary – Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition 2009
            5. ↑ Merriam-Webster’s Medical Dictionary, © 2007 Merriam-Webster, Inc.
            6. ↑ Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc.
            7. ↑ Rebecca F. Wisch – Overview of State Bestiality Laws – Animal Legal & Historical Center, 2008 (updated 2010)
            8. ↑ Watcher – Pakistan: Muslims Are Sex-Starved Surfers, With Bestial Interests – Eye On The World, May 18, 2006
            9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Robert E.L. Masters – Forbidden Sexual Behavior and Morality – The Julian Press, 1st edition 1966,
            10. ↑ Africa :: Morocco – The online Factbook
            11. ↑ Read the full text here.
            12. ↑ Allen Edwardes and R.E.L. Masters – Cradle of Erotica (pp. 223-224) – Bantam Paperback; New Ed edition (1977), ISBN 0553103016
            13. ↑ Judith Worell – Encyclopedia of women and gender: Volume 1 (p. 298) – Academic Press; 1 edition, September 27, 2001, ISBN 9780122272455
            14. ↑ Dr. Ahmad Shafaat – Ahadith About Rajm – Islamic Perspectives, March 6, 2005
            15. ↑ ON TASAWWUF Imam Nawawi (d. 676) – Sunnah.org

      • MOHAMMEDANS CAN’T SEE THE BURKA CLAD WOMEN, SO THEY FUCK THE BEARDLESS BOYS Chris Mondloch Tuesday 29 October 2013 AN AFGHAN TRAGEDY: THE PASHTUN PRACTICE OF HAVING SEX WITH YOUNG BOYS Afghanistan’s subculture of paedophilia is one of the country’s untold shames With the looming withdrawal of Nato troops and a persistent insurgent threat, Afghanistan is in a precarious position. Innumerable tragedies have beleaguered rural Afghans throughout the past decades of conflict — perpetual violence, oppression of women, and crushing poverty have all contributed to the Hobbesian nature of life in the Afghan countryside. While the Afghan government has been able to address some of these issues since the Taliban’s ouster in 2001, archaic social traditions and deep-seated gender norms have kept much of rural Afghanistan in a medieval state of purgatory. Perhaps the most deplorable tragedy, one that has actually grown more rampant since 2001, is the practice of bacha bazi — sexual companionship between powerful men and their adolescent boy conscripts. This phenomenon presents a system of gender reversal in Afghanistan. Whereas rural Pashtun culture remains largely misogynistic and male-dominated due to deeply-ingrained Islamic values, teenage boys have become the objects of lustful attraction and romance for some of the most powerful men in the Afghan countryside. Demeaning and damaging, the widespread subculture of paedophilia in Afghanistan constitutes one of the most egregious ongoing violations of human rights in the world. The adolescent boys who are groomed for sexual relationships with older men are bought — or, in some instances, kidnapped — from their families and thrust into a world which strips them of their masculine identity. These boys are often made to dress as females, wear makeup, and dance for parties of men. They are expected to engage in sexual acts with much older suitors, often remaining a man’s or group’s sexual underling for a protracted period. EVOLUTION OF BACHA BAZI Occurring frequently across southern and eastern Afghanistan’s rural Pashtun belt and with ethnic Tajiks in the northern Afghan countryside, bacha bazi has become a shockingly common practice. Afghanistan’s mujahideen warlords, who fought off the Soviet invasion and instigated a civil war in the 1980s, regularly engaged in acts of paedophilia. Keeping one or more “chai boys,” as these male conscripts are called, for personal servitude and sexual pleasure became a symbol of power and social status. The Taliban had a deep aversion towards bacha bazi, outlawing the practice when they instituted strict nationwide sharia law. According to some accounts, including the hallmark Times article “Kandahar Comes out of the Closet” in 2002, one of the original provocations for the Taliban’s rise to power in the early 1990s was their outrage over paedophilia. Once they came to power, bacha bazi became taboo, and the men who still engaged in the practice did so in secret. When the former mujahideen commanders ascended to power in 2001 after the Taliban’s ouster, they brought with them a rekindled culture of bacha bazi. Today, many of these empowered warlords serve in important positions, as governors, line ministers, police chiefs and military commanders. Since its post-2001 revival, bacha bazi has evolved, and its practice varies across Afghanistan. According to military experts I talked to in Afghanistan, the lawlessness that followed the deposing of the Taliban’s in rural Pashtunistan and northern Afghanistan gave rise to violent expressions of paedophilia. Boys were raped, kidnapped and trafficked as sexual predators regained their positions of regional power. As rule of law mechanisms and general order returned to the Afghan countryside, bacha bazi became a normalized, structured practice in many areas. Many “chai boys” are now semi-formal apprentices to their powerful male companions. Military officials have observed that Afghan families with an abundance of children are often keen to provide a son to a warlord or government official — with full knowledge of the sexual ramifications — in order to gain familial prestige and monetary compensation. Whereas bacha bazi is now largely consensual and non-violent, its evolution into an institutionalized practice within rural Pashtun and Tajik society is deeply disturbing. PEDOPHILIA & ISLAM The fact that bacha bazi, which has normalized sodomy and child abuse in rural Afghan society, developed within a deeply fundamentalist Islamic region of the world is mystifying. According to a 2009 Human Terrain Team study titled “Pashtun Sexuality,” Pashtun social norms dictate that bacha bazi is not un-Islamic or homosexual at all — if the man does not love the boy, the sexual act is not reprehensible, and is far more ethical than defiling a woman. Sheltered by their pastoral setting and unable to speak Arabic — the language of all Islamic texts — many Afghans allow social customs to trump religious values, including those Quranic verses eschewing homosexuality and promiscuity. Warlords who have exploited Islam for political or personal means have also promulgated tolerance for bacha bazi. The mujahideen commanders are a perfect example of this — they fought communism in the name of jihad and mobilized thousands of men by promoting Islam, while sexually abusing boys and remaining relatively secular themselves. RAGIC CONSEQUENCES The rampant paedophilia has a number of far-reaching detrimental consequences on Afghanistan’s development into a functional nation. The first — and most obvious — consequence of bacha bazi is the irreparable abuse inflicted on its thousands of victims. Because it is so common, a significant percentage of the country’s male population bears the deep psychological scars of sexual abuse from childhood. Some estimates say that as many as 50 percent of the men in the Pashtun tribal areas of southern Afghanistan take boy lovers, making it clear that paedophilia is a pervasive issue affecting entire rural communities. Many of the prominent Pashtun men who currently engage in bacha bazi were likely abused as children; in turn, many of today’s adolescent victims will likely become powerful warlords or government-affiliated leaders with boy lovers of their own, perpetuating the cycle of abuse. A second corrupting, and perhaps surprising, consequence of bacha bazi is its negative impact on women’s rights in Afghanistan. It has become a commonly accepted notion among Afghanistan’s latent homosexual male population that “women are for children, and boys are for pleasure.” Passed down through many generations and spurred by the vicious cycle created by the pedophile-victim relationship, many Afghan men have lost their attraction towards the opposite gender. Although social and religious customs still heavily dictate that all men must marry one or more women and have children, these marriages are often devoid of love and affection, and are treated as practical, mandated arrangements. While the Afghan environment has grown more conducive to improving women’s social statuses, the continued normalization of bacha bazi will perpetuate the traditional view of women as second-class citizens — household fixtures meant for child-rearing and menial labor, and undeserving of male attraction and affection. The third unfortunate consequence of bacha bazi is its detrimental bearing on the perpetual state of conflict in Afghanistan, especially in the southern Pashtun-dominated countryside. Because paedophilia and sodomy were, and remain, a main point of contention between the Islamist Taliban and traditional Pashtun warlords, the widespread nature of bacha bazi likely continues to fuel the Taliban’s desire to reassert sharia law. The adolescent victims are vulnerable to Taliban intimidation and may be used to infiltrate the Afghan government and security forces. The resurgence of bacha bazi since the Taliban’s defeat and the significant percentage of government, police, and military officials engaged in the practice has put the United States and its NATO allies in a precarious position. By empowering these sexual predators, the coalition built a government around a “lesser evil,” promoting often-corrupt pedophiles in lieu of the extremist, al-Qaida-linked Taliban. Going forward, the strong Western moral aversion to pedophilia will likely erode the willingness of NATO and international philanthropic agencies to continue their support for Afghanistan’s development in the post-transition period. As Joel Brinkley, a reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle, asked: “So, why are American and NATO forces fighting and dying to defend tens of thousands of proud pedophiles, certainly more per capita than any other place on Earth?” LOOKING FORWARD Despite the grave nature of the child abuse committed across Afghanistan, this tragic phenomenon has received relatively little global attention. It has been highlighted mainly in sporadic news articles and one Afghan-produced documentary, while other Afghan issues such as women’s rights and poverty are center stage. From a human rights perspective, the pervasive culture of paedophilia deserves substantial international consideration due to its detrimental effects — the immediate and noticeable effects on the young victims, as well as the roadblocks it creates towards achieving gender equality and peace. The only way to tackle both bacha bazi and gender inequality is to modernize Afghanistan’s rule of law system. Afghan officials have been scrutinized in multiple reports by the United Nations’ Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict for their failure to protect children’s rights. Although Afghan officials formally agreed to outlaw these practices in response to UN criticism in 2011, the government’s ability and willingness to internally enforce laws protecting children has been non-existent. If a future Afghan government can achieve a balance between the Taliban, who strictly enforced anti-paedophilia laws but harshly oppressed women, and the current administration, which has put an end to the hard-line Islamic subjugation of women but has allowed bacha bazi to reach shocking levels, Afghanistan’s dismal human rights record may improve. An additional strategy for combating bacha bazi is to attack the issue from an ethno-cultural standpoint. Identifying key tribal elders and other local powerbrokers who share the West’s revulsion towards such widespread paedophilia is the first step in achieving lasting progress. As is true with women’s rights, understanding Afghanistan’s complex social terrain and bridging its cultural differences is necessary to safeguard the rights of adolescent boys. The Afghan government’s acknowledgement of bacha bazi and subsequent outreach into rural Pashtun communities, where the legitimacy of the government is often eclipsed by the power of warlords and tribal elders, will also be critical. The most important breakthrough, of course, will come when the Afghan government, police, and military rid themselves of all pedophiles. If the central government can ensure its representatives at the local level will cease their engagement in bacha bazi, the social norms are bound to change as well. Eliminating this truly damaging practice will finally occur when a paedophile-free Afghan government is able to more closely connect the country’s urban centers to its rural countryside. Only then will a progressive social code be established. And if this evolved social code can incorporate the tenets of Islam with social justice and effectively marginalize the archaic and abusive aspects of Pashtun and Tajik warlord culture, there is hope for Afghanistan yet. Chris Mondloch served as an analyst for the U.S. Marine Corps for five years and directed intelligence production for the Corps’ Economic Political Intelligence Cell in Helmand province in 2012. Copyright Washington Post/ Foreign Policy 2013. AFGHANISTAN’S DIRTY LITTLE SECRET Joel Brinkley Published 4:00 am, Sunday, August 29, 2010 Western forces fighting in southern Afghanistan had a problem. Too often, soldiers on patrol passed an older man walking hand-in-hand with a pretty young boy. Their behavior suggested he was not the boy’s father. Then, British soldiers found that young Afghan men were actually trying to “touch and fondle them,” military investigator AnnaMaria Cardinalli told me. “The soldiers didn’t understand.” All of this was so disconcerting that the Defense Department hired Cardinalli, a social scientist, to examine this mystery. Her report, “Pashtun Sexuality,” startled not even one Afghan. But Western forces were shocked – and repulsed. For centuries, Afghan men have taken boys, roughly 9 to 15 years old, as lovers. Some research suggests that half the Pashtun tribal members in Kandahar and other southern towns are bacha baz, the term for an older man with a boy lover. Literally it means “boy player.” The men like to boast about it. “Having a boy has become a custom for us,” Enayatullah, a 42-year-old in Baghlan province, told a Reuters reporter. “Whoever wants to show off should have a boy.” Baghlan province is in the northeast, but Afghans say pedophilia is most prevalent among Pashtun men in the south. The Pashtun are Afghanistan’s most important tribe. For centuries, the nation’s leaders have been Pashtun. President Hamid Karzai is Pashtun, from a village near Kandahar, and he has six brothers. So the natural question arises: Has anyone in the Karzai family been bacha baz? Two Afghans with close connections to the Karzai family told me they know that at least one family member and perhaps two were bacha baz. Afraid of retribution, both declined to be identified and would not be more specific for publication. As for Karzai, an American who worked in and around his palace in an official capacity for many months told me that homosexual behavior “was rampant” among “soldiers and guys on the security detail. They talked about boys all the time.” He added, “I didn’t see Karzai with anyone. He was in his palace most of the time.” He, too, declined to be identified. In Kandahar, population about 500,000, and other towns, dance parties are a popular, often weekly, pastime. Young boys dress up as girls, wearing makeup and bells on their feet, and dance for a dozen or more leering middle-aged men who throw money at them and then take them home. A recent State Department report called “dancing boys” a “widespread, culturally sanctioned form of male rape.” So, why are American and NATO forces fighting and dying to defend tens of thousands of proud pedophiles, certainly more per capita than any other place on Earth? And how did Afghanistan become the pedophilia capital of Asia? Sociologists and anthropologists say the problem results from perverse interpretation of Islamic law. Women are simply unapproachable. Afghan men cannot talk to an unrelated woman until after proposing marriage. Before then, they can’t even look at a woman, except perhaps her feet. Otherwise she is covered, head to ankle. “How can you fall in love if you can’t see her face,” 29-year-old Mohammed Daud told reporters. “We can see the boys, so we can tell which are beautiful.” Even after marriage, many men keep their boys, suggesting a loveless life at home. A favored Afghan expression goes: “Women are for children, boys are for pleasure.” Fundamentalist imams, exaggerating a biblical passage on menstruation, teach that women are “unclean” and therefore distasteful. One married man even asked Cardinalli’s team “how his wife could become pregnant,” her report said. When that was explained, he “reacted with disgust” and asked, “How could one feel desire to be with a woman, who God has made unclean?” That helps explain why women are hidden away – and stoned to death if they are perceived to have misbehaved. Islamic law also forbids homosexuality. But the pedophiles explain that away. It’s not homosexuality, they aver, because they aren’t in love with their boys. Addressing the loathsome mistreatment of Afghan women remains a primary goal for coalition governments, as it should be. But what about the boys, thousands upon thousands of little boys who are victims of serial rape over many years, destroying their lives – and Afghan society. “There’s no issue more horrifying and more deserving of our attention than this,” Cardinalli said. “I’m continually haunted by what I saw.” As one boy, in tow of a man he called “my lord,” told the Reuters reporter: “Once I grow up, I will be an owner, and I will have my own boys.” © 2010 Joel Brinkley BACHA BAZI Bacheh-baazi (Persian: بچهبازی, meaning “playing with kids” in Afghan dialect), also known as bacchá (from the Persian bacheh بچه “child, young man, kid”) or bacha bi-reesh (beardless boy), is sexual slavery and child prostitution[1] in which prepubescent and adolescent boys are sold to wealthy or powerful men for entertainment and sexual activities. This business thrives in Afghanistan, where many men keep them as status symbols.[2][3] Some of the individuals involved report being forced into sex. The authorities are barely attempting to crack down on the practice but many doubt it would be effective since many of the men are powerful and well-armed former commanders.[4] A documentary film by Najibullah Quraishi about the practice was screened by the UK Royal Society of Arts on March 29, 2010[5] and aired by the U.S. TV series PBS Frontline on 20 April 2010.[2] The practice is illegal under Afghan law, being “against both sharia law and the civil code”,[6] but the laws are seldom enforced against powerful offenders and police have been reportedly complicit in related crimes.[7][8] The UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict reported in 2009, “It is time to openly confront this practice and to put an end to it. Religious leaders in Afghanistan appealed to me to assist them in combating these activities. Laws should be passed, campaigns must be waged and perpetrators should be held accountable and punished. Boys, as well as girls, should be protected so that they are allowed the full benefits of a childhood without exploitation.”[9] HISTORY The practice of bacha bazi is one form of pederasty which has been prevalent in that area since ancient times.[9] Historically more common, especially in northern areas of Afghanistan, than at present, it waned in the big cities after World War I, forced out for reasons that dance historian Anthony Shay describes as “Victorian era prudery and severe disapproval of colonial powers such as the Russians, British, and French, and the post-colonial elites who had absorbed those Western colonial values.”[10] A number of western travellers through Central Asia have reported on the phenomenon of the bacchá. Visiting Turkestan in 1872 to 1873, Eugene Schuyler observed that, “here boys and youths specially trained take the place of the dancing-girls of other countries. The moral tone of the society of Central Asia is scarcely improved by the change”. His opinion was that the dances “were by no means indecent, though they were often very lascivious.” At this date there were already signs of official disapproval of the practice. Wrote Schuyler: These batchas, or dancing-boys, are a recognised institution throughout the whole of the settled portions of Central Asia, though they are most in vogue in Bokhara and the neighbouring Samarkand. In the khanate of Khokand public dances have for some years been forbidden – the formerly licentious Khan having of late put on a semblance of morality and severity…. In Tashkent batchas flourished until 1872, when a severe epidemic of cholera influenced the Mullahs to declare that dancing was against the precepts of the Koran, and at the request of the leaders of the native population, the Russian authorities forbade public dances during that summer. Schuyler remarked that the ban had barely lasted a year, so enthusiastic were the Sarts for a bazem “dance”. He further describes the respect and affection the dancers often received: These batchas are as much respected as the greatest singers and artistes are with us. Every movement they make is followed and applauded, and I have never seen such breathless interest as they excite, for the whole crowd seems to devour them with their eyes, while their hands beat time to every step. If a batcha condescends to offer a man a bowl of tea, the recipient rises to take it with a profound obeisance, and returns the empty bowl in the same way, addressing him only as Taxir, ‘your Majesty’, or Kulluk ‘I am your slave’. Even when a batcha passes through the bazaar all who know him rise to salute him with hands upon their hearts, and the exclamation of Kulluk! and should he deign to stop and rest in any shop, it is thought a great honour. He also reports that a rich patron would often help establish a favorite dancer in business after he had grown too old to carry on his profession.[11] Count Konstantin Konstantinovich Pahlen, during his travels through the area in 1908 and 1909, described such dances: Cushions and rugs were fetched, on which we gratefully reclined, great carpets were spread over the court, the natives puffed at their narghiles, politely offering them to us, and the famous Khivan bachehs made their entrance. Backstage, an orchestra mainly composed of twin flutes, kettle drums, and half a dozen man-sized silver trumpets took up its stand. Opposite us a door left slightly ajar led to the harem quarters. We caught a glimpse of flashing eyes as the inmates thronged to the door to have a good look at us and watch the performance. The orchestra started up with a curious, plaintive melody, the rhythm being taken up and stressed by the kettle drums, and four bachehs took up their positions on the carpet. The bachehs are young men specially trained to perform a particular set of dances. Barefoot, and dressed like women in long, brightly coloured silk smocks reaching below their knees and narrow trousers fastened tightly round their ankles, their arms and hands sparkle with rings and bracelets. They wear their hair long, reaching below the shoulders, though the front part of the head is clean shaven. The nails of the hands and feet are painted red, the eyebrows are jet black and meet over the bridge of the nose. The dances consist of sensuous contortions of the body and a rhythmical pacing to and fro, with the hands and arms raised in a trembling movement. As the ballet proceeded the number of dancers increased, the circle grew in size, the music waxed shriller and shriller and the eyes of the native onlookers shone with admiration, while the bachehs intoned a piercing melody in time with the ever-growing tempo of the music. The Heir explained that they were chanting of love and the beauty of women. Swifter and swifter moved the dancers till they finally sank to the floor, seemingly exhausted and enchanted by love. They were followed by others, but the general theme was usually the same.[12] In 1909, two bacchá performed among the entertainers at the Central Asian Agricultural, Industrial and Scientific Exposition in Tashkent. Noting the public’s constant interest in and laughter at the performance, several locally based researchers recorded the lyrics of the songs performed by the two boys (16-year-old Hadji-bacchá and 10-year-old Sayid-bacchá, both from the then Margilan uyezd). The songs were then published them in the original “Sart language” (Uzbek) and the Russian translation.[13] A 2011 study in Pakistan involving four boys found similarities and differences between the practice in Pakistan and those observed in Uzbekistan in the 1970s by Ingeborg Baldauf.[14] MEDIA COVERAGE Afghan journalist Najibullah Quraishi made a documentary film titled The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan about the practice, which was shown in the U.K. in March, 2010[5] and aired in the U.S. the following month.[2] Journalist Nicholas Graham of The Huffington Post lauded the documentary as “both fascinating and horrifying.”[15] The film won the 2011 Documentary award in the Amnesty International UK Media Awards.[16] The film was broadcast on Channel 4’s More4 service. Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan.[17] The practice of bacha bazi prompted the US Defense Department to hire social scientist AnnaMaria Cardinalli to investigate the problem, as Western soldiers on patrol often passed older men walking hand-in-hand with pretty young boys. British soldiers found that young Afghan men were actually trying to “touch and fondle them,” which the soldiers didn’t understand.[18] In the novel The Kite Runner, and in the movie of the same name, the practice of bacha bazi is depicted. In the plot, the protagonist’s half-nephew is forced to become a dancing boy and sexual slave to a high-ranking official of the Taliban government, who also had, years earlier, raped the boy’s father when the official was a teenager and the boy’s father was a pre-teen. In December 2010 a cable made public by WikiLeaks revealed that foreign contractors from DynCorp had spent money on bacha bazi in northern Afghanistan. Afghan interior minister Mohammad Hanif Atmar requested that the US military assume control over DynCorp training centers in response, but the US embassy claimed that this was not “legally possible under the DynCorp contract”.[6] In March 2011 “The Documentary” series on the BBC World Service addressed the concerns over the increased incidence of Dancing Boys and how this was at odds with the image which many wish to project about the post Taliban future.[19] In December 2012, a young man kept in an “improper relationship” by a border guard commander killed eight guards.[20] References 1.”Boys in Afghanistan Sold Into Prostitution, Sexual Slavery”, Digital Journal, Nov 20, 2007 2.”The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan”, PBS Frontline TV documentary, April 20, 2010. 3.Qobil, Rustam (September 7, 2010). “The sexually abused dancing boys of Afghanistan”. BBC News. 4.”Afghan boy dancers sexually abused by former warlords”. Reuters. 2007-11-18. Retrieved November 24, 2007. 5.”True Stories: The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan”, March 29, 2010 6. Jump up to: a b Boone, Jon (December 2, 2010). “Foreign contractors hired Afghan ‘dancing boys’, WikiLeaks cable reveals”. The Guardian (London). 7.Quraishi, Najibullah Uncovering the world of “bacha bazi” at New York Times April 20, 2010 8.Bannerman, Mark The Warlord’s Tune: Afghanistan’s war on children at Australian Broadcasting Corporation February 22, 2010 9. Coomaraswamy, Radhika Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Children at United Nations General Assembly, October 14, 2009 10. Shay, Anthony. “The Male Dancer in the Middle East and Central Asia”. Retrieved July 7, 2008 11.Schuyler, Eugene, Turkistan: Notes of a Journey in Russian Turkistan, Khokand, Bukhara and Kuldja (London: Sampson, Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington) 1876, Vol.I pp 132-3 12.Count K. K. Pahlen, Mission to Turkestan: Being the memoirs of Count K.K. Pahlen, translation by Mr. N. Couriss, 1908-1909 13.B.M. Ilkin (Б. — Г. М. — А. Илькин), A.A. Divayev (А. — Б. А. — Д. Диваев), Pyotr Komarov (Петр Комаров), Песни бачей (Songs of the bacchá). In: Кауфманский сборник, изданный в память 25 лет, истекших со дня смерти покорителя Туркестанского края, генерал-адъютанта К. П. фон-Кауфмана I-го (“Kaufman Collection: for the 25th anniversary of the death of Adjutant General K.P. von Kaufman, the conqueror of Central Asia”), Moscow, 1910 (Uzbek) (Russian) 14.Jan Willem de Lind van Wijngaarden & Bushra Rani (2011): Male adolescent concubinage in Peshawar, Northwestern Pakistan, Culture, Health & Sexuality, 13:9, 1061-107 15.Graham, Nicholas (April 22, 2010). “‘Dancing Boys Of Afghanistan’: Bacha Bazi Documentary Exposes Horrific Sexual Abuse Of Young Afghan Boys (VIDEO)”. The Huffington Post. Retrieved July 3, 2010. 16.”Amnesty announces 2011 Media Awards winners”. Amnesty International UK (AIUK). May 24, 2011. Archived from the original on Jan 10, 2013. Retrieved January 10, 2013. 17.Some Afghan Men Form Sexual Relationships With Young Boys 18.Brinkley, Joel Afghanistan’s dirty little secret at San Francisco Chronicle August 29, 2010 19.”The Documentary: Afghanistan’s Dancing Boys”. BBC World Service. BBC. Mar 23, 2011. Retrieved January 14, 2013. 20.Afghan police Betrayed while asleep, Afghan police die at hands of their countrymen at New York Times December 28, 2012 THE DANCING BOYS OF AFGHANISTAN It was an ancient tradition banned by the Taliban but now it’s back: Ghaith Abdul-Ahad reports from northern Afghanistan on the hiring out of young male dancers by older men • Ghaith Abdul-Ahad • • The Guardian, Saturday 12 September 2009 Private dancer: The practice of bacha bazi (‘boy for play’) is growing in Afghanistan. Photograph: Ghaith Abdul-Ahad The night’s rituals unfolded slowly. In a small house in a village near the town of Taluqan in northern Afghanistan, a dozen men huddled in a cold, dark room, wrapped in thick blankets and squatting on red cushions. The wind sliced through a plastic sheet nailed to a wooden frame in the mud wall, and a strong aroma of hashish lingered in the air. A young boy brought a small metal pot, poured warm water on the men’s hands and dried them with a small, stinking towel. Dinner was served: plates of meat stew, thick loaves of bread and bowls of yogurt. Then, when the meal was over, one of the guests opened his sash and pulled out four small bottles of Tajik vodka. Solemnly and with half-embarrassed smiles, the men raised their glasses, whispered, “Salamte” and drained them. As more vodka was drunk, the party grew louder. Its host – a former Taliban commander now in alliance with the Afghan government and Americans – chatted jovially to his guests, mainly local farmers and shopkeepers. Then one of the men produced a sitar and a dancer entered the room. Dressed in a flowing shirt and long, red skirt, with sherwal pants beneath and small silver bells fastened to hands and feet, the dancer stepped across the floor, face hidden behind a red scarf. The bells chimed with the movement, the skirt brushing past the watching men who stretched out their hands to touch it. The sitar player sang loudly, a love song about betrayal. The dancer twisted and sang hoarsely with him, arms thrown high above a lean, muscular body, moving faster and faster until finally the scarf dropped, revealing a handsome young man’s face with traces of a moustache and beard. One of the men quickly grabbed the scarf and started sniffing it. The practice of taking young boys to perform as dancers at private parties is known as bacha bazi (literally, “boy for play”) and is an Afghan tradition with very deep roots. Under Taliban rule, it was banned, but it has crept back and is now widespread, flourishing also in the cities, including the capital, Kabul, and a common feature of weddings, especially in the north. The bacha dancers are often abused children whose families have rejected them. Their “owners” or “masters” can be single or married men, who keep them in a form of sexual slavery, as concubines. The bachas are usually released at the age of 19, when they can get married and reclaim their status as “male”, though the stigma of having lived as a bacha is hard to overcome. The Afghan authorities and human rights groups are aware of the plight of bacha boys, but seem powerless to stop it. In an adjacent room, 16-year-old Mustafa was preparing to dance next. His owner opened a small bundle of clothes and produced a long, blue skirt, crimson shirt, leather straps and bells. Mustafa stood on a table and nervously smoked a cigarette. Holding his thin arms over his head, he allowed two bearded, turbaned men, giggling and laughing, to dress him like a doll. One combed his long hair, and invited the other to have the “honour” of wrapping the straps around his hands and feet. Later, when he had finished his performance, Mustafa told me his story. “My grandfather kept telling me when I was a child to be careful of men because I was handsome,” he said. “One day a mechanic in the town attacked me, my family rejected me and I had to go and stay with that man. Now I am with someone else and he taught me how to dance.” He spoke matter-of-factly, then started explaining in great detail about where he buys his women’s clothes. How did he feel about the men dressing him? “It’s OK,” he said. In Kabul and other Afghan cities, bacha bazi CDs and DVDs are widely on sale from street stalls and carts, serving an audience who can’t afford the real thing. In many of the cafes, men sit drinking tea and watching grainy images of boys dancing. Most of Kabul’s musicians congregate in the southern part of the city, an area that was half destroyed by the civil war. In a crumbling hotel, an aged guard opened a gate that led to a dark staircase surrounded by metal grilles. The air was damp and heavy with the smell of hashish, opium, urine and burned oil. On the first floor was a small hall and a few rooms, with shoes and flip-flops piled high outside. On Thursday afternoons, dancing boys and their owners come here to wait for clients to hire them for weddings or parties. The hotel was crowded with musicians and singers, including 30 Pakistani Pashtun musicians who had come to Kabul to seek refuge from the clampdown in the north-west of their country. One, his hair parted with a ruler in the middle and greased with cream, told me, “The Afghans like us as much as their own musicians. Even Kendeel Kuji [a famous Pakistani singer] is here.” In the same room I met Habib, a dancer, dressed in a spotless white salwar kameez. Two gold rings decorated his manicured fingers. His face was plump and he had a thin, well-groomed moustache above thick, red lips. Why did he start dancing? “I love it. No one forced me to do it – I love it.” When he was 13, he said, his family disowned him, so he went with his lover to Peshawar, fleeing the Taliban. “There I learned how to dance. We could do everything there; I could dress like a woman and dance. Here in Kabul we can’t do much: I can only put some red on my lips and dance.” He stroked his face with his delicate hands and pushed back his hair with a shake. After the fall of the Taliban, Habib came back and settled in a small hotel near Kabul. “People accuse us of being homosexuals and transsexuals, but we are not,” he said firmly. “We are not trying to be women, we are just dancers. Some men like my dancing and give me tips, but other men like to do other things with me. I have to be careful – they can be dangerous. I know how to manoeuvre to take their money and not let them harm me.” Why did he think other young boys dressed as women and danced? “Because men like women and they are not available, so we act like women. We wink at the rich men in the room, we excite them and they pay us. Two weeks ago, in a town north of Kabul, the elder paid me 4,000 Afghanis [around £49]. But after the programme I had to shout so he would be embarrassed in front of other people, because he wanted to do things with me. Sometimes we get a lot of money. Sometimes we have to spend the night with them and they don’t give us anything. “I am normal, but I like to walk and talk and to perform like a woman. Once, a man offered me $20,000 [£12,250] to become his lover and stop dancing, but I said no because I love to dance. I took only $1,000. Now we are together. Yes, he is married. But he still likes me.” FRONTLINE: THE DANCING BOYS OF AFGHANISTAN By Cynthia Fuchs 21 April 2010 PopMatters Film and TV Editor Power is Power “The boy should be attractive. Who’s good for dancing, around 12 or 13 and good-looking. I tell their parents I will train them.” Dastager is riding in a car, the Afghan desertscape stretching far beyond the window. He explains that boys and their parents agree to Dastager’s terms because he pays them. “You look for poor boys who have nothing?” asks Frontline correspondent Najibullah Quraishi. “Yes,” nods Dastager. “They’re poor.” This explanation—so simple and so awful—covers a lot of ground in The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan. Money allows Dastager, a former mujahideen commander, now a wealthy businessman who travels with bodyguards who are also on the local police force, to do pretty much what he wants, and even to talk about it publicly. Turned around to face the camera poised in the back seat of his car, he looks forward to meeting the new boy he has in mind, a child named here Shafiq. As the boy approaches the car (his face digitally blurred), Quraishi narrates: “Dastager said that Shafiq was 11.But to me, he looked no more than nine.” Shafiq is about to enter into the world of bacha bazi (which translates as “boy play”). As the program points out, such traffic was banned by the Taliban and remains illegal today, but its wealthy, well-connected practitioners see it as a necessary emblem of power and privilege. As Mestary, puts it, he started keeping “boy partners” while he was a senior commander with the Northern Alliance: “Every commander had one. There’s competition amongst the commanders, [and] without one, I couldn’t compete.” Now that he’s married he says, he might still have sex with a boy, but only after asking his wife: “In Afghanistan, men don’t listen to their wives,” he says, “but I’m a cultured person, I discuss it with my wife first.” The Frontline camera follows Dastager along to parties, where bacha bazi boys dance for crowds of men, and are frequently sold or traded to men who keep “stables.” (Quraishi confides to his audience that he’s lied to Dastager about the nature of the project in order to gain access.) Some of the boys wear women’s clothes and learn to sing love songs. Slavery being illegal, the actual numbers of bacha bazi owners remains unknown, the secrecy helped along by government officials and law enforcement representatives also involved in the sales/trading rings and parties. Thirteen-year-old Abdullah says his parents and friends don’t know what he’s doing. When Quraishi speaks with Abdullah, his owner and a sort of manager, Rafe, stand nearby. “I had a passion for it,” he says by way of explaining how he started dancing. At 15, Imam is already a “veteran” performer (he first appears as he sings these lyrics: “You rally make me want to lose control”). Imam says he plans to have his own stable of boys when he turns 18 (the film doesn’t examine the pathology of bacha bazi per se, but it does suggest the business is a cycle premised on money and tradition, or at least a horrific sort of habit). As the boy dances for a gathering of men, his owner Golhom appears appreciative and attentive (he wipes the boy’s face with a towel, tenderly), then sends him home with Dastager for that night. The Frontline camera remains on the sidewalk as Dastager ushers the boy into his car, which then pulls away, disappearing into the night. Quraishi supplements his interviews with bacha bazi boys, owners, and a blond-bearded pimp called The German, by speaking as well with Radhika Coomaraswamy, U.N. special representative for Children and Armed Conflict. She describes the difficulty of prosecuting offenders; the one instance of punishment documented here has to do with a boy’s murder. Quraishi visits with the victim’s mother and brother, and together they look at photos of Hafiz’s bloody corpse. He was trying to get out of bacha bazi, she says, but was killed with a gun supplied by a local policeman. The murderer was convicted, then released after just 16 months. “If only these people were punished,” the mother observes, this kind of thing wouldn’t happen. Whoever commits these crimes doesn’t get punished. Power is power.” Covering such heartbreak and abuse has unexpected effects on Quraishi and the Frontline crew, and changed the documentary’s shape as well. Originally scheduled to air last year, The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan was postponed until now, as one of the profiled boys escaped his owner and was relocated—events put in motion when Frontline producer Jamie Duran “consulted with “Western authorities” and got help from Mestary (“He seemed to have become more sensitive to the damage done by bacha bazi”). It’s a strangely heartening and necessarily vague story, involving help as well from the “Afghan government.” Frontline‘s intervention into the workings of local power and practice is surely unusual, if understandable. But as the makers become part of the story they’re telling, they are only underlining what is always the case in such documentary work—the films mean to expose and change bad situations and the camera’s very presence affects its subjects, as do interactions with crewmembers (on-screen or off-). As Dancing Boys reveals and helps to stage Dastager’s shifting postures—his arrogance and apparent ease with what he’s doing, as well as his increasing “agitation” and outright lies by documentary’s end—it also uncovers its own apparatus, the power it brings to bear on its subjects. THE DANCING BOYS OF AFGHANISTAN BY Jeremy Anderson September 8, 2010 British and American soldiers fighting forces of terrorism in Afghanistan have recently been shocked at an age-old Afghan practice known as “bacha bazi.” For centuries, Afghan men took boys, aged 9 to 15 years old, as entertainers and, in some cases, even lovers. Considered among many Afghan tribes to be signs of prestige and wealth, the behavior, although illegal under Afghan law, is now rampant and widespread among corrupt soldiers and officials. The practice had been banned by the Taliban, but has more recently been brought back to popularity by warlords and wealthy businessmen. A 42-year old in the Baghlan province says, “Having a boy has become a custom for us. Whoever wants to show off should have a boy.” A recent State Department report on the practice called the “dancing boys,” who dress up as girls, put makeup on their faces, and attend dance parties, “a widespread, culturally sanctioned form of male rape.” Afghan journalist Najibullah Quraishi reports on the issue for Frontline saying, “What was so unnerving about the men I met was not just their lack of concern for the damage their abuse was doing to the boys. It was also their casualness with which they operated.” With the inapproachability and subjugation of women that is prominent in many provinces, older Afghan men keep their boys explaining, “How can you fall in love if you can’t see her face…We can see the boys, so we can tell which are beautiful.” Many of the young boys, who are generally of more poor and disadvantaged backgrounds, have tried escaping from their masters and have been punished greatly or even killed in response. The problem, however, rests in that many of the men practicing the illegal form of slavery are involved with the government; observers are often too scared to report them, thus, leaving them unpunished and adding fuel to the revolting phenomenon. Thousands of boys around the country suffer this practice and little has been done within the country to stop the cultural observation, despite the clear contradiction with Islamic and Quranic guidelines and requirements for the proper treatment of children, the clear ban on slavery, and the tremendous punishment for rape. With the recent release of the State Department report and increased reporting on the issue in many prominent news sources, there is hope that the international community will step up to claim the rights of the impoverished and trafficked young children who have lost their innocence to the trying chaos in Afghanistan and the Islamically-haram and atrocious practice which plagues the war-torn country. To watch the Frontline documentary on the “bacha bazi” and see how you can put an end to the practice with donations and advocacy, visit the following site: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/dancingboys/ South Asia Jan 11, 2011 SODOMY & SUFISM IN AFGHANISTAN By Spengler Social scientists attached to the Second Marine Battalion in Afghanistan last year circulated a startling report on Pashtun sociology, in the form of a human terrain report on male sexuality among America’s Afghan allies. The document, made available by military sources, is not classified, just disturbing. Don’t ask, don’t tell doesn’t begin to qualify the problem. These are things you didn’t want to know, and regret having heard. The marines got their money’s worth from their Human Terrain adjuncts, but the report might have considered whether male pedophilia in Afghanistan has a religious dimension as well as a cultural one. I will explain why below. Most Pashtun men, Human Terrain Team AF-6 reports, engage in sex with men – boys – in fact, the vast majority of their sexual contacts are with males. “A culturally-contrived homosexuality [significantly not termed as such by its practitioners] appears to affect a far greater population base then some researchers would argue is attributable to natural inclination. Some of its root causes lie in the severe segregation of women, the prohibitive cost of marriage within Pashtun tribal codes, and the depressed economic situation into which young Pashtun men are placed.” The human terrain team responded to scandalous interactions between Pashtun fighters and North Atlantic Treaty Organization troops, some reported with hilarity by the media. An article in the Scotsman of May 24, 2002, reported, for example: “In Bagram, British marines returning from an operation deep in the Afghan mountains spoke last night of an alarming new threat – being propositioned by swarms of gay local farmers. An Arbroath marine, James Fletcher, said: ‘They were more terrifying than the al-Qaeda. One bloke who had painted toenails was offering to paint ours. They go about hand in hand, mincing around the village.’ While the marines failed to find any al-Qaeda during the seven-day Operation Condor, they were propositioned by dozens of men in villages the troops were ordered to search.” Another interviewee in the article, a marine in his 20s, stated, “It was hell. Every village we went into we got a group of men wearing makeup coming up, stroking our hair and cheeks and making kissing noises.” The trouble, the researchers surmise, is “Pashtun society’s extremely limited access to women,” citing a Los Angeles Times interview with a young Pashtun identified as Daud. He only has sex with men, explaining: “I like boys, but I like girls better. It’s just that we can’t see the women to see if they are beautiful. But we can see the boys, and so we can tell which of them is beautiful.” Many of the Pashtuns interviewed allow “that homosexuality is indeed prohibited within Islam, warranting great shame and condemnation. However, homosexuality is then narrowly and specifically defined as the love of another man. Loving a man would therefore be unacceptable and a major sin within this cultural interpretation of Islam, but using another man for sexual gratification would be regarded as a foible -undesirable but far preferable to sex with a ineligible woman, which in the context of Pashtun honor, would likely result in issues of revenge and honor killings.” How prevalent are homosexual relations among Pashtuns? The researchers note that “medics treated an outbreak of gonorrhea among the local national interpreters on their camp. Approximately 12 of the nearly 20 young male interpreters present in the camp had contracted the disease, and most had done so anally. This is a merely anecdotal observation and far too small of a sample size to make any generalizations regarding the actual prevalence of homosexual activity region-wide. However, given the difficulty in procuring such data, it may serve as some indicator.” Through Khaled Hosseini’s 2003 novel The Kite Runner, Western audiences caught a glimpse of what the military team calls “an openly celebrated cultural tradition. Kandahar’s long artistic and poetic tradition idolizes the pre-pubescent ‘beardless boy’ as the icon of physical beauty. Further, even the newly re-emerging musical nightlife of southern Afghan cities idolizes pre-pubescent boy performers, whose star status lasts only as long as their voices remain immature.” “Kandahar’s Pashtuns have been notorious for their homosexuality for centuries, particularly their fondness for naive young boys. Before the Taliban arrived in 1994, the streets were filled with teenagers and their sugar daddies, flaunting their relationship. It is called the homosexual capital of South Asia. Such is the Pashtun obsession with sodomy – locals tell you that birds fly over the city using only one wing, the other covering their posterior – that the rape of young boys by warlords was one of the key factors in Mullah Omar mobilizing the Taliban,” the report adds. Although the Taliban discouraged open display, it “should not be viewed as free of the culture and tradition of homosexuality of the Pashtun world of which it is a part” the authors add. “Men who take on a halekon [young male lover] often attempt to integrate the boy into their families by marrying him to a daughter when the boy is no longer young enough to play the ‘beardless’ role. This maintains the love relationship between the father and son-in-law which inevitably makes difficult the establishment of a normal relationship with the wife,” the human terrain Team explains. The team’s results are striking, but they place too much emphasis on the weirdness of Pashtun tradition and give too little attention to the broader role of homosexuality in Islamic (and especially Sufi) culture. What scholars now consider the Golden Age of Islamic love poetry, the Persian high middle ages, made homosexual pederasty the normative mode of love. While Petrarch wrote sonnets to Laura and Dante longed for Beatrice, their counterparts in the canon of Islamic poetry, Hafez and Rumi, wrote of their infatuation with young boys. Afghanistan’s own Sufi poet was the 17th-century bard Abdul Rahman Baba, of whom little is known except that he is said to have eloped with a young boy named Mujnoon. He is generally portrayed as a premature flower-child dedicated to peace and love; that must be what the Taliban thought as well, for they placed a bomb in his tomb in March 2009. According to the limited available criticism of Rahman’s work, his Pashto poems are closely related to the Persian style of Rumi. The prevalence of homosexual pedophilia in classical Islamic poetry, Persian as well as Pashto, suggests that the human terrain team may have missed an important dimension, namely the religious. In a study entitled Sufism, Sodomy and Satan published in this space August 12, 2008, I argued: Sufi pedophilia cannot be dismissed as a remnant of the old tribal practices that Islam often incorporated, for example, female genital mutilation. Genital mutilation is a pre-Islamic practice unknown in the ancient and modern West. Even though some Muslim authorities defend it on the basis of Hadith, no one has ever claimed that it offered a path to enlightenment. Sadly, pedophiles are found almost everywhere. In its ascendancy, Sufism made a definitive spiritual experience out of a practice considered criminally aberrant in the West. But pederasty as a spiritual exercise is not essentially different in character from the furtive practices of Western perverts. As the psychiatrists explain, pederasty is an expression of narcissism, the love of an idealized youthful self-image. All forms of contemplative mysticism involve the danger that the object of adoration into which one dissolves might turn out to be one’s self. It sounds well and good to seek God in the all, that is, no place in particular. The trouble is that if one tries to dissolve one’s self into the all, one’s self becomes part of the all. The lover cannot distinguish himself from the all. The self and the all are the same, and one loves one’s self. There is no other in Sufism, only your own ego staring back in the carnival mirror of mysticism. The adept does not worship a God who is wholly other – YHWH of the Hebrew Bible or Jesus of the Gospels – but a younger and prettier version of himself. In that respect, pedophilia in Afghanistan may have a distinctly religious motivation. Spengler is channeled by David P Goldman, Senior Editor at First Things magazine. KANDAHAR’S LIGHTLY VEILED HOMOSEXUAL HABITS The World Society: Restrictions on relations with women lead to greater prevalence of liaisons between men, a professor says. April 03, 2002|MAURA REYNOLDS | TIMES STAFF WRITER • KANDAHAR, Afghanistan — In his 29 years, Mohammed Daud has seen the faces of perhaps 200 women. A few dozen were family members. The rest were glimpses stolen when he should not have been looking and the women were caught without their face-shrouding burkas. “How can you fall in love with a girl if you can’t see her face?” he asks. Daud is unmarried and has sex only with men and boys. But he does not consider himself homosexual, at least not in the Western sense. “I like boys, but I like girls better,” he says. “It’s just that we can’t see the women to see if they are beautiful. But we can see the boys, and so we can tell which of them is beautiful.” Daud, a motorbike repairman who asked that only his two first names and not his family name be used, has a youthful face, a jaunty black mustache and a post-Taliban cleanshaven chin. As he talks, his knee bounces up and down, an involuntary sign of his embarrassment. “These are hard questions you are asking,” he says. “We don’t usually talk about such things.” Though rarely acknowledged, the prevalence of sex between Afghan men is an open secret, one most observant visitors quickly surmise. Ironically, it is especially true here in Kandahar, which was the heartland of the puritanical Taliban movement. It might seem odd to a Westerner that such a sexually repressive society is marked by heightened homosexual activity. But Justin Richardson, a professor of psychiatry at Columbia University, says such thinking is backward–it is precisely the extreme restrictions on sexual relations with women that lead to greater prevalence of the behavior. “In some Muslim societies where the prohibition against premarital heterosexual intercourse is extremely high–higher than that against sex between men–you will find men having sex with other males not because they find them most attractive of all but because they find them most attractive of the limited options available to them,” Richardson says. In other words, sex between men can be seen as the flip side of the segregation of women. And perhaps because the ethnic Pushtuns who dominate Kandahar are the most religiously conservative of Afghanistan’s major ethnic groups, they have, by most accounts, a higher incidence of homosexual relations. Visitors might think they see the signs. For one thing, Afghan men tend to be more intimate with other men in public than is common in the West. They will kiss, hold hands and drape their arms around each other while drinking tea or talking. Moreover, there is a strong streak of dandyism among Pushtun males. Many line their eyes with kohl, stain their fingernails with henna or walk about town in clumsy, high-heeled sandals. The love by men for younger, beautiful males, who are called halekon, is even enshrined in Pushtun literature. A popular poem by Syed Abdul Khaliq Agha, who died last year, notes Kandahar’s special reputation. “Kandahar has beautiful halekon,” the poem goes. “They have black eyes and white cheeks.” But a visitor who comments on such things is likely to be told they are not signs of homosexuality. Hugging doesn’t mean sex, locals insist. Men who use kohl and henna are simply “uneducated.” Regardless, when asked directly, few deny that a significant percentage of men in this region have sex with men and boys. Just ask Mullah Mohammed Ibrahim, a local cleric. “Ninety percent of men have the desire to commit this sin,” the mullah says. “But most are right with God and exercise control. Only 20 to 50% of those who want to do this actually do it.” Following the mullah’s math, this suggests that between 18% and 45% of men here engage in homosexual sex–significantly higher than the 3% to 7% of American men who, according to studies, identify themselves as homosexual. That is a large number to defy the strict version of Islam practiced in these parts, which denounces sex between men as taboo. Muslims seeking council from religious elders on the topic will find them unsympathetic. “Every person has a devil inside him,” says Ibrahim. “If a person commits this sin, it is the work of the devil.” The Koran mandates “hard punishment” for offenders, the mullah explains. By tradition there are three penalties: being burned at the stake, pushed over the edge of a cliff or crushed by a toppled wall. During its reign in Kandahar, the Taliban implemented the latter. In February 1998, it used a tank to push a brick wall on top of three men, two accused of sodomy and the third of homosexual rape. The first two died; the third spent a week in the hospital and, under the assumption that God had spared him, was sent to prison. He served six months and fled to Pakistan. Apparently to discourage post-Taliban visitors, the owners of a nearby house have begun rebuilding on the site. “A lot of foreigners came and started interviewing people,” says Abdul Baser, a 24-year-old neighbor, who points out the trench where the men were crushed. “Since then they have rebuilt the wall.” (Page 2 of 2) KANDAHAR’S LIGHTLY VEILED HOMOSEXUAL HABITS The World Society: Restrictions on relations with women lead to greater prevalence of liaisons between men, a professor says. April 03, 2002|MAURA REYNOLDS | TIMES STAFF WRITER • But many accuse the Taliban of hypocrisy on the issue of homosexuality. “The Taliban had halekon, but they kept it secret,” says one anti-Taliban commander, who is rumored to keep two halekon. “They hid their halekon in their madrasas,” or religious schools. It’s not only religious authorities who describe homosexual sex as common among the Pushtun. Dr. Mohammed Nasem Zafar, a professor at Kandahar Medical College, estimates that about 50% of the city’s male residents have sex with men or boys at some point in their lives. He says the prime age at which boys are attractive to men is from 12 to 16–before their beards grow in. The adolescents sometimes develop medical problems, which he sees in his practice, such as sexually transmitted diseases and sphincter incontinence. So far, the doctor said, AIDS does not seem to be a problem in Afghanistan, probably because the country is so isolated. “Sometimes when the halekon grow up, the older men actually try to keep them in the family by marrying them off to their daughters,” the doctor says. Zafar cites a local mullah whom he caught once using the examination table in the doctor’s one-room clinic for sex with a younger man. “If this is our mullah, what can you say for the rest?” Zafar asks. Richardson, the psychiatry professor, says it would be wrong to call Afghan men homosexual, since their decision to have sex with men is not a reflection of what Westerners call gender identity. Instead, he compares them to prison inmates: They have sex with men primarily because they find themselves in a situation where men are more available as sex partners than are women. “It is something they do,” he notes, “not something they are.” Daud, the motorbike repairman, would concur that the segregation of women lies at the heart of the matter. Daud says his first sexual experience with a man occurred when he was 20, about the time he realized that he would have difficulty marrying. In Pushtun culture, the man has to pay for his wedding and for gifts and clothes for the bride and her family. For many men, the bill tops $5,000–such an exorbitant sum in this impoverished country that some men, including Daud, are dissuaded from even trying. “I would like to get married, but the economic situation in our country makes it hard,” Daud says. Daud talked about his sex life only in private and after being assured that no photos would be taken. “I have relations with different boys–some for six months, some for one month. Some are with me for six years,” he says. “The problem is also money. If you want to have a relationship with a boy, you have to buy things for him. That’s why it’s not bad for the boy. Some relationships need a lot of money, some not so much. Sometimes I fix a motorbike and give it to him as a present.” It is not easy to conduct homosexual affairs, he admits. Home is out of the question. “If my father were to find me, he’d kick me out of the house,” Daud says. “If you want to have sex, you have to find a secret place. Some go to the mountains or the desert.” Opinions differ as to whether homosexual practices in Kandahar are becoming more open or more closed since the Taliban was defeated. For instance, after anti-Taliban forces arrived in the city in early December, some Westerners reported seeing commanders going about town openly with their halekon. But that has changed in recent weeks since Kandahar’s new governor, Gul Agha Shirzai, issued an order banning boys under 18 from living with troops. Officially, the ban is aimed at ending the practice of using children as soldiers. “It is not that way,” says one of the governor’s top aides, Engineer Yusuf Pashtun, objecting to the insinuation that the boys may have been used for sex. The governor’s order said only that “no boys should be recruited in the army before the age of 18,” he adds. Still, the anti-Taliban commander, who is close to Shirzai, acknowledged that one goal of the order was to keep halekon out of the barracks. The move simply drove the practice underground, he says. Zafar, the doctor, says that in the community at large the Taliban frightened many men into abstinence. “Under the Taliban, no more than 10% practiced homosexual sex,” he says. “But now the government isn’t paying attention, so it may go back up to 50%.” But Daud thinks the opposite may happen. If coeducation returns and the dress code for women eases, men will have fewer reasons to seek solace in the beds–or fields or storage rooms–of other men. “As for me, if I find someone and see she is beautiful, I will send my mother over to her” to ask for her hand in marriage, Daud says. “I’m just waiting to see her.” * Reynolds was recently on assignment in Kandahar. STARTLED MARINES FIND AFGHAN MEN ALL MADE UP TO SEE THEM Published on the 24 May 2002 BRITISH marines returning from an operation deep in the Afghan mountains spoke last night of an alarming new threat – being propositioned by swarms of gay local farmers. An Arbroath marine, James Fletcher, said: “They were more terrifying than the al-Qaeda. One bloke who had painted toenails was offering to paint ours. They go about hand in hand, mincing around the village.” While the marines failed to find any al-Qaeda during the seven-day Operation Condor, they were propositioned by dozens of men in villages the troops were ordered to search. “We were pretty shocked,” Marine Fletcher said. “We discovered from the Afghan soldiers we had with us that a lot of men in this country have the same philosophy as ancient Greeks: ‘a woman for babies, a man for pleasure’.” Originally, the marines had sent patrols into several villages in the mountains near the town of Khost, hoping to catch up with al-Qaeda suspects who last week fought a four-hour gun battle with soldiers of the Australian SAS. The hardened troops, their faces covered in camouflage cream and weight down with weapons, radios and ammunition, were confronted with Afghans wanting to stroke their hair. “It was hell,” said Corporal Paul Richard, 20. “Every village we went into we got a group of men wearing make-up coming up, stroking our hair and cheeks and making kissing noises.” At one stage, troops were invited into a house and asked to dance. Citing the need to keep momentum in their search and destroy mission, the marines made their excuses and left. “They put some music on and ask us to dance. I told them where to go,” said Cpl Richard. “Some of the guys turned tail and fled. It was hideous.” The Afghan hill tribes live in some of the most isolated communities in the country. “I think
        • Lucky bin Gangbanger, The USA, Canada and Brazil have the biggest pornographic industries in the world. Did you get that??? It means those countries have the maximum number of prostitutes, gays, druggists, call girls, Herpes, STDs, etc. Why bother with who watches…the logical fact is that the above countries are all MAXIMUM Christian Countries.!!

