Saudi Arabia: Muslims are leaving Islam For Atheism In Alarming Numbers


[By Sameera Ehteram] Despite the fact that Atheism is considered equal to terrorism in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the number of such people is blowing up overnight.127713_story__tumblrn4ufq7qCUz1ql94czo2r11280


In April this year, Saudi Arabia passed a terrorism law declaring all non believers of Islam to be enemies of the state.

It was probably random acts like the tweet below that ruffled feathers in the kingdom:

Saudi Tweet

Regardless of the restrictions and strict laws, more and more people are coming out as atheists, perhaps not candidly, but in a country where such a concept was unthinkable till recently, such admissions are surprising:

Saudi 2

Fahad Al Fahad, a human right activist, recently claimed“I know at least six atheists who confirmed that to me.”

“Six or seven years ago, I wouldn’t even have heard one person say that. Not even a best friend would confess that to me,” he added.

According to a 2012 poll, five percent of Saudis described themselves as“convinced atheist.” Although the figure is well below the global average of 13 percent, for a conservative country like Saudi Arabia, where civil liberties are scarce, the number is quite large.

Bassim Alim, a Saudi lawyer, thinks the sudden growth in numbers is “because people are becoming more disillusioned with the government, they started looking at the government and its support groups as being in bed together and conspiring together against the good of the people.”

It may also have something to do with the ironfisted imposition of religious restrictions by the government on its people. Surely, many felt suffocated and it prompted them to retaliate.

In a country where members of the opposite sex cannot interact openly, women are not allowed to drive or even go to libraries, and people are sentenced to jail for voicing their opinions people are bound to feel the need to rebel.

18 thoughts on “Saudi Arabia: Muslims are leaving Islam For Atheism In Alarming Numbers

  1. SHIA PEN:
    REVEALING THE TRUTH
    Ch 8: Examples of Sunni morality

    As we stated in the previous chapter, Dr. Salamah and Ibn al-Hashmi have made a big mistake by attempting to argue that Shi’ite hadeeth literature legitimises immorality. All that we have discussed leaves no doubt that Mut’ah is in no way immoral, and that it was sanctioned by Allah (swt) and His Prophet (s). Conversely, the Sunni hadeeth literature abounds with some of the most lurid and disgusting tales. The Sunni fiqh is, at times, even worse. Some notable examples of the public immorality of some companions and Sunni ‘ulama are given below, as well as some of the blasphemous stories attributed to the Holy Prophet (s) himself. For the sake of taste, we would normally not bring such issues up; but Dr. Salamah and Ibn al-Hashmi have uttered words of utter blasphemy against Allah, His Prophet, and His Religion, as well as forging numerous hadeeths against them. Since Dr. Salamah has decided to make a moral argument, than we will see how “moral” the Sunni belief system, hadeeth literature, and law is:

    (1) First example of Sunni morality
    SALAFI “ULAMA RULED THAT MASTURBATION (WANKING) IS HALAL
    Shamsuddin Ibn Qayyim al Jawziya who is one of the only scholars that the Wahabis do not reject and who was a student of Ibn Taymiyya. Let us quote what he writes in his Bada’i al-Fuwa’id, page 129:
    “Ibn ‘Aqeel, and many of our scholars, and our Shaykh [Ibn Taymiyya] have ruled that masturbation is makruh (disliked), and never explicitly said he that it was haram”.
    Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 129
    He then presents his own discussion on the conditions that make masturbation halaal:
    “If a man is torn between continued desire or releasing it, and if this man does not have a wife or he has a slave-girl but he does not marry, then if a man is overwhelmed by desire, and he fears that he will suffer because of this (someone like a prisoner, or a traveller, or a pauper), then it is permissible for him to masturbate, and Ahmad (ibn Hanbal) is explicit on this. Furthermore, it is narrated that the Companions of the Prophet (s) used to masturbate while they were on military expeditions or travelling”.

    COMMENT:
    The polytheists at the dawn of Islam must have been terrified by that scene:
    (AN ARMY OF WANKERS)
    an army of pious companions, their pants nice and short, their beards stretching down to their wastes, their swords held high with one hand while they heartily masturbate with the other. If this was the type of scene going on, we might be able to understand why so many companions refused to go on jihad. Would Dr. Salamah march off to battle with only an army of masturbators to protect him? Or was this tactic of masturbatory jihad supposed to be some sort of an offensive stratagem, to strike fear into the hearts of the enemy? Indeed, these companions were masters at the art of war!
    We appeal for justice: who is promoting debauchery, the Sunnis or the Shi’a? There are a lot of Ahkam surrounding travelling mentioned by the Prophet (s) and the Imams (as): the obligation to pray two rakaat for zuhr instead of four, or the obligation to break one’s fast. This Sunni ‘alim, who is one of the singularly most distinguished Sunni’ ulama and is adored by the Wahabis, has offered another hukm for travelling the permissibility of masturbating. And yet when a Shi’a says that a man is allowed to contract temporary marriage in order to satisfy his desires, Dr. Salamah passes a hukm of takfir. One is allowed to masturbate but not contract a temporary marriage? Is this not the peak of insanity?

    (2) Second example of Sunni morality:
    SUNNI ‘ULAMA LEGITIMISED THE USE OF DILDOS (FEMALE SEX TOYS)
    After this ingenious fatwa, Ibn Qayyim then goes on to make permissible the use of a dildoe by women. It is only logical; when the husbands leave to go masturbate and spread Islam by the sword, they need something to do with themselves. On the same page as quoted above, Ibn Qayyim writes:
    “If a woman does not have a husband, and her lust becomes strong, then some of our scholars say: It is permissible for the woman to take an akranbij, which is a piece of leather worked until it becomes shaped like a penis, and insert it in herself. She may also use a cucumber”.
    COMMENT:
    Now, according to Dr. Salamah’s logic, the Saudi government should therefore purchase a large number of such dildoes, and distribute them to old widows or otherwise unattractive women who cannot marry. Since anything that is permissible, according to Dr. Salamah, requires stand sanction and support, than clearly a dildoe distribution office needs to be immediately established in the great Islamic state of Saudi Arabia.
    Maybe this is another reason why ‘Umar the Khalifa never went on jihad: somebody had to stay behind and organize the cucumber distribution.

    (3) Third example of Sunni morality –
    SUNNI ‘ULAMA HAVE RULED ON PERMISSIBILITY OF HAVING SEX WITH WATERMELONS
    That was not a typographical error. Ibn Qayyim continues this discussion, which exemplifies the morals espoused by Sunni Islam:
    “If a man makes a hole in a watermelon, or a piece of dough, or a leather skin, or a statue, and has sex with it, then this is the same as what we have said about other types of masturbation [i.e., that it is halaal in the same circumstances given before, such as being on a journey]. In fact, it is easier than masturbating with one’s hand”.
    COMMENT:
    All the Muslims should certainly be grateful that Ibn Qayyim has offered this advice on the easiest way to masturbate, and clearly Ibn Qayyim has done a lot of personal research on this issue. This is the ruling of the “saved sect”: Contracting temporary marriage with a woman is haram, but contracting temporary marriage with a watermelon is halaal. In his defence, perhaps Ibn Qayyim only meant that it is allowed to marry a watermelon with the intent of divorcing it, for doing Mut’ah with a watermelon would clearly be an act of fornication.
    Let us remember the words of Dr. Salamah quoted at the beginning of this book:
    Mut’ah, on the other hand, is an open license for sexual pleasure with as many women as one can financially afford. The women who engage in Mut’ah are hired women; thus, it can be performed with all women irrespective of their age, character, conduct or religion. It requires no witnesses, nor is there any obligation on the man’s part to provide food and shelter to the woman.
    • Well, it seems that in the Nasibi logic having sex with as many women as one can afford is utterly immoral, but having sex with as many watermelons as one can afford is not. Based on this, let us ask him some questions about the Ahkam related to having sex with watermelons: Are there any conditions as to the age of the watermelon? For example, is it allowed to perform a marriage with the intent to divorce with a newly grown watermelon, or must one wait until the watermelon is nine years old?
    • Must it be a pious watermelon, or is it permissible to contract a marriage with the intent to divorce with a watermelon that is known to “get around”?
    • May a pious brother share his watermelon with another pious brother, or would the second man’s marriage with the intent to divorce constitute an act of fornication unless the watermelon observes proper ‘iddah?
    • Are witnesses required in the marriage with the intent to divorce of a watermelon? May other watermelons serve as witnesses in that marriage, since according to Sunni fiqh all marriages require witnesses? Applying the Sunni principle of Qiyas (analogy), we can strongly argue that if it is allowed to marry (with intention of divorce) a watermelon, than certainly it is allowed for a watermelon to bear witness to another watermelon’s blessed and chaste marriage.
    • What about oranges?
    Really, we have to ask all reasonable Muslims: would you rather follow ‘ulama that rule on the permissibility of having sex with fruits and vegetables, or follow the pious path of the Holy Imams (as), of whom Allah (swt) has said:
    We intend, O Family of the Prophet, to remove from you all impurity, and to give you a through purification.
    Al-Qur’an, Surah Al-Ahzab, Ayah 33
    Does somebody who spends his time thinking about whether or not it is permissible to have sex with watermelons really sound like somebody who has been removed of all impurity? Why is Ibn Qayyim even thinking about such things? What kind of personal life does such a person have that would lead him to debate such issues in his mind? What happened in Ibn Qayyim’s life that one day he woke up and said: “I really need to find out if its halaal to have sex with watermelons.” Is the type of clergymen who openly rules for the permissibility of having sex with watermelons (with conditions, of course, such as that one is on a journey) be the kind of person you would want to meet in a dark alley, much less do taqlid of?

