Ireland: Pastor calls Islam “satanic” ; fanatics prove his point by trying to bomb his church


[Befast Telegraph] The bulky package aroused suspicion when it arrived at the north Belfast church yesterday.

Pastor James McConnell outside his church, the Whitewell Metropolitan Tabernacle

Pastor James McConnell outside his church, the Whitewell Metropolitan Tabernacle

It has been at the centre of a storm over a controversial sermon during which Pastor James McConnell slammed Islam as “Satanic” and a religion “spawned in Hell”.

Police were called the church yesterday afternoon.

It is understood the package did not contain anything explosive but rather a sinister message.

That included a black rose, a joker card from a pack of cards as well as a message which read, “you will reap what you sow”.

This incident follows a hacking attack on the church website last week.

In a statement the church said a group called Izzah Hackers, whom it claimed were Islamic hackers, took down their website.

It particularly affected webstreams of services on the site. The church said it put into place a number of pieces of technology to deal with the disruption.

45 thoughts on “Ireland: Pastor calls Islam “satanic” ; fanatics prove his point by trying to bomb his church

  1. Criss Cross : YOU said > “I am a believer of Holy Quran, but NOT believer in the recent muslims & their activities!”
    Nobody favours any atrocities done by Muslim fanatics as well as Non Muslim dudes. If YOU are a believer of the Quran, then that is YOUR choice…but talking ill of Muslims without substance is evil in itself!

  2. Thought of sharing this (Warning: don’t watch if you have a weak heart)!!!

    ISIS Beheads Christian Children!!!

    Don’t forget to go thru the comments below the video too.

    • “Don’t forget to go thru the comments below the video too” –> I mean in Youtube page (NOT in these pages) if you view this video in Youtube.

    • There is NOTHING in the video that shows the “graphic” images and remember the ultimatum the Muslims offered, if it were true? This dude is CLEARLY an Islamophobic..
      caught LYING when questioned! Didn’t Bush, another Christian Islamophobic, kill over a million innocent Muslims in the same area? Now, the Iraqi media is controlled by the USA, so isn’t it easy to show us the actual atrocities Muslims commit against the Christians??

      • http://lindaikeji.blogspot.in/2014/08/graphic-pics-isis-behead-christian.html

        Actually I myself didn’t had the guts to see the video after seeing the ABOVE photos 😦

        BUSH killed million muslims in the same area??? Then why the muslims killing thousands of innocent people & kids INSTEAD of Bush????
        Buddy, you are just making a fun of yourself in most of your comments 🙂

        Iraqi media is controlled by US, Pakistan media is controlled by US, Afghanistan media is controlled by US, Syrian, Egyptian media, All controlled by US!!! Then what are everybody doing??? Just blogging and blaming US like you???

        • SS bin Raj, I wonder if YOU have enough knowledge and are competent enough to have any argument on specific subject! Do YOU know what CONTROL of media is?
          Do YOU know that Time Warner owns CNN, HBO, Time and Warner Bros? Fox, Wall Street Journal, New York Post is owned by News Corp. The rest are owned by CBS, Viacom, Disney and GE.
          NO foreign news can be reported without going through the above six CONTROL Houses and they have to be first sanctioned by the Government. Every NEWS that YOU read, see or hear has been sanctioned through media control by the Government of YOUR county whose Media is controlled by the above SIX conglomerates and BBC.
          They do NOT interfere in the Local News and developments of individual countries but reports for example of major foreign News, for example 9/11 are censured by them and ONLY then released.
          Ask YOURSELF, who controls the MOST common types of satellites which give News to the World? “Common types include military and civilian Earth observation satellites, communications satellites, navigation satellites, weather satellites, and research satellites. Space stations and human spacecraft in orbit are also satellites. Satellite orbits vary greatly, depending on the purpose of the satellite, and are classified in a number of ways. Well-known (overlapping) classes include low Earth orbit, polar orbit, and geostationary orbit.” (wiki)
          That is called the CONTROL of Media!
          YOU don’t know that for one Saddam the controversially elected Bush killed over 2 million Iraqis? YOU don’t know that for one bin laden over a million innocent Afghanis have been maimed and still being killed? You don’t know what happened in Cambodia and Vietnam? Where do Muslims kill “thousands” of people? How come we are fed with daily news of the American martyrs…whereas the killings of those millions was NEVER reported?
          YOU are a BIASED person…hating Muslim for kicks and I do NOT entertain such biased minds! Islam is the MOST beautiful religion and that is why it is growing, growing…growing and growing…and NO Bush, Patterson or YOUR likes can stop it. Today Islam is Number ONE religion in the world because its Leader is God Himself called Allah!!

          • Another dissembling brain-dead muslim? Media control is totally negated by THIS medium- the internet which is why ISLAM is being exposed as the vicious, ridiculous, evil invention of the insane 7th century psychopath. HOW is it you buffoons refuse to see that ALL the current violence is being done IN THE NAME OF ALLAH? You are deluded, stupid, ignorant and terrified of your own ‘holy’ books and the filth and depravity therein- and your response to the truth is denial and claims “Islam is a beautiful religion”.

            It is certainly NOT the no1 religion. But of course with muslim taqiyya you can think it is.
            Where are thousands of muslims being killed- in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan…. but you are, of course blinded to that- because you are a stupid moronic… muslim.

            ISLAM will be stopped- with nuclear annihilation, if needed. Don’t delude yourself that it can’t happen- see what happened to Japan and think about what easy targets Mecca and Medina would make… and that’s only the start. We will NEVER submit to your putrid fantasies.

  3. HOW MISS PLUM WAS CONCEIVED:

    ALLAH WANTS TO KNOW IF YOU ARE BUGGING YOUR WIFE?

    Distortion committed by Bukhari whilst copying down a tradition in his ‘Sahih’ pertaining to the legitimacy of sodomy

    We read in the Holy Quran:

    Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will (Yusufali, 2:223).
    In various Sunni works we read that testimony of Abdullah Ibn Umar regarding the reason for the revelation of the said verse qua legitimacy of performing buggery on one’s wife. Hafiz Jalaluddin Suyuuti for example recorded in Tafseer Durre Manthur, Volume 1 page 638:
    وأخرج الحسن بن سفيان في مسنده والطبراني في الأوسط والحاكم وأبو نعيم في المستخرج بسند حسن عن ابن عمر قال‏:‏ إنما نزلت على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏{‏نساؤكم حرث لكم‏.‏‏.‏‏.‏‏}‏ الآية‏.‏ رخصة في إتيان الدبر‏.‏
    Hasan bin Sufiyan in his Musnad, Tabarani in Al-Awsat, Hakim and Abu Naeem in Al-Mastakhraj with a ‘Hasan’ chain of narration narrated from Ibn Umar who said: ‘This verse was revealed upon the Holy Prophet (s) in respect of the permissibility of performing sex in the anus of a woman’
    Curiously, when it came to the great Imam Bukhari, he felt compelled to record the statement of Abdullah Ibn Umar in an incomplete manner. We read in Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 50:
    Narrated Nafi’: Whenever Ibn ‘Umar recited the Qur’an, he would not speak to anyone till he had finished his recitation. Once I held the Qur’an and he recited Surat-al-Baqara from his memory and then stopped at a certain Verse and said, “Do you know in what connection this Verse was revealed? ” I replied, “No.” He said, “It was revealed in such-and-such connection.” Ibn ‘Umar then resumed his recitation. Nafi added regarding the Verse:–”So go to your tilth when or how you will” Ibn ‘Umar said, “It means one should approach his wife in ..”
    ‘In’ what? Of course IN her anus and whilst Hafiz Jalaluddin Suyuti and other famed Sunni scholars recorded this fact, it was Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani who filled in the blanks whilst commenting on the cited tradition of Bukhari:

    في إتيان المرأة في دبرها
    “Approach the woman in her anus”

    Fatah ul Bari Sharah Sahih Bukhari, Volume 8 page 190
    Imam Bukhari has recorded this tradition in his ‘Sahih’ with the following chain of narration:
    Ishaq (bin Rehwiya) – Nadar – Ibn Aun – Nnaf’i
    Now the most interesting part is that Bukhari actually copied down the above statement of Abdullah Ibn Umar from his Shaykh, namely Ishaq bin Rehwiya as mentioned by Ibn Hajar Asqalani:
    فقد أخرجها إسحاق ابن راهويه في مسنده وفي تفسيره بالإسناد المذكور ، وقال بدل قوله حتى انتهى إلى مكان ” حتى انتهى إلى قوله نساؤكم حرث لكم فأتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم فقال : أتدرون فيما أنزلت هذه الآية ؟ قلت لا . قال : نزلت في إتيان النساء في أدبارهن
    Ishaq bin Raheweh recorded it in his Musnad and his Tafsir with the same chain, when it reached the part “your wives are tilth to you, so go to your tilth anyhow you will” he said: ‘Do you know what for this verse has been revealed about?’

    They said: ‘No’.

    He replied: ‘It has been revealed in regards to approaching women in their anuses’

    Interestingly whilst citing the said tradition verbatim Bukhari committed deception and did not quote the words of his Shaykh opting to leave a blank, in the hope that the attention plan of his readers would be short enough to confuse them and direct them to the next narration.

    • Louis F,
      “Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will” (Yusufali, 2:223).

      Correct…..the “missionary style” is what conceived Plum but what about YOU…was it the doggy that DID the ACT??

      Jesus was a mere STORY character “created” by the anonymous author in the Book according to Matthew. Did Jesus EVER claim anywhere that he would CARRY away the SINS?? If NOT,~ then~ why do the Christians believe in GRACE through salvation?

      When Jesus “DIED”, were the guilty prisoners ~ FREED from the JAILS…world over?

      Huh…Jesus carried our SINS!

    • Repeat: Jesus is a fabricated story Character in the Book of Matthew, who copied verses from the Past Scriptures, distorted those verses and “created” his Hero whom he called Jesus Christ. Do YOU know why this unknown author of Matthew did that? He wrote to justify his/her hatred of the Jews…in that the author depicts that Jesus, the servant of God, was killed by the Jews!

      The New World order is NOT a new concept introduced by the illuminati, Bush or Rothschild but had its beginning in the 15th Century and that is why King James Version was written. This New World order concept converted Jesus to a carrot!

      This “carrot” they took to all parts of the world and used the bible to subjugate, undermine and dominate the world…the Order that established them as the COLONIALISTS.

      They entered foreign lands as Saints, as Fatherly figures but eventually dominated the people and relegated them to suburbs, thus taking their best land. They tortured and killed their leaders and soon became masters!

      Jesus NEVER lived and the Vatican Church is a farce!

    • CC bin Raj, “If we Muslims are really against these Islamists, we have to take a clear and a vocal stand against them and what they stand for.”

      YOU being a “WE” Muslim, can YOU help YOUR fellow Muslims in saying HOW YOU would go about “a vocal stand against them”??

      Another question : Since YOU are a “WE” why have YOU kept quiet all this time??

      WHY haven’t YOU taken a vocal STAND against them?? Aren’t YOU surprised that
      there is NOTHING wrong that ISLAM is DOING…that can be reported save for very FEW self seeking Muslims….but such individuals and groups are found in every religion, every Nation, correct?

      Say anti things against Islam and that is WHAT I shall respond to…….as my passion is wearing out!! Nothing against Islam….?????? Huh…suffering from bankruptcy?

      • Can’t understand what exactly you are trying to mean! Today majority of muslims have turned into devils/dajjal like this, it doesn’t matter whether you believe it or not. Why just blame West? And when that is the case, then there has to be some issues with Islam. And that is what this & other similar websites are doing.

        “Nothing against Islam….????? Huh”
        The muslims are against Islam! Huh! Huh! Huh!

        • CC, I ask YOU to desist from spreading YOUR FAKE balls about Islam. Muslims are VERY good people and I live in their midst. They have NO hatred against ANYBODY. WHICH ISLAMIC SITE ATTACKS OTHER RELIGIONS IF THOSE SITES ARE not TO clear THE MERE MISCONCEPTIONS??

          Give us a single site where Muslims attack and profane other religions.

          And, If YOU are NOT a believer of the Quran then why do you spread YOUR hatred towards others who are innocent of any crime against YOU??

          • I am a believer of Holy Quran, but NOT believer in the recent muslims & their activities!

          • Better- here is your koran attacking other religions–

            Take not the Jews and the Christians for friends. … He among you who taketh them for friends is (one) of them. Q5:51
            The Jews … We have cast among them enmity and hatred till the Day of Resurrection. Q5:64

            Your answer?????

    • CC, the MAJOR media in the world IS controlled by the Western World…as witnessed by on-going wars on Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt……and do YOU remember the destruction and takeover of the Al~jazeera…during Iraq war which WAS reporting as things happened and without filtering? Most CNN reporters shifted there!!!!

      Do YOU remember the partial and biased NEWS coming from the CNN…due to which it lost its credibility the world over?

      THAT Media is silent ONLY because whatever reports YOU are receiving are “PLANTED” otherwise the Western Media would NEVER remain shutup!

      Did the Muslims create the First and the Second World WARS? We know of the Western instigation of wars within independant countries by interference just for the CONTROL of OIL reserves. YOU do KNOW that, don’t YOU??

      Who has displaced 50 million people…isn’t it the West, through its manipulation?
      The West should come to its senses and know that killing innocent people in the name of TERRORISM is sinful…in the EYES of Humanity…and instead strive for stability in the World that it CONTROLS.

      • When Millions are killed in the past so many decades (& in present too), due to the conflict of Shia & Sunni, that too are caused by Western media, right??? YOU keep on Blaming others and the followers of Islam will keep on the slaughtering!

        http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
        These are ALLLLL Western media cover-ups, right???

        • CC bin Raj, None of YOUR business in regards to two brothers fighting, of the same religion. Where have :
          “Millions are killed in the past so many decades (& in present too), due to the conflict of Shia & Sunni”??

          Where and when have “millions” been killed? Is that coming from YOUR impoverished empty BOX?
          WHICH SUNNI KILLS A PERSIAN??

        • Plum
          “Muhammad(saw) was the greatest person ever lived”
          In western morality being a rapist, pedophile, mass murderer, racist does not make “the greatest person who ever lived”. To a muslim (who has never read the koran), maybe so.

  4. Pingback: Ireland: Pastor calls Islam “satanic” ; fanatics prove his point by trying to bomb his church | Last Days News4Christians

  5. Raj,

    YOU “forgot” to add the following, which was in the continuation of the article :

    IRISH police INVESTIGATE Pastor James McConnell!!!!!!!

    “Flashback: Ireland: Christian Pastor Speaking Truth About Islam Is Investigated By Police For ‘Hate Mongering’ – “A 75-year-old Irish preacher was subjected to a police probe after he condemned Islam in a sermon and was accused of ‘hate mongering.’ James McConnell, pastor of the Whitewell Metropolitan Church in North Belfast, Ireland, discussed the religion of Islam during an evening sermon on Sunday, May 18th. During the sermon, McConnell denounced Islam and said the contrast between it and Christianity is stark. ‘The God we worship and serve this evening is not Allah,’ he proclaimed, according to a video of his sermon. ‘The Muslim god—Allah—is a heathen deity.”

    This James Connell dude must be a Catholic as he easily jumped to the conclusion that some remote Palestinian Hackers were bugging his church, as all Catholic do in attacking Islam…to NO avail. And Robert Spencer bin Lucky bin Satan is the same!

    NO wonder he “thought” a black rose, a joker card from a pack of cards as well as a message which read, “you will reap what you sow”.

    Is THAT an evidence of a Muslim involvement?

    This rubber-headed dummy pastor LIES AND THAT IS WHY HE HAS BEEN BOOKED!!!!!!!!!!

    • Louis Farrakhan bin Nation of Islam,

      Psalms 82:6 KJV :

      “I have said, YE are GOD; and all of you are children of the most High”

      What is GOD saying in the ABOVE verse?? Is it saying that YOU, Louis Farrakhan, are
      an Idiot??

      NO, it IS saying that YOU are NOT an IDIOT but that YOU are a GOD! Thus, every human being is a GOD!

      And, that we, the entire MANKIND, are HIS sons and daughters…we are all HIS kids.

      From the above ~Jesus was HIS child too…just like YOU and ME. Repeat : YOU are GOD too besides being God’s baby. It means, YOU, I and Jesus, all the Pagans, Jews, Christians and Muslims are real, true brothers.

      According to Psalms 82:6 KJV, YOU and POPE are GODS! Does it make any sense…this Bible??

      • Louis bin Nation of Islam, the knuckle sized FETLOCK! Another perplexing statement :
        I am an African and so automatically ALL Blacks, Browns and Whites, those born in Africa become my brothers! NOW what race am I, dude?

        Jesus NEVER lived…he was a mere story character. So, what happens to ALL these Bibles by tons in the world…will they be burnt? What about the sins of deaths caused by the Crusaders of the Jews, fellow heresy-Christians, Pagans and Muslims? What will happen to ALL these Churches in the world, the Vatican and the PAPACY?

        What will happen to Farrakhan ~who pretends to be taking the “Nation of Islam”, a black “MID-Islam” religious body, forwards and backwards in waves, who knows NOT a verse of the Quran, lingering between the Church and Mosque…what YE say about him?

        What WILL happen to the likes of YOU, FETLOCK…a joint stuck like Adam’s apple… in the FAKE Nazarene beliefs??

        “Matthew” C R E A T E D Jesus by copying verses from the Old Testament and SAUL bin PAUL carried the LIES using his cronies namely Mark, Luke and John and ENHANCED his Character equating to GOD the Creator.

        YOU have to GO back to YOUR kinder garten NOTES to find out what ATHEIST stands for….as YOU, the FETLOCK, make wild guesses even about the SOURCES of the Quran
        and its beautiful teachings……

        • MS PLUM SAYS:

          Jesus NEVER lived…he was a mere story character.

          YOU MAKE MUHAMMAD TO BE A LIAR!

          THIS MUSLIM SITE MAKE YOU OUT TO BE AN IGNORANT LIAR!

          JESUS IN THE QURAN

          4/18/2014 – Religious Interfaith – Article Ref: IC0812-3759
          Number of comments: 10
          By: Sayyid Abul Ala Mawdudi
          IslamiCity* –

          Jesus or Isa in Arabic (peace be upon him) is of great significance in both Islam and Christianity. However, there are differences in terms of beliefs about the nature and life occurrences of Jesus . There are about 71 verses in the Quran that refer to Prophet Jesus. Following is a translation and explanation of Chapter 3 verses 44 thru 60 by Sayyid Abul Ala Mawdudi, English rendering by Muhammad Akbar.

          O Muhammad, these are the “unseen” things, We are revealing to you: you were not present there when the priests of the Temple were casting lots by throwing their quills to decide which of them should be the guardian of Mary: 43 nor were you with them when they were arguing about it. Quran 3:44

          Note 43: As Mary was a girl who had been dedicated by her mother to the Temple in the way of God, the question of her guardianship had become a problem for the keepers because of her sex. They were therefore casting lots to decide the delicate problem.