          Which Islamic nation has a single pornographic industry in the world!!

          • Lucky bin Wanker, the USA, Canada and Brazil have the biggest pornographic industries in the world.

            Did you get that???

            It means those countries have the maximum number of prostitutes, consorts, gays, druggists, drunkards, murderers, dirty music, nudist camps…imagine your daughter being a patron of one of them….Call Girls, Herpes, STDs, etc. Why bother with the Pakistanis who just watch…but the fact remains that the above countries are all MAXIMUM Christian Countries.!!

            Which Islamic Nation has a single pornographic industry in the world???

          • YO MO,

            IS IT A LIE?

            AYATOLLAH TORTURED, NEAR DEATH, IN IRAN FOR CRITICIZING POLITICAL ISLAM
            by Shadi Paveh
            February 5, 2014

            Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s condition has reportedly worsened as of January 28, 2014, when he suffered severe body tremors and was motionless for hours in his cell. The authorities still refuse to transfer him to a medical facility and are denying him the most basic medical care. We ask for intervention to save his life.
            Ayatollah Hossein-Kazamani Boroujerdi, a senior member of the Shiite Muslim clergy, is presently serving the eighth year of an 11-year sentence handed down to him by the Islamic Republic’s courts for advocating the separation of state and religion inside Iran. He has also spoken against political Islam and its leaders. As a result, during his time in prison, he has been exposed to torture especially reserved for the Islamic Republic’s dissident clergy and political prisoners.

            Boroujerdi HAS ENDURED THE RAPE OF HIS SPOUSE IN FRONT OF OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS.

            He has been purposely exposed to toxic chemical agents while kept in a small solitary cell. As a result, he now suffers permanent neurological damage, further aggravated by group beatings. Urgent medical attention has been systematically withheld for his long list of ailments, which are mostly a direct result of years of torture and malnutrition.

            On September 29, 2013, for example, Ayatollah Boroujerdi suffered a heart attack in prison for which he was refused medical intervention. His condition has reportedly worsened as of January 28, 2014, when he had severe body tremors and was motionless for hours in his cell, where he presently remains with no medical care.

            Possibly due to Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s prominence, the regime has apparently chosen not to execute him, but instead to kill him silently in prison. There were two failed attempts on his life by poisoning inside prison in 2012. His mother, detained at the same time, was also poisoned and died as a result. Previously, in November 2011, a prisoner on death row was told by the authorities that if he succeeded in killing Boroujerdi he would be set free. The attempt failed when other prisoners intervened.

            To protest the violent crimes of political Islam in the Islamic Republic, Boroujerdi announced via audio tape from prison that: “I am not inclined anymore to wear this frock; this frock has no credit or value in Iran or the international community” and removed his clerical robes.

            Ayatollah Boroujerdi descends from a long line of renowned Shiite clergy; both his father and grandfather were staunch opponents of religious leaders in politics. As a result, both of his parents, along with his brother, were killed by the authorities under mysterious circumstances, as is the regime’s custom.
            Despite his critical medical condition in prison, he remains defiant and his spirit remains unbreakable: he has stated hopes that his case will serve as a strong indictment of the Islamic Republic’s despotic rule and unspeakable human rights violations.

            Ayatollah Boroujerdi has risked losing his life slowly under torture by writing letters from inside prison to then-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and to the United Nations, speaking of the absolute lack of freedom inside Iran, the grotesque human rights violations and the imminent danger of political Islam. Further, he recently urged people of Iran to boycott the so-called elections on June 14, 2013. As a direct result of this statement his tortures recommenced despite his extremely fragile medical condition.
            Ms. Roya Araghi, an advocate of Boroujerdi who herself was jailed and tortured for defending the him, and has since fled Iran, believes that without medical treatment and international intervention, Ayatollah Boroujerdi will most likely die soon under torture.

            On June 29, 2013, members of Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s family went to Evin prison to visit him, and were shocked to see nature of his physical condition in the seventh year of his 11-year sentence. He has developed acute heart disease, which has led to the severe swelling of his feet and knees. He also suffers from ocular, pulmonary and respiratory disorders, but has been denied medical treatment by officials until he “repents “and “mends his ways”.

            On July 8, 2013, Boroujerdi was interrogated for an extended period of time by government agents for his refusal to concede to the demands of the regime by signing a letter of “repentance.” He was informed that “the pressures and tortures will increase until he has been destroyed”. He has thus far refused to surrender.

            In a rare phone call to his family that followed this episode, he stated that he “will never give in to a single threat or intimidation tactic of the regime.” His family stated that he also added, “he does not regret any of his actions and stands by his word, as he is prepared to die”.

            After their visit, the Boroujerdi family announced that the tyrannical regime of the Islamic Republic’s fanatics continue systematically to exterminate political prisoners and prisoners of conscience through well-planned prolonged torture; both psychological and physical.

            Despite a statement by then-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2012 and a plea by the UN Special Rapporteur on Iran, Dr. Ahmad Shaheed, to release Ayatollah Boroujerdi, the Iranian regime continues to torture this man of God whose only crime is advocating separation of religion from politics, democracy and human rights.

            On July 24, 2013, Andrew Bennett, Canada’s Ambassador to the Office of Religious Freedom, condemned the prolonged detention of Grand Ayatollah Boroujerdi by Iranian authorities, but to no avail.

            The regime of Iran is silently executing Mr. Boroujerdi, without a bullet or a noose — away from the eyes of the world. These silent executions are now a common method of killing political prisoners in Iran as the regime tries to hide its grotesque human rights violations and its escalating rate of executions of opponents.

            The human rights activists for democracy in Iran would like to bring to the immediate attention of all international human rights organizations and governments that Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s life is in grave danger due to deliberate withholding of necessary medical care by the authorities in Iran. We ask for an intervention on his behalf, to save his life.

            IRAN SHIA INTELLECTUAL QUESTIONS THE CORE OF SHIISM & THE “AYATOLLAHS” GO NUTS
            November 13, 2013

            The situation for reasonable Shiite insides Iran who are tired of the with heresies and superstitions infested sect of Twelver Shiism (which has been condemned throughout centuries by Muslim scholars) is not easy. Criticising the ‘Ayatollahs’ and certain Shia beliefs and practices alone will get one in huge trouble, let alone declaring openly ones conversion to true Islam (Sunnism) or denouncing the core of Shiism.
            A Shia intellectual and scholar, Dr. Seyyed Ali Asghar Gharavi caused a stir when he indicated that the Sunni belief in regards to Ali Ibn Abi Talib (the fourth righteouss Caliph to the Sunnis and first ‘infallible’ direct successor of the Prophet by the Shiites) is the correct one i.e. that leaders are NOT chosen by God, neither the Shia ‘infallibles’ nor any other ruler (except the Prophets). Dr. Seyyed Ali Gharavi studied in Iran and Lebanon and holds doctorate in Islamic philosophy. He is from a major religious Shiite family, his father is the late Ayatollah Seyyed Jawad Gharavi who was also known for his reformists thoughts and opposition to many Shiite beliefs, which he (just like his son) considered heretical and superstitious.
            Ali Gharavi, is father was the late Ayatollah Jawad Gharavi

            Ali Gharavi’s father was in fact a friend of Ayatollah Al-Borqei who mentioned him (Ayatollah Borqei) in his autobiography. Ayatollah Jawad Gharavi back in his times was already accused of ‘Wahhabism’ (merely for speaking against some Shia practices and beilefs he believed to be heresies!), and today it seems to the turn of his son, who has been imprisoned for writing a small academical article on the topic of Imamate.
            Bahar published the article that sealed its fate on Oct. 28. In “Imam Ali, a Political Leader or a Religious Model?” the writer, Ali Asghar Gharavi, claimed that the religious role of the first Shiite imam was more important than his political role. He wrote, “He [Ali] is not just the political ruler for a few days of passing power in this world. Ali, more than being the commander of the faithful, is the imam and the role model for humanity.” The article appeared one day before the innovated ‘Eid Al-Ghadeer’ in Iran.

            Iran on Monday arrested Ali Asghar Gharavi, the author of a controversial article seen by critics as questioning the beliefs of Shiite Islam, a prosecutor general said. “In regards with the banned newspaper (Bahar), the author of that article was arrested yesterday,” prosecutor Mohseni Ejeie was quoted as saying by Fars news agency. In late October, the pro-reformist Bahar daily published an opinion piece penned by Gharavi, which drew heavy criticism from the authorities.

            Judiciary chief Ayatollah (of course an Ayatollah …) Sadegh Larijani has warned his department will “act with determination against those who falsify the history and try to undermine the fundamentals of the regime.” A single article has shaken the thrones of the Shia clergy and their whole belief system and they know very well that their whole existence is based on the heretical Shiite belief called ‘Imamate’, because with no Imamite, there is no justification for the innovated velayat-e faqih system.

            The establishment in Iran is stressing the point that the velayat-e faqih [guardianship of the jurist] is in fact the continuation of the rulership [velayat] of Imam Ali. Knowing this fact, Gharavi still emphasized the point that Imam Ali was more of a spiritual leader than a political one. In other words, he has questioned the position of Ayatollah [Ali] Khamenei as the political leader.” In one part of the article Gharavi wrote, “Imam Ali repeatedly mentions in Nahj al-BalaghaI [a book of quotations and sermons attributed to him] that political rule can only be achieved by people voting and paying allegiance.”

            But what was the crim of Dr. Gharavi? In his article, Dr. Gharavi mentioned that leaders are appointed through Shura (Quranic Sunni belief) of the people not divinely. He discuses the verses that Shia use to prove the appointment of Ali Ibn Abi Talib and refuted them. His article angered many ‘Ayatollahs’ who asked the government to punish him and shutdown the newspaper (that’s their intellectual strenght when dealing with critics).

            He was arrested on Sunday in Isfahan and transferred to a prison in Tehran. Not only that but even the newspaper, Roznameh Bahar, that published his article has been forced to shutdown. Note that Gharavi did not use any harsh words, let alone profanity, he simply criticised a Shiite belief that is already being criticised for ages by orthodox Muslims (i.e. the Imamite belief), yet instead of discussing with him, his opponents resorted to prosecution and even even shut down a newspaper (because of a single article!)
            After his arrests, a few Shia scholars popped out and wrote ‘refutations’, knowing well that the arrested Gharavi can’t defend himself when being put in prison by the very same Mullahs. It is to no suprise that nearly all the other newspapers, TV and radio (which are in the hands of the Mullahs) started a war on Gharavi and repeated the lie that Gharavi ‘insulted and disrespected’ Shiism, in fact they went so far to speak for the whole nation and accused Gharavi of having insulted the whole Iranian nation (as if all Iranians are Shiites!).

            ‘Ayatollah’ Makarem Shirazi and ‘Ayatollah’ Hamadani are two major Shia Marja’s of Iran who literally called for the prosecution of Gharavi and everyone who dares to question Shia beliefs. Makarem Shirazi said (as reported by the state owned FARS news agency):

            “نویسنده گستاخ در این روزنامه حرفهای بسیار زشتی نوشته بود، روزنامه توقیف شده است ولی نباید به این هم قناعت شود.”

            ‘The ‘Gustakh’ (Persian religious term, referring to people who do not give due respect to religious sanctities) author of this (Bahar) newspaper uttered very terrible words in and (thus) the newspaper has been shut down, but we shouldn’t be satisfied with that (this is not enough).’ He further said “Some people shouldn’t think that since there is a new government they can say anything they want”.

            Another frightened ‘Ayatollah’:

            ‘Ayatollah’ Hossein Nouri Hamedani, who has a substantial following as a marja – source of emulation –joined in the condemnation of the article, asking (as reported by Qomnew.ir),

            “Why should a newspaper permit itself the temerity and audacity to insult and malign sacred religious beliefs, the Ghadeer, the imamat, and the guardianship [of the supreme leader]?”

            Arresting someone for criticising Shiism (in an academic article) and shutting down the entire newspaper is not enough to this ‘Ayatollah’, he wants more prosecution, probably to intimidate futures ‘Gustakhs’. Shia are so proud that Iran is majority Shia, of course it’s gonna be majority Shia if doubting the Imamite belief itself in a respectable way will get you into so much trouble.

            The shutting of the paper is an unlawful and unethical measure especially when the newspaper even released an apology and three refutations of Mr. Gharavi’s article. This did not stop the Iranian regime and the Shia clergy to prosecute everyone who was involved in the release of a single article, most probably to give out a message for future thinkers, of how the Shia clergy will deal with those who dare to question the Shia creed.

            Mr. Gharavi’s article did not contain religious insults or slander, or even negate the necessities of religion, to deserve being labeled criminal and be banned. It is noteworthy that the article was written by a Shiite. Even if we suppose that it may have been written by a Sunni person then how does one reconcile the fact that just a few months ago, prior to the June presidential elections, the sitting president had gone to the Sunni provinces of Iran to get the votes of this 10-15+ percent minority and support in the June elections and through this act recognized their civil rights while the right of the Sunnis to express their thoughts and opinions through an article results in the closure of the newspaper where it was published?

            Some government officials who tried to rationalize the malicious closure of Bahar and stamp it as a peaceful act have said such articles incited the religious and sectarian differences. But a close look at what has been happening to the Sunnis reveals the source of the differences and conflicts: They do not have the right to have their own mosque in the capital of their own province and they face layers of political and security restrictions! It is these discriminatory and insulting acts that fuel religious and sectarian differences and not the publication of an article that happens to be different from the official Shiite narrative.

            There are so many resemblances between Shiism and Catholicism – especially the clerical caste, saint worship etc. – that one shouldn’t be really suprised that the Shia clergy act similar to the medieval Catholic priests and church who suppressed their opponents within the Catholic church in the name of Inquisition i.e. combating heresy, a scenario quite similar to what Shia thinkers and reformists face in Iran today.
            For a Muslim, there is no doubt that the Catholic church is based on the essence of heresies and those Christian reformers in the medieval times who tried to purify it (from at least some heresies) were no doubt closer to the truth and original Christianity than the Catholic church who (according to Islam) distorted the true message of Jesus (peace be upon) much more than the protestants for example.