    (4)Fourth example of Sunni morality –
    A SALAFI WOMAN CAN SUCKLE A SALAFI MAN WITH A BEARD
    We read in Sahih Muslim Hadith Number 3426:
    Ibn Abu Mulaika reported that al-Qasim b. Muhammad b. Abu Bakr had narrated to him that ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail b. ‘Amr came to Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Messenger of Allah, Salim (the freed slave of Abu Hudhaifa) is living with us in our house, and he has attained (puberty) as men attain it and has acquired knowledge (of the sex problems) as men acquire, whereupon he said: Suckle him so that he may become unlawful (in regard to marriage) for you He (Ibn Abu Mulaika) said: I refrained from (narrating this hadith) for a year or so on account of fear. I then met al-Qasim and said to him: You narrated to me a hadith which I did not narrate (to anyone) afterwards. He said: What is that? I informed him, whereupon he said: Narrate it on my authority that ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) had narrated that to me.
    COMMENT:
    This reference is especially for Dr Salamah who has accused the Shi’a of being filthy proponents of Mut’ah, what right do you have to attack us when have the above Fatwa of Ayesha allowing your women to suckle men with beards so as to make them mahram? How many pubescent Salafi men has your mother suckled so that they can enter your house? When your madhab allows your mothers / daughters to breast feed men with beards what gives you the right to attack the practice of Mut’ah? If today any Nasibi tries to suggest that this practice no longer exists in their school and it was only Ayesha who had issued the fatwa then we shall present the thoughts of their Imam Ibn Tamiyah as quoted by one of the revered scholars of Salafies Ibn Uthaimeen:
    واختار شيخ الإسلام ابن تيميه رحمه الله التفصيل وقال إذا دعت الحاجة إلى إرضاع الكبير وأرضع ثبت التحريم
    “Sheikh ul-Islam ibn Taymia (may Allah’s mercy be upon him) chosed to explain in details and said that if the breast suckling by an adult was necessary and he suckled, then the prohibition (of marriage) is established.”
    Fatawa Nur Ala Aldarb, Volume 10 page 204
    Imam Ibn Hazm records:
    ورضاع الكبير محرم ولو انه شيخ يحرم كما يحرم رضاع الصغير
    “The breast suckling by an adult prohibits (marriage) even if he is an old man just like it prohibits (marriage) in the case of suckling by a child”
    Al-Muhala, Volume 10 page 17
    Now compare this morality to the comments of a contemporary Salafi scholar from “Islamic Fatawa Regarding Women” compiled by Muhammed al-Musnad and translated by Jamal Zarabozo. In Chapter 19, Questions of a Miscellaneous Nature under the sub heading Ruling Concerning Women Driving Automobiles’, Imam of the Salafi Nasibi Shaykh bin Baz stated:
    There have been numerous questions concerning the ruling of women driving automobiles. The response is the following:
    There is no doubt that such is not allowed. Women driving leads to many evils and negative consequences. Included among these is her mixing with men without her being on her guard. It also leads to the evil sins due to which such an action is forbidden. The Pure Law forbids those acts that lead to forbidden acts and considers those means to be forbidden also. Allah has ordered the wives of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the women of the believers to remain in their houses, to wear hijab and not to display their adornments to non-mahram males as that leads to promiscuity that overruns a society.
    Now on the one side these moralistic Salafi have this kind of fatawa prohibiting their women from (Allah forbid) driving a car as this may cause promiscuity, and on the other hand they deem it permissible for their women to suckle men with beards! Women driving ‘leads to many evils and negative consequences’, but if the same women were to remain at home suckling men with beards, that’s fine!

    (5) Fifth example of Sunni morality –
    BESTIALITY CAN BE PERFORMED DURING HAJJ
    Sunni Imam Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H) records in his authority work ‘Badaye al-Sanae’ Volume 2 page 216:
    ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه
    “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal that will not make his hajj void”

    (6) Sixth example of Sunni morality –
    PEDOPHILIA, BESTIALITY & NECROPHILIA CAN BE PERFORMED WHILST ONE IS FASTING
    In Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603:
    “It was narrated by Ahmed that a man came to him that feared that he would ejaculate while he was fasting. Ahmed said: “What I see is that he can release semen without ruining the fast, he can masturbate using his hands or the hands of his wife, If he has an “Ammah” whether be it a girl or a little child, she can masturbate for him using her hands, and if she was a non-believer, he can sleep with her without releasing (his semen), if he released it in her, it becomes impermissible”.
    Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603
    Not to be hard done by, the Hanafi’s follow suit. In Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820, the learned Hanafi scholar Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan sets out those acts that do not invalidate one’s fast, and he includes:
    “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”
    Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820

    COMMENT:
    What can we say about such Fatwas of morality? Fasting in Islam, is viewed as a means via which a believer purifies himself, via self-discipline, he dedicates that time to the remembrance of Allah (swt) and keeps aloof from sinful thoughts and acts. That is the theory, but the Hanbali and Hanafi madhab allows a man (whilst fasting) to have sex with kaffir women, animals, and dead people, the only proviso being that no ejaculation takes place! Ibn Hanbal was however more considerate to his adherents allowing for a man to ejaculate whilst fasting, providing the deed is achieved via masturbation, and to this end he can do it himself, or seek the help of his wife or a small child! Is this is not evidence that Ibn Hanbal was endorsing paedophilia? Would any decent man (Muslim or Non Muslim) find it appropriate to use a child for sexual stimulation? If we put together these type of fatwas one shudders to think of the image of these great Salaf, entering the war whilst fasting, their buttocks exposed, having sex with melons at the ready. This image would have terrified the opposition!

    (7) Seventh Example of Sunni morality –
    THE PERMISSIBILITY OF PRAYING BEHIND A DRUNKEN PERSON
    According to the great Salafi Ibn Taymiyyah, it is entirely permissible to pray behind a drunkard. We read in the his Majmu’ al-Fatawa, p. 271
    The Companions would pray behind people whom they knew to be open transgressors, such as when Abd ‘Allah ibn Mas’ud and other Companions would pray behind Walid ibn ‘Uqba ibn Abi Mu’it, who may have recently drunken alcohol (when he was praying) and would wind up praying four rakaats.
    COMMENTARY:
    The salat is the pillar of the religion, and yet here we see it being stated that it is permissible to pray behind someone who is drunk at the time, and who is so intoxicated that he prays four rakaats for the morning prayer. Yet let us remember that, according to Ibn Taymiyyah, it is entirely impermissible to pray behind a Shi’a!

    (8) Eighth Example of Sunni morality –
    THE PERMISSIBILITY TO PAY FOR SEX, WITHOUT FEAR OF ISLAMIC PUNISHMENT
    We read in Dur al-Mukhthar, Volume 2, Page 474 (a compilation of the great Fatwas of Imam Abu Hanifa) as follows:
    We read in Fathul Qadeer that if a man informs a woman that he is paying her for sex then he cannot be subject to any manner of Islamic penalty.
    Dur al-Mukhtar, Volume 2, page 474
    It is indeed sad to say that the Hanafi madhab whilst catering for a man’s sexual appetite is very prejudicial to monkeys. In Sahih al Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 188 we read the very sad plight of this immoral, promiscuous monkey:
    Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:
    During the pre-Islamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.
    If this Hanafi had paid this she monkey for sex he would have been absolved of any Islamic penalty, whilst this poor she monkey who releases her animal instincts is stoned to death!

    (9) Ninth example of Sunni Morality Fatwa of Abu Hanifa on –
    THE PERMISSIBILITY OF HAVING SEX WITH ONE’S MOTHER
    Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan writes in his book of fatwa, Volume 4, p. 820:
    Of things which are haram but for which there is no Islamic penalty, these include… marrying your wife’s sister, or her mother, or a woman who is already married.
    Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Volume 4, page 820
    On the very next page Qadhi Khan records a classic Fatwa of Imam Abu Hanifa
    “if a person marries a mahram (mother, sister, daughter, aunt etc.) and has sexual intercourse with them and even admits the fact that he knew while performing the marital rites that it was Haraam for him to do that even then according to Imam Abu Hanifa, he is not subject to any type of Islamic penalty”.
    Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Volume 4, Ppage 821
    We read in another authority Hanafi work, Fatwa Alamgiri:
    “If someone marries five women at a time or marries a fifth woman while already having four wives or marries his sister in law or mother in law and then performs intercourse with her and then says that I knew that it is haram for me or performs nikah al mutah with a woman then there will be no plenty of adultery on him in all of these situations though he confessed that he knew it was haram on him”
    Fatwa Alamgiri, Volume 3 page 264
    COMMENTARY
    Let us understand this then: in accordance with the fatwa of ‘Umar, the Sunni position is that anybody who contract Mut’ah should be executed. However, if somebody marries his mother, not just commits incest, but actually pronounces a formal marriage, there is no penalty for that person.
    This should demonstrate the degree to which Sunni Islam is nothing but an artificial construction, designed solely to be a bulwark against the mission of the Ahl al-Bayt (as). When a sincere reader sees that these individuals have ruled that there is no Islamic penalty for marrying one’s mother, but that there is for doing Mut’ah, does not reason dictate that such fatwas about Mut’ah are motivated only by bigotry and hatred of the Shi’a? When a Sunni rules that it is permissible to pray behind a drunk person who is so intoxicated he can’t even keep track of the number of rakaats he has prayed, but then says that it is not permissible to pray behind a sober Shi’a, what should one think? Does this seem like the religion of the Prophet (s), or the religion of a group of hate-filled scholars?

    (10) Tenth example of Sunni morality –
    THE “HONOURABLE” TACTIC OF AMR BIN AAS TO SURVIVE IMMINENT DEATH ON THE BATTLEFIELD
    As we are intending on highlighting the morals presented by a favourite of the Salafi and Nasibi we have chosen to rely on the following authentic Sunni sources:
    1. Al Bidayah wa al Nihayah, Volume 7 page 293
    2. Al Akhbar at Tawaal, page 177 Dhikr Sifeen
    3. Al Manaqib al Khwarizmi page 162 Dhikr Sifeen
    4. Al Fusul al Muhimma, page 91 Dhikr Sifeen
    5. Tadhkira al Khawwas al Ummah, page 51 Dhikr Sifeen
    6. Mutalib al Saul, page 122 Dhikr Sifeen
    7. Nur al Absar, page 94 Dhikr Sifeen
    8. Aqd al Fareed, page 235 Dhikr Sifeen
    9. Al Imam wa al Siyasa, page 99 Dhikr Sifeen
    We read in al Bidaya:
    “One day ‘Ali attacked Amr ibn Aas, he threw a spear and Amr fell to the ground, Amr fell to the ground and he then exposed his buttocks. ‘Ali then turned away his face [people said] this was Amr bin Aas. ‘Ali replied he showed me his anus and this made me merciful to him. When Amr ibn Aas returned, Mu’awiya said ‘You should praise Allah and your anus”.
    Al Bidayah wa al Nihayah, Volume 7 page 293
    Allamah Abu Hanifa Ahmed bin Dawud Dinori in ‘Akhbar al Tawaal’ has reported the flashing incident in the same manner, with the words of Mu’awiya to his beloved Commander as follows:
    “You should shower praises on Allah (swt) and that black anus that saved your life today”
    COMMENT:
    Islam has a code of ethics for all scenarios, including behaviour during Jihad, we are yet to find any code wherein Rasulullah (s) authorised the Sahaba to expose their buttocks as a means of sickening the opposition! In Karachi a Nasibi scholar said to his blind followers ‘Had Mu’awiya not entered on the plains of Sifeen the entire continent of Europe would have been conquered’. We agree with this conclusion but it would have been achieved through the battle tactics of Amr ibn Aas, since not even the greatest military tactitioner would not have accounted for this ‘shock and awe’ tactic! Our appeal to our Rafidi brethren is to control the illiterates in our community from throwing mud at Amr ibn Aas for this immoral act: after all had Amr not survived that day, who would have been enlightened enough to place the Qur’an on spears? Who would have dishonestly made Mu’awiya the khalifa during the negotiations? The Salafi are no doubt ever indebted to Amr bin Aas, for all future events such the rise to power of their fifth Khalifa Mu’awiya as Khalifa was all through the Sadaqa of the anus of Amr ibn Aas.