          And remember when the angels said, “O Mary, God sends you the good news of a Command of His: his name shall be Messiah, Jesus son of Mary. He will be highly honored in this world and in the Next World and he will be among those favored by God. He will speak to the people alike when in the cradle and when grown up, and he will be among the righteous.” Hearing this, Mary said, “How, O Lord, shall I have a son, when no man has ever touched me?” “Thus shall it be,”44 was the answer. God creates whatever He wills. When He decrees a thing, He only says, “Be” and it is. (Continuing their message, the angels added,) “And God will teach him the Book and wisdom, and give him the knowledge of the Torah and the Gospel, and appoint him as His Messenger to the children of Israel.” Quran 3:45-49

          Note 44 That is, “Although no man has touched you, yet a son shall be born to you.” It should be noted that the same word “kazalika, “meaning “so shall it be,” had been used in response to Zacharias’ prayer. It, therefore, carries the same sense here. Moreover, the whole context here corroborates the story that Mary was given the glad tidings of the birth of a son without any sexual intercourse, and the birth of Christ, in actual fact, took place in that unusual way. If a son was to be born to her in the normal known way, and if the event of the birth of Jesus had taker. place in a natural way, then the whole discourse starting from verse 33 and ending with verse 63 would become absolutely pointless. Not only that but all other references to the unusual birth of Jesus in the Qur’an would lose their significance and meaning. The Christians had made Jesus the Son of God and worthy of worship simply because of his unusual birth without a father and the Jews had accused Mary because they had witnessed that she had given birth to a child, though she was not married. Had it been otherwise, then the two groups could have been told plainly that the girl was married to such and such a man and that Jesus was from his seed. In that case, one fails to see the reason why such a long introduction and a series of arguments should have been necessary to remove all doubts about his miraculous birth. Then Jesus could have been called the son of a particular man, instead of being called “the son of Mary”. The position of those people who, on the one hand, profess to believe the Holy Qur’an to be the Word of God and on the other hand try to prove that Jesus was born after the natural coming together of a husband and wife, really try to show that God is not able to express Himself as clearly as these people. (May God protect us from blasphemy!)

          (And when he came as a Messenger to the children of Israel, he said,) “I have come to you with a clear Sign from your Lord: in your very presence, I make the likeness of a bird out of clay and breathe into it and it becomes, by God’s Command, a bird. I heal those born blind and the lepers and I bring to life the dead by God’s Command: I inform you of what you eat and what you store up in your houses. Surely there is a great Sign for you in all this, if you have a mind to believe. 45 And I have come to confirm those teachings of the Guidance of the Torah which are intact in my time. 46 Lo! I have come with a clear Sign from your Lord; 47 so fear God and obey me. Indeed God is my Lord, and also your Lord; therefore worship Him alone: that is the straight way.”48 Quran 3:49-51

          Note 45 That is, “These Signs are clear enough to convince you that I have been sent by that God Who is the Creator and Absolute Ruler of this universe, provided that you are not obdurate but are willing to accept the Truth.”

          Note 46 That is, “This is yet another proof of the fact that I have been sent by God. If I had been a false prophet I would have invented my own religion and by virtue of these miracles striven to divert you from your previous Faith to the New creed. But I profess the same original religion to be true and confirm the same teachings which were brought by the Prophets before me.”

          The fact that Jesus taught the same religion that had been presented by Moses and the other Prophets is supported even by the existing Gospels. For example, according to the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus declared in the Sermon on the Mount: “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the Prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.” (5: 17).

          One of the Pharisees, who was a lawyer, asked Jesus, “Which is the great commandment in the law?” He replied:

          “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and the great commandment. And the second is like. unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and Prophets.” (Matthew 22: 37-40).On another occasion Jesus said to his disciples:

          “The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.” (Matthew 23: 2-3).
          Note 47 That is, “I have come to efface and abolish the superstitions of your ignorant people, the hairsplitting of your jurists, the religious austerities of your ascetics and the restrictive additions made in the Law of God under the non-Muslim domination; I will make lawful or unlawful for you only those things which God has made lawful or unlawful.”

          Note 48 This shows that like all other Prophets, Jesus also based his teachings on the following three fundamentals:

          1. The Supreme Authority to which mankind should submit and surrender exclusively belongs to God and all the social and moral systems should be built entirely on it.

          2. Being a representative of the same Paramount Power, a prophet must be obeyed unconditionally.

          3. God alone is entitled to prescribe laws and regulations for making things lawful or unlawful, pure and impure; consequently all laws imposed by others must be abolished.

          Thus it is clear that Jesus, Moses, Muhammad and all other Prophets (God’s peace be upon them all) had one and the same mission. Those people who aver that different Prophets were sent with different missions and to fulfil different aims, are gravely mistaken. Anyone, who is delegated by the Absolute Master of the Universe to His subjects, cannot have any other mission than to prevent the people, from becoming disobedient to and independent of Him, and to forbid them to set others to rank with God as partners in His Authority in any way. For, they are sent to invite the people to surrender and submit and be loyal to the Almighty God and worship Him alone.

          It is a pity that the existing Gospels do not present the mission of Jesus so precisely and clearly as it has been presented above in the Holy Qur’an. Nevertheless all the three basic things mentioned above are found scattered over in these Books. For instance, the fact that Jesus believed exclusively in the worship of God is clear from the following:

          1. “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve.” (Matthew 4: 10).
          2. Not only did he believe in this, but also made it the ultimate aim of all his activities and strove to make the people of the earth to submit to the revealed Law of God just as the whole universe submits to His physical Law.

          “Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.” (Matthew 6 :10).
          Then the fact that Jesus always presented himself as a prophet and as a representative of the Kingdom of Heaven, and always invited the people to follow him in that capacity alone, is supported by a number of his sayings. When he started his mission in his native place, Nazareth, the people of his own town and his own kinsfolk rose against him and according to an agreed tradition of Matthew, Mark and Luke, he said: “No prophet is accepted in his own country”. And when his enemies were conspiring at Jerusalem to kill him and the people advised him to go to somewhere else, he replied: “It cannot be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem.” (Luke 13: 33).

          When he was entering Jerusalem for the last time, his disciples began to utter in a loud voice: “Blessed be the King that cometh in the name of the Lord.” At this the Pharisees felt offended and asked him to silence his disciples. He replied:

          “I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out.” (Luke 19: 38-40).
          On another occasion he said: “Come unto me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn of me for I am meek and lowly in heart ….. my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.” (Matthew 11: 28-30). Moreover the fact that Jesus wanted the people to obey the Divine Law rather than man-made laws becomes clear from that tradition of Matthew and Mark which says that when the Pharisees asked, why his disciples transgressed the tradition of the elders and took food without washing their hands,. he replied and said, “Well hath Esaias prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written. This people honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. For laying aside the commandments of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups, and many other such like things ye do. And he said unto the, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition. For Moses said, Honor thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death: But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free. And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother; Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.” (Mark 7 : 6-13).

          When Jesus perceived that the children of Israel were bent upon disbelief, he said, “Who will be my helper in the cause of God?” The disciples 49 (promptly responded and) said, “We are God’s helpers: 50 we have believed in God; so do bear witness that we are Muslims (who surrender to God). Lord! we have believed in that which Thou hast sent down and followed Thy Messenger; so enroll us among those who bear witness. Quran 3:52-53

          Note 49 The Arabic word (havari) is almost the equivalent of “helper”. In the Bible, they have been called “disciples” and at some places “apostles” because Jesus used to send them to the people to deliver his message, and not because God had appointed them as His apostles.

          Note 50 Those people who help establish Islam have been called God’s helpers. In order to understand its significance, it should be kept in view that God has taken upon Himself to persuade human beings to adopt Islam of their free will, for He does not force His will on man in those spheres of his life in which He has granted him freedom of action but likes to convince him by reason and admonition. As it is the work of God to bring the people to the right way by admonition and advice, He calls those people who exert their utmost to establish Islam “His helpers and companions:” This is indeed the highest position that a servant of God can aspire to achieve. For man’s position is merely that of a servant when he is engaged in praying, fasting and other kinds of worship, but he is elevated to the high and unique position of God’s companion and assistant when he is exerting for the establishment of the way of God. And this is indeed the loftiest position of spiritual attainment, to which a man can aspire in this world.

          Then the children of Israel began to plot (against Jesus) and God also devised His secret plan, and God is the best of devisers. (It was to carry out His secret plan that) He said, “O Jesus, now I will recall 51 you and raise you up to Myself and cleanse you of (the uncongenial company and the filthy environment of ) those who have rejected you and will set up those who follow you above those who have rejected you 52 till the Day of Resurrection. And ultimately all of you shall return to Me: then I will judge between you in what you differ, and punish with a grievous punishment, both in this world and in the Hereafter, those who have adopted the attitude of disbelief and rejection and they shall have none to help them. And those, who have believed and done good deeds, shall be given their rewards in full. And note it well that God does not like the transgressors.” Quran 3:54-57

          Note 51 The word (mutawaffi) in the Arabic text is from (tawaffa) which literally means “to take and to receive” and “to seize the soul” is not its lexical but metaphorical meaning. Here it means “to recall from mission.” God recalled Jesus because the Israelites had rejected him in spite of the clear Signs he had brought. They had been disobeying God for centuries and, in spite of many a warning and admonition served to them, their national character was rapidly deteriorating. They had killed several Prophets, one after the other, and had grown so audacious as to demand the blood of any good man who ventured to invite them to the Right Way. In order to give them the last chance for turning to the Truth, God appointed among them two great Prophets, Jesus and John (God’s peace be upon them), at one and the same time. These Prophets came with such clear signs of their appointment from God that only such people dared reject them as were utterly perverted and prejudiced against the Truth and were averse to following the Right Way. Nevertheless the Israelites lost their last chance also as they not only rejected their invitation but also had the head of a great Prophet like John cut off openly at the request of a dancing girl. ‘And their Pharisees and Jurists conspired and sought to get Jesus punished with the death sentence by the Roman Government. Thus they had proved themselves to be so obdurate that it was useless to give the Israelites any further chance. So God recalled His Prophet Jesus and inflicted on them a life of disgrace up to the Day of Resurrection.

          It will be useful here to bear in mind the fact that this whole discourse is meant to refute and correct the Christian belief in the God-head of Jesus. Three main things were responsible for the prevalence of this belief among the Christians:

          1. The miraculous birth of Jesus.
          2. His concrete and tangible miracles.
          3. His ascension to heaven about which their Scriptures were explicit.

          The Qur’an confirmed the first thing and made it plain that the birth of Jesus without a father was only a manifestation of the infinite powers of God. He can create anybody in whatever manner He wills. His miraculous birth, therefore, is no reason why he should be made a god or a partner in Godhead.
          The Qur’an also confirms the second thing and even recounts the miracles performed by Jesus, but makes it clear that all those miracles were performed by him, as a servant of God, by His leave and not as an independent authority. It is, therefore, wrong to infer that Jesus was a partner in Godhead.

          Now let us consider the third thing. If the Christian belief in “Ascension” had been wholly baseless, it could have been refuted by pointing out that the object of their worship, the so-called “Son of God”, expired long ago and had become one with dust, and that they could see, for their full satisfaction, his grave at such and such a place. But the Qur’an does not declare this explicitly. On the other hand, it not only uses such words as give at least a vague suggestion of his “Ascension”, but also denies that Jesus was crucified at all. According to it the one who gave a loud cry at his last hour, saying, “Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?” and the one whose picture they carry on the cross, was not Messiah at all, because God had recalled to Himself the real Messiah before the crucifixion took place.

          It is thus clear that those people who try to prove the death of Jesus from these verses, really try to show that God is not able to express Himself clearly and unambiguously. (May God protect us from such a blasphemy!)

          Note 52 “Those who rejected” him were the Jews who were invited by Jesus to accept the Truth.
          “Those who follow” him are really the Muslims only but if it may be taken to imply all those who believe in him, then the sincere Christians may also be included.

          The stories which We are relating to you are full of signs and wisdom. In the sight of God, the case of the birth of Jesus is like that of Adam, whom He created out of dust and said, “Be”, and he was. 53 This is the fact of the matter your lord is imparting, and you should not be of those who doubt it. 54 Quran 3:58-60

          Note 53 That is, “If one’s miraculous birth entitles one to become God or the Son of God, then Adam was better entitled to it because he was created without either a human father or a mother, while Jesus was born without a father only.

          Note 54 The main points in the discourse presented before the Christians up to here are:

          First, he was only a man who was born in a miraculous way by the will of God and given the power to perform certain miracles as a clear proof of his Prophet-hood. As regards his “Ascension”, God had arranged to recall him to Himself before the disbelievers could crucify him. In fact, the Master of the Universe has full powers to treat any of His servants in any special way He pleases. It is, therefore, wrong to infer from the exceptional treatment accorded to Jesus that he himself was the Master or the Master’s Son or a partner in the authority of the Master.

          Secondly, their attention has been drawn to the fact that Prophet Muhammad (God’s peace be upon him) invites them to the same Truth that had been preached by Prophet Jesus (God’s peace be upon him) in his own time and that the teachings of the two Prophets were basically identical.
          Thirdly, the disciples of Jesus believed in and followed the same religion of Islam that is being presented in the Qur’an. However the Christians of the later age discarded the message of Jesus and digressed from the Faith of his disciples.

          • Luois bin Nation of Islam, YOU are doing clear Taqiyyaship!

            When I say Jesus NEVER existed, YOU immediately respond by saying that “but Islam approves of Jesus”…and go through copy pasting the same material over and OVER, thus ending up in “circular-reasoning”!

            Jesus is a fabricated story Character in the Book of Matthew, who copied verses from the Past Scriptures, distorted those verses and “created” his Hero whom he called Jesus Christ. Do YOU know why this unknown author of Matthew did that? He wrote to justify his/her hatred of the Jews…in that the author depicts that Jesus, the servant of God, was killed by the Jews!

            The New World order is NOT a new concept introduced by the illuminati, Bush or Rothschild but had its beginning in the 15th Century and that is why King James Version was written. This New World order concept converted Jesus to a carrot!

            This “carrot” they took to all parts of the world and used the bible to subjugate, undermine and dominate the world…the Order that established them as the COLONIALISTS.

            They entered foreign lands as Saints, as Fatherly figures but eventually dominated the people and relegated them to suburbs, thus taking their best land. They tortured and killed their leaders and soon became masters!

            Jesus NEVER lived and the Vatican Church is a farce!

      • Salami & Bacon to to you Ms Plum,

        ALL MOHAMMEDANS ARE SHABBAT GOYS!

        The unedited full-text of the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia

        SHABBAT GOY:

        The Gentile employed in a Jewish household on the Sabbath-day to perform services which are religiously forbidden to Jews on that day. The Shabbat goy’s duty is to extinguish the lighted candles or lamps on Friday night, and make a fire in the oven or stove on Sabbath mornings during the cold weather. A poor woman (“Shabbat goyah”) often discharges these offices. The hire in olden times was a piece of ḥallah; in modern times, about 10 cents.

        According to strict Jewish law, a Jew is not allowed to employ a non-Jew to do work on the Sabbath which is forbidden to a Jew. The rule of the Rabbis is “amirah le-goy shebut” (i.e., “to bid a Gentile to perform work on the Sabbath is still a breach of the Sabbath law,” though not so flagrant as performing the work oneself); but under certain circumstances the Rabbis allowed the employment of non-Jews, especially to heat the oven on winter days in northern countries.

        Legendary literature contains many instances in which the Shabbat goy was replaced by a Golem. The latest story in which the Shabbat goy plays a rôle is that of K. L. Silman Franco, in Hebrew, in “Aḥiasaf,” 5665 (1904-5). Maxim Gorki, the Russian novelist, was once employed as a Shabbat goy by the Jewish colonists in the governments of Kherson and Yekaterinoslav.
        Bibliography:

        Jacobs, in Jewish Year Book, 5659 (1899), p. 291.

        THE JEWISH RABBI WHO CREATED ISLAM

        ISLAM WAS FINANCED & CONTROLLED BY ARABIAN JEWS FROM ITS BEGINNING, TO BUILD AN ARMY TO FIGHT THE ROMAN EMPIRE.

        Intro:

        [ABU BAKR WAS A JEWISH RABBI]

        Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, perceiving this dreadful predicament, went to Mahomed, and offering him his submission, friendship, and services, endeavoured to enter with him into a friendly compact. Mahomed accepted his proposition with pleasure, conceived a great affection for him, and took his daughter, a handsome young girl ( A 6 YEAR OLD CHILD), for wife; he made him also a general in his army, and gave him the name of Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik, literally:

        The father of the maiden, the descendant of the righteous; this means, that of all his wives, who were either widows or divorced women, this one was the only one who had never been married before, and then she was the granddaughter of the celebrated chief of the captivity; therefore, the descendant of the righteous. This occurrence induced Mahomed to give up his terrible intention to destroy the Jews in his country, and thus did Rabbi Shallum save his people.

        THE BETRAYAL

        [Why Muhammad hated alcohol]

        Abu Bachr and Aliman now resolved among themselves to remove the dangerous enemy of the Jews, Bucheran. One evening Mahomed, Bucheran, Aliman, and Abu Bachr, were drinking together; the latter two soon saw that Mahomed and the astrologer were strongly intoxicated, and lay stretched out in a deep and profound sleep. Abu Bachr thereupon drew the sword of Mahomed from its scabbard, cut off therewith Bucharan’s head, and put the bloody sword back into its receptacle, and both then lay themselves down quietly near Mahomed to sleep. When Mahomed awoke and saw his friend lying decapitated near him, he cried out in a fury: “This terrible deed has been done by one of us three in our drunkenness!” Abu Bachr thereupon said quite unconcernedly: “Let each one draw his sword, and he whose weapon is stained with blood, must needs be the murderer!” They all drew their swords, and that of Mahomed was completely dyed with fresh blood, which proved thus clearly to his satisfaction that he had murdered his friend. He was greatly grieved at this discovery; cursed and condemned the wine which was the cause of this murder, and swore that he never would drink any more, and that also no one should do so who wishes to enter heaven. This is the cause why wine is prohibited to the Mahomedans.

        At a later period, Mahomed learned the whole transaction, and that his father-in-law was the perpetrator of the bloody deed; wherefore, he lost his favour, and he would not permit him to come before him. Abu Bachr went thereupon and conquered sixty places, which had not yet submitted to Mahomed, and presented them to him, through which means he became again reconciled to him, was received in favour, and remained thereafter at court.

        HISTORY OF PALESTINE
        614-1096 C.E.
        From the Accession of the Mahomedans to that of the Europeans.