            The situation of Shia reformists in Iran is quite similar (and there are many in Iran, not just Gharavi who happen to be a known Shia intellectual in Iran, Isfahan), for they too are the real victims and real reformers who have realised and acknowledged that the current Shia twelver sect is nothing but a sect infiltrated with the most hideous heresies and innovations. They too are being suppressed and silenced by the (Shia) clergy who are in fact the true propagators of heresies (just as the Catholic church) even if they claim to combat heresies (just as the Catholic church). They too are being thrown into the dungeons of the Shia church for merely writing academical articles in refutation of Shia Twelver beliefs whom they believe (just as the Sunnis) of not being the true beliefs of the Shias (supporters) of Ali Ibn Abi Talib, in this case, the belief in the ‘Imamate/Wilayah’ of Ali Ibn Abi Talib (upon which many other misguided Shia bliefs, including the Takfir of the Prophet’s companions are based upon).

            Throwing Mr. Gharavi into the dungeons of the regime and THEN releasing some ‘rebuttals’ by a number of Shia scholars is an easy task (how shall someone reply from his cell anyway, where he is most like being terrorised and tormented for questioning Shiism?!) and apparently in accordance to the Shia religion, as for Islam, it even encourages the discussion with non-Muslims (let alone Muslims):

            Say: “O People of the Book! come to common terms as between us and you: That we worship none but Allah; that we associate no partners with him; that we erect not, from among ourselves, Lords and patrons other than Allah.” If then they turn back, say ye: “Bear witness that we (at least) are Muslims (bowing to Allah’s Will).

            Invite to the way of your Lord with wisdom and good instruction, and argue with them in a way that is best. Indeed, your Lord is most knowing of who has strayed from His way, and He is most knowing of who is [rightly] guided. (Qur’an, 16:125)

            Refuting, discussing and arguing (in the best manner) is what Islam teaches and encourages (for the educated, not laymen) even with the Christians and Jews, let alone with fellow Muslims. The Safavids of today are only exposing themselves and proving their desperation if they deal so harsh with a single academical article. They are only proving that they are no different to their mass-murdering forefathers, who (by force and mass-executions) turned a majority Sunni Persia into Rafidi Persia with similar methods.
            During the Safavid era, after a genocide of the Sunni population of Khorasan/Persia, Shah Ismail (the Safavid) arrested the Sunni Mufti of these lands, the Allamah Taftazani, and urged him (Taftazani) to leave Sunnism and embrace Shiism. Taftazani gave a condition. He said that Shah Ismail should bring his Shia scholars, and if they can refute him (Taftazani) then he is ready to become a Shiite, but if he (Taftazani) refutes them, then they (including Shah Ismail) have to become Sunnis. Shah Ismail consulted with the Shia scholars but they refused and said: “There is no discussion with these people”. Thereupon Shah Ismail ordered the worst form of execution for Taftazani (and other Sunni scholars).

            (‘Tarikh Rashidi’, page 367-368, by Mirza Mohammad Haidar)

            This is why Mohammad Aref Espanagheshi (Iranian historian) writes: “Every Sunni scholar in those times (Safavid era) who challenged the Shia scholars for debates and discussion was facing execution. This is why some Sunni scholar kept silent (did not speak out) and other left the country.”

            (‘Inqilab Al-Islam bain Al-Khawaas wa Al-Awaam’, page 48 by Mohammad Aref Espanagheshi)

            And today, the descendants of the Safavids, the ‘Ayatollahs’ also claim to be upon the truth and the religion of Islam and Ahl Al-Bayt, yet the way they deal with their opponents WITHIN themselves is not much different to the classical Safavids, except that ordering mass-executions of Sunni scholars and Shias who question Shiism are not as easy today as back then. Nevertheless, as we can see in the case of Mr. Gharavi, the ‘Ayatollahs’ try everything to suppress the voice of any opposition, they are in fact afraid of an awakening amongst the Shias of Iran. Yes, an awakening, and it is not an exaggeration to claim so, for what is going behind the scenes is much bigger than most of us (particularly non Persian speaking ones) could have ever imagines. Ali Asghar Gharavi is NOT an isolated case (as been mentioned before), Iran is full of his likes, who try to reform Shiism from within (some leaving it completely, others opposing literally every heresy and superstition that Shia scholars today propagate as the ‘school of thought of Ahl Al-Bayt’. Amongst them are the likes of Ahmad Kasravi, Musa Al-Musawi (Iranian), Ahmad Al-Katib (Iraqi of Iranian origin),Ustad Qalamdaran, Ayatollah Al-Borqei (Iranian), Mostafa Husseini Tabatabai (Iranian), Shaykh Al-Muayyad (Iraqi) and many others.

            HERE IS HIS ARTICLE THAT HAS SHAKEN THE THRONES OF RAFIDI SHIA MULLAHS

            (That’s a translation of just some of his points, i.e. not the complete translation of the original article):
            This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion. [Maida:3]

            – The verses before and after shows that Allah (swt) gives the Prophet (saw) the responsibility to convey the message, nothing should stop him from doing his job and He shouldn’t worry about the opposition from the disbelievers. From the way and style of the verse it becomes clear that the “completion of favor” is the divine revelation (Quran) and Islam. Meaning, now that revelation has been conveyed to the people without any defects, the favor has been completed.

            – If the verse “Convey that which we have revealed upon you” [Madia: 67] was about introducing Ali (as) for caliphate, Allah would have mentioned it clearly right here in the verse. Allah is wise.

            – Ali (as) himself in Nahj al-Balagha emphasize that a political government comes through Bayah and vote. For example Amir al-Muminin says to Muawiah in letter 6 of Nahj al-Balagha:

            Verily, the people who payed allegiance to Abu Bakr, Omar and Othman, have payed allegiance to me based on the same principles as the allegiance to them. So anyone who was present has no right to go against his pledge of allegiance, and anyone who was absent has no right to oppose it. And verily Shura (consultation) is only the right of the Muhajirs and the Ansar. So if they decide upon a man and declare him their Imam, then it is with the pleasure of Allah.

            The words of Ali clearly shows that caliphate is not something divine, rather the political successors of the Prophet (saw) must be appointed through people.

            – Ali (as) never talks about his divine appointment and his appointment by the Prophet (saw). Even when he wants to defend his right for caliphate, he emphasizes on his merits and his suitabilities and informs the people about these points so that they don’t make mistake in appointing their leader. In entire sermons of Nahjul Balagha “awareness and selection (of leader)” is so clear that it leaves no doubt what opinion of Ali (as) was about a government.

            – The behavior of Ali (as) towards the three caliphs especially Abu bakr and Omar, as mentioned in many history books, clearly shows that he didn’t consider them to be people who would disobey the command of the Prophet (saw) and usurp the government. The cooperation of Ali (as) with Khulafa, which he himself have mentioned many times is so compassionate that leaves no room for doubt.

            For example in the book al-Gharat al-Thaqafi Shi’i Amir al-muminin Ali (as) says: “When the Prophet (saw) completed his mission, Allah took him from this world, peace and blessing of Allah be upon him, then the Muslims appointed two worthy men (Abu Bakr and Omar) as his successors and those two leaders acted upon the book and the Sunnah and did not deviate from the Sunnah and ways of the Prophet (saw). Then Allah took their souls. May Allah have mercy on them.”

            – If Amir al-Muminin was divinely appointed after the Prophet (saw), would his courage stop him to unleash his sword to implement the order and justice of Allah? Was it not expected from the gate of knowledge to explain the truth in time when needed?

            IRANIAN POET & PEACE CAMPAIGNER HASHEM SHAABANI HANGED FOR “WAGING WAR AGAINST GOD”

            By
            Barry Duke
            – February 9, 2014

            NEWS has emerged from Iran that the young poet, who was arrested in February 2011 and subjected to extreme torture, has been executed.

            According to this report, an Islamic Revolutionary Tribunal had imposed a death sentence on the poet – a member of the Arabic-speaking Ahvazis ethnic minority – along with 14 others, last July on charges that included “waging war on God.”

            Press reports said Shaabani was hanged last month after his sentence was approved by President Hassan Rohani.

            In a statement on February 5, Freedom House said Shaabani was subjected to severe torture and interrogation during his three years in prison.

            Human Rights Voices also reports on the execution, writing:

            To those who knew him, Hashem Shaabani was a man of peace and understanding struggling to extend spaces of individual freedom within the despotic Khomeinist system … In one of his letters from prison, made available to use through his family, Shaabani says he could not have remained silent against ‘hideous crimes against Ahvazis perpetrated by the Iranian authorities, particularly arbitrary and unjust executions.’

            Shabaani added:

            I have tried to defend the legitimate right that every people in this world should have which is the right to live freely with full civil rights. With all these miseries and tragedies, I have never used a weapon to fight these atrocious crimes except the pen.

            The Jerusalem Post reported that Rouhani has presided over “an execution spree” and pointed out the The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Iran Ahmed Shaheed and the UN’s expert addressing executions Christof Heyns urged Iran last month to stop the surge in hangings since the start of 2014.

            The UN experts said at least 40 persons have been reportedly hanged in the first two weeks of January.
            In 2013, Iran executed 625 people, including 29 women and political prisoners. Iranians faced the death penalty for the crimes of Moharabeh – a catchall phrase for “enmity against God” – or the charge of threatening “national security.”

            Said Heyns:

            It is deeply concerning that the Government proceeds with executions for crimes that do not meet the threshold of the ‘most serious crimes’ as required by international law and when serious concerns remain about due process rights.

            The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps dragged Shaabani into an Iran’s Press TV studio in December 2011 where confessed to involvement in “separatist terrorism,” and contacts with former Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak and Libya’s former president Muammar Gaddafi.

            Shaabani wrote later wrote in a letter that he:

            Had never participated in any armed activity, whatever the motives. I disagree with armed activities if there are other peaceful channels to make demands and express our wishes and aspirations.
            US writer Stephen Hager declared President Rouhani as “the villain in this tragedy”.

            He’s the 7th President of Iran and has quietly executed over 400 dissidents, while projecting himself as a moderate in favor of women’s rights. Time magazine fawns on him, calling him the 9th most powerful person in the world. One wonders why his reign of terror gets virtually no play in the Western media. But then, Western media is really a carefully controlled cartel run by a handful of global corporations.

            Hashem Shaabani is the poet and hero of this tragedy. He held a Masters in Political Science and taught Arabic literature in high school. He also wrote poetry in both Arabic and Farsi.

            He leaves behind a widow and child and invalid parents he had been caring for until his arrest in February of 2011 in Khalafabad.

      • ANY ASS WILL DO!

        MOHAMMEDANS FUCK ANYTHING THAT HAS AN ASS:

        ISLAMIC CLERIC CONFIRMS ALL SUNI MUSLIM MEN ARE SODOMITES

        You know how some people insult Muslims by calling them crude names that are the equivalents of sodomites and bestialists (butt- and goat-f**kers)? It turns out at least the sodomite insult is true! We have it straight from the mouth of none other than a Muslim cleric — a London-based Shiite cleric named Yasser Habib.

        ‘PERFUMED GARDEN’

        by Abu Nuwas:

        O the joy of sodomy!
        So now be sodomites, you Arabs.
        Turn not away from it–
        therein is wondrous pleasure.
        Take some coy lad with kiss-curls
        twisting on his temple
        and ride as he stands like some gazelle
        standing to her mate.
        A lad whom all can see girt with sword
        and belt not like your whore who has
        to go veiled.
        Make for smooth-faced boys and do your
        very best to mount them, for women are
        the mounts of the devils

        THIS IS REAL MOHAMMEDANISM:

        Surah 8:69: “But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good.” (Yusuf Ali)

        ISLAMIC QUESTION & ANSWER, ONLINE WITH MUFTI EBRAHIM DESAI, SOUTH AFRICA, ASK THE IMAM:

        “It may, superficially, appear distasteful to copulate with a woman who is not a man’s legal wife, but once Shariah makes something lawful, we have to accept it as lawful, whether it appeals to our taste, or not; and whether we know its underlying wisdom or not.”

        ALL SUNNI MUSLIMS ARE SODOMITES

        Satan Attends Every Childbirth; He Touches Every Infant
        Except for Mary and her Son Jesus, all babies cry during their birth, because Satan touches them… (Sahih Bukhari, 4.55.641)
        Whenever a child is born, Satan pricks it; that is why the child cries. Only Mary and Jesus were not pricked by Satan…(Sahih Muslim, 30.5837, 5838)
        Say prayer during sexual intercourse, and Satan will not touch your child…(Sahih Bukhari, 4.54.503

        ALL SUNNI MUSLIMS FINGER FC-KED BY SATAN AT BIRTH

        In a broadcast on the UK’s Fadak TV on May 24, 2012, Habib calmly and dispassionately asserts that all non-Shiite males — especially the Shiites’ Muslim rivals, the Sunnis — are sodomized at birth by the devil, and grow up to become “passive homosexuals”, i.e., the “bottom” of a homosexual pair who is penetrated in anal sex.

        EVEN MUTT & HIS COMPANIONS

        Islamic cleric confirms Muslim men really are sodomites
        You know how some people insult Muslims by calling them crude names that are the equivalents of sodomites and bestialists (butt- and goat-f**kers)? It turns out at least the sodomite insult is true! We have it straight from the mouth of none other than a Muslim cleric — a London-based Shiite cleric named Yasser Habib.
        In a broadcast on the UK’s Fadak TV on May 24, 2012, Habib calmly and dispassionately asserts that all non-Shiite males — especially the Shiites’ Muslim rivals, the Sunnis — are sodomized at birth by the devil, and grow up to become “passive homosexuals”, i.e., the “bottom” of a homosexual pair who is penetrated in anal sex.

        TRANSCRIPTION OF YASSER HABIB:

        “Anyone who consents to being called ‘Emir of the Believers’ is a passive homosexual. Omar Ibn Al-Khattab, for example, who willingly assumed this title, was, without a doubt, a passive homosexual. The same goes for the caliphs Othman Ibn Affan, Muawiyya, Yazid, and the rules and sultans of the Umayyad and Abbasid dynasties, as well as some of the rulers and sultans of our day and age.

        For example, the king of Morocco bears this title. This is how you know that he is a passive homosexual. This is in addition to the evidence revealed by Western media, which showed that the current king of Morocco is indeed a passive homosexual who belongs to the homosexual community. This was leaked from his palace by his assistants, his servants, and his ‘boys,’ whom he would penetrate and who would penetrate him. They fled to Europe, sought asylum, and exposed all this.

        Cleric Yasser Habib exposes Kalifa Umar as a Sodomite

        It is told (in the hadith) that Umar Ibn Al-Khattab had an anal disease, which could be cured only by semen. One should know that this is a well-known medical condition, which is also mentioned in sacred texts. Someone who, God forbid, has been penetrated in the anus, a worm grows within him, due to the semen discharged in him…
        A disease develops in his anus, and as a result, he cannot calm down, unless. he is penetrated again and again.

        The Shiites are undoubtedly protected from this disease, and from committing this abominable and hideous act. As for the Nasibis (who hated the prophet Muhammad’s family), they are definitely afflicted with this homosexuality.

        One of the devils is present at the birth of every human being. If Allah knows that the newborn is one of our Shiites, He fends off that devil, who cannot harm the newborn. But if the newborn is not one of our Shiites, the devil inserts his index finger into the anus of the newborn, who thus becomes a passive homosexual. If the newborn is not a Shiite, the devil inserts his index finger into this newborn’s anus, and when he grows up, he becomes a passive homosexual.

        If the newborn is a female, the devil inserts his index finger into her vagina, and she becomes a whore. At that moment, the newborn cries loudly, as he comes out of his mother’s womb. Note that some children cry normally at birth, while others cry loudly and incessantly. You should know that this is the work of that devil, according to this narration.”

        Islam is NOT a religion, but an insane political system and sex cult populated by the severely mentally impaired.”

        When cleric Yasser Habib “says ‘passive homosexual’, he is referring to the receptive, submissive, female-equivalent partner. Dominant, inserting male homosexual activity is universally accepted in Islam. He has no problem with that. It’s grown men ‘catching’ that he has a problem with.”

        ANIMAL LOVING MUSLIMS:

        ISLAM & ZOOPHILIA

        Pakistan has banned content on more than a dozen websites because of “offensive” and “blasphemous” material, while they themselves rank No. 1 for certain sex-related search terms, including “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.[1]

        IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD

        AFGHANISTAN

        In a society where homosexuals and adulterers are stoned to death for “sexual immorality” you would expect a similar outcome for someone caught having sex with an animal. Surprisingly this is not the case.
        An Afghan soldier was detained by police after being caught having sex with a donkey in southeastern Afghanistan, a police officer told AFP.
        The soldier was discovered with the donkey in an abandoned house in a small village of Gardez, the capital of Paktia province, last week, a local police officer said.
        “He was caught in the act by a small boy who immediately told police about what he had seen and police arrested him in action,” the Gardez-based officer told AFP, requesting anonymity.
        The soldier claimed he committed the act because he did not have enough money to get married.
        After being caught with the donkey in a village about 100km south of the capital Kabul, he was jailed for four days and then released without charge.
        According to tradition in south and southeastern Afghanistan, a suitor must pay around $US5,000 ($A6,800) to the parents of the girl he wishes to marry.
        Soldier caught with his pants down
        The Age, March 16, 2004
        Could it be that the soldier was released without charge because there is nothing in the Qur’an that prohibits bestiality?

        PALESTINE

        In 1923, the Director of Health in the British Mandate government in Palestine sent out a questionnaire to his Principal Medical and Health Officers in the country, asking them to report on various sexual practices and attitudes among the Muslim Arab population.
        As a result, the British discovered that the Muslim Arabs engaged in bestiality.
        The Nablus officer finds sodomy and “similar vices” “not uncommon in some of the towns but less so in the villages where…bestiality is by no mean unknown” and “immorality…rather lightly regarded” in those villages that are closer to the larger towns. He comments, “in the villages there seems to be curiously little feeling against bestiality which I have heard admitted in a very airy way on more than one occasion. Sodomy is considered disgraceful but not I think more so than ordinary immorality” (III).
        “Unnatural Vices” or Unnatural Rule? The Case of a Sex Questionnaire and the British Mandate
        Ellen L. Fleischmann, Jerusalem Quarterly File, Issue 10, 2000

        PAKISTAN

        In Southern Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh and Balochistan, sex with animals is a common practice among rural youths and considered a rite of passage into adulthood.
        In southern Punjab, much of NWFP, Sindh and Balochistan sodomy and bestiality are common among rural youths. In fact, he caught two boys trying to rape a goat in the vicinity of the mazar of Hazrat Sultan Bahu. The punishment meted out to them was 10 blows with a chhittar (shoe) each on their butts. They protested however that in many rural areas having sex with an animal was considered a rite of passage on the way to becoming full members of the male society!
        Desegregation of the sexes and promiscuity
        Ishtiaq Ahmed (associate professor of political science at Stockholm University), Daily Times, June 27, 2006

        DONKEY KILLED AFTER BEING RAPED

        In June 2011, a male who was caught having sex with another man’s donkey was fined Rs 50,000. This fine was not imposed for having sex with an animal, but for committing adultery. The raped donkey was labelled a ‘kari’ (an adultress) and eventually honor killed by its owner.

        Incredible though it may sound, a donkey was declared ‘Kari’ and shot dead here in a remote area on Monday. The Jirga imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the alleged ‘Karo’.
        The reports said that in Village Ghahi Khan Jatoi, a villager Ghazi Khan alias Malang shot dead his donkey on being ‘Kari’ with Sikandar Ali alias Deedo. He attempted to kill Sikander too but the alleged Karo managed to escape and surrendered himself to an influential person of the area.
        Sources said the influential person summoned both the parties and imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the Karo. They said Sikander and his family were forced to pay Rs 50,000 on the spot and the remaining amount in two installments.
        The sources added that the alleged Karo pleaded innocence at the Jirga, but the Jirga members paid no attention to it. Sikander’s family said he paid Rs 50,000 to save his life otherwise he would have been killed.
        Donkey declared ‘Kari’ killed
        The News International, July 19, 2011
        Pakistan ranks number 1 for such varied search terms as “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.
        The Muslim country, which has banned content on at least 17 websites to block offensive and blasphemous material, is the world’s leader in online searches for pornographic material
        . . .
        Google ranks Pakistan No. 1 in the world in searches for pornographic terms, outranking every other country in the world in searches per person for certain sex-related content.
        Pakistan is top dog in searches per-person for “horse sex” since 2004, “donkey sex” since 2007, “rape pictures” between 2004 and 2009, “rape sex” since 2004, “child sex” between 2004 and 2007 and since 2009, “animal sex” since 2004 and “dog sex” since 2005, according to Google Trends and Google Insights, features of Google that generate data based on popular search terms.
        The country also is tops — or has been No. 1 — in searches for “sex,” “camel sex,” “rape video,” “child sex video” and some other searches that can’t be printed here.
        No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan
        Kelli Morgan, Fox News, July 13, 2010

        OTHER COUNTRIES & BESTIALITY — RELATED SEARCHES

        Pakistani Muslims are not alone in their search for porn.
        Google, the world’s most popular Internet search engine, has found in a survey that mostly Muslim states seek access to sex-related websites and Pakistan tops the list. Google found that of the top 10 countries – searching for sex-related sites – six were Muslim, with Pakistan on the top. The other Muslim countries are Egypt at number 2, Iran at 4, Morocco at 5, Saudi Arabia at 7 and Turkey at 8. Non-Muslim states are Vietnam at 3, India at 6, Philippines at 9 and Poland at 10.
        Pakistan most sex-starved
        Khalid Hasan, Daily Times, May 17, 2006
        Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
        Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
        Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
        Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
        Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
        Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
        Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
        Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
        Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
        Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
        Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
        Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
        Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
        Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

        MIDDLE EAST

        Bestiality is common among boys of tribal Arab cultures.
        Miner and DeVos (1960) comment that amongst Arab tribal cultures, “Bestiality with goats, sheep, or camels provides another outlet. These practices are not approved but they are recognized as common among boys.” Havelock-Ellis [note 52] states “The Arabs, according to Kocher, chiefly practice bestiality with goats, sheep and mares. The Annamites, according to Mondiere, commonly employ sows and (more especially the young women) dogs.”
        Historical And Cultural Perspectives On Zoophilia
        Serving History
        There is also a certain saying which remains popular among the Arabs:
        The Arabs have never taken quite so condemnatory an attitude towards the practice, and indeed a popular Arab saying had it that

        “The pilgrimage to Mecca is not complete without copulating with the camel.”[9]

        SUDAN

        In February 2006, a man caught having sex with a neighbor’s goat was not punished, but ordered by the council of elders to pay the neighbor a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) and marry the animal because he “used it as his wife”.
        A Sudanese man has been forced to take a goat as his “wife”, after he was caught having sex with the animal.
        The goat’s owner, Mr Alifi, said he surprised the man with his goat and took him to a council of elders.
        They ordered the man, Mr Tombe, to pay a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) to Mr Alifi.
        “We have given him the goat, and as far as we know they are still together,” Mr Alifi said.
        Sudan man forced to ‘marry’ goat
        BBC News, February 24,2006

        MOROCCO
        Morocco is an Islamic country, with 98.7% of the population Muslims.[10] The following is taken from a paper on sexuality in Morocco written by Nadia Kadiri, M.D., and Abderrazak Moussaïd, M.D., with Abdelkrim Tirraf, M.D., and Abdallah Jadid, M.D. Translated by Raymond J. Noonan, Ph.D., and Sandra Almeida.[11]
        In the rural world, zoophilia is still very widespread and not blameworthy. With masturbation, it constitutes an obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality.
        The operative phrase is ‘obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality’. Obligatory. It means in rural Morocco, Muslim males must have sexual intercourse with animals as part of their sexual apprenticeship.
        Also according to the scholars Allen Edwardes and Robert Masters, Ph.D, FAACS, the Muslims of Morocco believe that sexual intercourse with donkeys “make the penis grow big and strong” and masturbation is often scorned by them in favor of bestiality.[12]

        SLAMIC SCRIPTURE

        The above paper also says “it is prohibited without question by the Shariâ”. But is this alleged prohibition within the Shari’ah extracted (as it must be) from the Qur’an and Hadith, or has this fiqh been derived using external non-Islamic sources?

        QURAN

        In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur’an has to say on the subject:
        That’s right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur’an’s clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’
        If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.[13]

        HADITH

        There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. The following hadith is taken from the Sunnah Abu-Dawud collection, not Bukari or Muslim.
        Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.
        Abu Dawud 38:4449
        Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? And it is. Just look at the very next hadith.
        Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
        Abu Dawud 38:4450
        This is a very clear contradiction. How can one hadith say kill the person committing bestiality, and the very next one say there is no prescribed punishment for the same person? Both statements cannot be true.
        What’s worse; these two contradictory hadiths (transmitted through different isnad) have been attributed to the same person. Abu Dawud himself had said the former of the two hadith is “not strong” and the latter further “weakens” it.[14]
        From the above, we can gather that Robert Masters had correctly stated, “bestiality was not specifically prohibited by the Prophet,”[9] so there is little wonder that Islamists generally shy away from mentioning Abu Dawud 38:4449 in their pronouncements on bestiality.

        SAHIH (AUTHENTIC) HADITH

        As we have previously mentioned, there is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs (Authentic). However there does exist a certain hadith and commentary by the renowned Islamic scholar al-Nawawi, which is of interest.
        The following narration does not exist in the English translations of Sahih Muslim, but a similar (but sanitized version) appears in: Sahih Muslim 3:684
        و حدثني ‏ ‏زهير بن حرب ‏ ‏وأبو غسان المسمعي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثناه ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏وابن بشار ‏ ‏قالوا حدثنا ‏ ‏معاذ بن هشام ‏ ‏قال حدثني ‏ ‏أبي ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏ومطر ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏الحسن ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي رافع ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي هريرة ‏ ‏أن نبي الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏إذا جلس بين ‏ ‏شعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ثم جهدها فقد وجب عليه الغسل ‏
        ‏وفي حديث ‏ ‏مطر ‏ ‏وإن لم ينزل ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏زهير ‏ ‏من بينهم بين ‏ ‏أشعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن عمرو بن عباد بن جبلة ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن أبي عدي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏حدثني ‏ ‏وهب بن جرير ‏ ‏كلاهما ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏بهذا الإسناد ‏ ‏مثله غير أن في حديث ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏ثم اجتهد ولم يقل وإن لم ينزل ‏
        Narrated by Zuhair Ibn Harb, narrated by Ghasan Al-Masma’i, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Ibn Bashar, who said that it was narrated by Muath Ibn Hisham, narrated by Abu Qatada, narrated by Mattar, narrated by Al-Hassan, narrated by Abu Rab’i, narrated by Abu Huraira who said:
        “The prophet — peace be upon him — said, ‘If one sits between a woman’s four parts (shu’biha Al-arba’) and then fatigues her, then it necessitates that he wash.’
        In the hadith of Mattar it is added ‘even if he does not ejaculate (yunzil).’ Zuhair narrated among them using the phrase ‘Ashba’iha Al-arba’. It was also narrated by Muhammad Ibn Umar Ibn Ibad Ibn Jablah, narrated Muhammad Ibn Abi Uday, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Wahb Ibn Jarir who both related from Shu’bah who narrated from Qatada who gave this same chain of transmission, except that in the hadith of Shu’bah it has the phrase ‘then he labored’ but did not have the phrase ‘even if he does not ejaculate.’
        Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525

        IMAM AL-NAWAWI (1234 — 1278 AD)

        Below is a short bio of al-Nawawi, whose commentary of Sahih Muslim is second only to Ibn Hajar’s commentary of Sahih Bukhari.[15]
        Imam Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi was born in the village of Nawa in Southern Syria, Nawawi spent most of his life in Damascus where he lived in a simple manner, devoted to Allah, engaging single-mindedly in worship, study, writing and teaching various Islamic sciences. The life of this world seems scarcely to have impinged upon him. He was a versatile and extremely dedicated scholar whose breadth of learning was matched by its depth.
        Imam Nawawi died at the young age of 44 years, leaving behind him numerous works of great importance, the most famous of these being:
        • al-Arba’un Nabawi (An-Nawawis Forty Hadith)
        • Riyadhus saleheen
        • al-Maqasid (Al-Nawawi’s Manual of Islam).
        • Kitab al-Adhkar,
        • Minhaj al-Talibin (a main reference for Shafi’i fiqh)
        • Shar’ Sahih Muslim (he was the first to arrange the sahih of Muslim in the now familiar categories)
        Although best known for his works in hadith, Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi (d. 676/1277) was also the Imam of the later Shafi’i school of Jurisprudence, and widely acknowledged as the intellectual heir to Imam Shafi’i. He was a renowned scholar and jurist who dedicated his life to the pursuit of Islamic learning.
        About Imam al-Nawawi

        COMMENTARY
        صحيح مسلم بشرح النووي ‏ ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو غَسَّان الْمِسْمَعِيّ ) ‏ ‏هُوَ بِفَتْحِ الْغَيْن الْمُعْجَمَة وَتَشْدِيد السِّين الْمُهْمَلَة , وَيَجُوز صَرْفه وَتَرْكُ صَرْفه . وَالْمِسْمَعِيّ بِكَسْرِ الْمِيم الْأُولَى وَفَتْح الثَّانِي , وَاسْمه مَالِك بْن عَبْد الْوَاحِد , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَانه مَرَّات , لَكِنِّي أُنَبِّه عَلَيْهِ وَعَلَى مِثْله لِطُولِ الْعَهْد بِهِ , كَمَا شَرَطْتهُ فِي الْخُطْبَة . ‏
        ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو رَافِع عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَة ) ‏ ‏اِسْم أَبِي رَافِع : ( نُفَيْع ) وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ أَيْضًا . ‏ ‏قَوْله صَلَّى اللَّه عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : ( إِذَا قَعَدَ بَيْن شُعَبهَا الْأَرْبَع ثُمَّ جَهَدهَا ) ‏ ‏وَفِي رِوَايَة ( أَشْعُبهَا ) اِخْتَلَفَ الْعُلَمَاء فِي الْمُرَاد بِالشُّعَبِ الْأَرْبَع , فَقِيلَ : هِيَ الْيَدَانِ وَالرِّجْلَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالْفَخِذَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالشَّفْرَانِ , وَاخْتَارَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض أَنَّ الْمُرَاد شُعَب الْفَرْج الْأَرْبَع , وَالشُّعَب النَّوَاحِي وَاحِدَتهَا شُعْبَة , وَأَمَّا مَنْ قَالَ : ( أَشْعُبِهَا ) , فَهُوَ جَمْع شُعَب . وَمَعْنَى ( جَهَدَهَا ) حَفَرَهَا كَذَا قَالَهُ الْخَطَّابِيُّ وَقَالَ غَيْره : بَلَغَ مَشَقَّتهَا , يُقَال : جَهِدْته وَأَجْهَدْته بَلَغْت مَشَقَّته , قَالَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض رَحِمَهُ اللَّه تَعَالَى : الْأَوْلَى أَنْ يَكُون جَهَدَهَا بِمَعْنَى بَلَغَ جَهْده فِي الْعَمَل فِيهَا , وَالْجَهْد الطَّاقَة , وَهُوَ إِشَارَة إِلَى الْحَرَكَة وَتَمَكُّن صُورَة الْعَمَل , وَهُوَ نَحْو قَوْله مِنْ حَفَرَهَا أَيْ كَدّهَا بِحَرَكَتِهِ . وَإِلَّا فَأَيّ مَشَقَّة بَلَغَ بِهَا فِي ذَلِكَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . وَمَعْنَى الْحَدِيث أَنَّ إِيجَاب الْغُسْل لَا يَتَوَقَّف عَلَى نُزُول الْمَنِيّ بَلْ مَتَى غَابَتْ الْحَشَفَة فِي الْفَرْج وَجَبَ الْغُسْل عَلَى الرَّجُل وَالْمَرْأَة , وَهَذَا لَا خِلَاف فِيهِ الْيَوْم , وَقَدْ كَانَ فِيهِ خِلَاف لِبَعْضِ الصَّحَابَة وَمَنْ بَعْدهمْ , ثُمَّ اِنْعَقَدَ الْإِجْمَاع عَلَى مَا ذَكَرْنَاهُ , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَان هَذَا . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ الْحَشَفَة فِي دُبُر اِمْرَأَة , أَوْ دُبُر رَجُل , أَوْ فَرْج بَهِيمَة , أَوْ دُبُرهَا , وَجَبَ الْغُسْل سَوَاء كَانَ الْمَوْلَج فِيهِ حَيًّا أَوْ مَيِّتًا , صَغِيرًا أَوْ كَبِيرًا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ ذَلِكَ عَنْ قَصْد أَمْ عَنْ نِسْيَان , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مُخْتَارًا أَوْ مُكْرَهًا , أَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَهُ وَهُوَ نَائِم , وَسَوَاء اِنْتَشَرَ الذَّكَر أَمْ لَا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مَخْتُونًا أَمْ أَغْلَف , فَيَجِب الْغُسْل فِي كُلّ هَذِهِ الصُّوَر عَلَى الْفَاعِل وَالْمَفْعُول بِهِ إِلَّا إِذَا كَانَ الْفَاعِل أَوْ الْمَفْعُول بِهِ صَبِيًّا أَوْ صَبِيَّة فَإِنَّهُ لَا يُقَال وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ لِأَنَّهُ لَيْسَ مُكَلَّفًا , وَلَكِنْ يُقَال صَارَ جُنُبًا فَإِنْ كَانَ مُمَيِّزًا وَجَبَ عَلَى الْوَلِيّ أَنْ يَأْمُرهُ بِالْغُسْلِ كَمَا يَأْمُرهُ بِالْوُضُوءِ , فَإِنْ صَلَّى مِنْ غَيْر غُسْلٍ لَمْ تَصِحّ صَلَاته , وَإِنْ لَمْ يَغْتَسِل حَتَّى بَلَغَ وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ الْغُسْل , وَإِنْ اِغْتَسَلَ فِي الصِّبَى ثُمَّ بَلَغَ لَمْ يَلْزَمهُ إِعَادَة الْغُسْل . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَالِاعْتِبَار فِي الْجِمَاع بِتَغْيِيبِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْ صَحِيح الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ , فَإِذَا غَيَّبَهَا بِكَمَالِهَا تَعَلَّقَتْ بِهِ جَمِيع الْأَحْكَام , وَلَا يُشْتَرَط تَغْيِيب جَمِيع الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ . وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ بَعْض الْحَشَفَة لَا يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام بِالِاتِّفَاقِ إِلَّا وَجْهًا شَاذًّا ذَكَرَهُ بَعْض أَصْحَابنَا أَنَّ حُكْمه حُكْم جَمِيعهَا , وَهَذَا الْوَجْه غَلَط مُنْكَر مَتْرُوك , وَأَمَّا إِذَا كَانَ الذَّكَر مَقْطُوعًا فَإِنْ بَقِيَ مِنْهُ دُون الْحَشَفَة لَمْ يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام , وَإِنْ كَانَ الْبَاقِي قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَحَسْب تَعَلَّقَتْ الْأَحْكَام بِتَغْيِيبِهِ بِكَمَالِهِ , وَإِنْ كَانَ زَائِدًا عَلَى قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَفِيهِ وَجْهَانِ مَشْهُورَانِ لِأَصْحَابِنَا أَصَحّهمَا أَنَّ الْأَحْكَام تَتَعَلَّق بِقَدْرِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْهُ , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَتَعَلَّق شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام إِلَّا بِتَغْيِيبِ جَمِيع الْبَاقِي . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ لَفَّ عَلَى ذَكَرِهِ خِرْقَة وَأَوْلَجَهُ فِي فَرْج اِمْرَأَة فَفِيهِ ثَلَاثَة أَوْجُه لِأَصْحَابِنَا مِنْهَا وَالْمَشْهُور أَنَّهُ يَجِب عَلَيْهِمَا الْغُسْل , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَجِب لِأَنَّهُ أَوْلَجَ فِي خِرْقَة , وَالثَّالِث إِنْ كَانَتْ الْخِرْقَة غَلِيظَة تَمْنَع وُصُول اللَّذَّة وَالرُّطُوبَة لَمْ يَجِب الْغُسْل . وَإِلَّا وَجَبَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَ بَهِيمَة وَجَبَ عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل , وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت ذَكَرًا مَقْطُوعًا فَوَجْهَانِ أَصَحّهمَا يَجِب عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل
        Commentary of Imam Al-Nawawi on the Hadith
        The saying of the prophet — peace be upon him- ‘When he sits between her fours parts) mostly its a home animal (shu’biha Al-arba) and has intercourse with her then fatigues her’

        In another narration the word ‘Ashu’biha’ is used. The scholars have disagreed about the intended meaning of ‘shu’biha Al-arba’ (the fours) for some said that it means the arms and the legs, while others have said that it refers to the legs and thighs, and other said it means the legs and the edge of the pubic area. Al-Qadi Ayad chose the meaning of the four areas surrounding the vagina. The word (Shu’b) means areas, its singular form being (Shu’bah). As for those who say (Ashba’iha) that is the plural of the word (Shu’b).
        The word Aj-hada-ha (fatigue her) means to plow her, which was also stated by Al-Khatabi. Others have said it means to make her reach exhaustion as in the phrase ‘she made him toil and labor till he was exhausted’. Al-Qadi Ayad — may Allah rest his soul- said ‘Primarily, the word (Jahada’ha) means that the man exerted his effort working in a woman, where the word (Juh’d) means energy and refers to motion by describing the type of work. This is similar to his (the prophet) saying ‘he who plowed her’ meaning he who penetrated her by his motion. Otherwise, what other fatigue could a man experience because of her, and Allah knows best.