  2. Part A
    Where YOU find Lucky bin SATAN, there you will find the tale of a donkey wearing a Burkha! He is such a bestiality – rights loving dude that he even knows the scent, the smell of the filth that comes out from their behind!
    And this bin SATAN quotes : “In Southern Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh and Balochistan, sex with animals is a common practice among rural youths and considered a rite of passage into adulthood.”
    Has ANYBODY seen such a BULL as “sex with animals is a common practice” “a rite of passage into adulthood”?? And that comes from the Western ‘learned’ SCUM BOX of LUCKY bin SATAN!!!

    Christianity and Islam are ONE and the SAME religion.

    “The Quran says : 4:57 (P) : “And because of their saying: We SLEW the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah’s messenger – THEY SLEW him NOT nor crucified him, but it APPEARED so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in DOUBT thereof; they have NO KNOWLEDGE THEREOF save pursuit of a CONJECTURE; THEY SLEW HIM NOT FOR CERTAIN.”
    So, Let us put the Quran to TEST, the TOUCHSTONE being the Bible, okay?

    John 19:30(KJV): When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost. (This is what the Christians believe, correct?)
    John 19:4 : Pilate finds NO fault in Jesus. 19:6 : “I find NO fault in him”.
    8 “When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he was the more afraid”..Would a Roman King been “MORE AFRAID” because the Jews got ANGRY for Jesus calling himself “son of God” when they had “gods” by tons in their own scripture?? Ref to Psalms 82:6 : “I have said, YE are GODS; and all of you are children-SONS and DAUGHTERS- of the most High.
    17 “And he bearing his cross”..different story from Matthew!
    Mat 27:32 SIMON by name: him(Simon) they compelled to bear his(Jesus’s) cross.
    (In “John” Jesus carried the cross but in “Matthew” it was Simon and NOT Jesus!!)…also he didn’t take the wine in Matthew but in John he did! Last words of Jesus on this earth, in Matthew he said “God, God, why have you forsaken me?” but in John he says : “It is finished”…and so on… who is right??
    26. His Mother, Mary, was looking at him and Jesus said to his MUM : “Woman, behold thy son”. He was dying and to his mother he said “WOMAN”!!! 27. He gives his MUM to an unknown disciple to stay in this unknown disciple’s house!! But mary did have other children besides Jesus…eg., James. Where were they?
    Crucifixion is meant for slow death which would take minimum 2 days. How come Jesus died within 3 hours?
    But that is besides the point.
    Now, the REAL ISSUE THAT Jesus WAS ALIVE!
    John 19:33 : Jesus’s legs NOT broken! but the two crucified with him, their legs were broken. Why???? ONLY REASON : Jesus was ALIVE!
    19:34 : Blood and Water came out when pierced with spear because he was ALIVE!
    The walking of Zombies, Curtain renting, Darkness, Earthquake….MISSING in “John”…why???

    Answer : Jesus in “Matthew” ASKS for God’s help and so God must help : Luke 22:43
    “And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, strengthening him.”…an angel had appeared just a day before, then surely he was with him all the time.

    cont to Part B

    • Christianity and Islam are ONE and the SAME religion. Part B ;

      The author of Mark, Matthew, Luke, John and Acts…including Paul copied Psalms and made its verses sound like prophecies, then the verses should be complete, correct?
      Psalms 22:1 : My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? why art thou so far from helping me, and from the words of my roaring? (Why did for eg., “Matthew” leave out the second line?) This prophecy is for David and NOT Jesus!

      Psalms 22:6 Jesus says : But I am a worm, and no man; a reproach of men, and despised of the people.(!!!) Why was this left out?

      Pslm 22:8 He trusted on the Lord that he would deliver him: let him deliver him, seeing he delighted in him. (Remember the people taunting Jesus?)

      Pslm 22:16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet. (why pick ONLY “they pierced my hands and feet” and leave out the others??
      Pslm 22:18 They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture.
      Pslm 22:20 Deliver my soul from the sword; my darling from the power of the dog.
      Pslm 22:5 I have hated the congregation of evil doers; and will not sit with the wicked.(Jesus used to sit with the evil doers, Mark 2:15 :15 “And it came to pass, that, as Jesus sat at meat in his house, many publicans and sinners sat also together with Jesus and his disciples: for there were many, and they followed him.”

      Now, coming to the main point : Mark 14:50 (KJV):

      “And they all forsook him, and fled.” : If THEY ALL FLED, then who RECORDED the events of Jesus?? Remember, there were NO eyewitnesses!!!!!

      Who SAW Jesus coming down the cross? Was he dead? NO, he was ALIVE!

      PROOF THAT JESUS WAS ALIVE, FROM THE BIBLE!!
      Jesus was put in a tomb and not buried.(John 19:42)
      Jn 20:4 So they ran both together: and the other disciple did outrun Peter, and came first! (other disciple…what a name!)
      Jn 20:5 : Saw the linen clothes lying. (Jesus had WALKED AWAY..He was ALIVE)
      Jn 20:15 : She, supposing him to be the gardener. (Are gardeners spirits?)
      Jn 20:17 : I ascend unto my Father, and YOUR Father; and to my God, and YOUR God.
      (My God and YOUR God is ALLAH!)
      Jn 20:19 : Jesus said “asalamwaliekum”…John 20:19 (OJB):
      “then came Rebbe, Melech HaMoshiach and stood in the midst and says to them, Shalom AleiKem! (“Che” pronounced as ‘Ke’)

      Jn 20:20 : he shewed unto them his hands and his side.
      Luke 24:5 Why seek ye the living among the dead?
      Luke 24:19 : Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a PROPHET mighty in deed and word before God and all the people.(QURAN SAYS THAT!)
      Luke 24:23 And when they found not his body, they came, saying, that they had also seen a vision of angels, which said that he was ALIVE.
      30 And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them.
      Lke 24:32 and while he opened to us the scriptures? (Jesus used to read from the scriptures…which ones??)
      37 But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit.(They had heard that he was dead…remember they had fled due to earthquake, darkness, thunderstorms, etc.)
      39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.(Jesus is saying I am ALIVE!!)
      Luke 24:41 : Have ye here any meat? (do spirits eat meat?)
      42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb.
      43 And he took it, and did eat before them.
      44 And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.
      50 And he led them out as far as to Bethany
      51 and carried up into heaven!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Haaa haa on what?

      Using Bible as the TOUCHSTONE it is noticed easily that Jesus was NOT dead on the cross and that is also confirmed by the Quran!!

    • Atheist??..prove it who made you? Darwin’s theory was debunked look up the pilton man incident…so you weren’t a fish who became a monkey then you came out…prove you are an atheist please and remember Darwinian belief is debunked by scientist and the museum of London but they still teach it to you because it promotes baselessness in the mind and makes good obedient masses…this is hardcore science no faith…so prove you are an atheist without the already proven not to be valid Darwinian “theory ” FYI it was always a theory that Darwin actually took on without personal examination from his uncle…the holly ghost told Muhammad pbuh read in the name of the creator…this verse has your answer…oh and furthermore look up the origins of the word atheist you will be surprised…there is no other god than the god that created all things we know of and what we don’t know of and Muhammad is his prophet….by saying Muhammad is his prophet it actually seems to ignorant mind that only Mohammed is his prophet but to the enlightened one it’s means all of his prophets because Muhammad himself affirmed all prophets before him so bearing witness that Muhammad is god’s prophet means you are bearing witness that Jesus Moses Abraham Noah and all others mentioned by Mohammed are too….wake up and use your Neo cortex to reason and examine facts for yourself and don’t take someone’s word for it God himself told you to do so think about it a God that challenges you about himself and actually telling to use your Neo cortex to believe in him rather than following your fathers….please there is no argument here whatsoever you can’t even prove your status as an atheist…I’m sure by now you research the meaning of the word atheist and the Darwinian theory and how your brain function….atheist please and parallel universes don’t hold any water because if so we’re in an infinity and you and I won’t be here in this case….so did you prove you’re an atheist yet?????good luck and remember baseless is alway in the air

    • PLUM IS IN LOVE WITH HIS DONKEY!

      ANIMAL LOVING MUSLIMS:

      ISLAM & ZOOPHILIA

      Pakistan has banned content on more than a dozen websites because of “offensive” and “blasphemous” material, while they themselves rank No. 1 for certain sex-related search terms, including “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.[1]

      IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD

      AFGHANISTAN

      In a society where homosexuals and adulterers are stoned to death for “sexual immorality” you would expect a similar outcome for someone caught having sex with an animal. Surprisingly this is not the case.
      An Afghan soldier was detained by police after being caught having sex with a donkey in southeastern Afghanistan, a police officer told AFP.
      The soldier was discovered with the donkey in an abandoned house in a small village of Gardez, the capital of Paktia province, last week, a local police officer said.
      “He was caught in the act by a small boy who immediately told police about what he had seen and police arrested him in action,” the Gardez-based officer told AFP, requesting anonymity.
      The soldier claimed he committed the act because he did not have enough money to get married.

      After being caught with the donkey in a village about 100km south of the capital Kabul, he was jailed for four days and then released without charge.
      According to tradition in south and southeastern Afghanistan, a suitor must pay around $US5,000 ($A6,800) to the parents of the girl he wishes to marry.
      Soldier caught with his pants down
      The Age, March 16, 2004
      Could it be that the soldier was released without charge because there is nothing in the Qur’an that prohibits bestiality?