        By Rabbi Joseph Schwarz, 1850

        From the Accession of the Mahomedans to that of the Europeans.

        In the year 4374* (614) there lived in Medina, in Arabia, Mahomed ibn Abdallah, descended from Keder, son of Ishmael (Genesis. 25:13), who had taken possession of Arabia and the neighbouring countries. Mahomed had two secret counsellors, who assisted him in the construction of his new system of doctrines and belief; these were Allman Mam Ali, of Jewish descent, and Turchman, a Christian; hence it resulted that the Koran contains many rules bearing analogy to Jewish ideas, for they were derived from Mam Ali.

        * It is not easy to give the precise year of the Chadjra (the flight of Mahomed), since all authorities are not agreed in this respect. In general, the year of the text is assumed. In a Hebrew work, out of which I have drawn largely, the year 4384 (621) is given. The Mahomedans reckon this year 5605 (1845) as the 1261st of the Chadjra. If we now calculate their years in general at 355 days, as they have no leap year, we shall have only about 1226 solar years, which would give us the year 4379 (619 of the Christian Era) as the year of the Chadjra.

        Mahomed had an astrologer at his court called Bucheran, who was a very great enemy of the Jews, and urged the prophet constantly to persecute and exterminate them entirely, so that Mahomed at length listened to the proposition, since he had without this already a hatred towards them, because they had not aided him in his campaigns according to his expectation; wherefore the whole Jewish population under his rule, ran great danger of being entirely cut off.

        [Abu Bakr was a Jewish Rabbi]

        Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, perceiving this dreadful predicament, went to Mahomed, and offering him his submission, friendship, and services, endeavoured to enter with him into a friendly compact. Mahomed accepted his proposition with pleasure, conceived a great affection for him, and took his daughter, a handsome young girl (CHILD, 6 YEARS OLD), for wife; he made him also a general in his army, and gave him the name of Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik, literally: The father of the maiden, the descendant of the righteous; this means, that of all his wives, who were either widows or divorced women, this one was the only one who had never been married before, and then she was the granddaughter of the celebrated chief of the captivity; therefore, the descendant of the righteous. This occurrence induced Mahomed to give up his terrible intention to destroy the Jews in his country, and thus did Rabbi Shallum save his people.

        [Why Muhammad hated alcohol]

        Abu Bachr and Aliman now resolved among themselves to remove the dangerous enemy of the Jews, Bucheran. One evening Mahomed, Bucheran, Aliman, and Abu Bachr, were drinking together; the latter two soon saw that Mahomed and the astrologer were strongly intoxicated, and lay stretched out in a deep and profound sleep. Abu Bachr thereupon drew the sword of Mahomed from its scabbard, cut off therewith Bucharan’s head, and put the bloody sword back into its receptacle, and both then lay themselves down quietly near Mahomed to sleep. When Mahomed awoke and saw his friend lying decapitated near him, he cried out in a fury: “This terrible deed has been done by one of us three in our drunkenness!” Abu Bachr thereupon said quite unconcernedly: “Let each one draw his sword, and he whose weapon is stained with blood, must needs be the murderer!” They all drew their swords, and that of Mahomed was completely dyed with fresh blood, which proved thus clearly to his satisfaction that he had murdered his friend. He was greatly grieved at this discovery; cursed and condemned the wine which was the cause of this murder, and swore that he never would drink any more, and that also no one should do so who wishes to enter heaven. This is the cause why wine is prohibited to the Mahomedans.

        At a later period, Mahomed learned the whole transaction, and that his father-in-law was the perpetrator of the bloody deed; wherefore, he lost his favour, and he would not permit him to come before him. Abu Bachr went thereupon and conquered sixty places, which had not yet submitted to Mahomed, and presented them to him, through which means he became again reconciled to him, was received in favour, and remained thereafter at court.

        Mahomed urged his conquests to the north and west; made war against Heraclius and his son Constantine, captured the country around Antiochia, Armenia, a part of Asia Minor (Anatolia), and Palestine. Jerusalem, however, continued in possession of the Greeks. Mahomed reigned 11 years, and died in 4385 (625); he was succeeded by his father-in-law, Abu Bachr, but he survived him but two years, when he also died.

        In 4387 (627), another father-in-law, Omar ibn Kataf, ascended the throne. In the tenth year of his reign (4397) he appeared before Jerusalem with a large army. He besieged it, and after producing great distress thereby in the city, it surrendered to his arms. He then made a treaty with the Greek inhabitants of the city, that they should pay him a ransom for their lives, and send an annual tribute. He commanded to rebuild the temple, and appropriated several pieces of ground, the proceeds of which were destined to defray the expenses and keep it in repair, which is continued to be done to this day. He built, accordingly, the great Mosque al Sachara [Dome of the Rock], of which I have spoken above. He also conquered the whole country around Damascus and Ispahan, which is a part of Persia.

        Egypt was taken by his general Omar ibn Aleaz, as also the city of Alexandria, where he burnt the celebrated library, through which learned posterity suffered an irreparable loss. This conquest of Egypt put an end to the government of the Mameluks, and it came under the rule of the Califs, and so it remained till the country was conquered by the Tartars in 4502 (742). In 4400 (640), Omar built the present al Mazr and called it Al Kairo, which means, “care, pains, sorrow;” since this building cost him much trouble, care, and labour. In the town of Pastat, the ancient Zoar (for which see the Appendix), he prohibited and prevented a terrible ancient custom, which was prevalent among the Greeks of that place. They used, on the day when the Nile begins to rise, to take a handsome young woman, to dress her in the most costly and brilliant attire, to lead her to the river under accompaniment of music and dancing, and then to throw her into the water; since, according to their opinion, the Nile would, in reward for this beautiful sacrifice, rise higher and higher, and scatter its rich blessings over the land. Omar reigned 15 years.

        In the year 4402 (642), Osman (or Othman) ibn Afan assumed the government. He was a son-in-law of Mahomed. In the year 4406 (646), he took the island of Rhodes, and in 4413 (603) the island of Cyprus, from the Greeks.

        In 4413 (653), the Calif Ali ibn Abu Talbih, also a son-in-law of Mahomed, who had slain his predecessor Osman, succeeded to the throne. The Persians, and many other Mahomedans, regard this Ali also as a prophet, equal to Mahomed. Even at the present day there are two sects of Mahomedans; one is composed of those who only believe in and acknowledge Mahomed as a prophet [Sunni], and the other of those who ascribe the same honour to Ali [Shia]. These two sects always are inimical towards, and persecute each other. In Syria and on the Lebanon there are likewise several Mahomedans who belong to the sect of Ali.–Under him the Mahomedans conquered the whole of Anatolia, and penetrated as far as Africa and Spain. He was succeeded, in 4419 (659), by his son, Calif Chazan ibn Ali.

        Calif Maevia ibn Sefian began his reign in 4434 (674). Under him there were constant wars and contests among the great men of the state, concerning the califate, and it was always doubtful whether he should be able to maintain himself on the throne or not.

        In 4435, Calif Abd al Maleki assumed the government. He made a treaty with the Greek Emperor of Constantinople, Justinian II. He built the city of Ramla, and several other towns in that neighbourhood. The district of Abu Gosh (see above, Kirjath-Jearim), is to this day called Belad Beni Amaleki, perhaps in allusion to this Calif. In his time, in 4459 (699), there ruled in Iraq and Babel yet another Calif, Chadjadj ibn Jusif. Abd al Maleki was succeeded in 4467 (707) by his son, Calif Walid I., ibn Abd al Maleki.

        In 4502 (742), the country was invaded by innumerable hordes of Tartars, from the vicinity of the Caspian Sea. They were called Turkemans ; hence the name of Turks. These conquered the whole of Syria, Cappadocia, and Palestine, and caused everywhere terrible devastations. The Arab Califs made war against them, and drove them out of the country; they, however, came back a third time, as I shall relate hereafter, till at length the Arabs and Turks became united, by the latter assuming the Koran and the Mahomedan religion, and formed, as at this day, but one nation, only that the former are called Arabs or Ishmaelites, and constitute the greater portion of the inhabitants of Palestine; whilst of the others, called Turks, but few are in our country, whereas in Turkey, in Europe, the population is mostly composed of them.

        In 4523 (763), there reigned the Calif Al Mansur, who built Bagdad, the modern Babylon.

        In 4546 (786), the Calif Harun al Rashid (i.e. the just) became ruler, and reigned till 4569 (809). He completed the building of the city of Baghdad, commenced by Al Mansur. In 4557 (797) there arose a terrible war between the Saracens and the Arabic tribes in Palestine, through which means Gaza, Ashkelon, Sarifea צריפין and Beth-Gubrin were entirely destroyed.

        In 4572 (812), the Mahomedans attacked and slew the ecclesiastical chiefs of the Christians in Jerusalem.

        In the year 4573 (813), ruled Calif Almamans ibn Harun, until the year 4603 (843).

        In 4628 (868), there reigned Sultan Ibn Achmad ibn Tulun over Egypt. In that year the Tartaric hordes made another irruption, and conquered Palestine and Egypt. Sultan Ibn Achmad had constant wars with them: he reigned till 4644 (884).

        In 4729 (969), there reigned the Calif Ma’ez, of the Fatimite family. This name was borne by the Califs of Kairuan, a country to the west of Egypt, in the neighbourhood where Carthage formerly stood (see Appendix). He conquered Egypt, Palestine, and Syria, and had his seat in Cairo (Al Mazr).

        Calif Al Chakim, the third of the Fatimite family, became sovereign in the year 4756 (996). He was a great enemy to the Christians, and persecuted them everywhere.

        In the year 4776 (1016), he advanced with a large army against Jerusalem, and drove away the Tartars, who yet occupied the same. He also destroyed totally the church which Constantine had built over the so­called place of Jesus’s sepulchre. His reign extended till 4781 (1021).

        The pilgrims who came from the west (Europe) to Palestine, and beheld these persecutions, painted them in strong and glaring colours on their return to their native countries, and moreover calumniated the Jews, as though these had contributed much to produce the enmity and persecution of the Christians on the part of Al Chakim. These and still other falsehoods and calumnies increased the hatred and the persecution towards the Jews in European countries; and when at a later period the pious crusaders from the west went eastward, to snatch the Holy Land from the power of the Mahomedans, they found ample opportunity to execute a pious and holy vengeance on these poor Israelites, as I shall relate somewhat more circumstantially hereafter.

        In 4781 (1021), his son Calif Dahir ibn Chakim became sovereign. He was a friend to the Christians, and permitted them to rebuild their destroyed church.

        In 4800 (1040), the Tartaric hordes made a third irruption under their leader Seldjuk, who was of the tribe Hildokiao. This chief was uncommonly successful in his conquests: he made war against the Egyptian Calif, and conquered Syria, and Jerusalem with its environs. He bitterly persecuted the Christians in the Holy City, and they had to endure terrible exactions, and were compelled to submit entirely to his arbitrary will.

        In 4859 (1099), the Arabs under the Egyptian Calif again acquired Jerusalem and the surrounding country, and drove the Tartars away from there, and thought themselves secure in possession of the city, when suddenly a new enemy came over them, with whom they had to wage a long and bloody strife. This enemy was the Europeans of the West, who in that very year entered the land of Palestine and conquered it.

        A Short Review Of This Period.

        There exist but few documents concerning the situation of the Jewish literati and literature in Palestine of this period. But at the time of Mahomed, the most distinguished and learned person amongst the Jews, Rabbi Yizchak Ha-Gaon, resided in Babylon. The title of Nahssi had at that time been given up for that of Gaon.

        In 4521 (761), there arose a serious contest in Babylon between the Resh Gelutha, and the celebrated Rab Acha, of Shabecheh, the author of the She’elthoth שאלתות through which cause the latter was not chosen as Gaön, wherefore he quitted Babylon and repaired to Palestine, where he ended his days.

        In 4543 (733), there lived in Beth-Zur, a town not far from Hebron, a man by the name of ‘Anan ענן a scholar of the then Gaon, Rabbi Yehudai, of Babylon. He had observed in his scholar that he had neither affection for, nor faith in our tradition as an exposition of the written law; wherefore he (‘Anan) could not be chosen either as Resh Gelutha or Gaon. He returned, therefore, to his native country, Palestine, and formed a new sect, the leader of which he became, by openly preaching against our system of tradition. The sect of the Sadducees, who only adopted the written law and rejected the tradition, had gradually fallen entirely into decay after the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem, and had become nearly dissolved. But the appearance of ‘Anan gave them new life, and they soon increased and spread extensively in Palestine, Egypt, and North Africa. In Palestine, they had yet another learned chief, Sheich Abu al Ferag, who wrote a work, bearing his own name, concerning the principles of his sect, and which contains much that is absurd and blasphemous. He is the same Abu al Ferag who is frequently mentioned in the Opinions of Maimonides תשובות הרמב״ם. Anan had a wife who was called Al Me’alma, i. e. the learned, the instructress, who was acknowledged chief of his sect after the death of her husband, and was consulted in all cases of doubt; and as everything was decided according to her opinion and practice, it came to be customary to ask among the sect, “How did Al Me’alma on that occasion? or what was her practice in that case?” and every one looked up to her for guidance. When, at a later period, Rabbi Joseph Ben Ali became Nahssi in Africa, he used every effort to suppress this sect in all directions,–so that it was nearly dissolved, and but few vestiges are found thereof at the present time; since all that is left are the few Caraites קראים who only acknowledge the written law, are partly descended from the ancient Sadducees, and are found in several places in Asia and Egypt. We find mentioned in Abn Ezra’s Commentary on the Pentateuch, several ridiculous expositions of many passages of Holy Writ ascribed to a certain Anan; it would, therefore, appear that he also had composed a commentary on the books of Moses.

        In general the situation of the Jews, under the rule of the Mahomedans, was quite favourable, and considerably better than under the Greeks, since the former are naturally more favourably inclined to Judaism;–so that scarcely any persecution took place in this whole period. Only when the Calif Omar ibn Kataf banished, in the year 4398 (638), the Christians from Tiberias, the same fate was soon meted out to the Jews, and they also had to quit this place.

        THE FIRST QURAN WAS AUTHORIZED BY THE JEWISH RABBI, ABU BAKR!
        NOW YOU WILL UNDERSTAND WHY THE QURAN IS FULL OF TALMUDIC MYTHS AND FABLES!

        • Louis bin Nation of Islam, YOU are NOT a Goy but a GOY-GOY!

          This is what YOU dummy have just said :”In general the situation of the Jews, under the rule of the Mahomedans, was quite favourable, and considerably better than under the Greeks, since the former are naturally more favourably inclined to Judaism;–so that scarcely any persecution took place in this whole period!”
          Huh…”so that scarcely any persecution took place in this whole period!”

          But, do YOU remember YOU had also said earlier that Muhammad had massacred hundreds of Jews in Medina in the TRENCH war?

          So, explain to us the contra, GOY-GOY!

    • Ms Plum shows her ignorance by stating James Connell MUST BE A CATHOLIC. If she took the time to Google the Whitewell Metropolitan Church in North Belfast, then she would realize that its NOT CATHOLIC.

  6. HOW YA PADDY?

    YOU WOULD THINK THAT BY NOW, YOU WERE SICK OF ALL THAT “HARRY POTTER” CAMEL SH-T ABOUT SATAN & HELL?

    TALMUDIC JUDAISM – CHRISTENDOM & MOHAMMEDANISM, ARE THE UNHOLY TRINITY OF THE ABRAHAMIC FAITH!

    ABRAHAM WAS THE FATHER OF CHILD ABUSE!

    A DIVINE COMEDY:

    OH GOD!

    The word “God” has no objective meaning. This explains why there have been so many religions throughout the ages. In this article I show that the God which we currently know as the only God of the universe was originally thought of as being one of many gods. If believers wish to accept the Bible as the word of God, then we have his own admission that he is not the only god.

    Early religions were polytheistic. In the Bible, God started out as a Jewish tribal god. By the early first century BCE, the definition changed to a Jewish God of the universe. In the early centuries CE there were many schools of thought at odds with each other. Modern Christianity arose through the efforts to unify God under one secular authority. There is more politics to religion than meets the eye.

    One could argue that the modern definition reflected a growing awareness among religious authorities that God was more encompassing than earlier thought. The counter to that argument is that by making the definition of God universal, it expanded Church authority. It is because the Church set itself as the medium for knowing about God, that it is, in effect, marketing itself.

    Without God’s minions campaigning on his behalf, he would have become a forgotten relic. God needs your support because the organizations behind him need your patronage. In effect, faith in God translates to faith in Synagogue/Church/Mosque authority.

    To make my point, what is wrong with this picture?
    God/YHWH/Allah, the creator of the universe, the super-intelligent being who is omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent and perfect in every way, can’t get his message across without guidance from religious organizations.
    In contrast, scientific discovery presents an opposing view of Nature as being devoid of any conscious activity. For argument’s sake, if there was a creator God, his first laws have proven to be the inviolable laws of Nature.
    It is only within human imagination that such laws can be violated.

    POLYTHEISM
    Joshua explains that Abraham’s ancestors served other gods.
    2And Joshua said to all the people, “Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel, ‘Your fathers lived of old beyond the Euphrates, Terah, the father of Abraham and of Nahor; and they served other gods. (Joshua 24:2)
    Jeremiah notes that for as many cities there are gods.
    28But where are your gods that you made for yourself? Let them arise, if they can save you, in your time of trouble; for as many as your cities are your gods, O Judah. (Jeremiah. 2:28)
    In biblical days, it was a hard and fast rule for kingdoms to have their own god as a symbol of political prestige.