        The meaning of the hadith is that the necessity to wash is not limited to when semen is ejaculated, rather it is when the penile head (Hash-fa, lit. “the head of the male member,” i.e. head of the penis) penetrates the vagina, then it is necessary for the man and the woman to wash. There is no disagreement on this today, even though there was disagreement on this by some of the early companions and others later. However, an agreement was later reached and this is what we have shown and presented previously.
        Our companions have said that if the penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus, or a man’s anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus then it is necessary to wash whether the one being penetrated is alive or dead, young or old, whether it was done intentionally or absentmindedly, whether it was done willfully or forcefully.

        This also applies if the woman places the male member inside her while the man is asleep, whether the penis is erect or not, whether the penis is circumcised or uncircumcised. All these situations require that the person committing the act and the one the act is committed on must wash themselves, unless the person committing the act or the person the act is committed on is a young male or female. In that case it cannot be said that the person must wash, for they do not have the responsibility, rather it is said that this person is in a state of impurity. If that person can discern (the sexual act) then his guardian can command him to wash just as he commands him to perform the ablution washing for prayers. For if he prays without washing, his prayer has not been performed correctly; likewise if he doesn’t wash after he reaches puberty he must be forced to wash. If he washed as a youth and then reaches puberty, then he does not have to repeat the washing.

        Our companions have said that intercourse occurs when a healthy male’s penile head completely penetrates (an orifice), as has been unanimously agreed. Thus, when the penile head has completely disappeared (inside the orifice), then all the regulations concerning washing apply. It is unanimously agreed that it is not necessary that the entire penile shaft penetrate to apply the regulations of washing. If part of the penile head penetrates, then the regulations of washing are not imposed as is agreed, except by an odd few of our companions who said that even in this case all the regulations of washing apply. However, this opinion is wrong, rejected and abandoned. If the male member was severed and what remained was less than the length of the penile head, then none of the washing regulations apply. If the part remaining was equal in length to the penile head length then that part must completely penetrate for the regulation of washing to apply. If the part remaining was greater in length to the penile head length then there are two famous opinions for our companions. The most correct is that if the portion that penetrates is equal to the length of the penile head, then the regulations for washing apply. The other opinion is that none of the regulations for washing apply until the entire remaining length of the penile shaft completely penetrates and Allah knows best.
        If a man wraps a sheath around his male member and then ejaculates inside a woman’s vagina, then there are three opinions from our companions. The most famous is that the man must wash. The second is that he does not have to wash because he ejaculated inside the sheath. The third is that if the sheath is thick and prevents climax and wetness (in the vagina) then washing is not necessary, otherwise it is necessary and Allah knows best.
        If a woman inserts (in her vagina) an animal’s penis she must wash, and if she inserts a detached penis (thakaran maktu-an, lit. “a severed male member”) there are two opinions; the most correct is that she must wash.

        Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525 – Commentary

        ISLAMIC SCHOLARS

        Some Sunni Islamic scholars have ruled that bestiality does not invalidate the hajj or ones fast.
        ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه

        “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal, that will not make his hajj void”
        Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H), Badaye al-Sanae, Vol. 2, p. 216
        “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”
        Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan, Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820
        Others have said it is halal.
        لقد كانت نكاح الحيوانات قبل البعثه منتشره وتروى كثير من الروايات انها حلال لكنها مكروه والاحوط وجوبا ترك هذه العاده التي تسبب الأذى النفسي ويجب عليك الاعتراف لصاحب الاغنام ودفع قيمتها لمالكها

        Sex with animals before the mission (Islam) was wide spread and many narrations are narrated that it is halal but makrooh (disliked). And on the compulsory precaution one should abandon this practice that may cause self harm. And you must admit this to the owner of the sheep and pay the owner.
        Sex with animals Fatwa
        al-Uzma Seyyid Ali al-Sistani

        CONCLUSION

        From all of the above, we can certainly see that, unlike the West, Islamic societies do not universally harbor negative attitudes towards bestiality. Many Muslims seek out gratification or are indifferent to this perversion, and in some cases it is even openly promoted and made obligatory.
        This is all in stark contrast with their attitudes towards homosexuality and their allowance of pedophilia. Therefore to claim that the West without the guidance of Islam has allowed bestiality is not only false, but hypocritical when you consider that this perversion, alongside pedophilia, is left largely unhindered by the Islamic clerisy in their societies and runs rampant among followers of Islam.
        Aside from their own embarrassment, we can also see that there is little basis for any Shari’ah prohibition of bestiality/zoophilia as the Qur’an and the Sahih Hadiths (Bukhari and Muslim) do not prohibit this unnatural practice, furthermore the references we have examined outside of the two Sahihs are considered weak.

        References

        1. ↑ Kelli Morgan – No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan – Fox News, July 13, 2010
        2. ↑ Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2010 Douglas Harper
        3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Bestiality – Dictionary.com
        4. ↑ Collins English Dictionary – Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition 2009
        5. ↑ Merriam-Webster’s Medical Dictionary, © 2007 Merriam-Webster, Inc.
        6. ↑ Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc.
        7. ↑ Rebecca F. Wisch – Overview of State Bestiality Laws – Animal Legal & Historical Center, 2008 (updated 2010)
        8. ↑ Watcher – Pakistan: Muslims Are Sex-Starved Surfers, With Bestial Interests – Eye On The World, May 18, 2006
        9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Robert E.L. Masters – Forbidden Sexual Behavior and Morality – The Julian Press, 1st edition 1966,
        10. ↑ Africa :: Morocco – The online Factbook
        11. ↑ Read the full text here.
        12. ↑ Allen Edwardes and R.E.L. Masters – Cradle of Erotica (pp. 223-224) – Bantam Paperback; New Ed edition (1977), ISBN 0553103016
        13. ↑ Judith Worell – Encyclopedia of women and gender: Volume 1 (p. 298) – Academic Press; 1 edition, September 27, 2001, ISBN 9780122272455
        14. ↑ Dr. Ahmad Shafaat – Ahadith About Rajm – Islamic Perspectives, March 6, 2005
        15. ↑ ON TASAWWUF Imam Nawawi (d. 676) – Sunnah.org

      • THE MORAL TEACHINGS OF PROPHET MOHAMMED:

        ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF ALLAH.

        ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED THE RAPE OF FEMALE CAPTIVES:

        RAPE JIHAD:

        Sahih Muslim Book 08. N 3371Marriage
        Chapter: Al-Azl (incomplete sexual intercourse): Coitus Interruptus.
        Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women;
        and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them.
        So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him?
        So we asked Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

        REMEMBER:

        ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF GOD
        ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED RAPE

        Al-’Azl
        Al-’Azl, (العزل) also known as coitus interruptus, is the practice of having sexual intercourse with a woman but withdrawing the penis before ejaculation. Apparently al-’Azl with female captives and slaves was a pretty important topic for Muhammad and his companions as evidenced by the abundance of Hadith material on the subject.
        Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle .

        Sahih Bukhari 7:62:135

        Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interrupt us while the Quran was being revealed. Jabir added: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle while the Quran was being Revealed.
        Sahih Bukhari 7:62:136

        When RAPING your captive, it’s better if you do not pull out at the end

        Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus(RAPE WITHOUT PREGNANCY)?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to PULL OUT. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.”
        Sahih Bukhari 3:34:432
        Abu Said said, “We went with Allah’s Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the ‘Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah’s Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence.”

        Sahih Bukhari 3:46:718

        We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. ………
        We asked (him) about it and he said, “It is better for you not to PULL OUT, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist.”

        Sahih Bukhari 5:59:459

        Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: That during the battle with Bani Al-Mustaliq they (Muslims) captured females and wanted sexual relation with them without impregnating them. So they asked the Prophet about coitus interruptus. He said, “It is better that you leave it in, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.” Qaza’a said, “I heard Abu Sa’id saying that the Prophet said, ‘No soul is ordained to be created but Allah will create it.”

        Sahih Bukhari 9:93:506

        Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah’s Apostle about it and he said, “Do you really do that?” repeating the question thrice, “There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection.”

        Sahih Bukhari 7:62:137

        Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: That while he was sitting with the Prophet a man from the Ansar came and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get slave girls from the war captives and we love property; what do you think about coitus interruptus?” Allah’s Apostle said, “Do you do that? It is better for you not to pull out, for there is no soul which Allah has ordained to come into existence but will be created.”

        Sahih Bukhari 8:77:600

        Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

        Sahih Muslim 8:3371, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3372

        Yahya related to me from Malik from Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman from Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Habban that Ibn Muhayriz said, “I went into the mosque and saw Abu Said al-Khudri and so I sat by him and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said al-Khudri said, ‘We went out with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, on the expedition to the Banu al-Mustaliq. We took some Arabs prisoner, and we desired the women as celibacy was hard for us. We wanted the ransom, so we wanted to practise coitus interruptus. We said, ‘Shall we practise coitus interruptus while the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, is among us before we ask him?’ We asked him about that and he said, ‘You don’t have to not do it. There is no self which is to come into existence up to the Day of Rising but that it will come into existence.’ ”

        Al-Muwatta 29 32.95b

        It’s okay to practice ‘azl when having sex with your slave-girl
        Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri: A man said: Apostle of Allah, I have a slave-girl and I withdraw the penis from her (while having intercourse), and I dislike that she becomes pregnant. I intend (by intercourse) what the men intend by it. The Jews say that withdrawing the penis (azl) is burying the living girls on a small scale. He (the Prophet) said: The Jews told a lie. If Allah intends to create it, you cannot turn it away.

        Abu Dawud 11:2166

        Jabir (Allah be pleased with him) reported that a man came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: I have a slave-girl who is our servant and she carries water for us and I have intercourse with her, but I do not want her to conceive. He said: Practise ‘azl, if you so like, but what is decreed for her will come to her. The person stayed back (for some time) and then came and said: The girl has become pregnant, whereupon he said: I told you what was decreed for her would come to her.

        Sahih Muslim 8:3383

        Your slave-girl is your field, so water it or leave it thirsty if you want
        Yahya related to me from Malik from Damra ibn Said al-Mazini from al-Hajjaj ibn Amr ibn Ghaziya that he was sitting with Zayd ibn Thabit when Ibn Fahd came to him. He was from the Yemen. He said, “Abu Said! I have slave-girls. None of the wives in my keep are more pleasing to me than them, and not all of them please me so much that I want a child by them, shall I then practise coitus interruptus?” Zayd ibn Thabit said, “Give an opinion, Hajjaj!” “I said, ‘May Allah forgive you! We sit with you in order to learn from you!’ He said, ‘Give an opinion! ‘I said, ‘She is your field, if you wish, water it, and if you wish, leave it thirsty. I heard that from Zayd.’ Zayd said, ‘He has spoken the truth.’ ”

        Al-Muwatta 29 32.99b

        “You don’t need your slave-girl’s permission to practice ‘azl with her.”
        Yahya related to me from Malik from Humayd ibn Qays al-Makki that a man called Dhafif said that Ibn Abbas was asked about coitus interruptus. He called a slave-girl of his and said, “Tell them.” She was embarrassed. He said, “It is alright, and I do it myself.” Malik said, “A man does not practise coitus interruptus with a free woman unless she gives her permission. There is no harm in practising coitus interruptus with a slave-girl without her permission. Someone who has someone else’s slave-girl as a wife, does not practise coitus interruptus with her unless her people give him permission.”

        Al-Muwatta 29 32.100b

        Additional Hadith about ‘azl

        Sahih Muslim

        Sa’d b. Abu Waqqas (Allah be pleased with him) reported that a person came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: I do ‘azi with my wife. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Why do you do that? The person said: I fear harm to her child or her children. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (way peace be upon him) said: If that were harmful it would harm the Persians and the Greeks.

        Sahih Muslim 8:3394

        Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl with them. We then asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) about it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born until the Day of judgment must be born.

        Sahih Muslim 8:3373

        Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) (was asked if he had heard it himself), to which he said: Yes. (I heard) Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: There is no harm if you do not practise it, for it (the birth of the child) is something ordained (by Allah).

        Sahih Muslim 8:3374, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3375

        Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) was asked about ‘azl, whereupon he said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for it (the birth of the child) is something ordained. Muhammad (one of the narrators) said: (The words) La ‘alaykum (there is no harm) implies its Prohibition.

        Sahih Muslim 8:3376

        Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that mention was made of ‘azl in the presence of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) whereupon he said: Why do you practise it? They said: There is a man whose wife has to suckle the child, and if that person has a sexual intercourse with her (she may conceive) which he does not like, and there is another person who has a slave-girl and he has a sexual intercourse with her, but he does not like her to have conception so that she may not become Umm Walad, whereupon he (the Holy Prophet) said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for that (the birth of the child) is something pre- ordained. Ibn ‘Aun said: I made a mention of this hadith to Hasan, and he said: By Allah, (it seems) as if there is upbraiding in it (for ‘azl).

        Sahih Muslim 8:3377, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3378 and Sahih Muslim 8:3379

        Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: Mention was made about al-’azl in the presence of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), whereupon he said: Why any one of you practises it? (He did not say: One of you should not do it), for there is no created soul, whose creator is not Allah.

        Sahih Muslim 8:3380

        Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) was asked about ‘azl, whereupon he said: The child does not come from all the liquid (sermen) and when Allah intends to create anything nothing can prevent it (from coming into existence).

        Sahih Muslim 8:3381, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3382

        Jabir b. ‘Abdullah (Allah be pleased with them) reported that a person asked Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) saying: I have a slave-girl and I practise ‘azl with her, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: This cannot prevent that which Allah has decreed. The person then came (after some time) and said: Messenger of Allah, the slave-girl about whom I talked to you has conceived, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: I am the servant of Allah and His Messenger.

        Sahih Muslim 8:3384

        Al-Muwatta

        Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’n-Nadr, the mawla of Umar ibn Ubaydullah from Amir ibn Sad ibn Abi Waqqas from his father that he used to practise coitus interruptus.

        Al-Muwatta 29 32.96b

        Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’n-Nadr, the mawla of Umar ibn Ubaydullah from Ibn Aflah, the mawla of Abu Ayyub al-Ansari from an umm walad of Abu Ayyubal-Ansari that he practised coitus interruptus.

        Al-Muwatta 29 32.97b
        Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar did not practise coitus interruptus and thought that it was disapproved.

        Al-Muwatta 29 32.98b

        Yahya said that Malik related from Ibn Shihab from Salim ibn Abdullah ibn Umar from his father that Umar ibn al-Khattab said, “What’s the matter with men who have intercourse with their slave-girls and then dismiss them? No slave-girl comes to me whose master confesses that he has had intercourse with her but that I connect her child to him, whether or not he has practised coitus interruptus or stopped having intercourse with her.”

        Al-Muwatta 36 23.24b

        Malik related to me from Nafi that Safiyya bint Abi Ubayd informed him that Umar ibn al-Khattab said, “What is the matter with men who have intercourse with their slave-girls and then leave them to go? No slave-girl comes to me whose master confesses that he has had intercourse with her but that I connect her child to him, whether or not he has practised coitus interruptus or left off from intercourse with her.” Yahya said that he heard Malik say, “What is done in our community about an umm walad who commits a crime is that her master is liable for what she has done up to her value. He does not have to surrender her, and he cannot be made to bear more than her value for her crime.”

        Al-Muwatta 36 23.25b

        STONED TO DEATH

        On October 30, 2008, the United Nations condemned the stoning to death of Aisha Duhulowa, a 13-year-old girl who had been gang-raped and then sentenced to death by a Sharia court for fornication (Zina). She was screaming and begging for mercy, but when some family members attempted to intervene, shots were fired by the Islamic militia and a baby was killed.

        Local Sharia courts in Bangladesh regularly punish raped minor girls and women by flogging and beating them with shoes.[1] Similar cases of punishing raped women are Mina v. the State, Bibi v. the State and Bahadur v. the State.[2] Sharia courts in Pakistan have punished thousands of raped women by long term imprisonment.[3]

        You might think that such horrific barbarity cannot be the real Sharia law; that it is a misapplication of the law by ignorant clergy. Sadly, neither is true.

        There is a traceable dynamic in Sharia Law that is bound to lead to this barbarity. And unless we abandon these laws we will never be able to emerge from this barbarity. It was a blunder that Muslim jurists included rape in the Hudood section of Sharia Law that deals with murder, bodily harm, apostasy, drinking, defamation, theft, adultery and highway robbery. But anyone who tried to change these laws ended up banging their heads against the wall. Mawdudi, the founding father of modern Political Islam, claims that even if all the world’s Muslims together wanted to make the slightest change in these laws, they would not be allowed to do so.[4]

        But change is necessary.

        Another key element of these laws is that only eye-witnesses are acceptable and no circumstantial evidence can be accepted.[5] Rape is included in the Dyat (monetary compensation for bodily harm) section of Sharia Law because it is considered as “Bodily Harm” or “Robbing Property” (chastity). This classification led jurists to create these laws:

        * A rapist is obliged to pay the victim the amount typically received as marriage payment to similar brides.[6]

        * “If the rapist cannot be punished for any reason he will pay the victim the amount equal to bride-money.”[7]

        As no other punishment is mentioned, the punishment of rape can be only financial compensation. But Jurists missed the point that rape is a crime of its own kind. It has a devastating psychological and social impact on raped women. They are shamed to death, socially outcast, unsuitable for marriage, bring shame on the family and in some countries become the victims of honor killing. Many raped women commit suicide in Muslim countries.

        The Quranic word “Zina” means sexual relation between a man and woman not married to each other. It is called adultery for married persons and fornication for unmarried ones. The Quran severely prohibits Zina. Muslim jurists also included rape in the category of Zina because in rape cases such sexual relations “between a man and woman not married to each other,” even though forced on the victim, have taken place. As rape is not mentioned in the Quran, the death sentence for rapists originated from the Prophet’s example: “Narrated Wa’il ibn Hujr: When a woman went out in the time of the Prophet (peace be upon him) for prayer, a man attacked her and overpowered (raped) her. …he said: Stone him to death”.[8]

        The laws are so clear about defining rape and the requirement for proof of rape that a judge has no option but punish the rape victims.
        When rape is caught or reported, “sex between a man and woman not married to each other” can be proven by testimony, physical evidences of bodily scars/bruises, torn clothing or pregnancy of the victim. Then the Sharia laws are enforced.
        Sharia Law: The rapist will be punished to death if force on the victim is proven.[9]
        Clear enough. But exactly how can “force on the victim” be proven? The answer must surely rank as one of the most insane and sexist laws in human history.

        (A) “Proof of Zina (adultery) or Zina Bil-Jabr (rape) liable to Hadd shall be one of the following:

        (a) The accused makes confession or
        (b) There are at least four Muslim adult male witnesses”[10]
        (B) “Proof of adultery or rape liable to Hadd shall be one of the following:
        (a) The accused makes confession, or
        (b) There are at least four Muslim adult male witnesses.”[11]
        (C) “Punishment will take place when Zina or rape have been proved by witness.”[12]
        (D) Sharia Law rejects the witness of women in Hudood cases.[13]
        (E) “The evidence of women is originally inadmissible on account of their weakness of understanding, want of memory and incapacity of governing.”[14]

        Because such “proofs” are almost impossible to obtain and because circumstantial evidence is not accepted, a rape cannot be proved as rape in a Sharia court. Instead, “sex outside marriage” is proved for the woman by her complaint or physical scars or torn cloths or pregnancy etc. Then the law of “Punishment for Sex Outside Marriage” i.e. stoning to death for married adulterers and flogging and exile for unmarried adulterers are applied to the rape-victims.[15] On the other hand, a rapist has simply to deny the crime and go scott free. As the New York Times reports: “Ms. Lawal, a divorced woman, identified a man as the father of her child. The man denied the charge, swore on the Koran, and was deemed innocent by the trial court. No one suggested DNA tests.”[16]
        But DNA tests have no place in Hudood Laws either. The BBC reported that Zafran Bibi of Pakistan “went to the police to register a case of rape, but she herself was instead sentenced to death for having an adulterous affair.”[17] About conducting a DNA test to identify the rapist, the Dawn reports: “Justice Ali Nawaz Chauhan of the Lahore High Court has observed that the DNA test is not acceptable as evidence to establish the offence of Zina under the Hudood laws which require a direct testimony in such cases..”[18]

        This is how Sharia Law punishes raped women. The sources of these laws span the period from the 7th century to recent times. Some Muslim countries have withdrawn from the application of these laws, but these laws are still alive and active in many Muslim societies. Many Muslims talk about it, but there has never been a concerted effort to end this barbarity. It is true that many, including the UN’s Children Fund, have expressed alarm over the plight of Aisha Duhulowa, but history tells us that merely condemning these acts or calling on the humanity of the perpetrators has never stopped the violent soldiers of God. The solution can only been found by raising the awareness and opposition of the entire world, irrespective of religion.

        Muslims must reject this barbarity or risk Islam being seen as the criminal. The screams of little Aisha Duhulowa will echo around the world until this is done.

        NOTES:

        [1] The Daily Star on 04 April 2006
        [2] “Rape Law in Islamic Societies” by Julie Norman, CSID 6th Annual Conference
        [3] Annual report of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom, May 2004 – Ref – National Commission on the Status of Women in Pakistan.
        [4] Islamic Law and Constitution – page 140.
        [5] Codified Islamic Law Vol 2 page 600
        [6] Shafi’i Law Reliance of the Traveler -# m.8.10
        [7] Codified Islamic Law Vol 1 page 301
        [8] Abu Dawood Book 38, Hadis# Number 4366
        [9] Codified Islami Law Volume 1 Law#134, Shafi’i law Reliance of the Traveler – o.7.3
        [10] Pakistan Hudood Ordinance VII of 1979 amended by Ordinance XX of 1980
        [11] Codified Islami Law Volume 1 Law#133
        [12] Ibid Law #135
        [13] Hanafi Law-Page 176, 353, Shafi’i Law- page 638 Law#o.24.9, Criminal Law in Islam and the Muslim World -page 251, The Penal Law of Islam – Kazi Publications Lahore- page 44, 45, Tafsir of Translation of the Qura’an by Muhiuddin Khan pages 239 and 928
        [14] The Penal Law of Islam – Kazi Publications Lahore- page 44 – 45
        [15] Hanafi Law Hedaya 178, Codified Islamic Law#129 Vol 1, Sunan Abu Dawood Book 38,4451& 4423
        [16]
        http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.htmlres=9900E0D9153DF935A1575AC0A9659C8B63
        [17] http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/03_06_02/thursday/info1.shtml
        [18] http://www.dawn.com/2005/05/21/top4.htm
        By Hasan Mahmud
        FrontPageMagazine.com
        Hasan Mahmud is the Director of Sharia Law of the Muslim Canadian Congress. He played a vital role in the successful movement against the Toronto Sharia Court. The court had been established in 1991 (and functioning since then) with the blessing of Ontario law and was banned in 2003 when the Ontario Government enacted a new law banning all faith-courts. He has authored books, debates, 2 docu-dramas and a docu-movie on Sharia. He has also spoken on Sharia in various conferences in Europe and North America.
        © 2013, Assyrian International News Agency. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use.

        HOW A WOMAN MUST PROVE RAPE

        Question:

        Why are rape victims often punished by Islamic courts as adulterers?

        Summary Answer:

        Under Islamic law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape, without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience, are actually confessing to having sex. If they or the accused happens to be married, then it is considered to be adultery.

        The Qur’an:
        Qur’an (2:282) – Establishes that a woman’s testimony is worth only half that of a man’s in court (there is no “he said/she said” gridlock in Islam).

        Qur’an (24:4) – “And those who accuse free women then do not bring four witnesses (to adultery), flog them…” Strictly speaking, this verse addresses adultery (revealed at the very time that Muhammad’s favorite wife was being accused of adultery on the basis of only three witnesses, coincidentally enough) however it is a part of the theological underpinning of the Sharia rule.

        Qur’an (24:13) – “Why did they not bring four witnesses of it? But as they have not brought witnesses they are liars before Allah.”

        Qur’an (2:223) – “Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will…” There is no such thing as rape in marriage, as a man is permitted unrestricted sexual access to his wives.

        From the Hadith:
        Bukhari (5:59:462) – The background for the Qur’anic requirement of four witnesses to adultery. Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was accused of cheating [on her polygamous husband]. Three witnesses corroborated the event, but Muhammad apparently did not want to believe it, and so established the arbitrary rule that four witnesses are required.

        Additional Notes:

        Rape is virtually impossible to prove under strict Islamic law (Sharia). If the man claims that the act was consensual sex, there is very little that the woman can do to refute this. Islam places the burden of avoiding sexual encounters of any sort on the woman.

        A recent fatwa from a mainstream Islamic site echoes this rule and even chides a victim of incest for complaining when she has no “evidence”:

        However, it is not permissible to accuse the father of rape without evidence. Indeed, the Sharee’ah put some special conditions for proving Zina (fornication or adultery) that are not required in case of other crimes. The crime of Zina is not confirmed except if the fornicator admits it, or with the testimony of four trustworthy men, while the testimony of women is not accepted.

        Hence, the statement of this girl or the statement of her mother in itself does not Islamically prove anything against the father, especially that the latter denies it.

        Therefore, if this daughter has no evidence to prove that her accusations are true, she should not have claimed that she was raped by her father and she should not have taken him to the court. (IslamWeb.net, Image)

        Since it is incredibly unlikely that a child molester will violate his victim in front of “four trustworthy men”, Islamic law amounts to a free pass for sexual predators.

        Islamic law rejects forensic evidence (such as DNA) in favor of testimony. An interesting situation thus sometimes develops in cases where a victim alleges rape and the man denies that sex even took place. In the absence of four male witnesses, rape cannot be proven. The woman’s testimony then becomes a “confession” of adultery. She can be stoned, even though the male is unpunished, since he never “confessed” to a sexual act!

        Some clerics blame rape on the woman. Australian Sheik Feiz recently said a rape victim “has no one to blame but herself. She displayed her beauty to the entire world… to tease man and appeal to his carnal nature.”

        Also, there can be no such thing as rape in marriage, even if the husband has to hit the wife in order to bring about her submission. Another recent fatwa reminds a woman, she “does not have the right to refuse her husband, rather she must respond to his request every time he calls her.” (Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 33597).

        Keep in mind that most Muslim countries do not operate under strict Islamic law, but rather under legal codes imported from the West. Therefore rape victims in these countries can and often do receive justice under more reasonable standards of proof.

        WATERMELONS & CUCUMBERS

        “If a man makes a hole in a watermelon, or a piece of dough, or a leather skin, or a statue, and has sex with it, then this is the same as what we have said about other types of masturbation [i.e., that it is halaal in the same circumstances given before, such as being on a journey].
        In fact, it is easier than masturbating with one’s hand”.
        “If a woman does not have a husband, and her lust becomes strong, then some of our scholars say: It is permissible for the woman to take an akranbij, which is a piece of leather worked until it becomes shaped like a penis, and insert it in herself. She may also use a cucumber”.
        Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim (Islamic scholar), page 129
        A Muslim Shia website notes: “Maybe this is another reason why ‘Umar the Khalifa never went on jihad: somebody had to stay behind and organize the cucumber distribution.”

        WANKING JIHAD!

        Companions of Muhammad masturbated during Jihad
        “If a man is torn between continued desire or releasing it, and if this man does not have a wife or he has a slave-girl but he does not marry, then if a man is overwhelmed by desire, and he fears that he will suffer because of this (someone like a prisoner, or a traveller, or a pauper), then it is permissible for him to masturbate, and Ahmad (ibn Hanbal) is explicit on this.

        2. Furthermore, it is narrated that the Companions of the Prophet (s) used to masturbate while they were on military expeditions or travelling”.
        Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim (Islamic scholar), page 129
        Muttaqi (God-fearing) monkeys
        Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun: During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.
        Sahih Bukhari 5:58:188

        ALLAH’S ARITHMETIC: 54 INTO 9 GOES NICELY

        THE WANKING PERVERT FROM MECCA

        A marriage is engaged in by 2 consenting adults.
        Do you really believe a 6 year old child would desire to marry a 51 year old man?
        Do you think that is what she would choose?
        Do you think a 9 year old girl would desire to have sex with a 54 year old?

        The thought of an old man becoming aroused by a child is one of the most disturbing thoughts that makes us cringe as it reminds us of pedophilia and the most despicable people. It is difficult to accept that the “Holy Prophet” of Mecca married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and WANKED BETWEEN HER THIGHS FOR 3 YEARS and consummated/RAPED her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.

        HOW TO THIGH & GET HIGH

        Now let us see how thighing is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

        Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.

        According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

        Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

        Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.

        Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.”Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

        The inquirer asked the following: ‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’

        After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

        That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers'” (Fatwa No. 31409).

        Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

        AISHA WASHING SEMEN FROM MUHAMMAD’S CLOTHES

        From the Hadith of Bukhari:

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

        Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

        I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

        Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

        I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

        From the Hadith of Bukhari:

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 230:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        as above (229).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

        Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

        I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

        Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

        I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

        MUHAMMAD RESERVED BABY AISHA FOR HIMSELF, BECAUSE SHE WAS A VIRGIN & HE WANTED A VIRGIN.
        Sahih al-Bukhari, volume 7, book 62, number 17
        Narrated jabir bin ‘abdullah:
        When I got married, Allah’s apostle said to me, “what type of lady have you married?” I replied, “I have married a matron.” he said, “why, don’t you have a liking for the virgins and for fondling them?” Jabir also said: Allah’s apostle said, “why didn’t you marry a young girl so that you might play with her and she with you?”
        Hence, Muhammad’s comments indicate that his reason for marrying Aisha while a young virgin is so that he could fondle and sexually play with her!

        AISHA WAS NOT THE ONLY BABY GIRL MUHAMMAD FANTASIZED ABOUT
        In the classic history, Sirat Rasul Allah (The Life of Muhammad) by Ibn Ishaq, there is an account in which Muhammad expressed a marital interest in a crawling baby. This event seems to have occurred around the time of the battle of of Badr, when he was about 55 years old. He had married Aisha two years earlier, when he was 53 years of age.
        (Suhayli, ii. 79: in the Riwaya of Yunus i. I. Recorded that the apostle saw her (Ummu’lfadl) when she was a baby crawling before him and said,
        ‘if she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’
        but he died before she grew up and sufyan b. Al-aswad b. ‘Abdu’l-asad al-Makhzumi married her and she bore him rizq and lubab… [Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad, Karachi, p. 311]
        Muhammad saw Um Habiba the daughter of Abbas while she was fatim (age of nursing) and he said, “if she grows up while I am still alive, I will marry her.” (Musnad Ahmad, number 25636)

        MUHAMMAD WOULD BATH & FONDLE AISHA
        Bukhari (6:298) – Muhammad would take a bath with the little Aisha and fondle her.
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        The prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me. While in itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses).

        MUHAMMAD CONSUMMATED HIS MARRIAGE TO BABY AISHA, WHEN SHE WAS 9
        Sunaan abu Dawud: book 11, number 2161:
        Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
        I and the apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) used to lie in one cloth at night while I was menstruating. If anything from me smeared him, he washed the same place (that was smeared), and did not wash beyond it. If anything from him smeared his clothe, he washed the same place and did not wash beyond that, and prayed with it (i.e. The clothe).

        MUHAMMAD WOULD SEXUALLY ABUSE HIS WIVES
        Bukhari (6:300) – Muhammad’s wives had to be available for the prophet’s fondling even when they were having their menstrual period.
        Bukhari volume 1, book 6, number 299:
        Narrated ‘Abdur-rahman bin al-Aswad:
        …(on the authority of his father) ‘Aisha said: “Whenever Allah’s apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used to order her to put on an izar and start fondling her.” ‘Aisha added, “None of you could control his sexual desires as the prophet could.”