      PALESTINE

      In 1923, the Director of Health in the British Mandate government in Palestine sent out a questionnaire to his Principal Medical and Health Officers in the country, asking them to report on various sexual practices and attitudes among the Muslim Arab population.
      As a result, the British discovered that the Muslim Arabs engaged in bestiality.
      The Nablus officer finds sodomy and “similar vices” “not uncommon in some of the towns but less so in the villages where…bestiality is by no mean unknown” and “immorality…rather lightly regarded” in those villages that are closer to the larger towns. He comments, “in the villages there seems to be curiously little feeling against bestiality which I have heard admitted in a very airy way on more than one occasion. Sodomy is considered disgraceful but not I think more so than ordinary immorality” (III).

      “Unnatural Vices” or Unnatural Rule? The Case of a Sex Questionnaire and the British Mandate
      Ellen L. Fleischmann, Jerusalem Quarterly File, Issue 10, 2000

      PAKISTAN

      In Southern Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh and Balochistan, sex with animals is a common practice among rural youths and considered a rite of passage into adulthood.
      In southern Punjab, much of NWFP, Sindh and Balochistan sodomy and bestiality are common among rural youths. In fact, he caught two boys trying to rape a goat in the vicinity of the mazar of Hazrat Sultan Bahu. The punishment meted out to them was 10 blows with a chhittar (shoe) each on their butts. They protested however that in many rural areas having sex with an animal was considered a rite of passage on the way to becoming full members of the male society!

      Desegregation of the sexes and promiscuity
      Ishtiaq Ahmed (associate professor of political science at Stockholm University), Daily Times, June 27, 2006

      DONKEY KILLED AFTER BEING RAPED

      In June 2011, a male who was caught having sex with another man’s donkey was fined Rs 50,000. This fine was not imposed for having sex with an animal, but for committing adultery. The raped donkey was labelled a ‘kari’ (an adultress) and eventually honor killed by its owner.

      Incredible though it may sound, a donkey was declared ‘Kari’ and shot dead here in a remote area on Monday. The Jirga imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the alleged ‘Karo’.
      The reports said that in Village Ghahi Khan Jatoi, a villager Ghazi Khan alias Malang shot dead his donkey on being ‘Kari’ with Sikandar Ali alias Deedo. He attempted to kill Sikander too but the alleged Karo managed to escape and surrendered himself to an influential person of the area.
      Sources said the influential person summoned both the parties and imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the Karo. They said Sikander and his family were forced to pay Rs 50,000 on the spot and the remaining amount in two installments.
      The sources added that the alleged Karo pleaded innocence at the Jirga, but the Jirga members paid no attention to it. Sikander’s family said he paid Rs 50,000 to save his life otherwise he would have been killed.
      Donkey declared ‘Kari’ killed

      The News International, July 19, 2011
      Pakistan ranks number 1 for such varied search terms as “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.

      The Muslim country, which has banned content on at least 17 websites to block offensive and blasphemous material, is the world’s leader in online searches for pornographic material
      . . .
      Google ranks Pakistan No. 1 in the world in searches for pornographic terms, outranking every other country in the world in searches per person for certain sex-related content.
      Pakistan is top dog in searches per-person for “horse sex” since 2004, “donkey sex” since 2007, “rape pictures” between 2004 and 2009, “rape sex” since 2004, “child sex” between 2004 and 2007 and since 2009, “animal sex” since 2004 and “dog sex” since 2005, according to Google Trends and Google Insights, features of Google that generate data based on popular search terms.
      The country also is tops — or has been No. 1 — in searches for “sex,” “camel sex,” “rape video,” “child sex video” and some other searches that can’t be printed here.
      No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan
      Kelli Morgan, Fox News, July 13, 2010

      OTHER COUNTRIES & BESTIALITY — RELATED SEARCHES

      Pakistani Muslims are not alone in their search for porn.
      Google, the world’s most popular Internet search engine, has found in a survey that mostly Muslim states seek access to sex-related websites and Pakistan tops the list. Google found that of the top 10 countries – searching for sex-related sites – six were Muslim, with Pakistan on the top. The other Muslim countries are Egypt at number 2, Iran at 4, Morocco at 5, Saudi Arabia at 7 and Turkey at 8. Non-Muslim states are Vietnam at 3, India at 6, Philippines at 9 and Poland at 10.

      PAKISTAN MOST SEX STARVED

      Khalid Hasan, Daily Times, May 17, 2006
      Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
      Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
      Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
      Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
      Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
      Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
      Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
      Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
      Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
      Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
      Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
      Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
      Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
      Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

      MIDDLE EAST

      Bestiality is common among boys of tribal Arab cultures.
      Miner and DeVos (1960) comment that amongst Arab tribal cultures, “Bestiality with goats, sheep, or camels provides another outlet. These practices are not approved but they are recognized as common among boys.” Havelock-Ellis [note 52] states “The Arabs, according to Kocher, chiefly practice bestiality with goats, sheep and mares. The Annamites, according to Mondiere, commonly employ sows and (more especially the young women) dogs.”
      Historical And Cultural Perspectives On Zoophilia
      Serving History
      There is also a certain saying which remains popular among the Arabs:
      The Arabs have never taken quite so condemnatory an attitude towards the practice, and indeed a popular Arab saying had it that

      “The pilgrimage to Mecca is not complete without copulating with the camel.”

      SUDAN

      In February 2006, a man caught having sex with a neighbor’s goat was not punished, but ordered by the council of elders to pay the neighbor a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) and marry the animal because he “used it as his wife”.
      A Sudanese man has been forced to take a goat as his “wife”, after he was caught having sex with the animal.
      The goat’s owner, Mr Alifi, said he surprised the man with his goat and took him to a council of elders.
      They ordered the man, Mr Tombe, to pay a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) to Mr Alifi.
      “We have given him the goat, and as far as we know they are still together,” Mr Alifi said.
      Sudan man forced to ‘marry’ goat
      BBC News, February 24,2006

      MOROCCO

      Morocco is an Islamic country, with 98.7% of the population Muslims. The following is taken from a paper on sexuality in Morocco written by Nadia Kadiri, M.D., and Abderrazak Moussaïd, M.D., with Abdelkrim Tirraf, M.D., and Abdallah Jadid, M.D. Translated by Raymond J. Noonan, Ph.D., and Sandra Almeida.
      In the rural world, zoophilia is still very widespread and not blameworthy. With masturbation, it constitutes an obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality.
      The operative phrase is ‘obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality’. Obligatory. It means in rural Morocco, Muslim males must have sexual intercourse with animals as part of their sexual apprenticeship.
      Also according to the scholars Allen Edwardes and Robert Masters, Ph.D, FAACS, the Muslims of Morocco believe that sexual intercourse with donkeys “make the penis grow big and strong” and masturbation is often scorned by them in favor of bestiality.

      SLAMIC SCRIPTURE

      The above paper also says “it is prohibited without question by the Shariâ”. But is this alleged prohibition within the Shari’ah extracted (as it must be) from the Qur’an and Hadith, or has this fiqh been derived using external non-Islamic sources?

      QURAN

      In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur’an has to say on the subject:
      That’s right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur’an’s clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’
      If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.

      HADITH

      There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. The following hadith is taken from the Sunnah Abu-Dawud collection, not Bukari or Muslim.
      Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.
      Abu Dawud 38:4449
      Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? And it is. Just look at the very next hadith.
      Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
      Abu Dawud 38:4450
      This is a very clear contradiction. How can one hadith say kill the person committing bestiality, and the very next one say there is no prescribed punishment for the same person? Both statements cannot be true.

      What’s worse; these two contradictory hadiths (transmitted through different isnad) have been attributed to the same person. Abu Dawud himself had said the former of the two hadith is “not strong” and the latter further “weakens” it.

      From the above, we can gather that Robert Masters had correctly stated, “bestiality was not specifically prohibited by the Prophet,” so there is little wonder that Islamists generally shy away from mentioning Abu Dawud 38:4449 in their pronouncements on bestiality.

  3. The News of Saudis going Atheism is a FARCE..planted by the EuropeNews, another anti-Islamic site as this. Can YOU name only 3 renowned Saudi figures who have converted to atheism…since now they “live” in the Western world?

    YOU copypasted :
    “Despite the fact that Atheism is considered equal to terrorism in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the number of such people is BLOWING up overnight.”
    Muslims converting to Atheism…and that even “BLOWING UP OVERNIGHT”! = BULLS!

    “According to a 2012 poll, five percent of Saudis described themselves as“convinced atheist.” Although the figure is well below the global average of 13 percent, for a conservative country like Saudi Arabia, where civil liberties are scarce, the number is quite large.” Huh….ACCORDING TO POLLS!! 5% of what? Who took the POLLS and where??
    “because people are becoming more disillusioned with the government, they started looking at the government and its support groups as being in bed together and conspiring together against the good of the people.” So, people are NOT disillusioned with religion of ISLAM but the Government, the political system! That happens in every religion…and so what is wrong with a few disillusioned dudes converting to atheism if this “PLANTED” report is to go by?

    “In a country where members of the opposite sex cannot interact openly, women are not allowed to drive or even go to libraries”. Saudi Arabia is a vast country with her own constitution and it is NONE of anybody’s business to poke their noses in their affairs!

    YOU may allow YOUR wives, mothers, daughters to drive Taxis in the west and even dance with their patrons….as divorce is like swatting a fly for YOU!

    • You are sadly mistaken. In 2 decades working in Saudi Arabia I made friends with nearly 20 arabs who admitted to me that they had abandoned islam, of which 7 were full-blown atheists Iincluding 3 Saudi females and 2 males). All were highly qualified professionals, and NONE of them abandoned islam for social reasons – in every case they abandoned it decisively once they examined it in depth, and fought off the years of heavy conditioning. All felt a massive sense of relief.

      You will surely bury your head in the sand and simply disbelieve this, before screeching one of your semi-coherent hysterical responses. Do as you wish. I mean, hey, why let the truth interfere with your prejudices.

  4. THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND WEARING BURKA:

    ONCE YOU COVER WITH A BURKA, ALL THAT IS VISIBLE ARE THE EYES!

