Militant Islamist website calls for attacks on France and Hollande


[Chicago Tribune] A militant Islamist website has created a series of posters calling for attacks on France and for the assassination of President Francois Hollande in reprisal for the country’s policies in Mali and the Central African Republic, the SITE monitoring service said late on Monday.

French President Francois Hollande speaks and greets French troops at Mpoko international airport in Bangui (Stringer . Reuters, / March 11, 2014)

French President Francois Hollande speaks and greets French troops at Mpoko international airport in Bangui (Stringer . Reuters, / March 11, 2014)

In addition to assisting Mali in its war against Islamists, France sent troops four months ago to the majority Christian Central African Republic, where predominantly Muslim “Seleka” rebels seized power a year ago. The Seleka have since been pushed back by Christian “anti-balaka” – “anti-machete” in the local language – militia.

The al Minbar Jihadi Media Network, a well-known Islamist website, created six posters as part of a campaign it dubbed, “We will not be silent, O France,” SITE said.

The forum’s “Media soldiers for the support of Islam” designed the posters, which can be downloaded and printed by visitors to the site.

France’s troops in the Central African Republic, around 2,000 soldiers, are supporting a 6,000-strong African Union peacekeeping mission.

“To our lone-wolves in France, assassinate the president of disbelief and criminality, terrify his cursed government, and bomb them and scare them as a support to the vulnerable in the Central African Republic,” one of the posters said.

Hollande has said his troops would work to stop the Central African Republic splitting in two and to disarm rival fighters.

A source in the French president’s office said that while the government was very alert to the threat of attacks, they were not a new phenomenon.

“This is not the first time there have been threats,” the source said. “There were others during the Mali intervention and even before, so we took precautionary measures.”

“Just because they (threats) are being publicized does not mean that they are new… Sometimes they are more dangerous when they are not publicized.”

Al Minbar Jihadi Media Network publishes news for various al Qaeda affiliates and other jihadists and has had an online magazine since July last year.

A French-led offensive in January 2013 drove out Islamist militants who had seized control of northern Mali. Small groups of fighters loyal to Islamist groups including the Movement for Unity and Jihad in West Africa and al Qaeda in the Maghreb still operate in the desert region, carrying out periodic attacks.

Kidnappings and killing of French nationals has since then taken place as a form of reprisal.

Two French journalists were abducted and killed in Northern Mali in November, with Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb claiming responsibility.

20 thoughts on “Militant Islamist website calls for attacks on France and Hollande

  1. PLUM aqka ALLAH SAYS:

    Shias are very good people.

    SHIA SHIRK

    The Shia have exalted their Imams–including and especially Ali (رضّى الله عنه)–to a level of Shirk (associating partners with Allah). The Shia have granted their Imams a status of gods amongst men. Islam was sent to destroy Shirk in all its forms, and Shirk is considered by Allah to be the gravest of sins.
    • Saying “Ya Ali Madad” is Shirk
    It is Shirk to say such things as “Ya Ali Madad” (O Ali, help us). Indeed, we should only call out with “Ya Allah Madad.” Only Allah and Allah alone can hear and answer our prayers. Thus, we should only go to Him and Him alone for help. We see that the very basic foundation block of Shi’ism is rooted in Shirk.
    • Ali (رضّى الله عنه) or Jesus (عليه السلام)?
    Much like the Christians have exalted the status of Prophet Isa (عليه السلام), the Shia have exalted the status of Ali (رضّى الله عنه). They even draw pictures of Ali (رضّى الله عنه), and we see the similarities between Shi’ism and Christianity, two faiths that exaggerated the status of men. This article contains disturbing (and offensive) pictures, exposing the blasphemy of the Shia.
    • Ali’s Message (رضّى الله عنه) in Nahjul Balagha
    In the Shia’s very own Nahjul Balagha, Ali (رضّى الله عنه) says there will be a group of people whose love for him will lead them away from rightfulness. He further states that a person should “be with the great majority of Muslims.” Who could this be other than the Ahlus Sunnah? It is interesting to see how the Nahjul Balagha itself testifies against the Shia.
    • Turbah: Sajdah to the Imams
    By praying to stones made from the shrines of their Imams and saints, the Shia are practising a polythiestic and paganistic grave-worshipping; they are quite literally making Sajood (prostration) to the Imams or Saints. Indeed, praying to the Turbah of these Imams and saints is Bidah (evil innovation) and Shirk; it is not much different than idol worshipping.
    • Grave Worship
    It is polythiestic the manner in which the Shia go to their shrines and cry next to them, rub them, and pray to them. It is Shirk reminscent of the Jahiliyyah times when the pagan Arabs used to do this. Tawheedullah (the Unity and Oneness of Allah) is the central tenet of Islam, and the Shia are guilty of violating this core belief by engaging in Shirk, which is the absolute major sin in Islam. The main emphasis in Islam is to stay away from Shirk, and yet the Shia embrace practises and customs that foster Shirk.
    • Who Invented Shirk?
    The people of Prophet Nuh (عليه السلام) were the originators of Shirk in the form of idol-worshipping. We see that the Shia have fallen into all the same traps as these people did. The Shia have erected shrines for their Imams and saints. They put up pictures of them and they invoke their names in prayer. Some even do Tasbeeh to their names. They ask their dead Imams and saints for special favors and believe in Waseelah through their Imams and saints.
    • Fatwa On Saying “Ya Ali Madad”
    Official Fatwa from the Permanent Committee and Fiqh Council on those who call for help from other than Allah, using such innovations as “Ya Ali Madad”.
    • Shrines: the Need to Raze Them and Level the Graves
    It is a sad state of affairs that errant Muslims have raised graves, mounted shrines over them, and exalted the dead as was the practise of the pagans before the Call to Islam. Today, Muslims have built huge shrines over the graves of some of the Ahlel Bayt, Sahabah, the righteous people, and others. This has led to the inevitable result of mimicking pagans who worship the dead, either directly or indirectly. There is therefore a necessity to raze to the ground these pagan shrines and to level the graves, as was the Sunnah.
    Saying “Ya Ali Madad” is Shirk

    The Shia are guilty of committing Shirk by giving characteristics of Allah to their Imams. The Shia even pray to their Imams and invoke their names by saying “Ya Ali” or “Ya Hussain” or “Ya Nabi!” They then proceed to make du’a asking for whatever they want. The famous Shia prayer “Ya Ali Madad” means “O Ali, help us!”

    According to the very basic principles of Islam, this is Shirk (associating partners with Allah). What power does Ali have to grant our requests? What power does Prophet Muhammad have to grant our requests? Indeed, nobody save Allah has the power to grant our requests.

    It is not permissible to ask Allah by the virtue of anyone, not even by the virtue of the Prophets or Messengers or Awliyaa’ or righteous people. No one can compel Allah to do anything. It is not permissible to ask Him in any way except by His Names and Attributes, as Allah says:

    “And (all) the Most Beautiful Names belong to Allah, so call on Him…” (Quran, 7:180)
    And yet we see the Shia saying things like “Naad-e-Ali” which means “call on Ali!” We should only call on Allah. Ali will tell these deviant Shia to stop calling him as he has no power, but rather to call Allah for help. In the same manner will Prophet Isa repudiate the Christians for calling on him as opposed to Allah.
    With regard to saying to the occupant of a grave, “O So and so, help me,” this is obviously Shirk, because it is a supplication to someone other than Allah. Asking by the virtue of someone is a means to Shirk, and calling upon a created being is Shirk in worship.

    How can a Muslim seek assistance from any other than Allah Almighty? Despite the fact that every Muslim must repeat the following words from the Quran in his prayer (salat) at least seventeen times a day:
    “You alone do we worship, and Your aid alone we seek.” (Quran, 1:5)

    We see the Shia saying things like “Ya Ali” and “Ya Mehdi” when they are distressed and need help. They will say “Ya Ali Madad!” These people cry out these names in times of distress when they wish for help. In true Islam, however, we should only say “Ya Allah!” Calling out anyone else’s name for help is Shirk, because we believe only Allah can help us! This is the Sunnah of the Prophet, as well as the way of Ali.
    Allah Almighty says clearly in the Quran:

    “And invoke not, besides Allah, [anyone since that] will neither profit you, nor hurt you, but if (in case) you did so, you shall certainly be one of the Zaalimoon (polytheists and wrongdoers). And if Allah should afflict you with harm, then there is none to remove it but He; and if He intends good to you there is none to repel His grace.” (Quran, 10:106-107)

    Humans, no matter their status, cannot help anyone or harm anyone. Only Allah Almighty can cause harm and only He can bring benefit to us. Allah Almighty says in the Quran:

    “Say [O Muhammad]: ‘I have no power over any good or harm to myself except as Allah wills’” (Quran, 7:188)

    If the Prophet could not even have power of good or harm over himself, then how can we say that he has such powers over others? If the Prophet himself declares that he cannot bring good or harm, then why are we asking him?

    Islam is a fiercely monothiestic faith, and rejects all forms of intermediaries with Allah. Intermediaries are none other than idols. The pagans believe that their idols are intermediaries, and they invoke them to ask God for help through them. So too do the Christians believe in Jesus as an intermediary to God. And so have the Imams become an intermediary and idols for the Shia.

    How often do we hear the Shia say: “Ya Ali, give us [such and such]” or “Ya Hussain, rescue us!” The Shia even go to the graves of their Imams, crying and rubbing their tombs; it is not unusual to see a Shia kissing the grave of his Imam and invoking the deceased Imam’s name in du’a. The Shia cry to their idols, kiss them, and invoke them.

    Then after doing all of this, the same Shia will say unashamedly about the Imam whose tomb they just cried to: “I do not worship him.” This fact is embodied in their dictum: “Call upon Ali, the revealer of wonders.” When these same people are asked if they worship Ali, they categorically deny this, despite the fact that they call upon his name (and their Imams) appealing for aid in obtaining their most demanding needs.
    This is exactly what modern day Hindus do. They worship idols, but if we ask them, they will look at us straight in the eye and say that they are monothiests. They claim that they aren’t worshipping the idols, and that the idols are just intermediaries to God.

    O Shia, come to the Call of Islam and to Absolute Tawheedullah (Oneness of Allah). “La Illaha Illalah”…There is no God except Allah! None is equal to Him and no partners and no intermediaries does He need.

    Allah Almighty says in the Quran:

    “The most beautiful names belong to Allah; so call on Him by them…” (Quran, 7:180)
    Allah did not say: “So call on Him by the names of the Imams, their shrines, etc.”

    Allah Almighty also said in the Quran:

    “And your Lord says: ‘Call on Me, I will answer your (prayer).’” (Quran, 40:60)
    Allah did not say: “Call on Me by the names of the Imams, I will answer your prayer.”
    We should invoke Allah and Allah alone for Help, and asking anyone else is Shirk, the one sin Allah will not forgive.

    Allah Almighty says it so clearly in the Quran:

    “Verily those whom you call upon besides Allah are servants like you. Therefore, call upon them, and let them listen to your prayers, if you are (indeed) truthful!” (Quran, 7: 194)

    This is a challenge from Allah, whereby Allah dares anyone to ask others for help. Nobody can listen to our prayers and grant them except Allah the Almighty.

    Allah Almighty mocks those people who go to graves to supplicate invoking their Saints:

    “If you invoke (or call upon) them, they hear not your call; and if (in case) they were to hear, they could not grant it (your request) to you….But you cannot make those hear who are in graves…” (Quran, Chapter 35)
    Islam shuns the superstitious (and useless) practise of visiting graves to worship (and in fact considers it Haram).

    Allah Almighty says in the Quran:

    “Call upon those whom you imagine beside Allah! They have not an atom’s weight of power either in the heavens or in the earth, nor have they any share in either, nor does He need any of them as a helper.” (Quran, 34:22)

    Allah Almighty says again in the Quran:

    “Yet have they taken, besides Him, gods that can create nothing but are themselves created; that have no control of hurt or good to themselves; nor can they control Death nor Life nor Resurrection.” (Quran, 25:3)
    Prophet Muhammad and Ali will say it proudly on the Day of Judgement that they are only slaves of Allah. In fact, the Prophet was asked by Allah if he would rather be a king of men or a slave of Allah. The Prophet chose to be a slave of Allah. There is no shame in this, and it is not belittling the status of either the Prophet nor Ali in the least in admitting that they cannot give benefit nor do harm even to themselves.
    The Christians may think that we are insulting Prophet Jesus by saying that he is only a slave, but the Quran says:

    “Christ disdains not to serve and worship Allah, nor do the angels, those nearest (to Allah).” (Quran, 4:172)

    The Prophet and Ali would be included in “those nearest (to Allah)” who would not disdain to serve and worship Allah. All are powerless except Allah, and this is why we ask only Him for help. This is the essence of Islam. Anything other than this is Shirk and subsequent Kufr.

    The Shia teach their children to supplicate by calling out the names of their Imams, thereby inculcating the habits of polythiesm in their children from a young age. This must be rejected, and children must be taught to only ask Allah for help and do so by using His Names, as mentioned in the Quran.

    We will even find Shia who recite the names of Ali, Hasan, and Hussain whilst they do Tasbeeh, and claim that this is Dhikr. It is nothing short of Shirk, and Ali would burn such people on the stake if he knew that they were doing such things. In a similar manner did Ali burn the followers of Abdullah ibn Saba to the stake for the very same blasphemy.

    The Shia believe that their prayers are accepted because they invoke the names of their Imams. They believe that the names of their Imams are the key-factor for acceptance of their prayers and a major prerequisite for getting invocations answered by Allah. This is similar to the unfounded claim by the polythiests who say that their idols draw them nearer to Allah.

    The polythiests would say that the idols are a “Waseelah” to bring them close to Allah. And likewise, the Shia say that their Imams and Saints are the Waseelah to Allah, intermediaries who can bring them closer to Allah. This is the concept of Tawassul, but it is rejected by true Muslims, who believe that the only Waseelah to Allah is to be pious and to invoke Allah and Allah alone for help!

    Whoever worships Ali, know that he is dead and that he cannot hear our cries, and even if he could, he could do nothing to help us. But whoever worships Allah, let him know that Allah is Alive and can never die, and that He has promised us help if we just turn to Him and Him alone. We should say only “Ya Allah Madad.”

    Edited By: Ibn al-Hashimi, http://www.ahlelbayt.com
    Ali (رضّى الله عنه) or Jesus (عليه السلام)?

    At first glance, these pictures seem like they are of Jesus Christ (عليه السلام) as depicted by the Christians. However, all of the pictures on this page are actually of Ali (رضّى الله عنه). Indeed, the Shia have done the same with Ali (رضّى الله عنه) that the Christians have done with Prophet Isa (عليه السلام). The Shia claim that they love Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and have thus exalted his status, but Ali (رضّى الله عنه) himself will condemn them on the Day of Judgement, just like Prophet Isa (عليه السلام) will condemn the Christians for falsely exalting his position.

    Allah Almighty says in the Quran:

    “O People of the Scripture, do not exceed limits in your religion beyond the truth and do not follow the inclinations of a people who had gone astray before and misled many and have strayed from the soundness of the way.” (Quran, 5:77)

    The Christians ascribe qualities of Allah to Prophet Isa (عليه السلام) in the name of loving him. So too do the Shia exalt the status of Imamah in order to praise Ali (رضّى الله عنه). The Shia say that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) is perfect, infallible, cannot make mistakes, cannot sin, knows Al-Ghaib (the Unseen), knows when he will die, dies only by his own wish, and has the power to do Tawassul for his followers. The Shia refer to Ali (رضّى الله عنه) as “Mazhar Al Aja-ib” which translates to “The Executor of Wonders,” a name that should only be used for Allah Almighty. The Christians call Isa (عليه السلام) the Son of God, but the Shia go one step even further and call Ali (رضّى الله عنه) to be the “Yadullah” or the “Hand of Allah.” The Shia call Ali (رضّى الله عنه) the Living “Ism-i Azam” or the Living “Supreme Name of God.”

    Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was a person, just like the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) was a person. Yes, they were best of people, but they were still people. They were still creation, and only Allah is the Creator. It should become all too obvious to the unbiased observor how similar the Shia are to the Christians. Even we can compare a picture of Ali (as depicted by the Shia) and Jesus (as depicted by the Christians) here. Notice the similarities:

    It is compeletly forbidden in true Islam to make pictures of the Prophets or Imams. This is considered Shirk and is a polythiestic practise of pagan people who desire to see the unseen because they are weak of faith and would rather worship idols as opposed to Allah Who is part of Al-Ghaib (the Unseen). The manner in which the Shia make portraits of these great figures is blasphemy and is actually very insulting to the Ahlus Sunnah. Yet, we see that the Shia worldwide put up pictures of Ali (رضّى الله عنه) in their houses. In fact, one simply has to turn on the television to see marches in Iraq in which the Shia are parading around with pictures of Ali (رضّى الله عنه).

    And this is not just done by some errant Shia, but rather it is sanctioned by the Shia Ulema. Ayatollah Sistani, one of the leading Shia Imams, said “it is permissible to hang them” in reference to pictures of Ali (رضّى الله عنه). When the Shia are questioned as to why they allow picture-making of their Imams, they will defend themselves with weak arguments; but the truth is clear to the believers who know that it can only be wrong. We wonder why these same Shia do not make pictures of the Prophet Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم)? Why then is it permissible to draw pictures of Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and not of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم)? And why not take it one step further and draw pictures of the Angels, Paradise, or even of Allah Almighty Himself?

    Below we have included some Shia pictures of Ali (رضّى الله عنه); we observe how dramatically similar they are to the Mushrik Christian depictions of Prophet Isa (عليه السلام). This is a mockery of Islam, and of the great Ali (رضّى الله عنه). Islam came to reject such polythiestic practises, and we find that the Ahlus Sunnah has never engaged in such blasphemy.

    Article Written By: Ibn al-Hashimi, http://www.ahlelbayt.com

    Ali’s Message (رضّى الله عنه) in Nahjul Balagha

    The Nahjul Balagha is considered sacred by the Shia, which they consider the most reliable source for the words, sermons, and letters of Ali (رضّى الله عنه). Let us examine one of these sermons in particular, which is available on the popular Shia website, Al-Islam.org:
    Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 126

    Ali says:

    “With regard to me, two categories of people will be ruined, namely he who loves me too much and the love takes him away from rightfulness, and he who hates me too much and the hatred takes him away from rightfulness. The best man with regard to me is he who is on the middle course. So be with him and be with the great majority of Muslims because Allah’s hand of protection is on keeping unity. You should beware of division because the one isolated from the group is a prey to Satan just as the one isolated from the flock of sheep is a prey to the wolf. Beware! Whoever calls to this course [of sectarianism], kill him, even though he may be under this headband of mine.”
    (Source: Al-Islam.org, http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/126.htm)

    Let us now reflect on the words of Ali (رضّى الله عنه), line by line.

    “With regard to me, two categories of people will be ruined, namely he who loves me too much and the love takes him away from rightfulness…”

    We could not possibly find a better description for the Shia than this. The Shia love Ali (رضّى الله عنه) so much that they exaggerate and exalt his status to a level of Shirk, thereby going away from rightfulness. The Shia give the names of Allah to Ali (رضّى الله عنه), calling him the Living “Ism-i Azam” of Allah, or the Living Supreme Name of Allah. They call Ali (رضّى الله عنه) the Mazhar Al Aja-ib (The Executor of Wonders) and Mushkil Kusha (the Remover of Hardships) . They exaggerate so much that they call Ali (رضّى الله عنه) to be the Yadullah (hand of Allah). They call him Asdadullah (unconquerable and ever-overpowering strength of Allah). They say Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was too powerful for even the angels to stop him, that all the atoms in the world submit to Ali (رضّى الله عنه), that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) is the speaking Quran, and is the Mirror of Allah.
    Look how loving Ali (رضّى الله عنه) too much has caused them to exaggerate his status like the Christians did with Jesus (عليه السلام), and look how this leads to Shirk. It also leads to going away from rightfulness, such as how the Shia hate the wives and companions of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). Ali (رضّى الله عنه) warned the Shia on this matter. And the source is the Shia’s very own Nahjul Balagha.

    “…and he who hates me too much and the hatred takes him away from rightfulness. The best man with regard to me is he who is on the middle course. So be with him and be with the great majority of Muslims because Allah’s hand of protection is on keeping unity.”

    Ali (رضّى الله عنه) says not to hate him like the Nasibis (haters of Ahlel Bayt). He then says that the best of people are the ones who are on the middle course. Who else is that other than the mainstream Muslims (i.e. the Ahlus Sunnah)? The Ahlus Sunnah loves Ali (رضّى الله عنه) deeply, and considers him one of the greatest Sahabah. On the other hand, the Ahlus Sunnah does not exaggerate by giving him characteristics of Allah, nor do they hate the wives or friends of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم).

    Ali (رضّى الله عنه) says be with the majority of Muslims because Allah’s hand of protection is on keeping unity. Can the Shia really get a clearer command than this? Who is the majority of the Muslims other than the orthodox Ahlus Sunnah? Ali (رضّى الله عنه) says be with the great majority of Muslims, not split up into these tiny Shia sects.

    “You should beware of division because the one isolated from the group is a prey to Satan just as the one isolated from the flock of sheep is a prey to the wolf.”

    So why is it then that the Shia have schismed from the Ummah? Are they not a prey of Shaitan’s now? And so it is that Shaitan has infiltrated the ranks of the Shia, leading so many millions of Shia astray. Why do the Shia not follow Ali (رضّى الله عنه) when he says to be with the great majority of Muslims?

    “Whoever calls to this course [of sectarianism], kill him, even though he may be under this headband of mine.”

    Even if someone claims to be a Shia’t Ali (i.e. under the headband of Ali), he really is an enemy of Ali (رضّى الله عنه) if he calls for sectarianism and the creation of a religious sect. This is Ali’s condemnation of all Shia sects that have split away from the mainstream Muslims. Ali (رضّى الله عنه) even commanded these heretics to be killed, so it can be seen that he has no compassion for any of these deviants even if they claim to love him.

    Article Written By: Ibn al-Hashimi, http://www.ahlelbayt.com

    Turbah: Sajdah to the Imams

    The Shia place a piece of stone or clay, known as “Turbah,” on the ground so that their forehead touches the stone when they prostrate themselves in prayer. The Turbahs are made out of the stone or clay from the shrines of Imams or saints. Oftentimes, the Turbah is made from the clay or stone from Imam Hussain’s shrine. The Shia Ulema have declared that no Turbah has a higher sacredness than a Turbah made from Imam Hussain’s shrine, not even the stone from the Holy Ka’abah.

    By praying to stones made from the shrines of their Imams and saints, the Shia are practising a polythiestic and paganistic act of grave-worshipping; they are quite literally making Sajood (prostration) to the Imams or saints. Indeed, praying to the Turbah of these Imams and saints is Bidah (evil innovation) and Shirk; it is not much different than idol worshipping. What is the difference between the idol that Hindus do Sajood to and the Turbah that the Shia do Sajood to? Both are considered Waseelah to bring them closer to God, and both of them are prostrated to.

    Shi’ism is rooted in Shirk; the Shia have allowed their so-called love for the Imams translate into polythiestic adoration.

    Article Written By: Ibn al-Hashimi, http://www.ahlelbayt.com

    Grave Worship

    We have seen in previous articles how the Shia believe that the Imams are infallible and posses many attributes of Allah. But the Shia don’t stop there; they have taken it to the next level. The Shia have erected shrines over the graves of their Imams. Millions of Shia from all over the world visit these shrines in Iran and Iraq to pray in them.

    The Ahlus Sunnah is stunned by this pagan practise of creating shrines and grave-worshipping. The Shia will argue that they really aren’t praying to the deceased, but that really doesn’t make any sense. Why then do they travel all the way to Iran to do prayer? Surely they believe there is some benefit of praying next to the body of a deceased Imam? Otherwise, why would they come from so far to do it?

    Shrines are completely Haram (forbidden) in Islam because they are paganistic and polythiestic in nature. Historically, Prophet Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) destroyed all the shrines in Mecca. This point cannot be stressed enough: the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) shed blood of the Sahabah in order that Mecca be cleansed of shrines, and this was one of the Prophet’s first legislative acts after the Muslims conquered Mecca. How is it that the Shia do not realize that what they are doing is completely antithetical to the entire mission of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) who was sent to guide a shrine-worshipping people?
    The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) repeatedly condemned grave-worshipping in the authentic Hadith:
    “Beware of those who preceded you and used to take the graves of their prophets and righteous men as places of worship, but you must not take graves as mosques; I forbid you to do that.” (Sahih Muslim)
    “May Allah’s curse be on the Jews for they built the places of worship at the graves of their Prophets.” (Sahih Bukhari)

    “May Allah curse the Jews and Christians for they built the places of worship at the graves of their Prophets.” (Sahih Bukhari)

    “If any religious man dies amongst those people they would build a place of worship at his grave and make these pictures in it. They will be the worst creature in the sight of Allah on the Day of Resurrection.” (Sahih Bukhari)

    “Do not sit on the graves and do not pray facing towards them.” (Sahih Bukhari)

    The first time in human history that people commited the sin of idol-worship was around the time of Prophet Nuh (عليه السلام). A very pious man passed away. Shaytan whispered in the ears of the tonwnspeople: he urged them never to forget this pious man lest the townspeople abandon his example and be lost to sin. Once Shaytan had convinced them of the necessity to revere the memory of this pious dead man, he then then convinced them to erect a shrine over the grave of this man. Eventually, the people started praying in the shrine, and soon thereafter Shaytan convinced them to pray to the deceased man.

    It was in this step by step fashion that Shaytan was able to misguide people into Shirk. He convinced them that they were doing a good thing by respecting a pious man, and he allowed them to add one Bidah (evil innovation) after another, infusing polythiestic practise in their belief. Likewise do the Shia believe that they are being pious by visiting shrines but in reality they have been fooled by Shaytan.

    Of course, the Shia will make the futile argument that they really aren’t praying to the deceased person. It just so happens that they pray next to the grave and supplicate. Indeed, this argument sounds very similar to what modern-day Hindus claim. Hindus say that they don’t really worship the idol itself, that they really are worshipping God, and that they are just facing the idol. We see there is very little difference between what the Shia say and what the Hindus say.

    The Islamic ethos deplores all idol-worshipping and is very strict in forbidding it. There is absolutely no point in praying next to someone’s grave. There is no benefit in it, and grave-worship is considered a grave sin (no pun intended). It is Shirk, and no matter what the intention is, it is still praying to the creation instead of the Creator. We urge any Shia reading this to immediately cease engaging in idol-worshipping. If a Muslim wants to “pay his respects” to a religious person of old, the best way to do that is to be an upright Muslim: to read Quran, to pray Salat, to give Zakat, to make Hajj, and to follow the Sunnah of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) does not want anyone to commit Shirk to him. Ali (رضّى الله عنه) does not want anyone to commit Shirk to him. Neither would any pious person ever want someone to use them to commit Shirk. The pious Muslims of the past would only want the Muslims of today to also be pious.

    It is polythiestic the manner in which the Shia go to their shrines and cry next to them, rub them, and pray to them. It is Shirk reminscent of the Jahiliyyah times when the pagan Arabs used to do this. Tawheedullah (the Unity and Oneness of Allah) is the central tenet of Islam, and the Shia are guilty of violating this core belief by engaging in Shirk, which is the absolute major sin in Islam. The main emphasis in Islam is to stay away from Shirk, and yet the Shia embrace practises and customs that foster Shirk.
    Article Written By: Ibn al-Hashimi, http://www.ahlelbayt.com

    Who Invented Shirk?

    The first people to commit Shirk (associating Partners with Allah) and idol-worship were the people of Prophet Nuh (عليه السلام). At that time, there were very few who could be called Mu’min, or good-doers; when one of the Mu’min passed away, Shaytan came to the remaining people and told them that they should never forget this Mu’min. To this, the people agreed. Shaytan then convinced the people that they should mark the grave of this Mu’min lest he be forgotten. The people agreed to this. Slowly and gradually, Shaytan convinced them to create new Bidah (innovations to Islam), such as build shrines around the graves of the man, and they began to refer to him as a “saint.”

    All of this Shaytan convinced the people that it was for a good cause: to remember the good-doers! Soon, Shaytan convinced the people to put up pictures of the pious people…then, he convinced them to go to their graves to worship…then, Shaytan told them to ask Allah for things by invoking the names of these saints…eventually, the people started using these saints as Waseelah, or intermediaries to Allah. They would invoke the names of the saints, and they would ask them for special favors. These people–the originators of Shirk–then crossed over to the obvious eventuality: they began worshipping the saints.
    The Shia have fallen into the same trap as the people of Prophet Nuh (عليه السلام). They have done the same with their Imams and saints. The Shia have erected shrines for their Imams and saints. They put up pictures of them and they invoke their names in prayer. Some even do Tasbeeh to their names. They ask their dead Imams and saints for special favors and believe in Waseelah through their Imams and saints.
    Another example for the Shia to ponder is the example of the Christians, who exalted the status of Prophet Isa (عليه السلام). The Christians say that they love Prophet Isa (عليه السلام) but the truth is that Prophet Isa (عليه السلام) will condemn them on the Day of Judgment. Likewise will Ali (رضّى الله عنه) condemn those Shia who have exalted his status.

    Why do people commit Shirk? Shirk is actually a reflection of the base and primitive carnal instincts of barbarian men. Primitive men have poor cognitive abilities and they do not possess the higher mental functions to even think of the Al-Ghaib (the Unseen). They can only see what is in front of their very own eyes. What they cannot see is not a reality, and they cannot deal with that. They are like animals; for example, the deer only reacts to a car that is about to hit it, but it does not possess the cognitive ability to think that maybe it should avoid roads because cars come there. It cannot imagine the cars, but can only see them when it is far too late, and the car comes crashing into it.
    Primitive man needs to worship whatever it can see: the sun, the moon, trees, rocks, people, shrines, etc. These are physical things and do not require advanced abstraction. But the reality is that “blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe.” Allah Almighty could easily reveal Himself and thus make everyone believe in Him, but the very purpose of the test is to believe in the Unseen and to reject the baseness of this Dunya (materialistic life).
    Primitive men cling to polythiestic practises such as Ziaarat, grave-worshipping, Turbah, pictures of their saints, shrines, etc…but Islam came to destroy polythiesm and paganism, and beckons its believers to let go of primitive practises and to instead worship Allah and Allah Alone. Allah is Unseen and yet we believe in His Omnipotency.

    Article Written By: Ibn al-Hashimi, http://www.ahlelbayt.com

    • Hey, Raj, dude, here’s a nice example of a non-Muslim terrorist in front of you. Would you mind condemning him as well? Now I can understand why Muslim murder people like Lucky. I don’t support such murders but I can feel the rage and anger of Muslims you arise by making such comments about our religion. That’s why Muslims kill you.

      • YO MO THE MONGREL SHIA KUFER,

        YOU ARE THE LOWEST PIECE OF SHIT ON THE PLANET!

        YOU BELONG TO A SECT THAT HANGS POETS, WOMEN, HOMOSEXUALS & ANYONE WHO POINTS OUT, THAT SHIAS ARE MONGREL DOGS, SUB HUMAN NEANDERTHALS.

        HERE IS A SUNNI BLOG EXPOSING THE MOST DEGRADING CULT IN THE WORLD:
        WOMEN & SEX IN SHIISM

        http://www.DiscoveringIslam.org

        To our best knowledge, there is no religion or cult in the world, more disgracing, more humiliating, more belittling and more degrading to women than the Shi’i Religion ever. This is another proof that the Jewish Rabbis, starting with Abdullah bin Saba’- the founder of Shi’ism – had a lot to do in formulating this so-called “Shi’i Islam” to act as a cavity, or better said, as the AIDS virus to destroy the Muslim Ummah from within. This page is dedicated to expose all I was able to read from the Shi’i Rabbis books regarding women, their usage as mere sexual objects and homosexuality, hoping to shed some light on this dark area of Shi’ism.