        WOMEN ARE SEXUAL OBJECTS
        Allah promoted this abusive sexual behavior:
        “Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will” [Koran 2:223]
        Koran (2:223) likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills. In this verse, Allah also gives divine sanction for anal sex.
        According to Islam, Muhammad is the perfection of humanity and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct. He had sex with Aisha at the age of nine, which amounts to rape of a minor. He also left behind an enduring legacy for aged Muslim men to fulfill their carnal desires contrary to natural law and to the life-long devastation of young girls.

        ALLAH PROMOTES PEDOPHILIA

        Quran 65.4 “and those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘iddah (prescribed divorce period), if you have doubts (about their periods), is three months, and for those who have no courses [(i.e. They are still immature) their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise, except in case of death] . And for those who are pregnant (whether they are divorced or their husbands are dead), their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is until they deliver (their burdens) (give birth) and whosoever fears Allah and keeps his duty to him, he will make his matter easy for him.”
        Sura (65:4) lays down rules for divorce and sets the prescribed period for divorce. It clearly says, Muslim men can marry (and divorce) little girls who have not yet reached menstruation age. This means that Muslim men were allowed to marry baby girls. This is the eternal word of god. This is an eternal law of Allah. All Muslims must believe in this teaching. Otherwise, they are no longer Muslims but apostates of Islam.

        ALLAH ORDAINS RAPE

        “All married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” 4:24
        You can have sex with slaves women captured in war (with whom you may rape or do whatever you like).
        Muhammad established an appalling precedent for abuse of young girls which is continued to be nurtured by the Muslim faithful. For example, Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran gave a fatwa about Quran 65.4:
        “A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man’s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl’s sister.”

      • MOHAMMAD HAD THE MORALS OF A JACK RABBIT:

        ALLAH FROWNS OVER ABSTAINING FROM SEX WITH SLAVE GIRLS
        (Surah No. 66, AT-TAHRIM)

        CONTEXT OF THE SURAH **
        It was Hafsa’s turn to sleep with the Prophet . Her maid Maria Quptia ( a gift from King of Alexandria) was also in her room when prophet walked in.. Maria was a very attractive and voluptuous young teenager.. She aroused carnal desires in any man who looked at her; then our Prophet was not any man, he was endowed with 30 man libido* by Allah…
        * Bukhari Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:
        Narrated Qatada:
        “ Prophet was given the sexual strength of thirty men”
        To be alone with Maria, Prophet sent Hafsa to her Dad’s house with a phony excuse that Umar wanted to see her.

        UMAR WAS AWAY PERFORMING SUNNA

        Umar was not home, when Hafsa reached her Dad’s place few houses down the street.
        Hafsa: “Mom Where is Dad”?
        Mother: “He has gone to the Al Manasi field near Baqia to defecate”…

        Hafsa: “Why doesn’t he go to the field behind our house”..
        Mother: “Because it is a sunna to relieve yourself at the place where Prophet relieves himself”..

        Hafsa: “I will wait for him” .
        Mother: ”It may be a long wait. He hides there afterwards to spy on the prophet’s wives.”

        Hafbsa: “Spy on the prophet’s wives, what for?”
        Mother: “To make sure they are veiled according to aya 33.59 when they come to relieve themselves. As you know this aya was sent* by Allah at your Dad’s request.”

        *Bukhari Volume 8, Book 74, Number 257:
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        (the wife of the Prophet) ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab used to say to Allah’s Apostle “Let your wives be veiled” But he did not do so. The wives of the Prophet used to go out to answer the call of nature at night only at Al-Manasi.’ Once Sauda, the daughter of Zam’a went out and she was a tall woman. ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab saw her while she was (defecating) in a group, and said, “I have recognized you, O Sauda!” He (‘Umar) said so as he was anxious for some Divine orders regarding the veil (the veiling of women.) So Allah revealed the verse of veiling 33.59. (Al-Hijab; a complete body cover excluding the eyes). (See Hadith No. 148, Vol. 1)

        *Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 395:
        Narrated ‘Umar (bin Al-Khattab): Allah agreed with me on three things and revealed ayas, one of them was the verse of the veiling of the women (33.59) .
        Hafsa: “Well I cant wait that long. It is my turn with Prophet , he must be in bed waiting for me.”

        PROPHET IN BED BUT NOT WAITING

        When Hafsa returned, she found the Prophet in bed but not waiting. He was in action with her maid Maria. Hafsa was outraged (she had the temper of her Dad Umar) and started hollering at him.
        Hafsa: “Rasulullah you lied and deceived me to screw my maid”?
        Prophet: “Hafsa mind your language. Aya 33.32* says you should talk to Allah’s Prophet in an honorable manner.” (33.32: “O wives of the Prophet! Speak to the prophet in an honorable manner”)
        Hafsa: “I will speak honorably to the prophet when the Prophet stops acting dishonorably himself”.
        Prophet: “Having sex with slave girls is not dishonorable. Allah has made* them halal for me.” (33.50 “Mohammed, sex with slave girls and captured women is halal for you)
        Hafsa: “I don’t give a rat’s behind who is halal for you and who is not .. You can have sex with a she camel for all I care. But I don’t want it in my bed and on my night”.
        Prophet: “Hafsa, calm down. I will tell you something. If you keep this incident a secret between you and me and don’t tell any one, I take an oath that I will never touch Maria again. And Please cool down first . Go have a drink of cold water….”
        Hafsa: “ O.K., I have to go pee also…”

        AYA 66.1 AND 66.2 REVEALED

        Hafsa returned after a short while and found her husband again screwing with Maria.
        Hafsa: “Rasulullah, You have a short memory. You had just said you will not touch her again”.
        Prophet: “Yes I did, but Allah revealed aya 66.1 after you left, it says

        “Mohammed why do you forbid yourself what Allah has made lawful to you just to please your wife”

        Hafsa: “What about the oath you took.”
        Prophet: “Allah dissolved my oath” by aya 66.2 which says
        “Allah has ordained for you the dissolution of your oath. And Allah is your Maula.”

        ALLAH SPIED FOR THE PROPHET

        Next morning when Prophet returned from Fajr prayer, his wives gave him dirty looks and a silent treatment instead of happily greeting him like every day… As smart as our prophet was, he knew right away that Hafsa, had ratted and had divulged last night’s incident to all other wives who incidentally hated Maria for her beauty and the prophet’s fondness for her. Prophet was pissed off and rushed into Hafsa’s room:
        “When I told you to keep last night’s incident with Maria a secret to yourself, I trusted you; why did you spread it”?
        Hafsa: “Who informed you that I spread it”?
        Prophet: “Allah informed me” (“The prophet had trusted one of his wives with a certain incident, then she spread it, and GOD let him know about it. He then told his wife, she asked him, “Who informed you of this?” He said, “I was informed by Allah” (Q 66.3)
        Hafsa started trembling with fear. She had no idea Allah spied for the prophet and told tales to him about his wives private talks and gossips.

        MISBEHAVING WIVES WILL BURN IN HELL FIRE

        An angry Prophet then gathered all his resentful wives and conveyed the following chilling message from Allah to them which had just arrived.
        Quran 66.5: “If Mohammed divorced you all, Allah will give him in exchange wives better than you who are submissive and devout”.
        That message was a death sentence to the scared wives. A divorce meant starving to death since no body was allowed to marry Prophet’s wife according to an earlier aya…
        The Prophet continued:
        Quran 66.10-11: “On one hand wives of Allah’s prophets Noah and Lut misbehaved with their husbands and they were put in hell fire. On the other hand wife of the kafir Pharoah was well behaved and she was awarded paradise”..

        ONE MONTH BREAK EXCLUSIVELY WITH MARIA

        All the wives started wailing. Starving to death was one thing ; burning in hellfire for ever was something else. They grabbed his feet and begged him for mercy. The merciful prophet then took pity on them and decided to apply abstention clause of aya 4.34 (abstaining from sex with wives as a disciplinary action ) He could have divorced them like Allah suggested or beaten them under scouging clause of aya 4.34 .
        The Koran (Quran) allows men to beat their wifes, and here are the rules. After watching this, you will no longer be able to claim ignorance of Islam.

        QURAN 4:34 – “Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme.”
        He stayed away from all his wives for a month* and slept exclusively with Maria to humiliate them further and make them jealous.

        * Bukhari: Volume 3, Book 43, Number 648:
        “The Prophet did not go to his wives because of the secret which Hafsa had disclosed to ‘Aisha, and he said that he would not go to his wives for one month as he was angry with them when Allah admonished him for his oath that he would not approach Maria.”
        Allah also decided to pitch-in in the misery of Prophet’s wives by making Maria pregnant with a baby boy (Ibrahim), something Mo desired most and which could not be delivered by any of the nine resident wives.

        NOTE:
        Several embarrassed sahabis made false hadiths later about this sura to protect the “good” name of Mohammed. They fabricated the story and said it was honey and not Maria which prophet took an oath to abstain from. That is ridiculous and does not make any sense.
        Here is what Ibn Saad wrote in “Tabaqat”
        “Waqidi has informed us that Abu Bakr has narrated that the messenger of Allah (PBUH) had sexual intercourse with Maria in the house of Hafsa.. She told the prophet, O Messenger of Allah, do you do this in my house and during my turn? The messenger said, control yourself and let me go because I make her haram to me. Hafsa said, I do not accept, unless you swear for me. That Hazrat (his holiness) said, by Allah I will not contact her again.”
        [Tabaqat v. 8 p. 223 Publisher Entesharat-e Farhang va Andisheh Tehran 1382 solar h ( 2003) Translator Dr. Mohammad Mahdavi Damghani]

        The Koran (Quran) allows men to beat their wives, and here are the rules. After watching this, you will no longer be able to claim ignorance of Islam.

        QURAN 4:34 – “Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme.”

        In the name of Allah, Gracious, Merciful.

        1O prophet! why do you hold to be forbidden that which Allah has made lawful to you? You seek to please your consorts. But Allah is often forgiving, most merciful. (1)
        2Allah has already ordained for you the dissolution of your oaths: and Allah is your protector and He is full of knowledge and wisdom. (2)
        3When the prophet disclosed a matter in confidence to one of his consorts and she then divulged it and Allah made it known to him, he confirmed part thereof and repudiated a part. Then when he told her thereof she said “Who told you this?” He said “He told me who knows and is well acquainted with all things.”

        Notes:
        (1). The following Hadith is what this verse refers to: Sahih Al-Bukhari’s Hadith 7.193
        Narrated by Aisha: Allah’s Apostle was fond of honey and sweet edible things and (it was his habit) that after finishing the ‘Asr prayer he would visit his wives and stay with one of them at that time. Once he went to Hafsa, the daughter of ‘Umar and stayed with her more than usual. I got jealous and asked the reason for that. I was told that a lady of her folk had given her a skin filled with honey as a present, and that she made a syrup from it and gave it to the Prophet to drink (and that was the reason for the delay).
        I said, “By Allah we will play a trick on him (to prevent him from doing so).” So I said to Sauda bint Zam’a “The Prophet will approach you, and when he comes near you, say: ‘Have you taken Maghafir (a bad-smelling gum)?’ He will say, ‘No.’ Then say to him: ‘Then what is this bad smell which I smell from you?’

        He will say to you, ‘Hafsa made me drink honey syrup.’ Then say: Perhaps the bees of that honey had sucked the juice of the tree of Al-’Urfut.’ I shall also say the same. O you, Safiyya, say the same.” Later Sauda said, “By Allah, as soon as he (the Prophet ) stood at the door, I was about to say to him what you had ordered me to say because I was afraid of you.” So when the Prophet came near Sauda, she said to him, “O Allah’s Apostle! Have you taken Maghafir?” He said, “No.” She said, “Then what is this bad smell which I detect on you?” He said, “Hafsa made me drink honey syrup.” She said, “Perhaps its bees had sucked the juice of Al-’Urfut tree.” When he came to me, I also said the same, and when he went to Safiyya, she also said the same. And when the Prophet again went to Hafsa, she said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! Shall I give you more of that drink?” He said, “I am not in need of it.” Sauda said, “By Allah, we deprived him (of it).” I said to her, “Keep quiet.”

        Maulana Ali points to a different story regarding Mary the Copt, who was an Egyptian wife of the prophet and because of that was looked down upon and for this reason the wives of the prophet conspired against him to at least prevent him from going to Mary’s house. Muhammad gave in to the trickery of his wives and this verse speaks about what he did which he should not have done for the fear of his wives.

        (2). Once an oath is given, one is bound to keep the words of the oath, but here Allah is making an exception for men, not women. The Bible says that God does not favor those who make foolish oaths; Ecclesiastes 5:4: “When you vow a vow to God, do not delay paying it, for he has no pleasure in fools. Pay what you vow.” In comparison to the Qur’an, God will not tolerate men from taking an oath and getting out of the oath.

        Quran sura 66:

        4 If you two turn in repentance to Him, your hearts are indeed so inclined; but if you back up each other against him, truly, Allah is his protector and Gabriel and every righteous one among those who believe, and furthermore, the angels will back him up.

        5It may be if he divorced you, that Allah will give him in exchange consorts better than you who submit, who believe, who are devout, who turn to Allah in repentance, who worship, who travel, and fast, previously married or virgins.

        6O you who believe! save yourselves and your families from a fire whose fuel is men and stones over which are angels stern and severe who flinch not from executing the commands they receive from Allah but do what they are commanded.

        7“O you unbelievers! make no excuses this day! You are being but requited for all that you did!”

        😯 you who believe! turn to Allah with sincere repentance: in the hope that your Lord will remove from you your ills and admit you to gardens beneath which rivers flow, the day that Allah will not permit to be humiliated the prophet and those who believe with him. Their light will run forward before them and by their right hands while they say “Our Lord! perfect our light for us and grant us forgiveness; for You have power over all things.”

        9O prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be firm against them. Their abode is hell, an evil refuge indeed. (3)

        10Allah sets forth for an example to the unbelievers, the wife of Noah and the wife of Lut: they were under two of Our righteous servants, but they were false to their and they profited nothing before Allah on their account but were told: “Enter you the fire along with others that enter!”(4)

        Notes:

        (3). If Muhammad is the Holy Spirit who was to come, why is he being told to strive (fight) against unbelievers and the hypocrites instead of convicting them of sin, righteousness and judgment. Jesus said that that will be the work of the Holy Spirit when he comes; John 16:8: “When he comes, he will convict the world of sin, righteousness, and judgment.” Muhammad’s commission was to be firm against the non-Muslims, something not shared by the Holy Spirit.

        (4). The wife of Lot became a pillar of salt, not so the wife of Noah. There is no Biblical support for this claim by Allah.

        QURAN 66:

        11And Allah sets forth as an example to those who believe, the wife of Pharaoh: Behold she said: “O my Lord! build for me in nearness to You a mansion in the garden and save me from Pharaoh and his doings and save me from those that do wrong”;

        12And Mary the daughter of Imran who guarded her chastity; and We breathed into her of Our spirit; and she testified to the truth of the words of her Lord and of His revelations and was one of the devout servants.(5)

        Note:
        (5). Mary, the daughter of Ammran, was the sister of Moses and Aaron. She is completely different from Mary, the mother of Jesus, whom this verse is pointing to.

      • ALLAH FROWNS OVER ABSTAINING FROM SEX WITH SLAVE GIRLS
        (Surah No. 66, AT-TAHRIM)

        CONTEXT OF THE SURAH **
        It was Hafsa’s turn to sleep with the Prophet . Her maid Maria Quptia ( a gift from King of Alexandria) was also in her room when prophet walked in.. Maria was a very attractive and voluptuous young teenager.. She aroused carnal desires in any man who looked at her; then our Prophet was not any man, he was endowed with 30 man libido* by Allah…
        * Bukhari Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:
        Narrated Qatada:
        “ Prophet was given the sexual strength of thirty men”
        To be alone with Maria, Prophet sent Hafsa to her Dad’s house with a phony excuse that Umar wanted to see her.

        UMAR WAS AWAY PERFORMING SUNNA
        Umar was not home, when Hafsa reached her Dad’s place few houses down the street.
        Hafsa: “Mom Where is Dad”?
        Mother: “He has gone to the Al Manasi field near Baqia to defecate”…

        Hafsa: “Why doesn’t he go to the field behind our house”..
        Mother: “Because it is a sunna to relieve yourself at the place where Prophet relieves himself”..

        Hafsa: “I will wait for him” .
        Mother: ”It may be a long wait. He hides there afterwards to spy on the prophet’s wives.”

        Hafbsa: “Spy on the prophet’s wives, what for?”
        Mother: “To make sure they are veiled according to aya 33.59 when they come to relieve themselves. As you know this aya was sent* by Allah at your Dad’s request.”
        *Bukhari Volume 8, Book 74, Number 257:
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        (the wife of the Prophet) ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab used to say to Allah’s Apostle “Let your wives be veiled” But he did not do so. The wives of the Prophet used to go out to answer the call of nature at night only at Al-Manasi.’ Once Sauda, the daughter of Zam’a went out and she was a tall woman. ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab saw her while she was (defecating) in a group, and said, “I have recognized you, O Sauda!” He (‘Umar) said so as he was anxious for some Divine orders regarding the veil (the veiling of women.) So Allah revealed the verse of veiling 33.59. (Al-Hijab; a complete body cover excluding the eyes). (See Hadith No. 148, Vol. 1)
        *Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 395:
        Narrated ‘Umar (bin Al-Khattab): Allah agreed with me on three things and revealed ayas, one of them was the verse of the veiling of the women (33.59) .
        Hafsa: “Well I cant wait that long. It is my turn with Prophet , he must be in bed waiting for me.”
        PROPHET IN BED BUT NOT WAITING
        When Hafsa returned, she found the Prophet in bed but not waiting. He was in action with her maid Maria. Hafsa was outraged (she had the temper of her Dad Umar) and started hollering at him.
        Hafsa: “Rasulullah you lied and deceived me to screw my maid”?
        Prophet: “Hafsa mind your language. Aya 33.32* says you should talk to Allah’s Prophet in an honorable manner.” (33.32: “O wives of the Prophet! Speak to the prophet in an honorable manner”)
        Hafsa: “I will speak honorably to the prophet when the Prophet stops acting dishonorably himself”.
        Prophet: “Having sex with slave girls is not dishonorable. Allah has made* them halal for me.” (33.50 “Mohammed, sex with slave girls and captured women is halal for you)
        Hafsa: “I don’t give a rat’s behind who is halal for you and who is not .. You can have sex with a she camel for all I care. But I don’t want it in my bed and on my night”.
        Prophet: “Hafsa, calm down. I will tell you something. If you keep this incident a secret between you and me and don’t tell any one, I take an oath that I will never touch Maria again. And Please cool down first . Go have a drink of cold water….”
        Hafsa: “ O.K., I have to go pee also…”
        AYA 66.1 AND 66.2 REVEALED
        Hafsa returned after a short while and found her husband again screwing with Maria.
        Hafsa: “Rasulullah, You have a short memory. You had just said you will not touch her again”.
        Prophet: “Yes I did, but Allah revealed aya 66.1 after you left, it says
        “Mohammed why do you forbid yourself what Allah has made lawful to you just to please your wife”

        Hafsa: “What about the oath you took.”
        Prophet: “Allah dissolved my oath” by aya 66.2 which says
        “Allah has ordained for you the dissolution of your oath. And Allah is your Maula.”

        ALLAH SPIED FOR THE PROPHET
        Next morning when Prophet returned from Fajr prayer, his wives gave him dirty looks and a silent treatment instead of happily greeting him like every day… As smart as our prophet was, he knew right away that Hafsa, had ratted and had divulged last night’s incident to all other wives who incidentally hated Maria for her beauty and the prophet’s fondness for her. Prophet was pissed off and rushed into Hafsa’s room:
        “When I told you to keep last night’s incident with Maria a secret to yourself, I trusted you; why did you spread it”?
        Hafsa: “Who informed you that I spread it”?
        Prophet: “Allah informed me” (“The prophet had trusted one of his wives with a certain incident, then she spread it, and GOD let him know about it. He then told his wife, she asked him, “Who informed you of this?” He said, “I was informed by Allah” (Q 66.3)
        Hafsa started trembling with fear. She had no idea Allah spied for the prophet and told tales to him about his wives private talks and gossips.
        MISBEHAVING WIVES WILL BURN IN HELL FIRE
        An angry Prophet then gathered all his resentful wives and conveyed the following chilling message from Allah to them which had just arrived.
        Quran 66.5: “If Mohammed divorced you all, Allah will give him in exchange wives better than you who are submissive and devout”.
        That message was a death sentence to the scared wives. A divorce meant starving to death since no body was allowed to marry Prophet’s wife according to an earlier aya…
        The Prophet continued:
        Quran 66.10-11: “On one hand wives of Allah’s prophets Noah and Lut misbehaved with their husbands and they were put in hell fire. On the other hand wife of the kafir Pharoah was well behaved and she was awarded paradise”..
        ONE MONTH BREAK EXCLUSIVELY WITH MARIA
        All the wives started wailing. Starving to death was one thing ; burning in hellfire for ever was something else. They grabbed his feet and begged him for mercy. The merciful prophet then took pity on them and decided to apply abstention clause of aya 4.34 (abstaining from sex with wives as a disciplinary action ) He could have divorced them like Allah suggested or beaten them under scouging clause of aya 4.34 .
        The Koran (Quran) allows men to beat their wifes, and here are the rules. After watching this, you will no longer be able to claim ignorance of Islam.

        QURAN 4:34 – “Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme.”
        He stayed away from all his wives for a month* and slept exclusively with Maria to humiliate them further and make them jealous.
        * Bukhari: Volume 3, Book 43, Number 648:
        “The Prophet did not go to his wives because of the secret which Hafsa had disclosed to ‘Aisha, and he said that he would not go to his wives for one month as he was angry with them when Allah admonished him for his oath that he would not approach Maria.”
        Allah also decided to pitch-in in the misery of Prophet’s wives by making Maria pregnant with a baby boy (Ibrahim), something Mo desired most and which could not be delivered by any of the nine resident wives.
        NOTE:
        Several embarrassed sahabis made false hadiths later about this sura to protect the “good” name of Mohammed. They fabricated the story and said it was honey and not Maria which prophet took an oath to abstain from. That is ridiculous and does not make any sense.
        Here is what Ibn Saad wrote in “Tabaqat”
        “Waqidi has informed us that Abu Bakr has narrated that the messenger of Allah (PBUH) had sexual intercourse with Maria in the house of Hafsa.. She told the prophet, O Messenger of Allah, do you do this in my house and during my turn? The messenger said, control yourself and let me go because I make her haram to me. Hafsa said, I do not accept, unless you swear for me. That Hazrat (his holiness) said, by Allah I will not contact her again.”
        [Tabaqat v. 8 p. 223 Publisher Entesharat-e Farhang va Andisheh Tehran 1382 solar h ( 2003) Translator Dr. Mohammad Mahdavi Damghani]
        The Koran (Quran) allows men to beat their wives, and here are the rules. After watching this, you will no longer be able to claim ignorance of Islam.

        QURAN 4:34 – “Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme.”

        In the name of Allah, Gracious, Merciful.

        1O prophet! why do you hold to be forbidden that which Allah has made lawful to you? You seek to please your consorts. But Allah is often forgiving, most merciful. (1)
        2Allah has already ordained for you the dissolution of your oaths: and Allah is your protector and He is full of knowledge and wisdom. (2)
        3When the prophet disclosed a matter in confidence to one of his consorts and she then divulged it and Allah made it known to him, he confirmed part thereof and repudiated a part. Then when he told her thereof she said “Who told you this?” He said “He told me who knows and is well acquainted with all things.”

        Notes:
        (1). The following Hadith is what this verse refers to: Sahih Al-Bukhari’s Hadith 7.193
        Narrated by Aisha: Allah’s Apostle was fond of honey and sweet edible things and (it was his habit) that after finishing the ‘Asr prayer he would visit his wives and stay with one of them at that time. Once he went to Hafsa, the daughter of ‘Umar and stayed with her more than usual. I got jealous and asked the reason for that. I was told that a lady of her folk had given her a skin filled with honey as a present, and that she made a syrup from it and gave it to the Prophet to drink (and that was the reason for the delay).
        I said, “By Allah we will play a trick on him (to prevent him from doing so).” So I said to Sauda bint Zam’a “The Prophet will approach you, and when he comes near you, say: ‘Have you taken Maghafir (a bad-smelling gum)?’ He will say, ‘No.’ Then say to him: ‘Then what is this bad smell which I smell from you?’

        He will say to you, ‘Hafsa made me drink honey syrup.’ Then say: Perhaps the bees of that honey had sucked the juice of the tree of Al-’Urfut.’ I shall also say the same. O you, Safiyya, say the same.” Later Sauda said, “By Allah, as soon as he (the Prophet ) stood at the door, I was about to say to him what you had ordered me to say because I was afraid of you.” So when the Prophet came near Sauda, she said to him, “O Allah’s Apostle! Have you taken Maghafir?” He said, “No.” She said, “Then what is this bad smell which I detect on you?” He said, “Hafsa made me drink honey syrup.” She said, “Perhaps its bees had sucked the juice of Al-’Urfut tree.” When he came to me, I also said the same, and when he went to Safiyya, she also said the same. And when the Prophet again went to Hafsa, she said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! Shall I give you more of that drink?” He said, “I am not in need of it.” Sauda said, “By Allah, we deprived him (of it).” I said to her, “Keep quiet.”
        Maulana Ali points to a different story regarding Mary the Copt, who was an Egyptian wife of the prophet and because of that was looked down upon and for this reason the wives of the prophet conspired against him to at least prevent him from going to Mary’s house. Muhammad gave in to the trickery of his wives and this verse speaks about what he did which he should not have done for the fear of his wives.

        (2). Once an oath is given, one is bound to keep the words of the oath, but here Allah is making an exception for men, not women. The Bible says that God does not favor those who make foolish oaths; Ecclesiastes 5:4: “When you vow a vow to God, do not delay paying it, for he has no pleasure in fools. Pay what you vow.” In comparison to the Qur’an, God will not tolerate men from taking an oath and getting out of the oath.

        Quran sura 66:

        4 If you two turn in repentance to Him, your hearts are indeed so inclined; but if you back up each other against him, truly, Allah is his protector and Gabriel and every righteous one among those who believe, and furthermore, the angels will back him up.

        5It may be if he divorced you, that Allah will give him in exchange consorts better than you who submit, who believe, who are devout, who turn to Allah in repentance, who worship, who travel, and fast, previously married or virgins.

        6O you who believe! save yourselves and your families from a fire whose fuel is men and stones over which are angels stern and severe who flinch not from executing the commands they receive from Allah but do what they are commanded.

        7“O you unbelievers! make no excuses this day! You are being but requited for all that you did!”

        😯 you who believe! turn to Allah with sincere repentance: in the hope that your Lord will remove from you your ills and admit you to gardens beneath which rivers flow, the day that Allah will not permit to be humiliated the prophet and those who believe with him. Their light will run forward before them and by their right hands while they say “Our Lord! perfect our light for us and grant us forgiveness; for You have power over all things.”

        9O prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be firm against them. Their abode is hell, an evil refuge indeed. (3)

        10Allah sets forth for an example to the unbelievers, the wife of Noah and the wife of Lut: they were under two of Our righteous servants, but they were false to their and they profited nothing before Allah on their account but were told: “Enter you the fire along with others that enter!”(4)

        Notes:

        (3). If Muhammad is the Holy Spirit who was to come, why is he being told to strive (fight) against unbelievers and the hypocrites instead of convicting them of sin, righteousness and judgment. Jesus said that that will be the work of the Holy Spirit when he comes; John 16:8: “When he comes, he will convict the world of sin, righteousness, and judgment.” Muhammad’s commission was to be firm against the non-Muslims, something not shared by the Holy Spirit.

        (4). The wife of Lot became a pillar of salt, not so the wife of Noah. There is no Biblical support for this claim by Allah.

        QURAN 66:

        11And Allah sets forth as an example to those who believe, the wife of Pharaoh: Behold she said: “O my Lord! build for me in nearness to You a mansion in the garden and save me from Pharaoh and his doings and save me from those that do wrong”;

        12And Mary the daughter of Imran who guarded her chastity; and We breathed into her of Our spirit; and she testified to the truth of the words of her Lord and of His revelations and was one of the devout servants.(5)

        Note:
        (5). Mary, the daughter of Ammran, was the sister of Moses and Aaron. She is completely different from Mary, the mother of Jesus, whom this verse is pointing to.

  3. YO MO, THE MORONIC KUFER SHIA,

    YOU ARE THE MOST IGNORANT SHIA KUFER ON THE PLANET:

    MOHAMMEDAN VOODOO

    VOODOO WOMEN

    Strictly, the topic of treatment of women in Islam, in itself, is massive. Please read other essays on this issue. Many such callous treatments are based upon superstitions, archaic, and barbaric traditions. They are nothing but ‘voodoos’ in a modern society.

    In Islam, a woman is truly problematic. From the moment of her birth until her death she endures much more Islamic tyranny than a male Muslim. All these Islamic torment are inflicted on her just because of her sex and biology. When we pursue this episode, we will understand why the Islamists encapsulate a woman with so much of ‘voddoo’ burden, and why it is just impossible to reform Islam, vis-à-vis women.

    ALLAH HATES MENSTRUATION

    Monthly period of a woman is the basis of survival of human species. This natural phenomenon is prevalent in all mammals. There is nothing impure, ugly, reprehensible, or sinful in this biological cycle of a woman. We must respect, show understanding, and provide all assistance and care so that a woman passes this period with ease, comfort, and hassle free.

    Unfortunately, in many religions this monthly period of a woman is treated as a disease, unholy, and impure. Islam is no exception on this. It appears that Allah Himself has a great dislike for the menstruation cycle of a woman, even when He Himself had designed this biological process, for the survival of His creation.

    In verse 2:222 of the Qur’an Allah has declared menstruation as a disease, and has instructed men not to indulge in sex during this sickness of women. Embarrassed, many Islamists often twist the wordings and insist that this verse actually shows utmost respect for women’s period. This explanation by the crafty Islamists is just a fib. For the truth of Allah’s hatred for women’s period we must turn to hadis.

    Sahih Bukhari (3.31.172) says that menstruation is a defect in women, for they cannot fast and pray during their periods. Allah has more hatred for women who have prolonged and heavy flow during her period. In Sunaan Abu Dawud (1.1.0287) we read that excessive blood-flow during a woman’s period is from Satan. To illustrate the damaging effect of women’s menstruation, ibn Sad (p.1.22) writes that the menstruating women and unclean people touched the white stone (of Kaba), so it turned black.

    Surprisingly, Benjamin Walker (p.47) writes that Kaba means female pudenda. In fact, the Black Stone is shaped like a vulva, while the shrine itself is set in an ovoid space. In a hadis in Sunaan ibn Majah (1.595, 596) Muhammad said that a sexually defiled man and a menstruating woman cannot recite the Qur’an.
    Since Allah has declared menstruation a disease, defilement, here are a few Islamic methods to cleanse a woman when she is menstruating:

    After menstruation clean the private parts and apply musk (fragrance) there… (Sahih Muslim, 3.0647)

    Put a dish under a menstruating woman’s vulva while she is in prayer… (Sahih Bukhari, 1.6.306)

    Use saliva and nails to rub off bloodstains from period… (Sahih Bukhari, 1.6.309)

    Wash period blood with jujube leaves… Sunaan Nasai, 1.295)

    Period blood, clean with musk… (Sunaan Nasai,1.429)

    Besides hating women’s menstruation, Allah insults them further in verse 2:223. In this verse, Allah considers women’s vagina as a sowing field, like a machine to produce babies. He says (in verse 2:223) that wives are tilths, sow in them in whatever manner you like. Ibn Abbas says that this verse means the vulvas of your wives are plantations for your offspring, and Jalalyn explains that it is the place where you sow [the seeds of] your children.

    ISLAMIC PENALTY FOR HAVING SEX WITH A MENSTRUATING WOMAN

    If, by mistake, or by chance, a man has intercourse with his wife during her period, Islam prescribes financial penalty to expiate this infraction (i.e., violating verse 2:222).
    There are a number of ahadith on this peculiar Islamic punitive measure. Here are a few samples:

    If you have sexual intercourse with your wife while she is menstruating then you must give one Dinar or half a Dinar in alms… (Sunaan Abu Dawud, 1.0264)

    Perform sexual intercourse during the start of menstruation, pay one Dinar; towards the end of menstruation—pay half a Dinar… (Sunaan Abu Dawud, 1.1.0265)

    Do sexual intercourse during a woman’s period, donate one Dinar or half-a-Dinar… (Sunaan ibn Majah, 1.640, 650)

    Do sex with a menstruating woman, pay a fine of one Dinar… (Sunaan Nasai, 1.292)
    The above ahadith demonstrate the legal force of Islamic Voodoos.

    ISLAMIC WOMEN EJACULATE SPERM

    In Islam, it is believed that during her orgasm, a woman ejaculates sperm, just as a man does. A few ahadith even suggest that as a man has nocturnal emission or wet dreams, a woman too discharges her sperm during her sexual dreams. Here are a few ahadith to marvel at Allah’s incredible biology.

    When a woman ejaculates sperm, she should take a bath…(Sunaan Nasai, 1.198, 199)

    If a woman has nocturnal discharge, she should take a bath…(Sunaan Nasai, 1.197)

    When a woman has wet dreams, she should take a bath…(Sunaan Nasai, 1.200)

    Men’s sperm is white; women’s sperm is yellow…(Sunaan Nasai, 1.202)

    Women has discharges during wet dreams, that is why the son resembles the mother…(Sahih Bukhari, 1.3.132)

    ALLAH DISLIKES WOMEN: HE HAS MADE WOMEN CROOKED

    In the Qur’an Allah expresses His dislike for females. In verse 43:18 we read that the weak personality of females cannot be associated with Allah; Allah does not like daughters (women). Undeniably, in this verse, Allah openly disparages women. We might think that may be we are missing something good in this verse, may be Allah cannot be that hateful to women, who He had created from Adam’s rib.

    To clarify that Allah does indeed dislike women, here is what ibn Kathir writes about this verse:
    Women are regarded as lacking something, which they make up for with jewellery and adornments from the time of childhood onwards, and when there is a dispute, they cannot speak up and defend themselves clearly, so how can this be attributed to Allah?