    WHERE THERE IS A SCARCITY OF WOMEN, A DONKEY WEARING A BURKA, LOOKS ATTRACTIVE.
    THEY HAVE LOVELY EYES & SO HAVE GOATS!

    FROM THE REAR IT’S HARD TO TELL ONE PIECE OF ASS FROM ANOTHER & THE SMELL IS ABOUT THE SAME.

    MECCA & ANIMAL SEX:

    HAJJ PILGRIMAGE INCOMPLETE WITHOUT

    HOT CAMEL SEX

    Sunni Imam Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H) records in his authority work ‘Badaye al-Sanae’ Volume 2 page 216:
    ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه

    ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه
    “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal that will not make his hajj void”
    Islamic Scripture

    Qur’an

    In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur’an has to say on the subject:

    ” ________________________________________________”

    That’s right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur’an’s clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’

    If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.

    HOT MOHAMMEDAN SEX

    Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five
    world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:
    Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
    Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
    Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
    Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
    Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
    Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
    Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
    Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
    Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
    Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
    Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
    Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
    Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

    AND AS THEY MOUNT THEIR ASSES, THEY SHOUT, “ALLAH AKBAR”

        • YO BRO,

          THE MOHAMMEDAN MONTY PYTHON SHOW:

          A KAFIR IS A NON-MUSLIM

          Characteristics of Kafir

          * 1 Kafir are Arrogant and Divided
          * 2 Kafir are close-minded
          * 3 Kafir are Deaf, Dumb and Blind
          * 4 Kafir are Evil
          * 5 Kafir are Greedy
          * 6 Kafir are Like Animals
          * 7 Kafir are Perverse
          * 8 Kafir are Unclean
          * 9 Kafir are Unintelligent
          * 10 Kafir are the Worst of Creatures

          KEFIR ARE ARROGANT & DIVIDED

          Nay, but those who disbelieve are in false pride and schism.
          Qur’an 38:2

          KEFIR ARE CLOSE-MINDED

          As for the Disbelievers, Whether thou warn them or thou warn
          them not it is all one for them; they believe not.
          Qur’an 2:6
          They desire to deceive Allah and those who believe, and they
          deceive only themselves and they do not perceive.
          There is a disease in their hearts, so Allah added to their
          disease and they shall have a painful chastisement because they
          Qur’an 2:9-10
          Such are the men whom Allah has cursed for He has made them
          deaf and blinded their sight.
          Do they not then earnestly seek to understand the Qur’an, or
          are their hearts locked up by them?
          Qur’an 47:23-24

          KEFIR ARE DEAF, DUMB & BLIND

          As for the Disbelievers, Whether thou warn them or thou warn them not it is all one for them; they believe not.
          Qur’an 2:6
          The likeness of those who disbelieve is as the likeness of one who shouts to that which hears nothing, save a call and a cry; deaf, dumb, blind — they do not understand.
          Qur’an 2:171

          KEFIR ARE EVIL

          In their hearts is a disease, and Allah increaseth their disease. A painful doom is theirs because they lie.
          Qur’an 2:10
          O ye who believe! spend of that wherewith We have provided
          you ere a day come when there will be no trafficking, nor friendship, nor
          intercession. The disbelievers, they are the wrong-doers.
          Qur’an 2:254
          And We prescribed for them therein: The life for the life, and the eye for the eye, and the nose for the nose, and the ear for the ear, and the tooth for the tooth, and for wounds retaliation. But whoso forgoeth it (in the way of charity) it shall be expiation for him. Whoso judgeth not by that which Allah hath revealed: such are wrong-doers.
          Qur’an 5:45
          The similitude of those who were charged with the (obligations of the) Mosaic Law, but who subsequently failed in those (obligations), is that of a donkey which carries huge tomes (but understands them not). Evil is the similitude of people who falsify the Signs of God: and God guides not people who do wrong.
          Qur’an 62:5
          Allah has promised, to those among you who believe and work righteous deeds, that He will, of a surety, grant them in the land, inheritance (of power), as He granted it to those before them; that He will establish in authority their religion – the one which He has chosen for them; and that He will change (their state), after the fear in which they (lived), to one of security and peace: ‘They will worship Me (alone) and not associate aught with Me. ‘If any do reject Faith after this, they are rebellious and wicked.
          Qur’an 24:55
          No plea had they, when Our terror came unto them, save that they said: Lo! We were wrong-doers.
          Qur’an 7:5
          O Children of Adam! Let not Satan seduce you as he caused your (first) parents to go forth from the Garden and tore off from them their robe (of innocence) that he might manifest their shame to them. Lo! he seeth you, he and his tribe, from whence ye see him not. Lo! We have made the devils protecting friends for those who believe not.
          Qur’an 7:27
          Evil as an example are people who reject Our signs and wrong
          their own souls.
          Qur’an 7:177

          KEFIR ARE GREEDY

          And you will most certainly find them the greediest of men for life (greedier) than even those who are polytheists; every one of them loves that he should be granted a life of a thousand years, and his being granted a long life will in no way remove him further off from the chastisement, and Allah sees what they do.
          Qur’an 2:96

          KEFIR ARE LIKE ANIMALS

          If it had been Our will, We should have elevated him with Our signs; but he inclined to the earth, and followed his own vain desires. His similitude is that of a dog: if you attack him, he lolls out his tongue, or if you leave him alone, he (still) lolls out his tongue. That is the similitude of those who reject Our signs; So relate the story; perchance they may reflect.
          Qur’an 7:176
          And well ye knew those amongst you who transgressed in the matter of the Sabbath: We said to them: “Be ye apes, despised and rejected.”
          Qur’an 2:65
          Shall I tell thee of a worse (case) than theirs for retribution with Allah? (Worse is the case of him) whom Allah hath cursed, him on whom His wrath hath fallen and of whose sort Allah hath turned some to apes and swine, and who serveth idols. Such are in worse plight and further astray from the plain road.
          Qur’an 5:60
          When in their insolence they transgressed (all) prohibitions, We said to them: “Be ye apes, despised and rejected.”
          Qur’an 7:166
          Or thinkest thou that most of them listen or understand? They are only like cattle; – nay, they are worse astray in Path.
          Qur’an 25:44

          KEFIR ARE PERVERSE

          And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah. That is their saying with their mouths. They imitate the saying of those who disbelieved of old. Allah (Himself) fighteth against them. How perverse are they!
          Qur’an 9:30
          When thou lookest at them, their exteriors please thee; and when they speak, thou listenest to their words. They are as (worthless as hollow) pieces of timber propped up, (unable to stand on their own). They think that every cry is against them. They are the enemies; so beware of them. The curse of Allah be on them! How are they deluded (away from the Truth)!
          Qur’an 63:4

          KEFIR ARE UNCLEAN

          O ye who believe! Truly the Pagans are unclean; so let them not, after this year of theirs, approach the Sacred Mosque. And if ye fear poverty, soon will Allah enrich you, if He wills, out of His bounty, for Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.
          Qur’an 9:28

          KEFIR ARE UNINTELLIGENT

          O Prophet! Exhort the believers to fight. If there be of you twenty steadfast they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a hundred (steadfast) they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are a folk without intelligence.
          Qur’an 8:65

          KEFIR ARE THE WORST OF CREATURES

          For the vilest beasts in God’s sight, are the deaf, the dumb, who understand not.
          Qur’an 8:22
          For the worst of beasts in the sight of God are those who reject Him: They will not believe.
          Qur’an 8:55
          Verily those who believe not, among those who have received
          the scriptures, and among the idolaters, [shall be cast] into the fire of hell,
          to remain therein [for ever]. These are the worst of creatures.
          Qur’an 98:6

          ALLAH WANTS TO KNOW IF YOU ARE BUGGING YOUR WIFE.

          Distortion committed by Bukhari whilst copying down a tradition in his ‘Sahih’ pertaining to the legitimacy of sodomy
          We read in the Holy Quran:
          Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will (Yusufali, 2:223).
          In various Sunni works we read that testimony of Abdullah Ibn Umar regarding the reason for the revelation of the said verse qua legitimacy of performing buggery on one’s wife. Hafiz Jalaluddin Suyuuti for example recorded in Tafseer Durre Manthur, Volume 1 page 638:
          وأخرج الحسن بن سفيان في مسنده والطبراني في الأوسط والحاكم وأبو نعيم في المستخرج بسند حسن عن ابن عمر قال‏:‏ إنما نزلت على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏{‏نساؤكم حرث لكم‏.‏‏.‏‏.‏‏}‏ الآية‏.‏ رخصة في إتيان الدبر‏.‏
          Hasan bin Sufiyan in his Musnad, Tabarani in Al-Awsat, Hakim and Abu Naeem in Al-Mastakhraj with a ‘Hasan’ chain of narration narrated from Ibn Umar who said: ‘This verse was revealed upon the Holy Prophet (s) in respect of the permissibility of performing sex in the anus of a woman’
          Curiously, when it came to the great Imam Bukhari, he felt compelled to record the statement of Abdullah Ibn Umar in an incomplete manner. We read in Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 50:
          Narrated Nafi’: Whenever Ibn ‘Umar recited the Qur’an, he would not speak to anyone till he had finished his recitation. Once I held the Qur’an and he recited Surat-al-Baqara from his memory and then stopped at a certain Verse and said, “Do you know in what connection this Verse was revealed? ” I replied, “No.” He said, “It was revealed in such-and-such connection.” Ibn ‘Umar then resumed his recitation. Nafi added regarding the Verse:–”So go to your tilth when or how you will” Ibn ‘Umar said, “It means one should approach his wife in ..”

          ‘In’ what?

          Of course IN her anus and whilst Hafiz Jalaluddin Suyuti and other famed Sunni scholars recorded this fact, it was Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani who filled in the blanks whilst commenting on the cited tradition of Bukhari:
          في إتيان المرأة في دبرها

          “Approach the woman in her anus”

          Fatah ul Bari Sharah Sahih Bukhari, Volume 8 page 190
          Imam Bukhari has recorded this tradition in his ‘Sahih’ with the following chain of narration:
          Ishaq (bin Rehwiya) – Nadar – Ibn Aun – Nnaf’i
          Now the most interesting part is that Bukhari actually copied down the above statement of Abdullah Ibn Umar from his Shaykh, namely Ishaq bin Rehwiya as mentioned by Ibn Hajar Asqalani:
          فقد أخرجها إسحاق ابن راهويه في مسنده وفي تفسيره بالإسناد المذكور ، وقال بدل قوله حتى انتهى إلى مكان ” حتى انتهى إلى قوله نساؤكم حرث لكم فأتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم فقال : أتدرون فيما أنزلت هذه الآية ؟ قلت لا . قال : نزلت في إتيان النساء في أدبارهن
          Ishaq bin Raheweh recorded it in his Musnad and his Tafsir with the same chain, when it reached the part “your wives are tilth to you, so go to your tilth anyhow you will” he said: ‘Do you know what for this verse has been revealed about?’