        General Characteristics of women:

        (1)”Narrated to us Ali bin Ahmad bin Abdullah bin Ahmad bin Abi Abdillah al-Barqi: Narrated my father, from his grandfather Ahmad bin Abi Abdillah, from his father, from Muhammad bin Abi Omair, from more than one person from the Truthful Ja’far bin Muhammad from his father, from his forefathers, peace be on them, said:

        One of the companions of Amirul-mu’mineen (Ali) complained to him his women. He [as] thus stood to address the public saying:

        O people, Obey not the women in any case, nor trust them with money, nor let them be in charge of the children, for if they are left to do what pleases them, they will lead (you) to troubles and aggress the rights of the lords. We found them to be unhesitant when they are in need, impatient when their (sexual) lust at peak, wasteful spending is part of them even if they are old, and self admiring follows them even at their senior age. They don’t appreciate the “much” when they are prevented the “little”. They forget the good and recall the bad. They rush to falsehood, insist on arrogance and follow Satan. So deal with them at any how, address them well that their deeds be well (as a result).

        Al-Amaali: Ibn Babawaih al-Qummi, the 37th council, narration No. 6, p.172

        (2) “Narrated few of our friends on the authority of Ahmad bin Abi Abdillah, from his father, from Wahab, from (Imam) Abu Abdullah [as] said: Amirul-Mu’mineen (Ali) [as] said:

        Men were created from Earth, and all they care for is the land. As for the woman, she was created from the man, and all she cares for is men, O Men, lock up your women”.
        Al-Kaafi ( fil Furoo’ ): al-Kulainy, Kitaab al-Nikah, Chapter What’s Recommended for Women Who Reached pubery…; vol.5, p.337, narration 6.

        Women are less Intelligent !!??:

        Shi’ites spare no opportunity to humiliate, degrade and belittle women but rush to grasp it, mainly because their Infallible Imams taught them so, and following the commands and footsteps of those “Infallibles” is naturally a virtue:

        “Narrated Muhammad bin Omar bin Salamah bin al-Baraa’ al-Hafiz al-Baghdadi: Narrated to us Ahmad bin Abdallah al-Thaqafi Abul-Abbas saying: Narrated to us Issa bin Muhammad al-Katib saying: Narrated to me al-Madayini from Ghiyath bin Ibrahim from the Truthful Ja’far bin Muhammad from his father from his grandfather, peace be on them, said: Ali bin Abi Talib [as] said:

        The brains of women are in their beauty, and the beauty of men is in their brains”.

        al-Amaali: Ibn Babawaih al-Qummi, the 40th Council, narration No. 9, p.189
        Q: What do Women, vehicles and houses have all in common according to the Infallible Shi’i Imams?
        A: bad luck. LOL

        “Narrated Muhammad bin Ali Majilwaih: Narrated to us Muhammad bin Yahya al-’Attaar saying: Narrated to us Sahl bin Ziyad al-Adami saying: Narrated to me Othman bin Issa from Khalid bin Nujaih from Abu Abdallah [as] saying:

        Bad luck was discussed in his presence, he [as] thus said: Bad luck are to be found in three things: in the woman, vehicle (horse, mule, camel, donkey, etc) and house. As for the bad luck in the woman, it is due to her high dowery and her disobedience to her husband, the vehicle is due to its attitude, and the house is due to its narrowness, its bad neighbor and its defects”.

        Al-Amaali: Ibn Babawaih al-Qummi, 42nd Council, Narration No.7, p.199, and in his al-Khisaal, Chapter of the Three, narration 53,p. 100

        Ashorter version of this narration is also found in al-Kafi (fil Furoo’): al-Kulainy, Book of Nikaah, Chapter: Nawadir, vol.5, p. 567, narration 51.

        Following is an interesting narration that induces us to ask whether Ali [ra] treated Fatimah [ra] as he advised the others:

        “Narrated to us Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Yahya al-’Attaar saying: Narrated to us my father from Muhammad bin al-Husain bin Abil-Khattab from Muhammad bin Sinaan, from Abi al-Jarood from Abu Ja’far al-Baqir [as] from his father, from his grandfather [as] saying: Amirul-Mu’mineen (Ali) [as] said:

        He who places himself in a suspicious position, let him not blame who misjudges him; and he who conceals his secret holds the choice. Any conversation surpasses two (people) will be spread around. Think well of your brother until you see of him otherwise, and think well of a word said by your brother if it is possible to be interpreted as such. Choose the truthful brothers and make lots of them, for they are your ornament in times of peace and your fort in times of need. Consult in your affairs those who fear Allah, and love the brothers according to their level of righteousness. Try to avoid the bad women, and ever be watchful of the best of them, if they enjoined good on you, disobey them so they won’t have a hope to have you obey them in that which is no good”.

        Al-Amaali: Ibn Babawaih al-Qummi, 50th Council, Narration No.8, p.250

        Lying on the Prophet [saw]:

        Lying on Allah [swt] and His Messenger [saw] is the profession of the Shi’ites’ Rabbis. Following are few examples of such lies:

        (1) “Narrated to us Muhammad bin Musa bin al-Mutawakkil [ra] saying: Narrated to us Abdullah bin Ja’far al-Humairi, from al-Fadl bin ‘Aamir, from Musa bin al-Qasim al-Bajaliy, from Thuraih al-Maharibiy, from Abu Abdullah [as] from his forefathers [as] saying: The Messenger of Allah [sawa] said:

        Three (types of people) if you don’t wrong them, they will still wrong you: The low class, your wife and your servant”.

        al-Khisaal: Ibn Babawaih al-Qummi, Chapter of the Three, narration 15, p.86

        (2) “Narrated to us my father [ra] saying: Narrated to us Sa’d bin Abdallah, from Ahmad bin al-Husain bin Sa’eed, from Abu al-Husain al-Hadramiy, from Musa bin al-Qasim al-Bajaliy, from Jameel bin Darraj, from Muhammad bin Sa’eed, from al-Muhariby, from Ja’far bin Muhammad, from his father, from his forefathers, from Ali [as] saying: The Messenger of Allah [sawa] said: Three (type of situations) are good lie in them: Trickery in a war, promising your wife, and reconciliation between people. There are three (types of situations) where telling the truth becomes ugly: snitching, telling the man something he may dislike about his wife, and to disbelieve the man over the rumor. He further said: And there are three (types of people) sitting with them kills the heart: sitting with the low class, talking to women, and sitting with the wealthy people”.
        al-Khisaal: Ibn Babawaih al-Qummi, Chapter of the Three, narration 20, p.87

        (3) (Narrated) Ali bin Muhammad, from Salih bin Abi Hammaad, from Haroon bin Muslim, from Buraidah bin Mu’awiyah from Abu Abdullah [as] said: A man came to the Messenger of Allah [pbuh] saying: O Messenger of Allah, I have the greatest of what men carry (size wise), is it fine if I use my own animals, like a camel or a donkey? Because indeed women cannot handle mine. The Messenger of Allah [pbuh] said: Allah most Exalted did not creat you until He created who can handle you. The man left, but soon returned and repeated to the Messenger of Allah what he initially told him. The Messenger of Allah [pbuh] said: Why don’t you seek a tall black woman? (Imam Abu Abdallah) Said: The man left, but soon returned to the Messenger [pbuh] saying: I really testify that you are indeed the Messenger of Allah. I looked for the type you asked me to seek and found who can handle me and I am contended”.

        al-Kafi ( fil Furoo’ ): al-Kulainy, Kitaab An-Nikah; Chapter Allah the Exalted Created for the People Their Peers; vol.5, p.336, narration 1.

        Discussion: What is actually meant by this narration, is that the man asked about having sex with the animals, and the Messenger [saw] did not rebuke him or forbid him from doing such horrible act, but simply told him, get a tall black woman, she can handle it. In other words, since the Messenger [saw] did not strongly condemn such a request, there is a room for those who feel like trying animals to do so. It further explains why the Ayatullas of Iran are focusing on Africa for their missionaries. LOL

        Virtues of Women’s Lust Over Men’s:

        (1) Several of our friends narrated, from Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Issa, from al-Husain bin Sa’eed, from al-Husain bin ‘Alwaan, from Sa’d bin Tareef, from al-Asbagh bin Nabatah said: Amirul-Mu’mineen (Ali) [as] said:

        Allah created the lust in ten parts, and has placed nine parts in women and one part for men. If it wasn’t for the shyness that Allah gave them according to their lust parts, each man would have had nine women hanging to him.”

        al-Kafi (fil Furoo’): al-Kulainy, Kitaab al-Nikah, Chapter The Virtues of Women’s Lust Over The Men’s, vol.5, p.337, narration 1.; al-Khisaal: Ibn Babawaih al-Qummi, Chapter of the Ten, Section: Lust Is Ten Parts, p.338, Narration 28.

        Discussion: Please read the narration once again. Does it make a sense? Probably the “Infallible” meant to say: each woman would have had nine men hanging to her. hahahahahaha

        What is more interesting thou, is the commentary of Ibn Babawaih al-Qummi on this narration. He wrote in the footnote: “Allah the Exalted, created lust in ten parts: Ten for men, and one for women. But that is specifically for Bani Hashim and their Shi’ites. And for the women of Bani Umayyah and their supporters, the lust is ten parts: nine for women, and one for men” ahahhahahaahhaha Subhanallah how Judaism work wonders.

        (2) “Several of our fellows narrated, from Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Khalid, from Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Abi Nasr, from whoever narrated to him, from Ishaaq bin Ammaar said: (Imam) Abu Abdullah [as] said:
        Verily, Allah made for the woman the patience of ten men, but when it hits her, she gets the lust power of ten men.”

        al-Kafi (fil Furoo’): al-Kulainy, Kitaab al-Nikah, Chapter The Virtues of Women’s Lust Over The Men’s, vol.5, p.337, narration 2; al-Khisaal: Ibn Babawaih al=Qummi, Chapter of The Ten, Section: Woman Has Patience of Ten Men, p.339, narration 32

        “Several of our fellows narrated, from Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Issa, from Muhammad bin Sinaan, from Abu Khalid al-Qammaat, from Durais, from (Imam) Abu Abdullah [as] said:
        I heard him (i.e the Imam) saying: Women were given an intercourse power of twelve (men) and the patience of twelve (men).”
        Ibid, p. 339, Narration 3.

        Comments: Please compare to the previous narration. Any discrepency on the part of the “Infallible” ? LOL
        UM Kalthoom, The Daughter of Ali:

        One of the major embarrassments to Shi’ites, is the fact that Ali [ra] gave his daughter Um Kulthoom to Caliph Omar bin al-Khattab as a wife. This, if indicative of any, is an indication that Ali [ra] had no hard feelings toward Omar, to the contrary, he named three of his sons in the following order: Abu Bakr, Omar & Othman. A fact, the Shi’ites hate to mention, and actually seldom mention them, or attribute any virtues to them, simply because it will ruin the myth that the Jew Ibn Saba’ fabricated for them. Let us examine what they have to say about this marriage:

        (1) “(Narrated) Ali bin Ibrahim, from his father, from Ibn Abi Umair, from Hisham bin Salim and Hammaad, from Zurara, from Abu Abdullah [as] in reference to the marriage of Um Kalthoom, said:
        That is a cunt we were forced to give up.”

        Al-Kaafi (fil Furoo’): al-Kulainy, Book of Nikah, Chapter: Marriage of Um Kulthoom, vol. 5, p. 346, Narration 1.

        (2) “(Narrated) Muhammad bin Abi Umair, from Hisham bin Salim from Abu Abdullah [as] said:

        When (Omar) requested the engagement (of Um Kalthoom) from him, Amirul-Mu’mineen (Ali) said to him: She is still young. (Abu Abdullah) said: He (Omar) then met al-Abbaas (the uncle of Ali) and said to him: Why? What is wrong with me? (al-Abbaas) Said: What is it? (Omar) Said: I approached the son of your brother for the engagement (of his daughter), but he turned me down. By Allah I shall backfill Zamzam and leave no virtue for you (Tribe of Hashim) but nullify it, and I shall bringforth two false witnesses testifying that he stole, and shall cut off his right (hand). al-Abbaas then approached him (i.e, Ali) and told him that, and asked him to make him in charged of the matter, which he did.”

        al-Kafi (fil Furoo’): al-Kulainy, Book of Nikah, Chapter: marriage of Um Kalthoom, vol. 5, p. 346, Narration 2.

        The Scientific Side Effect of Wearing Black & Yellow Shoes:

        Let’s examine how scientific are these “Infallibles”:

        “Narrated to us my father [ra] saying: Narrated Ahmad bin Idris saying: Narrated to me Muhammad bin Ahmad, from Musa bin Omar, from Abdallah bin Jablah, from Hanan bin Sudair who said:
        I entered on Abu Abdallah [as] wearing a black shoe, and he said: Why are you wearing a black shoe? Did you not know there are three characteristics in it? The narrator said: I said, what are they; may I be your ransom? He [as] said:

        It weakens your vision, loosens your penis and brings you depression.

        On top of that, it is part of the arrogant apparel. Wear the yellow shoes, for in it is three characteristics. The narrator said: I said, what are they? He [as] said:

        It sharpens the vision, strengthens the penis and puts away the depression, and furthermore, it is part of the Prophets [as] apparel”.

        Al-Khisaal: Ibn Babawaih al-Qummi, Chapter of the Three, narration 50, p.99

        * Similar reports are found in al-Kafi(fil-Furoo’): al-Kulainy, Kitaab: AzZay wat-Tajammul (Apparel & Beautification), Chapter: Shoe Colors, vol.6, p.465, narrations: 1, 2 & 4

        Comments: It is time to put the Imam’s infallibility on the line. Either all Shi’a who wear black shoes are on Viagra or those Imams don’t know what they are talking about. ahahhahahahahhaha but if that what happens to the man, I wonder what would happen to the woman who wears a black shoe, LOL

        Let’s Go Eye Shopping:

        There is basically nothing taught by Allah [swt] & His Messenger [saw] that the Shi’i Rabbis agree to. In fact, there is no evil left that they did not enjoin on their followers, starting with the 1st step of spreading Zina (fornication, adultery) which is to eye shop women, when Allah [swt] said, in several places in His Glorious Book: 24:30 Say to the believing men that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty: that will make for greater purity for them: and Allah is well acquainted with all that they do.

        “(Narrated) Muhammad bin Yahya, from Ahmad bin Muhammad, from Ali bin al-Hakam, from Ali bin Suwaid said: I said to Abu al-Hasan [as]:

        I have the problem of looking at the pretty woman, so I (keep) looking at her. He said: Laa Ba’s (No Problem) if Allah knows that your intention is true, but beware of Zina, it causes the blessings and faith to perish.

        al-Kafi (fil Furoo’): al-Kulainy, Book of Nikaah, Chapter of Zina, vol.5, p.542, narration 6.

        Sodomy & Homosexuality are Halaal?? !!!

        Amazing how these Shi’a Rabbis lie on Allah, the Apostle and their own Imams, in a manner that is most insulting to the family of the Messenger [saw], which strengthen the belief that this cult is in fact the product of a few Jewish Ribbis:

        (1) “(Narrated) Ali bin Ibrahim from his father from al-Nufaly from As-Sukoony from (Imam) Abu Abdallah [as] said: Amierul-Mu’mineen (Ali) [as] said: (al-Luwaat ma doon ad-dubur, wad-dubur huwal-kufr) Sodomy is in (anything) other than dubur (anal sex), for dubur [has multi meanings] is actually the Kufr (disbelief)”.
        The commentator on al-Kafi wrote: “It is possible to understand (from the statement) that Sodomizing (a man) is permissible”
        al-Kafi (fil Furoo’): Book of Marriage: Chapter of Sodomy,narration 3, vol.5, p.544
        Mashallah !! what a religion !

        (2) “(Narrated) Muhammad bin Yahya, from Ahmad bin Muhammad, from Muhammad bin Yahya, from Talha bin Zaid, from Abu Abdullah [as] said: The Messnenger of Allah [pbuh] said:
        Whoever volunterily let others sexually molest him, Allah will invest him with women’s lust.”
        al-Kafi (fil Furoo’): al-Kulainy, Book of Nikaah, Chapter: Who Let Others Sexually Molest Him, vol.5, p.549, narration 1.

        Comment: May Allah curse the liars who lie on the Apostle of Allah [saw].

        (3) “(Narrated Muhammad, from Ahmad bin Muhammad, from Ali bin al-Hakam, from Abdul-Rahman al-’Azramy, from Abu Abdullah [as] said: Amirul-Mu’mineen (Ali) [as] said:
        There are servant (men) of Allah who carry in their lions uteruses like those of women. (Abu Abdullah) Said: He was asked: Then Why they don’t get pregnant? He (Ali) said: Because it is (placed) upside down. They also have glands in their anuses like that of the camel, if erupted they erupt with it, and if it cooled down, they cool down with it.”
        ibid, narration 3.