    ELOHIM
    The term Elohim is plural for god and is used 216 times in the Old Testament for “gods” and 2366 times for “God.” The singular form of Elohim is Eloah and is used 55 times in place of “God.” This mistranslation hides the pluralistic nature of the Hebrew god. To the Israelites, Elohim encompasses all supernatural beings: spirits, angels, demons, semi-gods and so forth.
    So whenever they appealed to Elohim, they were inferring the entire pantheon.
    That these lesser beings are not gods is a matter of semantics. By pagan definition, they are all gods. For example, the Greek God, Mercury, was seen as a messenger god. To the ancient Jews, he would be the equivalent of an angel.
    According to the Hebrew translation, there were many gods involved in creation. There was not one single god all by himself.
    1In the beginning God [Elohim] created the heavens and the earth. (Genesis. 1:1)
    Genesis 1:2 explains the true meaning of Genesis 1:22, “Let us make man in our image.”
    26Then God [Elohim] said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.” (Genesis. 1:26)
    We have evidence that many gods revealed themselves to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Moses.
    2And God [Elohim] said to Moses, “I am the LORD.
    3I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty, but by my name the LORD I did not make myself known to them.(Exodus. 6:2-3)
    Only 216 or about ten percent of the time, Elohim is properly interpreted as gods.
    11Now I know that the LORD is greater than all gods, [Elohim] because he delivered the people from under the hand of the Egyptians, when they dealt arrogantly with them.” (Exodus. 18:11)
    A good example of how the English translations mislead can be found in Genesis 3:5. In the King James, the Serpent tells Eve she will be like the gods, knowing good from evil.
    5For God [Elohim] doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods [Elohim], knowing good and evil. (Genesis. 3:5 KJV)
    Modern translations convert to the singular God to hide a critical embarrassment.
    5For God [Elohim] knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God [Elohim], knowing good and evil.” (Genesis. 3:5)
    Out of 55 times when the singular form of God, eloah appears, it appears 40 times in the book of Job. God is never addressed directly as eloah. The term is always applied indirectly.
    9By the breath of God [eloah] they perish, and by the blast of his anger they are consumed. (Job 4:9)
    If there were no other gods, Yahweh would have no reason to be jealous.
    14You shall not go after other gods, of the gods of the peoples who are round about you;
    15for the LORD your God in the midst of you is a jealous God; lest the anger of the LORD your God be kindled against you, and he destroy you from off the face of the earth. (Deuteronomy. 6:14-15)
    14(for you shall worship no other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God), (Exodus. 34:14)
    God was so frustrated by the Israelites disloyalty that he grew to hate them. In reality, it was Jeremiah expressing his own hatred.
    8My heritage has become to me like a lion in the forest, she has lifted up her voice against me; therefore I hate her .(Jeremiah. 12:8)

    GOD OF ISRAEL
    The term, God of Israel, appears almost 200 times in the Old Testament. Simply, the phrase, God of Israel, designates the name of a national god, not the god of the universe.
    1Afterward Moses and Aaron went to Pharaoh and said, “Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel, ‘Let my people go, that they may hold a feast to me in the wilderness.'” (Exodus. 5:1)
    The God of Israel vows to enlarge the borders of Israel.
    23Three times in the year shall all your males appear before the LORD God, the God of Israel.
    24For I will cast out nations before you, and enlarge your borders; neither shall any man desire your land, when you go up to appear before the LORD your God three times in the year. (Exodus. 34:23-24)

    GOD OF SPIRIT
    In this context, the God of spirits means the God of the dead.
    16″Let the LORD, the God of the spirits of all flesh, appoint a man over the congregation, (Numbers. 27:16)

    GOD OF GODS
    We see some braggadocio here. The Israelites claim their God is the supreme God of all gods. There can be no denial here that the biblical world is infested with deities and demons.
    17For the LORD your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great, the mighty, and the terrible God, who is not partial and takes no bribe. (Deuteronomy. 10:17)
    1God has taken his place in the divine council; in the midst of the gods he holds judgment: (Psalm. 82:1)
    2O give thanks to the God of gods, for his steadfast love endures for ever. (Psalm. 136:2)
    3O give thanks to the Lord of lords, for his steadfast love endures for ever; (Psalm. 136:3)

    LORD-NAMES OF
    In the Ancient Near East, a number of deities were known be several names. For example, the Babylonia deity Marduk had 50 names, the Egyptian deity Re had 74 names, and Osiris had 100 to 142 names. Such deities also had hidden or secret names known only by certain priests who knew the proper way to invoke them without offense. The second reason was that it was believed that these hidden names were believed to give the speakers access to and influence with-and sometimes magical powers-over the named.
    7″You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain. (Exodus. 20:7)
    This passage tells us about an Israelite woman who turned in her son to Moses for blaspheming God’s name. We are not told what he said, but he was stoned to death shortly thereafter. This is where the Muslims get their Blasphemy law!
    10Now an Israelite woman’s son, whose father was an Egyptian, went out among the people of Israel; and the Israelite woman’s son and a man of Israel quarreled in the camp,
    11and the Israelite woman’s son blasphemed the Name, and cursed. And they brought him to Moses. His mother’s name was Shelomith, the daughter of Dibri, of the tribe of Dan.
    12And they put him in custody, till the will of the LORD should be declared to them.
    13And the LORD said to Moses,
    14″Bring out of the camp him who cursed; and let all who heard him lay their hands upon his head, and let all the congregation stone him.
    15And say to the people of Israel, Whoever curses his God shall bear his sin.
    16He who blasphemes the name of the LORD shall be put to death; all the congregation shall stone him; the sojourner as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death. (Leviticus. 24:10-16)

    YEHOVAH OR YAHWEH
    “Lord” translates to Yehovah over 6,400 times in the Old Testament. Yehovah was originally conceived of as a local weather God, responsible for rain and fertility. Yehovah is now translated to “Yahweh.”
    8Smoke went up from his nostrils, and devouring fire from his mouth; glowing coals flamed forth from him.
    9He bowed the heavens, and came down; thick darkness was under his feet.
    10He rode on a cherub, and flew; he came swiftly upon the wings of the wind.
    11He made darkness his covering around him, his canopy thick clouds dark with water.
    12Out of the brightness before him there broke through his clouds hailstones and coals of fire.
    13The LORD also thundered in the heavens, and the Most High uttered his voice, hailstones and coals of fire.
    14And he sent out his arrows, and scattered them; he flashed forth lightnings, and routed them.
    15Then the channels of the sea were seen, and the foundations of the world were laid bare,
    at thy rebuke, O LORD [Yehovah], at the blast of the breath of thy nostrils. (Psalms 18:8-15)
    It wasn’t until the rise of the monarchy in Judah and Israel, did Yehovah rise to the status of a supreme god and universal weather god.
    17For the LORD [Yehovah] your God [Elohim] is God [Elohim] of gods [Elohim] and Lord [Adon] of lords [Adon], the great, the mighty, and the terrible God, who is not partial and takes no bribe. (Deuteronomy. 10:17)
    5 For I know that the LORD [Yehovah] is great, and that our Lord [Adon] is above all gods [Elohim]. (Psalm. 135:5)
    Far from being friendly, ancients had to fear the Lord (Yahweh), who was more powerful than all the other deities.
    10And all the peoples of the earth shall see that you are called by the name of the LORD; and they shall be afraid of you. (Deuteronomy. 28:10)
    JEHOVAH
    Jehovah can be found in the King James four times, translated from the Hebrew Yehovah. Other English versions typically translate to God. Yahweh is now the favored translation in place of Yehovah.
    3And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them. (Exodus. 6:3 KJV)
    18That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth. (Psalm. 83:18, KJV)
    2Behold, God is my salvation; I will trust, and not be afraid: for the LORD JEHOVAH is my strength and my song; he also is become my salvation. (Isaiah. 12:2, KJV)
    4Trust ye in the LORD for ever: for in the LORD JEHOVAH is everlasting strength: (Isaiah. 26:4, KJV)

    ADONAY
    Lord translates to Adonay to denote the god of Israel. It is used 430 times in the Old Testament, with Ezekiel counting for over 200 times. Elsewhere, Lord is substituted for Yehovah over 6,400 times.

    ADON
    Lord translates to Adon 211 times.
    3O give thanks to the Lord [Adon] of lords [Adon], for his steadfast love endures for ever; (Psalm. 136:3)
    Adonis originally meant lord, which is translated that way 211 times.
    5For I know that the LORD [Yahweh] is great, and that our Lord [adon] is above all gods. (Psalm. 135:5)

    LORD OF HOSTS
    The word “hosts” is a euphemism for the stars.
    3Now this man used to go up year by year from his city to worship and to sacrifice to the LORD of hosts at Shiloh, where the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were priests of the LORD. (1 Samuel 1:3)

    WHO IS THE CREATOR?
    To Jews, the one God of creation is Yahweh. To Christians, he is the Trinitarian God embodied in Jesus Christ. But according to Scripture, it is none of the above. In fact, both religions are as polytheistic as their pagan predecessors. Here is why.
    The word God is not a proper noun such as John. With a capital G, it designates a title, like Mister or Sir. The same can be said of the word Lord. It is within these two title words, Lord and God, where the original definition is disguised by the translators.
    In the ancient Near East all theistic religions believed in a supreme God who reigned above lesser gods; Judaism and Christianity were no exceptions. For example, to the ancient Egyptians, the supreme god was Ra. To the Greeks, he was Zeus. According to the pagan definition of all immortal beings as gods, Christianity is just as polytheistic. It is all a matter of semantics.
    The question before us is what god or gods caused creation as defined by the first two verses of Genesis?
    By mistranslating the true Hebrew name, Elohim, from the original texts for the generic name, God, readers are deceived into thinking of God as a singular entity. To repeat, the God of creation is not a Jewish or a Christian God. Elohim, in Hebrew means gods, spirits or lords. In the singular, it is El, meaning the supreme Canaanite god. Thus the early Hebrews worshipped the same God or gods as their heathen neighbors. So let’s revise Genesis. 1:1 to what it honestly says.
    1In the beginning [the] God[s] created the heavens and the earth. (Genesis 1:1)
    The plurality of God gives true meaning to when the gods agreed to,
    “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.”
    If the gods made man in their image, then it stands to reason that the gods are in the image of men and women.
    26Then [the] God[s] said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; (Genesis. 1:26)
    In the English translations, the word that denotes Yahweh is Lord. Another term we see in Genesis 2 is Lord God, which means Yahweh Elohim or Yahweh of the gods. As events turn out, Yahweh is nothing but a mythological tribal God among others which the heathen Israelites worshipped.
    Several passages tell us that Jews did not claim Yahweh as their only God; he was merely the supreme to other gods.
    Other statements attest to this fact. Moses’ father-in-law, Jethro, is made to say:
    11Now I know that the LORD is greater than all gods. (Exodus. 18:11)
    Moses and the Israelites are credited with this next statement.
    11Who is like thee, O LORD, among the gods? (Exodus. 15:11)
    In the passage below, Yahweh is the most fearsome among a council of gods.
    6For who in the skies can be compared to the LORD? Who among the heavenly beings is like the LORD,
    7a God feared in the council of the holy ones, great and terrible above all that are round about him? (Psalms 89:6-7)
    Even in the Ten Commandments, God recognizes the existence of other gods. There is a big difference between, “you shall have no other gods” verses “there are no other gods.”
    3″You shall have no other gods before me. (Exodus. 20:3)
    Bear in mind that Christianity is on even shakier grounds in maintaining the existence of only one God. First, by canonizing Jewish Scripture, the Christian Fathers gave recognition to Yahweh and the pantheon of lesser gods mentioned by name throughout the Old Testament. And don’t even mention Mohammedanism and Allah.
    The supreme God El has been traced to the Amorite kingdom of Ugarit, located in North Syria. He was known as the creator, the supreme authority in all matters human and divine, the father of gods and men.
    Associated with El is the young male God, Baal, the storm god. Associated with El and Baal were two female figures, Ashera and Anath, goddesses of fertility. The Ugarit (Babylonian) myths also feature two adversaries of Baal, Yam, the sea, and Mot, the destructive power of drought and sterility. In another interesting parallel with the biblical sea monster Deep, Yam is personified as dragon, serpent and Leviathan, representing the forces of chaos.
    The Canaanite influence on the early Hebrews can be found by tracing the origins of the Hebrew language. The father of Jews, Abraham is said to come from “Ur of the Chaldeans” (Genesis. 11:31). It’s a safe bet that the Chaldean Abraham was an ordinary idol-worshipping heathen Syrian who never heard of Yahweh. Additionally, the Chaldeans were known for their expertise in astrology.
    31Terah took Abram his son and Lot the son of Haran, his grandson, and Sarai his daughter-in-law, his son Abram’s wife, and they went forth together from Ur of the Chaldeans to go into the land of Canaan; but when they came to Haran, they settled there. (Genesis. 11:31)
    Abraham’s grandson Jacob erected an altar to El of the gods.
    20There he [Jacob] erected an altar and called it El-Elohe-Israel. (Genesis. 33:20)
    And El said to Jacob he is the supreme god of gods of his father.
    3Then he said, “I am God [El], the God [Elohim] of your father; do not be afraid to go down to Egypt; for I will there make of you a great nation. (Genesis. 46:3)
    According to the appendix of the American Heritage Dictionary, the Hebrew language branched off from the Canaanite language. Abraham spoke the dialect of his region in the days when Canaan was under Egyptian domination. Even Isaiah admits to that fact.
    18In that day there will be five cities in the land of Egypt which speak the language of Canaan and swear allegiance to the LORD of hosts. (Isaiah 19:18)
    What kind of leader was the God of Abraham? Exodus 15:3 tells us he is,
    “the Lord is a man of war”-Yahweh is a war god.
    Drawing from Sarah and El, we get Israel, meaning a nation who worships a war god by the name of El. The marriage of Abraham and Sarah was the Bible’s way of introducing the Jewish race by way of pun.
    16I will bless her, and moreover I will give you a son by her; I will bless her, and she shall be a mother of nations; kings of peoples shall come from her. (Genesis. 17:16)
    Abraham is said to be married to Sarah (Genesis. 17:15). Sarah comes from the Hebrew, Sar, meaning prince, ruler, leader, chief, chieftain, official, captain.
    Certainly, Yahweh was NOT the god of creation.
    Instead, what we learn is that the Jewish Patriarchs and the Israelites were Chaldean (Babylonian) speaking heathens until the time of the Exodus when Moses was first introduced to Yahweh during the burning bush incident. The colloquy between God and Moses demonstrates that Moses never knew or heard of Yahweh when he lived in Egypt.
    13Then Moses said to God, “If I come to the people of Israel and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name?’ what shall I say to them?” (Exodus. 3:13)
    Since Moses grew up in Egypt, it can be understandable that he never heard of Yahweh until this time. But in these next passages we find out that the Chosen People never heard of Yahweh either.
    13Moses said to God, “Suppose I go to the Israelites and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name?’ Then what shall I tell them?” (Exodus. 3:13)
    Curiously, God tells Moses that his one true name is I AM, and it is to remain that way forever. As we shall see later, he gives Moses a different name.
    14God said to Moses, “I am who I am. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: ‘I AM WHO I AM has sent me to you.'”
    15God also said to Moses, “Say this to the people of Israel, ‘The LORD, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you’: this is my name for ever, and thus I am to be remembered throughout all generations. (Exodus. 3:14-15)

    A CASE OF PIOUS MISTRANSLATION
    Knowledgeable students of the Bible would probably agree with the above statements, arguing that God purposely did not reveal his true name before the time of Moses. In support, they cite Exodus 6:1-3, when God said he withheld his true name from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. So let’s examine.
    2And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the LORD:
    3And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them. (KJV, Exodus. 6:2-3)
    Modern revisions such as the Revised Standard Version, substitute Lord for Jehovah. To clear up this name confusion, Jehovah comes about as the English translation for the Hebrew YHVH. Traditionally, vowels are inserted to make the consonants pronounceable interchangeably as Yahveh or Yahweh.
    2And God said to Moses, “I am the LORD.
    3I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty, but by my name the LORD I did not make myself known to them. (Exodus. 6:2-3)
    Now that we have positive affirmation that the true name of the one true God is known interchangeably as Jehovah, Yahweh, Yahveh or YHVH, it would be reasonable to expect any of these names to be used throughout the Old Testament. Almost none of the English translations do this.
    In the Hebrew versions, the word Jehovah appears 6,528 times. In the King James Version, it can be found four times: Exodus. 6:3, Psalms 83:18, Isaiah 12:2 and 26:4. It contains none of the other iterations. The English revision to follow the King James was the American Standard Version which contains Jehovah 5,763 times.
    4These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that Jehovah God made earth and heaven. (Genesis. 2:4 ASV)
    Throughout all English translations, the name for the Canaanite God pantheon, Elohim, appears 2366 times as God and 216 times as gods. The name for the Canaanite supreme God, El, appears 224 times in Hebrew, but nowhere in the English translations.
    In conclusion, if the English translators stuck to the original god names, they would not be able to deceive their readers into believing that Judaism was always a monotheistic religion.

    WAS JESUS IN THE BEGINNING
    Three passages in the New Testament stand out as claiming Jesus was the same God of Creation.
    John claims he was at the beginning with God.
    1In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
    2He was in the beginning with God;
    3all things were made through him, and without him was not anything made that was made. (John 1:1-3)
    John has Jesus claiming he was “I am” in reference to God’s name in Genesis 3:14. The following passage tells us his audience was so offended they threw stones at him. The Jewish leaders never accepted him as their leader.
    58Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.”
    59So they took up stones to throw at him; but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple. (John 8:5-59)
    Paul tells us Jesus was the Creator.
    17He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. (Colossians. 1:17)
    The Moody Handbook of Theology offers two Old Testament proofs to support the New Testament. But when we examine them, we see that they are taken out of context and don’t refer to Jesus.
    First, Micah predicts a child from Bethlehem Ephrathah will come forth as ruler of Israel to rescue him. So this can’t be Jesus because he never ruled over Israel, and because Micah was dead hundreds of years before Jesus’ time.
    2But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, who are little to be among the clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to be ruler in Israel, whose origin is from of old, from ancient days. (Micah 5:2)
    Second, Isaiah tells us a child is born, meaning he was born during Isaiah’s time, hundreds of years before Jesus.
    6For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government will be upon his shoulder, and his name will be called “Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” (Isaiah. 9:6)

    FINAL THOUGHT

    This is only a sampling of how disconnected the Old Testament is from the New Testament. Christian apologists have no scruples about taking Old Testament Scripture out of context to “prove” that their Jesus is the same God of the Old Testament. Even the Old Testament is replete with errors, false translations and self contradictions. It can’t even prove itself much less prove the false claims of the New Testament.

    PS:

    THE PERFECT EXAMPLE FOR MANKIND

    “PARAGON OF MORAL PERFECTION”

    THE PERFECT MUSLIM

    And surely thou hast sublime morals
    (Surat Al-Qalam 68:4).

    Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah an excellent exemplar
    (Surat Al-Ahzab 33:21).
    “Say (O Muhammad to mankind): ‘If you (really) love Allah then follow me (i.e. accept Islamic Monotheism, follow Quran and the Sunnah), Allah will love you and forgive you your sins. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.’ Say (O Muhammad): ‘Obey Allah and the Messenger (Muhammad).’ But if they turn away, then Allah does not like the disbelievers.”
    (Quran: 3:31)
    “And whatever the Messenger gives you, take it, and whatever he forbids you, leave it. And fear Allah: truly Allah is severe in punishment.
    (Quran 59:7)

    Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly.