    In ahadith we read the reasons why Allah considers women crooked and reprehensible.
    Sahih Bukhari (7.62.114) writes that Allah created women from Adam’s rib; that is why she is crooked. Sahih Muslim (8.3466) writes that a woman is like a rib, if you straighten it you will break it and if you leave her alone you will benefit by her; her crookedness will remain in her. In another hadis in Sahih Muslim (8.3467) we read that Allah created women crooked: if you try to straighten her you will break her and breaking her is divorcing her.

    Imam Ghazali exposes more of Allah’s displeasure for women. He writes (Ghazali, p.2.41) that daughters are such burdensome that a man will go to paradise for having the burden of one or two or three daughters. This should not surprise us considering the truth that in many Islamic paradises ‘honour’ killing of women is not considered a serious crime. In Islam, women’s lives are indeed very cheap—Allah has rendered a woman nothing more than mere chattels in the hands of either her father, or her husband, or her son, or her brother, or her grandson, or her legal guardian. In Islam, it is compulsory that a woman must be always under the guardianship of a male or her Wali.

    In Islam, a woman is viewed merely as a repository of sexual organs. Here is what Ghazali (p.2.43), the greatest of all Islamic scholars writes about women. Ghazali quotes Ali, Muhammad’s cousin and son in law:
    A woman has ten private parts. When she gets married, her husband covers one private part; when she dies the grave covers other nine private parts.

    Allah’s hate for a barren woman has no bound. Ghazali (p.2.24) writes that Muhammad said:
    A prison in the corner of a house is better than a childless woman.

    Ghazali (ibid) writes further that an ugly woman with children is better than a beautiful woman without children.

    WOMEN, DOGS, DONKEYS & PIGS ANNUL AN ISLAMIC PRAYER

    Please read the following ahadith to measure the Islamic Status of a woman:

    A woman, an ass and a dog disrupts the prayer; if you use the back of a saddle then that will guard against the disruption of the prayer… (Sahih Muslim, 4.1034)

    A passing woman, a dog, and a monkey annul a prayer. Aisha complained that Muhammad’s companions had made women dogs… (Sahih Bukhari, 1.9.490, 493,498)

    A menstruating woman and a dog cuts off a prayer…(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 2.0703)

    A black dog is Satan; or a donkey or a woman cancels a prayer…(Sunaan ibn Majah, 2.952)

    An ass, a woman, and a black dog annuls a prayer…(Sunaan Nasai, 1.753)
    I quoted from the five of Sahih Sitta (the authentic six) ahadith to demonstrate the importance of this hadis.

    WOMEN ARE STUPID: SATAN CONTROLS WOMEN

    In Islam, a woman is an extension of Satan or devil. This might sound unbelievable to those who are accustomed to the secular (or non religious) treatment of women in un Islamic countries. There are plenty authentic Islamic sources where women are truly considered as devils. Let us consult a few such Islamic scriptures.

    In Sahih Muslim (8.3240, 3242) and in Sunaan Abu Dawud (2.11.2146) we read that a woman advances and retires in the shape of a devil; so when one sees a woman, he should come to his wife and have intercourse with her. Truly, Muhammad did the same. Once after watching a beautiful and sexy woman, Muhammad hurried to have sex with Zaynab bt. Jahsh. Imam Ghazali (p.2.26) confirms this hadis by repeating the story. Another hadis in Tirmidhi (927) writes that after watching a charming woman Muhammad hurried to have sex with Sawda, another of his wives; then he said, ‘Your wife is the same kind of thing as the other woman.’

    Ghazali (p.2.26) explains the devilish nature of woman in this manner:

    If you see a woman in front (sic) she is a devil. After seeing such a woman, hurry to your wife because your wife also becomes a devil; have sex with your wife.

    Ghazali upholds the misogyny nature of Islam. He writes (ibid, p.2.43) that a woman is like a private part. When she comes out of her house the devil holds her high. Ghazali (p.3.87) even quotes Muhammad, ”A woman is the string of the devil.”

    A hadis in Sunaan ibn Majah (5.4003) tells unambiguously that women are stupid; they lack intelligence, no matter how educated and scholarly she might be (remember, Ms. Banazir Bhutto is a Harvard and Oxford graduate). According to Islamic Sharia, a woman cannot be a judge, and she can never be a caliph or the head of an Islamic Paradise. In case we are thinking of Indonesia, Bangladesh, or Pakistan, please know that these countries are not real Islamic. Most Islamists will tell us that so far, there has never been a perfect Islamic country, since Muhammad had established such a paradise in Medina.

    Let us consult the following hadis to ascertain why in a perfect Islamic society a woman can never be the head of state.

    People ruled by a woman will never be successful (a jihadist who fought in the battle of the camel remembered this saying of Muhammad)…(Sahih Bukhari, 5.59.709)

    If a nation is ruled by a woman then that nation will not succeed…(Sahih Bukhari, 9.88.219)

    A woman, a slave, and an unbeliever is not fit to be a moral police…(Ghazali, p.3.87)
    Islam considers women truly evil. Numerous ahadith attest that as per Islam a woman is no better than a horse, a camel, a crow, or a house, because, in Islam, these objects are treated as signs of bad omen. Let us read the following messages of Islam:

    The evil omens are: the horse, the women and the house…(Sahih Bukhari, 4.52.110, 111)

    A house, a horse and a woman is an evil omen; a mat in a house is better than a barren woman…(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 3.29.3911)

    If there is a bad luck in anything then it is horse, the abode and the woman…(Sahih Muslim, 26.5528, 5529)

    No good fortune in a woman, a horse and a house…(Sunaan ibn Majah, 3.1993)

    Seek refuge from a woman, a servant and cattle—they are evils…(Sunaan ibn Majah, 3.1918)

    Miserliness, pride, and cowardice are bad for men but good for women…(Ghazali, p.2.32)
    On the treatment of women in Islam here are a few more remarkable quotes from Ghazali:

    Muhammad said, “Fear unchaste women because she will make you old before you grow old”… (Ghazali, p.2.34)

    Women are like crows; only a religious woman is like a crow with white belly among one hundred crows…(Ghazali, p.2.34)
    In Islam, women are such despicable that a man should never shake hands with a woman who is not his wife. It seems, in Islam, a leper’s hand is purer than a woman’s hand. Reportedly, Muhammad had never touched the hands of a woman, except his wives. Here are a few ahadith on Muhammad’s great hatred for women who were not his wives.

    Muhammad never shook hands with a woman…(Sunaan ibn Majah, 4.2874)

    Muhammad never touched the hand of a woman except his wives…(Sunaan ibn Majah, 4.2875)

    ALLAH CURSES WOMEN WHO ATTENDS TO HER PERSONAL GROOMING

    Islam discourages women to beautify their looks to appear presentable and charming. Muhammad had the harshest words for those women who indulged spending time in beauty parlours. Further, it is the duty of a woman to sexually satisfy her husband no matter what. If a woman does not immediately respond to her husband’s call for sex she is doomed to face Allah’s wrath, until she surrenders her person to her husband.
    Here are a few ahadith to demonstrate Allah’s wrath for women who attempt to beautify their appearances and do otherwise when her husband calls her for sex.

    Allah curses the women who wear wigs…(Sahih Muslim, 24.5295)

    Allah destroyed the Bani Israel people when their women wore false hair…(Sahih Muslim, 24.5306)

    Allah curses those women who practise tattooing and those women who get themselves tattooed or those women who manipulate their teeth to look beautiful…(Sahih Bukhari, 7.72.815)

    Allah gets displeased with the woman who does not immediately respond when her husband demands sex from her…(Sahih Muslim, 8.3367, 3368)

    The angels curse a woman for refusing to have sex with her husband…(Sahih Bukhari, 4.54.460)

    Gold necklaces and gold rings on a woman’s body are like fire put on her on the resurrection day…(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 34.4226)

    Women cannot wear bells on their legs. There is a devil along with each bell…34.4218)

    Men’s perfume should have an odor but no color and women’s perfume should have color but no odor. This means that she should not wear any perfume while going out but she can wear a perfume when she is with her husband… (Sunaan Abu Dawud, 32.4037)

    Allah does not accept a woman’s prayer unless she prays wearing a veil…(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 2.0641)
    Majority of Women will be in Islamic Hell
    Allah possesses so much hatred towards women that He has relegated most women to hell. Here are a few ahadith where Muhammad claimed that he saw that most of the inhabitants of hell are women.

    Majority in hell are women because they are ungrateful to their husbands… (Sahih Bukhari, 1.2.28)

    Majority of women are in hell because they are deficient in intelligence… (Sahih Bukhari, 1.6.301)

    Those women who are naked even in their dresses and lead their husbands to astray will go to hell…(Sahih Muslim, 24.5310)

    A naked woman tears down the curtain of Allah… (Sunaan ibn Majah, 5.3750)

    A woman should veil herself even from a blind man [note 3532, vol. iii, p.1147]… (Sunaan Abu Dawud, 3.32.4100)

    GOOD WOMEN BAD WOMEN

    The most striking aspect of an Islamic woman is that she could never be independent. From birth to death she must be under the spell of Islamic Voodoos—under the control of her male owner, also known as Wali. This wali starts with the father, then husband, then son, then any other male relative who is eligible to be her mahram (a Muslim man who can meet her without having her to wear her veil, or with whom she could be alone in privacy).

    Thus, a good woman (Islamic) must be obedient, and must never ever try to set herself free to decide her life. This lack of freedom of choice extends even to the extent of choosing her marriage partner.

    In verse 2:232 Allah advises a woman’s guardian not to prevent her from marrying her former husband. Many scholars indicate that this verse means that the woman is not permitted to give herself in marriage. Rather, she requires a wali—a guardian, such as her father, brother, adult son, and so forth, to give her away in marriage, for only the adulteress gives herself away in marriage. True to the spirit of the above Qur’anic verse, a number of ahadith say that a woman should never chose her marriage partner herself, if she violates this rule she is an adulteress. In Sunaan ibn Majah (3.1882) and Tirmidhi (934) we read that if a woman contracts her own marriage she is an adulteress. Sunaan Tirmidhi (35) even writes that only an immoral woman gives herself in marriage.

    Thus, the first quality of a good Islamic woman is for her not to seek her independence at any time of her life. She must remain a charge or a dependant until her death. Here are few ahadith which tell women how to be a good Muslimah (Islamic woman) or to enter hell as a bad woman.

    The best and the most righteous women among the Quraysh were the riders of camels… (Sahih Bukhari, 7.62.19)

    A woman should not ask a man to divorce his current wife to marry her, instead she should happily accept to be his another wife… (Sahih Bukhari, 8.77.598)

    A good Muslimah readily undergoes female circumcision (cliterodectomy); as that is better for a her and more desirable for her husband… (Sunaan Abu Dawud, 41.5251)

    For voluntary fasting a woman needs her husband’s permission… (Sunaan ibn Majah, 3.1762)

    A woman who asks her ugly husband to divorce her will not enter paradise…(Sunaan ibn Majah, 3.2054, 2055, 2057)

    A woman, alone cannot take a journey for more than a day… (Sunaan ibn Majah, 4.2899)

    During prayer at home women stand behind men… (Sunaan ibn Majah, 2.975)

    Women can pray in the darkness of a mosque…(Sunaan Nasai, 2.1365)

    MEN WILL ENJOY PLENTY OF WOMEN

    This is perhaps the most laughable of all Islamic voodoos. Statistics show that in virtually all the Islamic paradises there is shortage of women. In Arab countries, such as Bahrain, Dubai, Kuwait there is severe shortage of women. But Islamic scriptures say in the days to come each Muslim man will enjoy between forty to fifty women. When we assume that male to female ratio to be 50:50, currently there will be around 600 million Muslim men and 600 million Muslim women around the globe. Now, according to hadis, during the last days (assuming it happens now) there should be around 30000 million (or 30 billion) Muslim women in the world. This figure does not include the natural increase in population. Please read the following ahadith to marvel at Muhammad’s statistics.

    ● During the last hour knowledge would be taken away and ignorance would prevail, liquor would be drunk and adultery would be rampant, there will be one man to look after fifty women… (Sahih Muslim, 34.6451, 6452)

    ● Portents of hour are: religious ignorance, drinking, sex, and fifty women per men… (Sahih Bukhari, 1.3.80, 81)
    ● There will be scarcity of men; forty women for one man… (Sahih Bukhari, 2.24.495)

    ● Each inmate of paradise will have 72 women; two will be from his wives on earth and 70 will be from the non-believers’ women; everyone with pleasant vagina; the man will have permanent erection; Muslims will inherit pharaohs wives… (Sunaan ibn Majah, 5.4337)

    AN ISLAMIC WOMAN CAN BREASTFEED A BEARDED MAN

    Recently, this topic has been of worldwide interest when an al Azhar academic proposed an Islamic solution to prevent the sex segregation in Islamic offices. He suggested that the lactating (or women who could produce milk, somehow or other) women in the office breastfeed their male counterpart, for the men to become their mahram. This meant that having suckled the breast of the women, these men will become haram to the women who had breastfed them, and therefore, these men will be permitted to visit these women in the privacy of their office rooms.

    Please do not laugh. Ha, ha, ha

    The al Azhar academic gave his recommendations based on a few ahadith. Deeply embarrassed, the al Azhar authority, subsequently, claimed that Muhammad had instructed this procedure only as a once off case. Later, the academic lost his job for indulging in hadis fabrication.

    Was the al Azhar academic correct? He was, of course right in his assertion of the hadis. However, whether Muhammad made this one off or not is fiercely contested by opposing camps. There are controversial ahadith on this, so this has become a subject of fierce debate.

    Let us read this interesting hadis.

    A woman can suckle a grown up bearded man so that she becomes haram for him (i.e. they cannot get married; Hudhaifa, let his young wife suckle Salem, the freed-slave of him to make Salim sexually haram for her)…(Sahihh Muslim, 8.3428).

    Because this is such an amazing hadis, let us read the full text.

    Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3428:
    Zainab daughter of Abu Salama reported:
    I heard Umm Salama, the wife of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him, saying to ‘A’isha: By Allah, I do not like to be seen by a young boy who has passed the period of fosterage, whereupon she (‘A’isha) said: Why is it so? Sahla daughter of Suhail came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: Allah’s Messenger, I swear by Allah that I see in the face of Abu Hudhaifa (the signs of disgust) on account of entering of Salim (in the house), whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Suckle him. She (Sahla bint Suhail) said: He has a beard. But he (again) said: Suckle him, and it would remove what is there (expression of disgust) on the face of Abu Hudhaifa. She said: (I did that) and, by Allah, I did not see (any sign of disgust) on the face of Abu Hudhaifa.

    Sunaan ibn Majah narrates a similar hadis.
    A woman can suckle (breastfeed) a grown up (with beard) man to make him unlawful to her for marriage… (Sunaan ibn Majah, 3.1943)

    This event is better understood from the following narrations (Muhammad’s Companions, p.188 189):
    Abu Abdullah Salim remained a freed slave of Abu Hudhayfa. Salim married Hudhayfah’s niece Fatima bt. Waleed. Abu Hudhayfah’s wife was Sahla bt. Suhail When he became a bearded adult he was breastfed bySahla. He was not an Arab but an Iranian. Abu Hudhayfa, the son of Utba b. Rabiah, adopted him.
    Abu Hudhayfa’s freed slave was Salim. Hudhayfa disliked the free entrance in his house of Salim, then a grown up adult with beard. Muhammad permitted Sahla to breastfeed a bearded Salim so that he became her foster son (ibid, p.415). Sahla bt. Suhail breastfed Salim. Muhammad said to Sahla, “Feed him the milk from your breast, and thus he will become your confidant and shall be able to be admitted into the women’s apartment (ibid, p.190).”

    Muhammad, however, recommends that a man should not have sex with a lactating woman. In Sunaan ibn Majah (3.2012) we read that do not have sex with a woman who suckles a baby, if you do, her child will become a very weak rider, he will die falling down from the horse.

    ISLAMIC PROTOCOL ON THE FIRST TIME HAVING SEX WITH YOUR WIFE

    Here are two interesting ahadith to amuse the readers

    If you marry a virgin woman then stay with her for a week; if you marry a previously married woman then stay with her for three days… (Sahih Muslim, 8.3443, 3444)

    Spend three nights with a previously married woman and seven nights with a virgin woman… (Sunaan ibn Majah, 3.1916, 1917)

    CONCLUSIONS

    Despite the enthusiastic claims by the crafty Islamists of today, that Islam is a religion of peace, rationality and scientific thought, it is quite clear that Islam is just the opposite of what these Islamists claim. From the founts of Islam, such as the Qur’an, ahadith, and Sharia we can demonstrate that Islam is deeply mired in superstitious, fallacious, irrational, unscientific, unhealthy, and sometimes simply dangerous voodoo practices and beliefs which might be mind boggling to those who are not familiar with the ‘true’ nature of Islam.

    This ‘voodoo’ nature of Islam would not be a problem had Islam been like any other religion or voodoo cults of Africa, South America, or certain parts of Asia. As written in the beginning, the danger of Islamic voodoo emanates from the enforceable nature of Islamic irrationalities. Sharia laws give teeth to these Islamic mumbo jumbos, no matter how much the civilised world thinks them to be illogical, superstitious, barbaric and pure evil. In many Islamic societies, these Islamic ills are enforced with the might of legal power, and the Islamic courts mete out harsh punitive measures for violating them. Herein lays the reason/s why Islam cannot be reformed.

    Before anyone attempts to reform Islam, he/she must reform the very sources of Islam, that is, the Qur’an, ahadiith, and Sharia. It is as simple as this. Except for Islam, most other religions have lost their teeth to enforce their ‘voodoos’ on gullible people. The exception is Islam.

    Islam is the last frontier, which the humanity must conquer to ensure to live in a civilised society.
    In essence, from this essay, we may conclude the following:

    Islamic Voodoos are simply the irrationalities, and superstitious beliefs of the Bedouin Arabs. The aim of Islam is to impose on the world this Bedouin Arabism, through terror and bloodshed, if needed.

    Islamic voodoos emanate straight from the Qur’an, ahadith, Sharia, and Sirah (Muhammad’s biography).

    It is compulsory for Muslims to believe in Islamic Jinns, Islamic Angels, and Islamic human Messenger (Muhammad).

    Muslims must believe that some animals and insects are Muslims too. Like it or not, Allah will send a beast as the final messenger.

    Islamic biology and embryology are the most unscientific, irrational, and superstitious. However, Muslims are forced to believe in such grossly corrupt, and ridiculous Islamic mumbo jumbo.

    Many Mullahs use the Qur’an to practice Islamic Black Magic. In many Islamic societies, Islamic Black Magic is a flourishing business.

    Non Muslims must endure Islamic punishment in their graves. Allah will not reprieve them even in their graves. This is a terror tactic par excellence, to coerce the non Muslims into Islam.

    Like it or not, Muslims must believe in and resort to Islamic Medicines and Islamic surgeries, no matter how dangerous they could be. This Islamic medicine might even include the drinking of camels’ and cattle urine.

    Equally dangerous are the use of Islamic medicines such as, human saliva, dust, and ash. Unfortunately, a true Muslim must believe in the healing power of such potentially harmful materials; he must not doubt what Muhammad had prescribed as Islamic medicines.

    A mosque is a potentially dangerous place for the non Muslims. Allah has permitted His adherents to use mosque as a planning centre to conduct jihad, that is, to murder non Muslims. A mosque is also a potential Islamic voodoo centre.

    Islamic personal hygiene practices are absolutely, unhealthy, impractical, and potentially dangerous.

    Islam is Arab/white racism. Islam advocates the superiority of the Arab white complexion people. Islam detests the black Muslims. Even on the day of resurrection, Allah will not admit into paradise a pious Black Muslim, until Allah has changed his skin to white. This should be strong a message to all the African/American Black Muslims.

    Islamic Voodoo is grossly enmeshed with the Islamic penis. An Islamic penis is very dear to Allah. Every Muslim man must be meticulous in taking care of his penis.

    Islamic concept of human souls is the most unscientific, grossly untrue, and potentially harmful to those who undertake Islamic Black Magic.

    Islamic toilet practices are crude, shameful, embarrassing, and have the potential to spread many life threatening epidemics.

    Islamic Voodoos have the most damaging effect on women. Islam treats women as devils, stupid, impure, and less than human.

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Internet resources

    The following websites are useful to read online versions of the Qur’an and ahadith. Please note that only about fifty percent of all ahadith are available in the Internet version of Sunaan Abu Dawud. Note that not all ahadith of Sahih Bukhari are available in the internet version of it. Currently, as far as the author is aware of, the only source of the English translation of Tirmidhi ahadith is Alim CD ROM.
    Abu Dawud, Sulayman b. al-Ash’ath. Al-Sunaan, a collection of Hadith Translated in English by Prof. Ahmad Hasan: http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/abudawud/
    al-Bukhari, Muhammad b. Ismail. Sahi Bukhari. Translated in English by Dr Muhammad Muhsin Khan: [http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/ ]
    ALIM CD ROM
    http://www.simplyislam.com/iteminfo.asp?Item=30000
    Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir (exegesis) of the Qur’an
    http://www.qtafsir.com
    Tafsir ibn Abbas and Jalalyn
    http://www.altafsir.com/
    Muslim, Abu al-Hussain b. al-Hajjaj al-Qushairi. Sahi Muslim. Translated in English by Abdul Hamid Siddiqi: [http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/ ]
    Malik’s Muwtta. Translators: Aisha Abdurrahman Bewley and Ya’qub Johnson:
    http://www.simplyislam.com/iteminfo.asp?Item=30000
    The Holy Qur’an. The internet version of three English translations can be read at: http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/reference/reference.html
    The Noble Qur’an Transliteration in Roman Script And English Translation of the Meanings. http://www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/
    Printed Books
    Abu Dawud, Sulayman b. al-Ash’ath. 2001 Al-Sunaan, a collection of Hadith,vol.iii. Translated in English by Prof. Ahmad Hasan. Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002 (India).
    Abu Dawud, Sulayman b. al-Ash’ath. 2001. Al-Sunaan, a collection of Hadith, vol.i. Translated in English by Prof. Ahmad Hasan, Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002 (India).
    Abu Dawud, Sulayman b. al-Ash’ath. 2001. Al-Sunaan, a collection of Hadith, vol.ii. Translated in English by Prof. Ahmad Hasan, Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002 (India).
    al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid al-Tulsi. 1993. Ihya’ Ulum al-Din (Revival of Religious Learnings). Translated in English in four volumes by Fazl-ul-Karim, first edition. Darul Ishat, Urdu Bazar, Karachi, Pakistan.
    Al-Muwatta of Imam Malik ibn Anas. 2004. Translated in English by Aisha Abdurrahman Bewley. Madinah Press Inverness, Paper Edition. ISBN 0710303610
    al-Tabari, Abu Ja’far Muhammad b. Jarir. 1988. Muhammad at Mecca, vol.vi. Translated and annotated by W. Montgomery Watt and M.V. McDonald, State University of New York Press, Albany.
    Dashti, Ali. 1994. 23 Years: A Study in the Prophetic Career of Mohammad. Ttranslated from Persian by F.R.C. Bagley, Mazda Publishers, Costa Masa, California.
    Ibn Abdullah Tabrizi, Sheikh Wali-ud-Din Muahmmad. ‘Mishkat-ul-Masabih’, in three volumes. Translated and annotated by Abdul Hameed Siddiqui, Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002, India.1990.
    Ibn Ishaq, Muhammad b. Yasr. 2001. Sirat Rasul Allah. Translated in English by A. Guillaume. First published by Oxford University Press, London in 1955. Fifteenth reprint by Oxford University Press, Karachi, Pakistan.
    Ibn Musa al-Yahsubi, Qadi ‘Iyad, 2004. Ash-Shifa, Translated in English by Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley, Medina Press. P.O. Box 5531, Inverness IV5 7YA, Scotland, UK, fifth print.
    Ibn Sa’d, Abu Abd Allah Muhammad. 1972. Kitab al-Tabaqat, vol i. Translated in English by S. Moinul Haq, Kitab Bhavan, 1784, Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi, India.
    Imam Abu ‘Abdur Rahman Ahmad Nasa’i (with Arabic Text), 2006. Sunaan Nasa’I, Vol. I. Translated in English by Muhammad Iqbal Siddiqi. Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002. Improved Indian edition. ISBN: 81 7151 368 9 (Vol. I).
    Imam Abu ‘Abdur Rahman Ahmad Nasa’i (with Arabic Text), 2006. Sunaan Nasa’I, Vol. II. Translated in English by Muhammad Iqbal Siddiqi. Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002. Improved Indian edition. ISBN: 81 7151 369 7 (Vol. II).
    Lings, Martin. 1983. Muhammad his life based on the earliest sources. Inner Traditions International, One Park Street, Rochester, Vermont 05767, USA.
    Muslim, Abu al-Hussain b. al-Hajjaj al-Qushairi. 2004. Sahih Muslim, vol. i. Translated into English by Abdul Hamid Siddiqi, Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002, India.
    Muslim, Abu al-Hussain b. al-Hajjaj al-Qushairi. 2004. Sahih Muslim, vol.ii. Translated in English by Abdul Hamid Siddiqi,. Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002, India.
    Muslim, Abu al-Hussain b. al-Hajjaj al-Qushairi. 2004. Sahih Muslim, vol.iii. Translated in English by Abdul Hamid Siddiqi. Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002, India.
    Muslim, Abu al-Hussain b. al-Hajjaj al-Qushairi. 2004. Sahih Muslim, vol .iv. Translated in English by Abdul Hamid Siddiqi,. Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002.
    Walker, Benjamin. 2004. Foundations of Islam. Rupa & Co. New Delhi. First published in Great Britain by Peter Owen Publishers, 1998.
    Shaikh, N.M. Rafi Ahmad Fidai, The Companions of the Holy Prophet, revised and consolidated edition. Adam Publishers & Distributors, India, 2001.
    Yazid ibn-i-Maja Al-Qazwani, Imam Abu Abdullah Muhammad b. 2003. (with Arabic Text), Sunaan Ibn-i-Majah, vol.v. 2nd. Ed. Translated in English by Muhammad Tufail Ansari. Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002, India.
    Yazid ibn-i-Maja Al-Qazwani, Imam Abu Abdullah Muhammad b. 1994. (with Arabic Text), Sunaan Ibn-i-Majah,vol.i. Translated in English by Muhammad Tufail Ansari. Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002, India.
    Yazid ibn-i-Maja Al-Qazwani, Imam Abu Abdullah Muhammad b. 2003. (with Arabic Text), Sunaan Ibn-i-Majah, vol. ii. 2nd Ed. Translated in English by Muhammad Tufail Ansari. Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002, India.
    Yazid ibn-i-Maja Al-Qazwani, Imam Abu Abdullah Muhammad b. 2003. (with Arabic Text), Sunaan Ibn-i-Majah,vol. iii. 2nd Ed Translated in English by Muhammad Tufail Ansari. Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002, India.
    Yazid ibn-i-Maja Al-Qazwani, Imam Abu Abdullah Muhammad b. 2003. (with Arabic Text), Sunaan Ibn-i-Majah,vol.iv. 2nd Ed. Translated in English by Muhammad Tufail Ansari. Kitab Bhavan, 1784 Kalan Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi-110002, India.

    THE END

    • Lucky bin Satan, you said “Islamic Voodoos are simply the irrationalities, and superstitious beliefs of the Bedouin Arabs. The aim of Islam is to impose on the world this Bedouin Arabism, through terror and bloodshed, if needed. Islamic voodoos emanate straight from the Qur’an, ahadith, Sharia, and Sirah (Muhammad’s biography).”

      You are terribly WRONG : Islam is not a religion of superstitions. Superstition and Magic existed before the revelation of the Quran! There is NO Islamic “Voodoo”, as that exists in some Latin countries which are Christian Nations like Brazil! And the aim of Islam is NOT to impose on the world “terror and bloodshed”! This fake belief of Magic and Superstition DOES still exists in ALL other religions save for Islam!

      Now ref to these verses of the Quran :

      Q 36:19 : The Messengers said, “This ill omen lies within yourselves. Will you then take heed? In fact, you are a transgressing people.”

      Q 17:56 : YA: Say: “Call on those – besides Him – whom ye fancy: they have neither the power to remove your troubles from you nor to change them.”

      And 11:123 will suffice for you :Pickthall: And Allah’s is the Invisible of the heavens and the earth, and unto Him the whole matter will be returned. So worship Him and put thy trust in Him. Lo! thy Lord is not unaware of what ye (mortals) do.

      No Magic, No Idols, No Superstition in Islam. The rest of what you have copied IS from the FAKE Hadiths as ALL of the Hadith literature is fake…and so you have wasted our precious time!

      2:188 : Pickthall: And eat not up your property among yourselves in vanity, nor seek by it to gain the hearing of the judges that ye may knowingly devour a portion of the property of others wrongfully.

      • DUMB, PLUM, SCUM,

        YOU ARE A LYING/TAQIYYA PIECE OF SHIT!

        MOHAMMEDAN SUPERSTITION

        THE SATAN VOODOOS

        Every time a Muslim stands for prayer he must recite ‘Nauju Billah Minhas Shaytan ar Rajim’, which means, ‘I seek refuge from Satan, the devil’. This litany is compulsory in almost all Islamic acts and rituals. In many cases, these few words accompany the words, `Bismi Allah ar Rahman ar Rahim` which means, ‘I begin in the name of Allah, the most compassionate, the most merciful’. Muslims never contemplate why they must mention the name of Satan whenever they recite the name of Allah. Why must they seek refuge from Satan whenever they seek Allah’s bounty? This non stop repetition of Satan’s association with Allah really means that Allah, after all, is not a good protector of His ardent devotees. The most important message in the Qur’an is that Allah is in charge of Muslims, and Satan is in charge of non Muslims. Since Allah has declared a permanent war on Satan, it logically it follows, that the Islamic world is at permanent war with the un Islamic world, the world of Satan. There cannot be any negotiation with the non Muslims, since it means negotiating with the Satan, which Allah has forbidden. In this episode we shall explore a few fascinating features of Islamic Satan. This will help us to understand why the jihadist/Islamist killers do what they do. They simply follow Allah’s dictum (9:5): ‘fight Satan (that is the non Muslims) anywhere you find him.

        ISLAMIC SATAN IS ILLUSIVE: IT HAS SEVERAL IDENTITIES

        In Islam, Satan is a mysterious, contradictory, convoluted entity. In the Hebrew Bible, such as in the Book of Job, Satan (aka Devil) is seen as an angel and an adversary of God. He rebelled against God and speaking through the serpent, he seduced Eve into disobeying God’s command. His goal is to lead people astray from the path of God. In Islamic thought, Allah instructed all his angels to prostrate before the newly created Adam: all the angels, except Satan. The Qur’an also narrates this scenario, except that the Qur’an provides the reason why Satan did what he did. According to the Qur’an, Satan was actually a jinn, who used to keep company with the angels. Satan was proud of his jinn background, and so he declined to bow down to lowly Adam.

        This would have been quite cognisant had Allah been consistent with the identity of Satan. Let us see how Allah misleads us vis-à-vis His Islamic Satan.

        Verse 18:50 of the Qur’an mentions Allah’s command to the angels to prostrate before Adam. In this verse we learn that Islamic Satan’s name is Iblis. To clarify, ibn Kathir writes that before Iblis under took the path of sin, Iblis was with the angels and was called `Azazil.’ He was among the residents of the earth and was one of the most active worshippers and knowledgeable persons among the angels.

        Ibn Kathir confuses us. We learn from the Qur’an that Satan (in this case, Iblis) lived in Islamic Paradise, and that Azazil is the Islamic angel of death. Ibn Kathir probably understood correctly Allah’s intelligence, so he clarifies further by saying that when Allah commanded the angels to prostrate before Adam, Iblis was included in this command. Although Iblis was not an angel, he was trying and pretending to imitate the angels’ behaviour and deeds, and this was why he was also included in the command to the angels to prostrate before Adam.

        In verse 18:50 Allah instructs the Muslims not to follow the progeny of Satan. This means Satan (Iblis) has many children. To confirm this, Ghazali (p.3.43) writes that Allah proclaimed that for each child born to a human being a child is also born for the devil.
        Ash Shifa (p.343) writes that Iblis is the father of jinns; he was the leader of angels.
        How is this possible—the father of the jinns becoming the leader of the angels?
        In verse 81:25 Allah says that Muhammad’s words are not the words of an evil spirit. Jalayn says this evil spirit means Satan. This implies that Satan is a spirit. To confuse us further ibn Abbas writes that the name of Satan is al Marmi.

        THERE ARE MANY ISLAMIC SATANS: EVERYONE HAS A SATAN

        We already noted that Satan has many children. The Qur’an further confirms this in verse 26:210. In this verse Allah says that the Qur’an is not from Satans. Please note that previously, in verse 81:25 Allah claimed that the Qur’an is not the words of an evil spirit.
        Allah says in verse 19:83 that He has unleashed many devils to stir up (confuse) the disbelievers

        In an interesting hadis, Sahih Muslim (39.6759) tells us that every person has a devil attached with him. Even Aisha, Muhammad’s most favourite child wife, had a devil attached with her. But, Muhammad claimed that Allah had contained the devil (Satan) the devil attached with him (Muhammad).

        Ash Shifa (p.296) writes that everyone has a jinn and an angel as his companions. To confirm this, Ash Shifa quotes the following hadis:
        ’Abdullah ibn Mas’ud said that the Messenger of Allah said, “Everyone of you is given a companion from the jinn and a companion from the angels.” They asked, “You as well, Messenger of Allah?” he said, “Me as well, but Allah has helped me against him and he has given up.”

        SATAN BEFRIENDS WEALTHY PEOPLE

        Islamic Satan is a friend of the wealthy, influential people. In verse 4:38 of the Qur’an we read that those who spend lavishly to show off, but have no faith in Allah, takes Satan as their friend.

        Further, Allah says in verse 17:64 that Satan’s promises are nothing but deceit. Allah allowed Satan to befool mankind through his voice in the form of music, songs, and idle talks. Allah also permitted Satan to tempt the weak believers to earn wealth and money through illicit means. Many Islamist scholars say that this verse bans music and song for Muslims, as Music and songs are the forte of Satan.

        Ibn Kathir explains this verse in this manner:

        Allah caused Shaytan to take a share of wealth and children by making them Magians, Jews and Christians, and making them follow any religion other than Islam, and by making them give a part of their wealth to the Shaytan.