        My Goddddddddd, men have uteruses??? hahahahahahahhahahaah what an Infallible, hehehheheehehe.
        (4) “(Narrated) Muhammad bin Yahya , from Ahmad bin Muhammad, from Ali bin al-Hakam said: I heard Safwaan bin Yahya saying:

        I said to (Imam) al-Rida [as]: a man among your followers requested me to ask you about a matter, which he feared and embarrassed to ask you (directly). He [as] said: What is it? I said: For the man to use the woman’s anus. He said: He may. I said: Do you personally do that? He said: We do not do that.”
        al-Kafi (fil Furoo’): al-Kulainy, Book of Nikaah, Chapter: Women’s anuses, vol.5, p.540, narration 2.
        Comments: Typical hypocrisy condemned by Allah [swt] when He said:61:03-04 …Why say ye that which ye do not? Grievously hateful is it in the sight of Allah that ye say that which ye do not. And is typical to the Devil Iblis’ behavior 59:16 Like Satan when he says to man “disbelieve”: but when (man) disbelieves, Satan says: I am free of thee: I do fear Allah, the Lord of the Worlds. Nevertheless, the Shi’ites are people who love to dive in swamps and isles of human waste.

        (5) “(Narrated) al-Hussain bin Ali bin Yaqteen said: I asked Abul-Hassan [as] about the permessibility for the man to have anal sex with women, he [as] said: It was made halal (permissible) in the Book of Allah, when (Prophet) Lot said: 11:78 Here are my daughters, they are purer for you and he knew it was not the vagina they were after.”

        Tafseer al-Ayyashi, vol.1, p.157; Bihaar al-Anwaar vol.21, p.98; Tafseer al-Burhaan vol.2, p.230
        (6) “Narrated Abdullah bin Abi Ya’foor: I asked Abu Abdullah [as] about approaching women thru their anus, he said: No Problem. He then recited: 2:223 Your women are as tilth unto you, so approach your tilth when (or how) ye will .”

        Tafseer al-Ayyashi, vol.1, p.110;Bihaar al-Anwaar Baqir al-Majlisi, vol.23, p.98; al-Burhaan fee Tafseer al-Qur’an: Hashim al-Bahraani, vol.1, p.219; Wasaa’il al-Shi’a: al-Hur al-Amily, vol.3, chpater 73: An-Nikaah wa Aadabuh

        Comments: This is another evidence on how mentally sick these clerics are, and how Satanic they get to distort the Words of Allah or their meanings to lead their followers to behave as the people of Prophet Lot, whom Allah has condemned in all Scriptures.

        (7) Narrated Muhammad bin Yahya, from Ahmad bin Muhammad, from al-Barqiy reporting (Imam) Abu Abdullah [as] sa saying:

        “If the man used the woman’s anus, but did not ejaculate, there is no Ghusl on either one. But if he ejaculated, he must take a ghusl, not her.”

        al-Kafi (fil Furoo’): al-Kulainy, Book of Tahra, Chapter: What Mandates Ghusl on the Man and Woman, vol.3, p.47, narration 8

        Comments: Let us see what comment did Rabbi Ali Akbar al-Ghaffari give on this narration:

        “The fellows (Shi’i Rabbis) dispute was over the Ghusl if the intercourse was in the woman’s anus. The majority, among them the Sayyid, Ibn al-Junaid, Ibn Hamza, Ibn Idris, al-Muhaqqiq (al-Damaad), and the Allamah (al-Majlisi) in several of his books, are of the opinion that it is mandatory to take ghusl. The Sheikh (i.e., At-Tusi) in his al-Istibsaar as well as in his al-Nihayah, the Sadooq (Ibn Babawaih al-Qummi), Sallaar have all said it is not mandatory. As for the intercourse in the man’s anus, they’ve also disputed it. The Sayyid Racist Imams ???

        While Allah [swt] says: 49:13. O Mankind, We created you from a single (pair) of a male and female, and made you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each others. Verily the most honored of you in the sight of Allah is (he who is) the most righteous of you, we find that those “Infallible” , who are the Deputies of Allah, preach racism in its ugliest form. While the following reports are sad, yet you will find them funny, so here we go:

        (1) “(Narrated) Ali bin Ibrahim, from Haroon bin Muslim, from Mas’adah bin Ziyad, from Abu Abdullah [as] said: Amirul-Mu’mineen (Ali) [as] said:

        Beware of marrying the Negros (zunj) for they are a distorted creation.”
        al-Kafi (fil Furoo’): Book of Nikah, Chapter: Whom (the Imam) Disliked for Marriage Amongst the Kurdish, Negros and Others, vol. 5, p. 352, Narration 1.

        (2) (Narrated) Ali bin Ibrahim, from Ismael bin Muhammad al-Makki, from Ali bin al-Husain, from ‘Amr bin Othman, from al-Husain bin Khalid, from whom he mentioned from Abu Ar-Rabi’ al-Shami said: Abu Abdullah [as] said to me:

        Do not buy anyone who is a negro, but if you must, then (buy) the Nubians, for they are amongst those whom Allah the Exalted said about them: 5.14 From those too, who call themselves Christians, We did take a covenant, but they forgot a good part of the Message that was sent them . Surely, a time will come when they will remember that portion, and when the Qa’im (Mahdi) arise, a group of them will come to his support, but never marry anyone of the Kurdish (people) for they are part of the Jinn (demons) whom the screen was lifted from them”
        Ibid, narration 2

        Comments: by “whom the screen was lifted from them” he meant, the screen or divider which Allah has created between us human and Jinn, where we are unable to see them but they can see us.
        The KURDS, according to this narration, are a type of demons which we are enabled to see.
        (3)” (Narrated) Several of our fellows from Sahl bin Ziyad, from Musa bin Ja’far, from ‘Amr bin Sa’eed, from Muhammad bin Abdillah al-Hashimi, from Ahmad bin Yousuf, from Ali bin Dawood al-Haddaad, from Abu Abdullah [as] said:

        Marry not from the Negros nor the Khazar, for they have uteruses indicate they are unfaithful. He [as] further said: India, Sind and Qind not a single one of them is smart, meaning Qandaharis
        Ibid, Narration 3.

        Comments: Khazar is the area around the Black Sea, and Qandahar is in Afghanistan.
        http://www.DiscoveringIslam.org

        • Lucky bin Satan, Shias are very good people. They have their faith and their beliefs as Hindus have theirs in believing in Idols which cannot lift a finger and have NO hearts!! Like Christians who always think that JEWS who killed Jesus by slaying him and hanging on a tree, are their brethren, forgetting that they are actually Paulians and that in fact means their ‘following’ is a Cult!!

          If their leaders impose some directions..then it is none of anybody’s business…..to them is theirs and to you is yours!

          You should be worried about this….. Acts 5:30 : Jesus whom you slew and hung him on a tree!!!! Where is the Cruci-Fiction????? Jesus was NEVER crucified and that is what the Quran CLEARLY says!!!!!!!!

          Quran 4:157/8 “That they said (in boast), “We killed Al-Masih ‘Isa the son of Maryam, the Messenger of Allah”; but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.[158] Nay, Allah raised him up unto Himself; and Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.(as all are raised unto Allah on death)

          • THE HARRY POTTER ARABIAN BOOK – QURAN IS ALL ABOUT SATAN – HELL – JINNS, BUT THE FACT IS,

            THERE IS NO SUPERNATURAL BEING NAMED SATAN!

            THAT IS A ZOROASTRIAN MYTH OF DUALISM, WHICH WAS BROUGHT BACK FROM BABYLON BY EZRA & THE DIASPORA JEWS.

            THEY PRODUCED TALMUDIC JUDAISM, WITH THE HELP OF THE PHARISEES.

            JESUS THE PROPHET OF NAZARETH CONDEMNED TALMUDIC JUDAISM!

            GENESIS 2:17 THE TREE OF GOOD & EVIL, WHICH GOD PLANTED & MAN EAT FROM.

            JEREMIAH 17:9-10; JAMES 1:12-20

            THE “HEART” & MIND OF MAN IS THE ESSENCE OF EVIL & JAMES TELLS US HOW IT STARTS & COMES TO FRUITION.

            JEREMIAH 17:9-10

            9 “The human mind is the most deceitful of all things. It is incurable.
            No one can understand how deceitful it is.
            10 I, the LORD, search minds and test hearts.
            I will reward each person for what he has done.
            I will reward him for the results of his actions.

            JAMES 1:12-27

            12 Blessed are those who endure when they are tested. When they pass the test, they will receive the crown of life that God has promised to those who love him. 13 When someone is tempted, he shouldn’t say that God is tempting him. God can’t be tempted by evil, and God doesn’t tempt anyone. 14 Everyone is tempted by his own desires as they lure him away and trap him. 15 Then desire becomes pregnant and gives birth to sin. When sin grows up, it gives birth to death.
            16 My dear brothers and sisters, don’t be fooled. 17 Every good present and every perfect gift comes from above, from the Father who made the sun, moon, and stars. The Father doesn’t change like the shifting shadows produced by the sun and the moon.
            18 God decided to give us life through the word of truth to make us his most important creatures.
            19 Remember this, my dear brothers and sisters: Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and should not get angry easily. 20 An angry person doesn’t do what God approves of. 21 So get rid of all immoral behavior and all the wicked things you do. Humbly accept the word that God has placed in you. This word can save you.
            22 Do what God’s word says. Don’t merely listen to it, or you will fool yourselves. 23 If someone listens to God’s word but doesn’t do what it says, he is like a person who looks at his face in a mirror, 24 studies his features, goes away, and immediately forgets what he looks like. 25 However, the person who continues to study God’s perfect laws that make people free and who remains committed to them will be blessed. People like that don’t merely listen and forget; they actually do what God’s laws say.
            26 If a person thinks that he is religious but can’t control his tongue, he is fooling himself. That person’s religion is worthless. 27 Pure, unstained religion, according to God our Father, is to take care of orphans and widows when they suffer and to remain uncorrupted by this world.
            OK?

            NOW WE WILL QUOTE THE ARABIAN HARRY POTTER QURAN:

            QURAN, SURA 17:61-64
            17:61

            Sahih International
            And [mention] when We said to the angles, “Prostrate to Adam,” and they prostrated, except for Satan. He said, “Should I prostrate to one You created from clay?”

            17:62

            Sahih International
            [Iblees] said, “Do You see this one whom You have honored above me? If You delay me until the Day of Resurrection, I will surely destroy his descendants, except for a few.”

            17:63

            Sahih International
            [ Allah ] said, “Go, for whoever of them follows you, indeed Hell will be the recompense of you – an ample recompense.

            17:64

            Sahih International
            And incite [to senselessness] whoever you can among them with your voice and assault them with your horses and foot soldiers and become a partner in their wealth and their children and promise them.” But Satan does not promise them except delusion.

            QURAN SURA 15:26-43

            15:26

            Sahih International
            And We did certainly create man out of clay from an altered black mud.

            15:27

            Sahih International
            And the jinn We created before from scorching fire.

            15:28

            Sahih International
            And [mention, O Muhammad], when your Lord said to the angels, “I will create a human being out of clay from an altered black mud.

            15:29

            Sahih International
            And when I have proportioned him and breathed into him of My [created] soul, then fall down to him in prostration.”

            15:30

            Sahih International
            So the angels prostrated – all of them entirely,

            15:31

            Sahih International
            Except Satan, he refused to be with those who prostrated.

            15:32

            Sahih International
            [ Allah ] said, O Satan, what is [the matter] with you that you are not with those who prostrate?”

            15:33

            Sahih International
            He said, “Never would I prostrate to a human whom You created out of clay from an altered black mud.”

            15:34

            Sahih International
            [ Allah ] said, “Then get out of it, for indeed, you are expelled.

            15:35

            Sahih International
            And indeed, upon you is the curse until the Day of Recompense.”

            15:36

            Sahih International
            He said,”My Lord, then reprieve me until the Day they are resurrected.”

            15:37

            Sahih International
            [ Allah ] said, “So indeed, you are of those reprieved

            15:38

            Sahih International
            Until the Day of the time well-known.”

            15:39

            Sahih International
            [Iblees] said, “My Lord, because You have put me in error, I will surely make [disobedience] attractive to them on earth, and I will mislead them all

            15:40

            Sahih International
            Except, among them, Your chosen servants.”

            15:41

            Sahih International
            [ Allah ] said, “This is a path [of return] to Me [that is] straight.

            15:42

            Sahih International
            Indeed, My servants – no authority will you have over them, except those who follow you of the deviators.

            15:43

            Sahih International
            And indeed, Hell is the promised place for them all.

            BIBLICAL CONCEPTS:

            WHO IS “SATAN” IN THE BOOK OF JOB?

            Satan in the Book of Job: The Facts

            The Book of Job does not tell us many facts concerning the identity of Satan, which is doubtless why it forms such a mystery. Nevertheless we do glean two things from the passages where Satan is mentioned:

            Satan presented himself before God

            Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them. (Job 1:6 RSV)

            Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the LORD. (Job 2:1 RSV)

            Satan is given the authority (by God) to cause calamity to Job

            The LORD said to Satan, “Very well, then, everything he has is in your hands, but on the man himself do not lay a finger.” (Job 1:12)

            The LORD said to Satan, “Very well, then, he is in your hands; but you must spare his life.” So Satan went out from the presence of the LORD and afflicted Job with painful sores from the soles of his feet to the top of his head. (Job 2:6-7)

            These two dialogues, in Job 1 and 2 respectively, are the only appearances of the word “Satan” in the book of Job. So the information we have to work with to understand who “Satan” is, is minimal. To help us understand these quotes it is useful to explore occurrences of the two facts: ‘presenting oneself before the Lord’ and the ‘power to cause calamity’ in other parts of the Bible.

            Comparing the facts in Job with other Scriptures

            Presenting oneself before the Lord
            It is noteworthy that in the Bible those who present themselves before the Lord are invariably men: not angels, nor any other type of being. Here are some examples:

            The LORD said to Moses… “Be ready in the morning, and then come up on Mount Sinai. Present yourself to me there on top of the mountain.” (Exodus 34:1-2)

            The priest who pronounces him clean shall present both the one to be cleansed and his offerings before the LORD at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting. (Leviticus 14:11)

            Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy… (Jude 1:24 KJV)

            By contrast, the angels are described as being permanently in the presence of God.

            “See that you do not look down on one of these little ones. For I tell you that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father in heaven.” (Matthew 18:10)

            On the basis of the evidence above, we are left to question who then was:

            “…Satan came also among them to present himself before the LORD”?

            If the scriptural pattern is consistent the answer is that it must be men, appearing in a place of worship or otherwise who are presenting thoughts to God, e.g. in prayer or meditation.

            Furthermore the Bible categorically states that an angel could not have brought this slanderous accusation against Job in the presence of God:

            …angels, although they are stronger and more powerful, do not bring slanderous accusations against [righteous men] in the presence of the Lord. (2 Peter 2:11)

            The Power to cause Calamity

            The Bible makes clear that God has ultimate control over everything, including the power to allow or prevent the evil behavior of men. The power to cause calamitous diseases is beyond the capacity of humans and must come solely from God.

            “I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me: That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD, and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.” (Isaiah 45:5-7 KJV)

            If God is the sole source of such calamity it must be God who brought the evil upon Job. This conclusion is harmonious with the text in Job, which also affirms that God was the one who afflicted him:

            All his [Job’s] brothers and sisters and everyone who had known him before came and ate with him in his house. They comforted and consoled him over all the trouble the LORD had brought upon him, and each one gave him a piece of silver and a gold ring. (Job 42:11)

            Nevertheless the explanation that God was the “Satan” who afflicted Job does not satisfy all the verses, because clearly God is speaking to a second party when discussing Job’s impending calamities.