    MOHAMMED GAVE BLOWJOBS TO HIS GRANDSON:
    SURA 52:24
    “And there shall wait on them [the Muslim men] young boys of their own, as fair as virgin pearls.”
    Hadith Number 16245, Volume Title: “The Sayings of the Syrians,” Chapter
    Title: “Hadith of Mu’awiya Ibn Abu Sufyan”: “I saw the prophet – pbuh –
    sucking on the tongue or the lips of Al-Hassan son of Ali, may the
    prayers of Allah be upon him. For no tongue or lips that the prophet
    sucked on will be tormented (by hell fire)
    He (the Prophet) lift up his (al Hasan’s) shirt & kissed his (little) penis..”
    روى أنه صلى الله عليه و سلم قبل زبيبة الحسن أو الحسين
    He (the prophet) kissed the (little) penis of al Hasan or al Husein
    رأيت النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم فرج ما بين فخذي الحسين و قبل زبيبته
    He (the prophet) put Husein’s legs apart & kissed his (little) penis
    Another Hadith. Majma al-Zawa’id, Ali ibn Abu Bakr al-Haythami, 299/9 مجمع الزوائد لعلي بن أبى بكر الهيثمي
    رأيت رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم فرج ما بين فخذي الحسين و قبل زبيبته
    رواه الطبراني و إسناده حسن
    translated in English: “I saw the Messenger of Allah pbuh putting Husein’s legs apart & kissing his (little) penis.”
    Related by Al-Tabarani & it’s authentication is good.
    Face it your prophet who you consider perfect had sex with young boys including his grandson & had a 6 year old wife; raped and murdered, among other things.

    ALLAH’S ARITHMETIC: 54 INTO 9 GOES NICELY

    THE WANKING PERVERT FROM MECCA

    A marriage is engaged in by 2 consenting adults.
    Do you really believe a 6 year old child would desire to marry a 51 year old man?
    Do you think that is what she would choose?
    Do you think a 9 year old girl would desire to have sex with a 54 year old?

    The thought of an old man becoming aroused by a child is one of the most disturbing thoughts that makes us cringe as it reminds us of pedophilia and the most despicable people. It is difficult to accept that the “Holy Prophet” of Mecca married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and WANKED BETWEEN HER THIGHS FOR 3 YEARS and consummated/RAPED her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.

    MUHAMMAD: HIS SEX LIFE, SEX ABUSE & CHILD MOLESTING

    Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly. Let us investigate how did the prophet live Islam; how did the prophet apply the eternal teachings of God in his daily life? In this search for the historical Muhammad, we will utilize the Islam’s holy books, its own writings.

    MUHAMMAD’S MOLESTATION OF BABY AISHA

    Muhammad fantasized about baby Aisha before soliciting her from her father.
    Sahih Bukhari 9.140
    Narrated ‘Aisha:
    Allah’s apostle said to me, “you were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘if this is from Allah, then it must happen.

    AISHA’S FATHER DID NOT APPROVE AT FIRST
    Aisha’s father, Abu Bakr, wasn’t on board at first, but Muhammad explained how the rules of their religion made it possible. This is similar to the way that present-day cult leaders manipulate their followers into similar concessions.
    Sahih Bukhari 7.18
    Narrated ‘Ursa:
    The prophet asked abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “but I am your brother.” the prophet said, “you are my brother in Allah’s religion and his book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”

    MUHAMMAD WOULD THIGH WITH BABY AISHA

    HOW TO THIGH & GET HIGH

    Now let us see how thighing is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

    Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.

    According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

    Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

    Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.
    Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.”Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

    The inquirer asked the following: ‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’

    After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

    That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers'” (Fatwa No. 31409).

    Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

    AISHA WASHING SEMEN FROM MUHAMMAD’S CLOTHES

    From the Hadith of Bukhari:

    Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

    Narrated ‘Aisha:

    I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

    Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

    Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

    I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

    MUHAMMAD WAS A CUCKSUCKING, WANKING CHILD MOLESTER!

    ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED THE RAPE OF FEMALE CAPTIVES:

    RAPE JIHAD:

    Sahih Muslim Book 08. N 3371Marriage

    Chapter: Al-Azl (incomplete sexual intercourse): Coitus Interruptus.

    Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women;

    and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them.
    So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him?

    So we asked Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

    REMEMBER:

    ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF GOD

    ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED RAPE

    Al-‘AZL

    Al-‘Azl, (العزل) also known as coitus interruptus, is the practice of having sexual intercourse with a woman but withdrawing the penis before ejaculation. Apparently al-‘Azl with female captives and slaves was a pretty important topic for Muhammad and his companions as evidenced by the abundance of Hadith material on the subject.
    Practiced during Muhammad’s lifetime & ALL OVER EUROPE TODAY

    Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle .
    Sahih Bukhari 7:62:135

    Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interrupt us while the Quran was being revealed. Jabir added: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle while the Quran was being Revealed.
    Sahih Bukhari 7:62:136

    Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus(RAPE WITHOUT PREGNANCY)?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to PULL OUT. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.”

    Sahih Bukhari 3:34:432

    Abu Said said, “We went with Allah’s Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the ‘Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah’s Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence.”
    Sahih Bukhari 3:46:718

    EDUCATING IGNORANT MOHAMMEDANS:

    CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF AN INTACT HYMEN

    Most females are born with a hymen, a thin piece of skin that partially covers the vaginal opening (or introitus). The main purpose of the hymen is to protect the vaginal opening and the areas immediately surrounding the introitus during a female’s early developing years. Despite its biological function, many cultures place a significant amount of importance on the hymen and whether or not it is intact. This small and seemingly insignificant piece of tissue is of such great importance to many cultures because an intact hymen is believed to indicate the chastity of a female. The presence of the hymen implies that the female is a virgin (one who has never engaged in sexual intercourse). The importance of a female’s chastity is often emphasized in patriarchal societies and by traditional religions. Some arguments that are used to back this notion are the presumption that a chaste bride values fidelity and the that there is an increased guarantee that her offspring will be her husband’s children and not someone else’s. Men are also encouraged to seek virgins as wives because they are deemed “pure” and not sexually promiscuous.
    One problem with this theory, however, is that if a woman does not have an intact hymen, it is possible that she is still a virgin. A woman may not have a hymen for a variety of different reasons. Many women tear their hymen, thus enlarging the vaginal opening, through nonsexual activities that put tension on the hymeneal tissue. These activities include engaging in sports, horseback riding, or inserting tampons. Women may not even be aware that their hymen has torn, since there may be little or no blood and no pain. Sexual intercourse is only one of many reasons why a woman may not have a hymen. Likewise, a non-virginal female may still have an intact hymen. The hymen can stretch sufficiently to permit entry of tampons and sometimes even a penis.

    In societies that emphasize the importance of a hymen, a woman without a hymen may be at risk on her wedding night. In many cultures that put an emphasis on virginity, the husband expects to “pop” his wife’s “cherry.” Blood-stained sheets are often put on display to mark the loss of virginity and prove the bride’s purity. A female who does not bleed on her wedding night may be judged as to be a non-virgin. She risks being shunned by her family and new husband. She may even be returned to her family as “used goods,” stoned to death, or banished from her society. Again, virginal women may not have an intact hymen or experience bleeding upon intercourse.

    The hymen carries a great deal of importance and symbolism even in the United States. There have been instances in the United States, especially among college students, of people being eager to lose their virginity as soon as possible. In this case retaining one’s virginity is seen as a stigma of inexperience. However, in many places in the U.S., losing ones virginity still carries a stigma for young women. Perhaps because of the stigma associated with this act, men and boys alike are sometimes eager to be the ones who “take” a girls virginity. Men and boys alike may be eager to “pop a girl’s cherry.” However, other than tearing or stretching her hymen, there is no other biological change that a woman goes through after her first intercourse. The thought that a woman loses value by losing her virginity is an outdated and degrading concept. We can only hope that as more and more people begin to understand the basics of human sexuality, these false myths will be eradicated.

    Another problem with connecting the presence of an intact hymen and lack of penile-vaginal penetration to virginity, is that it often excludes the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered (LGBT) community. Members of the LGBT community consider sex with the same partner as a relinquishing of virginity, and may feel discredited or discounted by the heteronormative view that pervades discussions of virginity. Similarly, there has been a rise in alternative sexual activity among teenagers who have taken chastity pledges. This alternative sexual activity includes practices like oral sex and anal sex, which they often do not think of as sexual intercourse. Because virginity is a complex and culturally constructed concept, we recommend that you take it with a grain of salt. Whether or not you tore or stretched your hymen, it is up to you and no one else to decide whether you are a virgin. Besides, your virginity is not an accurate measure of your worth or morality.

    Hymen Reconstructive Surgery

    In many religious communities, there has been an influx of hymen reparation surgery. In some Muslim communities, virginity is expected of a bride. For this reason, women who no longer have an intact hymen have their hymens surgically reconstructed in order to appear virginal on their wedding night. This is especially prominent among students who have gone to live in more sexually permissive cultures. The surgery creates a fake hymen at the vaginal opening. It generally costs from $400 to $1000, but varies from country to country. In addition to the surgery, some women have a gelatin capsule full of blood inserted within their vaginal canal to cause bleeding upon penetration. Beyond reasons of religious necessity, some women will get this surgery done as a gift to their husband along with a tightening of the vaginal canal.

    Sources:
    http://www.babapandey.com/hymen-repair-and-a-prettier-vagina-the-current

    SUNNA OF EVIL PERFECTION
    The following are a short-list of the evil Sunnah of Muhammad, recorded in the Hadiths of Bukhari:
    Child sexual molestation and Pedophilia is Sunna in Islam.
    Murder, even Mass Murder, is Sunna in Islam.
    Extermination and ethnic cleansing of communities is Sunna in Islam.
    Rape is Sunna in Islam.
    Sex Slavery is Sunna in Islam
    Beheading is Sunna in Islam.
    Stoning to death for sexual deviation is Sunna in Islam.
    Beating one’s wife is Sunna in Islam
    Murdering Kafir children is Sunna in Islam.
    Murdering Muslims’ own children is Sunna in Islam.
    Murdering Jews is Sunna in Islam
    Murdering Christians is Sunna in Islam
    Slavery is Sunna in Islam
    Booty is Sunna in Islam
    Whipping is Sunna in Islam
    Torture is Sunna in Islam
    Terror is Sunna in Islam
    Maiming is Sunna in Islam
    Jihad is Sunna in Islam
    Extortion is Sunna in Islam
    Inferiority, oppression, subjugation of Women Is Sunna in Islam
    Looting, pillaging is Sunna in Islam
    Murdering elderly is Sunna in Islam
    Murdering musicians is Sunna in Islam
    Murdering those who are being sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat is Sunna in Islam
    Murdering those who deny any verse of the Quran or ‘anything which by scholarly consensus belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong to it is Sunna in Islam
    Murdering those who hold that ‘any of Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent is Sunna in Islam
    (Murdering those who revile the religion of Islam, being sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law; denying that Allah intended ‘the Prophet’s message to be the religion followed by the entire world is Sunna in Islam
    Murdering apostates is Sunna in Islam
    Murdering prisoners of war is Sunna in Islam
    Murdering gays is Sunna in Islam.
    Forcible conversion is Sunna in Islam.Murdering those who are critical of Islam is Sunna in Islam
    Murdering those who revile Allah or his Messenger is Sunna in Islam

    • Louis Farrakhan, why did YOU lucky bin Satan convert to LF? YOUR avatar of Ayatollah
      was impressive though YOU are giving the same Chicken poopoo once more!

      NOW tell us, in which Islamic country are gays murdered though it is against the Quran? Where is forced conversion practised in Islamic world?

      Islam spreaded through lots of sacrifices and NO Muslim will tolerate ANYBODY demeaning their Allah, His Messenger and His Quran.

      Muhammad was the greatest leader the world has ever known ~relegating Alexander the Great(?) to a dot in history. Muhammad brought about a religion that has made Papacy
      look like a rubber ball!

      When Christianity is embroiled in Homo-sexual controversies and child molestation scandals, Islam flows to every corner of the world, unhindered. Islam moves in ONLY one direction like the clouds…with KAABA being the CENTRE of the world….and all the Muslims saying IN UNISON : ALLAH IS GREAT!

      • My Dearest Mr Plum,

        Would you please take your Black head outta your Black ass and see reality!
        You are like a Dog’s vomit, when it comes to discussing religious history.
        You have stated in the past that you don’t believe in religions and you are in fact an ATHEIST!
        You have no business commenting on this blog!

        THE REAL PROPHET OF ISLAM:

        It is now clear to me that Umar is the REAL Prophet of Islam.
        Muhammad had insulted Abu Bakr twice by doubting the morality of his daughter and he insulted Umar by threatening to divorce his daughter Hafsa (Sura 66).
        The fix was in. They knew Muhammad wanted Ali to take over the reins when he died and they were not happy about it. So they got both daughters to poison him SLOWLY and took over Islam.
        Umar dictated the veiling of women!
        Umar refused the “Pen & Paper” for Muhammad’s Last Will.
        Umar showed contempt for Muhammad time after time.
        Umar dictated what went into the Quran and what stayed out!
        But I guess the greatest insult to Islam is, Umar had Muhammad killed, his daughter killed, his grandsons killed and he is buried next to Muhammad, with the other murderer, Abu Bakr

        UMAR DICTATED THE VEILING OF WOMEN

        Why do Islamists need to veil (hijab) a Muslim woman? If you go to Islamic websites or read many of the literature written by the Islamists, you will be amazed by silly logics they put forward in support of Islamic veil for women. Their logic runs the whole gamut ranging from protection of women from rape/prying eyes, a woman’s beauty is skin deep, how secured a woman feels, how beautiful a woman looks in hijab to divine sanction and……. blah, blah, blah. Many Muslims even believe that since the instruction of veiling had emanated from Allah so there must be some scientific reasons and give convoluted logic about the psychological make up of women and why they need to be put under Islamic cover (hijab). All these reasons are utterly hilarious to any person who has the slightest idea of the game that the Islamists play to fool the gullible believers. You will have a hearty laugh I swear when you come to know the real secret behind the Islamic veil and wonder why some Muslim women support it.

        So, what is the real reason for Islamic veil? To know the truth, we need to go back 1500 years backward and look at the sanitary/toilet facilities of the poor Arabs during Muhammad’s time. If you are living in a modern environment then, of course, it will be difficult to imagine the sanitary condition of those old days of Islam. However, if you have come from a poverty stricken family from a poor country of Asia or Africa you may recall your childhood and find a great similarity of what you are about to read below.

        After the death of Khadijah, Muhammad spent most of the wealth left by Khadijah. He became so poor that he had very little money to support himself. When he migrated to Medina, he and his followers were destitute. Under this dire poverty, Muhammad had to house his wives in places with very primitive or non-existent toilet/sanitary facilities. He had no choice but to ask his wives to go to an open field nearby and answer the call of nature. It is most likely that he himself did ease in this manner on many occasions. Here is what Sahih Bukhari says:

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 4, Number 149:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        The Prophet said to his wives, “You are allowed to go out to answer the call of nature.”

        The new converts of Islam were so haplessly poor that they even had no shelter and privacy to engage in sexual intercourse. The only place where they could satisfy this biological need was in the open sky. Thus, having sexual intercourse in open field was also common.

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 203:

        Narrated Muhammad bin ‘Abbas bin Ja’far:

        That he heard Ibn ‘Abbas reciting: “No doubt! They fold up their breasts.” (11.5) and asked him about its explanation. He said, “Some people used to hide themselves while answering the call of nature in an open space lest they be exposed to the sky, and also when they had sexual relation with their wives in an open space lest they be exposed to the sky, so the above revelation was sent down regarding them.”

        So Muhammad’s wives started to go to an open field only at night to answer the call of nature without any veil or proper attire. Hazrat Umor used to watch these ladies and was very uncomfortable and distressful to see them answering the call of nature in the open sky without much protection to their privacy. He requested Muhammad to cover his wives with veils whenever they went out to do their business in the open field at night.

        At first, Muhammad ignored Umar’s plea. But when Umor kept on pestering him on this issue, he turned to Allah for His suggestion (since he did not have the pecuniary means to solve this toilet problem). Allah promptly sent down the verse on veil (33:59)

        Muhammad’s wives, daughters, and believing women are to wear outer garments

        (hijab)…33:59 (chronological order 90)

        033.059
        YUSUFALI: O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

        Here are some ahadith that confirm those pathetic toilet facilities for Muhammad’s wives and Umor’s plea to veil them.

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 4, Number 148:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        The wives of the Prophet used to go to Al-Manasi, a vast open place (near Baqia at Medina) to answer the call of nature at night. ‘Umar used to say to the Prophet “Let your wives be veiled,” but Allah’s Apostle did not do so. One night Sauda bint Zam’a the wife of the Prophet went out at ‘Isha’ time and she was a tall lady. ‘Umar addressed her and said, “I have recognized you, O Sauda.” He said so, as he desired eagerly that the verses of Al-Hijab (the observing of veils by the Muslim women) may be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of “Al-Hijab” (A complete body cover excluding the eyes).

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 395:

        (Please note that this hadith has been shortened to show the relevant part only)

        Narrated ‘Umar (bin Al-Khattab):

        My Lord agreed with me in three things: ——–

        1. I said,”………………

        2. And as regards the (verse of) the veiling of the women, I said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! I wish you ordered your wives to cover themselves from the men because good and bad ones talk to them.’ So the verse of the veiling of the women was revealed.

        Sahih Muslim Book 026, Number 5397:

        ‘A’isha reported that the wives of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) used to go out in the cover of night when they went to open fields (in the outskirts of Medina) for easing themselves. ‘Umar b Khattab used to say: Allah’s Messenger, ask your ladies to observe veil, but Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) did not do that. So there went out Sauda, daughter of Zama, the wife of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), during one of the nights when it was dark. She was a tall statured lady. ‘Umar called her saying: Sauda, we recognise you. (He did this with the hope that the verses pertaining to veil would be revealed.) ‘A’isha said: Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, then revealed the verses pertaining to veil

        After Allah took care of veiling Muhammad’s wife, Muhammad was relaxed. He did nothing to improve physically the toilet/sanitary facilities for them. In fact, he even developed the specifications of how to cleanse oneself with stones after defecating. His wives still continued to relieve themselves in the open field albeit with the hijab. Umar continued to monitor. When Sauda was caught red handed by Umar, she complained to Muhammad about Umar and asked about what to do with the business of easing oneself. Muhammad sought Allah’s help. Allah immediately revealed that she could continue with the old style (that is defecating in the open field).

        Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 318:

        Narrated Aisha:

        Sauda (the wife of the Prophet) went out to answer the call of nature after it was made obligatory (for all the Muslims ladies) to observe the veil. She was a fat huge lady, and everybody who knew her before could recognize her. So ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab saw her and said, “O Sauda! By Allah, you cannot hide yourself from us, so think of a way by which you should not be recognized on going out. Sauda returned while Allah’s Apostle was in my house taking his supper and a bone covered with meat was in his hand. She entered and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! I went out to answer the call of nature and ‘Umar said to me so-and-so.” Then Allah inspired him (the Prophet) and when the state of inspiration was over and the bone was still in his hand as he had not put in down, he said (to Sauda), “You (women) have been allowed to go out for your needs.”