          They said: ‘No’. He replied: ‘It has been revealed in regards to approaching women in their anuses’

          Interestingly whilst citing the said tradition verbatim Bukhari committed deception and did not quote the words of his Shaykh opting to leave a blank, in the hope that the attention plan of his readers would be short enough to confuse them and direct them to the next narration.

          SHIA PEN:
          REVEALING THE TRUTH
          Ch 8: Examples of Sunni morality

          As we stated in the previous chapter, Dr. Salamah and Ibn al-Hashmi have made a big mistake by attempting to argue that Shi’ite hadeeth literature legitimises immorality. All that we have discussed leaves no doubt that Mut’ah is in no way immoral, and that it was sanctioned by Allah (swt) and His Prophet (s). Conversely, the Sunni hadeeth literature abounds with some of the most lurid and disgusting tales. The Sunni fiqh is, at times, even worse. Some notable examples of the public immorality of some companions and Sunni ‘ulama are given below, as well as some of the blasphemous stories attributed to the Holy Prophet (s) himself. For the sake of taste, we would normally not bring such issues up; but Dr. Salamah and Ibn al-Hashmi have uttered words of utter blasphemy against Allah, His Prophet, and His Religion, as well as forging numerous hadeeths against them. Since Dr. Salamah has decided to make a moral argument, than we will see how “moral” the Sunni belief system, hadeeth literature, and law is:

          (1) First example of Sunni morality
          SALAFI “ULAMA RULED THAT MASTURBATION (WANKING) IS HALAL

          Shamsuddin Ibn Qayyim al Jawziya who is one of the only scholars that the Wahabis do not reject and who was a student of Ibn Taymiyya. Let us quote what he writes in his Bada’i al-Fuwa’id, page 129:
          “Ibn ‘Aqeel, and many of our scholars, and our Shaykh [Ibn Taymiyya] have ruled that masturbation is makruh (disliked), and never explicitly said he that it was haram”.
          Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 129
          He then presents his own discussion on the conditions that make masturbation halaal:
          “If a man is torn between continued desire or releasing it, and if this man does not have a wife or he has a slave-girl but he does not marry, then if a man is overwhelmed by desire, and he fears that he will suffer because of this (someone like a prisoner, or a traveller, or a pauper), then it is permissible for him to masturbate, and Ahmad (ibn Hanbal) is explicit on this. Furthermore, it is narrated that the Companions of the Prophet (s) used to masturbate while they were on military expeditions or travelling”.

          COMMENT:

          The polytheists at the dawn of Islam must have been terrified by that scene:
          (AN ARMY OF WANKERS)
          an army of pious companions, their pants nice and short, their beards stretching down to their wastes, their swords held high with one hand while they heartily masturbate with the other. If this was the type of scene going on, we might be able to understand why so many companions refused to go on jihad. Would Dr. Salamah march off to battle with only an army of masturbators to protect him? Or was this tactic of masturbatory jihad supposed to be some sort of an offensive stratagem, to strike fear into the hearts of the enemy? Indeed, these companions were masters at the art of war!
          We appeal for justice: who is promoting debauchery, the Sunnis or the Shi’a? There are a lot of Ahkam surrounding travelling mentioned by the Prophet (s) and the Imams (as): the obligation to pray two rakaat for zuhr instead of four, or the obligation to break one’s fast. This Sunni ‘alim, who is one of the singularly most distinguished Sunni’ ulama and is adored by the Wahabis, has offered another hukm for travelling the permissibility of masturbating. And yet when a Shi’a says that a man is allowed to contract temporary marriage in order to satisfy his desires, Dr. Salamah passes a hukm of takfir. One is allowed to masturbate but not contract a temporary marriage? Is this not the peak of insanity?

          (2) Second example of Sunni morality:
          SUNNI ‘ULAMA LEGITIMISED THE USE OF DILDOS (FEMALE SEX TOYS)

          After this ingenious fatwa, Ibn Qayyim then goes on to make permissible the use of a dildoe by women. It is only logical; when the husbands leave to go masturbate and spread Islam by the sword, they need something to do with themselves. On the same page as quoted above, Ibn Qayyim writes:
          “If a woman does not have a husband, and her lust becomes strong, then some of our scholars say: It is permissible for the woman to take an akranbij, which is a piece of leather worked until it becomes shaped like a penis, and insert it in herself. She may also use a cucumber”.
          COMMENT:
          Now, according to Dr. Salamah’s logic, the Saudi government should therefore purchase a large number of such dildoes, and distribute them to old widows or otherwise unattractive women who cannot marry. Since anything that is permissible, according to Dr. Salamah, requires stand sanction and support, than clearly a dildoe distribution office needs to be immediately established in the great Islamic state of Saudi Arabia.
          Maybe this is another reason why ‘Umar the Khalifa never went on jihad: somebody had to stay behind and organize the cucumber distribution.

          (3) Third example of Sunni morality –
          SUNNI ‘ULAMA HAVE RULED ON PERMISSIBILITY OF HAVING SEX WITH WATERMELONS

          That was not a typographical error. Ibn Qayyim continues this discussion, which exemplifies the morals espoused by Sunni Islam:
          “If a man makes a hole in a watermelon, or a piece of dough, or a leather skin, or a statue, and has sex with it, then this is the same as what we have said about other types of masturbation [i.e., that it is halaal in the same circumstances given before, such as being on a journey]. In fact, it is easier than masturbating with one’s hand”.

          COMMENT:

          All the Muslims should certainly be grateful that Ibn Qayyim has offered this advice on the easiest way to masturbate, and clearly Ibn Qayyim has done a lot of personal research on this issue. This is the ruling of the “saved sect”: Contracting temporary marriage with a woman is haram, but contracting temporary marriage with a watermelon is halaal. In his defence, perhaps Ibn Qayyim only meant that it is allowed to marry a watermelon with the intent of divorcing it, for doing Mut’ah with a watermelon would clearly be an act of fornication.
          Let us remember the words of Dr. Salamah quoted at the beginning of this book:
          Mut’ah, on the other hand, is an open license for sexual pleasure with as many women as one can financially afford. The women who engage in Mut’ah are hired women; thus, it can be performed with all women irrespective of their age, character, conduct or religion. It requires no witnesses, nor is there any obligation on the man’s part to provide food and shelter to the woman.
          • Well, it seems that in the Nasibi logic having sex with as many women as one can afford is utterly immoral, but having sex with as many watermelons as one can afford is not. Based on this, let us ask him some questions about the Ahkam related to having sex with watermelons: Are there any conditions as to the age of the watermelon? For example, is it allowed to perform a marriage with the intent to divorce with a newly grown watermelon, or must one wait until the watermelon is nine years old?
          • Must it be a pious watermelon, or is it permissible to contract a marriage with the intent to divorce with a watermelon that is known to “get around”?
          • May a pious brother share his watermelon with another pious brother, or would the second man’s marriage with the intent to divorce constitute an act of fornication unless the watermelon observes proper ‘iddah?
          • Are witnesses required in the marriage with the intent to divorce of a watermelon? May other watermelons serve as witnesses in that marriage, since according to Sunni fiqh all marriages require witnesses? Applying the Sunni principle of Qiyas (analogy), we can strongly argue that if it is allowed to marry (with intention of divorce) a watermelon, than certainly it is allowed for a watermelon to bear witness to another watermelon’s blessed and chaste marriage.
          • What about oranges?
          Really, we have to ask all reasonable Muslims: would you rather follow ‘ulama that rule on the permissibility of having sex with fruits and vegetables, or follow the pious path of the Holy Imams (as), of whom Allah (swt) has said:
          We intend, O Family of the Prophet, to remove from you all impurity, and to give you a through purification.
          Al-Qur’an, Surah Al-Ahzab, Ayah 33
          Does somebody who spends his time thinking about whether or not it is permissible to have sex with watermelons really sound like somebody who has been removed of all impurity? Why is Ibn Qayyim even thinking about such things? What kind of personal life does such a person have that would lead him to debate such issues in his mind? What happened in Ibn Qayyim’s life that one day he woke up and said: “I really need to find out if its halaal to have sex with watermelons.” Is the type of clergymen who openly rules for the permissibility of having sex with watermelons (with conditions, of course, such as that one is on a journey) be the kind of person you would want to meet in a dark alley, much less do taqlid of?

          (4)Fourth example of Sunni morality –
          A SALAFI WOMAN CAN SUCKLE A SALAFI MAN WITH A BEARD