            The LORD said to Satan, “Very well, then, he is in your hands; but you must spare his life.” So Satan went forth from the presence of the LORD, and afflicted Job with loathsome sores from the sole of his foot to the crown of his head. (Job 2:6-7)

            So who is this second party to whom God is speaking? The answer is that when God acts to bring calamity (or deliverance) in scripture, it is commonly described as being performed by an angel acting under the divine directive. There is much evidence for this; here are just two examples:

            “My God sent his angel, and he shut the mouths of the lions. They have not hurt me, because I was found innocent in his sight. Nor have I ever done any wrong before you, O king.” (Daniel 6:22)

            He unleashed against them his hot anger, his wrath, indignation and hostility– a band of destroying angels. He prepared a path for his anger; he did not spare them from death but gave them over to the plague. (Psalm 78:49-50)

            Who then is the Satan sent out of God’s presence to afflict Job? The scriptural answer must be that “Satan” is an angel, obediently performing God’s decisions to allow Job to suffer affliction.

            But now we seem to have two Satans: the jealous men and the destroying angel! How are we to determine who is Satan — or are they both Satan? We account for this apparent discrepancy by realizing that the term “Satan” in Hebrew is a title given to something or someone, which is in opposition, rather than to a particular person himself. Thus the title “Satan” belongs to whoever is in opposition at that time (much like the title of “King” or “governor” therefore, it can pass from person to person through time). Consequently “Satan” is used to describe the men whilst they generate their jealous hatred of Job, and “Satan” is used to describe the angel whilst he is directed by God to act upon this jealous hatred.

            “Satan” is not the only Hebrew word that is used in this generic titular fashion. It will enhance our understanding of the use of the word “Satan” in Job to consider at least one other Hebrew word, which is used in this way.

            GENERIC TITLES IN SCRIPTURE

            Certain words in scripture are generic titles, rather than personal names. That is to say their application is not restricted to a particular personality, but is applied to a variety of different people at such times as they satisfy the criteria for the title, much like the title of an office. Two specific examples of this are the words: “Elohim” and “Satan.”

            EXAMPLE 1 ELOHIM: — A TITLE FOR MIGHTY ONES (s)

            “Elohim” is a Hebrew title for one who stands in great power, to rule and judge. This title is applied across the entire range of scriptural characters, from (a) God, to (b) angels, to (c) human men.

            (a) God as “Elohim”

            In the beginning God [Hebrew: ELOHIM] created the heavens and the earth. (Genesis 1:1)

            (b) Angels as “Elohim”

            “What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visits’ him? For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels [Hebrew: ELOHIM], and hast crowned him with glory and honour.” (Psalm 8:4-5 KJV)

            (c) Human men as “Elohim”

            But if the servant declares, “I love my master and my wife and children and do not want to go free,” then his master must take him before the judges [Hebrew: ELOHIM]. He shall take him to the door or the doorpost and pierce his ear with an awl. Then he will be his servant for life. (Exodus 21:5-6)

            Example 2 SATAN — A TITLE FOR AN OPPONENT

            The title “Satan” is equally generic in scripture. It is not a personal name, and thus again its use is not limited to a single character. The title “Satan” is applied for one who stands in opposition; and it is applied, in the same way as “Elohim,” across the full spectrum of scriptural characters from a) God, to b) angels, to c) human men.
            (a) God as “Satan” (Compare these two parallel accounts)

            “Again the anger of the LORD burned against Israel, and he incited David against them, saying, “Go and take a census of Israel and Judah.” (2 Samuel 24:1)

            “SATAN rose up against Israel and incited David to take a census of Israel”. (1 Chronicles 21:1)

            (b) AN ANGEL AS “SATAN”

            But God’s anger was kindled because he went; and the angel of the LORD took his stand in the way as his adversary [Hebrew: SATAN]. Now he was riding on the ass, and his two servants were with him. (Numbers 22:22 RSV)

            (c) A HUMAN MAN AS “SATAN”

            “Jesus turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, SATAN! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men.” (Matthew 16:23)

            THE BIG PICTURE OF GOD & “SATAN” IN SCRIPTURE

            To gain a deeper understanding of the real interplay in the book of Job, it is essential to analyze the broader relationship in scripture between God and the various parties who adopt the role of Satan. We find that this relationship adopts the same characteristic three-point trend, as shown below. We shall then use this model to solve the puzzling mystery of who is Satan in the book of Job.

            TREND OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GOD & “SATAN” IN THE BIBLE

            {1} God pronounces a truth.
            {2} Satan opposes God’s truth (“opposes” by definition) and declares a lie.
            {2b} Often this lie is an accusation against a righteous man.
            {3} God invariably rebukes Satan for his error.

            Here are example cases from which we establish this trend as scripturally valid. The first example is the classic encounter in the Garden of Eden.

            EXAMPLE 1: THE SERPENT IN EDEN BRINGING THE DOWNFALL OF MAN

            {1} Pronouncement of God’s truth:

            “And the LORD God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die.” (Genesis 2:16-17)

            {2} Satan opposes, speaking lies:

            “You will not surely die,” the serpent said to the woman. “For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” (Genesis 3:4-5)

            [Revelation 12:9 shows that the serpent of Eden can indeed be called Satan]

            {2b} Satan’s lies are accusations against the righteous (notice the reference to the “ancient serpent,” which shows that this is a commentary on the Eden story)

            “And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the Devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world–he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him. And I heard a loud voice in heaven, saying, “Now the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ have come, for the accuser of our brethren has been thrown down, who accuses them day and night before our God.” (Revelation 12:9-10 RSV)

            {3} Satan is rebuked by God

            “So the LORD God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, Cursed are you above all the livestock and all the wild animals! You will crawl on your belly and you will eat dust all the days of your life. And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” (Genesis 3:14-15)

            This archetypal relationship between God and whoever is in the role of Satan is evidenced in later scriptural scenarios. Here is the evidence: notice the characteristic points of the relationships in each case.

            EXAMPLE 2: PETER CONTRADICTING JESUS

            {1} Pronouncement of God’s truth

            “From that time on Jesus began to explain to his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things at the hands of the elders, chief priests and teachers of the law, and that he must be killed and on the third day be raised to life”. (Matthew 16:21)

            {2} Satan opposes, speaking untruth

            “Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him. “Never, Lord!” he said. “This shall never happen to you!” (Matthew 16:22)

            {3} Satan is rebuked

            “Jesus turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men.” (Matthew 16:23)

            EXAMPLE 3: THE ENEMIES OF JUDAH FRUSTRATING THE REBUILDING OF THE TEMPLE

            {1} Pronouncement of God’s truth

            “…the LORD moved the heart of Cyrus king of Persia to make a proclamation throughout his realm and to put it in writing: “…The LORD, the God of heaven… has appointed me to build a temple for him at Jerusalem in Judah. Anyone of his people among you–may his God be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem in Judah and build the temple of the LORD, the God of Israel, the God who is in Jerusalem.” (Ezra 1:1-3)

            {2} Satan opposes…

            “When the enemies of Judah and Benjamin heard that the exiles were building a temple for the LORD, the God of Israel… [they] set out to discourage the people of Judah and make them afraid to go on building”. (Ezra 4:1,4)

            {2b} …by making accusatory lies against the righteous

            At the beginning of the reign of Xerxes, they lodged an accusation against the people of Judah and Jerusalem… This is a copy of the letter they sent him… “The king should know that the Jews who came up to us from you have gone to Jerusalem and are rebuilding that rebellious and wicked city.” (Ezra 4:6,11-12)

            {3} Satan is rebuked by God for his slander upon Jerusalem. (Zechariah is commenting on the same historical events recorded in Ezra — see also Jude 1:9.)

            “Then he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the LORD, and Satan standing at his right side to accuse him. The LORD said to Satan, “The LORD rebuke you, Satan! The LORD, who has chosen Jerusalem, rebuke you! Is not this man a burning stick snatched from the fire?” (Zechariah 3:1-3)

            RECONSTRUCTION OF EVENTS IN THE BOOK OF JOB

            Using the model above of the three-point relationship between God and Satan in scripture, we can now identify who “Satan” is in Job. The way we achieve that is by looking for the signature characteristics of the behavior of Satan, which we have deduced in the previous section.

            We expect to find:

            {1} A pronouncement of God’s truth in the presence of Satan

            “Then the LORD said to Satan, “Have you considered my servant Job? There is no one on earth like him; he is blameless and upright, a man who fears God and shuns evil.” (Job 1:8 c.f. Job 1:1)

            {2} One who opposes, speaking lies: this will be Satan

            “Does Job fear God for nothing?” Satan replied… “But stretch out your hand and strike everything he has, and he will surely curse you to your face.” (Job 1:9,11)
            {2b} …whose opposition is realized as accusing the righteous with lies: this will be Satan

            ELIPHAZ:

            “Is not your wickedness great? Are not your sins endless? You demanded security from your brothers for no reason; you stripped men of their clothing, leaving them naked.” (Job 22:6)

            BILDAD:

            “The lamp of the wicked is snuffed out; the flame of his fire stops burning… He has no offspring or descendants among his people, no survivor where once he lived.” (Job 18:5,19) [Remember Job’s family had been destroyed: Job 1:18-19.]

            ZOPHAR:

            “Oh, how I wish that God would speak, that he would open his lips against you and disclose to you the secrets of wisdom, for true wisdom has two sides. Know this: God has even forgotten some of your sin.” (Job 11:5-6)

            {3} One who is rebuked by God: this will be Satan

            “After the LORD had said these things to Job, he said to Eliphaz the Temanite, “I am angry with you and your two friends, because you have not spoken of me what is right, as my servant Job has. So now take seven bulls and seven rams and go to my servant Job and sacrifice a burnt offering for yourselves. My servant Job will pray for you, and I will accept his prayer and not deal with you according to your folly.” (Job 42:7-8)

            CONCLUSION

            Who then is Satan in the book of Job?

            “Satan” in Job is those who oppose God’s opinion of righteous Job. This is the jealousies of men that contradict the truth of God that Job was an upright man, (Job 1:9-11) and which the evil men bear into God’s presence (Job 1:6; 2:1). God gives limited rein to the evil by dispatching His angel to realize the desires of the evil men (Job 1:12; 2:6).

            Specifically, “Satan” is identified as Job’s three friends: Eliphaz, Bildad and Zophar.

            They are the ones who oppose Job, even during his suffering, who bring lying accusations against him, (Job 22:6; 18:5,19; 11:5-6), and who are rebuked by God at the end of the matter (Job 42:7-8). We have seen how opposition; lying accusations against the upright; and a subsequent rebuke from God, are telltale characteristics of the presence of Satan. Additionally, that the core of Satan’s jealousy is of Job’s wealth (Job 1:9-10) is instructive, for jealousy is an essentially human trait. It does not easily befit a Mephistophelean Superpower, posing his supernatural guile and strength in eternal battle with the Almighty, to be distressed by the fact that Job has got a lot of sheep. Jealousy of material possessions is an emotional response so preternaturally petty as to be of undoubtedly human origin: and indeed the text confirms that Satan was “from the earth” (Job 1:7). Hence we confidently conclude that it is these three men, who know Job well, with whom the evil jealousies began, and from whose evil jealousy all the disaster was initially precipitated.

            In conclusion it is appropriate to point out that God was always in control of the entire situation, which is why such evil that radiated from Satan was always limited by God’s control (Job 1:12; 2:6), and the end saw Satan condemned (Job 42:7-8), whilst upright Job was blessed (Job 42:12-17)

            THE HARRY POTTER ARABIAN QURAN, IS A BOOK OF MYTHS, LEGENDS & SUPERSTITIONS.

        • Plum, you’re the only person here who can understand. All others are blind and ignorant, specially some mental patients :P. Never mind!

          • Lucky bin Satan, today you talked about your friend, the “Satan”. So, let us uncover the truth, okay?

            1. Christians NEVER pray the way Jesus taught! Jesus said pray to God the Father and did NOT mention himself anywhere. Funnily, Christians, as they have always done, went against the dictums of Jesus!!!! Matthew 6:9-13

            “This, then, is how you should pray: “‘Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name, ………but deliver us from the evil one.’ NOTE : “deliver us from the EVIL ONE”.

            2. Jesus WAS TEMPTED by SATAN!! If Jesus had existed from the beginning of the world and he had made everything with GOD, then how could he have been tempted like a dumbass?? Then he felt spiritually weak because of the temptations, and the Angels came from nowhere , and he suffered! Christian God suffering!!!
            And : whoever gets tempted has “evil desires” and was “dragged/let by satan” because of the evil desires in him. To save time just refer to : Mark 1:12-13; Hebrews 2:17-18; Luke 4:5-6 and James 1:13-15:

            3. So, let us see what the West took it to be the “KINGDOM” of Jesus on Earth here :
            (a). Largest pornographic Industry (b) Gayship marriages and open homo sexuality (c)Largest Society of druggists and drunkards (d) Raping, child trafficking, Molestation and mass brutality towards women (e) Indirect slavery and mentality of colonisation, monopoly, theft, nudeness in name of freedom, prostitution…the Kingdom of Jesus??? Was Jesus tempted for over a month, remaining hungry and thirsty…being tortured by who??? Imagine it was SATAN himself the papa of Lucky!!

          • 1. Christians NEVER pray the way Jesus taught! Jesus said pray to God the Father and did NOT mention himself anywhere. Funnily, Christians, as they have always done, went against the dictums of Jesus!!!! Matthew 6:9-13

            WHY ARE YOU SUCH A HYPOCRITE?

            WHY ARE YOU QUOTING SOMEONE YOU SAID NEVER EXISTED?

            YOU NEED TO GO BACK TO THE HOSPITAL & ASK THEM DID THEY LEAVE ANYTHING IN YOUR HEAD AFTER THE OPERATION.

            YOUR COMMENTS ARE THOSE OF A DERANGED LUNATIC!

            YOU ARE MENTALLY SICK!

        • LUCKY BIN RAPIST,

          Delhi gang-rape case: High Court confirms death sentence for four convicts!(ndtv:March 13th 2014)

          : 1. Mukesh 2. Vinay Sharma 3. Pawan and 4. Akshay Thakur… will hang for raping and killing the young woman on a moving bus in Delhi, the High Court ruled.

          NOTE : DELHI rape culprits were ALL Hindu brutes! There was NO Muslim involved!!!

          http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/delhi-gang-rape-case-high-court-confirms-death-sentence-for-four-convicts

          • Lucky bin Catholic Apostate, “Jesus” of the Bible was a mere story character and NEVER lived in actual life!

            But since dumbie like you believes in the Bible as the word of God then It is your duty to explain of the same to us when I asked.

            In 100% of the cases you NEVER ever give any answers to my questions, why? Is it because you are thick upstairs?

            I went for an operation of hematoma evacuation but after looking at me they said: “we need Lucky bin Satan here, since we had an appointment with him to evacuate some fake notions from his brain, about his belief in “Jesus”, Islam and not you”.

            At the least, when will your dumbie self present to them?…they are waiting for an early answer!!!

          • DUMB PLUM ONCE AGAIN SHOWS HIS GROSS IGNORANCE:

            “Lucky bin Catholic Apostate, “Jesus” of the Bible was a mere story character and NEVER lived in actual life!

            But since dumbie like you believes in the Bible as the word of God then It is your duty to explain of the same to us when I asked.

            In 100% of the cases you NEVER ever give any answers to my questions, why? Is it because you are thick upstairs?

            I went for an operation of hematoma evacuation but after looking at me they said: “we need Lucky bin Satan here, since we had an appointment with him to evacuate some fake notions from his brain, about his belief in “Jesus”, Islam and not you”.

            At the least, when will your dumbie self present to them?…they are waiting for an early answer!!!”

            WHY THE VIRGIN BIRTH IN ISLAM?

            By Sami Zaatari

            We the Muslims just like the Christians believe that Mary gave birth to Jesus as a virgin, and not the result of sexual intercourse. Both us and the Christians agree that this was a mighty miracle and sign from God, however so the differences between us and the Christian arise when we discuss why the virgin birth was done, both of us have different reasons, and in this article I shall talk about why Allah choose to carry out such a great miracle.