        In Sunan Abu Dawud (2.14.2550) we read that the bell is a musical instrument of Satan. Since Christians use bells in their churches, this means the Christians are the followers of Satan’s music. By the way, the Christian world is much wealthier than the Islamic world. This also proves that the Satan helps the rich.

        SATAN SUPPLIES WINE IN ISLAMIC PARADISE

        Allah says in verse 5:90 that intoxicants (wine and spirits), stones (i.e., stone/idol worshipping), and gambling are Satan’s handiwork.
        In verse 47:15 and 83:25 Allah promises Muslims that they will be in gardens with rivers of incorruptible water, rivers of milk, rivers of wine, rivers of honey
        But non Muslims will dwell in fire, they will drink boiling water which will tear their intestines.

        This means Allah will appoint Satan to supply wine to the Muslims residing in Islamic Paradise.

        While Satan takes care of wine for Muslims, Allah will punish the non Muslims.

        NON MUSLIMS ARE FRIENDS OF SATAN

        We already saw Satan helps the wealthy people, the non Muslims. This means there are only two worlds—the world of Allah or the world of Islam, and the world of Satan or the world of non Muslims.

        This is exactly what Allah says in verse 4:76. Believers fight for Allah, unbelievers fight for evil, so fight against the friends of Satan. This verse literally divides the world into two camps—the world of Islam and the world of Satan or Kufr; i.e., Dar-al-Islam and Dar-al-Harb or Satan.

        In verse 6:121 Allah clarifies further that Muhammad receives Allah’s revelations; Satan’s friends receive Satan’s revelations. Let us read ibn Kathir explanation of this verse:

        There are two types of revelation, one from Allah and one from the devil. Allah’s revelation came to Muhammad, while the Satan’s revelation comes to his friends.
        In verse 6:125 Allah says He gives authority to whom He wills. Jalalyn’s explanation of this verse is that Allah gives authority to Satan over those who do not believe. This means Allah has a compact with Satan to handover non Muslims to him (Satan).

        SATAN IS MORE POWERFUL THAN ALLAH

        This might sound ridiculous. But if we were to trust Allah’s words, this is precisely what Allah says.

        In verse 16:98 Allah says that while reciting the Qur’an seek protection from Satan.

        Ibn Kathir explains this verse in this manner:

        The reason for seeking refuge with Allah before reading is that the reader should not get confused or mixed up, and that the Shaytan would not confuse him or stop him from thinking about and pondering over the meaning of what he reads. Hence the majority of scholars said that refuge should be sought with Allah before starting to read.
        In verse 16:99 Allah says that Satan has no power over the believers, whereas in verse 16:100 Allah maintains that Satan has power over those who are his (Satan’s) friends. Funny, but it appears that all Powerful Allah is powerless to stop Satan from recruiting his followers. So Satan conducts Satanic Jihad, and Allah conducts Islamic Jihad.
        Since non Muslims (the followers of Satan) are in majority and more powerful, it means Satan (or Satanic Jihad) is indeed more powerful than Allah (or Islamic Jihad).
        Allah revealed verse 3:155 in connection with the Muslim’s defeat in the battle of Uhud in the hands of the followers of Satan. Allah candidly admits that Satan caused the defeat of the Muslims in this battle. Therefore, at times, Satan is militarily more powerful than Allah.

        SATAN FARTS AT ALLAH’S PRAYER CALL

        Allah is truly toothless in the face of Satan’s deliberate attempt to humiliate Him. According to Allah, the sweetest music in the universe is the Muezzin’s call for prayer (Azan). When Azan is in the air all Muslims must get ready to offer prayer. Satan, on the contrary, gives a damn to Allah’s prayer. He simply humbles Allah by farting whenever he hears the Islamic Azan. It seems that Allah can do nothing about this chutzpah of Satan.
        There are a number of ahadith, which tell us that when Azan is announced Satan farts.

        Here are few samples:

        *. When Azan is pronounced, Satan takes to heel and passes wind with noise… (Sahih Bukhari, 1.11.582)

        *. When Azan is called Satan runs back breaking the wind so that he cannot hear the call, and when the call is over he comes back… (Sahih Muslims, 4.1161)
        *. When Satan hears the Azan he runs away 36 miles from Medina… (Sahih Muslim, 4.0751)

        *. When Satan hears Azan, he farts… (Sunaan Nasai, 2.1256)

        *. When the call to prayer is made Satan retreats, passing wind; when the Azan is finished then Satan comes back… (Malik’s Muwatta, 3.1.6)

        Satan Works on You when You Sleep: He Plays with Your Private Parts

        Following are the activities of Satan when you sleep:

        *. Satan urinates in a sleeping man’s ears when he does not get up for prayer…(Sahih Bukhari, 2.21.245)

        *. The devil urinates on the ears of a man who sleeps the whole night till dawn…(Sahih Muslim, 4.1700)
        *. The devil spends the night in the interior of your nose; so clean your nose after
        sleep…(Sahih Muslim, 2.0462, 0468)

        *. When anyone of you goes to sleep, the devil ties three knots at the back of his neck…(Sahih Muslim, 4.1702)

        *. If you have more bed than required, except the bed kept for a guest, then that extra bed is for Satan…(Sahih Muslim, 24.5190)

        *. Satan is let loose with the sinking of the sun until the darkest part of the night is over…23.4998)

        *. During sleep Satan plays with your private parts…(Sunaan ibn Majah, 1.337)

        *. Satan plays with private parts of children…(Mishkat, 1.187)

        SATAN SWIMS IN YOUR BODY

        Keep your mouth shut with your hand because devil enters you when you yawn.

        Satan is so powerful that he completely fuses himself in a human body. A hadis in Sahih Bukhari (3.33.251) tells us that Satan reaches everywhere in a human body. Another hadis in Sahih Bukhari (4.54.501) says that Satan circulates in the human mind as blood circulates in it.

        It is just incredible, the power of Satan. Why cannot Allah circulate in a human body? Why did Allah empower Satan to accomplish the feat that Allah cannot do? Just imagine, instead of Satan, if only Allah could swim in the blood stream of human.
        Satan even enters your body when you yawn, so you must refrain from yawning (Sahih Muslim, 42.7132). Why Allah cannot Allah enter the human body?

        Here are a few more gems of ahadith about Islamic Satan.

        *. The devil circulates in you like your blood; so do not visit a woman whose husband is away; only Muhammad was safe in this matter…(Sunaan Tirmidhi, 931)

        *. If you have to yawn then keep your mouth shut with your hand; because devil enters you when you yawn…(Sahih Muslim, 42.7129, 7131)

        *. When your nails are long devil sits in them….(Ghazali, p.1.131)

        SATAN PLAYS WITH HUMANS

        Satan is quite adept at playing with humans. So where’s Mecca?
        It is also incredible that Satan is quite adept at playing with human, whereas Allah is incapable of doing so. If only Allah could play with humans—just imagine!
        Just think, if only Allah could play with humans like Satan does how good the life would have been.

        Here is what we find about Islamic Satan’s game with humans:

        *. Looking hither and thither during prayer is Satan’s play…(Sahih Bukhari, 1.12.718)

        *. Satan (devil) plays with pebbles; if you play with pebbles, you play with devil (Sunaan Nasai, 2.1269)

        Ash Shifa (p.296) tells the incredible story that once Muhammad wanted Satan to play with the children of Medina. Here is the hadis:

        In the hadith of Abu’d –Darda’, the Prophet said, “The enemy of Allah, Iblis, came to me brandishing a brand of fire on my face.” The Prophet was doing the prayer and he sought refuge with Allah and cursed Shaytan. He said, “Then I wanted to seize him so he could be shackled and in the morning the children of Medina could play with him.”

        SATAN ATTENDS EVERY CHILDBIRTH: HE TOUCHES EVERY INFANT

        Here are a few interesting ahadith on Satan’s power over newly born babies. If only Allah had the same power, every child would be a perfect bundle of joy.

        *. Except for Mary and her son Jesus, all babies cry during their birth, because Satan touches them… (Sahih Bukhari, 4.55.641)

        *. Whenever a child is born, Satan pricks it; that is why the child cries. Only Mary and Jesus were not pricked by Satan…(Sahih Muslim, 30.5837, 5838)

        *. Say prayer during sexual intercourse, and Satan will not touch your child…(Sahih Bukhari, 4.54.503)

        SATAN EATS WITH YOU

        According to Islam whenever you eat Satan joins you. Satan actually eats with left hand. So anyone eating with his/her left hand is a Satan (Sahih Muslim, 23.5007). Sahih Muslim (23.5006) also says that if you mention the name of Allah while entering a house and while eating a food then Satan will not come near it.

        Here are a few ahadith on Satan’s eating with you:

        *. Satan is present when you are eating food; if you drop your mouthful of food then do not leave it for the Satan to eat it; remove the filth and then eat the food…(Sahih Muslim, 23.5046, 5049)

        *. Perform eating and drinking with the right hand; Satan eats with left hand…(Sunaan ibn Majah, 4.3266)

        *. Satan considers that food lawful on which Allah’s name is not mentioned…(Sahih Muslim, 23.5004)

        THESE ARE SATAN’S FAVORITE HUNTING GROUNDS

        Allah has very little idea about the permanent abode of Satan. In a hadis in Sunaan Abu Dawud (1.0184) Muhammad said that the places where camels lie down are the places of Satan; so do not offer prayer there; but places where the sheep lie down are places of blessings; so you can offer prayers at these places. A Tirmidhi hadis (222) says that when you go to the market Iblis follows you. Another Tirmidhi hadis (930) mentions that whenever a man and a woman are alone together Satan visits them.
        Ghazali (p.3.39) writes that Allah created women as games for Satan, and Satan lives in markets and bazaars.

        In Mishkat (2.39), we read that if you do morning marketing then you are following Iblis.
        Satan Will Depart when You Do These:

        Strangely, getting rid of Islamic Satan is quite simple. All you need to do pray and prostrate before Allah, endlessly.

        Here is how you can eschew Satan:

        *. When the son of Adam falls down in prostration, the Satan goes into seclusion and weeps… (Sahih Muslim, 1.0144)
        *. If Satan intervenes during your prayer then spit three times on your left… (Sahih Muslim, 26.5463)

        *. Spit on your left when you perceive Satan… (Mishkat , 1.46)

        • Lucky bin Satan, very good comment that you have written on yourself. First, lets cross the bridge…of the grave. Do you know that we will all die one day or the other?

          Some are cremated and many others are buried. Maggots start eating those who are buried and what about the cremated ones…what happens to them? Imagine the maggots eating the satan that you are…soon dead, away from this earthly life, with a sick brain of hatred towards others’ faith, in that grave!! Or will you be cremated???

          Nobody knows!! I personally do NOT know where the “big daddy” is and all religions are for morality and structure. Islam has better structure than the rest! The reason is that it has NO ONE supreme Leader save for ONE invisible GOD and has an open Book on Morality!

          And that open Book is called the Quran…a guidance for mankind.

          • Plum, my friend, it’s useless talking to this bastard Lucky (unless you have known enough to spend without work). Lucky’s a terrorist. He’s a mental patient.

  4. Nothing like honor killing exists in Islam. Honor killing is a part of Afghan and Pakistani cultures. That’s what the Afghans and Pakistanis believe in. They are intolerant in the matter of their honor and if one of their family members hurt their pride’n honor, that becomes totally unbearable. So Islam isn’t responsible for these honor killings. Muslims have a dilemma that they like to attribute each and every thing they desire, to Islam. Similarly, some Muslims try to justify honor killings with Islam. However that’s their opinion. Other Muslims disagree with their opinion.

    In Islam, no individual is allowed to murder anyone on its own. That’s what the Arabs used to do and Islam forbade it. The Prophet (صلی اللہ علیہ و الہ وسلم) introduced judiciary system to the Arabs for the very first time. So this is in the hands of the government to decide whom to kill. Nobody is allowed to decide this on its own.

    • THE HIGH RAPE SCALE IN SAUDI ARABIA
      January 16, 2013

      Saudi Arabia is considered one of the most conservative countries in the world, especially in regard to the status of women. Saudi Arabia is an extreme Islamic country where its legal code is based on Shari’a Law. They therefore believe that there is no separation between church and state and the state’s laws are heavily based on Islamic teachings. Because of this strict Islamic culture, women in Saudi Arabia are treated and acknowledged very differently than the women who live in the west. For example, in Saudi Arabia, there are laws that require women to wear a hijab, a head scarf, as well as dress in loose, long garments that do not show the shape of the woman’s body. To do so would be shameful and secular. There are other laws such as this one that are meant to protect the virtue of women in Saudi Arabia.
      Knowing this about Saudi Arabia, I had assumed that women there would be relatively safe since there are such strict laws regarding the protection of a woman’s virtue. I assumed incorrectly when I was studying a WomanStats map that displayed the rape scale of each country in the world. On a scale from one to five, Saudi Arabia had a ranking of a four. I was confused by this since, as briefly described above, Saudi Arabia is considered one of the most conservative countries in the world where women are highly secluded. I would have thought these practices and laws would have decreased the rape rate substantially.
      The question I pose then is this, why does Saudi Arabia, one of the most conservative countries in the world have one of the highest rape scales in the world?

      While there are many interconnecting reasons why rape occurs so often in Saudi Arabia, I have chosen four possible causes to narrow down the research for this project. The four causes I have chosen are one, a secular society, two, insufficient laws, three, taboos against reporting rape and four, an ineffective judicial system.

      SECULAR SOCIETY

      The first cause, a secular society, was quickly dismissed because as was mentioned in the introduction, Saudi Arabia is considered one of the most conservative countries in the world. The society of Saudi Arabia is especially conservative when it comes to women. For example, it is illegal for women to drive or intermingle in public with males that are not related to them. It is also illegal for a woman to go out in public without a male-escort who is related to her as well as go out in public without wearing her hijab (WomanStats). Violence or legal prosecution usually ensues if any of these are broken. To further illustrate this point, the following maps show how strict Saudi Arabia is in regard to dress code and intermingling in public laws compared to the rest of the Middle East, a very conservative region itself.

      It is clear from these maps that Saudi Arabia has one of the strictest dress codes and intermingling laws in the Middle East which is the most conservative region in the world. Based on these findings, one would sense that these women are highly secluded from society and thereby would be more protected from instances of rape and other forms of violence. On the other hand, one may argue that because women are treated so differently, they could be seen as inferior and thus suffer more abuse because of the lack of secularism.

      INSUFFICIENT LAWS AGAINST RAPE

      The next probable cause studied was the possibility of insufficient laws against rape in Saudi Arabia. Since there were reported convictions of rapists, it can be assumed that there are laws against rape. Also, Saudi Arabia’s legal code is based on the Shari’a law, which criminalizes rape as punishable by death. However, spousal rape is not included in this criminalization according to Shari’a law. Although these laws exist against rapists, the actual conviction process is complicated and nearly impossible. In order for a perpetrator to be convicted he or she must confess or there must be four witnesses of the act (FreedomHouse). Usually in these certain circumstances, there are only two witnesses present, the perpetrator and the victim. Since it would be hard for a victim to find four witnesses, it is very unlikely that a perpetrator would admit to such a heinous act that he or she could very well get away with. Another example of the insufficient laws against rape is that foreign female domestic workers, which consists of 1.5 million of foreign nationals, receive no protection from the labor laws and are more prone to be victims of abuse. Based on this research, it can be concluded that while there are laws against rape, the actual conviction of rapists is very rare. This could be a plausible cause of the high rape scale since the punishment of such an act hardly occurs.

      TABOOS AGAINST REPORTING RAPE

      The third possible cause of a high rape scale in Saudi Arabia is the taboos against reporting rape. There are many social stigmas that scare women away from reporting a rape to the police. One social stigma is that in many instances, the law enforcer will accuse the woman of having illicit sex instead of accusing the man of the crime (FreedomHouse). As a consequence of this accusation, societal reprisals take place such as a woman being seen as unfit for marriage or even violently punished for bringing shame to the family. In some extreme cases, honor killings have been committed against women who have been raped (Zoepf). One may wonder why these crimes take place if the laws in Saudi Arabia are supposedly meant to protect women. There is another cultural stigma that plays a role here. In Islamic society, a family’s honor, particularly the male family member’s honor is based on the purity and virtue of the women in their family. If a woman in the family becomes “violated” either by choice or by force, the family’s honor is seemingly stripped from them. It is not so much about the concern over the woman but over the honor of the men. Because of this engrained belief, already victimized women are sometimes further victimized by their own family members. This causes great fear among the women in these types of societies and if one is raped, it is very unlikely that she will report it based on the potential ensuing consequences.

      INEFFECTIVE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

      The last possible cause studied was an ineffective judicial system. As was mentioned before, Saudi Arabia’s legal code is based on the Shari’s law, an extreme version of the Islamic code. Because of this, women are not given the same rights as men, especially when it comes to the courts. For example, in most cases, women are unable to speak for themselves in court. They must be represented by a male-relative or lawyer. It is considered shameful for a woman to speak to the sheik or judge and is only sometime allowed to do so if her face is covered (WomanStats). Because of this, if a woman is raped, and a man’s honor is based on her virtue, what male relative would want to shed further light on the subject by representing her? Also a man’s testimony is worth two women’s testimonies. So if a woman had four witnesses to testify against the perpetrator, if some of them were women, the number of females would have to be doubled for the accusation to be considered.

      Another clause of the judicial system is that most clerics were taught in Wahhabi schools where extreme Islam is taught extensively. Because of this, most clerics demand the seclusion of women and often hold an unforgiving attitude toward accusations of violence against men (WomanStats). A Saudi Arabian attorney even said, “Unfortunately, judges consider women to be lacking in reason and faith, so generally do not agree with her arguments” (HumanRights).

      The following stories illustrate the point explained above. The first is about a young girl who was being molested by her father. She went to the courts to file a complaint. The law enforcers did not believe her and told her, her father needed to come in to file the complaint (Economist). The obvious ignorance need not be explained in this situation. The next story tells of a nineteen year-old woman who met a man not related to her in a car. They were both kidnapped by a gang and she was then gang-raped fourteen times. Seven men of the gang were convicted and were sentenced to prison ranging from one to five years. This was a light conviction given they could have received the death penalty according to the law. The woman was also convicted to six months of prison as well as ninety lashes for being associating with a male who was not related to her in public (Harrison). The woman was later pardoned by the King of Saudi Arabia, not because he disagreed with the punishment but because he was being merciful and thought it was best for the whole of the country, not to mention international relations with countries that were in an absolute uproar over the ordeal (Zoepf).

      Based on my research I propose that the main perpetrator of the high rape-scale in Saudi Arabia is the lack of conviction of rapists due to the taboos against reporting rape and the ineffective judicial system. If perpetrators are not being punished then there is little incentive to not rape woman if that is the desire. To illustrate how low the conviction rate actually is, in 2002, there were 59 reported rapes out of a population of 26,534,504 (WomanStats) The perpetrators are getting away with a heinous crime and the Saudi Arabian government must pass more effective legislation that enables law enforcers to convict those criminals. The social stigmas will be very difficult to overcome regarding seeing a woman unfit for marriage or taking away the family’s honor because of being raped. However, if women continue to speak up about the issues they face, solutions will come, just as they have in other parts of the world. Also international pressure must always be present to give those women courage to stand up.
      —By TS

      References

      Double indemnity a bizarre application of the law. (2007, Novem 22). The Economist, Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/10191773
      Eleanor Abdella Doumato, Rowman & Littlefield. (2012, April 4). Freedom House, Saudi Arabia Freedom House Report. Retrieved from http://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/inline_images/Saudi%20Arabia.p df
      Harrison, F. (2007, Novemeber 15). Saudi Gang-Rape Victim is Jailed. BBC. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7096814.stm
      Womanstats project. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://womanstats.org/CodebookCurrent.htm
      United States Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights- Saudi Arabia, 2007
      Zoepf, K. (2007, Decem 18). Saudi king pardons rape victim sentenced to be lashed, saudi paper reports.The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/18/world/middleeast/18saudi.html
      Related
      The Impact of the Media on the Status of Women
      In “Positive Change”
      The Honor of a Man Lies Between the Legs of a Woman
      In “Insane Laws”
      Withdrawal of Troops Affecting Women in Afghanistan
      In “Coping Strategies”

      THE MYTH:

      MUHAMMAD WOULD NEVER APPROVE OF RAPE

      THE TRUTH:

      It is against Islam to rape Muslim women, but Muhammad actually encouraged the rape of others captured in battle. This hadith provides the context for the Qur’anic verse (4:24):

      The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives.
      Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)
      Actually, as the hadith indicates, it wasn’t Muhammad, but “Allah the Exalted” who told the men to rape the women in front of their husbands – which is all the more reason not to think of Islam as being the same as other religions.

      Note also that the husbands of these unfortunate victims were obviously alive after battle. This is important because it flatly contradicts those apologists who like to argue that the women Muhammad enslaved were widowed and thus unable to fend for themselves. (Even if the apologists were right, what sort of a moral code is it that forces a widow to choose between being raped and starving?)
      There are several other episodes in which Muhammad is offered the clear opportunity to disavow raping women – yet he instead offers advice on how to proceed. In one case, his men were reluctant to devalue their new slaves for later resale by getting them pregnant. Muhammad was asked about coitus interruptus in particular:

      “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.” (Bukhari 34:432)

      As indicated, the prophet of Islam did not mind his men raping the women, provided they ejaculated within the bodies of their victims.

      As one might imagine, Muhammad’s obvious approval of raping women captured in battle and his own personal participation as recorded in many places is of intense inconvenience to the Muslim apologists of our time. For this reason, some of them attempt to explain away these many episodes and Qur’anic references to sex with captives by pretending that these are cases in which women have fled bad marriages and sought refuge with the Muslims. Some apologists even refer to them as “wives,” even though the Qur’an makes a clear distinction between “those whom thy right hand possesses” and true wives (see Sura 33:50).

      Beyond the desperation of the 21st century apologist however, there is absolutely nothing in the historical text that supports this rosy revision of Muslim history. The women of the Banu Mustaliq were sold into slavery following their rape:

      “We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter” (Sahih Muslim 3371)

      In fact, female slaves were traded like any other simple commodity by Muhammad and his band of devoted followers:

      “Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu’l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons.” (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham/Hisham 693)
      Is it Islamic to sell one’s wife for horses? Clearly these were not wives!

      More importantly, by definition a “captured” woman is not one who is fleeing her husband. She is fleeing her captor (ie. the Muslim slave raider). This hadith describes a typical raid, in which the women and children are captured as they are attempting to flee the attacking Muslims:

      “…and then we attacked from all sides and reached their watering-place where a battle was fought. Some of the enemies were killed and some were taken prisoners. I saw a group of persons that consisted of women and children [escaping in the distance]. I was afraid lest they should reach the mountain before me, so I shot an arrow between them and the mountain. When they saw the arrow, they stopped. So I brought them, driving them along” (Sahin Muslim 4345)

      The Muslim narrator (who happens to be Muhammad’s adopted son) sees the women trying to escape (following the massacre of their men) and cuts off their route by shooting an arrow into their path. These aren’t women trying to seek refuge with the Muslims. They are trying to avoid capture by the Muslims.
      The same hadith goes on to recount that Muhammad personally demanded one of the captured women for his own use:

      I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: “Give me that girl.” (Sahih Muslim 4345)

      The prophet of Islam and his companions used war to collect women for personal sexual use and for trading. Unless she was arbitrarily declared as someone’s wife, the woman became a sex slave. In no case was her fate tied to anything that she had personally done, nor was she given a choice about her future.

      ISLAM & ITS CULTURE OF RAPE

      The number of rapes committed by Muslim immigrants in Western nations are so extremely high that it is difficult to view them only as random acts of individuals. It resembles warfare. This happens in most Western European countries, as well as in other infidels countries such as India.

      In Bradford, England, Channel 4 pulled a documentary about Pakistani and other Muslim men sexually abusing white English girls, some as young as 11. Writer Theodore Dalrymple thinks that “thanks to their cultural inheritance, (Muslim) abuse of women is systematic rather than unsystematic as it is with the whites and blacks.” In France, grotesque reports about systematic gang rapes of French or “too Western” Muslim girls keep coming in. At the same time, European jails are getting filled up with Muslims imprisoned for robberies and all kinds of violent crimes, and Muslims bomb European civilians. You can see the mainstream media are struggling to make sense of all of this. That’s because they can’t, or don’t want to, see the obvious: This is exactly how an invading army would behave. Rape, pillage and bomb.

      I disagree that this has nothing to do with Islam. Muhammad himself had forced sex (rape) with several of his slave girls/concubines. This is perfectly allowed, both in the sunna and in the Koran. If you postulate that many of the Muslims in Europe view themselves as a conquering army and that European women are simply war booty, it all makes perfect sense and is in full accordance with Islamic law. And Muslims do follow their medieval religious laws, even today:

      What does rape, then, have to do with these religious conflicts? Unfortunately, everything. The Islamic legal manual ‘Umdat al-Salik, which carries the endorsement of Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, stipulates: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” Why? So that they are free to become the concubines of their captors. The Qur’an permits Muslim men to have intercourse with their wives and their slave girls: “Forbidden to you are … married women, except those whom you own as slaves” (Sura 4:23-24).

      After one successful battle, Muhammad tells his men,

      “Go and take any slave girl.”

      He took one for himself also. After the notorious massacre of the Jewish Qurayzah tribe, he did it again. According to his earliest biographer, Ibn Ishaq, Muhammad “went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for [the men of Banu Qurayza] and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches.” After killing “600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900,” the Prophet of Islam took one of the widows he had just made, Rayhana bint Amr, as another concubine.

      Emerging victorious in another battle, according to a generally accepted Islamic tradition, Muhammad’s men present him with an ethical question: “We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl [coitus interruptus] with them.” Muhammad told them: “It is better that you should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.’” When Muhammad says “it is better that you should not do it,” he’s referring to coitus interruptus, not to raping their captives. He takes that for granted.
      For her to be absolved from guilt, a raped woman must have shown good conduct.

      For non-Muslim women, they are in every respect — the way they walk, the way they talk, those bedroom eyes we all know so well — simply asking for it, and Muslim men have every right to do what they wish.
      It is not understood that Western women are not so much regarded by most Muslims as individuals, but as “their women,” the women who “belong” to hostile Infidels. They are booty, to be taken, just as the land of the Infidels someday will drop, it is believed, into Muslim hands — by demographic conquest rather than military conquest. It has worked in many parts of Africa; and if Muslims fail to reproduce even faster than they do, there is always the expedient of killing the remaining Infidels.

      All over France there are cases of rapes, by Muslim gangs, of French girls. In Australia, in 2000, Bankstown and Greenacre (in Sydney) had a succession of gang-rapes, in which the victims testified to the particularly gruesome details of being assaulted by a dozen or more men at a time, screaming at them for being “Aussies” or “Christians.” It made a big splash in Sydney, when the cases came to trial in 2002. Alan Jones, an Australian commentator, noted: “Let’s not mince words here — these are racist attacks against ordinary Australian girls carried out by out of control Muslim Lebanese….” The girls themselves all testified to the fact that the attacks were full of observations about, not race, but religion — and the confusion of Jones here is understandable. The Western world is still groping to understand something of which it had been so remarkably and indeed, in some ways so fortunately unaware; it is the attitudes engendered toward Infidels — a Frenchman who is beaten to death for trying to retrieve his daughter’s stolen bicycle, a mother and her year-old-child assaulted on an RER train near Louvres, the thousands of assaults which are a modern version of the rape and pillage that Muslim conquerors were permitted whenever they conquered Infidel lands. This is not mere crime, but ideologically-justified crime or rather, in Muslim eyes, attacks on Infidels scarcely qualify as crime.

      Have we forgotten the mass rapes, at the hands of Muslims (Turks, Kurds, and in the Syrian Desert, Arabs) of the Armenian women, those helpless “giavours,” in the first full-scale massacres in modern times, those of 1894-1895, and then the genocidal campaign that began in 1915 and went on for years? Have we all forgotten what happened to the Assyrian Christian women during the Assyrian massacres of 1933, when — just a few months after the British left — Muslim Iraqis had a high old time with their helpless Christian population? What about the rapes of the Christian women, kidnapped in Ramadi, Iraq last year — never to be returned to their husbands, and now the permanent property of the Muslims who kidnapped them? Shall one recall what happened to the Christian Maronites in Damur, at the hands of the PLO? What about the Copts, in Egypt? Or, during the Algerian War the mass rape of Christian and Jewish women by the FLN (scarcely given enough attention in Alastair Horne’s reticent “A Savage War of Peace” but given much more by such writers as Jacques Soustelle, the great ethnographer of Mexican culture, and a perceptive analyst of the Algerian situation and the real nature of Islam — akin, in his way, to Andre Servier).
      The figures on Muslim rape of Western women in Europe are astounding. In Denmark and Norway, between 65% and 70% of all rapes are committed by Muslims, who as yet still less than 5% of the population. One local judge in Norway actually exonerated one rapist by accepting his defense that the victim’s dress was taken by him to mean that she was egging him on. Her dress was nothing special to Norwegians, but the judge found it to be unbearably provocative to this poor Muslim immigrant. A curious argument, is it not? Even if she had been dressed a la Gisele Bundchen doing a shoot for Victoria’s Secret — and she of course was not — rape is not an acceptable response.

      The argument now seems to be: Western mores are offensive. Western women are cheap and offensive. We Muslims are here, here to stay, and we have a right to take advantage of this situation. It is our view of the matter that should prevail. Western goods, like the land on which we now live, belong to Allah and to the best of men — his Believers. Western women, too, essentially belong to us — our future booty. Western laws may “apply” but not in any sense that really counts or that we reocgnize. We recognize Islamic law, the sharia, and according to that we are simply exhibiting the attiudes toward Infidels that are drummed into us, that are right and according to the laws of Allah. Why should we act differently? Oh, and if we happen to act, as some of the Islamic websites tell us we can act, in accordance with the local laws — but only insofar as they do not contradict Islam — that is only because of darura, the doctrine of necessity — and that necessity, that darura, is of course only temporary.

      In other words, when in Rome, if you are Muslim, do any damn thing you please and justify it by saying you didn’t realize you were in Rome, or what the Romans did, and anyway, the Romans are Infidels so who cares what they do, or expect. A fascinating attitude. The sooner this is fully grasped by Infidels, the fewer victims, ultimately, there will be.

      How do you describe the largest problem the world (and that includes women) faces – with one word – Islam.

      The intellectual chains that bind Muslims to Islam are so entrenched that the “Saudi woman” can’t even complain about Islam itself. She blames the problem on Saudi Arabia.

      Islam is the scourge of humanity. It either enslaves a population with Sharia law or prepares for war against non-Muslims. Women are just part of the road kill of Islam.

      Women in the non-Muslim world need to help their sisters held hostage by the scourge of Islam.
      Here are a few links documenting the reality of women within Islam.

      Canadian Women leaves college because of art she created
      http://theomega.ca/2013/04/11/controversial-conversation-continues-due-to-cultural-art/

      Afghan women in Kabul prison over moral crimes
      http://news.yahoo.com/afghan-women-kabul-prison-over-moral-crimes-131735797.html

      Exclusive: How my brother tried to kill me in ‘honor attack’
      http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/04/world/asia/afghanistan-honor-killing-survivor/index.html?hpt=hp_c3

      Saudi religious police lift ban on women on bikes
      http://news.yahoo.com/saudi-religious-police-lift-ban-women-bikes-111923001.html

      Saudi Arabia Introduces SMS Tracking to Keep Women in State of Slavery
      http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/407818/20121123/saudi-women-husband-wife-muslim-islam-sms.htm

      Maldives girl to get 100 lashes for pre marital sex
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-21595814

      Only 14, Bangladeshi girl charged with adultery was lashed to death
      http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/29/bangladesh.lashing.death/index.html

      Nearly half Saudi women are beaten at home
      http://www.emirates247.com/crime/region/nearly-half-saudi-women-are-beaten-at-home-2013-02-26-1.496510

      Marriage or rape 90 year old Saudi weds 15 year old girl
      http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2013/01/07/259048.html

      Read http://islamsfatalflaw.blogspot.com/ .

      MOHAMMED SAID WOMEN WERE INTELLECTUALLY CHALLENGED!

      A SUICIDE BOMBER’S PRAYER TO ALLAH:

      “Allah, better 72 Houris in Paradise, than 1 Bitch on earth”!
      BOOM!
      “Allah! Allah! What the f—k are these”?
      “They are what I promised, 72 Raisins”!
      “Raisins? Raisins? I was promised 72 Virgins”!
      “Not by Me, Achmed! Not by Me”!
      “My imam told me if I died as a Suicide Bomber, I would have 72 Beautiful, Ever Virgins & I could F—k them all the time & they never complain.”
      “Take it up with your imam, when you see him”!
      “Now eat up your Raisins & have a wank”!
      “How can I have a wank”?
      “I have no “Dick” or hands”!
      “So what did you want 72 Virgins for”?
      “Unless you were going to give them Oral sex, like Muhammad used to give his wives”?
      “He had a major problem with his “Dick” also.”

      I HAD HEARD OF A “DEAD” RIDE, BUT THIS BEATS EVERYTHING!

      Islamic Teachings on Sex with Dead Humans and Animals
      Islam’s world of unfettered sex: sex with dead spouses and animals; anal sex with women, men and animals…

      MUSLIMS ARE ALLOWED NORMAL SEX WITH DEAD WOMEN AND ANIMALS

      Muhammad had sex with a dead woman to qualify her for the perks of a prophetic wife.
      According to Hadiths and Sayings of Prophet on issues of women in “Al-Jami Al-Saghir” written by Jalal ul-Din Al-Suyuti.

      Narrated by Ibn Abbas: “I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and SLEPT with her in her coffin.”
      The prophet was referring to Fatima, the mother of Ali, his son-in-law. Commentators have offered differing views about the significance of Muhammad’s sleeping with the dead-body of Fatimah in her coffin, some emphasizing that it had no sexual side. But Arabic scholar Demetrius explains that to express Muhammad sleeping inside Fatima’s coffin with her dead-body, “The Arabic word used here is “Id’tajat”, which literally means “lay down to have sex.”

      Muhammad is also understood to have said that because he slept with her, she has become like a wife to his; so she will be considered like “mother of the believers”.
      After Muhammad slept with her and “consummated”, Medina women routinely offered themselves to Mohammad for sex so that the holy fluid of the prophet released into them will qualify them for paradise. Here is a hadith.