          We read in Sahih Muslim Hadith Number 3426:
          Ibn Abu Mulaika reported that al-Qasim b. Muhammad b. Abu Bakr had narrated to him that ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail b. ‘Amr came to Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Messenger of Allah, Salim (the freed slave of Abu Hudhaifa) is living with us in our house, and he has attained (puberty) as men attain it and has acquired knowledge (of the sex problems) as men acquire, whereupon he said: Suckle him so that he may become unlawful (in regard to marriage) for you He (Ibn Abu Mulaika) said: I refrained from (narrating this hadith) for a year or so on account of fear. I then met al-Qasim and said to him: You narrated to me a hadith which I did not narrate (to anyone) afterwards. He said: What is that? I informed him, whereupon he said: Narrate it on my authority that ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) had narrated that to me.
          COMMENT:
          This reference is especially for Dr Salamah who has accused the Shi’a of being filthy proponents of Mut’ah, what right do you have to attack us when have the above Fatwa of Ayesha allowing your women to suckle men with beards so as to make them mahram? How many pubescent Salafi men has your mother suckled so that they can enter your house? When your madhab allows your mothers / daughters to breast feed men with beards what gives you the right to attack the practice of Mut’ah? If today any Nasibi tries to suggest that this practice no longer exists in their school and it was only Ayesha who had issued the fatwa then we shall present the thoughts of their Imam Ibn Tamiyah as quoted by one of the revered scholars of Salafies Ibn Uthaimeen:
          واختار شيخ الإسلام ابن تيميه رحمه الله التفصيل وقال إذا دعت الحاجة إلى إرضاع الكبير وأرضع ثبت التحريم
          “Sheikh ul-Islam ibn Taymia (may Allah’s mercy be upon him) chosed to explain in details and said that if the breast suckling by an adult was necessary and he suckled, then the prohibition (of marriage) is established.”
          Fatawa Nur Ala Aldarb, Volume 10 page 204
          Imam Ibn Hazm records:
          ورضاع الكبير محرم ولو انه شيخ يحرم كما يحرم رضاع الصغير
          “The breast suckling by an adult prohibits (marriage) even if he is an old man just like it prohibits (marriage) in the case of suckling by a child”
          Al-Muhala, Volume 10 page 17
          Now compare this morality to the comments of a contemporary Salafi scholar from “Islamic Fatawa Regarding Women” compiled by Muhammed al-Musnad and translated by Jamal Zarabozo. In Chapter 19, Questions of a Miscellaneous Nature under the sub heading Ruling Concerning Women Driving Automobiles’, Imam of the Salafi Nasibi Shaykh bin Baz stated:
          There have been numerous questions concerning the ruling of women driving automobiles. The response is the following:
          There is no doubt that such is not allowed. Women driving leads to many evils and negative consequences. Included among these is her mixing with men without her being on her guard. It also leads to the evil sins due to which such an action is forbidden. The Pure Law forbids those acts that lead to forbidden acts and considers those means to be forbidden also. Allah has ordered the wives of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the women of the believers to remain in their houses, to wear hijab and not to display their adornments to non-mahram males as that leads to promiscuity that overruns a society.
          Now on the one side these moralistic Salafi have this kind of fatawa prohibiting their women from (Allah forbid) driving a car as this may cause promiscuity, and on the other hand they deem it permissible for their women to suckle men with beards! Women driving ‘leads to many evils and negative consequences’, but if the same women were to remain at home suckling men with beards, that’s fine!

          (5) Fifth example of Sunni morality –
          BESTIALITY CAN BE PERFORMED DURING HAJJ

          Sunni Imam Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H) records in his authority work ‘Badaye al-Sanae’ Volume 2 page 216:
          ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه
          “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal that will not make his hajj void”

          (6) Sixth example of Sunni morality –
          PEDOPHILIA, BESTIALITY & NECROPHILIA CAN BE PERFORMED WHILST ONE IS FASTING

          In Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603:
          “It was narrated by Ahmed that a man came to him that feared that he would ejaculate while he was fasting. Ahmed said: “What I see is that he can release semen without ruining the fast, he can masturbate using his hands or the hands of his wife, If he has an “Ammah” whether be it a girl or a little child, she can masturbate for him using her hands, and if she was a non-believer, he can sleep with her without releasing (his semen), if he released it in her, it becomes impermissible”.
          Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim, page 603
          Not to be hard done by, the Hanafi’s follow suit. In Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820, the learned Hanafi scholar Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan sets out those acts that do not invalidate one’s fast, and he includes:
          “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”
          Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820

          COMMENT:

          What can we say about such Fatwas of morality? Fasting in Islam, is viewed as a means via which a believer purifies himself, via self-discipline, he dedicates that time to the remembrance of Allah (swt) and keeps aloof from sinful thoughts and acts. That is the theory, but the Hanbali and Hanafi madhab allows a man (whilst fasting) to have sex with kaffir women, animals, and dead people, the only proviso being that no ejaculation takes place! Ibn Hanbal was however more considerate to his adherents allowing for a man to ejaculate whilst fasting, providing the deed is achieved via masturbation, and to this end he can do it himself, or seek the help of his wife or a small child! Is this is not evidence that Ibn Hanbal was endorsing paedophilia? Would any decent man (Muslim or Non Muslim) find it appropriate to use a child for sexual stimulation? If we put together these type of fatwas one shudders to think of the image of these great Salaf, entering the war whilst fasting, their buttocks exposed, having sex with melons at the ready. This image would have terrified the opposition!

          (7) Seventh Example of Sunni morality –
          THE PERMISSIBILITY OF PRAYING BEHIND A DRUNKEN PERSON

          According to the great Salafi Ibn Taymiyyah, it is entirely permissible to pray behind a drunkard. We read in the his Majmu’ al-Fatawa, p. 271
          The Companions would pray behind people whom they knew to be open transgressors, such as when Abd ‘Allah ibn Mas’ud and other Companions would pray behind Walid ibn ‘Uqba ibn Abi Mu’it, who may have recently drunken alcohol (when he was praying) and would wind up praying four rakaats.

          COMMENTARY:

          The salat is the pillar of the religion, and yet here we see it being stated that it is permissible to pray behind someone who is drunk at the time, and who is so intoxicated that he prays four rakaats for the morning prayer. Yet let us remember that, according to Ibn Taymiyyah, it is entirely impermissible to pray behind a Shi’a!

          (8) Eighth Example of Sunni morality –
          THE PERMISSIBILITY TO PAY FOR SEX, WITHOUT FEAR OF ISLAMIC PUNISHMENT

          We read in Dur al-Mukhthar, Volume 2, Page 474 (a compilation of the great Fatwas of Imam Abu Hanifa) as follows:
          We read in Fathul Qadeer that if a man informs a woman that he is paying her for sex then he cannot be subject to any manner of Islamic penalty.
          Dur al-Mukhtar, Volume 2, page 474
          It is indeed sad to say that the Hanafi madhab whilst catering for a man’s sexual appetite is very prejudicial to monkeys. In Sahih al Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 188 we read the very sad plight of this immoral, promiscuous monkey:
          Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:
          During the pre-Islamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.
          If this Hanafi had paid this she monkey for sex he would have been absolved of any Islamic penalty, whilst this poor she monkey who releases her animal instincts is stoned to death!

          (9) Ninth example of Sunni Morality Fatwa of Abu Hanifa on –
          THE PERMISSIBILITY OF HAVING SEX WITH ONE’S MOTHER

          Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan writes in his book of fatwa, Volume 4, p. 820:
          Of things which are haram but for which there is no Islamic penalty, these include… marrying your wife’s sister, or her mother, or a woman who is already married.
          Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Volume 4, page 820
          On the very next page Qadhi Khan records a classic Fatwa of Imam Abu Hanifa
          “if a person marries a mahram (mother, sister, daughter, aunt etc.) and has sexual intercourse with them and even admits the fact that he knew while performing the marital rites that it was Haraam for him to do that even then according to Imam Abu Hanifa, he is not subject to any type of Islamic penalty”.
          Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Volume 4, Ppage 821
          We read in another authority Hanafi work, Fatwa Alamgiri:
          “If someone marries five women at a time or marries a fifth woman while already having four wives or marries his sister in law or mother in law and then performs intercourse with her and then says that I knew that it is haram for me or performs nikah al mutah with a woman then there will be no plenty of adultery on him in all of these situations though he confessed that he knew it was haram on him”
          Fatwa Alamgiri, Volume 3 page 264

          COMMENTARY

          Let us understand this then: in accordance with the fatwa of ‘Umar, the Sunni position is that anybody who contract Mut’ah should be executed. However, if somebody marries his mother, not just commits incest, but actually pronounces a formal marriage, there is no penalty for that person.
          This should demonstrate the degree to which Sunni Islam is nothing but an artificial construction, designed solely to be a bulwark against the mission of the Ahl al-Bayt (as). When a sincere reader sees that these individuals have ruled that there is no Islamic penalty for marrying one’s mother, but that there is for doing Mut’ah, does not reason dictate that such fatwas about Mut’ah are motivated only by bigotry and hatred of the Shi’a? When a Sunni rules that it is permissible to pray behind a drunk person who is so intoxicated he can’t even keep track of the number of rakaats he has prayed, but then says that it is not permissible to pray behind a sober Shi’a, what should one think? Does this seem like the religion of the Prophet (s), or the religion of a group of hate-filled scholars?

          (10) Tenth example of Sunni morality –
          THE “HONOURABLE” TACTIC OF AMR BIN AAS TO SURVIVE IMMINENT DEATH ON THE BATTLEFIELD
          As we are intending on highlighting the morals presented by a favourite of the Salafi and Nasibi we have chosen to rely on the following authentic Sunni sources:
          1. Al Bidayah wa al Nihayah, Volume 7 page 293
          2. Al Akhbar at Tawaal, page 177 Dhikr Sifeen
          3. Al Manaqib al Khwarizmi page 162 Dhikr Sifeen
          4. Al Fusul al Muhimma, page 91 Dhikr Sifeen
          5. Tadhkira al Khawwas al Ummah, page 51 Dhikr Sifeen
          6. Mutalib al Saul, page 122 Dhikr Sifeen
          7. Nur al Absar, page 94 Dhikr Sifeen
          8. Aqd al Fareed, page 235 Dhikr Sifeen
          9. Al Imam wa al Siyasa, page 99 Dhikr Sifeen
          We read in al Bidaya:
          “One day ‘Ali attacked Amr ibn Aas, he threw a spear and Amr fell to the ground, Amr fell to the ground and he then exposed his buttocks. ‘Ali then turned away his face [people said] this was Amr bin Aas. ‘Ali replied he showed me his anus and this made me merciful to him. When Amr ibn Aas returned, Mu’awiya said ‘You should praise Allah and your anus”.
          Al Bidayah wa al Nihayah, Volume 7 page 293
          Allamah Abu Hanifa Ahmed bin Dawud Dinori in ‘Akhbar al Tawaal’ has reported the flashing incident in the same manner, with the words of Mu’awiya to his beloved Commander as follows:
          “You should shower praises on Allah (swt) and that black anus that saved your life today”

          COMMENT:

          Islam has a code of ethics for all scenarios, including behaviour during Jihad, we are yet to find any code wherein Rasulullah (s) authorised the Sahaba to expose their buttocks as a means of sickening the opposition! In Karachi a Nasibi scholar said to his blind followers ‘Had Mu’awiya not entered on the plains of Sifeen the entire continent of Europe would have been conquered’. We agree with this conclusion but it would have been achieved through the battle tactics of Amr ibn Aas, since not even the greatest military tactitioner would not have accounted for this ‘shock and awe’ tactic! Our appeal to our Rafidi brethren is to control the illiterates in our community from throwing mud at Amr ibn Aas for this immoral act: after all had Amr not survived that day, who would have been enlightened enough to place the Qur’an on spears? Who would have dishonestly made Mu’awiya the khalifa during the negotiations? The Salafi are no doubt ever indebted to Amr bin Aas, for all future events such the rise to power of their fifth Khalifa Mu’awiya as Khalifa was all through the Sadaqa of the anus of Amr ibn Aas.