            To begin with, here are the relevant passages from the Quran:
            QURAN:
            003.045

            YUSUFALI: Behold! the angels said: “O Mary! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honour in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah;

            003.046
            YUSUFALI: “He shall speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. And he shall be (of the company) of the righteous.”
            003.047

            YUSUFALI: She said: “O my Lord! How shall I have a son when no man hath touched me?” He said: “Even so: Allah createth what He willeth: When He hath decreed a plan, He but saith to it, ‘Be,’ and it is!
            Ibn Kathir’s tafsir writes:

            Delivering the Good News to Maryam of `Isa’s Birth

            This Ayah contains the glad tidings the angels brought to Maryam that she would give birth to a mighty son who will have a great future. Allah said,

            Remember) when the angels said: “O Maryam! Verily, Allah gives you the glad tidings of a Word from Him,) a son who will come into existence with a word from Allah, `Be’, and he was. This is the meaning of Allah’s statement (about Yahya)

            Believing in the Word from Allah.) [3:39], according to the majority of the scholars.
            (His name will be Al-Masih, `Isa, the son of Maryam) and he will be known by this name in this life, especially by the believers. `Isa was called “Al-Masih” (the Messiah) because when he touched (Mash) those afflicted with an illness, they would be healed by Allah’s leave. Allah’s statement,
            (`Isa, the son of Maryam) relates `Isa to his mother, because he did not have a father.
            (Held in honor in this world and in the Hereafter, and will be one of those who are near to Allah.) meaning, he will be a leader and honored by Allah in this life, because of the Law that Allah will reveal to him, sending down the Scripture to him, along with the other bounties that Allah will grant him with. `Isa will be honored in the Hereafter and will intercede with Allah, by His leave, on behalf of some people, just as is the case with his brethren the mighty Messengers of Allah, peace be upon them all.

            `Isa was Created Without a Father

            When Maryam heard the good news that the angels conveyed from Allah, she said;
            (“O my Lord! How shall I have a son when no man has touched me.”)
            Mary said, “How can I have a son while I did not marry, nor intend to marry, nor am I an indecent woman, may Allah forbid” The angel conveyed to Maryam, Allah’s answer,
            (So (it will be) for Allah creates what He wills.)
            He is Mighty in power and nothing escapes His ability. Allah used the word `create’ here instead of the word `does’ as in the tale about Zakariyya [3:40], to eradicate any evil thought concerning `Isa. Allah next emphasized this fact when He said,
            When He has decreed something, He says to it only: “Be! ? and it is.) meaning, what Allah wills, comes into existence instantly and without delay. In another Ayah, Allah said,
            (And Our commandment is but one as the twinkling of an eye.) [54:50], meaning, “We only issue the command once, and it comes into existence instantly, as fast as, and faster than, a blink of the eye. ”
            So from this we can conclude one reason why Allah did this why to show his strength and how he can do what he wills whenever he wills, he just says be and it is. As the tafsir says, he is mighty in power and nothing escapes his ability, this is showing that Allah is able to do all things, including a birth of a child with no father, and also a birth of a child with no father and mother, such as in the case of Adam.
            The Quran touches on the virgin birth again in Surah Maryam:
            QURAN:
            019.016

            YUSUFALI: Relate in the Book (the story of) Mary, when she withdrew from her family to a place in the East.
            019.017

            YUSUFALI: She placed a screen (to screen herself) from them; then We sent her our angel, and he appeared before her as a man in all respects
            019.018

            YUSUFALI: She said: “I seek refuge from thee to (Allah) Most Gracious: (come not near) if thou dost fear Allah.”
            019.019

            YUSUFALI: He said: “Nay, I am only a messenger from thy Lord, (to announce) to thee the gift of a holy son.
            019.020

            YUSUFALI: She said: “How shall I have a son, seeing that no man has touched me, and I am not unchaste?”
            019.021

            YUSUFALI: He said: “So (it will be): Thy Lord saith, ‘that is easy for Me: and (We wish) to appoint him as a Sign unto men and a Mercy from Us’:It is a matter (so) decreed

            Here we see why Allah carried out the virgin birth, as verse 21 says, Allah wanted to make Jesus as a sign for man. What this basically means is that Allah wanted the virgin birth to signify a mighty miracle and mighty proof and sign of God, because such a thing was impossible and unthinkable, and that the only way that such a thing could happen is only if a divine being carried this act out.
            And what better proof do we need than the existence of a divine being and creator than a virgin birth? This is a very strong proof for the Children of Israel, and mankind, and only a fool would deny the existence of God with such a miraculous sign.
            verse 21 also shows us that Allah said that causing a birth even with the fact that no man has touched Mary is easy for him, this once again demonstrates God’s mighty power and how all things are possible with him.

            Ibn Kathir’s tafsir writes:

            The Story of Maryam and Al-Masih (`Isa)

            THE STORY OF MARY & MESSIAH (JESUS)

            After Allah, the Exalted, mentioned the story of Zakariyya, and that He blessed him with a righteous, purified and blessed child even in his old age while his wife was barren, He then mentions the story of Maryam. Allah informs of His granting her a child named `Isa without a father being involved (in her pregnancy). Between these two stories there is an appropriate and similar relationship. Due to their closeness in meaning, Allah mentioned them here together, as well as in Surahs Al `Imran and Al-Anbiya’. Allah has mentioned these stories to show His servants His ability, the might of His authority and that He has power over all things. Allah says,
            ﴿وَاذْكُرْ فِى الْكِتَـبِ مَرْيَمَ﴾
            (And mention in the Book, Maryam,) She was Maryam bint `Imran from the family lineage of Dawud. She was from a good and wholesome family of the Children of Israel. Allah mentioned the story of her mother’s pregnancy with her in Surah Al `Imran, and that she (Maryam’s mother) dedicated her freely for the service of Allah. This meant that she dedicated the child (Maryam) to the service of the Masjid of the Sacred House (in Jerusalem). Thus, they (Zakariyya, Maryam’s mother and Maryam) were similar in that aspect.
            ﴿فَتَقَبَّلَهَا رَبُّهَا بِقَبُولٍ حَسَنٍ وَأَنبَتَهَا نَبَاتًا حَسَنًا﴾
            (So her Lord (Allah) accepted her with goodly acceptance. He made her grow in a good manner.)﴿3:37﴾ Thus, Maryam was raised among the Children of Israel in an honorable way. She was one of the female worshippers, well-known for her remarkable acts of worship, devotion and perseverance. She lived under the care of her brother-in-law, Zakariyya, who was a Prophet of the Children of Israel at that time. He was a great man among them, whom they would refer to in their religious matters. Zakariyya saw astonishing miracles occur from her that amazed him.
            ﴿كُلَّمَا دَخَلَ عَلَيْهَا زَكَرِيَّا الْمِحْرَابَ وَجَدَ عِندَهَا رِزْقًا قَالَ يمَرْيَمُ أَنَّى لَكِ هَـذَا قَالَتْ هُوَ مِنْ عِندِ اللَّهِ إنَّ اللَّهَ يَرْزُقُ مَن يَشَآءُ بِغَيْرِ حِسَابٍ﴾
            (Every time Zakaiyya entered the Mihrab to (visit) her, he found her supplied with sustenance. He said: “O Maryam! From where have you got this” She said, “This is from Allah.” Verily, Allah provides to whom He wills, without limit.) ﴿3:37﴾ It has been mentioned that he would find her with winter fruit during the summer and summer fruit during the winter. This has already been explained in Surah Al `Imran. Then, when Allah wanted to grant her His servant and Messenger, `Isa, one of the five Great Messengers.
            ﴿انتَبَذَتْ مِنْ أَهْلِهَا مَكَاناً شَرْقِياً﴾
            (she withdrew in seclusion from her family to place facing east.) ﴿19:16﴾ This means that she withdrew from them and secluded herself from them. She went to the eastern side of the Sacred Masjid (in Jerusalem). It is reported from Ibn `Abbas that he said, “Verily, I am the most knowledgeable of Allah’s creation of why the Christians took the east as the direction of devotional worship. They did because of Allah’s statement,
            ﴿انتَبَذَتْ مِنْ أَهْلِهَا مَكَاناً شَرْقِياً﴾
            (When she withdrew in seclusion from her family to a place facing east.) Therefore, they took the birthplace of `Isa as their direction of worship.” Concerning Allah’s statement,
            ﴿فَاتَّخَذَتْ مِن دُونِهِم حِجَاباً﴾
            (She placed a screen before them;) This means that she hid herself from them and concealed herself. Then, Allah sent Jibril to her.
            ﴿فَتَمَثَّلَ لَهَا بَشَراً سَوِيّاً﴾
            (and he appeared before her in the form of a man in all respects.) ﴿19:17﴾ This means that he came to her in the form of a perfect and complete man. Mujahid, Ad-Dahhak, Qatadah, Ibn Jurayj, Wahb bin Munabbih and As-Suddi all commented on Allah’s statement,
            ﴿فَأَرْسَلْنَآ إِلَيْهَآ رُوحَنَا﴾
            (then We sent to her Our Ruh,) “It means Jibril.”
            ﴿قَالَتْ إِنِّى أَعُوذُ بِالرَّحْمَـنِ مِنكَ إِن كُنتَ تَقِيّاً ﴾
            (She said: “Verily, I seek refuge with the Most Gracious from you, if you do fear Allah.”) This means that when the angel (Jibril) appeared to her in the form of a man, while she was in a place secluded by herself with a partition between her and her people, she was afraid of him and thought that he wanted to rape her. Therefore, she said,
            ﴿إِنِّى أَعُوذُ بِالرَّحْمَـنِ مِنكَ إِن كُنتَ تَقِيّاً﴾
            (Verily, I seek refuge with the Most Gracious from you, if you do fear Allah.) She meant, “If you fear Allah,” as a means of reminding him of Allah. This is what is legislated in defense against (evil), so that it may be repulsed with ease. Therefore, the first thing she did was try to make him fear Allah, the Mighty and Sublime. Ibn Jarir reported from `Asim that Abu Wa’il said when mentioning the story of Maryam, “She knew that the pious person would refrain (from committing evil) when she said,
            ﴿إِنِّى أَعُوذُ بِالرَّحْمَـنِ مِنكَ إِن كُنتَ تَقِيّاًقَالَ إِنَّمَآ أَنَاْ رَسُولُ رَبِّكِ﴾
            (“Verily, I seek refuge with the Most Gracious from you, if you do fear Allah.” He said: “I am only a messenger from your Lord…”) This means that the angel said to her in response, and in order to remove the fear that she felt within herself, “I am not what you think, but I am the messenger of your Lord.” By this he meant, “Allah has sent me to you.” It is said that when she mentioned the (Name of the) Most Beneficent (Ar-Rahman), Jibril fell apart and returned to his true form (as an angel). He responded, (إِنَّمَآ أَنَاْ رَسُولُ رَبِّكِ لِيَهَب لَكِ غُلَـمًا زَكِيًّا) `I am only a messenger from your Lord, to provide to you the gift of a righteous son.’
            ﴿قَالَتْ أَنَّى يَكُونُ لِى غُلَـمٌ﴾
            (She said: “How can I have a son…”) This means that Maryam was amazed at this. She said, “How can I have a son” She said this to mean, “In what way would a son be born to me when I do not have a husband and I do not commit any wicked acts (i.e. fornication)” For this reason she said,
            ﴿وَلَمْ يَمْسَسْنِى بَشَرٌ وَلَمْ أَكُ بَغِيّاً﴾
            (when no man has touched me, nor am I Baghiyya) The Baghiyy is a female fornicator. For this reason, a Hadith has been reported prohibiting the money earned from Baghiyy.
            ﴿قَالَ كَذَلِكَ قَالَ رَبُّكَ هُوَ عَلَىَّ هَيِّنٌ﴾
            (He said: “Thus said your Lord: `That is easy for Me (Allah)…”) This means that the angel said to her in response to her question, “Verily, Allah has said that a boy will be born from you even though you do not have a husband and you have not committed any lewdness. Verily, He is Most Able to do whatever He wills.” Due to this, he (Jibril) conveyed Allah’s Words,
            ﴿وَلِنَجْعَلَهُ ءَايَةً لِّلْنَّاسِ﴾
            (And (We wish) to appoint him as a sign to mankind) This means a proof and a sign for mankind of the power of their Maker and Creator, Who diversified them in their creation. He created their father, Adam, without a male (father) or female (mother). Then, He created Hawwa’ (Adam’s spouse) from a male (father) without a female (mother). Then, He created the rest of their progeny from male and female, except `Isa. He caused `Isa to be born from a female without a male. Thus, Allah completed the four types of creation (of the human being), which proves the perfection of His power and the magnificence of His authority. There is no god worthy of worship except Him and there is no true Lord other than Him. Concerning Allah’s statement,
            ﴿وَرَحْمَةً مِّنَّا﴾
            (and a mercy from Us,) This means, “We will make this boy a mercy from Allah and a Prophet from among the Prophets. He will call to the worship of Allah and monotheistic belief in Him. This is as Allah, the Exalted, said in another Ayah,
            ﴿إِذْ قَالَتِ الْمَلَـئِكَةُ يمَرْيَمُ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُبَشِّرُكِ بِكَلِمَةٍ مِّنْهُ اسْمُهُ الْمَسِيحُ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ وَجِيهًا فِي الدُّنْيَا وَالاٌّخِرَةِ وَمِنَ الْمُقَرَّبِينَ – وَيُكَلِّمُ النَّاسَ فِى الْمَهْدِ وَكَهْلاً وَمِنَ الصَّـلِحِينَ ﴾
            ((Remember) when the angels said: “O Maryam! Verily, Allah gives you the good news of a Word from Him, his name will be Al-Masih, `Isa, the son of Maryam, held in honor in this world and in the Hereafter, and will be one of those who are near to Allah. And he will speak to the people, in the cradle and in manhood, and he will be one of the righteous.) ﴿3:45-46﴾ This means that he will call to the worship of his Lord in his cradle and while and adult. Concerning His statement,
            ﴿وَكَانَ أَمْراً مَّقْضِيّاً﴾
            (and it is a matter (already) decreed (by Allah).) This is the completion of Jibril’s dialogue with Maryam. He informed her that this matter was preordained by Allah’s power and will. Muhammad bin Ishaq said,
            ﴿وَكَانَ أَمْراً مَّقْضِيّاً﴾
            (and it is a matter (already) decreed (by Allah).) “This means that Allah determined to do this, so there is no avoiding it.”
            ﴿فَحَمَلَتْهُ فَانْتَبَذَتْ بِهِ مَكَاناً قَصِيّاً – فَأَجَآءَهَا الْمَخَاضُ إِلَى جِذْعِ النَّخْلَةِ قَالَتْ يلَيْتَنِى مِتُّ قَبْلَ هَـذَا وَكُنتُ نَسْياً مَّنسِيّاً ﴾
            (22. So she conceived him, and she withdrew with him to a remote place.) (23. And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a date palm. She said: “Would that I had died before this, and had been forgotten and out of sight!”)