        Sahih Muslim Book 026, Number 5395:

        A’isha reported that Sauda (Allah he pleased with her) went out (in the fields) in order to answer the call of nature even after the time when veil had been prescribed for women. She had been a bulky lady, significant in height amongst the women, and she could not conceal herself from him who had known her. ‘Umar b. Khattab saw her and said: Sauda, by Allah, you cannot conceal from us. Therefore, be careful when you go out. She (‘A’isha) said: She turned back. Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) was at that time in my house having his evening meal and there was a bone in his hand. She (Sauda) came and said: Allah’s Messenger. I went out and ‘Umar said to me so and so. She (‘A’isha) reported: There came the revelation to him and then it was over; the bone was then in his hand and he had not thrown it and he said:” Permission has been granted to you that you may go out for your needs.”

        It is most likely that Muhammad was not very comfortable with the original style of veiling (complete cover except the eye-slit: somewhat like the Burqa so common in Afghanistan). After marrying Aisha (the child bride) and other younger women, he changed his mind on the veil issue. Allah now revealed the new specification of veiling:

        Believing women are to draw their veils over their bosoms and they are not to display their beauty to unrelated men…24:31 (chronological order 102)

        024.031

        YUSUFALI: And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband’s fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers or their brothers’ sons, or their sisters’ sons, or their women, or the slaves whom their right hands possess, or male servants free of physical needs, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex; and that they should not strike their feet in order to draw attention to their hidden ornaments. And O ye Believers! turn ye all together towards Allah, that ye may attain Bliss.

        Although verse 33:59 (chronological order 90) is an earlier verse than 24:31 (chronological order 102) it is not clear which of the verses (i.e 33:59 or 24:31) is the appropriate verse for veiling of women. Nowhere does Qur’an say that one of them is the replacement of the other. When you watch the hapless Afghan women in TV in their mobile prisons (Burqa), you are probably seeing verse 33:59 in action in a pure Islamic Paradise. When you are walking through the streets of an infidel land and suddenly watch a hijab clad Muslim lady, you are probably seeing verse 24:31 in action in a Kufir land. It will be interesting to know amongst two groups who will be more in hell. After all, most of the inhabitants of hell are women (Sahih Bukhari 2.18.161).

        It is quite clear that there is absolutely no compelling reason to impose the intolerable and ugly hijab on Muslim women. If there was any reason, it could reasonably be attributed to the prehistoric toilet facilities that Muhammad offered to his wives. Do today’s women still head towards the open fields to defecate or to ease themselves? It may be true that in some very backward Muslim countries in Africa and Asia the sanitary/toilet facilities may still be very primitive but it is definitely not like what it used to be during Muhammad’s time.

        One interesting point comes into mind, though. How come Hazrat Umar was such a busybody to watch Muhammad’s wives easing themselves? Have you ever thought about this? After all, Islamists always say that Islam respects greatly the privacy, be that a man or a woman. Another interesting point is this: where did the male Muslims during prophet’s time used to go to defecate? I am sure that they did not have sanitary lavatory in their homes. Most likely, they also used to go in the open land to ease themselves (as well as for sexual intercourse, as we saw earlier). Why was prophet so discriminatory? Why did Allah have to veil women only? Why did He not ask for the veiling of men? Why did not prophet ask his male colleagues to taste how it is like wearing hijab or going inside a mobile prison (Burqa)? Is this the fairness of Islam? Is this gender equality?

        The message is very clear, folks. All the inane arguments that the Islamists give in support of veiling of women are completely hollow and illogical. Now that we know the real reason for veiling, let your women assert their right to chose the attire that befits them. Why should they be imprisoned in ugly hijab and the unconscionable Burqa?

        UMAR UNDERSTOOD WHAT PROPHET WANTED TO WRITE

        Conversation between Ayatullah Baqir al Sadr and Mohammad al-Tijani

        I still remember the answer which al-Sayyid Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr gave me when I asked him, “How did our master Umar understand, among all the Companions what the Messenger wanted to write, namely the appointment of Ali as his successor- as you claim – which shows that he was a clever man?”

        Al-Sayyid al-Sadr said: Umar was not the only one who anticipated what the Messenger was going to write. In fact most of the people who were present then understood the situation the same way as Umar did, because the Messenger of Allah had previously indicated the issue when he said, “I shall leave you with two weighty things: the Book of Allah and the members of my Family (Ahl al-Bayt) and their descendants, if you follow them, you will never go astray after me.” And during his illness he said to them, “Let me write you a document, if you follow its contents, you will never go astray.” Those who were present, including Umar, understood that the Messenger of Allah wanted to reiterate, in writing, what he had already said in Ghadir Khum, and that was to follow the Book of Allah and Ahl al-Bayt and that Ali was the head of it. It was as if the holy Prophet (saw) was saying, “Follow the Qur’an and Ali.” He said similar things on many occasions, as has been stated by many historians.

        The majority of Quraysh did not like Ali because he was young and because he smashed their arrogance and had killed their heroes; but they did not dare oppose the Messenger of Allah, as they had done at the “Treaty of al-Hudaibiyah’, and when the Messenger prayed for Abdullah ibn Abi al- Munafiq, and on many other incidents recorded by history. This incident was one of them, and you see that the opposition against writing that document during the Prophets illness encouraged some of those who were present to be insolent and make so much noise in his presence.

        That answer came in accordance with what the saying meant. But Umar’s statement, “You have the Qur’an, and it is sufficient, being the Book of Allah” was not in accordance with the saying which ordered them to follow the Book of Allah and the Household [Ahl al-Bayt] together. It looks as if he meant to say, “We have the Book of Allah, and that is sufficient for us, therefore there is no need for Ahl al-Bayt.” I could not see any other reasonable explanation to the incident other than this one, unless it was meant to say, ‘Obey Allah but not His Messenger.” And this argument is invalid and not sensible. If I put my prejudices and my emotions aside and base my judgement on a clean and free mind, I would tend towards the first analysis, which stops short of accusing Umar of being the first one to reject the Prophet’s Tradition (al-Sunnah) when he said, “It is sufficient for us, being the Book of Allah”.

        Then if there were some rulers who rejected the Prophet’s Traditions claiming that it was “contradictory”, they only followed an earlier example in the history of Islam. However, I do not want to burden Umar alone with the responsibility for that incident and the subsequent deprivation of the nation of the guidance. To be fair to him, I suggest that the responsibility should be borne by him and those Companions who were with him and who supported him in his opposition to the command of the Messenger of Allah.

        I am astonished by those who read this incident and feel as if nothing happened, despite that it was one of the “great misfortunes” as Ibn Abbas called it. My astonishment is even greater regarding those who try hard to preserve the honour of a Companion and to correct his mistake, even if at the cost of the Prophet’s dignity and honour and at the cost of Islam and its foundations.

        Why do we escape from the truth and try to obliterate it when it is not in accordance with our whims . . . why do not we accept that the Companions were human like us, and had their own whims, prejudices and interests, and could commit mistakes or could be right?

        But my astonishment fades when I read the Book of Allah in which He tells us the stories of the prophets- may Allah bless them and grant them peace – and the disobedience they faced from their people despite all the miracles they produced .. Our God! Make not our hearts to deviate after thou hast guided us aright, and grant us from Your Mercy; surely You are the Most Liberal Giver.

        I began to understand the background to the Shia’s attitude towards the second Caliph, whom they charge with the responsibility for many tragic events in the history of Islam, starting from “Raziyat Yawm al-Khamis” when the Islamic nation was deprived of the written guidance which the Messenger wanted to write for them. The inescapable fact is that the sensible man who knew the truth before he encountered the men seeks an excuse for the Shias in this matter, but there is nothing we can say to convince those who only judge truth through men.

        References:

        Sahih, Bukhari, Chapter: About the saying of the sick, vol 2

        Sahih, Muslim, End of the book of al Wasiyyah, vol 5 p 75

        Musnad, Ahmed, vol 1 p 335, vol 5 p 116

        Tarikh, Tabari, vol 3 p 193

        Tarikh, Ibn al Athir, vol 2 p 320

        Monday, November 25, 2013
        TRAGEDY OF THURSDAY; THE PEN & PAPER INCIDENT
        Posted by abdullah On 12:30 AM No comments

        Every Muslims loves the Prophet (SAW) in their own way, with various emotional levels. Some will kill in order to protect the Prophet’s honor and some will take out processions.
        When cartoons published by Prophet (SAW) were published in Scandinavia, I remember the people in Pakistan showed their anger and disgust by damaging public property and taking out processions, shouting anti-Denmark slogans. This was their dislike, their disgust, their show of love for the Prophet (SAW), their dissociation from the cartoons, their Tabbara against those who disrespected the Prophet (SAW).

        Yet when Shias show their disgust towards the people who disrespected the Prophet (SAW) during his very life time, Shias are highly criticized. Why I ask? Were the people around the Prophet (sahabis) allowed to disrespect the Prophet (SAW) or are the Shias not allowed to love the Prophet?
        Maybe because the name of a highly Sunni-revered personality comes up in this list of such criticism, Sunnis are reluctant to discuss the issue of the Pen and Paper, more appropriately known as the Tragedy of Thursday.

        To protect Umer, Sunnis

        • Try to find faults in the Narration
        • Try to prove the traditions are weak
        • Try to defend the intentions of Umer
        • Try to blame other companions other than Umer
        Which traditions do I speak about?

        Sa’id b. Jubair reported that Ibn ‘Abbas said: Thursday, (and then said): What is this Thursday? He then wept so much that his tears moistened the pebbles. I said: Ibn ‘Abbas, what is (significant) about Thursday? He (Ibn ‘Abbas) said: The illness of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) took a serious turn (on this day), and he said: Come to me, so that I should write for you a document that you may not go astray after me. They (the Companions around him) disputed, and it is not meet to dispute in the presence of the Apostle. They said: How is he (Allah’s Apostle)? Has he lost his consciousness? Try to learn from him (this point). He (the Holy Prophet) said: Leave me. I am better in the state (than the one in which you are engaged). I make a will about three things: Turn out the polytheists from the territory of Arabia; show hospitality to the (foreign) delegations as I used to show them hospitality. He (the narrator) said: He (Ibn Abbas) kept silent on the third point, or he (the narrator) said: But I forgot that. Sahih Muslim, Book 13, Hadith 4014

        Sa’id b. Jubair reported from Ibn Abbas that he said: Thursday, and what about Thursday? Then tears began to flow until I saw them on his cheeks as it they were the strings of pearls. He (the narrator) said that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Bring me a shoulder blade and ink-pot (or tablet and inkpot), so that I write for you a document (by following which) you would never go astray. They said: Allah’s Messenger (may peace upon him) is in the state of unconsciousness. Sahih Muslim, Book 13, Hadith 4015

        Ibn Abbas reported:….. Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: Come, I may write for you a document; you would not go astray after that. Thereupon Umar said: Verily Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) is deeply afflicted with pain. You have the Qur’an with you. The Book of Allah is sufficient for us. Those who were present in the house differed. Some of them said: Bring him (the writing material) so that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) may write a document for you and you would never go astray after him And some among them said what ‘Umar had (already) said. When they indulged in nonsense and began to dispute in the presence of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), he said: Get up (and go away) ‘Ubaidullah said: Ibn Abbas used to say: There was a heavy loss, indeed a heavy loss, that, due to their dispute and noise. Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) could not write (or dictate) the document for them. Sahih Muslim, Book 13, Hadith 4016

        Narrated Said bin Jubair: Ibn ‘Abbas said, “Thursday! What (great thing) took place on Thursday!” Then he started weeping till his tears wetted the gravels of the ground . Then he said, “On Thursday the illness of Allah’s Apostle was aggravated and he said, “Fetch me writing materials so that I may have something written to you after which you will never go astray.” The people (present there) differed in this matter and people should not differ before a prophet. They said, “Allah’s Apostle is seriously sick.’ The Prophet said, “Let me alone, as the state in which I am now, is better than what you are calling me for.” The Prophet on his death-bed, gave three orders saying, “Expel the pagans from the Arabian Peninsula, respect and give gifts to the foreign delegates as you have seen me dealing with them.” I forgot the third (order)”…. Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, Hadith 288

        Narrated Said bin Jubair: that he heard Ibn ‘Abbas saying, “Thursday! And you know not what Thursday is? After that Ibn ‘Abbas wept till the stones on the ground were soaked with his tears. On that I asked Ibn ‘Abbas, “What is (about) Thursday?” He said, “When the condition (i.e. health) of Allah’s Apostle deteriorated, he said, ‘Bring me a bone of scapula, so that I may write something for you after which you will never go astray.’The people differed in their opinions although it was improper to differ in front of a prophet, They said, ‘What is wrong with him? Do you think he is delirious? Ask him (to understand). The Prophet replied, ‘Leave me as I am in a better state than what you are asking me to do.’ ……. Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 53, Hadith 393

        Narrated Ibn Abbas: Thursday! And how great that Thursday was! The ailment of Allah’s Apostle became worse (on Thursday) and he said, fetch me something so that I may write to you something after which you will never go astray.” The people (present there) differed in this matter, and it was not right to differ before a prophet. Some said, “What is wrong with him ? (Do you think ) he is delirious (seriously ill)? Ask him ( to understand his state ).” So they went to the Prophet and asked him again. The Prophet said, “Leave me, for my present state is better than what you call me for.” ….. Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Hadith 716

        Narrated Ubaidullah bin ‘Abdullah: Ibn Abbas said, “When Allah’s Apostle was on his deathbed and there were some men in the house, he said, ‘Come near, I will write for you something after which you will not go astray.’ Some of them ( i.e. his companions) said, ‘Allah’s Apostle is seriously ill and you have the (Holy) Quran. Allah’s Book is sufficient for us.’ So the people in the house differed and started disputing. Some of them said, ‘Give him writing material so that he may write for you something after which you will not go astray.’ while the others said the other way round. So when their talk and differences increased, Allah’s Apostle said, “Get up.” Ibn Abbas used to say, “No doubt, it was very unfortunate (a great disaster) that Allah’s Apostle was prevented from writing for them that writing because of their differences and noise.” Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Hadith 717

        Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: When the time of the death of the Prophet approached while there were some men in the house, and among them was ‘Umar bin Al-Khatttab, the Prophet said, “Come near let me write for you a writing after which you will never go astray.” ‘Umar said, “The Prophet is seriously ill, and you have the Quran, so Allah’s Book is sufficient for us.” The people in the house differed and disputed. Some of them said, “Come near so that Allah’s Apostle may write for you a writing after which you will not go astray,” while some of them said what ‘Umar said. When they made much noise and differed greatly before the Prophet, he said to them, “Go away and leave me.” Ibn ‘Abbas used to say, “It was a great disaster that their difference and noise prevented Allah’s Apostle from writing that writing for them. Sahih Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 92, Hadith 468

        Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: When Allah’s Apostle was on his death-bed and in the house there were some people among whom was ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab, the Prophet said, “Come, let me write for you a statement after which you will not go astray.” ‘Umar said, “The Prophet is seriously ill and you have the Qur’an; so the Book of Allah is enough for us.” The people present in the house differed and quarrelled. Some said “Go near so that the Prophet may write for you a statement after which you will not go astray,” while the others said as Umar said. When they caused a hue and cry before the Prophet, Allah’s Apostle said, “Go away!” Narrated ‘Ubaidullah: Ibn ‘Abbas used to say, “It was very unfortunate that Allah’s Apostle was prevented from writing that statement for them because of their disagreement and noise.” Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 70, Hadith 573

        Thus from the above traditions, we get to know that;

        • Ibne Abbass cries while telling the narration and declares it a tragedy
        • Prophet (SAW) wanted to write something for the Ummah before his death, something which if followed will never lead the Ummah astray
        • Some Companions around the Prophet decline the query of the Prophet (SAW) declaring that Quran is sufficient for them and the three things the Prophet (SAW) feel necessary are in fact worthless
        • Some Companions around the Prophet at this time think that the Prophet (SAW) asked for something to write only because he is unwell/delirious/unconscious
        • It is Umer who raises the issue of Prophet being ill/delirious and it was he who claimed that they don’t require the Prophet’s will as Quran is sufficient for them
        • Some Companions agreed with Umer’s claim while some thought that the Prophet (SAW) should not be denied due to his high and divine status
        • The Companions start to quarrel infront of the Prophet
        • The Prophet (SAW) tells them to leave him/his company and points to the fact that his condition is not what certain companions blamed him for
        • The Prophet indeed wrote down or told three things but each traditions fails to narrate the third point of the Prophet’s will

        On a Thursday, just three days before the demise of Prophet (PBUH&HF), the Messenger of Allah asked for pen and paper in order to state his last will. Major Sunni sources including Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim mentioned that an opposition group among the companions whose leader was Umar, accused prophet of talking non sense (May Allah protect us) in order to prevent this writing.

        They questioned the rationality of Prophet to discredit his will.
        I will not interpret the above incident as of now. Because i want you to ponder over the facts, over the events which happened on that Thursday, and your love and reverence for Prophet Muhammad (SAW).

        However, I will like to shed light on some of the Verses of Quran.
        And (O Muhammad) do not drive away those who call upon their Lord in the morning and the evening, they desire only His favor; neither are you answerable for any reckoning of theirs, nor are they answerable for any reckoning of yours, so that you should drive them away and thus be of the unjust.

        Quran [6:52]
        Do they not reflect that their companion has not unsoundness in mind; he is only a plain warner

        Quran [7:184]
        O you who believe! obey Allah and His Messenger and do not turn back from Him while you hear.

        Quran [8:20]
        Surely (as for) those who speak evil things of Allah and His Messenger, Allah has cursed them in this world and the here after, and He has prepared for them a chastisement bringing disgrace.

        Quran [33:57]
        O you who believe! be not forward in the presence of Allah and His Messenger, and be careful of (your duty to) Allah; surely Allah is Hearing, Knowing. O you who believe! do not raise your voices above the voice of the Prophet, and do not speak loud to him as you speak loud to one another, lest your deeds became null while you do not perceive. Surely those who lower their voices before Allah’s Messenger are they whose hearts Allah has proved for guarding (against evil); they shall have forgiveness and a great reward. (As for) those who call out to you (Muhammad) from behind the private chambers, surely most of them do not understand. And if they wait patiently until you come out to them, it would certainly be better for them, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

        Quran [49:1-5]
        I swear by the star when it goes down. Your companion does not err, nor does he (Muhammad) go astray; Nor does he speak out of desire. It is naught but revelation that is revealed,

        Quran [53:1-4]
        We can read from the Quran that it gives us clear directions regarding our attitude towards Prophet Muhammad (SAW).
        • Prophet Muhammad (SAW) should not expel or drive away sincere people from around him who are believers and who want to learn and be nearer to Allah. If the Prophet (SAW) drives away such people, he will be one of the unjust
        • Prophet Muhammad (SAW) has been labeled as a mad man by the pagans. Quran testifies that Prophet (SAW) has no unsoundness in his mind.
        • The believers are told to obey Allah and his Messenger under all circumstances
        • Speaking evil things or ill about the Prophet (SAW) will invite the punishment of the fire
        • No one should be forward in the presence of Prophet (SAW), no one should give his own opinion over the opinion of Prophet (SAW)
        • No one should raise his voice over the voice of Prophet (SAW), no one should raise his voice infront of the Prophet (SAW), because such actions will nullify the previous deeds of the person
        • The Prophet (SAW) does not err, whatever he speaks is not his desire but is a part of a revelation revealed to him
        Before going back to the event of that Thursday, i will like to add footnotes of certain respected Sunni scholars.
        “To trouble Allah” implies two things: That Allah should be disobeyed, that an attitude of disbelief and shirk and atheism be adopted with regard to Him, and that things made unlawful by Him be made lawful; and that His Messenger be troubled, for just as obedience to the Messenger is obedience to Allah, so is opposition and disobedience of the Messenger opposition and disobedience of Allah.