      MUSLIM ARE ALLOWED “ANAL” SEX EVEN WITH DEAD WOMEN AND ANIMALS

      Sahih Muslim, Book of Menstruation, Hadith 525:
      “Our companions have said if a penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus or penile anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus, then it is necessary to wash…”

      NOW IT MAY AN EGYPTIAN LAW TOO

      Egyptian husbands may be legally allowed to have sex with their dead wives – for up to six hours after their death (sex performed after six hours will be considered adultery and the husband will be beheaded and buried with the wife)

      This law is part of measures being introduced by the Islamist-dominated parliament under ‘religious interpretations’. The subject of a husband having sex with his dead wife arose in May 2011 when Moroccan cleric Zamzami Abdul Bari said marriage remains valid even after death (Al Arabiya News).
      See cleric Zamzami Abdul Bari’s video, claiming Islamic justification of sex with dead bodies of spouses.

      Anal Sex Approved by Allah and Prophet Muhammad

      Caution: Sexually explicit images below!!

      In Pakistan, the mullahs are notorious for child abuse and molestation. Every day, we hear news about a mullah sodomizing his beardless student. It is very common in Pakistan. Almost every one knows what happens in madrassas. Even one of my friends narrowly escaped from being sodomized by his Quranic teacher when he was taking the Quran memorizing lessons.

      But why do these mullahs commit such a thing, allegedly condemned in Islam? Muslims are most vocal in commending sodomy, homosexuality in words? They are known to attack homosexuals in Europe.
      Answer is that, according to them, masturbation is haram. Seeing any na mehram girl is also prohibited. The only way left to satisfy their lusty desires is to sodomize one of their pupils. While reading from a shia Website, http://www.answering-ansar.org, I came across the fact that the root of sodomy lies in the Islamic text and history. Here are some examples of the gems from the history and authentic books of Sunni Islam.
      Umar indulged in sodomy and Allah was forced to legitimize this practise in the Qur’an
      For evidence you can consult the following texts:
      • Jami al Tirmidhi, Bab al Tafseer Volume 2, page 382, ‘Ayat Hars’
      • Fathul Bari Volume 8 page 191 Kitab Tafseer Ayat Hars
      • Gharab al Qur’an Volume 3 page 249 Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer al Ibn Katheer Volume 1 page 261
      • Fayl ai Lawathar Volume 6 page 229
      • Tafseer Qurtubi Volume 1 page 92 Ayat Hars

      Lets quote verbatim from Jami al Tirmidhi [Bab al Tafseer Vol. 2, p. 382, ‘Ayat Hars’]:
      “Ibn Abbas narrates that Hadhrath Umar went before Rasulullah (s) and “Master I am destroyed!’. Rasulullah (s) asked ‘what thing has destroyed you?’. Umar replied last night I had anal sex. Rasulullah (s) did not give a reply to Umar, then Allah (swt) sent down this revelation “Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will; the words ‘kabool wa Dhabar’ (the anus is accepted)”
      Abdullah Ibn Umar deemed sodomy to Halaal, like his old man.
      For evidence, please consult the following authentic Sunni texts:
      • Tafseer Durre Manthur Volume 1 page 264 Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Qasmi Volume 2 page 220, by Jamaladeen Qasmi
      • Tafseer Qurtubi page 92 Ayat Hars
      Here is the direct quote from Tafseer Durre Manthur:
      “Traditions wherein Abdullah ibn Umar believed sodomy with women are well known and Sahih”.
      Ulema of Madina believed that sodomy was halaal.
      Please see the following Sunni sources:
      • Fayl al Lawathar Volume 6 page 154 Kitab Nikah, Bab Mut’ah
      • Tafseer Qasmi Volume 2 page 223 Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Ibn Katheer Volume 1 page 262 Ayat Hars
      • Fathul Bari Volume 8 page 191 Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Mazhari, Volume 3, Page 19
      Quoting directly from Fayl al Lawathar:
      “Imam Auzai stated of the Fatwas from Hijaaz that are famous, one fatwa is from the people of Makka is that is that they deemed Mut’ah with women to be permissible, the other from the people of Madina, that sodomy with women is permissible”.
      Ibn Kathir in his Tafseer also stated:
      “Statements on the permissibility of sodomy with women have come from the jurists of Madina”.
      Companions of mohammed deemed sodomy with women to be permissible
      We read in Tafseer Qurtubi Volume 3 page 93 Ayat Hars:
      “Fatwas on the permissibility of sodomy with women Saeed bin Maseeb Nafi, ibn Umar, Muhammad bin Kab, Abdul Malik, Imam Malik, a large group amongst the Sahaba and Tabaeen deemed sodomy to be permissible”.
      Imam Sha’afi deemed sodomy to be permissible!
      Please see the following Sunni texts:
      • Tafseer Durre Manthur Volume 1 page 266, Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Ruh al Ma’ani page 125, Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Ahkam al Qur’an Volume 1 page 265
      • Tafseer Qasmi Volume 2 page 228 Baqarah Verse 223
      • Al Mahzoorath page 268

      We read in Tafseer Durre Manthur:

      “On sodomy with women, Imam Sha’afi no Sahih narration’s have reached us from Rasulullah (s) as to whether it is halaal or haraam and logic suggests that this halaal”.
      Imam of Ahl’ul Sunnah Abu Maleeka suggested ‘in times of trouble’ use a stick!’

      We read in Tafseer Durre Manthur Ayat Hars:

      “Abu Maleeka was asked whether it was permissible to practise sodomy with women. He replied ‘Last night I practised sodomy with my servant, penetration became difficult hence I sought the assistance of a stick”.
      Imam Malik believed sodomy with women was halaal

      We read in the following Sunni sources:

      • Ahkam al Qur’an Volume 1 page 352 Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Gharab al Qur’an Volume 2 page 249 Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Durre Manthur Volume 1 page 111, Ayat Hars
      • Fathul Bari Volume 8 page 190 Kitab Tafseer Ayat Hars

      Quoting verbatim from Ahkam al Qur’an:
      “Sahil asked Imam Malik ‘is sodomy with women permissible? Imam Malik replied ‘I just did this act and have just washed by sexual organs”.

      Imam Abu Hanifa’s esteemed student Ibn Mubarak was also a homosexual
      We also read in ‘Muhadarat al-’udaba’, p. 199, Chapter 1, “Al hada al Saani” that:
      “Hakim Tabaristan made Abdullah bin Mubarak a Judge, who was addicted to the anus (Homosexual) he asked the Hakim ‘Sir I need some men who can help you” Hakim said I was aware of your need before this”.
      The Salaf deem it permissible to pray Salat behind a homosexual Imam
      We read in Sahih al Bukhari, p. 96, Kitab Bab ul Salaat, narrates a tradition from Zuhri [Sahih al-Bukhari, p. 96, 1375 AH print]:

      “The Imamate of a mukhanath at a time of necessity is Sahih”.
      Note: Arabic word “Mukhanath” means homosexual. This hadith has been removed from the English version of Bukhari, but exists in old copies of Arabic version. E.g. this 1375 Hijri print.
      So I think that the mullahs sodomizing little girls and boys are not wrong at all they are just following the Sunnah of the prophet and his companions.

      • Lucky bin Rapist, Saudi Arabia has the least rape and adultery cases in the world. Lucky the “Fatwa” dude, with your sick mind can you think of anything good in this world?? I think you are truly bankrupt……..

        • CHASITY IN THE TEACHINGS OF PROPHET MOHAMMED

          ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF ALLAH.

          ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED THE RAPE OF FEMALE CAPTIVES:

          RAPE JIHAD:

          Sahih Muslim Book 08. N 3371Marriage
          Chapter: Al-Azl (incomplete sexual intercourse): Coitus Interruptus.
          Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them.
          So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him?
          So we asked Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

          REMEMBER:

          ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF GOD
          ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED RAPE

          Al-’Azl
          Al-’Azl, (العزل) also known as coitus interruptus, is the practice of having sexual intercourse with a woman but withdrawing the penis before ejaculation. Apparently al-’Azl with female captives and slaves was a pretty important topic for Muhammad and his companions as evidenced by the abundance of Hadith material on the subject.
          Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle .

          Sahih Bukhari 7:62:135

          Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interrupt us while the Quran was being revealed. Jabir added: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle while the Quran was being Revealed.

          Sahih Bukhari 7:62:136

          When RAPING your captive, it’s better if you do not pull out at the end

          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus(RAPE WITHOUT PREGNANCY)?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to PULL OUT. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.”

          Sahih Bukhari 3:34:432

          Abu Said said, “We went with Allah’s Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the ‘Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah’s Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence.”

          Sahih Bukhari 3:46:718

          We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. ………
          We asked (him) about it and he said, “It is better for you not to PULL OUT, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist.”

          Sahih Bukhari 5:59:459

          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: That during the battle with Bani Al-Mustaliq they (Muslims) captured females and wanted sexual relation with them without impregnating them. So they asked the Prophet about coitus interruptus. He said, “It is better that you leave it in, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.” Qaza’a said, “I heard Abu Sa’id saying that the Prophet said, ‘No soul is ordained to be created but Allah will create it.”

          Sahih Bukhari 9:93:506

          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah’s Apostle about it and he said, “Do you really do that?” repeating the question thrice, “There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection.”

          Sahih Bukhari 7:62:137

          Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: That while he was sitting with the Prophet a man from the Ansar came and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get slave girls from the war captives and we love property; what do you think about coitus interruptus?” Allah’s Apostle said, “Do you do that? It is better for you not to pull out, for there is no soul which Allah has ordained to come into existence but will be created.”

          Sahih Bukhari 8:77:600

          Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3371, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3372

          Yahya related to me from Malik from Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman from Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Habban that Ibn Muhayriz said, “I went into the mosque and saw Abu Said al-Khudri and so I sat by him and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said al-Khudri said, ‘We went out with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, on the expedition to the Banu al-Mustaliq. We took some Arabs prisoner, and we desired the women as celibacy was hard for us. We wanted the ransom, so we wanted to practise coitus interruptus. We said, ‘Shall we practise coitus interruptus while the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, is among us before we ask him?’ We asked him about that and he said, ‘You don’t have to not do it. There is no self which is to come into existence up to the Day of Rising but that it will come into existence.’ ”

          Al-Muwatta 29 32.95b

          It’s okay to practice ‘azl when having sex with your slave-girl
          Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri: A man said: Apostle of Allah, I have a slave-girl and I withdraw the penis from her (while having intercourse), and I dislike that she becomes pregnant. I intend (by intercourse) what the men intend by it. The Jews say that withdrawing the penis (azl) is burying the living girls on a small scale. He (the Prophet) said: The Jews told a lie. If Allah intends to create it, you cannot turn it away.

          Abu Dawud 11:2166

          Jabir (Allah be pleased with him) reported that a man came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: I have a slave-girl who is our servant and she carries water for us and I have intercourse with her, but I do not want her to conceive. He said: Practise ‘azl, if you so like, but what is decreed for her will come to her. The person stayed back (for some time) and then came and said: The girl has become pregnant, whereupon he said: I told you what was decreed for her would come to her.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3383

          Your slave-girl is your field, so water it or leave it thirsty if you want
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Damra ibn Said al-Mazini from al-Hajjaj ibn Amr ibn Ghaziya that he was sitting with Zayd ibn Thabit when Ibn Fahd came to him. He was from the Yemen. He said, “Abu Said! I have slave-girls. None of the wives in my keep are more pleasing to me than them, and not all of them please me so much that I want a child by them, shall I then practise coitus interruptus?” Zayd ibn Thabit said, “Give an opinion, Hajjaj!” “I said, ‘May Allah forgive you! We sit with you in order to learn from you!’ He said, ‘Give an opinion! ‘I said, ‘She is your field, if you wish, water it, and if you wish, leave it thirsty. I heard that from Zayd.’ Zayd said, ‘He has spoken the truth.’ ”

          Al-Muwatta 29 32.99b

          “You don’t need your slave-girl’s permission to practice ‘azl with her.”
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Humayd ibn Qays al-Makki that a man called Dhafif said that Ibn Abbas was asked about coitus interruptus. He called a slave-girl of his and said, “Tell them.” She was embarrassed. He said, “It is alright, and I do it myself.” Malik said, “A man does not practise coitus interruptus with a free woman unless she gives her permission. There is no harm in practising coitus interruptus with a slave-girl without her permission. Someone who has someone else’s slave-girl as a wife, does not practise coitus interruptus with her unless her people give him permission.”

          Al-Muwatta 29 32.100b

          Additional Hadith about ‘azl

          Sahih Muslim

          Sa’d b. Abu Waqqas (Allah be pleased with him) reported that a person came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: I do ‘azi with my wife. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Why do you do that? The person said: I fear harm to her child or her children. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (way peace be upon him) said: If that were harmful it would harm the Persians and the Greeks.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3394

          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl with them. We then asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) about it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born until the Day of judgment must be born.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3373

          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) (was asked if he had heard it himself), to which he said: Yes. (I heard) Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: There is no harm if you do not practise it, for it (the birth of the child) is something ordained (by Allah).

          Sahih Muslim 8:3374, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3375

          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) was asked about ‘azl, whereupon he said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for it (the birth of the child) is something ordained. Muhammad (one of the narrators) said: (The words) La ‘alaykum (there is no harm) implies its Prohibition.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3376

          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that mention was made of ‘azl in the presence of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) whereupon he said: Why do you practise it? They said: There is a man whose wife has to suckle the child, and if that person has a sexual intercourse with her (she may conceive) which he does not like, and there is another person who has a slave-girl and he has a sexual intercourse with her, but he does not like her to have conception so that she may not become Umm Walad, whereupon he (the Holy Prophet) said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for that (the birth of the child) is something pre- ordained. Ibn ‘Aun said: I made a mention of this hadith to Hasan, and he said: By Allah, (it seems) as if there is upbraiding in it (for ‘azl).

          Sahih Muslim 8:3377, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3378 and Sahih Muslim 8:3379

          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: Mention was made about al-’azl in the presence of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), whereupon he said: Why any one of you practises it? (He did not say: One of you should not do it), for there is no created soul, whose creator is not Allah.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3380

          Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) was asked about ‘azl, whereupon he said: The child does not come from all the liquid (sermen) and when Allah intends to create anything nothing can prevent it (from coming into existence).

          Sahih Muslim 8:3381, See also: Sahih Muslim 8:3382

          Jabir b. ‘Abdullah (Allah be pleased with them) reported that a person asked Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) saying: I have a slave-girl and I practise ‘azl with her, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: This cannot prevent that which Allah has decreed. The person then came (after some time) and said: Messenger of Allah, the slave-girl about whom I talked to you has conceived, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: I am the servant of Allah and His Messenger.

          Sahih Muslim 8:3384

          Al-Muwatta

          Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’n-Nadr, the mawla of Umar ibn Ubaydullah from Amir ibn Sad ibn Abi Waqqas from his father that he used to practise coitus interruptus.

          Al-Muwatta 29 32.96b

          Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu’n-Nadr, the mawla of Umar ibn Ubaydullah from Ibn Aflah, the mawla of Abu Ayyub al-Ansari from an umm walad of Abu Ayyubal-Ansari that he practised coitus interruptus.

          Al-Muwatta 29 32.97b
          Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar did not practise coitus interruptus and thought that it was disapproved.

          Al-Muwatta 29 32.98b

          Yahya said that Malik related from Ibn Shihab from Salim ibn Abdullah ibn Umar from his father that Umar ibn al-Khattab said, “What’s the matter with men who have intercourse with their slave-girls and then dismiss them? No slave-girl comes to me whose master confesses that he has had intercourse with her but that I connect her child to him, whether or not he has practised coitus interruptus or stopped having intercourse with her.”

          Al-Muwatta 36 23.24b

          Malik related to me from Nafi that Safiyya bint Abi Ubayd informed him that Umar ibn al-Khattab said, “What is the matter with men who have intercourse with their slave-girls and then leave them to go? No slave-girl comes to me whose master confesses that he has had intercourse with her but that I connect her child to him, whether or not he has practised coitus interruptus or left off from intercourse with her.” Yahya said that he heard Malik say, “What is done in our community about an umm walad who commits a crime is that her master is liable for what she has done up to her value. He does not have to surrender her, and he cannot be made to bear more than her value for her crime.”

          Al-Muwatta 36 23.25b

          STONED TO DEATH

          On October 30, 2008, the United Nations condemned the stoning to death of Aisha Duhulowa, a 13-year-old girl who had been gang-raped and then sentenced to death by a Sharia court for fornication (Zina). She was screaming and begging for mercy, but when some family members attempted to intervene, shots were fired by the Islamic militia and a baby was killed.

          Local Sharia courts in Bangladesh regularly punish raped minor girls and women by flogging and beating them with shoes.[1] Similar cases of punishing raped women are Mina v. the State, Bibi v. the State and Bahadur v. the State.[2] Sharia courts in Pakistan have punished thousands of raped women by long term imprisonment.[3]

          You might think that such horrific barbarity cannot be the real Sharia law; that it is a misapplication of the law by ignorant clergy. Sadly, neither is true.

          There is a traceable dynamic in Sharia Law that is bound to lead to this barbarity. And unless we abandon these laws we will never be able to emerge from this barbarity. It was a blunder that Muslim jurists included rape in the Hudood section of Sharia Law that deals with murder, bodily harm, apostasy, drinking, defamation, theft, adultery and highway robbery. But anyone who tried to change these laws ended up banging their heads against the wall. Mawdudi, the founding father of modern Political Islam, claims that even if all the world’s Muslims together wanted to make the slightest change in these laws, they would not be allowed to do so.[4]

          But change is necessary.

          Another key element of these laws is that only eye-witnesses are acceptable and no circumstantial evidence can be accepted.[5] Rape is included in the Dyat (monetary compensation for bodily harm) section of Sharia Law because it is considered as “Bodily Harm” or “Robbing Property” (chastity). This classification led jurists to create these laws:

          * A rapist is obliged to pay the victim the amount typically received as marriage payment to similar brides.[6]

          * “If the rapist cannot be punished for any reason he will pay the victim the amount equal to bride-money.”[7]

          As no other punishment is mentioned, the punishment of rape can be only financial compensation. But Jurists missed the point that rape is a crime of its own kind. It has a devastating psychological and social impact on raped women. They are shamed to death, socially outcast, unsuitable for marriage, bring shame on the family and in some countries become the victims of honor killing. Many raped women commit suicide in Muslim countries.

          The Quranic word “Zina” means sexual relation between a man and woman not married to each other. It is called adultery for married persons and fornication for unmarried ones. The Quran severely prohibits Zina. Muslim jurists also included rape in the category of Zina because in rape cases such sexual relations “between a man and woman not married to each other,” even though forced on the victim, have taken place. As rape is not mentioned in the Quran, the death sentence for rapists originated from the Prophet’s example: “Narrated Wa’il ibn Hujr: When a woman went out in the time of the Prophet (peace be upon him) for prayer, a man attacked her and overpowered (raped) her. …he said: Stone him to death”.[8]

          The laws are so clear about defining rape and the requirement for proof of rape that a judge has no option but punish the rape victims.
          When rape is caught or reported, “sex between a man and woman not married to each other” can be proven by testimony, physical evidences of bodily scars/bruises, torn clothing or pregnancy of the victim. Then the Sharia laws are enforced.
          Sharia Law: The rapist will be punished to death if force on the victim is proven.[9]
          Clear enough. But exactly how can “force on the victim” be proven? The answer must surely rank as one of the most insane and sexist laws in human history.

          (A) “Proof of Zina (adultery) or Zina Bil-Jabr (rape) liable to Hadd shall be one of the following:

          (a) The accused makes confession or
          (b) There are at least four Muslim adult male witnesses”[10]
          (B) “Proof of adultery or rape liable to Hadd shall be one of the following:
          (a) The accused makes confession, or
          (b) There are at least four Muslim adult male witnesses.”[11]
          (C) “Punishment will take place when Zina or rape have been proved by witness.”[12]
          (D) Sharia Law rejects the witness of women in Hudood cases.[13]
          (E) “The evidence of women is originally inadmissible on account of their weakness of understanding, want of memory and incapacity of governing.”[14]

          Because such “proofs” are almost impossible to obtain and because circumstantial evidence is not accepted, a rape cannot be proved as rape in a Sharia court. Instead, “sex outside marriage” is proved for the woman by her complaint or physical scars or torn cloths or pregnancy etc. Then the law of “Punishment for Sex Outside Marriage” i.e. stoning to death for married adulterers and flogging and exile for unmarried adulterers are applied to the rape-victims.[15] On the other hand, a rapist has simply to deny the crime and go scott free. As the New York Times reports: “Ms. Lawal, a divorced woman, identified a man as the father of her child. The man denied the charge, swore on the Koran, and was deemed innocent by the trial court. No one suggested DNA tests.”[16]
          But DNA tests have no place in Hudood Laws either. The BBC reported that Zafran Bibi of Pakistan “went to the police to register a case of rape, but she herself was instead sentenced to death for having an adulterous affair.”[17] About conducting a DNA test to identify the rapist, the Dawn reports: “Justice Ali Nawaz Chauhan of the Lahore High Court has observed that the DNA test is not acceptable as evidence to establish the offence of Zina under the Hudood laws which require a direct testimony in such cases..”[18]

          This is how Sharia Law punishes raped women. The sources of these laws span the period from the 7th century to recent times. Some Muslim countries have withdrawn from the application of these laws, but these laws are still alive and active in many Muslim societies. Many Muslims talk about it, but there has never been a concerted effort to end this barbarity. It is true that many, including the UN’s Children Fund, have expressed alarm over the plight of Aisha Duhulowa, but history tells us that merely condemning these acts or calling on the humanity of the perpetrators has never stopped the violent soldiers of God. The solution can only been found by raising the awareness and opposition of the entire world, irrespective of religion.

          Muslims must reject this barbarity or risk Islam being seen as the criminal. The screams of little Aisha Duhulowa will echo around the world until this is done.

          NOTES:

          [1] The Daily Star on 04 April 2006
          [2] “Rape Law in Islamic Societies” by Julie Norman, CSID 6th Annual Conference
          [3] Annual report of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom, May 2004 – Ref – National Commission on the Status of Women in Pakistan.
          [4] Islamic Law and Constitution – page 140.
          [5] Codified Islamic Law Vol 2 page 600
          [6] Shafi’i Law Reliance of the Traveler -# m.8.10
          [7] Codified Islamic Law Vol 1 page 301
          [8] Abu Dawood Book 38, Hadis# Number 4366
          [9] Codified Islami Law Volume 1 Law#134, Shafi’i law Reliance of the Traveler – o.7.3
          [10] Pakistan Hudood Ordinance VII of 1979 amended by Ordinance XX of 1980
          [11] Codified Islami Law Volume 1 Law#133
          [12] Ibid Law #135
          [13] Hanafi Law-Page 176, 353, Shafi’i Law- page 638 Law#o.24.9, Criminal Law in Islam and the Muslim World -page 251, The Penal Law of Islam – Kazi Publications Lahore- page 44, 45, Tafsir of Translation of the Qura’an by Muhiuddin Khan pages 239 and 928
          [14] The Penal Law of Islam – Kazi Publications Lahore- page 44 – 45
          [15] Hanafi Law Hedaya 178, Codified Islamic Law#129 Vol 1, Sunan Abu Dawood Book 38,4451& 4423
          [16]
          http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.htmlres=9900E0D9153DF935A1575AC0A9659C8B63
          [17] http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/03_06_02/thursday/info1.shtml
          [18] http://www.dawn.com/2005/05/21/top4.htm
          By Hasan Mahmud
          FrontPageMagazine.com
          Hasan Mahmud is the Director of Sharia Law of the Muslim Canadian Congress. He played a vital role in the successful movement against the Toronto Sharia Court. The court had been established in 1991 (and functioning since then) with the blessing of Ontario law and was banned in 2003 when the Ontario Government enacted a new law banning all faith-courts. He has authored books, debates, 2 docu-dramas and a docu-movie on Sharia. He has also spoken on Sharia in various conferences in Europe and North America.
          © 2013, Assyrian International News Agency. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use.
          HOW A WOMAN MUST PROVE RAPE
          Question:
          Why are rape victims often punished by Islamic courts as adulterers?
          Summary Answer:
          Under Islamic law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape, without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience, are actually confessing to having sex. If they or the accused happens to be married, then it is considered to be adultery.
          The Qur’an:
          Qur’an (2:282) – Establishes that a woman’s testimony is worth only half that of a man’s in court (there is no “he said/she said” gridlock in Islam).
          Qur’an (24:4) – “And those who accuse free women then do not bring four witnesses (to adultery), flog them…” Strictly speaking, this verse addresses adultery (revealed at the very time that Muhammad’s favorite wife was being accused of adultery on the basis of only three witnesses, coincidentally enough) however it is a part of the theological underpinning of the Sharia rule.
          Qur’an (24:13) – “Why did they not bring four witnesses of it? But as they have not brought witnesses they are liars before Allah.”
          Qur’an (2:223) – “Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will…” There is no such thing as rape in marriage, as a man is permitted unrestricted sexual access to his wives.
          From the Hadith:
          Bukhari (5:59:462) – The background for the Qur’anic requirement of four witnesses to adultery. Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was accused of cheating [on her polygamous husband]. Three witnesses corroborated the event, but Muhammad apparently did not want to believe it, and so established the arbitrary rule that four witnesses are required.
          Additional Notes:
          Rape is virtually impossible to prove under strict Islamic law (Sharia). If the man claims that the act was consensual sex, there is very little that the woman can do to refute this. Islam places the burden of avoiding sexual encounters of any sort on the woman.
          A recent fatwa from a mainstream Islamic site echoes this rule and even chides a victim of incest for complaining when she has no “evidence”:
          However, it is not permissible to accuse the father of rape without evidence. Indeed, the Sharee’ah put some special conditions for proving Zina (fornication or adultery) that are not required in case of other crimes. The crime of Zina is not confirmed except if the fornicator admits it, or with the testimony of four trustworthy men, while the testimony of women is not accepted.
          Hence, the statement of this girl or the statement of her mother in itself does not Islamically prove anything against the father, especially that the latter denies it.
          Therefore, if this daughter has no evidence to prove that her accusations are true, she should not have claimed that she was raped by her father and she should not have taken him to the court. (IslamWeb.net, Image)
          Since it is incredibly unlikely that a child molester will violate his victim in front of “four trustworthy men”, Islamic law amounts to a free pass for sexual predators.
          Islamic law rejects forensic evidence (such as DNA) in favor of testimony. An interesting situation thus sometimes develops in cases where a victim alleges rape and the man denies that sex even took place. In the absence of four male witnesses, rape cannot be proven. The woman’s testimony then becomes a “confession” of adultery. She can be stoned, even though the male is unpunished, since he never “confessed” to a sexual act!
          Some clerics blame rape on the woman. Australian Sheik Feiz recently said a rape victim “has no one to blame but herself. She displayed her beauty to the entire world… to tease man and appeal to his carnal nature.”
          Also, there can be no such thing as rape in marriage, even if the husband has to hit the wife in order to bring about her submission. Another recent fatwa reminds a woman, she “does not have the right to refuse her husband, rather she must respond to his request every time he calls her.” (Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 33597).
          Keep in mind that most Muslim countries do not operate under strict Islamic law, but rather under legal codes imported from the West. Therefore rape victims in these countries can and often do receive justice under more reasonable standards of proof.
          WATERMELONS & CUCUMBERS
          “If a man makes a hole in a watermelon, or a piece of dough, or a leather skin, or a statue, and has sex with it, then this is the same as what we have said about other types of masturbation [i.e., that it is halaal in the same circumstances given before, such as being on a journey].
          In fact, it is easier than masturbating with one’s hand”.
          “If a woman does not have a husband, and her lust becomes strong, then some of our scholars say: It is permissible for the woman to take an akranbij, which is a piece of leather worked until it becomes shaped like a penis, and insert it in herself. She may also use a cucumber”.
          Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim (Islamic scholar), page 129
          A Muslim Shia website notes: “Maybe this is another reason why ‘Umar the Khalifa never went on jihad: somebody had to stay behind and organize the cucumber distribution.”
          WANKING JIHAD!

          Companions of Muhammad masturbated during Jihad
          “If a man is torn between continued desire or releasing it, and if this man does not have a wife or he has a slave-girl but he does not marry, then if a man is overwhelmed by desire, and he fears that he will suffer because of this (someone like a prisoner, or a traveller, or a pauper), then it is permissible for him to masturbate, and Ahmad (ibn Hanbal) is explicit on this.

          WANKING JIHAD!

          2. Furthermore, it is narrated that the Companions of the Prophet (s) used to masturbate while they were on military expeditions or travelling”.
          Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim (Islamic scholar), page 129
          Muttaqi (God-fearing) monkeys
          Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun: During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.
          Sahih Bukhari 5:58:188
          ALLAH’S ARITHMETIC:
          54 INTO 9 GOES NICELY

          THE WANKING PERVERT FROM MECCA

          A marriage is engaged in by 2 consenting adults.
          Do you really believe a 6 year old child would desire to marry a 51 year old man?
          Do you think that is what she would choose?
          Do you think a 9 year old girl would desire to have sex with a 54 year old?

          The thought of an old man becoming aroused by a child is one of the most disturbing thoughts that makes us cringe as it reminds us of pedophilia and the most despicable people. It is difficult to accept that the “Holy Prophet” of Mecca married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and WANKED BETWEEN HER THIGHS FOR 3 YEARS and consummated/RAPED her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.

          HOW TO THIGH & GET HIGH

          Now let us see how thighing is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

          Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.

          According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

          Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

          Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.

          Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.”Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

          The inquirer asked the following: ‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’

          After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

          That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers'” (Fatwa No. 31409).

          Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

          AISHA WASHING SEMEN FROM MUHAMMAD’S CLOTHES

          From the Hadith of Bukhari:

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

          Narrated ‘Aisha:

          I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

          Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

          I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

          Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

          I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

          Narrated ‘Aisha:

          I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

          From the Hadith of Bukhari:

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

          Narrated ‘Aisha:

          I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 230:

          Narrated ‘Aisha:

          as above (229).

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

          Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

          I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:

          Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

          I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

          Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

          Narrated ‘Aisha:

          I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.
          MUHAMMAD RESERVED BABY AISHA FOR HIMSELF, BECAUSE SHE WAS A VIRGIN & HE WANTED A VIRGIN.
          Sahih al-Bukhari, volume 7, book 62, number 17
          Narrated jabir bin ‘abdullah:
          When I got married, Allah’s apostle said to me, “what type of lady have you married?” I replied, “I have married a matron.” he said, “why, don’t you have a liking for the virgins and for fondling them?” Jabir also said: Allah’s apostle said, “why didn’t you marry a young girl so that you might play with her and she with you?”
          Hence, Muhammad’s comments indicate that his reason for marrying Aisha while a young virgin is so that he could fondle and sexually play with her!
          AISHA WAS NOT THE ONLY BABY GIRL MUHAMMAD FANTASIZED ABOUT
          In the classic history, Sirat Rasul Allah (The Life of Muhammad) by Ibn Ishaq, there is an account in which Muhammad expressed a marital interest in a crawling baby. This event seems to have occurred around the time of the battle of of Badr, when he was about 55 years old. He had married Aisha two years earlier, when he was 53 years of age.
          (Suhayli, ii. 79: in the Riwaya of Yunus i. I. Recorded that the apostle saw her (Ummu’lfadl) when she was a baby crawling before him and said,
          ‘if she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’
          but he died before she grew up and sufyan b. Al-aswad b. ‘Abdu’l-asad al-Makhzumi married her and she bore him rizq and lubab… [Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad, Karachi, p. 311]
          Muhammad saw Um Habiba the daughter of Abbas while she was fatim (age of nursing) and he said, “if she grows up while I am still alive, I will marry her.” (Musnad Ahmad, number 25636)
          MUHAMMAD WOULD BATH & FONDLE AISHA
          Bukhari (6:298) – Muhammad would take a bath with the little Aisha and fondle her.
          Narrated ‘Aisha:
          The prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me. While in itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses).
          MUHAMMAD CONSUMMATED HIS MARRIAGE TO BABY AISHA, WHEN SHE WAS 9
          Sunaan abu Dawud: book 11, number 2161:
          Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
          I and the apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) used to lie in one cloth at night while I was menstruating. If anything from me smeared him, he washed the same place (that was smeared), and did not wash beyond it. If anything from him smeared his clothe, he washed the same place and did not wash beyond that, and prayed with it (i.e. The clothe).
          MUHAMMAD WOULD SEXUALLY ABUSE HIS WIVES
          Bukhari (6:300) – Muhammad’s wives had to be available for the prophet’s fondling even when they were having their menstrual period.
          Bukhari volume 1, book 6, number 299:
          Narrated ‘Abdur-rahman bin al-Aswad:
          …(on the authority of his father) ‘Aisha said: “Whenever Allah’s apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used to order her to put on an izar and start fondling her.” ‘Aisha added, “None of you could control his sexual desires as the prophet could.”
          WOMEN ARE SEXUAL OBJECTS
          Allah promoted this abusive sexual behavior:
          “Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will” [Koran 2:223]
          Koran (2:223) likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills. In this verse, Allah also gives divine sanction for anal sex.
          According to Islam, Muhammad is the perfection of humanity and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct. He had sex with Aisha at the age of nine, which amounts to rape of a minor. He also left behind an enduring legacy for aged Muslim men to fulfill their carnal desires contrary to natural law and to the life-long devastation of young girls.

          ALLAH PROMOTES PEDOPHILIA
          Quran 65.4 “and those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘iddah (prescribed divorce period), if you have doubts (about their periods), is three months, and for those who have no courses [(i.e. They are still immature) their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise, except in case of death] . And for those who are pregnant (whether they are divorced or their husbands are dead), their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is until they deliver (their burdens) (give birth) and whosoever fears Allah and keeps his duty to him, he will make his matter easy for him.”
          Sura (65:4) lays down rules for divorce and sets the prescribed period for divorce. It clearly says, Muslim men can marry (and divorce) little girls who have not yet reached menstruation age. This means that Muslim men were allowed to marry baby girls. This is the eternal word of god. This is an eternal law of Allah. All Muslims must believe in this teaching. Otherwise, they are no longer Muslims but apostates of Islam.

          ALLAH ORDAINS RAPE
          “All married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” 4:24
          You can have sex with slaves women captured in war (with whom you may rape or do whatever you like).
          Muhammad established an appalling precedent for abuse of young girls which is continued to be nurtured by the Muslim faithful. For example, Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran gave a fatwa about Quran 65.4:
          “A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man’s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl’s sister.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s