            The Conception and the Birth

            Allah, the Exalted, informs about Maryam that when Jibril had spoken to her about what Allah said, she accepted the decree of Allah. Many scholars of the predecessors (Salaf) have mentioned that at this point the angel (who was Jibril) blew into the opening of the garment that she was wearing. Then the breath descended until it entered into her vagina and she conceived the child by the leave of Allah. Muhammad bin Ishaq said, “When she conceived him and filled her water jug (at a well), she returned (to her people). After this, her menstrual bleeding ceased and she experienced what the pregnant woman experiences of sickness, hunger, change of color and there was even a change in the manner of her speech. After this, no people came to visit any house like they did the house of Zakariyya. The word spread among the Children of Israel and the people were saying, `Verily, her partner (in fornication) was Yusuf, because there was no one else in the temple with her except him.’ So she hid herself from the people and placed a veil between herself and them. No one saw her and she did not see anyone else.” Allah said;
            ﴿فَأَجَآءَهَا الْمَخَاضُ إِلَى جِذْعِ النَّخْلَةِ﴾
            (And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a date palm.) This means that her pains of labor compelled her to go to the trunk of a date-palm tree that was at the place where she had secluded herself. The scholars differed over its location. As-Suddi said, “Her place of seclusion was to the east and that was where she would pray at the Sacred House of Jerusalem.” Wahb bin Munabbih said, “She ran away and when she reached an area between Ash-Sham and Egypt, she was overcome by labor pains.” In another narration from Wahb, he said, “This took place eight miles from the Sacred House of Jerusalem in a village that was known as Bayt Al-Lahm (Bethlehem).” I say, there are Hadiths about the Isra’ (Night Journey of the Prophet ) that are reported by An-Nasa’i on the authority of Anas, and Al-Bayhaqi on the authority of Shadad bin Aws, that say that this took place at Bait Al-Lahm. Allah knows best. This is what is well known that the people all relate from each other. The Christians have no doubt held that the place of this occurrence was Bethlehem and this is what all the people relate. It has been related in a Hadith also, if the Hadith is authentic. Allah says, informing about her,
            ﴿قَالَتْ يلَيْتَنِى مِتُّ قَبْلَ هَـذَا وَكُنتُ نَسْياً مَّنسِيّاً﴾
            (She said: “Would that I had died before this, and had been forgotten and out of sight!”) In this is an evidence of the permissibility to wish for death when a calamity strikes. She knew that she was going to be tested with the birth, the people would not assist her, and they would not believe her story. After she was known as a devout worshipper among them, they now thought that she had become a fornicating whore. She said,
            ﴿يلَيْتَنِى مِتُّ قَبْلَ هَـذَا﴾
            (Would that I had died before this,) She said this to mean before this situation.
            ﴿وَكُنتُ نَسْياً مَّنسِيّاً﴾
            (and I had been forgotten and out of sight!) This means, “I wish I had not been created and I was nothing.” This was mentioned by Ibn `Abbas. Qatadah said,
            ﴿وَكُنتُ نَسْياً مَّنسِيّاً﴾
            (and I had been forgotten and out of sight!) “This means something unknown, forgotten and no one knew who I was.”
            ﴿فَنَادَاهَا مِن تَحْتِهَآ أَلاَّ تَحْزَنِى قَدْ جَعَلَ رَبُّكِ تَحْتَكِ سَرِيّاً – وَهُزِّى إِلَيْكِ بِجِذْعِ النَّخْلَةِ تُسَـقِطْ عَلَيْكِ رُطَباً جَنِيّاً – فَكُلِى وَاشْرَبِى وَقَرِّى عَيْناً فَإِمَّا تَرَيِنَّ مِنَ البَشَرِ أَحَداً فَقُولِى إِنِّى نَذَرْتُ لِلرَّحْمَـنِ صَوْماً فَلَنْ أُكَلِّمَ الْيَوْمَ إِنسِيّاً ﴾
            (24. Then he cried unto her from below her, saying: “Grieve not: your Lord has provided a Sariy under you.”) (25. “And shake the trunk of date palm towards you, it will let fall fresh ripe dates upon you.”) (26. “So eat and drink and rejoice. And if you see any human being, say: `Verily, I have vowed a fast for the Most Gracious so I shall not speak to any human being today.,”)
            What was said to Her after the Birth Some reciters read the Ayah as, (ENFR *N-*NG’)

            (Who was below her) Meaning the one who was below her called to her. Others recited it as,
            ﴿مِن تَحْتِهَآ﴾
            (from below her) With the meaning of a preposition (from) instead of a pronoun (who). The scholars of Tafsir have differed over the interpretation of who was calling out. Al-`Awfi and others reported from Ibn `Abbas that he said,
            ﴿فَنَادَاهَا مِن تَحْتِهَآ﴾
            (Then cried unto her from below her,) “This is referring to Jibrilbecause `Isa did not speak until she brought him to her people.” Similarly, Sa`id bin Jubayr, Ad-Dahhak, `Amr bin Maymun, As-Suddi and Qatadah all said, “Verily, this is referring to the angel Jibril.” This means that he (Jibril) called out to her from the bottom of the valley. Mujahid said,
            ﴿فَنَادَاهَا مِن تَحْتِهَآ﴾
            (Then cried unto her from below her,) “This is referring to `Isa bin Maryam.” Likewise, `Abdur-Razzaq reported from Ma`mar that Qatadah said that Al-Hasan said, “This is referring to her son (`Isa).” This is also one of the two opinions reported from Sa`id bin Jubayr — that it was her son, `Isa, speaking. Sa`id said, “Have you not heard Allah saying,
            ﴿فَأَشَارَتْ إِلَيْهِ﴾
            (Then she pointed to him.) Ibn Zayd and Ibn Jarir preferred this opinion in his Tafsir. Allah said,
            ﴿أَلاَّ تَحْزَنِى﴾
            (Grieve not:) He called to her saying, “Do not grieve.”
            ﴿قَدْ جَعَلَ رَبُّكِ تَحْتَكِ سَرِيّاً﴾
            (your Lord has provided a Sariy under you.) Sufyan Ath-Thawri and Shu`bah reported from Abu Ishaq that Al-Bara’ bin `Azib said, s
            ﴿قَدْ جَعَلَ رَبُّكِ تَحْتَكِ سَرِيّاً﴾
            (your Lord has provided a Sariy under you.) “This means a small stream.” Likewise, `Ali bin Abi Talhah reported that Ibn `Abbas said, “Sariy means a river.” `Amr bin Maymun held the same view, as he said, “It means a river for her to drink from.” Mujahid said, “It means river in the Syrian language.” Sa`id bin Jubayr said, “Sariy is a small flowing river.” Others said that Sariy refers to `Isa. This was said by Al-Hasan, Ar-Rabi` bin Anas, Muhammad bin `Abbad bin Ja`far, and it is one of the two opinions reported from Qatadah. It is also the view of `Abdur-Rahman bin Zayd bin Aslam. However, the first view seems to be the most obvious meaning. For this reason, Allah said after it,
            ﴿وَهُزِّى إِلَيْكِ بِجِذْعِ النَّخْلَةِ﴾
            (And shake the trunk of date palm towards you,) meaning, “Grab the trunk of the date-palm tree and shake it towards yourself.” Therefore, Allah blessed her by giving her food and drink. Then He said,
            ﴿تُسَـقِطْ عَلَيْكِ رُطَباً جَنِيّاًفَكُلِى وَاشْرَبِى وَقَرِّى عَيْناً﴾
            (It will let fall fresh ripe dates upon you. So eat and drink and rejoice.) Meaning to be happy. This is why `Amr bin Maymun said, “Nothing is better for the woman confined in childbed than dried dates and fresh dates.” Then he recited this noble Ayah. Concerning Allah’s statement,
            ﴿فَإِمَّا تَرَيِنَّ مِنَ البَشَرِ أَحَداً﴾
            (And if you see any human being,) This means any person that you see,
            ﴿فَقُولِى إِنِّى نَذَرْتُ لِلرَّحْمَـنِ صَوْماً فَلَنْ أُكَلِّمَ الْيَوْمَ إِنسِيّاً﴾
            (Say: `Verily, I have vowed a fast unto the Most Gracious (Allah) so I shall not speak to any human being today.’) Meaning, by signaling with gestures, not a statement by speech. This is so that she does not negate her oath itself,
            ﴿فَلَنْ أُكَلِّمَ الْيَوْمَ إِنسِيّاً﴾
            (so I shall not speak to any human being today. ) Anas bin Malik commented on,
            ﴿إِنِّى نَذَرْتُ لِلرَّحْمَـنِ صَوْماً﴾
            (I have vowed a fast unto the Most Gracious) He said; “A vow of silence.” Likewise said Ibn `Abbas and Ad-Dahhak. The meaning here is that in their Law, when fasting, it was forbidden for them to eat and speak. As-Suddi, Qatadah and `Abdur-Rahman bin Zayd have all stated this view. `Abdur-Rahman bin Zayd said, “When `Isa said to Maryam,
            ﴿أَلاَّ تَحْزَنِى﴾
            (Grieve not) She said, `How can I not grieve when you are with me and I have no husband nor am I an owned slave woman What excuse do I have with the people Woe unto me, if I had only died before this, and had been a thing forgotten and unknown.’ Then, `Isa said to her, `I will suffice you with a statement,
            ﴿فَإِمَّا تَرَيِنَّ مِنَ البَشَرِ أَحَداً فَقُولِى إِنِّى نَذَرْتُ لِلرَّحْمَـنِ صَوْماً فَلَنْ أُكَلِّمَ الْيَوْمَ إِنسِيّاً﴾
            (And if you see any human being, say: `Verily, I have vowed a fast unto the Most Gracious so I shall not speak to any human being this day.’)’ All of this is from the speech of `Isa to his mother.” Wahb said the same as well.
            ﴿فَأَتَتْ بِهِ قَوْمَهَا تَحْمِلُهُ قَالُواْ يمَرْيَمُ لَقَدْ جِئْتِ شَيْئاً فَرِيّاً – يأُخْتَ هَـرُونَ مَا كَانَ أَبُوكِ امْرَأَ سَوْءٍ وَمَا كَانَتْ أُمُّكِ بَغِيّاً – فَأَشَارَتْ إِلَيْهِ قَالُواْ كَيْفَ نُكَلِّمُ مَن كَانَ فِى الْمَهْدِ صَبِيّاً – قَالَ إِنِّى عَبْدُ اللَّهِ ءَاتَانِىَ الْكِتَـبَ وَجَعَلَنِى نَبِيّاً – وَجَعَلَنِى مُبَارَكاً أَيْنَ مَا كُنتُ وَأَوْصَانِى بِالصَّلَوةِ وَالزَّكَوةِ مَا دُمْتُ حَيّاً – وَبَرّاً بِوَالِدَتِى وَلَمْ يَجْعَلْنِى جَبَّاراً شَقِيّاً – وَالسَّلَـمُ عَلَىَّ يَوْمَ وُلِدْتُّ وَيَوْمَ أَمُوتُ وَيَوْمَ أُبْعَثُ حَيّاً ﴾
            (27. Then she brought him to her people, carrying him. They said: “O Mary! Indeed you have brought a thing Fariy.”) (28. “O sister of Harun! Your father was not a man who used to commit adultery, nor your mother was an unchaste woman.”) (29. Then she pointed to him. They said: “How can we talk to one who is a child in the cradle”) (30. He said: “Verily, I am a servant of Allah, He has given me the Scripture and made me a Prophet;”) (31. “And He has made me blessed wherever I be, and has enjoined on me ﴿Awsani﴾ Salah and Zakah, as long as I live.”) (32. “And to be dutiful to my mother, and made me not arrogant, unblessed.”) (33. “And Salam (peace) be upon me the day I was born, and the day I die, and the day I shall be raised alive!”)
            Maryam with Al-Masih before the People, Their Rejection of Her and His Reply to Them

            Allah, the Exalted, informs of Maryam’s situation when she was commanded to fast that day and not to speak to any human being. For verily, her affair would be taken care of and her proof would be established. Thus, she accepted the command of Allah and she readily received His decree. She took her child and brought him to her people, carrying him. When they saw her like this they made a big deal about her situation and they sternly protested against of it, and
            ﴿قَالُواْ يمَرْيَمُ لَقَدْ جِئْتِ شَيْئاً فَرِيّاً﴾
            (They said: “O Mary! Indeed you have brought a thing Fariy.”) Fariy means a mighty thing. This was said by Mujahid, Qatadah, As-Suddi and others. Ibn Abi Hatim reported from Nawf Al-Bikali that he said, “Her people went out searching for her, she was from a family that was blessed with prophethood and nobility. However, they could not find any trace of her. They came across a cow herder and they asked him, `Have you seen a girl whose description is such and such’ He replied, `No, but tonight I saw my cows doing something that I’ve never seen them do before.’ They asked, `What did you see’ He said, `Tonight I saw them prostrating in the direction of that valley.”’ `Abdullah bin Ziyad said (adding to the narration), “I memorized from Sayyar that he (the cattle herder) said, `I saw a radiant light.’ ” So they went towards the direction that he told him, and Maryam was coming towards them from that direction. When she saw them she sat down and she was holding her child in her lap. They came towards her until they were standing over her.
            ﴿قَالُواْ يمَرْيَمُ لَقَدْ جِئْتِ شَيْئاً فَرِيّاً﴾
            (They said: “O Mary! Indeed you have brought a mighty thing (Fariy).”) This means it was a mighty thing that she had brought.
            ﴿يأُخْتَ هَـرُونَ﴾
            (O sister of Harun!) This means, “O one resembling Harun (Aaron) in worship.”
            ﴿مَا كَانَ أَبُوكِ امْرَأَ سَوْءٍ وَمَا كَانَتْ أُمُّكِ بَغِيّاً﴾
            (Your father was not a man who used to commit adultery, nor your mother was an unchaste woman.) They meant, “You are from a good, pure family, well-known for its righteousness, worship and abstinence from worldy indulgence. How could you do such a thing” `Ali bin Abi Talhah and As-Suddi both said, “It was said to her,
            ﴿يأُخْتَ هَـرُونَ﴾
            (O sister of Harun!) referring to the brother of Musa, because she was of his descendants. This is similar to the saying, `O brother of Tamim,’ to one who is from the Tamimi tribe, and `O brother of Mudar,’ to one who is from the Mudari tribe. It has also been said that she was related to a righteous man among them whose name was Harun and she was comparable to him in her abstinence and worship. Concerning Allah’s statement,
            ﴿فَأَشَارَتْ إِلَيْهِ قَالُواْ كَيْفَ نُكَلِّمُ مَن كَانَ فِى الْمَهْدِ صَبِيّاً ﴾
            (Then she pointed to him. They said: “How can we talk to one who is a child in the cradle”) This is what took place while they were in doubt about her situation, condeming her circumstances, saying what they wanted to say. At that time they were slandering her and falsely accusing her of a horrendous act. On that day she was fasting and keeping silent. Therefore, she referred all speech to him (the child) and she directed them to his address and speech to them. They scoffed at her because they thought that she was mocking at them and playing with them. They said,
            ﴿كَيْفَ نُكَلِّمُ مَن كَانَ فِى الْمَهْدِ صَبِيّاً﴾
            (How can we talk to one who is a child in the cradle) Maymun bin Mahran said,
            ﴿فَأَشَارَتْ إِلَيْهِ﴾
            (Then she pointed to him.) “She indicated, `Speak to him.’ They then said, `After she has come to us with this calamity, she now commands us to speak to one who is a child in the cradle!”’ As-Suddi said, “When she pointed to him they became angry and said, `Her mocking us, to the extent of commanding us to speak to this child, is worse to us than her fornication.’ ”
            ﴿قَالُواْ كَيْفَ نُكَلِّمُ مَن كَانَ فِى الْمَهْدِ صَبِيّاً﴾
            (They said: “How can we talk to one who is a child in the cradle”) This means, “How can someone speak who is in his cradle, in the state of infancy and a child” `Isa said,
            ﴿إِنِّى عَبْدُ اللَّهِ﴾
            (Verily, I am a servant of Allah,) The first thing that he said was a declaration of the lofty honor of his Lord and His being free of having a child. Also, he affirmed that he himself was a worshipper of his Lord. Allah said,
            ﴿ءَاتَانِىَ الْكِتَـبَ وَجَعَلَنِى نَبِيّاً﴾
            (He has given me the Scripture and made me a Prophet.) This was a declaration of innocence for his mother from the immorality that was attributed to her. Nawf Al-Bikali said, “When they said what they said to his mother, he (`Isa) was nursing from her breast. At their statement he released the breast from his mouth and reclined on his left saying,
            ﴿إِنِّى عَبْدُ اللَّهِ ءَاتَانِىَ الْكِتَـبَ وَجَعَلَنِى نَبِيّاً﴾
            (Verily, I am a servant of Allah, He has given me the Scripture and made me a Prophet.) And he continued speaking until he said,
            ﴿مَا دُمْتُ حَيّاً﴾
            (as long as I live.)” Concerning his statement,
            ﴿وَجَعَلَنِى مُبَارَكاً أَيْنَ مَا كُنتُ﴾
            (And He has made me blessed wherever I be,) Mujahid, `Amr bin Qays and Ath-Thawri all said that this means, “And He made me a teacher of goodness.” In another narration from Mujahid, he said, “A person of great benefit.” Ibn Jarir reported from Wuhayb bin Al-Ward, a freed slave of the Bani Makhzum tribe, that he said, “A scholar met another scholar who had more knowledge than himself. So he said to him, `May Allah have mercy upon you, what acts of mine should I perform openly’ The other replied, `Commanding good and forbidding evil, for verily, it is the religion of Allah, which He sent His Prophets with to His servants.’ The scholars have indeed agreed upon the statement of Allah,
            ﴿وَجَعَلَنِى مُبَارَكاً أَيْنَ مَا كُنتُ﴾
            (And He has made me blessed wherever I be,) Then it was said, `What was his blessing’ He (Wuhayb) replied, `Commanding good and forbidding evil wherever he was.’ ” His saying,
            ﴿وَأَوْصَانِى بِالصَّلَوةِ وَالزَّكَوةِ مَا دُمْتُ حَيّاً﴾
            (and He has enjoined on me ﴿Awsani﴾ Salah and Zakah, as long as I live.) This is similar to the statement of Allah to Muhammad ,
            ﴿وَاعْبُدْ رَبَّكَ حَتَّى يَأْتِيَكَ الْيَقِينُ ﴾
            (And worship your Lord until there comes unto you the certainty (i.e. death).) ﴿15:99﴾ `Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Qasim reported from Malik bin Anas that he commented on Allah’s statement,
            ﴿وَأَوْصَانِى بِالصَّلَوةِ وَالزَّكَوةِ مَا دُمْتُ حَيّاً﴾
            (and He has enjoined on me ﴿Awsani﴾ Salah and Zakah, as long as I live.) He said, “Allah informed him of what would be of his affair until his death. This is the firmest evidence against the people who deny Allah’s preordained decree.” Concerning Allah’s statement,
            ﴿وَبَرّاً بِوَالِدَتِى﴾
            (And to be dutiful to my mother.) This means, “He (Allah) has commanded me to treat my mother well.” He mentioned this after mentioning obedience to his Lord, Allah. This is because Allah often combines the command to worship Him with obedience to the parents. This is similar to Allah’s statement,
            ﴿وَقَضَى رَبُّكَ أَلاَّ تَعْبُدُواْ إِلاَّ إِيَّـهُ وَبِالْوَلِدَيْنِ إِحْسَـناً﴾
            (And your Lord has decreed that you worship none but Him and that you be dutiful to your parents.) ﴿17:23﴾ And He, the Exalted, said,
            ﴿أَنِ اشْكُرْ لِى وَلِوَلِدَيْكَ إِلَىَّ الْمَصِيرُ﴾
            (Give thanks to Me and to your parents. Unto Me is the final destination.) ﴿31:14﴾ Concerning his statement,
            ﴿وَلَمْ يَجْعَلْنِى جَبَّاراً شَقِيّاً﴾
            (and He made me not arrogant, unblessed.) This means, “He (Allah) has not made me too proud or arrogant to worship Him, obey Him and be dutiful to my mother, and thus be unblessed.” Concerning Allah’s statement,
            ﴿وَالسَّلَـمُ عَلَىَّ يَوْمَ وُلِدْتُّ وَيَوْمَ أَمُوتُ وَيَوْمَ أُبْعَثُ حَيّاً ﴾
            (And Salam (peace) be upon me the day I was born, and the day I die, and the day I shall be raised alive!) This is his affirmation that `he is a worshipper of Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, and that he is a creature created by Allah. He (`Isa) will live, die and be resurrected, just like the other creatures that Allah has created. However, he will have peace in these situations, which are the most difficult situations for Allah’s creatures.’ May Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him.
            ﴿ذلِكَ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ قَوْلَ الْحَقِّ الَّذِى فِيهِ يَمْتُرُونَ – مَا كَانَ للَّهِ أَن يَتَّخِذَ مِن وَلَدٍ سُبْحَـنَهُ إِذَا قَضَى أَمْراً فَإِنَّمَا يَقُولُ لَهُ كُن فَيَكُونُ – وَإِنَّ اللَّهَ رَبِّى وَرَبُّكُمْ فَاعْبُدُوهُ هَـذَا صِرَطٌ مُّسْتَقِيمٌ – فَاخْتَلَفَ الاٌّحْزَابُ مِن بَيْنِهِمْ فَوْيْلٌ لِّلَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ مِن مَّشْهِدِ يَوْمٍ عَظِيمٍ ﴾
            (34. Such is `Isa, son of Maryam. Qawlal-Haqq ﴿it is a statement of truth﴾ about which they doubt (or dispute).) (35. It befits not (the majesty of) Allah that He should beget a son. Glorified be He. When He decrees a thing, He only says to it: “Be!” — and it is.) (36. ﴿`Isa said﴾: “And verily, Allah is my Lord and your Lord. So worship Him. That is the straight path.”) (37. Then the sects differed, so woe unto the disbelievers from the meeting of a great Day.)
            `Isa is the Servant of Allah and not His Son