        Tafheem ul Quran, By Abul ala Maududi, Tafseer of Surah 33, Verse 57
        This is the foremost and basic demand of the Faith. If the person who regards Allah as his Lord and accepts Allah’s Messenger as his guide and leader. is true in his belief, he can never have the attitude that he should give his own opinion and view precedence over the decision of Allah and His Messenger, or -should adopt an independent opinion in the matters, and pass his own judgments without caring to find out whether Allah and His Messenger have given any guidance in those matters or not, and if they have given it, what it is. That is why it has been said “O believers, do not go `in advance’ of AIIah and His Messenger. ” That is, “Do not go ahead of them, but follow behind: Do not precede them, but be subordinate to them. ” This Command is, in its application and effect, a step further to verse 36 of AI-Ahzab. There it was said: `It does not behove a believing man and a believing woman that when Allah and His Messenger have given their decision in a matter, they should exercise an Option in that matter of theirs”, and here it is said that the believers should not decide their matters themselves by their own initiative, but should look for guidance in Allah’s Book and His Prophet’s Sunnah concerning those matters. If ever you adopted an attitude of independence as against Allah and His Messenger, or gave priority to your own opinion and view over their Command, you should know that you have to deal with that God Who is hearing whatever you utter and is even aware of your secret intentions.

        Tafheem ul Quran, By Abul ala Maududi, Tafseer of Surah 49, Verse 1
        This is the etiquette that was taught to the people who sat among the audience of the Holy Prophet or came to visit him. Its intention was that the believers should treat ‘the Holy Prophet with the highest respect and reverence when visiting him and talking to him. Nobody should raise his voice louder than his: the people should not be unmindful of the fact that they are addressing the Messenger of Allah, and not a common man, or a person of equal rank; therefore, there should be a marked difference between one’s tone of conversation with the common people and one’s tone of conversation with the Holy Prophet, and no one should talk to him in a voice louder than his. This shows what high position the person of the Holy Prophet occupies in Islam. No one beside the Holy Prophet, whatever his rank and status, has a position that unmannerly behavior towards him should deserve in the sight of AIlah the same punishment which is, in fact, the punishment for disbelief. In respect of ordinary people it is at the most a sort of rudeness, an uncivilized conduct, but in respect of the Holy Prophet a little lack of reverence is such a grave sin as can destroy all the services of one’s lifetime. For the reverence of the Holy Prophet is indeed reverence of that God Who has sent him as His Messenger and lack of reverence for him amounts to lack of reverence to God Himself.

        Tafheem ul Quran, By Abul ala Maududi, Tafseer of Surah 49, Verse 2
        That is, “Only those people give due reverence to the Messenger of Allah, who have passed successfully through the tests and trials set by Allah and proved by their steadfastness that their hearts indeed possess taqva (piety). ” From this it follows automatically that the heart which is devoid of reverence for the Holy Prophet is, in fact, devoid of taqva, and a person’s raising his voice louder than the Holy Prophet’s is not only an uncivilized act outwardly but also a sign of the absence of tagva in his heart.

        Tafheem ul Quran, By Abul ala Maududi, Tafseer of Surah 49, Verse 3
        That is, everyone is personally responsible for his deeds, whether good or bad. The Prophet (peace he on him) is told that he will neither have to explain to God the conduct of the converts nor will the latter be required to explain his conduct. They can neither usurp his good deeds, nor transfer their own misdeeds to his account. There is, therefore, no reason for the Prophet (peace be on him) to alienate those who approach him as seekers after Truth.

        Tafheem ul Quran, By Abul ala Maududi, Tafseer of Surah 6, Verse 52
        (And turn not away those who invoke their Lord, morning and evening seeking His Face.) meaning, (The Prophet) should not turn away those who have these qualities, instead make them your companions and associates.

        Tafseer Ibne Kathir, Tafseer of Surah 6, Verse 52
        Thus we agree that any one who raises his voice infront of the Prophet (SAW), either during a conversation with each other, or with the Prophet, is a sign of lack of piety in one’s heart. The act of calling the Prophet (SAW) insane, speaking loudly/quarrelling with him or infront of him, giving your own opinion over the commands of the Prophet (SAW), are highly criticizable acts, and will be done by people only if they lack piety in their hearts. Furthermore, such actions will displease Allah himself and invite his wrath, irrespective of who the person is. We believe the Prophet was Just. The Prophet is not allowed to tell people around him to leave him if they are God fearing with clean intentions for guidance. The Prophet tells the people around his deathbed to leave him which proves what? Use your imagination.
        We must note that the actions which displeased the Prophet (SAW) should earn our disgust as well. For me, speaking loudly infront of the Prophet or calling him unwell/unconscious/delirious or denying him his will, is sufficient to discocicate myself from the people and companions involved in this tragic event. But as Umer’s name shows up again and again in many narrations, which forces the people to justify this tragedy of Thursday, i had to put down certain verses of Quran which would tell people regarding the fate of those who are told by the Prophet (SAW) to leave him (SAW).
        So Omar said, “Pain had taken over the Prophet peace be upon him.” Omar meant that the Prophet peace be upon him was tired, therefore, do not increase his pain and leave him alone. Then someone (The scholars said that this person might be a newcomer to Islam) said in a questioning form, “What is wrong with him? Is he hallucinating?” Meaning, is he aware of what he is talking about or had the fever affected him? It is widely known that prophets could be sick, and that does not slander in their infallibility. Anyhow, the person who asked the question did a mistake. He thought that involuntary speech due to fever is applicable to the Messenger of Allah as it is applicable to the rest of the people. He was wrong, definitely.

        http://ansar.org/english/faq14.htm

        The hardcore Sunni website provides with a lame excuse in order to defend Umer’s disrespect of the Prophet. You must note from the narrations that it was Umer who gave his opinion over the Prophet’s command telling him that Quran was sufficient for them and they did not require any further sources of guidance. This also led to a division amongst the companions, some sided with Umer’s opinion while some supported the Prophet’s decision.
        It is funny to note how the author claims that Umer was only worried about the health of the Prophet and wanted the people not to disturb the Prophet. Did he not know that the Prophet of Allah says only what is revealed to him (SAW), and did he not know that the Prophet of Allah knew his own condition better? And did Umer not know that the Quran alone was infact insufficient for them which is why the Prophet (SAW) wanted to give them further instructions.
        The author however puts the bulk of the blame on a supposedly new comer to Islam. I do not see where did he get the idea from. However, this proves more that not all Companions of Prophet (SAW) were good and sincere to him, and also equal in knowledge and wisdom amongst each other.
        I need not say anything more. The love for Prophet (SAW) amongst all Muslims is an important part of faith. This love will make me dislike the people involved in troubling the Prophet (SAW) during that Thursday, while to you, the actions of certain companions may seem defendable.
        However, if we are pleased with the people who troubled the Prophet (SAW), then i cannot say about the love and respect you have for Prophet (SAW), for the merit and rank of Companions is nothing without the Prophet. If our loyalty is more towards the companions because we have been taught that way since our childhood, then i say we must verify our approach towards Islam.

        Monday, November 25, 2013
        WHY ARE ABU BAKR & UMAR ALLOWED BY ALLAH, TO BE BURIED NEXT TO PROPHET(sawa) IF THEY WERE BAD?
        Posted by abdullah On 12:59 AM 2 comments
        • Why are Abu bakr and Umar allowed by Allah, to be buried next to prophet Muhammad (SAW), if they were bad and evil men and will go to hell, as Shias believe.
        The will of Allah is to give free will to men. Everything is governed by the will of Allah because Allah has given free will to man. Man’s free will is the will of Allah, thus any action of any man is indirectly the will of Allah, as Allah wanted man to choose for himself. But every action of man is not a desire of Allah, and any action of man which is undesirable to Allah would not gain Allah’s pleasure.
        There are people amongst the Jews and atheists, among the disbelievers, who abuse Muhammad (SAW) very badly! Is this also the will of Allah? You and I both know it is not, it is the free will of man, for which he is highly punishable.
        Abu bakr was succeeded by Umar and thus umar buried Abu bakr next to prophet (SAW). Umar was succeeded by Usman and thus usman buried Umer next to Rasool (SAW) as well. When usman was killed, people didn’t let him be buried next to prophet (SAW) and thus he was buried in the graveyard just where the graves of the Jews started! These burials were due to the free will of the people. Do u believe that if Abu bakr was succeeded by someone else who was not his ally, would he allow Abu bakr to be buried next to prophet (SAW)? Maybe not.
        Thus the part that only good people can be buried next to prophet (SAW) is not true and illogical.
        And from among those who are round about you of the dwellers of the desert there are hypocrites, and from among the people of Medina (also); they are stubborn in hypocrisy; you do not know them; We know them; We will chastise them twice then shall they be turned back to a grievous chastisement Quran [9:101]
        Allah sets forth an example to those who disbelieve the wife of Nuh and the wife of Lut: they were both under two of Our righteous servants, but they acted treacherously towards them so they availed them naught against Allah, and it was said: Enter both the fire with those who enter. Quran [66:10]
        If hypocrites can eat with prophet (SAW), and if the wives of prophets, such as that of Nuh and Lut, the very wives who shared the prophets’ bed etc, if they can be burnt in hell due to their deeds, then no one is safe until their actions, deeds and faiths saved them. Being the teacher of angels couldn’t save Satan due to his deeds, do you expect that any bad person if dies in a holy place or is buried in a holy place will be saved? That is against the Justice of Allah.
        And guard yourselves against a day in which you shall be returned to Allah; then every soul shall be paid back in full what it has earned, and they shall not be dealt with unjustly. Quran [2:281]
        Mecca and Medina are holy places. Kerbala is a holy place to Shias. Jerusalem is a holy place. A lot of people have lived and died in these areas. Were all of these people good, sinless, masooms, on the right path ? As a matter of fact, Kaaba has been surrounded by idols most of the time in pre-Islamic era. Thus the sanctity, piety and goodness of any place and personality cannot be judged by the day they died, the place they died or the place where they are buried!! It will only be judged by their faith and actions.
        • Even if they are bad men, burying next to prophet (SAW) means they won’t be punished in their grave due to the barkat of Rasool Allah (SAW)
        I have heard, not read, that the punishment of the grave is relieved if a momin is buried nearby. This means that people around the grave of Prophet (SAW) will not be punished due to the barkat of the prophet (SAW). What happens in the grave is not our matter, because we do not know.
        And the trumpet shall be blown, when lo ! from their graves they shall hasten on to their Lord. They shall say: O woe to us! who has raised us up from our sleeping-place? This is what the Beneficent Allah promised and the messengers told the truth. Quran [36:51-52]
        This verse proves that the disbelievers, the kuffars, on the day of Qiyamat will complain that who disturbed them from a very good sleeping place. Due to this verse, many people do not believe in the punishment of the grave, because a punishment place cannot be referred to as a sleeping place, sleep is peaceful.
        However, the other ideology is, which i tend to agree to, given the numerous prayers of Prophet (SAW) and Imams regarding the punishment in the grave, that such punishment exists. However, this the punishment of the grave is not permanent and not even the real deal. The punishment of the grave lasts only for three days, and after that the person is put to sleep until the day of resurrection. You do not feel anything in your sleep.
        So this day no soul shall be dealt with unjustly in the least; and you shall not be rewarded aught but that which you did. Quran [36:54]
        The real deal is the Qiyamat. If Abu bakr and Umer were evil, they might not suffer the punishment in grave due to the presence of prophet (SAW), or they might be punished in the grave in such a way that no one else around them is disturbed. That is not our concern. Is it ?
        Because what they did, was wrong and that is what matters. Allah is the judge, he forgives whom he wills and punishes whom he wills. Why should we judge who will be punished and how and who will go to heaven. Leave it to Allah. We are only concerned with who did good and who did bad! Recognize that goodness or badness, and stay away from the path of those who did bad.
        • How can evil people be allowed to be buried next to the greatest creation, Prophet Muhammad (SAW)
        As I said earlier, past prophets were killed brutally, prophet Yahya for example! Is not Allah the protector of everyone? Will not Allah protect his Prophets from all harm, all evil? Why then were Prophets slain? Past prophets had evil spouses, even evil children, corrupt followers! Prophet Nuh had animals for his companions in his ark!!
        O my two mates of the prison! are sundry lords better or Allah the One, the Supreme? You do not serve besides Him but names which you have named, you and your fathers; Allah has not sent down any authority for them; judgment is only Allah’s; He has commanded that you shall not serve aught but Him; this is the right religion but most people do not know; Quran [12:39-40]
        Prophet Yusuf had disbelievers as companions in the prison and was an advisor to the pharaoh. Prophet Moses was brought up in the house of Firaun! People who killed prophet’s grandson, imam Hussain at Kerbala, were hajis and namazis!!!
        Thus in no way does being buried next to the prophet prove u were masoom or good, neither it guarantees as an atonement for your sins. What matters is your faith, your beliefs, your actions and your sincerity and love for Allah, his Deen, his Quran, his angels, his Rasool and his ahlulbayt.
        For argument’s sake, if I agree to your ideology that no wretched can be buried next to Prophet Muhammad (SAW), then you should remember, that the third caliph, Usman ibn Affan, was not allowed to be buried next to Prophet Muhammad (SAW). Your argument will prove that Abu Bakr and Umer were noble, while Usman was wretched. Or you should accept the principles of Islam, which declare that every man will be judged according to his faith, actions and intentions.
        The Shias do not judge anyone, nor do we declare who goes to paradise and who to hell. But it is important to realize who did bad, and stay away from that forbidden path
        I hope this helped.
        Categories: English
        Newer Post Older Post Home
        2 comments:

        Anonymous says:
        April 24, 2014 at 7:57 AM
        Shame on you admin! I bear witness that you wrote such and such things against the blessed companion hazrat Umar R.A. How strange a man is, for yourself you wrote “please use polite language” while writing such a foul thing about blessed companion you forgot your own manners!
        May Allah guide you!

        abdullah says:
        April 25, 2014 at 12:27 AM
        I am surprised at your logic, Mr. Anonymous.
        You are living with the assumption that Umar and Abu Bakr were the ‘blessed’ companions of Prophet(SAWA). This is due to a vast number of fabricated traditions about these companions in your reputed books. Those fabricated traditions were manufactured in the factory of Banu Umayyah who were the worst enemies of Holy Prophet(SAWA) and Banu Hashim.
        If you are trully a man in search of truth, then go and refer the early islamic history. Read about the battle of Uhud where Holy Prophet(SAWA) was left alone by these so called ‘blessed’ companions who ran away from the battlefied.
        I advise you to read how Umar and Abu Bakr failed to capture the fort of Khyber.
        I suggest you to read Umar’s doubting the prophethood of Mohammad(SAWA) at the time of treaty of Hudaybiya.
        I ask you the reason for Umar and Abu Bakr disobedience to join the army of Osama.
        I strongly ask you why Umar denied pen and paper to the Holy Prophet(SAWA) when it is clearly wriiten in Quran that Prophet(SAWA) did not speak but its a revelation from his Lord.
        I ask you what prompted Umar and his companions to burn the door of the beloved daughter of Holy Prophet(SAWA) and eventually became the cause of her death.
        Is it a shameful act to narrate the oppressions done by Umar and Abu BAkr on the pure progeny of Holy Prophet(SAWA)???
        And please dont say that these are the accusations of Shias., because these incidents are found innumerable sunni books.
        Now I ask you if you are trully a muslim what has stopped you from narrating these things found in both shia and sunni books.
        Yes we write to use polite language but that doesnt stop any body from narrating the historical facts.
        These are not foul things about ‘blessed’ companion but proved facts about some of the hypocrites in the rank of companions of Holy Prophet(SAWA).
        We shias are against only those companions who oppressed the pure progeny of Prophet(SAWA) …
        And we think its is quite logical ….
        If you really love Prophet(SAWA) you would also love his Ahlal Bayt and would hate those who troubled them.
        May Allah guide you toward the truth
        Post a Comment
        براہ مہربانی شائستہ زبان کا استعمال کریں
        Please use Polite Language.

        • Lucky bin SATAN, You see I filtered YOU out! Do YOU know how I GOT YOU??

          I sieved YOU by watching YOU bend naked in the mirror of this BLOG and SAW what a BLACK asshole YOU have. YOU are the ONLY one who has an asshole DARKER than the BLACK-SPOTS found on the SUN!!!

          STOP condemning Muhammad because he succeeded in bringing sanity and morality whereas Jesus FAILED. Compare the SINS in the world between the Islamic and non-Islamic world…and be HONEST, okay?

          • LF, ref to Psalms 82:6 KJV :

            I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.

            And, also refer to Exodus 1 :7 KJV :

            And the Lord said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharaoh: and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet.

            So, EXPLAIN those gods!

          • MUSLIM GENOCIDE ON BLACK AFRICANS THROUGH MASS-CASTRATION:

            Tidiane N´Diaye – Muslim Genocide on Black Africans Through Mass-Castration

            Explore the diversity of black-, white-, Jewish- and Arab ethno-centrism.

            Thanks to Universe Freedom for helping me out with the above translation.

            An Interview with Tidiane N´Diaye – Translated by Galliawatch

            In May 2001 the French Parliament passed a law that came to be called Taubira’s Law after its sponsor, Christiane Taubira, the socialist deputy from Guiana. I posted an English translation of the law in May 2006. The first part of the law qualifies both slavery and the transatlantic and Indian Ocean slave trades as crimes against humanity, but does not mention the Arab-Muslim slave trade. Madame Taubira is quoted as having said in 2006 that the Negro slave trade practiced by Arab-Muslims must not be brought up too often so that “young Arabs do not bear on their shoulders all the weight of the heritage of Arab misdeeds.”