          SHIA PEN

          • Lucky bin SATAN, YO said : Characteristics of Kafir

            * 1 Kafir are Arrogant and Divided
            * 2 Kafir are close-minded
            * 3 Kafir are Deaf, Dumb and Blind
            * 4 Kafir are Evil
            * 5 Kafir are Greedy
            * 6 Kafir are Like Animals
            * 7 Kafir are Perverse
            * 8 Kafir are Unclean
            * 9 Kafir are Unintelligent
            * 10 Kafir are the Worst of Creatures.

            There YOU are 100% right!! YOU are all of the above and that is why YOU are damned!! The Quran CONFIRMS that YOU are the Kaffir dude!!

            Satan = NonBeliever = Kaffir.
            Lucky bin SATAN = KAFFIR!!

      • WHERE YOU FIND MOHAMMEDANS, YOU WILL FIND DONKEYS WEARING BURQAS:

        ANIMAL LOVING MUSLIMS:

        ISLAM & ZOOPHILIA

        Pakistan has banned content on more than a dozen websites because of “offensive” and “blasphemous” material, while they themselves rank No. 1 for certain sex-related search terms, including “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.[1]

        IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD

        AFGHANISTAN

        In a society where homosexuals and adulterers are stoned to death for “sexual immorality” you would expect a similar outcome for someone caught having sex with an animal. Surprisingly this is not the case.
        An Afghan soldier was detained by police after being caught having sex with a donkey in southeastern Afghanistan, a police officer told AFP.
        The soldier was discovered with the donkey in an abandoned house in a small village of Gardez, the capital of Paktia province, last week, a local police officer said.
        “He was caught in the act by a small boy who immediately told police about what he had seen and police arrested him in action,” the Gardez-based officer told AFP, requesting anonymity.
        The soldier claimed he committed the act because he did not have enough money to get married.
        After being caught with the donkey in a village about 100km south of the capital Kabul, he was jailed for four days and then released without charge.
        According to tradition in south and southeastern Afghanistan, a suitor must pay around $US5,000 ($A6,800) to the parents of the girl he wishes to marry.
        Soldier caught with his pants down
        The Age, March 16, 2004
        Could it be that the soldier was released without charge because there is nothing in the Qur’an that prohibits bestiality?

        PALESTINE

        In 1923, the Director of Health in the British Mandate government in Palestine sent out a questionnaire to his Principal Medical and Health Officers in the country, asking them to report on various sexual practices and attitudes among the Muslim Arab population.
        As a result, the British discovered that the Muslim Arabs engaged in bestiality.
        The Nablus officer finds sodomy and “similar vices” “not uncommon in some of the towns but less so in the villages where…bestiality is by no mean unknown” and “immorality…rather lightly regarded” in those villages that are closer to the larger towns. He comments, “in the villages there seems to be curiously little feeling against bestiality which I have heard admitted in a very airy way on more than one occasion. Sodomy is considered disgraceful but not I think more so than ordinary immorality” (III).

        “Unnatural Vices” or Unnatural Rule? The Case of a Sex Questionnaire and the British Mandate
        Ellen L. Fleischmann, Jerusalem Quarterly File, Issue 10, 2000

        PAKISTAN

        In Southern Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh and Balochistan, sex with animals is a common practice among rural youths and considered a rite of passage into adulthood.
        In southern Punjab, much of NWFP, Sindh and Balochistan sodomy and bestiality are common among rural youths. In fact, he caught two boys trying to rape a goat in the vicinity of the mazar of Hazrat Sultan Bahu. The punishment meted out to them was 10 blows with a chhittar (shoe) each on their butts. They protested however that in many rural areas having sex with an animal was considered a rite of passage on the way to becoming full members of the male society!

        Desegregation of the sexes and promiscuity
        Ishtiaq Ahmed (associate professor of political science at Stockholm University), Daily Times, June 27, 2006

        DONKEY KILLED AFTER BEING RAPED

        In June 2011, a male who was caught having sex with another man’s donkey was fined Rs 50,000. This fine was not imposed for having sex with an animal, but for committing adultery. The raped donkey was labelled a ‘kari’ (an adultress) and eventually honor killed by its owner.

        Incredible though it may sound, a donkey was declared ‘Kari’ and shot dead here in a remote area on Monday. The Jirga imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the alleged ‘Karo’.
        The reports said that in Village Ghahi Khan Jatoi, a villager Ghazi Khan alias Malang shot dead his donkey on being ‘Kari’ with Sikandar Ali alias Deedo. He attempted to kill Sikander too but the alleged Karo managed to escape and surrendered himself to an influential person of the area.
        Sources said the influential person summoned both the parties and imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the Karo. They said Sikander and his family were forced to pay Rs 50,000 on the spot and the remaining amount in two installments.
        The sources added that the alleged Karo pleaded innocence at the Jirga, but the Jirga members paid no attention to it. Sikander’s family said he paid Rs 50,000 to save his life otherwise he would have been killed.
        Donkey declared ‘Kari’ killed

        The News International, July 19, 2011
        Pakistan ranks number 1 for such varied search terms as “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.

        The Muslim country, which has banned content on at least 17 websites to block offensive and blasphemous material, is the world’s leader in online searches for pornographic material
        . . .
        Google ranks Pakistan No. 1 in the world in searches for pornographic terms, outranking every other country in the world in searches per person for certain sex-related content.
        Pakistan is top dog in searches per-person for “horse sex” since 2004, “donkey sex” since 2007, “rape pictures” between 2004 and 2009, “rape sex” since 2004, “child sex” between 2004 and 2007 and since 2009, “animal sex” since 2004 and “dog sex” since 2005, according to Google Trends and Google Insights, features of Google that generate data based on popular search terms.
        The country also is tops — or has been No. 1 — in searches for “sex,” “camel sex,” “rape video,” “child sex video” and some other searches that can’t be printed here.
        No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan
        Kelli Morgan, Fox News, July 13, 2010

        OTHER COUNTRIES & BESTIALITY — RELATED SEARCHES

        Pakistani Muslims are not alone in their search for porn.
        Google, the world’s most popular Internet search engine, has found in a survey that mostly Muslim states seek access to sex-related websites and Pakistan tops the list. Google found that of the top 10 countries – searching for sex-related sites – six were Muslim, with Pakistan on the top. The other Muslim countries are Egypt at number 2, Iran at 4, Morocco at 5, Saudi Arabia at 7 and Turkey at 8. Non-Muslim states are Vietnam at 3, India at 6, Philippines at 9 and Poland at 10.

        PAKISTAN MOST SEX STARVED

        Khalid Hasan, Daily Times, May 17, 2006
        Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
        Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
        Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
        Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
        Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
        Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
        Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
        Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
        Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
        Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
        Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
        Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
        Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
        Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

        MIDDLE EAST

        Bestiality is common among boys of tribal Arab cultures.
        Miner and DeVos (1960) comment that amongst Arab tribal cultures, “Bestiality with goats, sheep, or camels provides another outlet. These practices are not approved but they are recognized as common among boys.” Havelock-Ellis [note 52] states “The Arabs, according to Kocher, chiefly practice bestiality with goats, sheep and mares. The Annamites, according to Mondiere, commonly employ sows and (more especially the young women) dogs.”
        Historical And Cultural Perspectives On Zoophilia
        Serving History
        There is also a certain saying which remains popular among the Arabs:
        The Arabs have never taken quite so condemnatory an attitude towards the practice, and indeed a popular Arab saying had it that

        “The pilgrimage to Mecca is not complete without copulating with the camel.”

        SUDAN

        In February 2006, a man caught having sex with a neighbor’s goat was not punished, but ordered by the council of elders to pay the neighbor a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) and marry the animal because he “used it as his wife”.
        A Sudanese man has been forced to take a goat as his “wife”, after he was caught having sex with the animal.
        The goat’s owner, Mr Alifi, said he surprised the man with his goat and took him to a council of elders.
        They ordered the man, Mr Tombe, to pay a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) to Mr Alifi.
        “We have given him the goat, and as far as we know they are still together,” Mr Alifi said.
        Sudan man forced to ‘marry’ goat
        BBC News, February 24,2006

        MOROCCO

        Morocco is an Islamic country, with 98.7% of the population Muslims. The following is taken from a paper on sexuality in Morocco written by Nadia Kadiri, M.D., and Abderrazak Moussaïd, M.D., with Abdelkrim Tirraf, M.D., and Abdallah Jadid, M.D. Translated by Raymond J. Noonan, Ph.D., and Sandra Almeida.
        In the rural world, zoophilia is still very widespread and not blameworthy. With masturbation, it constitutes an obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality.
        The operative phrase is ‘obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality’. Obligatory. It means in rural Morocco, Muslim males must have sexual intercourse with animals as part of their sexual apprenticeship.
        Also according to the scholars Allen Edwardes and Robert Masters, Ph.D, FAACS, the Muslims of Morocco believe that sexual intercourse with donkeys “make the penis grow big and strong” and masturbation is often scorned by them in favor of bestiality.

        SLAMIC SCRIPTURE

        The above paper also says “it is prohibited without question by the Shariâ”. But is this alleged prohibition within the Shari’ah extracted (as it must be) from the Qur’an and Hadith, or has this fiqh been derived using external non-Islamic sources?

        QURAN

        In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur’an has to say on the subject:
        That’s right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur’an’s clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’
        If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.

        HADITH

        There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. The following hadith is taken from the Sunnah Abu-Dawud collection, not Bukari or Muslim.
        Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.
        Abu Dawud 38:4449
        Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? And it is. Just look at the very next hadith.
        Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
        Abu Dawud 38:4450
        This is a very clear contradiction. How can one hadith say kill the person committing bestiality, and the very next one say there is no prescribed punishment for the same person? Both statements cannot be true.

        What’s worse; these two contradictory hadiths (transmitted through different isnad) have been attributed to the same person. Abu Dawud himself had said the former of the two hadith is “not strong” and the latter further “weakens” it.

        From the above, we can gather that Robert Masters had correctly stated, “bestiality was not specifically prohibited by the Prophet,” so there is little wonder that Islamists generally shy away from mentioning Abu Dawud 38:4449 in their pronouncements on bestiality.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s