            Allah, the Exalted, says to His Messenger Muhammad , `This is the story which We have related to you about `Isa,’ upon him be peace.
            ﴿قَوْلَ الْحَقِّ الَّذِى فِيهِ يَمْتُرُونَ﴾
            ((It is) a statement of truth about which they doubt.) lThis means that the people of falsehood and the people of truth are in disagreement, of those who believe in him and those who disbelieve believe in him. For this reason most of the reciters recited this Ayah with Qawlul-Haqq (statement of truth) as the subject, referring to `Isa himself. `Asim and `Abdullah bin `Amir both recited it Qawlal-Haqq (statement of truth) referring to the story in its entirety that the people differed about. It is reported from Ibn Mas`ud that he recited it as Qalal-Haqqa, which means that he (`Isa) said the truth. The recitation of the Ayah with the Qawlul-Haqq being the subject referring to `Isa, is the most apparent meaning grammatically. It has support for it in the statement of Allah ﴿after the story of `Isa﴾,
            ﴿الْحَقُّ مِن رَّبِّكَ فَلاَ تَكُنْ مِّن الْمُمْتَرِينَ ﴾
            ((This is) the truth from your Lord, so be not of those who doubt.) ﴿3:60﴾ When Allah mentioned that He created him as a servant and a Prophet, He extolled Himself, the Most Holy, by saying,
            ﴿مَا كَانَ للَّهِ أَن يَتَّخِذَ مِن وَلَدٍ سُبْحَـنَهُ﴾
            (It befits not (the majesty of) Allah that He should beget a son. Glorified be He.) Means glory be unto Him, He is far exalted above that which these ignorant, wrongdoing, transgressing people say about Him.
            ﴿إِذَا قَضَى أَمْرًا فَإِنَّمَا يَقُولُ لَهُ كُن فَيَكُونُ﴾
            (When He decrees a thing, He only says to it: “Be!” — and it is.) Whenever He wants something, He merely commands it and it happens as He wills. This is as Allah says,
            ﴿إِنَّ مَثَلَ عِيسَى عِندَ اللَّهِ كَمَثَلِ ءَادَمَ خَلَقَهُ مِن تُرَابٍ ثُمَّ قَالَ لَهُ كُن فَيَكُونُ – الْحَقُّ مِن رَّبِّكَ فَلاَ تَكُنْ مِّن الْمُمْتَرِينَ ﴾
            (Verily, the likeness of `Isa before Allah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then said to him: “Be” — and he was. (This is) the truth from your Lord, so be not of those who doubt.) ﴿3:59-60﴾
            `Isa commanded the Worship of Allah Alone, then the People differed after Him

            Allah said;
            ﴿وَإِنَّ اللَّهَ رَبِّى وَرَبُّكُمْ فَاعْبُدُوهُ هَـذَا صِرَطٌ مُّسْتَقِيمٌ ﴾
            (And verily, Allah is my Lord and your Lord. So worship Him. That is the straight path.) Among those things which `Isa said to his people while he was in his cradle is that Allah was his Lord and their Lord, and he commanded them to worship Him alone. He said,
            ﴿فَاعْبُدُوهُ هَـذَا صِرَطٌ مُّسْتَقِيمٌ﴾
            (So worship Him. That is the straight path.) Meaning, “That which I have come to you with from Allah is the straight path.” This means that the path is correct; whoever follows it will be rightly guided and whoever opposes it will deviate and go astray. Allah’s statement,
            ﴿فَاخْتَلَفَ الاٌّحْزَابُ مِن بَيْنِهِمْ﴾
            (Then the sects differed,) means that the opinions of the People of the Book differed concerning `Isa even after the explanation of his affair and the clarification of his situation. They disagreed about his being the servant of Allah, His Messenger, and His Word that He cast upon Maryam and a spirit from Himself. So a group of them — who were the majority of the Jews (may Allah’s curses be upon them) — determined that he was a child of fornication and that his speaking in his cradle was merely sorcery. Another group said that it was Allah Who was speaking (not `Isa). Others said that he (`Isa) was the son of Allah. Some said that he was the third part of a divine trinity with Allah. Yet, others said that he was the servant of Allah and His Messenger. This latter view is the statement of truth, which Allah guided the believers to. A report similar with this meaning has been reported from `Amr bin Maymun, Ibn Jurayj, Qatadah and others from the Salaf (predecessors) and the Khalaf (later generations). Allah said,
            ﴿فَوْيْلٌ لِّلَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ مِن مَّشْهِدِ يَوْمٍ عَظِيمٍ﴾
            (so woe unto the disbelievers from the meeting of a great Day.) This is a threat and severe warning for those who lie about Allah, invent falsehood and claim that He (Allah) has a son. However, Allah has given them respite until the Day of Resurrection, and He has delayed their term out of gentleness and confident reliance upon His divine decree overcoming them. Verily, Allah does not hasten the affair of those who disobey Him. This has been related in a Hadith collected in the Two Sahihs,
            «إِنَّ اللهَ لَيُمْلِي لِلظَّالِمِ حَتَّى إِذَا أَخَذَهُ لَمْ يُفْلِتْه»
            (Verily, Allah gives respite to the wrongdoer until He seizes him and he will not be able to escape Him.) Then, the Messenger of Allah recited the Ayah,
            ﴿وَكَذلِكَ أَخْذُ رَبِّكَ إِذَا أَخَذَ الْقُرَى وَهِىَ ظَـلِمَةٌ إِنَّ أَخْذَهُ أَلِيمٌ شَدِيدٌ ﴾
            (Such is the punishment of your Lord when He punishes the towns while they are doing wrong. Verily, His punishment is painful, (and) severe.) ﴿11:102﴾ In the Two Sahihs it is also reported that the Messenger of Allah said,
            «لَا أَحَدَ أَصْبَرُ عَلَى أَذىً سَمِعَهُ مِنَ اللهِ، إِنَّهُمْ يَجْعَلُونَ لَهُ وَلَدًا وَهُوَ يَرْزُقُهُمْ وَيُعَافِيهِم»
            (No one is more patient with something harmful that he hears than Allah. Verily, they attribute to Him a son, while He is the One Who provides them sustenance and good health.) Allah says,
            ﴿وَكَأَيِّن مِّن قَرْيَةٍ أَمْلَيْتُ لَهَا وَهِىَ ظَـلِمَةٌ ثُمَّ أَخَذْتُهَا وَإِلَىَّ الْمَصِيرُ ﴾
            (And many a township did I give respite while it was given to wrongdoing. Then I punished it. And to me is the (final) return (of all).) ﴿22:48﴾ Allah, the Exalted, also says,
            ﴿وَلاَ تَحْسَبَنَّ اللَّهَ غَـفِلاً عَمَّا يَعْمَلُ الظَّـلِمُونَ إِنَّمَا يُؤَخِّرُهُمْ لِيَوْمٍ تَشْخَصُ فِيهِ الأَبْصَـرُ ﴾
            (Consider not that Allah is unaware of that which the wrongdoers do, but He gives them respite up to a Day when the eyes will stare in horror.)﴿14:42﴾ This is the reason that Allah says here,
            ﴿فَوْيْلٌ لِّلَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ مِن مَّشْهِدِ يَوْمٍ عَظِيمٍ﴾
            (So woe unto the disbelievers from the meeting of a great Day.) referring to the Day of Resurrection. It has been related in an authentic Hadith that is agreed upon (in Al-Bukhari and Muslim), on the authority of `Ubadah bin As-Samit who said that the Messenger of Allah said,
            «مَنْ شَهِدَ أَنْ لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللهُ وَحْدَهُ لَا شَرِيكَ لَهُ، وَأَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا عَبْدُهُ وَرَسُولُهُ، وَأَنَّ عِيسَى عَبْدُاللهِ وَرَسُولُهُ وَكَلِمَتُهُ أَلْقَاهَا إِلَى مَرْيَمَ وَرُوحٌ مِنْهُ، وَأَنَّ الْجَنَّةَ حَقٌّ وَالنَّارَ حَقٌّ، أَدْخَلَهُ اللهُ الْجَنَّةَ عَلَى مَا كَانَ مِنَ الْعَمَل»
            (Whoever testifies that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah alone, Who has no partners, and that Muhammad is His servant and Messenger, and that `Isa was Allah’s servant and Messenger, and His Word that He cast upon Maryam, and a spirit from Him, and that Paradise and Hell are both real, then Allah will admit him into Paradise regardless of whatever he did.)
            ﴿أَسْمِعْ بِهِمْ وَأَبْصِرْ يَوْمَ يَأْتُونَنَا لَـكِنِ الظَّـلِمُونَ الْيَوْمَ فِى ضَلَـلٍ مُّبِينٍ ﴾
            ﴿وَأَنْذِرْهُمْ يَوْمَ الْحَسْرَةِ إِذْ قُضِىَ الاٌّمْرُ وَهُمْ فِى غَفْلَةٍ وَهُمْ لاَ يُؤْمِنُونَ – إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَرِثُ الاٌّرْضَ وَمَنْ عَلَيْهَا وَإِلَيْنَا يُرْجَعُونَ ﴾
            (38. How clearly will they see and hear, the Day when they will appear before Us! But the wrongdoers today are in plain error.) (39. And warn them of the Day of grief and regrets, when the case has been decided, while (now) they are in a state of carelessness, and they believe not.) (40. Verily, We will inherit the earth and whatsoever is thereon. And to Us they all shall be returned.)

      • Lucky, through his hatred of Islam has become daft!! He is NO different from an Alsatian puppy…a complete nincompoop!

          • Lucky bin Poop Sniffer, MM is one hell of a nice person…with a heart of GOLD. MM said let there be a curse on YOU…but he is so good that he didn’t specify to you what that curse will be. He meant over your head let there be a permanent cloud of confusion as the Quran says :

            (Quran 2:18) : Deaf, Dumb and Blind; and they are NOT to return.

            (Quran 2:171) : And the example of the disbelievers is similar to one who calls upon one that hears nothing except screaming and yelling; deaf, dumb, blind – so they do not have sense.

            (Maidah 5:71) :And they assumed that there will be no punishment, so they turned blind and deaf.

            But according to ME you are already a GONE CASE and there is NO need of invoking any curse….as why curse a sick person correct?? You are so much out of your mind that you cannot control yourself from writing filth about what others …..others say!!!

          • Lucky bin Ayatollah, how come your avatar is of Ayatollah Khomeini…with its long beard?

            Narendra Modi is an Old Cockerel, just like that Avatar of yours…. and Indians are being taken for FOR A RIDE in that Euphoria of lies. Indians can never be satisfied with anything…imagine all that advancement the Sonia administration brought about, the launching of satellites, education, infrastructure, RTI, …..etc!

            These Indian dudes are being deceived by this Old Cockerel who uses media anchors to favour him..the way Kejriwal was caught recently influencing a TV anchor….. wants to be the watchman of the Treasury of India and build more toilets with that money!!.

            This Old Cockerel is a divider, in every State he goes he always talks ills of the CMs there, talks against their Chief Ministers…thus dividing people instead of unifying Indians. Is that a quality of a Good Leader? He NEVER talks of employment, infrastructure, economics, how he will cope with the outside greater world, etc, etc.

            Muslim Nations will NOT accept him from his 2002 Gujarat riots track records!

            Rahul is the RIGHT person!!!!

    • Lucky bin NUKER, there is NO better site … looking at than that simple Cubic Stone structure called Kaaba…the best on this planet!! There is NO decoration or special light effects, music, etc….but it ranks as the MOST beautiful site in the world. The fake vatican CANNOT touch its toes……Ask any person who has visited that place and you will be told it is better ……a thousand times more than even the seven wonders of the world combined…it IS VERY beautiful…extremely exquisite.

      Your ass ought to be nuked FIRST!

    • Lucky bin Missing Plane : Today, it is the FIFTH day since the Boeing 777, Malaysian Plane –with over 230 people on board, the one similar to American Boeings of 911, which surprisingly had only 213 people total in all the FOUR planes…disappeared in the thin air.

      Why 213 people in FOUR Boeings?????

      Where is this Western world…which “knows” every terrorist in the world…PLANE…has been caught with pants down??? Where a “terrorist” is they know and DRONE him as well as civilians just like killing rats…as long as it is a Muslim life….but what about a huge, gigantic Boeing…NO track?????????????

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s