            Now a book published in France by Gallimard, entitled Le Génocide Voilé (“Veiled Genocide”), exposes the cover-up of the Arab-Muslim slave trade, denounces the attempt to place all of the blame for slavery on the backs of Western countries, and goes so far as to qualify the atrocities committed by Arabs to Africans as “genocide.”

            The author is Tidiane N’Diaye (photo), a Senegalese Muslim, anthropologist, economist, and researcher at INSEE (National Institute of Economic Studies). The following interview with the author is posted at Evene.

            Le Génocide Voilé is an inquiry into the Arab-Muslim slave trade. Why should we be interested in this subject today?

            Because the misery, the poverty, the long demographic stagnation and the current developmental delays of the black continent, are not merely the consequences of the transatlantic slave trade, as many imagine. The transatlantic drain is well known and has been debated for decades. Studies and syntheses on this slave trade are legion. And yet, even though one cannot speak of degrees of horror or a monopoly on cruelty, it is possible to declare that the Negro slave trade and the wars provoked by the Arab-Muslims were, for black Africa through the centuries, much more devastating than the transatlantic trade. Likewise the Islamization of many Negro-African peoples and all that it engendered, such as jihad, were no less the source of innumerable implosions. But to this day, only the genocide of black peoples by the Arab-Muslim nations has not been clearly acknowledged by those who research the responsible parties. Even though this crime is historically, juridically and morally forbidden.

            When did it begin and in what region(s)?

            In the 7th century A.D., the Arabs, having conquered Egypt, proceeded to enslave numerous peoples of Nubia, Somalia, Mozambique, and elsewhere, during the first Islamic expansion. The Nubians had been harshly dealt with in the fierce attacks by Arab forces. They defended themselves courageously, but faced with superior numbers and the determination of the soldiers of the jihad and the repeated assaults by Arab jihadists, the Nubians preferred to negotiate peace, concluding in 652 the treaty known as Bakht. This treaty committed the vanquished African monarch to turn over annually a supply of 360 captives to become slaves in the Arab-Muslim world. Thus it was that a large-scale Negro slave trade was for the first time invented by Arab-Muslims. I use the term Arab-Muslim because after the Bakht, this trade became trans-Saharan and Eastern, implicating more and more peoples and regions and extending far beyond the Arab world. The traders who took part were also Berbers from the Maghreb, Turks of the Ottoman Empire and Iranians, hence Persians. Many African captives were sold by the Arabs as far away as India, since the king of Bengal possessed about 8000 slaves in the 15th century. The majority of men deported at the start of this trade came from the population of Darfur. It all began there, and apparently it has never ceased.

            What were the specific forms and motivations of this slave trade compared with the transatlantic trade?

            In the Arab world – the Wahhabi system (Saudi Arabia) for example – did not favor economic and social development through the hard work of its inhabitants. It condemned them to an endless need for servile labor furnished by the Negro trade. Moreover, for an Arab of those times, a man is never poor so long as his neighbor possesses something. The Holy War came in handy, if you wanted to become rich. Since every believer had the obligation to lead a jihad, they said, it was imperative to subject and enslave the non-converted. They took the Koran abusively as a pretext to stage raids on their infidel neighbors, stripping them of all they possessed. And so it was that with a clear conscience and using methods that were convenient as well as blessed, most of these converted Arab tribes ended up not living from their own resources. Thus the permanence of the plague of the Negro slave trade and of Arab-Muslim slavery in Africa was due to the traditions of these peoples dating from a time when they could not, out of debauchery and laziness, do without servile men to infuse strength and new blood into them. For example, in the middle of the 19th century, one third of the population of Oman was African or of African origin. In Arab societies, Africans played a central role. They had no specific function but they took part in a great many common activities.

            You speak of massive castration…

            Before the terrible castrations there were first sudden raids and massacres. For example, in the Holy War led by that Sudanese Arab chieftain, a mystic, enlightened, who considered himself a Mahdi (descendant of the Prophet), the whole of Sudan from the ocean to Egypt, taking in all the plateaux of Africa – from the Nile to the Zambezi – was subject to manhunts and the sale of captives. This space was twice the size of Europe, and certain explorers estimated its population to be around 100 million in the the 19th century. To have an idea of the evil, you must realize that these same observers stated that to hunt down and carry off 500,000 individuals, it was necessary to kill almost two million others (who resisted or tried to flee). So if births had ceased at the time, then, in less than a half-century, the interior of Africa would be nothing but a desolate wasteland today.

            You also speak of genocide. Do you think there was a desire to annihilate the African Negro populations?

            I do indeed find the word “genocide” suitable for this unprecedented enterprise. It must be stated that the disdain of the Arabs towards Africans was also a catalyst. The famous Arab historian of the 14th century, Ibn-Khaldum, wrote: “The only people who accept slavery are the Negroes, because of an inferior degree of humanity, their place being closer to the level of animals.” The question then was: how to see to it that these “animals” did not reproduce in Arab-Muslim lands. For from the outset of the slave trade, the traders wanted to prevent them from becoming rooted. Since there was nothing metaphysical about it, castration appeared to be a practical solution. And so, in this effort to abase human beings, if the Arabs sent most black women to harems, they mutilated the men, using rudimentary procedures that caused a terrifying mortality. The figures on this slave trade are quite simply harrowing. (…)

            In the second part of the interview, of which I will quote one excerpt only, he discusses critically the work of Olivier Pétré-Grenouilleau, who also exposed the Arab-Muslim slave trade. He comments on the current situation in Darfur and reveals the truth about Zulu hero Chaka Zulu. His most interesting remarks deal with what he sees as the Stockholm syndrome African-style:

            Very numerous are those who would like to see the Arab-Muslim slave trade forever veiled in oblivion, often in the name of a certain religious, or even ideological solidarity. It is in fact a virtual pact signed and sealed between the descendants of the victims and those of the executioners, that leads to this denial. Because in this sort of “Stockholm syndrome African-style,” all of these fine people agree to place everything on the shoulders of the West. The selective silence surrounding the Arab-Muslim crimes against black peoples and this effort to minimize it, so as to better point the projectors solely at the transatlantic trade, is a cement being used to bring about a fusion of Arabs and Negro-African peoples – who have long been ” fellow victims” of Western colonialism. That Arab-Muslim writers and other intellectuals attempt to make even the simplest memory of this infamy disappear, as if it had never existed, is easily understood.

            On the other hand, what is harder to grasp is the attitude of many researchers, and even of African Americans who are converting more and more to Islam. This attitude is not always healthy and is strongly influenced by a sort of self-censorship. As if evoking the slave trading past of Arab-Muslims is in some way tantamount to minimizing the transatlantic trade. (…)

      • THE PERFECT EXAMPLE FOR MANKIND

        “PARAGON OF MORAL PERFECTION”

        THE PERFECT MUSLIM

        And surely thou hast sublime morals
        (Surat Al-Qalam 68:4).

        Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah an excellent exemplar
        (Surat Al-Ahzab 33:21).
        “Say (O Muhammad to mankind): ‘If you (really) love Allah then follow me (i.e. accept Islamic Monotheism, follow Quran and the Sunnah), Allah will love you and forgive you your sins. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.’ Say (O Muhammad): ‘Obey Allah and the Messenger (Muhammad).’ But if they turn away, then Allah does not like the disbelievers.”
        (Quran: 3:31)
        “And whatever the Messenger gives you, take it, and whatever he forbids you, leave it. And fear Allah: truly Allah is severe in punishment.
        (Quran 59:7)

        Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly.

        MOHAMMED GAVE BLOWJOBS TO HIS GRANDSON:

        SURA 52:24
        “And there shall wait on them [the Muslim men] young boys of their own, as fair as virgin pearls.”
        Hadith Number 16245, Volume Title: “The Sayings of the Syrians,” Chapter
        Title: “Hadith of Mu’awiya Ibn Abu Sufyan”: “I saw the prophet – pbuh –
        sucking on the tongue or the lips of Al-Hassan son of Ali, may the
        prayers of Allah be upon him. For no tongue or lips that the prophet
        sucked on will be tormented (by hell fire)
        He (the Prophet) lift up his (al Hasan’s) shirt & kissed his (little) penis..”
        روى أنه صلى الله عليه و سلم قبل زبيبة الحسن أو الحسين
        He (the prophet) kissed the (little) penis of al Hasan or al Husein
        رأيت النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم فرج ما بين فخذي الحسين و قبل زبيبته
        He (the prophet) put Husein’s legs apart & kissed his (little) penis
        Another Hadith. Majma al-Zawa’id, Ali ibn Abu Bakr al-Haythami, 299/9 مجمع الزوائد لعلي بن أبى بكر الهيثمي
        رأيت رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم فرج ما بين فخذي الحسين و قبل زبيبته
        رواه الطبراني و إسناده حسن
        translated in English: “I saw the Messenger of Allah pbuh putting Husein’s legs apart & kissing his (little) penis.”
        Related by Al-Tabarani & it’s authentication is good.
        Face it your prophet who you consider perfect had sex with young boys including his grandson & had a 6 year old wife; raped and murdered, among other things.

        ALLAH’S ARITHMETIC: 54 INTO 9 GOES NICELY

        THE WANKING PERVERT FROM MECCA

        A marriage is engaged in by 2 consenting adults.
        Do you really believe a 6 year old child would desire to marry a 51 year old man?
        Do you think that is what she would choose?
        Do you think a 9 year old girl would desire to have sex with a 54 year old?

        The thought of an old man becoming aroused by a child is one of the most disturbing thoughts that makes us cringe as it reminds us of pedophilia and the most despicable people. It is difficult to accept that the “Holy Prophet” of Mecca married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and WANKED BETWEEN HER THIGHS FOR 3 YEARS and consummated/RAPED her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.
        MUHAMMAD: HIS SEX LIFE, SEX ABUSE & CHILD MOLESTING

        Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly. Let us investigate how did the prophet live Islam; how did the prophet apply the eternal teachings of God in his daily life? In this search for the historical Muhammad, we will utilize the Islam’s holy books, its own writings.

        MUHAMMAD’S MOLESTATION OF BABY AISHA

        Muhammad fantasized about baby Aisha before soliciting her from her father.
        Sahih Bukhari 9.140
        Narrated ‘Aisha:
        Allah’s apostle said to me, “you were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘if this is from Allah, then it must happen.

        AISHA’S FATHER DID NOT APPROVE AT FIRST
        Aisha’s father, Abu Bakr, wasn’t on board at first, but Muhammad explained how the rules of their religion made it possible. This is similar to the way that present-day cult leaders manipulate their followers into similar concessions.
        Sahih Bukhari 7.18
        Narrated ‘Ursa:
        The prophet asked abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “but I am your brother.” the prophet said, “you are my brother in Allah’s religion and his book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”

        MUHAMMAD WOULD THIGH WITH BABY AISHA

        HOW TO THIGH & GET HIGH

        Now let us see how thighing is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

        Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.

        According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

        Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

        Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.
        Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.”Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

        The inquirer asked the following: ‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’

        After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

        That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers'” (Fatwa No. 31409).

        Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

        AISHA WASHING SEMEN FROM MUHAMMAD’S CLOTHES

        From the Hadith of Bukhari:

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:

        Narrated ‘Aisha:

        I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

        Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:

        Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

        I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

        MUHAMMAD WAS A CUCKSUCKING, WANKING CHILD MOLESTER!

        ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED THE RAPE OF FEMALE CAPTIVES:

        RAPE JIHAD:

        Sahih Muslim Book 08. N 3371Marriage

        Chapter: Al-Azl (incomplete sexual intercourse): Coitus Interruptus.

        Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women;

        and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them.
        So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him?

        So we asked Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

        REMEMBER:

        ISLAM TEACHES THAT RAPE IS ORDAINED OF GOD

        ALLAH & MOHAMMED SANCTIONED RAPE

        Al-‘AZL

        Al-‘Azl, (العزل) also known as coitus interruptus, is the practice of having sexual intercourse with a woman but withdrawing the penis before ejaculation. Apparently al-‘Azl with female captives and slaves was a pretty important topic for Muhammad and his companions as evidenced by the abundance of Hadith material on the subject.
        Practiced during Muhammad’s lifetime & ALL OVER EUROPE TODAY

        Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle .
        Sahih Bukhari 7:62:135

        Narrated Jabir: We used to practice coitus interrupt us while the Quran was being revealed. Jabir added: We used to practice coitus interruptus during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle while the Quran was being Revealed.
        Sahih Bukhari 7:62:136

        Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus(RAPE WITHOUT PREGNANCY)?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to PULL OUT. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.”

        Sahih Bukhari 3:34:432

        Abu Said said, “We went with Allah’s Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the ‘Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah’s Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence.”
        Sahih Bukhari 3:46:718

        EDUCATING IGNORANT MOHAMMEDANS:
        CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF AN INTACT HYMEN

        Most females are born with a hymen, a thin piece of skin that partially covers the vaginal opening (or introitus). The main purpose of the hymen is to protect the vaginal opening and the areas immediately surrounding the introitus during a female’s early developing years. Despite its biological function, many cultures place a significant amount of importance on the hymen and whether or not it is intact. This small and seemingly insignificant piece of tissue is of such great importance to many cultures because an intact hymen is believed to indicate the chastity of a female. The presence of the hymen implies that the female is a virgin (one who has never engaged in sexual intercourse). The importance of a female’s chastity is often emphasized in patriarchal societies and by traditional religions. Some arguments that are used to back this notion are the presumption that a chaste bride values fidelity and the that there is an increased guarantee that her offspring will be her husband’s children and not someone else’s. Men are also encouraged to seek virgins as wives because they are deemed “pure” and not sexually promiscuous.
        One problem with this theory, however, is that if a woman does not have an intact hymen, it is possible that she is still a virgin. A woman may not have a hymen for a variety of different reasons. Many women tear their hymen, thus enlarging the vaginal opening, through nonsexual activities that put tension on the hymeneal tissue. These activities include engaging in sports, horseback riding, or inserting tampons. Women may not even be aware that their hymen has torn, since there may be little or no blood and no pain. Sexual intercourse is only one of many reasons why a woman may not have a hymen. Likewise, a non-virginal female may still have an intact hymen. The hymen can stretch sufficiently to permit entry of tampons and sometimes even a penis.

        In societies that emphasize the importance of a hymen, a woman without a hymen may be at risk on her wedding night. In many cultures that put an emphasis on virginity, the husband expects to “pop” his wife’s “cherry.” Blood-stained sheets are often put on display to mark the loss of virginity and prove the bride’s purity. A female who does not bleed on her wedding night may be judged as to be a non-virgin. She risks being shunned by her family and new husband. She may even be returned to her family as “used goods,” stoned to death, or banished from her society. Again, virginal women may not have an intact hymen or experience bleeding upon intercourse.

        The hymen carries a great deal of importance and symbolism even in the United States. There have been instances in the United States, especially among college students, of people being eager to lose their virginity as soon as possible. In this case retaining one’s virginity is seen as a stigma of inexperience. However, in many places in the U.S., losing ones virginity still carries a stigma for young women. Perhaps because of the stigma associated with this act, men and boys alike are sometimes eager to be the ones who “take” a girls virginity. Men and boys alike may be eager to “pop a girl’s cherry.” However, other than tearing or stretching her hymen, there is no other biological change that a woman goes through after her first intercourse. The thought that a woman loses value by losing her virginity is an outdated and degrading concept. We can only hope that as more and more people begin to understand the basics of human sexuality, these false myths will be eradicated.

        Another problem with connecting the presence of an intact hymen and lack of penile-vaginal penetration to virginity, is that it often excludes the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered (LGBT) community. Members of the LGBT community consider sex with the same partner as a relinquishing of virginity, and may feel discredited or discounted by the heteronormative view that pervades discussions of virginity. Similarly, there has been a rise in alternative sexual activity among teenagers who have taken chastity pledges. This alternative sexual activity includes practices like oral sex and anal sex, which they often do not think of as sexual intercourse. Because virginity is a complex and culturally constructed concept, we recommend that you take it with a grain of salt. Whether or not you tore or stretched your hymen, it is up to you and no one else to decide whether you are a virgin. Besides, your virginity is not an accurate measure of your worth or morality.

        Hymen Reconstructive Surgery

        In many religious communities, there has been an influx of hymen reparation surgery. In some Muslim communities, virginity is expected of a bride. For this reason, women who no longer have an intact hymen have their hymens surgically reconstructed in order to appear virginal on their wedding night. This is especially prominent among students who have gone to live in more sexually permissive cultures. The surgery creates a fake hymen at the vaginal opening. It generally costs from $400 to $1000, but varies from country to country. In addition to the surgery, some women have a gelatin capsule full of blood inserted within their vaginal canal to cause bleeding upon penetration. Beyond reasons of religious necessity, some women will get this surgery done as a gift to their husband along with a tightening of the vaginal canal.

        Sources:
        http://www.babapandey.com/hymen-repair-and-a-prettier-vagina-the-current

        SUNNA OF EVIL PERFECTION

        The following are a short-list of the evil Sunnah of Muhammad, recorded in the Hadiths of Bukhari:
        Child sexual molestation and Pedophilia is Sunna in Islam.
        Murder, even Mass Murder, is Sunna in Islam.
        Extermination and ethnic cleansing of communities is Sunna in Islam.
        Rape is Sunna in Islam.
        Sex Slavery is Sunna in Islam
        Beheading is Sunna in Islam.
        Stoning to death for sexual deviation is Sunna in Islam.
        Beating one’s wife is Sunna in Islam
        Murdering Kafir children is Sunna in Islam.
        Murdering Muslims’ own children is Sunna in Islam.
        Murdering Jews is Sunna in Islam
        Murdering Christians is Sunna in Islam
        Slavery is Sunna in Islam
        Booty is Sunna in Islam
        Whipping is Sunna in Islam
        Torture is Sunna in Islam
        Terror is Sunna in Islam
        Maiming is Sunna in Islam
        Jihad is Sunna in Islam
        Extortion is Sunna in Islam
        Inferiority, oppression, subjugation of Women Is Sunna in Islam
        Looting, pillaging is Sunna in Islam
        Murdering elderly is Sunna in Islam
        Murdering musicians is Sunna in Islam
        Murdering those who are being sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat is Sunna in Islam
        Murdering those who deny any verse of the Quran or ‘anything which by scholarly consensus belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong to it is Sunna in Islam
        Murdering those who hold that ‘any of Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent is Sunna in Islam
        (Murdering those who revile the religion of Islam, being sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law; denying that Allah intended ‘the Prophet’s message to be the religion followed by the entire world is Sunna in Islam
        Murdering apostates is Sunna in Islam
        Murdering prisoners of war is Sunna in Islam
        Murdering gays is Sunna in Islam.
        Forcible conversion is Sunna in Islam.Murdering those who are critical of Islam is Sunna in Islam
        Murdering those who revile Allah or his Messenger is Sunna in Islam

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s